DGFT Committee Minutes

Directorate General of Foreign Trade DES-V Section...

licensingThe Meeting No.17/AM-20 dated 11.03.2020(Part-III) actually held on 28.08.2020, 30.09.2020 for the year 2019-20 to consider the cases under para 4.7 FTP 2015-20, Duty Exemption Schemes (Chapter-4) in officersConferencewereRoompresent:-No.11 of DGFT, under the Chairmanship of Shri S.S.B. Reddy, Addl. DGFT. The following

1 [ Shri Kuldeep Singh, Asst Director | “pews 2. [ Dr Ram Asrey Lal Consultaniy ct -3[ Shui Nand Lal (Consultan) oi 4 _[ Shri Shaish Kumar, (Peete) 5 -S.[ Shri Rajesh Mathowa, DDG 6. _[ Shri Manoj Kumar Meena, Assi Ditestor | ~parpt

Minutes for manual cases (offline) M. No. 17-84 Dt. 11.03.2020 Actually held on 28.08.2020

NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00448/AM17/DES-V actually held on 28.08.2020

Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that firm has submitted their reply. Committee went through the details submitted in this case and decided to ask the firm to furnish the amendment sheet of export and import item along with quantity, issued from RA concerned. The case stands deferred for re-listing.

NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00179/AM18/DES-V actually held on 28.08.2020 RA F. No. 05/23/040/00228/AM18/ Adv. Authorization No. 0510403977 dated 08.09.2017 Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that firm has submittedfor examination.their reply. Committee went through the details submitted in this case and decided to defer the case The case stands deferred for re-listin g.

;

Case No. 360 M/s. GOKUL POLYMERS PVT LTD sshNC Meeting No.on hong17/AM20 dated 1 1.03.2020 |[FNerevesotmvaneDesyF. No. 01/84/050/00336/AM18/DES-V | Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that case pertains to DPIIT and firm has submitted their reply. Based on comments furnished by Shri Nand Lal, DPIIT by e-mail dated 23.09.2020, Committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following; 1. Net import content of each raw material in export product including indigenous input if any. In the 2. teply only total consumption of raw materials has been given. occurredCalculationin the process.for requirement of raw materials both imported and indigenous giving Separately wastage The 3. Weight of export product in Kgs. case stands deferred for re-listing.

==> picture [141 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Ber YK<br>S —<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

