IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE (DES-I SECTION) MINUTES OF THE NORMS COMMITTEE-| MEETING NO.NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) DATED 08.02.2022

Meeting No.NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) of the Norms Committee (NC-I) for the licensing year 2021-2022 was held on 08.02.2022 under the Chairmanship of Shri Akash Taneja, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption/Remission Schemes (Chapter-4) of the applicable Foreign Trade Policy and the Handbook of Procedures. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting:

SI. No. | Name of the representatives & their Designation Shri K. S. Sodhi, AD /MSMEOU
| 4. | Shri V.C. Agarwal, Consultant (Tech-3) | Consultant | _5.__| ShriS. K. Bhatnagar, Consultant(SKB) | Consultant | 1. | ShriSantosh Kumar Dubey, Dy.DGFT | (GFT Note: 1. For information of exporters, Norms Committee-] handles all cases pertaining to fixation/ratification of norms for Export products on Engineering items falling under ITC(HS) Chapter 81 to 84, 86 to 93. Communications in respect of cases/pertaining to NC-I may be sent to email address: nc1.dgft@nic.in
1. In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/ Observations/Deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The scanned copies uploaded are to be accepted. The U.O. No./O.M No of the scanned copy is reflected in the minutes.

ch document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The scanned copies uploaded are to be accepted. The U.O. No./O.M No of the scanned copy is reflected in the minutes.

The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspect/wastage norms. While redeeming the applications, RA should check that the applicant has fulfilled all requirements as prescribed in policy/procedure including those in Policy Circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for EODC.
Wherever the Committee has fixed norms, the RAs should allow inputs as per wastage norms approved or as applied, whichever is less.

==> picture [484 x 163] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- The minutes of Meeting No.NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/7 held on 16.11.2021 were circulated on 21.12.2021 amongst the members of the Committee and finalized. Decision taken on each of the cases is enumerated as below: al a pune gartoe ome age : GO atyFreta SeeeralAEoreo4 CON a WPAeg GOW optF AAGott 1|Page one Fa ent wt. of we Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Bate 8-07 202% °5>" yar ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [402 x 17] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Meeting No.:NC/1/MEET/Jan/2021 22/12 (Offline Cases)Meeting Date: 08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [47 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

picture text ----- Meeting No.:NC/1/MEET/Jan/2021 22/12 (Offline Cases)Meeting Date: 08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----**

==> picture [47 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 01 ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [462 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) | M/s Navkar Fittings &| Status: PRACase Ne OSSopRoeeR ny | Sublece:of ad-hocRequest norms for ation | to history: The case was rejected in Meeting No. 04/80-ALC2/2017dated 23.05.2017 due non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DIPP vide UO No.12/13/2017-TSW/81 dated 02/03/2017. However, the applicant had furnished the reply with a request to reconsider their case for fixation of the ad-hoc norms. The applicant's representation was forwarded to MSME on 28.11.2018 followed by ID reminders on 17.09.2019, 10.01.2020 & 06.03.2020 for expediting the comments. On the advice of the representative of MSME, the case was forwarded to DPIIT on 04.01.2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P- 47011/8/2021-TSW dated 10.03.2021 had informed that the applicant's reply is incomplete. As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021: ----- End of picture text -----

in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021: ----- End of picture text -----

Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.
Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be
imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
Detailed calculations for the quantities of import items.

As per NC decision,a deficiency letter as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021, 10.11.2021 & 05.01.2022.

for the quantities of import items.

As per NC decision,a deficiency letter as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 02.08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021, 10.11.2021 & 05.01.2022.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant vide email dated 18.01.2022 requested to give some more time to submit their reply of deficiency letter. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the applicant.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 02

==> picture [456 x 75] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- M. Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) M/s Terumo Penpol Ltd. | Deferred of ad-hoc norms Subject: Request for fixation a ----- End of picture text -----

2| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

Case history: In the Meeting No. 11/80 date 30.11.2018, the representative of MSME stated that the norms may be fixed on the basis of DIPP recommendation vide No. 07/9/20I6-TSW dt. 08.12.2017 for License No. 5310019514 dt. 05.10.2017 as ratified in Meeting No. 16/80 dated 14.11.2017. However, the Committee observed that the description of export item in the subject application does not exactly match with the recommendation of DIPP and therefore, MSME was requested to provide comments. Based on the deliberations & as per advice of MSME, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech -1) may look into the matter. Hence, the case was referred to Consultant (Tech -1) on 16.10.2019 for examination & comments. Consultant (Tech-1) informed that a similar case of the applicant had already been referred to PLEXCONCIL and Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days’ time to reply the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. PLEXCONCIL was reminded on 12.02.2020 for the expediting the matter.

ad requested for 15 days’ time to reply the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. PLEXCONCIL was reminded on 12.02.2020 for the expediting the matter. PLEXCONCIL’s reply was received and forwarded to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2020 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-1) informed in the meeting that PLEXCONCIL reply mentions Acetic Anhydride as the export product, which does not make any sense. Also, a D.O. Letter was sent to JS, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 30.07.2020 to provide their comments in the matter at the earliest. Subsequently, a reminder along with copy of application was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 09.03.2021 for examination & comments. As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated16.06.2021, a reminder was issued on 02.08.2021. Further, as decided in meeting dated 02.09.2021, the reminder was issued on 29.09.2021. Also, as per NC decision, final reminder [Letter] was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 05.01.2022 for expediting the comments. However, no information has been received so far.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that no information has been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals despite several remainders. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek the opinion of Consultant (Tech-1) to expedite the matter.

Case is deferred.

ved from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals despite several remainders. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek the opinion of Consultant (Tech-1) to expedite the matter.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 03 Status: Cases) dated 08.02.2022 Engineers Ltd. Subject: Request for fixation of Case history: The case was rejected in the Meeting No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DHI. The case was reconsidered in M.No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 and it was decided to send a deficiency letter to the applicant as per comments of DHI. In response to DL, applicant’s reply dated 23.11.2020, was sent to DHI on 01.12.2020. DHI informed that the applicant's reply had Appendix 4K dated 04.06.2016 only and not contained information as sought in M. No. 07/80 dated 22.10.2020 (Held on 23.10.2020). Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of

3|Page

Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [435 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and Supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 2. Utilization of import item at SL. No. 11 in the export product. ----- End of picture text -----

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. On receipt of the applicant's reply, the same was forwarded to DHI on 24.09.2021 for examination and comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the comments of DHI vide dated 08.02.2022, has called for quantity in number for import items at SI. No. 4 to 6 & 7 to 10. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. To provide quantity of each import item (items at SI. No. 4 to 6 & 7 to 10) in number separately. Case is deferred. Sl. No. 04 Status: Cases) dated 08.02.2022 Engineers Ltd. CaseRLA No.: 05/23/040/00015/AM17 a Subject:___ad-hocRequest norms for fixation of history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DIPP. However, the firm had furnished the reply with a request to reopen case and fix the ad-hoc norms.

eeting No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DIPP. However, the firm had furnished the reply with a request to reopen case and fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 20.10.2020. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that applicant's reply against the deficiency letter raised by DPIIT was sent on 05.11.2020.DPIIT vide U. O. No. P- 47011/301/2019-TSW dated 23.11.2020 had informed that the applicant's reply is incomplete. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 17.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.
Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be

us wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be

imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
Quantity of export item in meters also in addition to its weight. 6. Quantities of import items at SI. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights.

4|Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

7. Quantities of import items at SI. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.

The applicant's reply dated 31.08.2021 was forwarded to DPIIT on 31.08.2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/301/2019-TSW dated 20.09.2021 informed that the applicant's reply is incomplete. Further, as per the comments of DPIIT, a deficiency letter was issue to the applicant on 05.01.2022 to furnish following information: 1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.
1. Quantity of export item in meters also to its weight. 3. Quantities of import items at SI. No. 1 to 4 in meters also in addition to their weights. 4. Quantities of import items at SI. No. 5 to 9 in Nos. also in addition to their weights.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that reply of deficiency letter dated 05.01.2022 has not been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.

etter dated 05.01.2022 has not been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 05 M. No.: | Status: EvA gi Nc M/s TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd. Deferred dated 08.02.2022 HQ. No.: Subject: EOU- M/s. TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd., LOP 01/80/162/301/AM18/ No. PER: 076/EOU/VSEZ/HYD/2011 dated 25.07.2011 for DES-1 fixation of wastage norms for export product “Helicopter cabin kits & parts and accessories for Aircraft” against import items 1. Stainless Steel bars/rods 2. Stainless Steel Tube/Pipes 3. Stainless Steel round bars Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DIPP on 10.07.2018 and to DHI on 03.08.2018 for their examinations/comments. Since, they had stated that the export product is not under the purview of DIPP/ DHI, it was forwarded to MSME on 18.03.2019 followed by reminders on 24.09.2019, 10.01.2020 & 12.02.2020. A deficiency letter (To provide excel sheet of calculations) was sent to the applicant as per comments of MSME received via email dated 22.10.2020. The applicant's reply was sent to MSME on 18.11.2020 to examine the case. MSME via email dated 16.06.2021 has asked to submit certain information. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

submit certain information. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

To submit step-wise calculation for all products. 2. To submit MSME-DI wastage report/SEZ wastage report, if any.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply dated 10.08.2021 was forwarded to MSME for examination & comments on 11.08.2021 followed by reminders on 24.09.2021, 10.11.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

5|Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

Sl. No. 06 Status: Cases) dated 08.02.2022 PRIVATE LIMITED HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00205/AM18 Subject: Request for re-fixation RLA No.: 53/24/040/00003/AM18 of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 03/80 dated 09.05.2018 as per written comments of DIPP (TSW section) vide letter No.: 07/9/2016-TSW dated 08.12.2017. However, the applicant requested to re-fix the norms and to allow them for Personal Hearing. The applicant appeared for PH in NC Meeting 09/80 dated 14.09.2019 and explained the reason for higher wastage claims. Based on the deliberations, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech 1) would look into the matter. Consultant (Tech-1) pointed out that applicant is requesting to increase the wastage norms for PVC compound from 10% to 16% on the basis of Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals Suggestion vide letter dated 10.09.2012 for amending the SION H-67 and AA of the applicant had been ratified based on SION H-67 which allows for only 10%. Consultant (Tech-1) suggested that PLEXCONCIL may be requested to provide Production/Consumption data of other manufacturers. The case was referred to PLEXCONCIL, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 18.10.2019 & 05.11.2019 respectively. However, PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days’ time to reply the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals.

