IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr B / NC-I) Advance Authorisation 2009-11-10

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.32/10 held on 10.11.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 32/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 was held on 10.11.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 475 23062635 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. B.D. Ghosh. Jt. IA 399 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 4. Sh. A.K. Mishra, AIA M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 6. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1

Case No.:22/32/80ALC2/2007

Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED Meet No/Date:32/80ALC2/2009 10.11.2009 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00538/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00570/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211053 24.10.2007 Defer Date: 22.12.2009 Decision : The representative of the M/o Steel present in the meeting stated that recommendation has been placed before Jt. Secretary (MOS) and the matter is awaiting approval. The Committee accordingly, decided to defer the case and to relist it on 22.12.2009. 2

Case No.:23/32/80ALC2/2007

Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00539/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00571/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211055 24.10.2007 Defer Date: 22.12.2009 Decision : The representative of the M/o Steel present in the meeting stated that recommendation has been placed before Jt. Secretary (MOS) and the matter is awaiting approval. The Committee accordingly, decided to defer the case and to relist it on 22.12.2009. 3

Case No.:24/32/80ALC2/2007

Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00540/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00572/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211058 24 10 2007 Defer Date: 22.12.2009

24.10.2007 Decision : The representative of the M/o Steel present in the meeting stated that recommendation has been placed before Jt. Secretary (MOS) and the matter is awaiting approval. The Committee accordingly, decided to defer the case and to relist it on 22.12.2009. 4

Case No.:80/16/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:JSW STEEL LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00603/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01231/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310467010 02.04.2008 Defer Date: 24.12.2010 Decision : The representative of MOS present in the meeting informed the Committee that their comments are under finalization. The Committee accordingly, decided to defer the case for a short period and to relist it on 24.11.2009. 5

Case No.:3/14/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:MACMET INDIA LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00479/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00031/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210113457 11.06.2008 Defer Date: 05.01.2010 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 6

Case No.:8/14/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:KILBURN ENGINEERING LTD 10.11.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00484/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00281/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310474390 12.06.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(09)/09TSW(B) dated 09.11.2009 informing that firm has not given information for each of export product and weight of export product given in their letter is 2600 kg. while in the drawing weight is 4400 kg (2200+2200) and the firm has not replied to Sl.No. 4,5 & 11 of SDL and appendix 11A of application has not been given. The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 7

Case No.:11/14/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 10.11.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00487/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00178/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510222179 16.06.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(10)/09TSW(B)/378 dated 05.10.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Weight of 176.95 MT may be incorporated in the export product. 2 Quantity of raw material i e non alloy steel plate / bolster plate may be allowed as 123 MT with 5% wastage

2. Quantity of rawmaterial i.e. nonalloy steel plate / bolster plate may be allowed as 123 MT with 5% wastage. 3. Rest of the import items are components and they may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering products. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 8

Case No.:21/14/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:PYRO ELECTRIC INSTRUMENTS GOA PVT.LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00497/AM09/ RLA File :17/24/040/00037/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1710002066 17.06.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish weight of components to be manufactured out of imported raw material at S.No.1 & 2 alongwith the drawing of the components with its dimension with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.. 9

Case No.:27/14/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:G.B. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00503/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00078/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410096592 18.06.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 10

Case No.:53/16/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00576/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00213/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510223312 03.07.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(10)/09TSW(B)/376 dated 05.10.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Weight of 208.655 MT may be incorporated in the export product. 2. Quantity of raw material i.e. nonalloy steel plate / bolster plate may be allowed as 151.6 MT with 5% wastage. 3. Rest of the import items are components and they may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering products. 11

Case No.:55/16/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:PATEL ENGINEERING LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00578/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00309/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310477341 03.07.2008

Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 12

Case No.:5/22/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00816/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00120/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110034724 06.08.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from DIT are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 13

Case No.:23/22/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00834/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00413/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310481814 08.08.2008 Decision : The firm vide their letter dated 24th September, 2009 informed that the norms for the similar authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007 has already been ratified by the NC in its meeting No.5/09 held on 29.04.2008. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis in accordance with NC decision in authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007. 14

Case No.:39/22/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00850/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00445/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310482136 11.08.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for a short period and to relist the case on 24.11.2009. 15

Case No.:42/22/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00853/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00359/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310482337 12.08.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 16

Case No.:47/22/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:AKSH OPTIFIBRE LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00858/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00314/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510225481 13.08.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from DIT are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting

their comments with a request to send their representative in the meeting. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 17

Case No.:64/22/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00875/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00327/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510225643 18.08.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for a short period and to relist the case on 24.11.2009. 18

