DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.40/10 held on 05.01.2010 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 40/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 was held on 05.01.2010 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 2. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 3 Sh. Krishan Kumar, Dy.DGFT Convenor 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:3/14/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MACMET INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:40/80ALC2/2009 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00479/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00031/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210113457 11.06.2008 Defer Date: 19.01.2010 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 2
Case No.:27/14/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:G.B. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00503/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00078/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410096592 18.06.2008 Decision : On the written recommendations of DHI vide their U.O. No.3(6)/09TSW(B)/437 dt.23.11.2009, the committee decided to ratify the case as under: 1. The quantity of export product to be indicated as three numbers and its export weight of 1462 MT to be incorporated in the licence. d b d l d fi
2. Item No.17, 27 to 49 and 52 are to be deleted as per firms request. 3. On item No. 1 to 16, 18 and 19, wastage to be allowed at 2%(Pipes). 4. On items No. 22 to 26, wastage to be allowed at 3%(Plates and Forged Bar). 5. Item No. 50 and 51 are components and thus allowed on net to net basis. 6. Wastage is to be allowed on utilized quantity as shown in the revised list furnished by the firm vide their letter dt.27.10.2009. A copy of revised list submitted by the firm be sent to RA. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 3
Case No.:55/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PATEL ENGINEERING LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00578/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00309/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310477341 03.07.2008 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 4
Case No.:5/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00816/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00120/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110034724 06.08.2008 Defer Date: 02.03.2010 Decision : The committee noted that comments called for from DIT are yet to be received and therefore decided to remind them again for expediting their comments. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 5
Case No.:42/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00853/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00359/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310482337 12.08.2008 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 6
Case No.:47/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:AKSH OPTIFIBRE LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00858/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00314/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510225481 13.08.2008 Decision : The committee noted that comments called for from DIT are yet to be received and therefore decided to remind them again for expediting their comments. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 7
Case No.:8/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01138/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00263/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035492
7 Q 30.09.2008 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010. 8
Case No.:34/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ARMET ARMOURED VEHICLES (INDIA) LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01164/AM09/ RLA File :06/24/040/00033/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610014375 07.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that M/O Defence conveyed their No objection to the import items but that Ministry did not communicate about requirement of inputs. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind / write to Ministry of Defence again for their comments about ratification of norms. It was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 9
Case No.:64/46/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CETHAR VESSELS LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/01758/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00192/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099728 04.11.2008 Decision : The Committed noted that DHI has furnished written comments vide their U.O. No.3(20)/08TSW(B)/441 dt.24.11.2009. The Committed decided to ratify the norms in accordance with DHI comments as under: Item No. of import in the licence Quantity allowed in Meters 1 4284 2. 1775 3 2598 4 566 5 4284 6 1780
6 1780 7 2598 8 750 The above quantities are with 2% wastage and as per the revised quantity of import intimated by the firm vide their letter dt.11.07.2009. 2. Import item No. 9 to 16 to be deleted, as informed by the firm vide their letter referred to above. A copy of firm’s letter to be forwarded to RA. 10
Case No.:1/38/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ARMET ARMOURED VEHICLES (INDIA) LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01500/AM09/ RLA File :06/24/040/00046/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610014679 27.11.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that M/O Defence conveyed their No objection to the import items but that Ministry did not communicate about requirement of inputs. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind / write to Ministry of Defence again for their comments about ratification of norms. It was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 11
Case No.:47/46/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01741/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00798/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310497146 10.12.2008 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 12