1

pulvunenepemnnnitniiicnseneen

==> picture [500 x 715] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> ;<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00220/AM17/ DES-V<br>seme eae ae[Fanner ——<br>Decision: Adv. Authorization No. 3210077953 dated 11.08.2016.<br>submitted Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that firm has<br>furnish1. the following;their reply. Committee went through the details submitted in this case and decided to ask the firm to<br>2. The CADs submitted are not indicating the relevant Export item details,<br>items.<br>Party advised to submit the CADs labeled with export item no., efficiency and Style no. for all export<br>3. Measurement chart of all export items,<br>The 4. Incase lining material is used, please indicate the use of it in export item,<br> case stands deferred for re-|isting.<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 TF, No. 01/84/050/00481/AM19/ DES-V<br>et uaag = aS [FN sieeocnermnramy ————<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that RLA-<br>Ludhiana has already approved the redemption of Adv. Authorization. Therefore committee decided to<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00085/AM19/ DES-V<br>eels oe | tienes<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and went through the<br>details submitted in this case and noted that the representative had appeared before NC on 28.08.2020 and<br>explained their case. After detailed deliberation, Committee noted that CAD has been submitted by firm and<br>decided to refer the case to DC-MSME for their comments.<br>The case stands deferred for re-listin g.<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00676/AM19/ DES-V<br>sacle ae [FM tieboesnyoRs<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as Per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that firm has<br>DGFTsubmitted Consultant their reply. (SK) Committeefor examination. went through the details submitted in this case and decided to refer the case to<br>The case stands deferred for re-listing.<br>actually held on 28.08.2020<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that case<br>pertains to DPIIT. In this case, Norms were ratified in meeting No-9/84-ALC3/2008 dated 2.8.2018. The<br>authorization holder represented for amendments in the minutes. Committee went through the details submitted<br>in this case and decided to do following amendments in the descriptions of ratified norms.<br>(i) Description of export item amended to read as PVC footware.<br>(ii) Description ofimport item 2 amended to read as Platicizer (DOP)<br>(iii) Description of import item-5 amended to read as Di-CumylI Peroxide -98/40 (DCP)<br>RA concerned may take necessary action subject to compliance ofother usual conditions. RenalSTROVW<br>2<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00301/AM18/DES-V ea iekaaag [Fs cinto aT $ Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that firm has submitted their reply vide e-mail dated 26.08.2020. Committee decided to defer the case for next meeting. NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 TF. No. 01/84/050/00532/AM19/DES-V slide |e eaensiooees Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant Papers and noted that firm has Committeesubmitted their approved reply the dated in put13.08.2020. output norms Based as onunder: written comments furnished by Dr. R.A. Lal, Consultant the S. No. Qty. S. No. Qty. LININGGENTS LONG | 380 1, NYLON FABRIC GSM 210 4/- 2.19Recommendedsq met per 2. LINING FABRIC GSM 130 +/- | 1.89 sq met per 10% pe, 2, [ZIPPER Netto J WITHLINNGGENTS TROUSER | [xe210 |"4. NYLON FABRIC 210 +/- 10% 2.86 Sq. Mtr per 5. LINING FABRIC GSM 130 4/2.62 Sq. Mtr. A 10% Per pc RA a a concerned may take necessary action subject to compliance of other usual conditions.

NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00219/AM19/DES-V al ica Oe [FN inteomtnmspee RA F. No. 05/24/040/00227/AM19/ Adv. Authorisation No. 0510407253 dated Decision: 19.07.2018 details Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and went through the submitted in this case and noted that the representative had appeared before NC on 28.08.2020 and explained their case. After detailed deliberation, Committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the CAD for each DCMSMEexport product.for theirFirm comments.has submitted their reply by email Dt. 11.09.2020 and same has been sent to O/o The case stands deferred for re-listing.

NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00547/AM19/DES-V abate | einem —— RA F. No. 06/24/040/00036/AM19/ Adv. Authorisation No. 0610038997 dated Decision: 09.10.2018 details Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and went through the submitted in this case and noted that the representative had appeared before NC on 28.08.2020 and explained their case. After detailed deliberation, Committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following: 1. Size wise (dimensions of export items) quantity of export items and net contents of input in export. 2. Justification for wastage claimed at each stage of manufacturing. 3. Details and quantity of indigenous inputs used, if any. __ 3

