DGFT Committee Minutes

pdfcrowd.com PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API Directorate General of Foreign Trade Udyog Bhawan DES-V Section

Minutes of the Meeting NC-V held on 04.12.2008

The Meeting No. 36/AM-09 for the licensing year 2008-09 to consider the cases under Duty Exemption Schemes (Chapter-4) of 04.12.2008 in Room No.4 of DGFT under the Chairmanship of Shri A.K.Singh, Jt. DGFT. The following officers were present: - Sl. No. Name of the representatives & their designation Department 1. Sh. Shaish Kumar, Industrial Advisor DIPP 2. Sh.R.A.Lal, Deputy Director R.O, TC, Noida 3. Sh. Ashok Kumar Arora, Dy.DGFT DGFT 4. Sh. J.D.Giri, Vice President Nominee, AEPC 5. Sh. Kuldeep Singh, Asstt. Director DC (MSME) 6. Sh. Pradip Kumar, F.T.D.O DGFT

(TEXTILES AND LEATHER ITEMS)

At the outset the Minutes of NC Meeting No. 35/AM09 dated 27.11.2008 were ratified. Thereafter, Agenda for individual cases for Meeting No. 36/AM09 was taken up for discussion and the decision taken in respect of each case is enumerated below: -

MEETING NUMBER : 36/84-ALC3/2008 MEETING DATE : 04.12.2008

Online agenda case 1

Case No.:5/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:JYOTI CNC AUTOMATION PVT LTD, Meet No/Date:36/84-ALC3/2008 04.12.2008 Status: Transferred HQ File :01/84/050/00397/AM09/ RLA File :24/21/040/00197/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:2410020941 01.04.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that ITC (HS) code of export item mentioned in this case is 84, which fall under the purview of DES-I Section (NC-I). It was therefore decided to transfer the case to DES-I Section.

2

Case No.:2/25/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:CHELSEA MILLS 04.12.2008 Status: Approved HQ File :01/84/050/00299/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00363/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510226979 05.09.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the Advance authorization issued in this case on the basis of written comments of DC (MSME) conveyed vide their U.O NO.37 (5)/63/2008-09/Hosy. dated 03.12.2008 as detailed below: - Export Product Import Item Qty. allowed 99% cotton 1% spandex stretch denim girls long boot cut jeans (Style No.621528)

1. 99% cotton 1% spandex fabric, GSM- 430+/-10%
2. 65% polyester 35% cotton dyed fabric, GSM- 105+/-10%

Non woven fusible interlining 4) Zip Fastners

5. Snap Fastners

6. Elastic

7.   1.98 sq mtrs/Pc
   

8. 0.32 Sq mtrs/Pc

9. 0.20 Sq mtrs/Pc

Net to net with accountability clause 5) Net to net with accountability clause 6) 0.40 mtrs. 99% cotton 1% spandex stretch denim girls long wide Bermuda jeans (Style No.621543/627830/621542/627834)

1. 99% cotton 1% spandex fabric, GSM- 430+/-10%
2. 65% polyester 35% cotton dyed fabric, GSM- 105+/-10%

Non woven fusible interlining 4) Zip Fastners

5. Snap Fastners

6. Elastic

7.   1.45 sq mtrs/Pc
   

8. 0.26 Sq mtrs/Pc

9. 0.20 Sq mtrs/Pc

Net to net with accountability clause 5) Net to net with accountability clause 6) 0.40 mtrs. 100% cotton denim jeans

Not recommended 100% cotton 1 denim girls jeans (Style No.621477/626783/621507/626788) 1) 100% cotton denim fabric, GSM- 340+/-10% 2) 65% polyester 35% cotton dyed fabric, GSM- 105+/-10% 3) Non woven fusible interlining 4) Zip Fastners

5. Snap Fastners

6.   1.15 sq mtrs/Pc
   

7. 0.24 Sq mtrs/Pc

8. 0.20 Sq mtrs/Pc

Net to net with accountability clause 5) Net to net with accountability clause The GSM should match in both import & export. The R.A shall be advised to take necessary action subject to compliance of other usual conditions.

3

Case No.:1/30/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:JIWANRAM SHEODUTTRAI INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. 04.12.2008 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/84/050/00337/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00166/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210118381 10.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that applicant firm have neither forwarded calculation sheet nor CAD/CAM/Laymarker/Measurement/Style No., in absence of which it is not possible to compute the requirement of inputs. In view of this, Committee was constrained to reject. RLA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

4

Case No.:2/31/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:RICHA & CO 04.12.2008 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/84/050/00342/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00451/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229287 15.10.2008 Defer Date: 18.12.2008 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that copy of application has not been received in this case. It was decided to await the same and defer the case for re-listing on 18.12.2008.