Case No.:28/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:RESHAM ROOSEN INDIA PVT.LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00494/AM10/ RLA File :06/21/040/00103/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610014832 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee took note of changes reported by RA vide their letter No. 06/21/040/00103/AM09/JDG/KAN/03364 dt. 23.12.2009. The Committee also decided to issue final reminder to the firm for sending information by 23.02.2010 otherwise the case would be rejected. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 13
Case No.:7/46/80ALC2/2008
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01701/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00233/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101782 22.01.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010. it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010
14
Case No.:18/46/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/01712/AM09/ RLA File :06/24/040/00054/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610015018 28.01.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DHI has furnished written comments vide their U.O. No.3(17)/09TSW(B)/443 dt.25.11.2009. The Committed decided to ratify the norms in accordance with DHI comments as under: 1. The net export weight of items No. 1 as 253 gms; Item No. 2 is 4.3 gms; Item No.3&4 are 392 gms each and of Item No.5 as 99 gms may be incorporated in the licence. 2. Both the raw material are recommended with 5% wastage; 3. The description of import item Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) may be changed to “PVC compound granules” and that of “CR Steel “ to “CRC Steel”; 4. The unit of colour concentrate (Master Batch)” may changed to “Kg” from “Number”. 5. Paper Corrugated Box may be allowed as per packing policy. 15
Case No.:29/46/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ENMAS ANDRITZ PRIVATE LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/01723/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00244/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102101 03.02.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DHI has furnished written comments vide their U.O. No.3(94)/08TSW(B)/462 dt.02.12.2009. The Committed decided to ratify the norms in accordance with DHI comments as under: 1. The export weight of item No. 1 as 3000 MT and that Item No. 2 as 899 MT may be incorporated it the authorization. 2. The firm submitted revised list of import a copy of this list is to be forwarded to RA . 3. Import items at sl. No. 11 to 14 ; 16 to 18 and 66 to 69 are to be deleted as per firm’s request. 4. Items No. 1 to 10 and 15 are recommended with 2% wastage on utilized quantity shown in the revised list. 5. Items at Sl. No. 19 to 65 and at 70 are components and thus allowed on net to net basis. 16
Case No.:2/51/81ALC2/2008
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/81/050/00748/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00175/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410023519 17.02.2009
Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 17
Case No.:22/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:WPIL LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01820/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00274/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210123758 27.02.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed that he has not received firm’s reply. The Committed handed over concerned file to DIPP for examination of the case. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 18
Case No.:2/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01825/AM09/ RLA File :53/24/040/00012/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:5310007800 16.03.2009 Decision : The committee noted that comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received and therefore decided to remind them again for expediting their comments. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 19
Case No.:15/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 05.01.2010 Status: Apporved HQ File :01/80/050/01838/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00764/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510238079 17.03.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DHI has furnished written comments vide their U.O. No.3(117)/09TSW(B)/448 dt.25.11.2009. The Committed considered DHI’s comments and decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Import Items are allowed at 1.05 Kg/Kg content in the export product. 20
Case No.:29/25/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00387/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00455/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037412 17.03.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that DHI representative was not present in the meeting and reply from the firm was not received in DGFT. The Committee, therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm for furnishing information by 23.02.2010 otherwise the case will be rejected. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010.
Case No.:31/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CRAFTSMAN AUTOMATION PVT. LTD., Status:
21 y , 05.01.2010 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/01854/AM09/ RLA File :32/21/040/00179/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210040016 19.03.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DHI has furnished written comments vide their U.O. No.3(154)/09TSW(B)/445 dt.25.11.2009. The Committed decided to ratify the norms in accordance with DHI comments as under: 1. Description of export product may be changed to “Diesel Engines fitted with alternator and Pumps”. 2. The items of import may be allowed under GN4. 22
Case No.:32/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CRAFTSMAN AUTOMATION PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01855/AM09/ RLA File :32/21/040/00180/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210040020 19.03.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that reply from the firm was not received. The Committee, therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm for furnishing information by 23.02.2010 otherwise the case will be rejected. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 23
