DGFT Committee Minutes
Office of Directorate General of Foreign Trade New Delhi ‐0 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Para 4.7 Decision
MEETING NUMBER : 5/82‐ALC4/2009 MEETING DATE : 05.05.2009 The Mee捀�ng No5/82 in the year 2009‐10 to consider the cases under Duty Exemp捀�on Scheme (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2004‐09 pertaining to products falling in Chapter 29 and 30 scheduled to be held on 05.05.2009 was actually held on 26.05.2009 under the Chairmanship of Jt. DGFT, Shri Anil Aggarwal in his chamber. Following members were present:‐ 1. Shri Jasbir Singh, IA, Department of C&PC 2. Shri D.N. Mathur, Dy. IA, Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals 3. Shri Rajinder Pal Singh, Dy. DGFT 4. Shri Shyam Lal, FTDO At the outset, minutes of Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng No.1/82 dated 12.05.2009 and 2/82 dated 12.05.2009 were ra捀�fied by the Commi掀�ee.
Case No.B‐35
M/S Suven Life Sciences Ltd. Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng No.5/10 F.No.01/82/050/00627/AM09 Mee捀�ng Date: 05.05.2009 RA F.No.09/24/040/00044/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0910034059 dated 26.05.2008 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng decided to maintain status quo as there is no jus捀�fica捀�on for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs.
Case No.B‐36
M/S Suven Life Sciences Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/01662/AM09 RA F.No.09/24/040/00393/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0910037114 dated 18.02.2009 decided to amend the descrip捀�on of export product to read as “Tetrazole Aldehyde”. As regards enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs, it was decided to maintain status quo as there is no jus捀�fica捀�on for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs.
Case No.B‐37
M/S Suven Life Sciences Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00873/AM09 RA F.No.09/24/040/00189/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0910035022 dated 12.08.2008
decided to amend the descrip捀�on of export product to read as “Tetrazole Aldehyde”. As regards enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs, it was decided to maintain status quo as there is no jus捀�fica捀�on for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs.
Case No.B‐38
M/S Suven Life Sciences Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00683/AM09 RA F.No.09/24/040/00080/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0910034199 dated 06.06.2008 decided to amend the descrip捀�on of export product to read as “Tetrazole Aldehyde”. As regards enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs, it was decided to maintain status quo as there is no jus捀�fica捀�on for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs.
Case No.B‐39
M/S Suven Life Sciences Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00543/AM08 RA F.No.09/24/040/00450/AM08 Adv.Lic.No.0910032659 dated 15.01.2008
Case No.B‐40
M/S S.K. Age Exports F.No.01/94/180/00998/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0310324570 dated 04.04.2005 Adv.Lic.No.0310324569 dated 04.04.2005 Adv.Lic.No.0310335401 dated 22.06.2005 Adv.Lic.No.0310335402 dated 22.06.2005 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and decided to seek comments of DCGI. Accordingly, case was deferred for 23.06.2009.
Case No.B‐41
M/S Grand Organics Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/01568/AM07 RA F.No.17/24/040/00068/AM07 Adv.Lic.No.1710001513 dated 12.01.2007 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and decided to forward a copy of decision taken in 3/83 mee捀�ng held on 18.04.2007 to RA.
Case No.B‐42
M/S Concord Biotech Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/01035/AM09 RA F.No.08/24/040/00138/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0810074890 dated 22.09.2008 Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals.
Case No.B‐43
M/S Fine Organics Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00392/AM09 RA F.No.03/94/040/00136/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0310471547 dated 16.05.2008 Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC.
Case No.B‐44
M/S Fine Organics Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00587/AM09 RA F.No.03/94/040/00278/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0310474948 dated 16.06.2008 Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC.
Case No.B‐45
M/S Fine Organics Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00737/AM09 RA F.No.03/94/040/00375/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0310478323 dated 11.07.2008 Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC.