Case No.:29/28/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:MANAKSIA LTD.( FORMERLY HINDUSTHAN SEALS LTD.) 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01110/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00162/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210117855 23.09.2008 Decision : The MOS furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 2(11)/2008TW Vol.I dated 28.10.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Export product: Sl. No. Item Qty. UOM 1. Cold Rolled Galvanized Colour Coated Non Alloy Steel Sheets/Coils Thickness 0.65 mm (+/0.02 mm) Galvanized steel content 1194 MT 1200 MT 2. Cold Rolled Galvanized Colour Coated Non Alloy Steel Sheets/Coils Thickness 0.35 mm (+/0.02 mm) Galvanized steel content 199 MT 200 MT 3. Cold Rolled Galvanized Colour Coated Non Alloy Steel Sheets/Coils Thickness 0.47 mm (+/0.02 mm) Galvanized steel content 99.50 MT 100 MT 4. Cold Rolled Galvanized Colour Coated Non Alloy Steel Sheets/Coils Thickness 0.25 mm (+/0.02 mm) Galvanized steel content 99.50 MT 100 MT Importt product: Sl. no Item Qty. UOM 1. Cold Rolled Galvanized Non Alloy Steel Coils –Thickness 0.63 mm (+/0.02 mm) Having zinc coating of 110 to 129 grams per Sq. meter 1206.43 MT 2. Cold Rolled Galvanized Non Alloy Steel Coils –Thickness 0.32 mm (+/0.02 mm) Having zinc coating of 110 to 129 grams per Sq. meter 200.23 MT 3. Cold Rolled Galvanized Non Alloy Steel Coils –Thickness 0.45 mm (+/0.02 mm) Having zinc coating of 110 to 129 grams per Sq. meter 100.35 MT 4. Cold Rolled Galvanized Non Alloy Steel Coils –Thickness 0.23 mm (+/0.02 mm) Having zinc coating of 110 to 129 grams per Sq. meter 99.73 MT 5. Paints (a) Primer (b) Top Coat (c) Back Coat 4827 11451 5129 Litre Litre Litre

Case No.:8/30/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01138/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00263/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035492 30.09.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 20

Case No.:24/30/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01154/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00073/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022464 03.10.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for a short period and to relist the case on 24.11.2009. 21

Case No.:27/30/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01157/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00435/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510228787 03.10.2008 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for a short period and to relist the case on 24.11.2009. 22

Case No.:34/30/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ARMET ARMORED VEHICLES (INDIA) LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01164/AM09/ RLA File :06/24/040/00033/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610014375 07.10.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from M/o. Defence are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 23

Case No.:64/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:CETHAR VESSELS LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01758/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00192/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099728 04.11.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010.

Case No.:1/38/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ARMET ARMORED VEHICLES (INDIA) Meet No/Date:32/80ALC2/2009 Status:Case deferred

24 Case No.: /38/80 C / 008 a ty Na e: O V C S ( N ) LTD. eet No/ ate:3 /80 C / 009 10.11.2009 Status:Case de e ed HQ File :01/80/050/01500/AM09/ RLA File :06/24/040/00046/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610014679 27.11.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from M/o. Defence are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 25

Case No.:29/38/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:HIGHTEMP FURNACES LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01528/AM09/ RLA File :07/21/040/00913/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061548 04.12.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI present in the meeting informed the Committee that the firm vide their letter dated 9.11.09 requested to delete the import items at S.Nos.16 to 19. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to delete the import items at S.Nos. 16 to 19 from the subject license and ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per General Note No.4 for Engineering Product. 26

Case No.:47/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01741/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00798/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310497146 10.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that the DL already issued in accordance with DHI letter and the firm has now furnished the required information. The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm reply dated 1.10.09 to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 27

Case No.:50/38/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01549/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00295/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036392 11.12.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm in its letter dated 5.11.09 did not make reference to this office letter dated 21.8.09 followed by reminder dated 15.10.09 calling for certain information and the reply does not contain requisite information, in the absence of requisite information, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.. 28

Case No.:51/38/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01550/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00296/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036393 11.12.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly

Case No.:53/38/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 10.11.2009 Status:Case Closed HQ File :01/80/050/01552/AM09/ RLA File :53/21/040/00007/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:5310007059 11.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter No. 53/21/040/00007/AM09 dt. 15.09.2009 informed the subject advance authorization has been issued as per SION 63/67 and hence ratification is not necessary. The Committee, however, felt that RA may again check up the correct SION under which the product is covered and decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 30

Case No.:7/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01701/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00233/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101782 22.01.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 31

Case No.:18/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01712/AM09/ RLA File :06/24/040/00054/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610015018 28.01.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 32

Case No.:25/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01719/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00676/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510235207 28.01.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, requested DHI to expedite their comments and to relist the case on 24.11.2009. 33

Case No.:26/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ZINSER TEXTILE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01720/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00879/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310504917 02.02.2009 Decision : The O/o. Textile Commissioner furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 9(144)/2009/TXM/S/66,67 dated 24.07.2009 recommending norms as per GN4 for the Engg. Product. Representative of DHI present in the meeting also concurred with the TC comments. The Committee, after deliberating upon the comments of the O/o. Textile Commissioner, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per GN4 for the Engg. Product.

