DGFT Minutes
In force — no superseding record on file.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject Decision of the committee 1. M/s Sangat Printers (P) Limited 01/37/218/203/AM 14/EPCGII 0530138393 dated 31.05.2005 Condonation of block wise EO for the 1st block and extension in EO period. The Committee decided to recommend to DG for relaxation under Para 2.5 of FTP to allow (i) condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to payment of composition fee of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in terms of the provisions of
Para 5.8.3 of HBP v1/Para
5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013) and (ii) extension in EOP for 2 years on payment of composition fee equal to 2% of proportionate duty saved amount on unfulfiled EO or an enhancement in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11(a) of HBP Vol. I. This has the approval of DG. MINUTES OF EPCG COMMITTEE MEETING HELD UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF SHRI JAIKANT SINGH, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AT 1430 Hours ON 23.01.2014 Following officers attended the meeting: a. Shri Akash Taneja, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, DGFT b. Shri K. K. Tiwari, Industrial Adviser, Department of Heavy Industry c. Shri A.K Pandey, Senior Technical Officer (DBK), D/o Revenue II. Minutes of the last Meeting held on 19.12.2013 were confirmed. III. The Committee deliberated upon all the cases and following decisions were taken: DGFT = Directorate General of Foreign Trade DG = Director General FTP = Foreign Trade Policy HBP v1 = Handbook of Procedure Vol. I EO = Export Obligation EODC = Export Obligation Discharge Certificate EOP = Export Obligation Period EPCG = Export Promotion Capital Goods RA = Regional Authority BG = Bank Guarantee FFE = Free Foreign Exchange FE = Foreign Exchange M/o = Ministry of IEC = ImporterExporter Code DOR = Department of Revenue CLA = Central Licensing Area IEM = Industrial Entrepreneurs Memorandum
tee FFE = Free Foreign Exchange FE = Foreign Exchange M/o = Ministry of IEC = ImporterExporter Code DOR = Department of Revenue CLA = Central Licensing Area IEM = Industrial Entrepreneurs Memorandum RCMC = RegistrationcumMembership Certificate
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 2. M/s Pioneer Polyleathers Private Limited 01/37/218/211/AM 14/EPCGII 0530143581 dated 04.05.2007 wise EO for the 1st block. The Committee decided of FTP to allow condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to payment of composition fee of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG. 3. M/s Raju Spinning Mills (P) Limited 01/37/218/209/AM 14/EPCGII 3530001294 dated 19.10.2005 Extension in export obligation period. The Committee decided of FTP to allow extension in EOP on payment of composition fee equal to 2% of proportionate duty saved amount on unfulfiled EO or an enhancement in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11(a) of HBP Vol. I. DG.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 4. M/s Sheena Exports, Panipat 18/75/AM13/EPCG II 3330000669 dated 06.12.2006 3330000739 dated 29.03.2007 3330000791 dated 04.07.2007 3330000872 dated 30.10.2007 3330000980 dated 10.04.2008 3330000974 dated 07.04.2008 Grant of benefit of
Para 5.7.6 of HBP v1.
Since the Technical Member from M/o Textiles was absent the Committee decided to defer the case.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 5. M/s Vijay Spinners 01/37/218/210/AM 14/EPCGII 3530001047 dated 06.06.2005 wise EO and extension in export obligation period. The Committee decided of FTP to allow (i) condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to payment of composition fee of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013) and (ii) extension in EOP on equal to 2% of proportionate duty saved amount on unfulfiled EO or an enhancement in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11(a) of HBP Vol. I. DG. 6. M/s Viown Mettube Private Limited 01/37/218/214/AM 14/EPCGII 0530139719 dated 17.10.2005 0530140105 dated 21.12.2005 wise EO for the 1st block. The Committee decided of FTP to allow condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG.
tion from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 7. M/s Rajshree Mechanical Udyog (P) Limited 01/37/218/97/AM 14/EPCGII 0230000347 dated 11.06.2003 wise EO and extension in export obligation period. The Committee decided of FTP to allow (i) condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to payment of composition fee of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013) and (ii) extension in EOP for 2 years on payment of composition fee equal to 2% of proportionate duty saved amount on unfulfiled EO or an enhancement in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought and further extension of two years with a condition that 50% of duty payable in proportion to the unfulfilled export obligation is paid by authorization holder to Custom authorities before an endorsement of extension is made on EPCG authorization by RA concerned. DG.
