DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.40/09 held on 06.01.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No.40/09 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20082009 could not held on the scheduled date of 30.12.2008 as the technical officers of DHI and DIPP attending the NC were on leave and it was actually convened on 06.01.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh Gajraj Singh, Sr. D.O. 2306 DHI 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP 3. Sh. B.D. Ghosh, Jt. I.A. 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 4. Sh. A.K. Mishra, AIA M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director DC(MSME) 6. Sh. Ramanand Meena, DDG & Convener NCI 485 23061562 Ext.276 DGFT, U.B. 7. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:18/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED Meet No/Date:40/80ALC2/2008 30.12.2008 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/01622/AM09/ RLA File :53/24/040/00008/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:5310007118 16.12.2008 Defer Date: 17.02.2009 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e C&PC for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009. 2
Case No.:5/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:SPARKLINE EQUIPMENTS PVT.LTD, 30.12.2008 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01609/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00250/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036558 19.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned
Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 3
Case No.:9/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 30.12.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01613/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00526/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310498998 19.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009. 4
Case No.:1/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 30.12.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01605/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00511/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061857 22.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009. 5
Case No.:2/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01606/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00617/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233152 22.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 6
Case No.:6/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 30.12.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01610/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00251/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036564 22.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and
submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009. 7
Case No.:7/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:SANDVIK ASIA LIMITED 30.12.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01611/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00236/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036574 22.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009. 8
Case No.:10/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 30.12.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01614/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00565/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233251 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009. 9
Case No.:11/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ALFA LAVAL (INDIA) LTD. 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01615/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00305/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036601 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 10
Case No.:12/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MONARCH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01616/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00757/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310499528 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly
11
Case No.:13/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KENT INTROL PRIVATE LIMITED 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01617/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00255/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036604 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 12
Case No.:14/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC CO LTD 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01618/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00257/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036605 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 13
Case No.:3/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ACE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS LTD., 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01607/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00376/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061930 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 14
Case No.:4/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ACE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS LTD., 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01608/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00154/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061931 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according li d i f i b d i GN 4 f h E i i P d Th C i di l d id d b k h d
to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 15
Case No.:8/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:VA TECH ESCHER WYSS FLOVELPVT. LTD., 30.12.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01612/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00631/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233247 23.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009. 16
Case No.:15/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:UD ENERGY SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED, 30.12.2008 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01619/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00225/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210121503 24.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 17
Case No.:16/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:SANMARCO TEXMAC P.LTD, 30.12.2008 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01620/AM09/ RLA File :32/24/040/00048/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210039383 24.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 18
Case No.:17/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:UD ENERGY SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:40/80ALC2/2008 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01621/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00224/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210121506 24.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06 01 2009 h d d h h h NIC li Th C i d h fi ’ li i h b i d f H di
06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 19
Case No.:19/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ALFA LAVAL (INDIA) LTD. 30.12.2008 back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/01623/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00323/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036653 24.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 20
Case No.:20/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MADRAS HYDRAULIC HOSE PVT. LTD., 30.12.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01624/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00224/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410101209 24.12.2008 Decision: The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda generated through the NIC online system. The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A09
M/s. Trumac Engg. Co. P. Ltd; Ahmedaad HQ F.No.01/80/162/880/AM.09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.03/95/40/39/2/AM09 0310488667 dt.01.10.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Ratification of norms The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above annual advance authorization for a CIF value of Rs. 653,55,880.36/ was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee decided to refer the copy of firm’s application to Textile Commissioner for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R59
M/s. Navkar Transcore P. Ltd; Ahmedaad HQ F.No.01/80/50/1322/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.08/24/40/308/AM07 0810062841 dt.9.2.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms and restoration of original description of export and import items under the above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee observed that the firm’s request for higher wastage is not received within 4 months period from the date of communication of NC decision hence it can not be exceeded to being time barred. So far as their request for restoration of original description of t d i t it i d C itt t d th t di t fi th h d l t d t d i t d th bj t th i ti i th
export and import items is concerned, Committee noted that according to firm they had completed some export and import under the subject authorization prior the ratification of norms by the NC. The Committee accordingly decided to call for the specimen set of export documents including E P copy of shipping bills. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R60
M/s. Alstom Projects India Ltd;, Vadodara HQ F.No.01/80/50/1180/AM07/DES.I HQ F.No.01/80/50/00844/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.03/94/40/01100/AM07 RA F.No.03/94/40/00850/AM07 0310414907 dt. 08.01.2007 0310406397 dt. 02.11.2206 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DHI present in the meeting, informed the Committee that full details of the case is readily not available with them. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the case files to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R61
M/s. AiroilFlaregas ( India) P. Ltd; Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00974/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.03/94/40/509/AM08 0310439524 dt.14.08.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee reviewed its earlier decision and after taking into account the information and justification given by the firm decided to amend the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Quantities of import items at Sl.Nos. 2.1 & 2.2 may be modified as 106300 Kgs and 4000 Kgs respectively inclusive of 5 % wastage. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 2.4 may be modified as 3118 Kgs.
