DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.20/10 held on 18.08.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 20/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 held on 18.08.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 475 23062635 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. B.D. Ghosh. Jt. IA 399 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 4. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Dir. 736A DC(MSME), N.B. 4. Sh. A.K. Mishra, AIA M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 6. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:67/28/80ALC2/2007
Party Name: ANSALDOCALDAIE BOILERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:20/80ALC2/2009 18.08.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00467/AM08/ RLA File :04/24/040/00238/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0410091269 28.09.2007 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(09)2009/TSW(B)/327 dated 17/08/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of DHI letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 2
Case No.:28/30/81ALC2/2007
Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/81/050/00362/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00559/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510210503 15.10.2007 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(09)2009/TSW(B)/327 dated 17/08/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. The weight of export product may be shown as 223.388 MT in the advance authorization. 2. Quantity of raw material i.e. nonalloy steel plates may be allowed with 5% wastage as applied by the firm. 3. Rest of the import items are components and may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering product.
3
Case No.:181/2/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:A1 FENCE PRODUCTS CO. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00149/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01011/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310457509 11.01.2008 Decision : The M/o Steel furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.2(7))2008/TW dated 07/08/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Quantity of import item no.1 i.e. nonalloy galvanized steel wire of relevant diameter may be allowed as 49.5 MT with 1% wastage. 2. Quantity of import item no.2 i.e. nonalloy galvanized steel wire of relevant diameter may be allowed as 77.20 MT with 1% wastage. 3. Quantity of import item no.3 i.e. PVC Compound may be allowed as 22.00 MT (as applied for) inclusive of 2% wastage. 4. Quantity of import item no.4 i.e. nonalloy galvanized steel wire of relevant diameter may be allowed as 100 MT with 2% wastage. 4
Case No.:8/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 18.08.2009 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00308/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00471/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910032693 22.01.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The committee observed that reminder was issued to the firm to expedite their reply only on 04th August, 2009. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 5
Case No.:19/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00319/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00821/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510215301 22.01.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009. 6
Case No.:10/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 18.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00310/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00472/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910032692 22.01.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No.:28/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TIMKEN INDIA LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00328/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00315/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0210110050 07.03.2008
7 07.03. 008 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Total net export weight of 171.749 MT may be added with the quantity of export product. 2. Quantity of import items may be allowed as under: a) Steel Tube Lot 33 200151 Kgs. inclusive of 75.6% wastage after 20 % recovery. b) Steel Bars 106009 Kgs. inclusive of 83% wastage after 20 % recovery. 3. Total weight of import items may be allowed 306160 Kgs. inclusive of 78.3% wastage after 20% recovery. 8
Case No.:51/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ZINSER TEXTILE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00351/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/01176/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310464472 11.03.2008 Decision : The Textile Commissioner furnished written comments in this case vide their letter No.9(144)/2009/TXM/K/09 dated 04.06.2009 and DHI also concurred their recommendation vide U.O. No.3(121)/09TSW(B) dated 24.07.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their recommendation as under: 1. Import item No. 322 i.e. “powder” may be deleted as it can not be allowed as component and justification for use of this item is not available in the application. 2. Quantity of all import items other than import item no. 322 may be allowed under GN4 for the engineering products. 9
Case No.:24/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TIL LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00324/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00324/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0210110531 19.03.2008 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Net export weight of 71.2 MT may be added with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at S.Nos. 1 to 4. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 may be allowed as 46.07 MT inclusive of 14% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No.2 may be allowed as 28.7 MT inclusive of 40.7% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No.3 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 5.302 MT inclusive of 12% wastage. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No.4 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 0.65 MT on net to net basis. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No.5 may be allowed as 1.616 MT
Case No.:41/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KILBURN ENGINEERING LIMITED 18.08.2009
10 HQ File :01/80/050/00341/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01309/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310465801 19.03.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The committee noted that letter issued earlier was received undelivered from the firm. The firm has also informed that their address has changed. The committee accordingly decided to issue final reminder to the firm at revised address to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 11
Case No.:20/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:NATIONAL STEEL AND AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00689/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00026/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:1110017656 07.07.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of MOS present in the meeting informed the Committee that they have received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009. 12
Case No.:21/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:NATIONAL STEEL AND AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00690/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00004/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110017657 07.07.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of MOS present in the meeting informed the Committee that they have received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009. 13
