DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of Mee埀�ng No.24/13 scheduled on 19.02.2013 of Norms CommiĀee(NC‐I) (DES.I Sec埀�on) The mee埀�ng No. 24/13 of the Norms CommiĀee (NC‐I) for the licensing year 2012‐2013 was held on 19.02.2013 under the Chairmanship of Sh. L.B. Singhal, Addi埀�onal Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applica埀�ons under Duty Exemp埀�on (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014/ Handbook of Procedure Volume‐I. The following Members of the CommiĀee were present in the mee埀�ng: ‐ Sl. No Name of the representa埀�ves & their Designa埀�on Room No. Telephone No. DepĀ. 1. Sh K.K. Tiwari I.A 476 23063321 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 428A 23063166 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, AssĀ. Dir. (Mech) 736A 23063802 Extn.2459 DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. Parveen Sharma, Dy.DGFT 312 23061562 Extn.146 DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. K.C. Raju, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The CommiĀee first considered the minutes of the Norms CommiĀee Mee埀�ng No.23/13 dated 5.2.2013 for confirma埀�on and confirmed and adopted the same without any change. 1
Case No.:16/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00081/AM13/ RLA File :31/21/040/00050/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038576 28.05.2009 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DHI and decided to await comments. 2
Case No.:31/23/80‐ALC2/2009
Party Name:HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00353/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00651/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710066776 02.09.2009 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DHI, the CommiĀee decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to MSME for examina埀�on and comments. 3
Case No.:31/39/80‐ALC2/2010
Party Name:SAVAS ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00833/AM11/ RLA File :31/24/040/00249/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:3110046929 15.02.2011 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision :The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 31.1.2013 and decided to remind them for expedi埀�ng their comments. 4
Case No.:8/14/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00262/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00182/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510300205 24.08.2011 Defer Date:02.04.2013 D i i Th C iĀ t d th t th i d i 埀� f C&PC d d id d t it t
Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 5
Case No.:11/14/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:HITTCO TOOLS LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00265/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00203/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710081769 25.08.2011 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that six replies have been received from firm in response to six deficiency leĀers issued to them. However, the firm has not provided complete informa埀�on. A copy of firm’s applica埀�on has now been forwarded to MSME for examina埀�on and comments. Firm is again finally requested to provide complete informa埀�on as called vide various deficiency leĀers and in case firm wish to avail personal hearing then they may appear for personal hearing before the NC on 2.4.2013 at 2.30 pm in DGFT, Room No.11, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi to explain detailed manufacturing process of their case. In case of non‐ receipt of complete informa埀�on from the firm, the CommiĀee would be constrained to reject the case with direc埀�on to pay Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the case. 6
Case No.:1/20/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00386/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00235/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510304889 11.10.2011 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm vide email dated 19.2.2013 has requested for 15 days more 埀�me for furnishing informa埀�on. 7
Case No.:9/27/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:ECHAAR EQUIPMENTS PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00542/AM12/ RLA File :03/94/040/01018/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310682257 16.02.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per DHI UO No. 3/62/12‐TSW(B)/12 dated 14.01.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 8
Case No.:74/2/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:EMMVEE SOLAR SYSTEMS PVT LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00038/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00505/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710086964 13.03.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per MSME UO note No. 30(165)2011‐ME dated 07.02.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 9
Case No.:23/2/81‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:KATSUSHIRO MATEX INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/81/050/00023/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00340/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410134907 21.03.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of firm’s applica埀�on was forwarded to Ministry of Steel and decided to await comments. 10
Case No.:22/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MVS ENGINEERING LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00087/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00466/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510321214 Defer
10 HQ File :01/80/050/00087/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00466/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510321214 28.03.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that it is a case of Deemed Exports and a copy of PAC was received from firm. The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of this document to DIPP for examina埀�on and comments. 11
Case No.:69/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:AUTOMAT IRRIGATION PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00134/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00538/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510321283 28.03.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP. However, the CommiĀee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of Deemed exports or physical exports. In case of supply against EPCG licence, the following details may also be provided : i. EPCG licence number and date. ii. CIF value of the licence. iii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iv. Custom duty saved amount. v. Products to be manufactured. vi. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. 12
Case No.:42/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:VIJAYJYOT SEATS PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00107/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00274/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3410033796 10.04.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 1.1.2013 followed by reminder dated 30.1.2013 and decided to send a final reminder reques埀�ng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiĀee shall be constrained to reject their case with direc埀�on to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the licence. 13
Case No.:46/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00111/AM13/ RLA File :61/24/040/00001/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:6110000809 11.04.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per DHI leĀer No. 3(116)/2012‐TSW(B)/7 dated 29.12.2012 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 14
Case No.:22/5/81‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:KATSUSHIRO MATEX INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/81/050/00089/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00002/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410135521 12.04.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of firm’s applica埀�on was forwarded to Ministry of Steel and decided to await comments. 15
Case No.:5/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ADORE MEDI PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00070/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00529/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510322243 Defer
16.04.2012 Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 26.12.2012 followed by reminder dated 31.1.2013 and decided to send a final reminder reques埀�ng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiĀee shall be constrained to reject their case with direc埀�on to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the licence. 16
Case No.:14/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00079/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00015/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510322347 17.04.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm vide email dated 19.2.2013 has requested for 15 days more 埀�me for furnishing informa埀�on. 17
Case No.:31/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:AKSH TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00096/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00006/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510322974 23.04.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that DIT has sought some informa埀�on from firm required for examina埀�on of the case and firm’s reply is awaited. 18
Case No.:68/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LION HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00133/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00015/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510323034 24.04.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per MSME UO note No. 30(176)2011‐ME dated 30.01.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 19
Case No.:11/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00346/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00075/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310693103 02.05.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 31.12.2012 followed by reminder dated 31.1.2013 and decided to send a final reminder reques埀�ng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiĀee shall be constrained to reject their case with direc埀�on to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the licence. 20
Case No.:1/5/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC CO LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00063/AM13/ RLA File :31/82/040/00424/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110054139 09.05.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm was asked to provide EPCG licence details and a reply was also received from firm vide leĀer dated 14.1.2013. The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of firm’s reply to the technical authority and defer the case.