ion to the unfulfilled export obligation is paid by authorization holder to Custom authorities before an endorsement of extension is made on EPCG authorization by RA concerned. DG.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 8. M/s R.S. Paper 01/37/218/202/AM 14/EPCGII 0530161327 dated 05.08.2013 0530160913 dated 28.05.2013 0530161346 dated 08.08.2013 Shifting of capital goods from one unit to other unit The Committee observed that the addresses of both the units {i.e. at which Capital Goods was installed as per EPCG Authorization (RS Paper, 60, Udyog Kendra1, Extn.II, EcotechIII, Greater Noida 201306) and at which Capital Goods is to be shifted (I076, Site5, Kasna Industrial Area, Greater Noida 2010308)} are mentioned in IEC. The Committee, therefore, allowed shifting of capital goods from their Manesar Unit to Kolar Unit subject to the condition that the firm will furnish fresh installation certificate. 9. M/s Dia Aluminium India Private Limited 01/36/218/11/AM 14/EPCGI 3130001051 dated 23.02.2005 Condonation of shortfall in stipulated percentage of EO during the 1st block of EOP in respect of EPCG Authorization No. 3130001051 dated 23.02.2005 The Committee decided of FTP to allow condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG.
tion from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 10. M/s Gold Plus Glass Industry Limited 01/36/218/287/AM 14/EPCGI 0530144915 dated 05.11.2007 Condonation of delay in installation of Machinery imported against EPCG Authorization No. 0530144915 dated 05.11.2007 beyond a period of 6 months from the date of import the firm have already obtained the Installation Certificate from Central Excise and therefore, decided to condone the delay in Installation of Capital Goods imported against EPCG Authorization No. 0530144915 dated 05.11.2007 in terms of PN No. 48 dated 10.01.2014. 11. M/s J.D. Knitting Mills 01/36/218/303/AM 14/EPCGI 0230001190 dated 21.10.2005 Extension in EOP for two years in respect of EPCG Authorization No. 0230001190 dated 21.10.2005 The Committee decided of FTP to allow extension in EOP for 2 years on payment of composition fee equal to 2% of proportionate duty saved amount on unfulfiled EO or an enhancement in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11 of HBP Vol. I. DG.
ment in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11 of HBP Vol. I. DG.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 12. M/s LG Electronics India Private Limited 01/36/218/281/AM 14/EPCGI N.A Clarification regarding installation certificate for use of Moulds/Jigs/Spares in installed capital goods in terms of Para 5.3 of FTP 200914 The Committee deliberated upon the case in detail and came to the conclusion that
Para 5.3.3(b) of HBP v1 is
regarding usage of spares and Auditing of the stock of the spares whereas Para 5.3.1(b) of HBP v1 relates to Installation of spares. Moreover, representative from the DOR side confirmed that the Installation Certificate in case of spares is usually given on the basis of inspection of old spares taken out from the machinery for replacement. The Committee, therefore, decided to clarify that Certificate from Central Excise Authority is required to be submitted in respect of spares also. 13. M/s Bharat Aluminium Company Limited 01/36/218/289/AM 14/EPCGI 0530138817 dated 09.06.2005 0530138717 dated 24.05.2005 Submission of installation certificate for spares from Chartered Engineer in terms of Para 5.3.3(b) of HBP The Committee deliberated upon the case in detail and came to the conclusion that
Para 5.3.3(b) of HBP v1 is
regarding usage of spares and Auditing of the stock of the spares whereas Para 5.3.1(b) of HBP v1 relates to Installation of spares. Moreover, representative from the DOR side confirmed that the Installation Certificate in case of spares is usually given on the basis of inspection of old spares taken out from the machinery for replacement. The Committee, therefore, decided to clarify that Certificate from Central Excise Authority is required to be submitted in respect of spares also.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 14. M/s LG Electronics India Private Limited 01/36/218/288/AM 14/EPCGI 0530137174 dated 11.10.2004 To allow enhancement of duty saved amount alongwith enhancement in specific export obligation in respect of EPCG authorization No. 0530137174 dated 11.10.2004 The Committee observed that: a. EPCG Authorization No. 0530137174 dated 11.10.2004 was obtained for import of Second Hand Capital Goods for Duty Saved Amount of Rs. 56,05,458.00; b. At the time of import the Customs Department assessed the duty amount on higher side for the imported Second Hand Capital Goods; c. The Customs Department allowed the import consignment with the permission of the ADC and debited the Duty Saved amount of Rs. 1,10,79,006.00 vide Bill of Entry No. 731699 dated 30.10.2004; d. After completion of Obligation, they submitted their request for issue of redemption letter with the Additional