Case No.:71/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:AVLIGHT AUTOMOTIVES LTD. 18.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00740/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00215/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510223933 16.07.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 14
Case No.:83/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00752/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00129/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710058627 21.07.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 15
Case No.:21/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SURAJ INDUSTRIES 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00029/AM10/ RLA File :30/24/040/00017/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3010057230 23.07.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that D.L. has already been issued to the firm based on the DHI U.O. dated 17.08.2009 for which reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained The case may be re listed on 13 10 2009
and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 16
Case No.:4/25/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:SONA OKEGAWA PRECISION FORGINGS LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01013/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00230/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510226701 02.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009. 17
Case No.:25/25/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01034/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00143/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035317 09.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 18
Case No.:11/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THE INDURE PVT. LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01047/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00364/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510227284 11.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The DHI vide their U.O. Note dt. 04.08.2009 informed that firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. Point wise reply to the deficiency letter should be given since reply is not given to any of the quarries raised. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the required information complete in all respects by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 19
Case No.:13/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01049/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00381/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510227332 11.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 20
Case No.:20/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 18.08.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01056/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00389/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510227382 12.09.2008 Decision : The committee noted that the firm in its application has mentioned that norms have been fixed by NC in its meeting No. 40/08 dt. 13.02.2008 in advance authorization No. 0510204921 dt. 14.06.2007 and thus decided to ratify norms in this case on repeat basis. However, RA may verify these facts. The RA may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No.:22/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED 18 08 2009
21 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01058/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00390/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510227404 12.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 22
Case No.:35/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01071/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00494/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310486492 16.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 23
Case No.:36/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01072/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00537/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310486504 16.09.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(116)/09TSW(B)/280 dated 29.06.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of DHI letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. 24
Case No.:44/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GAZEBO INDUSTRIES LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01080/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00565/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310486788 17.09.2008 Decision : Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(53)/2009TSW(B)/322 dated 17.08.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. The quantity of import item No. 1 & 2 may be allowed as 195 MT and 225 MT respectively with 5% wastage. 25
Case No.:45/26/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01081/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00113/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410098647 17.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance
26
Case No.:26/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MIKROTEK MACHINES LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00034/AM10/ RLA File :07/21/040/00520/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060152 26.09.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The committee noted that DL already issued to the firm based on the DHI comments and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 27
Case No.:44/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01224/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00339/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229888 23.10.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(10) 09/TSW(B)/317 dated 17/08/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Weight of 257.28 MT (without Oil) may be incorporated in the export product. 2. Quantity of raw material i.e. nonalloy steel plates may be allowed as 188 MTwith 5% wastage. 3. Rest of the import items are components and may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering product. 28
Case No.:3/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01245/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00292/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035792 30.10.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 29
Case No.:6/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BRAKES INDIA LIMITED, 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01248/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00176/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099633 31.10.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 30
Case No.:13/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01255/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00666/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310492676 03.11.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance
31
Case No.:15/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KILBURN ENGINEERING LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01257/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00757/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310492847 04.11.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 32
Case No.:24/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KUVAWALA DRILLEQUIP 18.08.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01266/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00761/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310493107 05.11.2008 Decision : The committee noted that the firm in its application has mentioned that norms of the product has already been ratified by the NC. The Committee accordingly decided to forward the firm’s reply dt. 08.08.2009 to RA with the advice to verify the fact and do the needful since authorization was issued on 12.09.2008 i.e. one year of ratification of norms. 33
