IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

Date of Uploading 19 | 04/2025

Directorate General of Foreign Trade (PRC Section)

| | | | | :

Minutes of the Policy Relaxation Committee Meeting Held on 11.09.2025 under the Chairmanship of Shri Ajay Bhadoo, Additional Secretary & Director General of Foreign Trade

Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025.

The following members were present in the meeting: -

Ms. Shubhra Sr. Development Commissioner 2. Shri Abhinav Gupta Addl. DGFT 3. Shri Lokesh H.D. Addl. DGFT 4. Shri Randheep Thakur Joint DGFT 5. Shri Md. Moin Afaque Joint DGFT 6. Shri Satya Raja Sekhar G Joint DGFT 7. Shri Pravin Nalawade Joint DGFT 8. Shri K. Hrushikesh Reddy Joint DGFT

Following cases were discussed. The decision taken on the individual cases are as under:-

S.NO. NAME OF THE FIRM | 1. |Mis. Addon Export House Limited, Mumbai | 2. |M/s. M Lakhamsi Industries Limited, Mumbai | 3. |Mis. Mahalasa Exports, Karnataka | 4. |M/s. Tasty Nut Industries, Kollam | 5. |Mis. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 6. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 7. |Mis. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 8. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 9. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 10. |Mis. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 11. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 12. |Mis. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 13. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 14. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra | 15. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra 15. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

ee32. |M/s. Nickunj Edm Wires & Consumables Private Limited,

Gujrat [5 [Ws. Welspun Living Lined,

CLarn& a

-2-

Maharashtra 15. |M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

ee32. |M/s. Nickunj Edm Wires & Consumables Private Limited,

Gujrat [5 [Ws. Welspun Living Lined,

CLarn& a

-2-

|M/s. United Pactec Private Limited, Karnataka [56.|Wis. Essen Specialy Fims Limited Rajkot [858. |W is.s. S tertehree Pragya ElectricFlexfim Limited, MaharashtIndusties, Vadoda ra [60.|Wis. Satrac Engineering Private Limited, Bangalore [67 |Ms. Diamond Engineering (Chennal Private Limited, Chennai [6 Ws. PK Textiles Ud,West [85 |is.Bengal Marco Limited [6 |Ws.Mumbai Bulk Liquid Solutions Private United, Bangalore [68.|Ws. Shockley Hall Electronics PviLig.Kokala [8 |iWs. Pagarya Food Products Private Limited

[0~|Wis. Maple Ceramica Private Limited,Moradabad [BS fs Krishna Fab, Deahh [86 |Ws. Anshika Fasteners Private Limited, Nagpur 89. |M/ food Guat abonatorny ane Reseanmch Cenjre,

‘

= 3 -

==> picture [330 x 240] intentionally omitted <==

ad [BS fs Krishna Fab, Deahh [86 |Ws. Anshika Fasteners Private Limited, Nagpur 89. |M/ food Guat abonatorny ane Reseanmch Cenjre,

‘

= 3 -

==> picture [330 x 240] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|90. Ys:|Genus Péwertardatiehites Linttewtlaur™|
|||91.||Mis. Genus Power|Infrastructures|Limited,|Jaipur|
|||92.|IMs. Assam Carbon|Products|Ltd, West Bengal|
|||93.||M/s.|Rigi|Cut Tools|Private|Limited,|Mumbai|
|||94.|IMs.|Delta Airtech|Engineering|Private|Limited,|Tamil|Nadu|
|||95.||Ms. Menon|Pistons|Limited,|Maharashtra|
|||96.||M/s.|Vikram|Solar|Limited,|Kolkata|
|||97.||M/s. Amar Tea|Private|Limited, Mumbai|
|||98.||M/s.|Rallis|India|Limited, Mumbai|
|||99.|M/s.|Nordex|India|Private|Limited,|Karnataka|
|100.||M/s. Saumyaa|Processors|Private|Limited, Surat|
|101.||M/s. Crown|Decor|Private|Limited, Anmedabad|
|102.||M/s.|Laurus Labs|Limited, Hyderabad|

----- End of picture text -----

Case No. 01 M/s. Addon Export House Limited, Mumbai F.No. HARPRCAPPLYOO005986AM24

Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025

Subject: Revalidation of DFIA no. 0311010424 dated 13.01.2023.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.24AM24 held on 18.12.2023 (Case No.12) wherein Committee decided to seek a detailed report from RA, Mumbai before taking the final decision.

ted 13.01.2023.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.24AM24 held on 18.12.2023 (Case No.12) wherein Committee decided to seek a detailed report from RA, Mumbai before taking the final decision.

Applicant Statement: The matter was taken up. The entire submission made by the applicant was gone through. We M/s ADDON EXPORT HOUSE holding 7IEC No 0392071851 hereby apply for extend validity of our DFIA authorization no. 0311010424, dt. 13.01.2023. The reason is due to some DGFT portal issue, our BRC realized against S/bill no. 4311022 Dt. 23.02.2017 was showing 3 times. And because of which our CIF value is coming more. Attached herewith with Licence copy that which shows CIF value is much more compare to FOB, there were mistake in the application but RA issued the Licence. Also attached letter for exact details.

Comments of RA were also seen.

Decision: The Committee examined the case in detail and in view of justification provided by the firm it decided to accede to the request and allowed revalidation of DFIA Authorization No. 0311010424 dated 13.01.2023 for a further period of 3 months from the date of endorsement. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. ‘ (Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai) aaaa

| |

M/s. M Lakhamsi Industries Limited, Mumbai

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00013266AM25

Subject: Request for Minor Amendment on Unit Measurement of Import Qty against DFIA Authorization No. 0311037833 dated 10/10/2024.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.01AM26 held on 09.04.2025 (Case No.34) wherein Committee decided to refer to EGTF for comments.

Applicant Statement: The matter was taken up. The entire submission made by the applicant was gone through. We have encountered an issue with the Transferable DFIA issued on 10/10/2024, under Script No: 0311037833 Date 10/10/2024 FILE NO: 03AS07600524AM25, where the unit of measurement is incorrectly listed as Kilogram instead of Metric Tons (MTS). Export Documents such as shipping bill and Invoices and your System clearly showing the unit measurement of exports as Metric Ton so we are entitled to import the quantity as per Norms using the same unit of measurement. We further requesting kindly condone as a human error if any, and kindly amend the unit measurement of Import Quantity as METRIC TON instead of Kilogram.

Comments of EGTF were also seen.

Decision: The Committee examined the case in detail and noted that Public Notice No. 22 dated 09.09.2025 has been issued for enabling amendments of DFIA. Firm may follow the procedure laid down in the said Public Notice.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

M/s. Mahalasa Exports, Karnataka

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00007282AM24

Subject: Request for revalidation of DFIA licence issued with mistake in import quantity against DFIA Authorization No. 0711005845 dated 23.12.2022.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.07AM26 held on 03.07.2025 (Case No.12) wherein Committee decided to seek a detailed report from RA Bengaluru for taking the decision.

Applicant Statement: The matter was taken up. The entire submission made by the applicant was gone through As per the FTP 2015-20 we availed DFIA licence 0711005845 dated 23.12.2022 from RA BANGALORE(issued from file number 07AS07600034AM23), unfortunately the quantity came in the licence wrongly, Actual quantity has to come is 1110222.288 KGS but licence issued with

110222.288 KGS. As per our knowledge in DFIA amendment option not provided in the DGFT SOFTWARE, so we submitted manual amendment to office (RA Bangalore) .on 23.01.2023,AND = submitted revalidation = application online(O7AM07600015AM24) before expiry of licence, but file is under deficiency asking ‘specify the provision under which revalidation has been applied to process further’, so we are submitting PRC application, Kindly accept our request and do the needful.

Comments of RA were also seen.

Decision: The Committee examined the case in detail and in view of justification provided by the firm it decided to accede to the request and allowed revalidation of DFIA Authorization No. 0711005845 dated 23.12.2022 for a further period of 3 months from the date of endorsement. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/ RA Bengaluru)

Case No.04 M/s. Tasty Nut Industries, Kollam

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001058AM26

Meeting No.11AM26 heldon 11.09.2025

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 1011000131 dated 08/03/2021.

