← Archive
IN FORCE SEZ / EOU / FTWZ

Agenda for the 115th meeting of the BoA for SEZs

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

No. K-43022/44/2023-SEZ Government of India Ministry of Commerce and Industry Department of Commerce (SEZ Section) Vanijya Bhawan, New Delhi Dated the 06" June, 2023

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

  • Subject: 3" meeting (2023 Series) of the Board of Approval for Export Oriented Units and 11s® Meeting of the Board of Approval (BoA) for Special Economic Zones (SEZs) scheduled to be held on 17" June, 2023 — Reg.

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM of even no. dated 30.05.2023 on the subject cited above and to inform that the 3" meeting (2023 Series) of the Board of Approval for Export Oriented Units and 115" meeting of the BoA for SEZs is scheduled to be held on 17™ June, 2023 at Pune under the chairmanship of Commerce Secretary in hybrid mode.

  • Z The agenda for the 115" meeting of the BoA for SEZs is enclosed herewith.

  • 3 The Venue and meeting link of the aforesaid meeting will be shared shortly.

==> picture [74 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Encl: As above<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

To

==> picture [257 x 109] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Ke [a<br>(Sumit Kumar—" Sachan) ¢ 92<br>Under Secretary to the Government of India<br>Tel: 23039829<br>Email: sumit.sachan@nic.in<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

  1. Central Board of Excise and Customs, Member (Customs), Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi. (Fax: 23092628),

  2. Central Board of Direct Taxes, Member (IT), Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi. (Telefax: 23092107).

  3. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services, Banking 4. Division, Jeevan Deep Building, New Delhi (Fax: 23344462/23366797). Shri Anil Agarwal, Additional Secretary, Department of Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi.

  4. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, Transport Bhawan, New Delhi. 6. Joint Secretary (E), Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

  5. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Plant Protection, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. 8. Ministry of Science and Technology, Sc ‘G’ & Head (TDT), Technology Bhavan, Mehrauli Road, New Delhi. (Telefax: 26862512)

  6. Joint Secretary, Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, 7 Floor, Block 2, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.

  7. Additional Secretary and Development Commissioner (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Scale Industry), Room No. 701, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi (Fax: 23062315).

odhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.

  1. Additional Secretary and Development Commissioner (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Scale Industry), Room No. 701, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi (Fax: 23062315).

  2. Secretary, Department of Electronics & Information Technology, Electronics Niketan, 6, CGO Complex, New Delhi. (Fax: 24363101)

  3. Joint Secretary (IS-I), Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi (Fax: 23092569)

  4. Joint Secretary (C&W), Ministry of Defence, Fax: 23015444, South Block, New Delhi.

  5. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Pariyavaran Bhavan, CGO Complex, New Delhi — 110003 (Fax: 24363577)

  6. Joint Secretary & Legislative Counsel, Legislative Department, M/o Law & Justice, A-Wing, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi. (Tel: 23387095).

  7. Department of Legal Affairs (Shri Hemant Kumar, Assistant Legal Adviser), M/o Law & Justice, New Delhi.

  8. Secretary, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 18. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, Akbar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi. (Fax: 24674140)

  9. Chief Planner, Department of Urban Affairs, Town Country Planning Organisation, Vikas Bhavan (E-Block), I.P. Estate, New Delhi. (Fax: 23073678/23379197)

  10. Director General, Director General of Foreign Trade, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi.

  11. Director General, Export Promotion Council for EOUs/SEZs, 8G, 8" Floor, Hansalaya Building, 15, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi — 110 001 (Fax: 223329770)

ent of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi.

  1. Director General, Export Promotion Council for EOUs/SEZs, 8G, 8" Floor, Hansalaya Building, 15, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi — 110 001 (Fax: 223329770)

22.Dr. Rupa Chanda, Professor, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, Bennerghata Road, Bangalore, Karnataka

  1. Development Commissioner, Noida Special Economic Zone, Noida.

  2. Development Commissioner, Kandla Special Economic Zone, Gandhidham.

  3. Development Commissioner, Falta Special Economic Zone, Kolkata.

  4. Development Commissioner, SEEPZ Special Economic Zone, Mumbai.

  5. Development Commissioner, Madras Special Economic Zone, Chennai 28. Development Commissioner, Visakhapatnam Special Economic Zone, Visakhapatnam

  6. Development Commissioner, Cochin Special Economic Zone, Cochin.

  7. Development Commissioner, Indore Special Economic Zone, Indore.

  8. Development Commissioner, Mundra Special Economic Zone, 4h Floor, C Wing, Port Users Building, Mundra (Kutch) Gujarat.

  9. Development Commissioner, Dahej Special Economic Zone, Fadia Chambers, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad, Gujarat

  10. Development Commissioner, Navi Mumbai Special Economic Zone, SEEPZ Service Center, Central Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai — 400 096

  11. Development Commissioner, Sterling Special Economic Zone, Sandesara Estate, Atladra Padra Road, Vadodara - 390012

  12. Development Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh Special Economic Zone, Udyog Bhawan, 9" Floor, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam — 3

  13. Development Commissioner, Reliance Jamnagar Special Economic Zone, Jamnagar, Gujarat

t Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh Special Economic Zone, Udyog Bhawan, 9" Floor, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam — 3

  1. Development Commissioner, Reliance Jamnagar Special Economic Zone, Jamnagar, Gujarat

  2. Development Commissioner, Surat Special Economic Zone, Surat, Gujarat

  3. Development Commissioner, Mihan Special Economic Zone, Nagpur, Maharashtra

  4. Development Commissioner, Sricity Special Economic Zone, Andhra Pradesh. 40. Development Commissioner, Mangalore Special Economic Zone, Mangalore. 41. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Principal Secretary and CIP, Industries and 42. Commerce Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad — 500022. (Fax: 040-23452895). Government of Telangana, Special Chief Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department, Telangana Secretariat Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana.

  5. Government of Karnataka, Principal Secretary, Commerce and Industry Department, Vikas Saudha, Bangalore — 560001. (Fax: 080-22259870)

  6. Government of Maharashtra, Principal Secretary (Industries), Energy and Labour Department, Mumbai — 400 032.

  7. Government of Gujarat, Principal Secretary, Industries and Mines Department Sardar 46. Patel Bhawan, Block No. 5, 3rd Floor, Gandhinagar — 382010 (Fax: 079-23250844). Government of West Bengal, Principal Secretary, (Commerce and Industry), IP Branch (4 Floor), SEZ Section, 4, Abanindranath Tagore Sarani (Camac Street) Kolkata — 700 016

  8. Government of Tamil Nadu, Principal Secretary (Industries), Fort St. George, Chennai — 600009 (Fax: 044-25370822),.

EZ Section, 4, Abanindranath Tagore Sarani (Camac Street) Kolkata — 700 016

  1. Government of Tamil Nadu, Principal Secretary (Industries), Fort St. George, Chennai — 600009 (Fax: 044-25370822),.

  2. Government of Kerala, Principal Secretary (Industries), Government Secretariat, Trivandrum — 695001 (Fax: 0471-2333017).

  3. Government of Haryana, Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary), Department of Industries, Haryana Civil Secretariat, © Chandigarh (Fax: 0172-2740526).

  4. Government of Rajasthan, Principal Secretary (Industries), Secretariat Campus, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur — 302005 (0141-2227788).

  5. Government of Uttar Pradesh, Principal Secretary, (Industries), Lal Bahadur Shastri Bhawan, Lucknow — 226001 (Fax: 0522-2238255).

  6. Government of Punjab, Principal Secretary Department of Industry & Commerce Udyog Bhawan), Sector -17, Chandigarh- 160017.

  7. Government of Puducherry, Secretary, Department of Industries, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.

  8. Government of Odisha, Principal Secretary (Industries), Odisha Secretariat, Bhubaneshwar — 751001 (Fax: 0671-536819/2406299).

  9. Government of Madhya Pradesh, Chief Secretary, (Commerce and Industry), Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal (Fax: 0755-2559974)

  10. Government of Uttarakhand, Principal Secretary, (Industries), No. 4, Subhash Road, Secretariat, Dehradun, Uttarakhand

  11. Government of Jharkhand (Secretary), Department of Industries Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi — 834002.

Principal Secretary, (Industries), No. 4, Subhash Road, Secretariat, Dehradun, Uttarakhand

  1. Government of Jharkhand (Secretary), Department of Industries Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi — 834002.

  2. Union Territory of Daman and Diu and Dadra Nagar Haveli, Secretary (Industries), Department of Industries, Secretariat, Moti Daman — 396220 (Fax: 0260-2230775).

  3. Government of Nagaland, Principal Secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce), Kohima, Nagaland.

  4. Government of Chattishgarh, Commissioner-cum-Secretary Industries, Directorate of Industries, LIC Building Campus, 2" Floor, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Fax: 0771-2583651).

Copy to: PPS to CS/ PPS to AS (LSS) / PPS to JS (VB) PPS to Dir (SNS).

Agenda for the 115" meeting of the Board of Approval for Special Economic Zones

to be held on 17" June, 2023

115.1: Ratification of the minutes of the 114" meeting of the Board of Approval held on 15" April, 2023.

115.2: Request for extension of validity of formal approval for developers (1 proposal)

Rule position: In terms of Rule 6(2) of the SEZ Rules, 2006, the letter of approval of a developer shall be valid for a period of three years within which time at least one unit has commenced production and the SEZ become operational from date of commencement of such production. The Board may on an application by the developer for reasons to be recorded in writing extend the validity period.

115.2(i) Request of M/s. Nagaland Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. SEZ for extension of the validity period of the Formal Approval granted for setting up of a sector specific SEZ for Agro and Food Processing for a further period of 03 years beyond 02.12.2022.

==> picture [400 x 139] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Name of the|Developer|:|M/s.|Nagaland|Industrial|Development|
|Corporation|Limited|
|Sector|:|Agro & Food|Processing|
|Location|:|Dimapur,|Nagaland|
|Extension|;|Formal|approval|was|issued|on|12.10.2007.|The|
|Developer|has|been|granted|7|extensions.|The|
|SEZ|stands|notified|as|on|date|over|an|area|of|
|50|Ha.|
|Request|;|Extension|of|validity|of|formal|approval|for|
|three|years|beyond|02.12.2022|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Request

The Board of Approval in its meeting on 06.01.2017 had directed to issue a Show Cause Notice and to carry out a physical inspection of the above said SEZ. As informed by the DC, a Show Cause Notice was issued on 10.02.2017 and the Inspection was carried out by the representative of Falta SEZ on 27.04.2017, wherein the following was observed:

(i) M/s. NIDCL, the Developer had created common infrastructure facilities such as road, boundary wall, administrative block, guest house, House, Industrial Shed, and Electrification ete.