Case No.:37/34/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01279/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00698/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310493987 12.11.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s application. The Committee therefore handedover the firm’s application alongwith reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 34
Case No.:40/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00048/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00825/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310496821 08.12.2008 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Net empty weight of 67 MT may be added with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at S.Nos.1 & 4. 3. The quantity of import item at S.No.1 may be allowed as 27426 Kgs. inclusive of 13.9% wastage after 1/3rd recovery from scrap. 4. The quantity of import item at S.No.2 may be allowed as 10 Nos. (3117 Kgs.) on net to net basis. 5. The quantity of import item at S.No.3 may be allowed as 6 Nos. (7966 Kgs.) on net to net basis. 6. Weight of 27357 Kgs. may be added with the quantity of import item at S.No.4. 7. Words “12.7 MM (OD) x 1.244 MM thk.(Min.)” may be suffixed with the description of import item at S.No.4 & quantity of this item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 82391.8 Meters inclusive of 0.37% wastage. 8. Quantities of import items at Nos. 5, 6 & 7 may be allowed as 543 kgs. each. 9. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. Note: The import of components shall be permitted on net to net basis with accountability clause and the type technical specifications (including part No if
Note: The import of components shall be permitted on nettonet basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilized in the manufacture of the resultant product. 35
Case No.:16/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AIR LIQUIDE ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00024/AM10/ RLA File :09/70/040/00167/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036290 12.12.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 13.10.2009: 1. Information in respect of items at S.Nos. 3, 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format – Export product wise. 2. Certain export products like Deriming Heater and Piping etc. and import items at S.No.11 and 12 have been shown as optional. The same may be clarified by the firm. 36
Case No.:17/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AIR LIQUIDE ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00025/AM10/ RLA File :09/70/040/00168/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036289 12.12.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of items at S.Nos. 3, 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format – Export product wise. 2. Certain export products like Deriming Heater and Piping etc. and import item at S.No.11 have been shown as optional. The same may be clarified by the firm. 37
Case No.:15/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01568/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00586/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510232526 15.12.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(10) 09/TSW(B)/318 dated 17/08/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Weight of 653.329 MT may be incorporated in the export product. 2. Quantity of raw material i.e. nonalloy steel plates may be allowed as 466.8 MT with 5% wastage. 3. Rest of the import items are components and may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering product.
Case No.:11/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEI INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ Fil 01/80/050/00019/AM10/ RLA Fil 03/94/040/00297/AM09/ Li N /D t 0310499716 D f D t
38 HQ File :01/80/050/00019/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00297/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310499716 24.12.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s application. The Committee therefore handedover the case fiel to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 39
Case No.:6/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KERNLIEBERS SPRINGS & STAMPINGS PVT.LTD, 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01630/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00531/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710062052 26.12.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. The firm has not replied to the information in respect of Sl.No.11(A) of the Standard Deficiency Format. The firm to give sheet lay out with blanking of pitch. 2. Weight of export product in Application does not match with Appendix 11A of Application. The firm should clarify. 40
Case No.:1/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:METSO PAPER INDIA PVT.LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01625/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00635/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233403 29.12.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.1,2,3,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 41
Case No.:12/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01636/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00243/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036661 29.12.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009.: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.11 & 11(A) of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 42
Case No.:3/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01627/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00634/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233408 29.12.2008 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri Alok Trigunayat, Business Head appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish certain information. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The Committee accordingly decided to remind the firm to furnish the following information desired during the PH and relist the case on 13.10.2009:
1.Justification of 10% wastage on wash coat 2. Certificate showing dry weight and wash coat water slurry 3.. Proper Weight balance of each export product with out wastage 4. calculation of net content of platinum from its compound from chemical formula 43
Case No.:48/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEI INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00056/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00823/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310500853 01.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s application. The Committee therefore handedover the case file to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 44
Case No.:23/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:VEELINE MEDIA LTD. 18.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/01647/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00238/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210121774 02.01.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 45
Case No.:24/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00032/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00222/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101397 02.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 46
Case No.:29/42/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:XYTEL INDIA PVT.LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01653/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00248/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036856 02.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s reply. The Committee therefore handedover the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 47
Case No.:37/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00045/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00881/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310501215 05.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009.
