DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.11/10 held on 16.06.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 11/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 held on 16.06.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 475 23062635 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. B.D. Ghosh. Jt. IA 399 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 4. Sh. A.K. Mishra, AIA M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director 736A DC(MSME) N.B. 6. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 7. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:47/14/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC CO LTD Meet No/Date:11/80ALC2/2009 16.06.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00523/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00072/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110034121 23.06.2008 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per General Note No.4 for Engineering Product. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No.:1/35/85ALC3/2008
Party Name:GESTEK ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED 16.06.2009 Status:Case deferred
2 HQ File :01/85/050/00243/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00650/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510234536 15.01.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 04.08.2009: 1. Basis for the quantity of import item at Sl.No. 1 i.e. Carbon Molecular Seives supported by the documentary evidence. 2. Difference in between import item at Sl.No. 2 and export product at Sl.No. 3 with details of manufacturing activity therein. 3
Case No.:19/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00136/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00951/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310502952 19.01.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 4
Case No.:6/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:RAJ ENGINEERING CO 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00123/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00015/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517595 28.04.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 04.08.2009: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No. 4, 5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 5
Case No.:18/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00135/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00037/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310518054 01.05.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 04.08.2009: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.5,11 & 13 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
6
Case No.:5/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ROSE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00122/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00086/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310519689 13.05.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DC(MSME) present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 04.08.2009: 1. Process of manufacturing with process flow chart and wastage stages. 2. Design / Drawing / sample of each export product. 3. Blanking diagram justifying requirement of raw material as 88 gms for one pulley. 4. Correct specification of imported input i.e. HR or CR flat sheet. 7
Case No.:8/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00125/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00001/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310008351 20.05.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DC(MSME) present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 04.08.2009: 1. Details of calculation, as how the qty. of raw material has been arrived with complete wastage justification. 2. Process of manufacturing and stepwise wastage therein. 3. Requirement of component, raw material and packing material separately for each export product excluding wastage. 4. Weight of each export product. 5. Processing to be done on imported raw material and justification of wastage claimed therein. 8
Case No.:1/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED 16.06.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00118/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00008/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310521726 28.05.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per SION C1829, as amended.
Case No.:2/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. 16.06.2009
9 HQ File :01/80/050/00119/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00150/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310521734 28.05.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 10
Case No.:3/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00120/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000313 29.05.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s application and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 04.08.2009 11
Case No.:4/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00121/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00910/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310521948 29.05.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 12
Case No.:11/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00128/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00121/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522066 01.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP, present in the meeting, informed the Committee that they have not received the copy of firm’s application. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s application to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009
Case No.:12/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED 16.06.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00129/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00090/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522086 01.06.2009
13 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per SION C1829, as amended. 14
Case No.:10/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:HONEYWELL TURBO (INDIA) PVT.LTD 16.06.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00127/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00057/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038636 02.06.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 15
Case No.:13/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PAMGLATT PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD 16.06.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00130/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00087/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522255 02.06.2009 Decision :The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 16
Case No.:14/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00131/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00051/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522281 02.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009
Decision : The representative of DIPP, present in the meeting, informed the Committee that they have not received the copy of firm’s application. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s application to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 17
Case No.:7/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:UDYOGI INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED 16.06.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00124/AM10/ RLA File :02/24/040/00040/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0210127190 02.06.2009 Decision :The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 18
Case No.:9/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THE INDURE PVT. LTD 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00126/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00113/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510242827 02.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 19
Case No.:15/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00132/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00117/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510242888 03.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI & DC(MSME) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 20
Case No.:16/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00133/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00062/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038103 03.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009
Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 21
Case No.:17/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00134/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00064/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038105 03.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 22
Case No.:20/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00137/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00063/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038107 03.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 23
Case No.:23/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00140/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00008/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000314 03.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 24
Case No.:24/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00141/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000315 03.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009
25
Case No.:25/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00032/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410024359 03.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 26
Case No.:26/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SPX INDIA PVT.LTD, 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00143/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00094/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510242998 04.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DC(MSME) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 27
Case No.:21/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PAMGLATT PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD 16.06.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00138/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00135/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522873 05.06.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 28
Case No.:22/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00139/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00077/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065272 05.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009
29
Case No.:27/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 16.06.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00144/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00038/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038751 09.06.2009 Defer Date: 04.08.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that agenda was attached by the NIC without receipt of hardcopy of firm’s application from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DC(MSME) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009 30
Case No.:28/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PREMIUM ENERGY TRANSMISSION LTD 16.06.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00145/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00055/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038766 10.06.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007.
Case No. A/R21
M/s. Patels Airtemp (India) Ltd. F.No. 01/80/50/125/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.11/10 R.A. F.No.08/24/40/186/AM08 0810068645 dt. 26.11.07 Date: 16.6.2009 The case regarding revision of norms of the subject advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.11/10 held on 16.06.2009 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 04.08.2009: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 2. The firm may also note that the above information was sought from them at the time of original listing of the case also and the same is not incorporated in the representation.
Case No. C04
M/s.Bhukhanwala Diomond Systems Ltd. F.No. 01/80/162/11/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.11/10 Fixation of Norms Date: 16.6.2009 The case regarding ratification of norms of the subject advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.11/10 held on 16.06.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DHI, present in the meeting, informed the Committee that they have not received the copy of firm’s application. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s application to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009.
