DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.36/10 held on 08.12.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 36/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 was held on 08.12.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 475 23062635 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. B.D. Ghosh, jt. IA 399 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 6. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:80/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:JSW STEEL LIMITED Meet No/Date:36/80ALC2/2009 08.12.2009 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00603/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01231/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310467010 02.04.2008 Defer Date: 02.02.2010 Decision : The representative of the MOS informed the Committee that they examined the firm’s reply and their comments are under finalization. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for short period and to relist the case on 22.12.2009. 2
Case No.:2/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 08.12.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00284/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00095/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510220857 22.05.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Quantity of import items at Sl.No. 1 to 3 may be allowed as applied for by the firm inclusive of 1% wastage. 2. Quantity of import items no. 4 may be allowed on nettonet basis. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly.
3
Case No.:83/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00752/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00129/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710058627 21.07.2008 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 4
Case No.:21/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SURAJ INDUSTRIES 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00029/AM10/ RLA File :30/24/040/00017/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3010057230 23.07.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. 5
Case No.:39/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 08.12.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00850/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00445/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310482136 11.08.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(75)/08TSW(B)/454 dated 26.11.2009 informing that value addition become negative as the firm vide their letter dt. 01.07.2009 revised the CIF value of import to Rs. 3,61,618.28. The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that negative value addition will not be allowed as per FTP. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 6
Case No.:64/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00875/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00327/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510225643 18.08.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(117)/09TSW(B)/448 dated 25/11/2009 recommending the norms on weight basis instead of length basis. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. RA may call for exact net weight of components to be manufactured out of imported seamless tubes and allow the quantity import items at Sl.No. 5 to 7 @ 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. 2. Rest of the import items may be allowed on nettonet basis.
Case No.:95/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 08.12.2009
7 HQ File :01/80/050/00971/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00337/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510226413 28.08.2008 Decision : The DHI vide their U.O. No. No3(130)/09/TSW(B) dt. 19.11.2009 informed that firm has furnished incomplete reply. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respect by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010: Calculation of raw material and wastage for at least three types of each type of export product giving strip lay out, pitch of blanking with calculation. 8
Case No.:25/25/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01034/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00143/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035317 09.09.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, 9
Case No.:13/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01049/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00381/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510227332 11.09.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue a D.O. reminder from Member Secretary enclosing therewith a consolidated list of all pending cases for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 10
Case No.:45/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 08.12.2009 Status:Case reject HQ File :01/80/050/01081/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00113/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410098647 17.09.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(50)/07TSW(B)/473 dated 07.12.2009 informing that firm has not given point wise reply in their letter dt. 14.08.2009. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 11
Case No.:26/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MIKROTEK MACHINES LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00034/AM10/ RLA File :07/21/040/00520/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060152 26.09.2008 Decision :The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs.
12
Case No.:13/29/81ALC2/2008
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/81/050/00430/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00106/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022444 30.09.2008 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 02.02.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 13
Case No.:24/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01154/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00073/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022464 03.10.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they examined the firm’s reply and their comments are under finalization. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for short period and to relist the case on 22.12.2009. 14
Case No.:27/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01157/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00435/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510228787 03.10.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(117)/09TSW(B)/448 dated 25/11/2009 recommending the norms on weight basis instead of length basis. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. RA may call for exact net weight of components to be manufactured out of imported seamless tubes and allow the quantity @ 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. 15
Case No.:3/34/80ALC2/2008
08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01245/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00292/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035792 30.10.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. 16
Case No.:15/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KILBURN ENGINEERING LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01257/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00757/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310492847 04.11.2008
16 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm did not furnish proper reply to point nos. 4,5 & 11 of standard deficiency letter without this requisite information, it was not possible to ratify the norms and hence rejected the case for norms fixation. 17
Case No.:37/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01279/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00698/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310493987 12.11.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 18
Case No.:16/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AIR LIQUIDE ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00024/AM10/ RLA File :09/70/040/00167/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036290 12.12.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish specific reply regarding S.Nos.3, 5 and 11 of SDF with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 19
Case No.:17/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AIR LIQUIDE ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00025/AM10/ RLA File :09/70/040/00168/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036289 12.12.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish specific reply regarding S.Nos.3, 5 and 11 of SDF with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 20
Case No.:6/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KERNLIEBERS SPRINGS & STAMPINGS PVT.LTD, 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01630/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00531/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710062052 26.12.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder
21
Case No.:1/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:METSO PAPER INDIA PVT.LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01625/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00635/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233403 29.12.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 22
Case No.:12/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01636/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00243/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036661 29.12.2008 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net weights of export products from S.No. 1 to 8 may be specified as 64 MT, 128 MT, 36.8 MT, 20 MT, 14.4 MT, 92.52 MT, 92.52 MT & 16.67 MT respectively. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at Sl. No 1 & 2. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 11.50 MT. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 87.35 MT inclusive of 5% wastage. 5. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 3 & 4 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 102 MT & 57 MT respectively. 6. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 21 MT inclusive of 5% wastage. 23
Case No.:24/5/80ALC2/2009
08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00032/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00222/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101397 02.01.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(109)/09TSW(B)/ dated 07.12.2009 informing that firm has not furnished the information regarding Sl.No. 5 & 11 of SDL, input weight of each casting / forging and corresponding finished weight, use of each components proposed for import in the manufacture of export product (except item no. 8 to 22) and length and weight of different types of pipes given by the firm does not match with the list of import items. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs.
