DGFT Committee Minutes

D!RECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE DES―V!(F00D&MiSC) Meeting No. 12/17 held on ol.12.2016 for the licensing year 2016‐ 17 to consider cases under Duty Exemp●on Schemes(Chapter-4)of Foreign Trade POlicy 2015-20 pertaining to Food&Mics.Products under the Chairmanship of sh.J V Patil′ Addl.DGFT.Fo‖ owing members were presentin the meeting. S.No Name of the Officer Designation Department 1 Sh.Karan Singh Sttwal Dv.:ndl.Adviser MFPl Sh.S.K.Pandey Asstt. Director MSME(Food) Officers in attendance 1 Sh Yoginder Singh DDG DGFT Sh. Ratan Lal Meena FTDO DGFT Decision taken in each case is enumerated below. Ad-hoc norms fixed in this meeting are valid for a period of 2 years reckoned from the date of ratification as per para 4.12(a)(vi) of Hand book of procedure (vol-L) 2015-20 updated as on 01.04.2015. Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt. IMeet No/Date:12/85- Ltd. :ALC3/2016 101.12.2016 HQ File i01/85/050/085/AM17 RLA File i31/83/040/080/AM15 I Lic.No/Date:3110064524′ Deferred 103.07.2014 The Committee noted the reply of the firm and it is observed that the firm has intimated that they are the Grower & Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR,Bangalore. ThefertilizerclaimedisforentirevalueofAuthorisationconstitutesnearlyT0toS0%ofthevalue of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is deferred f or 22.12.20].6. 489 1Case No.:7/10/85-ALC3/2014 1 490 1Case No.:3/4/85-ALC3/2016 Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt.Meet No/Date:12/85- Ltd. ・ALC3/2016 01.12.2016 Status: Status: :HQF‖ e:01/85/050/00006/AM17 1RLA F‖ e i31/83/040/00188/AM16 1Lic.No/Date:3110066044′ Deferred , . 14.03.2016 The Committee noted the reply of the firm and it is observed that the Firm has intimated that they are the Grower& i[I麗風 i誕l賓詰駆rt:よ∬灘詭:認::埋I潔:ltti¶ぼ‖ :il‖酬Tぶ1よ:呉:illl∬■lIT[:‖1響」 ; ‐‖HR′ Bangalore. The fertilizer claimed is for entire value of Authorisation constitutes nearly 70 to 80° /。ofthe value of export product″ Rose flowers″ ′which is unreanstic.Further′ Committee decided to forward and seek comments oflCAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the ExpOrt product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to furtherissue anv A.A.for this product. Firm may also exp!ain their fac‖ ity available for growing of flowers′ such as′ open field or green house etc.Further′ firm is to exp!ain that as per RCMC the firm′ s status is manufacturer lCurn Merchant whereas they have mentioned in theirletter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture ExpOrter The case is め'一 deferred for 22.12.2016. |

491

Case No.:3/4/85-ALC3/2016

Party Name: Dhirendra lnternational Pvt. Ltd. Meet No/Date:72185- ALC3l2016 Status: Status: idated 01.12.2016 . 3.HQ File Ю1/85/050/00021/AM17 RLA日le:56/24/040/00003/AM17 1日c.No/Date:5610004908′ Deferred 117.05.2016 The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask the firm to explain of the process sterilising Coriander Seeds including the facility available. The case is deferred for 29.L2.2Ot6. 4g2 Party Name: Nagawat Traders Meet No/Dat e:12/g5-

Case No.:51!9185-A1C312015

ALC3l2Ot6 dated 01.12.2016 HQ File:01/85/050/00191/AM 17 RLA F‖ e:56/24/040/00047/AM16 Lic.No/Date:5610004797′ .Approved 12.01.2016 1 The Committee noted the comments of MFP!furnished vide their O.M.No.4(46ソ2015‐DGFT dt.1711.2016.On the basis of MFPI′ s comments′ the Committee decided to fix the ad― hocinput output norms with l%wastage as under:― Export ltem Qty lmport ltem Qtv Coriander Powder made of coriander seeds of same variety and origin as imported 13 319 MT Coriander seeds 13.454 MT RA may take consequential action as per policy/procedure. 493 Party Name: Ghodawat Agro Pvt. Meet No/Date:12/85- Status:

Case No.:8/19/85-A1C312075 Ltd.