Rs. 1,10,79,006.00 vide Bill of Entry No. 731699 dated 30.10.2004; d. After completion of Obligation, they submitted their request for issue of redemption letter with the Additional DGFT, CLA, New Delhi, who has directed them to deposit the Customs Duty + Interest on Excess duty debited by the Customs Department. The Committee felt that the duty saved had perhaps been assessed on the higher side as the machinery was second hand and, therefore, decided of FTP to allow enhancement of duty saved amount alongwith enhancement in specific export obligation in respect of EPCG authorization No. 0530137174 dated 11.10.2004.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject DG. 15. M/s Arihant Tiles & Marbles Private Limited 01/36/218/48/AM 14/EPCGI 1330000416 dated 17.12.2003 Condonation for slight deviation in description of capital goods imported against EPCG Authorization No. 1330000416 dated 17.12.2003 on the EPCG Authorization and B/E description of machine has been shown as Poly Valent Resin Line Machine Type Res “60L” whereas on Customs attested Invoice only Poly Valent Resin Line Machine is mentioned. Moreover, the machine found installed in the factory is Poly Valent Resin Line Machine Type Res “80L”. The party could not produce a corroborative evidence attested by Customs to show that model “80L” had been imported. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the request of the firm. 16. M/s Indo Autotech Limited 01/36/218/323/AM
e attested by Customs to show that model “80L” had been imported. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the request of the firm. 16. M/s Indo Autotech Limited 01/36/218/323/AM 14/EPCGI 0530145603 dated 12.02.2008 Condonation of procedural lapse of installing the capital goods at main unit located at Plot No. 3340338, Sector – 24, Faridabad instead at the unit located at Plot No. 261, Sector24, Faridabad mentioned in condition sheet of EPCG Authorization No. 0530145603 dated 12.02.2008 the address of the main unit located at Plot No. 3340338, Sector – 24, Faridabad and the address of the unit located at Plot No. 261, Sector24, Faridabad mentioned in condition sheet of EPCG Authorization No. 0530145603 dated 12.02.2008 are mentioned in IEC, RCMC and IEM acknowledgment. The Committee, therefore, decided to condone the procedural lapse of installing the capital goods at main unit instead of the unit located at Plot No. 261, Sector24, Faridabad.
wledgment. The Committee, therefore, decided to condone the procedural lapse of installing the capital goods at main unit instead of the unit located at Plot No. 261, Sector24, Faridabad.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 17. M/s Baddi Print Packs Private Limited 01/36/218/337/AM 14/EPCGI 2230000327 dated 07.06.2006 2230000329 dated 15.06.2006 2230000330 dated 21.06.2006 2230000332 dated 22.06.2006 2230000345 dated 12.07.2006 2230000348 dated 17.07.2006 Condonation of shortfall in first block EO in respect of 6 EPCG Authorizations The Committee decided of FTP to allow condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG. 18. M/s Dahod Agro Industries 01/36/218/297/AM 14/EPCGI 3430000479 dated 11.01.2005 Allow fulfillment of 100% EO by Green Bajra item by using the capital goods imported against EPCG Authorization No. 3430000479 dated 11.01.2005 in the year 2005 there was a provision to fulfill the Export Obligation by exports of other goods manufactured by the same/group company. The Committee, therefore, decided of FTP to count the exports of ‘Green Bajra’ for fulfillment of 100% EO. DG.
ligation by exports of other goods manufactured by the same/group company. The Committee, therefore, decided of FTP to count the exports of ‘Green Bajra’ for fulfillment of 100% EO. DG.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 19. M/s Minda Industries Limited 01/36/218/305/AM 14/EPCGI 0530136757 dated 09.08.2004 Condonation from shortfall in stipulated percentage of EO during first block of EOP against EPCG Authorization No. 0530136757 dated 09.08.2004 The Committee decided of FTP to allow condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG. 20. M/s GTN Industries Limited, 01/36/218/139/AM 13/EPCGI 1030000189 dated 20.06.2002 Counting of exports of Cotton Yarn made upto March, 2003 by extending the provision of alternate product (which came into effect from 01.04.2003) under relaxation of Policy under Para 2.5 of FTP in respect of their EPCG Authorization No. 1030000189 dated 20.06.2002 The Committee decided to defer the case as the written comments from Textile Commissioner, Mumbai are awaited.
