Final minutes of 23rd BoA Meeting - 20th March, 2008

Minutes of the 23rd meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 20th March, at 9.30 A.M., to consider proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones

The twenty third meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval was held on 20.03.2008 at 9.30 A.M. under the Chairmanship of Shri Gopal K. Pillai, Commerce Secretary, Department of Commerce at Conference Room No. 108, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi to consider the proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones and other miscellaneous requests in respect of notified/approved SEZs. A list of participants is enclosed.

Addressing the Board of Approval members, the Chairman informed that out of the 449 formal approvals granted for setting up of SEZs, 206 SEZs have been notified as on date. All the DCs were requested to send updated figures for investment/employment for their jurisdictions.

Development Commissioner, MEPZ SEZ, made a reference to the minutes of the meeting of Board of Approval held on 25-02-2008. He observed that decision taken in the meeting to allow a one-time permission instead of phased permissions, to construct residential training facility (employee care centre) in respect of M/s Infosys Technologies Ltd – Chennai, Pune, Mangalore, Mysore and Trivandrum, has been omitted in the minutes of the meeting of the last BoA held on 25.02.08. The request of M/s Infosys was as under:

SI. No. Location Expected employees when the zone is complete Estimated Built up area in the Processing Area when the zone is complete (sqft) Built up Area so far (sqft) Total requirement of Residential training facility ((sqft) 1. Chennai (Mcity) 25000 31.25 lakh 14.90 lakh 8.00 lakh 2. Pune 25000 31.25 lakh 14.51 lakh 8.00 lakh 3. Mangalore 25000 31.25 lakh 4.05 lakh 6.00 lakh 4. Mysore 15000 18.75 lakh

4.60 lakh 5. Trivandrum 10000 12.50 lakh

2.75 lakh

Accordingly, the Board decided to modify the minutes of BoA held on 25.02.08 to make good the omission. DC concerned would monitor that processing area in the zone is built up as per the estimates given above.

It was agreed that checklists would be devised for submission of documents by developers at the time of in-principle/formal approval and notification. These checklists would be placed on the departmental website for the convenience of all concerned.

1

Minutes of the 23rd meeting of the SEZ BoA held on 20th March 08 (A) Decision for Formal Approvals:

Request for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES sector at Ganjimutt, EPIP Industrial Area, Mangalore, Karnataka by Brigade Enterprises Private Limited – 10.117 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 5):

The Board noted that the Developer was in possession of the land. The State Government had also recommended the proposal. The representative of the State Government also confirmed that the land of the proposed SEZ is contiguous. Accordingly, the Board decided to grant formal approval for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES sector at Ganjimutt, EPIP Industrial Area, Mangalore, Karnataka by Brigade Enterprises Private Limited over an area of 10.117 hectares.

Request for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for Biotech sector at Pregnapur Village, Gajwel Mandal, Medak District, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh by Vivo Bio Tech Limited – 10.93 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 6):

The Board noted that the Developer was in possession of the land. The State Government had also recommended the proposal. The Board was informed that a report has been received from the Development Commissioner concerned which confirms that land is contiguous and the road passing through the SEZ is only an internal road. The representative of the State Government also confirmed that the land of the proposed SEZ is contiguous and that there is no thoroughfare. Accordingly, the Board decided to grant formal approval for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for Biotech sector at Pregnapur Village, Gajwel Mandal, Medak District, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh by Vivo Bio Tech Limited over an area of 10.93 hectares, subject to clearance from MHA.

Request for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for Electronics / IT & ITES sector at Revenue Village of Babra Bankipur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon, Haryana by Wellgrow Buildcon Private Limited – 24.29 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 7):

The Board noted that the Developer was in possession of the land. The State Government had also recommended the proposal. The representative of the State Government also confirmed that the land of the proposed SEZ is contiguous and is in the ownership of the Developer. He also stated that the land has to be partitioned in the revenue records, which will be carried out before the notification of the SEZ. Accordingly, the Board decided to grant formal approval for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for Electronics / IT & ITES sector at Revenue Village of Babra Bankipur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon, Haryana by Wellgrow Buildcon Private Limited over an area of 24.29 hectares subject to the condition that the notification will be issued only after the land is partitioned in the revenue records with clear title and possession.