ALC3/2016 0L.12.2076 HQ File :O1,l85l05OlOO194/AM16 RLA File :3tlBloaolOo1.24lAMt6 Lic.No/Date: 3110065789, Deferred 11.12.2015 . Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is J' substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR,Bangalore. ThefertilizerclaimedisforentirevalueofAuthorisationconstitutesnearlyT0to80%of thevalue of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is deferred for 22.72.2016. 一 ａ 　 　 　 ¨ 4. do=U,toctiioEs srNGH irs qgrl'Blr=ti qeTl q:atl Dy-oiroiior c...r.r ot Foreigir Trad' fteYr aurqrc ErtnrftrYrrcr€ olraJtiiatc Gon€rr,l ol Forclgn Trrdr qrftfe ftr+i.tlUepairnGnt oa Co,ttnrclca rrut'r "rS-r, {d k",ifl ir,rlJ. aro*er.. iew Dc'lrl 「

494 Party Name: Ghodawat Agro pvt. Meet No/Date:lL/g5_

Case No.:13/11l85-ALC3l201s Ltd.

ALC3/2016 01.72.20L6 HQ File :07185105o1o0094/AM16 RLA File :3UBloaolooT2lAMt6 Lic.No/Date: 3110065603, Deferred 20.08.201s A Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR,Bangalore. ThefertilizerclaimedisforentirevalueofAuthorisationconstitutesnearlyT0tos1%ofthevalueofexport product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is deferred for 22.!2.20L6. 495 Party Name: Ghodawat Agro pvt. 'Meet No/Date:t2l81-

Case No.: 1717185-ALC312074 ,Ltd.

ALC3/2016 ,01.12.20L6 HQ File oU85lo5olo0053/AM15 RLA File :37/83lo4oloo16/AM1G Lic.No/Date: 3110063679, 28.04.2014 The Committee noted the reply of the firm and it is observed that the firm has intlmated that they are the Grower & , Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR,Bangalore. ThefertilizerclaimedisforentirevalueofAuthorisationconstitutesnearlyT0to80%ofthevalue of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is deferred for 22.12.2016. 496 1Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt. IMeet No/Date:12/85-

Case No.:12/1/85-ALC3/2015 Ltd. IALC3/2016

01.12.2016 HQ File :071851050100011/AM16 RLA File :31.1$l0aO/O0239/AM15 Lic.No/Date: 311006s265, Deferred tt.o2.20ts ^ Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is 6' substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR,Bangalore. ThefertilizerclaimedisforentirevalueofAuthorisationconstitutesnearlyT0to80%ofthevalue of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is Status: Status: Deferred Stat u s: ヽ 1 4減 ↑・7′ YCG:::●・F:'SINGH Dttr罵憑覆聾齢 a“ 姦※ 冨驚椰‖u deferred for 22.12.2016.

⌒ 497 Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt.Meet No/Date:12/85- tdse No.:11/1/85-ALC3/2015 ttd. ALC3/2016 101.12.2016 HQ File :Otl8slOsOlOOO1o/AM16 RLA File :3U$!OaO1OO238/AM15 Lic.No/Date: 3110065266, Deferred 11..02.2075 o Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR,Bangalore. ThefertilizerclaimedisforentirevalueofAuthorisationconstitutesnearlyT0to80%of thevalue of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard ,to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is ,deferred f or 22.1,2.2016. Statu s: Status: Status: 498 Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt.IMeet No/Date:12/85-

Case No.:11/17/85-ALC3/2014 Ltd. :ALC3/2016

.01.12.2016 ,HQ File :011851050100131/AM1s RLA File :3Ll$/0aO/001s5/AM15 ,Lic.No/Date: 3110064958, Deferred 09.10.2014 1n Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is '"' substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR, Bangalore. The fertilizer claimed is for entire value of Authorisation constitutes nearly 70 to 80% of the value of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available 'for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is deferred for 22.72.2Ot6. 499 1Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt. IMeet No/Date:12/85‐

