IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr B / NC-I) Advance Authorisation 2022-06-03

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

SI. No. Name of the representatives<br>& their Department
Designation
1. Shri S.K. Jain, DO DPIIT
2. Shri K. S. Sodhi, Assitant Director MSME
3. Smt. Jenny Charan, Consultant MeitY
4. Shri Shaish Kumar, Consultant (Tech-1) Technical Consultant, DGFT
5. Shri V.C. Agarwal, Consultant (Tech-3) Technical Consultant, DGFT
6. Shri S. K. Bhatnagar, Consultant (SKB) Technical Consultant, DGFT
In Attendance
1. Shri Santosh Kumar Dubey, Dy. DGFT DGFT

Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 01

Case No. 36/21/80-ALC2/2016

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) M/s Navkar Fittings & Status: dated 03.06.2022 Forgings Pvt. Ltd. Deferred Lic. No.: 0310808954 Date: 03.11.2016 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00496/AM17 Subject: Request for RLA No.: 03/95/040/00606/AM17 fixation of ad-hoc norms

Case history: The case was rejected in Meeting No. 04/80-ALC2/2017dated 23.05.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DIPP vide UO No.12/13/2017-TSW/81 dated 02/03/2017. However, the applicant had furnished the reply with a request to reconsider their case for fixation of the ad-hoc norms. The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME on 28.11.2018 followed by ID reminders on 17.09.2019, 10.01.2020 & 06.03.2020 for expediting the comments. On the advice of the representative of MSME, the case was forwarded to DPIIT on 04.01.2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P- 47011/8/2021-TSW dated 10.03.2021 had informed that the applicant’s reply is incomplete. As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021:

  1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

  2. Weight of each Export Product.

  3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

  4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

  5. Detailed calculations for the quantities of import items.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter, as raised by DPIIT, was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021, 10.11.2021 & 05.01.2022. The applicant vide email dated 18.01.2022 requested to give some more time to submit their reply of deficiency letter.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply has been sent to DPIIT on 31.03.2022 for examination & comments. Further, it was noted that physical copy of the applicant’s reply was also sent to DPIIT on 25.04.2022. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DPIIT for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

2 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 02

Case No. 2/4/80-ALC2/2015 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) M/s Terumo Penpol Ltd. Deferred dated 03.06.2022 Lic. No.: 5310008377 dated 28.05.2009 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00073/AM16 Subject: Request for RLA No.: 53/21/040/00002/AM10 fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: In the Meeting No. 11/80 date 30.11.2018, the representative of MSME stated that the norms may be fixed on the basis of DIPP recommendation vide No. 07/9/20l6-TSW dt. 08.12.2017 for License No. 5310019514 dt. 05.10.2017 as ratified in Meeting No. 16/80 dated 14.11.2017. However, the Committee observed that the description of export item in the subject application does not exactly match with the recommendation of DIPP and therefore, MSME was requested to provide comments. Based on the deliberations & as per advice of MSME, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech -1) may look into the matter. Hence, the case was referred to Consultant (Tech -1) on 16.10.2019 for examination & comments . Consultant (Tech-1) informed that a similar case of the applicant had already been referred to PLEXCONCIL and Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals . PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days’ time to reply the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. PLEXCONCIL was reminded on 12.02.2020 for the expediting the matter. PLEXCONCIL’s reply was received and forwarded to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2020 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-1) informed in the meeting that PLEXCONCIL reply mentions Acetic Anhydride as the export product, which does not make any sense. Also, a D.O. Letter was sent to JS, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 30.07.2020 to provide their comments in the matter at the earliest. Subsequently, a reminder along with copy of application was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 09.03.2021 for examination & comments. As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated16.06.2021, a reminder was issued on 02.08.2021. Further, as decided in meeting dated 02.09.2021, the reminder was issued on 29.09.2021. Also, as per NC decision, final reminder [Letter] was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 05.01.2022 for expediting the comments. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, it was decided to seek opinion of Consultant (Tech-1) in this matter as no information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals despite several reminders. As per NC decision, an email was sent to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2022. Consultant (Tech-1) via email dated 20.05.2022 has requested to send physical file of the case and the same was sent to Consultant (Tech-1) on 25.05.2022. However, no comments have been received yet.

Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 03
CaseNo.26/11/80-ALC2/2016<br>Status:
M/s Dee Development<br>Engineers Ltd.<br>Approved<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022<br>Lic. No.:0510398701dated 01.06.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00299/AM17<br>**Subject:**Request for fixation
of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00101/AM17
**Case history:**The case was rejected in the Meeting No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-<br>submissionof reply ofdeficiencyletter raised by DHI. The casewasreconsideredin M. No.

3 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

07/80 dated 22.10.2020 and it was decided to send a deficiency letter to the applicant as per<br>comments ofDHI.In response to DL, applicant’s reply dated 23.11.2020, was sent to DHI on<br>01.12.2020. DHI informed that the applicant’s reply had Appendix 4K dated 04.06.2016 only<br>and not contained information as sought in M. No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 (Held on<br>23.10.2020). Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency<br>letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:<br>1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product.<br>As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. On<br>receipt of the applicant’s reply, the same was forwarded to DHI on 24.09.2021 for examination<br>and comments. In NC meeting dated 08.03.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DHI<br>received vide letter dated 08.02.2022 and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following<br>information as per comments of DHI:<br>1. To provide quantity of each import item (items at Sl. No. 4 to 6 & 7 to 10) in number<br>separately.<br>The deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 09.03.2022.The applicant’s reply was<br>referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022 for examination & comments as decided on the<br>file.<br>Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Item<br>of<br>Export<br>Quantit<br>y in MT<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Item of Import<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>640.28<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A 106<br>Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X 52/ X 55/<br>X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA / A 333 GR 6,<br>APL 5L GRADE B<br>250.23 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>2<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade P2<br>To P92<br>15.23MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA/A 312<br>& SA/A 358 TP 304 TO 316 , TP 321 &<br>TP 347 ,TP 316 L /TP 304 L/TP 317L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 /304 L,TP 316 /316<br>L & TP 317/317 L<br>85.09 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS), SA/ A 350 LF 2<br>(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182 GR<br>F 304 TO F 316, F 321 & F 347,SA/A<br>Net to Net 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 and it was decided to send a deficiency letter to the applicant as per<br>comments ofDHI.In response to DL, applicant’s reply dated 23.11.2020, was sent to DHI on<br>01.12.2020. DHI informed that the applicant’s reply had Appendix 4K dated 04.06.2016 only<br>and not contained information as sought in M. No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 (Held on<br>23.10.2020). Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency<br>letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:<br>1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product.<br>As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. On<br>receipt of the applicant’s reply, the same was forwarded to DHI on 24.09.2021 for examination<br>and comments. In NC meeting dated 08.03.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DHI<br>received vide letter dated 08.02.2022 and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following<br>information as per comments of DHI:<br>1. To provide quantity of each import item (items at Sl. No. 4 to 6 & 7 to 10) in number<br>separately.<br>The deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 09.03.2022.The applicant’s reply was<br>referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022 for examination & comments as decided on the<br>file.<br>Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Item<br>of<br>Export<br>Quantit<br>y in MT<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Item of Import<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>640.28<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A 106<br>Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X 52/ X 55/<br>X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA / A 333 GR 6,<br>APL 5L GRADE B<br>250.23 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>2<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade P2<br>To P92<br>15.23MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA/A 312<br>& SA/A 358 TP 304 TO 316 , TP 321 &<br>TP 347 ,TP 316 L /TP 304 L/TP 317L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 /304 L,TP 316 /316<br>L & TP 317/317 L<br>85.09 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS), SA/ A 350 LF 2<br>(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182 GR<br>F 304 TO F 316, F 321 & F 347,SA/A<br>Net to Net 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 and it was decided to send a deficiency letter to the applicant as per<br>comments ofDHI.In response to DL, applicant’s reply dated 23.11.2020, was sent to DHI on<br>01.12.2020. DHI informed that the applicant’s reply had Appendix 4K dated 04.06.2016 only<br>and not contained information as sought in M. No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 (Held on<br>23.10.2020). Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency<br>letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:<br>1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product.<br>As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. On<br>receipt of the applicant’s reply, the same was forwarded to DHI on 24.09.2021 for examination<br>and comments. In NC meeting dated 08.03.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DHI<br>received vide letter dated 08.02.2022 and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following<br>information as per comments of DHI:<br>1. To provide quantity of each import item (items at Sl. No. 4 to 6 & 7 to 10) in number<br>separately.<br>The deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 09.03.2022.The applicant’s reply was<br>referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022 for examination & comments as decided on the<br>file.<br>Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Item<br>of<br>Export<br>Quantit<br>y in MT<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Item of Import<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>640.28<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A 106<br>Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X 52/ X 55/<br>X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA / A 333 GR 6,<br>APL 5L GRADE B<br>250.23 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>2<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade P2<br>To P92<br>15.23MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA/A 312<br>& SA/A 358 TP 304 TO 316 , TP 321 &<br>TP 347 ,TP 316 L /TP 304 L/TP 317L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 /304 L,TP 316 /316<br>L & TP 317/317 L<br>85.09 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS), SA/ A 350 LF 2<br>(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182 GR<br>F 304 TO F 316, F 321 & F 347,SA/A<br>Net to Net 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 and it was decided to send a deficiency letter to the applicant as per<br>comments ofDHI.In response to DL, applicant’s reply dated 23.11.2020, was sent to DHI on<br>01.12.2020. DHI informed that the applicant’s reply had Appendix 4K dated 04.06.2016 only<br>and not contained information as sought in M. No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 (Held on<br>23.10.2020). Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency<br>letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:<br>1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product.<br>As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. On<br>receipt of the applicant’s reply, the same was forwarded to DHI on 24.09.2021 for examination<br>and comments. In NC meeting dated 08.03.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DHI<br>received vide letter dated 08.02.2022 and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following<br>information as per comments of DHI:<br>1. To provide quantity of each import item (items at Sl. No. 4 to 6 & 7 to 10) in number<br>separately.<br>The deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 09.03.2022.The applicant’s reply was<br>referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022 for examination & comments as decided on the<br>file.<br>Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Item<br>of<br>Export<br>Quantit<br>y in MT<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Item of Import<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>640.28<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A 106<br>Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X 52/ X 55/<br>X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA / A 333 GR 6,<br>APL 5L GRADE B<br>250.23 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>2<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade P2<br>To P92<br>15.23MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA/A 312<br>& SA/A 358 TP 304 TO 316 , TP 321 &<br>TP 347 ,TP 316 L /TP 304 L/TP 317L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 /304 L,TP 316 /316<br>L & TP 317/317 L<br>85.09 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS), SA/ A 350 LF 2<br>(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182 GR<br>F 304 TO F 316, F 321 & F 347,SA/A<br>Net to Net 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 and it was decided to send a deficiency letter to the applicant as per<br>comments ofDHI.In response to DL, applicant’s reply dated 23.11.2020, was sent to DHI on<br>01.12.2020. DHI informed that the applicant’s reply had Appendix 4K dated 04.06.2016 only<br>and not contained information as sought in M. No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 (Held on<br>23.10.2020). Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency<br>letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:<br>1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product.<br>As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. On<br>receipt of the applicant’s reply, the same was forwarded to DHI on 24.09.2021 for examination<br>and comments. In NC meeting dated 08.03.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DHI<br>received vide letter dated 08.02.2022 and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following<br>information as per comments of DHI:<br>1. To provide quantity of each import item (items at Sl. No. 4 to 6 & 7 to 10) in number<br>separately.<br>The deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 09.03.2022.The applicant’s reply was<br>referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022 for examination & comments as decided on the<br>file.<br>Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Item<br>of<br>Export<br>Quantit<br>y in MT<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Item of Import<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>640.28<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A 106<br>Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X 52/ X 55/<br>X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA / A 333 GR 6,<br>APL 5L GRADE B<br>250.23 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>2<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade P2<br>To P92<br>15.23MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA/A 312<br>& SA/A 358 TP 304 TO 316 , TP 321 &<br>TP 347 ,TP 316 L /TP 304 L/TP 317L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 /304 L,TP 316 /316<br>L & TP 317/317 L<br>85.09 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS), SA/ A 350 LF 2<br>(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182 GR<br>F 304 TO F 316, F 321 & F 347,SA/A<br>Net to Net
Item<br>of<br>Export Quantit<br>y in MT Sl.<br>No<br>. Item of Import Recommended<br>Quantity
Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers 640.28<br>MT 1 Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A 106<br>Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X 52/ X 55/<br>X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA / A 333 GR 6,<br>APL 5L GRADE B 250.23 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage
2 Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade P2<br>To P92 15.23MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage
3 Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA/A 312<br>& SA/A 358 TP 304 TO 316 , TP 321 &<br>TP 347 ,TP 316 L /TP 304 L/TP 317L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 /304 L,TP 316 /316<br>L & TP 317/317 L 85.09 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage
4 Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS), SA/ A 350 LF 2<br>(LTCS) <br>Net to Net
5 Flanges Carbon Steel, SA / A 105, SA/ A<br>350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS) <br>Net to Net
6 Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182 GR<br>F 304 TO F 316, F 321 & F 347,SA/A <br>Net to Net

