IN FORCE Agenda SEZ / EOU / FTWZ 2017-11-17

Agenda for 80th Meeting of the BOA for SEZ to be held on 17th November, 2017

Document text

|7 Oo Agenda for the 80" meeting of the Board of Approval to be held on . a co 17! November, 2017 in the Room No. 47, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi — ' oS

. , Item No. 80.1: Requests for extension of validityof formal approvals (5 proposals) Be er . , BoA in its meeting held on 14" September, 2012, examining sitnilat’ cases observed SO . as under; - ; ; i -_ mo

| “The Board advised the Development Commissioners to recommend ‘the requests — . for extension offormal approval beyond sit year and onwards only after.satisfying . . that the developer has taken sufficient steps towards operationalisation of the , Oo ... »* project andfurther extension is based on justifiable reasons. Board also observed... | r me __ that extensions may not be granted as a matter ofroutine unless some progress has .been made. on ground by the developers.. The Board, therefore, after .

, ’ deliberations, extended the validity of the formal approval to the requests for — ; ‘ _ extensions beyond fifth years fora period of one year and those beyond sixth . , _ yearfor a period of 6 months from the date ofexpiry of last extension”. . , (i) Request of Mis. Nagaland Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. SEZ for . further extension of the validity of the Formal Approval for setting up a sector specific oo , SEZ for Agro and Food Processing at Ganeshnagar, Dimapur, Nagaland béyond 11.10.2016 over an area of 50 hectares. Name of the Developer — : M/s. Nagaland Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. - | : Location _ .°._ ; Ganeshnagar, Dimapur, Nagaland . | Oo ; 7 Extension | : Formal Approval was granted on 12.10.2007. Thé SEZ stands | . Be on notified on 09.07.2009. The Developer has been granted 4 a_ . validity(Four) extensions, period of whichlast extensionwas upto was11.10.2016.granted Theon 28.04.2016Developer, oe ae has requested for further extension of three years. a _ , |. Present Progress: 7 | | Jo — . - : SI.No.(a)|DetailsTypeofCostof BusinessPlan : | ae . Investmentce (Rs.in | |. . . fo . . . : lakhs) | Land & Site Development - . 403.64 _ a 2 -| Internal main road and Internal approach road, Culverts, Cross . Ce ; Drain, Internal & External Drainage ee S|

_. |. 3 .| Administrative Building including water supply, sanitary . ot . . _ 4 | -|}Guestinstallation,installation,HouseInternalInternal“Buildingelectrificationelectrificationincluding && serviceservite.connection..water connection,supply, sanitary. [57.06| 114.94. 7 jou!. 7 .. | 3 ; | Type ‘A’ Residential Building including water supply, sanitary Po ts (installation, Internal electrification & service connection. | 119.17 mf 6 | Type ‘B’ Residential Building including water supply, sanitary |’ . . - . a ___| installation, Internal electrification & service connection, - 108.28 | - ~

==> picture [593 x 603] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||
|_|7|_||| Typeinstallation,‘C’|ResidentialInternal electrificationBuilding including&|service waterconnection. supply,|sanitary}©|||©|||103.13.a|nie|7|-|
|_8|||Standard Design|Factory|:|.|||
|| a|Industrial|Shed.|including|water|supply,|Interna! electrification|7|rn|Lol|
|a|.|__.10||_||| Boundary&service wall/connection...Security|fencing—|with; Gate and guard room123.33|fo.CO-|
|||il|||Water|Supply|system|including|Internal.|electrification|&|||=|rn|
|=|ae||service connection|||aaa|8|4458|||oan|
|-.|12||Power|supply arrangement|.|oe|a|
|13|||Furniture &|Fixtures|and|other Equipments|SF|,|-|29.50|;|.|
|-.|
|-||-|14]|Landscaping|and|green plantation|andmonolith|ete.|.|a|-|
|ae}|18|-} Céastruction of secutity fencing|=|||40|.|:|
|:|~.|||16||-Augmentation of security|fencing|||a|.|.|
|Site/Plot Development|and formation cutting|etc.|
|||npg|oestrone|mat|ua|Som wide|||7 Se|
|.|221 [mand| Construction|of RCC|H/P|Cross drain 600mm|dia|(for internal|ae.|||
|||.|approach|road)|_|2.69|fo.|
|;|
||_||.|48.00WaterAdditionalTreatment Street Plant lighting &|Internal|water|Distribution|—|z|:|||
|-|--||_ 4||SODSewarge/external drainage|
|a|400.00|
||__||Total Proposed Investment|-|oo|1423.00|Co|7|:|
|__(b)|Incremental|Investment made so farand|incremental investment|since|last|extension|:|a|
|||SLNo.|| Type of Cost|-|| Total|investment made|so|Incremental|Investment|||-|
|Be|:|far|(In lakhs|.|since|last extension (inRs.||.|
|a|oo,|Crores)|Po|
|ne|eo|Water Treatment Plant|a|Oo|a|
|os|& Internal water|a|:|.|||nn|
|,|Distribution|(initial|=|||a|an|es|
|ae|phase works)|a|S107|||-|oe|

----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [596 x 702] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|a|'»|(¢)|Details of|physical progress|till date:.|OS,|oe|Tg|
|S.No..|| Activity|:|%|||%||"|Deadline|for:|
|;|
|:|
|SOO-|:|“completion|| completion.|completion of|:|
|Se|oo|'.|||during|last|||+|balance work”|
|:|fn|a|||.|A|oneyear ||ioe|fe|
|7|2|||Internal’|main|road|and|Internal]|-100%|—|oe,|
|;|-||||Drain,approach|Internalroad,|Culverts,&|External)Crossh|.|©|po|
|:—|-.|.|||3|_||||Drainage|*|..|a|.|;|
|ne|Administrative’ Building|including||."|100%|=|oe|:|
|—/.|water|supply,|sanitary|installation,|||
|.||...|| Internal|electrification &|service}|_|.|
|.|connection,|
|||4|||| Guest|House|Building|including}|100%|.|pe|
|water|supply,|sanitary|installation,|
|:|=|Internal.connection.electrificationa&|-service|a|.|.|-|
|5|| Type|‘A’|Residential|Building|100%|a|.|a.|a|
|_|| including|water|supply,|sanitary|on|.|7|pS|
|°|
|J|
|-||installation,|Internal|electrification|.|.|l|
|.|||on|||&|service|connection.|ae|.|oe|‘|
|yn®|Type.|‘B’.|Residential|Building|100%|||-|-|
|oo|||dneluding|water.|supply,|sanitary)|ee|
|oe|installation,|Internal|electrification|.|en|
|-|||&|service|connection...|:|,|
|7|| Type|‘C’|Residential|Building].|100%|.|
|Os|||including|water|supply,|sanitary|||po|
|a|_.|‘||installation,|Internal|electrification|||=|=|
|||||&|service connection.|od.|:|
|an|Industrial.|Shed|including|water|||100%|~|‘|oo|||
|.|supply,|Internal|electrification|&|a|
|10|service connection.|oo|Co|ee|.|oo.|
|||withBoundary|wall/|Security|fencing||100%|-|.|oe|mo|||
|Gateand|guardrooms|fs|—|oe|
|’|lL||.Water|Supply|system|including|100%.||.|po|Fa,|
|Internal|electrification|&|service|°|.|a|re|
|.|.|connection|_|7|:|af|||
|12|| Power supply arrangement|.|_|.|So|
|oa.|.|13.|| FurnitureEquipments&|Fixtures|and|:|other)me|100%eae/|fe:|.|:|Oo|a|
|14|||Landscaping|and|green|plantation|ee|Co|7|||
|~|||.||and|monolith|ete.|-|ee|oe|ee|ee|
|Do|15|__| Construction of security fencing|||-.|100%|||__|ee|oe|
||)|16.||Augmentation|of security fencing.||,|100%|||ee|mS|oe,|
|||17|||Site/Plot|.|Development|and|||“100%|||st:|.|
||__||formation|cutting|ete,|.|“||.|eee|
|-|---L18|||Construction|of|internal main road|||100%- ||eee|

----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [594 x 683] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 19 | Construction of internal mainroad} .100% — |. . pee i | > | 4.5m wide - _ oe 20 | Construction of RCC Bridge 5m] 100% [o> 0 a ty | . | 21 | Construction of RCC H/P Cross] 100% . en ban  Doe | drain 600mm dia (for internal main of re |road) _ : =e fp . 22. | Construction of RCC H/P Cross], 100% | ) SO aoe : | drain 600mm ° dia. (for internal). . , , . tl of.|“23. :) approachConstructionroad) uf External Drainage | - 100% =pooees . _ , . a 7 . |, 24 | Construction of RRM Retaingwall — - oe | for [ internal] main road ; . . 2626 [additionwater Distributionsrestighing . |ae peinee||ee a ; 27 | Common Effluent Treatment Plant | pipeline _ pe, / ar [commo|.Additio n al Streetlightvn ra ment Pint i ng | _ p i p els in ee | So rn 28 | Sewarge/external drainage pipeline “ a | sonmlremal snings | pene ||| ~ | 29 + | Cold Storage ; pipeline - oo . 2. Detailed reasons for delay: a . mo, The project has not been completed as per the schedule date for various reasons. NO, ; . a (a)_- Inwherethe infrastructureinitial stages development of the project’could notthere was be implementedconstraint of asfund planned.flow to | the project. (b) There was delay-and slow down in execution of the project due to adverse business climate due to global recession as a result there was-lack of demand for space in the " (c) The State & Central Government with its proactive initiatives like ‘Make in India’ ~~ and the ‘Act East Policy’, NIDC the developer is confident that the SEZ would be  . . ideal springboard fot promotion of export activities in the State and the NE region as. a : oe _ (d)a Withwhole.a view to position the SEZ. attractive to potentialFOinvestors,. the developer te. requested that their case may be taken up with the Board of Approval to consider and - | accord certain relaxations as a special package for the NorthEast: = = . — By extending a further period of 3 year condoning the lapsed'period between, . _.- October 2016 to October 2017, ae - eb > 5. ii) Te allow conversion from Sector Specific SEZ to Multi-sector SEZ despite : | not fulfilling the area of minimum land mandated, a a ~-.. (a)With: the business environment and the State Government recently taking the services of - the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT) to formulate the State export strategy, the State | ----- End of picture text -----