Case No.:11/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DICKINSON FOWLER PVT. LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01834/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00665/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063756 20.03.2009 Decision : the Committee noted that the firm has given their further submissions vide their letter dt.31.12.2009 addressed to DHI with a copy of DGFT. The case may be further examined by DHI and is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 24
Case No.:69/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01892/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01085/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310512634 20.03.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010. it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 25
Case No.:16/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01839/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00755/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510238732 24.03.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010
Case No :38/1/80 ALC2/2009
Part Name:ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS PROJECTS Meet No/Date:40/80 ALC2/2009 Stat s:
26
Case No.:38/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS PROJECTS LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01861/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00283/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103309 25.03.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 27
Case No.:75/1/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AUTOMOTIVE ANCILLARY SERVICES (PVT) LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01898/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00284/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103434 30.03.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that Firm’s reply has been received and therefore decided to remind DHI for submission of its comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 28
Case No.:13/9/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRABHA EXPORTS(P) LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00104/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00856/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310515273 13.04.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010. it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 29
Case No.:4/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CANTRONICS OFFICE EQUIPMENTS PVT.LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00227/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00050/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517619 28.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to ratify the norms in the subject authorization on repeat basis as per decision taken in NCs meeting 38/10 held on 22.12.2009 in advance authorization No.0310532496 dt.05.08.2009, as under: 1. Quantity of Empty Cartridges may be allowed on nettonet basis. 2. Quantity of Toner may be allowed as Net+5% Wastage. 30
Case No.:3/9/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00094/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00025/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210126587 18.05.2009
Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 31
Case No.:5/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00228/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00067/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520406 19.05.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DIPP has furnished written comments. The Committed considered DIPP’s comments and decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Net empty export weight of 2340 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at S.Nos. 1 & 2. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl.No. 1 & 2 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 30120 Kgs. & 51400 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 3 % wastage. 4. Weights of 1737 MT, 207 MT, 5 MT, 176 MT, 3 MT, 4 MT & 3.2 MT may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.No. 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, 14 & 15 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No. 7 may be allowed as 48 Nos. ( 8.8 MT). 6. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 8, 9, 10 & 12 may be allowed as applied for i.e 14208 Kgs., 64054 Kgs., 18000 Kgs. & 174767 Kgs. respectively. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No.11 may be allowed as 110712 Kgs. 8. Import item at S.No.13 to be supplied alongwith export product. 9. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause.
32
Case No.:6/9/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/0097/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00059/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520322 19.05.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DIPP has furnished written comments. The Committed considered DIPP’s comments and decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Net empty export weight of 2040 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at S.Nos. 1 & 2. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl.No. 1 & 2 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 30120 Kgs. & 37300 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 3 % wastage. 4. Weights of 1475 MT, 196 MT, 5 MT, 176 MT, 3 MT, 3.7 MT & 3.2 MT may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.No. 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, 14 & 15 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No. 7 may be allowed as 48 Nos. ( 8.8 MT). 6. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 8, 9, 10 & 12 may be allowed as applied for i.e 14208 Kgs., 52808 Kgs., 18000 Kgs. & 149489 Kgs. respectively. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No.11 may be allowed as 96681 Kgs. 8. Import item at S.No.13 to be supplied alongwith export product. 9. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause.