4 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

==> picture [476 x 347] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> 182 F 317 L / 347 L/ 316 L ,Dual Grade -<br>F 304 / 304 L , F 316 / 316 L & F 317 /<br>317 L<br>7 Pipe Fitting Carbon Steel ,SA/A 234 Net to Net<br>WPB / WPC,SA/ A 420 WP L 6,<br>Reducers / Elbow / End Caps/ Tee /<br>Tee/ Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y<br>Piece / Megalet & All Types Of Variants<br>8 Pipe Fitting Alloy Steel ,SA/A 182 / SA Net to Net<br>234 Grade P1 TO P92, Reducers /<br>Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y Piece /<br>Megalet & All Types Of Variants<br>9 Pipe Fitting Stainless Steel, SA/A 403 Net to Net<br>WP 304 TO WP 316, WP 317, WP 347,<br>SA/A 403 WP 304 L/WP 316 L/ WP 317<br>L , DUAL GRADE - WP 304 / 304 L ,<br>WP 316 / 316 L & WP 317 / 317 L ,<br>Reducers / Elbow / End Caps/Tee/ Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y Piece<br>/ Megalet & All Types Of Variants<br>10 Valves Net to Net<br>11 Angles & Channel 1.802 MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Sl. No. 04

Case No. 21/6/80-ALC2/2016 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s Dee Development Approved Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Engineers Ltd. Lic. No.: 0510398216 dated 13.04.2016 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00180/AM17 Subject: Request for fixation RLA No.: 05/23/040/00015/AM17 of ad-hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DIPP. However, the firm had furnished the reply with a request to re-open case and fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 20.10.2020. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that applicant’s reply against the deficiency letter raised by DPIIT was sent on 05.11.2020. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P- 47011/301/2019-TSW dated 23.11.2020 had informed that the applicant’s reply is incomplete. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

  1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

  2. Weight of each Export Product.

  3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for

  • 5 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022
the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>5. Quantity of export item in meters also in addition to its weight.<br>6. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>7. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The applicant’s reply dated 31.08.2021 was forwarded to DPIIT on 31.08.2021 for examination<br>& comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/301/2019-TSW dated 20.09.2021 informed that the<br>applicant’s reply is incomplete. Further, as per the comments of DPIIT, a deficiency letter was<br>issue to the applicant on 05.01.2022 to furnish following information:<br>1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for<br>the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>2. Quantity of export item in meters also to its weight.<br>3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The deficiency letter dated 05.01.2022 followed by a reminder dated 09.03.2022 was issued to<br>the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. The deficiency letter was issued to the<br>applicant on 09.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>item<br>Quantit<br>y<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import items<br>Recommended<br>quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for<br>Chemical<br>Storage<br>Plant<br>1954.7<br>9 MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipes SA106 Gr.<br>B/ Gr. C / SA-333/ASTM A-106/ASTM<br>SA333 Gr 6 (LTCS) Eqvt. International<br>Standard<br>1387.54 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>2<br>Carbon Steel Welded Pipe ASTM A672<br>B60 CL 12, CL 22 ASTM A 134 GR<br>A283D S.A.W /API 5L Gr. B. Eqvt.<br>InternationalStandard<br>37.11 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes A 312<br>Gr. TP 304 to 316, TP 317 L / (304 L)<br>Eqvt. International Standard<br>28.55MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>4<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA 312<br>TP 304 / 316 Eqvt. International Standard<br>24.75MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82%wastage<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel GR.SA105 Gr.B/<br>Net to Net the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>5. Quantity of export item in meters also in addition to its weight.<br>6. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>7. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The applicant’s reply dated 31.08.2021 was forwarded to DPIIT on 31.08.2021 for examination<br>& comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/301/2019-TSW dated 20.09.2021 informed that the<br>applicant’s reply is incomplete. Further, as per the comments of DPIIT, a deficiency letter was<br>issue to the applicant on 05.01.2022 to furnish following information:<br>1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for<br>the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>2. Quantity of export item in meters also to its weight.<br>3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The deficiency letter dated 05.01.2022 followed by a reminder dated 09.03.2022 was issued to<br>the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. The deficiency letter was issued to the<br>applicant on 09.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>item<br>Quantit<br>y<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import items<br>Recommended<br>quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for<br>Chemical<br>Storage<br>Plant<br>1954.7<br>9 MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipes SA106 Gr.<br>B/ Gr. C / SA-333/ASTM A-106/ASTM<br>SA333 Gr 6 (LTCS) Eqvt. International<br>Standard<br>1387.54 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>2<br>Carbon Steel Welded Pipe ASTM A672<br>B60 CL 12, CL 22 ASTM A 134 GR<br>A283D S.A.W /API 5L Gr. B. Eqvt.<br>InternationalStandard<br>37.11 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes A 312<br>Gr. TP 304 to 316, TP 317 L / (304 L)<br>Eqvt. International Standard<br>28.55MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>4<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA 312<br>TP 304 / 316 Eqvt. International Standard<br>24.75MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82%wastage<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel GR.SA105 Gr.B/<br>Net to Net the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>5. Quantity of export item in meters also in addition to its weight.<br>6. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>7. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The applicant’s reply dated 31.08.2021 was forwarded to DPIIT on 31.08.2021 for examination<br>& comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/301/2019-TSW dated 20.09.2021 informed that the<br>applicant’s reply is incomplete. Further, as per the comments of DPIIT, a deficiency letter was<br>issue to the applicant on 05.01.2022 to furnish following information:<br>1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for<br>the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>2. Quantity of export item in meters also to its weight.<br>3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The deficiency letter dated 05.01.2022 followed by a reminder dated 09.03.2022 was issued to<br>the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. The deficiency letter was issued to the<br>applicant on 09.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>item<br>Quantit<br>y<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import items<br>Recommended<br>quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for<br>Chemical<br>Storage<br>Plant<br>1954.7<br>9 MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipes SA106 Gr.<br>B/ Gr. C / SA-333/ASTM A-106/ASTM<br>SA333 Gr 6 (LTCS) Eqvt. International<br>Standard<br>1387.54 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>2<br>Carbon Steel Welded Pipe ASTM A672<br>B60 CL 12, CL 22 ASTM A 134 GR<br>A283D S.A.W /API 5L Gr. B. Eqvt.<br>InternationalStandard<br>37.11 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes A 312<br>Gr. TP 304 to 316, TP 317 L / (304 L)<br>Eqvt. International Standard<br>28.55MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>4<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA 312<br>TP 304 / 316 Eqvt. International Standard<br>24.75MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82%wastage<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel GR.SA105 Gr.B/<br>Net to Net the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>5. Quantity of export item in meters also in addition to its weight.<br>6. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>7. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The applicant’s reply dated 31.08.2021 was forwarded to DPIIT on 31.08.2021 for examination<br>& comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/301/2019-TSW dated 20.09.2021 informed that the<br>applicant’s reply is incomplete. Further, as per the comments of DPIIT, a deficiency letter was<br>issue to the applicant on 05.01.2022 to furnish following information:<br>1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for<br>the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>2. Quantity of export item in meters also to its weight.<br>3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The deficiency letter dated 05.01.2022 followed by a reminder dated 09.03.2022 was issued to<br>the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. The deficiency letter was issued to the<br>applicant on 09.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>item<br>Quantit<br>y<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import items<br>Recommended<br>quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for<br>Chemical<br>Storage<br>Plant<br>1954.7<br>9 MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipes SA106 Gr.<br>B/ Gr. C / SA-333/ASTM A-106/ASTM<br>SA333 Gr 6 (LTCS) Eqvt. International<br>Standard<br>1387.54 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>2<br>Carbon Steel Welded Pipe ASTM A672<br>B60 CL 12, CL 22 ASTM A 134 GR<br>A283D S.A.W /API 5L Gr. B. Eqvt.<br>InternationalStandard<br>37.11 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes A 312<br>Gr. TP 304 to 316, TP 317 L / (304 L)<br>Eqvt. International Standard<br>28.55MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>4<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA 312<br>TP 304 / 316 Eqvt. International Standard<br>24.75MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82%wastage<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel GR.SA105 Gr.B/<br>Net to Net the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of<br>components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at<br>each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc.<br>5. Quantity of export item in meters also in addition to its weight.<br>6. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>7. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The applicant’s reply dated 31.08.2021 was forwarded to DPIIT on 31.08.2021 for examination<br>& comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/301/2019-TSW dated 20.09.2021 informed that the<br>applicant’s reply is incomplete. Further, as per the comments of DPIIT, a deficiency letter was<br>issue to the applicant on 05.01.2022 to furnish following information:<br>1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for<br>the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.<br>2. Quantity of export item in meters also to its weight.<br>3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.<br>4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.<br>The deficiency letter dated 05.01.2022 followed by a reminder dated 09.03.2022 was issued to<br>the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. The deficiency letter was issued to the<br>applicant on 09.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 25.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>item<br>Quantit<br>y<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import items<br>Recommended<br>quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for<br>Chemical<br>Storage<br>Plant<br>1954.7<br>9 MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipes SA106 Gr.<br>B/ Gr. C / SA-333/ASTM A-106/ASTM<br>SA333 Gr 6 (LTCS) Eqvt. International<br>Standard<br>1387.54 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>2<br>Carbon Steel Welded Pipe ASTM A672<br>B60 CL 12, CL 22 ASTM A 134 GR<br>A283D S.A.W /API 5L Gr. B. Eqvt.<br>InternationalStandard<br>37.11 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes A 312<br>Gr. TP 304 to 316, TP 317 L / (304 L)<br>Eqvt. International Standard<br>28.55MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage<br>4<br>Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA 312<br>TP 304 / 316 Eqvt. International Standard<br>24.75MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82%wastage<br>5<br>Flanges Carbon Steel GR.SA105 Gr.B/<br>Net to Net
Export<br>item Quantit<br>y Sl.<br>No<br>. Import items Recommended<br>quantity
Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for<br>Chemical<br>Storage<br>Plant 1954.7<br>9 MT 1 Carbon Steel Seamless Pipes SA106 Gr.<br>B/ Gr. C / SA-333/ASTM A-106/ASTM<br>SA333 Gr 6 (LTCS) Eqvt. International<br>Standard 1387.54 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage
2 Carbon Steel Welded Pipe ASTM A672<br>B60 CL 12, CL 22 ASTM A 134 GR<br>A283D S.A.W /API 5L Gr. B. Eqvt.<br>InternationalStandard 37.11 MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage
3 Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes A 312<br>Gr. TP 304 to 316, TP 317 L / (304 L)<br>Eqvt. International Standard 28.55MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82% wastage
4 Stainless Steel Welded Pipes SA 312<br>TP 304 / 316 Eqvt. International Standard 24.75MT<br>inclusive of<br>1.82%wastage
5 Flanges Carbon Steel GR.SA105 Gr.B/ Net to Net