Case No.:29/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:XYTEL INDIA PVT.LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ Fil 01/80/050/01653/AM09/ RLA Fil 31/24/040/00248/AM09/ Li N /D t 3110036856 D f D t 02 02 2010
24 HQ File :01/80/050/01653/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00248/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036856 02.01.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 25
Case No.:43/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00051/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00897/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310502444 13.01.2009 Defer Date: 22.12.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they examined the firm’s reply and their comments are under finalization. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for short period and to relist the case on 22.12.2009. 26
Case No.:23/5/80ALC2/2009
08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00031/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00232/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101778 22.01.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(109)/09TSW(B)/ dated 07.12.2009 informing that firm has not furnished the information regarding Sl.No. 5 & 11 of SDL, input weight of each casting / forging and corresponding finished weight, use of each components proposed for import in the manufacture of export product (except item no. 11 to 45), length and weight of different types of pipes and catalogue / write up of gauge glass and justification of quantity of import provided by firm does not match with the list of import items. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 27
Case No.:25/5/80ALC2/2009
08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00033/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00236/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101783 22.01.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(109)/09TSW(B)/ dated 07.12.2009 informing that firm has not furnished the information regarding Sl.No. 5 & 11 of SDL, input weight of each casting / forging and corresponding finished weight, use of each components proposed for import in the manufacture of export product (except item no. 11 to 40), length and weight of different types of pipes and catalogue / write up of gauge glass and justification of quantity of import provided by firm does not match with the list of import items. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs.
Case No.:25/46/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY Meet No/Date:36/80ALC2/2009 Status:Case approved
28
Case No.:25/46/80 ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL Meet No/Date:36/80 ALC2/2009 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01719/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00676/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510235207 28.01.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(117)/09TSW(B)/448 dated 25/11/2009 recommending the norms on weight basis instead of length basis. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. RA may call for exact net weight of components to be manufactured out of imported seamless tubes and allow the quantity @ 1.05 kg./kg. content in export product. 29
Case No.:50/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ITS INDIA PVT. LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00058/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00971/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310504031 28.01.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 30
Case No.:35/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:WONJIN AUTOPARTS INDIA PVT LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00317/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00254/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102257 11.02.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 31
Case No.:1/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01799/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00263/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102464 19.02.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that during personal hearing held on 3.11.09 the firm’s representative were advised to furnish some specific information. However, the requisite details are still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm to furnish the information desired during P.H. by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 32
Case No.:3/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01801/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00260/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102466 19.02.2009 i i h i b d h d i l h i h ld h fi i d i d f i h ifi i f i
Decision : The Committee observed that during personal hearing held on 3.11.09 the firm’s representative were advised to furnish some specific information. However, the requisite details are still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm to furnish the information desired during P.H. by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 33
Case No.:10/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01808/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00601/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063214 24.02.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 34
Case No.:12/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01810/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00630/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063217 24.02.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 35
Case No.:14/50/80ALC2/2008
08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01812/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00427/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037147 24.02.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, 36
Case No.:16/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01814/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00315/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110037452 24.02.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 37
Case No.:19/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PIONEER FRICTION LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01817/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00271/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210123670 25.02.2009 Defer Date: 19.01.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that case was considered by the NC in its meeting held on 24.11.09 wherein it was decided to ask some information/details desired by
the DHI from the firm and to relist the case on 19.01.2010. However, the case was again listed in the agenda due to technical error. Accordingly, the Committee decided to withdraw this case and take necessary action as per the NC decision dt.24.11.09. The case may be relisted on 19.01.2010. 38
Case No.:14/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00022/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00644/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063398 03.03.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 39
Case No.:14/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AIR LIQUIDE ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00296/AM10/ RLA File :09/70/040/00250/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037551 26.03.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish specific reply regarding S.Nos.3, 5 and 11 of SDF with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 40
Case No.:15/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AIR LIQUIDE ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00297/AM10/ RLA File :09/70/040/00207/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037584 31.03.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish specific reply regarding S.Nos.3, 5 and 11 of SDF with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 41
Case No.:3/2/85ALC3/2009
Party Name:SAI KALA POWER PVT.LTD, 08.12.2009 Status:Case Closed HQ File :01/85/050/00003/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00656/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710064045 06.04.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information.