5

Case No.:3/31/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:GOPAL CLOTHING CO P LTD 04.12.2008 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/84/050/00343/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00460/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229341 15.10.2008 Defer Date: 18.12.2008 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that copy of application has not been received in this case. It was decided to await the same and defer the case for re-listing on 18.12.2008.

6

Case No.:4/31/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:GOPAL CLOTHING CO P LTD 04.12.2008 Status: Approved HQ File :01/84/050/00344/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00448/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229342 15.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that in this case export product is covered under SION, J-196, which allows input @ 2.20 Sq mtrs whereas firm have asked the same @ 2.34 Sq mtrs/Pc. The Committee observed that in this case 7.5% more than SION Qty. is 2.36 Sq mtr./Pc, which is lower than the Qty. asked for in terms of Policy Circular No. 34 dated 24.03.2008. Hence, Committee decided to allow the input @ 2.20 Sq mtrs./Pc in this case.
The GSM should match in both import & export.

7

Case No.:6/31/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:COLOR LINES CLOTHING INDIA PVT LTD, 04.12.2008 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/84/050/00346/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00368/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060473 16.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that applicant firm have neither forwarded calculation sheet nor CAD/CAM/Laymarker/Measurement/Style No., in absence of which it is not possible to compute the requirement of inputs. In view of this, Committee was constrained to reject. RLA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

8

Case No.:1/33/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:LUMENS INDIA 04.12.2008 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/84/050/00352/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00186/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210118753 22.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that applicant firm have neither forwarded calculation sheet nor CAD/CAM/Laymarker/Measurement/Style No., in absence of which it is not possible to compute the requirement of inputs. Further, wastage asked for is also not specific. In view of this, Committee was constrained to reject. RLA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

9

Case No.:2/33/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:UNIWORTH TEXTILES LIMITED, 04.12.2008 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/84/050/00353/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00184/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210118793 22.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that applicant firm have not elaborated the manufacturing process of export product with silk. Further, in the import item no. 1 Tussah spun silk yarn has been mentioned, which is not correct, hence, in absence of technical characteristics of this item, it is not possible to compute the requirement of input. In view of this, Committee was constrained to reject. RLA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

10

Case No.:5/33/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:KESHAR MULTIYARN MILL LIMITED 04.12.2008 Status: Approved HQ File :01/84/050/00356/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00188/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210118973 24.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representative of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the Advance authorization issued in this case as detailed below: - Export item Export Qty. Import Item Qty. allowed Viscose yarn twisted with 70D/24Fx2 Ply Nylon 66 textured yarn 48000 Kgs

1. Nylon 66 textured yarn,
   

70D/24Fx2 Ply 2) Viscose 1.25Dx38mm bright staple fibre

1. 12 M.T

37890 Kgs

11

Case No.:6/33/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:GAURAV INTERNATIONAL 04.12.2008 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/84/050/00357/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00483/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229978 27.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that applicant firm have neither forwarded calculation sheet nor CAD/CAM/Laymarker/Measurement/Style No., in absence of which it is not possible to compute the requirement of inputs. Further, wastage asked for is also not specific. In view of this, Committee was constrained to reject. RLA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

12

Case No.:10/33/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:ASPINWALL & CO. LTD. 04.12.2008 Status: Approved HQ File :01/84/050/00361/AM09/ RLA File :10/24/040/00096/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1010031410 31.10.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the Advance authorization issued in this case by allowing 3% wastage. In the description of import item, the words ‘Plastic Sole’ may be amended to read as “Plastisole”.

13

Case No.:1/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:CHELSEA MILLS 04.12.2008 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/84/050/00385/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00546/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510231295 Defer Date:01.01.2009

pdfcrowd.com PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API 13 Q e :0 /8 /050/00385/ 09/ e :05/ /0 0/005 6/ 09/ c.No/ ate:05 0 3 95 21.11.2008 e e ate:0 .0 . 009 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that copy of application has not been received in this case. It was decided to await the same and defer the case for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

14

Case No.:2/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:TEXSHADE PREFABS PVT.LTD, 04.12.2008 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/84/050/00386/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00465/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061239 24.11.2008 Defer Date:01.01.2009 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that copy of application has not been received in this case. It was decided to await the same and defer the case for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

15

Case No.:3/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:ADITYA BIRLA NUVO LIMITED., 04.12.2008 Status: Approved HQ File :01/84/050/00387/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00205/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210120199 25.11.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representative of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the Advance authorization issued in this case by allowing 2% wastage on repeat basis as detailed below: - Export item Export Qty. Import Item Qty. allowed 100% Flax/Linen Yarn Auto cone spliced 2000 Kgs 100% Flax/Linen Yarn upto 80 LEA/NM 2040 Kgs.