Case No.B‐46
M/S Cipla Ltd. F.No.01/82/162/00901/AM09 RA F.No.03/94/040/00797/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0310494625 dated 18.11.2008 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of wri掀�en comments forwarded by Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals vide their U.O. No.35011/241/2008‐PI‐III dated 17.03.2009 and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to ra捀�fy norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Export Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed Nevirapine 200mg tablet [Nevirapine 204 mg/tablet] 1 No. 1. 3‐(2‐Chloro‐3‐pyridine‐carbonyl)‐ amino‐2‐chloro‐4‐methyl pyridine/(NVP(II) compound) 1.428 kg/kg of Nevirapine
Cyclopropylamine 0.57 kg/kg of Nevirapine Nevirapine Oral solu捀�on 50 mg/5ml, 100ml bo掀�le [Nevirapine 1020 mg/100 ml bo掀�le] 1 No. 3. Diglyme 2.76 kg/kg of Nevirapine 4. Calcium Oxide 0.55 kg/kg of Nevirapine 5. Sodium Hydride 0.44 kg/kg of Nevirapine 6. Ethyl Acetate 1.70 kg/kg of Nevirapine RA concerned may take further necessary ac捀�on as per above decision of NC.
Case No.B‐47
M/S Torrent Pharmaceu捀�cals Ltd F.No.01/82/050/01503/AM09 RA F.No.08/24/040/00188/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0810076697 dated 15.12.2008 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng
Case No.B‐48
M/S Mohini Organics Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/01075/AM09 RA F.No.03/95/040/00235/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0310487970 dated 26.09.2008 Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 09.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC.
Case No.B‐49
M/S Siddi Vinataka Spechem Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/87/050/01441/AM06 RA F.No.07/24/040/00915/AM06 Adv.Lic.No.0710043512 dated 06.03.2006 Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals.
Case No.B‐50
M/S Morepen Laboratories Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00530/AM09 RA F.No.05/24/040/00956/AM08 Adv.Lic.No.0510218438 dated 25.03.2008
Case No.B‐51
M/S Morepen Laboratories Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00798/AM09 RA F.No.05/24/040/00270/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0510224498 dated 28.07.2008
Case No.B‐52
M/S Morepen Laboratories Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00797/AM09 RA F.No.05/24/040/00269/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0510224493 dated 28.07.2008
Case No.B‐53
M/S Alchymars ICM Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/83/050/00016/AM08 RA F.No.05/24/040/00501/AM07 Adv.Lic.No.0410088727 dated 02.04.2007
Case No.B‐54
M/S Srini Pharmaceu捀�cals Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00623/AM09 RA F.No.09/24/40/00069/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0910034081 dated 27.05.2008
Case No.B‐55
M/S Mahavir Dyechem F.No.01/82/050/01813/AM07 RA F.No.52/24/040/00006/AM07 Adv.Lic.No.5210021288 dated 15.03.2007 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of wri掀�en comments forwarded by Chemical Division of C&PC vide their O.M. No.14010/118/2004/Ch.III, signed copy handed over in the mee捀�ng and in consulta捀�on with
technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to ra捀�fy norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed 2‐(3‐Amino Phenyl Sulfonamide) Naphthalene 6,8 Disulfonic Acid 1 MT. 1. Beta Naphthol 0.875 kg
Case No.B‐56
M/S Resonance Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00987/AM09 RA F.No.07/24/040/00316/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0710059630 dated 08.09.2008 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of wri掀�en comments forwarded by Chemical Division of C&PC vide their U.O. No.14010/110/2008/Ch.II dated 04.05.2009 and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to revise norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed 2,4‐Bis‐{[4‐(2‐ethyl‐ hexyloxy)‐2‐hydroxy]‐ phenyl)‐6‐(4‐ methoxyphenyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine 1 Kg. 1. 2,4‐Bis‐(resorcin‐4‐yl)‐6‐)4‐ methoxyphenyl) 1,3,5‐triazine 80% 1.067 kg 2. 2‐Ethyl hexyl chloride (Iso‐Ortho Chloride 1.003 kg
Case No.B‐57
M/S Resonance Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00525/AM09 RA F.No.07/24/040/00081/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0710057574 dated 26.05.2008 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of wri掀�en comments forwarded by Chemical Division of C&PC vide their U.O. No.14010/110/2008/Ch.II dated 04.05.2009 and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to revise norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed 2,4‐Bis‐{[4‐(2‐ethyl‐ hexyloxy)‐2‐hydroxy]‐ phenyl)‐6‐(4‐ methoxyphenyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine 1 Kg. 1. 2,4‐Bis‐(resorcin‐4‐yl)‐6‐)4‐ methoxyphenyl) 1,3,5‐triazine 1.067 kg 2. 2‐Ethyl hexyl chloride (Iso‐Ortho Chloride 1.003 kg
Case No.B‐58
M/S Resonance Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/01578/AM09 RA F.No.07/24/040/00588/AM09 Adv.Lic.No.0710062565 dated 27.01.2009 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of wri掀�en comments forwarded by Chemical Division of C&PC vide their U.O. No.14010/110/2008/Ch.II dated 04.05.2009 and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to revise norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed 2,4‐Bis‐{[4‐(2‐ethyl‐ hexyloxy)‐2‐hydroxy]‐ phenyl)‐6‐(4‐ methoxyphenyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine 1 Kg. 1. 2,4‐Bis‐(resorcin‐4‐yl)‐6‐)4‐ methoxyphenyl) 1,3,5‐triazine 1.067 kg 2. 2‐Ethyl hexyl chloride (Iso‐Ortho Chloride 1.003 kg
Case No.B‐59
M/S Redox Pharmachem Pvt. Ltd. F.No.01/82/050/00440/AM08 RA F.No.05/24/040/00500/AM08 Adv.Lic.No.0510210770 dated 18.10.2007 Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC.