2

Request for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES sector at Gurgaon, Haryana by Sunwise Properties Private Limited – 10.121 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 8):

The Board noted that the Developer was in possession of the land. The State Government had also recommended the proposal. The representative of the State Government also confirmed that the land of the proposed SEZ is contiguous. Accordingly, the Board decided to grant formal approval for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES sector at Gurgaon, Haryana by Sunwise Properties Private Limited over an area of 10.121 hectares.

Request for conversion of in-principle approval to formal approval for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES sector at Kusumagiri, Kakkanad, Ernakulam District, Kerala by Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Private Limited – 94.9194 hectares (Item No. 2 –Sl. No.1):

The representative of the State Government confirmed that land is in the legal possession of the Developer. However, it was observed that the land is divided into two parts. After detailed deliberations, it was decided to grant formal approval over the contiguous patch measuring 53.838 Hectares in block 9, Kakanad village as per the request of state government. For the balance land, the Board decided that the Developer may come up with new application. Accordingly, the Board decided to grant formal approval for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES sector at kakkanad village, Kanayanoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala by Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Private Limited over an area of 53.838 hectares.

(B) Decision for in-principle approvals:

Request for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for Engineering sector at MIDC, Phaltan, District Satara, Maharashtra by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC)– 103.29 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 1):

The Board noted that the Developer was not in possession of the land and that the State Government had recommended the proposal for grant of in principle approval. After deliberations, the Board decided to grant in-principle approval for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for Engineering sector at MIDC, Phaltan, District Satara, Maharashtra by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) over an area of 103.29 hectares.

(C) Decision for Deferment:

Request for setting up of a multi product Special Economic Zone at Kurakalapatnam Village, Anatapur, District, Andhra Pradesh by Limitless Properties Limited – 1000 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 2):

3

The Board noted that a Dubai-based Company has complained that the Developer has infringed upon their name and is using their logo also. After deliberations, it was decided that clarification may be sought from the applicant. Accordingly, the Board decided to defer the proposal.

Request for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES/BPO sector at Hire Amanikere and Akkupet Villages, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka by Gokaldas Images Infrastructure Private Limited – 10.36 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 3):

The Representative of the State Government recommended the proposal and also informed that the proposal has also been approved by the High Level Committee of the State.
However, the Representative of the Department of Revenue expressed the view that legal possession should first be established by way of lease/ sale deed. Accordingly, the Board decided to defer the proposal.

Request for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES sector at Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjawadi, Ph-II, Pune, Maharashtra by DLF Akruti Info Parks (Pune) Ltd. – 11.83 hectares (Item No. 1 –Sl. No. 4):

The Representative of the State Government sought deferment of the proposal.
Accordingly, the Board decided to defer the proposal.

Item No. 3: Request for Formal approval for setting up of Free Trade Warehousing Zone SEZ at Haldia, West Bengal by Haldia Free Trade Warehousing Private Limited

The Board noted that the formal approval had already been granted for setting up of Free Trade Warehousing Zone SEZ by Haldia Free Trade Warehousing Private Limited at Haldia, West Bengal over an area of 45.72 Ha. The state government representative confirmed that the Developer has further taken possession of land to the extent of 35.22 Ha.
Accordingly, the Board granted formal approval for setting up of Free Trade Warehousing Zone SEZ at Haldia, West Bengal by Haldia Free Trade Warehousing Private Limited over a total area of 80.94 Ha.