16

Case No.:4/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:DULARI EXPORTS PVT. LTD. 04.12.2008 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/84/050/00388/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00540/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510231444 25.11.2008

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that applicant firm have neither forwarded calculation sheet nor CAD/CAM/Laymarker/Measurement/Style No., in absence of which it is not possible to compute the requirement of inputs. Further, wastage asked for is also not specific. In view of this, Committee was constrained to reject. RLA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

17

Case No.:6/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:SHAHI EXPORTS PVT. LTD. 04.12.2008 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/84/050/00398/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00487/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061334 26.11.2008 Defer Date:01.01.2009 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that copy of application has not been received in this case. It was decided to await the same and defer the case for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

18

Case No.:7/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:SHAHI EXPORTS PVT. LTD. 04.12.2008 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/84/050/00399/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00488/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061335 26.11.2008 Defer Date:01.01.2009 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that copy of application has not been received in this case. It was decided to await the same and defer the case for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

19

Case No.:8/36/84-ALC3/2008

Party Name:DIGJAM LIMITED 04.12.2008 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/84/050/00400/AM09/ RLA File :24/24/040/00015/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:2410023004 27.11.2008 Defer Date:01.01.2009 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and decided to link the earlier relevant file wherein similar case of the firm have been ratified and defer the case for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

Manual agenda cases

Case No. 485

M/s Shiny Knitwear, Tirupur NC36/09 dt. 04.12.2008 F.NO.1/84/50/137/AM09-DES-V Ratification of input output norms in respect of Advance Authorization No.3210037883 dt. 29.05.2008 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and decided to re-list this case on 01.01.2009 alongwith other cases of the firm wherein applicant firm have been granted personal hearing. The case stands deferred for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

Case No. 486

M/s Shiny Knitwear, Tirupur F.NO.1/84/50/129/AM09-DES-V No.3210037801 dt. 09.05.2008 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and decided to re-list this case on 01.01.2009 alongwith other cases of the firm wherein applicant firm have been granted personal hearing. The case stands deferred for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

Case No. 487

M/s SAS International, Chennai F.NO.1/84/50/192/AM09-DES-V No.0410097080 dt. 09.07.2008 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the Advance authorization issued in this case taking cue from SION, J-312 in partial modification of its earlier decision taken on 24.07.2008 as detailed below: - Export item Export Qty. Import Item Qty. allowed Silk/Cashmere blended Shawls, Scarves, Mufflers(45% Silk/55% Cashmere) 6000 Kgs Spun silk yarn 2835 Kgs. (with 5% wastage) Yarn of fine animal hair of Cashmere (Carded) 3630 Kgs. (with 10% wastage)

Case No. 488

M/s Colour Lines Incorporated, Bangalore F.NO.1/84/50/68/AM06-DES-V No.0710037513 dt. 29.04.2005 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and observed that applicant firm have neither forwarded calculation sheet nor CAD/CAM/Laymarker/Measurement/Style No. in terms of Policy Circular No. 34 dated 24.03.2008. In view of this Committee decided to advise the applicant firm to submit all the above-mentioned details in justification of their case to DC (MSME) under intimation to DGFT.

             The case stands deferred for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

Case No. 489

M/s Orient Fashions Exports India Pvt. Ltd. F.NO.1/84/50/272/AM07-DES-V No.0510190578 dt. 11.09.2006 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the Advance authorization issued in this case on the basis of written comments of DC (MSME) conveyed vide their U.O NO.37 (5)/29/2007-08/Hosy. dated 01.12.2008 as detailed below: - Export Product Import Item Qty. allowed Ladies’ Tunic (Top) in 100% cotton dyed embroidered fabric. (Style No.440512) 100% cotton dyed embroidered fabric, GSM- 125+/-10%

2.20 sq mtrs/Pc

Infants dress with diaper cover 100% cotton dyed fabric. (Style No.453362) 100% cotton dyed fabric, GSM- 82+/-10% 1.25 sq mtrs/Pc 100% polyester piece dyed fabric, GSM- 60+/-10% 0.40 sq mtrs/Pc

Snap fastners (1 set of four Pcs) Net to net with accountability clause 100% cotton Lace 5/8” width 3.00 yards/Pc 100% cotton Lace 1/2” width 4.00 yards/Pc 100% Polyester tape 2.45 yards/Pc Girls dress with panty covers 100% cotton dyed fabric. (Style No.467475) 100% cotton dyed fabric, GSM- 82+/-10% 1.35 sq mtrs/Pc 100% polyester piece dyed fabric, GSM- 60+/-10% 0.40 sq mtrs/Pc

