IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

Meeting No.NC/1/MEET/Dec./202324/20 (OFFLINE CASES) Dated 03.01.2024

==> picture [500 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Si. No.1 M. ‘No.: NC/1/MEET/Dec./202324/20 (OFFLINE Status of case CASES) Dated 03.01.2024 M/s. Xomox Sanmar Ltd., Chennai Lic. No : 0410120070 dated 23.12.2010 HQ. F. No.: 01/80/50/00670/AM11/NC-I (part Subject: Order dated 06.06.23 of | DPIIT, Called for PH file Madras High Court in W.P.No.26422 of RLA No.: 2015 in M/s. Xomox Sanmar Ltd. Vs. The DGFT & Anr. — reconsideration of norm fixation case reg. ----- End of picture text -----

Case History: This is regarding Order dated 06.06.23 of Madras High Court in W.P.No.26422 of 2015 in M/s. Xomox Sanmar Ltd. Vs. The DGFT & Anr., received vide mail dated 23.06.23.

In the said petition, the petitioner has challenged DES-I’s letter No.01/80/050/00670/AM1 1/DES.1/1162 dated 12.08.14 whereby the request of the petitioner for ratification of norms in respect of Advance License No.0410120070 dated 23.12.2010 was rejected by NC-I in its meeting No.07/15 dated 24.06.14 on the grounds that the items of export as well as items of imports are valves and there is no manufacturing activity involved because upon manufacturing a new product with distinctive named should come into existence.

he items of export as well as items of imports are valves and there is no manufacturing activity involved because upon manufacturing a new product with distinctive named should come into existence.

Vide Order dated 06.06.23 (copy enclosed), the court has set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the file of Respondent 1, to be decided afresh and in line with the discussion in the said order after ascertaining if the petitioner has in fact, made any additions to the imported valves by procurement of indigenous products.
Consequent upon this order, RA, Chennai asked the petitioner to file a representation afresh. In compliance, the petitioner has forwarded their letter dated 20.12.23 vide mail dated 20.12.23, wherein the details of their earlier representation dated 07.04.11 and supporting documents are mentioned. The petitioner has requested that it may be given an opportunity of being heard before any orders are passed in this matter.

5; The matter has been referred to DPIIT for examination and comments.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to call the applicant in PH in the forthcoming meeting to explain the case in detail.

Case stands deferred.

==> picture [122 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- y pey a paA ~~ orc® ™ aia < ar. ena veo ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [30 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

No.2 ----- End of picture text -----

CASES) Dated 03.01.2024

M/S BEML LIMITED

RLA No.: 07/24/040/00084/AM15 hoc norms Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The firm's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. The Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

Acopy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 had requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI:

y of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI:

Accopy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 10.03.2022. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. Further, DHI vide email dated 26.07.2022 has raised some queries and the same was asked from the applicant to furnish. The applicant's reply received vide email dated 30.07.2022 was forwarded to DHI on 01.08.2022. As per NC decision, a reminder was also issued to DHI on 27.09.2022 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. The firm has submitted the requisite information/documents as per email dt.23.08.2023 and the same has been forwarded to MHI for examination and comments. The comments of MHI are awaited. The case was considered by NC-I in its meeting held on 22.1 1.23 and the minutes of the said case is as under:-

been forwarded to MHI for examination and comments. The comments of MHI are awaited. The case was considered by NC-I in its meeting held on 22.1 1.23 and the minutes of the said case is as under:-

“The Committee considered the case as per agenda and observed the above AA has list of only indigenous items in ANF 4B of the application and do not have any imported items required for manufacturing of 12 DT cars. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the applicant on PH in the forthcoming meeting to explain the case in detail.”

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and heard the representatives of the firm in PH. S/Shri Praveen Kumar Mathpal, CGM (0), Prabhakar S, Dy. GM, Manish Kumar, AGM(F & A) & Nagendra Mishra, Manager attended the PH and briefed the committee in detail. MHI has pointed out that data provided by BEML is inconsistent and not complete. It has been assured by the representatives of firm that rectified & authenticated data in respect of referred items would be provided within a week. After due deliberation, the committee decided to wait for the rectified data and the complete information from the firm and on receipt of the same, MHI would examine the case expeditiously.

Case stands deferred.

i |

Sl. No.3

CASES) Dated 03.01.2024 M/S BEML LIMITED

hoc norms

e information from the firm and on receipt of the same, MHI would examine the case expeditiously.

