DGFT Minutes

DIRECTORAttE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE (DES‐lSEC丁10N) MINUttES OF THE NORMS COMMITTEEJ MEETING NO.NCノ1ノMEETノOcυ202122/7(Offline Cases)DATED 16.11.2021 Meelng No NC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7(Offline cases)of the Norms Committee(NC― |)fOr the llcensing year 2021-2022 was held on 16 11 2021 under the Chairmanship of Shri Akash Taneja,Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to considerthe app‖ catlons under Duty Exemp‖ on/Remission Schemes(Chapter_4)of the app‖ cable Foreign ttrade PoHcy and the Handbook of Procedures tthe fo‖ owing Members of the Cornmittee were present in the meetlngi― Name of the representatives & their Designation ■11に‖蝸H議「Ⅷ器電 :悧T 0: lphl Sり31,h Ku甲o「,90nSЧ ltent(T9oい「1) Consultant 4. ] $hri V.C- Agarwal, Consultant (Tech-3) Consultant Consultant DGF丁 Note:

1. For information of exporters, Norms Committee-l handles all cases pertaining to fixation/ratification of norms for Export products on Engineering items falling under ITC(HS) Chapter 81 to 84, 86 to 93. Communications in respect of cases/pertaining to NC-l may be sent to email address: nc1.dgft@nic.in
2. ln certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/ Observations/Deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The scanned copies uploaded are to be accepted. The U.O. No./O.M No of the scanned copy is reflected in the minutes.
3. The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspecUwastage norms.

copies uploaded are to be accepted. The U.O. No./O.M No of the scanned copy is reflected in the minutes. 3. The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspecUwastage norms. While redeeming the applications, RA should check that the applicant has fulfilled all requirements as prescribed in policy/procedure including those in Policy Circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for EODC. 4. Wherever the Committee has fixed norms, the RAs should allow inputs as per wastage norms approved or as applied, whichever is less. The minutes of Meeting No.NC/1/MEET/OcI/20212217 held on 16.11.2021 were circulated on 21.12.2021amongst the members of the Committee and finalized. Decision taken on each of the cases is enumerated as below: 1 1 DHI MeitY ln Attendance Meeting No.: NC/1/MEEf Dctl2O212217 (Oftline Cases) Meeting

Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/OcU2O2122tT (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.'l'1.2021

Case No 36ノ21ノ80…ALC2/2016

M NoiNC/1ノMEET/Oct/202122/7(Offline Cases)dated 16 11.2021 _____ Lic No:0310808954 Datei 03 11 2016 HQ No:01/80/050/00496/AM17 Case history:丁he case was relected in Meeting No 04/80-ALC2/2017dated 23 05 to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DIPP vide UO No.121131201 M′s Navkar Fittings&Forgings Pvt.Ltd. Subjecti Request for ixation of ad― hoc norrns Status: Deferred 2017 due 7-TSVV/81 dated O2lO3t2O17. However, the applicant had furnished the reply with a request to reconsider their case for fixation of the ad-hoc norms. The applicant's representation was foruvarded to MSME on 28.11.2018 followed by lD reminders on 17.09.2019, 10.01 .2020 & 06.03'2020for expediting the comments. On the advice of the representative of MSME, the case was fonrvarded to DPIIT on 04.01 .2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P- 47011tBt2O21-TSW dated 10.03.2021 had informed that the applicant's reply is incomplete. As decided in the Meeting No. O2|BO dated 16.06.2021, deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021'. 1 Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. Weight of each Export Product. Weignt of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated.

enous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along wiih details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw materiil proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/d rawi ngs etc. Detailed calculations for the quantities of import items. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021& 10.11.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to issue the final reminder to the applicant.

Case No 2ノ4ノ80‐ALC2ノ2015

M NoiNC/1/MEE丁/Ocν202122/7 CaSettdated_竺翌 υl Case history: ln the Meeting No. 11l80 date 30.11.2018, the representative tat市e of MS 2018 型L2上上 nOrmS maJ⊇⊆lxp生9n the basis of DIPP recommendatton vide No 07/9/2016-丁SW dt Sl.No.02 21, , ,, ,". Meeting No.: NC/'tlMEETlOctl2O2122l7 (Oflline Cases) Meeting Date: 15.11.2021 Case is deferred. M/s Terumo Penpol Ltd.

Subject: Request for fixation of

ad-hoc norms Lic.No i 5310008377 dated 28 05 2009

08.12.2017 for License No. 5310019514 dt. 05.10.2017 as ratified in Meeting No. 16/80 dated 14.11.2017. However, the Committee observed that the description of export item in the subject application does not exactly match with the recommendation of DIPP and therefore, MSME was requested to provide comments. Based on the deliberations & as per advice of MSME, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech -1) may look into the matter. Hence, the case was referred to Consultant (Tech -1) on 16.'10.2019 for examination & comments. Consultant (Tech-1) informed that a similar case of the applicant had already been referred to PLEXCONCIL and Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days'time to reply the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. PLEXCONCIL was reminded on 12.02.2020 for the expediting the matter PLEXCOUNCIL's reply was received and foruvarded to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2020 for examination of the case. However, Gonsultant (Tech-1) informed in the meeting that PLEXCONCIL reply mentions Acetic Anhydride as the export product, which does not make any sense. Also, a D.O. Letter was sent to JS, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 30.07.2020 to provide their comments in the matter at the earliest.

the export product, which does not make any sense. Also, a D.O. Letter was sent to JS, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 30.07.2020 to provide their comments in the matter at the earliest. Subsequently, a reminder along with copy of application was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 09.03.2021 for examination & comments. As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated'16.06.2021, a reminder was issued on 02.08.2021. Further, as decided in meeting dated 02.09.2021, the reminder was issued on 29.09.2021. However, no information has been received so far. Decision. Therefore, the Committee decided to issue final reminder [Letter] to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals for expediting the comments. Case is deferred.

Case No 26ノ11′ 80¨ALC2/2016

M No.: NC/1/MEETI OcU20212217 (Offline Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Llc No:0510398701 dated 01 06 2017 HQ No:01/80/050/00299/AM17 RLA No:05/23/040/00101/AM17 M/s Dee Development Engineers Ltd.

Subject: Request for fixation of

ad-hoc norms Status: Deferred Case history: The case was rejected in the Meeting No.09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non- submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DHl. The case was reconsidered in M. No. 07180 dated 22.10.2020 and it was decided to send a deficiency letter to the applicant as per comments of DHl. ln response to DL, applicant's reply dated 23.11.2020, was sent to DHI on 01.12.2020. DHI informed that the applicant's reply had Appendix 4K dated 04.06.2016 only and not contained information as sought in M" No. 07180 dated 22.10.2020 (Held on 23.10.2020). Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02180 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021'for furnishing the following information:

1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/d rawi ngs etc.
2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product. 31『)3 8 0 Meeting No.:NCノ 1ノMEETノOcぜ202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

pported by documentary evidence/d rawi ngs etc. 2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product. 31『)3 8 0 Meeting No.:NCノ 1ノMEETノOcぜ202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

Decisioni tthe Cornmittee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 24.09.2021 for examination and comments. The representative'ot DHI informed that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. SI.No.04 M. No.: NC/1iMEET I OcU20212217 (Offline M/s Dee DeveloPment Engineers Ltd.

Subject: Request for fixation of

ad-hoc norms Lic No 1 0510398216 dated 13 04 2016 HQ Noi01/80/050/00180/AM17 RLA No:05/23/040/00015/AM17 l\Lr\ rrv.. I lommittee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was reject"a in Meeting No.09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised ny Otne. However, the firm had furnished the reply with a request to re- open .rs" and fix the id-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 20.10.2020. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that applicant's reply against the deficiency letter raised by DPIIT was sent on 05.11.2020.DP||T vide U. O. No. P- +1OlltZOtt2O1g-TSW dated 23.11.2020 had informed that the applicant's reply is incomplete. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02180 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on '17.08.2021for furnishing the following information.

1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.
2. Weight of each ExPort Product.
3. Weignt of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

ed. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw materiJl proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Quantity of export item in meters also in addition to its weight. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply dated 31.08"2021 was foruvarded to DPIIT on 31 .08.2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011t301t2019-TSW dated 20.09.2021 informed that the applicant's reply is incomplete. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant to furnish the following information as per the comments of DPIIT:

1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated.

enous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imporled input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be 'ocured from sources other than t堕墜:enSel」kttL_mttalsO be_indlCated_ ５ ６ ７ 4 | Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOctl202122t7 (Oftline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021

Case No 21ノ6′ 80¨ALC2ノ2016

dated 16 11 2021

Quantity of export item in meters also to its weight. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. I to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights. Case is deferred. M No: NC/1/MEE丁/ Ocν202122/7 (Offline Cases) dated 16112021 M/s TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd.

Subject: EOU- M/s. TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd., LOP

No. PER 076/EOUA/SEzuHYD|201'1 dated 25 07 2011 for fixation of wastage norms for export product "Helicopter cabin kits & parts and accessories for Aircraft" against import items 1. Stainless Steel bars/rods 2. Stainless Steel Tube/Pipes 3. Stainless Steel round bars Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DIPP on 10.07 .2018 and to DHI on 03.08.2018 for their examinations/comments. Since, they had stated that the export product is not under the purview of DIPP/ DHl, it was fonruarded to MSME on 18.03.2019 followed by reminders on 24.09.2019, 10.01.2020 & 12.02.2020. A deficiency letter (To provide excel sheet of calculations) was sent to the applicant as per comments of MSME received via email dated 22.10.2020. The applicant's reply was sent to MSME on 18.11.2020 to examine the case. MSME via email dated 16.06.2021 has asked to submit certain information. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02180 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 'for furnishing the following information :

1. To submit step-wise calculation for all products.
2. To submit MSME-DI wastage reporVSEZ wastage report, if any. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply dated 10.08.2021 was fonvarded to MSME for examination & comments on 11 .08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021 & 10.11.2021. However, no comments have been received yet.

t the applicant's reply dated 10.08.2021 was fonvarded to MSME for examination & comments on 11 .08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021 & 10.11.2021. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred.

Case No 27ノ9ノ80‐ALC2′ 2017

２ ３ ４ M No : ruclilHlrrr t o,cizozl22l7 (ofline Mノs TERUMO PENPOL PRIVATE LIMITED Lic No i 5310019417 dated 15 06 2017 f-fO. f..lo.: 01780/050/0OZOSInMta 1 Subject: Request for re-fixaiion RLA No:53/24/040/00003/AM18 of ad-hoc norms was approved in Meeting No. 03/80 dated 09.05.2018 as perwritten comments of DIPP (TSW section) vide letter No.: 07/9/2016-TSW dated 08.122017. However, the applicant requested to re-fix the norms and to allow them for Personal Hearing. Si.No.05 HQ No: 01/80/162/301ノAM18/ DES-1 Si.No.06 5 | F;i g e Meeting No.: NG/'llMEETlOctlZO2122l7 lOtlline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 dated 16 11 2021

The appliiani appeired for PH in f,lC Meeting 09/BO dated 14.0g 2O1g anA explained the reason for higher wastage claims. Based on the deliberations, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech- 1) would look into the matter. Consultant (Tech-1) pointed out that applicant is iequesting to increase the wastage norms for PVC compound from 10% to 16% on the basis of Departmint of Chemicals & Petrochemicals suggestion vide letter dated 10.09.2012 for amending the SION H-67 and AA of the applicant had been ratified based on SION H-67 which allows foi only 10%. Consultant (Tech-1) suggested that PLEXCONCIL may be requested to provide Production/Consumption data of other manufacturers. The case was referred to irUgXCOtrtClL, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 18.10.2019 & 05.112019 respectively. However, PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days' time to repiy the query.

to irUgXCOtrtClL, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 18.10.2019 & 05.112019 respectively. However, PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days' time to repiy the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. The-Committee noted that Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals and pLEXCONCIL were reminded on 12.02.2020 for expediting the matter. PLEXCONCIL's reply was received and fonrvarded to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2020 for examination. However, Consultant (Tech-1) informed in the meeting that PLEXCONCIL reply mentions Acetic Anhydride as the export product, which does not make any sense. Also, a D.O. Letter was sent to JS, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 30.07.2020 to provide their comments in the matter at the earliest. Further, a copy of application was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 09.03.2021 for examination & comments. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02l80dated 16.06.2021, a reminder was issued on 02.08.2021. Further, as decided in meeting dated 02.09.2021, another reminderwas issued on29.09.2021. However, no information has been received so far. Decision. Therefore, the Committee decided to issue a final reminder (letter) to of Chemicals & Petrochemicals for expediting the comments. Department Case is deferred.