Government along with NIDC proposes to create indebt awarenéss of the vast export’ . ‘potentialities of the State and the NE region. * Ce . (b)Organizing and holding extensive seminars; workshops and trainings for creation of , ee . awareness among local entrepreneurs for venturing into export activities and setting up SEZ . me (c)Aggressively promoting and marketing the SEZ at National and International | = ___Events/Business Summits to attract investors from outside the region.» = a oe ; : - (e)Encouragingaccorded(d)Making by provision the andSEZengagingforSchemeState Central/Staten incentives and. Government concessionsoe public'sectorsover and aboveoe, for the: leading benefits. the way co 7 in settingup SEZ units, oe a i oO : : ot Recommendation by DC: . _ oS . - 1. This case was earlier discussed in the 74 BOA Meeting held on 06.01.2017 and it. _ was decided 'that the Developer is hereby directed to Show Cause Notice as to why . Se ; . further extension should be given and why the SEZ has not yet become operational . despite several extensions. . . oe ) has' Accordingly, replied givinga Show the aforesaidCause Notice reasonswasforissued delay.on 10.02.2017 whichoethe applicant — Do; . - 2. The site was visited by DC on 28.08.2017 and it was observed that sufficient . _. physical progress has been made as detailed above and the Developer.as well asthe . sector: _ State Governmentare trying their best to bringinvestorsin their SEZ. It istheonly] specific SEZ of Agro and Food Processing promoted by Govt. of Nagaland, ; This will be the first ever SEZ which may come in the entire North-Eastern Region a a - and therefore, a lenient view may be taken... oe . a . . 3. Request of the Developer for allowing conversion from Sector Specific SEZ to «Multi product SEZ may not be acceded to as the notified area i.e. 50 hectares is _ not fulfilling the criteria of minimum. land area of. 100 Hectares in case of Multi: a product SEZ located in North Eastern Region. Be . . -- 4, Tt is recommended only to extend the validity ofLOA of developer by one year _ - from the date of approval of such extension by BOA. .— oo ‘ The request is placed before BoA for its consideration: eo oe a (ii) Request of Mis. G.P. Realtors Pvt. Ltd. for further extension of the validity of | _. formal approval, granted for setting up of Electronic Hardware & IT/ITES SEZ at ee oe, Village Behrampur, Gurgaon (Haryana) beyond 13.11.2017, | . , "Name of the developer - Mis. GP. Realtors Pvt. Ltd. oo - Se ne ; - Séctor , . : Electronic Hardware & IT/ITES. oe - | oo ae Location a Village Behrampur, Distt- Gurgaon (Haryana) - . - a Extension eS Bormal approval to the developer was granted on + SOLER SS o ©+ - 14.11.2006. The. developer. has. been granted.-08 —- -- -

os extensions, last extension was granted by BoA held on ; : . a . a 09.08.2016 upto 13.11.2017.The developer has requested a oe , notifiedfor furtheras onextension date. upto| 13.11.2019.aThe SEZ o stands:. ‘ . Present Progress: ; a re - - a (a) Details ofbusinessplansee a_i Para - . . Proposed Investment - , Type of Cost . a (Rs. in Lakhs) | ; 1 Land Cost | _ 16,725.00 So o> | 2.s | Construction Cost a 243,275,000 pon - 3 | Plant& Machiner. So . . - = . . - _ (b) Investment made so far & incremental investment since last extension:7 . a Total Investment | Incremental investment - . _ (Rs. in Lakhs) | (Rs. in Lakhs) | i [Vand16,725.00Cost 4 [otter Overheads , (c) Details of Physical progress till date:7 Jo ee a a | Sf Authorised activity | % completion | % completion | - Deadline for - . oe fo oo os - a one year balance work oo 1. | Block-1ofPhase-I Building - | 90% Sn 2.| Block-2 of Phase-1 Building | 52% _ [45%| April, 2018 | — . ee _ a Reasons for seeking extension: _ an : . The developer has stated that they are strivmg to construct and. operationalize a 14.5 0 7 ~~ lakh Sqft. Phase-1 building in the SEZ-1 within next 9 months. The construction.of Phase-l oe mS building will see an investment of over Rs.300 crores with future investment plans of =. 7 Rs.2600 crores to develop the entire SEZ-1 of G.P. Realtors and have secured all‘necessary — _ . approvals and steps to complete the: construction of the first 14.5 lakh sqft building. The . ns ~. developer has stated that the companyis targeting to complete the Block . 7 1 by end of 2017.00 reoo | (Photographs of buildings furnished.) ©. = oe . a As per Rule 5(7) of SEZ Rules, 2006, “The Developer or ;Co-developer. shall have to oe 7 Ofce 5 construct ten-yearsthe(upto minimum03,05,2019) builtup from areathe(100000date of Sqm.notificationin case of theITHITESSpecialSEZ) Economic within aZone periodin Sy which at least fifty percent of such area to be constructed withina period of five years from , the date ofsuch:notification.” In the instant case approx. 8 years have elapsed from the date |

. .

==> picture [596 x 676] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- . of notification. The developer has stated that they are striving to construct and operationalize ee - a 14.5 lakh Sqft. (approx. 134709°Sqmt.). Phase-1 building in the SEZ-1 within next 9 0 : months. Thus.total built up area would be more than minimum prescribed area of 100000 sqmt. within.ten years from the. date of notification, if the developer complies the given ne timelines. | - - Fe, Lo . : . “oes Co , : . Recommendation by DC: a es ae : a . | oeoe DC, NSEZ has recommended’the request of extension of LOA for a period ofone year upto 13.11.2018. ee - 7 rs . | ee The request is placed-before BoA for its consideration. re - re 1° _ ; : . (iii). . Requestof M/s. Mikado Realtors Pvt. Ltd. for further extension of the validity . oo Gurgaonof formal (Haryana)approval, beyondgranted29.10.2017.for setting- up of ITATES. SEZ- at VillageaBehrampur,. . .  Name of the developer : M/s. Mikado Realtors Pvt. Ltd. an . , : Sector - “1 Electronic Hardware, IT/ITES - : Location | 1 Village Behrampur, Distt- Gurgaon (Haryana) a a Extension ) _ 1 LoA granted dated 30.10.2008, BoA in its meeting. i St | : held on 28.04.2016 had granted one extension inthe “validity period of LOA upto 29.10.2017. Now, the " . developer has submitted request for LOA extension 7 a = a — . upto 29.10.2020,. 0 | re oe . Present Progress: | me rr | — a a (a) Details of business plan:- . | a oS ox an tri - Proposed Investment | a S, No. | Type of Cost ne - (Rs, in Crore) oy an Land Cost : cL 44.91 : | | — . 2 Construction Cost . | 984.60 : fo a 3__| Plant& Machinery of 30,00 , | 4 . | Other Overheads ; oe: 435.10 os ee ee | Total: 1594.61 7 . _ (b) Investment made so far & incremental investment since last extension:- oe , a. . Total Investment| Incremental investment since DS : rn No. bo Lype of Cost ~_. made so far -’ ‘last extension . Fe - . | (Rs.in Crore) (Rs. in Crore)) | ; . 1 | LandCost a 44.01 - ee oe . 2 - | Material Procurement ee ae ee “| 3 | Service Cost . a 16.83 a 16.83 “foo So 4 | Other Overheads = iE tté‘“‘iS;tSS 0.20 oy. . en ee - _ Total: 61.94 i 17,03 - £ ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [1 x 3] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

. . 9 ee ne ©

: (c) Details of Physical progress till date :- So _ me oo oo Authorised activity % | % completion |- Deadline for completion 7 . | No. . completion} duringlast |. ofbalance work ~ | | , 1. | ive| asondate | one year fo es eae | Received the Environment |----6. years (2023). post} = | . Clearance: dt. 29"° August, So obtaining approvals . 7 2017. They have applied for; | mandatory to commence ~ | the - Consent... to}... 7” oe ~ |/ start. of. construction. | of . Establishment (CTE on 4" ce ~ -. |Next - _-_sthrree-year 4 = 4+ | Sept, 2017. Once the CTE]. mY, | development plan given. . 7| | executionreceived oftheywork.will“fersstart)wpa seit= -Se nn. oe ee - ees-

. The developer has-attached a annexure showing Development Plan of Phase-1 as given below:a z a ; te re

oo

==> picture [477 x 274] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 1 | Sub-Structure [Foundation Work [17.12.2018 _ | Tower-1 [| Services Work {19.06.2020| at re Common Area Finishing | Services Work oe | 3. -| Landscape Work =| . 2008 42000 . Reasons for seeking extension: _ Ce oo ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [33 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- oo oo, . ----- End of picture text -----

The Developer has stated that pre-construction approval process by the statutory , authoritiesfrom State tois quiteCentreexhaustive MoEF Committee.-Thedue to changedeveloperin Rule ofhas MoEF.further‘Theirmentionedcase wasthattransferredthey have. . . received MoEF Clearance (EC) granted on 30 August, 2017. CTE (Consent to 9 . Establishment). from Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Gurgaon is expected by go “September 2017. ‘The Construction’ activities at site are schedule to commence immediately after the approvals are received. ae ak Recommendation by DC: oe i BI ST _ DC, NSEZ has recommended the request of extension of LOA of M/s. Mikado Realtors Pvt.Ltd. for a period ofone-yearupto 29.10.2018. oo oe Be ras

. The request is placed before BoA for its consideration.