S no Item description Weight per piece in gms Quantity 1 131073002(Plastic Plug) made of poly propylene 1.82 3,695,000 2 057656001(Plastic pipe clip) made of polyacetal 1.81 6,720,000 3 054177001(Plastic pipe clip) made of polyacetal 4.3 1,637,000 42
Case No.:4/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CARTOON SANITATION PVT. LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00012/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00002/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610015395 17.04.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that a subCommittee has to visit the factory to assess the wastage. The Chairman has directed to complete the visit without delay and submit the report so that norms can be ratified at the earliest. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2002. 43
Case No.:5/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:A RAYMOND FASTENERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00013/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00013/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038142 17.04.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(128)/09TSW(B)/472 dated 7.12.09 recommending the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. The export product and their quantity may be modified as follows & incorporated in the licence. 2. Quantity of 7 MT of poly propylene and 20 MT of polyacetal may be allowed with net wastage of 4% as per firm’s revised list. 44
Case No.:33/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LIVACO INDUSTRIES, 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00041/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00951/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310516930 24.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 45
Case No.:34/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MUDHRA FINE BLANC PRIVATE LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00042/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00313/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410104216 24.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder
Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 46
Case No.:35/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00043/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/01050/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310517241 24.04.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Net empty weight of 289 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 4. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.1 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 130000 Kgs inclusive of 5 % wastage. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.2 may be allowed as 874 Kgs inclusive of 2 % wastage 5. Weights of 84 MT, 3537 Kgs, & 500 Kgs may be specified with the quantities of import items at Sl.Nos. 3, 5 & 8 respectively and these may be allowed on net to net basis. 6. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.4 may be allowed as 57400 mtrs.(73000 Kgs) inclusive of 2 % wastage 7. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.6 may be allowed as 1 Set on net to net basis. 8. Import item at Sl. No.6 to be exported alongwith the export product 9. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.7 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 2000 Nos. 10. Quantities of import items at Sl.No.9, 11 & 12 may be allowed as 1579 Kgs, 2000 Kgs & 3579 Kgs respectively. 11. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.10 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 600 Kgs. 12. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. 47
Case No.:56/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00064/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00041/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510240558 29.04.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3( 25)/09TSW(B)/404 dated 22.10.09. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Export product: Part No. 86278, quantity 3700 numbers & weight 650 gms each. 1. Quantity of 6734 gms of platinum or 13251 gms of platinum salt (import item no.1) may be allowed as applied for without any wastage. 2. Quantity of import item no. 2 may be allowed as 502 kg. with 5% wastage.
