Minutes of 56th Authority Meeting held on 29.11.2022 under the chairmanship of Development Commissioner and Chairperson, SEEPZ-SEZ Authority

File No.E-FNC/69/2022-EO

MINUTES OF THE 56" AUTHORITY MEETING HELD ON 29.11.2022 UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER/CHAIRPERS ON, SEEPZ-SEZ AUTHORITY.

The following were present:-

1. Shri C.P.S Chauhan, - JDC,SEEPZ SEZ 2. Shri Abhay Doshi, - MD, M/s. Fine Line Circuits Ltd.

2. Shri Adil Kotwal, Chairman/ CEO - M/s. Creations Jewellery Mfg. Pvt. Ltd. 4. Shri Himanshu Dhar Pandey, - Dy. Directorate General of Foreign Trade

==> picture [101 x 21] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Member /Secretary<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Member Member

Member

Special Invites for Estate related Issues :-

Members of SEEMA and GJEPC

Shri. Smt. Bridget Joe, E.A. to D.C./Estate Manager, Smt. Rekha Nair, Assistant, UDC G.S. Bhandari, Assistant, Shri Ravindra Kumar Assistant, Shri. Rajesh Kumar, and Shri. Ashok Kumar Meena, LDC also attended for assistance and smooth functioning of the meeting. the The Chairperson welcomed all the members present and thereafter agenda of meeting was taken up. Agenda Item No.1:- Confirmation of the Minutes of the 55* Authority meeting held on 29.09.2022

Decision: After deliberation, the Authority confirmed the Minutes of the meeting held on 29.09.2022 with consensus.

Agenda Item No. 2:- Administrative Approval for Mega CFC

Mega The Authority was appraised that the total project proposal for setting up of CFC at SEEPZ SEZ is amounting to Rs.70.76 Crore. However due to addition of basement and 6" floor as against the initial proposal of Gr. Plus 5 floor there is an increase in the built up area leading to cost escalation in the Part A from Rs. 29.92 cr to Rs. 48 crores. Authority was apprised that on cost escalation in Part A would also lead to increase in the PMC charges and Design Consultant charges.

==> picture [38 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> pyr<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Decision:48 crores inPartAfter deliberation,A of the Mega CFCAuthority with approved a5%, Plus the cost Proposal on actual of basis.cost escalation to Rs.

Agendathereof. Item No. 3:- Approval for expenses related to Mega CFC & progress of work Mega The Authority was appraised about the various expenses incurred till date on the been CFC project. Authority was also informed that excavation and shore piling has completed and the site was handed over to the building contractor ie. M/s. Hariom Projectswork Pvt. Ltd. and they have started basement PCC work, lift pit and water tank

Decision : After deliberation, the Authority approved the expenses incurred towards mega CFC asper the details Siven in agenda.

Agenda Item No.4 :- Execution of Memorandum of Understanding between GJEPC and SEEPZ-SEZ Authority for implementation and operation of Mega CFC team Authority was apprised that the MOU was drafted & got vetted by GJEPC legal and all the relevant clauses of the MOU were informed to the Authority.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority approved the MOUand also asked to verify the lease rental and to be corrected in the MOU as Rs. 17.50per sq. ft. per month. Authority also directed to update the same to Ministry.

Agenda Item No.5 :- i) Nomenclature of SDF-09 as New Enterprises & Services Tower (NEST) - 02

ii) Administrative approval for proposed building.

Authority was apprised that the preliminary cost was approx. Rs 30 crs and on demolition of CWC the cost escalated to Rs. 75 cores on the revised plinth area. However, after detailed review, the revised cost of construction of the bldg. increased to Rs. 102 crores. Authority was informed that the PMC is under preparation of the revised REP of EPC Contract on the escalated cost of Rs. 102 crores.. Authority was also informed that considering the large size of the bldg., the nomenclature of the bldg. was proposed to change from SDE-09 to NEST - 02 (New Enterprises & Services Tower-02) Decision: ~ After deliberation, the Authority granted administrative approval for the ae s calatedNEST-02 cost ofRs. 102 crores and also noted the nomenclature of the bldg. to be read

==> picture [41 x 24] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> © 41<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Agenda Item No.6 :- i)Nomenclature of SDF-10 as New Enterprises & Services Tower (NEST)-01

ii) Administrative approval for proposed building.