: = ee

7 ~ oe | | a . )

. :

;

==> picture [1 x 1] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- . ----- End of picture text -----

(iv) Request of M/s. Golden Tower Infratech Pvt. Ltd. for further extension of the validity of formal approval, granted for setting up of IT/ITES SEZ at Plot No.8,Sector144, Noida (U.P.) beyond 02.09.2017,

==> picture [1 x 1] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- . ----- End of picture text -----

Name of the developer . : M/s. Golden Tower Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Sector. ss TATES oe FO -. Location = Plot No. 8, Sectot-144,Noida(U.P.) 9 a . re , . Extension Formal approval to the. developer was granted. on. . Ts . 03.09.2008. The developer has been granted 6" . - extensions, last extension was granted vide DOC letter —— . OU a developerdated 30.03.2017has requestedwhich wasfor furtherupto 02.09.2017.extension uptoThe. - . a 02.09.2018. The SEZ stands notified as on date. — Present Progress: oe

(a) Details of business plan:° |

==> picture [486 x 88] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- (a) Details of business plan:- ° | , oe Proposed Investment | Le [Land4SCost a 100.00 foe ----- End of picture text -----

ee

(b) Investment made so far & incremental investment since last extension:fo ) _ Total Investment | Incremental investment since

==> picture [594 x 254] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- / ef ee (Rs.in Crore) | (Rs. in Crore) fo . — Material Procurement | , 3 | Service Cost _ 4300 | Other Overheads, | : 7.53. _ 0.84 | a ia _. Total: 91.59 209 a (c)S.Details of PhysicalAuthorised progressactivitytill date :- % 7% completion | Deadline for. . . : a No. |. . . ; “3 ) completion | during last | completion of | oe ne os | asondate | “one-year — |- balance work |. | 1. | Completed 02 Basement+.GF+ 6 floors | 74% "| 14% ° | June 2018 an ae of | -and.7th. castingfloor isof theunder.slab progress..for the lastAreaiie. || 9. foen Pe en- esa # . | | constructed till date. is approx. 6.25) =. |. eS fos | | Jakhs Sqft. of first building. External | re : od | | and internal brick work’ and plastering is | ~ : ; rs _almost completed and work on other |. ; ed ee ee ----- End of picture text -----

..7 etc.frontsare alsolike castigoi ng ofsimultaneously.ramps slabs, |stairs S| 7 bo,_ aRa | 7 2.. | Approx. 01 lakhs sqft: excavation work}. . 2% ~ os 0. . | August, 2018 ° |: |-completed for 2” building - 5 lakhs} oo rs ee | 3. | Third building- 5 lakhs sqft. 0 -- QO . J November fo | of 20208 4. .| Fourth building— 5 lakhs sqft. - 0 0 November .. - | 3. | Fifth building— 5 lakhs sqft. rn ~ Q — . | November . : Reasons for seeking extension: — . oe . a - . The developer has stated that unfortunately, owing to drastic changes in Global financial . market and recession in IT/ITES industry, there was a delay in the completing the project. ; Z within specific time. Further, the developer has mentioned that that immediately after the last oo, extension up to 02.09.2017 granted by BoA vide letter 30.03.2017,they have mobilized the , work force and other resources. to complete the project at the earliest, The developer has -, informed that M/s. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. has sanctioned a loan of Rs.130 Crores (on equitable mortgage) for this project and the construction work of the project is in full © - swing. Till date they have constructed about 6.25 lakhs sqft. of the first building and approx., . O1-lakhs sqft area of excavation work has been completed for 2™ building. The developerhas po stated that considering the availability of funds and the favorable market scenario they have : _________ tevised the construction schedule and. also planning to construct second tower about Slakhs . sqft by August,2018. - _ - oe cos oo The developer has further stated that the absorption and demand for IT SEZ has "improved in the recent past especially in Noida and they have received some serious enquiries ae from prospective clients for taking on lease the office space in SEZ project. The developer is. oe 7 - confident that their SEZ will be operational by May-June, 2018. co . . an - As per Rule 5(7) of SEZ Rules, 2006, “The Developer or ;Co-developer shall have to . . construct the minimum built up area (100000 Sqmt. in case ofITITES SEZ) within a period. ce of ten years (upto 17.12.2018) from the date of notification of the Special Economic Zone in which at least fifty percent of such area to be constructed within a period offive years from 7 the date ofsuch notification.” In the instant case approx. 8% years have elapsed from the date of notification. However, the developer has informed that they have completed approx. 6.25. oo, lakhs Sqft. (approx. 58064 Sqmt.) built up area of 1° Tower and propose to construct gnd . Tower of approx. 5 lakhs Sqft. (approx. 46452 Sqmt.) by August, 2018. Thus total built up — . - area would be more than minimum prescribed area of 100000 sqmt. within ten years from the ee . date of notification, ifthe developer complies the given timelines, _ - RecommendationbyDC: = = Oa - |” DC, NSEZ has recommended the request of extension of LOA of M/s, Golden Tower ae _- -Infratech Pvt. Ltd. for a period of one year upto 02.09.2018. 6 be mo .. ... The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. wat a

) oo (v) Request of M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. SEZ Ltd, Gopalpur, Odisha for further . . extension of the validity of the Formal Approval for setting up a Multi Product SEZ beyond 17" December, 2017. . a Fy oe a 7 oe LOA 3 18.6.2007 ee e Nature ofbusiness.of the SEZ Multi Product . oS . e Area . a of the SEZ ~ 1500.15 Hectares. . BO i e. No. of Extensions : 8" extension (1* approval for 3 years)" . — oO e LOA Valid upto. ° —117.12;:2017 ; . : . ¢ Date ofNotification 1 08.4.2016. re : i -. .... . @ Request for Extension - : For further extension of 1(one) Year ceo er wef, 18.12.2017to 17.12.2018. - _ So an Present Progress : . . ms (a) Details of Business Plan; _ _ we ce Type of Cost oe Investment (Rs.in Crores) ae a Land & SiteDevelopment |80 — | |3 | Plant & Machinery i Other Overhead a 7 PP Total Sy extension . oo, a ae . , oe , SI.No.. | Type of Cost Total investment made so | Incremental Investment | . oan oe 7 Se oo | September,far (In Crs.)2017till 30™ ’. | Crores)since last extension (Rs.S I. | Land Cost | 13523. SC—~<C*s~SDS oo - [2 | 60.54 9.38 Jo. | 7 Other Overheads OT 1.22 — Cn re “| “Total «198,46 16.85 _ — | . i (c) Details of physical progress till date: — I a Oo | S.No. | Authorised % completion | % completion during "Deadline for oo |. Activity as on date last one year ... completion of - . es ee es |= balance work |. 4 . Boundary Wall. |. 70%: | 9 = [0% a June, 2018 | : 2} Constructionof.) = 0% MH. a Project activityto | te ~- | Powerand water | | start from Jan, 2018 . | facilities within. Se | after formal B.C, | o £37220 KV power 90% | 40% May, 2018 an|. | +.fromthe, | transmissionline |ef ee eeCeco _ .

==> picture [591 x 713] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Narendrapur . on | ao , 7 | ; Sub- station pS . : oo i : 8 Kms. away soe | | oe Development and investment made from last extension i.e. December, 2016 to till date ) 7 SLNo. Type of Cost : Total investment made so Incremental Investment | me fe oO _... | far in Crs.) a30" since last extension ( Rs. oe . . | September, 2017 (Crores) | “I. |kand Cost 185.23 1623 °° a ob 2 | Material Procurement of60.54 OB at | EB. | Service Cost lo GOL 00) Lo . Other Overheads 2.67 1.22 . 198.46 | 16.85 Reasons for delay : . vo ce - | - oo | As ‘per guidelines of Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, GOI, development activities within the SEZ can only be taken up after approval of Environment a Clearance (EC) and-Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) clearance). a co Tata Steel SEZ had applied for Environment Clearance on 24 March, 2017 & CRZ . a - clearances on 3 July, 2017 and finally Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of MoEF & CC, ; GOI. Recommended: for grant of EC & CRZ: clearance on 16.10.2017. The formal approval oe Tetter Of EC & CRZ Clearance is expectéd “by énd of November”, 2017 “post “which the ~rs . infrastructure development activity would be taken up, ' mt . | | a Bo - Recommendation by DC — - 7 7 be ~~ Development Commissioner, Falta SEZ has. recommended the request of extension : ae for a period of one year, as requested upto. 17.12.2018 in view of the reasons given for delay. - re The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. ‘Item No. 80.2 Requests for extension of LoA beyond 3°"Year onward (7 proposals) a S : e As per Rule 18(1) of the SEZ Rules, the approval. Committeemay approve or ~~ reject a proposal for setting up of Unitina Special Economic Zone, = e Cases for consideration of extension of Letter of Permission (LoP)s it.o units in - SEZs are governed by Rule 19(4) of SEZ Rules, > OS , . ® Rule 19(4) states that an LoP shall be valid.for one year. First Proviso grants a . - power to DCs for extending the LoP not exceeding 2 years. Second Proviso grants a further power to DCs for extending the LoP for one more year but subject tothe . condition that two-thirds of activities including constriction, relating to the setting Se up of the Unit is complete and a Chartered Engineer’s certificate to this effectis °° 9. ns -. submitted oo Extensionsbybeyond the entrepr3° y e neur.ar (in cases where two-third; activitiesPtare not complete)’s. ae oo “and 4% year are granted by BoA; , a _. @ “BoA-can extend the validity for a period of one year at atime. oa ae Thereis no time limit up to which the Board can‘extend the validity, <--° - . ----- End of picture text -----

| ' -@ Extension in validity of Letter of Approval ‘dated02-09-2014,issued to M/s. ae DorfKetal Chemicals () Pvt. Ltd., Dahej-SEZ, Bharuch, Gujarat. ne oe . "’ . Mis. DorfKetal Chemicals (I) Pvt. Ltd.,. were granted Letter of Approval (LOA) )~. oO | ‘dated 02-09-2014, for setting-up a new unit in Dahej — SEZ, Bharuch for manufacture and a _. . export of. goods . under chapter 29.& 38 of ITC (HS) Code. pone : a — The details areasunder: . . . oe a . _ © LoA issued on (date): 02-09-2014. rs oe : . ae - oe Nature of“business of the Unit: Manufacturing of products under-chapter29.° Ho BBB OFITC(HS). . Be ; . . oe No. of Extensions: 02 -(two) by DC Dahej SEZ Nil by BOA.

| ~ LoAvalidup to: 01.09.2017, Be e Request: Extension for1 (One) year, up to 01.09.2018. . oe - . Present Progress: . - .

: . (a) Details of Business plan: . | | - a eero SiNo. Typeof Cost _ | Proposed Investment(Rs.] oe ee. canoes opm emnnee es wen | sneme aenescemie ae 7 sommes s samen a= aeenmeenenes ose oem nesegene Bm Seenen eea a . . in crores) . . ; . ’ . ; . Lo |5hand Oe ] oy 2 ‘Land Development & Factory Building [| 28.00 eer Plant & Machinery . 50.00 : a . . _ [2 [TOTAL 100.00 : | | ; . ~(b) Incremental Investment made so far and incremental investment since last extension: a S.No. |Type of Cost . | Total” Investment | Incremental ‘ : 7 a made. so far (Rs. in| Investmentsince) ; 7 Crores) _jlast extension) =

\ oe oe | (Rs. in Crores) || . fl Land . 11.55 . 10 . ce 2 Land, Development & Factory |.00.00 | re 0 rn ed |. | TOTAL.Building& other infrastructure| ~ 4 11.55 oo ee: ee : (c ) Details of physical progress till date:- LE : Te Fa | eo | Sr, | Activities [% completion as] % Completion during Deadline for{ oo. . = No. . .| on date (15" July, | last 10 months of -completion of . so . fe | 2017 LOA Extension __| balance ‘work -

==> picture [4 x 50] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- . | ----- End of picture text -----

. |

) a In this case, the entrepreneut/approval holder could not complete the project and -... commence production within the stipulated and extended time of the LoA for the following reasons. a oo ee .