(ii) Physical Progress:

==> picture [247 x 122] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|No.|
|||1.|{Land &|Site Development|100%|
|2|nternal|main|road|and|_Internalj100%|
|approach|road|
|Administrative|Building|100%|
|| 4.||Guest House Building|100%|
|| 5.|[Boundary|Wall|
|| 6.|[Water Treatment Plant|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 1 of 30

==> picture [403 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> | 7. _|Common Effluent Treatment Plant _ [In the pipeline<br>|. 89 . | ColdSewerage/extStorag e rnal drainageintheinthe pipelinePipeline Cd<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

On the basis of such progress and reply of SCN, BoA had again extended the LOA.

Further, DC has informed that the 1 UAC Meeting was held in Nagaland on 18.11.2019 wherein one unit, M/s. Zatara Pvt. Ltd. was granted LoA on 03.12.2019 for manufacturing and export of 'King Chilly Hot Sauce, King Chilly Pickle, Dried Chilly Powder, Dried Chilly Pods, Powdered King Chilly and Seeds for Germinations'. However, despite after a considerable period of time, since lapse of LoA of both the Developer and the Unit, no application had been received for extension of LoA from the Developer. Neither any reason was cited nor any update was provided in this regard.

e lapse of LoA of both the Developer and the Unit, no application had been received for extension of LoA from the Developer. Neither any reason was cited nor any update was provided in this regard.

DC office had requested the Developer vide letter dated 17.01.2023 to submit the current status of the above said SEZ along with future road-map, Work completion status etc. Now, the Managing Director of M/s. Nagaland Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. has sent a reply dated 03.05.2023 alongwith their application in Form-C1 for extension of their SEZ for further three (03) years beyond 02.12.2023.

Present Progress:

a. Details of Business Plan

==> picture [433 x 149] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|b.||IncrementalffotalSBSInvestment|since|last|extension:|Ci‘CSC‘isC|
|Crore)|last|extension|(Rs.|in|
|Crore|
|a.|Land|Cost|il|(Allotted|by|Govt.|of|Nil|(Allotted|by|Govt.|o|
|a|ae|Sh|<|
|||fPotal|5SCd|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

The list of operations carried out at the SEZ as per Form-C1 dated 03.05.2023.

==> picture [383 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

||||
|---|---|---|
||6.|[_|intemalRoads_CS#L00%]|
||8.|[Water Treatment Plant|90%|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 2 of 30

==> picture [325 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
6. [_
8. [Water Treatment Plant 

**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 2 of 30 

**==> picture [325 x 74] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
9. ERA In the pipeline<br>|10.___|Cold Storage<br>|[Residential 11. Block<br>| 12. [Factory Shed (3 Nos) 100%<br>| 13_|Standard Design Factory (02 Nos) 100%<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Wall, AdministrativeThe DeveloperBlock,has createdGuest commonHouse, IndustrialInfrastructureShed, Electrificationfacilities such etc.as Road, Boundary 

Reason for Delay to implement the Project within the schedule date as submitted by the Developer: 

- e Units are yet to set up at this SEZ. 

- e Interest has been shown by nine (09) units to establish their units at this SEZ. ¢ Units have shown interest to set up at AFSEZ (Agro & Food processing SEZ). ¢ Additional infrastructure to be set up as and when AFSEZ (Agro & Food processing SEZ) units are set up.

## Recommendation by DC, Falta SEZ: 

this DC, FSEZ has recommended the proposal for another two years from 03.12.2022 as is the only SEZ in NE Region and 95% of the work has been completed and one entrepreneur is interested to set up unit in this SEZ when it is expected to start operation.

## Item No. 115.3: Requests for extension of validity of in-principle approval (2 proposals) 

Rule position: Rule 6 (2)(b) of the SEZ Rules, 2006 stipulates that “The letter ofapproval of a Developer granted under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) shall be validfor a period of one year within which time, the Developer shall submit suitable proposal for formal approval in Form A as prescribed under the provisions ofrule 3: 

Provided that the Board may, on an application by the Developer, for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the validity period: 

Providedfurther that the Developer shall submit the application in Form C2 to the concerned Development Commissioner, as specified in Annexure III, who, within a period offifteen days, shallforward it to the Board with his recommendations." 

115.3(i) Request of M/s. NDR Infrastructure Private Ltd., Chennai, for second extension of validity period of In-Principle Approval granted for setting up of a MultiSector SEZ at Soorai Village & Aayal Village, Sholingar Taluk, Ranipet Dist., TN over an area of 50.58 Ha, for a further period of one year beyond 30.06.2023.

roval granted for setting up of a MultiSector SEZ at Soorai Village & Aayal Village, Sholingar Taluk, Ranipet Dist., TN over an area of 50.58 Ha, for a further period of one year beyond 30.06.2023. 

for M/s. NDR Infrastructure Private Ltd., Chennai was granted "In-Principle" Approval setting up of "Multi-Sector SEZ" at Soorai Village & Aayal Village, Sholingar Taluk, Ranipet Dist., Tamil Nadu vide LoA dated 08.06.2021. At the time of their application for inprinciple approval, they were in possession of 32.37 Hectares (80 acres) of land out of their total proposed 50.58 Hectares for setting up of their Multi Sector SEZ. To fulfil the minimum requirement of land for grant of Formal Approval, the applicant sought time for acquiring the 

Page 3 of 30 

remaining lands. Accordingly, the first extension for one year was granted by the BoA on 31.03.2022 and the in-principle approval is valid upto 30.06.2023. 

The Developer has informed that they acquired additional lands 9.805 Ha (24.23 acres). With the above additional lands, the applicant is presently, in possession of land, totalling 42.175 Hectares (104.21 acres). In their application, the Developer has mentioned the reason for extension of validity i.e., due to delay in concluding the land purchase. They also stated that the inflation of the land price has subsequently escalated the project cost, because of which they could not conclude acquiring the land as per the scheduled time. Also, the land nearby which are proposed for purchase is not having the updated/clear title of the owners.

cost, because of which they could not conclude acquiring the land as per the scheduled time. Also, the land nearby which are proposed for purchase is not having the updated/clear title of the owners. Hence, it is taking time to clear/update the title of the land owner for completing the purchase of the land. However, the Developer has stated that they are confident in purchasing the proposed land area within 10 to 12 months’ time. In view of the above, the Developer has sought extension of the validity of their ‘In-principle’ Approval for another one year till 30.06.2024.

## Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ: 

DC MEPZ has recommended the proposal for extension of validity of in-principle approval granted to the developer. 

115.3(ii) Request of M/s. Magnus Infrastructure Ltd. for extension of validity period of In-Principle Approval granted for setting up of a Multi-Sector SEZ at Neidavoyal Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District, TN, over an area of 50.58 Ha, for a further period of one year beyond 30.06.2023. 

M/s. Magnus Infrastructure Ltd. was granted In-Principle Approval for setting up of "Multi-Sector SEZ" at Neidavoyal Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur Dist., Tamil Nadu vide LoA dated 08.06.2021. At the time of their application, they were in possession of 22.26 Hectares [55 acres] of land out of their total proposed 50.58 Hectares for setting up of their Multi Sector SEZ. To fulfil the minimum requirement of land for grant of Formal Approval, the applicant sought time for acquiring the remaining lands. Accordingly, the first extension for one year was granted by the BoA on 31.03.2022 and the in-principle approval is valid upto 30.06.2023.

e applicant sought time for acquiring the remaining lands. Accordingly, the first extension for one year was granted by the BoA on 31.03.2022 and the in-principle approval is valid upto 30.06.2023. 

The Developer has informed that they have almost finalised another 10 Ha of land and the same are nearing agreement stage. In their application for extension of validity for a further period of one year, the developer has stated that due to upcoming projects like Cement, Fertilizers & Petro chemicals, around their proposed Multi Sector SEZ, the cost of lands increased substantially high. To conclude the purchase with a reasonable price, the developer is under negotiation with many land owners, for which it may take few more months. However, it is stated that they are confident in acquiring the required remaining land in a year.

## Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ: 

DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal for extension of validity of in-principle approval granted to the developer.

## 115.4: Request for extension of LoA of unit (1 proposal) 

Page 4 of 30

## Rule position: 

- ¢ As per Rule 18(1) of the SEZ Rules, the Approval Committee may approve or reject a proposal for setting up of Unit in a Special Economic Zone. 

- e Cases for consideration of extension of Letter of Approval i.r.o. units in SEZs are governed by Rule 19(4) of SEZ Rules. 

- ¢ Rule 19(4) states that LoA shall be valid for one year. First Proviso grants power to DCs for extending the LoA for a period not exceeding 2 years. Second Proviso grants further power to DCs for extending the LoA for one more year subject to the condition that two-thirds of activities including construction, relating to the setting up of the Unit is complete and a Chartered Engineer’s certificate to this effect is 

- ¢ submitted by the entrepreneur. Extensions beyond 3™ year (in cases where two-third activities are not complete) and onwards are granted by BoA. 

- ¢ BoA can extend the validity for a period of one year at a time. ¢ There is no time limit up to which the Board can extend the validity. 

115.4(i) Request of M/s. Algolog Systems Pvt. Ltd., a Unit in Ansal IT City & Parks Ltd., ITATES SEZ at Plot No. TZ-06, Tech Zone, Greater Noida (U.P.) for extension of Letter of Approval for a further period of one year i.e., upto 31.03.2024. Name of Unit : Algolog Systems Pvt. Ltd. LOA issued on : 26.10.2015 Nature of Business of the: Software Development. unit No. of Extensions : Unit had been granted three extensions. LOA valid upto : 31.03.2023 extended by BOA in its meeting dated 31.03.2022 Request : Unit has requested for one year extension i.e., upto 31.03.2024.

ions : Unit had been granted three extensions. LOA valid upto : 31.03.2023 extended by BOA in its meeting dated 31.03.2022 Request : Unit has requested for one year extension i.e., upto 31.03.2024. 