Case stands deferred.

i |

Sl. No.3

CASES) Dated 03.01.2024 M/S BEML LIMITED

hoc norms

Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency(raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms.

The firm's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

Acopy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

iency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.

Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 had requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI:

Acopy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. Further, DHI vide email dated 20.07.2022 has raised some queries and the same was asked from the applicant to furnish. The applicant's reply received vide email dated 30.07.2022 was forwarded to DHI on 01.08.2022. As per NC decision, a reminder was also issued to DHI on 27.09.2022 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received as yet.

dated 30.07.2022 was forwarded to DHI on 01.08.2022. As per NC decision, a reminder was also issued to DHI on 27.09.2022 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received as yet.

The firm has submitted the requisite information/documents as per email dt.23.08.2023 and the same has been forwarded to MHI for examination and comments. The comments of MHI are awaited. The case was considered by NC-I in its meeting held on 22.11.23 and the minutes of the said case is as under:-

“The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has submitted the reply. However, the TE, MHI has stated that data furnished by the firm are highly inconsistent and hence, they are not able to offer the comments. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the applicant on PH in the forthcoming meeting to explain the case in detail.”

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and heard the representatives of the firm in PH. S/Shri Praveen Kumar Mathpal, CGM (O), Prabhakar S, Dy. GM, Manish Kumar, AGM(F & A) & Nagendra Mishra, Manager attended the PH and briefed the committee in detail. MHI has pointed out that data provided by BEML is inconsistent and not complete. It has been assured by the representatives of firm that rectified & authenticated data in respect of referred items would be provided within a week. After due deliberation, the committee decided to

wait for the rectified data and the complete information from the firm and on receipt of the same, MHI would examine the case expeditiously.

. After due deliberation, the committee decided to

wait for the rectified data and the complete information from the firm and on receipt of the same, MHI would examine the case expeditiously.

==> picture [431 x 123] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case stands deferred. SI. No.4 CASES) Dated 03.01.2024 M/S BEML LIMITED Subject: Request for fixation of ad- Deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [487 x 136] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The firm's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Acopy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. ----- End of picture text -----

in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [488 x 112] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 had requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI: 1. Acopy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. ----- End of picture text -----

in a chronological order. 4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. ----- End of picture text -----

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI 30.05.2022 for examination & comments. Further, DHI vide email dated 18.07.2022 has raised some queries and the same was asked from the applicant to furnish. The applicant's reply received vide email dated 30.07.2022 was forwarded to DHI on 01.08.2022. As per NC decision, a reminder was also issued to DHI on 27.09.2022 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received as yet.

The firm has submitted the requisite information/documents as per email dt.23.08.2023 and the same has been forwarded to MHI for examination and comments. The comments of MHI is awaited.

The case was considered by NC-I in its meeting held on 22.11.23 and the minutes of the said case is as under:“The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has submitted the reply. However, the TE, MHI has stated that data furnished by the firm are highly inconsistent and hence, they are not able to offer the comments. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the applicant on PH in the forthcoming meeting to explain the case in detail.”

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and heard the representatives of the firm in PH.

call the applicant on PH in the forthcoming meeting to explain the case in detail.”

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and heard the representatives of the firm in PH.

S/Shri Praveen Kumar Mathpal, CGM (O), Prabhakar S, Dy. GM, Manish Kumar, AGM(F & A) & Nagendra Mishra, Manager attended the PH and briefed the committee in detail. MHI has pointed out that data provided by BEML is inconsistent and not complete. It has been assured by the representatives of firm that rectified & authenticated data in respect of referred items would be provided within a week. After due deliberation, the committee decided to wait for the rectified data and the complete information from the firm and on receipt of the same, MHI would examine the case expeditiously.

Case stands deferred.

|SI. No.5|
|---|
|M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Dec./202324/20 (OFFLINE<br>Status ofcase|
|CASES) Dated 03.01.2024<br>M/s.<br>Mach<br>Aero Components<br>Pvt.<br>Pp<br>C—“‘COCCCC*C(#C(C Ltd. Bangalore<br>HQ. F. No.: 01/80/162/07/AM24<br>Subject:<br>Fixation<br>of<br>scrap/wastage |Approved|
|Case History: M/s. Mach Aero Components Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, an EOU unit located at Bangalore Rural District|
|has applied for fixation ofSION norms ofthe scrap/wastage generated during their manufacturing process. The firm|
|has applied for Fixation of scrap/wastage norms for the manufacture ofexport product Aeronautical components as|
|per para 6.8 (e) of FTP.