Case No :No.:9/12/80‐ ALC2/2017

Status: Deferred M No : NC/1/MEET t OctllO21z)ti lOrntne Mノs SMC PNEUMATICS(INDIA) PRiVATE LIMITED 14072017 HQ No101/80/050/00223/AM18

Subject: Request for re-fixation of

RLA Noi05/24/040/00172/AM18 ad-hoc norms the applicant had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the recommendation of Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to DPIIT on 08.07.2020 as similar cases were examined/ recommended by them. However, DPIIT on O2.Og.2O2O requested for some additional information and the same were sent to DPIIT on 07.1O.zO2O.Also, some other information received from the applicant was forwarded to DPIIT on 16.10.2020.As decided in the Meeting No. 02180 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021for furnishing the following information as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47012128912018-TSW dated 10.12.2020'

1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. Weight of each Export Product. from the ification of the 'oduct basic calculation as to how of raw O I I Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOctl2O2122t7 (Otfline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 堕19→04ed 16111 2021 ２ ３

f each Export Product. from the ification of the 'oduct basic calculation as to how of raw O I I Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOctl2O2122t7 (Otfline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 堕19→04ed 16111 2021 ２ ３

material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. However, the applicant's reply was fonruarded to DPIIT on 12.08.2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No.' P-47011128912018-TSW dated 31.08.2021 informed that the applicant's reply was incomplete. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information.

1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.
2. Weight of each Export Product.
3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 4" Brass Bar blank size and weight thereof supported by size & weight of component (Body B) to be manufactured- export product wise.

stification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 4" Brass Bar blank size and weight thereof supported by size & weight of component (Body B) to be manufactured- export product wise. 5. Cutting allowance and end cutting loss on brass bar. Reply from applicant was received and sent to DPllT. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DPIIT on 11.10.2021 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. M. No.: NC/1/MEET/ Octl202122l7 (Offline Cases)dated 1 6.112021

Case No.:13′ 16ノ80-ALC2′2017

Lic No ノdate:0310815484 Datei 01092017 HQ No:01′80/050/00276/AM18 RLA No:03ノ95/040/00052/AM18 MノsL&T…MHPS TURBINE GENERATORS PRiVATE LIMITED

Subject: Request for review

and fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history:The case was releCted in Meeting No 06/80-ALC2/2018 datedl1 07 2018 on the ground that the parts of the import items given (Unit of Measurement) in sets and numbei of parts in each set and their composition is not known. The Committee found that it was very difficult to enforce accountability and rejected the case. However, the applicant had requested for review of the case. The firm had 7 | Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOctt2O2122l7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 15'11-2021 lven

representation dated 25.02.2019 enclosing a statement giving composition along with unit of measurement in numbers against each set of imported items. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was sent to DH! for examination on 21 .02.2020 followed by a reminder on 15.10.2020. Further, reply of deficiency received from the applicant was sent to DHI via email on 14.06.2021 to examine the case. DHI has given their comments dated 16.11 .2021. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the comments dated 16.11.2021 given by DHl. The Committee observed that DHI has recommended very high wastage for certain import items. However, name of raw material & shape are not mentioned in the description of import items neither in ANF- 4AlCondition Sheet nor in the comments of DHl. Therefore, the Committee decided to get clarification on the same from the applicant & DHI for the import items at Sl. Nos. 13, 22, 48 to 53, 79 to 82,85 to 88, 327 & 328 Case is deferred.

Case No:53′ 2ノ80-ALC2ノ2016

M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7 Offline Cases) dated 16,11.2021 Mノs ALS丁OM iNDiA L:MITED Lic No /date:0310795652 Datei 30042015 HQ No101/80/050ノ00056/AM17/

Subject: Request for fixation of

RLA No:03/94ノ040/00060/AM16/ ad-hoc norms Case history: The case was rejected in M. No.20I80-ALC212016 datedO3.01.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 24.1O.2016 raised by DHl. The applicant vide letter dated 28.09.2019 had requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking following information was received from DHI and sent to the applicant via email dated 16.08.2021'. t. Copy of complete set of application. z. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 16.08.2021 followed by reminder on 27.09.2A21. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days. 81■ I Meeting No.:NC/1′ MEETノOct/202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:1611.2021

| I Case is deferred.

Case No:4r8ノ80-ALC2′2018

M No:NC/1/M EETノNov/202122/7 Offllne Cases) dated 16 11 2021 M′s CHIRAC UDYOG Lic No /date:0510406909 Date: 19062018 HQ No101ノ80/050/00127/AM19

Subject: Request for re-

RLA No:05/23/040/00141/AM19/ 1
輌xation of ad― hoc norms Case history: 丁he case was approved in M No 10/80-ALC2/2019 datedl1 09 2019 based on inputs given by the Technical Authorities present in the meeting. The applicant vide letter dated 21 10.2019 had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the applicant on 12.10.2020. The applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 06.01 .2021 for examination of the case. Consultant (Tech-3) via email dated 13.06.2021 had informed that the applicant's reply dated 23.11.2020 is incomplete. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02180 dated 16.06.2020, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3):

1. To provide sheet layout along with dimensions and detailed calculations of wastage. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 13.09.2021 for examination & comments.

d calculations of wastage. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 13.09.2021 for examination & comments. However, Consultant (Tech-3) informed via email dated 15.11.2021 that the applicant's reply is incomplete and wastage may not be enhanced due to the following reasons: Photographs of export products are only given without drawings. Sheet layouts are also photographs only and there were no dimension and detai led calcu lations. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case. M No:NC/1ノMEETノOct/202122/7 Mノs GE POWER INDIA LIMITED Offline Cases) dated 16 11 2021 Lic.No /date:0310821275 Date: １ ２ 9 | ir',r 3 r,r Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl202122l7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 Case is rejected. Status: Rejected

Case No.:23′ 8ノ80…ALC2′2018

28.05.2018 HQ Noi01/80/050/00146/AM19

Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc

norms Case history: 丁he case was relected in Meeting No 4ノ80-ALC2′2019 dated22.O5.2}19 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 28.12.2018 raised by DHI The applicant vide letter dated 27.09.2019 had furnished the reply and requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was inadvertently forwarded to MSME who advised referring the case to DHI for examination. The case was referred to DHI on 31.10.2020. As per comments of DHI and as decided in the Meeting No.02180 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

1. Complete application with all annexure.
2. Copy of the NC decisions in chronological order.
3. All the replies of deficiencies letters in chronological order.
4. Copy of deficiency letter issued by NC Decision: As no decided to send a within 15 days. Case is deferred.

Case Noi 21/14/80¨ ALC2/2018

M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7 Qrline ca,9S)dat9d 16 11 2021 reply has been received yet from the applicant, the committee reminder letter to the applicant to furnish the requisite information M/s MANN AND HUMMEL FILTER PVT.LTD. Deferred Lic No /date1 071 011 01 90 Datel 29072016 HQ No101/80/050/00337/AM19 RLA Noi07/24/040/00144ハMI__ 」___ _ hOC norms Iヽ ― ]ヽυ V′ ′4¬ V可 V′ VV:T r′ ′ "■11, __
」 ____ _ _ __ ~~~ ~~― ― ―
― ― - 1-― ― ―

― ― ― Case history:丁he Cornrnittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case 品菖こЪ `岳 3し出 in Mee‖ ng No 14/80-ALC2/2018 dated20 02 2019 on the recommendalon of representative of【〕Hl.The applicant vide letter dated 1 8 12 201 9 had requested for re― fixation of ad―hoc norrTls The CornrYlittee reconsldered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fon″ard to DHl on 06 10 2020 for exarnination&cornrnents As decided in the Meetlng No 02/80 dated 16 06 2021, as per comrnents of DHI)a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06 08 2021 forfurnlshing the fo‖ owing inforrnationi l Complete application with a‖ annexure 2 Copy ofthe NC decisions in chronologlcal order 3 A‖ the replies of deficiencies letters in chronological order 4 Copy of deficiency letterissued by NC Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27.0g.2U21& 10.1-1 .2021 However, no reply has been received as yet.

er the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27.0g.2U21& 10.1-1 .2021 However, no reply has been received as yet. Hence, the Committee 10 I : , Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOcll202122t7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date:16.11.2021 |

decided to issue the iinal reminder io the applicant for furnishing the reply wittrin 15 days Case is deferred. S:.No.13 Mノs TPP BOiLERS PV「.LTD

Subject: Request for fixation of

ad-hoc norms

Case Noi34ノ2/80… ALC2ノ2016

M ru o : ru c7 rv r rii o {v zozt i)ri-(oitiie Lic No /date:0310801039 Dated 15122015 HQ No:01ノ80ノ050/00037ノAM17 RLA No:03/95/040/00696/AM16 Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 02180 dated26.04.20'16as per comments of DHl. The applicant vide letter dated 29.07.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonivard to DHI on 07.10.2020 for examination & comments. As decided in the Meeting No. 02180 dated 16.06.2021, as per comments of DHl, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

1. Complete application with ANF 48 with all annexure.
2. Copy of the NC dectsions in chronological order.
3. All the replies of deficiencies letters in chronological order.
4. Copy of deficiency letter issued by NC. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was received and forwarded to DHI on 26.08.2021. The representative of DHI informed that the applicant's reply did not contain responses of above mentioned deficiencies. Therefore, the Committee decided to issue a final reminder to the applicant asking them to furnish the relevant & justified reply of the above mentioned deficiencies. Case is deferred. 階鷲な:協:£麗メ胤/― ― | ― ― 一

― ― ― ―

―

― ―

―

― 一 ‐

― | M/s GEA Process Engineering, Vadodara

Subject: Request for fixation of ad-

• --[qq.!p!rs- Case history: The applicant has stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No. KASEZ100%EOU/|l/08/09-10111623 dated 23.11.2009 are the Member of EPC for EOUs and KSEZs. The applicant has stated that the company is an EOU unit and it is registered with Kandla Special Economic Zone (KASEZ) and there is a requirement by KASEZ that EOU unit needs to fix the norms of its export product. The applicant vide their representation dated 11.01.2020 had requested for fixation of inpuUoutput Norms for the imporUexport products. The Committee considered the case and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 08.09.2020 for examination of the case. As per comments of MSME received via email dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.2021 for furnishing the following information :

1. A copy of complete set of application. MSME― DI e/SEZ 11 I , , ,, Meeting No.: NC/1/MEEI Dcil202122t7 (Ottline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11-2021 Status: Deferred

ishing the following information :

1. A copy of complete set of application. MSME― DI e/SEZ 11 I , , ,, Meeting No.: NC/1/MEEI Dcil202122t7 (Ottline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11-2021 Status: Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by MSME was issued to the applicant on 27.09.2021. The applicant via email dated 28.09.2021 informed that their unit is not registered under MSME Act, 2006. Therefore, they do not have any MSME-DI wastage report issued by MSME Authority and also such waitage report is not issued by KASEZ Authority. Further, it was noted that the case has already been ieferred to MSME. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments from MSME Case is deferred

Case No- 12lt+leO-alC2l2}18

i t Status: -_- .- ,-] ivr. r,lo: r,lclrlrrrrrErl r.rov tiflzzt- lotnine-- I ruls rll LIMITED I Deferred … ― ― ―

― 一 Lic No i 0210208845 dated ll 12 2018 HQ No:01ノ80/050/00328ノAM19 ntn rrto b7zryo+oloot ionMte _- -L- liryr!.on {q9-!9qI9ry9 - L-- - Case historf Tfre Commiftee-consiOerea ttre case as per the agenda and noted that the case was ratified by NC in its Meeting No. 14180 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.: DES-1fflLL/OTRS-1-2019-HEl dated 19.02.2019.However, the applicant vide their representation dated 27.10.2019 received on 1'1 .11.2020 has stated that the norms ratified by NC in respect of above AA, item No. 142 was deleted on the plea that the same was not certified as parl of export product as per Appendix 4E. They have mentioned that this is a typographical error on their part and Sl. No 142i.e. Variable Disp Pump - Altered -1 No. is very much required for manufacturing of their export item i e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis. Now the applicant has requested to allow import item at serial No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump - Altered Part No. H4194402100 -1 No. on net to net basis. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 16.06.2021and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on 1'1.'1 1.2021for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed that the case is under examination.

ee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on 1'1.'1 1.2021for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. l.No.16 M No:NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7(Offline M/s TIL LIMITED SubieCt:Request for re― RLA No,, O2l24lO4OlOO109lAM19 fixation of ad-hoc norms 1 was ratified by NC in its Meeting No. 14180 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.: DES-1fflLL/OTRS-1-20'1g-HEl dated 19.02.2019.The applicant vide their representation dated 27.10.2019 received on 1'1 .11.2020 has stated that the norms ratified by NC in respect of above AA, item No. 142 was deleted on the plea that the same is not certified as part of export product as per appendix 4E. They have mentioned that this is a typographical error on their and SI No 142 ie Vattao19 pi,p PЧ ttp一ハ|!9reO「l N9 1,VOry mЧ pb r9qり1堅,0 12 | i:r, ,r 11 1 Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl202122l7 (Offline Gases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 No: dated 16 11 2021 Lic No i 0210208842 dated ll 12 2018 Noi 01/80/050/00326/AM19