33
Case No.:6/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00229/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00085/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520430 20.05.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DIPP has furnished written comments. The Committed considered DIPP’s comments and decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Net empty export weight of 932 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at S.Nos. 1to 8 and 23, 24 & 25. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 1 may be allowed as 114720 Kgs. inclusive of 19.3 % wastage after taking 1/3rd recovery. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 2 may be allowed as 84578 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 5. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 3 may be allowed as 407673 Kgs. inclusive of 6.3 % wastage after taking 1/3rd recovery. 6. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 4 may be allowed as 12818 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage. 7. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 5 may be allowed as 13920 mtrs.(109897 Kgs.) inclusive of 2 % wastage. 8. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 6 may be allowed as 486 mtrs.(6726 Kgs.) inclusive of 2 % wastage. 9. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 7 may be allowed as 18818 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. 10. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 8 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 2302 Kgs. on net to net basis. 11. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 9 may be allowed as 1854 Nos.on net to net basis. Its duty free weight may be restricted to 120941 Kgs. inclusive of 9 % wastage after 20% recovery. 12. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 10 may be allowed as 343 Nos.on net to net basis. Its duty free weight may be restricted to 7095 Kgs. inclusive of 20.5 % wastage after 20% recovery. 13. Weights of 719 Kgs., 606 Kgs., 8000 Kgs., 500 Kgs., 819 Kgs., 1587 Kgs., 1928 Kgs., 1000 Kgs., 600 Kgs. & 1850 Kgs. may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27 & 31 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 14. In import item No. 21, quantity of spare parts may be allowed as per policy for spares. 15. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 15 may be allowed as 158 Nos.on net to net basis. Its duty free weight may be restricted to 11931 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. 16. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 16, 17, 18, & 19 may be allowed as 20,000 Kgs., 13013 Kgs., 6500 Kgs. & 19513 Kgs. respectively. 17. Quantity of import item at S.No.23 may be allowed as 71855 Kgs. inclusive of 10% wastage. 18. Quantities of import items at S.Nos. 24 & 25 may be allowed as applied for i.e 600 Kgs. & 300 Kgs. respectively on net to net basis. 19. Quantities of import items from S.Nos. 28 to 30 put together may be allowed within 2% of FOB value of exports. 20. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause.
34
Case No.:9/9/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DAGGER MASTER TOOL INDUSTRIES LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00100/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00047/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310520470 20.05.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DHI has furnished written comments vide their U.O. No.3(108)/08TSW(B)/461 dt.02.12.2009. The Committed decided to ratify the norms in accordance with DHI comments as under: 1. Taking clue from SION C421, item No. 2 is allowed with in 5% of FOB value of export. 2. Description of item No. 1 of import may be amended as “Tungsten Carbide blanks of relevant dia” and quantity may be allowed as 22500 Nos. on net to net basis. 3. The description of export item may be amended as “Tungsten Carbide Drills” 35
Case No.:11/9/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS PROJECTS LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00102/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00036/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410104770 21.05.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 36
Case No.:22/9/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:OGNIBENE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00113/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00023/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038528 25.05.2009 Decision : The firm vide its letter dt.18.12.2009 has reported that authorization is issued as per GN4. This is evident from copy of authorization forwarded by the firm. The Committee, therefore, decided to close the case on its part without further examination. 37
Case No.:8/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TRF LIMITED, 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00231/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00039/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210127502 10.06.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that Firm’s reply has been received and decided that a copy of the reply may be forwarded to DHI for their examination The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010.
38
Case No.:44/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00510/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00109/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065478 19.06.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to call for the following information from the firm, as per written comments of DIPP: 1. Information in respect of S.No. 3 & 11 of Standard Deficiency format, export productwise. 2. Input raw material blank size without cutting allowance – export product wise. 3. Input raw material blank weight without cutting allowance – export product wise. 4. Cutting allowance and any other allowance / wastage export product wise. The firm may furnished the information immediately as the case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. Thereafter , the case will not be considered further, if reply is not received before that. 39
Case No.:7/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AQUASUB ENGINEERING 05.01.2010 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00230/AM10/ RLA File :32/24/040/00013/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3210040747 03.07.2009 Decision : The committee noted that reply furnished by the firm vide its letter dt. 29.10.2009 does not pertain to the item of export product covered by this authorization under consideration and therefore decided to reject the case. 40
Case No.:3/16/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00214/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00220/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510245518 10.07.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DC(MSME) present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Import items at Sl. No. 1 to 3 may allowed with 5% wastage. 2. Import item No. 4 & 5 may be allowed on net to net basis.
Case No.:4/16/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00215/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00221/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510245519 10.07.2009
41 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DC(MSME) present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Import items at Sl. No. 1 to 3 may allowed with 5% wastage. 2. Import item No. 4 may be allowed on net to net basis. 42
Case No.:6/16/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SAHAJANAND MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD, 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00217/AM10/ RLA File :52/24/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5210027361 10.07.2009 Decision : The committee noted that comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received and therefore decided to remind them again for expediting their comments. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 43
Case No.:7/16/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ITS INDIA PVT. LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00218/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00262/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310528364 10.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that Firm’s reply has been received and a copy is endorsed to DHI. The Committee decided to remind DHI for their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 44
Case No.:8/16/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SHOWA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00219/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00224/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510245619 10.07.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 45
Case No.:2/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ULTRAMATIX COMPUTER SUPPORT SYSTEMS PVT.LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00225/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00107/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039239 14.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; otherwise their case will be rejected. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010.