Applicant Statement: We had imported 384071kgs of raw cashew nut under above AA and we had completed EO. Unfortunately one container return back and EO shortage effected. We had exported 16443kgs cashew kernels under SB No.5132231/04.11.2023 instead of return container but it was made after two months of 2nd EO Period. So we request you to kindly allow us EOP extension for further six months to covering exports made by us for regularization of EO. That is need EO extension up to 07.03.2024.

Decision: The Committee having examined the statement made by the applicant in its application decided to defer the case to seek clarification from the firm as how they could make the export after return of their consignment.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No.05 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001028AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311042491 dated 25/03/2025.

on: Applicant)

Case No.05 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001028AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311042491 dated 25/03/2025.

Applicant Statement: Due to many unforeseen uncertainties in the global market

sits

| |

in the last 2 months which has resulted constrained in the availability of non-QCO PTA and consequent delays in Polyester exports. Not only this but many other volatilities in global markets have resulted in non-availability of PTA in international trade-detail is also mentioned in letter.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311042491 dated 25.03.2025 for a further period up to 04.11.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001029AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311042487 dated 25/03/2025.

Applicant Statement: Due to many unforeseen uncertainties in the global market in the last 2 months which has resulted constrained in the availability of non-QCO PTA and consequent delays in Polyester exports. Not only this but many other volatilities in global markets have resulted in non-availability of PTA in international trade-detail is also mentioned in letter.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311042487 dated 25.03.2025 for a further period up to 04.11.2025 subject to : payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.07 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001030AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311042568 dated 26/03/2025.

-F-

trade-detail is also mentioned in letter.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311042568 dated 26.03.2025 for a further period up to 04.11.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.08 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001031AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311042566 dated 26/03/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311042566 dated 26.03.2025 for a further period up to 04.11.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.09 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY000001032AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311042493 dated 25/03/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to

accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311042493 dated 25.03.2025 for a further period up to 04.11.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.10 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001035AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311042488 dated 25/03/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311042488 dated 25.03.2025 for a further period up to 04.11.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.11 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00001466AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No.0311043925 dated 16/05/2025.

| | |

payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.12 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00001460AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311040523 dated 16/01/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311040523 dated 16.01.2025 for a further period up to 04.01.2026 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.13 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001458AM26

Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025 Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311043922 dated 16/05/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311043922 dated 16.05.2025 for a further period up to 04.01.2026 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001457AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311043931 dated 16/05/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311043931 dated 16.05.2025 for a further period up to 31.12.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.15 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00001456AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311040524 dated 16/01/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311040524 dated 16.01.2025 for a further period up to 31.12.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No. 16 M/s. Reliance Industries Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001454AM26

==> picture [50 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- aa ----- End of picture text -----

—tis

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311043923 dated 16/05/2025.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311043923 dated 16.05.2025 for a further period up to 04.01.2026 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.17 M/s. Astec Lifesciences Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00001324AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311019329 dated 18/11/2022.

Applicant Statement: EOB of 200 Kg is pending for export against AA no.0311019329. This order is for a specific quality requirement product as per customer demand. Therefore we could not achieve the yield as per the ratios allowed in license while processing the final export product due to quality restraints. Hence there is a short fall of 200 kgs in export quantity of the license. In view of above facts please issue EOP for 6 Months under PRC to enable export of 200 kgs to complete the EOB. Request for your urgent action as the goods are ready for export.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.18 M/s. Hi Tech International, Ludhiana

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001407AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 3011001812 dated

ee

25/02/2022.

| || ||

Applicant Statement: Please note that we have obtained an Advance Authorization Number 3011001812 on Dated 25/02/2022 Import Validity 25/02/2023 and extendable Export Validity 25/08/2024. The Import items as per licence is as mentioned below: - 1 PBAT Resin (PBAT Resin TH801T, Biodegradable Polymer PBAT 1908) Quantity 84787.50 Kgs and ITCHS 39079900 & The Export items as per licence is as mentioned below: - 1 Biodegradable Bag or Biodegradable Rolls (PBAT Resin TH801T (85%)/ Biodegradable Polymer PBAT 1908 (85%), Coated/Uncoated Calcium Carbonate Powder (15%) We have done import with in time against the above said license but couldn't fulfill the Export Obligation within the Original and extendable Export obligation Period. But, during this period, we have made significant progress: We have invented a new product: Biodegradable bags, Compostable Bags which needs to be tested from different laboratories (e.g., CIPET, INDIA). CIPET has given us the final pass report on 05.02.2024 (Copy enclosed for your reference) We also have made Testing from Canada Laboratories BNQ lab, Quebec. It was approved on 21.12.2023. We also would like to inform that we got orders from Canada and dispatched the material on 05.07.2024 vide shipping bill no. 2203326, but due to some clerical mistake we couldn't mention the license detail on shipping bill. After that, we had sent samples to our export customers. As it takes so much time to get the order of the said item. Buyers have confirmed their willingness to proceed with export orders.

pping bill. After that, we had sent samples to our export customers. As it takes so much time to get the order of the said item. Buyers have confirmed their willingness to proceed with export orders. We kindly request the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) to grant a 6-month extension to fulfill our export obligations. Thank you for considering our request. Also, we are writing that due to some unforeseen global market challenges has impacted our industry. Despite our best efforts, we faced significant disruptions, including: Geopolitical instability in Europe and the Middle East, Iran-lsrael conflict affecting logistics, Cancellation of export orders, non-availability of containers. So, we request you to kindly grant us extension of six month to complete our export obligation.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 3011001812 dated 25.02.2022 for a further up to 25.02.2026 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Ludhiana)

Case No.19 M/s. Silver Spark Apparel Limited, Bengaluru

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001235AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0711006050 dated 28/12/2022.

Applicant Statement: We hereby submitting application for EOP extension with

==> picture [49 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- “ ----- End of picture text -----

—~ (25

regard to our imported material still pending from our factory due to the buyer postponed the export order kindly approve our application and enable us keep export under the same license to fulfill the export obligation. This will be a great help to achieve our Export obligation as per the imported qty.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0711006050 dated 28.12.2022 for a further period up to 28.12.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Bengaluru)

Case No.20 M/s. Silver Spark Apparel Limited, Karnataka

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001405AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0711002727 dated 27/12/2021.

Applicant Statement: We hereby submitting application for EOP extension with regard to our imported material still pending from our factory due to the buyer postponed the export order kindly approve our application and enable us to keep export under the same license to fulfill the export obligation. This will be a great help to achieve our Export obligation as per the imported quantity.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0711002727 dated 27.12.2021 for a further period up to 27.12.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Bengaluru)

Case No.21 M/s. ACME Commodities Private Limited, Chennai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001413AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 1011001298 dated 05/08/2022.

Applicant Statement: We could achieve 43.64 percent EO since inferior quality supply of raw cashew nut effected our export operations. During the period we have received 1000 MT sub standard immature Raw cashew Nut. This combined by unprecedented challenges posed by COVID 19 Pandemic and its aftermath

==> picture [1 x 1] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

_14-

| |

have exacerbated delays in export schedule there by shortfall in export quantity. There are totally unfavorable conditions such as shortage of export orders competition from abroad setting up of processing centers in African countries, shortage of working capital stringent banking conditions for export finance etc. hindered us from achieving the export targets. We have pumped in additional capital and built a new factory of international standard thereby achieving capability for volume business. Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No.22 M/s. ACME Commodities Private Limited, Chennai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001412AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 1011001260 dated 12/07/2022

Applicant Statement: We could achieve 68.63 percent EO since inferior quality supply of raw cashew nut effected our export operations. During the period we have received 474 MT sub standard immature Raw cashew Nut. This combined by unprecedented challenges posed by COVID 19 Pandemic and its aftermath have exacerbated delays in export schedule there by shortfall in export quantity. There are totally unfavorable conditions such as shortage of export orders competition from abroad setting up of processing centers in African countries, shortage of working capital stringent banking conditions for export finance etc. hindered us from achieving the export targets. We have pumped in additional capital and built a new factory of international standard thereby achieving capability for volume business.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No.23 M/s. ACME Commodities Private Limited, Chennai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY0000141 1AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 1011001340 dated 12/09/2022.

