DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.38/10 held on 22.12.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 38/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 was held on 22.12.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. A.K. Mishra, AIA M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 6. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:22/32/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED Meet No/Date:38/80ALC2/2009 22.12.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00538/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00570/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211053 24.10.2007 Decision : The MOS furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 2(10)/2007TW(Pt.) dated 21.12.09 recommending the norms based on available information as the firm has provided partial information relating to pain thickness, volume solid % and weight solid %. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Export item: Item Thickness Quantity Cold Rolled Close Annealed (CRCA) skin passed / temper passed (including half hard / quarter hard) Colour coated Non Alloy steel Sheets (plain/ corrugated) / Hoops and Strips/wide Coils having paint coating of primer 9 to 10 micron; back coat 7 to 20 micron; and top coat 20 micron. a) 0.30 mm b) 0.32 mm c) 0.34 mm a) 2500 MT b) 2500 MT c) 3000 MT Import Item: S.N. Item Quantity 1. Hot Rolled non Alloy Steel Wide Coils of relevant grade 8639.96 MT 2. Rolling Mill Rolls 10 MT 3. Rolling Oil 2.8 MT 4. Pickling Oil 3.6 MT
Steel Strappings 16 MT 6. Guard Film (to be allowed if export product is covered with guard film) 127.52 MT 7. Primer (Volume Solid 30+/2%; Weight Solid 43.51+/2%) 79520 liters 8. Top Coat (Volume Solid 36+/2%; Weight Solid 57.66+/2%) 159032 liters 9. Back Coat (Volume Solid 32+/2%; Weight Solid 52+/2%) 77585 liters For arriving at the requirement of item at Sl.No.1,clue has been taken from SION C471 while for consumables at Sl.No.2 to 6, clue has been taken from C471 and engineering table 1. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 2
Case No.:23/32/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00539/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00571/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211055 24.10.2007 Decision : The MOS furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 2(10)/2007TW(Pt.) dated 21.12.09 recommending the norms based on available information as the firm has provided partial information relating to pain thickness, volume solid % and weight solid %. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Export item: Item Thickness Quantity Cold Rolled Full Hard Colour coated Non Alloy steel Sheets (plain/ corrugated) / Hoops and Strips/wide Coils having paint coating of primer 9 to 10 micron; back coat 7 to 20 micron; and top coat 20 micron. a) 0.30 mm b) 0.32 mm c) 0.34 mm a) 2500 MT b) 2500 MT c) 3000 MT Import Item: S.N. Item Quantity 1. Hot Rolled non Alloy Steel Wide Coils of relevant grade 8384.94 MT 2. Rolling Mill Rolls 10 MT 3. Rolling Oil 2.8 MT 4. Pickling Oil 3.6 MT 5. Steel Strappings 16 MT 6. Guard Film (to be allowed if export product is covered with guard film) 127.52 MT 7. Primer (Volume Solid 30+/2%; Weight Solid 43.51+/2%) 79520 liters 8. Top Coat (Volume Solid 36+/2%; Weight Solid 57.66+/2%) 159032 liters 9. Back Coat (Volume Solid 32+/2%; Weight Solid 52+/2%) 77585 liters For arriving at the requirement of item at Sl.No.1,clue has been taken from SION C470 while for consumables at Sl.No.2 to 6, clue has been taken from C470 and engineering table 1.