Present Progress: 

**==> picture [432 x 161] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
a. Details of business plan: -<br>J (Rs.<br>2___|Constructionfland Cost  Cost______—(2,76,00,SLT8,2 0 00/-,0007-—“C~*~s~s~SCS(approx) SS—=*d<br>4 [Other Overheads LBO8-—S—“—~sSCS<br>b. | ffotal: OBABOROSC~—“—~*~*~SCS<br>Investment made so far & incremental investment since last extension:<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


S.No. {Type of Cost 

**==> picture [245 x 43] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
otal Investment|Incremental investment since<br>(Rs. (Rs.<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 5 of 30 

**==> picture [411 x 77] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
1 Land Cost 1,18,20,000/- -<br>2 [Material Procurement _|1,56,19,826/-____40,96,234/-<br>4| _—|OtherTotal:Overheads____4,28,939/-_B17,071/-3, [47,75,812.20__177,26,952.20]<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


c. Details of Physical progress till date: - 

**==> picture [413 x 478] intentionally omitted <==**

4,28,939/-_B17,071/-3, [47,75,812.20__177,26,952.20]<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


c. Details of Physical progress till date: - 

**==> picture [413 x 478] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
S.No. Authorised activity |% completion as o completion|Deadline fo<br>alaayear balance work<br>1 Land taken on lease Within 5<br>and registration ears of date|<br>of issue of<br>sanction by<br>Gr. Noida, dt.<br>03.01.2019<br>a<br>2architect [approval] [drawings] a a<br>5 construction agenc ee a<br>5 Completion off 1. 1.RCC 100% Within 3<br>onstruction Work upto ears of date<br>plinth i.e. of issue o<br>work upto sanction by<br>basement Gr. Noida, dt.<br>parking roof 03.01.2019.<br>completed. [100%<br>2. Katcha Road<br>along the<br>building side<br>completed.<br>Machineries building is under building i<br>Commercial construction. under<br>F9 [_Prodution&][__|Exportorders] expo| construction.<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Project Implementation schedule. 

Page 6 of 30 

**==> picture [372 x 157] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|*|Work|for pucca boundary|wall|of the|site|has|been|started|simultaneously.|
|¢|Simultaneously|the|work|for|other|floors|commenced|
|¢|3"|floor|will|be completed|by|October’|2023|
|¢|Likely|trial|production November|/ December’|2023|
|¢|Likely|commercial|production November|/ December’|2023|
|¢|Likely|export|orders|November|/ December’|2023|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Details reasons for delay: -

  • ¢ Because of the ban on construction and demolition activities in the months of November and December imposed by the NGT due to Supreme Court orders to improve the deteriorating air quality;

  • ¢ Labour also returned late to work at the construction site, which also hindered the progress.

Recommendation by DC, Noida SEZ:

i.€., DC, NSEZ has recommended the extension of LoA for a further period of one year state upto 31.03.2024. A site visit was also undertaken on 01.05.2023 to verify the current of the project. It was found to be as per the project implementation schedule above.

115.5: Request for co-developer status (5 proposals)

Relevant provision: In terms of sub-section (11) under Section 3 of the SEZ Act, 2005, any person who or a State Government which, intends to provide any infrastructure facilities in the identified area or undertake any authorized operation after entering into an agreement with the developer, make a proposal for the same to the Board for its approval.

==> picture [450 x 172] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|115.5(i)|Request|of|M/s.|Waystar|Realty|Private|Limited,|Ahmedabad|for|Co-|
|Developer|status|within|the|processing Area|in|GIFT-Multi|Services|SEZ,|at Ratanpur,|
|District Gandhinagar,|Gujarat,|developed|by|M/s. GIFT SEZ Limited.|
|,*|||ame of|the Developer|&|Location|s. GIFT SEZ Limited,|
|||Pate of|LoA to Developer|07-01-2008Gandhinagar, Gujarat.|
|ulti-services-SEZ|
|= of|[the SEZ]|
|at|oni of|Notification|18-08-2011|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 7 of 30

==> picture [451 x 361] intentionally omitted <==

Gujarat.| |ulti-services-SEZ| |= of|[the SEZ]| |at|oni of|Notification|18-08-2011|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 7 of 30 

**==> picture [451 x 361] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|5.|Total|notified|area|(in|Hectares)|105.4386|Hectares|
|||&|[Whether the SEZ is operational or not|SEZ operational|
||__|(i)|If operational,|date|of operationalization|{21-04-2012|
|(ii) No.|of Units|Functional|— 232|units|
|nder|implementation|—|302|units|
|(iii)|Total|Exports|&|Imports|for|the|last|S|Exports|— 26291.62|
|years|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|Imports —|783.17|
|||[_fiv)]|[Total]|[Employment]|[(In][ Nos.)]|
|hi|ame|of the|proposed|Co-developer|M/s.|Waystar|Realty|Private|
|Limited,|
|Ahmedabad|
|Details|of|Infrastructure|facilities|Development|of|SEZ|building|o|
|authorized|operations|to|be|undertaken|byjPlot No.|15-F.|
|the|co-developer|
|otal|area|(in|Hectares)|on|which|activities|7196|square|meters|(0.719|hectares)|
|ill|be|performed|by|the|co-developer|50,066.15|square|meters|built-up|
|area|
|10.|Proposed|investment|by|the|Co-developerjRs.|350.00|crores|
|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|
|11.|et|worth of the|Co-developer|(Rs.|in|Cr.)||Rs.|610.12|crores|(of|one|of|the|
|promoters)|
|[=|= of|the Co-developer agreement|23.03.2023 & 25.05.2023|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, GIFT SEZ: -

In view of the increase in economic activity and other developments at GIFT-SEZ, Gandhinagar; DC, GIFT SEZ has recommended the proposal of M/s. Waystar Realty Private Limited, Ahmedabad as a Co-Developer, for development of SEZ building on Plot No. 15-F within the processing area in GIFT-SEZ, Gandhinagar.

115.5(ii) Request of M/s. Sreeka Builders Pvt. Ltd. for Co-Developer status in M/s. Phoenix Tech Zone Pvt. Ltd. SEZ, Sy. No. 115/35 at Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Telangana.

==> picture [432 x 116] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|ame of the|Developer &|Location|M/s.|Phoenix|Tech|Zone|Pvt.|
|Ltd.|
|Lau of|LoA to Developer|17.2.2017|
|| 3|eer of|the SEZ|ITATES|
|||Pate of Notification|17.3.2017|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 8 of 30

==> picture [433 x 331] intentionally omitted <==

eveloper|17.2.2017| || 3|eer of|the SEZ|ITATES| |||Pate of Notification|17.3.2017|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 8 of 30 

**==> picture [433 x 331] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|6.|Whether|the|SEZ|is|operational|or not|Yes|
||__|).|If operational,|date of operationalization|||28.2.2020|
|||[(ii).]|[No.]|[of][ Units]|
|(iii).|Total|Exports &|Imports|for the|last|5|| Exports|from|2019-20|to|2022-|
|years|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|23|—|Rs.|2312.38|Crores|
|Imports|from|2019-20|to|2022-|
|23|—|Rs.|331.98|Crores|
|(iv).|Total|Employment|(In Nos.)|Employment|from|2019-20|to|
|2022-23|—|3353|Nos|
|ame of the proposed|Co-developer|M/s.|Sreeka|Builders|Pvt.|Ltd|
|Details|of Infrastructure|facilities|/|Upgrade,|operate,|lease|and|
|authorized operations|to be undertaken|by|__|{maintain|the|authorized)|
|the|co-developer|operations|
|Total|area|(in|Hectares) on which activities|| 46,669|sq.|ft.|in|3rd|Floor|i|
|will|be|performed by the|co-developer|'Tower-B|of the SEZ|
|Proposed|investment by the Co-developer|| 41.50|
|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|
|et worth|of the|Co-developer|(Rs.|inCr.)||100%|subsidiary|of|M/s.|
|||>|of|the Co-developer agreement|Phoenix06.03.2023 Tech Zone Pvt.|Ltd.|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ:-

DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal.

115.5(iii) Request of M/s Sreeka Infra Pvt. Ltd. for Co-Developer status in M/s. Phoenix Tech Zone Pvt. Ltd SEZ, Sy. No. 115/35 at Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Telangana.

==> picture [451 x 236] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|i=|||ame of|the Developer|& Location|Ltd.M/s.|Phoenix|Tech|Zone|Pvt.|
|Date of LoA|to|Developer|17.2.2017|
|a|of|the SEZ|IT/ITES|
|\*|= of|Notification|17.3.2017|
|||Se|sae the SEZ is operational or not|
||__|).|If operational,|date of operationalization||28.2.2020|
|dS|
|[i|NoofUnits|
|(iii).|Total|Exports &|Imports|for the|last|5|Exports|from|2019-20|to|2022|
|ears|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|23|—|Rs.|2312.38|Crores|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 9 of 30

==> picture [392 x 228] intentionally omitted <==

e|last|5|Exports|from|2019-20|to|2022| |ears|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|23|—|Rs.|2312.38|Crores|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 9 of 30 

**==> picture [392 x 228] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Imports|from|2019-20|to|2022-23|
|Rs.|331.98|Crores|
|(iv).|Total|Employment|(In Nos.)|Employment|from|2019-20|to|
|2022-23|—|3353|Nos|
|ame of the|proposed|Co-developer|M/s.|Sreeka|Infra|Pvt.|Ltd|
|Details of Infrastructure|facilities|/ authorized||Upgrade,|operate,|lease|and|
|operations to be undertaken|by the co-|maintain|the|authorized|
|developer|operations|
|Total|area|(in|Hectares)|on which|activities|46,669|sq.|ft.|in|4th|Floor|i|
|ill|be|performed|by|the|co-developer|Tower-B|of the|SEZ|
|Proposed|investment|by|the|Co-developer|(Rs.|| 41.50|
|in|Cr.)|
|et worth of the Co-developer|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|100%|subsidiary|of|M/s.|
|Phoenix|Tech|Zone|Pvt.|Ltd|
|Date|of the|Co-developer|agreement|06.03.2023|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ:

DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal.

115.5(iv) Request of M/s Evermark SEZ Developers Pvt. Ltd. for Co-Developer status in M/s. Phoenix Tech Zone Pvt. Ltd SEZ, Sy. No. 115/35 at Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Telangana.