,VOry mЧ pb r9qり1堅,0 12 | i:r, ,r 11 1 Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl202122l7 (Offline Gases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 No: dated 16 11 2021 Lic No i 0210208842 dated ll 12 2018 Noi 01/80/050/00326/AM19

for manufacturing their export item i.e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis. Now the applicant has requested to allow import item at serial No. 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump - Altered Part No. H41944O2100 -'1 No. on net to net basis. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 16.06.2021 and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on '1 1.11.2021 for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred Si.No.17

Case No:39/27/80¨ALC2/2011

M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Ocυ202122/7(Offline Mノs Bharat Heavy Electricals Lirnited Lic No /date:6110000728 Dated 27122011 HQ No:01/80/050/00572/AM12/ SubieCti Request for review and allowing six import items at SI Nos 217,218,219,229,230&234 RLA Noi61/24/040/00055/AM12 Case history: The Commrttee consrdered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was considered in various meetings of NC-'l and its decisions as under: Meeting No. 27180 dated 20.03.2012:The Committee fixed the ad-hoc norms as per comments of DHI vide U.O. Note dated 20.03.2012 and decided to ratify the norms of 2 units on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 6110000536 dated 01.12.2010. For 1 Unit, import items at Sl. Nos" 217 to 233 were deleted on being their Capital Goods nature. Meeting No. 14180 dated 01.10.2013: The Committee decided to amend earlier decision of NC dated 20.03.2012 and allowed all other items except import items at Sl. No. 217 to 219 & 228 to 230. (Six items were not allowed in terms of Policy Circular No. 50 dated 28 12 2011) Meeting No.09/15 dated 22.07.2014: The Committee decided, after deliberation the matter with Technical Authorities present in the meeting, to reiterate its earlier decision, Meeting No. 05/16 dated 09.06.2015: The Committee noted that the firm's representatives were called for personal hearing in the meeting dated 08.06.2015 to clarify their position on exporUimport items in their cases.

dated 09.06.2015: The Committee noted that the firm's representatives were called for personal hearing in the meeting dated 08.06.2015 to clarify their position on exporUimport items in their cases. The firm's representatives explained before the NC that items are components/raw materials (BTGs) and to substantiate their claim they submitted schematic diagram. Chairman, NC-1 clarified to them that these items (BTGs) are finished goods and not components/raw material as claimed by them and therefore, benefits of deemed exports would not be admissible for these items as per Circular No. 50 dated 28.12.2011. Meeting No. 14180 dated 19.12.2017: The Committee decided to refer the matter to Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) for consideration, being a policy issue. PRC in their Meeting 17lAM19 dated 25.09.2018: Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) went through the statement made by the firm in its application and decided to refer the issue to Policy Division-4 for examination and comments. Policy Division-4: PC-4 referred the matter to Policy-Vl Division. ＞ 　 　 り Ｖ 　 　 　 Ｖ vil) vill) Po:icy‐ Vi DivisionI Policy― VI Division vide their letter dated 12 12 2019 stated that the cases ofthe firm were placed by NC-2 before the P:C in its meeting held on 16.07.2019 wherein a decision has been taken. PC-4INC-1 may take similar action for a decision jn 131:。 (,、ξ Meeting No.:NCノ1ノMEETノOcV202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021 Ｄ 　 ｖ＞

held on 16.07.2019 wherein a decision has been taken. PC-4INC-1 may take similar action for a decision jn 131:。 (,、ξ Meeting No.:NCノ1ノMEETノOcV202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021 Ｄ 　 ｖ＞

this matter. ix) Meeting No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020: The Norms Committee noted that the firm had ' requestLd for revision of ad-hoc norms for six import items at Sl. No. 217,218,219,228, 229 & 230 and grant of deemed export benefits against the above six items. The Committee observed that the items in this case are different from that in the cases taken up in the PRC. Here, the items are Turbine, Generator and Tools. Further, The Committee observed that Turbine and Generator are capital Goods fitted as it is and the tools are for assembly. Hence, these items were not to be allowed and rejected the case. Now, the applicant vide representation dated 24.02.2021 has requested to review the case and to allow six items at Sl. No. 217, 218,219, 229, 230& 234 as well as grant of deemed export benefits against the above six items. They have represented that out of total 235 items, norms for six components (i) HP Bladed Rotor & HP Casing (ltem No. 217), (ii) lP Bladed Rotor & lP Casing (ltem No. 218), (ii) LP Bladed Rotor and LP Gasing (ltem No. 219), (iv) Generator Rotor (liem No. 229), (v) Generator Excluding Rotor (ltem No. 230), (vi) HP/ lP lnlet Segment for Casing (ltem No. 234) norms to be fixed. x; lVt. tto. O2l8O dated 16.06.2021:The Committee noted that the applicant's representation was foruvarded to DHI on 01.03.2021 for examination of the case.

r Casing (ltem No. 234) norms to be fixed. x; lVt. tto. O2l8O dated 16.06.2021:The Committee noted that the applicant's representation was foruvarded to DHI on 01.03.2021 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case was very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
2. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosure. x) M. No. NC/1 /MEEI t Jull2021 2212 (Otfline Cases) dated 02 09 2021. The Committee reconsidered the case in the presence of technical authority from DHI and decided to seek clear comments of DHl. Further, the advice of Policy-4 in view of the decision taken in NC meeting dated 22.10.2020 may also be obtained. ln the NC meeting held on 16.11.2021, BHEL was given PH to represent their case. DHI has also submitted their comments vide letter dated 16.11.2021. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and heard the firm's representatives (Shri S. Bandyopadhyay/GM, Shri Kunwar Rajesh/ Manager, Shri Amar Kumar/ DGM, Ms. Suparna Sivakumar/ DGM, Ms. Sonia Dalal Dhankar/ Manager, Shri Kalpak Kaplash/ Dy. Manager) attended in personal hearing. The firm's representatives informed the NC that these six components are not capital goods and are only parts of Turbines and Generators which themselves are part of Power Generating Sets (Export Product).

rm's representatives informed the NC that these six components are not capital goods and are only parts of Turbines and Generators which themselves are part of Power Generating Sets (Export Product). Further, they stated that the six imported components are not final or export products. DHl, in their letter dated 16.11.2021,had reiterated the comments as given earlierforthese six cases vide letter dated 31.10.2017. Further, the Committee observed the decisions of meeting Nos. 05/16 dated 09.06.2015 and No. O7l80 dated 22.10.2020 wherein it was clearly stated that these items (BTGs) are finished goods and not components/raw material as claimed by the applicant. lt was also stated that Turbine and Generator are capital Goods fitted as it is and the tools are for assembly. Therefore, these items were not to be allowed for the subject AA. The Committee also noted that the applicant has not brought out any new facts or justification in support of their request to fix the ad-hoc norms in respect of these six items at Sl. No. 217,218, zigi,22g,23O & 234. Therefore, the Committee decided to maintain the decrsion of Norms Committee-1 takerr in its meeting No. 07/80 dated 2210.2020. RA concerned m take further necessary action as per the decision of NC, 1411■ |,■ Meeting No.:NC′ 1ノMEETノOct/202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date1 16.11.2021

Si.No.18

Case No :64ノ11′ 80‥ALC2ノ2018

M No: NC/1/MEETI OcU20212217 (Oflline Lic No i 2210015975 Date:13092018 HQ No:01/80/050/00255/AM19 RLA No122/24/040/00048/AM19 MノslND‐SPHINX PRECIS10N LTD

Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-

hoc norms Case history: The Cornrnittee considered the case as perthe agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.13/80-ALC212018 dated 22.01 .2019 on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 2210015101 dated 10.10.2014 on the recommendation of the representative of DHI. However, the applicant had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that in Meeting No. 08/80dated05.11.2020, the comments of MSME were referred back for re-examination of the case on 2112.2020 followed by a reminder on 27.09.2021. However, no comments have been received yet. Decision: As no comments have been received as yet from MSME, the Committee decided to wait for the comments from MSME. Case is deferred.

Case No :17′ 19ノ80‐ALC2/2014

M J.lo. l.lC/1 /lVlEET/ OcU2 ollizii tOiitiie Cases■dated工■1.2021_____ MノsiND¨SPH:NX PRECISiON LTD. Lic No i 2210015101 Datei 10 10 2014 HQ No:01/80/050/00451/AM15 I Subject: Request for re-fixation of RLA No:22/24/040/00056/AM15 ad-hoc norms Ca-se hiatory: The Comlnittee consrderA irre Cise is-per Ge-aWnOa ffi approved in Meeting No. 22l80-4LC212015 dated 02.02.2}16as per written comments of MSME vide lD Note No.30 (199)/15-ME dated 30J2.2015.However, the applicant has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that in Meeting No. 08/80 datedO5.11.2020, the comments of MSME were referred back for re- examination of the case on 21.12.2020 followed by a reminder on 27.09.2021. However, no comments have been received yet. Decision: As no comments have been received as yet from MSME, the Committee decided to wait for the comments from MSME. Case is deferred.

Case No :12ノ7ノ80‐ALC2/2016

M NoiNC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7 Mノs HONDA TRAD:NG CORPORAT10N INDIA PV「.LTD. Offline Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Lic.No:0510398531 Datei 17 05 2016

Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc

norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 1'1180 dated 19.08.2017 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 26.04 2017 (raised by DHI). However, the applicant requested for review and Si.No.19 Si.No.20 HQ No:01/80/050/00233/AM17 RLA No:05/23ノ040ノ00053/AM17 15 | i:,:: 'r Meeting No.: NG/1/MEETIOIU2O2122I7 (OtflineCases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 Status: Deferred Status: Deferred Status: Deferred

fixation of norms tthe Committee reconsidered the case and Consultant(Tech… 3) informed via email dated 14.06.2021that the applicant's reply dated 03.03.2021 is incomplete as they have not replied to deficiency letter but referred to their earlier letters only. A deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08 .2021 lo furnish the following information as per advice of Consultant (Tech-3):

1. To explain why the consumption per unit in past is 1.448 gram while requirement in present case is given as 0.384 gram per unit.

the following information as per advice of Consultant (Tech-3):

1. To explain why the consumption per unit in past is 1.448 gram while requirement in present case is given as 0.384 gram per unit.
2. btrrting from th! specification of tn" export product, basic calculation as to how of raw materiJl proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components io Ue manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Decision; The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 2g.0-g.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the apflicant to furnish the requisite information within 15 days. Case is deferred No.21

Case No i30′ 33/80-ALC2/2009

Status: Deferred M. No.: NC/I/MEET I Ocll202122l7 (Offline 寵爺:譜諾轟懲訂27亜。 OΩ Hc≧No:01/8Q/050/00496/AMlp______

Subject: Request for review for

fixation of ad-hoc norms_-- RLA No:09/24/040′ 00184/AM10 Case history:The Cornrnittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case was reject"d in M"uting No. 48/80 dated 02.03.2010 due to non-submission reply of the deficiency later as raised"by DHl. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 29.01.2020 followed by reminder along with additional information received from applicant on '19.08.2020. However, a copy of applicaiion was again sent to DH.l on 17.12.2020 and 0.1 .04.2021. DHI vide letter dated ia.oa.zozl informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08 .2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order'
2. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosure' Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.202'1 followed by a reminder on 27.Og.202L However, no reply has been ieceived as yet.

he case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.202'1 followed by a reminder on 27.Og.202L However, no reply has been ieceived as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the apfticant to furnish the requisite information within 15 days. Case is deferred Mノs BHARAT HEAW ELECttRICALS LIMITED 15 | I ; , Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl2O2122l7 (Otlline cases) Meeting Date:16.11.2021

RLA No:09/24/040/00055/AM18

Case No 2ノ17ノ80¨ALC2ノ2017

Status: Deferred M No:NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7(Offline Mノs VEM TECHNOLOG:ES PVT. LTD. Lic No 1 0910065045 Datei 15 05 2017 HQ Noi01/80/050/00281/AM18

Subject: Request for review for

fixation of ad-hoc norms was rejected in Meeting No.05/80 dated 06.06.2019 dueto non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 14.01.2019as raised by DPllT. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the applicant on 20.01 .2020 followed by reminders on 22.09.2020,25.11.2020 & 14.06.2021.fhe applicant's reply was received via email dated 16.06.2021 & the same was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 17.06.2021'for examination & comments. Consultant (Tech-3)via email dated 06.08.2021 requested for sending the physical file of the case. Decision: The Committee considered the cases as per the agenda and noted that the physical file of the case was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 01.09.2021. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments. Case is deferred.