Case No.:24/32/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED 22 12 2009
3 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00540/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00572/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211058 24.10.2007 Decision : The MOS furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 2(10)/2007TW(Pt.) dated 21.12.09 recommending the norms based on available information as the firm has provided partial information relating to pain thickness, volume solid % and weight solid %. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Export item: Item Thickness Quantity Cold Rolled Colour coated, Zinc (43.50%) & aluminiumsilicon (56.50%) alloy coated non alloy steel sheets (plain/corrugated)/strips wide Coils having paint coating of primer 9 to 10 micron; back coat 7 to 20 micron; and top coat 20 micron. Coating weight of Zinc Aluminium Silicon alloy will be 120 gms / sq.Metre. a) 0.30 mm b) 0.32 mm c) 0.34 mm a) 5000 MT b) 5000 MT c) 5000 MT Import Item: Sl. No. Item Quantity 1. Hot Rolled non Alloy Steel Wide Coils of relevant grade 15072 MT 2. Zinc Slab/ingots (Minimum Purity 99.50%) 417 MT 3. Aluminiumsilicon alloy slab/ingots 542 MT 4. Rolling Mill Rolls 18.75 MT 5. Rolling Oil 5.25MT 6. Pickling Oil 6.75 MT 5. Steel Strappings 30 MT 6. Guard Film (to be allowed if export product is covered with guard film) 239.10 MT 7. Primer (Volume Solid 30+/2%; Weight Solid 43.51+/2%) 149100 liters 8. Top Coat (Volume Solid 36+/2%; Weight Solid 57.66+/2%) 298185 liters 9. Back Coat (Volume Solid 32+/2%; Weight Solid 52+/2%) 155036 liters For deciding about the requirement of item at Sl.No.1,clue has been taken from SION C2034 and for arriving at the requirement of consumables at Sl.No. 4 to 8, clue has been taken from C2034 and engineering table 1. 4
Case No.:21/12/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:QUADRANT EPP SURLON INDIA LTD. 22.12.2009 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00387/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00886/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510216788 21.02.2008 Defer Date: 16.02.2010 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from Chemical Division of DC(MSME) are yet to be received in spite of D.O. reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to write a letter to the concerned Jt. Secretary, by name with a copy to Director(Chemical) in O/o DC(MSME) to expedite their comments. The Committee also decided to remind the C&PC for their comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010.
5
Case No.:42/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00918/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00940/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510217768 12.03.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(117)/09TSW(B)/448 dated 25.11.09 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Quantity of import item Nos.1 to 6 may be allowed on nettonet basis. 2. Quantity of import item Nos.7 to 12 may be allowed as 1.05 kg./kg. content in the export product. 6
Case No.:69/52/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01146/AM08/ RLA File :03/95/040/01133/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310464682 12.03.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(116)/09TSW(B)/439 dated 24.11.09 informing that firm has not given the complete reply. The Committee noted that firm has also furnished some additional information vide their letter dated 30.10.09. However, the same is also not having the calculation of raw material with supporting documents. The Committee however decided to ratify norms as below in view of DHI’s U.O.No. 3(69)/2008/TSW(B)/48 dt. 28.01.2009:. 1. Item no. 1 to 5 & 14 may be allowed as 50% of the quantity applied for by the firm. 2. Item no. 6 may be allowed on nettonet basis. Further the ward ‘finished’ to be added before the item as no wastage has been claimed. 3. Items no. 7 to 9 may be allowed on nettonet basis, being components. 4. Item no. 10,11 & 12 may be deleted. 5. Item no. 13 may be allowed as applied for subject to restriction of 1% of FOB value, being consumable. 6. Item no. 16 may be allowed as applied for. 7. Quantity of item no. 17 may be reduced to 1700 kg. to make it equal to quantity of welding wires. 7
Case No.:29/14/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 22.12.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00505/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00077/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410096594 18.06.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 8
Case No.:29/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00351/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00278/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310476211 24.06.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010.
9
Case No.:43/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00566/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00085/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410096891 01.07.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 10
Case No.:5/17/81ALC2/2008
Party Name:VISIOCORP MOTHERSON LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/81/050/00252/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00238/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510223636 09.07.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(54)/09TSW(B)/419 dated 3.11.09 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Quantity of 3877464 meters of inner wire may be allowed with 2% wastage. 11
Case No.:56/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:WILSON ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00725/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00099/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210114834 15.07.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(58)/09TSW(B)/467 dated 2.12.09 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. The export weight of each Shoe track is 11.62 Kg. and total export weight of 85.34 MT may be incorporated in the authorization. 2. Quantity of raw material may be allowed as 90 MT with net wastage of 5.4% considering 20% recovery. 12
Case No.:65/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00876/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00192/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035094 19.08.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time upto 31.12.09 for submission of required information. The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010.