Case No. C05
F.No. 01/80/162/12/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date
M/s.Bhukhanwala Diomond Systems Ltd. Meeting No.11/10 Fixation of Norms Date: 16.6.2009 The case regarding ratification of norms of the subject advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.11/10 held on 16.06.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee noted that firm’s application has been forwarded to DIPP instead of DHI. The Committee accordingly advised the representative of DIPP to forward the application to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009.
Case No. C06
M/s. Powermaster Engineers Pvt. Ltd. F.No. 01/80/162/237/AM10/DES.I Meeting No.11/10 Clarification about DEPB Entry Date: 16.6.2009 The case regarding clarification about DEPB entry was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.11/10 held on 16.06.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DHI asked for the copy of firm’s application. Since, the subject case pertains to a representation seeking clarification regarding applicability of DEPB entry at Sl.No. 591 to their product, the Committee decided to forward the copy of firm’s representation to representative of DHI to give their comments. The case may be relisted on 04.08.2009. Supplementary agenda case
Case No. A/R
M/s. Yashika Boats. F.No. 01/85/162/184/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.11/10 R.A. F.No.01/81/40/0002/AM07 1010023407 Dt. 25.04.2006 Date: 16.6.2009 The case regarding revision of norms of the subject advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.11/10 held on 16.06.2009as per the agenda. The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s representation and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 04.08.2009. Supplementary agenda case
Case No.C30
M/s.Essar Steel Ltd. M/s Ispat Industries M/s JSW Steel HQ F.No.01/80/162/1315/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No 11/10 Removal of Cap Value on export product covered under DEPB Date: 16.06.2009 The case regarding removal of Cap Value on export products covered under DEPB entries at Sl.No. 350, 329 & 387A was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.11/10 held on 16.06.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee noted that average FOB value has been worked out based on the copies of Shipping Bills / details of S/Bs given by the firm in their statements. The Committee also decided to convey the minimum and maximum FOB value of the export product along with average FOB value worked out as per details given in the statements and arrived at as per data bank available on Deptt. of Commence website to Policy IV (B) Section for consideration and taking appropriate decision with the advice to consider revision of DEPB rate also while revising the value Cap of the export product. For DEPB entries at Sl.No.350: Hot Rolled Non Alloy Steel Plates / Wide Coils / Sheets / Hoops&Strips (including Skelp) Sl. No. Information details M/s Essar Steel Ltd. M/s Ispat Ind. Ltd. ( As per firm’s statement. Shipping Bills not provided) JSW Steel Ltd. 1. Rs. 42929.30/. Rs. 40017/ Rs. 48426.95/
Average FOB value per MT of export product 2. FOB value per MT varies from Rs.26675.95/ to Rs. 44139.90/ Rs.13563/ to Rs.54337/ Rs.37513/ to Rs.60623/ 3. Average vlue per MT of the export product as per data bank available on Deptt. of Commence website for the period April, 08 to Dec., 08 For ITC (HS) Code 72085110 – Rs. 41933.78/MT For ITC (HS) Code 72083840 – Rs. 42,908.00/MT 4. Whether Application received through EEPC Yes Yes Yes 5. DEPB Committee may decide about value cap. For DEPB entries at Sl.No.329: Hot Rolled Galvanised NonAlloy Steel Sheets / Hoops & Strips / Wide Coils / Circles (Plain / Corrugated) Sl. No. Information details M/s Essar Steel Ltd. M/s Ispat Ind. Ltd. ( As per firm’s statement. Shipping Bills not provided) JSW Steel Ltd. 1. Average FOB value per MT of export product Rs. 44325.72/. Rs. 51417/ Rs. 54491.40/ 2. FOB value per MT varies from Rs.32973.06/ to Rs. 52761.13/ Rs.26031/ to Rs.64995/ Rs.47820/ to Rs.56181.23/ 3. Average vlue per MT of the export product as per data bank available on Deptt. of Commence website for the period April, 08 to Dec., 08 For ITC (HS) Code 72104900 – Rs. 51,806/MT 4. Whether Application received through EEPC Yes Yes Yes 5. DEPB Committee may decide about value cap. For DEPB entries at Sl.No.387A: Cold Rolled (including full hard/half hard/annealed and /or skin passed / temper passed) Nonalloy steel sheets/hoops and strips / wide –coils, including CRCA
Sl. No. Information details M/s Essar Steel Ltd. M/s Ispat Ind. Ltd. ( As per firm’s statement. Shipping Bills not provided) JSW Steel Ltd. 1. Average FOB value per MT of export product Rs. 37042.21/. Rs. 43498/ Rs. 49907.60/ 2. FOB value per MT varies from Rs.35172/ to Rs. 46.443.74/ Rs.26620/ to Rs.52568/ Rs.36978/ to Rs.50587/ 3. Average vlue per MT of the export product as per data bank available on Deptt. of Commence website for the period April, 08 to Dec., 08 For ITC (HS) Code 720917 – Rs. 49,306/MT For ITC (HS) Code 720918 – Rs. 45896/MT 4. Whether Application received through EEPC Yes Yes Yes 5. DEPB Committee may decide about value cap. The Committee also decided to recommend to the DEPB Committee that whenever a proposal for revision of value cap is considered, proposal for revision of DEPB rate should also be considered. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (B.D. Ghosh, Jt. IA, MOS) Member (K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director) Member (A.K. Mishra, AIA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A. Komu)
Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.