4

Item No. 4: Requests for authorized operations

(i) Request of M/s. DLF Limited for authorized operations, as co-developer, in the multi product SEZ at Mihan, Nagpur, Maharashtra proposed to be developed by Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited

The Developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities. After deliberation, the Board decided to approve the authorized activities, as listed below:

S. No. Authorized operations in the processing area

1 Food Services including Cafeteria, Food Courts(s), Restaurants, coffee shops, canteens and catering facilities
2 Effluent treatment plant and pipelines and other infrastructure in Effluent Treatment 3 Employee welfare facilities like Creche, Clinic, Medical Centre and other such facilities in the processing area 4 Office Built up space 5 Drip and Micro Irrigation Systems
6 Wi Fi and/or Wi Max Services 7 Swimming Pool 8 Common Data Centre with interconnectivity 9 Bus Bay 10 Parking including Multi-level car parking (automated or manual) – 70,000 Sq m 11 Power including Power backup facilities 108 MW (for captive use only)

(ii) Request of M/s. DLF Limited for authorized operations in the IT/ITES SEZ in District Khurda, Orissa

The Developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities. After deliberation, the Board approved the authorized activities, as listed below:

S.No. Authorized operations in the processing area

1 Food Services including Cafeteria, Food Court(s), Restaurants, coffee shops, canteens and catering facilities

5

2 Effluent treatment plant and pipelines and other infrastructure for Effluent Treatment
3 Parking including Multi-level car parking (automated or manual) – 40000 Sq.m 4 Employee welfare facilities like Creche, Clinic, Medical Centre and other such facilities
5 Drip and Micro Irrigation Systems 6 Wi Fi and/or Wi Max Services 7 Swimming Pool 8 Common Data Centre with interconnectivity 9 Bus Bay 10 Power Generation including Power backup facilities – 24 MW (for captive use only.)

(iii) Request of M/s. SNP Infrastructure Private Limited for authorized operations in the IT/ITES SEZ at Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu

The Board noted that the request was submitted without specifying the quantum.
Accordingly, the Board decided to defer the consideration of the request.

(iv) Request of M/s. Suzlon Infrastructure Limited for authorized operations in the Hitech Engineering SEZ in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu

The Developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities. After deliberation, the Board approved, as listed below:

Following modifications were approved in the activities earlier sanctioned in the BoA held on 02nd January, 2008.

Sr. No. Activity/Items Quantum approved in the BoA on 02nd Jan, 08 Total quantum approved including the earlier approval 1 Security Block & Customs Office 415 Sq.Mtr 545 Sq.Mtr 2 Fire Station & Health Center 334 Sq.Mtr 505 Sq.Mtr

6

Following additional activities were also approved.

FOR NON-PROCESSING AREA Sr. No.
Activity/Items Area in sq.meters/quantity
1 Construction, operation & maintenance of Kitchen/Canteen
1820 Sq. Meter 2 Construction operation & maintenance of Recreation area 7500 Sq. Meter 3 Construction operation & maintenance of Watch Towers 4 Nos

(v) Request of M/s. Suzlon Infrastructure Limited for authorized operations in the Hitech Engineering SEZ in Vadodra, Gujarat

The Developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities. After deliberation, the Board approved, as listed below: Following modifications were approved in the activities earlier sanctioned in the BoA held on 02nd January, 2008.

Sl. No. Activities/Items Quantum approved in the BoA on 02nd Jan, 08 Total Quantum approved including the earlier approval 1 Fire Station & Health Centre 189 Sqm
255 Square meters

Following additional activities were also approved.

FOR NON-PROCESSING AREA

Sr. No.
Activity/Items Area in sq.meters/quantity
1 Construction, operation & maintenance of Kitchen/Canteen
1720 Sq. Meter 2 Construction operation & maintenance of Recreation area 7500 Sq. Meter 3 Construction operation & maintenance of Watch Towers 6 Nos

7

(vi) Request of M/s. Suzlon Infrastructure Limited for authorized operations in the Hitech Engineering SEZ in Udupi, Karnataka

Following modifications were approved in the activities earlier sanctioned in the BoA held on 02nd January 2008.

Sr. No. Activity/Items Quantum approved in the BoA held on 02nd Jan, 08 Total quantum approved including the earlier approval 1 Security Block & Custom office 376 Sq. Mt 730 Sq. M

Following additional activities were also approved.