Case No.:34/28/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 22 12 2009
13 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01115/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00549/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310487648 24.09.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration 14
Case No.:31/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01161/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00467/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910035538 07.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time upto 31.12.09 for submission of required information. The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 15
Case No.:32/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01162/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00468/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910035539 07.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time upto 31.12.09 for submission of required information. The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 16
Case No.:39/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MULTITEX FILTRATION ENGINEERS LTD 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01169/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00442/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229059 08.10.2008 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Import items from S.Nos. 1 to 11 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import items at S.No.12, 13 & 14. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No.12 may be allowed as 118.44 sq.mtrs. on net to net basis. 4. Quantities of import items at S.No.13 & 14 may be allowed as 0.50 MT & 1.34 MT respectively on net to net basis. 17
Case No.:60/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KAMAL RUBPLAST INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01240/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00477/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510230022 27.10.2008
17 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from Chemical Division of DC(MSME) are yet to be received in spite of D.O. reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind Shri S.K. Sharma, Dy. Director (Chemical), DC(MSME) to expedite their comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 18
Case No.:20/36/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:INTERNATIONAL TUBULAR SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01299/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00794/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310494578 18.11.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 19
Case No.:1/33/85ALC3/2008
Party Name:BOVING FOURESS LIMITED, 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/85/050/00218/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00524/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061697 15.12.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that reply of the firm have been received today only. The Committee, therefore, decided to forward the copy of reply to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 20
Case No.:1/44/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01661/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00377/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036659 09.01.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration 21
Case No.:4/44/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01664/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00828/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310501993 09.01.2009 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(31)/09TSW(B)/ dated 14.12.09 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Total export weight of 3660 MT for twelve coke drums may be incorporated in the advance authorization. 2. Import item no. 1, 3 & 4 may be allowed as 1956.554 MT, 407.27 MT and 20 MT respectively with 3% wastage as applied by the firm. 3. Quantity of import item No. 2 may be allowed as 1221.3 MT with 8.4% wastage with 30% recovery. 4. Description of import item no. 5 may be amended as “Finished forged components” and its quantity may be allowed as 90 MT. 5. Quantity of import item No. 6 may be allowed as 15 MT. 6. Import item no. 7 may be allowed as per GN4 for engineering product being components. 7. Import item nos. 8 to 12 are welding material. Allowing 3% weight of plates proposed for import and 1% of weight of forging, the quantity of item No. 8 may be amended to 4.2 MT, item no. 9 to 3.5 MT, item no. 10 to 21.9 MT, item no. 11 to 79.4 MT and item no. 12 to 7.7 MT. h i l h i k i di l
22
Case No.:15/44/80ALC2/2008
22.12.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/01675/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00369/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036679 12.01.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 23
Case No.:18/44/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ZINSER TEXTILE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01678/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00742/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310502421 13.01.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the Textile Commissioner has informed that the firm has not furnished the required information in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for submission of the said information by 04.02.2010 to T.C. under intimation to this Office otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. However, if the firm has furnished reply to T.C., they should expedite their comments in the matter. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 24
Case No.:18/7/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00085/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00989/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310511441 13.03.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration 25
Case No.:17/7/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00084/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/01014/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310512044 18.03.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 26
Case No.:23/15/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00207/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00682/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710063809 24.03.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010.
27
Case No.:6/14/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00176/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00473/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037585 31.03.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration 28
Case No.:22/15/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AQUASUB ENGINEERING 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00206/AM10/ RLA File :32/24/040/00068/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210040136 01.04.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 29
Case No.:15/15/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00199/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00293/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103657 03.04.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 30
Case No.:16/15/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00200/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00303/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103660 03.04.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 31
Case No.:7/14/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00177/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00299/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103654 03.04.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected
Case No.:8/14/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00178/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00298/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410103650 Defer Date: 16.02.2010
32 Q e :0 /80/050/00 78/ 0/ e :0 / /0 0/00 98/ 09/ c.No/ ate:0 0 03650 03.04.2009 e e ate: 6.0 . 0 0 Decision : The Committee observed that firm vide their letter dt. 19.12.2009 requested for extension of time to reply. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 33
Case No.:3/14/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00173/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00697/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710064050 06.04.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010.: 1. Input raw material blanks size without cutting allowance – export product wise. 2. Input raw material blanks weight without cutting allowance – export product wise. 3. Cutting allowance and any other allowance / wastage export product wise. 34
Case No.:2/14/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 22.12.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00172/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00016/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710064254 20.04.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 35
Case No.:5/14/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:AIA ENGINEERING LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00175/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810079414 21.04.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 36
Case No.:1/7/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00068/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00983/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310517989 01.05.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration
37
Case No.:10/14/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00180/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00004/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910037842 06.05.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 38
Case No.:21/7/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00088/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00732/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510241368 13.05.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 39
Case No.:22/7/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VA TECH ESCHER WYSS FLOVELPVT. LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00089/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00067/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510241369 14.05.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 40
Case No.:12/14/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00182/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00048/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038038 28.05.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 41
Case No.:13/14/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00183/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00051/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038039 28.05.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010.