46
Case No.:16/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00239/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00300/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310529264 16.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application is yet to be received from RA and therefore decided to remind RA with a copy to the firm, mentioning that if application is not received by 23.02.2010, the case will be closed on the part of NC, as if ratification of the authorization is not requried. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 47
Case No.:20/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:OGNIBENE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00243/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00095/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039293 17.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application has not been received from RA and firm despite final reminder and therefore decided to close the case on the part of NC. Considering that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required. 48
Case No.:26/17/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00253/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00034/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410106305 21.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application has not been received from RA and firm despite final reminder and therefore decided to close the case on the part of NC, considering that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required.
49
Case No.:1/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00359/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00015/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610015979 28.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firms reply was received and on the recommendation of the representative of DC(MSME) present in the meeting decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Weight of each export product at Sl. No. 1 is fixed as 92 gms; each export product at Sl. No.2&3 is fixed as 89 gms each. 2. Weight of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2,3,4 and 8 is fixed as 1.05 kg/kg content in the export product. 3. Import items at Sl. No.5,6, and 7 are allowed on net to net basis. 50
Case No.:2/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00360/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00017/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610016067 13.08.2009 Decision : The representative of DC(MSME) informed that their comments will finalized shortly. The Committee decided to defer the case for two week, and relist on 19.01.2010. 51
Case No.:3/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00361/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00018/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610016068 13.08.2009 Decision : The representative of DC(MSME) informed that their comments will finalized shortly. The Committee decided to defer the case for two week, and relist on 19.01.2010. 52
Case No.:28/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TECHNOMEC ROLL MANUFACTURING C0MPANY PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00386/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00092/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810082373 19.08.2009 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm has not furnished certain information sought from it even after issue of a reminder and decided to reject the case as in the absence of the information , it was not possible to ratify the norms.
Case No.:30/25/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00388/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00151/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039051 20.08.2009
53 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm has not furnished certain information sought from it even after issue of a reminder and decided to reject the case as in the absence of the information , it was not possible to ratify the norms. 54
Case No.:30/33/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00496/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00184/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039076 27.08.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 55
Case No.:31/33/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00497/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00197/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039077 27.08.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 56
Case No.:4/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KONECRANES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: closed HQ File :01/80/050/00362/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00142/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039832 04.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide its letter No.31/24/040/00142/AM10/1124 dt.18.12.2009 has informed that advance authorization has been issued under GN4 and therefore decided to close the case on its part without any further examination. 57
Case No.:21/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:METSO POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00379/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00129/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107591 07.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm had sought time for furnishing reply, first upto 15.12.2009 and than upto 21.01.2010. The Committee, therefore decided to give this last chance to the firm for furnishing the reply and also decided not to issue any further reminder to the firm. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010 58
Case No.:7/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS PROJECTS LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00365/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00138/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107592 07 09 2009
07.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has been received and a copy is endorsed to DHI. The Committee decided to remind DHI for their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 59
Case No.:9/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TITANIUM TANTALUM PRODUCTS LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00367/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00250/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410107602 08.09.2009 Decision : The Committee handed over a copy of the application to the representative of the DIPP for examination. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 60
Case No.:11/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AUTOMAT IRRIGATION PVT. LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00369/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00148/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510248965 09.09.2009 Decision : The Committee handed over reply received from the firm, to DIPP for further examination. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 61
Case No.:13/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AKSH OPTIFIBRE LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00371/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00039/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249115 11.09.2009 Decision : The committee noted that comments called for from DIT are yet to be received and therefore decided to remind them again for expediting their comments. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 62
Case No.:14/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00372/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00029/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249119 11.09.2009 Decision : The Committee handed over reply received from the firm, to DIPP fro further examination. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 63
Case No.:24/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SAINT GOBAIN SEVA ENGINEERING INDIA LTD, 05.01.2010 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00382/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00208/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710066971 15.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application has not been received from RA and firm despite issue of a reminder and therefore decided to close the case on the part of NC, considering that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required. 64
Case No.:25/25/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00383/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00053/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107816 15.09.2009
Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 65