Applicant Statement: We could achieve only 10.13 percent EO since inferior

op ee

quality supply of raw cashew nut effected our export operations. During the period we have received 1000 MT sub standard immature Raw cashew Nut. This combined with unprecedented challenges posed by COVID 19 Pandemic and its aftermath have exacerbated delays in export schedule there by shortfall in export quantity. There are totally unfavorable conditions such as shortage of export orders competition from abroad setting up of processing centers in African countries, shortage of working capital stringent banking conditions for export finance etc. hindered us from achieving the export targets. We have pumped in additional capital and built a new factory of international standard thereby achieving capability for volume business.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.24 M/s. Medley Pharmaceuticals Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001011AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311029542 dated 20/12/2023.

Applicant Statement: The Advance Licence is under PC 9 conditioned and we have valid Export Order to complete the Obligation (Order Attached). Our 1st EOP extension is valid till 27.06.2025. We couldn't complete the export because of cancellation of Orders. Attaching the statement of Import and Export with request you to kindly approve for 2nd EOP extension and we are ready to pay the Composition fee as per HBP 4.40 (k). We will be highly obliged on your intervention in approving our 2nd extension for 6 months to complete the Export Obligation.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.25 M/s. Medley Pharmaceuticals Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00001019AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311026611 dated 25/08/2023.

Applicant Statement: The Advance Licence is under PC 9 conditioned. Our 1st

==> picture [66 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- etl ----- End of picture text -----

= ihib.< ?

EOP extension is valid till 22.03.2025. We have completed 52.5% of Export Obligation against Actual Import made (Statement of Export and Import Attached). Presently we are having Export Order to complete the Balance export obligation. We therefore request for 2nd EOP Extension and we are ready to pay the Composition fee as per HBP 4.40 (k). We will be highly obliged on your intervention in approving our 2nd extension for 6 months to complete the Balance Export Obligation.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.26 M/s. Hetero Labs Limited, Telangana

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001 136AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0911000550 dated 23/03/2021.

Applicant Statement: We have fulfilled the export obligation to the extent of 22.45% within the original validity period of Authorization. We have not taken any extension in EOP from RA, since we were not having export orders at that time. Balance export obligation could not be fulfilled due to cancellation of export orders/postponement of delivery by our customer. Now we are having sufficient export orders to fulfill the entire export obligation.

Decision: |The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No.27 M/s. Boson Motors Private Limited, Chennai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001072AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0411004903 dated 15/02/2023.

Applicant Statement: We would request you extend the Export Validity period for another SIX months beyond two extensions obtained from RA, Chennai against Advance Authorisation No. 0411004903 Dated 15/02/2023 to complete our export obligations, in light of recent trade developments that have unexpectedly affected our business operations Earlier this year, the newly elected President of the United States announced significant changes to import tariffs, resulting in a sudden 26%

-| +"

increase in duties applicable to our products. This abrupt shift has disrupted global trade dynamics and has had a particularly severe impact on our scheduled exports to the U.S. market.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0411004903 dated 15.02.2023 for a further period of 6 months from the date of endorsement subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Chennai)

M/s. Bulk Liquid Solutions Private Limited, Bangalore

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001042AM26

Meeting No.11AM26 heldon 11.09.2025

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0710112164 dated 20.09.2017.

Applicant Statement: We have the Advance authorization no. 0710112164 / 20.09.2017 issued from ADGFT Bangalore, since we have already applied for the EOP on 18.03.2019 and we have done export beyond the EOP. so we Humbly request the Policy Relaxation Committed to consider our request of EOP extension. We sincerely apologize for this unintentional lapse.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0710112164 dated 20.09.2017 for a further period up to 27.04.2019 for regularization purpose subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Bengaluru)

Case No.29 M/s. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Gujarat

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001049AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0811010550 dated 22/10/2024.

Applicant Statement: We earnestly request the Policy Relaxation Committee to please look into genuine points of case on priority for grant another six-months extension i.e. up to up to 03-02-2026 in Advance Authorization 0811010550

Aes

| | | | | |

Dt.22.01.2024 as per HBP 4.40 to effectively serve export orders based on market demand of finished Products which was delayed on account of ANDA approval and obliged us.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.30 M/s. Hetero Labs Limited, Telangana

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001129AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0911003309 dated 08/07/2022.

Applicant Statement: We have fulfilled the export obligation to the extent of 63.13% within the original validity period of Authorization. We have taken 1st and 2nd EOP extensions from RA up to 08.01.2025 and fulfilled 19.28% of export obligation within the 1st and 2nd EO extended periods. Balance export obligation could not be fulfilled due to cancellation of export orders/postponement of delivery by our customer. Now we are having sufficient export orders to fulfill the entire export obligation.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.31 M/s. Hetero Labs Limited, Telangana

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001282AM26

Meeting No. 11AM26 held on 11.09.2025

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0911001654 dated 29/09/2021.

Applicant Statement: We have obtained advance authorization No.0911001654 dated 29.09.2021 under Ad-hoc Norms fixed category from the office of Addl. DGFT, Hyderabad for export 3,000 kgs of Rosuvastatin Calcium. We have fulfilled the export obligation to the extent of 44.57% within the original validity period of Authorization. We have not taken any extension in EOP from RA, since we were not having export orders at that time. Balance export obligation could not be fulfilled due to cancellation of export orders/postponement of delivery by our customer. Now we are having sufficient export orders to fulfill the entire export obligation. :

—19-

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.32 M/s. Nickunj Edm Wires & Consumables Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLYO0001065AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311007838 dated 22/10/2021.

Applicant Statement: We, M/s. Nickunj EDM Wires & Consumables Pvt. Ltd. have been issued Advance Authorisation no. 0311007838 dated 22.10.2021. The validity of export of said Authorisation was up to 22.04.2023. We would like to inform you that during the period of 2021 to 2023 there was a pandemic of Covid all over the world and due to which there was a stagnant situation of the market. Therefore, we could not fulfill our export obligations of the captioned Advance Authorisation. Also, during the said period there was a war between Russia and Ukraine which affected our export market adversely. We would also like to state that we have exported to the extent of 50% of the product as per Authorisation. Since, we have to export the remaining export obligations of the said Authorisation, we request you to grant us E.O. extension of 6 months for the date of endorsement.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311007838 dated 22.10.2021 for a further period up to 22.10.2025 subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.33 M/s. Malas Food Products Private Limited, Pune

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001016AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311020788 dated 18/01/2023.

Applicant Statement: We are applying third EOP extension as our export obligation is pending in respect of import which we have made therefore kindly consider our application so that we can export our balance export obligation in said

=20=

advance license no.0311020788 dt.18.01.2023 we are attaching self attested import export statement for your reference.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311020788 dated 18.01.2023 for a further period of 6 months from the date of endorsement subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.34 M/s. ARL Tyres Limited, Telangana

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001021AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0911005275 dated 26/06/2023.

Applicant Statement: As we have imported the raw material under appendix 4j and have to do exports under the 4j condition and we have applied for EOP extension by paying composition fees of rs.21000.00, hence, we request you us to grand EOP extension under public notice no. 52/2015-2020 dt. 18.01.2023 for 06 months period (upto04.12.2025) under para (f) of the notice as we are eligible for the same.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.35 M/s. Tangerine Design Private Limited, Gurgaon

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001532AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against 15 Advance Authorisations.