Authority was apprised that the RFP was published for Rs. 40 crores on CPPP and on receipt of the bids and its evaluation by the Committee the lowest L1 bid was of M/s. Aashi Solutions with 12.475% above the estimated cost to Rs. 44.98 cr. and based on the decision of the Committee, the contract was awarded to M/s. Aashi Solutions. Authority was also informed that the said bldg. is primarily for Gems & Jewellery sector and hence the nomenclature of the bldg. was proposed to change from SDF-10 to NEST01 (New Enterprises & Services Tower-01).

Further Authority was apprised that in the plot for construction ofNEST-01 there is a requirement of underground water storage of 3 lakhs litre and the present water storage of SDF-V at the site of NEST-01 needs to be shifted to SDF-V as that is catering to the needs of SDF-V. WAPCOS and TDA has been asked to explore the cost and furnish a detailed proposal for an underground water storage of 3 lakhs litre. However, as an interim arrangement 1 lac Itr water storage can be built till the construction of the new storage tank,

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority approved the escalated cost to Rs. 44.98 crores and also noted the nomenclature of the bldg. to be read as NEST-O1. Authority also directed to submit a detailed proposal in the next Authority meeting w.r.t. the requirement of construction of3 lakhs litre of underground water tank storage.

_

Agenda Item No.7:- Proposal for CFC for the electronics sector at SEEPZ-SEZ, Mumbai as presented to the Hon’ble Union Commerce and Industry Minister, Government of India.

Authority was apprised that during the visit of the Minister on 22.10.2022, a trade member had proposed that a similar proposal for CFC for electronic sector needs to be explored for the benefit of the Units. SEEMA and EPCES had informed that to solve the problems of the units, the CFC will have cutting edge technology machines with the use of which the units can avail the services and raise the quality of their manufacturing processes and products due to adequate affordable testing and also raise the capabilities of their products and for the said project there is a requirement of 10000 sq. ft. area.

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority agreed in-principle for the said proposal. However, requested SEEMA & EPCES to furnish a detailed proposal explaining the number of units which will be benefited by the said proposal, its facilities and type of activities and who would run the said facility and what would be the contribution cost for the saidproject bySEEMA & EPCES. 9

Agenda Item No.8 :- Updation on decision taken in 55% Authority meeting regarding investment of funds from Sweep FDR held with Central Bank of India

Authority was informed that the present funds lying in various banks have been withdrawn and transferred in respective banks to a higher interest rate as per existing bank guidelines.

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority noted the investment in various banks subject to any change as per the bank guidelines and directed the CA to submit a detailed bankwise FDs report with current status.

|

Agenda Item No.9 :- Submission of monthly expenditure accounts - % expenditure and balance in the approved annual financial statement of the SEZ Authority

Authority was informed about various expenses, its budgeted provision utilized and the % to the effect of the amount spent against the provision.

Decision: - The authority noted the detailed expenditure statement.

Agenda Item No.10 :- Proposal for post facto approval of Appointment of Tax Audit for the year 2021-22 Authority was informed that to comply with the statutory requirement a tax auditor was appointed for the FY 2021-22 with a remuneration of Rs. 31,900/-. Decision : After deliberation, the Authority noted the appointment of the Tax auditor for the year 2021-22. . InternalCominittee also directed to complete the preparation of tender documents of Auditor, Appointment of CA and Tax Auditor within 15 days time.

Agenda Item No.11:Proposal for legal fees of Rs.3,34,100/utilized from the Contingency fund in the budget of FY 2022-23 of SEEPZ-SEZ Authority. Authority was informed that in order to make the payment for legal fees of Rs. 3,34,100/- to the Advocate, the funds was utilized from contingency fund of Rs. 15,00,000/- in the budget of FY 2022-23. Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority granted post facto approval i.r.o. payment of legal fees from the contingency fund.