FTP in respect of their EPCG Authorization No. 1030000189 dated 20.06.2002 The Committee decided to defer the case as the written comments from Textile Commissioner, Mumbai are awaited.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 21. M/s SR Foils and Tissue Limited 18/117/AM 13/EPCGII 0530139685 dated 06.10.2005 wise EO and extension in EO period The Committee decided of FTP to allow (i) condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to payment of composition fee of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013) and (ii) extension in EOP for 2 years on payment of composition fee equal to 2% of proportionate duty saved amount on unfulfiled EO or an enhancement in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11 of HBP Vol. I. DG. 22. M/s Alstom Projects India Limited 01/36/218/54/AM 14/EPCGI 0310247081 dated 12.01.2004 Ratification of norms of Advance Authorization No. 0310247081 dated 12.01.2004 The Committee was of the view that since the matter relates to change in Policy for import of Capital Goods for Power Generation which is under examination, the case may not be taken up by the Committee.
view that since the matter relates to change in Policy for import of Capital Goods for Power Generation which is under examination, the case may not be taken up by the Committee.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 23. M/s Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited 01/36/218/334/AM 14/EPCGI 3130002576 dated 13.07.2007 3130002957 dated 11.02.2008 3130003838 dated 25.02.2009 3130003840 dated 27.02.2009 3130004977 dated 21.07.2010 3130005324 dated 10.12.2010 3130005915 dated 18.08.2011 Shifting of machinery imported against 7 EPCG Authorizations The Committee deliberated upon the case and decided to grant permission to shift the Capital Goods from one of the units of the firm located at Khadki, Pune to their another unit at Kagal, Kolhapur subject to the condtion that addresses of both the units are mentioned in IEC/IEM/RCMC and submission of fresh Installation Certificate. 24. M/s Divyalakshmi Textiles (P) Limited 01/36/218/172/AM 14/EPCGI 10 EPCG Authorizations issued during the period of AM06 to AM07 wise EO in respect of 10 EPCG Authorizations issued during the period of AM06 to AM07 The Committee decided of FTP to allow condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG.
tion from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). DG.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 25. M/s Ford India Private Limited 01/36/218/293/AM 14/EPCGI 0430012229 dated 26.02.2013 Extension of validity period (Revalidation) of EPCG Authorization No. 0430012229 dated 26.02.2013 from 9 months to 18 months under Para 2.5 of Foreign Trade Policy In view of Para 5.21 of HBP v1 (PN No. 1 Notified on 18.04.2013) EPCG Authorization cannot be revalidated. The Committee further observed that the firm can avail fresh Authorization under EPCG Scheme and, therefore, decided to reject the request. 26. M/s Photonix Solar Private Limited 01/37/218/215/AM 14/EPCGII 3130007248 dated 12.03.2013 Revalidation of Zero Duty EPCG Authorization though the company had already made the advance payment to the tune of 50% for import of second hand capital goods, the seller could not supply the goods in time. In between, the policy changed and import of second hand capital goods has been discontinued under EPCG Scheme. The Committee, therefore, decided to allow revalidation of EPCG Authorization upto 31.05.2013 as a special case. This dispensation would, however, not be treated as precedent.
EPCG Scheme. The Committee, therefore, decided to allow revalidation of EPCG Authorization upto 31.05.2013 as a special case. This dispensation would, however, not be treated as precedent.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 27. M/s Vishkarma Enterprises 01/37/218/152/AM 14/EPCGII 0530136563 dated 17.04.2004 wise EO and condonation of delay in submission of installation certificate. The Committee decided of FTP to allow condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013). the firm has already obtained the Installation Certificate from Central Excise and therefore, decided to condone the delay in Installation of Capital Goods imported against EPCG Authorization No. 0530144915 dated 05.11.2007. DG. 28. M/s Pyramid Timber Associated Pvt. Ltd. 01/37/218/177/AM 14/EPCGII 0730003241 dated 02.09.2005 Refixation of average EO The Committee decided to defer the case with the direction to call for a report, including CAC for old export items with ITC HS Codes, from the concerned RA.