Case No. A/R62
M/s. Driplex Water Engineering Ltd; New Delhi. HQ F.No.01/80/50/1363/AM07/DES.I HQ F.No.01/80/50/01367/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.05/24/40/00722/AM07 RA F.No. 05/24/40/00723/AM07 0510199587 dt.15.02.2007 0510199592 dt.15.02.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding amendment of description of import items under the above advance authorizations at Sl.No. 10 & 11 was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee, after taking into account the firm’s request, decided to delete the various sizes specified in the import items at Sl.No. 10 & 11 of the subject authorizations and amend the description of these items as under : Import Item Amended description Sl.no.10 Pneumatically Controlled SS/CS Butterfly Valves of various Sizes from 80 mm to 250 mm complete with switches, pneumatic actuator and manual override Sl.no.11 Manually Controlled Butterfly Valves of various sizes from 250mm to 350mm complete with switches and gear operator
Case No. A/R63
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00961/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.03/94/040/587/AM08 0310442080 dt.06.9.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R64
M/s. Micron Instruments P. Ltd; New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/50/307/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.05/24/40/300/AM08 0510206450 dt.18.07.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DIPP present in the meeting informed the Committee that full details of the case are readily not available with them. The Committee, accordingly, handed over the case file to them for examination and submission of comments.. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R65
M/s. Micron Instruments P. Ltd; New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/162/711/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.05/24/40/306/AM08 510206559 dt.20.07.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DIPP present in the meeting informed the Committee that full details of the case are readily not available with them. The Committee, accordingly, handed over the case file to them for examination and submission of comments.. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R66
M/s. MIL Industries, Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/413/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.04/24/40/182/AM08 0410090925 dt.5.9..2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee observed that as per material balancing details given in firm’s application net content of import item in 1 kg of export product is 0.0889 kg. Hence, for 1011.3 kg. of export product, requirement of import item with 3% wastage works out to 916.7 kg. Therefore, Committee finds no merit in the firm’s request for higher quantity of import item and decided to maintain its original decision. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No. A/R67
M/s. Navkar Transcore P. Ltd; Ahmedaad HQ F.No.01/80/162/95/AM08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.08/24/40/344/AM07 0810063837 dt.23.03.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms and restoration of original description of export and import items under the above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee observed that the firm’s request for higher wastage is not received within 4 months period from the date of communication of NC decision hence it can not be exceeded to being time barred. So far as their request for restoration of original description of export and import items is concerned, Committee noted that according to firm they had completed some export and import under the subject authorization prior the ratification of norms by the NC. The Committee accordingly decided to call for the specimen set of export documents including E P copy of shipping bills. The case may be li t d 17 02 2009
relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R68
M/s. MPP Technologies P. Ltd; Banglore HQ F.No.01/80/162/921/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40/09 RA F.No.34/21/40/915/AM07 0710048373 dt.13.11.2006 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DHI, present in the meeting, informed the Committee that they have not received the copy of firm’s representation. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the copy of firm’s representation to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R69
M/s.Titagarh Wagons Ltd; Titagarh HQ F.No.01/81/162/462//M08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40/09 RA F.No.02/24/40/0039/AM08 0210100711 dt.11.05.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding amendment in the specification of item “AAR Standard Draw Bar” to read as “58 ½” P/NNF902BE” instead of “58 ½” P/NN902BE” under the above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee decided to allow the required modification with same norms as ratified by the NC in its meeting No. 17/09 held on 12.07.2008.