, ~. a) The Unit have received Environment Clearance Certificate from State Level. , a - Environment Impact Assessment Authority on 01.05.2017. Impact Assessment Authority on 01.05.2017. Assessment Authority on 01.05.2017. Authority on 01.05.2017. on 01.05.2017. 01.05.2017. ; oe ) db) They have have further informed that informed that that revised application application for development plan of plan of of plot . | is submitted to to Developer for approval. for approval. approval. oo

a - Environment Impact Assessment Authority on 01.05.2017. Impact Assessment Authority on 01.05.2017. Assessment Authority on 01.05.2017. Authority on 01.05.2017. on 01.05.2017. 01.05.2017. ; oe ) db) They have have further informed that informed that that revised application application for development plan of plan of of plot . | is submitted to to Developer for approval. for approval. approval. oo a The unit has informed that project work is being done and will be completed-upto Se oO . ‘DC, Dabej ‘SEZ has pointed out ‘titat the ‘approval holder have not completed the 7 “requisite two-third activity including construction work relating to setting up the unit under Rule 19(4) of SEZ. Rules, 2006. oe - 7 . ; DC, Dahej SEZ has recommended that LoA of the unit may be extended for the ; further period of one year 1.¢. upto 01.09.2018. | . , . The request is placed before BoA for its consideration, a po (ii) Extension in validity of Letter of Approval dated 08-09-2011, issued to M/s. Benzo Chem Industries Pvt. Ltd., Dahej-SEZ, Bharuch, Gujarat. ; 7 M/s. Benzo Chem Industries Private Limited, were granted Letter ofApproval (LOA) ms —-----~~_ exportdated-08+09-2011; of goods for-setting-up-aunder chapter 28, new29 &unit-in-31 of ITC Dahej—-SEZ,-Bharuch-for-manufacture-and.(HS) Code... . —--——-----—_ . 7 MIs Benzo- Chem ‘Industries Private Limited (M/s BCIPL) in the Dahej SEZ . | - - requested vide their letter dated 18-07-2017 . fot extension ofLetter of Approval(LoA), =~ beyond 5" vear for one year upto 07/09/2018. . oc > The details are as under: . - . Oo ~.@ LoA issued on (date) :08.09.2011.ae | ; e Naturé of business of the Unit: Manufacturing of various types of specializes - ~ Chemicals. Oo , - oe Lo . ° No. of Extensions: 01 (one) by DC Dahej SEZ 03 (Three) by BOA. Co Lo valid up to: 07.09.2017. | : a : -.@ Request: Extension for 1 ( One ) year, up to 07.09.2018. a oe we Present Progress: rn rs 7 oO : oo _ {a) Details of Business plan: gE re - re SLNo. | Type of Cost | ~ - ~~~] Proposed Investment (Rs.. . _ . ee ee oo m crores) mae oe | 2 | Land Development& FactoryBuilding | 47.00. Jee * .

OO “7T

==> picture [475 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Plant & Machinery 170.00 7 od. | 4 | Miscellaneous _ | 27.03 Z ae ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [585 x 336] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- : (b), Incremental Investment made so far and incremental investment since last extension: oo |S.No.. |-Typeof Cost’; ~-) Total Investment made} Incremental ~°= | 9. 7 : so far (Rs.in Crores) Investment since ae a O | Jast extension: a oo cs ae | (Rs, in Crores)- a oe 2 Land Development & | 12.28 | 10.89 —_ OO — |°. | Factory” Building & -other) es ere . pas a infrastructure os LP TOTAL | . | a (c) Details ofphysical progress till date:- . Se mo, Sr. | Activities 7 |% completion; % Completion | Deadline — for . . oo No j. - |.as_ on date | during last 10) completion of}. : a . (15™ July, 2017) 2017) |monthsExtensionof LOA°monthsExtensionof LOA°Extensionof LOA°of LOA° LOA°° | balancemo, work balancemo, workmo, work work | . ae;; Security Building & Water|90% & Water|90% Water|90%|90%90% 90% 30" July, 2017 ~ July, 2017 ~ 2017 ~ ~ | | 4} Manufacturing Plant, | Tanks Form,| 7 PS oe . ElAdmin.Admin. Building, ~— 25%ae[25%ae[25%[25% oo 30 Nov2017.):2017.):: ----- End of picture text -----

a . (15™ July, 2017) 2017) |monthsExtensionof LOA°monthsExtensionof LOA°Extensionof LOA°of LOA° LOA°° | balancemo, work balancemo, workmo, work work | . ae;; Security Building & Water|90% & Water|90% Water|90%|90%90% 90% 30" July, 2017 ~ July, 2017 ~ 2017 ~ ~ | | 4} Manufacturing Plant, | Tanks Form,| 7 PS oe . ElAdmin.Admin. Building, ~— 25%ae[25%ae[25%[25% oo 30 Nov2017.):2017.):: BF In this case, the entrepreneur/approval holder could not complete the project and a a _ commencereasons. productionnewithin the stipulated. and extended: a time of the LoA forthe following , oe . fe - . a) the unit has informed that the land allotted to them had two old temples and local an people are. creating lot of problems and not allowing the construction work. Now Developer ofDahej SEZ has.informed that temples had been shifted to other placesin SC the month of August, 2016. - an an oe . . _ b) Based on the soil test pile the unit had to redesign the structural part of the factory a . The unit has informed ‘that project work is being done and will be-completed upto. July, 2018. _ oe, | ee In view ofthe above, it is recommended that LoA of the unit may be extended for the 9. further period of one year i.e. upto 07.09.2018... . oe - oe, | _ __* '‘The request'is placed before BoA for its consideration. ar .

. oe

(iii) Request of M/s. Tech Mahindra Ltd. (Unit-IV) in the Noida SEZ for extension of = - Letter of Permission. (LOP) beyond 22/04/2017 upto 22/04/2018 co ee

, - 4

| ¢ LoP issyed on: 23/09/2011. ne Oo - e . Nature of business of the Unit: Softwate Development, Data entry and conversion and , OO _ export thereof, Data Processing and Export thereof, Data Analysisand control, Data. a SO management & Export thereof, Cali Centre Services & Export thereof, BPO Services: me and Export thereof. . oe _ . : | ; | ee Noof Extensions: 5 by DC; Noida SEZ (after approval of BOA) - ' BO | we LOP valid upto: 22/04/2017. , | ; * Request: For further extension for one year, upto 22/04/2018 os Present Progress: | CS oo SS : — oe (a) Details of Business plan: Ce i . co a . : Proposed Investment an . : Plant | o4 i Other Overheads.& Machinery ; 1050 . | : 7 OS7 . _ (b) Investment made so far & incremental investment since last extension. . a . . Co . re Incremental . . ; LS T e of Cost | Total Investment made | investment.since last | ~ NO i a ° so far (Rs. in Crore) | extension (Rs. in a : 3_| Service Cost — tl 0,533 . 0.2320 f- . | 4 __| Other Overheads 0,592 0100 - [Totals 26476 0.332 Jo. | - | - . (¢) Details ofPhysical progresstill date :- : oe eo - No.S.|:Activity. oo %ascompletionon date |.%duringcompletionlast | completionofDeadline for | - -- i, | of | one year | balance work | - co | Awaiting approval of Building planso that theconstructionwork can be started.| ° ” 4

Detailed reasons for delay:= Oe oS

_ The unit has submitted following reasons for delay in implementation of project:

==> picture [26 x 16] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- os ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [588 x 645] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- , 1. Main reason for delay was the permission from National Green Tribunal with reference to . 7 the Okhla Bird Sanctuary which was directly linked to the environment clearances. and Hos, . 3 2. approval of building plan from UPPCB for constructionof building. Bo , That building plan .approval has reached the final stage of clearance by NOIDA : a : authorities after obtaining various other approvals like fire approval, MOEF clearance and _ AAI NOC. However, a valid LOA have been requested by the Noida Authority for =, . approval of building plan. ee 2 a .. °. 3. Their plan is to make immediate investment of around Rs. 10 Crores in building IT Sng a - Development Centre for 150 employees and to commence authorized operations . oO within next six months. ; .  Recommendation by DC: oF 7 .!year beyond DC, Noida 22/04/2017 SEZ hasi.e. recommendedup to 22/04/2018. the request of extension of oeLOP for a period-ofae one a The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. 7 _ . (iv) Request of M/s. HAAAS Corporation Pvt. Ltd., in the MIHAN - SEZ for . ; extension of letter of Permission (LOP) beyond 15.09.2017 for 4 Extension upto 14.09.2018. ° a - -..° @ LOP issued on (date) . ot 16.09.2013 ee ae | e Nature of business of the Unit : IT/ITES | . oe :   @ No of Extensions . : Two by DC MIHAN SEZ and One by BOA / Lop valid upto (date) + :14.09.2017 Se | : © Request . . ? for further extension for one year, up to (a) Details of Business plan: _ a a ae 1 = , a ‘| @s. in Lakhs) . . . Land Cost |.172.10 of. . oe 2 Construction Cost 1048.00 . : ae Be 3 ‘Plant and Machinery- Imported | 371.00 -__ ar | and Indigenous both .. - . Z a  — |Total|. - —_ |.1693.10 |. _ '. (b) Incremental Investment made so far and. incremental. investment since last ~ extension: ae eo ee oe | | S.No | TypeofCost. | Total Investment | Incremental. - rn | made so far (Rs. in | Investment since last} 7 rr rs ~+DLakbs). 9 f. extension (Rs. in . oo 1ro a 1 | Lakhs)- , fe ; oo | Land Cost 172.10. 1.0.00 7 a eo ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [595 x 698] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- . 2. Construction &| 73819 423.91. . . i  - | Procurement Cost __ | - | | A a 4 | Other overheads | 17.45 6.78 . ee mer Total (|---| 952.90 438.55 ee an © Details of PhysicalProgress till date:- ee | eee S.No.. | Activity - | % completion |'% completion | Deadline for’) - re as —s on | during —last | completion of ' Ss [31.08.2017 one year balance work || | SF 1 | Generator’ RoemyEHlectric |Nii. NIL | March 2p. ne | Substation/FO Generators (To| 9 : . — .| | augment MSEB. Power)/UPS | a me | Room/Distribution . oo . foe 7 . substation/HSD Yard ~— ; nl Oe , . 3 Boundary.Lighting and~ signage’swalls/ -. Gates/ | 100 . - ; Completed. in| . Fencing/Security office/ January2017 | Security Posts : ho, 4 All. . civil and — Interior 7: 50. April 2018 work/Electrical work/BMS/Air TOTAL ) ; Conditioning/Fite Protection 70% : i a . | system : . |e _ oe . :oo LS")| DevelopmentLandscaping/Garden spaceMayfo 2018 re . | “76. | RecruitmentBuilding © of= Employees~— Completion Nil» | May 2018... a : . - - | certificate and occupancy . . , a | certificate =. oe , . 7 ot ~ «Detailed reasons for delay: . me . Oo . . . - Reasons for delay in execution of the project'as under: a — Co ; 1. Financial: Term Loan amounting to Rs.13/- Crores for their BPO project at MIHAN, oo: Nagpur,. was sanctioned by Union .Bank of India, vide their letter no. — . MCB/ADV/352/2015-16 dated 5" March 2016. However afterwards due to-serious _... impact in economic conditions, bank has not disbursed the loans to the developers. - SO TheyThis hashave adverselyto arrange affectedthe theirfund financialfrom their planning,internalandresources amountedand to delaycontinued. in project. the = . , °.. project. But the lapse of time for arrangements has delayed the construction of © - 2. Operational Hindrance: Many times work was stopped due to reyalty issues of sand —— ~~. and project got delayed by six months for this reason. a a Now they have plantedthe completionof ¢ivil works (Civil construction Work near. - > about 70% completed, remaining 30%) and.part occupancy of the premises so as to + gommence the business simultaneously. a ne ce ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [595 x 704] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- oo, Recommendation by DC. . ; re . CO _ DC MIHAN SEZ has recommended the. request of extension of LOP for a period of . . . one year year up to.(date) 14.09.2018. = : a oo The request is placed-before BOA for its consideration. © = con ee : - 7 (v). Request | of Mis. Rajdhani -C¥aft in Mahindra World City (Jaipur) Ltd., : _ Handicraft SEZ at Village- Kalwara, Jaipur for extensionof Letter of Permission , ’ (LOP) for a further period of one year i.e. upto 12/08/2018. Se, (5 LoP issued on:13.08:2014 es 2 oe _ @ Nature of business of the Unit: Manufacturing of Wooden Furniture items & . Handicraft items namely, “Dining tables, Book case, Chairs, Bed side, Side board, — . _ Stools, Wall hanger, Almirah, Coffee table, Bench, High board, Low board, Cabinet, TV cabinet, Cube Rack, Round desk, Writing table, Vitrine, Side table, Console table, = ' Corner table & other Handicrafts furniture items”. Doe a “ : . @ No. of Extensions: 2 Extensions granted by.DC, NSEZ ) , e LOP valid upto: 12/08/2017 7 . -¢ Request: For further extension for one year, upto 12/08/2018 , : Present Progress: - \ we a _ (a) Detailsof Business plan ; . ee | Type . Proposed Investment 7 oe . . of Cost (Rs. in Crore) oo —— | 4 | Other Overheads . i , , a ' (b) Investment made so far & incremental investment since last extension _ | ‘S. Type ofCost | Total Investment made: Incremental ‘investment since oe | No. So so far (Rs. in Crore) | last extension (Rs. in Crore) | © + -|2 Construction Cost” 0.59 052 of? 7 (3... |Plant& Machinery | - 0.40 a 0.21. : oo - [4 - | Other Overheads =| 0.14 i 010 Ce - || Total: 3B 0.83 mat : (c) Details of Physical progress till: date :- ee ae : oe , 7 7 S. | Typeof cost | %. completion |% completion} Deadline = fforf No. | asondate . | during last ‘one| completion = of) =. : : | year _ | balance’work re a . 1... Construction. “... 50% 6 40% 30.04.2018 | ae _ 2 Plante ~ 0. 7 30.06.2018 | — [3 |Production. 0 |: 0” 01.08.2018.| ----- End of picture text -----

Detailed reasons for delay:Boe - re i ' The unit has submitted following reasons for delay in implementation of project: ye | . , k. The unit has not completed two third activities including construction work (only io Oe _ 50% has been completed) as per chartered engineer certificate submitted by the unit. = 2. Their factory land in SEZ is having a big open sewerage behirid the plot which many. . . a time get overflowed and that sewer water gets inside the factory land. Due to-this’ - - |. they faced difficulty in levelling the.land. In fact.a big time was spent in levelling the land by putting mud and sand to raise the level by 04 to 05 feet, then few months of 7 _time was given to settle he filling art that caused a big delay in setting up ofnew unit. _, 33, Another reasen tor delay is sanctioning of limits by Bank for project financing.Now, . oe ~~ they manage their own funds for all work. 9° 1. > _ oo | ) : , Recommendation by DC: - tar - DC, Noida SEZ has recommended the extension of LOP for a further periodof one year ie, up to 12/08/2018. CO oo, ) . : The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. | a - . . oe (vi) Request of M/s. Escientia Advanced Sciences Private Limited a Unit in’ M/s. | _ - . APIIC developed multi product SEZ at Visakhapatnam (APSEZ) for extension of . validity period of LoP beyond 20.10.2017 i.e. for fourth extension upto 20.10.2018. en a Letter-of.Approval was‘issued ons... 21.10.2013... ensuea _aeae . Nature of Business of the unit: . Manufacture of APIs/Bulk Drugs/ Intermediates Oo 7 ; So No. ofExtensions; Three byDC,APSEZ od LoP validuptos = == «20.10.2017 / Doe ae re ‘Request: - For further extension for one year upto (a) Details of Business Plan: - 7 SO ae _ 7 SI. No. Type of Cost l Proposed investment (Rs. in crores) an | - | 7 i.) | Manufacture. of | 200.00 - So _ _ | Pharmaceuticals — APIs/ - , . ae Oo , .| Bulk _ . a | Fotal oe ~~ | 200.00 | 7 BO - (6) Incremental Investment made so far and incremental investment since last extension: oe oo SLNo.| Typeofeost Total investment. Incremental To a nr | made so far (in Rs. | Investment since — | oe , ae ne ae fe | Crores) ~ | last extension (In ~ dL | Land lease premium | 16.00 [Oe a

os . an 7 ee ae

Plant & Machinery | 64.00 oS : 4, | Equipment— Electrical, _ 15.50 | BS . . ! . ETP, Fire and others . fe 7 34.75 a oe fo 76,509.75 | , (c) Details of Physical progress till date ’ - | ; Oo . | S. No.|Activity | % completion’ % completion . Deadline for ee - .. | during last one ,.|- completion of balance - 6 Oe —_ _ _ ‘year () . work oe ee i nl 1 |Building | 100%. _ | 28.18%() | ‘Already completed’ | "| 2. 4 Installation of 100% | 28.18% () Already completed . - machinery ee ; E () The work on building, plant and machinery is completed in all respects. The unit has , informed that, presently validations and trial runs are in progress. After USFDA inspection 9s approximately during second quarter of 2018-19, the Unit may go for commercial production. | Detailed reasons for delay: . . ee ee a | The unit has indicated that, they have completed all the works and presently - Z _, validations and trial batches ate in progress continuously for the last three months for . : _ bringing stabilization in the process and to meet the standards of USFDA for filing DMFs, . The site qualification and product qualification process by USFDA may happen in the second - Anyone Quarter-of 2018-19... The-inspection-by-USFDA..and-other-agencies-may-start in-second/third-—-—--. oo quarterthird quarterof 2018-19of 2018-19,and thereafter,: they are expecting to go for. commercial7 batches, in the . . — -.. Recommendation by DC: , co Ee oe DC, VSEZ has recommended the extension of LOP for a further period of one year i.e. up to 20.10.2018:. a - oo The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. a | . oe . . ; (vii) Request of M/s. Fibrofilt Industries a unit in AMRL SEZ for extension of Letter 7 _ of Approval (LoA) from’ 24.05.2013 to 10.08.2019 . ne oo an ow LOA issued on (date): 25.05.2010, ; ne — ae : - @ Nature of business of the Unit: Manufacture of Filter Media es Dt | ~ @ No. of Extensions: 02 (two) by DC, MEPZ oe ae | oo ; e LoA valid up to : 25.05.2013, / - ee a pa a , | a a : | ; ‘8 Request:; Fot further extension from 24.05.2013 to 23.05.2019, ; 7 a

; ; Present Progress: - oe a Se co - . a me - (c) Details of Business plan: a . oo oS Ct oo SLNo. | Type of Cost . | Proposed investment (Rs. in : lakh/crores) Je) oo Le. oo . 2 [TotalRawMaterial: ! . 700,00lakh|100.00lakh8 sp ec— oo 7 . (d) Incremental Investmentmade so far and incremental investment since last extension: oe Ss “S.No. | Type of Cost“): Total Investment made Incremental Investment since} < - on Se 7 ~ dF s0 far (Rs. in| last extension (Rs. in lakh/ Oo oe | lakh/Crores) . Crores) _. a foe OO i 70,00 lakh |. 25.00 lakh (Additional) . | TOTAL . 70.00 lakh | 25.00 lakh[|] (Additional) : - (¢) Details of physical progress till date:| a . oe . | Sr. |-Authorize | % completion | % Completion Deadline for | ~ | No. d activity 7 . |during — last | completion— of | Oo year balance work . , 2. | Details given in the unit’s. . : - | letter’ dated 10.08.2017 : . |. (Amnexure-1) _. ; Detailed Reasons for delay: 7 . a a a oo The unit has stated that their Parent Companyof M/s. CMS Manufacturing Company . Pvt. Ltd. Dubai is a very big Engineering Group and manufacturing varietyof products in setdifferentup.2 unitscountries,viz. M/s.With theAir intentionfilter Systems, of settingMEPZup ofSEZ manufacturingChennai andfacilitiesM/s. Claironin India,Filters,they . oe Cochin SEZ, Cochin, oe . — a . a , They were looking for further expansion and it was suggested that they can operate - . a from AMRL SEZ, Nangunery and accordingly they purchased a plot-at AMRL SEZ, . Nanguneri and paid around 70 lakh towards this in 2010-11. Due to Hill Area Conservative - Authority (HACA) tegulations, they could not get approval from the authority. — oe . : | | a poe a . Recommendation by DC: ° . The Development Commissioner, MEPZ SEZ has recommended the request of extension oo | _. Of LOA for the period from 24.05.2013 to 23.05.2019. a a _ The request of the developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. CF

