Minutes of the 25th SEEPZ-SEZ Authority Meeting held on 13.04.2015
. © | /
| MINUTES OF THE. 257h MEETING OF THE SEEPZ SEZ AUTHORITY HELD | ON 13T APRIL, 2015 AT 11.30 AM UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF | |\SEZDEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY, COMMISSIONER, SEEPZ SEZ AND CHAIRPERSON, SEEPZ the following were present: | :|) 4) Shrip.s. RamanMember | i Joint Development Commissioner 2 | | 2)! Shri. KK. Srivastav - Secretary | | ; 3), Shri. Abhay Doshi, (MD)- Member Representating Trade | | M/s. Fineline Circuit Ltd, ) a, | | 4) ! Shri. Prem kumar L. Kothari, (CMD)Member Representating Trade | ie M/s. Fine Jewellary Manufacturing Ltd. ; 2 ra | In Attendance: - ; (| 1), Smt. Mw. Kulkarni | i |Astt. Development Commissioner . Jpo | | i ‘Minutes of the meeting held on 13th April, 2015 were confirmed. | Agenda item No. 1 Gate Pass will be delivered only after receipt ‘of the payments: os . ) | Authority noticed that some of the unit holders have not made the | outstanding “payment of gate passes. As Per Circular no. 02/2005 dated © os /13.04.2005 of this office payment of gate passes should be made in advance . agifh stor issuance of gate pass. The CAG Audit has observed that the requirement of advance payment should be strictly adhered to. Accordingly, it has been | ldecidea that w.e.f. 1.4.2015 gate pass will be issued only against advance | rayment. . ‘Based | units on the average requirement of gate pass for the previous year, the a shall deposit amount equivalent to one month’s gate pass requirement by way of Demand Draft drawn favour of ‘SEEPZ-SEZ Authority Fund’ and gate pass charges will be debited as per actual issue of gate passes. As and when i; deposit is exhausted | / fully utilized, the unit shall make fresh deposit and : vithout advance payment, gate passes shall not be issued w.e.f. 1.4,2015, Decision: Trade representative informed that it is instead of submitting DD for each to and every gate pass. It would better maintain credit | | balance with the Authority. After detailed discussion it was decided that — gateby units.passes will be issued either against DD or credit balance maintained | — ee! — | by WA
;
.
.
==> picture [581 x 850] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----<br> aa Agenda item No, IT: Budget for the ear 2015 — 16,<br>\Decision: The Authority approved the Budget for the year 2015-16. )<br>_ enda_ item no. Itt: 12% _interest will be charged on<br>| outstanding of Lease rent, Service Charge and BMC charges<br>- rhe Authority noted that as ber Ministry’s Circular no, 2/2/87 NEPZ dated 31st<br>. October, 1995 the rate: of penal intcrest be fixed at 12% with effect from<br>1 11.1995, This office is charging 12% interest on outstanding of lease rent<br>| only, It is proposed to charge 12% interest will be charged on outstanding of a<br>: pervice Charge and BMC charges also. . oe ,<br>Pecison }<br>oo. The Authority approved the proposal to charge 12% interest on |<br>outstanding of Service Charge and BMC charges,<br>|16 Agenda item—- No.IV : Rent Revision for the Financial Year 2015-<br>| After detailedHence| rent wasdeliberation approved as under:it was decided to reduceoo no of slabs to 4 : of. i |<br>! .<br>' Rate (2014-15) Revised Rate per sq. mtr. p.a.<br>fof | .<br>,<br> (2015-16) , |<br>tof | 860° 1100<br>.<br>eee 1940 ) 2350<br>Dol | | 2230 i re. |<br>: f 1460<br>On<br>PLors 77 100 |_No Change] a<br>| BANKS 100 | __No Change<br>| TATA POWER 100 |___No Change _|<br>|| BEHIND|L___ASHOKA G&J 100 No Change<br>| ; | | :<br>] i Nex<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>
==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----<br> |<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>
| ,
, . y
| , . | / | : Utility Services such aspost office, ICH canteen and MTNL is being charged at ) _ Hominal rate, It was decided that w.e.f Financial Year 2015-16 rent rate will be | ‘minimum of Rs, 500 /- sq mtr. pa. ) | | | | : __ SEEPZ Residential Complex S~S@Y | : | | Location Existing Rate Revised Rate phho | . : per sq. mtr, | HG ____| | p.a. (2015-16 | _ |SHOPPING fo | COMPLEX | Sbme of the. Quarters were allotted earlier at nominal rent, it was decided that - | woe. financial year 2015-16 rent rate will be Rs. 4,000/- PM. Decision: The Authority approved the lease rent for following| categories | Wee 1.04.2015. . , BFC Buildin . :
. , | | y Ithvasinoted that at present.concessional rent is granted in BFC Building to the. fo lowing allottees. FY Créche run by M/s Stree Mukhti Sanghatna and Seven Hills Clinic: No : . 7 lease rent is charged. : | af . A Dental Clinic: In the 23rd Authority meeting held on 26.11.2014, the .. | thority approved the rent concession to the extent of 90% w.e.f 1.12.2014 for ; the period of1 year for employee’s clinic facility (Dental Clinic). - | 3) GYM: In the 21st Authority meeting held on 23.04.2014, the Authority . | approved the rent concession to.the extent of 50% w.€.f 08.06.2014 for the ae Period of 1 year for GYM (Big Boss), - i“ | | | | | | It was decided that lease rent in respect of Temaining allottees will be Rs. 474 per sq. mir. pm. | , <A renda V & IX: Charges for issue of Gate Passes and Misuse of 1 gate passes: 3 | | at Authority noted that as an average 4,000 to 5,000 daily gate passes are ; iss ed ito units and May of gate pass continuous for more than 15 days. By : ade pting to obtain daily gate passes in a such case the unit concern is avoiding | to ‘pay the charges for 15 days gate pass there by misusing the facility. pass. | To avoid the misuse it is proposed to charge Rs. 10/- for each daily gate
.