6 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

==> picture [476 x 321] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Gr.C/ SA350/ASTM A-333/ASTM A-<br>106/API-SC-BA 105 /SA 350 LF2 (LTCS)<br>or Eqvt. International Standard<br>6 Flanges Stainless Steel SA 182 Gr.F304 Net to Net<br>To SA 182Gr. F316, F347 L or Eqvt.<br>International Standard<br>7 Pipe Fittings Carbon Steel and welded Net to Net<br>Carbon Steel SA 234 WPB/SA 420 WP<br>L6 /SA350LF2 i.e. Ecentric Reducers<br>/Concentric reducers/Elbows/End<br>caps/Equal Tee /Unequal Tee /Gaskets<br>/Half coupling / Sockolet / Thermowell<br>/Union/ Weldolet Etc.<br>8 Pipe Fittings Stainless Steel and welded Net to Net<br>Stainless Steel Grade SA 403<br>WP304/304L to WP 316 i.e. Ecentric<br>Reducers /Concentric reducers /Elbows<br>/End caps/ Equal Tee/ Unequal Tee/<br>Gaskets /Half coupling /Sockolet/<br>Thermowell /Union / Weldolet Etc.<br>9 Thermowells Net to Net<br>RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Sl. No. 05

M. No.: Status: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/ Deferred M/s TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd. 4 (Offline Cases) dated 03.06.2022 HQ. No.: Subject: EOU- M/s. TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd., 01/80/162/301/AM18/DES LOP No. PER: 076/EOU/VSEZ/HYD/2011 dated -1 25.07.2011 for fixation of wastage norms for export product “Helicopter cabin kits & parts and accessories for Aircraft” against import items 1. Stainless Steel bars/rods 2. Stainless Steel Tube/Pipes 3. Stainless Steel round bars Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DIPP on 10.07.2018 and to DHI o n 03.08.2018 for their examinations/comments. Since, they had stated that the export product is not under the purview of DIPP/DHl , it was forwarded to MSME on 18.03.2019 followed by reminders on 24.09.2019, 10.01.2020 & 12.02.2020. A deficiency letter (To provide excel sheet of calculations) was sent to the applicant as per comments of MSME received via email dated 22.10.2020. The applicant’s reply was sent to MSME on 18.11.2020 to examine the case. MSME via email dated 16.06.2021 has asked to submit certain information. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information: 1. To submit step-wise calculation for all products.

  1. To submit MSME-DI wastage report/SEZ wastage report, if any.

7 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

The applicant’s reply dated 10.08.2021 was forwarded to MSME for examination & comments on 11.08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021, 10.11.2021 & 05.01.2022.

Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide details of the parts being produced from each raw material, blank size and weight, finished weight along with manufacturing process.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 06

Case No. 27/9/80-ALC2/2017 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s TERUMO PENPOL Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 PRIVATE LIMITED Lic. No.: 5310019417 dated 15.06.2017 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00205/AM18 Subject: Request for re-fixation RLA No.: 53/24/040/00003/AM18 of ad-hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 03/80 dated 09.05.2018 as per written comments of DIPP (TSW section) vide letter No.: 07/9/2016-TSW dated 08.12.2017. However, the applicant requested to re-fix the norms and to allow them for Personal Hearing .

The applicant appeared for PH in NC Meeting 09/80 dated 14.09.2019 and explained the reason for higher wastage claims. Based on the deliberations, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech 1) would look into the matter. Consultant (Tech-1) pointed out that applicant is requesting to increase the wastage norms for PVC compound from 10% to 16% on the basis of Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals suggestion vide letter dated 10.09.2012 for amending the SION H-67 and AA of the applicant had been ratified based on SION H-67 which allows for only 10%. Consultant (Tech-1) suggested that PLEXCONCI L may be requested to provide Production/Consumption data of other manufacturers. The case was referred to PLEXCONCIL, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 18.10.2019 & 05.11.2019 respectively. However, PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days’ time to reply the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals . The Committee noted that Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals and PLEXCONCIL were reminded on 12.02.2020 for expediting the matter. PLEXCONCIL’s reply was received and forwarded to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2020 for examination. However, Consultant (Tech-1) informed in the meeting that PLEXCONCIL reply mentions Acetic Anhydride as the export product, which does not make any sense. Also, a D.O. Letter was sent to JS, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 30.07.2020 to provide their comments in the matter at the earliest. Further, a copy of application was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 09.03.2021 for examination & comments. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80dated 16.06.2021, a reminder was issued on 02.08.2021. Further, as decided in meeting dated 02.09.2021, another reminder was issued on 29.09.2021. Also, as per NC decision, final reminder [Letter] was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 05.01.2022 for expediting the comments. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, it was decided to seek opinion of Consultant (Tech-1) in this matter as no information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals despite several reminders. As per NC decision, an email was sent to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2022. Consultant (Tech-1) via email dated 20.05.2022 has requested to send physical file of the case and the same was sent to - Consultant (Tech 1) on 25.05.2022. However, no comments have been received yet.

8 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 07

Case No. : No.:9/12/80-ALC2/2017 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 PRIVATE LIMITED Lic. No. /date: 0510403402 dated 14.07.2017 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00223/AM18 Subject: Request for re-fixation RLA No.: 05/24/040/00172/AM18 of ad-hoc norms

Case history: The case was approved in M. No. 3/80-ALC2/2016 dated 09.05.2018 as per recommendation of representative of DHI, DIPP and MSME present in that meeting. However, the applicant had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the recommendation of Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to DPIIT on 08.07.2020 as similar cases were examined/ recommended by them. However, DPIIT on 02.09.2020 requested for some additional information and the same were sent to DPIIT on 07.10.2020.Also, some other information received from the applicant was forwarded to DPIIT on 16.10.2020.As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47012/289/2018-TSW dated 10.12.2020:

  1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

  2. Weight of each Export Product.

  3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

However, the applicant’s reply was forwarded to DPIIT on 12.08.2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/289/2018-TSW dated 31.08.2021 informed that the applicant’s reply was incomplete. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information:

  1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

  2. Weight of each Export Product.

  3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

  4. Brass Bar blank size and weight thereof supported by size & weight of component (Body B) to be manufactured- export product wise.

  5. Cutting allowance and end cutting loss on brass bar.

Reply from the applicant was received and sent to DPIIT on 11.10.2021 for examination & comments. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DPIIT vide

9 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

U. O. No. P-47011/289/2018-TSW dated 20.12.2021 and decided to seek opinion of Consultant (Tech-3) in this matter. As per NC decision, the case was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 11.03.2022 for his opinion. However, no comments have been received as yet.

Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 8

Sl. No. 8
CaseNo.:13/16/80-ALC2/2017<br>M/ L& TMHPS TURBINE<br>Status:
s -<br>GENERATORS PRIVATE<br>LIMITED<br>Withdrawn<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022<br>Lic. No. /date: 0310815484 Date: 01.09.2017
HQ. No.:01/80/050/00276/AM18<br>**Subject:**Request for review<br>and fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00052/AM18
Case history:The case was rejected in Meeting No. 06/80-ALC2/2018 dated11.07.2018 on the<br>ground that the parts of the import items given (Unit of Measurement) in sets and number of<br>parts in each set and their composition is not known. The Committee found that it was very<br>difficult to enforce accountability and rejected the case.<br>However, the applicant had requested for review of the case. The firm had given representation<br>dated 25.02.2019 enclosing a statement giving composition along with unit of measurement in<br>numbers against each set of imported items. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted<br>that the applicant’s representation was sent toDHIfor examination on 21.02.2020 followed by a<br>reminder on 15.10.2020.Further, reply of deficiency received from the applicant was sent toDHI<br>via email on 14.06.2021 to examine the case. DHI has given their comments dated 16.11.2021.<br>The case was discussed in meeting dated 16.11.2021 and the Committee observed that DHI<br>had recommended very high wastage for certain import items. However, name of raw material &<br>shape were not mentioned in the description of import items neither in ANF-4A/Condition Sheet<br>nor in the comments of DHI. Therefore, the Committee decided to get clarification on the same<br>from the applicant & DHI for the import items at Sl. Nos. 13, 22, 48 to 53, 79 to 82, 85 to 88, 327<br>& 328. As per NC decision, an email was sent to the applicant & DHI on 05.01.2022. The<br>applicant’s reply against email dated 05.01.2022 was sent to DHI on 07.02.2022 for comments.<br>Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was<br>already approved in the NC Meeting No. NC/1/MEET/Mar/202122/16 (Offline Cases) dated<br>31.03.2022. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda.<br>Caseiswithdrawn.