Case No.:57/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MINDA STONERIDGE INSTRUMENTS LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00065/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00320/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110038290
48 Q 30.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 49
Case No.:59/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VA TECH WABAG LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00067/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00020/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410104336 30.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 50
Case No.:16/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00161/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038385 12.05.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Net weights of export products from S.No. 1 to 11 may be specified as 200.935 MT, 95.831 MT, 93.02 MT, 3.519 MT, 1.404 MT, 2.16 MT, 4.08 MT, 3.216 MT, 0.293 MT, 1.872 MT & 6 MT respectively. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at Sl. Nos 1, 2, 3 & 5. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 1, 2 & 3 may be allowed as 100.625 MT, 21.16 MT & 189.81 MT respectively inclusive of 5% wastage. 4. Import item at Sl. No. 4 may be deleted as no consumption of this item shown in the manufacture of export products. 5. Quantities of import items from Sl. No. 5 to 10 may be allowed as 88.40 MT, 27.37 MT, 1.228 MT, 0.315 MT, 0.078 MT & 3.622 MT respectively inclusive of 5% wastage. 51
Case No.:1/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00283/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00129/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310523252 09.06.2009 Decision :The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore,
52
Case No.:2/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SOUTHERN LUBRICATION (P) LTD., 08.12.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00147/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00089/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065345 11.06.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information. 53
Case No.:4/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:UNITED ENGINEERING (EASTERN)CORPN., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00149/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00043/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210127645 12.06.2009 Decision : The DC(MSME) vide their U.O.No.30(26)2008ME dt.3.12.09 informed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information in respect of 200 Kg. of settile wire complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010: 1. The details about the use of hard face welding wire and basis to calculate its requirement. 2. Use and basis of calculation of stellite wire. 54
Case No.:12/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00157/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00151/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510243873 17.06.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3( 25)/09TSW(B)/405 dated 22.10.09. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Export product: Part No. 86110, quantity 4600 numbers & weight 1750 gms each. 1. Cell density of 330 cells per square inch may be incorporated in the import items and its quantity may be allowed as 7790 liters with 2% wastage. 55
Case No.:13/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00158/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00101/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065424 17.06.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 2. Firm has submitted 25 drawings without linking export product. Please submit legible drawing in English clearly highlighting each export product.
g g p p g g g y g g g p p 56
Case No.:3/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TRANTER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00285/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00042/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038873 17.06.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 57
Case No.:25/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PETRON ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00170/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00052/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310525689 24.06.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 58
Case No.:29/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MINDA STONERIDGE INSTRUMENTS LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00311/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00016/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039048 01.07.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 59
Case No.:4/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KOCH GLITSCH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:36/80ALC2/2009 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00422/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00036/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410024653 10.07.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms Taking clue from SION C2008, quantities of import items may be allowed as under: 1. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos.1 & 2 may be allowed as 57992 Kgs. & 27579 Kgs respectively inclusive of wastage of 4 %. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No 3 may be allowed on net to net basis.
60
Case No.:8/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DAEWON INDIA AUTOPARTS PVT LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00290/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00099/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410106653 05.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 61
Case No.:10/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SHOWA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00292/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00281/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510247351 07.08.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(137)/09TSW(B)/413 dated 29.10.09 recommending the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Description of export product may be modified to “Box Assembly Steering gear (Electric Power Steering for Automobiles”. 2. Description of import item No. 23 may be modified to “Electric Motor DC 12V, 1000 + / 300RPM”. 3. All the import items are components and may be allowed under GN4 for the engineering products. 62
Case No.:11/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PVT. LTD., 08.12.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00293/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00021/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000336 10.08.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information.
Case No.:13/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00295/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00257/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510247447 10.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms
63 p j g 1. Net weight of export product may be modified as 20.088 MT. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.No.1. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No .1 may be allowed as 9.933 MT inclusive of 2% wastage. 4. Quantities of import items at S.Nos.2 & 3 may be allowed as 3.8 MT & 4.75 MT respectively on net to net basis. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No.4 may be allowed as 0.185 MT. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No.5 may be allowed equal to quantity of Welding Wire at S.No. 4 of import item. 7. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. 64
Case No.:16/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00298/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00261/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510247528 11.08.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 65
Case No.:17/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MILINDIA LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00299/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00191/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510247533 11.08.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder 66
Case No.:18/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00300/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00179/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038908 12.08.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information upto 15.12.09. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 67
Case No.:19/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00301/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00180/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038899 12.08.2009
Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information upto 15.12.09. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 68