|
| |
==> picture [592 x 516] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----<br>
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||Decision:|After detailed|deliberation,|Authority|decided|to|revised|rate|
|!|late|pass|charges|as under:|
|||
|.|
|||No.|| Description|
|||oa|||ofGate Pass||Existing|Gate |Revised|Gate|
|||-|pass|charges|pass|charges|ae|
|||
|7|,|
|||1.4.2015|||
|a|||ee aa|||
|)|!|||1|Daily||Gate Pass|||NIL|Rs.10|(1-20|
|;|
|.|
|.|ae|Lo|NIL|above Ie|7|i|
|.|10/-|for|each|,|
|a|fs|Daily|Gate pass with Vehicle|.|
|,|Re aon|.|so|
|||
|||,|[20|15 days Gate Pass|Rs. 5/-|Rs. 100/-|,|
|es|6 Months Gate|Pass|.|“TRs. 50/-|PRs. 150/-|||
|.|
|||6 month Vendor|,|Rs.500 /-|_|
|:|6 month Utility|[NIL|Rs. 150/-|||
|,|om|One|year Canteen Workers|||Rs.100|/-|Rs. 200/-|a|
|One year Car|Sticker|of|.||Rs.250 /-|
|||_|:|| Commercial Vehicle|and|.|,|
||°|Ui||T|- Vehicle/|Parking|
|||
|F|Ak|One|year Bus Sticker/Parking|Rs.2000/-|7|
|||
|||13|Monthly|night|permission | NIL|Rs,|2000/-|vo.|
----- End of picture text -----<br>
| 7 | agenda VI: Strengthening and Repairs to SDF- IV Building in _ SEEPZ-SEZ premises ! . — T é Authority noted that the proposal of Strengthening and Repairs to SDF- VI | | B ilding in, SEEPZ-SEZ premises . - . ! . | ke details of work proposedare as follows: . a ! / > Strerigthening of external and internal walls at cracked portion by using ~ | : polymer mortar treatment. . | | : | > Strengthening of structural members by using micro polymer concrete by , | : | | , applying rust resisting chemicals to reinforcements. | » (Repairing of Kota stone and marble flooring to steps and passage of fire . | escape and main staircase.
i . | > Providing plastic paint to internal common portion and external Acrylic | ‘Painting to external side | of SDF — [Vv Building. — , are > | Provision of concrete work for drainage gutters and plinth protection, : | tiling work and drainage pipe work as per requirement. ~ i : Decision: | “After detailed discussion, the estimate of MIDC for | Rs. 1,51,65,000/ was approved. | . : of Agenda Item _ No.VI: Appointment of Disaster Management | Advisor: | | . oe. The Authority noted that services of a Co-ordinator with necessary © | expertise in implementing of DMP is required for implementation of he DMP as ade| | December, 20Disaster Management14. In this regard,Advisor thefor CAGa period Audit Partyof 11 hasmonths: raised anended observationon’ 20th| ° vi ti the effect that as per the calculation of compensation, the un-commuted a pession is to be deducted from the last salary drawn instead of commuted | pension. They have, thus observed that a sum of Rs. 1,89,772 /- per month :| ig to be recovered. In this regard, the Authority’ has replied to the Audit . | . satin that the remuneration was fixed taking into account the relevant . pprenence of the person in the Specialized field of Disaster Management and therefore, the observation may be dropped. However, the Audit has still | . : _ aintained the observation. | | As regards renewal u of the contract for a further period, the same was ) nder process and the following proposals are submitted:a | dj ‘The appointment of Comdr. Surinder Singh.as Disaster Management . | -be | Advisor on outsourced basis may be considered for a period of 11 months | | from 21st January, 2014 to 20th December, 2014 at a consolidated 7 | Compensation of Rs. 72,000/- + transport allowance of Rs. L500/- per | month, | . | ; | 2) Though the calculation during the previous contract period of 11 months _ | , was made as per the last pay drawn basis, the compensation of Rs. . 72,000/- deemed to have been arrived at on the basis of relevant | experience possessed by Comdr. Surinder Singh in the specialized field of | | Disaster Management, without linking the committed value of pension. | oD cision: 1) It was decided to approve continuation of contract basis — i _ appointment of Cdr. Surendra Singh as Disaster Management Advisor with consolidated compensation of Rs. 72,000/- + Rs. 1500/- travelling : silowance pian for a further period of 11 months w.e.f. 21.01.2015 "| For the period 2ist January, 2014 to 20th December, 2014 the compensation| awarded to Disaster ManagejhentAA «aAdvisor, it noted that, .
