DGFT Committee Minutes
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE DESVI (FOOD & MISC) Minutes of the meeting of NCVI held on 21.05.2009 Meeting No. 04/AM10 for the licensing year 200910 to consider cases under Duty Exemption Schemes ( Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 200409 pertaining to Misc. & Food Products was held on 21.05.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A.K. SINGH, Jt. DGFT. Following officers were present in the meeting. S.No. Name of the Officer Designation Department 1. Sh. Shaish Kumar I.A. DIPP 2. Sh. A.K. Ojha A.D. MSME 3. Sh. T.M. Skaria DDG DGFT 4. Sh. Raghu Nath FTDO DGFT The agenda for individual case was taken up for discussion. Decision taken in each case is enumerated below. Adhoc norms fixed in this meeting are valid for a period of 12 months as per Public Notice 37 dated 23.08.2007.
Case No 86 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Gujarat Paraffins Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad Meeting No. 04/09 Dt. 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/50/0018/AM10 RLA File 08/24/40/00090/AM07 Lic No. & Dt. 0810057870 dt. 06.07.2006 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda It was noted that Advance Authorization was issued in July’2006 and online agenda for this case was generated automatically. This office has no supporting documents except appendix 34 and 11A. RA may ascertain whether NC has already decided the case. In case, the case was not finalized earlier, committee in absence of complete details of production process etc. is not able to compute wastage and quantity of inputs. If the case has already been decided, RA may inform NC, otherwise the case is deemed to be rejected for want of complete details.
Case No 87 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Gangwal Chemicals (P) Ltd. Mumbai 21.5.09 Status: Transferred HQ File No. 01/83/50/00315/AM08 RLA File 03/94/40/0122/AM08 Lic No. & Dt. 0310429161 dt. 11.05.2007 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. It was noted that the export product is covered under Chapter 29 of ITC(HS). Work allocation is based on Chapters of ITC(HS). Chapter 29 is with NC3, as per O&M instruction 10/2008 dated 12.09.2008 (Copy enclosed). Committee decided to transfer the case to NC3.
Case No 88 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Funskool (India) Ltd., Chennai 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/87/50/00542/AM08 RLA File 04/24/40/00282/AM08 Lic No. & Dt. 0410092701 dt. 14.12.2007 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. The committee noted that net content of Rubber Wood in export product has not been given. The method of accounting of import inputs in export product is also not given. Further, no quantitative nexus between export product in numbers and import item in Cubic Meter can be determined. Committee was therefore constrained to reject the case. RLA to take consequential action as per policy/procedure.
Case No 89 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Drytech Processes (I) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai 21.5.09 Status: Deferred. HQ File No. 01/85/50/00113/AM09 RLA File 03/94/40/00358/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0310478010 dt. 09.07.2008 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. After discussion, Committee decided to call for the following information from the applicant firm: 1. Moisture content and % of foreign material in import content. 2. Information regarding what is Kibbled & Seyal in import item and how it is different from gum Arabic. To be relisted on 18.06.2009
Case No 90 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/50/00146/AM09 RLA File 02/24/40/00144/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0210116575 dt. 27.08.2008 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda The committee noted that applicant has not given justification for the quantity of import input sought for production of export product. There is no information as to what other products are made from the same import item. In such a situation committee is not in a position to compute wastage and is constrained to reject the case.
Case No 91 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Jindal Drugs Ltd., Mumbai 21.5.09 Status: Approved HQ File No. 01/85/50/00185/AM09 RLA File 03/94/40/713/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0310491369 dt. 21.10.2008 Committee considered the case as per agenda. It was noted that a similar case of he Firm has already been ratified by NC on 22.01.209 in advance authorization No. 0310486755 dt. 17.09.2008. On the same basis, committee ratified the following quantity: Export Item Qty. Import Item Qty. Cocoa Butter 100MT Cocoa BeansDried & Fermented 200.85MT
Case No 92 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Amrut Distilleries Ltd., Bangalore 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/50/00203/AM09 RLA File 7/24/40/471/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0710061428 dt. 01.12.2008 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. The committee noted that applicant firm has not given the manufacturing process and stage wise details of wastage in the production of export product. In the absence of the details, committee is unable to justify the wastage sought. The committee was therefore, constrained to reject the case.