age generated during their manufacturing process. The firm|
|has applied for Fixation of scrap/wastage norms for the manufacture ofexport product Aeronautical components as|
|per para 6.8 (e) of FTP. In this context, the firm has, inter alia, submitted acopyeach ofthe following:-|
|(i)<br>Request Letterdated 11.01.22 addressed to DGFT(Hars.), issued by O/o. Development Commissioner,|
|CSEZ, Bangalore, forfixation of norms.|
|(ii)<br>Valuation Report with percentage of Scrap, issued byMSME Development Institute, Bangaluru.|
|(iii)<br>Letter dated 24.11.21 of O/o. Development Commissioner, CSEZ, Bangalore fixing ad-hoc norms for|
|scrap/waste generated during the manufacture of Aeronautical components|
|2.<br>ThematterhasbeenreferredtoDPIITforexaminationandcomments.|

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that this is an EOU unit for which firm has sought fixation of scrap wastage norms. After due deliberation, the Committee decided to fix the scrap wastage norms in this case as per comments of DPIIT vide U.O. No.P-47011/5/2024-TSW dated 17.01.2024 (Copy enclosed).

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

==> picture [495 x 137] intentionally omitted <==

U.O. No.P-47011/5/2024-TSW dated 17.01.2024 (Copy enclosed).

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

==> picture [495 x 137] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Si.|No.|6|
|M.|No.:|NC/1/MEET/Dec./202324/19(Offline|Status of case|
|Cases)|Dated|01.12.2023|M/s MSS|India|Pvt.|Ltd.|
|Subject:|Requestasfor fixation|of ad-hoc|Approved|
|99/V-X/08373|dated|15.06.2023|
|Case|history:|M/s|MSS|India|Private|Limited|has|submitted|their|application|dated|17.05.2023|to DGFT through|
|SEEPZ-SEZ|for fixation|of SION|for the financial|year 2022-23|in terms|of para 6.8|if FTP|read with|para 6.06(e)|of|
|HBP.|The|application|of|the|firm|has|been|forwarded|by|SEEPZ-SEZ,|Mumbai|vide|letter|No.|SEEPZ-|
|SEZ/EOU/28/48/98-99/V-X/08373|dated|15.06.2023|requesting|for fixation|of wastage|norms.|

----- End of picture text -----


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


The applicant vide their representation dated 17.05.2023 has stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having Letter of Permission (LOP) No. PER: 241(1998) EOB/215/98 dated 17.11.1998 as amended and the LOP has been renewed for a further period of five years from 2019-20 to 2023-24 vide letter No SEEPZSEZ/EOU/28/48/98-99/V-X/10864 dated 30.06.2021 for manufacture and export of vide range of products mainly applicable for electrical industries. The applicant has submitted the application for fixation of the scrape wastage norms for the scrape arising out of the production process of 1344 items during the year 2022-23 as per their application. The application of the firm has been referred to DPIIT on 14.08.2023 for examination and comments from DPIIT has been received vide U.O.No.P-47011/46/2021-TSW dated 21.08.23.The case was last considered by NC-1 in its meeting held on 12.10.2023 and on 01.12.2023 and the committee, after due deliberation, had decided to see the team-visit report of the firm.

ed 21.08.23.The case was last considered by NC-1 in its meeting held on 12.10.2023 and on 01.12.2023 and the committee, after due deliberation, had decided to see the team-visit report of the firm. 

Decision: The Committee noted that DPIIT comments have been received in this regard. Further, the committee observed that a team consisting of a member each from the then DIPP, DC (MSME) and DGFT had made visit to the firm during July 2011 and recommended the wastage norms. After due deliberation, the Committee decided to fix the scrap wastage norms in this case as per comments of DPIIT vide U.O. No.P-47011/46/2021-TSW dated 21.08.2023 (Copy enclosed). RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. 