Agenda Item No.12 :- Engaging SBI for virtual mode of account and digitized platform for online payment.

Authority was informed that State Bank of India had submitted a proposal for

==> picture [41 x 17] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> oA<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

;

virtual mode of account for receipt of payment and the need of MIS platform for online payments. Authority was apprised that most of the Units are still paying by demand draft instead of e-payment and introduction of 100% e-payment system will help the units for timely payment of rent. Also it was informed that online payments to various vendors will reduce the preparation of cheques and follow up of such payments.

Decision: After deliberation, the Authority approved the proposal of MIS receipts and payments mode for the SEEPZ Admn. and directed to co-ordinate with SBI and expedite the introduction of the system.

Agenda Item No.13 :~ Hiring of Services of Wealth Management Agency to invest Surplus funds or new Investment Avenue for existing funds.

Authority was informed that on hiring of services, Wealth Management Agency will provide various investment options to optimise the Authority revenue and to manage the funds.

Decision: ~ After deliberation, the Authority held the view that at present the funds have been invested in FDs at PSU Banks attracting interest rates above 7% p.a, the proposal of wealth management agency is presently not required.

Agenda Item No.14 :- Security services- Appraisal of the SEZ authority of the public grievance of the Security services tender and the report thereof to the Ministry of Commerce and Industry and the fact of publication of new tender thereof and evaluation criterion of the Tender.

Supplementary Agenda No.2: Appraisal on the proposals received from MSSC & SGB

Authority was apprised about the present security services manpower tender and its tenure. Authority was also informed that SEEPZ Admun. had received a public grievance on the undue financial benefit taken by the vendor for which a detailed enquiry was held and a detailed reply was sent to Ministry. Authority was also apprised that there are technical glitches in GeM portal for which letter was issued to them and the Administration published a fresh tender in CPPP. Bidders in the pre-bid meeting had raised certain queries which were justified. However, the aspect of service charges to be paid was not justifiable. In the meanwhile, a proposal was received from Security Guard Board claiming that it was mandatory to take such services from them. Further, MSSC had also submitted proposal in past and resubmitted again.

Authority was apprised that a Committee was constituted for a detailed study of the proposals sent by MSSC & SGB. A comparative study was made and the matter was discussed before the Authority.

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority approved the proposal of MSSC subject to execution of contract agreement with them and also to request MSSC that the security

pY-

deposit may be accepted for 1 month alongwith 1 month advance payment and to bring into force the said proposal by 1° Jan, 2023. Authority also directed to apprise the matter to Ministry.

Agenda Item No.15 :- Housekeeping & Cleaning Tender- Award of work, receipt of complaint and redressal thereof to the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India for intimation to the SEZ Authority.

Authority was apprised that the present tender for housekeeping was awarded in 2019 and is still on extensions. New tender was floated and SEEPZ Administration has received 18 bids and is in the process of evaluation. Authority was informed that once finalized, the new tender will be awarded to the deserving bidder based on the parameters stipulated therein.

Authority was also informed that a public grievance was received on the ongoing tender for which a detailed reply was sent to Ministry. Decision: - After deliberation the Authority noted the said proposal and directed to expedite the tender awarding process.

Agenda Item No.16 :- Appraisal of the CB] investigation into works undertaken by the NFCD in SEEPZ, SEZ to the SEZ authority and directions of the Ministry of Commerce & Industry and steps thereof

Authority was informed that there were irregularities in the nomination of NFCD and violation of GFR provisions which was an audit objection. The said audit para was included in CAG Audit Report and submitted to the Public Accounts Committee. As per Ministry’s directions, matter of nomination of NFCD has been forwarded to CBI for a detailed investigation.

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority noted the said proposal.

Agenda Item No.17 :- Appraisal of action initiated related to the Court proceedings for the structural repair work executed by NFCD and the payment thereof.

Authority was informed that SEEPZ Administration has filed an appeal to obtain stay on the deposit of Rs. 9 cr and the matter was kept for hearing on 21.11.2022. However due to change in the assignment the matter was not listed before the same Bench.