.2019 respectively. However, PLEXCONCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days’ time to reply the query. No information had been received from Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals. The Committee noted that Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals and PLEXCONCIL were reminded on 12.02.2020 for expediting the matter. PLEXCONCIL’s reply was received and forwarded to Consultant (Tech-1) on 11.03.2020 for examination. However, Consultant (Tech-1) informed in the meeting that PLEXCONCIL reply mentions Acetic Anhydride as the export product, which does not make any sense. Also, a D.O. Letter was sent to JS, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 30.07.2020 to provide their comments in the matter at the earliest. Further, a copy of application was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 09.03.2021 for examination & comments. Therefore, as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80dated 16.06.2021, a reminder was issued on 02.08.2021. Further, as decided in meeting dated 02.09.2021, another reminder was issued on 29.09.2021. Also, as per NC decision, final reminder [Letter] was sent to Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals on 05.01.2022 for expediting the comments. However, no information has been received so far.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 07

rtment of Chemicals & Petrochemicals despite several remainders. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek the opinion of Consultant (Tech-1) to expedite the matter.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 07

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022

Status: M/s SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) | Deferred PRIVATE LIMITED

6|Page Meeting No.: NC/4/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

Case Subject:erathecnomeRequest for re-fixation | history: This case was approved in M. No. 3/80-ALC2/2016 dated 09.05.2018as per
recommendation of representative of DHI, DIPP and MSME present in that meeting. However, the applicant had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the recommendation of Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to DPIIT on 08.07.2020 as similar cases were examined/ recommended by them. However, DPIIT on 02.09.2020 requested for some additional information and the same were sent to DPIIT on 07.10.2020.Also, some other information received from the applicant was forwarded to DPIIT on 16.10.2020.As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47012/289/2018-TSW dated 10.12.2020: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

rmation as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47012/289/2018-TSW dated 10.12.2020: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

1. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
However, the applicant's reply was forwarded to DPIIT on 12.08.2021 for examination & comments. DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/289/2018-TSW dated 31.08.2021 informed that the applicant's reply was incomplete. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.
1. Weight of each Export Product.
2. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
3. Brass Bar blank size and weight thereof supported by size & weight of component (Body B) to be manufactured- export product wise.

ication and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

Brass Bar blank size and weight thereof supported by size & weight of component (Body B) to be manufactured- export product wise.
Cutting allowance and end cutting loss on brass bar.

Reply from the applicant was received and sent to DPIIT on 11.10.2021 for examination & comments.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/289/2018-TSW dated 20.12.2021. The case was discussed in the meeting & the Committee decided to seek second opinion of Consultant (Tech-3) in this matter.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 8

Case No.: 13/16/80-ALC2/2017 M/s L& T-MHPS TURBINE Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline GENERATORS PRIVATE Deferred Cases) dated 08.02.2022 LIMITED

Cases) dated 08.02.2022

7| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

Lic. No. /date: 0310815484 Date: 01.09.2017 erry ieee ines ines HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00276/AM18 Subject: Request for review RLA No.: 03/95/040/00052/AM18 and fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: The case was rejected in Meeting No. 06/80-ALC2/2018 dated11.07.2018 on the ground that the parts of the import items given (Unit of Measurement) in sets and number of parts in each set and their composition is not known. The Committee found that it was very difficult to enforce accountability and rejected the case. However, the applicant had requested for review of the case. The firm had given representation dated 25.02.2019 enclosing a statement giving composition along with unit of measurement in numbers against each set of imported items. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was sent to DHI for examination on 21.02.2020 followed bya reminder on 15.10.2020. Further, reply of deficiency received from the applicant was sent to DHI via email on 14.06.2021 to examine the case. DHI has given their comments dated 16.11.2021.

owed bya reminder on 15.10.2020. Further, reply of deficiency received from the applicant was sent to DHI via email on 14.06.2021 to examine the case. DHI has given their comments dated 16.11.2021.

The case was discussed in meeting dated 16.11.2021 and the Committee observed that DHI had recommended very high wastage for certain import items. However, name of raw material & shape were not mentioned in the description of import items neither in ANF-4A/Condition Sheet nor in the comments of DHI. Therefore, the Committee decided to get clarification on the same from the applicant & DHI for the import items at SI. Nos. 13, 22, 48 to 53, 79 to 82, 85 to 88, 327 & 328. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 07.02.2022 for comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [42 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. 9 ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.: 53/2/80-ALC2/2016 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Rejected Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s ALSTOM INDIA LIMITED Lic. No. /date: 0310795652 Date: 30.04.2015 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00056/AM17/ Subject: Request for fixation of RLA No.: 03/94/040/00060/AM16/ sidhiciadhiibia Case history: The case was rejected in M. No. 20/80-ALC2/2016 dated03.01.2017 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency letter dated 24.10.2016 raised by DHI. The applicant vide letter dated 28.09.2019 had requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking following information was received from DHI and sent to the applicant via email dated16.08.2021:

Copy of complete set of application.
Weight of each Export Product.
Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficienc 8| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [453 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

sidered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficienc 8| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [453 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- letter was issued to the applicant on 16.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.20218 05.01.2022. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [80 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is rejected. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [48 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 10 ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [454 x 173] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Status: hoc norms Case history: The case was rejected in Meeting No. 4/80-ALC2/2019 dated22.05.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 28.12.2018 raised by DHI. The applicant vide letter dated 27.09.2019 had furnished the reply and requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was inadvertently forwarded to MSME who advised referring the case to DHI for examination. The case was referred to DHI on 31.10.2020. As per comments of DHI and as decided in the Meeting No.

as inadvertently forwarded to MSME who advised referring the case to DHI for examination. The case was referred to DHI on 31.10.2020. As per comments of DHI and as decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information: ----- End of picture text -----

Complete application with all annexure. 2. Copy of the NC decisions in chronological order. 3. All the replies of deficiencies letters in chronological order. 4. Copy of deficiency letter issued by NC.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 07.02.2022 for examination & comments. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

==> picture [81 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [464 x 212] intentionally omitted <==

[81 x 10] intentionally omitted <==**

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [464 x 212] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 11 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline M/s MANN AND HUMMEL Rejected Cases) dated 08.02.2022 FILTER PVT. LTD. of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case ie cies —— eee | was approved in Meeting No. 14/80-ALC2/2018 dated20.02.2019 on the recommendation of representative of DHI. The applicant vide letter dated 18.12.2019 had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forward to DHI on 06.10.2020 for examination & comments. As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, as per comments of DHI, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information: 1. Complete application with all annexure. 2. Copy of the NC decisions in chronological order. ----- End of picture text -----

Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

All the replies of deficiencies letters in chronological order. 4. Copy of deficiency letter issued by NC.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021 & 10.11.2021.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 13.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 informed that earlier import items were allowed under GN-4 as the applicant was imported components. Now, the applicant has requested for wastage on components which is not allowed on components. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the applicant's request of revision of ad-hoc norms.

Case is rejected.

Sl.No. 12 Status: dated 08.02.2022 LTD HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00037/AM17 Subject: Request for [RLANe:caBuECOESSCIMTG ——————|_patehafaiocnams | Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 02/80 dated26.04.2016as per comments of DHI. The applicant vide letter dated 29.07.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forward to DHI on 07.10.2020 for examination & comments. As decided in the Meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021, as per comments of DHI, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information: 1. Complete application with ANF 4B with all annexure. 2.

d 16.06.2021, as per comments of DHI, a deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 06.08.2021 for furnishing the following information: 1. Complete application with ANF 4B with all annexure. 2. Copy of the NC decisions in chronological order. 3. All the replies of deficiencies letters in chronological order. 4. Copy of deficiency letter issued by NC. The applicant's reply was received and forwarded to DHI on 26.08.2021. The representative of DHI informed that the applicant's reply did not contain responses of above mentioned deficiencies. Therefore, as per NC decision, final reminder was issue on 05.01.2022 to the applicant asking them to furnish the relevant & justified reply of the above mentioned deficiencies. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that final reminder was issued to the applicant on 05.01.2022 for furnishing the requisite information. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case.

Case is rejected.