Case No.C‐3
M/S Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. F.No.01/82/162/00881/AM08 Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda for fixa捀�on of SION and decided to examine the case on file. 1
Case No.:2/27/82‐ALC4/2008
Party Name:AUCTUS PHARMA LIMITED Meet No/Date:5/82‐ALC4/2009 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/01019/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00216/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035277 16.09.2008 Decision :Withdrawn as the case has already been approved by NC in its 2/82 mee捀�ng held on 12.05.2009. 2
Case No.:6/46/82‐ALC4/2008
Party Name:PIONEER LABORATORIES PVT. LTD., Status:Case
05.05.2009 Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/01588/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00069/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110019460 23.01.2009 Defer Date:23.06..2009 Decision :Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and observed that the firm has been requested to furnish complete descrip捀�on of export product and import item No.1 and technical details as per Appendix 33 vide le掀�er dated 02.04.2009, but no reply has been received. It was, therefore, decided to await reply of firm and defer case for 23.06.2009. 3
Case No.:22/46/82‐ALC4/2008
Party Name:SARNA CHEMICALS PVT.LTD. 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/01604/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00854/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310504692 30.01.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision :Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC. 4
Case No.:1/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:VIVIMED LABS LIMITED 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00034/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00005/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910037716 22.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC. 5
Case No.:2/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:S.R.S.PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/00035/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00236/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310516665 22.04.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of earlier decision taken in 10/08 mee捀�ng held on 10.07.2007 vide case No.A‐300 and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to ra捀�fy norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed Cefuroxime 750 mg Injec捀�on USP Each vial containing Cefuroxime Sodium USP equivalent to Cefuraxime 750 mg 10 ml vial 1 No. 1. Cefuroxime Sodium Sterile 817.50 mg/vial 6
Case No.:3/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:LUPIN LIMITED 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved
HQ File :01/82/050/00036/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/01017/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310516807 22.04.2009 Decision :Commi掀�ee decided to close the case as Advance Authorisa捀�on has been issued under para 4.7.1 of HBP. 7
Case No.:4/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:ALEMBIC LIMITED 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00037/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00242/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410024018 22.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision :Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals. 8
Case No.:5/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:ONEIRO CHEMICALS LTD 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00038/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410024019 22.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals. 9
Case No.:6/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:GULBRANDSEN CHEMICALS PVT LTD 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00039/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410024025 22.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC. 10
Case No.:21/32/82‐ALC4/2008
Party Name:VARUN MEDIMPEX INC. Meet No/Date:53/82‐ALC4/2008 24.03.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/01196/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00347/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229889 23.10.2008 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of DIPP. 11
Case No.:8/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:HALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD. 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00041/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00013/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210125805 23.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of PC Division of Department of C&PC. 12
Case No.:9/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:GURUDEV DYESTUFF INDIA PVT.LTD. Status:Case
05.05.2009 Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00042/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00247/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0810079511 23.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC. 13
Case No.:10/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:HIKAL LIMITED 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00043/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/01024/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310517064 24.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC. 14
Case No.:11/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:HEMA DYE CHEM PVT. LTD. 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/00044/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00022/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517069 24.04.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of wri掀�en comments forwarded by Chemical Division of C&PC vide their U.O. No.14010/50/2007‐Ch.II, signed copy handed over in the mee捀�ng and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to ra捀�fy norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed 2‐Chloro‐1 4‐Dimethoxy Benzene (CLHQDME) 1 MT. 1. 1,4‐Dihydroxy Benzene 0.692 kg 15
Case No.:12/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:DORF‐KETAL CHEMICALS INDIA PVT.LTD. 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/00045/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/01114/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310517072 24.04.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to close the case as Advance Authorisa捀�on has been issued under para 4.7.1 of HBP. 16
Case No.:13/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:CIPLA LIMITED 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00046/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00024/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517091 24.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals.