Case No.:25/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00491/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00069/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107827 15.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 66
Case No.:26/25/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00384/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00043/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510249380 15.09.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 67
Case No.:27/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MAN DIESEL INDIA LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00493/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00349/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310538133 16.09.2009 Decision : Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 68
Case No.:11/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00477/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00104/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410025225 30.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 69
Case No.:29/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TECHNOMEC ROLL MANUFACTURING C0MPANY PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00495/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00144/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810083444 07.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010;
Case No.:43/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ Fil 01/80/050/00509/AM10/ RLA Fil 34/24/040/00107/AM10/ Li N /D t 3410025330 D f D t 02 03 2010
70 HQ File :01/80/050/00509/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00107/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410025330 09.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 71
Case No.:15/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LIVACO INDUSTRIES, 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00481/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00446/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310541482 12.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 72
Case No.:26/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AUTO TECH INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00492/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00149/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108339 12.10.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DHI has furnished written comments vide their U.O. No.3(140)/09TSW(B)/463 dt.02.12.2009. The Committed decided to ratify the norms in accordance with DHI comments as under: 1. Import of inserts is allowed as 0.75% of the FOB value of the export products, on repeat basis, as was done for authorization No.0410105021 dt.01.06.2009. 73
Case No.:45/33/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00511/AM10/ RLA File :11/24/040/00015/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1110021160 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 74
Case No.:32/33/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00498/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00143/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108784 23.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; 75
Case No.:33/33/80ALC2/2009
05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00499/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00155/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108786 23.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; otherwise their case will be rejected The case is to be re listed on 02 03 2010
76
Case No.:1/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:M M AQUA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00467/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00082/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510251802 30.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the D/L given by the o/o the DC(MSME) was already issued to the firm and the firm’s reply was also received. A copy of the reply was handed over to the representative of the DC(MSME) for examination. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 77
Case No.:2/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DICKINSON FOWLER PVT. LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00468/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00258/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067933 30.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the application was sent to DHI on 08.12.2009 and decided to remind DHI for their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 78
Case No.:4/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MAKINO INDIA PVT LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00470/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00259/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067949 30.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application is yet to be received from RA and therefore decided to remind RA with a copy to the firm, mentioning that if application is not received by 23.02.2010, the case will be closed on the part of NC, as if ratification of the authorization is not required. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 79
Case No.:17/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00483/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00039/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000365 03.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application is yet to be received from RA and therefore decided to remind RA with a copy to the firm, mentioning that if application is not received by 23.02.2010, the case will be closed on the part of NC, as if ratification of the authorization is not required. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 80
Case No.:18/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00484/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00040/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000366 03.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application is yet to be received from RA and therefore decided to remind RA with a copy to the firm, mentioning that if
application is not received by 23.02.2010, the case will be closed on the part of NC, as if ratification of the authorization is not required. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 81
Case No.:12/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KERNLIEBERS(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00478/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00283/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067999 04.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the application was sent to DHI on 07.12.2009 and decided to remind DHI for their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 82
Case No.:7/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00473/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00087/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510251883 04.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the application was sent to DHI on 27.11.2009. The Committee also decided to forward a copy of further communication dt. 25.12.2009 received from the firm, to DHI and also to remind them for their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 83
Case No.:35/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PERMANENT MAGNETS LIMITED 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00501/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00483/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310544498 09.11.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DIPP has furnished written comments. The Committed considered DIPP’s comments and decided to ratify the norms as under: Quantity of import item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 3440 Kgs. inclusive of 7.5% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 84
Case No.:37/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRABHA EXPORTS(P) LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00503/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00489/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310544632 09.11.2009 Decision :The Committee noted that application has been received by DC(MSME) and decided to issued D/L to the firm as follows, as per DC(MSME)’s written comments : 1. Drawing / Design of product indicating use & placement of all imported items. 2. Basic of requirement calculated for EPDM Hose and process to be done on it, whether this is imported in continue length or in pieces. Details of hose length required for each assy. 3. Details of any indigenous item used in export product. The firm may furnished the desired information immediately. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010.