==> picture [451 x 321] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|ia|ame of|the Developer & Location|Ltd.M/s.|Phoenix|Tech|Zone|Pvt.|
|= of|LoA to Developer|17.2.2017|
|| 3|Bector of|the SEZ|IT/ITES|
|ee|ws of Notification|17.3.2017|
|otal|notified|area|(in|Hectares)|2.032|
|||&|[Whether the SEZ is operational|or not|
||__|(i).|[If][ operational,]|[date]|[of][ operationalization]|_|28.2.2020|
|||ii). No.|of Units|
|(iii).|Total|Exports &|Imports|for the|last|5|Exports|from|2019-20|to|2022|
|years|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|23|—|Rs.|2312.38|Crores|
|Imports|from|2019-20|to|2022-23|
|Rs.|331.98|Crores|
|(iv).|Total|Employment|(In|Nos.)|Employment|from|2019-20|to|
|2022-23|—|3353|Nos|
|As|ame of the proposed|Co-developer|M/s.|Evermark|SEZ|Developer|
|Pvt.|Ltd.|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 10 of 30

==> picture [450 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

os| |As|ame of the proposed|Co-developer|M/s.|Evermark|SEZ|Developer| |Pvt.|Ltd.|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 10 of 30 

**==> picture [450 x 155] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|8.|Details|of Infrastructure|facilities|/ authorized|[Upgrade,|operate,|lease|and|
|operations|to|be|undertaken by the co-|maintain|the|authorized|
|developer|operations|
|‘Total|area|(in|Hectares)|on|which|activities|46,669|sq.|ft.|in|5"|Floor|i|
|will|be performed|by|the|co-developer|'Tower-B|of the|SEZ|
|Proposed|investment by the Co-developer|(Rs.|||41.50|
|in|Cr.)|
|et worth of the Co-developer|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|100%|subsidiary|of|M/s.|
|||1%|ate of|the Co-developer agreement|Phoenix06.03.2023 Tech Zone Pvt.|Ltd.|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ:

DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal.

==> picture [452 x 448] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|115.5(v)|Request|of M/s|Evermark|Spaces|Pvt.|Ltd.|for|Co-Developer|status|in|
|M/s.|Phoenix|Tech|Zone|Pvt.|Ltd|SEZ,|Sy.|No.|115/35|at|Nanakramguda|Village,|
|Serilingampally|Mandal, Telangana.|
|hal|ame of|the Developer & Location|M/s.|Phoenix|Tech|Zone|Pvt.|
|=|of LoA|to|Developer|17.2.2017|
||=|Ltd|
|||3|ester of|the SEZ|IT/ITES|
|Ct|in of|Notification|17.3.2017|
|||=|[ee notified area (in Hectares)|2.032|
|||&|—fWhethe the SEZ is operational or not|
|ae|If operational,|date of operationalization|| 28.2.2020|
|||Gi). No.ofUnits|Cd|S™~—CSSOSCSCS|
|(iii).|Total|Exports &|Imports|for the|last|5|xports|from|2019-20|to|2022-23|
|years|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|Rs.|2312.38|Crores|
|Imports|from|2019-20|to|2022-23|
|Rs.|331.98|Crores|
|(iv).|Total|Employment|(In|Nos.)|Employment|from|2019-20|to|
|2022-23|— 3353|Nos|
|ame of|the proposed Co-developer|M/s.|Evermark|Spaces|Pvt.|Ltd|
|Details|of Infrastructure|facilities|/ authorized||Upgrade,|operate,|lease|and|
|operations|to|be undertaken by the|co-|maintain|the|authorized|
|developer|operations|
|Total|area (in Hectares)|on which|activities|4,743|sq.|ft.|in|6°|Floor|i|
|will|be performed|by|the|co-developer|ower-B|of the|SEZ|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 11 of 30

==> picture [445 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

3|sq.|ft.|in|6°|Floor|i| |will|be performed|by|the|co-developer|ower-B|of the|SEZ|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 11 of 30 

**==> picture [445 x 85] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
10. Proposed investment by the Co-developer (Rs. [30.50<br>in Cr.)<br>ech Zone Pvt. Ltd<br>| oe et worth of the Co-developer (Rs. in Cr.) 100% subsidiary of M/s. Phoeni<br>| 1 Pate of the Co-developer agreement (06.03.2023<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>

## Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ: 

DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal.