Case No.:8/15/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:RATNAVEER STAINLESS PRODUCTS (PVT) Meet No/Date:38/80ALC2/2009
42 LTD, 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00192/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00170/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410024444 11.06.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: Description of import item may be amended as “Relevant Prime Stainless Steel Coils/Sheets/ Plates/Strip Grade 304” and its quantity may be allowed as 129000 Kgs. inclusive of 29% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 43
Case No.:14/14/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00184/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00012/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000320 19.06.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 44
Case No.:1/15/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KUVAWALA DRILLEQUIP 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00185/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00237/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310526625 01.07.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that norms of the similar product of the applicant firm in respect of advance authorization No.0310475753 dt.20.6.08 has already been ratified by the NC in its meeting No.8/10 held on 26.5.09 vide case No.42/14/80ALC2/2008. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis as under: 1. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 155.4 MT inclusive of 5% wastage. 45
Case No.:12/15/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00196/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00067/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410105868 03.07.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 16.02.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.5,8 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 2. Details of import item No. 4 with justification of quantity of import.
. eta s o po t te No. w t just cat o o qua t ty o po t. 3. The firm has enclosed the drawing of “ball separator” while export product is “condenser tube cleaning system”. The firm may submit relevant drawings. 46
Case No.:14/15/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LUBI SUBMERSIBLES LTD 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00198/AM10/ RLA File :08/24/040/00074/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0810081260 07.07.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 47
Case No.:26/15/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00210/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00051/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039118 07.07.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net weight of export products from S.No. 1 to 10 may be specified as 38.4 MT, 76.8 MT, 23.4 MT, 11.52 MT, 12 MT, 198.64 MT, 95.7 MT, 85.77 MT, 13.7 MT & 22.76 MT respectively. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 115.8 MT on net to net basis. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 2, 3 & 4 may be allowed as 36.67 MT, 12.6 MT & 15 MT respectively inclusive of 5% wastage. 4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5 & 6 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 0.691 MT & 0.451 MT respectively. 5. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at Sl. Nos 7 to 11. 6. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 7, 8 , 9,10 & 11 may be allowed as 187.572 MT, 21 MT, 100.48 MT, 94.65 MT & 15.02 MT respectively inclusive of 5% wastage 48
Case No.:1/17/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 22.12.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00224/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00079/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410106106 14.07.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to the discussion held during personal hearing on 3.11.09 wherein the firm’s representative were advised to furnish certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No.:30/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KEBURGMANN FLEXIBLES INDIA P.LTD. 22.12.2009
49 HQ File :01/80/050/00352/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00087/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410106216 16.07.2009 Decision : The representative of DC(MSME) informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the case file to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 50
Case No.:28/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICAL LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00350/AM10/ RLA File :11/24/040/00011/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1110020821 31.07.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that the comments called for from DIT are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 51
Case No.:17/23/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00339/AM10/ RLA File :11/24/040/00010/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:1110020832 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 52
Case No.:34/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:CANTRONICS OFFICE EQUIPMENTS PVT.LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00356/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00360/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310532496 05.08.2009 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 30(33)/2009ME dated 11.12.09 recommending the norms. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Quantity of Empty Cartridges may be allowed on nettonet basis. 2. Quantity of Toner may be allowed as Net + 5% wastage. 53
Case No.:3/23/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00325/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00292/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410107117 21.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration
Case No.:4/23/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00326/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00105/AM10/ Lic No/Date:0410107118 Defer Date: 16 02 2010
54 HQ File :01/80/050/00326/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00105/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107118 21.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 55
Case No.:6/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:DRIPLEX WATER ENGINEERING LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00328/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00024/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510248143 24.08.2009 Defer Date: 19.01.2010 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to advise the firm to appear before the NC to explain their case in person along with full facts. The case may be relisted on 19.01.2010. 56
Case No.:10/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00332/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00237/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510248312 25.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 57
Case No.:12/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:M/S. SPECIALITY VALVES, PROP.LION HOLDINGS (P) LTD 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00334/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00267/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510248227 25.08.2009 Decision :The representative of DC(MSME) present in the meeting informed the Committee that norms of the similar product of the applicant firm (earlier named as Lion Holding Pvt. Ltd.) in respect of advance authorization No.0510236942 dt.23.02.2009 has already been ratified by the NC in its meeting No.28/10 held on 13.10.09 vide case No.8/50/80ALC2/2008. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis as under: 1. Weight of 10.30 gm. each may be mentioned in the export product. 2. Quantity of import items may be allowed as applied for by the firm with nil wastage. 3. Unit of measurement for the import item No.5 [Ball (Celcon) Celcon] may be amended to read as Nos. 58
Case No.:13/23/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00335/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00051/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107193 25.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected
, , p g y j 59
Case No.:14/23/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00336/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00083/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107196 25.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 60