85
Case No.:38/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRABHA EXPORTS(P) LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00504/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00488/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310544637 09.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application has been received by DC(MSME) and decided to issued D/L to the firm as follows, as per DC(MSME)’s written comments : 1. Drawing / Design of product indicating use & placement of all imported items. 2. Basic of requirement calculated for EPDM Hose and process to be done on it, whether this is imported in continue length or in pieces. Details of hose length required for each assy. 3. Details of any indigenous item used in export product. The firm may furnished the desired information immediately. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 86
Case No.:39/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KKTC AUTOTECH (I) LTD. 05.01.2010 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00505/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00628/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310544643 09.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide its letter No.03/94/040/00628/AM10/174 dt.09.11.2009 has informed that advance authorization has been issued under GN4 and therefore decided to close the case on its part without any further examination.
Case No.:50/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:UNIVERSAL CABLES LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00516/AM10/ RLA File :17/24/040/00029/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1710002842
87 Q 09.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application is yet to be received from RA and therefore decided to remind RA with a copy to the firm, mentioning that if application is not received by 23.02.2010, the case will be closed on the part of NC, as if ratification of the authorization is not required. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 88
Case No.:46/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00512/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00093/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510252255 10.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the application was sent to DHI on 27.11.2009 and decided to remind DHI for their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 89
Case No.:47/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PERFECT ENGG COMPONENTS P LTD 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00513/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00334/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510252281 11.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the application was sent to DHI on 27.11.2009 and decided to remind DHI for their comments. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. 90
Case No.:48/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MIKROTEK MACHINES LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00514/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00274/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710068194 11.11.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application is yet to be received from RA and therefore decided to remind RA with a copy to the firm, mentioning that if application is not received by 23.02.2010, the case will be closed on the part of NC, as if ratification of the authorization is not required. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. 91
Case No.:49/33/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:HILLER DECANTERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 05.01.2010 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00515/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00156/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210133653 12.11.2009 Decision : The Committed noted that DIPP has furnished written comments. The Committed considered DIPP’s comments and decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 may be allowed within 2.5% of FOB value of exports. 2. Quantities of import items from S.Nos. 2 to 13 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. Sl.No.21
Case No. A 05
M/s. Thermal Systems Hyderabad Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad HQ F.No.01/81/162/876/AM08/DESII/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA F.No.09/24/40/288/AM08 0910031764 dt.12.10.2007 Date: 05.01.2010 Ratification of norms The Committee noted that firm’s reply has been received and decided to forward a copy of the reply to DHI for examination. The case may be relisted on 02.03.2010. Sl.No.22
Case No. A 6
M/s. Value Industries Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00194/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RA F.No.03/95/040/00012/AM10 0310527117 dt.03.07.2009 Date: 05.01.2010 The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; otherwise their case will be rejected. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. S.No. 209
Case No.A/R4