**==> picture [153 x 143] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
se ,<br>gat xax SOSWot5 a Froese oA geae<br><i inde ei . Gener aba ay te<br>ot pete art ao Fores nore?<br>Te<br>atoGenes 4, of Crea<br>copentTat [DOPI eaeeat og. indegusty<br>ek Famere? Oe ncio<br>WY ~ ot CO cont ait<br>ON ah “pew<br>a eae :<br>Syo? pre<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


| 

P-47011/5/2024I SW 

‘40047 /2024

## AT BLATT 

Say Bartlet she staan carurg Pasar Government of India Ministry of Commerce & Industry Department for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade (Technical Support Section) 

Subject: Application from M/s Mach Aero Components Private Limited, Bangalore (EOU) for fixation of Scrap/ Wastage norms for the manufacture of Aeronautical components in terms of para 6.06 (e) of Hand Book of Procedures (HBP). therewith DGFT (DES -1) may kindly refer to their email dated 10.01.2024 forwarding Bangalorean application received from M/s Mach Aero Components Private Limited, Aeronautical(EOU), for fixation of Scrap/Wastage norms for the manufacture of components in terms of para 6.06 (e) of Hand Book of Procedures (HBP). 2. Firm, an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) is engaged in the manufacture of Aeronautical components which involves high wastages. 3. After physical inspection of the unit on 15.09.2021 for evaluation of the wastage norms of the products manufactured by the firm, MSME-DI, Bangalore has summited a detailed report on the wastage generated for the manufacture of various components manufactured by the firm and it is recommended that the report submitted by MSME-DI may be accepted for fixation of scrap wastage norms for various components for the EOU, in terms of para 6.06(e) of Hand Book of Procedures(HBP). Norms committee may take a view. (SK. dain) Fa Consultant , Tel: 28063166 Email: sushilk.jain@nic.in 

DGFT(Sh. Santosh Kumar Dubey, Dy. DGFT, DES-1) DPIIT U.O. No.: P-47011/5/2024-TSW dated 17.01.2024 

, 

P-4/011/46/ 2021-1 SW 

3131/2023 

~

## HIT AAI 

sar Bata He arate carary fast Government of India Ministry of Commerce & industry Department for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade (Technica! Support Section) 

Subject: M’s MSS India Private Limited, Nashik, (EOU) for fixation of Scrap Wastage norms for the year 2022 -23, in terms of para 6.06(e) of Hand Book of Procedures(HBP).

## Reference: D.G.F.T F..No. 01/87/0008/AM23-24/DES-1 dated 14.08.2023. 

1. DGFT (DES -1) may kindly refer to their email dated 14.08.2023 forwarding therewith an application received from M/s MSS India Private Limited. Nashik (EOU). for fixation of Scrap Wastage norms for the scrap arising out of production process during the year 2022 -23 in terms of para 6.06(e) of Hand Book of Procedures (HBP). 

2. Firm, an Export Oriented Unit (EOQU) is engaged in the manufacture of various components mainiy for electrical industries. There are a large number of components and main raw materials used in the manufacture of various electrical components are Copper bars/rods’ fiats’strips/sheets’foil/wire, Aluminium rods/bars Flats. Brass rods/strips/ Sheets, Lead Ingots. Cooper cables. Steel Rods’Strips, Plastic Moulding Granules é@ic. 

3. In line-with their earlier scarp wastage norms, it is recommended that scrap wastage norms for various components for Electrical industry, for the year 2022-23 may be fixed for the EQU. in terms of para 6.06(e) of Hand Book of Procedures(HBP}, as per Annexure, duly certified by the Chartered Account, Chartered Engineer and their Jurisdictional Custom Authorities . 

Norms Committee may take a view. 

Encl: Annexure (attested) 

**==> picture [130 x 48] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
eg<br>— ail gta<br>(S.K. Jain) ‘J<br>Consultant<br>Tel: 23063166<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Email: sushilk.jain@nic.in

lly omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
eg<br>— ail gta<br>(S.K. Jain) ‘J<br>Consultant<br>Tel: 23063166<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Email: sushilk.jain@nic.in 

DGFT(Santosh Kumar Dubey.Dy.DGFT. DES-!) DPIIT U.O. No.: P-47011/46/2021-TSW dated 21 08.2023 