Case No.:27/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ZINSER TEXTILE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01721/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00743/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310504921 02.02.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from O/o. Textile Commissioner are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 35

Case No.:29/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ENMAS ANDRITZ PRIVATE LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01723/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00244/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102101 03.02.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 36

Case No.:67/46/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:AQUASUB ENGINEERING 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01761/AM09/ RLA File :32/24/040/00056/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210039683 05.02.2009 Decision : It has been noticed that firm’s reply has been received today. Therefore, it has been decided to refer the copy of firm’s reply to technical authority (i.e. DIPP) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 37

Case No.:2/51/81ALC2/2008

Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/81/050/00748/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00175/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410023519 17.02.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from DHI are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 38

Case No.:29/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01852/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00399/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110037568 03.03.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm vide their letter dated 29.9.09 sought time upto 15.10.09 for submission of required information. The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm has failed to furnish any reply upto the extended period i.e. 15.10.09, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs.

Case No.:4/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:CETHAR VESSELS LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01827/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00261/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102815 09.03.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 40

Case No.:51/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01874/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01068/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310510897 09.03.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm is seeking extension of time again and again. The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 41

Case No.:2/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01825/AM09/ RLA File :53/24/040/00012/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:5310007800 16.03.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 42

Case No.:15/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01838/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00764/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510238079 17.03.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply from DGFT and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 43

Case No.:29/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00387/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00455/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037412 17.03.2009 D i i Th C i b d h l f h fi h d b i d b hi ffi i hi ffi l lli f i i f i Th

Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 44

Case No.:47/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LIVACO INDUSTRIES, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01870/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00968/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310511759 17.03.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 45

Case No.:28/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BADVE AUTOCOMPS PVT.LTD, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01851/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00329/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110037728 18.03.2009 Decision :The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 46

Case No.:31/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:CRAFTSMAN AUTOMATION PVT. LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01854/AM09/ RLA File :32/21/040/00179/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210040016 19.03.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 1. Use of each item of import 2. Manufacturing activity involved 3. Placement of item of import in the export product. 4. Copy of export order

Case No.:32/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:CRAFTSMAN AUTOMATION PVT. LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01855/AM09/ RLA File :32/21/040/00180/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210040020 19.03.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee,

47 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 1. Import quantity not multiples of export quantity. 2. Sl no 2, & 8 of SDL. 3. Use of each item of import 48

Case No.:11/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DICKINSON FOWLER PVT. LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01834/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00665/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063756 20.03.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 49

Case No.:34/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01857/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00192/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410023781 20.03.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 50

Case No.:35/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01858/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00213/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410023782 20.03.2009 Decision :The Committee noted that Export Policy Cell has clarified vide their I.D.No.01/91/180/809/AM10/EC/3608 dated 7.10.09 that SCOMET LICENSE is not required in case of deemed export i.e. where the goods do not leave the territory of the country. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per General Note No.4 for Engineering Product. 51

Case No.:69/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01892/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01085/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310512634 20.03.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010.

Case No.:16/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01839/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00755/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510238732 24.03.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 53

Case No.:38/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS PROJECTS LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01861/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00283/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103309 25.03.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 54

Case No.:75/1/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:AUTOMOTIVE ANCILLARY SERVICES (PVT) LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01898/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00284/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103434 30.03.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 55

Case No.:13/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PRABHA EXPORTS(P) LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00104/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00856/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310515273 13.04.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 56

Case No.:15/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:OMNISCIENT PROCESS EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00106/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517220 24.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs.

Case No.:16/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00107/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00040/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517230 24.04.2009 Decision : The firm vide their letter dated 24th September, 2009 informed that the norms for the similar authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007 has already been ratified by the NC in its meeting No.5/09 held on 29.04.2008. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis in accordance with NC decision in authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007. 58

Case No.:4/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:CANTRONICS OFFICE EQUIPMENTS PVT.LTD., 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00227/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00050/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517619 28.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to refer the copy of firm’s reply to DC(MSME) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 59

Case No.:3/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00094/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00025/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210126587 18.05.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that case was under their study. The Committee requested DHI to expedite reply in the case and decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 60

Case No.:5/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00228/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00067/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520406 19.05.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 61

Case No.:5/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:KRONES INDIA PVT LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00096/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00034/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710064835 19.05.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder

Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 62

Case No.:6/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00097/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00059/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520322 19.05.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 63

Case No.:6/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00229/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00085/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520430 20.05.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The firm wanted more time for furnishing of information. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 24.12.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 64

Case No.:9/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DAGGER MASTER TOOL INDUSTRIES LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00100/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00047/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520470 20.05.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application was wrongly forwarded to DIPP instead of DHI for examination. The Committee, therefore, requested DIPP to transfer the firm’s application to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010.’ 65