FOR NON-PROCESSING AREA Sr. No.
Activity/Items Area in sq.meters/quantity
1 Construction, operation & maintenance of Kitchen/Canteen
1720 Sq. Meter 2 Construction operation & maintenance of Recreation area 7500 Sq. Meter 3 Construction operation & maintenance of Watch Towers 12 Nos

(vii) Request of M/s. RGA Software Systems Private Limited for authorized operations, as co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ in Bangalore, Karnataka proposed to be developed by M/s. Primal Projects Private Limited

The Co-Developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities. After deliberation, the Board decided to grant approval to the authorized activities in the processing area, as listed below:

1. Parking including multilevel car parking (automated or manual) - 2355 Sq.m
2. Effluent Treatment plants
3. Restaurant, food courts, Recreation facilities, Gymnasium, Medical Centre etc.

As regards the request for Paved Drive Ways and open spaces and Construction of High Quality facilities etc., the Board noted that these items may be taken up at the level of the Unit Approval Committee.

8

(viii) Request of M/s. Somani Worsted Limited for authorized operations in electronic and software SEZ at Bhiwadi, Rajasthan

The Developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities requested for by them. After deliberation, the Board decided to approve Retail cum commercial/retail/recreation space in the non-processing area not exceeding a total built-up area of 5000 Sq.m including the earlier 1000 sq. m. approved in 21st Jan, 08 BoA..

(ix) Request of M/s. Genpact Infrastructure (Bhubaneswar) Private Limited for authorized operations, as co-developer, in the IT/ITES SEZ in Bhubaneswar, Khurda, Orissa, proposed to be developed by IDCO

The Co-developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities. After deliberation, the Board decided to grant approval to the authorized activities in the processing area, as listed below,

Social Infrastructure Required

Approved Quantum Training cum Residential Apartments 1,500 sq mts

Back-up Diesel Generators
Total Power backup – 5,500 KVA (3 Nos of 1500 KVA and 2 Nos of 1000 KVA Diesel Generators) for captive use

(x) Request of M/s. Ascendas IT Park (Pune) Private Limited, as co-developer, for authorized operations in the IT/ITES SEZ at Pune, Maharashtra proposed to be developed by MIDC

The Co- Developer made a detailed presentation on the requirement of authorized activities. After deliberations, the Board decided to grant approval to the authorized activities, as listed below,

Authorized operations in processing area

Sl. No. Activities 1.
Security Offices 2.
Parking including Multi-level car parking (automated or manual) 3.
Common Data Centre with inter-connectivity
4.
Power for captive use only (including power back up facilities upto 22MVA)

9

Bus bay 6.
WIFI and /or WI-MAX Services 7.
Gymnasium/fitness center 12,500 Sqft. 8.
Employees Welfare facilities: a. Banks 10,000 Sqft. b. Medical centre /clinic/pharmacy 1500 Sqft. 9.
Convention/business centre, conference, meeting room 20,000 Sq ft. 10.
Food Services:
a. Food court /cafeteria/canteen 95,000 Sqft. b. Coffee Shops 15,000 Sqft. 11.
Sundry store/small shopping arcade 56,000 Sqft. 12.
Fine dining restaurant 10,000 Sqft. 13.
Travel desk 1,000 Sqft. 14.
Foreign exchange dealer 1,000 Sqft. 15.
High tension and low tension rooms, transformers, air conditioning and mechanical ventilation 1,02,000 Sqft.

Item No. 5: Requests for co-developer

(i) Request of M/s. Greystone Premises Pvt. Ltd. for co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ proposed to be developed by M/s. City Gold Realty Private Limited
The Representative of DoR observed that as per the Co-Developer agreement, entire responsibility is being shifted from Developer to Co-Developer. After deliberations, it was decided that both Developer and Co-developer be called for personal hearing. Accordingly, the proposal was deferred. (ii) Request of M/s. Aditi Technologies Private Limited for co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ at Bangalore, Karnataka proposed to be developed by M/s. Manyata Promoters Private Limited
The Representative of DoR observed that the Co-Developer is taking on lease an area that is already substantially developed. After deliberations, it was decided that both Developer and Co-developer be called for personal hearing. Accordingly, the proposal was deferred. (iii) Request of M/s Ariston Properties Pvt. Ltd. for co-developer in the Service Sector SEZ proposed to be developed by M/s. Lahari Infrastructure Limited in Ranga Reddy District of Andhra Pradesh

The Board noted that the proposal was earlier deferred pending decision on finalization of period/terms for lease of land. The Representative of the DoR requested that the record of discussions of the meeting held to discuss lease terms may be circulated first.