17
Case No.:14/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:MALLADI DRUGS & PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00047/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00002/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410104217 24.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals. 18
Case No.:15/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:ALKYL AMINES CHEMICALS LTD 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00048/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00401/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310517118 24.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of C&PC. 19
Case No.:16/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:MERCK LIMITED 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/00049/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00034/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517138 24.04.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of earlier decision taken in 31/82 mee捀�ng held on 04.12.2007 vide case No.954/21/82‐ALC4/2007 and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to ra捀�fy norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed DL‐Alpha Tocopherol Acetate USP (Vitamin E Acetate USP) 1 Kg. 1. Isophytol 0.738 kg 2. 2,3,5‐Trimethyl Hydroquinone 0.385 kg 20
Case No.:17/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:METROPOLITAN OVERSEAS LIMITED, 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/00050/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00046/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517197 24.04.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to close the case as Advance Authorisa捀�on has been issued under para 4.7.1 of HBP. 21
Case No.:18/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00051/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00019/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510240287 24.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals.
22
Case No.:19/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00052/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00015/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510240292 24.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals. 23
Case No.:20/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD 05.05.2009 Status:Case Deferred HQ File :01/82/050/00053/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00014/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510240296 24.04.2009 Defer Date:23.06.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to defer case for 23.06.2009 for comments of Department of Pharmaceu捀�cals. 24
Case No.:21/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:RATNAGIRI CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/00054/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00039/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517260 24.04.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee decided to close the case as Advance Authorisa捀�on has been issued under para 4.7.1 of HBP. 25
Case No.:22/5/82‐ALC4/2009
Party Name:KARNATAKA ANTIBIOTICS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., 05.05.2009 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/82/050/00055/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00026/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710064352 27.04.2009 Decision : Commi掀�ee considered case as per agenda and in light of earlier decision taken in 10/08 mee捀�ng held on 10.07.2007 vide case No.A‐300 and in consulta捀�on with technical authority present in mee捀�ng, decided to ra捀�fy norms under para 4.7 of HBP as per details below or as applied by firm whichever is lower:‐ Export product Exp. Qty. Sl.No. Import items Qty. allowed Cefuroxime 750 mg Injec捀�on USP Each vial containing Cefuroxime Sodium USP equivalent to Cefuraxime 750 mg 10 ml vial 1 No. 1. Cefuroxime Sodium Sterile 817.50 mg/vial
Case No.B‐90
M/S DSM Infec捀�ves Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng No.8/10 F.No.01/82/050/00527/AM07 Mee捀�ng Date: 26.05.2009 RA F.No.22/24/040/00117/AM07 Adv.Lic.No.2210005749 dated 10.07.2006 This case was listed for discussion in Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng to be held on 26.5.2009 and firm was given an opportunity of personal hearing for explaining their case. Due to backlog, the agenda could not be taken up for discussion on due date. However, representa捀�ves of firm who had come for personal hearing were heard by the Commi掀�ee. S/Shri Ashok Dhingra, J. Sagar, Naresh Sharma and Ms Sonia Malik, on behalf of firm appeared before Commi掀�ee and stated that they are leading manufacturer of Drugs and Drug Intermediates and 75% of their produc捀�on is being exported. Shri Dhingra explained that the ad‐hoc norms fixed by Commi掀�ee in respect of export product 6‐Amino Penicillinic Acid (6‐APA) pertaining to subject advance licence are less than the actual requirement of the firm and they have furnished Produc捀�on and Consump捀�on data of the export product duly cer捀�fied by the jurisdic捀�onal Excise Authori捀�es for the last three years. Based on this data and compara捀�ve analysis of the norms asked for ad‐hoc norms fixed in this case are less and as such they have requested for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs. He further stated that they are manufacturing the export product through different route for which higher inputs are required. He further stated that they have already got enhanced quan捀�ty of inputs against various advance licences for this export product in the past. He was of the view that some inputs asked for by them are required for produc捀�on of this export product but the same have not been allowed by the Commi掀�ee. Commi掀�ee aŌer detailed delibera捀�ons decided that there is no scope for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs since the ad‐hoc norms fixed in this case are based on comparison of data of various firms. Commi掀�ee further decided that the representa捀�on, if any, of the firm for allowing inputs which have not been allowed by the Commi掀�ee may be considered on merits.