Sl. No. 9

Sl. No. 9
CaseNo.:23/8/80-ALC2/2018<br>Status:
M/s GE POWER INDIA LIMITED<br>Deferred<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022<br>Lic. No. /date: 0310821275 Date: 28.05.2018
HQ. No.:01/80/050/00146/AM19<br>**Subject:**Request for fixation of<br>ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 03/94/040/00164/AM19
**Case history:**The case was rejected in Meeting No. 4/80-ALC2/2019 dated22.05.2019 due to<br>non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 28.12.2018 raised by DHI. The applicant vide

10 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

letter dated 27.09.2019 had furnished the reply and requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant’s representation was inadvertently forwarded to MSME who advised referring the case to DHI for examination. The case was referred to DHI on 31.10.2020. As per comments of DHI and as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

  1. Complete application with all annexure.

  2. Copy of the NC decisions in chronological order.

  3. All the replies of deficiencies letters in chronological order.

  4. Copy of deficiency letter issued by NC.

The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 07.02.2022 for examination & comments. DHI via email dated 11.02.2022 informed that the applicant has not submitted the point-wise reply. The Committee also noted that the case was referred to DHI on 31.10.2020 and the recommendation of the DHI is still inconclusive. Hence, the Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination and providing comments. As per NC decision, the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 07.02.2022 & 30.05.2022.

Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that Consultant (Tech3) has requested for physical file of the case for examination & comments. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to the TE, Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 10

==> picture [483 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s GEA Process Engineering, Status:<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Vadodara Deferred<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/162/AM09/ Subject: Request for fixation of ad-<br>hoc norms<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case history: The applicant has stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No. KASEZ/100%EOU/II/08/09-10/11623 dated 23.11.2009 are the Member of EPC for EOUs and KSEZs. The applicant has stated that the company is an EOU unit and it is registered with Kandla Special Economic Zone (KASEZ) and there is a requirement by KASEZ that EOU unit needs to fix the norms of its export product. The applicant vide their representation dated 11.01.2020 had requested for fixation of input/output Norms for the import/export products.

Case history: The applicant has stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No. KASEZ/100%EOU/II/08/09-10/11623 dated 23.11.2009 are the Member of EPC for EOUs and KSEZs. The applicant has stated that the company is an EOU unit and it is registered with Kandla Special Economic Zone (KASEZ) and there is a requirement by KASEZ that EOU unit needs to fix the norms of its export product. The applicant vide their representation dated 11.01.2020 had requested for fixation of input/output Norms for the import/export products. The copy of application was sent to MSME on 08.09.2020 for examination of the case. As per comments of MSME received via email dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.2021 for furnishing the following information : 1. A copy of complete set of application. 2. To provide MSME-DI wastage/SEZ wastage report, if any. As per NC decision, a deficiency letter as raised by MSME was issued to the applicant on 27.09.2021. The applicant via email dated 28.09.2021 informed that their unit is not registered under MSME Act, 2006. Therefore, they do not have any MSME-DI wastage report issued by MSME Authority and also such wastage report is not issued by KASEZ Authority. MSME was reminded on 09.03.2022 for expediting the comments.

11 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

  2. Weight of each Export Product.

  3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

  4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 11

==> picture [484 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Case No.: 12/14/80-ALC2/2018 Status:<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) M/s TIL LIMITED Deferred<br>dated 03.06.2022<br>Lic. No : 0210208845 dated 11.12.2018<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00328/AM19 Subject: Request for re-<br>RLA No.: 02/24/040/00110/AM19 fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was ratified by NC in its Meeting No. 14/80 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.: DES-1/TILL/OTRS-1-2019-HEI dated 19.02.2019.However, the applicant vide their representation dated 27.10.2019 received on 11.11.2020 has stated that the norms ratified by NC in respect of above AA, item No. 142 was deleted on the plea that the same was not certified as part of export product as per Appendix 4E. They have mentioned that this is a typographical error on their part and Sl. No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump – Altered -1 No. is very much required for manufacturing of their export item i.e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis. Now the applicant has requested to allow import item at serial No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump – Altered Part No. H4194402/00 -1 No. on net to net basis. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 16.06.2021 and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments. As per NC decision, the case was referred to DHI on 11.11.2021 for examination & comments. In meeting dated 08.02.2022, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was ratified by NC in its Meeting No. 14/80 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.: DES-1/TILL/OTRS-1-2019-HEI dated 19.02.2019.However, the applicant vide their representation dated 27.10.2019 received on 11.11.2020 has stated that the norms ratified by NC in respect of above AA, item No. 142 was deleted on the plea that the same was not certified as part of export product as per Appendix 4E. They have mentioned that this is a typographical error on their part and Sl. No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump – Altered -1 No. is very much required for manufacturing of their export item i.e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis. Now the applicant has requested to allow import item at serial No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump – Altered Part No. H4194402/00 -1 No. on net to net basis. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 16.06.2021 and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments. As per NC decision, the case was referred to DHI on 11.11.2021 for examination & comments. In meeting dated 08.02.2022, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. A copy of complete application with ANF-4A. 2. Deficiency letter issued earlier along with its reply. A deficiency letter dated 09.03.2022 followed by a reminder on 19.05.2022 was issued to the applicant. However, no reply has been received as yet. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to send final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days. Case is deferred.

12 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 12

Case No.: Case No:10/14/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s TIL LIMITED Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Lic. No : 0210208842 dated 11.12.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00326/AM19 Subject: Request for reRLA No.: 02/24/040/00109/AM19 fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was ratified by NC in its Meeting No. 14/80 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.: DES-1/TILL/OTRS-1-2019-HEI dated 19.02.2019.The applicant vide their representation dated 27.10.2019 received on 11.11.2020 has stated that the norms ratified by NC in respect of above AA, item No. 142 was deleted on the plea that the same is not certified as part of export product as per appendix 4E. They have mentioned that this is a typographical error on their part and Sl. No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump – Altered -1 No. is very much required for manufacturing their export item i.e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis. Now the applicant has requested to allow import item at serial No. 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump – Altered Part No. H4194402/00 -1 No. on net to net basis. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 16.06.2021 and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments. As per NC decision, the case was referred to DHI on 11.11.2021 for examination & comments. In meeting dated 08.02.2022, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

  1. A copy of complete application with ANF-4A.

  2. Deficiency letter issued earlier along with its reply.

A deficiency letter dated 09.03.2022 followed by a reminder on 19.05.2022 was issued to the applicant. However, no reply has been received as yet.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to send final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 13

Case No. : 64/11/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Deferred M/s IND-SPHINX PRECISION LTD Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Lic. No.: 2210015975 Date: 13.09.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00255/AM19 Subject: Request for re-fixation of adRLA No.: 22/24/040/00048/AM19 hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.13/80-ALC2/2018 dated 22.01.2019 on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 2210015101 dated 10.10.2014 on the recommendation of the representative of DHI. However, the applicant had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that in Meeting No. 08/80dated05.11.2020, the comments of MSME was referred back for re-examination of the case on 21.12.2020 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021& 09.03.2022.

13 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide dimensions of the import material and the dimensions of the export product.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 14

Case No. : 17/19/80-ALC2/2014 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s IND-SPHINX PRECISION LTD. Lic. No.: 2210015101 Date: 10.10.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00451/AM15 Subject: Request for re-fixation of RLA No.: 22/24/040/00056/AM15 ad-hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 22/80-ALC2/2015 dated 02.02.2016as per written comments of MSME vide ID Note No. 30 (199)/15-ME dated 30.12.2015.However, the applicant has requested for refixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that in Meeting No. 08/80 dated05.11.2020, the comments of MSME were referred back for re-examination of the case on 21.12.2020 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021& 09.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide dimensions of the import material and the dimensions of the export product.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 15

Case No. 2/17/80-ALC2/2017 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Deferred M/s VEM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. Cases) dated 03.06.2022 LTD. Lic. No.: 0910065045 Date: 15.05.2017 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00281/AM18 Subject: Request for review for RLA No.: 09/24/040/00055/AM18 fixation of ad-hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 05/80 dated 06.06.2019 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 14.01.2019as raised by DPIIT . However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the applicant on 20.01.2020 followed by reminders on 22.09.2020, 25.11.2020 & 14.06.2021. The applicant’s reply was received via email dated 16.06.2021 & the same was forwarded to Consultant (Tech3) on 17.06.2021 for examination & comments. Consultant (Tech-3) via email dated 06.08.2021 requested for sending the physical file of the case. The physical file of the case was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 01.09.2021 followed by a reminder on 05.01.2022. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, Consultant (Tech-3) informed that the applicant’s reply dated 16.06.2021 is deficient. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following

14 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

information as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3):

  1. To provide detailed calculation of raw material to be imported with supporting drawing of components to be made out of them separately for both export products.

A deficiency letter dated 09.03.2022 followed by a reminder on 19.05.2022 was issued to the applicant. However, no reply has been received as yet.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to send final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 16

==> picture [477 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Case No. 1/25/80-ALC2/2015<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s UNITED DRILLING TOOLS Status:<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 LTD Deferred<br>Lic. No.: 0510397442 Date: 29.01.2016<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00441/AM16/ Subject: Request for review and<br>RLA No.: 05/24/040/00493/AM16/ fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 05/80 dated 07.06.2016 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 29.03.2016 as raised by DHI. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and Consultant (Tech3) informed that the applicant’s reply dated 29.05.2020 & 06.07.2020 are deficient due to following reasons:

rejected in Meeting No. 05/80 dated 07.06.2016 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 29.03.2016 as raised by DHI. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and Consultant (Tech3) informed that the applicant’s reply dated 29.05.2020 & 06.07.2020 are deficient due to following reasons: 1. Process flow chart does not show use of import items at SL. No. 2 & 3. 2. Quantity of forging is proposed to be imported in fraction of numbers. 3. Weight of export product & import items in annexure A & B are not clear. 4. Quantity of export product given in annexure B is not matching with quantity in AA. The reply of above-mentioned deficiency was received from the applicant and sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 28.01.2021 for examination of case. Consultant (Tech-3) via email dated 14.06.2021 has requested to send physical file of the case. The physical file of the case was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 04.08.2021. The applicant’s reply of DL was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 05.01.2022 for examination of the case. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, Consultant (Tech-3) informed vide email dated 08.02.2022 that the applicant’s reply dated 15.12.2020 is deficient as the applicant has not given point-wise reply of DL. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3): 1. Process flow chart does not show use of import items at SL. No. 2 & 3. 2. Quantity of forging is proposed to be imported in fraction of numbers. 3. Weight of export product & import items in annexure A & B are not clear. 4. Quantity of export product given in annexure B is not matching with quantity in AA. A deficiency letter dated 09.03.2022 followed by a reminder on 19.05.2022 was issued to the applicant. However, no reply has been received as yet.