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority noted the proposal and directed to update the court proceedings in the next meeting.

==> picture [41 x 21] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> bh<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Agenda Item No.18 :- Update on Strategic Advisory Consultancy Services in SEEPZ-SEZ

Authority was informed that EOI was called for Strategic Advisory Consultancy services and tenders were received and the same is being evaluated by the Evaluation Committee

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority noted the progress in the matter and decided that on finalization of evaluation, the same should be sent to Ministry for approval.

Agenda Item No.19 :- Update on ‘RISE’, Tender for ERP solution.

Authority was informed that RFP was published on CPPP and bids were received and technical evaluation committee is examining on the basis of OQCBS marking system. The said issue was also discussed with Tata Consultancy Services and TCS were asked to provide their cost estimate. A decision was taken to schedule a detailed technical presentation by the bidders and on comparison with TCS terms & conditions, a final decision to be taken.

Decision: - After deliberation, the Authority noted the Proposal and directed to update the same in the next meeting. Agenda Item No.20 :- Update on Online OR Code enabled gatepass module Implementation Authority was apprised and updated on the online QR code enabled gate pass module implementation and commissioning of the system which would be easy to monitor the entry and exit of the visitors in SEEPZ & units. The decision of awarding the tender to M/s. VAMS was approved in the 54% Authority meeting and the hardware delivery has been achieved. Authority was informed that UAT deployment training and live feeds to be run on the system as a test run.

Decision: - After deliberation Authority held the view that the UAT implemented/functioned deployment may be in 2 units viz. M/s. Creation Jewellery and M/s. Fineline Circuit, units belonging to Authority members, as a trial run and the glitches if any can be worked out before implementation of the same in all Units. Agenda Item No. 21 :- Updation on SEEPZ website Authority was updated on the development of website and the data to be finalized by the Sections. Decision: -. After deliberation, Authority noted the updation and also directed the staff to update the data.

Agenda Item No. 22 :- Update on Hiring of Human Resource Development Agency

==> picture [41 x 24] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> o~<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

tender.

Authority was informed that tender for Human Resource Development Agency was published and the opening of the tender and evaluation of the technical documents is under process.

Decision: - Authority noted the proposal and directed to expedite the evaluation of tender documents.

Agenda Item No. 23 :- Proposal for Hiring of Social Media Agency Tender.

Authority was informed that tender for Social Media Agency was published and the opening of the tender and evaluation of the technical documents is under process. Decision: - Authority noted the proposal and directed to expedite the evaluation of tender documents.

Agenda Item No. 24:- Approval for Third party validation agency.

Authority was informed that SEEPZ SEZ are receiving DPRs/estimate from Technical Documentation Agency for execution of various works. As there is litigation on work done by NFCD on the govt. leased bldg. and VJTI, VNIT and IIT Bombay are technical expert institutions, hence the said DPRs need to validated by them as third party validation. Letters have been sent to Validation agencies and they have been asked to submit a detailed proposal on the same.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority held the opinion to follow up with the agencies for a detailed proposal and update the same in the next meeting.

Agenda Item No. 25:Project relating to record room and the works in light of the instructions of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry and the Vigilance Commission for record retention and administration. Authority was appraised that there are 3 record rooms having huge records which are in a dilapidated conditions and need to be categorized under Category A, B & C as per the CVC circular for retention / destruction of records for which it is desirous of engaging a personnel with 2 data entry operators and 5 helpers to assist. In order to execute and supervise the said work Shri. Birhade being retd. ADC and aware of the records of SEEPZ can be engaged for 4 months on remuneration.

Also the basement in the Bank bldg. being in a dilapidated condition needs certain repairs/renovation as there is water seepage, no air ventilation and fire safety system in place for which the TDA may be asked to furnish an Estimate/PPR and followed by DPR for the civil work. Authority was also informed that after civil work a digital archival unit can be created with 2 work stations and internet facility for streamlining the record system.