Snap fastners (1 set of four Pcs) Net to net with accountability clause 100% cotton Lace 5/8” width 3.00 yards/Pc 100% cotton Lace 1/2” width 4.00 yards/Pc 100% Polyester tape 2.45 yards/Pc Infants dress with diaper cover 100% cotton yarn dyed seer sucker fabric. (Style No.447442) 100% cotton yarn dyed seer sucker fabric, GSM- 135+/-10% 1.10 sq mtrs/Pc

Girls dress in 100% cotton yarn dyed seer sucker fabric (Style No.447442) 100% cotton yarn dyed seer sucker fabric, GSM- 135+/-10% 1.21 sq mtrs/Pc

The GSM should match in both import & export.

Case No. 490

M/s Colour Lines Incorporated, Bangalore F.NO.1/84/50/165/AM06-DES-V No.0710038241 dt. 01.05.2006 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting observed that firm have not given justification for enhancement in the Qty. already allowed by NC. Hence, decided to maintain status quo in this case.

Firm may be informed accordingly.

Case No. 491

M/s Chelsea Mills, New Delhi F.NO.1/84/50/316/AM07-DES-V No.0510192062 dt. 04.10.2006 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. M. K.Jain, Proprietor of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case alongwith technical person. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided as detailed below: - (i) As regards size-wise specification mentioned on the export items, Committee decided to delete this condition from export item. (ii) As regards item of import no. 1, Committee after going in detail of the sample felt that 2.09 Sq mtrs./Pc is adequate for the same. Hence, decided to allow the same @ 2.09 Sq mtrs./Pc instead of 1.66 Sq mtrs./Pc. (iii) As regards import item no.2, Committee felt that 0.09 Sq mtrs/Pc already allowed is adequate, hence, decided to maintain status quo.

The RLA shall be advised to take necessary action subject to compliance of other usual conditions.

Case No. 492

M/s Chelsea Mills, New Delhi F.NO.1/84/50/157/AM06-DES-V No.0510158636 dt. 30.05.2005 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. M. K.Jain, Proprietor of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case alongwith technical person. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided as detailed below: - (i) As regards size-wise specification mentioned on the export items, Committee decided to delete this condition from export item. (ii) As regards woven/non woven interlining against export item no. 1, Committee after going in detail of the sample felt that this is used in belt & flap also hence, 0.26 Sq mtrs./Pc is adequate instead of 0.16 Sq mtrs/Pc (as allowed by NC). Hence, decided to allow the same @ 0.26 Sq mtrs./Pc instead of 0.16 Sq mtrs./Pc.

Case No. 493

M/s Chelsea Mills, New Delhi F.NO.1/84/50/545/AM07-DES-V No.0510200771 dt. 12.03.2007 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009.

pdfcrowd.com PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. M. K.Jain, Proprietor of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case alongwith technical person. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided as detailed below: - (i) As regards size-wise specification mentioned on the export items, Committee decided to delete this condition from export item.

Case No. 494

M/s Chelsea Mills, New Delhi F.NO.1/84/50/592/AM06-DES-V No.0510171001 dt. 05.12.2005 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. M. K.Jain, Proprietor of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case alongwith technical person. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided as detailed below: - (i) As regards item of import no.4 i.e Elastic, Committee decided to allow @ 0.84 mtrs/Pc instead of 0.50 mtrs/Pc (as allowed earlier).

Case No. 495

M/s G.D. Enterprises, Kolkata F.NO.1/84/50/381/AM07-DES-V No.0210095357 dt. 14.11.2006 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and decided to call drawing, Laymarker, Calculation sheet in justification of their request for enhancement from firm and defer the case for re-listing on 01.01.2009.

Case No. 496

M/s Magnolia Martinique Clothing Pvt. Ltd. F.NO.1/84/50/281/AM09-DES-V No.0510226451 dt. 28.08.2008 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to allow the import item on net to net basis with accountability clause. The description of export item may be amended to read as “ Ladies dress with Belt made out of Raffia Elastic”.

Case No. 497

M/s Chelsea Mills, New Delhi F.NO.1/84/162/758/AM08-DES-V No.0510207949 dt. 22.08.2007 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. M. K.Jain, Proprietor of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case alongwith technical person. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided as detailed below: - (i) For Export item No. 1:- As regards item of import no.1 i.e Stretch denim fabric, GSM-375+/-10%, Committee decided to allow @ 2.46 Sq mtrs/Pc instead of 1.925 Sq mtrs/Pc (as allowed earlier). (ii) For Export item No. 2: - As regards item of import no.1 i.e Spandex denim fabric, GSM-320+/-10%, Committee decided to allow @ 2.46 Sq mtrs/Pc instead of 2.20 Sq mtrs/Pc (as allowed earlier).