Case No.:11/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS PROJECTS LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00102/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00036/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410104770 21.05.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 66

Case No.:19/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:MIKROTEK MACHINES LTD., 10.11.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00110/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00063/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710064913 21.05.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to

q , j q ; p j q RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information. 67

Case No.:22/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:OGNIBENE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00113/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00023/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038528 25.05.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No 3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 2. Manufacturing process involved in the manufacture of export product. 68

Case No.:26/9/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 10.11.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00117/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00002/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310008371 27.05.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA already reported that subject advance authorization has been cancelled due to technical reason and data of new authorization if issued has not been sent to NC. The Committee, therefore, decided to close this case and place the new authorization issued in place of subject authorization before the NC when RA transmits the data of the new authorization. The Committee noted that data of the new advance authorization No. 69

Case No.:8/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TRF LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00231/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00039/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210127502 10.06.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has desired to consider revised quantities of some products under the subject authorization. The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for sending revised list of imports and exports and expediting the said information w.r.t. the revised quantities of products desired by them otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010.

Case No.:22/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00245/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00253/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310525579 24.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications:

70 p j g 1. Following may be suffixed with the description of export : “containing SS316 Heat Transfer Plates, Model VT 130T – 0.6 MM Qty. 723 Nos.Net Weight 3507 Kgs. Model VT 130T 0.7 MMQty. 723 NosNet Weight 4092 Kgs. Model VT 130S 0.6 MM Qty. 4950 Nos. Net Weight 31234 Kgs. Model VT 130S – 0.7 MM Qty. 4068 Nos Net Weight 29988 Kgs.” 2. Quantity of import item may be allowed as under: Cold Rolled Stainless Steel Coil Type SS316, 0.6 MM thick – 40681 Kgs. Cold Rolled Stainless Steel Coil Type SS316, 0.7 MM thick – 39915 Kgs. 2. Total quantity of import item may be allowed as 80596 Kgs. inclusive of 17.1% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 71

Case No.:7/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:AQUASUB ENGINEERING 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00230/AM10/ RLA File :32/24/040/00013/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3210040747 03.07.2009 Decision : It has been noticed that firm’s reply has been received today. Therefore, it has been decided to refer the copy of firm’s reply to technical authority (i.e. DIPP) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 72

Case No.:1/16/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00212/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00205/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510245460 09.07.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Net weight of export product at S.No.1 may be modified as 24.34 MT containing 23.39 MT of imported inputs. 2. Net weight of export product at S.No.2 may be modified as 28.122 MT containing 27.12 MT of imported inputs. 3. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at S.No.1, 3, 7 & 9. 4. Quantities of import items at S.Nos.1, 3, 7 & 9 may be allowed as 9.448 MT, 4.196 MT, 11.628 MT & 4.845 MT respectively inclusive of 2% wastage. 5. Quantities of import items at S.Nos.2, 4, 8 & 10 may be allowed as 4.674 MT, 3.439 MT, 5.539 MT & 3.524 MT respectively on net to net basis. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No.5 may be allowed as 0.218 MT. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No.6 may be allowed equal to quantity of Welding Wire at S.No. 5 of import item. 8. Quantity of import item at S.No.11 may be allowed as 0.256 MT. 9. Quantity of import item at S.No.12 may be allowed equal to quantity of Welding Wire at S.No. 11 of import item. 10. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause.

Case No.:13/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:RATNAMANI METALS & TUBES LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00236/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00086/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810081362 09.07.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Description of export product may be modified as “Welded Titanium Tubes, Spec: SB338 Grade – 2, Size: OD 25.40 MM x 0.71 MM thk (63804.72 meters)”. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed and words “SB338” may be suffixed with the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as 16681 Kgs. inclusive of 5% wastage after taking clue from SION C 593. 74

Case No.:3/16/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00214/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00220/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510245518 10.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has been received. The Committee, therefore, decided to forward the copy of reply the DC(MSME), if they have not received the same for consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 75

Case No.:4/16/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00215/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00221/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510245519 10.07.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from DC(MSME) are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 76

Case No.:6/16/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:SAHAJANAND MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00217/AM10/ RLA File :52/24/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5210027361 10.07.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that firm has furnished the required information to C&PC with copy to DGFT. However, the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010.

Case No.:7/16/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ITS INDIA PVT. LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00218/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00262/AM10/ Lic No/Date:0310528364 Defer Date: 05 01 2010

77 HQ File :01/80/050/00218/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00262/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310528364 10.07.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 78

Case No.:8/16/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:SHOWA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00219/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00224/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510245619 10.07.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. 79

Case No.:11/16/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00222/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00200/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310528720 14.07.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Net empty export weight of 470 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.No. 1 and its quantity may be allowed as 400091 Kgs. inclusive of 6.5% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 3. Weights of 72.216 MT. 0.5 MT, 0.2 MT, 2 MT & 0.2 MT may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.No.2, 4, 5, 6 & 7 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 4. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.No. 3 and its quantity may be allowed as 24000 mtrs. (26MT) inclusive of 2% wastage. 5. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 8, 9 & 11 may be allowed as 2934 Kgs, 4357 Kgs. & 19564 Kgs. respectively. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No. 10 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 16630 Kgs. 7. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. 80

Case No.:2/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ULTRAMATIX COMPUTER SUPPORT SYSTEMS PVT.LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00225/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00107/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039239 14.07.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,6 & 9 of the Standard Deficiency Format.