48
Case No.:49/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00057/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00923/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310501152 05.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 49
Case No.:43/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00051/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00897/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310502444 13.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 50
Case No.:20/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00028/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00933/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310503032 19.01.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Net empty weight of 4500 Kgs. may be added with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at S.No.1 and quantity of this item may be allowed as 3828 meters (3426 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 3. Quantities of import items at Nos. 2, 3 & 4 may be allowed as 23 kgs. each. 51
Case No.:38/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00046/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00941/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310503031 19.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPPinformed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 52
Case No.:23/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00031/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00232/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101778 22.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee therefore decided to defer the consideration and to re list the case on 13 10 2009
53
Case No.:25/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00033/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00236/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101783 22.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 54
Case No.:50/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ITS INDIA PVT. LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00058/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00971/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310504031 28.01.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The committee noted that DL already issued to the firm based on the DHI comments and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 55
Case No.:12/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AYTIDA TOOLS PVT.LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00020/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00984/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310506554 10.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 56
Case No.:1/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01799/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00263/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102464 19.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 57
Case No.:3/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:20/80ALC2/2009 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01801/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00260/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410102466 19.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The
Case No.:7/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TRANTER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 18.08.2009 Status:Case closed HQ Fil 01/80/050/01805/AM09/ RLA Fil 31/21/040/00356/AM09/ Li N /D t 3110037423
58 HQ File :01/80/050/01805/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00356/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110037423 20.02.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA has not forwarded four set of firm’s application for the subject adv. Authorization and copy of export authorization (being SCIMET item) in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information. 59
Case No.:8/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LION HOLDINGS PVT. LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01806/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00730/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510236942 23.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DC(MSME) present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Weight of export product alongwith material balancing indicating weight of all components. 60
Case No.:10/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01808/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00601/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063214 24.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 61
Case No.:12/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01810/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00630/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063217 24.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 62
Case No.:14/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01812/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00427/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037147 24.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009.
Case No.:15/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ZINSER TEXTILE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01813/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00877/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310508901 24 02 2009
63 24.02.2009 Decision : The Textile Commissioner furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.9(144)/2009/TXM/R/30 dated 27.05.2009 and DHI also concurred their recommendation vide U.O. No.3(121)/09TSW(B) dated 24.07.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their recommendation under GN4 for the engineering products. 64
Case No.:16/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAX LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01814/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00315/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110037452 24.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 65
Case No.:19/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PIONEER FRICTION LTD., 18.08.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/01817/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00271/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210123670 25.02.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information. 66
Case No.:22/50/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:WPIL LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01820/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00274/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210123758 27.02.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 67
Case No.:14/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00022/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00644/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063398 03.03.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected
Case No.:28/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 18.08.2009
68 HQ File :01/80/050/00036/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00658/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063658 17.03.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 69
Case No.:3/3/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ROSE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00003/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00937/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310514295 02.04.2009 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.30(17)2009ME/422 dated 15.07.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Word “of relevant grade” may be suffixed in the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as 4250 kg. considering 38% wastage and one third recovery. 70
Case No.:1/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TIMKEN INDIA LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00009/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00005/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210125626 17.04.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Total net export weight of 24.767 MT may be added with the quantity of export product. 2. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 2211 Nos. on net to net basis. The duty free weight of import item may be restricted to 30796 Kgs. inclusive of 24.3% wastage after 20 % recovery. 71
Case No.:4/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CARTOON SANITATION PVT. LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00012/AM10/ RLA File :06/24/040/00002/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0610015395 17.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 72
Case No.:5/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:A RAYMOND FASTENERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00013/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00013/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038142 17.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009
Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 73
Case No.:7/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00015/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00014/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038151 17.04.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per General Note No.4 for Engineering Product. 74
Case No.:33/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LIVACO INDUSTRIES, 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00041/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00951/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310516930 24.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 75
Case No.:34/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MUDHRA FINE BLANC PRIVATE LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00042/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00313/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410104216 24.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Use of export product. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 76
Case No.:35/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00043/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/01050/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310517241 24.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 77
Case No.:53/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00061/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00021/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038260 28.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. h i h f d id d i d h fi f di i h id i f i h i h i ill b j d i h f h h