Case No.:20/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ATLAS COPCO (INDIA) LIMITED 08.12.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00302/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00234/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310533508 12.08.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter dt. 12.8.09 informed the subject advance authorization has been issued on nettonet basis hence hard copy of the firm’s application not forwarded to NC. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 69
Case No.:24/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00306/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510247596 12.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as 249.23 MT inclusive of 2% wastage. 70
Case No.:23/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00305/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00396/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310533764 13.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3, 4, 5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 2. Weight, length and specification of tubes proposed for import.. 71
Case No.:25/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00307/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00012/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510247598 13.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3, 4, 5, 11 & 13 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
72
Case No.:26/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DICKINSON FOWLER LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00308/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00188/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710066532 18.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.9 of the Standard Deficiency Format for components export product wise. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No. 11 for raw material of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 73
Case No.:31/21/80ALC2/2009
Party Name: OGNIBENE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 08.12.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00313/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00149/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039592 18.08.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information. 74
Case No.:37/21/80ALC2/2009
08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00319/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00020/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000343 19.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Specific quantity of each export product and their weight separately with details of Auxiliaries. 2. Input Weight of each casting/ forging and corresponding finished weight. (Item wise) 3. Use of each component proposed for import in the manufacture of export product 4. Total value of insulating material proposed for import. 5. Length and weight of different types of pipes/tubes/low fin tubes proposed for import. 6. Serial no 4,5 ,9 & 11 of SDL export product wise. 7. Weight of different types of welding material proposed to be imported giving calculation and justifying quantity of import. 75
Case No.:1/28/80ALC2/2009
08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00419/AM10/ RLA File :11/24/040/00016/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1110021021 08 09 2009
75 08.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 76
Case No.:17/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 08.12.2009 Status:Case Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00446/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00487/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310537048 10.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm vide their letter dt. 23.11.09 informed that they have surrendered the subject advance authorization to RA for cancellation. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 77
Case No.:5/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:RATNAMANI METALS & TUBES LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00423/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00143/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810082827 11.09.2009 Decision :On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 02.02.2010: 1. 1. Size i.e. OD, WT and length of export product. 2. 2. Thickness of item of import. 3. 3. Information in respect of S.No. 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Letter. 78
Case No.:18/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00447/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00365/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310538092 16.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Description of export product may be corrected as “Refrigeration Condenser” as per Amendment Sheet No. 1 issued by RA. 2. Net empty weight of 17 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product. 3. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at S.Nos.1, 3 & 6. 4. Word “Relevant Plates” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.No.2. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 may be allowed as 7650 Kgs. inclusive of 10.2 % wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No.2 may be allowed as 459 Kgs. inclusive of 55.6 % wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No.3 may be allowed as 2955 Kgs. inclusive of 62% wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap 8. Weights of 2125 Kgs. & 333 Kgs. may be added with the quantities of import items at S.Nos.4 & 5 and the same may be allowed on net to net basis. 9. Quantity of this item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 18452 Meters (4314 Kgs) inclusive of 2 % wastage. 10. Quantity of import item at No. 7 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 21 Nos. on net to net basis. 11. Quantity of import item at No. 8 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 50 Kgs. 12. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause.
p p y y 79
Case No.:19/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00448/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00091/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410025168 23.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Net empty weight of 12294 Kgs. may be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item. 3. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 7315 Kgs as 1.03 Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 80
Case No.:2/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00420/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00008/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310009185 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 81
Case No.:3/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00421/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00331/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510250091 30.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DC(MSME) present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Quantity of import items may be allowed as 1.05 kg./kg. content in the export product. 82
Case No.:6/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MIKROTEK MACHINES LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00424/AM10/ RLA File :07/21/040/00597/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067298 01.10.2009
Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 83
Case No.:7/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LUBI SUBMERSIBLES LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00425/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00157/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810083301 01.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5, 11 & 11A of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 84
Case No.:8/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BLUE STAR LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00426/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00512/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310540166 05.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Net weight of export products from S.Nos. 1 to 6 may be specified as 18437 Kgs., 21853 Kgs., 23228 Kgs., 9235 Kgs., 16292 Kgs. & 12161 Kgs respectively. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at S.No. 1 to 4, 13 & 19. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl No. 1 may be allowed as 1.01 Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl No. 2 may be allowed as 1.02 Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 5. Quantities of import items at S.No. 3 & 4 may be allowed 1.05 Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 6. Quantities of the import items at Sl .Nos. 5 to 11, 14 to 18 & 20 may be allowed on net to net basis with ccountability clause. 7. Quantity of import item at Sl No. 12 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 832.5 Kgs. 8. Quantities of import items at S.No. 13 & 19 may be allowed on net to net basis. 9. Import of components may allowed with accountability clause 85
Case No.:1/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00430/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00122/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040206 07.10.2009 Decision :The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010.