Case No:10/17/85-ALC3/2014 Ltd. IALC3/2016

101.12.2016 HQ File :Otl8sl}s]l}o130/4M15 RLA File :3u83104O/O01s5lAM1s Lic.No/Date: 3110064959, Deferred 09.70.2014 ,The Committee noted the reply of the firm and it is observed that the firm has intimated that they are the Grower & Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is 11' substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR, Bangalore. The fertilizer claimed is for entire value of Authorisation constitutes nearly 70 to 80% of the value of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is deferred for 22.12.2016. \
\rtr^ ' / rrY+rq fi?, yccriloF,R stNGH Gq q6rFr.*rqr ftei anvn Cy Director Ss-,rrrl s Foroign Trr.ra E<fl 'tft'rrc w5sft|erraa Olrsctorat. Gonet:.1 ot Forslgn TradC iffftG! fr{ltllOrp.I,tm€nt ot Cornmercg g.frw -re6, <{ F.IT+i Uoyog Bh.w.n, Now Dolht ― ― |

t^ 500 Party Name: Ghodawat Agro Pvt. Meet No/Dale:l2l81- rase No.:8/10/85-A1C312014 ttd. ALC3l2Ot6 0t.L2.2016 HQ File :01/851050100086/AM15 RLA File :3L/$10a01O0079/AM15 Lic.No/Date: 3110064525, Deferred 03.07.2014 Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is rz' substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified ,by llHR, Bangalore. The fertilizer claimed is for entire value of Authorisation constitutes nearly 70 to 80% of the value of export product "Rose flowers", which is unreallstic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR ,with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available ,for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture 'Exporter. The case is deferred for 22.L2.2076. Status: Status: Status: 501 Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt.IMeet No/Date:12/85-

Case No.:17/7/85-ALC3/2014 Ltd. ALC3/2016

101.12.2016 HQ Fi!e :01/85/050/00051/AM 156 ". Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is 15 substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR,Bangalore. ThefertilizerclaimedisforentirevalueofAuthorisationconstitutesnearlyT0to80%ofthevalue of export ,product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistic. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to 'advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture Exporter. The case is deferred f or 22.12.201,6. RLA F‖ e131/83/040/00030/AM15 Lic.No.Date:3110063934′ IDeferred 09.05.2014 502

Case No.:1/5/85-ALC3/2015

Party Name:Ghodawat Agro Pvt.IMeet No/Date:12/85- Ltd. IALC3/2016 101.12.2016 HQFile :0U8slO5OlO0045lAM16 RLA File :3U83l04OlOOO22lAMLG Lic.No/Date:3110065448, Deferred 22.05.2075 Exporter of the export product. After detailed deliberation the committee observed that the quantity of fertilizer claimed is 14' ,substantively on higher side. lt was decided to seek consumption data from the firm for the past three years duly certified by llHR, Bangalore. The fertilizer claimed is for entire value of Authorisation constitutes nearly 70 to 80% of the value of export product "Rose flowers", which is unrealistlc. Further, Committee decided to forward and seek comments of ICAR with regard to quantity of import item required for the Export product. As Committee is examining these cases it was also decided to advise the RA office not to further issue any A.A. for this product. Firm may also explain their facility available for growing of flowers, such as, open field or green house etc. Further, firm is to explain that as per RCMC the firm's status is manufacturer cum Merchant whereas they have mentioned in their letter dated 5.8.2016 their status as manufacture \ \i-14 - /' rddfz Srl vOGlrtDF:R STNGH igq q€rf-r.t{t6 ,B.ltr ai;..1t Oy. Diroctot (ie .:.rtl of Foreit n T.a'ra @gr altqF qi-Frfrsrrtq{i Oir"otorrta Gonotr,l ot Forolgn Tildt ilFr'.E EqFl,oepairnent o, c(rnmcrco i7r-: .r51, .T!t E|t{t UIYog rrl..wrn, I{(,w Deafa Exporter. The case is deferred for 22.12.2016. 一 :