10

The Board further noted that the Agreement between the Developer and the Co- Developer has been revised to change the period of lease from 999 years to ‘perpetual’ lease period of 30 years. The use of term ‘perpetual’ is not clear in a lease agreement of 30 years.
After deliberations, the Board decided to defer the proposal with the directions that both Developer and Co-developer may be called for personal hearing.

(iv) Request of M/s Tata Consultancy Services Limited for co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ at Kusumagiri, Village Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Kerala proposed to be developed by Infopark The Board noted that the proposal was earlier deferred pending decision on finalization of period/terms for lease of land. After deliberations, the Board decided to defer the proposal with the directions that both the parties may be called for personal hearing.
(v) Request of M/s. India Gateway Terminal Private Limited (IGTPL) for co- developer in the port based SEZ at Vallarpadam, Cochin proposed to be developed by Cochin Port Trust The Developer and the Co-Developer made a brief presentation on the proposal. The Chairman referred to an earlier decision of the Cabinet, where it was decided that the project site will be declared as a Special Economic Zone. It was decided that relevant Cabinet note alongwith the decision of the Cabinet will be sent to the Department of Revenue for their comments on the instant proposal and after clearance by DoR, approval for M/S IGTPL as Co-Developer may be accorded.
(vi) Request of M/s. Sunny View Estates Private Limited for co-developer in the IT SEZ at Mohali, Punjab by M/s. Quarkcity India Private Limited The representative of the DoR stated that the area notified for the SEZ included a portion of land admeasuring 1.13 acres, which was already with M/s Sunny View, under a collaboration agreement. The Department of Revenue wanted it to be clarified whether the Developer was in legal possession of this piece of land at the time of notification. Keeping in view these observations, the Chairman directed the Development Commissioner concerned to report the exact status. Accordingly, the Board decided to defer the proposal with the directions that both the parties may be called for personal hearing.

Item No. 6: Requests for extension of validity period of in-principle approval

(i) Request of M/s Hi Skill Investment Consultancy Private Limited for extension of validity period of IT/ITES SEZ at Bangalore, Karnataka

The Board noted that the developer applied for extension after the expiry of the validity period. Accordingly, the Board decided not to approve the request for extension of validity period.

(ii) Request of M/s Skil Infrastructure Limited for extension of validity period of airport based multi-product in Gagret, Una, Himachal Pradesh

The Board noted that the developer applied for extension after the expiry of the validity period. Accordingly, the Board decided not to approve the request for extension of validity period.

11

Item No. 7: Appeal of M/s Crystal Polymers Impex, a unit in Kandla Special Economic Zone, against the order of cancellation of letter of approval.

The unit holder made a detailed presentation on the proposal. The Board noted that the company has not been operating for more than three years. The unit holder also could not give any export commitment. After detailed deliberations, the Board decided to reject the appeal. Detailed speaking order would be issued separately.

Item No. 8: Request for transfer of formal approval in the name of an SPV company for sector specific SEZ for engineering goods at Sonepat, Haryana.

The representative of DoR observed that the Developer proposes to transfer the approval to the SPV where the original company has only 50% of the shareholding.
Moreover, the Developer has not provided the net worth of the other constituent of the SPV.
After detailed deliberations, the Board decided to call the Developer in the next BoA for seeking further clarification on the issue.

Item No. 9: Proposal of Noida SEZ for renewal of letter of approval of plastic unit for 5 years.

The Development Commissioner, Noida SEZ, informed that that the unit is not
exporting physically and is focused on DTA sale. DC, Noida further apprised the Board that the unit is not complying with the relevant instructions of DGFT by not using virgin scrap.
After detailed deliberations, the Board decided to defer the proposal with the directions that the party may be called for personal hearing.