Case No 93 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/50/00215/AM09 RLA File 02/24/40/00219/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0210121001 dt. 12.12.2008 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda The committee noted that applicant has not given justification for the quantity of import input sought for production of export product. There is no information as to what other products are made from the same import item. In such a situation committee is not in a position to compute wastage and is constrained to reject the case.
Case No 94 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Ganga Rasayanie Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/50/00244/AM09 RLA File 03/94/40/902/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0310502553 dt. 16.01.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. The committee noted that the import item and export item is under the same ITC(HS). Technical specification of import item and export item has not been given. By indicating any particular brand names, product does not appear to change. Moreover, applicant has not given justification for wastage, details of manufacturing process, stagewise wastage and details of physical products in entire production process. In the absence of such details, committee is not in a position to compute wastage. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case.
Case No 95 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Sonic Biochem Extractiions Ltd., Indore 21.5.09 Status: Approved HQ File No. 01/85/50/00245/AM09 RLA File 11/24/40/0070/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 1110019425 dt. 19.01.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. Committee noted that the process of manufacture of Textured Vegetable Protein (TVP) is from Soyaseed. How Hexane and Soya Protein Isolate are required for production of export product has not been brought out. Committee therefore disallowed that item and ratified norms as under: Export Item Qty. Import Qty. Textured Vegetable Protein (TVP) 30,000MT 1. Soya Protein Isolate 2. Hexane 3. Extensible Sack Craft Paper (For paper bag) 4. LDPE Granules Not allowed Not allowed As per packing policy As per packing policy
Case No 96 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd., Belgaum 21.5.09 Status: Deferred
HQ File No. 01/85/50/00273/AM09 RLA File 07/24/40/649/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0710063483 dt. 09.03.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. It was decided to defer the consideration of this case and relist on 18.06.2009
Case No 97 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd., Belgaum 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/00274/AM09 RLA File 07/24/40/650/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0710063485 dt. 09.03.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. It was decided to defer the consideration of this case and relist on 18.06.2009
Case No 98 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd., Belgaum 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/00275/AM09 RLA File 07/24/40/652/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0710063486 dt. 09.03.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. It was decided to defer the consideration of this case and relist on 18.06.2009
Case No 99 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Panama Petrochem Ltd., Mumbai 21.5.09 Status: Approved HQ File No. 01/85/50/0029/AM10 RLA File 03/95/40/878/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0310511438 dt. 13.03.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. Committee noted that production of export product involves only process of simple mixing and blending. There can not be wastage in such process. Moreover since products are costly, applicant should make effort to reach a level of Zero% wastage. Accordingly, Committee decided to ratify norms on net to net basis without wastage as under: Export Item Qty. Import Item Qty. Coning Oil (AntiStatic) 300000KG 1. SN150 Mineral Base Oil 2.Emulsifier (Ethoxylated Monyl Phenol) 3. Diethylene glycol 2,55,500KG 30,000KG 15,000KG
Case No 100 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Raj Petro Specialities Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai 21.5.09 Status: Approved HQ File No. 01/85/50/0278/AM09 RLA File 03/95/40/0990/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. 0310511366 dt. 13.03.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per the agenda. The committee decided to allow the inputs in this case as per SION A3346 or as applied for, whichever is less. Accordingly, inut output qty would be as under: Export Item Qty. Import Item Qty. White Petroleum Jelly (melting point Deg. C 56 2, Congealing Point Deg. C 541 & consistency @ 25 Deg. C 110 5) 326.4MT Base Oil Paraffin Wax Microcrystalline Wax 205.632MT 55.488MT 29.376MT The RLA may take consequential action as per policy/procedure.