Case No.:23/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00250/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00004/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310008755 14.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the C&PC vide their O.M. No. 46011/21/2009PC.II dated 25.9.09 informed in other similar case of the firm (Advance Authorization NO.5310009123 dt.14.09.09) that norms for the authorization can be decided based on their earlier recommendation dated 12.05.2009 for the same product. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization also in accordance with their written comments with minor modification as under: 1. Quantity of import item Nos.1,3,4, 9& 10 may be allowed on nettonet basis. 2. Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per written comments of C&PC as under: (i) Quantity of import item no. 2 i.e. “relevant evident paper” may be allowed with 5% wastage. (ii) Quantity of Luer Adaptor (item No.5), Oxygen Absorber (item No.6), Stamping Foil Tape (27mm width) (item No.7), Thermal Transfer Ribbon (110 mm width) (item No.8) may be allowed with 1% wastage. 82

Case No.:16/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00239/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00300/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310529264 16.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter No. 03/94/040/00300/AM10 dt. 16.07.2009 informed the subject advance authorization has been issued as per GN – 4 for the engineering products hence hard copy of the firm’s application not forwarded to NC. The Committee however noted that this is not a case of GN4 as all import items are raw material. Thus RA may be requested to forward four sets of applications. On receipt of application, a copy is to be forwarded to TA i.e. DHI for examination. A copy of letter written to RA to be forwarded to the firm also. Case to be relisted on 05.01.2010. 83

Case No.:20/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:OGNIBENE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00243/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00095/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039293 17.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority despite reminder. The Committee, however, decided to issue final reminder to RA & firm to report the status by 24.12.2009 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms of the subject license is not required and the case will be closed on the part of NC in its next meeting to be held on 05.01.2010.

Case No.:24/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00251/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00063/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210129313 21.07.2009 Decision :The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications:

84 1. Import items from S.Nos. 1 to 8, 17 to 31, 33 & 34 may be allowed as per SION C 1708. 2. Import items from S.Nos. 9 to 16 & 36 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 32 may be allowed as 1.05 Cubic.mtrs./Cubic.mtr. content in the export product after taking clue from SION C1708. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No.35 may be allowed as1.02 mtrs/mtr. content in the export product after taking clue from SION C1708. 85

Case No.:26/17/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00253/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00034/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410106305 21.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority despite reminder. The Committee, however, decided to issue final reminder to RA & firm to report the status by 24.12.2009 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms of the subject license is not required and the case will be closed on the part of NC in its next meeting to be held on 05.01.2010. 86

Case No.:1/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00359/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00015/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610015979 28.07.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 87

Case No.:2/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00360/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00017/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610016067 13.08.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 88

Case No.:3/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00361/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00018/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610016068 13.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further

Case No.:28/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TECHNOMEC ROLL MANUFACTURING C0MPANY PVT. LTD., 10.11.2009

89 HQ File :01/80/050/00386/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00092/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810082373 19.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 90

Case No.:30/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00388/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00151/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039051 20.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 91

Case No.:31/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00389/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00335/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310536224 03.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Net empty export weights of 88.5 MT, 235 MT, 19.2 MT, 68 MT & 27.6 MT may be specified with the quantities of export products from S.Nos. 1 to 5 respectively ( total net empty export weight: 438.3 MT). 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.No. 1 and its quantity may be allowed as applied for i.e. 312000 Kgs. inclusive of 5% wastage. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No. 2 may be allowed as under on net to net basis: Hemispherical Heads, Spec – SA 533M – 4 Nos. (10400 Kgs.) Test Coupons, Spec SA 533 M – 8 Nos. ( 400 Kgs.) 4. Weights of 54.85 MT, 0.2 MT, 2.097 MT & 1.25 MT may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.Nos. 3, 5, 6 & 7 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 5. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.No. 4 and its quantity may be allowed as 64314 mtrs. (69.25 MT) inclusive of 2% wastage. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No. 8 may be allowed as 1 set (1 MT) and to be supplied alongwith export product. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No. 9 may be allowed as 500 Nos. (250 kgs.) on net to net basis. 8. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 10 & 13 may be allowed as 1976 Kgs. & 11976 Kgs. respectively. 9. Quantities of import item at S.No. 11 & 12 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 1860 Kgs. & 10000 Kgs. respectively. 10. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. 92

Case No.:4/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:KONECRANES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00362/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00142/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039832 04.09.2009

Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 93

Case No.:21/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:METSO POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00379/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00129/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107591 07.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be re listed on 05.01.2010. 94

Case No.:7/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS PROJECTS LTD 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00365/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00138/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107592 07.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further 95

Case No.:9/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TITANIUM TANTALUM PRODUCTS LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00367/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00250/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410107602 08.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 96

Case No.:11/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:AUTOMAT IRRIGATION PVT. LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00369/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00148/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510248965 09.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise.