Case No 47ノ14/80‐ ALC2ノ2014

Lic No /datei 0710105249 dated 20062014 Mノs ALSTOM ttRANSPORT INDiA L:Mi丁ED RLA No:07/24/040/00092ノAM15 of ad-hoc norms. Case history: 丁he case was relected in Meeting No l1/80 dated 01 09 2015 due to non― submission reply of deficiency letter as raised by DHl. Thereafter, the applicant represented against the rejection and requested for a review. The case was again considered and deferred in Meeting no. 11119 dated 06.12.2018 with following decision: "The Committee noted that a personal hearing was already given to the applicant on 06.12.2018. ln the personal hearing the applicant informed the committee that it has taken various AA's for supply of 33 rail/tramway coaches. Fufther, applicant stated that it has taken an additional license for supplementary material required for these very 33 rail/tramway coaches. However, it has an additional export obligation of another 33 rail/tramway coaches in this license. The Committee observed that the given submission is not tenable. The committee decided fo seek a detailed repoft from the concerned RA regarding of all such /icenses issued to the applicant, admissibility and current sfafus. " ln response to Norm Committee's e-mail dated 23.04.2019, Addl. DGFT Bangalore informed that applicant has obtained several licenses, which are pending for the wants of norms and also informed about a letter from ECA-Il, DGFT, New Delhi seeking information ices followed by M/s Algtom Transport lndia. Si.No.23 17 | t, * g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETIOcA2O2122|7 (Offline Cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021 M. No..

from ECA-Il, DGFT, New Delhi seeking information ices followed by M/s Algtom Transport lndia. Si.No.23 17 | t, * g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETIOcA2O2122|7 (Offline Cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021 M. No.. NC/1/MEETI Odl2o2122l7 (Offline dated 16 11 2021 HQ No:01ノ80′050/00368ノAM15

Subject: Request to review &fixation

ln this matter, the committee noted that the applicant had approach the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) and the matterwas taken up vide Meeting No. 17lAM20 held on27.08.2019. The PRC noted the submissions by the applicant as under: "They have stated that initially, 7 Advance Authorizations were applied for duty free import of inpuis required for the manuiacture and suppty of 33 Metro Train sets to Chennai Metro Rail Limited being a deemed export project. AT|L sought amendment in all 7 Advance Authorizationi to inctude residual items that were required to manufacture the 33 Train sefs bul the request was rejected citing technical reasons by RA. Thereupon, ATIL was compelled to apply for additionil Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 for impofting iii[luat inputs that were missed out and not covered under earlier 7 Advance Authorizations. Acquisition of Atstom tndia timited who was the manufacturer of key sub-assemblies also lead to inctusion of components required for manufacture of sub-assemblies in the cap.tioned Advance Authorization. However, while applying for the said Advance Authorization (|th AA), export obligation of 33 Metro Train sets was declared inadverlently, as the system did not allow the applicint to apply for a new license unless the export obligation was declared. ln fact, there is no' separate EO inder the Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 as all imported inputs were used for manufacture of 33 train sets declared under previous 7 Advance /icenses.

, there is no' separate EO inder the Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 as all imported inputs were used for manufacture of 33 train sets declared under previous 7 Advance /icenses. The Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 under which parts required for manufacture of 33 Metro Trains have been imported has been issued after 22 months from the date of earliest Advance Authorization in the clubbing set. Hence, request is to treat the supp/ies of 33 Train sets fo the Metro Project supplied against Advance Authorizations as one and to discharge the EO. " The policy relaxation committee vide PRC Meeting No. 17lAM20 dated 27.08.2019 gave the following decision in the matter: "Decision: The Committee heard the submission made by the applicant and discussed the ,natte, at tength and decided to relax the conditions as laid down in Para a38 pi), (vii) and (xii) of HBP 2015-20 as amended vide Pubtic Notice No.70/2015-20 dated 30.01.2019 for clubbing of eight Advance Authorizations No.(i)0710090351 dated 21.08.2012, (ii)0710090531 dated 31.0A.2012, (iii)0710095554 dated 23.05.2013, (iv)0710096369 dated 02.07 2013, (v)0710096370 dated 02.07.2013, (vi)0710099232 dated 28.10.2013 and (vii)0710101246 dated 10.01.2014 and (viii) 0710105249 dated 20.06.2014. /f is subiect to verification that amendmenfs requesf of the applicant made in the AAs rlrzas reiected by the RA, as claimed by the applicant and all inputs imported in the I AAs are futly accounted for in the supplies.

ification that amendmenfs requesf of the applicant made in the AAs rlrzas reiected by the RA, as claimed by the applicant and all inputs imported in the I AAs are futly accounted for in the supplies. The other terms and conditions for clubbing shall remain sa/ne as per policy/HBP provisions. The applicant shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting." This Committee observed that the PRC has clubbed all the eight authorizations for imports and export purposes. Export obligation of AA No. 0710105249 dt. 20.06.2014 would remain as it is even aiter clubbing" Hence, the Committee in its Meeting No. 10/80 dated 11.O9"2019, asked the applicant to furnish following information:

1. To provide detailed statement to account for the inputs in the export products against this license.
2. Relevant technical drawings and wastage details may be provided in relevant formats for examination by the technical authorities for the purpose of fixation of norms. And also so clarification from the PRC ce‖ on 05 11 2019 the ex 18 | : ' Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOcll2O2122/7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11-2021

thorities for the purpose of fixation of norms. And also so clarification from the PRC ce‖ on 05 11 2019 the ex 18 | : ' Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOcll2O2122/7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11-2021

the eighth authorization if it would run concurrently with the export obligation of the first seven authorizations. PRC in its meeting no.23lAM20 dt. 03.12.2019, decided as follows: "The committee reviewed the case and observed that request of the applicant and minutes recorded in the earlier PRC decision were very clear. lt reiterated that in view of the submission made by the applicant, all the above 8 advance authorizations need to be clubbed for imports and exports purposes wherein export obligation of the 8th advance authorization no. 0710105249 dt. 20.06.2014 be treated as NIL as its EO is subsumed in the export obligation of the other 7 advance authorizations taken together. The applicant shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting for clubbing." The Committee noted in its Meeting No. 18/80 dated 02.01 .2020 that the applicant's reply dated 06.11.2019 was foruvarded to DHI on 02.12.2019 by NC-1 for examination of the case and DHI raised following deficiency: 1.

in its Meeting No. 18/80 dated 02.01 .2020 that the applicant's reply dated 06.11.2019 was foruvarded to DHI on 02.12.2019 by NC-1 for examination of the case and DHI raised following deficiency:

1. Specific use of items imported under the eighth authorization vis-a-vis those imported under other seven authorizations. The Committee noted in meeting dated 16.06.2021 that the reply of deficiency letter was sent to DHI on 24.02.2020 and some additional information received from the applicant was also sent to DHI on 19.08.2020 & 21.09.2020 followed by a reminder on '15.12.2020. However, DHI requested vide letter dated 16.06.2021 to send reply of further deficiency. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the applicant for personal hearing and also requested to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:
2. Background note of the case along with specific export list vis-a-vis import list. The applicant's reply was forwarded to DHI on 16.08.2021 for examination & comments. The case was further considered in the meeting dated 02.09.2021 and the Committee heard the applicant's representative during personal hearing. The applicant's representative explained the case in detail in the meeting and the representative of DHI had asked to submit certain information.

e applicant's representative during personal hearing. The applicant's representative explained the case in detail in the meeting and the representative of DHI had asked to submit certain information. Therefore, the Committee decided to request DHI for expediting the comments. The comments from DHI were received vide letter dated 16.11.2021. Decision: The Committee reconsldered the case and noted the comments given by DHI vide letter dated 16.11.2021 wherein it is stated that the applicant had taken 7 Advance Authorizations for manufacture & supply of 33 metro coaches. The applicant, during personal hearing, had clarified that the subject AA contains the residual items which could not be imported as amendment of earlier seven AAs were not allowed. Hence, DHI recommended the norms for manufacturing of 33 numbers of metro coaches. However, the Committee noted that in response to Norm Committee's email dated 23.04.2019, Addl. DGFT Bangalore had informed that applicant had obtained several licenses and mentioned that a letter from ECA-ll, DGFT, New Delhi was received seeking information regarding alleged corrupt practices followed by M/s Alstom Transport lndia Ltd. Further, it was atJo noted thal an tD Note No. 01/80/50/00368/AM15/DES-1/1310 dated 25.07.2019 was sent to ECA-ll for seeking their comments in this matter which are still awaited.

ansport lndia Ltd. Further, it was atJo noted thal an tD Note No. 01/80/50/00368/AM15/DES-1/1310 dated 25.07.2019 was sent to ECA-ll for seeking their comments in this matter which are still awaited. Therefore, the Committee desired to know the outcome of verification on the above referred allegations from ECA-Il and RA Bangalore before fixation of ad-hoc norms. Case is deferred. 19 | ,' , ., Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctt2O2122t7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date:16.11.2021

SI.No.24

Case No lノ25ノ80…ALC2/2015

M NoiNC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7(Offline Mノs UNITED DRILLiNG T00LS LTD C`型五国塾型」=生 堅2L________ Lic No:0510397442 Datei 29 01 2016 HQ No:01/80/050ノ00441/AM16/

Subject: Request for review and

RLA No:05/24/040/00493/AM16/ fixation of ad―hoc norrns Case history:The CorYlrnlttee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case was rejectedin Meeting No. 05/80 dated 07.06.2016 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 29.03.2016 as raised by DHl. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and Gonsultant (Tech-3) informed that the applicant's reply dated 29.05.2020 & 06.07.2020 are deficient due to following reasons. Process flow chart does not show use of import items at SL. No. 2 & 3. Quantity of forging is proposed to be imported in fraction of numbers' Weight of export product & import items in annexure A & B are not clear. Quantity of export product given in annexure B is not matching with quantity The reply of above-mentioned deficiency was received from the applicant and sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 28.01 .2021 for examination of case. Consultant (Tech-3) via email dated 14.06.2021 has requested to send physical file of the case. Decision: The Committee considered the cases as per the agenda and noted that the physical file of the case was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) for comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. Mノs AZAD ENGINEERING PRiVATE LIMITED Lic No:0910064137 Date:14092016

Subject: Request for review of ad-hoc

RLA Noi09/24/040/00295/ハM17/ l norttS,Xed in甲99t190a19。2つQ42917 was approved in Meeting No. 02180-ALC212017 dated 25.04.2017 on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 09100641 37 dated 14.09.2016 on the recommendation of the representative of DHl. However, the applicant had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee had reconsidered the case in its meeting No. 02180 dated 16.06.2021 and decided to ask from the firm the following information as per comments of DHI:

1. Calculation of the requirement of raw material supported by Dimensional Engineering Drawing with dimensions clearly highlighted. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 27.09.202'1 followed by a reminder on 11.11.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to issue a reminder in letter form to the applicant. Case is deferred. １ ２ ３ ４

Case No 19ノ23/80‐ ALC2/2016

M NoiNC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7 Offl!ry eag_es)dqled '16.11 2021 2011● =I Meeting No.:NC′ 1ノME匡丁ノOct/202122′ 7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021 Deferred No101/80/050/00522/AM17/

Case No 37ノ19ノ80¨ALC2ノ2014

M No:NC/1/MEET/Nov/202122ノ7 M′s KAMAR:NFRASTRUCttURE PVtt LTD. Status: Deferred Offline Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Licence No:0310788243 Date: 21082014 HQ File No:01/80/050/00471/AM15/

Subject: Request for review and

fixation of ad-hoc norms RLA File No:03/94/040/00449/AM15/ was rejected in Meeting No. 06/80 dated 20.06.2017 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 29.10.2020. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 25.02.2021 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16 06.2021 informed that the applicant's reply is deficient and it contains only copy of Advance Authorization. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

1. To furnish information as per Sl. No. 11 of SDF supported by Engineering Drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted. Sl. No. 11 of SDF: Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and su pported by docu mentary evi dence/d rawi ngs etc. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27 .09.2021 & 1 1.1 1.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet.

the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27 .09.2021 & 1 1.1 1.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to issue a final reminder to the applicant. Case is deferred. M No:NC/1/MEET/Nov/202122/7 Mノs HINDUSTAN RUBBER INDUSTR:ES (911199む,91)Cat9d_1611:2021 Lic No 0510402563 Datei 16 05 2017 HQ No:01/80/050/00213/AM18

Subject: Request for review and

fixation of ad-hoc norms RLA No:05/23/040/00043/AM18 was rejected in Meeting No 15/80-A1C212018 dated 06.032019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 08.10.2018. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DPIIT for examination of the case on 21.09.2020 followed by reminders on 25.11.2020 and on 13.08.2021. However, no comments have been received yet. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47O1114812021-fSW dated 20.09.2021wherein it is stated that the case is very old and have no previous record of the case. Therefore, as per comments of 2l I . Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl202122l7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021

Case No 3/10/80-ALC2ノ2017

Oif ff tne Commlttee decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information: A copy of complete set of application. A copy of deficiency letter issued to the applicant. A copy of representation along with the all relevant information/documents. Case is deferred.