15 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to send final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 17

Case No. 37/19/80-ALC2/2014 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s KAMAR Status: Cases) dated 03.06.2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD. Deferred Licence No.: 0310788243 Date: 21.08.2014 HQ File No: 01/80/050/00471/AM15/ Subject: Request for review and RLA File No: 03/94/040/00449/AM15/ fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 06/80 dated 20.06.2017 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 29.10.2020.

The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 25.02.2021 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the applicant’s reply is deficient and it contains only copy of Advance Authorization. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

  1. To furnish information as per Sl. No. 11 of SDF supported by Engineering Drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted.

    • Sl. No. 11 of SDF : Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021 & 11.11.2021. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 07.01.2022 for examination & comments. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, the Committee noted that DHI vide email dated 28.01.2022 informed that the applicant had submitted same information as of earlier. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

  1. To furnish information as per Sl. No. 11 of SDF supported by Engineering Drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted.

    • Sl. No. 11 of SDF : Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

A deficiency letter dated 09.03.2022 followed by a reminder on 19.05.2022 was issued to the applicant. However, no reply has been received as yet.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to send final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.

16 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 18

Case No. 3/10/80-ALC2/2017 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 M/s HINDUSTAN RUBBER Rejected (Offline Cases) dated 03.06.2022 INDUSTRIES Lic. No. 0510402563 Date: 16.05.2017 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00213/AM18 Subject: Request for review and RLA No.: 05/23/040/00043/AM18 fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 15/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 08.10.2018. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DPIIT for examination of the case on 21.09.2020 followed by reminders on 25.11.2020 and on 13.08.2021.

A deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 05.01.2022 as per comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/48/2021-TSW dated 20.09.2021 as under:

  1. A copy of complete set of application.

  2. A copy of deficiency letter issued to the applicant.

  3. A copy of representation along with the all relevant information/documents.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter dated 05.01.2022 followed by a reminder dated 09.03.2022 was issued to the applicant. The applicant via email dated 28.03.2022 has requested for some more time to reply the deficiency letter. An email dated 28.03.2022 was sent to the applicant with a request to submit their reply within a week. However, no information has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the applicant’s request of fixation of ad-hoc norms on the ground of non-submission of reply of deficiency letter.

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 19

Case No. 8/23/80-ALC2/2015 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 M/s HINDUSTAN RUBBER Deferred (Offline Cases) dated 03.06.2022 INDUSTRIES Lic. No. 0510395884 Date: 12.10.2015 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00421/AM16 Subject: Request for review and RLA No.: 05/23/040/00292/AM16 fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 06 /80- ALC2/2016dated 21.06.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 19.04.2016 as raised by DIPP (Chemical) vide ID No.7/77/2016-TSW dated 26.02.2016.However, the applicant had requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the applicant on 25.11.2020 as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/39/2019-TSW dated 12.10.2020 :

  1. To indicate weight of each type of rubber rollers to be exported, giving its composition i.e. net weight of rubber parts, Metal/Aluminium shell, handle etc.

  2. Complete calculation for requirement of inputs (Both imported and indigenous) indicating wastage claimed for each raw material. In this case, there are two export items as under:

17 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

  • i. Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery 10”—8000 Number. ii. Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery 14”—500 Number.

  1. To provide above details for both the export items.

  2. To provide relevant drawing of both the export items.

The applicant’s reply was sent to DPIIT on 28.12.2020 for examination of the case. DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/39/2019-TSW dated 28.01.2021 informed that the copy of application of the subject AA is not available with DPIIT to examine the case.

As per NC decision, a letter was sent to the applicant for submitting the copy of application on 06.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 11.11.2021. The copy of application was referred to DPIIT for examination & comments. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/39/2019-TSW dated 06.12.2021 and decided to seek opinion of Consultant (Tech-1) in this matter. As per NC decision, the case was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-1) for his opinion on 11.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and Consultant (Tech-1) informed vide email dated 28.03.2022 that no attachments/documents of the case has been received by him. Therefore, the Committee decided to send all the relevant documents to Consultant (Tech-1) for examination & comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 20

==> picture [477 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Case No. 19/19/80-ALC2/2016 Status:<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s L& T-MHPS TURBINE Deferred<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 GENERATORS PRIVATE LIMITED<br>Lic. No. 0310807493 Date: 31.08.2016<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00414/AM17 Subject: Request for re-fixation of<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00292/AM17 ad-hoc norms<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No. 15/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 as per the written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No. 3/96/2016/TSW(B) dated 24.12.2018.However, the applicant had requested for review of already fixed ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 24.02.2020 followed by reminders on 06.11.2020& 06.08.2021:

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No. 15/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 as per the written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No. 3/96/2016/TSW(B) dated 24.12.2018.However, the applicant had requested for review of already fixed ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 24.02.2020 followed by reminders on 06.11.2020& 06.08.2021: 1. The final list of import items after all amendments. (there appears to be at least four amendments) 2. To submit calculation correlating the same with Dimensional Engineering Drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 13.08.2021 & 11.11.2021 followed by a reminder on 09.03.2022 for expediting the comments. DHI vide email dated 30.03.2022 informed that the applicant has not given calculation correlating it with the dimensional Engineering drawing. As per comments of DHI, a DL was issued to the applicant on 25.05.2022. However, no reply has been received as yet. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to send a reminder to the applicant. Case is deferred.

18 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 21

Case No.: 67/5/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s BHARAT HEAVY Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 ELECTRICALS LIMITED Lic. No. 0410164150 Date: 02.04.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00116/AM19/ Subject: Request for re-fixation of RLA No.: 04/24/040/00267/AM18/ ad-hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No. 3/80-ALC2/2019dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide email dated 06.05.2019.However, the applicant had requested for review of the ad-hoc norms.

The representation of the applicant was forwarded to DHI for examination of the case on 25.02.2020 followed by a reminder on 29.10.2020. As per comments of DHI, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.2021for furnishing the following information:

  1. Complete application with ANF 4A and all enclosures.

  2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order.

Further, the Committee in its meeting dated 16.11.2021 noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 26.10.2021 for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed vide letter dated 16.11.2021 that the applicant’s reply was incomplete and the applicant did not furnish the point-wise reply as asked in deficiency letter dated 13.08.2021. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days:

  1. Complete application with ANF 4A and all enclosures.

  2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order.

Further, the Committee in its meeting dated 08.02.2022 noted that the applicant’s reply was forwarded to DHI on 16.12.2021 for examination & comments. DHI vide latter dated 08.02.2022 stated that this is an old case and sought for certain information. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant for furnishing the following information within 15 days:

  1. Complete application with ANF 4A, ANF 4B with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix 4K & Appendix 4H.

  2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter dated 10.03.2022 followed by a reminder dated 19.05.2022 was issued to the applicant as per comments of DHI. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to issue the final reminder to the applicant for submitting the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.

19 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 22

==> picture [477 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Case No.: 12/16/80-ALC2/2017 Status:<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s LARSEN& TOUBRO LIMITED Deferred<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022<br>Lic. No :0310815008 dated 03.08.2017<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00275/AM18/ Subject: Request for re-fixation of<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00235/AM18 ad-hoc norms<br>Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

approved in Meeting No. 03/80 dated 08.05.2019 on the recommendation of the representative of DHI. However, the applicant vide email dated 14.10.2020 had requested for revision of the ratified ad-hoc norms. The applicant’s representation was sent to DHI on 15.12.2020 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI : 1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 2. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosure. As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 11.11.2021 followed by a reminder on 09.03.2022 for expediting the comments. The case was last considered in the Meeting dated 31.03.2022 and the Committee noted the comments of DHI given via their email dated 31.03.2022 and also decided to seek the opinion of Consultant (Tech-3) in this matter. As per NC decision, the case was referred to Consultant (Tech-3) on 20.05.2022. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that Consultant (Tech-3) has requested for physical file of the case for examination & comments. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to the TE, Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 23

Sl. No. 23
CaseNo.:6/5/80-ALC2/2016 Status:
M/s ALPINE COILS LLP.<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Deferred
Lic. No:0410161893 dated10.05.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00155/AM17<br>**Subject:**Request for fixation of ad-
hoc norms<br>RLA No.:04/24/040/00022/AM17
**Case history:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was
rejected by NC in its Meeting No. 14/80 dated 11.10.2016 due to non-submission of replied to
the deficiency (raised by DIPP).However, the applicant vide representation dated 11.11.2020
furnished the reply of deficiency and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee
reconsidered the case and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 10.08.2021
for examination & comments.
As per comments of DPIIT vide U.O. No.: P-47011/44/2021-TSW dated 15.09.2021, the
following information was asked from the applicant to furnish within 15days:

20 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

  1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

  2. Weight of each Export Product.

  3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

  4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

  5. Quantities of export items in Nos. also in addition to their weights.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant and the applicant’s reply was forwarded to DPIIT on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U.O. No. P-47011/44/2021TSW dated 16.02.2022 informed that the applicant has not submitted the information as asked earlier. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DPIIT:

  1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

  2. Weight of each Export Product.

  3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

  4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

  5. Quantities of export items in Nos. also in addition to their weights.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter dated 20.05.2022 was issued to the applicant as per comments of DPIIT. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 24
Case No.:65/3/80-ALC2/2015 Status:
M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s PROMAC ENGINEERING<br>INDUSTRIES LIMITED Deferred
Lic. No:0710107942dated26.03.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00065/AM16 **Subject:**Request for fixation of ad-
RLA No.:07/24/040/00473/AM15 hoc norms
**Case history:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was
rejected in its Meeting No. 17**/**80-ALC2/2018held on 15.11.2019 on the ground that the import
and exportitems are same and thereisnomanufacturing activity**.**However, the applicantvide

21 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

email dated 10.10.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization.

The applicant’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 14.06.2021 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 11.08.2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

  1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  2. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosure.