Case No.:12/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00370/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00113/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210131348 10.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms

97 ec s o : e ep ese tat ve o t e p ese t t e eet g eco e ded t e case. e Co ttee, a te de be at g upo t e case, dec ded to at y t e o s 1. Import items from S.Nos. 1 to 8, 14 to 16, 18 & 19 may be allowed as per SION C 1708. 2. Import items from S.Nos. 9 to 13 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 17 may be allowed as 1.05 Cubic.mtrs./Cubic.mtr. content in the export product after taking clue from SION C1708. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No.20 may be allowed as1.02 mtrs/mtr. content in the export product after taking clue from SION C1708. 98

Case No.:13/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:AKSH OPTIFIBRE LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00371/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00039/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249115 11.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has been forwarded to DIT for examination and comments. However, comments called for from DIT are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 99

Case No.:14/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00372/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00029/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249119 11.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. Information in respect of S.No. 3, 4, 5, 11 & 13 of Standard Deficiency Letter, export productwise. 2. Length of Pipes/Tubes at import item S.Nos. 1, 3 & 5. 3. Quantity of pipe fittings at import item at S.No. 2 & 4 in Nos. 4. Total piping lengths of the export products at S.Nos. 1 & 2 supported by P&I diagram of the system 100

Case No.:15/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00373/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00119/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210131413 11.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms 1. Import items from S.Nos. 1 to 8, 13 to 16, 18 & 19 may be allowed as per SION C 1708. 2. Import items from S.Nos. 9 to 12 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 17 may be allowed as 1.05 Cubic.mtrs./Cubic.mtr. content in the export product after taking clue from SION C1708. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No.20 may be allowed as1.02 mtrs/mtr. content in the export product after taking clue from SION C1708.

g y y y g y 101

Case No.:27/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00385/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310009123 14.09.2009 Decision : The C&PC vide their O.M. No. 46011/21/2009PC.II dated 25.9.09 informed that norms for the subject authorization can be decided based on their earlier recommendation dated 12.05.2009 for the same product. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments with minor modification as under: 1. Quantity of import item Nos.2, 4, 5 & 10 may be allowed on nettonet basis. 2. Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per written comments of C&PC as under: a. Quantity of import item no. 1 i.e. PVC compound (Medical Grade) and import item no. 3 i.e. “relevant evident paper” may be allowed with 5% wastage. b. Quantity of Leur Adaptor (item No.6), Oxygen Absorber (item No.7), Stamping Foil Tape (27mm width) (item No.8), Thermal Transfer Ribbon (110 mm width) (item No.9) may be allowed with 1% wastage. 102

Case No.:24/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:SAINT GOBAIN SEVA ENGINEERING INDIA LTD, 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00382/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00208/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710066971 15.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 103

Case No.:25/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 10.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00383/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00053/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107816 15.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. Serial no 5 & 11 of SDL for each export product separately. 2. Input Weight of each casting/ forging and corresponding finished weight separately. 3. Quantity of seamless and welded pipes separately both in weight and length for each type of steel i.e. CS, AS and SS.

Case No.:26/25/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 10.11.2009

104 HQ File :01/80/050/00384/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00043/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249380 15.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. Sl.No.17

Case No. A 05

M/s.Thermal Systems Hyderabad Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad HQ F.No.01/81/162/876/AM08/DESII/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA F.No.09/24/40/288/AM08 0910031764 dt.12.10.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 Ratification of norms The Committee noted that the firm’s representatives appeared for personal hearing before the NC in its meeting held on 03.11.2009 and given assurance to submit the required information within short time. The Committee accordingly decided to to await the firm’s reply. If, firm’s reply not received up to 24.12.2009 the case will be rejected or decided based on the available information and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. Sl.No.151

Case No. A/R81A

M/s.Unique Punch Systems P. Ltd,.Banglore HQ F.No.01/81/50/1055/AM07//DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RA F.No.7/24/040/00863/AM07 0710050842 26.3.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 Amendment in norms The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net weight of export products from S.Nos. 1 to 16 may be specified as 18180 Kgs., 2400 Kgs., 132 Kgs., 600 Kgs., 30654 Kgs., 5200 Kgs., 286 Kgs., 2184 Kgs., 182 Kgs., 30654 Kgs., 5200 Kgs., 286 Kgs., 2184 Kgs., 182 Kgs., 260 Kgs. & 795 Kgs. respectively. 2. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 1, 2 & 3 may be allowed as 97.706 MT, 19.771 MT & 5.034 MT respectively after taking 1/3rd recovery. Sl.No.152