==> picture [33 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> ————<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> :<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [447 x 570] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00520/AM19/DES-V<br>st acai [FA OIEReAMTDDES<br>RA F. No. 06/24/040/00022/AM 19/ Adv. Authorisation No. 0610038938 dated<br>Decision: 06.08.2018<br>details Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and went through the<br>submitted in this case and noted that the representative had appeared before NC on 28.08.2020 and<br>explained their case. A fter detailed deliberation, committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following:<br>1. Size wise (dimensions of export items) quantity of export items.<br>2. Net contents of input in export.<br>3. Justification for wastage claimed at each stage of manufacturing.<br>Re isi Ne TAN ey EE<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00551/AM19/DES-V<br>al klieiaag a [FM creebamaNRe<br>RA F. No. 06/24/040/00039/AM19/ Adv. Authorisation No. 0610039010 dated<br>Ree = oat ——<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and went through the<br>details submitted in this case and noted that the representative had appeared before NC on 28.08.2020 and<br>explained their case. After detailed deliberation, Committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following:<br>1. Size wise (dimensions of export items) quantity of export items and net contents of input in export.<br>2. Justification for wastage claimed at each stage of manufacturing.<br>3. Details and quantity of indigenous inputs used, if any.<br>PRC Menibe No-T7 ANS dca ppp Seni a PetsPag,<br>actuallyNC Meetingheld No.on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00374/AM19/DES-V<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and went through the<br>details submitted in this case and decided to ratify the norms for above said Adv. Authorization as under:<br>a CN Ft ee<br>INDIAN HUMAN HAIR DOUBLE | 800.0 | HAIR CLEANING | CIF value of import<br>UP<br>DRAWN OR SINGLE DRAWN SIZE 10" Kgs. LIQUID item restricted to 10%<br>DRAWNINDIAN HUMAN HAIR DOUBLE HAIRWASHING HUMAN| of the FOB value.<br>UP OR SINGLE DRAWN SIZE 10"<br>RA concerned may take necessary action subject to compliance of other usual conditions.<br>FNC Ma No TNE doe ap oe Na a Des<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/162/00261/AM13/DES-V<br>Enhancement of Kraft Paper wastage from 15.42% to 18.81% of 100% EQU,<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant papers and noted that case<br>pertains to DPIIT. Committee perused the documents, sample submitted by the firm on dated 05.02.2020.<br>Committee also has gone through records Particularly letter Dt. 26.08.2019 of Dy. Commissioner of custom,<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [100 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Bing,<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

ee

4

actuallyNC Meetingheld No.on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00318/AM18/DES-V Decision: Adv. Authorisation No. 0710112111 dated 07.09.2017 details Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and went through the submitted in this case and noted that the firm has submitted very low Efficiency CAD. Therefore Thecommittee case stands decideddeferred to askfor the re-listing. firm to furnish the measurement chart of each export product, NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 | F. No. 01/84/050/00590/AM19/ sai eanagg |For $$ Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda along with other relevant Papers and noted that firm has submitted their reply vide dated 07.08.2020. Based on written comments furnished by Shri Shaish Kumar, consultant committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following: 1. Complete Specification of import item-1. 2. Drawing/design/layout of export item along with CAD and % efficiency. 3. Calculation sheet to arrive at the quantity of raw material asked for. The 4. Net content of each raw material in each export product. case stands deferred for re-listing.