_ Item No. 80.3 Requests forco-developer (7 proposals) , | 7 (i) Request of “Mis ANSR Global Corporation Pvt.. Ltd. (formerly known as : ‘Network Information Global Services India Pvt. Ltd.), Bangalore for Co-Developer O , - Status in Manyata Embassy Business Park SEZ, Bangalore for development of the SEZ So . ., area specifically to undertake the authorized operations of conversion of bare shell _ oo, buildings into warmshell buildings and to lease the built-up space in the above IT/ITeS _., +: The above mentioned SEZ stands notified on 16" November, 2006 over an area of . .... 26.2017 hectares. The SEZ is operational having export of Rs. 9991 crores during the 2016-. a eo QOIT wy he Lo mY a ae a oe . M/s ANSR Global Corporation Pvt. Ltd: has submitted a proposal for becoming a cO~ - developer in the aforesaid SEZ. for undertaking the authorized operations of conversion of oo bare shell buildings into warm. shell buildings and to lease the built-up space (52,301 Sq.ft. - . comprising of (a) 33,498 sq.ft. in Block Teak [G3], Wing A and (b) 18,803 sq.ft. in Block . - Mountain Ash(H2]in WingA. oo os _ . . . Co-developer agreement dated 9" August, 2017 entered-into with the developer has . . . been provided. The proposed amount of investment by the Co-developer in the SEZ is Rs. . | 8.00 Crore. ' ae . . | | | - Recommendation by DC: . oe oe nn DC, Cochin-SEZ-has recommended the proposal. einen a nce ecenema Na aaa a The request of the Co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. SS (ii) Request of. M/s. Biocon Ltd. for Co-Developer status in M/s. Ramky Pharma tg . City (India) Pvt. Ltd. SEZ for the purpose of:: . a a ~ For. undertaking the following infrastructure facilities in M/s. ‘Ramky Pharma-City °(India) Pvt. Ltd., Visdkhapatnam in an area of 50 acres with proposed amount of Rs. . 219 crores of investment. Be . . . (i) Development and maintenance of the infrastructure-including the buildings in a ce , (ii) . theOtherSEZ,dayEffluentto day treatmentroutine activities plant, wasterequired yard,to WTPbe carriedtanks etc.out in the SEZ like. — a Security and house-keeping. + - os 7 oe _.° The above mentioned SEZ stands notified on. 10" May, 2007 over an area of 247,39 _ oe _ hectares. The SEZ is: operational having made export of Rs. 642 crores during.the year. 2016-2017. Ont Bes, ee OS mo - M/s Biocon Ltd has submitted a proposal for becoming a co-developer in the ; - Lo aforesaid SEZ for development and maintenance of the infrastructure including the buildings ks >. in the SEZ, Effluent treatment plant, waste yard, WTP tanks ete and other day to day routine 7 activities required to be carried out in the SEZ like Security and'house-keeping as agreed in on . the co-development agreement. (authorized operations proposed by the eo-developer). * —

been - Co-developer agreement dated24 May, 2017 entered into with the developer has ae provided. The proposed amount of investment by the Co-developer in the SEZ is. Rs. ° 219 Crore. -_ , ; Co ee SS Recommendation byDC: - le ve 7 7 | | . DC, VSEZ-has recommended theproposaly Tt | ° ‘The request of the Co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. so . } | | (iii) Request of M/s. Capgemini Technology Services India Limited for co-developer a re statas in the Mahindra World City IT SEZ, Tamil Nadu fer granting Co-Developer .” _ status, . i , a ‘The above mentioned SEZ. stands notified. on 26.10.2004 over an area. of 265.6 - hectares and is operational having exports of Rs. 8202 crores during 2016-2017. . . M/s. Capgemini Technology Services India Limited has submitted a proposal for a becoming a co-developer in the aforesaid SEZ to develop the infrastructural requirement in . : the proposed area in the capacity of a Co-Developer. a |

. Co-developer agreement dated 14.05.2008 entered into with the developer has been provided. The proposed amount of investment by the co-developer in the SEZ is Rs. 143 Crores. ee a ; oS

. Loe ; DC. MEPZ SEZ has recommended the proposal . oo . | The request of the co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. ee

| , 7 - ' (iv) | Request of M/s. ATS Savvy Developers LLP for co-developer in the sector _ specific SEZ for multi services at Ratanpur, District Gandhinagar, Gujarat, being ; developed by M/s. GIFT SEZ Ltd. for additional built up area admeasuring 16370 sqft. . . (1520.8228 sqm.) a ee, _ The above mentioned SEZ stands notified over an atea 105.4386 hectares and is . operational having export of Rs. 284 crores during 2016-17, . _ . oO Mis. ATS Savvy Developers LLP has been granted co-developer status in the above. a . _ mentioned SEZ by the BoA in its 73“ meeting held on 9" November, 2016 for consttuction : development, maintenance and operationof SEZ building for units to undertake export of . . services in the processing area-of SEZ, over an area of 400000 sq.ft. BUA in Block-15 Zone . within GIFT SEZ processing area. soo : a Now the co-developer has requested for additional building up- area admeasuring 7 | . furnish/ s Co-developerittoday. agreementais. not provided.coHowever,DC KASEZ is requested/mail) to’ .

| "DC KASEZ. has recommended the proposal, | ee . The request of the co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. . , - | _ (v) — Request of M/s. Divyasree Tech Park Contractors Pvt. Ltd for co-developer | _ Status in- M/s. Lanco. Hills Technology Park-Pvt. Ltd: SEZ for providing infrastructure facilities and other operations including IT/ATTES buildings ~ . a . The above mentioned SEZ stands notified on 10.4.2007 for over an area of 11.77 0 hectares (29.08 Acres) and on 24,9.2013 an area of 0.66 hectares was. added to the SEZ. ; - ; a Ms. Divyasree Tech Park ContractorsPvt. Ltd has submitted a proposal for becoming ae co-developer in the aforesaid. SEZ for providing -infrastructure facilities and other | operations including IT/ITES buildings in an area of 11,15 Hectares (27.55 Acres). ot oo . Co-developer agreement dated 4.7,2017 entered into with the developer has been oo po _ provided.Crores, The proposed amount of investment: by. the co-developer in the SEZ is Rs. 1755 . ee, - | os - Recommendation byDC: | , ot . . OO . — DC VSEZ, has recommended/not recommended the proposal . . : The request of the co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. a Ce \2) Request of M/s. Glomed. Developers Pvt. ‘Ltd. for ‘Co-developer status in MIDCoe .. ITATES SEZ, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Phase-III, Hinjewadi, Pune for construction ~~ of buildings and related infrastructure for IT/ITES Units, Development of space of : IT/ATES Unit and all default authorized operations for area admeasuring 21,539 Sq. . The above mentioned SEZ stands notified on 7" June, 2007 over an area of 223.56 . hectares. + | M/s Glomed Developers Pvi. Ltd has submitted a proposal for becoming a co. developer in the aforesaid SEZ for construction ‘of buildings and related infrastructure for, . _ _ ITATES Units, Development of space of IT/ITES Unit and all default authorized operations . / ; for area admeasuring 21,539 Sq. Mtrs.. — . oe Co-developer agreement dated 9" March, 2015 entered into with the developer has ; -been provided. The proposed amount of investment by the Co-developer inthe SEZ is Rs, — 81.69 Crore. ; . . Se | . | | Recommendation by DC: . | 7 a ; oe oo DC, SEEPZ SEZ has recommended the proposal. - . - The request of the Co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. a }

; |

(vii) _ Request of M/s. Nxtra Data Ltd. for Co-developer status in MIDCITATES SEZ, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Phase-III, Hinjewadi, Pune for construction of buildings ©. and related infrastructure for IT/ITES Units, Development of space of IT/ITES Unit. ) and all default authorized operations for approx.area admeasuring 1.90 hectares. | ~The ‘above mentioned SEZ stands notified on’7 June, 2007 over an area of 223560 hectares. . . os a a M/s Nxtra Data Ltd. has submitted a proposal for becoming a co-developer in the © . aforesaid SEZ for construction of buildings and related infrastructure for ITATES Units, oe oo Development of space of IT/ITES Unit and all default authorized operations for approx area. _ admeasuring 1.90 hectares. . a . ~~... Co-developer agreement dated 29" May, 2017 entered into with the developer has been provided. The proposed amount of investment by the Co-developer in the SEZ is Rs. _ 300 Crore.» : oo, . : 7 Coo - ) Recommendation by DC: SS oe | 7 : DC, SEEPZ. SEZ has recommended the proposal. =. - | | The request of the Co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA, i | a | Item No. 80.4: Proposalsfor setting up of SEZs (One proposal) © Request ofM/s. Deccan Fine Chemicals’ (India) Pyt. Ltd. for settingup ofa = _ a sK e ctorsavaramspecificvillage,SEZ Sy.for ChemicalNo. 146, 149and&150, Pharm R a ceuticaljavaram Village,Sector Payakaraopetaat Sy. No. 84-93 Mandal,& 108, . Visakhapatnam Dist. Andhra Pradesh, over an area of 53.21 hectares. ° . - Ss. |. Name of the Name of the of the the “Location Sector ‘Area Land ‘| State Govt. Govt. Status of of No |. Developer || ‘ , “| (in ha) Possessi | Recommen- Recommen- | application a on dation _ (i) | M/s. M/s. Deccan | | Sy. No, 84-93 & 108, | Chemical Chemical 53.21 Yes Yes. New : : Fine Kesavaram vvillage,| and J : | (4.12,2015): . . Chemicals Sy. No. 146, 149 & | Pharmac Pharmac . '