## 115.6: Request for addition area approval of co-developer (8 proposals) 

Relevant provision: In terms of sub-section (11) under Section 3 of the SEZ Act, 2005, any person who or a State Government which, intends to provide any infrastructure facilities in the identified area or undertake any authorized operation after entering into an agreement with the developer, make a proposal for the same to the Board for its approval. 

```text
|115.6(i)|Request of M/s. Bakeri Residences LLP for amendment in area|Request of M/s. Bakeri Residences LLP for amendment in area|by|
|---|---|---|---|
|addition ofspace|space in Co-Developer Approval ofResidential Building in the dual use non-|||
|processing|Area in GIFT-Multi Services SEZ at Ratanpur, District Gandhinagar,|||
|Gujarat, developed by M/s. GIFT SEZ Limited.||||
||ame ofthe Developer& Location|M/s. GIFTSEZ Limited,||
|||Gandhinagar, Gujarat.||
|(><br>os<br>a|ofLoAtoDeveloper<br>of<br>theSEZ<br>ineofNotification|07-01-2008<br>Multi-services-SEZ<br>18-08-2011||
|i<br>le <br>||notifiedarea(inHectares)<br>105.4386Hectares<br> cadtheSEZisoperationalor not<br>SEZoperational<br>Ifoperational, dateofoperationalization |21-04-2012|||
||(ii)No. ofUnits|Functional —232 units||
|||nder implementation— 302 units||
||(iii) Total Exports & Imports for the last|5|Exports—26291.62||
||years<br>(Rs. in Cr.|Imports-<br>783.17||
||_(iv) TotalEmployment<br>(InNos.<br>rs<br>ame ofthe proposed Co-developer||/s. Bakeri Residences LLP, GIFT||
|||Multi-Services-SEZ, Gandhinagar||
||Details<br>of<br>Infrastructure<br>facilities|/1.

||_(iv) TotalEmployment<br>(InNos.<br>rs<br>ame ofthe proposed Co-developer||/s. Bakeri Residences LLP, GIFT||
|||Multi-Services-SEZ, Gandhinagar||
||Details<br>of<br>Infrastructure<br>facilities|/1. The proposed Residential Project||
||authorized operations to be undertaken byjconsists of connecting towers||i.e.|
||e co-developer|ower A, TowerB andTower C.||
|||=<br>The<br>3<br>towers<br>share<br>3-level||

Page 12 of 30

|||||common basement.||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||||«=|Commercial Retail Shops|o|
|||||Ground<br>and<br>First<br>Floor|off|
|||||each tower.||
||||«|Residential<br>units<br>start<br>fro||
|||||2"!<br>floor<br>onwards|and|
|||||extended till the 33 floors|fo|
|||||Tower A and C while Towe||
|||||B extends upto 20 floors.||
||||«|Project Amenities are being!||
|||||planned on the 2" floor|o|
|||||each tower.||
||Total area (in Hectares) on which activities\An||additional basement area of 558|||
||will be performed by the co-developer|sq|mtrs would<br>be<br>added<br>to||the|
|||already||approved 6503 sq. mtrs||
|||Approx||94000<br>Sq.Mtrs<br>(Built|up|
|||area||||
|||Proposed investment by the Co-developerRs. 449.00<br>in Cr.)||Co-developerRs. 449.00crores|||
||et worthofthe Co-developer (Rs. in Cr.)|[Net|Worth of Bakeri Projects||Pvt|
|||Ltd.|(parent company) is Rs. 191.71|||
|||rores and the Net worth of Bakeri||||
|||Residences LLP is NIL which is|||the|
|||SPVactingas<br>aCo-Developer.||||

Recommendation by DC, GIFT SEZ: -

DC, GIFT has recommended the proposal of M/s. Bakeri Residences LLP, CoDeveloper, GIFT-Multi-Services-SEZ, Gandhinagar, for development of SEZ building on Residential / Commercial Building at Plot No. 25D within the dual use Non-Processing Area of GIFT SEZ.

115.6(ii) Request of M/s. Savvy ATS Realty LLP, GIFT-Multi-Services-SEZ, Gandhinagar for amendment in area by addition of space in Co-Developer Approval of Residential Building in the dual use non-processing Area in GIFT-Multi Services SEZ, at Ratanpur, District Gandhinagar, Gujarat, developed by M/s. GIFT SEZ Limited. Gandhinagar, Gujarat. i bial eS ee

Page 13 of 30

==> picture [449 x 408] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|5.|otal|notified|area|(in|Hectares)|105.4386|Hectares|
||at__—__—((i)memeIf operational,|date|ofeceeelloperationalization [21-04-2012cen|
|Se|
|fa||_—(iv)years=Total(Rs.

---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|5.|otal|notified|area|(in|Hectares)|105.4386|Hectares|
||at__—__—((i)memeIf operational,|date|ofeceeelloperationalization [21-04-2012cen|
|Se|
|fa||_—(iv)years=Total(Rs. inEmployment Cr.)oleae(In Nos.)|4792,Imports-nder implementationaa783.17|—|302 units|
|Multi-Services-SEZ,|Gandhinagar|
|operations|to|be|undertaken|byjbuilding|in|the|dual|use|area|of|
|e|co-developer|GIFT|SEZ.|
|||[celeater]|authorizedTotal|area|(in|Hectares)|oniratewhich|activities|5810|squareFGmetersSirens(approved|4790|
|will|be performed|by|the|co-developer|square|meters|+|current|request|fo|
|addition/increase|of|1020|square|
|meters|to|accommodate|movemen|
|of fire|tender and|parking|area.|
|ESin|Cr.)|
|11.|(Rs.et|worth|of the|Co-developer|(Rs.=pin|Cr.)|
|name|of|Savvy|ATS|Realty|LLP|
|which|is|executing|the|project.|The|
|LLP|being|new|does|not|have|net|
|worth,|the|net|worth|of|one|of|the|
|partner|entity|Savvy|Infrastructure|
|Private|Limited|is|610.12|crores.|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, GIFT SEZ: -

DC, GIFT SEZ has recommended the proposal of M/s. Savvy ATS Realty LLP, CoDeveloper, GIFT-multi-services-SEZ, Gandhinagar for addition/increase of land area of 1020 square meters to accommodate drive-way for fire tender and parking area for the residential project on Plot No.16E, Block No. 16 within the dual use Non-Processing Area of GIFT SEZ. 115.6(iii) Request of M/s. Junomoneta International (IFSC) Private Limited, Gandhinagar for addition of space in the approval as a Co-Developer within the processing Area of GIFT-Multi Services SEZ at Ratanpur, District Gandhinagar, Gujarat, developed by M/s. GIFT SEZ Limited.

==> picture [344 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||
|---|---|---|---|
|la|Gandhinagar, Gujarat.|
|3|ISector ofthe|SEZ|Multi-services-SEZ_|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 14 of 30

==> picture [446 x 353] intentionally omitted <==

---|---|---| |la|Gandhinagar, Gujarat.| |3|ISector ofthe|SEZ|Multi-services-SEZ_|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 14 of 30 

**==> picture [446 x 353] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||6.5.|[Whether_|Total notifith|e|d areaSEZ|is (in opera Hec|t|ionalares)|ornot__|SEZ105.4386operational Hectares|
|ee(i)|If|operational,|date|offApril|21,|2012|
|Under|implementation|— 306|units|
|a|eee|
|||__|(iv)|[Persian]|(iii) TotalTotal Exports Employment & Imports(InNos.) for the lastA792 SJExportsmpas — 26291.62TestySCs|
|Private|Limited,|Gandhinagar|
|Details|of|Infrastructure|facilities|Construction,|development,|maintenance,|
|14C,|Block|no.|14,|within|the|processing|
|area.|
|||authorized operationsSaar to be undertak|e|n byjand operationee ofSEZ|building|having built|
|Total|area|(in|Hectares)|on|which}3966|sq.|meters|(already|approved|3399|
|activities|will|be|performed|by|the|co-square|meters|+|current|request|for|additio|
|i|of 567 square meters for basement parking|
|10.|Propooed|investment by the Co-developerRs.area),459.89 crores|
|[Ti|(Rs. in Cr.)|
|[ 12.|Net[Date|worthof|the oftheCo-developerCo-developeragreement(Rs. in GryIRs.24-03-2023 33,73|ores|SS~=~“—*~“—*~*~*~*~SSSS|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, GIFT SEZ: -

Private DC, GIFT has recommended the proposal of M/s. Junomoneta International (IFSC) Limited, Gandhinagar as a Co-Developer, for addition/increase of land area of 567 square meters on Plot No. 14C, Block no. 14, within the processing area in GIFT-SEZ, Gandhinagar.

==> picture [450 x 260] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> 115.6(iv) Request of M/s. Cybage Software (Private) Limited, Gandhinagar for<br>addition of space in the approval as a Co-Developer within the processing Area of<br>GIFT-Multi Services SEZ at Ratanpur, District Gandhinagar, Gujarat, developed by<br>M/s. GIFT SEZ Limited.<br>andhinagar, Gujarat.<br> —<br>CC<br>-3.Bector of the SEZ Multiservice: J<br>-S_(Whether the SEZ is operational or not EZ<br>operationalization<br>| Grciomtzaae YS ofet2toperational 20<br>Under implementation — 306 units<br>Page 15 of 30<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [445 x 264] intentionally omitted <==

ation<br>| Grciomtzaae YS ofet2toperational 20<br>Under implementation — 306 units<br>Page 15 of 30<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [445 x 264] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|(iii)|Total|Exports &|Imports|for|the|last|5|Exports|— 26291.62|
|years|(Rs.|in|Cr.)|Imports-|783.17|
|OS|
|andhinagar|
|Details|of|Infrastructure|facilities|onstruction,|development,|maintenance,|
|authorized|operations|to|be|undertaken|byjand|operation|of|building|having|built|-up|
|area.|
|||the co-developerme|area of 1,20,000a eesquare|feet on Plot No.|
|activities|will|be|performed|by|the|co-|1,20,000|square|feet|buil-up|area|+|curren|
|developer|request|for|addition|of|4789.94|square|feet!|
|or|basement|parking|area,|&|7531.46|
|p|Baaere|nan|eo|
|Rs.|in|Cr.)|
|ha|[hai]|quare feet for other utilities).|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, GIFT SEZ: -

DC, GIFT has recommended the proposal of M/s. Cybage Software (Private) Limited, Gandhinagar as a Co-Developer, for addition/increase of built-up area of 4789.94 square feet and 7531.46 square feet for parking and other utilities on Plot No. 14H, Block No. 14, within the processing area in GIFT-SEZ, Gandhinagar.

==> picture [446 x 281] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|115.6(v)|Request|of M/s.|Rajyash|Projects|LLP,|Ahmedabad|for|addition|of space|
|in|the|approval|as|a|Co-Developer|within|the|processing|Area|of GIFT-Multi|Services|
|SEZ|at|Ratanpur,|District|Gandhinagar,|Gujarat,|developed|by|M/s.|GIFT|SEZ|
|Limited.|
|Gandhinagar,|Gujarat.|
|aman|
|ee|
|[3,_|Sectorofthe—SSS—S*(Muulti-services-SEZ— SEZ|
|6.||Whether|the|SEZ|is|operational ornot__|SEZ|operational|
|operationalization|
|ee|
|_foNeortnis(iii)|TT|EierenenaionFunctional — 232 units 06m|
|||f earsTotal (Rs. Exports in Cr.)|& Imports for the last i|Imports-|783.17|
|Se|ae|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 16 of 30

==> picture [443 x 223] intentionally omitted <==

earsTotal (Rs. Exports in Cr.)|& Imports for the last i|Imports-|783.17| |Se|ae|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 16 of 30 

**==> picture [443 x 223] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|8.||Details|of|Infrastructure|facilities|Construction,|development,|maintenance,|
|authorized|operations|to|be|undertaken|byjoperation|of|commercial|building|o|
|the|co-developer|building|footprint|no.|14F,|Block|no.|14,|
|ithin|the|processing|area|
|Total|area|(in|Hectares)|on|which}|2292|square|meters|(already|approved|2050|
|activities|will|be|performed|by|the|co-\square|meters|of land|area|+|current|request|
|developer|for|addition|of|242|square|meters|of|land|
|area|for|basement|parking|area,|by|whic|
|ere|shall|be|increase|in|built-up|area|fro|
|1,20,000|square|feet|to|1,64,500|square|fee|
|an|increase|of 44,500|square|feet|of built-up|
|area|to accommodate|the|parking|area).|
|Proposed|investment|by|the|Co-developer|Rs.100.00|crores|
|(Rs.|in|Cr.|
|+|da}|et worth of the Co-developer|(Rs.|in Cr.)Rs.|99.48|crores|
|||12.|[Date of the Co-developer agreement|03-04-2023|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, GIFT SEZ: -

==> picture [447 x 417] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> DC, GIFT has recommended the proposal of M/s. Rajyash Projects LLP, Ahmedabad<br>as a Co-Developer, for addition/increase of land area of 242 square meters to accommodate<br>parking area thereby increasing the built-up area from 1,20,000 square feet to 1,64,000 square<br>feet on Plot No. 14F, Block no. 14, within the processing area in GIFT-SEZ, Gandhinagar.<br>115.6(vi) Request of M/s. Shivalik Jhanvi Infraspace LLP, Ahmedabad for<br>addition of space in the approval as a Co-Developer within the dual use non-processing<br>Area of GIFT-Multi Services SEZ at Ratanpur, District Gandhinagar, Gujarat,<br>developed by M/s. GIFT SEZ Limited<br>lal ame of the Developer & Location M/s. GIFT SEZ Limited,<br>}2. [Date of LoA to Developer G an uarydhinagar,7, 2008Gujarat.<br>}4. [Date of Notification August 18, 2011<br>otal notified area (in Hectares) 105.4386 Hectares<br>| 6. [Whether the SEZ is operational or not —_|SEZ operational<br>| fp If operational, date ofA<br>rt operationalization Functional — 232 units<br>| fea Total Exports & Imports for the last 5|ExportsUnder implementation — 26291.62 — 306 units<br>years (Rs. in Cr, Imports- 783.17<br>eae, a<br>ame of the proposed Co-developer M/s. Shivalik Jhanvi Infraspace LLP,<br>Ahmedabad<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 17 of 30

==> picture [442 x 190] intentionally omitted <==

ame of the proposed Co-developer M/s. Shivalik Jhanvi Infraspace LLP,<br>Ahmedabad<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 17 of 30

==> picture [442 x 190] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|8.|[Details|of|Infrastructure|facilities|Develop,|construct|and|operate|residential|
|authorized|operations|to|be|undertaken|byjbuilding|on|building|footprint|no.|16D|
|he|co-developer|Block|no.|16,|in|the|dual|use|non-processing||
|area|
|fotal|area|(in|Hectares)|on|whichi6723|sq.|meters|(approved|5595|square|
|activities|will|be|performed|by|the|co-\meters|+|current|request|fo|
|developer|addition/increase|of|1128|square|meters|to|
|accommodate|drive|way|for|fire|tender|and|
|parking|area.|
|Proposed|investment|by|the|Co-developerjRs.230.00|crores|
|Rs.|in|Cr.|
|| 12.A. ||Dateet w|o|frth of the Co-developerthe Co-developeragreement (Rs. in Cr.)|Rs.56.69 crores25-05-2023|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Recommendation by DC, GIFT SEZ: -

DC, GIFT has recommended the proposal of M/s. Shivalik Jhanvi Infraspace LLP, Ahmedabad as a Co-Developer, for addition/increase of land area of 1128 square meters to accommodate drive-way for fire tender and parking area for the residential project of Plot No. 16D, Block no. 16, in the dual use non-processing area in GIFT-SEZ, Gandhinagar.