L 

**==> picture [502 x 716] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
| 3“ihiie = m tt = |f +o {eT= 7 [] =a) [ie~2iot; oO§ ‘<br>a | c.{8 a FSa g =.3 43 g “3181 2<br>ASI e/ (8) | 2 g = | (3) | 8 = | | : alg= Ss><br>fs) a g} fol] s a 2 | j@| | 2 a | |s#lel ¥<br>. % 9 a 0 & 9 2 eS “3/8} 8<br>BA g g | iz > z a /; /3/ { & g - gf8} ®<br>tlhe 3 g | |§ 3 & 9. | [ai | g eBlal ¢<br>LP 3 g é ie SI a<br>LOO_ -§ “Val F<br>MAR . |<br>faee zO i 3<br>a Sas VN)Jel [8] Ile[8 8 || gas |] es2 |:lal | & eiPalsa [ffs<br>Fad g 3! |p 9 § peo ee |<br>. el eT | Ele) (elite! ees! gl LIE] BRL) ae] = 32.<br>aig! |&) fela/*| jaieleg) lelaeel (8 a] lzlolgie] jc Be} = Be<br>Ple| {3} /8/3)z] |FB2i2| |P\8la| 8 | [s(Siglay |esie 85<br>als} |& ole! |o Bl f2isis| |g 2 BY ia) jsBle >F<br>ei*| ja) | (ala) (3) |) leary | a! |Blel (Bt alt A<br>KS A AY<br>by FY >»4 3 a“| |@ &.3 8 BD “% “| =3<br>z= @ 7 ee 3 .<br>a : O]s: &<br>ON *8EP IJWL& | | 2 s pla} jw |+ |B) /&35) || 2 :<br>Owes el alle! (eleieie) (ate) (Bl | | Sl tslelelSy { i<br>vse Nh a fe} Q ao Wi w : H j<br> says ty 5] [Sis/8| (RiSi8/5) (88/8) (2) lsial8! (gigigi3] | .. 5<br>SE .<br>Qs ; gk] :<br>“\ 71.

) || 2 :<br>Owes el alle! (eleieie) (ate) (Bl | | Sl tslelelSy { i<br>vse Nh a fe} Q ao Wi w : H j<br> says ty 5] [Sis/8| (RiSi8/5) (88/8) (2) lsial8! (gigigi3] | .. 5<br>SE .<br>Qs ; gk] :<br>“\ 71. & gry<br>2 |<br>~ > \ : ee<br>ye NY | i) :<br>7 x ka :<br>« a e |) eS<br>*, le<br>BY oY =| :<br>gaaea_ OB |p |<br>a 99ABBs ruse auael COUEEUSESEESBEGHic<br>eleco@a4em | \ TY Ish | tel ial ie lellel (al |) lel Gel al“.  a ;<br>ae ~(3] [8 S| }8/8isle| [2/88 (8) [elela) (aja/tig stole er<br>zat ale, 1a) |y 2s =<br>no : ale a! jaiaisia| | | | @si7ezozveezocz<br>Rae] fae; faz : 64764 oD id ’ « ¥* ogg 1 3<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


a 

**==> picture [520 x 720] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
L adhah | ari eheaken ie — T Siealre) n n| .<br>DaLe> rya] fg) | £| fm!(él [oO glee)wi eae<br>+ 2% a 8 gs] 13 ) ala &<br>2 % Ey a >| |e 5 eon = 4<br>é ey a; || [3 g | gis) &<br>SONS | #| |¢] | * & ‘Slay s<br>ac al | § lal 8<br>fa.

ealre) n n| .<br>DaLe> rya] fg) | £| fm!(él [oO glee)wi eae<br>+ 2% a 8 gs] 13 ) ala &<br>2 % Ey a >| |e 5 eon = 4<br>é ey a; || [3 g | gis) &<br>SONS | #| |¢] | * & ‘Slay s<br>ac al | § lal 8<br>fa. Mews ee EI 2<br>b, 2ay \ye\\] S| | g feed 8<br>oOeo 233we Te JT) aDS) %g 55 fey“gS [aes 8Q<br>A286 oy 8 ~| (8 2 8 , :<br>: me Weg 9 Oo 3 re oe £ ¥<br>Ps z| lal] la 5] 19/5 |8 ag ib 24<br>RY 4 S| (ig) ig} a) | lBPizal SL Z<br>If B ¥ el el | *) 8) | Bh zs<br>ef 2!eaN e\g| |g eS eet<br>Gy 2 Ay 8:2 x z<br>Anis « S32 | lo Bae 8<br>| 8 ale a} lala| [Be 3<br>POPPE CEE 5<br>;<br>|<br>f be.)<br>Sr yen oe: i at<br>* ba<br>a] i<br>Ps t<br>; a = re prt bord<br>ay x 8) |S & ahSOP s : }<br>t x<br>ty SED) F ae :<br>oy te al<br>3 a a 3 ae ey :<br>F oon pre i}<br>iS giez4 SERRE ERE A<br>a<br>a hes 245.4 S| ja} (a8 a/§/8/2|/8/8 3 <,<br>3ag" al lal thal be TL ES<br>— IMs Abdsbor ATiove ig) |e -f "| NBBL/€202/8E 562 |<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6936 --apply.