Case No. A/R83

M/s. Blue Star Ltd; Mumbai F.No.01/80/162/511/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RA F.No.03/94/391/AM06 0310342378 Dt. 10.8.2005 Date: 10.11.2009 Amendment in norms Chairman NC advised the member secretary to bring out the factual position on file before placing the case before NC S.No. 153

Case No. A/R2

M/s. Alstom Power System Hydro India, Mumbai F.No. 01/80/50/01123/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RA F.No.03/94/040/1082/AM07 03104013870 Dt. 28.12.2006 Date: 10.11.2009 Amendment in norms The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3/79/09/TSW/B/430 dated 11.11.2009 recommending the revised norms based on the firm’s reply dt. 08.09.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under:

1. Total export weight of 487.54 MT containing 443.9 MT of imported plates may be incorporated in the export item No.1 i. e. draft tube 7 & 8. 2. Import of plates may be allowed as 555 MT with 25% net wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap. 3. Total export weight of 628.5 MT containing 627.5 MT of imported plates may be incorporated in the export item No.2 i. e. Spiral case 6 to 8. 4. Import of plates may be allowed as 740 MT with 18% net wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap. 5. Total quantity of import is 1295 MT of plates. S.No. 154

Case No. A/R3

M/s. Alstom Power System Hydro India, Mumbai F.No. 01/80/50/843/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RA F.No.03/94/040/834/AM07 0310406393 Dt. 02.11.2006 Date: 10.11.2009 Amendment in norms The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3/79/09/TSW/B/429 dated 11.11.2009 recommending the revised norms based on the firm’s reply dt. 08.09.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Total weight of 487.54 MT containing 443.9 MT of imported plates may be incorporated in the export item No.1 i. e. draft tube 5 & 6. 2. Import of plates may be allowed as 555 MT with 25% net wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap. 3. Total weight of 628.5 MT (spiral case 3 to 5) containing 627.5 MT of imported plates may be incorporated in the export item No.2. 4. Import of plates may be allowed as 740 MT with 18% net wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap. S.No. 155

Case No.A/R4

M/s. Alstom Projects Ltd., Mumbai. HQ F.No.01/80/50/1442/AM07/DES–I HQ F.No.01/80/50/1440/AM07/DES–I Lic. Nos. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA F.No.03/94/40/1364/AM07 RLA F.No.03/94/40/1367/AM07 0310421642 & 0310421640 Both dt. 02.03.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 Consideration of combined norms The representative of DHI, present in the meeting, informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s reply. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s reply to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. S.No.156

Case No.A/R31

M/s. Jord Engineers (I) Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01132/AM03/DES–I Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA No.34/80/040/00336/AM03 3410005671 dt.25.10.2002 Date: 10.11.2009 The Committee reviewed the case and observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply w.r.t. this office letter calling for certain information. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format.

S.No.157

Case No.A/R68

M/s. Avlight Automotives Ltd., New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/050/00957/Am08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA No.05/24/040/00522/Am08 0510210471 dt.12.10.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 The case was reviewed based on the reply received from the firm. The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. 1. The firm has given brand name of import item. Chemical Name with its chemical composition may be given. 2. If item of import is synthetic rubber material, specific name of synthetic rubber may be given. 3. Name and quantity of indigenous input, if any may also be given. S.No.158

Case No.A/R69

M/s. Flovel Valves Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00758/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA No.34/24/040/00075/AM08 3410019148 dt.09.07.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 05.01.2010: 1. According to firm, value of imported item namely, Wire Alloy X750 is only 0.8% of fob value of exports, but as per advance authorization, CIF value of the item is 67% of fob value of exports. 2. Quantity of export product at S.No. 1 i.e. Industrial Valve has been indicated as 63.8 Nos. which needs clarifications. 3. Indicate weight of spring to be manufactured out of imported wire and to clarify as to whether weight of spring is same in all the sizes of industrial valves as they have indicated consumption of 0.5 Kgs. of Wire Alloy in each valve. S.No.159

Case No.A/R71

M/s. Web India Pvt. Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/050/00441/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA No.07/24/040/00579/AM08 0710054541 dt.16.11.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 The Committee observed that the comments called for from DHI are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. S.No.160

Case No.A/R72

M/s. Rochem Separation System Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/81/050/00037/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA No.03/95/040/00038/AM08 0310426810 dt.06.04.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010.