==> picture [145 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> oY — ,<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

File No.£-FNC/69/2022-EO

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority approved the Proposal for engaging Shri. Birhade for record retention/destruction alongwith 2 data entry operators and 5 helpers. The remuneration for Shri. Birhade to be based on the last pay drawn less pension. As regards payment to data entry operators and helpers, the same to be based on the circular no. LAB/68/2022-23 dt. 17.08.20022.

Authority also directed to obtain separate estimate from TDA for civil work of all the record rooms. Agenda Item No. 26:- Proposal for allotment of alternative space to M/s. Vijisan Jewels Pvt. Ltd. : VijisanAuthority was informed that as per the decision of 55‘ Authority meeting M/s. Jewels were allotted Unit no. 20, SDF-I admeasuring 823 sq. mtr. and the applicant had requested for the alternative unit which is slightly smaller admeasuring 712 sq. mtr. i.e. unit no. 24 in SDF-I on temporary basis till the completion of construction of new building.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority approved the proposal for allotment of unit no. 24 admeasuring 712 sq. mtr. to M/s. Vijisan Jewels subject to payment of advance rental charges.

Agenda Item No. 27:- Proposal for allotment of office space at 3° floor, BFC Building to M/s. WAPCOS Ltd. for construction and Commissioning of New buildings i.e. NEST 01 and NEST - 02 at SEEPZ-SEZ.

Authority was informed that WAPCOS being PMC for construction of NEST 01 & 02 and statutory compliance PMC for Mega CFC and for smooth execution/monitoring of work as the said project being time bound had requested for allotment of office space. Decision: - After deliberation, Authority approved the proposal for allotment of space on the 3° floor in the BFC bldg. to M/s. WAPCOS subject to payment of the prevailing rent. Agenda Item No. 28:Proposal for allotment of “B” Type Quarter in the SEEPZ Residential Colony to M/s. Hariom Projects Pvt. Ltd. for their staff on temporary basis for the construction of Mega CFC in SEEPZ-SEZ. Authority was informed that M/s. Hariom Projects Pvt. Ltd.,, being contractor for construction of Mega CFC, and for smooth execution/ monitoring of work as the said project being time bound, had requested for C type quarter.

Authority was informed that presently C type quarter is not vacant and as an alternative arrangement 2 nos. of B type quarters may be made available to them.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority approved the proposal for allotment of 2 nos. of B type quarters to M/s. Hariom Projects Pvt. Ltd. subject to payment of rent @ Rs. 10,000

per month per quarter.

Agenda Item No. 29:- Execution of sublease agreement for plot no.16P, 17 by M/s. Minal Info jewels.

Authority was apprised that M/s. Minal Infojewels has requested for execution of sub-lease agreement based on the sub-division of the plot made by MIDC.

Authority was also informed that M/s. Goldstar Jewellery was not in agreement for the same and the plot of M/s. Gitanjali Gems is attached by Enforcement Directorate. Decision: - After detailed deliberation, Authority was of the opinion that based on the legal opinion obtained from Branch Secretariat, a letter to be issued to M/s. Minal Infojewels seeking clarification as to whether they have fulfilled all the terms and conditions ofMIDC and also that it would not cause any harm to the adjacent allottees.

Authority also directed to forward the legal opinion to M/s. GoldstarJewellery and Enforcement Directorate on behalf of M/s. Gitanjali Gems and obtain their comunents.

Agenda Item No. 30:- Proposal for remuneration to the existing govt. staff for attending the authority related work.

Authority was informed that presently there are no govt. staff on role of Authority and the work is executed by the outsourced staff engaged in terms of Rule 9 of the Authority Rules 2009 and there is no permanent staff, hence the present govt. Staff are executing the work of Authority as additional charge.

==> picture [456 x 125] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Decision: - After deliberation, as per agenda, Authority approved the proposal<br>of granting remuneration as per the following chart to the existing govt. staff w.e.f 15<br>December, 2022, who are working for Authority as additional charge:- :<br>a) I state Manager/ ADC IRs. 15,000/- p.m.<br>bp) Assistant#83, 000/= pa<br>C5, 000/= pa<br>DC/ Caretaker Rs.5,000/~ p.m.<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Authority also directed that to release the pending balance payment a detailed proposal alongwith earlier circular to be submitted before the Authority.