Case No 8ノ23ノ80…ALC2ノ2015

M NoiNC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7 Mノs HiNDUSTAN RUBBER INDUSttRIES Offline Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Lic No 0510395884 Datei 12 10 2015 HQ No:01/80/050/00421/AM16 ____ RLA Noi05/23/040/00292/AM16 fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Cornmittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case was rejected in Meeting No. 06/g0-ALc2t2ol6dated 21.06.2016 due to non-submission of reply of defiiiency tetterdatJd ig.04.2016 as raised by DIPP (Chemical) vide lD No.717712016-TSW dated 26.Oi.2OiO.However, the applicant had requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the appticant on 25. 11.2020 as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.. P-4701113912019-TSW dated 12.10.2020:

1. To indicate weight of each type of rubber rollers to be exported, giving its composition handle etc. (Both imported and indigenous) １ ２ ３ i.e. net weight of rubber parts, Metal/Aluminium shell,
2. Complete calculation for requirement of inputs indicating wastage claimed for each raw material. ln this case, there are two export items as under: Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery 10"―-8000 Number 14"-500 Number
3. To provide above details for both the export items'
4. To provide relevant drawing of both the export items' The applicant's reply was sent to DPIIT on 28.12.2020 for examination of the case. DPIIT vide U. O.

e above details for both the export items' 4. To provide relevant drawing of both the export items' The applicant's reply was sent to DPIIT on 28.12.2020 for examination of the case. DPIIT vide U. O. No.: p-4701113gt2019-TSW dated 28.01.2021 informed that the copy of application of the subject AA is not available with DPIIT to examine the case' Decisionl The Committee considered the cases as per the agenda and noted that a letter was sent to the applicant for submitting the copy of application on 06.08.2021 followed by a reminder on '1'1 .11.2021. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence' the committee decided to issue the final reminder to the applicant.

Case No 14ノ12ノ80…ALC2ノ2017

EE丁ノ Nov′ 202122/7(Offline Lic No 0510403501 Datei 25 07 2017 HQ No:01/80/050/0022o`AM18

Subject: Request for review

RLA No:05/23/040/00156/AM18 and fixation of ad-hoc norms Mノs GOLD MOHUR PROFILES LIM:TED 22111■: I Meeting No.:NC′ 1/MEETノOct/202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021 | | Deferred

was rejected in Meeting No. '15/80-ALC2l201B dated 06.03.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 12.10.2018 as raised by DIPP (Chemical).However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 29.10.2020 followed by reminders on 06.08.2021, 27.09.2021 &11.11.2021. However, no reply has been received yet. The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to issue the final reminder to the applicant. Case is deferred.

Case No 19ノ19ノ80‐ALC2ノ2016

M NoiNC/1/MEET/Nov/202122/7 MノsL&丁‐MHPS TURBINE CENERATORS PRIVAttE LIMITED Offline Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Llc No 0310807493 Datei 31 08 2016 HQ No:01/80/050/00414ハv17 1 SubieCt:Request for re-lxa‖ on of RLA No.:03/95ノ040/00292/AM17 ad-hoc norms Case history:The Cornmittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case was approved in M. No. 15/80-ALC212018 dated 06.03.2019 as per the written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.3/96/2016/TSW(B) dated 24.12.2018.However, the applicant had requested for review of already fixed ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 24.02.2020 followed by reminders on 06" 11.2020& 06.08.2021:

1. The final list of import items after all amendments. (there appears to be at least four amendments)
2. To submit calculation correlating the same with Dimensional Engineering Drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 13.08.2021 & 11.11.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred.

Case No:67ノ5ノ80…ALC2ノ2018

M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Nov/202122/7 Mノs BHARAT HEAVY ELECttRICALS LiMITED Offline Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Lic No 0410164150 Datei 02 04 2018 HQ No:01/80/050/00116/AM19/ Subjectr Request for re-fixation of RLA Noi04/24/040/00267/AM18ノ ad-hoc norms Case history:丁he Cornrnittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case was approved in M. No. 3/80-ALc2l2019dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide email dated 06.05.2019.However, the applicant had requested for review of the ad-hoc norms. Si.No.30 231 ' , r-' Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl2O2122l7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 Status: Deferred

@ottrreapptrcintwasforwardedtoDHlforexaminationofthecase on 25.02.2020 followed by a reminder on 29j02020. As per comments of DHl, a deficiency letter was sentto the applicant on 13 08 2021forfurnishing the fo‖ owing inforrnationi

1. Complete application with ANF 44 and all enclosures'
2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 26.10.2021 for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed vide letter dated 16.11.2021 that the applicant's reply is incomplete and the applicant did not furnish the point-wise reply as asked in deficiency letter dated 13.08.2021.

esentative of DHI informed vide letter dated 16.11.2021 that the applicant's reply is incomplete and the applicant did not furnish the point-wise reply as asked in deficiency letter dated 13.08.2021. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days: Complete application with ANF 4,A and all enclosures. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order. Case is deferred sl.

Case Noi 79′ 11/80‐ALC2/2018

Status: Deferred M No:NC′ 1/MEET/Nov/202122/7 M/s HONDA TRADING Offtine Casesl dqled 1611,20?1 i COneOnATION INDIA PVT. LTD. Lrcj.lo OStO+OSSO8 Date: 02.02.2018 | Hq.ltoi O1lqqOqOJO aoiAryl1L ---l SuOlect: Requestfor re-fixation of nie rlo : oslzi,toqotoo+r alAnar B 1 ad-hoc-norms L Cise nistory: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approv"O in U. No. 13/80 dated 22.01.2019as perwritten comments of DHI vide U. No' NO. DES-|/HTCI/AUp-t-2018-HEt dated 20.12.2O1B.However, the applicant had requested for reviewing the ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the applicant as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3): Specification and catalogue of export product. Siarting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw materiil proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components io be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Copy of Advance Authorization. Copy of export order. As per comments of Consultant (Tech-3), a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant for furnishing the above information on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 29-09.2021 & 11.11.2021.

xport order. As per comments of Consultant (Tech-3), a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant for furnishing the above information on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 29-09.2021 & 11.11.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet' Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to issue a final reminder letter to the aPPlicant. Case is deferred. １ ２ ３ ４ 24l, ,. . Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOctt2}2122l7 (Oflline cases) Meeting Date1 1 6.11.2021

Case Noi4/8ノ80‐ALC2ノ2019

Mノs ttHE INDIAN CARD CLOttHING CO LTD Status: Deferred M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7(Offline Lic No 0310830216 Date:11072019 HQ No:01/80/050/00116/AM20/DES-1

Subject: Request for re-fixation of

ad-hoc norms RLA No103/95/040/00302/AM20/ was approved in M. No. 14I80-ALC212019 dated 06.11.2019 as per written comments of Consultant (Tech-3).However, the applicant had requested for reviewing the ad-hoc norms. Thti Committee re-considered the case and noted that earlier Consultant (Tech-3) informed thatthe applicant has claimed nil wastage on export item at Sl. No. 3 and 34/oto 50% on rest of items. Process flow chart given is the same for all export product & products are also similar. ln view of this nil wastage was recommended on export product 3 and Zok on rest of items considering the nature of the process. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the applicant as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3):

1. To provide information on stage-wise wastage for each export product (which has been claimed for higher wastage). As per comments of Consultant (Tech-3), a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant for furnishing the above information on 10.08.2021 followed by reminders on 29.09.2021 & 11.11.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to issue a final reminder letter to the applicant. Case is deferred.

Case No:12′ 16ノ80…ALC2ノ2017

Mノs LARSEN&TOUBRO LIMITED Status: Deferred M NoiNC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7(Offline Lic No i0310815008 dated 03 08 2017 HQ No:01/80/050/00275/AM18/

Subject: Request for re-fixation of

ad-hoc norms RLA No:03/95/040/00235/AM18 was approved in Meeting No.03/80 dated 08.05.2019 on the recommendation of the representative of DHl. However, the applicant vide email dated 14.10.2020 had requested for revision of the ratified ad-hoc norms. The applicant's representation was sent to DHI on 15. 12.2020 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.20211o furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
2. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosure. 251「'a g F Meeting No.:NCノ 1ノMEETrOctr202122′ 7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

oGiiiion: fhe Commliiee consioered the case as per the agenda and noted the applicant's replywassenttoDHl on l1.11.2021forexaminationof thecase.However,nocommentshave been received as yet Hence,the cornrnittee decided to wait forthe co爾lrnents Case is deferred 儒乳)偽詔鼎諸争雖Z:多22/7 10mih百 M′siSGEC Hl丁ACHiZOSEN LIMITED Status: Approved Cases)dated 16 11 2021_______ Lic No 10510410946 dated 14 06 2019 HQ No:01/80/050/00092/AM20 ~~ | ~ hOC norms Crae rriitoiy: rne committee ionsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejectei Oy UC in its Meeting No 06/80 dated 0B 05.2019 due to non-submission of -) 4- 44 ^aa^ deficiency as riised by DPllT.

ttee ionsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejectei Oy UC in its Meeting No 06/80 dated 0B 05.2019 due to non-submission of -) 4- 44 ^aa^ deficiency as riised by DPllT. However, the applicant vide representation dated 27.11.2020 received on 01 12.2020 had furnished the reply of deficiency and requested for review and fixation of the ad-hoc norms" The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 10.08.2021 & 13.08.2021for examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to fix the ad- hoc norms as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-4701119812019-TSW dated 06.09'2021' (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC' 261::, ..,, ,,.. Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOctl2O2122t7 (Oflline Cases) Meeting Date:'16.11-2021 Mノs ALPINE COILS LLP. HQ Noi01/80/050/00155/AM17 RLA No:04/24/040/00022/AM17 hoc norms Case history:The CornrYlittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case 国避響|17TII was rejecteJ Uy ruC in its Meeting No. 14180 dated 11.10.2016 due to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised Oy otfel.Uowever, the applicant vide representation dated 11.11.2020 furnished the reply of deficiency and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms.

ue to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised Oy otfel.Uowever, the applicant vide representation dated 11.11.2020 furnished the reply of deficiency and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the cise and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 10.08.2021 for examination & comments. | Decision:TheCommltee condderedthecaseas perthe agelttTヽ鵠軍 til° 17贅埓rt盟 | applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DPIIT vide U.O. No.: P- | Weight of each Export Product. Wei6nt of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the [urpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imnnrrert anct inctioenous inout in the exoort oroduct may be indicated. Net weigf! 41919 ２ ３ 47044/44/M― TSIr d嗣¨ 計

画¨ … … | l Detailtechnical drawings with dlrnension of each exportl also be furnished.

with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawi ngs etc. Quantities of export items in Nos.

ed out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawi ngs etc. Quantities of export items in Nos. also in addition to their weights. Case is deferred. 4 5 Llc No i0710107942 dated 26 03 2015 HQ No101/80/050/00065/AM16

Case No.:65ノ3/80‐ALC2′2015

M. No.: NC/1/MEET I OcU20212217 (Of'fline RLA No:07/24/040/00473/AM15 Mノs PROMAC ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LIMI丁ED hoc norms was rejected in its Meeting No. 17180-ALc2l2018held on 15.11.2019 on the ground that the import and export items are same and there is no manufacturing activity. However, the applicant vide email dated 10.10.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. The applicant's representation was fonvarded to DHI on 14.06.2021 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 'l'1.08.2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
2. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosure. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 10.11.2021 for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. Mノs VICTORA AUttO PV丁.LttD.

Subject: Request for fixation oT aO-

hoc norms

Case No.:63/5ノ80‐ALC2ノ2018

M NoiNC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7(Offline Lic No i0510406550 dated 22 05 2018 HQ No:01/80/050/00112/AM19 RLA No:05/24/040/00096/AM19 Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/OcU20212217 (Otfline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.1'1.2021

Ciie friitory: ihe Committee considered the case as per the agenda and note,! ll1,ll"^:i:: was rejectedin Meeting No. 02180-ALczl2}19held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 25'08'2020 has represented against releciion of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the Advance Authorization. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonvarded to MSME for examination of the case on '15.03.2021 followed by a reminder on 27.09.202L However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred.