The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 78
Case No.:56/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00064/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00041/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510240558 29.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri Alok Trigunayat, Business Head appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish certain information. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The Committee accordingly decided to remind the firm to furnish the following information desired during the PH and relist the case on 13.10.2009: 1.Justification of 10% wastage on wash coat 2. Certificate showing dry weight and wash coat water slurry 3.. Proper Weight balance of each export product with out wastage 4. calculation of net content of platinum from its compound from chemical formula 79
Case No.:57/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MINDA STONERIDGE INSTRUMENTS LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00065/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00320/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110038290 30.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Use of item no 7,8 and 9 of import. 2. Justification of quantity of import of item no 7,8 and 9. 80
Case No.:58/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MIKROTEK MACHINES LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00066/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00021/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710064445 30.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 81
Case No.:59/5/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VA TECH WABAG LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00067/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00020/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410104336 30.04.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance C N 16/13/80 ALC2/2009 P N STARION INDIA PLTD M N /D 20/80 ALC2/2009 S C d f d
82
Case No.:16/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00161/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038385 12.05.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 83
Case No.:5/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ROSE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00122/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00086/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310519689 13.05.2009 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.30(17)2009ME/422 dated 15.07.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 2. Word “of relevant grade” may be suffixed in the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as 4250 kg. considering 38% wastage and one third recovery. 84
Case No.:15/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:OMNI LENS PVT. LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00160/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00024/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810080119 21.05.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The committee noted that DL already issued to the firm based on the DC(MSME) comments and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 85
Case No.:2/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SOUTHERN LUBRICATION (P) LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00147/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00089/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065345 11.06.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 86
Case No.:4/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:UNITED ENGINEERING (EASTERN)CORPN., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00149/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00043/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210127645 12.06.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The committee noted that DL already issued to the firm based on the DC(MSME) comments and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009.
87
Case No.:6/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:WOLFRA TECH PVT LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00151/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00539/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710065372 12.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Words “containing 70 Kgs. of Tungsten Rod and 30 Kgs. of TantalumWire” may be suffixed with the description o export product. 2. Quantities of import items at S.No.1 & 2 may be allowed as 72.1 Kgs. and 30.9 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 3% wastage after 2/3rd recovery. 88
Case No.:7/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00152/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00041/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038813 12.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case on repeat basis as per norms of advance authorization No. 3110035664 dated 07.10.2008 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting dated 31.03.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization based on earlier norms ratified for advance authorization No. 3110035664 dated 07.10.2008 in Norms Committee Meeting dated 31.03.2009 as under: 1. Net weight of export products from S.Nos. 1 to 5 may be specified as 1180 MT, 630 MT, 1035 MT, 330 MT & 345 MT respectively. (Total net export weight 3520 MT). 2. Import items from S.No.1 to 7 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 3. Import items from S.Nos. 8 to 13 may be allowed on net to net basis as applied for by the firm. Note: The import of components shall be permitted on nettonet basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilized in the manufacture of the resultant product. 89
Case No.:9/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00154/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00137/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510243667 15.06.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
Case No.:12/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00157/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00151/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510243873 17.06.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009
90 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri Alok Trigunayat, Business Head appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish certain information. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The Committee accordingly decided to remind the firm to furnish the following information desired during the PH and relist the case on 13.10.2009: 1.Justification of 10% wastage on wash coat 2. Certificate showing dry weight and wash coat water slurry 3.. Proper Weight balance of each export product with out wastage 4. calculation of net content of platinum from its compound from chemical formula 91
Case No.:13/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00158/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00101/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065424 17.06.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s application. The Committee therefore handedover the firm’s application to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. 92
Case No.:17/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TIL LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00162/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00033/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210128095 23.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Net export weight of 71.2 MT may be added with the quantity of export product. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at S.Nos. 1 to 4. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 may be allowed as 46.07 MT inclusive of 14% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No.2 may be allowed as 28.7 MT inclusive of 40.7% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No.3 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 5.302 MT inclusive of 12% wastage. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No.4 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 0.65 MT on net to net basis. 7. Quantity of import item at S.No.5 may be allowed as 1.616 MT 93
Case No.:19/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MVS ENGINEERING LTD 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00164/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00159/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510244226 23.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Words “containing 1870 Kgs. of Carbon Molecular Sieves” may be suffixed with the description of export product. 2. Quantity of import item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 1870 Kgs. on net to net basis. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly
94
Case No.:20/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:HILLER DECANTERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00165/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00048/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210128129 23.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Quantities of import items from S.Nos. 1 to 10 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 2. Quantity of import item at S.No.11 may be allowed within 2.5% of FOB value of exports. 95
Case No.:21/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED, 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00166/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00058/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410105546 24.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Net weight of export product may be specified as 39.2 MT. 2. Quantity of import item at S.No. 1 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 10300 Kgs. inclusive of 3% wastage. 3. Import item at S.No.2 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. Note: The import of components shall be permitted on nettonet basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilized in the manufacture of the resultant product. 96
Case No.:23/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ACE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS LTD., 18.08.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00168/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00096/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065569 24.06.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007.