86
Case No.:10/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00428/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00121/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040185 07.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 87
Case No.:11/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00429/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00124/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040186 07.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 88
Case No.:14/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00443/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00010/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310009262 07.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the C&PC vide their O.M. No. 46011/21/2009PC.II dated 25.9.09 informed in other similar case of the firm (Advance Authorization NO.5310009123 dt.14.09.09) that norms for the authorization can be decided based on their earlier recommendation dated 12.05.2009 for the same product. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization also in accordance with their written comments with minor modification as under: 1. Quantity of import item Nos.2, 4, 5 & 10 may be allowed on nettonet basis. 2. Quantity of import item no. 1 i.e. “PVC Compound” may be allowed with 5% wastage. 3. Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per written comments of C&PC as under: (i) Quantity of import item no. 3 i.e. “relevant evident paper” may be allowed with 5% wastage. (ii) Quantity of Luer Adaptor (item No.6), Oxygen Absorber (item No.7), Stamping Foil Tape (27mm width) (item No.8), Thermal Transfer Ribbon (110 mm width) (item No.9) may be allowed with 1% wastage.
Case No.:15/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00444/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310009263 07 10 2009
89 07.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the C&PC vide their O.M. No. 46011/21/2009PC.II dated 25.9.09 informed in other similar case of the firm (Advance Authorization NO.5310009123 dt.14.09.09) that norms for the authorization can be decided based on their earlier recommendation dated 12.05.2009 for the same product. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization also in accordance with their written comments with minor modification as under: 1. Quantity of import item Nos.2, 4, 5 & 9 may be allowed on nettonet basis. 2. Quantity of import item no. 1 i.e. “PVC Compound” may be allowed with 5% wastage. 3. Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per written comments of C&PC as under: (i) Quantity of import item no. 3 i.e. “relevant evident paper” may be allowed with 5% wastage. (ii) Oxygen Absorber (item No.6), Stamping Foil Tape (27mm width) (item No.7), Thermal Transfer Ribbon (110 mm width) (item No.8) may be allowed with 1% wastage. 90
Case No.:3/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00432/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00059/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510250400 07.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s application and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, 91
Case No.:9/28/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TIMKEN INDIA LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00427/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00137/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210132199 07.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case on repeat basis. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms based on the norms of Advance Authorization No. 0210120599 dated 3.12.2008 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting No. 08/80 dated 26.05.2009 as under: 1. Total net export weight of 53.542 MT may be added with the quantity of export product. 2. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 4788 Nos. on net to net basis. The duty free weight of import item may be restricted to 54881 Kgs. inclusive of 2.5 % wastage after 20 % recovery. 92
Case No.:10/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00439/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00159/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108280 08.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s application and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, d id d t d f th id ti d t li t th 02 02 2010
93
Case No.:11/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KINECO PVT. LTD. 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00440/AM10/ RLA File :17/24/040/00028/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1710002815 08.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that the firm’s application is readily not available with him. The Committee therefore handed over the case file to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 94
Case No.:4/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VASANTHA TOOL CRAFTS P.LTD., 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00433/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00218/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039513 08.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5, & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 95
Case No.:6/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TEKSONS LTD 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00435/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00291/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310540943 08.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received application of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s application to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. 96
Case No.:7/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00436/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00337/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310540953 08.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 97
Case No.:8/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00437/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00424/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310540959 08.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that they received the firm’s application and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010.