tion of average EO The Committee decided to defer the case with the direction to call for a report, including CAC for old export items with ITC HS Codes, from the concerned RA.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 29. M/s Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. 18/57/AM13/EPCG II 38 EPCG Authorizations issued during the period AM 09 to AM13 Refixation of average EO as per Para 5.7.4 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013) the value of the exports made against the EPCG Authorizations issued during 2002 to 2007 and redeemed during 2009 to 2012 has been added while fixing the average EO against the subject 38 EPCG Authorizations issued during AM09 and AM13 in terms of
Para 5.7.4 of HBP v1 of the
relevant period. The Committee, however, decided relaxation under para 2.5 of FTP to grant the benefit of
Para 5.7.4 of current HBP v1
notified on 18.04.2013. DG. 30. RA, Madurai 18/54/AM11/EPCG II 3530000034 dated 30.05.2000 3530000044 dated 26.07.2000 3530000183 dated 09.04.2009 Nexus Certification The Committee deliberated upon the case and decided to defer the case with the direction to call for comments from Department of Mines. 31. M/s Unison Hotels Private Limited 01/37/218/110/AM 14/EPCGII 0530143859 dated 06.11.2007 0530143860 dated 11.06.2007 0530149544 dated 04.08.2009 0530143858 dated 11.06.2007 Issuance of EODC The Committee deliberated upon the case and permitted disposal of vehicles as they would deteriorate subject to submission of Registration Certificate in respect of vehicle imported against these authorizations as Tourist Vehicles and submission of fresh Bank Guarantee equivalent to duty saved amount.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 32. M/s Golden Park 01/36/218/335/AM 14/EPCGI 3530000960 dated 24.04.2005 Consideration of payment received from foreigners in INR by Hotel Industry there is a discrepancy in the Certificate in respect of foreign exchange earning issued by Chartered Accountant and decided to defer the case with the direction to call for verification of statement certified by the Chartered Accountant. 33. M/s Bharat Explosives Limited 01/36/218/292/AM 14/EPCGI 0530132716 dated 20.03.2002 0530134025 dated 02.04.2003 0530134026 dated 02.04.2003 0530135944 dated 24.03.2004 0530136146 dated 30.04.2004 0530139479 dated
ives Limited 01/36/218/292/AM 14/EPCGI 0530132716 dated 20.03.2002 0530134025 dated 02.04.2003 0530134026 dated 02.04.2003 0530135944 dated 24.03.2004 0530136146 dated 30.04.2004 0530139479 dated 07.09.2005 Extension in EOP in respect of EPCG Authorization Nos. 0530132716 dated 20.03.2002, 0530134025 dated 02.04.2003, 0530134026 dated 02.04.2003, 0530135944 dated 24.03.2004, 0530136146 dated 30.04.2004 and 0530139479 dated 07.09.2005. the comments from the Exports Division of DGFT is awaited in the matter and therefore, decided to defer the case.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 34. M/s Dabur India Limited 01/36/218/321/AM 14/EPCGI 0530136392 dated 16.06.2004 wise EO and extension in EOP for 2 years i.e. upto 15.06.2014 against EPCG Authorization No. 0530136392 dated 16.06.2004 The Committee decided of FTP to allow (i) condonation from condition of fulfilment of blockwise EO subject to payment of composition fee of 2% on duty saved amount in proportion to the shortfall at the end of each block in 5.8.2 of HBP v1 (RE: 2013) and (ii) extension (first) in EOP for 2 years on payment of composition fee equal to 2% of proportionate duty saved amount on unfulfiled EO or an enhancement in EO imposed to the extent of 10% of total EO at the choice of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11(a) of HBP Vol. I. DG. 35. M/s Tata Motors Limited 18/195/AM 12/EPCGII 0330020330 dated
of exporter, for each year of extension sought in terms of provisions contained in Para 5.11(a) of HBP Vol. I. DG. 35. M/s Tata Motors Limited 18/195/AM 12/EPCGII 0330020330 dated 12.06.2008 Endorsement of supporting manufacturer i.e. M/s Caparo Engineering India Pvt. Ltd in EPCG authorization w.e.f. 01.10.2008 instead of w.e.f. 27.02.2009 The Committee deliberated upon the case and decided to regularize gap between date of transfer of Capital Goods and endorsement of name of supporting manufacturer.
S. No. Firm’s Name and Numbers EPCG Authorisation No. Subject 36. M/s Nissan Motor India Pvt. Ltd. 01/37/218/108/AM 14/EPCGII 0430007571 dated 04.08.2009 0430008297 dated 03.09.2010 0430008342 dated 17.05.2010 Condonation of procedural lapse and give instructions to accept their application for issue of EODC The Committee deliberated upon the case and decided to condone the procedural lapse of installation of tools on a location other than their own factory premises addresses of which were not endorsed on the EPCG Authorization prior to transfer of these tools to the supporting manufacturers.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6357 --apply.