Case No.:24/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ICEM ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED, 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00169/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00240/AM10/ Lic No/Date:0310525671
97 HQ File :01/80/050/00169/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00240/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310525671 24.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify 1. Unit of Measurement of export product may be corrected to “Kgs.”. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as 11814 Kgs. inclusive of 10% wastage after taking clue from SION C1808. 98
Case No.:25/13/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PETRON ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION LIMITED 18.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00170/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00052/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310525689 24.06.2009 Defer Date: 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. S.No.12
Case No.A156
M/s. BHEL, Ranipet HQ F.No.01/80/162/555/AM08/DES–I/ Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 RLA F.No.04/24/0010/AM08 0410090198 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of Norms Dt.04.07.2007 The Deptt. of Heavy Industry vide their U.O. No. 3(29)/09TSW(B) dt. 09.07.2009 informed that firm’s reply dt. 28.02.2009 was incomplete, sketchy & casual. The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish proper reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. S.No.81
Case No. A/R. 42
M/s. Kilburn Engg. Ltd; Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/541/ AM08/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No.03/94/40/772/AM08 Lic.No.03104478478 Date 25.10.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms. The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(126)/2009/TSW(B)/324 dated 17.08.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of DHI letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. S.No.82
Case No. A/R. 43
M/s. Alstom Power System Hydro; India Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/1285/ AM07/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No.03/94/40/1185/AM07 Lic.No.0310417512 Date 25.01.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Revision of norms. The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009.
S.No.83
Case No. A/R. 44
M/s. Alstom Power System Hydro; Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00200/AM08/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No.03/94/40/0032/AM08 Lic.No.0310426534 Date 12.04.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Revision of norms. The representative of the DHI present in the meeting recommended the case on repeat basis as per norms of advance authorization No. 0310434375 dated 28.06.2007 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting No. 08/10 dated 26.05.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to apply the same norms earlier ratified by the Norms Committee in its Meeting No. 08/10 dated 26.05.2009 for advance authorization No. 0310434375 dated 28.06.2007 in the subject advance authorization also. Copy of DHI U.O. No. 3(82)/09TSW(B)/226 dt. 12.05.2009 vide which comments were furnished for advance authorization No. 0310434375 dated 28.06.2007 may also be forwarded to RA. S.No.84
Case No. A/R. 45
M/s. Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. HQ F.No.01/81/50/344/AM08/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No.05/24/40/539/AM08 Lic.No.0510210113 Date 05.10.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms. The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office after the firm’s representative appeared for personal hearing and assured to furnish the information desired during the PH. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. S.No.85
Case No. A/R. 47
M/s. Boysen India, Noida HQ F.No.01/80/162/348/AM08/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No.05/24/40/539/AM08 Lic.No.0510204085 date 25.05.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms. The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009. S.No.86
Case No. A/R. 51
M/s. Imperial Inds. Ltd; , New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/50/361/AM07/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No Lic.No.0510185517 dt.29.0.2006 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms. On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 13.10.2009: 1. Quantity of each export item in number separately. 2. Import item 1 and export item 2 are same. The firm may give manufacturing activity involved in export item 2. 3. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. S.No.87
Case No. A/R. 56
M/s. BPL FTA Energies P. Ltd, Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/162/764/AM08/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No 04/24/40/139/AM08. Lic.No.0410090354 Dt.27.07.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms. The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009.