S.No.161

Case No.A/R73

M/s. Parker Hannifin India Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/050/00644/AM09/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA No.03/95/040/00046/AM09 0310468033 dt.10.04.2008 Date: 10.11.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(146)/09TSW(B)/400 dated 22.12.2009 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Import item no. 4 (Hydraulic Motor) is also allowed to import. However the description of the export item no. 2 may be modified to “Hydraulic Motor as per drawing 13205 797 1000” S.No.162

Case No.A/R46

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQ F.No.01/80/162/01436/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 32/10 RLA No.09/24/040/00556/AM07 0910030003 dt.16.04.2007 Date: 10.11.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 05.01.2010. Sl.No.46

Case No. C32

M/s. Cooper Foundry Pvt. Ltd., Satara. HQ F.No.01/80/162/1523/AM08/DESI Meeting No. 32/10 Fixation of SION Ref. From SEEPZ, Mumbai. Date: 10.11.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 1(4)/2008/TSW(B) dated 09.11.2009 recommending the wastage norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the wastage norms in respect of the following products only for the applicant firm being 100% EOU in accordance with DHI comments as under: Sl No Part no. of liner Weight of finished product in kgs. Quantity of finished product nos. Weight of input in kgs Rough casting (relevant) Quantity of input in nos. Wastage in % with respect to weight of export product 1. 205130N 34.1 1 72 1 111 2. 205130P 33.75 1 70 1 107 3. 204230K 39.95 1 70 1 75 4. 0010FO19600 24 4 48 1 100 The Development Commissioner, SEEPZ may take necessary action accordingly. S.No.47

Case No.C28

M/s.Bearing Manufacturing Co. Ltd. HQ F.No.01/80/162/869/AM09/DES.I Meeting No. 32/10 RA F.No. Date: 10.11.2009 Increase in value capDEPB. The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the metter. S.No.48

Case No.C31

M/s.Rajkot Engg. Association, Rajkot. HQ F.No.01/80/162/1245/AM09/DES.I Meeting No. 32/10 RA F.No. Date: 10.11.2009 Revision of DEPB rate and abolition of value cap in respect of Caste Iron products( rough/machined) The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the matter. S.No.49

Case No.C35

M/s. Panch Ratna Fastners (P). Ltd; HQ F.No.01/80/162/1316/AM09/DES.I Meeting No. 32/10 Date: 10.11.2009 Alleged swindling of several crores of Govt. revenue –DEPB. The Committee observed that the EEPC vide their letter dt. 04.11.2009 informed that some of their panel members have stated that their product do not get covered under the DEPB Sl.Nos. 581, 582 & 70A. However, they are again taking up the matter with some exporters to collect the representative data of the product. The Committee, therefore decided to remind the EEPC to provide the representative data within one months time. The Committee also decided to report the position to the DEPB Committee also for their information. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. S.No.50

Case No. C10

M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd., Gujarat HQ F.No.01/80/162/00385/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 32/10 Clarification of the norms Date: 10.11.2009 The Committee observed that the comments called for from M/o Mines are yet to be received. The member Secretary informed the Committee, that concerned officer in M/o Mines informed that they will send their comments within a weeks time. The Committee accordingly decided to defer the case for a short period and to relist on 17.11.2009. S.No.51

Case No. C18

M/s. Asia Motor Works LTd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00566/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 32/10 Clarification on “Steel Wheel” Date: 10.11.2009 The Committee observed that the comments called for from DHI are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010.

S.No.52

Case No. C19

M/s. Technova Imaging Systems (P) LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00311/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 32/10 Fixation of SION Date: 10.11.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case 24.11.2009. S.No.53

Case No. C20

M/s. BOSCH Limited, Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00683/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 32/10 Fixation of SION Date: 10.11.2009 The Committee observed that the representative data of the product called for from EEPC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them to provide the representative data immediately. The case may be relisted on 05.01.2010. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (B. D. Ghosh, Jt. IA, MOS) Member (A.K. Mishra, AIA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A. Komu) Chairman

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Case No.:22/32/80­ALC2/2007

Case No.:23/32/80­ALC2/2007

Case No.:24/32/80­ALC2/2007

Case No.:80/16/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:3/14/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:8/14/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:11/14/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:21/14/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:27/14/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:53/16/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:55/16/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:5/22/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:23/22/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:39/22/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:42/22/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:47/22/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:64/22/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:29/28/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:8/30/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:24/30/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:27/30/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:34/30/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:64/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:1/38/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:29/38/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:47/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:50/38/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:51/38/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:53/38/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:7/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:18/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:25/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:26/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:27/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:29/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:67/46/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:2/51/81­ALC2/2008

Case No.:29/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:51/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:2/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:15/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:29/25/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:47/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:28/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:31/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:32/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:11/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:34/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:35/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:69/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:16/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:38/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:75/1/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:15/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:16/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/17/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:5/17/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:5/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:6/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:6/17/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:9/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:11/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:19/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:22/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:26/9/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/17/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:22/17/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/17/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:1/16/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:13/17/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:3/16/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:4/16/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:6/16/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:7/16/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:8/16/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:11/16/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:2/17/80­ALC2/2009