115.6(vii) Request of M/s. MariApps Marine Solutions India Private Limited for taking additional land area admeasuring 0.3966 Ha (98 cents) on lease basis from the developer M/s. SmartCity (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., IT/AITES SEZ at Block — 09, Kakkanad Village, Kanayanoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala.

==> picture [447 x 307] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> ame of the Developer &|M/s SmartCity Kochi Infrastructure Private Limited<br>Location Ernakulam, Kerala<br>| F ate of LoA to Developer [21° April 2008<br>ai of the SEZ IT/ITES<br>_* = of Notification 01.03.2011 & 26.02.2014<br>5. otal notified area (in/93.9165 Ha<br>ectares)<br>operational or not<br>(i). If operational, date of[17.06.2016<br>operationalization<br>(iii).ImportsTotalfor theExportslast 5 yearsae pes 2019-20 [2020-21 22 3<br>(Rs. in Cr.) Export|180.53 [262.51 [332.24_393.87 639.08<br>importp4.001.20 0.60 [19.81 [8.62|<br>iv). Total Employment (Inj5175<br>: an 7 Additional proposal for 700-750<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 18 of 30

[332.24_393.87 639.08<br>importp4.001.20 0.60 [19.81 [8.62|<br>iv). Total Employment (Inj5175<br>: an 7 Additional proposal for 700-750<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 18 of 30

||a:|Name of|the|proposed Co-|proposed Co-|proposed Co-|M/s<br>MariApps<br>Marine<br>Solutions<br>India|M/s<br>MariApps<br>Marine<br>Solutions<br>India|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||Developer|||||Private Limited (Existing Co-Developer)||
|||Details|of|Infrastructure)|||«*|Approved Co-Developer status vide|
|||facilities|/||authorized|||ApprovalNo.F.2/74/2006-SEZ dt.|
|||operations to||be undertake||||16.04.2018 fordevelopment ofIT/ITES|
|||by theco-developer||||||infrastructureand its operationand|
|||||||||maintenance in anareaof0.58674 Ha (145|
|||||||||cents)|
||||||||e|Subsequently additional land area of|
|||||||||0.04047Ha(10 Cents) for creation of|
|||||||||Maritime TrainingCentre was approved|
|||||||||vide Approval No.F.2/74/2006-SEZ dated.|
|||||||||01.12.2021|
||||||||¢|Present request is for additional land areaof|
|||||||||0.3966 Ha(98 cents) for construction of|
|||||||||Multi-Level Car Parking to shiftthe existing|
|||||||||CarParking facilities at Phase-I Building|
|||||||||andconvert the same to office space|
|||Total area (in Hectares) <br>which<br>activities<br>will<br>performed<br>by<br>the||||o<br>be<br>co-|¢|Atpresent theCo-Developer iscarryingout<br>theiractivities in anareaof0.6272Ha(155<br>cents).|
|||developer|||||e|Onapproval ofadditional area [i.e.,0.3966|
|||||||||Ha (98 cents)], the net area shall be 1.0238|

eCo-Developer iscarryingout<br>theiractivities in anareaof0.6272Ha(155<br>cents).|
|||developer|||||e|Onapproval ofadditional area [i.e.,0.3966|
|||||||||Ha (98 cents)], the net area shall be 1.0238|
|||||||||Ha(253 cents)|
|||Proposed investment by <br>Co-developer (Rs. inCr.)||||the}||ExistinginvestmentbytheCo-Developer is<br>Rs. 87.40 Crore.|
||||||||¢|Proposed investment for the additional area|
|||||||||willbe Rs.10Crore therebymaking the total|
|||||||||investment to Rs.97.40 Crore|
|||=||N**e**t wo**r**th <br>d velope (Rs.||of the Co]<br> in Cr.)||||87.40|
|||Date of the||Co-develope|||||
|||agreement|||||||

Recommendation by DC, Cochin SEZ; -

DC, CSEZ has recommended the proposal.

115.6(vitl) Request of M/s. ANSR Global Corporation Pvt. Ltd. for increase in area of their me-Ceveliper area in M/s. Phoenix Tech Zone Pvt. Ltd. at Sy. No. 203(P), Manikoda Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Telangana

ameoftheDeveloper&Location M/s. Phoenix <br>Ltd.,<br>Rajendra <br>Telangana Tech Zone Pvt.<br> Nagar Mandal

Page 19 of 30

|2.|DateofLoA to Developer|17.2.2017|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
||Sector of the SEZ|IT/ITES|||
|=|ofNotification|17.3.2017|||
|=|theSEZisoperationalornot||||
|aS Ifoperational, dateofoperationalization |1.4.2022|||||
||(iii). Total Exports& Imports forthe last 5|Exports for 2022-23 - Rs.|1,024||
||years (Rs. in Cr.)|Crores|||
|||Imports for 2022-23 — Rs.||18|
|||Crores|||
|||TotalEmployment(InNos.)|Employment<br>for 2022-23<br>2923 Nos.|||
|7,|ameofthe proposed Co-developer|M/s. ANSR Global Corporatio|||
|||Pvt. Ltd.|||
||Details ofInfrastructure facilities / authorized||To<br>undertake<br>the<br>authorized|||
||operations to beundertaken by the co-|operations ofconversion ofwa|||
||developer|shell buildings<br>into<br>fully|fitted||
|||office space and to lease built||up|
|||space inthe SEZ as contracted.|||
||Total area(in Hectares) onwhich activities|Existing Area - 0.52Ha|||
||ill be performedby the co-developer|Proposed<br>Area<br>—<br>0.52||Ha|
|||(55,538 sq. ft.)|||
|||Total Area — 1.04 Ha (1,11,076|||
|||sq. ft.|||
||Proposed investmentbythe Co-developer (Rs.|| 19.45|||
||in Cr.)||||
||et worth ofthe Co-developer (Rs.

ea<br>—<br>0.52||Ha|
|||(55,538 sq. ft.)|||
|||Total Area — 1.04 Ha (1,11,076|||
|||sq. ft.|||
||Proposed investmentbythe Co-developer (Rs.|| 19.45|||
||in Cr.)||||
||et worth ofthe Co-developer (Rs. in Cr.)|89.61|||
|12.|DateoftheCo-developer agreement|Co-Developer Agreement <br>12.12.2022|dated||
|||Amendment<br>to<br>Co-Develope|||
|||Agreementdated26.5.2023|||

Recommendation by DC, VSEZ:

DC, VSEZ has recommended the proposal.

Page 20 of 30

115.7: Cancellation of Co-developer status (2 proposals)

Rule Position: Section 2 (g) of the SEZ Act 2005, defines Developer as, “a person who, or a State Government which, has been granted by the Central Government a letter of approval under sub-section (10) ofsection 3 and includes an Authority and a Co-developer”;

Section 10 of the said Act provides for Suspension of Letter of Approval and subsection (3) stipulates that no letter of approval shall be suspended under sub-section (1) unless the Board has given to the Developer not less than three months’ notice, in writing, stating the grounds on which it proposes to suspend the letter of approval, and has considered any cause shown by the Developer within the period of that notice, against the proposed suspension.

of Since the Co-Developer is covered under the definition of Developer, the suspension LoA of Co- Developer shall also be governed by Section 10 of the SEZ Act. There is no specific provision for cancellation of LoA, however, on the recommendation of the Development Commissioner for such cancellation on the ground of Co-Developer not fulfilling the necessary requirements / obligations in terms of SEZ Act / Rules or on the request by the Co-Developer, such cancellation has been considered by the BoA in the earlier cases.

115.7(i) Request of M/s. Embassy Services Private Limited for cancellation of CoDeveloper status granted in M/s. Saltire Developers Limited SEZ at Outer Ring Road, Rachanahalli Village, Nagavara, Bangalore, Karnataka.

M/s. Embassy Services Private Limited for cancellation of CoDeveloper status granted in M/s. Saltire Developers Limited SEZ at Outer Ring Road, Rachanahalli Village, Nagavara, Bangalore, Karnataka.

Co-Developer Status issued : M/s Embassy Services Private Limited was issued Letter of Approval dated 19" July 2017 as a Co-Developer for making operation and maintenance of building and other infrastructure/ facilities to be undertaken in the entire area of the SEZ (4.05 Ha). Nature of functions of the: The authorised operation of the Co-Developer is for Co-Developer making operation and maintenance of building and other infrastructure/facilities to be undertaken in the entire area Request : ofForthe cancellation SEZ (4.05 ofCo-Developer Ha) status

(a) Reasons for cancellation of Co-Developer status:

any The Co-Developer has not carried out any activity under the LoA and has not availed for benefit or incentive under SEZ Scheme. The Co-developer has informed that the demand wn space has substantially decreased in the last few years and also the Co-Developer intend to operate as Industrial IT Park with non-SEZ clients, hence they are under the process ofer of the entire SEZ area. Since the entire SEZ area is proposed to be denotified, the Co-developer decided to surrender the LoA and i Se-davelaner slots requested for cancellation of the (b) NOC from Saltire Developers Private Limited, Developer of Saltire SEZ. ; M/s Embassy Services Private Limited had obtai Saltire . ‘gai ned NOC from the Developer M/ Developers Private Limited, for cancellation ofCo-Developer status. lillian

Page 21 of 30

(c) The comments from the Specified Officer of Saltire SEZ

The Specified Officer, Saltire Developers Private Limited SEZ informed that they have not availed any tax benefits under SEZ Act/Rules.

Recommendation by DC, Cochin SEZ: -

DC, CSEZ has recommended the proposal.

115.7(ii) Request of M/s. Moser Baer Infrastructure and Developers Ltd. for Cancellation of Co-Developer status granted in M/s. SIPCOT Hitech, SEZ at Oragadam, Chennai.

M/s. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT), Hitech SEZ at Oragadam a Government of Tamil Nadu undertaking has submitted an application for Cancellation of Co-Developer status of M/s. Moser Baer Infrastructure and Developers Ltd. The Developer (M/s. SIPCOT) was allotted 95.76 acres (38.76 Ha) of land to the Co-Developer based on Board of approval in its 27th meeting held on 01.08.2008 and granted approval to the request of M/s. Moser Baer Infrastructure and Developers Ltd., as C- Developer for Electronic Hardware and related support activities.

The Co-Developer did not undertake any construction activities and only undertook cutting of bushes and general levelling of the site. Upon assessment of quarterly and halfyearly reports submitted by the Co-developer from 2008-09 to 2018- 19, it reveals that they did not import any goods nor made any procurement from Indigenous/DTA. M/s. Moser Baer Infrastructure and Developers Ltd., had left the land to M/s. PV Technologies India Limited vide MEPZ approval letter dated 28.08.2008. M/s. PV Technologies India Limited undertook the construction of the site office and preparatory work for construction of the plant. However, no commercial production was commenced. MEPZ granted the LOA extension up to 27.08.2011. Meanwhile, the name of M/s. PV Technologies India Limited was changed to M/s.

struction of the plant. However, no commercial production was commenced. MEPZ granted the LOA extension up to 27.08.2011. Meanwhile, the name of M/s. PV Technologies India Limited was changed to M/s. Moser Baer Solar Limited and the LOA validity got lapsed on 27.08.2012. The Board of Approval in its 54" meeting held on 14.09.2012 has rejected the further extension of LOA due to non-implementation of the project despite of four years. In view of the above, AO for the respective SEZ instructed to compute the duty due on the goods procured under exemption by M/s. Moser Baer Solar Limited. Accordingly, AO reported that based on the invoices and documents recovered from the Unit, a duty demand for 4,07,768/- Four lakh seven thousand seven hundred and sixty-eight only) was issued and the same was recovered by TR challan. Following the possession of land taken over by M/s. SIPCOT vide "Tamil Nadu Public Premises Eviction Act, 1975, suo-moto cancellation deed was executed and registered on 18.03.2021 under the name M/s. SIPCOT Hence, the proposal for cancellation of Codeveloper status of M/s Moser Baer Infrastructure and Developers Ltd., is proposed for consideration

Page 22 of 30

DC, MEPZ has stated that in accordance with the request of the Developer (M/s. SIPCOT) the Registration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu had cancelled the Lease agreement w.e.f. from 18.03.2021.

C, MEPZ has stated that in accordance with the request of the Developer (M/s. SIPCOT) the Registration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu had cancelled the Lease agreement w.e.f. from 18.03.2021.

Authorised officer from the respective SEZ had submitted a letter dated 18.07.2022 with countersigned by DDC stating that there are no dues pending since all the taxes and duties have been collected from the Co-Developer (M/s. Moser Baer Infrastructure and Developers). The report on Import duty free submitted by the Co-Developer for the period January-March 2019 is mentioned as "NIL" which is clearly evidenced that they have not taken any steps towards development and the report was countersigned by the respective AO SEZ.

Recommendation by DC, MEPZ SEZ:

DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal.

115.8: Request for Setting up of new SEZ (2 proposals)

115.8(i) Request of M/s. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) for setting up of a Multi-Sector SEZ at A Sathanur Village, Ullundurpet Taluk, Kallakurichi District, Tamil Nadu over an area of 77.0950 Ha (190.50 Acres).

The status of documents required for setting up of a new SEZ for consideration of the BoA and grant of LoA are as follows: -

==> picture [445 x 322] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|ae|ne|/Documents required|mii|
|A.|Documents|required|for|setting|up|of|SEZ|in|terms|0|
|Rule|3|of SEZ|Rules,|2006:|
|i)|ompleted|Form-A|(with|enclosures)|es, provided|
|A.|Total|Proposed|:|Rs.|2302|Cr.|by|Units &|
|investment|107.49|Cr.|by|the|
|Developer|
|B.|FDI|(in US|$)|:|278.27|Million|
|C.|Source|of FDI|:|Taiwan|
|D.|Proposed|Exports|:|US|$|191|Million|(Rs.|
|1529|Crores)|
|E.|Employment|(in|:|20,000|Direct &|In|Dir.|
|Nos.)|
|DC’|necti|5|:|
|)__{DC'sInspestionGonectionReporRepor|t|:|7|
|(iv)|Recommendation|for|National|Security|Clearance|
|ii|(NSC)IDC,|MEPZ|has|recommended|
|i of Home Affairs as per Rule 3 of SEZ Rulesjthat NSC is not required,|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 23 of 30

ational|Security|Clearance| |ii|(NSC)IDC,|MEPZ|has|recommended| |i of Home Affairs as per Rule 3 of SEZ Rulesjthat NSC is not required,|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 23 of 30 