SI. No. 13 M.OfflineNo.: Cases)NC/1/MEET/Jan/2021dated 08.02.202222/12 M/s GEA ProcessVadodara Engineering, Deferred HQ.10| No.:Page01/80/162/AMO09/Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12eerSubject:(OfflineRequestCases) fornee fixationMeetingof ad-Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [43 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Deferred ----- End of picture text -----

es) fornee fixationMeetingof ad-Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [43 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Deferred ----- End of picture text -----

Case history: The applicant has stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No. KASEZ/100%EOU/II/08/09-10/11623 dated 23.11.2009 are the Member of EPC for EOUs and KSEZs. The applicant has stated that the company is an EOU unit and it is registered with Kandla Special Economic Zone (KASEZ) and there is a requirement by KASEZ that EOU unit needs to fix the norms of its export product. The applicant vide their representation dated 11.01.2020 had requested for fixation of input/output Norms for the import/export products. The copy of application was sent to MSME on 08.09.2020 for examination of the case. As per comments of MSME received via email dated 16.06.2021, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.2021 for furnishing the following information:

1. Acopy of complete set of application.

2. To provide MSME-DI wastage/SEZ wastage report, if any.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter as raised by MSME was issued to the applicant on 27.09.2021. The applicant via email dated 28.09.2021 informed that their unit is not registered under MSME Act, 2006. Therefore, they do not have any MSME-DI wastage report issued by MSME Authority and also such wastage report is not issued by KASEZ Authority. Further, it was noted that the case was already referred to MSME.However, no comments have been received yet.

Decision: As no comments have been received as yet from MSME, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 14 Status: dated 08.02.2022 fixation of ad-hoc norms EE SEER STAG | fuiblec Reauestforre- | | Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was ratified by NC in its Meeting No. 14/80 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.: DES-1/TILL/OTRS-1-2019-HEI dated 19.02.2019.However, the applicant vide their representation dated 27.10.2019 received on 11.11.2020 has stated that the norms ratified by NC in respect of above AA, item No. 142 was deleted on the plea that the same was not certified as part of export product as per Appendix 4E. They have mentioned that this is a typographical error on their part and SI. No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump — Altered -1 No. is very much required for manufacturing of their export item i.e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis.

error on their part and SI. No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump — Altered -1 No. is very much required for manufacturing of their export item i.e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis. Now the applicant has requested to allow import item at serial No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump — Altered Part No. H4194402/00 -1 No. on net to net basis. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 16.06.2021 and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments. As per NC decision, the case was referred to DHI on 11.11.2021 for examination & comments.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

Acopy of complete application with ANF-4A. 2. Deficiency letter issued earlier along with its reply.

11| Page

Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

SI. No. 15 Status: Cases) dated 08.02.2022 RLA No.: 02/24/040/00109/AM19 fixation of ad-hoc norms HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00326/AM19 eee] | | Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was ratified by NC in its Meeting No. 14/80 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No.: DES-1/TILLIOTRS-1-2019-HEI dated 19.02.2019.The applicant vide their representation dated 27.10.2019 received on 11.11.2020 has Stated that the norms ratified by NC in respect of above AA, item No. 142 was deleted on the plea that the same is not certified as part of export product as per appendix 4E. They have mentioned that this is a typographical error on their part and SI. No 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump — Altered -1 No. is very much required for manufacturing their export item i.e. Rach Stacker, and is being imported on net to net basis. Now the applicant has requested to allow import item at serial No. 142 i.e. Variable Disp Pump — Altered Part No. H4194402/00 -1 No. on net to net basis. The Committee reconsidered the case in its meeting dated 16.06.2021 and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments. As per NC decision, the case was referred to DHI on 11.11.2021 for examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Acopy of complete application with ANF-4A. 2.

The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Acopy of complete application with ANF-4A. 2. Deficiency letter issued earlier along with its reply. Case is deferred. SI. No. 16 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 aeeferre M/s IND-SPHINX PRECISION LTD hoc norms Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad- ea Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.13/80-ALC2/2018 dated 22.01.2019 on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 2210015101 dated 10.10.2014 on the recommendation of the representative of DHI. However, the applicant had requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that in Meeting No. 08/80dated05.11.2020, the comments of MSME were referred back for re-examination of the case on 21.12.2020 followed byreminders on 27.09.2021. However, no comments have been received yet. Decision: As no comments have been received as yet from MSME, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. 12| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

SI. No. 17

==> picture [452 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- M. Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Deferred Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s IND-SPHINX PRECISION LTD. Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms ----- End of picture text -----

NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Deferred Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s IND-SPHINX PRECISION LTD. Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [460 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 22/80-ALC2/2015 dated 02.02.2016as per written comments of MSME vide ID Note No. 30 (199)/15-ME dated 30.12.2015.However, the applicant has requested for re- fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that in Meeting No. 08/80 dated05.11.2020, the comments of MSME were referred back for re-examination of the case on 21.12.2020 followed by a reminder on 27.09.2021. However, no comments have been received yet. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: As no comments have been received as yet from MSME, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

==> picture [82 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

remind MSME for expediting the comments.

==> picture [82 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

7 : 7 SI. No. 18 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s HONDA TRADING Deferred Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD. norms fileCase history:aesThe Committee considered|the[nse] case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 11/80 dated 19.08.2017 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 26.04.2017 (raised by DHI). However, the applicant requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and Consultant (Tech-3) informed via email dated 14.06.2021 that the applicant's reply dated 03.03.2021 is incomplete as they have not replied to deficiency letter but referred to their earlier letters only. A deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 to furnish the following information as per advice of Consultant (Tech-3): 1. To explain why the consumption per unit in past is 1.448 gram while requirement in present case is given as 0.384 gram per unit. 2. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

eight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. A deficiency letter as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 29.09.2021. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 16.12.2021, 05.01.2022 & 01.02.2022 for examination of the case. Further, it was noted that the physical file of the case was sent to Consultant (Tech3) on 04.08.2021. However, no comments have been received as yet. Hence, the Committee

13 | Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

decided to wait for the comments.

==> picture [460 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. SI. No. 19 M. Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline | M/s BHARAT HEAVY| Approved Subject: Request for review for Case fixation of ad-hoc norms was history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case rejected in Meeting No. 48/80 dated 02.03.2010 due to non-submission reply of the deficiency later as raised by DHI. ----- End of picture text -----

The case was again reviewed in meeting No. 31/11 dated 16.11.2010 and the Committee decided to close the case on the ground that the applicant had surrendered the subject AA No. at RA, Chennai.

However, the applicant has informed that the said license has not been surrendered by them and due to some miscommunication, DGFT has noted about surrendering of subject licence. Hence, the applicant requested for review and to fix the ad-hoc norms vide their letter dated 08.04.2021. The applicant stated that the said license has not been surrendered by them and due to some miscommunication, DGFT has noted about surrendering of subject licence. Committee reconsidered the case and noted that applicant's reply was sent to DHI followed by reminder along with additional information received from applicant. However, a copy of application was again sent to DHI. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 2. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosure.

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 27.09.2021. The applicant's reply was forwarded to DHI on 29.11.2021 for examination & comments.

deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 27.09.2021. The applicant's reply was forwarded to DHI on 29.11.2021 for examination & comments.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the comments of DHI received vide email dated 14.01.2022 wherein it is stated that the applicant has requested to fix ad-hoc norms for import of 38 items instead of 129 items applied earlier against the subject AA Number. The list of 38 items is at the consumption certificate submitted by the applicant (Copy enclosed). Therefore, as per comments of DHI, the Committee decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as under:

The total export weight is 2728.20MT and it may be added in the description of export item.
The quantity of import items at SI. No. 3, 26 & 87 may be allowed with 5% wastage on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0910039330 dated 22.09.2009.
The import items at SI. No. 88 & 89 may be deleted as these are not components. 4. The quantity of import items at SI. No. 15, 21, 27, 29, 37, 45 to 48, 50, 52, 57, 58, 63 to 65, 75, 82, 84, 86, 90, 92 to 95, 97, 98, 105, 109, 113, 118, 121, 129 may be allowed as

14|Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [461 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

97, 98, 105, 109, 113, 118, 121, 129 may be allowed as

14|Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [461 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 5. per GN-4 with accountability clause with no wastage on weight or number terms. The rest of the import items may be deleted as the items had not been imported by the applicant. Note: The concerned RA may ensure that the subject AA Number has not been surrendered by the applicant and also verify the consumption certificate. The concerned RA may also ensure the submission of composition fee by the applicant. Further, RA concerned may take necessary action as per the decision of NC. SI. No. 20 CaseM. No. 2/17/80-ALC 2/2017aa_ Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Deferred Cases)Lic. No.:dated 08.02.20220910065045 Date: 15.05.2017 vaio"~ vareaar; tb HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00281/AM18 Subject: Request for review for RLA No.: 09/24/040/00055/AM18 fixation of ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 05/80 dated 06.06.2019 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 14.01.2019as raised by DPIIT. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms.

ing No. 05/80 dated 06.06.2019 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter dated 14.01.2019as raised by DPIIT. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the applicant on 20.01.2020 followed by reminders on 22.09.2020, 25.11.2020 & 14.06.2021. The applicant's reply was received via email dated 16.06.2021 & the same was forwarded to Consultant (Tech- 3) on 17.06.2021 for examination & comments. Consultant (Tech-3) via email dated 06.08.2021 requested for sending the physical file of the case. The physical file of the case was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 01.09.2021 followed by a reminder on 05.01.2022. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the cases as per the agenda and Consultant (Tech-3) informed that the applicant's reply dated 16.06.2021 is deficient. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3): 1. To provide detailed calculation of raw material to be imported with supporting drawing of components to be made out of them separately for both export products.