S.No.88
Case No. A/R. 58
M/s. IDMC,. Vthal HQ F.No.01/80/50/20/AM07/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 Date: 18.08.2009 RA.F.No 34/24/40/299/AM06 Lic.No34 10058285 Dt.06.04.2006 Ratification of norms The representative of the firm Shri Alkesh Pandya, Sr. Executive appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. He explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish certain information. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The Committee accordingly decided to remind the firm to furnish the following information desired during the PH and relist the case on 13.10.2009: 1. Submit list of items proposed for import at the time of application and the revised list of items showing deletion of export and import items. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No. 11 of SDL. S.No.89
Case No. A/R88
M/s. Devu Tools. P. Ltd. Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00189/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 RA F.No.3/94/040/0097/AM07 0310381211 Dt. 22.05.2006 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of Norms The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(70)/09TSW(B)/307 dated 06/08/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Export weight of 5977 kg. may be incorporated in the export product. 2. Quantity of import item no. 1 may be allowed as 4660 kg inclusive of 15% wastage. 3. Quantity of import item no. 2 being component may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering products. S.No.90
Case No. A/R08
M/s. Alstom Project India Ltd. F.No. 01/80/50/458/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 RA F.No.03/94/040/610/AM08 0310443939 Dt. 21.09.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Amendment in norms On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 13.10.2009: 1. The firm has used over size plates in some of the cases. Please give wastage details based on correct size of plates. S.No.91
Case No. A/R09
M/s. Rochem Separation Systems ( India) P. Ltd. F.No. 01/81/50/560/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 RA F.No.03/95/040/769/AM06 0310349109 27.09.2005 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms The Committee noted that copies of firm’s application and previous correspondence made with NC have not been received so far from the firm or Regional Authority inspite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm and RA to forward the 4 set of application and previous correspondence made by them with DGFT to consider this case otherwise case will be rejected without another chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may
be relisted on 13.10.2009. S.No.92
Case No. A/R10
M/s.Filter Manufacturing India P. Ltd. F.No. 01/80/50/381/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 R.A.F.No.02/24/040/0054/AM06 0210079402 22.06.2005 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms The representative of the firm Shri M. Mondal (Sr. Manager – Design and Drawing Dept.) accompanied with Sh. P. Pramanik (Mkt. Executive) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. Firm’s representatives had not came with any documents – copy of application, authorization copy and copies of correspondence with DGFT. The representatives of the firm were asked to send all these documents by 30.09.2009. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. S.No.93
Case No. A/R11
M/s.TIL Ltd. F.No. 01/81/50/915/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 R.A.F.No.02/24/040/324/AM07 0210098170 15.02.2007 Date: 18.08.2009 Amendments in norms The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(61)/2008/TSW(B)/323 dated 17/08/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization up to following extent in accordance with their written comments. 1. Weight of 67 MT may be incorporated in the export product. 2. Quantity of raw material may be allowed as 26.5MT inclusive of 5% wastage. S.No.94
Case No. A/R12
M/s.Ingersoll Rand India Ltd; F.No. 01/80/162/687/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 R.A.F.No.03/24/040/00926/AM02 0310109409 07.11.2001 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 13.10.2009. S.No.95
Case No. A/R12
M/s. Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. F.No. 01/81/50/202/AM06/DES.II/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 R.A.F.No.05/24/040/0160/AM06 0510159271 Dt.06.06.2005 Date: 18.08.2009 Ratification of norms The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 30.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. S.No.96
Case No. A/R23
M/s. Srihans Technologies Exports P. Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/50/00270/AM06/DES.I Meeting No. 20/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00151/AM06 Lic.No.0510160956 Date 29. 06.2005 Date: 18.08.2009 Revision of norms. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization upto following extent:
p j p g Description of import items may be modified as under: (i) Powder Metallurgy Sintered Bearing 12000 Nos. (ii) Powder Metallurgy Sintered Flanged Bearing 12000 Nos. S.No.26
Case No. C01
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co.Ltd; F.No. 01/80/162/556/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 20/10 Modification of SION Date: 18.08.2009 The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 13.10.2009. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (B. D. Ghosh, Jt. IA, MOS) Member (K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director) Member (A.K. Mishra, AIA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A. Komu) Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.