Applicant Statement: What Relaxation is required 1) To allow the transfer of 15 unredeemed Advance Authorisations from Tangerine Design Pvt. Ltd (transferor company)( IEC No 0513031278) to Tangerine Skies Pvt. Ltd (transferee company) (IEC No AAGCT3423Q) the entity to whom the business has been transferred on account of Business Transfer Agreement (BTA)/ Slump Sale dtd. 17.04.23. c) A relaxation is sought in Para 4.40 (f) of HBP, requesting the EO Period to be allowed further for 6 months, after the online process of transfer to the transferee company Tangerine Skies Pvt. Ltd. ( IEC No AAGCT3423Q) is completed online

—2)

on DGFT portal. SI No. Authorisation No. & Date 1 0511007037 Dt. 22.12.2021 2 0511008530 Dt.03.02.2022 3 0511009169 Dt 16.02.2022 4 0511011785 Dt. 12.04.2022 5 0511013090 Dt. 08.06.2022 6 0511013568 Dt. 04.07.2022 7 0511014089 Dt 03.08.2022 8 0511014102 Dt 04.08.2022 9 0511014331 Dt. 17.08.2022 10 0511014730 Dt. 09.09.2022 11 0511014946 Dt. 21.09.2022 12 0511015052 Dt. 28.09.2022 13 0511015535 Dt. 31.10.2022 14 0511016316 Dt. 12.12.2022 15 0511012631 dt 18.05.2022 RELAXATION IN WHICH FTP/HBP PARA REQD 1) Online transfer as allowed in Para 2.14(e ) and ( f) of HBP 2023 is not functional in DGFT portal in case of Business Transfer 2) PARA 4.40 (f) OF HANDBOOK OF PROCEDURES Justification for Relaxation 1 Tangerine Design Pvt. Ltd (We Company transfer company) have been exporting Leather goods since 2013 .

e of Business Transfer 2) PARA 4.40 (f) OF HANDBOOK OF PROCEDURES Justification for Relaxation 1 Tangerine Design Pvt. Ltd (We Company transfer company) have been exporting Leather goods since 2013 . We have been earning the valuable foreign exchange for the country with the export turnover in 2022-23 being 398 crores and 344 crores in 2023-24. We were giving employment to more than 2000 people, continuously training them in skill development. 2 We have been utilizing Advance Authorisation Scheme regularly and have got more than 95 Authorisations redeemed/ surrendered. 3 We entered into Business Transfer Agreement (BTA) on 17.04.23 with Tangerine Skies Pvt. Ltd. (TSPL, transferee company) wherein our Business was transferred to Tangerine Skies Pvt. Ltd. Business Transfer is also known as Slump Sale. 4 Business Transfer is allowed under Income Tax Provisions The terms, business transfer and slump sale are used interchangeably and both refer to transfer and sale of an entire business undertaking of the seller on a going concern basis for a lump-sum consideration. Slump sale is purely a tax concept and the Income-tax Act, 1961 (ITA) defines a slump sale under Section 2 (42C) 5 Para 2.14( e) of HBP 2023 recognises business transfer where change in constitution of a PAN bases IEC takes place. Para 2.14(f) allows transfer of unredeemed Authorizations from earlier IEC to the new IEC by following online process, subject to RA approval, 6 However, the online process recognises only Merger and not Business Transfer where both the IECs remain active.

from earlier IEC to the new IEC by following online process, subject to RA approval, 6 However, the online process recognises only Merger and not Business Transfer where both the IECs remain active. Therefore, it is requested that permission may be given for online transfer of above mentioned 15 Advance Authorizations. 7 Due to change in management and handover delays, EO in subject 15 Advance Authorizations could not be completed. Lack of export orders in that period also affected the completion of EO. 8 The business has been fully taken over by TSPL and post transfer, they can now export within 6 months. TSPL has good queries for export orders. The export turnover achieved by Transferee Company in 2023-24 is 344 crores and approximately 576 crores in 2024-25. We are sure that transferee company shall complete the EO under the above 15 Advance Authorisations if the honourable Committee allows further period of 6 months for balance exports from the date of online transfer on DGFT portal.

Decision: The Committee after discussing the matter on the basis of justification submitted by the applicant, decided to defer the case and seek a detailed report from CLA, New Delhi and EGTF Division.

(Action: Applicant/ CLA, New Delhi/ EGTF Division)

Case No.36 | M/s. Fresenius Kabi Oncology Limited, Haryana F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001025AM26

==> picture [58 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- vad ----- End of picture text -----

Oey

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0511013693 dated 11/07/2022 and 0511017109 dated 01/02/2023.

Applicant Statement: Raw Material qty reduced in ad hoc norms and as per HBP we intend to do additional exports in proportion to qty reduced. However EOP extension time is over, hence relaxation application for EOP extension for six months from endorsement date. This would a great help and save us from huge loss. Detailed letter is attached. Submitted for your consideration.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to defer the case for further examination.

Case No.37 M/s. Modelama Exports Private Limited, Gurugram

F.No. HQARPRCAPPLY00001027AM26

Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0511019230 dated 07/06/2023.

Applicant Statement: The Item of Export is Ladies Sweat shirts. The Garments were made to be retailed in the beginning of the autumn season in USA. The fabric of the garment which were imported from Far East country were delayed in arriving our factories which disturbed the dispatch plan of the year 2024. Our Buyers had advised us to withhold the dispatches for the year 2024. We gave our consents to the Buyer suggestion and accepted the revised dispatch plan for the year December 2025. Kindly note that we don't possess the prowess to alter the nature and hence pray to grant necessary extension so our merchandise should receive the warm reception in the US market and its lives is saved.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0511019230 dated 07.06.2023 for a further period of 6 months from the date of endorsement subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ CLA New Delhi)

Case No.38 M/s. Ashish Life Science Private Limited, Mumbai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00000511AM24

==> picture [54 x 59] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- aa ----- End of picture text -----

—-23-

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311001372 dated 01/02/2021 and 0311006184 dated 15/08/2021.

Applicant Statement: (a) The Advance Authorisation No 0310001372 dated 1.2.2021 and No 0310006184 dated 15.8.2021 have been obtained for export Drug items. (b) Unfortunately due to Corona Epidemics during the year 2021 and 2022 the India and all overseas countries have hugely suffered production and demand due to from closures of their units and also lack of staff and due to huge financial constrains and lowered/ stopped production due to no requirement of their finished products. (c) In respect of the First authorisation dated 1.2.2021 date of imports are 15.1.2021 (First) and 17.11.2021 (Last) and the date of Exports are 15.12.2021 (First) and 22.6.2023 (Last). We have made 42.66% imports against which already fulfilled 74.40% EO within EOP. (d) In respect of the Second authorisation dated 15.8.2021 the date of First and Last imports are 10.9.2021 and only 11.88% impOrts for Rs.9.17 Lakh have been made. The pre-import condition have been complied with in respect of both authorisations.

15.8.2021 the date of First and Last imports are 10.9.2021 and only 11.88% impOrts for Rs.9.17 Lakh have been made. The pre-import condition have been complied with in respect of both authorisations. (e) We request PRC for (a) regularisation of exports already made beyond 12 months EOP under Appendix 4J and (b) grant of EOP for a period of 6 months against both authorisation from the date of endorsement by RA, Mumbai to enable us to make balance exports and also to provide employment to technical and weaker sector and also to earn valuable foreign exchange for the country.

Comments of RA were also seen.

Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request.

M/s. Kredence Multi Trading Limited, Mumbai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001050AM26

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311020293 dated 27/12/2022.