Case No.:15/23/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00337/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00111/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410107197 25.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 61
Case No.:11/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ITS INDIA PVT. LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00333/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00438/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310535255 26.08.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 62
Case No.:22/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MILINDIA LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00344/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00450/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510248613 28.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 63
Case No.:23/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MILINDIA LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00345/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00529/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510248614 28.08.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained The case may be relisted on 16 02 2010
64
Case No.:24/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MILINDIA LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00346/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00602/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510248615 28.08.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 65
Case No.:25/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MILINDIA LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00347/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00619/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510248616 28.08.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 66
Case No.:26/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MILINDIA LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00348/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00658/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510248618 28.08.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 67
Case No.:27/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MILINDIA LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00349/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00685/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510248621 28.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 68
Case No.:31/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD, 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00353/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00651/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710066776 02.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from DGCA are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010.
69
Case No.:35/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:D.D.ENTERPRISES, 22.12.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00357/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00178/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039809 02.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 70
Case No.:36/23/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD 22.12.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00358/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00146/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110039814 02.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information. 71
Case No.:1/31/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00449/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00036/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000362 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected 72
Case No.:5/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00453/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00269/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039591 14.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 16.02.2010: 1. Specific item of export with quantity in number. 2. Specification of item no. 2 of import and its use. 3. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise.
Case No.:6/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 22.12.2009
73 , HQ File :01/80/050/00454/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00270/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039592 14.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 16.02.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.3 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 74
Case No.:11/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00459/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00341/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510251004 15.10.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information and further D.L. has already been issued to the firm based on the DHI comments for which reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 75
Case No.:2/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ITT CORPORATION INDIA PVT LTD 22.12.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00450/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00112/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410025399 15.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA vide their letter No. 34/24/040/00112/AM10/4032 dt. 3.12.09 informed the subject advance authorization has been issued as per GN – 4 for the engineering products hence hard copy of the firm’s application not forwarded to NC. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 76
Case No.:3/31/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00451/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00161/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108588 15.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration 77
Case No.:4/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00452/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00168/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108614 16.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application of the firm has already been sent to DHI on 9.11.09. However, one set of firm’s application was again handed over to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010.
Case No.:8/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KAMAL RUBPLAST INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. 22 12 2009
78 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00456/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00063/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510251132 20.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DC(MSME) informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 79
Case No.:14/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00462/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00194/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067704 21.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that application of the firm was earlier forwarded to DIPP who is not concerned with the subject case. The Committee accordingly handed over one set of firm’s application to the concerned technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. 80
Case No.:15/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00463/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00129/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040354 22.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application by 04.02.2010 otherwise it will be treated as confirmed that ratification of norms are not required to RA.. The case may be relisted on16.02.2010. 81
Case No.:12/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 22.12.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00460/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00170/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108785 23.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm vide their letter dt. 10.11.09 has informed the subject advance authorization has been surrendered by them to RA for cancellation. The Committee accordingly decided to close the case on the part of NC without any examination. 82
Case No.:13/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00461/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00169/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108791 23.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 16.02.2010: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4, 5, 8 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 2. Input weight and finished product weight of import item No.3.