The case was considered by NC in its meeting dated 08.02.2022 and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 10.11.2021 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 informed that the applicant’s reply letter didn’t contain any new information and the comments sent by DHI earlier as per letter dated 01.11.2017 still holds good. However, the Committee noted that DHI in its comments has not mentioned about the specific deficiencies which are required to examine the case. The earlier comments sent as per letter dated 01.11.2017 are also not found. Therefore, the Committee decided to request DHI to give fresh comments in this matter.

The case was last considered in the meeting dated 31.03.2022 and the committee noted that DHI had furnished the comments vide email dated 23.03.2022 stating that there is no new information. The applicant had again confirmed that basically there was only punching of holes in the steel cord. Technically, whole manufacturing operation should not result in value addition of 342% (in Rs terms more than 80 lakhs). DHI had given comments stating that the above issue is not a technical matter. Hence, the Committee decided to seek opinion of Consultant (Tech-3). As per NC decision, the case was referred to Consultant (Tech-3) on 20.05.2022. However, no comments have been received as yet.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that Consultant (Tech-3) has requested for physical file of the case for examination & comments. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to the TE, Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 25

Case No.:63/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Status:
M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT. LTD.<br>Deferred<br>M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022
Lic. No:0510406550 dated22.05.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00112/AM19<br>**Subject:**Request for fixation of ad-
hoc norms<br>RLA No.:05/24/040/00096/AM19
**Case history:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was
rejected in Meeting No. 02/80-ALC2/2019held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the
documents/information raised by MSME**.**However, the applicant vide email dated 25.08.2020
has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has
furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and
drawings of all the parts mentioned in the Advance Authorization.

22 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 15.03.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021, 05.01.2022 & 09.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide blank size and weight, manufacturing process and stepwise wastage.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 26

Case No.:3/8/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT. LTD. Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Lic. No :0510407035 dated 02.07.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00126/AM19 Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 05/24/040/00172/AM19 hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 02/80-ALC2/2019held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME . However, the applicant vide email dated 28.09.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the Advance Authorization.

The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 15.03.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021, 05.01.2022 & 09.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide blank size and weight, manufacturing process and stepwise wastage.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 27

Case No.:64/5/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT. LTD. Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Lic. No:0510406462 dated 15.05.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00113/AM19 Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 05/24/040/00080/AM19 hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 0 2/80-ALC2/2019 held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME . However, the applicant vide email dated 09.09.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization.

The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on

23 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

14.06.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021, 05.01.2022 & 09.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide blank size and weight, manufacturing process and stepwise wastage.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 28

Case No.:60/5/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT. LTD. Deferred Cases) dated 03.06.2022 Lic. No :0510406587 dated 24.05.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00109/AM19 Subject: Request for re-fixation of RLA No.: 05/24/040/00111/AM19 ad-hoc norms

Case history: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 02 / 80-ALC2/2019held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME . However, the applicant vide email dated 02.10.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization.

The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 14.06.2021 followed by reminder on 27.09.2021, 05.01.2022 & 09.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide blank size and weight, manufacturing process and stepwise wastage. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 29

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status: Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/S Suttatti Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Deferred HQ. No.: 01/80/162/005/AM22/DES-I Subject: Request for fixation of adhoc norms

Case History: The firm vide representation dated 01.01.2021 received on 16.07.2021 enclosing their letter dated 06.04.2021 for fixation of Input Output Norms (SEEPZ, Mumbai). They have stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No. SEEPZ-SEZ/EOU/65/05-06V.II/05330 dated 06.04.2021 as amended and the LOP has been renewed for a further period of five years from 2021-22 to 2025-26 for manufacture and export of wide range of products mainly applicable for electrical industries:

i. Shroud Plate Part No. 3789337 (ITC HS code 87089900) ii. Shroud Plate Part No. 3767399/4046002 (ITC HS code 87089900)

24 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME on 08.11.2021 followed by a reminder on 10.03.2022 for expediting the comments.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022:

  1. To provide inspection report from MSME DI/Competent Authority.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 30

==> picture [476 x 75] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 Status:<br>(Offline Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s Avasarala Technologies Ltd. Approved<br>Lic. No : 0710078776 Date: 26.04.11<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00167/AM12/DES-I Subject: Request for fixation of ad-<br>hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 07/21/040/00896/AM11<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its Meeting No. 20/80 dated 27.12.11 due to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised by DIPP). Now, the firm vide representation dated 28.12.2020 received on 06.01.2021 furnished the reply of deficiency as raised by DPIIT and requested to fix the norms. They have stated that they have completed export obligation well in time as stipulated and requested to ratify the norms for import item Sl. No. 1 & 2 under General Note 4 and import item Sl. No. 3 with the wastage of 1% as mentioned in the Appendix 4E.

Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its Meeting No. 20/80 dated 27.12.11 due to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised by DIPP). Now, the firm vide representation dated 28.12.2020 received on 06.01.2021 furnished the reply of deficiency as raised by DPIIT and requested to fix the norms. They have stated that they have completed export obligation well in time as stipulated and requested to ratify the norms for import item Sl. No. 1 & 2 under General Note 4 and import item Sl. No. 3 with the wastage of 1% as mentioned in the Appendix 4E. The applicant’s representation was forwarded to DPIIT on 08.11.2021 for the examination & comments. In NC meeting dated 08.02.2022, the Committee noted the comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47014/14/2021-TSW dated 16.12.2021 and decided to seek opinion of Consultant (Tech-3) in this matter. As per NC decision, the case was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 10.03.2022 followed by a reminder on 20.05.2022 for his opinion. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that Consultant (Tech-3) has not given his opinion in this matter. However, the matter was deliberated in the meeting and the representative of DPIIT explained the case in details. After due deliberation, the Committee decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per comments of DPIIT given vide U. O. No. P-47014/14/2021-TSW dated 16.12.2021. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 31

Sl. No. 31
M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022<br>M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals<br>Limited Status:<br>Deferred
Lic. No:0910035792dated 09.01.2009
HQ. No.: 01/80//50/1245/AM09<br>**Subject:**Request for fixation of ad-
hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 09/24/040/292/AM09
**Case History:**The case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 44/80-ALC2/2009 dated
02.02.2010 as per comments of DHI vide letter No. 3(23)/09-TSW(B)/17 dated 12.01.2010.
Now, the applicant vide email dated 10.03.2021 has requested for revision of norms in respect
of import item at Sl. No. 75, which was deleted from import list and requested to allow the same
and in respect of import item at Sl. No. 92, ratified quantity for the said material is insufficient to
meet their requirement.

25 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant’s representation was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 09.08.2021, 29.09.2021 and 10.03.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 32

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022<br>M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals<br>Limited Status:<br>Deferred
Lic. No : 0910036322 dated 16.12.2008
HQ. No.:01/80//50/1580/AM09<br>**Subject:**Request for fixation of ad-
hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 09/24/040/351/AM09
**Case History:**The case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 19/80 dated 11.12.2012 as
per comments of DHI letter No. 3(42)/10 Vol. 20/408 dated 11.12.2012. Now, the applicant
vide their email dated 10.03.2021 has requested for revision of norms in respect of import item
at serial No. 12 is deleted from import list requested to allow the same and import item at serial
No. 91 ratified quantity for the said material is insufficient to meet their requirement.
**Decision:**The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant’s representation
was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case on 09.08.2021, 29.09.2021&
10.03.2022. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee
decided to**remind Consultant (Tech-3)**for expediting the comments.
Caseis deferred.

Case History: The case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 19/80 dated 11.12.2012 as per comments of DHI letter No. 3(42)/10 Vol. 20/408 dated 11.12.2012. Now, the applicant vide their email dated 10.03.2021 has requested for revision of norms in respect of import item at serial No. 12 is deleted from import list requested to allow the same and import item at serial No. 91 ratified quantity for the said material is insufficient to meet their requirement.

Sl. No. 33

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status: Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Deferred Lic. No : 0910045023 dated 03.01.2011 Limited HQ. No.: 01/80//50/701/AM11 Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 09/24/040/450/AM11 hoc norms Case History: The case was ratified by the Norms Committee in its meeting No.08/14 dated 09.07.2013 as per comments of DHI letter No. 3(42)/2010-TSW(B)/112 dated 31.05.2013.Now, the firm vide email dated10.03.2021 has requested that import items at Sl. Nos. 2, 6 & 7are raw material and the ratified quantity was restricted to 7960 Kgs, 4850Kgs & 320Kgs by Norms Committee as against applied quantities of 10000Kgs, 6000Kgs & 2000Kgs respectively. They have stated that the ratified quantity was insufficient to meet the requirement & thus they have imported more than the ratified quantity. For the justification of the same Accountability Certificate certified by the Central Excise Dept. has been enclosed in this regard for further consideration.

The Committee re-considered the case and noted that the applicant’s representation was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 09.08.2021 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-3) had requested to forward this case to DHI. Therefore, the Committee decided to refer the case to DHI for examination and comments. As per NC decision, the applicant’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 29.09.2021 for examination & comments. The case was considered by NC in its meeting dated 16.11.2021 and noted the comments of DHI received vide letter dated 16.11.2021 wherein it was stated that the applicant’s representation was not clear and they sought some more information. Therefore, the

26 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

  1. Background note giving the NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  2. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosures like Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

As per NC decision, DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing above information. The applicant’s reply/representation was forwarded to DHI on 29.11.2021 for examination & comments. DHI vide email dated 14.01.2022 & dated 30.03.2022 informed that earlier ad-hoc norms were fixed on the basis of applicant’s reply dated 17.05.2013 and now, the same is required by DHI for re-examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask the applicant to submit the reply dated 17.05.2013 as requested by DHI. As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant on 20.05.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 34

==> picture [476 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 Status:<br>(Offline Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s Dee Development Engineers Ltd. Approved<br>Lic. No : 0510403207 Date: 22.06.2017<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00450/AM19/DES-I Subject: Request for fixation of ad-<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00116/AM18/ hoc norms<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case History: The case was rejected by the Norms Committee in its meeting No. 22 / 80ALC2/2018held on 28.02.2020 due to non-submission of the documents/information as called by TA / DHI. The firm vide email dated 16.04.2021 and 24.06.2021 had furnished soft copy of application and requested to re-consider their case for fixation of norms. The firm had furnished technical details along with details of wastages claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization.