Applicant Statement: We are a Star exporter of steel and related products. Although we operate as merchant exporters, all our export goods are processed at M/s. Uttam Galva Steels Limited (UGSL), Khopoli, which is also a Star exporter. Regarding the referred license we procured in 2022, we imported around 1700 Metric tonnes of CR steel in December, 2022, which could not be processed due to the following reasons: UGSL was admitted in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), and a resolution professional was appointed who claimed the materials imported meant for export. Despite our best efforts to claim the materials back, we were unsuccessful. Subsequently, the resolution plan under CIRP was approved and the Company was acquired by M/s. Arcelor Mittal Khopoli Limited, with whom we raised the aforesaid issue. During the reconciliation conducted in

| |

he resolution plan under CIRP was approved and the Company was acquired by M/s. Arcelor Mittal Khopoli Limited, with whom we raised the aforesaid issue. During the reconciliation conducted in

| |

the CIRP period, it was found that our aforementioned materials are in their possession, and they have agreed to process and convert them into finished GP material. Due to restrictions imposed by the US and EU, we faced some challenges with prospective buyers. However, the issues have been resolved, and we plan to proceed with the export upon receiving the extension of the EOP. In light of this, we kindly request the following: 1. An extension or revalidation of the license for exports for an additional six months. 2. Closure of the license after completing these obligations. Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311020293 dated 27.12.2022 for a further period of 6 months from the date of endorsement subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai) Case No.40 M/s. Wheel Flexible Packaging Pvt. Ltd, Dadra & Nagar Haveli F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001422AM26 Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025 Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311020286 dated 26.12.2022.

le Packaging Pvt. Ltd, Dadra & Nagar Haveli F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001422AM26 Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025 Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorisation No. 0311020286 dated 26.12.2022. Applicant Statement: There was fire in raw material supplier factory M/s. Jindal Poly Films ltd. they are manufacturing polyester films as per our specifications. Due to fire accident the plant and machinery has been destroyed and the production and output of polyester films has come to halt. These have greatly impacted our export production due to shortage of raw material - polyester film. we have export orders in hand. We therefore request for extension in export obligation period for twelve months - 12 months from the date of endorsement by RLA Mumbai.

Decision: The Committee went through the justification made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to accede to the request and allowed EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0311020286 dated 26.12.2022 for a further period of 1 year from the date of endorsement subject to payment of composition fee as per policy provisions. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Mumbai)

Case No.41 M/s. Neeta International, Pune

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00353157AM22

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No. 3110067415 dated 14/05/2019.

Applicant Statement: We had completed 100 percentage of the export obligation under the subject Advance Authorization. As per the conditions in the Authorization we were suppose to fulfill the Obligation within 90 days from the date of imports affected but due to change in the buyers order we had to delay 2 of our shipments out of the initial export period, but have completed the exports within 45 days from the initial expiry of the EO Period of the license or which we request you to please grant us 1st extension for 45 days from the expiry of the initial EO Period so that we can get the Authorization Redeemed from DGFT as RA Pune is not accepting the application of EOP Extension due to submission delayed after 90 days from expiry of license.

Comments of RA were also seen.

Decision: The case is withdrawn.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No.42 M/s. Coral Laboratories Limited, Mumbai

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00001416AM26

Subject: Request for Acceptance of 5 Shipping Bills for fulfillment of Export Obligation under Advance Authorization No. 0311000117 dated 03/08/2021.

(Action: Applicant/ CLA New Delhi)

Case No.84 M/s. Ice Make Refrigeration Limited, Gujarat

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00013043AM25

Subject: Closure of EPCG License against EPCG Authorization No. 0830004744 dated 19/03/2012.

Applicant Statement: Request to give directions for closure EPCG License wherein export realization has been obtained in freely convertible foreign currency but the Bank Realization Certificate BRC could not be generated. Payment for the ;

SB No. 3920042 dated 17.07.2014 and SB No. 2668574 dated 07.12.2016 has been realised in the FFC. However, the BRC is not showing on the DGFT portal. In this regard we are unable to close the license. Detailed justification and supporting evidences are attached along with the application

Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to ask the firm to get the BRC from the new Bank for closure of EPCG Authorization No. 0830004744 dated 19.03.2012. (Action: Applicant)

Case No.85 M/s. Forward Leather Company, Chennai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00013384AM25

Subject: Achieved 83 percentages Relaxation in Annual Average Fulfillment against EPCG Authorization No. 0430005677 dated 08/01/2008.

Applicant Statement: 1. One of the main partner met with a serious car accident in the year 2006 and was out of the day to day running of the business for Eighteen Months . 2. Due to this unfortunate incident combined with the international market slow down culminating in the Global Collapse in 2008, our business showed a decline. 3. In the year 2012, our bankers declared the Company as NPA and we had to stop our manufacturing activities immediately. 4. There has been no activities in the Company since 2012. 5. The Senior Partner and my Father, late Mr.Asgar Ali Dhala passed away in the year 2020 and Company is not in Existence now.

Decision: The Committee went through the statement made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No.86 M/s. Anshika Fasteners Private Limited, Nagpur

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00000976AM26

Subject: Request for abeyance in terms of para 2.14 against EPCG Authorization No. 5030000112 dated 09/06/2011.

Applicant Statement: Request for placing the DEL orders in abeyance in terms of para 2.14(d) of the FTP-2023-28 and issuance of fresh EPCG License Ref.: |. DEL Order No. NGPMKDL32989 dated 24.01.2025 Il. EPCG License No 5030000112 Dated 09.06.2011 Ul. O-I-O vide file no. NGPECAAPPLY00006258AM22 Dated 29.08.2023 IV. PRC Decision: File No. s Gi

aoa,

HQRPRCAPPLY00168327AM22 Meeting No.06/AM23 held on 31.05.2022 V. Closure of EPCG application 50EEEPCO0609AM25 Dated 29.08.2024 VI. Fresh EPCG Application File No. 51EAEPC01871AM25 Dated 04.01.2025 VII. IEC No. 5009000601 Resp. Sir, With reference to caption subject matter, we would like to submit the following, 1. We have been issued an EPCG License no. 5030000112 dated 09.06.2011. 2. We have granted the EOP extension of Two years (upto 09.06.2019) as we could not complete the Export obligation in Six years. 3. Further, we could not fulfill our EO in extended EOP and therefore we decided to approach PRC for further EOP extension vide File No. HQRPRCAPPLY00168327AM22. 4. The PRC has accepted our request and granted us EOP extension upto 31.03.2022 on payment of composition fees @2% on balance Export obligation as on 09.06.2019. 5. Therefore, we have applied for EOP extension to RA Nagpur and paid the required composition fees. 6. However, in the mean time a Show Cause Notice was issued from file no NGPECAAPPLY00006258AM22 on 23.03.2022. 7.

have applied for EOP extension to RA Nagpur and paid the required composition fees. 6. However, in the mean time a Show Cause Notice was issued from file no NGPECAAPPLY00006258AM22 on 23.03.2022. 7. We have informed the adjudicating authority that our EOP extension case is pending before the PRC. 8. Further, In the said extended EOP period we have fulfill our export obligation and submitted our all the export documents along with our EOP extension application as per PRC approval. 9. However, an Adjudication Order was passed on 29.08.2023 for non fulfillment of required export obligation. 10. Therefore, we have submitted our Closure of EPCG application vide file no. 51EEEPCOO609AM25 on 29.08.2024. 11. The said application was not processed and marked as deficient sighting reason as ?Kindly note that, your application for redemption cannot be considered as an Order In Original has been passed on 29.08.2023 against this authorization.? 12. Further, DEL order vide file no. NGPMKDL32989 was passed on 24.01.2025 mentioning reason as ?In connection with the Export Obligation default for the Authorization you are being put in Denied Entity List. Requests you to please contact the Regional Authority as per the undersigned signatory.? 13. We are enclosing the date wise events for your ready reference. 14. We have applied for issuance of EPCG license vide file no. 50EAEPC01871AM25 on 04.01.2025 and same is marked as deficient due the reason as ?Your IEC is in DEL. Please refer to file no. S50EEEPCOO609AM25 (EPCG Authorization No.5030000112 dtd.

e vide file no. 50EAEPC01871AM25 on 04.01.2025 and same is marked as deficient due the reason as ?Your IEC is in DEL. Please refer to file no. S50EEEPCOO609AM25 (EPCG Authorization No.5030000112 dtd. 09.06.2011) in which Order in Original has been issued on 29.08.2023 wherein a penalty has been imposed. You are required to pay the penalty in addition to customs duty plus interest thereon.? 15. We would like to submit that we have already fulfilled our Export obligation under said EPCG license and also submitted our closure application for the same. 16. We will take necessary steps for getting appropriate relief against the above adjudication order as we have fulfilled our required export obligation in extended EOP under said EPCG. Furthermore, in order to expand our company and increase our production capacity, we have placed substantial orders for new capital machinery from China, valued at approximately 75.59 Crores. These machines are scheduled for dispatch from China within the next 10?15 days. In addition, we are in the process of placing further machinery orders, all of which are intended to be imported under the EPCG scheme. To facilitate these imports and meet our upcoming export orders, we urgently require the issuance of a new EPCG license. We would like to highlight that our export performance has been consistent ? in FY 2024725, we recorded exports worth 721.16 Crores, and in FY. Qeer\

~6-

e the issuance of a new EPCG license. We would like to highlight that our export performance has been consistent ? in FY 2024725, we recorded exports worth 721.16 Crores, and in FY. Qeer\

~6-

Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee noted that it is not a PRC matter. The firm may approach the Appellate Authority.