Item No. 10: Amendment to the minutes of the meeting of Board of Approval held on 8th August, 2006 – IT/ITES SEZ at Juinagar, District Thane, Maharashtra by M/s. New Found Properties and Leasing Private Limited

The Board approved ‘Juinagar’ as corrected location and agreed to amend accordingly the minutes of the meeting of Board of Approval held on 8th August, 2006

Decision on the Proposals deferred in earlier meetings of the BoA

Item No. 1: Requests for co-developer

(i) Request of M/s. Vignesh Hitech City-2 Society, M/s. Avinash Hitech City-2 Society and M/s. Ganga Hitech City-2 Society for co-developers in the IT/ITES SEZ at Ranga Reddy District, Andhra Pradesh proposed to be developed by L&T Phoenix Infoparks Private Limited It was noted that the request was earlier considered and rejected in the meeting of BoA held on 25-02-2008. After deliberations, the Board again rejected the proposal.

12

(ii) Request of M/s. WDC Technologies Private Limited for co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ proposed to be developed by M/s. M.L. Dalmiya and Company Limited
(iii) Request of M/s. Forum IT Parks Private Limited for co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ at South 24 Parganas, West Bengal proposed to be developed by M/s. M.L. Dalmiya and Company Limited

(ii) & (iii) The representative of the Department of Revenue observed that more clarification is required on the terms of the Co-Development agreement. Accordingly, the Board decided to call the Developer and Co-developers concerned for personal hearing in the next BoA and deferred the proposal.

(iv) Request of M/s. Asteck Infracon Private Limited for co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ at Bantala, Gangapur, West Bengal proposed to be developed by M/s. M.L. Dalmiya and Company Limited
The representative of the Department of Revenue observed that the net worth of the Co-Developer is negative. Accordingly, the Board decided to call both Developer and Co- developer in the next BoA for seeking clarification on the points raised and deferred the proposal.

(v) Request of M/s Mahindra Residential Developers Limited for co-developer in the IT SEZ at Chennai, Tamil Nadu proposed to be developed by Mahindra World City Developers Ltd.

The Board observed that in the revised proposal now submitted by the Co-Developer, Mahindra Integrated Township Limited proposes to relinquish its developmental rights in respect of 55 acres of land and Mahindra World City Developers Limited will enter into a Co-developer agreement with Mahindra Residential Development Limited. After deliberations and hearing the Developer, the Board decided to approve the proposal subject to the Developer filing revised agreements between the Developer and the Co-developers concerned in view of change in land area being developed by them.

Item No. 2: Proposal of M/s. Vedanta Alumina Limited for change in location and reduction in area of the sector specific SEZ for manufacture and export of aluminium in Jharsuguda, Orissa

Earlier, formal approval was granted for setting up sector specific SEZ for manufacture and export of Aluminium at ‘Bhurkamunda & Bhagipalli, Tehsil & District Jharsuguda, Orissa over an area of 242.18 Hectares. Now, in place of earlier proposed area, the developer has requested for change of location to an adjoining area at Bhurkamunda, Brundamal and Kurebaga, Tehsil & District Jharsuguda, Orissa over an area of 185.62 Hectares. The representative of the State Government recommended the proposal.
Accordingly, the Board decided to approve the request for change in location and reduction in area.

13

Item No. 3: Request of Hyderabad Urban Development Authority for reducing the area of IT/ITES SEZ at Kokapet, Andhra Pradesh.

The Board noted that the Developer has requested for reduction in area as one of the proposed units has opted out of SEZ. After deliberations, the Board decided not to approve the request as the boundaries of notified SEZ cannot be made to change every time a unit moves in or out of SEZ.

Item No. 4: Request of Adani Power Limited for increase in power generation capacity in the SEZ for supply of power at Mundra, Kutch, Gujarat.

After deliberations, the Board decided to defer the proposal and suggested that in the first phase, the Developer may set up the power generation plant with the previously approved capacity of 2640 MW and may come back later, if required.

Other items

(i) Request of M/s. Tidel Park Coimbatore Limited for Co-developer in the IT/ITES SEZ at Vilankurichi, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu proposed to be developed by Electronic Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (ELCOT).

After detailed deliberations, the Board decided to defer the request.

Supplementary Agenda was deferred for the next meeting because of paucity of time.

14