Ss. |. Name of the Name of the of the the “Location Sector ‘Area Land ‘| State Govt. Govt. Status of of No |. Developer || ‘ , “| (in ha) Possessi | Recommen- Recommen- | application a on dation (i) | M/s. M/s. Deccan | | Sy. No, 84-93 & 108, | Chemical Chemical 53.21 Yes Yes. New Fine Kesavaram vvillage,| and J : | (4.12,2015): . Chemicals Sy. No. 146, 149 & | Pharmac Pharmac . (India) Pyt. | 150, - Rajavaram | eutical . 4 Ltd. ' | Village, ‘Sector . = ; of . os Mandal,Payakaraopeta a a : oe - , ' | Visakhapatnam Dist. ; ; . ; Andhra Pradesh _- . fi) Proposed Investment Cg : Rs. 298.04 crores ~ (ii) Projected employment ofthe project ‘Approx 710, (iii) Foreign Investment : Yes (Rs. 22.27 crores) , | _.. DC VSEZ hasrecommended the proposal. : The proposal of proposal of of the developer developer is submitted for consideration of submitted for consideration of for consideration of consideration of of BoA. | ,

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

| os The proposal of proposal of of the developer developer is submitted for consideration of submitted for consideration of for consideration of consideration of of BoA.

| (i) . Request for granting permission to import, restricted raw material “used . cooking oil” falling under ITC Chapter Heading 29037100 . a Z M/s Panama Petrochem Limited, Dahej SEZ. Unit, Plot
ho No. Z/23, Gujarat is an me operational unit holding Letter of Approval dated 06-05-2008, for manufacture of various Products under Chapter Heading 27 of ITC (HS). . . Co 4.
| : M/s, Panama Petrochem Limited, vide letter dated 05-08-2017 has requested this . Chapteroffice for permission to import, raw material namely “used cooking oil” falling under 7
— _ restrictedHeadingfor import.15180040 As per ofMinistryITC (HS).of The Commerce item underand ChapterIndustry Headinginstruction No. 15180040,No.47 dated.is - to export prohibited items, provided they import raw-material for the same. However, each such case will be placed before BOA for approval so that views of DGFT, DoRso and others can be considered before taking a decision. sos me, ,
| ~ Gi) In respect of. items which are prohibited for import, SEZ units. will be permitted to , import the same provided they export goods made out ofthe same, Asinthe 7 | ~ case of exports,'each such casé will be placed before BOA: for consideration and , approval. . So CO .
a (iii)* In respect of supply of Restricted Items by aDTA unit to SEZ Developer/Unit, the wa ee es ee oe- DT A.tinit..can-.supply.-such--items--to--a- SEZ-Developer~or -unit~for~setting: up~ :/ . _ infrastructure facility or for setting up of a unit. It can also supply raw material to , - SEZ unit for undertaking a manufacturing operation excépt refrigeration, cutting,
, polishing and blending. However, it will require prior approval of BOA. For importing this item i.e, “used cooking oil”, the unit has.given following reasons. Ba > Bybringing this inputs they will be able.to cater huge volumes of 7 i. — a Europe and USA where the demand of these esters are very high ; _ » All Esters manufactured with this input will help to save the environment.
a » Government of India is also encouraging these Easters for Eco fuel . . » Additions, oe a a . Manufacturing technology is also completely Greenfield whereno” a a: Chemicals or water is used which can harm environment: ae a .
- » . Their present infrastructure is well equipped to process all Used Cooking
oe Oils without .any investment . | a
. °oe In-view ofthe Instruction No. 47 dated 04.03.2010, DE, Dahej has forwarded the a . proposal for consideration of Board of Approval. a oe Do
| The request of the unit is submitted for consideration of BoA, / i. : oo .

; (ii) ‘Request of Gujarat State Petronet Ltd., (GSPL) for approvalas a co-developer = for laying about sixteen kilometer gas pipeline in the[APSEZ,][ Mundra.] SE me ’ GSPL, a Government of Gujarat undertaking, is a gas: transportation company =~ engaged in creating a Gas Grid Pipeline Network on carrier basis within the. state of Gujarat. . Itis.apure transmission. entity and it does not own the gasthat is being transported... ee . Tt proposes. to construct, operate and maintain underground gas pipelineof 36” inch» diameter having length of approximately sixteen Kms within. APSEZ connecting LNG. os terminal inside APSEZ-to its Gas Grid Network on the APSEZ boundary with an-initial = investment of approximately Rs.100 Cr. Its Gas Grid is. equipped with, bi-directional ©. ce - transmission ,technolagy ‘which enables two-way gas flow. Hence, gas can be soureed, of on. 98] a uploaded at’ either end of the pipeline network. Since the proposed pipeline wouldbe ~~ _ tax.primarilybenefitscateringunder toSEZthe Actdistributionand Rules,networkon theinconstruction,the DTA, GSPLoperationwill notandavailmaintenanceor seek anyof oO , . . such pipelines. It has further stated that it would also give connectivity to the units in APSEZ) : whenever required. oe . . Measurement facility will be installed for measuring the gas being transported at the _ entry point (Source of gas) and also at the exit point (industrial customer). GSPL will charge _ transportation charges on the quantity of gas measured at the exitpoint. © © GSPL has stated that since it is connected to all major gas supply sources in Gujarat including LNG terminals it would. ensure uninterrupted supply of gas to the SEZ units at : other places in Gujarat, through its gridor otherwise. , Recommendation by Development Commissioner: a . - As the pipeline would be presently catering to its grid in the DTA, the proposal may ~ a _not be covered as a Co-developer in its stricter sense. Since GSPL would notbe availing any . Co tax benefit, BoA may consider granting approval provided it carries only that RLNG which is . . . . duly cleared by the SEZ customs. : - oe a ' The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. a (iii) Request of M/s. Platinum Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (Chennai) Developer of Sector. — . Specific SEZ for IT/ITES at Abu Garden, OMR Road, ‘Navalur, Chennai, Thiruvallur , District, Tamil Nadu for Revocation of cancellation of formal approval. _ (a) M/s. Platinum Holdings Pvt, Ltd., Developer vide letter dated 14.06.2017 has requested a for retaining & reviving their SEZ Operations. They have reasoned that M/s. True Living - — Spaces Pvt. Ltd.(a company forming part of Ozoné Group), has shown interest in acquiring. _» 99% stake in their company subject to the approval of the formal. approval and transfer of oe . shares (from M/s Platinum Holdings Pvt. Ltd. to M/s. True Living Spaces Pvt. Ltd.)by BOA. . In the same fetter, the developer has substantiated their request for revocationby stating that ae a the Ozone group is already in negotiation with many IT companies and one such. company’ - (TCS) has assured-to lease upto 60% ‘of the building, M/s. Platinum Holdings Pvt Lid., in . Realtorstheir applicationPvt. Ltd.,dated whose14:6.2017 approval/notificationhas also quotedwasas precedentcancelled dura s i milarng the casesame of BOAM/s. meeting Mikado, and gubsequeritly revoked and’ condoned for the delay; also the validity of their formal )

==> picture [593 x 707] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ; Approval was extended up to 29.10.2017. This office had examined the quoted precedent of — M/s Mikado Realtors and the complete details are attached herewith. an . . 7: . - | ‘(b) = Request of M/s. Platinum Holding Pvt. Ltd for further extension of the validity | Bo period of formal approval, granted for setting up of ITATES,SEZ at Navalur, Chennai , |. beyond. 05.05.2016. 0 Whee ce ee | " Name ofthe developer : M/s. Platinum HoldingPvtLtd. ; | ~ Sector SITITES OO a 7 aan “ea Location . : Navalur, Chennai. - a ga ee Lo en 0 Extension — — -: Formal approval to the developer was granted on 06.11.2006, The * -. developer has been granted 5 extensions, last extensionwas granted upto 05.05.2014. The. ao developer has requested for further extension upto March 2018. . Oe | on Present Progress: a! | ; . a | : | (a) Details of business Plan:-Proposed Investment (Rs.oein Crores) ae eon re; . (d) Incremental investment since last extension:- =~ , ae : 7 | S.No} ° Typeof Cost | Total Investment ~] Incremental investment | ee oees a os | Qs. Inmade Crores) so farup to-- (Rs.extensionIncrores) since last | | Construction ° ee Zz — — &) Details of physical progress till date:- ' as . - . - SO. S.No | Authorized. _activity. -..- | completion—«(:«&% ~ || %during Completion last |Deadline forcompletion-of: | | | . . we | one year balance work fo. / . 1 11 Lakh Square feet of . |.90% 10% . | Already completed “| a, . ° | civil structure including2) |” po ae ee foo .f | levelservice basementBlock with and three")a ef| - : opSoe foCoe . a : oe 2 | Internal finishing works... | 25% (25% |) Within 4-5 ‘months ee _ | from now of: ee 3 | Mechanical, Electrical and | 40% [10% Within 4-5-months | ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [588 x 391] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | | 4. | plumbingExternal facade - So 30% — | | Withinfromnow 2 months 7 a : : -_ o from now sR of S|) Lifts . - | Procurement | 20% ~ | Within 4-5 months: . . - . ae . being done, 7 from now all lifts will | — , Boat et erection and . . be fully operational |. |. . , "| testing is . Sf , Co aeSs 6_ |STP civil Work_ . -..| (100%happening _ a “t a~ |sAlready. completedoe— — ; Te . ee ef | STP Machinery tobe | | . | 7) DG Sets — | 50% 20% Within 3-4 months all . es rs a the remaining DGs . . . will be procured and -, oe _ DO, — - | all the DGs will be | | Z : Zz aan Operational . Z Detailed Reasons for delay: - _ ot Though 90% of the construction is over, the developer was not able to complete their project due to advérse market condition and global recession. , oe i oo . - In this regard, the following information has been been furnished by.. DC, MEPZ MEPZ SEZ after after Oo an site inspection on on 1.11.2017. e Between November November 2006 and April 2013, the Developer had developed developed an area of about of about about . . me 11.30 lakh sq.ft.(more than one million square meter) in the SEZ incurring a cost of . ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [571 x 367] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- oo . - In this regard, the following information has been been furnished by.. DC, MEPZ MEPZ SEZ after after Oo an site inspection on on 1.11.2017. e Between November November 2006 and April 2013, the Developer had developed developed an area of about of about about . me 11.30 lakh sq.ft.(more than one million square meter) in the SEZ incurring a cost of . TL approximately %280 Cr. The civil structure,STP Civil work and lifts in respect of this co - area were completed by April 2013. About 95% of the building and other works (to the . tune of 270 Cr.) was completed prior.to the expiry of their LOA validity (05.05.2014). . "This has been confirmed by [the][ report][ of][ the][ Authorised,][ Officer,] [dated] [14.05.2013.] _ -@ The Ozone Group(of which M/s.True Living Spaces Pvt. Ltd. is a part), through CBRE(a ~ - ae : Los Angeles, USA based firm) has conducted a detailed market study to assess the _ current need for this SEZ. As per the CBRE’s report, dated 11.10.2017, the following  - JT/ITES Companies are interested in taking up the space in the SEZ:- a Name of the Company Potential requirement( Sq.ft.) . 1 Cognizant Technologies 7,00,000. 7 oe | 2 |TCS 2,00,000 oe 3. | Intelenet Global Service | . 25,000 2 Oe ae | 6} Podapt Solitions_ of 70,000 fe ae ne Total __40,65,000 a os. "These companies are ready to enter into. formal agreement within.3 months once the | *. SEZ!8ets revived. In this régard, copy of Developer’s letter, dated 12.10.2017 with CBRE’s. ... reportis also enclosed for reference, . oot . ----- End of picture text -----