Case No 101 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Unibic Biscuits India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore 21.5.09 Status: Clarified HQ File No. 01/85/50/0036/AM08 RLA File 07/24/40/0177/AM08 Lic No. & Dt. 0710051968 dt. 13.06.2007 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that committee had ratified norms in this case on 06.09.2007 for export of Fruit Mince Pie from imported Fruit Mince subject to the condition that type of Fruit Mince shall be same both in import as well as in exports. The issue referred by RLA Bangalore is that applicant has requested that he should not be asked to comply with the above condition regarding same type of Fruit Mince in import/export product. Committee observed that production process documentation should match the type of fruit mince from Bill of Entry to production, to packing & to actual shipping. Applicant should produce any type of documentary evidence to prove that same type of fruit mince has been used in import & export product. For instance, export of fruit mince pie of strawberry can not have any nexus if import of mango fruit mince has been done. If applicant is not able to prove nexus, for any particular shipment, then that shipment can not be taken into account for fulfillment of EO. RLA may be informed accordingly.
Case No 102 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Wrigley India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/162/204/AM09 RLA File 07/24/40/0658/AM08 Lic No. & Dt. 0710055088 dt. 20.12.2007 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that the firm has not replied to the letter dated 30.04.2009 calling for certain information. It was therefore, decided to reject the case.
Case No 103 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Teesta Valley Exports Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/162/673/AM08 RLA File 02/77/40/221/AM08 Lic No. & Dt. 0210106138 dt. 16.11.2007 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. Committee observed that facilities exist for manufacturing under Customs Act where no advance authorization is required and imported goods do not touch DTA at all. Committee felt applicant should have use these facilities. Committee felt that the decision taken vide meeting No. 37 dated 05.03.2009 is logical and can not be changed. Committee decided to maintain status quo.
Case No 104 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Raghuvanshi Exports, Mumbai 21.5.09 Status: Rejected HQ File No. 01/85/162/225/AM09 RLA File 03/95/40/0990/AM09 Lic No. & Dt. Not issued (Application is under Para 4.4.2 of HBP) The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that applicant has requested for 50% Veg. Refined Palmolien Oil by weight, for production of export product. In assorted instant food mix, qty. of oil differ from item to item and requirement of oil also vary depending on the ingredients of mixing. Accordingly in the present form, it is not possible to establish nexus with qty. Veg. oil. Committee was, therefore, constrained to reject the case.
Case No 105 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd.,Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/0030/AM10 Lic No. & Dt.
RLA File 02/24/40/0024/AM10 0210126579 dt. 15.05.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that committee decided to refer the case to M/o PN&G (Petroleum Planning Analysis Cell) for details regarding quantities of various products (Including the quantities and additional inputs for each such products) resulting from cracking of 1MT of Naphtha from first stage of production upto production of Pyrolysis Gasoline (Py Gas). To be relisted on 18.06.2009.
Case No 106 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Himadri chemicals & inds. Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/0031/AM10 RLA File 02/24/40/00002/AM10 Lic No. & Dt. 0210126586 dt. 18.05.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that the hard copy of the application has not been received. Case deferred. To relist on 18.06.2009
Case No 107 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Himadri chemicals & inds. Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/0032/AM10 RLA File 02/24/40/00007/AM10 Lic No. & Dt. 0210126589 dt. 18.05.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that the hard copy of the application has not been received. Case deferred. To relist on 18.06.2009
Case No 108 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Himadri chemicals & inds. Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/0033/AM10 RLA File 02/24/40/0008/AM10 Lic No. & Dt. 0210126590 dt. 18.05.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that the hard copy of the application has not been received. Case deferred. To relist on 18.06.2009
Case No 109 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Himadri chemicals & inds. Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/0034/AM10 RLA File 02/24/40/00009/AM10 Lic No. & Dt. 0210126594 dt. 18.05.2009
The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that the hard copy of the application has not been received. Case deferred. To relist on 18.06.2009
Case No 110 NCVI
Dt. 21.05.2009 M/s. Himadri chemicals & inds. Ltd., Kolkata 21.5.09 Status: Deferred HQ File No. 01/85/50/0035/AM10 RLA File 02/24/40/00012/AM10 Lic No. & Dt. 0210126595 dt. 18.05.2009 The case was considered by the committee as per agenda. It was noted that the hard copy of the application has not been received. Case deferred. To relist on 18.06.2009 xxx
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.