Case No.:17/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KIRLOSKAR CHILLERS PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:38/80ALC2/2009 22.12.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00465/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00193/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040394
83 Q 27.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 84
Case No.:16/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SUTURES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, 22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00464/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00263/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067849 28.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DC(MSME) informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. 85
Case No.:18/31/80ALC2/2009
22.12.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00466/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00156/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108868 28.10.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration
Case No. A 4
M/s. Geecy Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Mubmai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00117/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00132/AM08 0310430069 dt.21.05.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 Ratification of norms The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case based on available information. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.Nos.1 & 2. 2. Words “20 MM to 52 MM thk.” may be suffixed with the description of import item at S.No.1 and its quantity may be allowed as 49333 Kgs inclusive of 5% wastage. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No.2 may be allowed as 9664 Kgs inclusive of 32% wastage after 20% recovery. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No.3 may also be specified as 17 Nos. in addition to its weight of 71680 Kgs. and the same may be allowed on net to net basis. 5. Quantity of import item at S.No.4 may be allowed as 1897 Kgs. 6. Import of components will allowed with accountability clause. S.No. 190
Case No. A/R14
M/s. BHEL Ltd., F.No. 01/80/50/167/AM06/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.11/24/040/11/AM06 1110010869 Dt.11.05.2005 Date: 22.12.2009 The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical
The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received reply of the firm. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. S.No. 191
Case No. A/R15
M/s. Godrej & Boyce MFG. Co. Ltd., F.No. 01/80/162/ 960/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.03/94/040/564/AM08 0310441981 Dt.06.09.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 The representative of the firm Shri Rajesh H. Alreja, Sr. General Manager and Shri R. Bahadur, Sr. Manager (Liaison) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, explained about defects in the reply furnished by the firm and advised them to rectify the same within two weeks time. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. S.No. 192
Case No. A/R57
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Tiruchiraalli F.No. 01/80/50/ 00285/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.04/24/040/00228/AM08 0410092521 dt.07.12.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 The Committee observed that the firm has not furnished requisite information alongwith their representation to reopen the case. The Committee therefore decided to advise the firm to appear before them to explain their case in person along with full facts. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. S.No. 193
Case No. A/R58
M/s. CTech Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Pune F.No. 01/80/50/ 01035/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.31/24/040/00295/AM08 3110031941 dt.14.12.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(18)/09TSW(B)/437 dated 12.11.2009 informing that they already furnished their recommendation vide their earlier U.O. No. 3(18)/2008TSW(B)/327 dated 21.11.2008. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with DHI comments dt. 21.11.2008 as under: 1. Import item no. 1 required for the manufacture of export product No. 1 to 3 is recommended with 5% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 2. Import item no. 2 required for the manufacture of export product no. 4 to 8 is recommended with 9% wastage after 1/3rd recovery. S.No. 194
Case No. A/R59
M/s. International Tubular Services (I) Pvt. LTd., F.No. 01/80/50/ 00601/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.03/94/040/00265/AM09 0310473475 dt.06.06.2008 Date: 22.12.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(33)/09TSW(B)/414 dated 29.10.09 recommending the norms. The Committee reviewed the case based on firm’s representation dt.15.6.09 and after deliberating upon the comments of DHI decided to modify point 1 of its earlier decision dated 31.3.09 as under: 1. Import of 13 Nos. of Stabilizer Forging may be allowed on nettonet basis with the condition that duty exemption benefit may be restricted to 31800 Kg. of inputs.
S.No. 195
Case No. A/R61
M/s. Denso Haryana Pvt. LTd., Gurgaon F.No. 01/80/50/ 00521/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.05/24/040/00396/AM07 0510188040 dt.11.08.2006 Date: 22.12.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(11)/08TSW(B)/417 dated 30.10.09 informing that firm has not given any justification for higher wastage and the firm has informed in the covering letter that the export weight is 84 gms while in the enclosure it is shown as 85.7 gms. The Committee, accordingly, decided to reject the firm’s representation for revision of norms and decided to maintain its earlier decision S.No. 196
Case No. A/R62
M/s. Bharat Earth Movers Ltd., Bangalore F.No. 01/80/50/ 00535/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.07/24/040/00486/AM08 0710053990 dt.23.10.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(68)/07TSW(B)/ dated 11.11.09 informing that firm has not given any new information to re examine the case. The Committee therefore decided to reject the firm’s representation for revision of norms and decided to maintain its earlier decision S.No. 197