Agenda Item No. 31:- Proposal for deduction of HRA + water charges of all outsourced staff

Authority was apprised that the outsourced staff residing in quarters are being levied HRA @ Rs. 4087 /- per month for A type quarter and Rs. 10087/- per month for B

rile No.E-FNC/69/2022-EO

type as per the decision of the 32"4 Authority meeting. Authority was informed that the said charges to be retained.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority held a view that a detailed proposal may be analyzed and examined based on the re-organization of the salary structure and put forth before the Authority.

Agenda Item No. 32:- Proposal for rental charges for external cabin/ shed of unit no. 54, M/s. Infinia Jewels Designs LLP. wrongly Authority was informed that the Unit has requested for waiver of charges by the Engineerslevied forit external was noticed cabin/shedthat presently built bythere the Unitis no insuch 2018. structure However, on inspection Decision: After deliberation, Authority directed Estate Manager to inspect and furnish a detailed report before considering their request for waiver.

Agenda Item No. 33:- Proposal of M/s. Mastek for waiver of fine and penalty.

Authority was informed that M/s. Mastek has requested for waiver of penalty as they had executed the work without any damage to the asset of SEEPZ and no disturbance to other allottees and they executed the work of providing sufficient lights in the common area and painting in the passage area at their own cost before their client’s visit.

Decision: - After deliberation Authority approved the proposal for waiver ofpenalty as the unit had applied before execution of work and the work was done in common area without any damage to SEEPZproperty.

Agenda Item No. 34:- Proposal of SGJMA & SEEMA for levy of no penalty for nonexecution of sub-lease agreement Authority was apprised that SGJMA & SEEMA are following up with State Govt. for stamp duty exemption and hence the penalty for delay in execution of sub-lease agreement @ Rs. 100/- per sq. mtr. p.a. to be waived off. Decision: - After deliberation, Authority was of the opinion that Units are required to execute the agreement within 6 months in terms of Rule 18 (2) of the SEZ Rules 2006 failing which it is violation of the conditions of Letter of Approval. Authority also directed that as there is no written directions from State Govt. on exemption of stamp duty, the proposal ofreduction in levy ofpenalty cannot be considered as this stage and will consider the same at appropriate time. Agenda Item No. 35:- Proposal of M/s. Jewelex India for space for cafeteria and yoga centre Authority was informed that M/s. Jewelex had mentioned that MIDC has disallowed the usage of basement for lunch for their employees. Hence, they have

oye

submitted a proposal for usage of 1* floor for canteen and partly for yoga centre. They would maintain the yoga centre without any cost to Authority and pay rent for the whole first floor on ICH canteen for use as dining area for their employees. Authority was informed that a letter has been sent to MIDC to permit all units . having basement for usage of lunch room subject to fire NOC and all statutory compliances.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority was of the opinion that letter regarding usage of basement at SEEPZ for dining purpose has been sent to MIDC. A meeting may also be conducted with MIDC & trade members to request MIDC to change the usage of basement area at SEEPZ for dining purpose. In the meantime, approve the said proposal of usage of 1°! floor ofICH for canteen facility and yoga centre on payment ofprevailing lease rent by M/s. Jewelex India. The yoga centre, to be run by SEEPZ Authority free of charge for its employees and trade members shall be maintained by M/s. Jewelex India without any cost to Authority.

Further, structural audit of the said building to be done by Authority and based on the same, the structure strengthening work to be carried out by M/s. Jewelex India with no cost to Authority. Thereatter, as per the requirement ofAuthority, yoga centre to be developed at 2°¢ floor of the said building by M/s. Jewelex India Pvt. Ltd. on their own cost and the 1° floor will be utilised by M/s. Jewelex India on payment of applicable rent for dining purpose of their employees and not for any other purpose. The yoga centre at 2°4 floor shall be maintained by M/s. Jewelex India with no cost to Authority.

Supplementary Agenda No.1: Proposal for increment in the remuneration of Addl. EM.