==> picture [81 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [48 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

re [81 x 10] intentionally omitted <==**

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [48 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. 21 ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [464 x 150] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 47/14/80-ALC2/2014 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline M/s ALSTOM TRANSPORT Deferred Cases) dated 08.02.2022 INDIA LIMITED Lic. No. /date: 0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 RLA No.: 07/24/040/00092/AM15 &fixation of ad-hoc norms. HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00368/AM15 - Subject: Request toreview a Hoel Case history: The case was rejected in Meeting No. 11/80 dated 01.09.2015 due to non- submission reply of deficiency letter as raised by DHI. Thereafter, the applicant represented against the rejection and requested for a review. The case was again considered and deferred in Meeting no. 11/19 dated 06.12.2018 with following decision: “The Committee noted that_a personal hearing was already given to the applicant on ----- End of picture text -----

15|Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [22 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- le ----- End of picture text -----

Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [22 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- le ----- End of picture text -----

06.12.2018. In the personal hearing the applicant informed the committee that it has taken various AA’s for supply of 33 rail/tramway coaches. Further, applicant stated that it has taken an additional license for supplementary material required for these very 33 rail/tramway coaches. However, it has an additional export obligation of another 33 rail/tramway coaches in this license. The Committee observed that the given submission is not tenable. The committee decided to seek a detailed report from the concerned RA regarding of all such licenses issued to the applicant, admissibility and current status.” informed In response to Norm Committee’s e-mail dated 23.04.2019, Addl. DGFT Bangalore and that applicant has obtained several licenses, which are pending for the wants of norms also informed about a letter from ECA-II, DGFT, New Delhi seeking information regarding alleged corrupt practices followed by M/s Alstom Transport India. In this matter, the committee noted that the applicant had approach the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) and the matter was taken up vide Meeting No. 17/AM20 held on 27.08.2019.

tom Transport India. In this matter, the committee noted that the applicant had approach the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) and the matter was taken up vide Meeting No. 17/AM20 held on 27.08.2019. ' | The PRC noted the submissions by the applicant as under: “They have stated that initially, 7 Advance Authorizations were applied for duty free import of inputs required for the manufacture and supply of 33 Metro Train sets to Chennai Metro Rail Limited being a deemed export project. ATIL sought amendment in all 7 Advance Authorizations to include residual items that were required to manufacture the 33 Train sets but the request was rejected citing technical reasons by RA. Thereupon, ATIL was compelled to apply for additional Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 for importing residual inputs that were missed out and not covered under earlier 7 Advance Authorizations. Acquisition of Alstom India limited who was the manufacturer of key sub-assemblies also lead to inclusion of components required for manufacture of sub-assemblies in the captioned Advance Authorization. However, while applying for the said Advance Authorization (8” AA), export obligation of 33 Metro Train sets was declared inadvertently, as the system did not allow the applicant to apply for a new license unless the export obligation was declared. In fact, there is no separate EO under the Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 as all imported inputs were used for manufacture of 33 train sets declared under previous 7 Advance licenses.

t, there is no separate EO under the Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 as all imported inputs were used for manufacture of 33 train sets declared under previous 7 Advance licenses. The Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 under which parts required for manufacture of 33 Metro Trains have been imported has been issued after 22 months from the date of earliest Advance Authorization in the clubbing set. Hence, request is to treat the supplies of 33 Train sets to the Metro Project supplied against Advance Authorizations as one and to discharge the EO. “ The policy relaxation committee vide PRC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 27.08.2019 gave the following decision in the matter: “Decision: The Committee heard the submission made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and decided to relax the conditions as laid down in Para 4.38 (vi), (vii) and (xii) of HBP 2015-20 as amended vide Public Notice No.70/2015-20 dated 30.01.2019 for clubbing of eight Advance Authorizations No.(i)0710090351 dated 21.08.2012, (ii)0710090531 dated 31.08.2012, (iii)0710095554 dated 23.05.2013, (iv)0710096369 dated 02.07.2013, (v)0710096370 dated 02.07.2013, (vi)0710099232 dated 28.10.2013 and (vii)0710101246 dated 10.01.2014 and (viii) 0710105249 dated 20.06.2014. It is subject to verification that amendments request of the applicant made in the AAs was rejected by the RA, as claimed by the applicant and all inputs imported in the 8 AAs are fully accounted for in the supplies.

verification that amendments request of the applicant made in the AAs was rejected by the RA, as claimed by the applicant and all inputs imported in the 8 AAs are fully accounted for in the supplies. The other terms and conditions for clubbing shall remain same as per policy/HBP provisions. The applicant shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.”

16 | Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

exportThe Committee observed that the PRC has clubbed all the eight authorizations forimportsand | purposes. Export obligation of AA No. 0710105249 dt. 20.06.2014 would remain as it is | even after clubbing. Hence, the Committee in its Meeting No. 10/80 dated 11.09.2019, asked the applicant to furnish following information: 1. To provide detailed statement to account for the inputs in the export products against this license. | 2. Relevant technical drawings and wastage details may be provided in relevant formats for examination by the technical authorities for the purpose of fixation of norms. And also sought clarification from the PRC cell on 05.11.2019 regarding the export obligation of the eighth authorization if it would run concurrently with the export obligation of the first seven authorizations. | PRC in its meeting no. 23/AM20 dt. 03.12.2019, decided as follows: | “The committee reviewed the case and observed that request of the applicant and minutes | recorded in the earlier PRC decision were very clear.

eting no. 23/AM20 dt. 03.12.2019, decided as follows: | “The committee reviewed the case and observed that request of the applicant and minutes | recorded in the earlier PRC decision were very clear. It reiterated that in view of the submission made by the applicant, all the above 8 advance authorizations need to be clubbed for imports and exports purposes wherein export obligation of the 8th advance authorization no. 0710105249 dt. 20.06.2014 be treated as NIL as its EO is subsumed in the export obligation of the other 7 advance authorizations taken together. The applicant shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting for clubbing.”

The Committee noted in its Meeting No. 18/80 dated 02.01.2020 that the applicant's reply dated 06.11.2019 was forwarded to DHI on 02.12.2019 by NC-1 for examination of the case and DHI raised following deficiency:

Specific use of items imported under the eighth authorization vis-a-vis those imported under other seven authorizations.

The Committee noted in meeting dated 16.06.2021 that the reply of deficiency letter was sent to DHI on 24.02.2020 and some additional information received from the applicant was also sent | to DHI on 19.08.2020& 21.09.2020 followed by a reminder on 15.12.2020. However, DHI requested vide letter dated 16.06.2021 to send reply of further deficiency. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the applicant for personal hearing and also requested to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

2021 to send reply of further deficiency. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the applicant for personal hearing and also requested to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI:

Background note of the case along with specific export list vis-a-vis import list. The applicant’s reply was forwarded to DHI on 16.08.2021 for examination & comments. The | case was further considered in the meeting dated 02.09.2021 and the Committee heard the applicant's representative during personal hearing. The applicant's representative explained the case in detail in the meeting and the representative of DH!I had asked to submit certain information. Therefore, the Committee decided to request DHI for expediting the comments. The comments from DHI were received vide letter dated 16.11.2021. Decision of NC meeting held on 16.11.2021: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted the comments given by DHI vide letter dated 16.11.2021 wherein it is stated that the applicant had taken 7 Advance Authorizations for manufacture & supply of 33 metro coaches. The applicant, during personal hearing, had clarified that the subject AA contains the residual | items which could not be imported as amendment of earlier seven AAs were not allowed. In |_ respect of subject advance authorization, comments from DHI has been received. sd 17 | Pas Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

were not allowed. In |_ respect of subject advance authorization, comments from DHI has been received. sd 17 | Pas Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

However, the Committee in its meeting dated 16.11.2021 noted that in response to Norms Committee’s email dated 23.04.2019, Addl. DGFT Bangalore had informed that applicant had obtained several licenses and mentioned that a letter from ECA-Il, DGFT, New Delhi was received seeking information regarding alleged corrupt practices followed by M/s Alstom | | Transport India Ltd. Further, it was also noted that an ID Note No. 01/80/50/00368/AM15/DES| 1/1310 dated 25.07.2019 was sent to ECA-II for seeking their comments in this matter which are | | still awaited. Therefore, the Committee desired to know the outcome of verification on the above | _ referred allegations from ECA-II and RA Bangalore before fixation of ad-hoc norms. | Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a letter was sent | to ECA-II for seeking their comments dated 25.07.2019 and subsequent reminders sent on | 03.01.2022 & 31.01.2021. Further, an email was also sent to RA Bangalore on 31.01.2022 for | seeking the information regarding the alleged irregularities. However, information is still awaited. | Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the requisite reports from ECA-II/RA, Bangalore. Caseisdeferred. es 2 a ee _—e [| | Case No. 1/25/80-ALC2/2015 _ ic M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s UNITED DRILLING TOOLS LTD | Status: (Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 __ Deferred Lic.

Bangalore. Caseisdeferred. es 2 a ee _—e [| | Case No. 1/25/80-ALC2/2015 _ ic M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s UNITED DRILLING TOOLS LTD | Status: (Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 __ Deferred Lic. No.: 0510397442 Date: 29.01.2016 | Sa RLAHQ. No:No.:01/80/050/0 05/24/040/0 04 4193 /AM1 6/6/ | Subject:fixationRequest ofad-h f o rcnorms review and =| | wC as erejected history:inTheMeeting CommitteeNo. 05/80 considereddated 07.06.2016 the case as perdue to thenon-submission agenda and notedreply thatof deficiency the case tationletter datedof ad-hoc29.03.2016norms.as raisedThe Committeeby DHI. However,reconsideredthe applicantthe casehad andrequestedConsultantfor review(Tech-and 3)informed that the applicant's reply dated 29.05.2020 & 06.07.2020 are deficient due to | following reasons: 1. Process flow chart does not show use of import items at SL. No. 2 & 3. 2. Quantity of forging is proposed to be imported in fraction of numbers. 3. Weight of export product & import items in annexure A & B are not clear. | 4. Quantity of export product given in annexure B is not matching with quantity in AA. The reply of above-mentioned deficiency was received from the applicant and sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 28.01.2021 for examination of case. Consultant (Tech-3) via email dated 14.06.2021 has requested to send physical file of the case. The physical file of the case | wasConsultantsent to(Tech-3)Consultanton 05.01.2022(Tech-3) onfor examination04.08.2021. ofThe the applicant'scase. reply of DL was sent to |

sical file of the case. The physical file of the case | wasConsultantsent to(Tech-3)Consultanton 05.01.2022(Tech-3) onfor examination04.08.2021. ofThe the applicant'scase. reply of DL was sent to |

Decision: The Committee considered the cases as per the agenda and Consultant (Tech-3) informed vide email dated 08.02.2022 that the applicant's reply dated 15.12.2020 is deficient as the applicant has not given point-wise reply of DL. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3): 1. Process flow chart does not show use of import items at SL. No. 2 & 3. | 2. Quantity of forging is proposed to be imported in fraction of numbers. __3. Weight of export product & import items in annexureA & Barenotclear 18] Pa Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

j 4. Quantity of export product given in annexure B is not matching with quantity inAA) Caseisdeferred | SI.No.23 ; M.Case No.19/23/80-ALC2/2016 si ics ie Bae - No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 | M/s AZAD ENGINEERING PRIVATE| Status: (OfflineLic. No.: Cases)0910064137dated 08.02.2022 Date: 14.09.2016 ; LIMITED | Deferred "HQ.RLA No.: 01/80/050/00522/AM17/ | Subject: Request for review of ad-hod| No.: 09/24/040/00295/AM17/ | norms fixed in meeting dated |[approved][in][Meeting][No.][02/80-ALC2/2017][dated][25.04.2017][on][repeat][basis][as][approved] |[was] Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case | forHowever, AA No.

eeting][No.][02/80-ALC2/2017][dated][25.04.2017][on][repeat][basis][as][approved] |[was] Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case | forHowever, AA No. 0910064137the applicant datedhad requested14.09.2016foronre-fixation the recommendationof ad-hoc norms.of the reprTh e sentatComm i vetteeof DHI.had | reconsidered the case in its meeting No. 02/80 dated 16.06.2021 and decided to ask from the | firm the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Calculation of the requirement of raw material supported by Dimensional Engineering Drawing with dimensions clearly highlighted. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency | letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 27.09.2021 followed by reminders on | 11.11.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the | C aseisdeferred,ommittee decided to issue the final reminder toat, the applicant. Se eo eee _| SIL.No.240 2 a aS BESSON: CaseM. No. 37/19/80-ALC2/2014 bial | ate No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline M/s KAMAR INFRASTRUCTURE| Status: | Cases) dated 08.02.2022 Licence : | PVT LTD. | Deferred No.:0310788243 Date: 21.08.2014 | =a na HQ File No: 01/80/050/0047 1/AM15/ | Subject: Request for reviewiiand L Rs Wal |[history:][The][Committee][considered][the][case][as][per][ the][agenda][and][noted][that][the][case] | | RLA[Case] File No: 03/94/040/00449/AM15/ | fixation ofad-hoc norms. i letter. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms.

e][agenda][and][noted][that][the][case] | | RLA[Case] File No: 03/94/040/00449/AM15/ | fixation ofad-hoc norms. i letter. However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. The wasCommittee rejectedreconsideredin Meeting No.the 06/80 dated 20.06.2017case and noted that a deficiency due to non-submissionletter seeking certainreply of deficiencyinformation | as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 29.10.2020. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 25.02.2021 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the applicant's reply is deficient and it contains only copy of Advance Authorization. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. To furnish information as per SI. No. 11 of SDF supported by Engineering Drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted. | calculationSI. No. 11asof to howSDF: of rawStarting materialfromproposedthe specificationfor import ofhasthe beenexportarrivedproduct,at, includingbasic|| ______the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, | 19 | age Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

wastagessupported byclaimed documentaryat eachevidence/drawingsstage of manufacturingetc. with complete justification and|

ng No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

wastagessupported byclaimed documentaryat eachevidence/drawingsstage of manufacturingetc. with complete justification and|

As per NC decision, a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021 & 11.11.2021. The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 07.01.2022 for examination & comments. | Decema i lsion:datedThe28.01.2022Committeeinfc o rmensi d eredthat thethe caseapplicantas perhasthesubmittedagenda andsamenotedinformth at ionDHIasvideof earlier. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI: | 1. To furnish information as per SI. No. 11 of SDF supported by Engineering Drawing with | relevant dimensions highlighted. SI. No. 11 of SDF: Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including | the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and | supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. | SI.No.25 CaseM. No.3/10/80-ALC2/2017, een a ee eaeStatus:| | No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 | M/s HINDUSTAN RUBBER Deferred (OfflineLic. Cases) dated 08.02.2022 _ | INDUSTRIES HQ.

e/drawings etc. | SI.No.25 CaseM. No.3/10/80-ALC2/2017, een a ee eaeStatus:| | No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 | M/s HINDUSTAN RUBBER Deferred (OfflineLic. Cases) dated 08.02.2022 _ | INDUSTRIES HQ. No.:No.05 0 1 /804 0 /050/00213/AM182563 Date: 16.05.2017 | Subject: Request foree review andee ! eee Te RLANo,: 05/23/040/00043/AM18 —|——‘fxation history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 15/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 08.10.2018. However, the applicant had requested for review Case of ad-hoc norms ew 7 andapplicant’sfixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the| reminders onreply25.11.2020was sentandto onDPIIT13.08.2021.for examination of the case on 21.09.2020 followed by A deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on 05.01.2022 as per comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/48/2021-TSW dated 20.09.2021 as under: 1. A copy of complete set of application. 2. Acopy of deficiency letter issued to the applicant. 3. Acopy of representation along with the all relevant information/documents. Decision: As no reply has been received as yet from the applicant, the Committee decided to _ Send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days. eae deferred. _ . a cama be esate sevasamtlal i Case No.8/23/80-ALC2/2015 | Status: | M.(OfflineNo.: Cases) dated08.02.2022NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 a M/s HINDUSTANINDUSTRIESRUBBER Deferred | | Lic. No.

e deferred. _ . a cama be esate sevasamtlal i Case No.8/23/80-ALC2/2015_ | Status: | M.(OfflineNo.: Cases) dated08.02.2022NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 a M/s HINDUSTANINDUSTRIESRUBBER Deferred | | Lic. No. 0510395884 Date: 12.10.2015 | 20 | © a Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [454 x 237] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Subject: Request for review and Case fixation of ad-hoc norms was history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case of rejected in Meeting No. 06/80-ALC2/2016dated 21.06.2016 due to non-submission of reply deficiency letter dated 19.04.2016 as raised by DIPP (Chemical) vide ID No.7/77/2016-TSW dated 26.02.2016.However, the applicant had requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the applicant on 25.11.2020 as per comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/39/2019-TSW dated 12.10.2020: 1. To indicate weight of each type of rubber rollers to be exported, giving its composition 2. i.e. net weight of rubber parts, Metal/Aluminium shell, handle etc. Complete calculation for requirement of inputs (Both imported and indigenous) indicating wastage claimed for each raw material. In this case, there are two export items as under: i. Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery 10”—8000 Number. 3. ii. Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery 14”—500 Number. 4.

his case, there are two export items as under: i. Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery 10”—8000 Number. 3. ii. Rubber rollers for automatic rice mill machinery 14”—500 Number. 4. To provide above details for both the export items. To provide relevant drawing of both the export items. ----- End of picture text -----

The applicant's reply was sent to DPIIT on 28.12.2020 for examination of the case. DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/39/2019-TSW dated 28.01.2021 informed that the copy of application of the subject AA is not available with DPIIT to examine the case. on As per NC decision, a letter was sent to the applicant for submitting the copy of application 06.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 11.11.2021. The copy of application was referred to DPIIT for examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/39/2019-TSW dated 06.12.2021. The case was discussed in the meeting & the Committee decided to seek second opinion of Consultant (Tech-1) in this matter. Case is deferred. SI. No. 27 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline M/s GOLD MOHUR Rejected Cases) dated 08.02.2022 PROFILES LIMITED Lic. No. 0510403501 Date: 25.07.2017 RLA No.: 05/23/040/00156/AM18 and fixation of ad-hoc norms eoCase history: The Committee considered theeecase as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 15/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 12.10.2018 as raised by DIPP (Chemical).

per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 15/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 12.10.2018 as raised by DIPP (Chemical). However, the applicant had requested for review and fixation of ad-hoc norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 29.10.2020 followed by reminders on 06.08.2021, 27.09.2021, 11.11.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case. Case is rejected. 21| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [456 x 168] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 28 M. Status: No.: NC/41/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s L& T-MHPS TURBINE Deferred Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 GENERATORS PRIVATE LIMITED HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00414/AM17 Subject: Request for re-fixation of RLA No.: 03/95/040/00292/AM17 ad-hoc norms Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No. 15/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 as per the written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No. 3/96/2016/T.SW(B) dated 24.12.2018.However, the applicant had requested for review of already fixed ad-hoc norms.

C2/2018 dated 06.03.2019 as per the written comments of DHI vide their U.O. No. 3/96/2016/T.SW(B) dated 24.12.2018.However, the applicant had requested for review of already fixed ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking following information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 24.02.2020 followed by reminders on 06.11 .2020& 06.08.2021: ----- End of picture text -----

The final list of import items after all amendments. (there appears to be at least four amendments) 2. To submit calculation correlating the same with Dimensional Engineering Drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 13.08.2021 & 11.11.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments.

==> picture [81 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [449 x 100] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 29 M. Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s BHARAT HEAVY Deferred Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 ELECTRICALS LIMITED Lic. No. 0410164150 Date: 02.04.2018 Subject: Request for re-fixation of Case ad-hoc norms norms ----- End of picture text -----

line Cases) dated 08.02.2022 ELECTRICALS LIMITED Lic. No. 0410164150 Date: 02.04.2018 Subject: Request for re-fixation of Case ad-hoc norms norms ----- End of picture text -----

Case ad-hoc norms norms was history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case vide approved in M. No. 3/80-ALC2/2019dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DHI email dated 06.05.2019.However, the applicant had requested for review of the ad-hoc norms. on The representation of the applicant was forwarded to DHI for examination of the case 25.02.2020 followed by a reminder on 29.10.2020. As per comments of DHI, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.2021for furnishing the following information:

Complete application with ANF 4A and all enclosures. 2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order.

Further, the Committee in its meeting dated 16.11.2021 noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 26.10.2021 for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed vide letter dated 16.11.2021 that the applicant's reply was incomplete and the applicant did not furnish the point-wise reply as asked in deficiency letter dated 13.08.2021. Therefore, the

22| Page Meeting No.: NC/41/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

Committee decided to ask again from the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days:

22| Page Meeting No.: NC/41/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

Committee decided to ask again from the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days:

Complete application with ANF 4A and all enclosures. 2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was forwarded to DHI on 16.12.2021 for examination & comments. DHI vide latter dated 08.02.2022 stated that this is an old case and sought for certain information. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days:

Complete application with ANF 4A, ANF 4B with all €nclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix 4K & Appendix 4H. 2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order.

th all €nclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix 4K & Appendix 4H. 2. Background note of the request giving details of the deficiency letter issued & the corresponding reply in the chronological order.

Case is deferred. SI. No. 30 M. Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s HONDA TRADING Deferred Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD. ad-hoc norms Subject: Request for re-fixation of Pete] Set) Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No. 13/80 dated 22.01.2019as per written comments of DHI vide U. No. NO. DES-I/HTCI/AUP-I-2018-HEI dated 20.12.2018.However, the applicant had requested for reviewing the ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the applicant as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3):

Specification and catalogue of export product. 2. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
Copy of Advance Authorization. 4. Copy of export order. As per comments of Consultant (Tech-3), a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant for

furnishing the above information on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 29.09.2021 & 11.11.2021.

t order. As per comments of Consultant (Tech-3), a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant for

furnishing the above information on 06.08.2021 followed by reminders on 29.09.2021 & 11.11.2021.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 03.12.2021 & 01.02.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. 23 | Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

Sl.No. 31 M/s Status: Offline THE INDIAN CARD CLOTHING Rejected Cases) dated 08.02.2022 COLTD Case Subject: Requestad-hoc normsfor re-fixation of era was history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case approved in M. No. 14/80-ALC2/2019 dated 06.11.2019 as per written comments of Consultant (Tech-3). However, the applicant had requested for reviewing the ad-hoc norms. The Committee re-considered the case and noted that earlier Consultant (Tech-3) informed that the applicant has claimed nil wastage on export item at SI. No. 3 and 34 % to 50% on rest of items. Process flow chart given is the same for all export product & products are also similar. In view of this nil wastage was recommended on export product 3 and 2% on rest of items considering the nature of the process. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the applicant as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3):

st of items considering the nature of the process. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that following information had been asked from the applicant as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3):

To provide information on stage-wise wastage for each export product (which has been claimed for higher wastage).

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the applicant on 10.08.2021 followed by reminders on 29.09.2021, 11.11.2021 & 05.01.2022. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case.

==> picture [462 x 165] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is rejected. SI. No. 32 Status: Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED | Deferred ad-hoc norms Subject: Request for re-fixation of Patt Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 03/80 dated 08.05.2019 on the recommendation of the representative of DHI. However, the applicant vide email dated 14.10.2020 had requested for revision of the ratified ad-hoc norms. ----- End of picture text -----

mmendation of the representative of DHI. However, the applicant vide email dated 14.10.2020 had requested for revision of the ratified ad-hoc norms. ----- End of picture text -----

The applicant's representation was sent to DHI on 15.12.2020 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 13.08.2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 2. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosure.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the applicant's 24| Page Meeting No.: NC//MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [454 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- reply was sent to DHI on 11.11.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [81 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [466 x 379] intentionally omitted <==

[81 x 10] intentionally omitted <==**

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [466 x 379] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Si. No. 33 M. Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s ALPINE COILS LLP. Deferred FRLANo.o4aioaQ/ooo22/aMt7—|Case Subject:"""“te Requ e stnome for fixation ne of ad- |_| history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected by NC in its Meeting No. 14/80 dated 11.10.2016 due to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised by DIPP).However, the applicant vide representation dated 11.11.2020 furnished the reply of deficiency and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 10.08.2021 for examination & comments. As per comments of DPIIT vide U.O. No.: P-47011/44/2021-TSW dated 15.09.2021, the following information was asked from the applicant to furnish within 15days: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated.

input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be 4. imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 5. Quantities of export items in Nos. also in addition to their weights. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [255 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was forwarded to DPIIT on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been as yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

==> picture [81 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [451 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

re [81 x 9] intentionally omitted <==**

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [451 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 34 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s PROMAC ENGINEERING Deferred ----- End of picture text -----

25|Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

Case Subject: Requesthoc normsfor fixation of ad[ei | was history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case rejected in its Meeting No. 17/80-ALC2/2018 held on 15.11.2019 on the ground that the import and export items are same and there is no manufacturing activity. However, the applicant vide email dated 10.10.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. The applicant's representation was forwarded to DHI on 14.06.2021 for examination of the case. DHI vide letter dated 16.06.2021 informed that the case is very old and required compete set of application along with representation. Therefore, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 11.08.2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 2. corresponding reply in a chronological order.

.08.2021 to furnish following information as per comments of DHI1. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 2. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosure.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 10.11.2021 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 informed that the applicant's reply letter didn’t contain any new information and the comments sent by DHI earlier as per letter dated 01.11.2017 still holds good. However, the Committee noted that DHI in its comments has not mentioned about the specific deficiencies which are required to examine the case. The earlier comments sent as per letter dated 01.11.2017 are also not found. Therefore, the Committee decided to request DHI to give afresh comments in this matter.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [172 x 50] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. 35 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----

intentionally omitted <==**

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. 35 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----

M. Status: No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT.LTD. | Deferred Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 hoc norms Subject: Request for fixation of ad- a Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 02/80-ALC2/2019held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 25.08.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the Advance Authorization.

Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 15.03.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again to MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

26| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

SI. No. 36

==> picture [467 x 648] intentionally omitted <==

he comments.

Case is deferred.

26| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

SI. No. 36

==> picture [467 x 648] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Status: M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT.LTD. | Deferred Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 Case Subject: Requesthoc normsfor fixation of ad- at | history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 02/80-ALC2/2019held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 28.09.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the Advance Authorization. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 15.03.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again to MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. SI. No. 37 Status: M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT.LTD. | Deferred Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 hoc norms PRLANo. 062040000808M1S | noenams | Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.

Cases) dated 08.02.2022 hoc norms PRLANo. 062040000808M1S | noenams | Case history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 02/80-ALC2/2019 held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised by MSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 09.09.2020 has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 14.06.2021 followed by reminders on 27.09.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again to MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. SI. No. 38 Status: M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 M/s VICTORA AUTO PVT. LTD. Deferred ad-hoc norms FRLANG. OS2ADA0001 AMIS] adhocnoms | was rejected in Meeting No. 02/80-ALC2/2019held on 24.04.2019 due to non-submission of the documents/information raised byMSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 02.10.2020 27| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----

aised byMSME. However, the applicant vide email dated 02.10.2020 27| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----

has represented against rejection of their case for fixation of norms. The applicant has furnished technical details along with details of wastage claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all the parts mentioned in the advance authorization. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant’s representation was forwarded to MSME for examination of the case on 1 4.06.2021 followed by reminder on 27.09.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 39

M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Status: Lic. No :0910046638 dated 04.05.2011 Limited RLA No.: 09/24/040/00046/AM12 Subject: Request for re-fixation of Case ad-hoc norms history: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the subject AA has not been considered in any of the NC meeting for fixation of ad-hoc norms yet. Further, the Committee noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to DHI to examine the case on 15.05.2021 followed by a reminder on 13.08.2021. DHI vide their mail dated 01.07.2021 has conveyed that the case is very old and the following documents are required to examine the case: 1. Background note on the case giving the NC decision/ Deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 2. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H.

The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 29.09.2021 for examination & comments. The representative of DHI informed vide letter dated 16.11.2021 that the applicant's reply was incomplete and they did not furnish the point-wise reply as per deficiency letter. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days: 1. Background note on the case giving the NC decision/ deficiency letter along with the 2. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H.

ng the NC decision/ deficiency letter along with the 2. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H. The applicant's reply was forwarded to DHI on 29.12.2021 for examination & comments. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the comments of DHI received vide letter dated 08.02.2022 wherein it is stated that the applicant has proposed to fix ad-hoc norms for import of 42 items instead of 118 items applied earlier against the subject AA Number. Further, the Committee noted that the Consumption Certificate/ accountability statement submitted by the applicant contains a list of 45 import items in which one item at SI. No. 67 is repeated. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek clarification on the same from the applicant & DHI.

28| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

SI. No. 40

Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s Bombardier Transportation Rejected Case Subject: Requesthoc normsfor fixation of ad—History: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the subject AA has not been considered in any of the NC meeting for fixation of ad-hoc norms as yet. The applicant vide their email/letter dated 22.07.2021 stated that they have obtained advance authorization for importing various components and raw material on a customs duty free basis for manufacturing metro rail coaches. The firm has mentioned that they have making efforts for filing the aid online application initially the portal was not allowing to file the application itself as the licence was tagged under the SION norms category. The import items which they required norms fixation includes approximately 5000 line items. While attempting to upload each of the items they have been facing issue of auto logout from the portal with data already posted not being saved. Now, they have requested to accept their application for norms fixation in the physical form.

ms they have been facing issue of auto logout from the portal with data already posted not being saved. Now, they have requested to accept their application for norms fixation in the physical form.

The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s representation was forward to DHI on 19.08.2021 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI asked for background of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek detailed background note along with ccomplete application with all enclosures like appendix 4E, Appendix4 K & Appendix 4H. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 29.09.2021 followed by reminders on 11.11.2021& 05.01.2022. However, no reply has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case.

SI. No. 41

==> picture [447 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Approved Limited hoc norms ----- End of picture text -----

Case History: This case was ratified by Norms Committee vide meeting No. 38/80 dated 22.02.2011 as per written comments of DHI vide their U.O. Note No. 3(42)/10-TSW (B)/106 dated 15.02.2011. The firm vide their email dated 10.03.2021 had requested to revise the norms ratified in meeting No. 38/80-ALC2/2009 dated 22.02.2011 as per comments of DHI Letter No. 3(42)/10-TSVV(B)/106 dated 15.02.2011.

The applicant’s representation was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case on 26.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 29.09.2021.

29|Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

==> picture [453 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that earlier ad-hoc norms were fixed for import items at SL. No. 51 & 64 with 2% wastage & 1% wastage respectively. The import item at SI. No. 80 was deleted as not part of export product. The Committee decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3) received via email dated 08.02.2022 as under: ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [454 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

d-hoc norms as per comments of Consultant (Tech-3) received via email dated 08.02.2022 as under: ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [454 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

The quantity of import item at SI. No. 51 may be allowed as 2870Kg including 5% wastage. 2. The quantity of import item at SI. No. 64 may be allowed as 9240Kg including 2% wastage. 3. The import item at SI. No. 80 may be deleted as it has been asked for Boiler Feed Pump, which is neither an export product not it is an integral part of it. Note: The decision for rest of import items shall remain unchanged as decided in the Meeting No. 38/80 dated 22.02.2011. The concerned RA may ensure the submission of composition fee by the applicant. ----- End of picture text -----

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 42 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Status: (Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/S Suttatti Enterprises Pvt. Ltd | Deferred HQ. No.: 01/80/162/005/AM22/DES-I Subject: Request for fixation of adCase hoc norms History: The firm vide representation dated 01.01.2021 received on 16.07.2021 enclosing their letter dated 06.04.2021 for fixation of Input Output Norms (SEEPZ, Mumbai). They have stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No.

16.07.2021 enclosing their letter dated 06.04.2021 for fixation of Input Output Norms (SEEPZ, Mumbai). They have stated that they are a 100% Export Oriented Unit having letter of permission (LOP) No. SEEPZ-SEZ/EOU/65/05-06V.1I/05330 dated 06.04.2021 as amended and the LOP has been renewed for a further period of five years from 2021-22 to 2025-26 for manufacture and export of wide range of products mainly applicable for electrical industries: i. Shroud Plate Part No. 3789337 (ITC HS code 87089900) ii. Shroud Plate Part No. 3767399/4046002 (ITC HS code 87089900) Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to MSME on 08.11.2021 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. Sl. No. 43 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Status: Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s Avasarala Technologies Ltd. Deferred Lic. No : 0710078776 Date: 26.04.11 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00167/AM12/DES-| Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 07/21/040/00896/AM11 eases etn Case History: The case was rejected by NC in its Meeting No. 20/80 dated 27.12.11 due to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised by DIPP). Now, the firm vide 30| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

. 20/80 dated 27.12.11 due to non-submission of replied to the deficiency (raised by DIPP). Now, the firm vide 30| Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

representation dated 28.12.2020 received on 06.01.2021 furnished the reply of deficiency as raised by DPIIT and requested to fix the norms. They have stated that they have completed export obligation well in time as stipulated and requested to ratify the norms for import item Sl. No. 1 & 2 under General Note 4 and import item SI. No. 3 with the wastage of 1% as mentioned in the Appendix 4E. The applicant's representation was forwarded to DPIIT on 08.11.2021 for the examination & comments.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47014/14/2021-TSW dated 16.12.2021. The case was discussed in the meeting & the Committee decided to seek second opinion of Consultant (Tech-3) in this matter.

Case is deferred.

vide U. O. No. P-47014/14/2021-TSW dated 16.12.2021. The case was discussed in the meeting & the Committee decided to seek second opinion of Consultant (Tech-3) in this matter.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 44 M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Status: Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 Limited Deferred Subject: Request for fixation of adRLA No.: 09/24/040/292/AM09 hoc norms Case History: This case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 44/80-ALC2/2009 dated 02.02.2010 as per recommendation of DHI letter No. 3/23/09/TSW9B) dated 12.01.2010. Now, the firm vide email dated has requested for revision of norms in respect of import item at serial No. 75 is deleted from import list requested to allow the same and import item at serial No. 92 ratified quantity for the said material is insufficient to meet their requirement.

Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 09.08.2021 & 29.09.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

.09.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 45 M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Status: Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 Limited Deferred hoc norms FRLANe. OB4O40RSUAMOD | focnome | Case History: This case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 19/80 dated 11.12.2012 as per recommendation of DHI letter No. 3/42/10/Vol. 20/408 dated 11.12.2012. Now, the firm vide their email dated has requested for revision of norms in respect of import item at serial No. 12 is deleted from import list requested to allow the same and import item at serial No. 91 ratified quantity for the said material is insufficient to meet their requirement.

Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case on 09.08.2021 followed by a reminder on 29.09.2021. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

31] Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

refore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (Tech-3) for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

31] Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

SI. No. 46 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Status: Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Deferred Limited RLA No.: 09/24/040/450/AM11 Subject: Request for fixation of adCase es hocnorms > || History: This case was ratified by Norms Committee vide meeting No.08/14 dated 09.07.2013 as per comments of DHI letter No. 3(42)/2010-TSW (B)/112 dated 31.05.2013. Now, the firm vide email dated 10.03.2021 has requested that import items at SI.Nos.2, 6&7 are raw material and the ratified quantity was restricted to 7960 Kgs,4850Kgs&320Kgs by Norms Committee as against applied quantities 10000Kgs,6000 Kgs & 2000Kgs respectively. They have stated that the ratified quantity was insufficient to meet their requirement & thus they have imported more than the ratified quantity. For the Justification of the same Accountability Certificate certified by the Central Excise Dept. has been enclosed in this regard for further consideration. was The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation forwarded to Consultant (Tech-3) on 09.08.2021 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-3) had requested to forward this case to DHI. Therefore, the Committee decided to refer the case to DHI for examination and comments. As per NC decision, the applicant's representation was forwarded to DHI on 29.09.2021 for examination & comments.

erefore, the Committee decided to refer the case to DHI for examination and comments. As per NC decision, the applicant's representation was forwarded to DHI on 29.09.2021 for examination & comments. The case was considered by NCin its meeting dated 16.11.2021 and noted the comments of DHI received vide letter dated 16.11.2021 wherein it was stated that the applicant's representation was not clear and they sought some more information. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Background note giving the NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding 2. reply in a chronological order. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosures like Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

As per NC decision, DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing above information.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply/representation was forwarded to DHI on 29.11.2021 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [459 x 168] intentionally omitted <==

owever, no comments have been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [459 x 168] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. 47 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Status: Subject: Request for fixation of ad- Case History: This case was rejected by the Norms Committee in its meeting No. 22/80- ALC2/2018held on 28.02.2020 due to non-submission of the documents/information as called by TA/ DHI. The firm vide email dated 16.04.2021 and 24.06.2021 had furnished soft copy of application and requested to re-consider their case for fixation of norms. The firm had furnished technical details along with details of wastages claimed, process flow charts and drawings of all 32 | Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----

the parts mentioned in the advance authorization.

The Committee reconsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s representation was forward to DHI on 26.08.2021 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI had asked for background note of the case along with previous decision of NC. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to DHI for examination & comments.

he case. The representative of DHI had asked for background note of the case along with previous decision of NC. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to DHI for examination & comments.

The applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 06.10.2021 for examination and comments. DHI vide letter dated 16.11.2021 informed that the applicant's reply was incomplete as the applicant didn’t answer to any of the points as raised in deficiency letter. The reply was not in chronological order with detailed background of the case i.e. decision of NC and other correspondence. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DHI: 1. Background note giving the NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order. 2. Complete application with ANF 4B with all enclosures like Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 07.01.2022. However, no rely has been received as yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.
SI. No. 48 Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred

ee decided to send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information within 15days.

Case is deferred.
SI. No. 48 Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred
RANDO7edDagO00SAMIS——|toonshoc norms || Case History: This case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The firm’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of
the case. As per comments of DHI, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information: 1. Acopy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
1. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.
As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information.

33 | Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [452 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

o the applicant for furnishing the above information.

33 | Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

==> picture [452 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 has requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point-wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI: ----- End of picture text -----

A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 4. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

==> picture [81 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

==> picture [81 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

SI. No. 49 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Status: Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred Subject: Request for fixation of adCase hoc norms History: This case was rejected by NC in its M. No. 15/80dated 25.10.2016 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 1 9.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. case. The firm’s representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the The Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.
Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H.
Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 4. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information.

==> picture [453 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information.

==> picture [453 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 has requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point- wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI: ----- End of picture text -----

A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B.
Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with 4. the corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

34| Page

Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 08.02.2022

SI. No. 50

Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred Subject: Request for fixation of adCase History: This case was rejected by NC in its M. No. hoc15/80 normsdated 25.10.2016 due to nonsubmission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing Process and Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The firm's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI:

A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information.

cation, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 has requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the pointwise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI:

Acopy of complete application as per ANF-4B.
Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the corresponding reply in a chronological order.
Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [48 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 51 ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [442 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Offline Cases) dated 08.02.2022 M/S BEML LIMITED Deferred hoc norms ----- End of picture text -----

submission of reply of deficiency (raised by DHI). The firm vide email dated 19.02.2021, 06.03.2021 & 10.08.2021 has furnished the technical documents containing Manufacturing

35 |Page Meeting No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

==> picture [453 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- theProcessad-hocandnorms.Nesting Diagram indicating scrap/wastage for Raw Materials and requested to fix the The firm's representation was forwarded to DHI on 23.08.2021 for examination of case. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI: 1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B. / 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 4. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231, ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [453 x 174] intentionally omitted <==

NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231, ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [453 x 174] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- As per NC decision, a DL was issued to the applicant for furnishing the above information. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was sent to DHI on 19.01.2022 for examination & comments. DHI vide letter dated 08.02.2022 has requested to send point-wise reply of the deficiency letter separately to each AA Number. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the point- wise reply of following deficiencies as per comments of DHI: 1. A copy of complete application as per ANF-4B. 2. Complete information as per Appendix-4E, Appendix-4K & Appendix-4H. 3. Background note of the case along with NC decision/deficiency letter along with the 4. corresponding reply in a chronological order. Complete application, NC deficiency letter along with its reply and decision of NC for the approved AA No. 0710104231. ----- End of picture text -----

Case is deferred.

SI. No. 52

==> picture [459 x 197] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 Status: Case Subject: Requesthoc norms for fixation of ad- A ES firm History: This Case was approved by NC in its Meeting No. 01/80dated 03.04.2019. The has stated that inadvertently they have submitted the online application with export & import quantity in KGs as same without any wastage. Therefore, on the basis of online application submitted at the office of Add. DGFT CLA, New Delhi norms was fixed by DGFT in its meeting No. 05/80 dated 28.06.2018. Hence, they have requested to reconsider their application on basis of actual wastage and revise the norms. Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the applicant's representation was forwarded to MSME on 09.11.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. ----- End of picture text -----

Case is deferred.

36 | Page Meeting No.: NC/41/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

he Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. ----- End of picture text -----

Case is deferred.

36 | Page Meeting No.: NC/41/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

SI. No. 53 M. No.: NC/1/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Status: dated 08.02.2022 M/S HANNING| Approved Lic. No.: 3411000327 dated 23.03.2021, 3411000326 MOTORS INDIA dated 23.03.2021, 3411000321 dated 24.03.2021 & PRIVATE LIMITED 3411000320 dated 24.03.2021 HQ. ! i= File No.: HQRNORMAPPLY00111756AM21, Subject: Request for _ HQRNORMAPPLY00111758AM21, revision of ad-hoc HQRNORMAPPLY00112709AM21, norms HQRNORMAPPLY00112710AM21 Case History: The cases were approved by NC in its Meeting No. NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/6dated 25.10.2021 as per comments of MSME. The applicant vide their email dated 20.01.2022 has stated the norms fixed by NC, in respect of above Advance Authorizations, have typographical error of Serial Number in the import items as it was mentioned And” instead of “To”. Now, the applicant has requested to correct the Serial Number of import items for subject AA Nos.

Decision: The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per comments of MSME as under: 1. 3411000327 dated 23.03.2021:

i. Quantity of relevant import items at SI. No. 18 to 25 may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the export product.

2. 3411000326dated 23.03.2021:

i. Quantity of relevant import items at SI. No. 16 to 23 may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the export product.

3. 3411000321 dated 24.03.2021:

i. Quantity of relevant import items at SI. No. 10 to 12 may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the export product.

3411000320 dated 24.03.2021:

i. Quantity of relevant import items at SI. No. 12 to 15 may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the export product.

Note: The decision for rest of import items for all above mentioned AAs shall remain unchanged as decided in the Meeting No. NC/1/MEET/Oct/202122/6 dated 25.10.2021.

==> picture [478 x 143] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. = [ae] ad RRRKKREKKKER ) we , pune! wast Kura ese Aa Ex e GON prety attao Peco jerttza “Gene oto Aa ‘yeu Mearepint eA,Sor got— Pueht 37|Page Meeting No.: NC/4/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date:hal08.02.2022 ----- End of picture text -----

37|Page Meeting No.: NC/4/MEET/Jan/202122/12 (Offline Cases)

==> picture [563 x 715] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ae ———"’ ¥ Of 01: 2°P-L : Accountabili n Narie Of The Applicant: BHEL, RC PURAM, HYDERABAD 1EC number: 0588138690 Advance Authorisation No: 0910039076 Date Of Issue: 27.08.2009 abie A; Cxport item Details: Si. No, of D SORE:SAMdRE:EE Let Sei ey Ft Aer ne a 8 Lea el ee RR ee DRIVE TURBINE DEARATORS,HPHEATERS.DRAIN COOLERS, BOILERMFEED PUMP WITH SPAES N FOR 2X500 MW umbers 2 TARE 1108 MILUS FOR 2xS00hV a 1 | a abie 3: import item Details: Ot bs po $I. Ne. |nding St. Total Qty imported as} Qty consumed In Export | No.of | Description of input as per Bill of Entry/Excise Description of input actually used in the per B/E/ Excise the resultant item {As} Inputas | involee{including technical specificationsipart resultant product(inciuding technical tnvoice for qty product for qty per tab! per Nos. atc} specitications/part Now. ete) exported as per exported as per A} | Authoris column(3) of table A | column(3) tableA | = — eee | PLANETARY GEAR BOX OF XRP~ 1003 MILL IPLANETARY R BOX OF MRP - 1003 MILL BEVEL PINION SHAFT FOR KMP 300 BEVEL PINION SHAFT FOR KIP 300 R (2 | « PLANETARYGEAR BOX OFGEARXRP -1003BOX OF MILLXRP - 1003 MILL.

EAR BOX OF XRP~ 1003 MILL IPLANETARY R BOX OF MRP - 1003 MILL BEVEL PINION SHAFT FOR KMP 300 BEVEL PINION SHAFT FOR KIP 300 R (2 | « PLANETARYGEAR BOX OFGEARXRP -1003BOX OF MILLXRP - 1003 MILL. COUPLINGPLANETARYSEAR BOX OFSLEEVEGEARXRP FOR-1003BOX KOF M ILLPXRP300- 1003 PLANETARYMil fou | sos | on1 | INTERNALLY TOOTHED GEAR WHEEL FOR INTERNALLY TOOTHED GEAR WHEEL FOR KMP 260 PLANETARY GEAR BOX OF XRP - 1003/KMP 300PLANG E ARTARYBOX OF XRP - | 2 | os |PINION- SHAFT FOR KMP300 PLANETARY GEAR |PINION SHAFT FOR KMP300 PLANETARY | te | nos | we | ERE BOX ANETARYOF XRP-1008GEAR MitWHEEL FOR KMP300 PLANETARYGEAR BOX OFGEAR XRP-1003WHEEL FORMiLI KMPS06 | so | nos | 50 | Pee peeOFPLANETARY GEAR BOX OF enXRP-1093 MILL EamonPLANETARY GEAR BOX OF XRP-1063 MILL [|woe | - leeoneeovrms D2 # EioereragaeGEARXRP-1003 Mit OF XRP-1903 MILL |? | [2 z a] PLANETARYPLANETARYBOX OF GEARXRP-1003GEAR WHEEL8OX MILLOF FORXRP-1003 KMP300MILL PLANETARY PLANETARY GEAR GEAR BOXWHEELBOX OFOF FOR XRP-1003XRP-100 KMP 3 MILL00 MILL | 3 | nos | 3 | Nos | fs |e | PRODUCTION TEST COUPON FOR TUBE PRODUCTION TEST COUPON FOR TUBE | 8 | nos | 6 | nos | ee EET SHEET a epEO ae ee SES FOReeHP HEATER ISSUTUBESFORHPeeeHEATERS ToadseeNOS |ee9448 | NOS | 8 OE A eS a es ees LTT Ee ea rm dome ttt,.oan RECIRCULATION (HIGH PRESSURE DROP) IRE-CIRCULATION (HIGH PRESSURE DROP) [| ST NOS TST NOS | 4 | 92 _|SS STRAIGHT TUBES FOR DRAIN COOLERS _|SS STRAIGHT TUBES FOR ORAINCOOLERS | 1350) NOS | 1860 f NOS | | Declaration : ji misigadingtwe hereby in fulura,declare thatwe inf

NOS TST NOS | 4 | 92 _|SS STRAIGHT TUBES FOR DRAIN COOLERS _|SS STRAIGHT TUBES FOR ORAINCOOLERS | 1350) NOS | 1860 f NOS | | Declaration : ji misigadingtwe hereby in fulura,declare thatwe information furnishedshail be able for penalas action above under theere trua andprovisionscorrect asof FTORper recordsAct and mamizinedrules madeby thereunderus. information furnished aeeReeiay\8 be hicnrseet or Sse or ; Date 22-06-2019 Ro \BS “i ial Name : K ind’ 4 «i “ ¥ Le ad | 7-48 ‘ela fbi22 - = institut & : My gre ; naparth! indraserta FIEPit. -" atingrt Kanaan 6. ta res , ue wes/ Si ce e - f t yte| WOHVOoSSh : = gery |; ) ceai ree+?) Dy, erMe t pasAS os ----- End of picture text -----

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6882 --apply.