po '® Ozone has estimated that the SEZ(11.30. lakh sq.ft.) has the potential of providing : employment to 10,000 people and. generating an annual exports of approximately USD - oe 230 million(about 21500 Cr.) in the next 2 years. re ; e Given the works completed and ongoing, the huge investment already incurred and its — _ - hearness to the Chennai International Airport (about 27 km), this SEZ could become . poDs operational by Sept. 2018. The. 11,30lakh sq.ft. already developed in the SEZ could cater to the immediate requirement ofSEZ Space‘in the next 8-12 months. oe, a _ Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ - re | | Development Comunissioner MEPZ SEZ has recommended the proposal torevoke the ©. . ; _ ‘cancelled LoA and request for extension ofLOA up to 30.09.2018. _ oo oe The request 1S placed before BOA for its consideration, ~ . | Recommendation by DC: ; oe i : Development Commissioner MEPZ SEZ has recommended the above two proposals. _ . The request of the developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. ~ ae . (iv) Request of M/s. Estancia IT Park SEZ, developer of sector specific SEZ for . . '. -TT/ATES at Vallancheri Village, Chenglepet Taluk, Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu for increase in area ofitsSEZ . . a a oe ee il nt. The_above. mentioned. SEZ. was-notified on.01.05.2007-over an: area of: 11.09 hectares. an | . The SEZ is yet to be operational. 7 Bo , - Now: the developer has requested approvalfor an increase: in area of (2.54+4.30 = | 6.84 hectares), thereby making the total area of SEZ as 17.93 hectares... oo SO There is a. public road adjacent to the current notified area of 11.09 hectares and , , ' proposed additional area of 2.54 hectares. The developer has submitted an undertaking that _ they construct a foot over bridge to connect the two land areas, . . ; - In the EC,it reflects the old name Mis. Arun Excello, the developer’ informed that the - records would undergo a change only upon transfer of the said property in future. The old name will reflect until suchtime. © Do, . a So oe The developer stated that there are 47 survey nos. involved in the area of 4,30 - _ heetares. The developer has executed the sale-agreement of 1.07 hectares (12 sy. Nos.) with —_ Mrs. Nusrath Fathima‘andMr.Mehboob.Khan and 1.60.5 hectares (10 ‘sy. Nos.) with M/s. © Presidency Kid Leather P. Ltd. and made exchange deed of 1.63 hectares (25 sy nos.) with ~~ co, M/s. Rane-NSK Steerng Systems P.Ltd. Oe a Oo 7 oo - The developer also stated that a building admeasuring 54,400 sq.ft/ approx.) isin ; : : the area of 1.07 hectares and 22,488 sq.ft. (approx.) is in the area of 1.60.5 hectares. The =, . "developer informed that they. have exchanged an area of 3.99.545 acres with M/s, Rane NSK — . ‘Steering Systems P. Ltd. for the land of:3.98.77 acres of land and submitted the exchange + deed | , . . , a

| DC MEPZ has recommended the request for increase the area of the SEZ. a Oo ; . The proposal of the developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. . ° . - | oo ee . Item no. 80.6 Appeais before BoA (2 Appeal). ct eee . “~@)— Appeal.of M/s. Reyan Impex requesting for setting up of new unitin NSEZ _against order dated 19.09.2017 passed by UAC, NSEZ. ~ Be ot a Gistof order. appealed against | oo . . , Mis. Reyan Tmpex has proposed to set up anew unit in NSEZ. presently ronninga ne shop at Shop No.6, Geeta Bhawan,15NWA,.Punjab Bagh, New Delhi is. a start-up unit to - - ~ undertake manufacturing & export of plain gold jewellery, plain gold jewellery, plain silver ~ : . _ jewellery, gold jewellery studded with pearls, silver jewellery studded with pearls with : projected exports of Rs. 18000 lakhs and NFEearnings worth Rs. 2085 lakhs over a period of | five years. The Approval Committee vide letter dated 19.09.2017 has. rejected the proposal oe stating that the promoters are working at the current location since 17.06.2017 and that there . were three staff members, a coordinator and two designers, the above designers are working in the firm for last one and half month. No machinery was installed in the premises and only =. | work of designing of jewellery is carried on by the promoters. toe Ft, . - Further, the Approval Committee after due deliberations, observed that in view of no _ | , Co export experience of promoters, disproportionately very low investment/proj ected-manpower . = by them, very high export projections and relatively very small income of the promoters, . ee projectis_not-viable-and rejectedthesame. in-terms of section .15(3) ofSEZ.Act,.2005 and... 0 2} Rule 18(1) of SEZ Rules, 2006.0 Oe a a oe | ~ Contents of Appeal - ee : . os | , | BC The Appellant has stated as under: . ; | . _ a It was informed by the Approval Committee that Shri Sandeep Aggarwal and Smt. 7 Pooja Aggarwal appeared before the Approval. Committee to explain the project. Shri “ _ Aggarwal. informed that he has vast. experience in. the business of the : ‘ manufacturing/import/export/distribution of various goods for more than 20 years. He further . informed that he does not have any experience in manufacturing of gems & jewellery sector, _ C: ‘That Shri Aggarwal further informed that initially he had submitted the application for | a ae setting up the unitinNSEZ as a proprietorship firm, However, now the constitution of the DC . firm has been changed to partnership firm with his wife Smt. Pooja Aggarwal as second’ =~ - partner. ; oo oo Oo oe a That He further informed that-his' wife Smt. Pooja Aggarwal’ has worked with British oO : _ Airways at IGI Airport from. 2007-2013 as ground staff and is experienced in handling the S SO import/export cargoof jewellery through air cargo & dealing with Custom clearance ete. Shri _* also has doné course from Gemological Institute of America, After British Airways, she joint ~«* jewelers and assistedin jewellery designing. 2 Oe coy 7 oe a 2 a That Smt. Pooja Aggarwal informed that they have planned to invest approx. Rs. 10° - , ~. . Jakhs inthe proposed manufacturing facility and 20-25 skilled craftsmen will be employed

; initially. She further informed that most of the jewellery shall be Handmadejewellery, 100% 7 _ manufacturing shall be done in house and no job works shall be undertaken; - . . bo That Further, it was informed that the Approval Committee in its earlier meeting held | bo on 05.07.2017 had. directed that a team from NSEZ shall undertake physical inspection of the — ae DTA premises ofthe.applicant. Accordingly, a team from NSEZ visited the address ofthe = a ae - company in Punjabi Bagh, Delhi on 31.07.2017; Accordingly, Approval Committee observed . :: that both promoters have done only one week course that too in Diamond/Gem Stone . — | ~ grading. Further, the :promioter’s does not have any experience at all in the field of '7 manufactutingapplicanthas projectedand exportexportof jewellery. of Rs. 180 ThecroresApproval against meagerCommittee investmentalso observed of Rs.:10that lakhs the a~ |_ Bo . . only. TheApproval Committee ’also. observed that the premise at Punjabi Bagh has been hired st just three days before filing the application for setting up unit in NSEZ. . oe So ‘Rule Position . | oo Section 15(3) of SEZ Act, 2005:provide that the Approval Committee may, either : an -approve the proposal without modification, or approve the proposal with modifications : | subject to such terms and conditions as it may deem fit to impose, or reject. the proposalin. — 7 accordance with the provisions of sub-section (8): - , 7 oo . : a Provided that in case | . of modification or rejection of a proposal, the Approval . i Comunittee shall afford a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the person concerned and after recording the reasons, either modify or reject the proposal. -_ neh pene op _ The appeal is placed before the BoA for consideration. (Annexure-2).- © - ---} (ii) Appeal of M/s. Robinson International Pvt. Ltd. a unit in FSEZ against order | dated 17.02.2017 passed by UAC, FSEZ. oe _ eS 7 ; _ Gist of order app:ealed against | os ce nO . Ceand M/s. Robinson International Pvt. Ltd., vide its LoP dated 27.02.1997as manufacturer a exporter of builders’ hardware and further included manufacturing .of brass rod from 7 : brass. scrap. A unit. holder requested DC FSEZ, for inclusion of new items like brass | handicraft. The UAC vide its meeting dated, 10.02.2017 had granted the permission to include. . a the items with condition that the unit cannot be allowed to import brass scrap, ee . However,theUAC/ PSBZ vide letter dated 17.02.2017 has rejected the request for = ~. inclusion of new items like Handcraft other Article of Brass (Brass door knob) — ITC (HS) Code 74199930 and Art ware/brass handicraft or brass ITC (HS) Code 741901 with condition , that no import/procurement of scrap will be allowed and the unit-will ensure compliance of: . oe Rule 18(4) of SEZ Rules, 2006. - | , . . pa 2 , : 7 7 As per the Rule 56 of SEZ Rules, 2006 - “An appeal shall be preferred by the 2 . 4 a Approvalaggrieved person within a periodof thirty days from the date of receipt of the order of the ~~ ae _ Committee under Rule 18. The appeal has been preferred on.04.10.2017 and not _ Oo within a period of thirty days from the date of order of the UAC, henceis time barred. - 2 a " ae The appeal is accordingly placed before the BoA for consideration (Annexure-3), -/ ; ,

econ . . ; ;

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.