Case No.B‐91
M/S DSM Infec捀�ves Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng No.8/10 F.No.01/82/050/01422/AM06 Mee捀�ng Date: 26.05.2009 RA F.No.22/24/040/00060/AM06 Adv.Lic.No.2210005286 dated 28.02.2006 This case was listed for discussion in Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng to be held on 26.5.2009 and firm was given an opportunity of personal hearing for explaining their case. Due to backlog, the agenda could not be taken up for discussion on due date. However, representa捀�ves of firm who had come for personal hearing were heard by the Commi掀�ee. S/Shri Ashok Dhingra, J. Sagar, Naresh Sharma and Ms Sonia Malik, on behalf of firm appeared before Commi掀�ee and stated that they are leading manufacturer of Drugs and Drug Intermediates and 75% of their produc捀�on is being exported. Shri Dhingra explained that the ad‐hoc norms fixed by Commi掀�ee in respect of export product Amoxycillin���
Trihydrate Enzyma捀�c route pertaining to subject advance licence are less than the actual requirement of the firm and they have furnished Produc捀�on and Consump捀�on data of the export product duly cer捀�fied by the jurisdic捀�onal Excise Authori捀�es for the last three years. Based on this data and compara捀�ve analysis of the norms asked for ad‐hoc norms fixed in this case are less and as such they have requested for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs. He further stated that they are manufacturing the export product through different route for which higher inputs are required. He further stated that they have already got enhanced quan捀�ty of inputs against various advance licences for this export product in the past. He was of the view that some inputs asked for by them are required for produc捀�on of this export product but the same have not been allowed by the Commi掀�ee. Commi掀�ee aŌer detailed delibera捀�ons decided that there is no scope for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs since the ad‐hoc norms fixed in this case are based on comparison of data of various firms. Commi掀�ee further decided that the representa捀�on, if any, of the firm for allowing inputs which have not been allowed by the Commi掀�ee may be considered on merits.
Case No.B‐92
M/S DSM Infec捀�ves Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng No.8/10 F.No.01/82/050/00407/AM07 Mee捀�ng Date: 26.05.2009 RA F.No.22/24/040/00078/AM07 Adv.Lic.No.2210005658 dated 10.07.2006 This case was listed for discussion in Norms Commi掀�ee Mee捀�ng to be held on 26.5.2009 and firm was given an opportunity of personal hearing for explaining their case. Due to backlog, the agenda could not be taken up for discussion on due date. However, representa捀�ves of firm who had come for personal hearing were heard by the Commi掀�ee. S/Shri Ashok Dhingra, J. Sagar, Naresh Sharma and Ms Sonia Malik, on behalf of firm appeared before Commi掀�ee and stated that they are leading manufacturer of Drugs and Drug Intermediates and 75% of their produc捀�on is being exported. Shri Dhingra explained that the ad‐hoc norms fixed by Commi掀�ee in respect of export product Cloxacillin Sodium from Pen G route pertaining to this advance licence are less than the actual requirement of the firm and they have furnished Produc捀�on and Consump捀�on data of the export product duly cer捀�fied by the jurisdic捀�onal Excise Authori捀�es for the last three years. Based on this data and compara捀�ve analysis of the norms asked for ad‐hoc norms fixed in this case are less and as such they have requested for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs. He further stated that they are manufacturing the export product through different route for which higher inputs are required. He further stated that they have already got enhanced quan捀�ty of inputs against various advance licences for this export product in the past. He was of the view that some inputs asked for by them are required for produc捀�on of this export product but the same have not been allowed by the Commi掀�ee. Commi掀�ee aŌer detailed delibera捀�ons decided that there is no scope for enhancement in the quan捀�ty of inputs since the ad‐hoc norms fixed in this case are based on comparison of data of various firms. Commi掀�ee further decided that the representa捀�on, if any, of the firm for allowing inputs which have not been allowed by the Commi掀�ee may be considered on merits. *******************************************
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.