503 Party Name: Meroz Exim Pvt. Ltd. ;Meet No/Date:!2185- ,status: IALC3/2016 1 01122016 HQ File:01/85/171/073/AM16/DES.VI Fixation of ad hocinput output normsin terms of para 4 06 of l Reiected RLA File:02/24/40/284/AM 16 HBP(2015-20)for eXport of Betel Nut O‖ againstimport of ‐ 1,
雫り Nut. The Committee noted that MFPl has furnished their comments vide their O.M.No.4(35ソ2015-DGFT dt.21.11.2016 and observed that M FP!has not supported the case as the firm did not furnish the requisite information Further′ stated that recently DGFT has drawn the attention of DRl′ s:etter dt.10.10.2016 wherein import of Betel Nut is attracting substantia! Customs duty of 108%and it is prOne to diversion and loss of revenue. ln the circumstances, considering a‖ aspects of sensitivity ofthe product involved The Committee decided that its not feasible to fix ad― hoc norms under para 4 06 of HBP for the sutteCt product. 一 Ｓ ｔ 504 Party Name:M/s.Taste′ L Fine lMeet No/Date:12/85-ALC3/2016 Food Pvt.Ltd. ol.12.2016 RLA File:03/95/40/255/AM13 Deferred 16. F.No.01/8sl s0/ 133 I AM 13/DES.Vl Fixation of ad-hoc norms under para 4.7of HBP, Vol.l. The Committee noted the comments of MFPI furnished vide their O M No. 43lDGFIl2072 dt. t6.17.201.6, however, the comments are still awaited from CFTRI. The Committee decided to remlnd CFTRI to expedite their comments in the case. The case is deferred for 29.L2.2OL6. Status: HQ File 505 Party Name:Nut百vita Foods Pvt. IMeet No/Date:12/85-

Case No.:32/17/85-ALC3/2014 ttd. :ALC3/2016

101.12.2016 HQ File :ov8slO5olo0152/AM1s RLA File :o3l95loaoloos55/AM15 Li..l,to7o.t", 0310789919, Rejected 17. 01.10.2014 The Committee noted the decision of PRC and observed that PRC has not agreed to proposal of NC for regularisation under para 4.4.2 of HBP (2009-14). PRC also directed the applicant to get the case regularised in terms of para 4.49 of HBP, 2015-20. Accordingly, the Committee decided to direct the applicant to get the AA regularised in terms of Para 4.49 of HBP (201s-20). RA may take consequential action as per policy/procedure. 506 Party Name: M/s. Expovan . IMeet No/Date:12/85-ALC3/2016 Status: 01.12.2016 HQ Fiie F No.01/85/50/123/AM16/DES.Ⅵ RLA File:32/24/40/010/AM16 Deferred Request for amending wastage on input from 10%to 60%in respect of AAs obtained in terms of para 4.07 of HBP′ (2015- 20)as under:‐ 3210077697 dt. 04.09.2015′ 3210077699 dt 07.09.2015′ 3210077701 dt. 07.09.2015′ 3210077698 dt. 0709.2015′ 3210077700 dt.0709.2015′ 3210077702 dt.07.09.2015 Shri K. Vinod, representative of the firm attended the PH. The firms request for 70% wastage as applied in 6 cases was already considered by NC in its M. No. 03 held on 05.05.2016. The Committee was not convinced with firm's justification for not mentioning wastage as 6OYo at the time of filing the application, because it was first application under the scheme. However, before taking decision, Committee decided to seek comments from CFTRI. Also decided to confirm from RA whether firm has surrendered three licences out of the six licences issued to the firm as informed during PH. The case is h\h_' . zi,+nr i:ir voclrroF ;: srNGH / _ -.sq qFrt,tr:ru e,lvr ti,qrt Oy Otrocto? r:e :rrrt 6i c'6iolgj- i.iJ.ro -. fu*Yl ulr.in 'r-trq+erild, Otr?crorate Gencrr:t oi ririi!ii iirOo crFrJq-EF fl,orp.it ient o{ co.n nrrcc 18 deferred for 29.12.2016. Ｆ Ｉ ＩＦ Ｉ

二 507 Party Name:SAMiSPlcES AND HERBS Meet No/Date:12/85- しase No:15/3/85-ALC3/2015 PvT.LTD. ALC3/2016 0112.2016 19. HQ File:01/85/050/00029/AM16 1RLA F‖ e103/95/040/00849/AM15 Lic.No/Date:0310794025′ Deferred 2002.2015 The Committee noted that clarification/reply is awaited from RA. The Committee decided to remind RA through D.O. rreminder at the level of Chairmen to expedite the reply RA, Mumbai. The Committee also decided to ask the processing details from the firm. The case is deferred for 29.I2.20t6. Status: 508 ‐

Case No.:14.5/85-ALC3/2015

20.HQ File:01/85/050/00058/AM16 Meet No/Date:12/85- Status: ‐ ALC3/2016 01.12.2016 Lic.No/Date:0210205882′ Reiected 12.06.2015 1 The Committee noted that the export product is "Deoiled Rice Bran extracting of oil from the Rice Bran there cannot be value addition consequential action as per policy/procedure. Extraction"" and import item as required under the policy is Rice Bran and after of A.A. RA may take 509 Party Name: Hemraj lndustries Meet No/Dat e:lrl,lgl-

Case No.: 3h3/85-ALC3/2O7s Pvt. Ltd.