dec ded to de e t e co s de at o a d to e st t e case o 0 .0 . 0 0. 98
Case No.:9/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00438/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00158/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108279 08.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s application and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, 99
Case No.:13/29/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 08.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00442/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00163/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108335 09.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s application and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, S.No.169
Case No. A/R. 51
M/s. Imperial Auto Inds. Ltd; New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/50/361/AM07/DES.I Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No Lic.No.0510185517 dt.29.0.2006 Date: 08.12.2009 Ratification of norms. The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. S.No.170
Case No. A/R. 58
M/s. IDMC,. Vthal HQ F.No.01/80/50/20/AM07/DES.I Meeting No. 36/10 Date: 08.12.2009 RA.F.No 34/24/40/299/AM06 Lic.No34 10058285 Dt.06.04.2006 Ratification of norms The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. S.No.171
Case No. A/R08
M/s. Alstom Project India Ltd. F.No. 01/80/50/458/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 RA F.No.03/94/040/610/AM08 0310443939 Dt. 21.09.2007 Date: 08.12.2009 Amendment in norms The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. S.No.172
Case No. A/R09
M/s. Rochem Separation Systems ( India) P. Ltd. F.No. 01/81/50/560/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 RA F.No.03/95/040/769/AM06 0310349109 27.09.2005 Date: 08.12.2009 Ratification of norms
The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. S.No.173
Case No. A/R10
M/s.Filter Manufacturing India P. Ltd. F.No. 01/80/50/381/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 R.A.F.No.02/24/040/0054/AM06 0210079402 22.06.2005 Date: 08.12.2009 Ratification of norms The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the case file to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. S.No.174
Case No. A/R12
M/s. Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. F.No. 01/81/50/202/AM06/DES.II/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 R.A.F.No.05/24/040/0160/AM06 0510159271 Dt.06.06.2005 Date: 08.12.2009 The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. S.No.175
Case No. A/R.
40 M/s. Multitex Filtration Engineers Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00800/ AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00408/AM06 Lic.No.0510166844 dt.20.09.2005 Date: 08.12.2009 Ratification of norms. It was noted that firm’s reply has been received today. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s reply to DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. S.No.176
Case No. A/R. 42
M/s. Larson & Toubro Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01106/ AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/01070/AM08 Lic.No.0310461144 dt.14.02.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 Ratification of norms. The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. S.No.177
Case No. A/R.
45 M/s. Cartoon Sanitation Pvt. Ltd., Mathura (UP) HQ F.No.01/80/50/00288/ AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.06/24/040/00003/AM09 Lic.No.0610013314 dt30.04.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 revision of norms. The Committee noted that a subCommittee has to visit the factory to assess the wastage. The Chairman has directed to complete the visit without delay and submit the report so that norms can be ratified at the earliest. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. S.No.178
Case No. A/R. –56
M/s. Dresser – Rand India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai. HQF.No.01/80/50/00672/ AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00539/AM06 Lic.No.0310344783
, eet g No. 36/ 0 . .No.03/9 /0 0/00539/ 06 c.No.03 03 783 dt.26.05.2005 Date: 08.12.2009 Ratification of norms. The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information by 22.01.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. S.No.179
Case No. A/R76
M/s. Emkay Exports, Jaipur HQ F.No.01/80/50/00278/ AM05/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.13/80/040/00029/AM05 1310014556 Date 08.06.2004 Date: 08.12.2009 On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 02.02.2010: 1. Net weight of each cable in Kgs/Km. 2. Copy of National/international Standard/ buyer’s data sheet in support of insulation thickness of cables. S.No.180
Case No. A/R77
M/s. Cethar Vessels LTd., Tiruchirapalli HQ F.No.01/80/50/01262/ AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00195/Am09 0410099767 dt.05.11.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(20)/08TSW(B)/442 dated 24.11.2009 recommending the norms. The Committee, noted that firm vide their letter dt. 11.07.2009 informed that they want to import only item at Sl.No. 5 to 8 with revised quantity. The Committee therefore decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with DHI comments as under: 1. Quantity of import item no. 5 may be allowed as 5950 meters inclusive of 2% wastage. 2. Quantity of import item no. 6 may be allowed as 2620 meters inclusive of 2% wastage. 3. Quantity of import item no. 7 may be allowed as 3073 meters inclusive of 2% wastage. 4. Quantity of import item no. 8 may be allowed as 836 meters inclusive of 2% wastage. S.No.181
Case No. A/R79
M/s. Godrej & Boyce MFG. Co. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01088/ AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00961/AM08 0310457213 dt.09.01.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. S.No.182
Case No. A/R80
M/s. Larson & Toubro Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01025/ AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00817/AM08 0310452638 dt.04.12.2007 Date: 08.12.2009
The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. S.No.183
Case No. A/R81
M/s. Larson & Toubro Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00354/ AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/01247/AM08 0310466484 dt. 27.03.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. S.No.184