oO
; : calculation of compensation was made as per the last pay drawn basis, the | \ : compensation of Rs. 72,000/ - deemed to have been atrived at on the basis | | : of relevant experience Possessed by Comdr. Surinder Singh in the |— [specialized field of Disaster Management, without linking the committed _|value ofpension. Oe 7 fuk. ntfs ji The Authority noted that the though tenders were floated on many dccasion in the past the response received were not in accordance with the : itender condition i.e. the tender condition specifies to quote “The bidder | A quote his/ their charges for the above work as a percentage ofthe oO | | ! value of precious metal content ascertained based on sample test carried _ | — out at the Government Mint Or reputed private Mint excluding customs rae ity, e.g. if the value of precious metal content ascertained as per sample - | a Mint is Rs. 10/- than, what percentage on the same shall be your | ¢| arges excluding customs duty.” where as the tender received were on the basis of per kg rate on as is where is basic conditions. | ;| - | It was also noted that “the Investment Powder waste has been - ~ accumulated behind the Gem & Jewellery Complex III and is occupying the .: hcC mmonving adversearea causingimpact hindrance on the Properin the upkeepproperof up-keep the premises.of the Further duringsurrounding” | , . . j onsoon the investment powder waste may get watched away in the flood . ater causing choke up of the drains wh ich may cause flooding of the low lane "ayo" | | | Decision: - The Trade Member stated that the investment powder | d sposed of the common area is actually a waste like the any other waste i whatever recovery Sei ben recovered by theofunits.preciousHence,metalthis wastecontent mayis feasible be disposedhas alreadyin the , manner other waste materials are disposed of. After detailed discussion - t on the subject, the Authority decided that fresh Tender may be invited for 4 disposal of investment powder waste on “as. — is where is basis” inviting fe in for disposal on the basis. . Agenda Item No. X: Addition and alteration to the Gate No.1: | - . | | The Authority noted that MIDC has submitted the estimate for some | : a dition and alternation to Gate No. I and prepared an estimate based on | M DC’s current DSR:| | | : | 1) Demolition works. —_hye |
: . | : | a 3) Masonry, plaster, painting and flooring works. , ye 4) Door works. : . ) : r _ 9) Interiors works. -_ !| - | ne) Landscaping and ACP | ‘ 7). Road development work, . . : : | Sr. | Name of work a , Estimated Cost in Rs. ; | | | 4S Architects fees 4.50% on estimated cost cd| |D | cision:The estimated expenAfter detaile d iturediscussion, to Rs. 99,61,800/-the estimate of: MIDC for Rs... , : Py. ,61,800 was ‘approved. Oo a | . Agenda: XI Extension ofG4S Security Contract. for further period of one year wet 12.01.2015; | | in the 21st Authority meeting, Tender was approved for outsourcing of Security . . / a Suards, Supervisors and accordingly G4s Security has been awarded the | we ; Teen for providing the services of 83 Security Guards and 5 Supervisors @ ° | . BS.30,002/. pm for Ex-serviceman Security Guard and Rs. 35,130/- pm for | per Ex-servicemen Supervisor and Rs. 15,500/- for Civilian Security Guards. . ! : \t present, it was'noted that present deployment is 12 Civilian Security a | en 71 Ex-serviceman Security Guards and 5 Ex-Servicemen Supervisors, | 7 ts. G4S Secure Solution (India) Pvt. Ltd. vide their letter dated 20.12.2013 ! dow requested for extension for further period of one year i.e. from 01.04.2015 tb 01.03.2016 for Security Guards the increased the strength Security Guards _ ile 88 to 98 guards and henceforth the setvices of supervisor has been | iscontinue. , : | : ; |
.
.
‘
. Decision: The Authority approved the proposal for continuation of the _ e isting contract for further period of one year w.e.f. 01.04.2015 on _ existing terms & condition with increased strength of Security of Guards from 88 to 98 guards,
.
The Meeting ended with vote of Thanks to the Chair.
,
i
ve
:
!
.
|
Chairppison — SEEPZ SEZ‘Authority
==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----<br> :<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>
==> picture [1 x 1] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----<br> .<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>
i
|
|
.
a
|
==> picture [2 x 1] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----<br> ,<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.