ALC3l2Ot6 0L.t2.2076 21.HQ Fi!e:01/85/050/00099/AM 16 RLA File:02/24/040/00102/AM16 日c.No/Date:0210206066′ IDeferred 12.08.2015 1丁he Committee decided to seek details of manufactunng facilities of the nrm with regard to usage of Hexane alongwith consumption detai!s of past three years.They may also explain the existing facility they have for such extraction.They mav a!50 eXplain the source ofthe raw materia!used for extraction. dated 01.12.2016 22.HQ File:01/85/050/00066/AM17 RLA File:56/24/040/00010/AM17 Lic.No/Date:5610004946′ Deferred l107.2016 The Committee noted thattheimportitem is barred under para 4.07 ofHBP(2015-20).The COmmittee decided to ask RA ,concern to intimate the reason as to how subject advance authorisation was issued under para 4.7 whereas it is barred under this para. The case is deferred for 29.1,2.2016. 510 1Party Name:Dhirendra

Case No.:10/7/85‐ ALC3/2016 1nternational Pvt Ltd.

Meet No/Date:12/85- ALC3/2016 Status: Status: \ r^ifl ' / q'iii=q i:i-tvocl:toEn SINGH .r,r qrrh'r?vr-.t iii+qt al;qr< Oy. Oiroctor r:tnarel ol Fotglgn Trlda laev arqn q-6rf*+srrao Diractorate Genorr-l o, Forglgn fTada arfulJq frqrtuuepailrnetil ot c(rrmorca {JflTryfcr-r, q{ f{-.dl UCysrg Bhow.n' Irbw g.ahl

•       511
  

、ase No.:3/14/85-ALC3/2015 Party Name: SAM| SptcES AND HERBS Pvr. Lro. IMeet No/Date:12/85- IALC3/2016 101.12.2016 Status: HQ File:01/85/050/00128/AM16 RLA F‖ e:03/95/040/00340/AM16 1Lic No/Date:0310798902′ Approved 115.09.2015 The Committee noted the comments of MFPifumished vide their O.M.No.4(24ソ 2014-DGFT dt.16.11.2016.On the basis of MFPl′ s comments′ cOmmittee decided to fix the ad― hocinput output nOrms with l%wastage as under:― Export ltem Qty lmport ltem Qty Coriander Powder made of same variety and origin as imported 100.000 MT Coriander seeds 101.00 MT 一 財 Fixation of wastage norms for export product Spices . The Committee noted the firm did not appear for PH and requested for adjournment of pH. The Committee accepted it and decided to grant another PH to the firm. 513 Party Name:Hemraj!ndustries Meet No/Date:12/85- Status: Pvt.Ltd. :ALC3/2016 . 01.12.2016 25. IHQ Fi!e:01/85/050/00069/AM 16 RLA F‖ e:02/24/040/00017/AM16 Lic.No/Date:0210205810′ Relected 19052015 The Committee noted that the export product is″ Deolled Rice Bran Extraction〃″and import item is Rice Bran and after extracting of oilfrom the Rice Bran thus it cannot meet the value addition as required under the poncy Of A.A. RA maytake consequential action as per po‖ cy/prOcedure 512 Party Name:M/s.Laxmi lEnterprises HQ File F.No.01/85/50/152/AM14/DES.Ⅵ ,Meet No/Date:12/85-ALC3/2016 101.12.2016 24. Deferred 一 嵯 Deferred | Committee decided to IMeet No/Date:12/85- IALC3/2016 I a0L.L2.2076 26. iHQ File :0U85/050/00108/AM17 inu rite t061241040loooz4lAMLT iric. rrro/oate:0610038471, r ', ';1g.10.2016 :, 'The Committee noted that hard copy of the application has not been received from the RA. The remind the RA to forward the same. The case is deferred for 29.12.2016. r
\ \i trtt ) - ,/ airlq' f .'7 7 yoct;iDEr:t SINGH _ is\r EFrt..:+v:E ?.!{': r4jt;I{ oy Director .e aerrr ci r.di"lg"- :iiJ.ro rlqvl <r.rrc qErReTrran Dircororaio oonerr.t d, Fo..;i;; i;.do al,{,ria B{rrrDrp"n-.nr or ci,m.rie i-l:'rlrr rrrfq, <!l F**aid! Ucyeu tsri.wrA, trhrcti galht 514 Status: RA may take consequential action as per policy/procedure. Status: 「 | 一 け