==> picture [430 x 443] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00675/AM19/<br>firmDecision:to furnish Committee the following: considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and decided to ask the<br>1. Bifurcation of export product size wise.<br>2. Quantity of export item in numbers for each Size, furnish in Sq. Mtr ofeach size.<br>The 3. Type and specification of import item.<br> case stands deferred for re-listing on 01.10.2020.<br>actuallyNC Meeting No.held on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00745/AM19/<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and noted that firm<br>approach RA concerned.<br>actuallyNC Meeting No. held on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00054/AM10/<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and noted that firm<br>requested for removal of style no as they have not mentioned the same in export documents. However in this<br>case quantity of inputs has been given based on style no. Now firm want to remove the style no., which is not<br>Possible. Sine style number has not been mentioned, quantities recommended by committee is no longer<br>applicable. Therefore same can be covered as per SION only.<br>The export items may be covered under SION as following:<br>Export item-1: SION J-176 and input Qty. allowed for inputs is 2.48 Sq. Mtr./pes.<br>Export item- 2: SION J-207 and input Qty. allowed for inputs is 4.20 Sq. Mtr./pcs.<br>RA Export item -3: SION J-223 and input Qty. allowed for inputs is 3.35 Sq. Mtr./pes.<br>may workout the requested quantity and re gularize the case as per HBP.<br><—<br>; Od<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [441 x 630] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated | 1.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00664/AM19/<br>actually held on 28.08.2020<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant Papers and went through the<br>details submitted in this case and decided to ratify the norms as under:<br>No.<br>eee1. a Recommended<br>UNPROCESS NARROW 190000 | 100% POLYESTER 100000 Kgs.<br>KNITTED/FABRIC/ ELASTIC (SIZE Kgs. FILAMENT (HIGH<br>100%1MM TO 100MM) (The contents Imported TENACITY YARN)<br>POLYESTER (T.C 100 %<br>TENACITY FILAMENT (HIGH POLYSTER<br>Kg. YARN) shall use 93 137.25 FILAMENT)<br>and RUBBER THRREADS SHALL<br>USE 93137.25 Kg.) in Export after<br>2s excluded 2% wastage<br>Elastic Cord / Rubber thread and cord 10000.0 |RUBBER THREAD 100000 Kgs.<br>textile covered Kgs. (T.C RUBBER<br>(The contents Imported 100% THREAD)<br>POLYESTER FILAMENT (HIGH<br>TENACITY YARN shall use 4901.96 Kg.<br>and RUBBER THRREADS SHALL USE<br>4901.96 Kg.) in Export after excluded 2%<br>wastage<br>RA concerned may take necessary action subject to compliance of other usual conditions.<br>NC Ne TANI epg S08 ——$-$ $$<br>NCactually Meeting No.held on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00322/AM18/<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and went through the<br>details submitted in this case and observed that UOM in Adv. Authorization in Kgs. There is no problem in<br>operating the Adv. Authorization, Committee decided that norms fixed correctly,<br>RA concerned may take necessary action subject to compliance of other usual conditions,<br>Re es NTR ppp Spon $$<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 1 1.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00350/AM19/<br>actually held on 28.08.2020<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers. Based on written<br>comments received form Sh. Shaish Kumar, committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following:<br>1. Details of indigenous inputs with their quantity.<br>2. GSM of import item, width of import item.<br>The 3. Justification for a wastage of 10.70 %<br> case stands deferred for re-listing.<br>NC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 1 1.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/00173/AM17/<br>actually held on 28.08.2020<br>Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda alongwith other relevant papers and decided to ask the<br>firm to appear before committee for personal hearing.<br>The case stands deferred for re-listing.<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [33 x 20] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> ile<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [5 x 8] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> 6<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> :<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Case No.389 NC M/s. Sure Safety India P. Ltd. actuallyMeeting No. held on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F. No. 01/84/050/001 19/AM16 RA F. No. 34/24/040/00050/AM16 Adv. Authorization. No. 3410041251 Dated:27.05.2015 Decision: Committee Considered the case as per agenda, along with other relevant papers and noted that this case was rejected due to non submission of requisite information. Now firm has again requested for fixation of norm without submitting the required information which were asked earlier. Therefore the committee decided to reject the case. And also decided not to place for discussion such type of cases before norms committee, Case No.390 actuallyNC Meeting held No, on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F.M/s. No.Sure 01/84/050/00092/AM19Safety India P. Ltd. RA F. No. 34/24/040/00062/AM19 Adv. Authorization. No. 3410044154 Dated: 18.05.2018 Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda, along with other relevant papers and noted that this Case was rejected due to non submission of requisite information. Now firm has again requested for fixation of norm without submitting the required information which were asked earlier. Therefore the committee decided to reject the case. And also decided not to place for discussion such type of cases before norms committee. Case No.391 actuallyNC Meeting held No. on 28.08.202017/AM20 dated 11.03.2020 F.M/s. No.Sure 01/84/050/00403/AMSafety India P. Ltd. 18 RA F. No. 34/24/040/00264/AM18 Adv. Authorization. No. 3410043756 Dated:28. 12.2017 Decision: Committee considered the case as per agenda, along with other relevant papers and noted that this Case was rejected due to non submission of requisite information. Now firm has again requested for fixation of norm without submitting the required information which were asked earlier. Therefore the committee decided to reject the case. And also decided not to place for discussion such type of cases before norms COMM jttek. Ze

7