Case No. A/R63
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai F.No. 01/80/162/ 00961/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.03/94/040/00587/AM08 0310442080 dt.06.09.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. S.No. 198
Case No. A/R66
M/s. Rathi Transpower Pvt. LTd., F.No. 01/80/50/ 01022/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.31/24/040/00290/AM08 3110031775 dt.04.12.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(37)/2008TSW(B)/426 dated 11.11.09 informing that firm has not given the complete reply. The Committee therefore decided to reject the firm’s representation for revision of norms on the following grounds and decided to maintain its earlier decision S.No. 199
Case No. A/R67
M/s. Solo Manufacturing Pvt. LTd., F.No.01/80/50/ 01195/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 38/10 RA F.No.05/24/040/00733/AM08 0510213882 dt.20.12.2007 Date: 22.12.2009 The firm’s request to take 20% recovery on wastage instead of 1/3rd recovery as has been done in their advance authorization No. 0510226457 dt. 28.08.2008 is considered by the committee. The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(30)/08TSW(B)/422 dated 9.11.09 informing that in the present case cost of raw
by the committee. The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(30)/08 TSW(B)/422 dated 9.11.09 informing that in the present case cost of raw material is Rs. 45 per kg. while in earlier case referred by the firm cost of raw material was Rs. 71 per kg. The Committee therefore decided to reject the firm’s representation for for 20% recovery as in the present case 1/3rd recovery is reasonable. S.No. 200
Case No. A/R93
M/s. GKB RX Lens Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata HQ F.No.01/80/50/01264/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00193/AM09 0210119385 dt.06.11.2008 Date: 22.12.2009 The representative of the DC(MSME) informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. S.No. 201
Case No. A/R94
M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01096/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00322/Am08 0410092978 dt.02.01.2008 Date: 22.12.2009 The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm for expediting the said information by 04.02.2010 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 16.02.2010. S.No. 202
Case No. A/R95
M/s. GKB RX Lens Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata HQ F.No.01/80/50/01816/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00280/AM09 0210123668 dt.25.02.2009 Date: 22.12.2009 The representative of the DC(MSME) informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. S.No. 203
Case No. A/R96
M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01097/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00325/AM08 0410092981 dt.02.01.2008 Date: 22.12.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(141)/09TSW(B)/465 dated 2.12.09 recommending the revision in norms as per modified list of import items submitted by the firm with their letter dt. 07.11.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to modify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: 1. Total export weight of 16 MT may be incorporated in the authorization. 2. Import item nos. 2, 5 to 11 and 13 may be deleted as requested by the firm. 3. Quantity of import item nos. 1, 3 & 4 may be allowed under GN4 for the engineering products. 4. Import item no. 12 may also be deleted as the firm has neither given the name of the component nor its calculation of wastage. S No 204
S.No. 204
Case No. A/R97
Reference from Jt.DGFT, of M/s. IDMC LTd., Vithal HQ F.No.01/80/50/00357/AM07/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.34/24/040/00761/Am07 3410016398 dt.04.07.2006 Date: 22.12.2009 The Committee reviewed the case based on RA’s letter No. 34/24/040/00761/Am07 dt.23.3.09 and decided to modify point 1 of its earlier decision dated 28.3.07 as under: 1. The export product should have the net content of tank plate of relevant grade and thickness weighing 2.8 MT. S.No. 205
Case No. A/R98
M/s. Indiana Conveyors Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00183/AM00/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.03/24/00042/00009/AM00 03030323 dt.17.06.1999 Date: 22.12.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. S.No.206
Case No. A/R78
M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01099/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 38/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00323/Am08 0410092975 dt.02.01.2008 Date: 22.12.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 16.02.2010. CATEGORY “C S.No 69
Case No. C15
M/s. Sunbeam Enterprises F.No. 01/80/162/ 00 /AM10/DES.I Meeting No. 38/10 Clarification regarding Exports under DEPB Scheme Date: 22.12.2009 The representative of the firm Shri M M Chhabra, CEO appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. He explained the case to the Committee and informed that appox. 90% of the total weight of the product is attributed to the frame made out of M S Pipe/Tubes. Since S.No.431 of DEPB rate list is applicable for fabricated hardware / structure / artifles made of M.S. Steel / C.R. Steel and not of Tubes / pipes the item of export manufactured by the applicant firm may not qualify for DEPB benefit under Sl.No. 431 of DEPB rate list. The committee therefore decided to inform the position to DEPB committee accordingly. S.No. 70
Case No. C16
M/s. N.K. Exports F.No. 01/80/162/ 0000836/AM09/DES.I Meeting No. 38/10 Fixation of wastage norms Date: 22.12.2009 The Committee noted that the DHI vide their UO No.01(06)/09TSW(B)/426 dated 17.11.2009 informed that they have already furnished their comments to BOA. The Committee, accordingly, decided to request BOA and Auto Desk of DHI to forward a copy of said comments so that same can be discussed in the NC for fixation of wastage norms
norms. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (K.K.Funda, Asstt. Dir.,DC(MSME) Member (A.K. Mishra, AIA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A. Komu) Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.