Case No. 498

M/s Chelsea Mills, New Delhi F.NO.1/84/162/721/AM06-DES-V No.0510175918 dt. 07.02.2006 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. M. K.Jain, Proprietor of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case alongwith technical person. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided as detailed below: - (i) As regards item of import no.9, Committee decided to allow @ 0.21 Sq mtrs/Pc instead of 0.16 Sq mtrs/Pc (as allowed earlier).

Case No. 499

M/s Indian Hair Industries (P) Ltd., Andrapredesh F.NO.1/85(82)/50/1693/AM07-DES-VI No.2610006044 dt. 22.02.2007 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. Vara Prasad PBK, Executive Director of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the advance authorization issued in this case by allowing the item of import with 5% in partial modification of its earlier decision taken on 18.10.2007.

Case No. 500

M/s Indian Hair Industries (P) Ltd., Andrapredesh F.NO.1/82/50/1052/AM07-DES-VI No.2610005702 dt. 27.09.2006 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. Vara Prasad PBK, Executive Director of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the advance authorization issued in this case by allowing the item of import with 5% in partial modification of its earlier decision taken on 18.10.2007.

Case No. 501

M/s Gaurav International, Gurgaon F.NO.1/84/162/539/AM05-DES-V No.0510148289 dt. 11.01.2005 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided to ratify the Advance authorization issued in this case on the basis of written comments of DC (MSME) conveyed vide their U.O NO.37 (5)/63/2008-09/Hosy. dated 03.12.2008 as detailed below: - Export Product Import Item Qty. allowed Ladies’ Top made of 100% cotton woven, fabric, GSM-75+/-10% 100% cotton woven fabric, GSM- 75+/-10%

1.78 sq mtrs/Pc

Ladies’ Top made of 100% cotton woven, fabric, GSM-75+/-10% 100% cotton woven fabric, GSM- 75+/-10%

2.21 sq mtrs/Pc

The GSM should match in both import & export.

Outside agenda cases

Case No. 1 M/s Chelsea Mills, New Delhi F.NO.1/84/162/352/AM08-DES-V No.0510204724 dt. 11.06.2007 – under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and heard Sh. M. K.Jain, Proprietor of the firm, who appeared for personal hearing in this case alongwith technical person. He explained the case along with sample and other relevant papers. The Committee after detailed deliberations in consultation with the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting decided as detailed below: - (i) For export item No.2: - As regards 98% cotton 2% spandex stretch dyed glitter corduroy fabric, Committee decided to allow @ 0.88 Sq mtrs/Pc instead of 0.73 Sq mtrs/Pc i.e as applied by the firm. (ii) For export item No.2: - As regards Rivets, Committee decided to allow @ 5 sets/Pc instead of 4 sets/Pc i.e as applied by the firm.

Case No. 2 Report of a team comprising officers of DGFT, DIPP, DC (MSME) and R.O of TC, Noida, who visited the units of (1) M/s Bros. India Group, Alleppey, kerala, (2) M/s Kanti Floor Furnishers, Alleppey, Kerala (3) M/s Palm Fibre (India) Pvt. Ltd., Ernakulam, Kerala (4) M/s Fibre World, Alappuzha, Kerala (5) M/s William Goodacre & Sons India Pvt. Ltd., Alleppey, Kerala – reg. NC36/09 dt. 04.12.2008 Fixation of input output norms for the export of PVC backed coir mats/PVC tufted vinyl backed stenciled coir mats/Vinyl backed coir mats/Leeds mats etc – under

Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol1) 2004-2009.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith report submitted by the team comprising officers of DGFT, DIPP, DC (MSME) and R.O of TC, Noida, who visited the units of (1) M/s Bros. India Group, Alleppey, kerala, (2) M/s Kanti Floor Furnishers, Alleppey, Kerala (3) M/s Palm Fibre (India) Pvt. Ltd., Ernakulam, Kerala (4) M/s Fibre World, Alappuzha, Kerala (5) M/s William Goodacre & Sons India Pvt. Ltd., Alleppey, Kerala. After detailed deliberations, Committee felt that for the first product i.e. PVC backed Coir mats whether stenciled or unstenciled, the wastage of 3% is reasonable while for the second product i.e Rubber backed Synthetic mats, a wastage of 5% is reasonable. Hence, above recommendations of team have been taken on record.

@@@@@@