Case No.87 M/s. Top Light Process, Tamil Nadu

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00000601AM24

Subject: Third Party Exports against EPCG Authorization No. 3230022210 dated 06/05/2015 — Reg. CEO Dyers Association of Tiruppur seeking 2 years extension for EPCG authorisation holders as per list attached with the request.

Applicant Statement: Please note that our EPCG Licence had allotted under FTP 2015-20 policy. And we were EO fulfilled through third party and necessary documents submitted to RA Coimbatore for redemption. But RA not consider the same as per para 5.04 (a) of FTP 2015-20. We are one of the supporting manufacturer for Readymade Garments (intermediate stage) and our unit is TINY (MSME) status only. So, kindly consider our case and permit & grand us the CSP scheme and we will be eligible to close the case and do the needful.

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and it decided to refer the case to EPCG division for its examination.

(Action: Applicant/ EPCG Division)

Case No.88 M/s. Amol Associates, Pune

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLYOO0008965AM24

Subject: Extension of Total EO Period against EPCG Authorization No. 3130007225 dated 26/02/2013.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.24AM25 held on 24.01.2025 (Case No.01) wherein Committee decided to defer the case and seek a detailed report from RA, Pune including comments on the relevant issues raised by the party in their PRC application, for taking the decision in the matter.

Applicant Statement: The matter was taken up. The entire submission made by the applicant was gone through. We are very thankful for your decision for allowance of EOP Extension in the subject EPCG Authorization No.3130007225 Date.26.02.2013 from 6 to 8 years wide meeting no.07/AM 23 Dt.14.10.2022 but as per our request we had asked further extension of 2 years from the date of expiry of the extended period i.e upto 26.02.2023 this request was made in December

==> picture [48 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Se ----- End of picture text -----

= Sa

|| | | |

23 this request was made in December

==> picture [48 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Se ----- End of picture text -----

= Sa

|| | | |

2021 and the minutes of meeting were published in November 2022 so now extension upto February 2023 is also insufficient to fulfill the Obligation. Our major Obligation period has been lapsed under the DGFT Custody by issuance of Order in Original and amendment the following details mentions the summary of events We had submitted our Authorization for Block extension to DGFT Pune on 18.01.2017, meanwhile as the application for Block extension was pending with RA Pune we had been issued with Show Cause notice on Dt.08.06.2017 for non fulfillment of Exports to which we replied on dt.15.06.2017 and also appeared in person in RA Pune for the same. Later shockingly Order in Original was passed before prior to expiry of the Obligation period on dt.26.06.2017. We approached the Head Quarters for Review of the Appeal decision made by RA Mumbai on dt.11.05.2018 and finally our request was being considered for Remand back of the Order.

eriod on dt.26.06.2017. We approached the Head Quarters for Review of the Appeal decision made by RA Mumbai on dt.11.05.2018 and finally our request was being considered for Remand back of the Order. After getting the Remand back order from the Head Quarters we submitted the application for to RA Pune for Block Extension and Amendment on 27.03.2019 for which after 8n months time and follow up in the department they just allowed us HS Code Amendment on 23.12.2020.Further to that Composition fees paid online for Block extension was debited from our account but got an unsuccessful message on DGFT Site error after regular follow up and many attempts finally we were able to make the payment online on 11.03.2021We missed 2 years getting Remand back from DGFT and change in the item demanded by the buyer for which we requested Amendment in the HS Code of the license applied on 18.01.2017 and received to us on 23.12.2020 Due to COVID Pandemic there were no export orders so we could not export and the Authorization got expired we request you to please kindly please grant us the period of 2 years which got wasted to get the remand back and amendment in the Authorization from the date of Endorsement and almost for 11 months it was with the PRC Committee to take decision.

Decision: The case is withdrawn.

Case No.89 M/s. Food Quality Laboratory and Research Centre,Kerala

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00011017AM25

Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025

Subject: Request For Waiver of Average Export against EPCG Authorization No. 1030003182 dated 22/09/2016.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.21AM25 held on 06.11.2024 (Case No.52) wherein Committee went through the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and it decided to defer the case and seek a detailed report from RA, including comments as to whether the firm was earlier getting payments from foreign buyers for the testing services provided and whether there wasa shift in the business model by virtue of which now exporters have to pay for testing; whether the material which was tested by the CGs for which payment was received in INR was actually exported; and whether the firm was functioning in the nature of a CSP, for further examination. Ler er See

Applicant Statement: In this connection we wish to submit that we are filing this request for PRC based on the direction from PMO and discussion with RA Kochi. So we are submitting the application to policy relaxation committee. Kindly consider our application and do needful.

Comments of RA Kochi were also seen.

Decision: The Committee went through the statemens made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request.

Case No.90 M/s. Genus Power Infrastructures Limited, Jaipur

F.No. HQREPCGPRAPP00001386AM26

Subject: Request for related to fulfillment specific Export Obligation against EPCG Authorization No. 1331002330 dated 10/11/2023.

Applicant Statement: We have fulfilled the export obligation (Specific EO + Average EO) of our EPCG License No. 1331002330 dated 10.11.2023 in the fiscal year 2023-2024. Details of the obligation and fulfillment are as follows: * Specific EO: * Obligation: Rs. 2,42,03,235.33 (USD 2,87,620.15) * Fulfilled: Rs. 2,71,23,468.00 (USD 3,30,774.00) * Average EO: * Obligation: Res. 53,48,61,406.00 (USD 64,91,036.48) * Fulfilled: Rs. 77,03,72,320.19 (USD 94,02,627.71) We have fulfilled our obligation before the end of the original export obligation allowable period. However, we did not mention our EPCG License No. 1331002330 on Shipping Bill No. 8552327 dated 22.03.2024 Value USD 3,30,774 at the time of export because at the time of export we have miss that we had completed our required Average EO. When we applied for redemption of our license to the DGFT Jaipur office. However, they raised a deficiency through their letter No. 1SEEEPCO00245AM26 dated 23.05.2025 and advised us to approach the PRC for grant relaxation for not mentioning the license number on the shipping bill and to allow redemption. As advised in the letter, we are now approaching the PRC to request a relaxation for the mistake of non-mention the license number on the shipping bill and we request you to allow the redemption to proceed. 1. Request Letter 2. Copy of Deficiency letter issued by RA-Copy enclosed. 3.

the mistake of non-mention the license number on the shipping bill and we request you to allow the redemption to proceed. 1. Request Letter 2. Copy of Deficiency letter issued by RA-Copy enclosed. 3. Copy of shipping bills-Copy enclosed. We kindly request your assistance in this matter. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request.

(Action: Applicant)

— oo

Case No.91 M/s. Genus Power Infrastructures Limited, Jaipur

F.No. HQREPCGPRAPP00001390AM26

Subject: Request for related to fulfillment specific Export Obligation against EPCG Authorization No. 1331002394 dated 12/12/2023.