Case No. A/R83
M/s. Multitex Filtration Engineers Ltd., HQ.F.No.01/80/50/00457/ AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00131/AM09 0510221450 dt.03.06.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 It was noted that firm’s reply has been received today. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s reply to DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. S.No.185
Case No. A/R84
M/s. PSL Limited HQ F.No.01/80/50/00650/ AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00987/AM08 0510218884 dt.02.04.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Words “ OD 12 MM to 20 MM” may be suffixed with the description of export product at Sl. No.1 and its quantity may also be specified as 99620 Mtrs. in addition to its quantity in MT. 2. Words “ OD 10 MM to 20 MM” may be suffixed with the description of export product at Sl. No.2 and its quantity may also be specified as 61900 Mtrs. in addition to its quantity in MT Based on available information & after taking clue from SION C1289, quantities of import items may be allowed as under: a) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 1 viz. Fusion Bonded Epoxy may be allowed as 20.655 MT. b) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 2 viz. Polyethylene may be allowed as 250.61 MT c) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 3 viz. Adhesive may be allowed as 22.968 MT. d) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 5 viz. Polypropylene may be allowed as 106.57 MT. e) Quantities of import items at Sl.Nos. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 put together may be allowed upto 6 % of FOB value of exports. S.No.186
Case No. A/R85
M/s. The Sarastwati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00910/ AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00979/AM08 0510218620 dt.27.03.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 Revision of norms The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the bj d h i i i h f ll i difi i
subject advance authorization with following modifications: Quantities of import items form Sl. Nos. 5 to 9 which are welding consumables required for weld overlay may be allowed as under: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No 5 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 702 Kgs. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No 6 may be allowed as 4365 Kgs. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No 7 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 4110 Kgs. 4. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 8 & 9 may be allowed as 688 Kgs. each S.No.187
Case No. A/R86
M/s. The Sarastwati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00395/ AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00877/AM08 0510216481 dt.15.02.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 Revision of norms The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Weight of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be modified as 5658 Kgs. 2. Weight of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be modified as 1715 Kgs. 3. Quantities of import items form Sl. Nos. 9 to 13 which are welding consumables required for weld overlay may be allowed as under: a) Quantity of import item at Sl. No 9 may be allowed as 3682 Kgs. b) Quantities of import items at Sl. No 10 & 11 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 10300 Kgs. & 11500 Kgs respectively. c) Quantities of import items at Sl. No 12 & 13 may be allowed as 231 Kgs & 435 Kgs respectively S.No.188
Case No. A/R88
M/s. The Sarastwati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01199/ AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00796/AM08 0510215106 dt.18.01.2008 Date: 08.12.2009 Revision of norms The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 4 & 5 may be modified as 2100 Kgs. each 2. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 6, 7 & 8 which are welding consumables required for weld overlay may be allowed as applied for i.e. 600 Kgs., 4400 Kgs. & 3900 Kgs., respectively. S.No.189
Case No. A/R89
M/s. The Sarastwati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01196/ AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 36/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00726/AM08 0510213777 dt.19.12.2007 Date: 08.12.2009 Revisionn of norms The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the
The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net weight of export products at Sl. Nos. 2, 3 & 4 may be modified as 64.94 MT each. 2. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 5, 6 & 7 which are welding consumables required for weld overlay may be allowed as applied for i.e. 400 Kgs., 800 Kgs. & 900 Kgs., respectively. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 8 may be modified as 63 Nos. (55.194 MT) on net to net basis. S.No.62
Case No. C01
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co.Ltd; F.No. 01/80/162/556/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 36/10 Modification of SION Date: 08.12.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 02.02.2010. S.No.63
Case No. C 11
M/s. M.K. Precision Metal Parts P. Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/162/00798/ AM09/DES.I Meeting No. 36/10 Fixation of norms (SION) for “York Panel” Date: 08.12.2009 The DIPP furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.7/294/09TSW/127 dt.25.10.09 informing that the export product “York Panel” is a non standard product manufactured by this particular firm and wastage would vary from panel to panel. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided that SION cannot be fixed for such nonstandard items. S.No.64
Case No. C 12
Confederation of Indian Industry, New Delhi M/s. Ambica Steels Ltd., Sahibabad, Ghaziabad F.No.01/80/162/00527/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 36/10 Date: 08.12.2009 Streamlining the DEPB benefits on auto spare parts The Committee observed that the comments called for from DHI are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.02.2010. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member
(K.K.Funda, Asstt. Dir.,DC(MSME) Member (B. D. Ghosh, Jt.IA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A. Komu) Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.