Case No. A/R70
M/s.Titagarh Wagons Ltd; Titagarh HQ F.No.01/81/162/312//M08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40/09 RA F.No.02/24/40/0038/AM08 0210100710 dt.11.05.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of import items at Sl.No. 3 & 4 which were earlier not allowed by the NC under the above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The committee noted that these items were earlier not allowed by the NC as their quantity did not match with the exports products. The Committee reviewed its earlier decision and after taking into account the justification given by the firm, decided to ratify the norms in respect of these items also as per GN4 for the engineering products with accountability clause.
Case No. A/R71
M/s.Titagarh Wagons Ltd; Titagarh HQ F.No.01/81/50/916/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40/09 RA F.No.02/24/040/00318/AM07 0210098171 dt.15.02.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Ratification of norms The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee reviewed its earlier decision and after taking into account the information and justification given by the firm, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per General Note No.4 for Engineering Product.
Case No. A/R72
M/s.Titagarh Wagons Ltd; Titagarh HQ F.No.01/81/50/484//M07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40/09 RA F.No.02/24/40/174/AM07 0210093819 dt.19.09.2006 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The Committee reviewed its earlier decision and after taking into account the information and justification given by the firm, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per General Note No.4 for Engineering Product.
Case No. A/R73
M/s.Magppie International Ltd; New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/50/695/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.05/24/40/538/AM07 0510191655 dt.25.09.2006 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DIPP present in the meeting informed the Committee that full details of the case are readily not available with them. The Committee, accordingly, handed over the case file to them for examination and submission of comments.. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R74
M/s. Doshion Ltd.,Ahmadabad HQ F.No.01/80/50/1353/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.08/24/40/270/AM07 0810062710 dt.02.02.2007 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DIPP present in the meeting, informed the Committee that full details of the case is readily not available with them. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the case files to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R75
M/s. Doshion Ltd.,Ahmadabad HQ F.No.01/80/50/755/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.08/24/40/158/AM07 0810059697 dt.19.09.2006 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding ratification of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of DIPP present in the meeting, informed the Committee that full details of the case is readily not available with them. The Committee, accordingly, decided to refer the case files to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R76
M/s. Windsor Machine Ltd; Mumbai HQ F.No.01/81/50/742/AM01/DES.II/I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.03/010/770/AM01/ZALC 0310056052 dt. 06.10.2000 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The committee noted that firm is a sick unit and repeatedly requesting to allow the required quantity of those imported components which has either partially allowed or disallowed by the NC. The Committee, decided to refer the case file to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 17.02.2009.
Case No. A/R77
M/s. Klaus Union Engg. Pvt. Ltd., Pune HQ F.No.01/80/50/676/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.40//09 RA F.No.31/24/40/00213/AM07 3110026595 dt.22.09.2006 Date: 30.12.2008 Revision of norms The case regarding revision of norms in respect of above advance authorization was considered by the Norms Committee (NCI) in its M.No.40/09 held 06.01.2009 as per the agenda. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case in view of the fact that the CIF value of raw material namely Seamless Steel Tubes is approximately Rs. 65 per Kg. and scrap generated is in the form of swarf and flake form having a sale price of Rs.7 to Rs.9 per kg. (as per sale invoice submitted by the firm) which is 10% to 14% of the cost of raw material, quantity of raw material may be revised after taking 20% recovery from scrap instead of 1/3rd recovery taken earlier. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the quantity of raw material in respect of the subject advance authorization after taking 20% recovery from scrap instead of 1/3rd recovery taken earlier as under:
decided to revise the quantity of raw material in respect of the subject advance authorization after taking 20% recovery from scrap instead of 1/3 recovery taken earlier as under: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.1 may be modified as 6319 Kgs. inclusive of 48 % wastage after taking 20 % recovery. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.2 may be modified as 8105 Kgs. inclusive of 68.4 % wastage after taking 20 % recovery 3. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.3 may be modified as 4904 Kgs. inclusive of 32.4 % wastage after taking 20 % recovery. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.4 may be modified as 2957 Kgs. inclusive of 54 % wastage after taking 20 % recovery 5. Quantity of import item at Sl.No.5 may be modified as 704 Kgs. inclusive of 56.4 % wastage after taking 20 % recovery (Gajraj Singh, Sr. D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member ( B.D. Ghosh, Jt. IA, M/o Steel) Member (K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director) Member (A.K. Mishra, AIA, MOS) Member (R.N. Meena, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A.Komu) Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.