Case No.:3/8′ 80‐ALC2ノ2018

N/1 N6:NCアイア A/1Ё Li′ 0こ1'202122/7(Ofline Mノs ViCTORA AUTO PVT.LttD. 日c Noi堕10407035 dated D2:蜃12"「 || HQ No:01/80/050/00126/AM19__ ___ drawings of all the parts mentioned in the Advance Authorization. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonrarded to MSME for examination of the case on 15.03.2021 followed by a reminder on 27.09.202L However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments' Case is deferred.

Case No.16475ノ80‐ALC2ノ2018

M NoiNC/1/MEET/Nov//202122/7 Mノs VICTORA AUTO PV「.LttD. Offllne dated 16 11 2021 SubieCt:Request forfixation of ad¨ hoc norms Case history:The Cornrnittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case was re」ected in Meeting No 02ノ80-ALC2/2019 held on 24 04 2019 due to non… submission of the documents/informaltion raised by MSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 0g.Og.2O2O has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details'along *itf, details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the 面 而 406462 dded 15 05 2018 HQ No:01/80/050/00110々生M19 RLA No:05/24/040/00080/AM19 2811■|= Meeting No.:NCノ 1ノMEET′Oct′ 202122ノ7(Offiine cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021 Case history:The Cornrnittee considered the case as perthe agenda and noted thatthe case was relected in Meeung No 02/80-ALC2/2019held on 24 04 2019 due to non― Submission ofthe Status: Deferred

was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on '14.06.2021 followed by a reminder on 27.09.2021 However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred.

Case No.:60ノ5/80… ALC2ノ2018

wiitTenine Lic No i0910046638 dated 04 05 2011 Mノs VICTORA AUTO PVT,LTD. Status: Deferred Lic No:0510406587 dated 24 05 2018 HQ Noi01/80/050/00109/AM19

Subject: Request for re-fixation of

ad-hoc norms RLA No:05/24/040/00111/AM19 was rejected in Meeting No. 02180-ALc2l2019held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 0210.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 14.06.202'1 followed by a reminder on 27.09.2021. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. No.42 M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7(Of‖ ine M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited RLA Noi09/24/040/00046/AM12

Subject: Request for re-fixation of

ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the subject AA has not been considered in any of the NC meeting for fixation of ad-hoc norms yet. Further, the Committee noted that the applicant's representation was fonrvarded to DHI to examine the case on 15.05.2021 followed by a reminder on 13.08.2021. DHI vide their mail dated 01.07.2021 has conveyed that the case is very old and the following documents are required to examine the case:

1. Background note on the case giving the NC decision/ Deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
2. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 29.09.2021 for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed vide letter dated 16.11.2021 that the applicant's reply is incomplete and they did not furnish the point-wise reply as per deficiency letter. Therefore, the Committee decided !o _ask agelUtqm the a nt for furnishinq the te information 29 1 1 F II● Meeting No.:NCノ1ノMEETrOct/202122′ 7(Offline cases)Mee」ng Date:16.11.2021 dated 16 11 2021

Therefore, the Committee decided !o _ask agelUtqm the a nt for furnishinq the te information 29 1 1 F II● Meeting No.:NCノ1ノMEETrOct/202122′ 7(Offline cases)Mee」ng Date:16.11.2021 dated 16 11 2021

within 15 days:

1. Background note on the case giving the NC decision/ Deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
2. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H. Case is deferred. .No.43 M No:NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7(Offllne CaS堅立dated 16 11 2021 __ _____ __ M/s Bombardier Transportation lndia Private Ltd Lic No i 3410043169 dated 09 05 2017 HQ F Noi01/80/162/006/AM22 hoc norms Case History: The Committee considered the case subject AA has not been considered in any of the NC as per the agenda and noted that the meeting for fixation of ad-hoc norms as yet. The applicant vide their email/letter dated 22.07.2021 stated that they have obtained advance authorization for importing various components and raw material on a customs duty free basis for manufacturing metro rail coaches. The firm has mentioned that they have making efforts for filing the aid online application initially the portal was not allowing to file the application itself as the licence was tagged under the SION norms category. The import items which they required norms fixation includes approximately 5000 line items. While attempting to upload each of the items they have been facing issue of auto logout from the portal with data aiready posted not being saved.

orms fixation includes approximately 5000 line items. While attempting to upload each of the items they have been facing issue of auto logout from the portal with data aiready posted not being saved. Now, they have requested to accept their application for norms fixation in the physical form. The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was fonryard to DHI on 19.08.2021 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI asked for background of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek detailed background note along with ccomplete application with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 29.09.202'1 followed by a reminder on 11.11.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send a reminder letter to the applicant for furnishing the reply. Case is deferred. 3011)o=t Meeung No.:NCノ 1ノMEET/Ocυ202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

Hence, the Committee decided to send a reminder letter to the applicant for furnishing the reply. Case is deferred. 3011)o=t Meeung No.:NCノ 1ノMEET/Ocυ202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

Lic No i 3310030436 Dated 03 06 2015 M No:NC/1/MEETノOct/202122/7(Offline dated 16 11 2021 M/S Electron ic lnstrumentation HQ.No:01ノ80/050/00016/AM19ノDES― | hoc norms RLA Noi33/24/040/00012/AM19 Case History: 丁his case was relected by the NC in its M No 13/80-ALC2/2018 dated 22.01.2019 due to non-submission of deficiency raised by representative of DIPP (Chemical). The firm vide their representation dated 18.02.2021 received on 05.04.2021 furnished the reply of deficiency as raised by DPIIT and requested to re-consider their case for fixation of norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonrvarded to Consultant (Tech-1) on 01 .09.2021for examination of the case Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to fix the ad- hoc as per comments of Consultant (Tech-1) as under: Export ltem Quantit lmport ltem 9023009 0 lnstruments, Appartus And Models (Made Out of Tpx (Polymethyl Pentene Resin)) 31500 00 Kgs 3902909 0 TPX (Polymethyl Pentene Resin) Grade 1.05Kgs/Kg content in the export pttdJは RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. M NolNC/1/MEE丁/Nov/202122/7 Offllne Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Birla Furukawa Fibre Optics Pvt. Lic Noi 1710006162 dt l1 08 2015 SubieCt:Requestfor ixation of ad― hoc norms Case History: This casewas approved by NC in its meeting No.

fllne Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Birla Furukawa Fibre Optics Pvt. Lic Noi 1710006162 dt l1 08 2015 SubieCt:Requestfor ixation of ad― hoc norms Case History: This casewas approved by NC in its meeting No. 14180 held on 1'1.10.2016 as per written comments furnished by DEIT vide their U.O. No. 17 (51)/2015-IPHW dated 04.10.2016. The firm vide email dated 24.08.2021 had requested for correction in the import item serial No. I as Preform of Silica instead of Single Mode Optical Fiber. They had stated that they obtained Advance Authorization for export product "Single Mode Optical Fiber for Manufacture of Telecommunication Grade Optical FiberCable" with three import items. They had stated that as per Advance Authorization they had applied import item at Sl. No. 1 is mentioned as "Preform of Silica" whereas norms fixed by NC import item as "Single Mode Optical Fibre". Now, they had requested to correct the import item as applied by them. The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm's representation to MeitY on 29.09.2021 for the examination & comments. Sl.No.45 HQ No:F No 01/80/050/00347 /AM16/DESI RLA No:17/24/040/00033/AM16 Status: 31 | P a il r: Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETIOctJ2O2122|7 (Otfline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.'11.2021 Status: \pproved

ents. Sl.No.45 HQ No:F No 01/80/050/00347 /AM16/DESI RLA No:17/24/040/00033/AM16 Status: 31 | P a il r: Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETIOctJ2O2122|7 (Otfline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.'11.2021 Status: \pproved

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to amend the description of import item at Sl. No. 1 as per comments of MeitY received via email dated 01.10.2021 as under: 1 The description of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be read as "Preform of Silica for Manufacture of Telecommunication Grade Optical Fibre". RA concerned 鰺J圭里eCessaryョ亜咀ョSp壁上鈎 咀」望 : M No:NCノ1/MEET/Oct/202122/7 Status: Offline C dated 16 11 2021 Birla Furukawa Fibre Optics Pvt. pproved Lic No1 1710006132 dt 22 06 2015 SubieCt:Requestfor ixation of ad― hoc F No 01/80/050/00350/AM16/DESI norms RLA No117/24/040/00032/AM16 Case History:This case was approved by NC in its rneeting No 14/80 held on ll 10 2016 as per written comments furnished by DEIT vide their U.O. No. 17(52)12015-IPHW dated 04 10 2016 The firm vide email dated 24.OB.2O21had requested for correction in the import item serial No. 1 as Preform of Silica instead of Single Mode Optical Fiber. They have stated that they obtained advance authorization for export product "single Mode Optical Fibre for Manufacture of Telecommunication Grade Optical Fibre Cable" with three import items. They had stated that as per advance authorization they had applied import item at serial No.

ode Optical Fibre for Manufacture of Telecommunication Grade Optical Fibre Cable" with three import items. They had stated that as per advance authorization they had applied import item at serial No. 1 is mentioned as "Preform of Silica" whereas norms fixed by NC import item as "single Mode Optical Fibre". Now, they had requested to correct the import item as applied by them. The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to fonruard the firm's representation to MeitY on 29.09.2021for the examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to amend the description of import item at Sl. No. 1 as per comments of MeitY received via email dated 01.1O.2021 as under:

1. The description of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be read as "Preform of Silica for Manufacture of Telecommunication Grade Optical Fibre". RA concerned take further qglLo_l :g pgr !!9 dgqlron 9I Nq. 32 I . Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl2O2122l7 (Olfline Cases) Meeting Date:16.11.2021 -ll---

ture of Telecommunication Grade Optical Fibre". RA concerned take further qglLo_l :g pgr !!9 dgqlron 9I Nq. 32 I . Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl2O2122l7 (Olfline Cases) Meeting Date:16.11.2021 -ll---

M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Nov/202122/7 (Offline Cases)dated 16 11 2021 Birla Furukawa Fibre Optics Pvt. Siatus: Lic No:1710006165 dt 27 08 2015 td., HQ No:F No 01/80/050/00361/AM16/DES I hoc norms RLA No:17/24/040/00043/AM16 Case History: This casewas approved by NC in its meeting No.14117 held on'11.10.2016 as per written comments furnished by DEIT vide their U.O. No. 17(52)12015-IPHW dated 04.10.2016 The firm vide email dated 24.08.2021 had requested for correction in the import item serial No. '1 as Perform of Silica instead of Single Mode Optical Fiber. They had stated that they obtained advance authorization for export product "Single Mode Optical Fibre for Manufacture of Telecommunication Grade Optical Fibre Cable" with three import items. They had stated that as per Advance Authorization they had applied import item at Sl. No. '1 is mentioned as "Preform of Silica" whereas norms fixed by NC import item as "Single Mode Optical Fibre". Now, they had requested to correct the import item as applied by them. The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to fonivard the firm's representation to MeitY on 29.09.2021 for the examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to amend the description of import item at Sl. No. '1 as per comments of MeitY received via email dated 01.10.2021 as under:

1. The description of import item at Sl. No.

as per the agenda and decided to amend the description of import item at Sl. No. '1 as per comments of MeitY received via email dated 01.10.2021 as under:

1. The description of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be read as "Preform of Silica for Manufacture of Telecommunication Grade Optical Fibre". 8A.qqt_ce4eq_q1ey_l_a!9_ fqthel rcqejg3ry ac,t!o_n qq pellhq decision of NC S:.No.48 M No:NC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7 興 墨 ― … 」」12曜1_ HQ No:01/80/050/01812/AM09 RLA No.:09/24/040/427/AM09 M/s Bharat Heavy Electrica:s Linlited hoc norms Case History: This case was ratified by Norms Committee vide meetingNo. 38/80 dated 22.02.2011 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. Note No. 3(42)/1O-TSW (B)/106 dated 15.02.2011. The firm vide their email dated 10.03.2021 had requested to revise the norms ratified in meeting No. 38/80-ALC212009 dated 22.02.2011 as per comments of DHI Letter No. 3(a2)/10-TSW(B)/106 dated 15 02 2011 . Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonivarded to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case on 26.08.2021 followed by a reminder on29.09.2021. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments. 3311)o s e Meeting No.:NC′ 1′MEETrOct/202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

een received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments. 3311)o s e Meeting No.:NC′ 1′MEETrOct/202122ノ7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