Case History: The case was rejected by the Norms Committee in its meeting No. 22 / 80ALC2/2018held on 28.02.2020 due to non-submission of the documents/information as called by TA / DHI. The firm vide email dated 16.04.2021 and 24.06.2021 had furnished soft copy of application and requested to re-consider their case for fixation of norms. The firm had furnished technical details along with details of wastages claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. The Committee reconsidered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm’s representation was forward to DHI on 26.08.2021 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI had asked for background note of the case along with previous decision of NC. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to DHI for examination & comments. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 06.10.2021 for examination and comments. DHI vide letter dated 16.11.2021 informed that the applicant’s reply was incomplete as the applicant didn’t answer to any of the points as raised in deficiency letter. The reply was not in chronological order with detailed background of the case i.e. decision of NC and other correspondence. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Background note giving the NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 2. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosures like Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

27 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

The deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 07.01.2022 followed by a<br>reminder on 10.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 30.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>Item<br>Export<br>Quantity<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>2307.60<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A<br>106 Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X<br>52/ X 55/ X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA<br>/ A 333 GR 6, APL 5L Grade B<br>1045.73MT inclusive<br>of 2% wastage<br>2<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes,<br>SA/A 312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , TP 304 L TO TP 347 L, Dual<br>Grade - TP 304 / 304 L TO TP 347<br>/ 347 L<br>12.51MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Fabricated /Welded<br>pipes/ Tubes / ERW Pipes SA/A<br>312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 & 347<br>,TP 316 L / TP 304 L/ TP 317 L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 / 304 L & TP<br>316 / 316L&TP317/ 317 L,<br>22.90MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade<br>P2 TO P95<br>5.09MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>5<br>Pipe Fitting Carbon Steel Seamless<br>& Welded, SA/A 105 / 234 WPB /<br>WPC,SA/ A 420 WP L 6, Reducers<br>/ Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y<br>Piece / Megalet & All Types Of<br>Variants<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA/A 36, SA /<br>A 105, SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/<br>A350LF 2(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>7<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182<br>SA/A 312 F 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , F 304 L TOF 347 L, DUAL<br>GRADE - F 304 / 304 L TO F 347 /<br>347 L Pipe Hub ( Clamped Flange<br>Connector ), Olets, Tube Connector<br>Net to Net<br>8<br>Pipe Fitting Stainless Steel, SA/A<br>403 & SA/A 182 WP 304 TO WP<br>347 SA/A 403 WP 304 L TO<br>WP347 L , DUAL GRADE - WP 304<br>/ 304 L TO WP 347 / 347, L AISI<br>304 OR 304L, Reducers / Elbow /<br>End Caps/ Tee / U-Bolt /Gasket /<br>Check Valve, Coupling / Sockolet/<br>Net to Net The deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 07.01.2022 followed by a<br>reminder on 10.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 30.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>Item<br>Export<br>Quantity<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>2307.60<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A<br>106 Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X<br>52/ X 55/ X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA<br>/ A 333 GR 6, APL 5L Grade B<br>1045.73MT inclusive<br>of 2% wastage<br>2<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes,<br>SA/A 312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , TP 304 L TO TP 347 L, Dual<br>Grade - TP 304 / 304 L TO TP 347<br>/ 347 L<br>12.51MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Fabricated /Welded<br>pipes/ Tubes / ERW Pipes SA/A<br>312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 & 347<br>,TP 316 L / TP 304 L/ TP 317 L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 / 304 L & TP<br>316 / 316L&TP317/ 317 L,<br>22.90MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade<br>P2 TO P95<br>5.09MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>5<br>Pipe Fitting Carbon Steel Seamless<br>& Welded, SA/A 105 / 234 WPB /<br>WPC,SA/ A 420 WP L 6, Reducers<br>/ Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y<br>Piece / Megalet & All Types Of<br>Variants<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA/A 36, SA /<br>A 105, SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/<br>A350LF 2(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>7<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182<br>SA/A 312 F 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , F 304 L TOF 347 L, DUAL<br>GRADE - F 304 / 304 L TO F 347 /<br>347 L Pipe Hub ( Clamped Flange<br>Connector ), Olets, Tube Connector<br>Net to Net<br>8<br>Pipe Fitting Stainless Steel, SA/A<br>403 & SA/A 182 WP 304 TO WP<br>347 SA/A 403 WP 304 L TO<br>WP347 L , DUAL GRADE - WP 304<br>/ 304 L TO WP 347 / 347, L AISI<br>304 OR 304L, Reducers / Elbow /<br>End Caps/ Tee / U-Bolt /Gasket /<br>Check Valve, Coupling / Sockolet/<br>Net to Net The deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 07.01.2022 followed by a<br>reminder on 10.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 30.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>Item<br>Export<br>Quantity<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>2307.60<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A<br>106 Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X<br>52/ X 55/ X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA<br>/ A 333 GR 6, APL 5L Grade B<br>1045.73MT inclusive<br>of 2% wastage<br>2<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes,<br>SA/A 312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , TP 304 L TO TP 347 L, Dual<br>Grade - TP 304 / 304 L TO TP 347<br>/ 347 L<br>12.51MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Fabricated /Welded<br>pipes/ Tubes / ERW Pipes SA/A<br>312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 & 347<br>,TP 316 L / TP 304 L/ TP 317 L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 / 304 L & TP<br>316 / 316L&TP317/ 317 L,<br>22.90MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade<br>P2 TO P95<br>5.09MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>5<br>Pipe Fitting Carbon Steel Seamless<br>& Welded, SA/A 105 / 234 WPB /<br>WPC,SA/ A 420 WP L 6, Reducers<br>/ Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y<br>Piece / Megalet & All Types Of<br>Variants<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA/A 36, SA /<br>A 105, SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/<br>A350LF 2(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>7<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182<br>SA/A 312 F 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , F 304 L TOF 347 L, DUAL<br>GRADE - F 304 / 304 L TO F 347 /<br>347 L Pipe Hub ( Clamped Flange<br>Connector ), Olets, Tube Connector<br>Net to Net<br>8<br>Pipe Fitting Stainless Steel, SA/A<br>403 & SA/A 182 WP 304 TO WP<br>347 SA/A 403 WP 304 L TO<br>WP347 L , DUAL GRADE - WP 304<br>/ 304 L TO WP 347 / 347, L AISI<br>304 OR 304L, Reducers / Elbow /<br>End Caps/ Tee / U-Bolt /Gasket /<br>Check Valve, Coupling / Sockolet/<br>Net to Net The deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 07.01.2022 followed by a<br>reminder on 10.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 30.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>Item<br>Export<br>Quantity<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>2307.60<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A<br>106 Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X<br>52/ X 55/ X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA<br>/ A 333 GR 6, APL 5L Grade B<br>1045.73MT inclusive<br>of 2% wastage<br>2<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes,<br>SA/A 312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , TP 304 L TO TP 347 L, Dual<br>Grade - TP 304 / 304 L TO TP 347<br>/ 347 L<br>12.51MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Fabricated /Welded<br>pipes/ Tubes / ERW Pipes SA/A<br>312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 & 347<br>,TP 316 L / TP 304 L/ TP 317 L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 / 304 L & TP<br>316 / 316L&TP317/ 317 L,<br>22.90MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade<br>P2 TO P95<br>5.09MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>5<br>Pipe Fitting Carbon Steel Seamless<br>& Welded, SA/A 105 / 234 WPB /<br>WPC,SA/ A 420 WP L 6, Reducers<br>/ Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y<br>Piece / Megalet & All Types Of<br>Variants<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA/A 36, SA /<br>A 105, SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/<br>A350LF 2(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>7<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182<br>SA/A 312 F 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , F 304 L TOF 347 L, DUAL<br>GRADE - F 304 / 304 L TO F 347 /<br>347 L Pipe Hub ( Clamped Flange<br>Connector ), Olets, Tube Connector<br>Net to Net<br>8<br>Pipe Fitting Stainless Steel, SA/A<br>403 & SA/A 182 WP 304 TO WP<br>347 SA/A 403 WP 304 L TO<br>WP347 L , DUAL GRADE - WP 304<br>/ 304 L TO WP 347 / 347, L AISI<br>304 OR 304L, Reducers / Elbow /<br>End Caps/ Tee / U-Bolt /Gasket /<br>Check Valve, Coupling / Sockolet/<br>Net to Net The deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 07.01.2022 followed by a<br>reminder on 10.03.2022. The applicant’s reply was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 30.05.2022<br>for examination & comments as decided on the file.<br>Decision:The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms as per comments of Consultant (SKB) received via email dated 31.05.2022, as under:<br>Export<br>Item<br>Export<br>Quantity<br>Sl.<br>No<br>.<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers<br>2307.60<br>MT<br>1<br>Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A<br>106 Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X<br>52/ X 55/ X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA<br>/ A 333 GR 6, APL 5L Grade B<br>1045.73MT inclusive<br>of 2% wastage<br>2<br>Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes,<br>SA/A 312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , TP 304 L TO TP 347 L, Dual<br>Grade - TP 304 / 304 L TO TP 347<br>/ 347 L<br>12.51MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>3<br>Stainless Steel Fabricated /Welded<br>pipes/ Tubes / ERW Pipes SA/A<br>312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 & 347<br>,TP 316 L / TP 304 L/ TP 317 L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 / 304 L & TP<br>316 / 316L&TP317/ 317 L,<br>22.90MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>4<br>Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade<br>P2 TO P95<br>5.09MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage<br>5<br>Pipe Fitting Carbon Steel Seamless<br>& Welded, SA/A 105 / 234 WPB /<br>WPC,SA/ A 420 WP L 6, Reducers<br>/ Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y<br>Piece / Megalet & All Types Of<br>Variants<br>Net to Net<br>6<br>Flanges Carbon Steel, SA/A 36, SA /<br>A 105, SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/<br>A350LF 2(LTCS)<br>Net to Net<br>7<br>Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182<br>SA/A 312 F 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , F 304 L TOF 347 L, DUAL<br>GRADE - F 304 / 304 L TO F 347 /<br>347 L Pipe Hub ( Clamped Flange<br>Connector ), Olets, Tube Connector<br>Net to Net<br>8<br>Pipe Fitting Stainless Steel, SA/A<br>403 & SA/A 182 WP 304 TO WP<br>347 SA/A 403 WP 304 L TO<br>WP347 L , DUAL GRADE - WP 304<br>/ 304 L TO WP 347 / 347, L AISI<br>304 OR 304L, Reducers / Elbow /<br>End Caps/ Tee / U-Bolt /Gasket /<br>Check Valve, Coupling / Sockolet/<br>Net to Net
Export<br>Item Export<br>Quantity Sl.<br>No<br>. Import Item Recommended<br>Quantity
Parts<br>consisting<br>of<br>prefabricat<br>ed piping<br>for Boilers 2307.60<br>MT 1 Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe SA/ A<br>106 Gr B & C , API 5 L GR. X 42 / X<br>52/ X 55/ X 65, SA/ A 53 GR B, SA<br>/ A 333 GR 6, APL 5L Grade B 1045.73MT inclusive<br>of 2% wastage
2 Stainless Steel Seamless Pipes,<br>SA/A 312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , TP 304 L TO TP 347 L, Dual<br>Grade - TP 304 / 304 L TO TP 347<br>/ 347 L <br>12.51MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage
3 Stainless Steel Fabricated /Welded<br>pipes/ Tubes / ERW Pipes SA/A<br>312 TP 304 TO 316 , 321 & 347<br>,TP 316 L / TP 304 L/ TP 317 L,<br>Dual Grade - TP 304 / 304 L & TP<br>316 / 316L&TP317/ 317 L, <br>22.90MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage
4 Alloy Steel Pipes, SA/ A 335 Grade<br>P2 TO P95 5.09MT<br>inclusive of 2%<br>wastage
5 Pipe Fitting Carbon Steel Seamless<br>& Welded, SA/A 105 / 234 WPB /<br>WPC,SA/ A 420 WP L 6, Reducers<br>/ Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / Tee/<br>Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y<br>Piece / Megalet & All Types Of<br>Variants <br> <br>Net to Net
6 Flanges Carbon Steel, SA/A 36, SA /<br>A 105, SA/ A 350 LF 2 (LTCS),SA/<br>A350LF 2(LTCS) Net to Net
7 Flanges Stainless Steel, SA/A 182<br>SA/A 312 F 304 TO 316 , 321 &<br>347 , F 304 L TOF 347 L, DUAL<br>GRADE - F 304 / 304 L TO F 347 /<br>347 L Pipe Hub ( Clamped Flange<br>Connector ), Olets, Tube Connector <br> <br>Net to Net
8 Pipe Fitting Stainless Steel, SA/A<br>403 & SA/A 182 WP 304 TO WP<br>347 SA/A 403 WP 304 L TO<br>WP347 L , DUAL GRADE - WP 304<br>/ 304 L TO WP 347 / 347, L AISI<br>304 OR 304L, Reducers / Elbow /<br>End Caps/ Tee / U-Bolt /Gasket /<br>Check Valve, Coupling / Sockolet/ <br>Net to Net