Applicant Statement: We have fulfilled the export obligation (Specific EO + Average EO) of our EPCG License No. 1331002394 dated 12.12.2023 in the fiscal year 2023-2024. Details of the obligation and fulfillment are as follows: * Specific EO: * Obligation: Rs. 56,01,078.33 (USD 66,442.21) * Fulfilled: Rs.2,23,47,132.00 (USD 2,72,526.00) * Average EO: * Obligation: Rs. 53,48,61,406.00 (USD 64,79,241.74) * Fulfilled: Rs. 77,03,72,320.19 (USD 94,02,627.71) We have fulfilled our obligation before the end of the original export obligation allowable period. However, we did not mention our EPCG License No. 1331002394 on Shipping Bill No. 8551817 dated 22.03.2024 Value USD 2,72,526 at the time of export because at the time of export we have miss that we had completed our required Average EO. When we applied for redemption of our license to the DGFT Jaipur office. However, they raised a deficiency through their letter No. 13EEEPC00247AM26 dated 23.05.2025 and advised us to approach the PRC for grant relaxation for not mentioning the license number on the shipping bill and to allow redemption. As advised in the letter, we are now approaching the PRC to request a relaxation for the mistake of non-mention the license number on the shipping bill and we request you to allow the redemption to proceed. 1. Request Letter 2. Copy of Deficiency letter issued by RA-Copy enclosed. 3.

Case No.92 M/s. Assam Carbon Products Ltd, West Bengal

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00012145AM25

Subject: Request for acceptance of FIRC as received from the receiving bank and the CA Certificate, certifying that payment has been realised against the exports made in fulfillment of the EPCG obligation, instead of BRC against EPCG Authorization No. 0230001332 dated 08/02/2006, 0230001133 dated 02/09/2005, 0230001033 dated 16/06/2005.

Applicant Statement: The related three numbers of EPCG were taken during 2005 & 2006 and sufficient export were duly made within the stipulated time. But

inadvertently relevant documents were not submitted with the DGFT office in time. After the present management took charge of the Company on and from May,2016, we started complying with the requirements and submitted all the related documents except BRC. In lieu of BRC we have submitted the relevant FIRC as received from the bank along with the CA Certificate, certifying that the payment has been duly realised against the Export made in fulfillment of EPCG obligation. We were unable to submit the relevant BRCs as the bank had expressed their inability to issues the BRC being a very old case. Exports made in 2005 and onwards.

Decision: The Committee after discussing the matter on the basis of justification submitted by the applicant, decided to ask the firm to approach the Bank for issuance of BRC.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Kolkata)

Case No.93 M/s. Rigi Cut Tools Private Limited, Mumbai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00000931AM26

Subject: Request for EODC Consideration Based on Bank Statement in Absence of e-BRC against EPCG Authorization No. 3130007475 dated 22/07/2013.

Applicant Statement: The PRC has kindly accepted our request to consider grant of EODC without insisting on submission of Bill of Exports. However, they have instructed RA Pune to verify whether the payment against the said Bill of Exports has been duly realised through approved banking channels. This is an old case, and e-BRCs have not been generated. Nevertheless, we have ‘already submitted the relevant bank statement as evidence that full payment against supplies made to the SEZ unit of M/s. S E Blades has been duly realised. We now respectfully request PRC to kindly direct RA Pune to consider our EODC application based on the bank statement already submitted. For your ready reference, we are once again enclosing a copy of the bank-attested statement. Kindly also note that the recipient SEZ unit has since ceased operations, and their bank is no longer cooperating with us in this matter.

Decision: The Committee after discussing the matter on the basis of justification submitted by the applicant, decided to ask the firm to approach the Bank for issuance of eBRC.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Pune)

Case No.94 M/s. Delta Airtech Engineering Private Limited, Tamil Nadu

F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00000923AM26

==> picture [58 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ‘ — ----- End of picture text -----

Subject: Extension of Total EO Period against EPCG Authorization No. 0430013394 dated 21/02/2014.

Applicant Statement: We have fulfilled the EO in part (75%) due to insufficient orders and COVID- pandemic issues. We will regularize the EPCG Authorization for the rest of the unfulfilled EO by paying duty with interest. In regard to EO Fulfilled part of Export we have dealt with Director Exports and also third party Exports during Covid period. While effecting export through third party we have declared our IEC, Company name as Manufacturer, EPCG Authorization etc., on the Shipping Bills. However we could not process the shipping bills under EPCG scheme and thus those third party shipping bills could not be processed under EPCG scheme due to certain online technical issues in Custom. Therefore, we humbly request for orders to consider those third party S/bills towards EO fulfillment of EPCG Authorization and oblige..

Decision: The Committee went through the submission made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and it decided to refer the case to EPCG division for its examination.

(Action: Applicant/ EPCG Division)

Case No.95 M/s. Menon Pistons Limited, Maharashtra

F.No. HQREPCGPRAPP00001439AM26

Subject: Third Party Exports against EPCG Authorization No. 0330029589 dated 26/05/2011 and 0330034193 dated 06/11/2012.

Applicant Statement: Request for Regularization of third party Name & Address in Shipping Bills. With reference to the above subject cited above, we would like to submit that we have successfully fulfilled 100% Export Obligation under the aforementioned EPCG Licence through third party exports made by our sister concern, M/s Menon Exports. However, we regret to inform you that due to a technical error at our end, the name and address of M/s. Menon Pistons Ltd were not reflected in the designated column meant for the third party exporter in the Shipping Bills. But their name is clearly mentioned in the Shipping Bills in different field. We therefore request your kind office to consider this oversight and regularize the said Shipping Bills towards fulfillment of our Export Obligation under EPCG Licenses.

—6r-

Case No.96

M/s. Vikram Solar Limited, Kolkata

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00012146AM25

Subject: Consideration of exports made by SEZ unit under AA license obtained by DTA unit against Advance Authorization No. 0211003160 dated 12/10/2022.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.02AM26 held on 16.04.2025 (Case No.03) wherein Committee decided to seek further details/documents from the firm.

Applicant Statement: The Company operates with two factories, one is DTA unit and other is SEZ unit, the company is filing this application for requesting the PRC Committee to consider the exports made by the SEZ unit of the company against the Advance Authorisation obtained by the DTA unit. The DTA had obtained multiple AA licenses and one of them is AA License No. 0211003160 dated 12.10.2022 and imported inputs for the manufacturing of the export product under such license. Suddenly the DTA unit encountered significant technical issues and became incapable to produce the desired products. Resultantly, the company had to transfer the imported raw materials under the mentioned license to SEZ unit for the production of the export product in respect to the completion of export obligation. On the basis of the above background, the company is raising a request before the esteemed committee to kindly consider the exports made by SEZ unit and in support of our matter the company is submitting a detailed justification along with the necessary information relevant to the concerned matter.

o kindly consider the exports made by SEZ unit and in support of our matter the company is submitting a detailed justification along with the necessary information relevant to the concerned matter.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No.97 M/s. Amar Tea Private Limited, Mumbai.

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLYO0000963AM26

Subject: Request of permission for re-exports of raw material imported vide Advance Licence No. 0311037402 dated 25/09/2024.

This is a review case of PRC Meeting No.22AM25 held on 03.12.2024 & 06.12.2024 (Case No.53) wherein Committee had rejected the case. Applicant Statement: Please note that for filing PRC Review Application against our earlier PRC Application vide File No. HQRPRCAPPLY00013075AM25, after clicking on Tab Initiate Review, the system does not open the application and provides error Sorry An error has occurred. Attached Screenshot for your reference. We have already filed Online Complaint vide No. 202507354559 dated 11.07.2025 and the same in process and not resolved as on date. Further, for Current PRC Review Request, we request you to kindly accord your permission for

“b2-

re-exports of raw material imported vide Advance Licence No. 0311037402 dated 25.09.2024.

(Action: Applicant)

Case No. 98 M/s. Rallis India Limited, Mumbai

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLYOO000959AM26

Meeting No.11AM26 held on 11.09.2025

Subject: Condonation of Delay in filing of the review application till 31.12.2024 as per Para 4.17 of HBP 2023 and Policy Circular No. 03/24 dt. 30.05.2024 against AA No. 0310828386 Dt. 16/04/2019 in terms of Provision of Para 2.59 of the FTP 2023.