515

Case No.:28/13/85-ALC3/2015

Party Name:PK AGR:LINK PRIVATE IMeet No/Date:12/85- LI M ITED. ALC3/2016 01.12.2016 HQ File:01/85/050/00124/AM16/ RLA F‖ e:02/24/040/00101/AM16/ Lic No/Date:0210206072 516

Case No.110/6/85‐ALC3/2016

Status: Rejected 14.08.2015 27 rh" committee noted the comments of MFPI furnished vide their o.M. No. 4(72)12076-DGFT dt. 30.11.2016. The Committee observed that the firm is importing two inputs i.e. Rice Bran and Hexane and exporting Deoiled Rice Bran Extraction which makes the value addition condition not possible to fulfil as per duty exemption scheme. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case. RA may take action as per policy/procedure. Party Name:PKAGR:LINK PRIVATE Meet No/Date:12/85- Status: 日M!TED. ALC3/2016
‐ 01.12.2016 1 HQ File:01/85/050/00037/AM17/ RLA F‖ e:02/24/040/00007/AM17/ Lic.No/Date:0210206631 Rejected 22.04.2076 28 th" Committee noted the comments of MFPI furnished vide their O.M. No. 4(t2)l2Ot6-DGFT dt. 30.11.2016. The Committee observed that the firm is importing two inputs i.e. Rice Bran and Hexane and exporting Deoiled Rice Bran Extraction which makes the value addition condition not possible to fulfil as per duty exemption scheme. Therefore, the ,Committee decided to reject the case. ' RA may take action as per policy/procedure. レ 品 29 1 517 1Case No.:20/6/85-ALC3/2016 1HQ File:01/85/050/00047/AM 17/ Party Name:FIELDFRESH F00DS PRIVATE LIMITED RLA F‖ e:05/23/040/00143/AM17/ ,Meet No/Date:12/85- ALC3/2076 o1.72.20t6 Lic. No/Date :05 10398838 77.06.2076 Deferred Status: Deferred 17.03.2016 from MSME(Hosiery). The cOmm■tee decided to remind The Committee noted that the comments are awaited from MFPI. The Committee decided to remind MFPI. The case is deferred for 29.t2.2O16 IMeet No/Date:12/85- ALC3/2016 0112.2016 30 HQ File 101/85/050/00003/AM17/ RLA F‖ e:31/83/040/00180/AM16/ Lic.No/Date:3110066060 518

Case No.:3/3/85-ALC3/2016

Party Name:P10NEER CALICOS PROD∪CTS PRIVATE LIMITED The Committee noted that the comments are awaited MSME(Hosiery). The case is deferred for 29.12.201.6 \ \r ht,,' ,/ qirY;; -':l t'cciirDr:: siNGH ll.l qFrf :*v--r: B.i.i.- r:l:qrc Oy Oiroctga C e narlr of i:o, eaen l-rad9 fr vl qr<rrg qtrtl-rr+{nFre Cir.ctq.ate Gon€r. I ot t'orolgn Tr.do v{dlcq ft{Ft/oepantment ol commorco virln r1q?, .r{ f&Fd L]altsg Bh.wrn, Itlow D.lhl | ― |

Committee noted that the comments are awaited from MSME(Chem). The Committee decided to remind MSME(Chem) The caSe is deferred for 29.12.2016. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXX x卜1 - Party Name:OsTERN PRIVATE LTD Case N o. :7/6/85-ALC3/2016 ALC3/2016 01.12.2016 31 | 1日Ч「:le:u■/ob/UbU/UUU54/AM■ /ノ IRLA F:le:02/24/040/00015/AM17/ Lic.No/Dat( 110.05.2016