28 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Weldolet / Olets/ Y Piece / Megalet & All Types Of Variants 9 Pipe Fitting Alloy Steel Seamless & Net to Net Welded, SA/A 182 / SA 234 GRADE P1 TO P95, Reducers / Elbow / End Caps/ Tee / U-Bolt/ Check Valve Coupling / Sockolet/ Weldolet / Y Piece / Megalet & All Types Of Variants. 10 Angle Section 1.49MT inclusive of 2% wastage 11 Valves Net to Net

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 35

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status: Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s BEML LIMITED Deferred Lic. No : 0710104233 dated 20.05.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00364/AM15 Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 07/24/040/00050/AM15 hoc norms Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms.

The firm’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. As per comments of DHI, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information:

  1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.

  2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  3. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 had requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number . Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI:

  1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.

  2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

  3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for

29 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 10.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DHI 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 36

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status: Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred Lic. No : 0710105280 dated 20.06.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00361/AM15 Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 07/24/040/00084/AM15 hoc norms Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms.

The firm’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. The Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

  1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.

  2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

  3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 had requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI:

  1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.

  2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

  3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 10.03.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DHI 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

30 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 37

==> picture [476 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status:<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred<br>Lic. No : 0710105285 dated 20.06.2014<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00363/AM15 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-<br>RLA No.: 07/24/040/00079/AM15 hoc norms<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The firm’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI: 1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 had requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI: 1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DHI 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 38 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status:

31 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred Lic. No : 0710105283 dated 20.06.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00366/AM15 Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 07/24/040/00103/AM15 hoc norms Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The firm’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

  1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.

  2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

  3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 had requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI:

  1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.

  2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

  3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

  4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DHI 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 39

32 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

==> picture [476 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status:<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/S Victora Auto Pvt. Ltd. Deferred<br>Lic. No.: 0510407583 dt. 23.08.2018<br>HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00195/AM19 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-<br>RLA No.: 05/24/040/00296/AM19 hoc norms<br>Case History: The case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 01/80dated 03.04.2019. The<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case History: The case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 01/80dated 03.04.2019. The firm has stated that inadvertently they have submitted the online application with export & import quantity in KGs as same without any wastage. Therefore, on the basis of online application submitted at the office of Add. DGFT CLA, New Delhi norms was fixed by DGFT in its meeting No. 05/80 dated 28.06.2018. Hence, they have requested to reconsider their application on basis of actual wastage and revise the norms. The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME on 09.11.2021 followed by a reminder on 11.03.2022 for expediting the comments.

firm has stated that inadvertently they have submitted the online application with export & import quantity in KGs as same without any wastage. Therefore, on the basis of online application submitted at the office of Add. DGFT CLA, New Delhi norms was fixed by DGFT in its meeting No. 05/80 dated 28.06.2018. Hence, they have requested to reconsider their application on basis of actual wastage and revise the norms. The applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME on 09.11.2021 followed by a reminder on 11.03.2022 for expediting the comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of MSME given vide email dated 31.05.2022: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 40

Sl. No. 40
M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022<br>M/s Bombardier Transportation Status:<br>Deferred
India Private Ltd<br>Lic. No : 3410043169 dated 09.05.2017
HQ. F. No.: 01/80/162/006/AM22<br>**Subject:**Request for fixation of ad-<br>hoc norms
RLA No.:34/21/040/00049/AM18
**Case History:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the subject
AA has not been considered in any of the NC meeting for fixation of ad-hoc norms as yet.
The applicant vide their email/letter dated 22.07.2021 stated that they have obtained
advance authorization for importing various components and raw material on a customs duty
free basis for manufacturing metro rail coaches. The firm has mentioned that they have making
efforts for filing the aid online application initially the portal was not allowing to file the
application itself as the licence was tagged under the SION norms category. The import items
whichtheyrequirednormsfixation includes approximately 5000lineitems. While attempting to

33 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

upload each of the items they have been facing issue of auto logout from the portal with data already posted not being saved. Now, they have requested to accept their application for norms fixation in the physical form.

The Committee reconsidered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm’s representation was forward to DHI on 19.08.2021 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI asked for background of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek detailed background note along with c complete application with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H. As per NC decision,a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 29.09.2021 followed by a reminder on 11.11.2021.

The case was considered in the meeting dated 31.03.2022 and the Committee noted that the case was erroneously rejected by the NC in its meeting dated 08.02.2022. The applicant had submitted the reply of deficiency letter as raised by TE on 15.12.2021. Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the applicant’s reply to TE, Consultant (Tech-3) for examination and comments. As per NC decision, the case was referred to Consultant (Tech-3) on 20.05.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 41

==> picture [476 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status:<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Deferred<br>Lic. No : 0910039051 dated 20.08.2009 Limited<br>HQ. F. No.: 01/80//50/1812/AM09 Subject: Request for re-fixation of<br>RLA No.: 09/24/040/151/AM10 ad-hoc norms<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case History: The case was approved in Meeting No. 13/80 dated 11.09.2012 as per comments of DHI vide letter No. 3/24/10/TSWB dated 03.09.2012. Now, the applicant via email dated 10.03.2021 & 05.04.2021 has requested for revision of ratified ad-norms for import items at Sl. Nos. 113 & 91. The applicant’s representation was sent to DHI on 29.12.2021. The applicant has furnished the complete information via email dated 07.04.2022 & the same was sent to DHI via email dated 08.04.2022 for examination & comments. The comments of DHI received via email dated 27.04.2022. Decision: The Committee re-considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments given by DHI vide email dated 27.04.2022. The matter was deliberated in the meeting and it was noted that earlier, the import item at Sl. No. 91 was deleted as it was not covered under Para- 4.1.3.1 of FTP-2009-14 and the import item at Sl. No. 113 was allowed with 10% wastage. Now, the applicant has requested to allow the import items at Sl. No. 91 of 2 Number & for import item at Sl. No. 113 has requested to allow as applied for. After due deliberation, the Committee decided to seek the opinion of Consultant (Tech-3) in this matter. Case is deferred.

34 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

Sl. No. 42

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status: Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s MSS India Pvt. Ltd. Approved HQ. F. No.: 01/80/162/016/AM22 Subject: Request for fixation of adhoc norms Case History: The application dated 29.04.2022 & SEEPZ Mumbai letter dated 13.05.2022 forwarded the representation of M/s. MSS India Pvt. Ltd., dated 29.04.22 for fixation of Input Output Norms (SEEPZ, Mumbai) for FY 2021-22. The applicant vide their representation dated 29.04.22 has stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having Letter of Permission (LOP) No. PER:241(1998) EOB/215/98 dated 17.11.1998 as amended and the LOP has been renewed for a further period of five years from 2019-20 to 2023-24 vide letter No SEEPZ-SEZ/EOU/28/48/98-99/V-X/10864 dated 30.06.2021 for manufacture and export of vide range of products mainly applicable for electrical industries. The applicant has submitted the application for fixation of the scrape wastage norms for the scrape arising out of the production process during the year 2021-22 as per their application. The copy of application was referred to DPIIT on 09.05.2022 for examination & comments.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/46/2021-TSW dated 17.05.2022. (Copy enclosed)

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 43

==> picture [476 x 79] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> M. No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Status:<br>Cases) dated 03.06.2022 M/s CML BIOTECH Approved<br>Lic. No : 1011000753 dated 04.01.2022 PRIVATE LIMITED<br>HQ. F. No.: HQRNORMAPPLY00307205AM22 Subject: Request for re-<br>RLA No.: 10AX04000023AM22 fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Case History: The case was approved in the Meeting No. NC/1/MEET/Apr/202223/1 dated<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

19/04/2022 as per comments of Consultant (Tech-1). Now, the applicant vide email dated 18.05.2022 has requested to review the ratified ad-hoc norms for import item at SL. No. 1. The applicant stated that the unit of measurement of import item at Sl. No. 1 (Bromo Butyl Vacuum Rubber Stopper) is in “ number” and the wastage allowed by NC in “Kgs”. Decision: The Committee re-considered the case as per agenda and decided to revise the adhoc norms for import item at Sl. No. 1 as per comments of Consultant (Tech-1) as given earlier via email dated 15.04.2022, as under: 1. The quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 ( Bromo Butyl Vacuum Rubber Stopper ) may be allowed with 1% wastage . Note: The decision for rest of the import items shall remain unchanged as decided in the Meeting No. NC/1/MEET/Apr/202223/1 dated 19/04/2022. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

35 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/May/202223/4 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.06.2022

==> picture [598 x 99] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [598 x 199] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [598 x 199] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [598 x 100] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [598 x 100] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [598 x 99] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [85 x 552] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [171 x 552] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [171 x 552] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [170 x 552] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [171 x 552] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [85 x 542] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [171 x 542] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [171 x 542] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [170 x 542] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [171 x 542] intentionally omitted <==

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied