IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr B / NC-I) Advance Authorisation 2010-03-30

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.52/10 held on 30.03.2010 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 52/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 was held on 30.03.2010 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. A.K. Mishra, Asstt. IA MOS, U.B. 4. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1

Case No.:95/24/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. Meet No/Date:52/80ALC2/2009 30.03.2010 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00971/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00337/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510226413 28.08.2008 Decision :The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(130)/09TSW(B) dated 30.03.2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises Department of Heavy Industry TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S Minda Silica for ratification of norms of licence no0510226413 dt 280808.

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S Minda Silica on the subject mentioned above. The firm has submitted the information vide their letter 070110.There are different models of both the types of keys. Calculation of universal keys The average net weight of these types of key blanks is around 7.5 gms each. The firm has given the calculation for three types of keys. From the process of manufacture & the calculation submitted by the firm, this Office recommends for gross wastage of 150%. After taking 1/3rd recovery, net wastage of 100% is recommended. The firm’s entitlement, then, comes to 78593 kg & the same is recommended. The total export weight of the product is 39.296 MT & the same may be incorporated in the licence. Calculation of Plastic head keys The net weight of these types of keys varies from 5 gms to 11.57 gms. The firm has given the calculation for three types of keys. From the process of manufacture & the

g f yp f y f g g f g f yp f y p f f calculation submitted by the firm, gross wastage of 150% on steel is recommended. After taking 1/3rd recovery, net wastage of 100% is recommended. The firm’s entitlement, then, comes to 10,700 kg of steel strips. The total export weight of the product is 8659 kg including weight of plastic which is 3.3 MT & the same can be incorporated in the licence. The total recommended quantity of steel strips is 89293 kg. The above issues with the approval of JS(B). DGFT file is returned herewith.. B.C.Nayak Development Officer 300310 Shri Ramavtar Meena, FTDO, DESI Deptt. of HI, UO No3(130)/09/TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 2

Case No.:13/26/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. 30.03.2010 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01049/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00381/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510227332 11.09.2008 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 3

Case No.:13/29/81ALC2/2008

Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/81/050/00430/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00106/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022444 30.09.2008 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 4

Case No.:50/38/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/01549/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00295/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036392 11.12.2008 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 5

Case No.:51/38/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/01550/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00296/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036393 11.12.2008 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010.

Case No.:8/40/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:VA TECH ESCHER WYSS FLOVELPVT. LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/01612/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00631/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233247 23.12.2008 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 7

Case No.:43/5/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00051/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00897/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310502444 13.01.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has been received in DGFT. DHI representative was advised to check and inform whether they received the reply or not. Committee decided to forward the copy of firm’s reply to DHI for examination and submission of comments in case they not received the same. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 8

Case No.:35/21/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:WONJIN AUTOPARTS INDIA PVT LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00317/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00254/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102257 11.02.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 9

Case No.:14/50/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/01812/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00427/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037147 24.02.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 10

Case No.:51/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/01874/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01068/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310510897 09.03.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 11

Case No.:47/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LIVACO INDUSTRIES, 30.03.2010 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/01870/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00968/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310511759 17.03.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that subject case was rejected by the NC in its meeting No. 32/10 held on 10.11.2010 as the firm did not reply to the

11 queries raised by the NC. The case was subsequently reopened as the firm’s reply was received before communication of NC decision. The reply was examined by the representative of DIPP and observed that firm has not given the point wise reply to the deficiency letter issued by this office. The Committee accordingly decided to maintain rejection. The RA may take necessary action accordingly. 12

Case No.:83/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:SPARKLINE EQUIPMENTS PVT.LTD, 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/01906/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00345/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110037942 31.03.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application was received from RA and the same has been referred to DIPP on 29/03/2010. The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that the case was yet to be examined by them. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 13

Case No.:15/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:OMNISCIENT PROCESS EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD 30.03.2010 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00106/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517220 24.04.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that subject case was rejected by the NC in its meeting No. 32/10 held on 10.11.2010 as the firm did not reply to the queries raised by the NC. The case was subsequently reopened as the firm’s reply was received before communication of NC decision. The reply was examined by the representative of DIPP and observed that firm has not given the point wise reply to the deficiency letter issued by this office. The Committee accordingly decided to maintain rejection. The RA may take necessary action accordingly. 14

Case No.:13/13/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00158/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00101/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065424 17.06.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 15

Case No.:25/13/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PETRON ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00170/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00052/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310525689 24.06.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010: 1 As per GA Drawing of VDU Heater submitted by the firm requirement of alloy steel tubes is 80 nos as against 489 nos claimed by them Firm may

1. As per GA Drawing of VDU Heater submitted by the firm, requirement of alloy steel tubes is 80 nos. as against 489 nos. claimed by them. Firm may clarify and to justify requirement of 1274 nos. of alloy steel tubes for 3 nos. of CDU/VDU Heaters supported by documentary evidence/drawings. Length of alloy steel tubes may also be indicated. 16

Case No.:8/21/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DAEWON INDIA AUTOPARTS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:52/80ALC2/2009 30.03.2010 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00290/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00099/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410106653 05.08.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 17

Case No.:23/21/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00305/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00396/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310533764 13.08.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 18

Case No.:25/21/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00307/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00012/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510247598 13.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.No.1&3. 2. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 may be allowed as 78.71 MT inclusive of 2% wastage. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No.2 may be allowed as 28.196 MT on net to net basis. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No.3 may be allowed as 2.60 MT inclusive of 2% wastage. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No.4 may be allowed as 1.52 MT on net to net basis. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No.5 may be allowed as 1.11 MT. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No.6 may be allowed equal to quantity of Welding Wire at S.No. 5 of import item. 8. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. 19

Case No.:26/21/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DICKINSON FOWLER LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00308/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00188/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710066532 18.08.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, th f d id d t d f th id ti d t li t th 25 05 2010

therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 20

Case No.:37/21/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00319/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00020/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000343 19.08.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 21

Case No.:5/28/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:RATNAMANI METALS & TUBES LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00423/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00143/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810082827 11.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Description of export product may be modified as “Welded Titanium Tubes, Spec: ASTM B26507 Grade – 2, Size: OD 25.40 MM, WT: 0.508 MM/ 0.711 MM ”. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as 32343 Kgs. inclusive of 5% wastage after taking clue from SION C 593. 22

Case No.:3/27/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 30.03.2010 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00392/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00014/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249404 16.09.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs.

Case No.:4/27/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00393/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00304/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249502 17.09.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(130)/09TSW(B)/ dated 30.03.2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section

23 TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S Minda Silica for ratification of norms of licence no0510249502 dt 170909

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S Minda Silica on the subject mentioned above. The firm has submitted the information vide their letter 050210. The information is incomplete. Based on the information available, this Office recommends the following. IMPORT 1. Item no 1 – It is a raw material. The firm has neither given the use or calculation of requirement. The same may be deleted. 2. Item no 8 & 9 these are stated to be accessories. These appear to be tools. Since this is not used in the manufacture of the end product, the same may be deleted. 3. Item no 14 & 15 these are consumed in setting of the key cutting machine. Since this is not used in the manufacture of the end product, the same may be deleted. 4. All other items proposed for import are components & may be allowed under GN4. The above issues with the approval of JS(B). B.C.Nayak Development Officer 300310 Deptt. of HI, UO No3(130)/09/TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. 24

Case No.:1/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PLANT ENGINEERING SERVICES, 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00560/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00146/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108037 24.09.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(165)/09TSW(B)/140 dated 22.03.2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S PLANT Engineering services for ratification of norms of licence no 0410108037 dt 240909

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S PLANT Engineering services. The firm has submitted information vide their letter of dated 100210. The information is incomplete. However based on information available this Office recommends the following. 1. The weight of the export product is 2.07 kg each & the same may be incorporated in the licence. 2. The firm has asked for wastage of 12% on item no 1 of import. The wastage is not supported by the calculation. Taking 20% recovery, this office recommends wastage of 9.5%. The firm’s entitlement comes to 43871numbers & 102,000 kg & the same is recommend . 3. Item no 2 of import is a consumable. The same may be allowed within 3% of FOB value of export. The above issues with the approval of Joint Secretary (B). B.C.Nayak Development Officer 17 03 10

170310 Deptt. of HI, UO No 3(165)/09TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with DHI recommendation except that quantity of import item no. 1 may be allowed as 45000 nos. with the condition that duty exemption benefit is restricted to 102000 kg. 25

Case No.:32/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00591/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00336/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310539120 24.09.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 26

Case No.:7/28/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LUBI SUBMERSIBLES LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00425/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00157/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810083301 01.10.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 27

Case No.:3/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00432/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00059/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510250400 07.10.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 28

Case No.:10/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00439/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00159/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108280 08.10.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010.

Case No.:11/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:KINECO PVT. LTD. 30 03 2010

29 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00440/AM10/ RLA File :17/24/040/00028/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1710002815 08.10.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 30

Case No.:4/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:VASANTHA TOOL CRAFTS P.LTD., 30.03.2010 Status:Case Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00433/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00218/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039513 08.10.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 31

Case No.:6/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TEKSONS LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00435/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00291/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310540943 08.10.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. 32

Case No.:7/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00436/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00337/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310540953 08.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net empty export weight of 796.58 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Weights of 564860 Kgs. and 65734 Kgs. may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.No. 1 & 3 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 3. Weight of 4000 Kgs & 2253 Kgs. may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.No. 2 & 4 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 4. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at S.Nos. 5 & 6 . 5. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.5 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 65523 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No. 6 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 6000 Kgs on net to net basis. 7. Weights of 55.246 MT, 1 MT, 1 MT, 5.4 MT, 7 MT, & 0.75 MT may be added with the quantities of import items at S.Nos.7, 8, 9, 10, 16, & 18 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 8. Quantities of import items from S.Nos. 11 to 15 may be allowed as applied for. 9. Import item at S.No.17 may be allowed as per Packing Policy. 10. Import item at S.No.18 to be supplied alongwith export product. 11. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause.

Case No.:9/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00438/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00158/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108279 08.10.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 34

Case No.:13/29/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00442/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00163/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108335 09.10.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has been received in DGFT. DHI representative was advised to check and inform whether they received the reply or not. Committee decided to forward the copy of firm’s reply to DHI for examination and submission of comments in case they have not received the same. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 35

Case No.:31/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PLAST TECH ENGINEERING 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00590/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00186/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410109229 10.11.2009 Decision : The C&PC furnished written comments in this case vide their O.M. No. 46011/04/2010PCII dated 18.02.2010 recommending the norms as per SION H27. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with 5% wastage as per SION H27. 36

Case No.:14/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 30.03.2010 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00573/AM10/ RLA File :11/24/040/00024/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1110021254 11.11.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 37

Case No.:28/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 30.03.2010 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00587/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00188/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410109500 18.11.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent

Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 38

Case No.:8/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00567/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00011/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310009599 25.11.2009 Decision : The C&PC furnished written comments in this case vide their O.M. No. 46011/21/2009PC.II dated 18.02.2010 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments with minor modification as under: 1. Quantity of import item no. 1 i.e. “PVC Compound (Medical Grade)” may be allowed as 1.05 kg./kg. content in the export product. 2. Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per written comments of C&PC as under: (i) Quantity of import item no. 2 i.e. “Relevant Stainless Steel Needle assembly” may be allowed with 3% wastage (ii) Quantity of import item no. 3 i.e. “Evident paperPlastic (Self Adhesive)” may be allowed with 5% wastage. (iii) Quantity of Aluminium Foil Cover (item No. 4), Relevant Plasma Cap (Rubber Cap) (item no. 5), Relevant Luer Adaptor (item No.6), Relevant Oxygen Absorber (item No.7), Stamping Foil Tape (item No.8) and Thermal Transfer Ribbon (item No.9) may be allowed with 1% wastage. (iv) Relevant Big Break Off Valve Assembly (item no. 10) may be allowed with 3% wastage. 39

Case No.:2/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00561/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00110/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510253560 27.11.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(117)/09TSW(B)/88 dated 19.2.10 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section Subject: Application of M/S Botil OIL tools Pvt Ltd for ratification of norms of licence no 0510255715 dt 060110,Lic no0510252255 dt 101109, Lic no0510252923 dt 191109, Lic no0510253560 dt 271109 DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S Botil OIL tools Pvt Ltd. The items proposed for import are mainly components and seamless tubes. The components may be allowed under GN4 . The firm has sought wastage of 0.5% on length basis. There is some machining loss involved in the manufacturing process. Hence we may recommend for wastage of 5% on weight basis. RA may call for exact net weight of components to be manufactured out of imported seamless tubes and total quantity of imported raw material may be allowed based on net + 5%wastage. B.C.Nayak Development Officer 190210

19 02 10 Deptt. of HI, UO No 3(117)/09TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. 40

Case No.:3/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:S.M.PULP PACKAGING PVT.LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00562/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00378/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510253563 27.11.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from M/o Defence are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 41

Case No.:10/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00569/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00033/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610016734 30.11.2009 Decision : The C&PC furnished written comments in this case vide their O.M. No. 46011/169/2009PC.II dated 18.02.2010 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Item to be exported Quantity Insulator Assembly Alternator/ rectifier / Seal Assembly / Parts / Components etc. 1 no. Rawmaterial Recommended for import 1. Phenolic Moulding compound 2. Polyamide66 3. Thermoplastic Elastomer 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. 42

Case No.:6/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00565/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00173/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510253589 30.11.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010.

Case No.:9/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00568/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00032/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610016729 30.11.2009 Decision : The C&PC furnished written comments in this case vide their O.M. No. 46011/169/2009PC.II dated 18.02.2010 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Item to be exported Quantity Handle Assembly / Motor Vehicle Parts 1 no. Rawmaterial Recommended for import 1. For 1 kg. weight of parts / components made of ABS Resin: (i) ABS resin (ii) Colour Master Batch 2. Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) 3. PVC Compound 4. Paper Corrugated Box for Packing 1.03 kg./kg. content in export product. 0.02 kg./kg. content in export product. 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. As per Packing Policy 44

Case No.:17/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00576/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00012/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310009656 01.12.2009 Decision : The C&PC furnished written comments in this case vide their O.M. No. 46011/21/2009PC.II dated 18.02.2010 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments with minor modification as under: 1. Quantity of import item no. 1 i.e. “PVC Compound (Medical Grade)” may be allowed as 1.05 kg./kg. content in the export product. 2. Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per written comments of C&PC as under: (v) Quantity of import item no. 2 i.e. “Relevant Stainless Steel Needle assembly” may be allowed with 3% wastage (vi) Quantity of import item no. 3 i.e. “evident paperPlastic (Self Adhesive)” may be allowed with 5% wastage. (vii) Quantity of Aluminium Foil Cover (item No. 4), Relevant Plasma Cap (Rubber Cap) (item no. 5), Relevant Luer Adaptor (item No.6), Relevant Oxygen Absorber (item No.7), Stamping Foil Tape (item No.8) and Thermal Transfer Ribbon (item No.9) may be allowed with 1% wastage. (viii) Relevant Big Break Off Valve Assembly (item no. 10) may be allowed with 3% wastage.

Case No.:16/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 30.03.2010

45 HQ File :01/80/050/00575/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00117/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510253818 02.12.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 46

Case No.:20/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:SARTORIUS STEDIM INDIA PVT. LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00579/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00324/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710068624 02.12.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 47

Case No.:22/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. 30.03.2010 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00581/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00178/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040937 04.12.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter dt. 18/02/2010 informed that the subject advance authorization has been issued as per GN – 4 for the engineering products hence hard copy of the firm’s application not forwarded to NC. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 48

Case No.:24/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PVT. LTD., 30.03.2010 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00583/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00042/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000375 04.12.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter No. 61/24/040/00042/AM10 dt. 18.02.2010 informed that the subject advance authorization has been issued as per GN – 4 for the engineering products hence hard copy of the firm’s application not forwarded to NC. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 49

Case No.:27/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:P&K HIGH TECH SYSTEM PVT.LTD. 30.03.2010 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00586/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00395/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510253966 04.12.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm vide their letter dt. 28.01.2010 informed that the subject advance authorization has been surrendered by them to RA for cancellation. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination and inform the same to RA.

Case No.:30/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00589/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00387/AM10/ Lic No/Date:0510254039 Defer Date:

50 HQ File :01/80/050/00589/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00387/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510254039 07.12.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 51

Case No.:34/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00593/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00125/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510254196 08.12.2009 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 30(72)2008ME dated 22.03.2010 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Item of import at Sl.No. 2,3,6,7 & 8 of import list may be allowed as net + 2% wastage. 2. Item at Sl. No. 4 of import list may be allowed as Net + 1.5% wastage. 3. Item at Sl. No. 5 & 9 of import list may be allowed as Net + 1% wastage. 4. Item at Sl. No. 10 of import list i.e. relevant silicon tube may be allowed as 12500 meters on the basis of Net + 1% wastage. 5. Item at Sl. No. 12 of import list i.e. relevant Tyvakunprinted may be allowed as 13200 meters on the basis of 0.00528 Sq. Mtrs. for each export product. 6. Item at Sl. No. 11 of import list i.e. relevant APET film may be allowed as 15350 meters on the basis of 0.614 Sq. Mtrs. for each 100 nos. of export product. 7. Item at Sl. No. 1 of import list i.e. relevant PTFE Tube may be allowed as 136500 meters on the basis of 5.46 Sq. Mtrs. for each 100 nos. of export product. 52

Case No.:36/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00595/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00397/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510254313 09.12.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 53

Case No.:2/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:VEELINE MEDIA LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00689/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00163/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210135094 10.12.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that DL was issued to firm based on DC(MSME) comments and firm’s reply has also been received. The representative of DC(MSME) has however informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010.

Case No.:37/37/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DELKOR TECHNIK INDIA P.LTD.

54 y 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00596/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00351/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710068795 10.12.2009 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s application. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s application to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 55

Case No.:5/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:G.R.ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00692/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00830/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310553362 01.01.2010 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net Empty Export weights of 121.7 MT & 11.65 MT may be added with the quantities of export products at S.No.1 & 2 respectively (Total net empty export weight 133.35 MT). 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at Sl. Nos. 1 & 2. 3. Quantities of import items at S.No.1 & 2 may be allowed as 1.05 Kg/ Kg. content in the export product. 4. Weight of “10.1 MT ”may be added with the quantity of import item at Sl.No.3 and quantity of this item may be allowed on net to net basis 56

Case No.:4/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00691/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00766/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310554385 08.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 57

Case No.:1/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00688/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00211/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110041587 20.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has been received and forwarded to DIPP whereas the case pertains to DIT. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s application to DIT for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 8

Case No.:7/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:COOKSON INDIA PVT. LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00694/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00264/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410110983 21 01 2010 Defer Date: 25 05 2010

58 21.01.2010 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm vide their letter dt. 24/03/2010 informed that subject adv. Authorization was obtained by them under para 4.7.1 on repeat basis as per NC decision in NC meeting No. 28/10 held on 13/10/2009 in respect of adv. Authorization No. 0410107040 dt. 19.08.09. The Committee decided to forward the firm’s letter to RA for confirmation. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 59

Case No.:8/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:COOKSON INDIA PVT. LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00695/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00250/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410110985 21.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 14.05.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 60

Case No.:9/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00696/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00184/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110041632 22.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 14.05.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 61

Case No.:12/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:MECHSOL TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD, 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00699/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00364/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710069609 25.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 25.05.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.1,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 62

Case No.:13/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:WINDLASS ENGINEERS & SERVICES PVT.LTD., 30.03.2010 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00700/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00048/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000385 25.01.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter No. 61/24/040/00048/AM10 dt. 09.03.2010 informed that the subject advance authorization has been issued as per GN – 4 for the engineering products hence hard copy of the firm’s application not forwarded to NC. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 63

Case No.:14/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:WINDLASS ENGINEERS & SERVICES PVT.LTD., 30.03.2010 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00701/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00049/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000386 25.01.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter No. 61/24/040/00049/AM10 dt. 09.03.2010 informed the subject advance authorization has been issued as per GN – 4 for the engineering products hence hard copy of the firm’s application not forwarded to NC. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination

close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 64

Case No.:15/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00702/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00453/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510256922 25.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 25.05.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5,11 & 13 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 65

Case No.:16/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00703/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00457/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510256923 25.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 25.05.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 &11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 66

Case No.:17/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:OGNIBENE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00704/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00217/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110041696 27.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 14.05.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 67

Case No.:19/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:SHOWA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00706/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00458/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510256995 27.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 14.05.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 68

Case No.:20/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00707/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00198/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210137059 28.01.2010 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications:

1. Words “Containing 38.80 MT of PVC sheet and 158.58 MT of PVC V Bar” may be suffixed with the description of export product. 2. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 1 & 2 may be allowed as applied for ie. 40.74 MT and 142.3 MT respectively as per SION C 1708. 69

Case No.:21/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00708/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00200/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110041728 28.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 14.05.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 70

Case No.:22/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00709/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00220/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110041743 29.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 14.05.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 71

Case No.:23/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:CAMFIL FARR AIR FILTRATION INDIA LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00710/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00174/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510257198 29.01.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that DL has been issued to the firm based on DC(MSME) comments and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 30.04.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 72

Case No.:24/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00711/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00461/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510257366 01.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 25.05.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 73

Case No.:25/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ALTEM POWER LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00712/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00222/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110041766 01.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010

Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 14.05.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 74

Case No.:28/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00715/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00013/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310010091 01.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 75

Case No.:26/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DRIPLEX WATER ENGINEERING LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00713/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00147/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510257387 02.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has been forwarded to DIPP whereas the case pertains to DHI. The Committee accordingly advised the representative of DIPP to handover the firm’s application to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 76

Case No.:27/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DRIPLEX WATER ENGINEERING LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00714/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00148/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510257390 02.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has been forwarded to DIPP whereas the case pertains to DHI. The Committee accordingly advised the representative of DIPP to handover the firm’s application to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 77

Case No.:29/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TRELLEBORG SEALING SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PVT LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00716/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00365/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710069753 02.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision :On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 25.05.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 2. Specific item of export and its use. 3. Item of export and import appears same. The firm may give manufacturing process.

Case No.:30/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PSK ENGINEERING PVT LTD 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00717/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00349/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710069760 02.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010

78 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 25.05.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,5,11 & 11a of the Standard Deficiency Format. 79

Case No.:31/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00718/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00466/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510257485 02.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has been forwarded to DIPP whereas the case pertains to DHI. The Committee accordingly advised the representative of DIPP to handover the firm’s application to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. 80

Case No.:32/45/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BASIC WATER NEEDS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 30.03.2010 HQ File :01/80/050/00719/AM10/ RLA File :25/24/040/00021/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:2510002720 02.02.2010 Defer Date: 25.05.2010 Decision : Deficiency letter was issued on 10/03/2010 as per DC(MSME) comments but the representative of DC(MSME) informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. S.No.28

Case No. A 09

M/s. Jhagadia Copper LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00542/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.34/24/039/00001/AM10 3410024795 dt.29.07.2009 Date: 30.03.2010 Ratification of norms. The Committee observed that the comments called for from M/o Mines are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. S.No.278

Case No. A/R. 51

M/s. Imperial Auto Inds. Ltd; New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/50/361/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No 0510185517 dt.29.0.2006 Date: 30.03.2010 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(64)/08TSW(B)/60 dated 05/02/2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S imperial Auto ltd ratification of norms of licence no 0510185517 dated 290606

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S imperial Auto ltd. The firm has not submitted complete information sought by this office. However based on the information available this Office recommends the following. 1. The export item no 2 may be deleted as requested by the firm. 2. The quantity of export item no 1 is 1,00,000 number and the steel tube outer dia is 9mm with wall thickness 0.71 mm may be incorporated in the licence. 3. The quantity of import item no 1 may be amended to 8305 meters with 2% wastage. The steel tube outer dia is 9mm with wall thickness 0.71 mm may be incorporated in the licence. 4 Item no 2 of import may be allowed under GN4 (quantity 95 500 numbers as given in their letter of 250209)

4. Item no 2 of import may be allowed under GN4. (quantity 95,500 numbers as given in their letter of 25 02 09). B.C.Nayak Development Officer 05021 Deptt. of HI, UO No 3(64)/08TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. S.No.279

Case No. A/R. 58

M/s. IDMC,. Vithal HQ F.No.01/80/50/20/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 Date: 30.03.2010 RA.F.No 34/24/40/299/AM06 34 10058285 Dt.06.04.2006 Ratification of norms The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(76)/09TSW(B)/69 dated 12.02.2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S IDMC Ltd for ratification of norms of licence no 3410015825 dtd 060406.

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S IDMC Ltd. The firm has submitted information after the personal hearing. The firm has stated that there was no import required for item no 18 of export which was subsequently not exported. The FOB value of export then to be reduced to Rs 170,10,646.10. The firm has sought wastage of 3% on steel sheets which is reasonable. This Office recommend for import of raw materials (item no 1 to 12) as applied for and item no 13 to 20 which are components under GN4. DGFT will incorporate the export weight of each export product in the licence. DGFT File is returned herewith The above issues with the approval of JS(B). B.C.Nayak Development Officer 120210 Deptt. of HI, UO No 3(76)/09TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. S.No.280

Case No. A/R.

40 M/s. Multitex Filtration Engineers Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00800/ AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00408/AM06 Lic.No.0510166844 dt.20.09.2005 Date: 30.03.2010 The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net empty weight of export product may be specified as 254.927 MT. 2. Import items at S.Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 9 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. Accordingly, quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7 & 9 may be reduced to 59 Nos., 3 Nos., 18 Nos., 19 Nos. & 229 Nos. respectively. 3. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at S.No.8 and its quantity may be allowed as 37.8 MT inclusive of 5 % wastage. 4. Import item at Sl. No. 2 may be deleted as no details submitted by the firm for use of this item. S.No.281

Case No. A/R.

42 M/s. Larson & Toubro Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01106/ AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/01070/AM08 Lic.No.0310461144 dt.14.02.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the firm’s request to reinstate the quantity of steel plates 29,700 kgs. and the quantity of refractory materials as 5,500 kgs. which have been deleted by the NC while ratifying the norms due to non availability of calculation of these items. The firm’s representation was examined by the technical authority in DHI and informed that firm has still not given the information regarding Sl.No. 11 of SDL. The Committee accordingly decided to maintain earlier decision as the deleted items can not be restored unless the firm gives complete information relating to Sl.No. 11 of SDL. The RA may take necessary action accordingly. S.No.282

Case No. A/R. –56

M/s. Dresser – Rand India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai. HQF.No.01/80/50/00672/ AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00539/AM06 Lic.No.0310344783 dt.26.05.2005 Date: 30.03.2010 The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net weight of export product may be specified as 1103 MT. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed the description of import items from S.No.1 to 19. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 1 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 55 MT inclusive of 1.5% wastage. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No. 2 may be allowed as 52 mtrs. (102 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No. 3 may be allowed as 366 mtrs. (732 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No. 4 may be allowed as 534 mtrs. (1602 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No. 5 may be allowed as 6 mtrs. (22.5 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 8. Quantity of import item at S.No. 6 may be allowed as 255 mtrs. (1275 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 9. Quantity of import item at S.No. 7 may be allowed as 536 mtrs. (3749 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 10. Quantity of import item at S.No. 8 may be allowed as 143 mtrs. (1000 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 11. Quantity of import item at S.No. 9 may be allowed as 23 mtrs. (252 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 12. Quantity of import item at S.No. 10 may be allowed as 564 mtrs. (8460 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 13 Quantity of import item at S No 11 may be allowed as 230 mtrs (5049 Kgs ) inclusive of 2% wastage

13. Quantity of import item at S.No. 11 may be allowed as 230 mtrs. (5049 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 14. Quantity of import item at S.No. 12 may be allowed as 58 mtrs. (1739 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 15. Quantity of import item at S.No. 13 may be allowed as 252 mtrs. (10836 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 16. Quantity of import item at S.No. 14 may be allowed as 318 mtrs. (13674 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 17. Quantity of import item at S.No. 15 may be allowed as 59 mtrs. (2521 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 18. Quantity of import item at S.No. 16 may be allowed as 178 mtrs. (10710 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 19. Quantity of import item at S.No. 17 may be allowed as 36 mtrs. (2856 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 20. Quantity of import item at S.No. 18 may be allowed as 18 mtrs. (1428 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 21. Quantity of import item at S.No. 19 may be allowed as 102 mtrs. (18666 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 22. Weight of import items from S.No. 20 to 144 may be specified as under and the same may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. Sl.No. Weight (Kgs.) Sl.No. Weight (Kgs.) Sl.No. Weight (Kgs.) 20 50 62 149 104 49 21 126 63 4 105 52 22 166 64 37 106 84 23 175 65 9 107 85 24 105 66 114 108 56 25 112 67 6.6 109 2.2 26 216 68 48 110 2 27 49 69 363 111 91 28 18 70 13 112 17 29 160 71 555 113 22 30 389 72 26 114 40 31 676 73 277 115 98 32 80 74 1831 116 197 33 799 75 73 117 209 34 110 76 586 118 309 35 204 77 37 119 5.4 36 531 78 597 120 11 37 342 79 1925 121 7 38 50 80 175 122 5 39 317 81 555 123 5 40 95 82 4359 124 92 41 1146 83 1090 125 49 42 775 84 18 126 79 43 420 85 2.2 127 40 44 1280 86 11 128 270 45 960 87 4 129 273 46 960 88 57 130 5 47 32 89 11 131 2 48 114 90 3 132 3 49 573 91 11 133 12 50 1260 92 22 134 1 51 1146 93 23 135 1.4 52 14 94 12 136 8 53 21 95 905 137 36 54 13 96 14 138 16 55 37 97 6 139 3.3 56 420 98 6 140 24 57 105 99 33 141 1.4 58 49 100 12 142 23 9 49 101 20 143 14

59 49 101 20 143 14 60 4.6 102 21 144 2.8 61 15 103 65 23. Import items from S.No. 145 to 157 may be deleted. S.No.283

Case No. A/R76

M/s. Emkay Exports, Jaipur HQ F.No.01/80/50/00278/ AM05/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.13/80/040/00029/AM05 1310014556 Date 08.06.2004 Date: 30.03.2010 Ratification of norms The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. S.No.284

Case No. A/R79

M/s. Godrej & Boyce MFG. Co. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01088/ AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00961/AM08 0310457213 dt.09.01.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 Ratification of norms The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(75)/08TSW(B)/64 dated 12/02/2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S Godrej & Boyce ltd ratification of norms of licence no 0310457213 dt 090108.

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S Godrej & Boyce ltd. The reply submitted by the firm is incomplete. However based on the information available, this office recommends the following. 1. The export product no1 weight is 0.09 kg per piece and that of export product no2 is 0.005 kg and the same may be incorporated in the licence. 2. Item no 1 of import may be allowed at 13.2 kg with 10% wastage as asked during the application. The word “Rod” may be suffixed to the same. 3. Item no 2 of import may not be allowed as “NItriding” is a process and not a raw material. The above issues with the approval of JS(B). B.C.Nayak Development Officer 120210 Deptt. of HI, UO No 3(75)/08TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments.

S.No.285

Case No. A/R80

M/s. Larson & Toubro Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01025/ AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00817/AM08 0310452638 dt.04.12.2007 Date: 30.03.2010 Ratification of norms The Committee considered to firm’s request to refix the norms of import item at Sl.No. 1,3,5,10,11,12,13 & 14. The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(31)/09TSW(B)/56 dated 03/02/2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S Larsen & Toubro Limited for ratification of norms of licence no 0310452638 dt 041207.

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence M/S L& T Limited. The firm has represented and requested for restoration of quantity of import which were deleted/ reduced vide their letter of dated 210709 and 181109. The description of export product may be amended to “Turbine Surface Condenser system for Oilfine Plant of Saudi Kayan Petrochemical Co. AlJubali with spares and special tools (Item nos SC13001,SC13002,SC15010, SC15020 and SC16040” as requested by the firm. Item no 1 – The quantity was reduced as the firm had used rectangular blank in stead of square blank. The firm has not given any justification. This Office sticks to earlier comments. Item no 3 There was certain calculation error. The quantity of import may be amended to 293.27 MT. Item no 5 The firm had applied for import in meters. However as requested by the firm quantity of import 127150 meters with weight restricted to 130,483 kg. Item no 14 and 15 both the items may be allowed under GN4. Item no 10to13 These are welding material. The firm has not given any calculation of the requirement. But the major quantity of plates allowed is at item no 3 whose thickness varies widely from 1 mm to 160 mm. This Office recommends welding material at 3% of weight of plates and 1% of weight of forgings. The total requirement comes to 11.5 MT say 12MT. Allowing proportionately, Item no 10 to be reduced to 7.3 MT, item no 11 to 4.6 MT, item no 12 to 250 kg and item no 13 to 4.85 MT. The above issues with the approval of JS(B). B.C.Nayak Development Officer 030210 Deptt. of HI, UO No 3(31)/09TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to revise the norms in respect of these products under the subject advance authorization in accordance with DHI comments. S.No.286

Case No. A/R81

M/s. Larson & Toubro Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00354/ AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/01247/AM08 0310466484 dt. 27.03.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 Ratification of norms The Committee considered the firm’s request to allow the quantity of import item no. 1 viz. steel sheets/ plates as 3,000 kgs., quantity of import item no. 2 viz. Nickel alloy steel sheets/plates/round/bars as 9,500 kgs. and to enhance the quantity of forgings to 20 nos. from 19 nos. Nos. The firm’s representation was examined by the technical authority in DHI and informed that import item no. 1 & 2 could not be restored as the firm has still not given the information regarding Sl No 11 of SDL and the quantity of forging could not be enhanced as it was reduced as per normal practice of taking recovery for wastage The Committee

Sl.No. 11 of SDL and the quantity of forging could not be enhanced as it was reduced as per normal practice of taking recovery for wastage. The Committee accordingly decided to maintain earlier decision as the deleted items can not be restored unless the firm gives complete information relating to Sl.No. 11 of SDL. The RA may take necessary action accordingly. S.No.287

Case No. A/R. 116

M/s. GEA BGR Energy Systems Ltd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01284/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No04/24/040/00197/AM09 0410099963 dt.12.11.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. S.No.288

Case No. A/R. 117

M/s. Industrial Boiler Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00450/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.03/82/038/00003/AM08 Date: 30.03.2010 DFRC against export Product “Industrial Boiler / Sub assembles of the Boilers” The Committee considered the firm’s request as to whether ERW Tubes can be allowed to import as per SION C1742 under DFRC. The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(20)/08TSW(B)/63 dated 11/02/2010. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S Industrial Boiler ltd for ratification of norms of licence no 03310014265 dt 121109.

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to above mentioned licence of M/S Industrial Boiler ltd. It is observed that different types of tubes like Seamless or ERW can be used for the manufacture of Industrial Boiler. AS per SION C1742 for Industrial Boiler,(ITEM no 21)Steel tube / pipes of relevent grade is allowed with 2% wastage. Since specifically type of tube has not been mentioned, ERW tubes can also be used for the manufacture of Industrial Boiler. This issues with the approval of JS(B). B.C.Nayak Development Officer Deptt. of HI, UO No 3(20)/08TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to clarify that ERW Tubes made of steel are covered by input entry No. 21 of SION C1742. S.No.289

Case No. A/R.

118 M/s. JKM DAE RIM Automotive Ltd., Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/50/00439/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00535/AM08 0710056578 dt.25.03.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 30(193)/2007ME dated 29.12.2009 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under:

1. Quantity of import item no. 1 may be allowed as 1.10kg./kg. content in the export product. Accordingly the weight of import of Aluminium ally may be amended as 0.8005 X 1.10 X 50000 = 44,028 kg. 2. Quantity of import item no. 2 & 3 may be allowed on nettonet basis S.No.290 Case No. A/R 144 M/s. The Saraswati Industrial Syndicate LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01201/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00842/AM08 0510215749 dt.01.02.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the firm’s request to allow more quantities of import items at Sl.Nos. 2,3 & 4 under the subject advance authorization. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to amend the norms in respect of import item no. 2 & 3 under the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 2 & 3 may be modified as 3600 Kgs. each S.No.291 Case No. A/R 146 M/s. DelphiTVS Diesel Systems LTd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00624/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00410/AM08 0410096032 dt.26.05.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee noted that firm has given some information with reference to this office letter advising them to furnish specific reply to each points of this office letter calling for certain information. The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments and also decided to relist the case on the same date on which the firm was asked to appear for PH in another similar case. The case may be relisted on 11.05.2010 S.No.292 Case No. A/R 147 M/s. DelphiTVS Diesel Systems LTd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00560/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00244/AM08 0410091900 dt.05.11.2007 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee noted that firm has given some information with reference to this office letter advising them to furnish specific reply to each points of this office letter calling for certain information. The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments and also decided to relist the case on the same date on which the firm was asked to appear for PH in another similar case. The case may be relisted on 11.05.2010 S.No.293 Case No. A/R 148 M/s. Timken India Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00069/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00018/AM10 0210126153 dt.01.05.2009 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the firm’s request to re fix the norms of subject advance authorization The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that

The Committee considered the firm s request to refix the norms of subject advance authorization. The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that there is no substantive justification to revise the norms. S.No.294 Case No. A/R 149 M/s. Thermax LTd., HQ F.No.01/81/50/000310/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00017/AM06 3110021206 dt.14.07.2005 Date: 30.03.2010 The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore decided to hand over the case file alongwith firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. S.No.295 Case No. A/R 150 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals LTd., Bhopal HQ F.No.01/80/50/01469/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.11/24/040/00042/AM08 1110016562 dt.17.12.2007 Date: 30.03.2010 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. S.No.296 Case No. A/R 151 M/s. The Saraswati Industrial Syndicates LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00649/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00888/AM08 0510216789 dt.21.02.2008 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the firm’s request to revise the norms of the subject advance authorization. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to amend the norms in respect of import item no. 14 under the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 14 may be allowed as 85 mtrs.(690 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. S.No.297 Case No. A/R 152 M/s. Thermax LTd., HQ F.No.01/81/50/00240/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00153/AM08 3110030218 dt.08.08.2007 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the firm’s request to allow more quantities of import items at Sl.Nos. 1,2 & 3 under the subject advance authorization. The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. S.No.298

Case No. A/R 153 M/s. The Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/50/00659/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00323/AM08 0510206703 dt.25.07.2007 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the firm’s request to revise the norms of import items at Sl.Nos. 8,9 & 10 under the subject advance authorization. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to amend the norms in respect of these import items under the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 8,9 & 10 which are welding consumables required for weld overlay may be allowed as 750 Kgs, 4400 Kgs and 5500 Kgs. respectively. S.No.299 Case No. A/R 154 M/s. Kineco Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01229/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA.F.No.17/24/040/00041/AM06 1710001187 dt.20.12.2005 Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the firm’s request to amend the export obligation for quantity in Nos. for redemption of subject adv. Authorization as they have already completed the export before NC decision. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to amend the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under with the condition that RA may verify shipping bills to ascertain the weight of inputs for all export products : i. Export products from S.No. 1 to 11 to contain 1116 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 1, 6312 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 2, 6300 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 3, 35000 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 4, 1574 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 5, 42149 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 6, 15636 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 7, 36000 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 8, 62000 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 9, 32000 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 10, 7900 Sq.mtrs. of import item at S.No. 11, 250 Kgs. of import item at S.No. 12. (RA may verify Shipping Bills to ascertain this) ii. Quantities of import items at S.No.3, 4, 8 to 12 may be allowed as applied for viz. 6,300 Kgs, 35,000 Kgs, 36,000 Kgs, 62,000 Kgs, 32,000 Kgs, 7,900 Sq.mtrs. & 250 Kgs respectively. iii. Quantities of import items at S.No.1, 2, 5, 6 & 7 may be modified to 1,172 Kgs., 6,628 Kgs., 1,653 Kgs., 44,256 Kgs. & 16,418 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 5% wastage. S.No.300

Case No. A/R83

M/s. BLUE Star Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00511/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA F.No.03/94/039/00001/AM06 0310342378 dt.10.08.2005 Date: 30.03.2010 Ratification of norms The Committee considered the comments of RA with regard to their statement that they have deleted the condition of SION from the authorization as per direction from headquarter and decided to clarify that no such instruction has been given by this office Hqrs has only suggested corrective action to rectify the mistake, if any. The Committee also advised the representative of the DIPP to examine the case for ratification and fixation of norms of the subject authorization. The case is to be relisted before the NC on 25.05.2010. S No 301

S.No.301

Case No. A/R16

M/s. BLUE Star Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00997/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 52/10 RA F.No.03/94/039/00021/AM07 0310407124 dt.08.11.2006 Date: 30.03.2010 Ratification of no The Committee considered the comments of RA with regard to their statement that they have deleted the condition of SION from the authorization as per direction from headquarter and decided to clarify that no such instruction has been given by this office Hqrs has only suggested corrective action to rectify the mistake, if any. The Committee also advised the representative of the DIPP to examine the case for ratification and fixation of norms of the subject authorization. The case is to be relisted before the NC on 25.05.2010.

Case No. C 01

M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co., Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/0556/AM09/DES.I Meeting No.52/10 Date: 30.03.2010 Modification in SION Sl. No. C1874 for the export product “Diesel Forklift 1.5 to 10 ton” The Committee noted that SION is already available for “Deasel Forklift 1.5 to 10 ton” at Sl.No. C1874 and the exporter requested to incorporate some additional components as inputs under this SION. The Committee noted that according to provision of General Note 4 for the engineering items in Handbook of Procedures Vol.II, where SION do not provide import of components or where additional components in addition to those allowed in norms are sought, the components as an input can be allowed for import on nettonet basis without any wastage with accountability clause by RA Accordingly, Committee opined that there is no need to incorporate components as addl. inputs under this SION entry and decided to advise the exporter to approach concerned RA for allowing import of components in addition to the inputs allowed under the SION on nettonet basis. The firm may be informed accordingly. S.No.96

Case No. C 12

Confederation of Indian Industry, New Delhi M/s. Ambica Steels Ltd., Sahibabad, Ghaziabad F.No.01/80/162/00527/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 52/10 Date: 30.03.2010 Streamlining the DEPB benefits on auto spare parts The Committee observed that the comments called for from r Auto Desk in DHI (Shri Sushil Lakra, I.A.) are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to write a D.O. letter from Member Secretary to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. S.No.97

Case No. C 24

Reference received from NSEZ, Noida of M/s. Eurotherm Hema Radiators India Ltd., F.No. 01/80/162/00842/AM10/DES.I Meeting No. 52/10 Fixation of wastage norms Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 14.05.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 25.05.2010. S.No.98

Case No. C 25

M/s. Meneta Automotive Components Pvt. LTd., F.No.01/80/162/00974/AM10/DES.I Meeting No. 52/10 Fixation of wastage norms Date: 30.03.2010 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 1(1)/10TSW(B)/ dated 22.03.2010 recommending the norms. Text of DHI comments are reproduced below: Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises

TSW(B) Section

Subject: Application of M/S Meneta Auto for fixation of wastage norms.

DESI, DGFT may kindly refer to the above mentioned licence of M/S Meneta Auto. The firm is an 100 % EOU & had submitted request for fixation of wastage norms. The firm has submitted reply. There are two export products namely back plate & Antinoise Shim. Back plate There are three models namely V1827,V475 & V2186. The firm has given calculation of wastage. There is little over size in width of the coil. The wastage varies from 70.6% to 84.8% on HR Coils. Considering above facts, this Office recommends for wastage of 70% on HR coils for the above three models. Anti noise Shim There are four models namely T1526108, T155513, T176010,T319010. The firm has given calculation of wastage. The shearing loss taken by the firm is 5%. The same can be managed with2% wastage. The wastage varies from 78.8% to 92%. Considering above facts, this Office recommends for wastage of 80% for the above four models on HR Coils. No recovery has been considered as it is a 100% EOU unit. The wastage norm is applicable to this unit only. The above issues with the approval of JS(B). B.C.Nayak Development Officer 220310 Deptt. of HI, UO No 1(1)/10TSW(B) dated The Committee, after deliberating upon the DHI comments, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Sl.No.99

Case No. C 22

M/s. Bhukhanvala Tools Pvt. LTd., Navasari F.No.01/80/162/00684/AM10/DES.I Meeting No. 52/10 Fixation of wastage norms Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee observed that as per the existing work distribution among the NCs the export product falls under the jurisdiction of NCVII. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, directed to transfer the file relating to this case to NCVII after issuing reminder to C&PC under intimation to the exporter and Development Commissioner. Sl.No.100

Case No. C 04

M/s. Bhukhanvala Tools Pvt. LTd., Navasari F.No.01/80/162/00011/AM10/DES.I Meeting No. 52/10 Fixation of wastage norms Date: 30.03.2010 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 25.05.2010. Sl.No.101

Case No. C 34

M/s. Kerala Automobiles LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00 /AM10/DES.I Meeting No. 52/10 Request for DEPB benefit for front Engined Auto Rickshaws Date: 30.03.2010 The Committee considered the representation of M/s Kerala Automobiles Ltd. seeking clarification regarding DEPB benefit for Front Engined Auto Rickshaws.

e Co ttee co s de ed t e ep ese tat o o /s e a a uto ob es td. see g c a cat o ega d g be e t o o t g ed uto c s aws. The NC requested the DHI to examine the inputs in both types of Auto Rickshaws and offer their comments. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (K.K.Funda, Asstt. Dir.,DC(MSME) Member (A.K. Mishra, Asstt. IA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A. Komu) Chairman

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Case No.:95/24/80­ALC2/2008

Subject: Application of M/S Minda Silica for ratification of norms of licence no­0510226413 dt 28­08­08.

Case No.:13/26/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:13/29/81­ALC2/2008

Case No.:50/38/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:51/38/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:8/40/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:43/5/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:35/21/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:14/50/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:51/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:47/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:83/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:15/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/13/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:25/13/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/21/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:23/21/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:25/21/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:26/21/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:37/21/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:5/28/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/27/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/27/80­ALC2/2009

Subject: Application of M/S Minda Silica for ratification of norms of licence no­0510249502 dt 17­09­09

Case No.:1/37/80­ALC2/2009

Subject: Application of M/S PLANT Engineering services for ratification of norms of licence no 0410108037 dt 24­09­09

Case No.:32/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/28/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:10/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:11/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:6/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:9/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/29/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:31/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:14/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:28/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:2/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:10/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:6/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:9/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:17/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:16/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:20/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:22/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:24/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:27/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:30/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:34/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:36/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:2/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:37/37/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:5/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:1/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:9/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:12/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:14/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:15/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:16/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:17/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:19/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:20/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:21/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:22/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:23/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:24/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:25/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:28/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:26/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:27/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:29/45/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:95/24/80ALC2/2008

Subject: Application of M/S Minda Silica for ratification of norms of licence no0510226413 dt 280808.

Case No.:13/26/80ALC2/2008

Case No.:13/29/81ALC2/2008

Case No.:50/38/80ALC2/2008

Case No.:51/38/80ALC2/2008

Case No.:8/40/80ALC2/2008

Case No.:43/5/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:35/21/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:14/50/80ALC2/2008

Case No.:51/1/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:47/1/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:83/1/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:15/9/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/13/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:25/13/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/21/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:23/21/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:25/21/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:26/21/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:37/21/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:5/28/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/27/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/27/80ALC2/2009

Subject: Application of M/S Minda Silica for ratification of norms of licence no0510249502 dt 170909

Case No.:1/37/80ALC2/2009

Subject: Application of M/S PLANT Engineering services for ratification of norms of licence no 0410108037 dt 240909

Case No.:32/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/28/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:10/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:11/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:6/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:9/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/29/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:31/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:14/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:28/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:2/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:10/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:6/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:9/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:17/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:16/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:20/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:22/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:24/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:27/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:30/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:34/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:36/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:2/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:37/37/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:5/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:1/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:9/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:12/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:14/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:15/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:16/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:17/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:19/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:20/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:21/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:22/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:23/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:24/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:25/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:28/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:26/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:27/45/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:29/45/80ALC2/2009