M/s. Alstom Projects Ltd., Mumbai. HQ F.No.01/80/50/1442/AM07/DES–I HQ F.No.01/80/50/1440/AM07/DES–I Lic. Nos. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA F.No.03/94/40/1364/AM07 RLA F.No.03/94/40/1367/AM07 0310421642 & 0310421640 Both dt. 02.03.2007 Date: 05.01.2010 Consideration of combined norms The committee decided to remind to DHI for early submission of their comments. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. S.No.210
Case No.A/R31
M/s. Jord Engineers (I) Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01132/AM03/DES–I Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA No.34/80/040/00336/AM03 3410005671 dt.25.10.2002 Date: 05.01.2010 The representative of DIPP informed that the case is under their examination. The committee, therefore, decided to defer and relist the case on 02.03.2010. S.No.211
Case No.A/R68
M/s. Avlight Automotives Ltd., New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/050/00957/Am08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA No.05/24/040/00522/Am08 0510210471 dt.12.10.2007 Date: 05.01.2010 The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; otherwise their case will be rejected. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. S.No.212
Case No.A/R69
M/s. Flovel Valves Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00758/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA No.34/24/040/00075/AM08 3410019148 dt.09.07.2007 Date: 05.01.2010 Ratification of norms
dt.09.07. 007 Date: 05.01.2010 The Committee handed over reply received from the firm, to DIPP fro further examination. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. S.No.213
Case No.A/R71
M/s. Web India Pvt. Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/050/00441/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA No.07/24/040/00579/AM08 0710054541 dt.16.11.2007 Date: 05.01.2010 The Committee noted that the D/L given by the o/o the DHI was already issued to the firm and the firm’s reply was also received. A copy of the reply was handed over to the representative of the DHI for examination. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. S.No.214
Case No.A/R72
M/s. Rochem Separation System Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/81/050/00037/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA No.03/95/040/00038/AM08 0310426810 dt.06.04.2007 Date: 05.01.2010 The Committee noted that the firm has not furnished certain information sought from it vide letter dt. 10.11.2009 and decided to reject the case as the absence of the information , it was not possible to consider the firm’s request. S.No.215
Case No.A/R46
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQ F.No.01/80/162/01436/AM08/DESI Lic. No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RLA No.09/24/040/00556/AM07 0910030003 dt.16.04.2007 Date: 05.01.2010 The committee decided to remind to DHI for early submission of their comments. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. . S.No.216
Case No. A/R103
M/s. Cethar Vessels Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/1261/AM09//DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RA F.No.04/24/040/00194/AM09 0410099766 dt.05.11.2008 Date: 05.01.2010 Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 S.No.217
Case No. A/R109
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/050/00283/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 40/10 RA F.No.04/24/040/00204/AM08 0410091231 dt.27.09.2007 Date: 05.01.2010
The Committee noted that firm’s reply has not been received and therefore decided to issue final reminder to the firm to send information by 23.02.2010; otherwise their case will be rejected. The case is to be relisted on 02.03.2010. S.No.71
Case No.C35
M/s. Panch Ratna Fastners (P). Ltd; HQ F.No.01/80/162/1316/AM09/DES.I Meeting No. 40/10 Date: 05.01.2010 Alleged swindling of several crores of Govt. revenue –DEPB. In view of EEPC’s letter dt.11.12.2009, the committee decided to call for the requisite information from M/s. Mohindra Fasteners Ltd., directly. The case may be re listed on 02.03.2010. S.No.72
Case No. C18
M/s. Asia Motor Works LTd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00566/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 40/10 Clarification on “Steel Wheel” Date: 05.01.2010 Since the DHI representative was not present in the NC meeting held on 05.01.2010, it was decided to defer the case for two week and relist on 19.01.2010 S.No.73
Case No. C20
M/s. BOSCH Limited, Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00683/AM10/DESI Meeting No. 40/10 Fixation of SION Date: 05.01.2010 The committee Decided to remind EEPC fro early submission of the requisite information. The case may be deferred and relisted on 02.03.2010. S.No.74
Case No. C23
M/s. Steel Strips Wheels Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/162/00647/AM08/AM08/DESI Meeting No. 40/10 Fixation of SION for 24” Auromotive Steel Wheel Rim Date: 05.01.2010 The case was not clearly brought out in the agenda and therefore, the Committee decided that case may be examined on file and again be placed before it for consideration on 12.01.2010. (K.K.Funda, Asstt. Dir.,DC(MSME) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member
Kishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT, Convenor (A. Komu) Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.