Applicant Statement: This is regarding our pending case for Ad-hoc Norms fixation under HQ File No. 083/050/00039/AM20 against Advance Authorisation No. 0310828386 Dt. 16.04.2019 issued under RLA File No. 03/95/040/01242/AM19. Norms of the said case is fixed in NC-IV Meeting dt. 13.11.2019 and one raw material i.e. N-Methyl 2-Pyrollidone (NMP) is fixed @0.7194 Kgs which is very low as this raw material is required @1.241 Kgs. However, for the reference the Applicant enclosed consumption certificate for the relevant product for FY 2014-15 to 2021-2022 i.e for 8 Years under which it can be found that the raw material NMP is never consumed below 1.241 Kgs. The Applicant also refereeing norms for similar product in other AA No. 0311020188/21.12.2022, 0310806456 dt. 21.07.2016 & 0310659072 dt. 12.10.2011 under which the same raw materials is fixed @1.241 Kgs for manufacturing of One Kgs of Finished goods i.e. ?7Metconazole Technical 94% Min.?. the lower norms is traced at the time of filing of EODC and due to the Inhouse DGFT staffs shifted and some new joining were done in the company during the last period of filing of review, we could not file the review till 31.12.2024 which is last date of filing of review in this matter in terms of Para 4.17 of HBP 2023 and Policy Circular No.

uring the last period of filing of review, we could not file the review till 31.12.2024 which is last date of filing of review in this matter in terms of Para 4.17 of HBP 2023 and Policy Circular No. 03/24 dt. 30.05.2024. However, we have exported more than the required EO as per the proportionate EO but due to lower norms in the inputs NMP we have to pay huge amount of duty with interest. In view of the above stated facts of the matter, we request the Policy Relaxation Committee to condone the delay in filing of the review Application towards enhancement of quantity of inputs NMP to the NC-IV under Relaxation of Policy and Procedures in terms of Provision of Para 2.59 of the FTP 2023. Also the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC), may direct the concerned section for enable the Online Portal to allow us to file the Review Application Online.

Decision:TheCommittee examined the case on the basis of submission made by

| | | |

the firm and discussed the matter at length. After detailed discussion it was decided to refer to the concerned Norms Committee for the grounds as stated for examination & resolution, provided it is a first Review.

(Action: Applicant/ Norms Committee)

Case No.99 M/s. Nordex India Private Limited, Karnataka

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00001006AM26

Subject: Revalidation of RODTEP validity against various RoDTEP Authorization Numbers.

Applicant Statement: We are the manufacturer and exports of Windmill parts. We are availing the RoDTEP Benefit from the date of introduction of the scheme. Due to the abrupt resignation of the Chief Accountant and resignation and change of Directors in the management level, our commercial operation were disturbed and were unable to track the expiry dates and utilize the scrips within the stipulated period. We could trace the expired RoDTEP scrips recently and as it was expired, we were unable to utilize for the imports duty payments. Being the Wind Mill power generation Industry, we are having several challenges primarily as below. ? Our investments are very high in land, building and Capital goods. ? Yearly we are increasing the investment on R & D, Machineries to upgrade the technology of Wind turbines. ? Our products rely heavily on imported components, making it vulnerable to price fluctuations and supply chain disruptions. ? We are incurring huge transport expenditure as our products are heavy and bulky in nature. Being a large-scale Industry our contribution to economy is in multiple ways. ? Yearly we are realizing Foreign Currency of 350 Million USD approximately. ? We are one of the large taxpayers. ? We have created nearly 10,000 jobs from all our manufacturing units and branches. There are 11 RoDTEP Scrips which are expired, and the value is considerable and substantial. The list of scrips mentioned in uploaded letter.

0,000 jobs from all our manufacturing units and branches. There are 11 RoDTEP Scrips which are expired, and the value is considerable and substantial. The list of scrips mentioned in uploaded letter. We request to extend the validity of the scrip till 31st December 2025 for self-utilization. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request.

Case No.100 M/s. Saumyaa Processors Private Limited, Surat

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00012292AM25

Subject: Request for grant of Terminal Excise Duty paid on CG procured under EPCG Scheme against Refund of TED Authorization No. 5230017691 Dated 29/07/2015.

==> picture [37 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Q 1 ----- End of picture text -----

= 6se

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.25AM25 held on 19.02.2025 (Case No.10) wherein Committee decided to refer the matter to PC-6 for comments.

Applicant Statement: The matter was taken up. The entire submission made by the applicant was gone through. We have submitted an application to the RA, Surat for grant of Refund of Terminal Excise Duty paid on Capital Goods procured from domestic manufacturers under EPCG Scheme. The application is still pending with the RA. We attach herewith a detailed letter explaining the entire history with a request to grant us some relaxation under the Policy so that we can get the issued cleared at the earliest.

Comments of PC-6 were also seen.

Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and discussed the matter at length anddecided to accede the request of the firm for processing the TED refund claim on the basis of manual BRCs. No other conditions / provisions relating to Deemed Export Benefits relaxed. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.

(Action: Applicant/ RA Surat)

Case No.101 M/s. Crown Decor Private Limited, Ahmedabad

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00013178AM25

Subject: Closure of Advance Authorization No. 0811004195 dated 25/02/2022.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.29AM25 held on 25.03.2025 & 02.04.2025 (Case No.38) wherein Committee decided to refer the matter to the concerned Norms Committee for the grounds as stated for examination and resolution.

Applicant Statement: The matter was taken up. The entire submission made by the applicant was gone through. We applied for and received an Advance Authorization from the DGFT, which included PROTECTIVE FILM (Self Adhesive Film for Temporary Surface Protection) as a packing material under the General Policy for Packing Material. However, during the closure process, a deficiency was noted. Specifically, the input at SR No. 10 (PROTECTIVE FILM) was not accounted for in the export products as required by the packaging policy. You are requested to pay Customs Duty along with interest to regularize the same and resubmit.

Comments of NC-IV were also seen.

—66-

(Action: Applicant)

M/s. Laurus Labs Limited, Hyderabad

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00013321AM25

Subject: Deemed Export Drawback As Per Policy 7.03(B) & 7.06 Of Ftp 2023 Read With Para 7.03 & 7.06 Of HBP 2023 against Authorization No. F N SEZ VRMOJ DBK 9 2023 SEZ VIZAG dated 30/01/2025.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.01AM26 held on 09.04.2025 (Case No.37) wherein Committee decided to refer to PC-6 for suitable action.

Applicant Statement: The matter was taken up. The entire submission made by the applicant was gone through. Back ground Laurus Labs Limited is under the rolls of EOU vide LOP No.354/EOU/LOP in Visakapatnam Special Economic Zone since 2006 . Laurus Labs intended to claim deemed export drawback as per policy 7.03(b) & 7.06 of FTP 2023 read with Para 7.03 & 7.06 of HBP 2023. Eligibility criteria for claiming Drawback under Para 7.03 HBP 2023 Application in Form ANF7A can be filed either by supplier or recipient of goods having IEC number. In case recipient unit files claim for Duty Drawback, disclaimer certificate as prescribed in the Annexure-lll to ANF-7A shall be obtained from supplier and shall be submitted along with the application. In case supplier of the goods is an applicant then the disclaimer certificate from the recipient of the goods shall be submitted. In ANF7A of check list of documents in SI No 08 & 09 in Annexure II and Annexure Ill to be attached in the physical form at the counter. Justification Laurus brings to the notice of policy relaxation committee that there is a contradiction for submission of Form in Annexure II & Annexure Ill of ANF7A.

the physical form at the counter. Justification Laurus brings to the notice of policy relaxation committee that there is a contradiction for submission of Form in Annexure II & Annexure Ill of ANF7A. Para 7.03 of HBP 2023 nowhere mentioned that Annexure II is attached with the claim form whereas ANF7A check list in SI No.08 & 09 mentioned that Annexure Il & Annexure Ill are attached with the claim form. In light of para 7.03 of HBP 2023 and ANF7A of Check list of documents SI No.08 & 09 , we request Policy Relaxation Committee to intervene our case to relax that the Deemed exports drawback claim not requires Annexure II from the supplier as per Para 7.03 of HBP 2023 to claim the benefit by the recipient EOU under ?All Industry Rate? of Duty Drawback Schedule notified by Department of Revenue from time to time. We request you to arrange / call for Personal Hearing to submits further information / need.

Comments of PC-6 were also seen.

(Action: Applicant)

==> picture [3 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- : ----- End of picture text -----

—64-

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 10753 --apply.