No.49 M No:NC/1/MEE丁ノOct/202122/7 (Offline Cases) dated 16.11.2021 Lic No 1 0910035792 dated 09 01 2019 M/S Suttatti Enterprises Pvt. Ltd Status: Deferred HQ Noi01/80/162/005/AM22/DES― | Case Flistorf lhe firm-viOe representatron dated 01.01.2021 received on 16.07.2021 enclosing their letter dated 06.04.2021for fixation of lnput Output Norms (SEEPZ, Mumbai). They have stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No. SEEPZ-SEZ/EOU/65/05-O6V.ll/05330 dated 06.04.2021 as amended and the LOP has been renewed for a further period of five years from 2021-22 lo 2025-26 for manufacture and export of wide range of products mainly applicable for electrical industries: i. Shroud Plate Part No. 3789337 (lTC HS code 87089900) ii. Shroud Plate Part No. 376739914046002 (lTC HS code 87089900) Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's representation was foruvarded to MSME on 08.11.2021 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. Si.No.50 M No. NC/1/MEETINov t20212217 i I Status: (Offline Cases) dated 16.11_.2021 I M/s Avasarala Technologies Ltd. I Deferred ffi{e.zan+11 _ | HQ.

ed to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. Si.No.50 M No. NC/1/MEETINov t20212217 i I Status: (Offline Cases) dated 16.11_.2021 I M/s Avasarala Technologies Ltd. I Deferred ffi{e.zan+11 _ | HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00167/AM12/DES-| lGnU;eci: nequesi tor fiiatron of aE-l Mo8e6/Aru11 I hocnorms i M NoiNC/1/MEET/Nov/202122/7 Status: Ciie giiiori: itre cise wis rejected by NC in its Meeting No. 20180 dated 27.12.11 due to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised by DIPP). Now, the firm vide representation dated 28.12.2020 received on 06.01.202'1 furnished the reply of deficiency as raised by DPIIT and requested to fix the norms. They have stated that they have completed export obligation well in time as stipulated and requested to ratify the norms for import item Sl. No. 1 & 2 under General Note 4 and import item Sl. No. 3 with the wastage of 1% as mentioned in the Appendix 4E. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's representation was fonvarded to DPIIT on 08.'11.2021 for the examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. M No:NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7(Offline M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited HQ No:01/80〃50/1245/AM09 iSuupcti-nequestrortixatronorao RLA No:09ノ24/040/292/AM09 hoc norms Case Historv: This case was Meetinq-[o 44/80-ALC2/2009 dated 34 | i ,: , Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETtOctl2O2122l7 (Ottline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021

Subject: Request for fixation

hoc norms Status: Deferred

02.02.2010 as per recommendation of DHI letter No. 3/23l09/TSWgB) dated 12.01.2010. Now, the firm vide email dated has requested for revision of norms in respect of import item at serial No. 75 is deleted from impoft list requested to allow the same and import item at serial No. 92 ratified quantity for the said material is insufficient to meet their requirement. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonvarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 09.08.2021 'for examination of the case. The case was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer the case to DHI for examination as per advice of Consultant (Tech-3). Case is deferred. Case History: This case was approved by NC in its Meeting No 19/80 dated ll 12 2012 as per recommendation of DHI letter No. 3142110A/ol. 201408 dated 11.12.2012. Now, the firm vide their email dated has requested for revision of norms in respect of import item at serial No. 12 is deleted from import list requested to allow the same and import item at serial No. 91 ratified quantity for the said material is insufficient to meet their requirement. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case on 09.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 29.09.2021. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments. Case is deferred M. No..

lowed by a reminder on 29.09.2021. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments. Case is deferred M. No.. NC/1/MEETI OcU20212217 (Offline Lic No i 0910036322 dated 16 12 2008 HQ Noi01/80〃50/1580/AM09 RLA Noi09/24/040/351/AM09 Lic No:0910045023 dated 03 01 2011 Mノs Bharat Heavy Electrica:s Lirnited hoc norms M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Linlited hoc norms HQ Noi01/80〃50/701/AMll Case History: 丁his case ratifiedbyNorrnsCornrnitteevidemeetingNo 08/14dated09 07 2013 as per letter No 3(42)/2010-TSh/V(B1/112 dated 31 05.2013 Now, the Status: Deferred WAS comments of DHI firm vide email dated10.03.2021 has requested that import items at Sl.Nos. 2, 6 & 7 are raw material and the ratified quantity was restricted to 7960 K9s,4850 Kgs & 320Kgs by Norms Committee as against applied quantities10000Kgs,6000 Kgs & 2000Kgs respectively. They have stated that the ratified quantity was insufficient to meet their requirement & thus they have imported more than the ratified quantity. For the Justification of the same Accountability Certificate certified by the Central Excise Dept. has been enclosed in this regard for further consideration. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonivarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 09.08.2021 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-3) had requested to forward this case to DHl. Therefore, the Committee decided to refer the case to DHI for examination and comments.

09.08.2021 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-3) had requested to forward this case to DHl. Therefore, the Committee decided to refer the case to DHI for examination and comments. As per NC decision, the icant's ntation was foruvarded to DHI on 29.09.2021for examinallon & comme4ts M No:NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7(Offline RLA Noi09/24/040/450/AMll 35 | P a g e Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl202122l7 (Ofiline Cases) Meeting Date: 15.11.2021 Status: Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the comments of DHI vide letter dated 16.11.2021have been received stating that the applicant's representation was not clear and they sought some more information. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

1. Background note giving the NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
2. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosures like Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. Case is deferred. Case H'tstory'. Thts caie was rejected by the Norms Committee in its meeting No. 22180- ALC2t2O18held on 28.02.2020 due to non-submission of the documents/information as called by TA / DHl. The firm vide email dated 16.04.2021 and 24.06.2021 had furnished soft copy of application and requested to re-consider their case for fixation of norms.

documents/information as called by TA / DHl. The firm vide email dated 16.04.2021 and 24.06.2021 had furnished soft copy of application and requested to re-consider their case for fixation of norms. The firm had furnished technical details along with details of wastages claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was forward to DHI on 26.08.2021 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI had asked for background note of the case along with previous decision of NC. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to DHI for examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 06.10.2021 for examination and comments. DHI vide letter dated 16.11.2021 informed that the applicant's reply is incomplete as the applicant didn't answer to any of the points as raised in deficiency letter. The reply was not in chronological order with deiailed background of the case i.e. decision of NC and other correspondence.

pplicant didn't answer to any of the points as raised in deficiency letter. The reply was not in chronological order with deiailed background of the case i.e. decision of NC and other correspondence. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: Background note giving the NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application with ANF 48 with all enclosures like Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H Case is deferred. 2 35 I , Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOcll2O2122l7 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021 M NoiNC/1/MEET/Oct/202122ノ7 I Status: I Dee Development Engineers Ltd. dated 16 11 2021 Lic No:0510403207 Date:22062017 Noi01/80/050/00450/AM19/DES… | RLA No105′ 23/040/00116/AM18/ hoc norms Deferred I-t

S:.No.55 M. No.: NC/1/MEETI Od120212217 (Qtfline Lic No:0710104233 dated 20.05.2014 MノS BEML LIMITED HQ No:01/80/050/00364/AM15 SuUiect nequest tor triatto{1 of ad RLA Noi07/24/040/00050/AM15 hoc norms Case History:丁his case was relected by NC inits M No 15/80dated 25 10 2016 due to non― submission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.202'1 & 10.08.202'l has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case.

ested to fix the ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-48.
2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.
3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. Case is deferred. M NoiNC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7 ine Cases) dated 16.11.2021 MノS BEML LIMITED Lic No:0710105280 dated 20 06 2014 Case is deferred. the ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was foruvarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:
5. A copy of complete application as per ANF-48.
6. Com'p1ete infoimation as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.
7. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order'
8. Comptete ap[ticatitn, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the apProved AA No.

C decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order' 4. Comptete ap[ticatitn, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the apProved AA No. 0710104231 37 | , i,, Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctt202122l7 lOtfline Cases) Meeting Date:15.11.2021 hoc norms -C-ase Hiitoryl-fniiiaie was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to non- submission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021,

Offline Cases) date{ 1 6.1 1 .L021__ Lic. No : 0710105285 dated 20.06.2014 | M NoiNC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7 HQ Noi01/80/050/00363/AM15 RLA Noi07/24/040/00079/AM15 RLA No:07/24/040/00103/AM15 M/S BEMLL:MiTED hoc norms Case History: This casewas rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 dueto non- submission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was foruvarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case.

sted to fix the ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was foruvarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI: A copy of complete application as per ANF-48. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order" Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. Case is deferred M NolNC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7 Offline C dated 16 11 2021 M/S BEML LIMITED Lic No 1 0710105283 dated 20 06 2014 HQ Noi01/80/050/00366/AM15 hoc norms Case History:丁his case was Kttected by NC in its M No 15/80dated 25 10 2016 due to non― submission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm's representation was fonvarded to DHI on 23.08.2021for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHl.

1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-48.

021for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHl.

1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-48.
2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.
3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
4. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. Case is deferred. １ ２ ３ 　 ４ 3811.||・ Meeting No.:NCノ1ノMEETノOcυ202122/7(Offline cases)Meeting Date:16.11.2021

Si.No.59 M No:NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7 ((Dffllne Cases)dated 16 11 2021 M/s Alstom Transport lndia Limited Statusr Approved Lic No:0710112422 Dated 16 11 2017 HQ No101ノ80/050/00162/AM18/DES― | RLA No:03/94/040/00227/AM18 hoc norms C-ase Hlstorlr: ffre case was afproved by NC in its Meeting No. 03/80 dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide U. O. No.: DES-liALST/RAIL-1-2018-HEl dated 26.11.2018.The firm vide representation dated 15.06.2021 has stated that they have obtained Advance authorization importing 694 components and raw material on a customs duty free basis for manufacturing metro rail coaches. They have stated that the norms were ratified as per as per written comments of DHI vide U. O. No.. DES-1/ALST/RAIL-1-2018-HEl dated 26.11.2018.

duty free basis for manufacturing metro rail coaches. They have stated that the norms were ratified as per as per written comments of DHI vide U. O. No.. DES-1/ALST/RAIL-1-2018-HEl dated 26.11.2018. Whereas, import item at serial No" 33, 35 131 to 139,215 and 326 were deleted. The firm has stated that the rejected input comprise approximately 6% of the total cost of component & row material used in manufacturing of metro rail coached. These items are key to and indispensable for manufacturing of metro rail coaches. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the norms as per comments of DHI dated 16.11.2021 as under: Item No. 215 may be allowed on repeat basis of AA No. 0710099232 dated 28-10.2013. S4 rq!9qryf9!-Ingy-Le!e, furtherygggss-ary ?q!!o! qs per the Ceqr-s, rqn -of l)'!C - - M NoiNC/1/MEE丁/Oct/202122/7 Offline Cases)dated 16 1112021 HQ No:01′ 80/162/005ノAM22 M′S MSS lndia Pvt.Ltd. 鸞穏聯維蝿擢冊‖ l[備騰二 J‖淵辮W繊毒 S10N fё r1000/OEOU 鯰 ne鮎lPr譴1::L「年∬晃:T吼濯 nlJ冦兇雷 V児塁F¶∫l譜 J烏:(選ぶ :l:哨ギ ;∬鷺ま瑞『:当7駄『‖ :景肥需 nes Thge tte a bЮ e numtt J COmpOnetts lre of various electrical compOnents are copper profiles/sect10ns/bars/rods/strips/plates/foil, Alurninium rodS/bars/Flats, Brass rodS/bars′ flats, , 1 _ _■_ TL^:__ H^_ _‖ h― i++‐ パ lh● ""i':;;'"";";il;, cabtes,'moulding gianules/poy-q"i -"J" The firm has submitted the ^a -^) J^- fi.,^+i^n ^f innr rl-nr rf nl tf 嘔‐u‖ りVも‐ VVドドψ'~~~'I百 81品 化rhe Fヤ

_ TL^ :__ H^_ _‖ h― i++‐ パ lh● ""i':;;'"";";il;, cabtes,'moulding gianules/poy-q"i -"J" The firm has submitted the ^a -^) J^- fi.,^+i^n ^f innr rl-nr rf nl tf 嘔‐u‖ りVも‐ VVドドψ'~~~'I百 81品 化rhe Fヤ 2020-2021 and for ixtton oflnpu卜 outp醸 app‖ cation for fixation of ad― hc __^ ′ 、 ´_―ハ ーJ‐ _:■L _^_^ ´∩公 ^口DD つ∩4氏_つ∩つ∩ nc dPμ lしauΨ H lυ :‖ ^uuVH V:… 向 丁 `ibё お,Ъ f l〒P read wlh p〔 lra 6 06 of HBP 2015… 2020 as norms(S10N)in terms of pa照 _´ _.:一 ^― 」^^^ぃ。‐ nDllT'c Hυ H‖ じ 、0]ヽノ:ヽノ ‖: ιしH‖ υ V: ド‐1~ V~― 、~′ ~ | amended tthe appliCation was referred to DP‖ T fOr examinatlon and comments DP‖ T'S cornments have been receiVed vide U O No P-47011/46/2021-丁 SVV dated 15 09 2021 391 Date:16.11.2021 ^