```text
|B.|inimum area requirement in terms ofRule|inimum area requirement in terms ofRule|Rule 5 of SEZ/Yes,|Rule 5 of SEZ/Yes,|Rule 5 of SEZ/Yes,|Rule 5 of SEZ/Yes,|condition<br>is met as the|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||Rules,2006.||||proposed land area is 77.09.50|||
||||||Ha|(190.50 Acres).||
|C.|Details|to be furnished in terms of Rule 7 ofSEZ Rules||||||
||2006:|||||||
|i)|ertificate from the concerned<br>State Government or|||i||||
||authorisedagency stating that the Developerhas:||||ide||letter dated<br>16.03.2023,|
||||||Industries,<br>Investment|||
||e<br>¢|Legal Possession,and<br>Irrevocable rightsto develop the saidareas <br>SEZ,and||_|Promotion<br>(MIE.2)<br> |Department, Secretariat, Govt.<br>ofTamilNadu hasstated that;|||
||e|That the said area is free from all|encumbrance.|||||
|||||||e|;<br>The land is already in|
|(ii)|Whether the Developer has leasehold<br>right over the<br>identified area.

Nadu hasstated that;|||
||e|That the said area is free from all|encumbrance.|||||
|||||||e|;<br>The land is already in|
|(ii)|Whether the Developer has leasehold<br>right over the<br>identified area. The lease shall be for a period not less than<br>twenty<br>years.||||||possessionof<br>SIPCOTand is free<br>from any|
|iii)|TheidentifiedareashallbeContiguous,||Vacantand|No|||encumbrance.The|
||horoughfare||||||land isa contiguous<br>one withno|
||||||||thoroughfare.|
|||||||e|Legal Possession|
||||||||Certificate has been|
||||||||provided.|
||||||Further, vide Certificate dated|||
||||||1.04.2023,<br>Tahsildar,|||
||||||Ulundurpet has certified that;|||
|||||||e|The Developer has|
||||||||the irrevocable rights|
||||||||to develop the lands|
||||||||and the lands are|
||||||||contiguous and|
||||||||vacant and free from|
||||||||any encumbrances /|
||||||||hindrances.|

Further, in compliance of DoC’s Instruction No. 102 dated 18.1 1.2019 regarding Physical Inspection and Contiguity condition, an Inspection Report has been provided by MEPZ. As per report, physical inspection was conducted on 19.04.2023 by DDC, ADC — MEPZ SEZ; Tahsildar, Revenue Department Ullundurpet Taluk; Revenue Inspector, Ullundurpet Taluk and AGM, SIPCOT. It has been noted that the Developer fulfils the Contiguity condition stipulated under rule 5 (read with rule 7) of the SEZ Rules, 2006. Recommendationof DC, MEPZ SEZ: DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal for its consideration by the BoA.

Page 24 of 30

y condition stipulated under rule 5 (read with rule 7) of the SEZ Rules, 2006. Recommendationof DC, MEPZ SEZ: DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal for its consideration by the BoA.

Page 24 of 30

115.8(ii) Request of M/s. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) for setting up of a Multi-Sector SEZ at Panapakkam Village, Ranipet District, Tamil Nadu over an area of 52.20 Ha (129 acres).

The status of documents required for setting up of a new SEZ for consideration of the BoA and grant of LoA are as follows: -

==> picture [444 x 558] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|inal|oni /Documents required|
|A.|Documents|required|for|setting|up|of|SEZ|in|terms|o|
|Rule|3|of SEZ|Rules,|2006:|
|(i)|ompleted|Form-A|(with|enclosures)|Yes,|provided|
|A.|Total|Proposed|:|Rs.|1,000|Cr.|by|Units|
|investment|&|101|Cr.|by|the|
|Developer|
|B.|FDI|(in US|$)|:|120|Million|
|C.|Source|of FDI|:|Taiwan|
|D.|Proposed|Exports|:|US|$|191|Million|(Rs.|
|1529|Crores)|
|E.|Employment|(in|:|20,000|Direct &|In|Dir.|
|Nos.)|
|(ii) ___DC’s|Inspection|Report|
|ll|ee Government’s Recommendation|
|(iv)|Recommendation|for|National|Security|Clearance|(NSC)IDC,|MEPZ|has|recommended|
|from|Ministry of Home|Affairs|as|per|Rule|3|of SEZ|Rules,that NSC|is not required.|
|2006.|
|Minimum|area|requirement|in|terms|of Rule|5|of SEZ Yes,|the|condition|is|met|as|the|
|Rules, 2006.|proposed|land|area|is|52.20|Ha|

fairs|as|per|Rule|3|of SEZ|Rules,that NSC|is not required.|
|2006.|
|Minimum|area|requirement|in|terms|of Rule|5|of SEZ Yes,|the|condition|is|met|as|the|
|Rules, 2006.|proposed|land|area|is|52.20|Ha|
|Cc.|Details|to|be|furnished|in|terms|of Rule|7|of SEZ|Rules|(129 acres).|
|006:|
|(i)|Certificate|from|the|concerned|State|Government|or|its}Vide|letter|dated|23.05.2023,|
|authorised|agency stating that the Developer|has:|Industries,|Investment|
|Promotion|(MIE.2|
|¢|Legal|Possession,|and|Department,|Secretariat,|Govt.|
|*|Irrevocable rights|to develop|the said area|as|_jof|Tamil Nadu has|stated|that:|
|SEZ,|and|
|¢|That the said area|is|free from|all encumbrance.|¢|SIPCOT|is|in|
|ii)|possession|of 129|
|Whether|the|Developer|has|leasehold|right|over|the|acres (52.20 Ha) of|
|identified|area.|The|lease|shall|be|for a|period|not|less|than|land and|will be the|
|enty|years.|Developer of|the|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 25 of 30

cres (52.20 Ha) of| |identified|area.|The|lease|shall|be|for a|period|not|less|than|land and|will be the| |enty|years.|Developer of|the|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 25 of 30 

|iii)|he identified area shall be Contiguous, Vacant and No||SEZ.|
|---|---|---|---|
||horoughfare.|e|The land for the|
||||proposed SEZ is|
||||contiguous with no|
||||thoroughfare.|
|||e|The land is free from|
||||any litigation and is|
||||in absolute|
||||possession of|
||||SIPCOT.|
|||Further, vide Certificate dated||
|||26.04.2023,<br>Tahsildar,<br>Nemili||
|||Taluk has certified that;||
|||e|M/s. SIPCOT has the|
||||irrevocable rights to|
||||develop the lands|
||||described above ason|
||||date.|
|||e|The lands described|
||||above are contiguous|
||||and lying vacant and|
||||free from any|
||||encumbrances /|
||||hindrances or|
||||whatsoever.|



Further, in compliance of DoC’s Instruction No. 102 dated 18.11.2019 regarding Physical Inspection and Contiguity condition, an Inspection Report has been provided. As per report, physical inspection was conducted on 26.04.2023 by DDC, MEPZ-SEZ along with Officials from Revenue Department, Govt. of Tamil Nadu. It is noted that the proposed area is 52.20 Ha out of which Processing area is 70% and Non-processing area is 30%. Further, the Developer fulfils the Contiguity condition stipulated under rule 5 (read with rule 7) of the SEZ Rules, 2006.

## Recommendation of DC, MEPZ SEZ: 

DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal for its consideration by the BoA.