Authority was informed that work order was issued to Shri. Kashif Ikbal Ahmed as Communication & Operation Manager for Golden Jubilee Celebration on contractual basis for 15 months with 50% increase on completion of 6 months. However a decision was taken to re-designate him as Addl. Estate Manager in the 54° Authority meeting. On completion of 6 months, Shri. Kashif has requested to revise his pay structure.

Decision: After deliberation, Authority approved the proposal for incremental increase of50 %as per the clause of the letter dt, 12.04.2022.

Supplementary Agenda No.2 : Decision deliberated in Agenda item no. 14. ,

Supplementary Agenda No.3: (i) Proposal for installation of 4 KW Solar Plant on Roof Top of all Watch Towers (4 Nos.) located in SEEPZ Premises

(ii) Solar Tree installation near Service Center Bldg. Garden Area, to feed Energy to High

==> picture [37 x 24] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> oy) Ne?<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Mast No. 1 near Gate no. 1

Authority was apprised that 4 solar panels can be installed on each watch tower and the total cost would amount to Rs. 10 lacs and the ROI of the capital deployed is Rs. 4800 per month and on installation of solar panel, the energy generated would amount to Rs, 5040/- per month and the recovery of the total investment payment would be covered in 4.13 years. Authority was apprised on another proposal of solar tree installation in the garden area which would also cost of Rs. 9 lacs and_ total consumption of conventional energy consumption would be 70% of high mast no. 1 to be met by Solar Tree.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority approved the proposal of installation of solar panel on watch towers. However, as regards solar tree, Authority held the view to examine the proposal in detail.

Supplementary Agenda No.4: Proposal for Valuation & Disposal of DG set near BFC Bldg.

Authority was apprised that there are 4 DG sets which are old and in order to retain the same will incur huge repairing charges. Authority was informed that . quotations were obtained from authorised agencies of OEM on repair cost and the sale value of the said DG set.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority held the view that one DG set of the higher cost mentioned at Sr. No. 1 of the table of said agenda may be disposed off through M/s. Raj Entrps. and the rest of 3 DG Sets may be repaired from M/s. DG Mech. Power.

Supplementary Agenda No.5: Administrative Approval for appointment of interior design Consultant

Authority was informed that the existing Design Consultant M/s. VPCPL has prepared the scope of services and fee proposal for Part ‘B’ of the project which amounts to Rs. 52,70,850/-. However, PMC has stated that the scope of existing Design Consultant includes the interior work of Part ‘B’ also.

Decision: - After deliberation, Authority held the view that PMC and WAPCOS to individually submit their report within 4 days time and submit the same to the Development Commissioner. The Design Consultant should also submit his claim in the matter. The Development Commissioner would examine the same and issue speaking recommendations to the Purchase Committee. The Purchase Committee would take a decision on the scope of work of Design Consultant for interior ofPart B.

ow

.

Supplementary Agenda No.6: Administrative approval for Changes in Services and Area ofMega CFC

which Authority was informed that due to addition of basement and 6% floor of Rs. 44,31,585/-.amounts to an additional fees to the Design Consultant of an additional payment Decision: - After deliberation, Authority held the view that PMC, WAPCOS and M/s. VPCPL to individually submit their report within 4 days and submit the same to the Development Commissioner. The Development Commissioner would examine the same and issue speaking recommendations to the Purchase Committee. Supplementary Agenda No.7: Supplementary demand for executing various Civil and electrical Works in all Sectors (SectorI to Sector VI) Authority was appraised about the various works to be executed. A detailed presentation was made by the Chairperson justifying the urgent works to be executed and the works which can be executed subsequently and the urgent requirement of supplementary demand for immediate works in all the 7 sectors. Decision: - After deliberation, Authority agreed in principle for the supplementary demand. However, Authority directed that a detailed estimate/DPR and the statement may be brought before the Authority in the special meeting for detailed examination.

The Meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair.

This issues with the approval of the Chairperson, SEEPZ SEZ Authority.

eX 9? (C.P. SinghWeChauhan) Re Secretary /Jt. Development Commissioner, SEEPZ SEZ Authority