Decisioni The Cornrnittee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad― hoc P-47011/46/2021¨ TSW dated wastage norms as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No: 15.09.2021 (Copy enclosed) O/o Development Commissioner, SEEPZ, Mumbai may take further necessary action as per the decision of Norms Committee. Si.No.6 M No.:NC/1/MEETノOct/202122/7 Status: Deferred Offllne Cases) dated 16.11.2021 MノS Victora Auto Pvt.Ltd. Lic No 1 0510407583 dt 23.082018 HQ Noi01/80/050/00195/AM19 SubieCt:Request for fixation of ad― hoc norms RLA Noi05/24/040/00296/AM19 Case History:This Case was approved by NC in its Meetlng No 01/80dated 03 04 2019 The firm has stated that inadvertently they have submitted the online application with export & import quantity in KGs as same without any wastage.

roved by NC in its Meetlng No 01/80dated 03 04 2019 The firm has stated that inadvertently they have submitted the online application with export & import quantity in KGs as same without any wastage. Therefore, on the basis of online application submitted at the office of Add. DGFT CLA, New Delhi norms was fixed by DGFT in its meeting No. 05/80 dated 28.06.20'18. Hence, they have requested to reconsider their application on basis of actual wastage and revise the norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was fonrvarded to MSME on 09.11.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ベ ユ智 ぶ漂犠濃ζぶ 嘔セ量卜界 5゛び 碑 401 Meeting No.: NC/1/MEETlOctl202122l7 (Ottline Cases) Meeting Date: 16.11.2021

STr{?T git6R amp:it{JEiT}irrrm r@u rratla:ltr:riaftm aqrqr Ee{Er Governmenl of tndia Minlstry of Commerce & lndustry Departmenl for Promotion of lndustry & lnternal Trade (Technica l,Supp.ort Section) subjecl - Mrs ISGEC Hitaclri Zosen Linrited - A.A. No.0510410946 dated 14.06.20i9 Reference - D G F T F No 01180/050/00092/AM20 DGFT(DES-1) may krndly rofer to their e-mail dated 1Orh August 2021 lowvarding firm's reply for fixation of norms in respecl of the above-mentioned A.A. ln this connection, lhe undersigned is directed to say that the instant A.A. may be ratified as under. r. Net Fabricated weights of export items at sl.No.1. z, g& 4 may be specified as 640 MT. 946.20 MT. 1070 MT and 685 MT respectivety. z. lmport rtems a[ Sl.

the instant A.A. may be ratified as under. r. Net Fabricated weights of export items at sl.No.1. z, g& 4 may be specified as 640 MT. 946.20 MT. 1070 MT and 685 MT respectivety. z. lmport rtems a[ Sl. No. 1 to B, 25 and 26 shall be of relevant grade ano thickness as contained/utilized in the export items. 3. Quantity of import item at sl.No.1 may be allowed as 9416g4 Kgs as 1.039 Kgs/Kg content in the export iterns at Sl. No. 1 & 2, as clairned by the firm. 4. Quantity of inrporl item at Sl,No.2 rttay be atlowed as 55087 Kgs as 1.041 Kgs/Kg content in the export item at Sl. No. 1, as claimed by the firm. .5. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.3 & 4 put together may be allowed as 1167253 Kgs as 1 .037 Kgs/Kg contenl in the export items at Sl. No. 1 la 4. as clainted by the rirm. 5. Quantity of inrport item at sl.No.S nray be ailowed as 7g77.4Kgs as 1.015Kgs/Kg content in the export items at Sl. No. 1 to 4, as claimed by the firm. 7. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.6 may be allowed as 'l1Z4Bg Kgs as 1.016K9s/Kg content in the export items at Sl. No. 1 to 4, as claimed by the firm. 8. Quantily of import item at St.No.7 may be allowed as 132936 Kgs as 1.01SKgslKg content in the export items at Sl. No. 1 to 4. as claimed by the firm. 9. Quantity of import ilem at Sl.No.8 may be allowed as 11132 Kgs as 1.013Kgs/Kg content in the export item at SI. No. 1. as claimed by the firnr. ro. Quantity of inrport item at Sl.No.9 may be allowed as 243 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this may be allowed as 154600K9s. inclusive ol 1.45o/t, wastage as claimed by the firm. u.

ro. Quantity of inrport item at Sl.No.9 may be allowed as 243 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this may be allowed as 154600K9s. inclusive ol 1.45o/t, wastage as claimed by the firm. u. hxport item at Sl.No,10 may be deleted as not required by the firm. ./こ ′ 〇 ´ ‐菅打。 s′_“

12:濁普 1:譜rtttS・ Noll and 12 put Ю gemσ may be ttOWed upわ2% “ ・ 蹄 :‰ :li闘譜」震 m a ttN° 13 may be訓酬ed as 250NoS On na tO nd 3countabinty Clause. M・ 獄 b翼馴 計譜 m at SINα tt may be ttOWed as■40Nos On nd b nd ccountability ctause. い '駄朧撼聾獅礼ξ篇晃£躍:倶ユ」【 may be ttOWed aS ap"ed bに vely. 16馴翼:轟譲 ::11『臨験∫性温紀創may be JbWed aS 23436 K9= ly. 口側ぼ:::Na隔η温還｀淫:』i繕√ ay be JbWed as app‖ ed brLa ‐ ?攪:罵s島認悪t肝乳:lp誅瀧鴛a冨∬3響T::C臨舅η鷺 1綿ポ S 1971]出s几認 :思tlmeょp訃鼈 ::」閣I∬3TT::C飾:∬洲獅fS 旭Quatty d面"鰤瀾量選気∫鰤.lξ::幅絆 、 St“7KgslK9 cOnte1ltin the exp 21.lmpOrtitenl at Sl・No.28 may be deleted as nOtrequired by the firm. 22.Quantity ofimpon item at Si・NO.29 may be alloWed as 20668Kgs. ― … … Nσms COmmmee may bke a uew
ノ多′ ´ `留 ・1ル (s.K Jain) Devd畔』麗£‰ E‐nlani sush‖ k lainOnic in Ю82“

equired by the firm. 22.Quantity ofimpon item at Si・NO.29 may be alloWed as 20668Kgs. ― … … Nσms COmmmee may bke a uew
ノ多′ ´ `留 ・1ル (s.K Jain) Devd畔』麗£‰ E‐nlani sush‖ k lainOnic in Ю82“

.rn-r;T q'r1,'l r a-rtrrrl ;1, ,:im rtTrrl ..-C qZ'4 ril , ,.,t6ir-I- ,At,rI, [rJ'*l.r Government of lndia lr,4rnistry of Cornnrerce & lndustry Departmcnt lor Prornotion ol lrrduslry & lnternal Trade (Technrcal Support Section) SubleCti‐ Mノs MSS lndia Private Limited,Nashik,(EOU)for fiXation of Scrap Wastage norms forthe year 2020‐ 21.in terrns of para 6.08(e)of Foreign Trade Policy 2015‐ 20 Relt)「cnce,ID G「 丁 errall datcd 13 09 2021 0GFT(DES-1)may kindly refer to their e‐ mall dated 13th September, 2021 fon″ ardin9 therewlth an application received from Mノs MSS Limited,Nashik(EOU),thOrOu9h Dovelop「neni ConlmisslontDr,SEEPZ.Mtlillba'for flxat,on OF Scrap wastage no「 rns'or tho scrap a「isir〕9()t't()r proflt,ct,ol、 process during the year 2020‐ 21 ir、 ternls of para 6 08(e)()〔 Foreign Trade P()IIcy 201 5-20 2 F″ nl.

SEEPZ.Mtlillba'for flxat,on OF Scrap wastage no「 rns'or tho scrap a「isir〕9()t't()r proflt,ct,ol、 process during the year 2020‐ 21 ir、 ternls of para 6 08(e)()〔 Foreign Trade P()IIcy 201 5-20 2 F″ nl. a Ex,ort Orientecl Unit(FO∪}iS engaged in the nlanuFacture of varlotls corT〕pOnents n13iflly for clectrical industrios There are a largo number Of components and nla‖1「avノ :llatcrlals usod in the rllanuia(〕 ture oi various electrical conlponents are CoppeF prOllleslsectiolヽs/bars/ 「ods/strips/plates′ foil` AlunniniuFTl rOds/bars/Flats、 Brass 「od緞/bars/Flats,t_ead lR90tS, COpper cables,Mouiding Granules/Powder etc 3 in lineヽv′ith thelr scarp vvastage norms fixed eariier it,s reconnmended that scrar〕 wastage r10rr子lS for variOtls c():mpOncflts iOr Electrical indtlstry, 10「the year 2020‐ 21 r1layじtl i,xO(l f()r th(I EOU ill terrils()r「,aFa 6 08(e)oF I}1(|「oreigrl Tradc P01icy 2015‐ 20, as ,)er Annexuro , Ctily certifled by the Chttrtered Eβ gil〕eeF, Chartered Accourlts and their iU「iSdiClion Custonl Authottties Nornrs Committee may take a view I rrcl Arr ner"ur"c" 1;rtlt-.str.'r.i ) DGFT(Sh SaFltOSI、Ku「1ld「Dubey,Dy DGFl,DES― り DP‖T∪ONO P‐ 47011/46/2021-TSVV(lated 15 0C」 2021 Lrr-i (S K Jal:l) Deveioprnenl OfFicer Te1 23063166 [‐mallisushilk lain@niC'0 /多 ´ 鷲

1;rtlt-.str.'r.i ) DGFT(Sh SaFltOSI、Ku「1ld「Dubey,Dy DGFl,DES― り DP‖T∪ONO P‐ 47011/46/2021-TSVV(lated 15 0C」 2021 Lrr-i (S K Jal:l) Deveioprnenl OfFicer Te1 23063166 [‐mallisushilk lain@niC'0 /多 ´ 鷲

MSS irdt●Pr卜′ate Lintitedt100%[OU) H8,MIDC.Aヽ13AD,P4ASH:K‐ 422010 FYおこ04 ■多お ・・ A“ ,●cxure e ヽ´ ′ 」り= 藤 :職場 講 与| ■||・11・1‐ Sl No. -.0 to AHF.4B - Pri-rrlu:tion enJ c:nsurrption dala of lho r:rartulacturor lor thc year 2A2O-21 l- rodr etion ol ifle e);{)rl Nei VV019',t。 1 RM Cα isun、ed QLar,tty of the dif{ercll Itrputs consuilled/used , il i:$.j J'ri.:Ii- lif;i:i FlnCa'rlfior'e'utJ 8,,leoヽ F｀31S Sma‖ Prec si,n FIぉt●Arld Metal P3‐ lS IIIIIIIIIIIII :i :Fabrlr.rtedBusttars 11“hinedよForgeC COふp●nents‐ fi tr' Crfip( nenls & ['ecr, Pafls | |[:■rt.‐・ |●ri`A・」 :o Ais■■ 1を|',i 1■11 11l t':ltⅢ ^.| =、 7()3516 Profile,Section,3ar,Piates&「 ols tnr Pro{ le. Secllon. 8ar, Plales I loals Bar, Fiats. RoJs, Stnps 1317312 26.{33 lAlumin,um Fta-s 6ll rllJfj (:opce.'Bar, F ats. Rols, Brass 3●r, 撃91,lJElats sti笙螢 Sheets 望 型 唾 盟 亜 笙

---

11700,6 tt・ad 10('ア11 1171663 17.360 Coppe'Flals 1.12.2?Q M:uld:;rg Gratrr:als 28 922 Brass Rods II=憂互憂霊肇 :|lppe・Cabte(Coveredl●ド GS eq 87,900 3710●ldinoもrai,ual=__´ ____ 7,3?,514 coppe-[tars, Rods Flats, Stnps, Shsels r0 ird.t ArLrnlttunllt{,}li Ealr Fiat: 35.74.■717 I ti,,l lj,, r':.1t.{:re' l.Ja,s i Ods_il-a,!:- 8[1=二 |ヽ 371 100 21,1)'.124 /■―~ ヽ tFrr｀ ,´ ilit l‐ 1‐ |｀ | . ヽ ヽ ヽ , ヽ 1 、ヽ ヽ (ヽ 争 ヽ ヽ . -ri; ..,1'!.: i,r::,1.;i.:'_ iii {r,:- キーー lt tら::|111 | ■| ｀ 1■●:|:lP:it l メ i,,i;i,. ー 11 ■,1:■,ij l ヽ |'い ` lal