## 115.9: Renewal of LoA of plastic recycling units (1 case)

## 115.9(i) Renewal of LoA of remaining plastic units in Kandla SEZ for a period of five years. 

The request of plastic recycling units for renewal of their LoA for a period of five years was placed before the Board of Approval in its 112" meeting held on 29.10.2022. The BoA, by consensus, decided to extend the validity of LoA on temporary basis of only those units which fulfil the following conditions: 

Page 26 of 30 

   1. Units should have been functional and carried out at least some production during the stipulated period of 18 months (i.e., 27th January, 2021 to 26th July, 2022). 

   2. Units should have made at least some exports during the stipulated period of 18 months (i.e., 27th January, 2021 to 26th July, 2022). 

   3. Units shall undertake not to carry out any DTA sales till they fulfil the shortfall of NFE and export obligations for the period upto their period of expiry of validity ice., 26th August 2022. On fulfilment of shortfall in NFE and other export obligations as stipulated above which shall be confirmed by the jurisdictional DC, and the DC may allow DTA sale to units subject to fulfilling of policy dated 27.05.2021.

l in NFE and other export obligations as stipulated above which shall be confirmed by the jurisdictional DC, and the DC may allow DTA sale to units subject to fulfilling of policy dated 27.05.2021. 

4. The extension would be granted for a further period upto five years from 27th August, 2022 onwards to align the validity with other units. Such extension shall be on temporary basis only, which will be reviewed by Development Commissioner concerned from time to time. The Board further directed that all the concerned Development Commissioners shall take necessary action accordingly and submit a report to the BoA in the next meeting. 

Report by Kandla, SEZ: As per decision taken in the 112" meeting of the BoA held on 29.10.2022, KASEZ has granted renewal of LoA to below mentioned 6 plastic recycling units for further period of five years i.e., from 27.08.2022 to 26.08.2027: 1. M/s. Blaze International 

   2. M/s. Polyrec Processors Pvt. Ltd. 

   3. M/s. Renew Plastics 

   4. M/s. Satguru Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. 

   5. M/s. R. R. Vibrant Polymers Ltd. 

   6. M/s. Ansa Polymers Ltd. 

- Further, one of the conditions imposed in the renewal of LoA letters issued to the above 

- units in line with minutes of 112" BoA held on 29.10.2022 is as under: - “This renewal will be treated as temporary and will be subject to following

e renewal of LoA letters issued to the above 

- units in line with minutes of 112" BoA held on 29.10.2022 is as under: - “This renewal will be treated as temporary and will be subject to following 

- conditions: - i. You shall not carry out any DTA sales till you fulfil the shortfall ofNFE and export obligations for the period upto 26" August 2022 i.€., upto the period of expiry of validity of your LoA. On fulfilment of obligations, you may be allowed DTA sale 

- : ii. subject to fulfilment of all conditions stipulated in the policy dated 27.05.2021. The performance ofyour unit will be continuously monitored and reviewed for fulfilment of export obligations as per the policy dated 27.05.2021. If the export obligations is not met then DTA sale would be put on hold till the unit achieves the mandated export obligations.” Now, out of the above 6 units wherein no DTA sales was i i 

- shortfall bias mposed till they fulfil the of NFE and export obligations for the period upto 26" August, 2022 ie. upto the Page 27 of 30 

period of expiry of validity of their LoA, the following 3 units have fulfilled the prescribed export obligations as per DoC’s policy dated 27.05.2021 and positive NFE earnings & also submitted Chartered Accountant certificates certifying that these units have achieved the prescribed export obligations and are positive NFE: 

i. M/s. Renew Plastics ii. | M/s. Blaze International iii. | M/s. Polyrec Processors Pvt. Ltd.

es certifying that these units have achieved the prescribed export obligations and are positive NFE: 

i. M/s. Renew Plastics ii. | M/s. Blaze International iii. | M/s. Polyrec Processors Pvt. Ltd. 

Accordingly, DC, KASEZ, has permitted DTA sale to the above three units subject to fulfilling of policy dated 27.05.2021 as stipulated by the BoA in its 112" meeting held on 29.10.2022. 

The above facts are submitted by DC, KASEZ for information of the BoA as per decision taken in the 112" meeting of the BoA held on 29.10.2022.

## 115.10: Request for Industrial License (1 proposal) 

Relevant provision: As per section 9 (e) of the SEZ Act, 2005, the Board has powers and functions of granting, notwithstanding anything contained in the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, a license to an industrial undertaking referred to in clause (d) of section 3 of that Act, if such undertaking is established, as a whole or part thereof, or proposed to be established, in a Special Economic Zone.

## 115.10(i) Proposal for grant of Industrial License under IDR Act, 1951 — M/s DCX Systems Limited, SEZ unit under CSEZ. 

M/s DCX Systems Limited (SEZ unit under CSEZ) had applied for Industrial License under IDR Act, 1951 for manufacturing of following items: 

- i. Sub Module for communication equipment including Antenna 

- ii. Microwave components and Modules for RADAR and EW subsystems iii. Assembly and Testing of Microwave Modules 

The location of the factory for the proposed activity is at Aerospace SEZ sector, Plot No. 29, 30 & 107, Hitech Defence & Aerospace Park, KIADB Industrial Area, Kavadanahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural, Karnataka — 562110 

The application of the unit was shared with various departments for their comments which have been received as below: 

**==> picture [437 x 112] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
IS-I Division, |Vide OM dated 17.04.2023, Security Desk-MHA has conveyed<br>(Security Desk), |security clearance in respect of the subject unit and its directors<br>MHA namely S/Shri Radhavendra Rao Hosakote Shama Rao, Neal<br>eremy Castleman, Sankarakrishnan Ramalingam,<br>Kalyanasundaram Chandrasekaran, Panchangam Nagashayana and<br>Lathika Siddharth Pai.<br>oD may recommend appropriate security and auditing procedures<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 28 of 30

aram Chandrasekaran, Panchangam Nagashayana and<br>Lathika Siddharth Pai.<br>oD may recommend appropriate security and auditing procedures<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 28 of 30 

```text
||||for the firm as well as its supply-chain depending upon the threat|
|---|---|---|---|
||||perception and sensitivity of the products to be manufactured, as|
||||per the security instructions/architecture prescribed in the Security<br>Manual for Licensed Defence Industries, issuedbyMoD.|
||||The Ministry of Commerce & Industry should ensure that<br>all|
||||security instructions/architecture prescribed in the Security Manual<br>for Licensed Defence Industries, issued byMoD from time to time|
||||are strictly adhered to.|
|IS-I Division,||(Arms||Vide OM dated 24.07.2022, Arms Section-MHA has offered No|
|Section),MHA|||Comments as the subject items do not fall under the category of|
||||small arms and ammunitions as per theArms Act, 1959& theArms|
||||Rules, 2016.|
|DPIIT|||DPIIT videOM dated 02.08.2022 has offeredNo Comments. DPIIT|
||||has requested DoC to take appropriate action and may like to|
||||approach DoDP being the Administrative Ministry for Defence|
||||Sector.|
|D/o<br>Production|Defence|||Vide OM dated 17.10.2022, DoDP has offered No Objection for<br>grant of license for manufacture of following items only from<br>defence angle, subject to standard terms and conditions under IDR|
||||Act, 1951:|
||||i. SubModule forcommunication equipment including Antenna<br>li. Microwave components and Modules for RADAR and E|
||||subsystems|
||||The item No.

terms and conditions under IDR|
||||Act, 1951:|
||||i. SubModule forcommunication equipment including Antenna<br>li. Microwave components and Modules for RADAR and E|
||||subsystems|
||||The item No. (iii) namely “Assembly and Testing of Microwave<br>Modules” is already covered under item No. (ii). Therefore, no<br>further license is required forthesame,|
||||Further, the company may be directed to follow the security<br>guidelines for Category ‘A’ mentioned in the Security Manual<br>available at DDP’s website while undertaking manufacturing of<br>items fordefence use.|
|O/o<br>Acquisition<br>(Army), M/o|ADG<br>Tech <br> Defence|||Vide ID Note dated 29.07.2022, M/o Defence (Acquisition Wing)<br> jhasofferedNoObjection.|
|(Acquisition|Wing)|||
|M/oCivilAviation|||ide email dated 09.01.2023, M/o Civil Aviation has stated that<br>AirportAuthority ofIndia does not deal withanymanufacturing of<br>equipment/components,<br>Equipment/parts<br>used<br>for<br>providing<br>Services are directly provided by the vendors. Thus, in view ofthe<br>above, AAI is not in a position to provide any comments on this<br>issueoflicensing ofmanufacturing<br>by the unit.|
||||proposedprojectdoesn’t<br>attract<br>theprovisionsoftheEIA|

Page 29 of 30

==> picture [438 x 291] intentionally omitted <==

this<br>issueoflicensing ofmanufacturing<br>by the unit.| ||||proposedprojectdoesn’t<br>attract<br>theprovisionsoftheEIA|




Page 29 of 30 

**==> picture [438 x 291] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|otification,|2006.|However,|M/o|EF&CC|has|stated|that|the|
|following may|please|be|taken|note|of:|
|i.|The|construction|of|SEZ|may|require|prior|EC|as|pe|
|provision|of EIA|Notification,|2006,|if applicable|
|ii.|In|case|the|proposed|project/activity|involves|the|diversion|of|
|forest|land,|or|passes|through|any|Protected|Area|or|Eco|
|sensitive|zone,|provisional|of|Forest|(Conservation)|Act,|
|1980|and|Wildlife|(Protection)|Act,|respectively|would|be|
|applicable.|
|iii.|| Consent|to|Establish|(CTE)|and|Consent|to|Operate|(CTO|
|from|the|concemed|State|Pollution|Control|Board|would|be|
|required|under|the|provision|of Air|(Prevenetion|and|Control|
|of|Pollution)|Act,|1981|and|Water|(Prevention|and|Control|of|
|Pollution)|Act,|1974,|if applicable.|
|State|govt.|of||Vide|letter|dated|16.08.2022,|State|Govt.|of Karnataka|has|offered|
|Karnataka|o|Objection|for|issue|of|IL|subject|to|other|statutory|approvals|
|from|the|Govt.|authorities,|if any.|
|CSEZ|Vide|letter|dated|03.08.2022,|O/o CSEZ|has|offered No|Objection.|

----- End of picture text -----<br>

The proposal is placed before the BoA for its consideration

KKK

Page 30 of 30

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 174 --apply.

Citation copied