Case No.:70/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:THE INDURE PVT. LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 Status: Deferred
21 ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 HQ File :01/80/050/00135/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00020/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510325671 23.05.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 22
Case No.:21/9/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BAXTER (INDIA) PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Transferred to NC3 HQ File :01/80/050/00201/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00065/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510326473 01.06.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that Department of Pharmaceu埀�cals vide OM No. 35021/01/2013‐PI (Norms) dated 28.1.2013 has informed that the HS Code 90189031 used by the applicant for all export products is misleading and it refers to some equipments such as renal dialysis equipments ar埀�ficial kidney, kidney machine and dialyzer. As the products are analogous to dextrose or saline solu埀�ons sold in plas埀�c pouches used for various clinical condi埀�ons, these products need to be classified under Chapter 30 for Pharmaceu埀�cal products. Dept. of Pharmaceu埀�cals has advised that the company to resubmit the applica埀�on with proper HS Code. In view of Department of Pharmaceu埀�cals observa埀�on that the products need to be classified under Chapter 30 for Pharmaceu埀�cal products, the CommiĀee decided to transfer the case to NC‐III and to also advise the firm that they may revise and resubmit their applica埀�on to RA and send copy to Norms CommiĀee‐III for fixa埀�on of norms. The CommiĀee also decided to inform this fact to RA for their informa埀�on. 23
Case No.:76/6/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00141/AM13/ RLA File :31/82/040/00078/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110054605 05.06.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that DIT has sought some informa埀�on from firm for examina埀�on of the case and firm’s reply is awaited. 24
Case No.:22/9/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00202/AM13/ RLA File :07/21/040/00103/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710088739 05.06.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of deficiency leĀer has been again forwarded to firm for providing informa埀�on and decided to remind the firm to immediately submit the requisite informa埀�on. 25
Case No.:23/9/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00203/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00136/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910053032 13.06.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that DHI vide leĀer NO. 3(110)/2012‐TSW(B)/6 dated 28.12.2012 has provided their comments. The CommiĀee, however, observed that this is a case of supply against EPCG licence and firm’s eligibility for facility of Advance Authoriza埀�on against EPCG is being examined in EPCG Division. 26
Case No.:10/12/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:DURAG INDIA INSTRUMENTATION PVT.LTD, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File 01/80/050/00250/AM13/ RLA File 07/21/040/00174/AM13/ Lic No/Date 0710088799 Defer
HQ File :01/80/050/00250/AM13/ RLA File :07/21/040/00174/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710088799 13.06.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIT and decided to await comments. 27
Case No.:6/12/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:CLYDE PUMPS INDIA PVT.LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00246/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00073/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510327269 14.06.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 20.9.2012 followed by reminder dated 9.11.2012 and final reminder dated 26.12.2012 and decided to reject the case with direc埀�on to firm to pay custom duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the case. 28
Case No.:13/9/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:INDIA INTERNATIONAL HOUSE LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00193/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00104/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510328272 25.06.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 14.1.2013 and decided to remind them for expedi埀�ng their reply. 29
Case No.:24/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRIJAI COOLTECH PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00359/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00186/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310699820 26.06.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: 1. Quan埀�ty of export item to also be specified as 20,00,000 Nos. in addi埀�on to its weight. 2. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1(Copper tube) to be allowed as 12423 Kgs.( 97819 Meters) inclusive of 1 % wastage. 3. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 40,00,000 Nos. (2800 Kgs. ) on net to net basis. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 30
Case No.:1/9/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TRANTER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00181/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00066/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110054924 06.07.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 6.11.2012 followed by reminder dated 31.12.2012 and final reminder dated 31.1.2013 and decided to await 15 days more to receive firm’s reply. 31
Case No.:46/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SCREEN‐O‐TEX (INDIA) PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00414/AM13/ RLA File :08/24/040/00120/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0810113162 06.07.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of MSME and decided to await comments.
Case No.:12/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TRANSASIA BIO MEDICALS LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 Status: Deferred
32 19.02.2013 HQ File :01/80/050/00347/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00235/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310701463 10.07.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm was requested to provide details of amendment made by RA in the import and export product and decided to remind them for expedi埀�ng their reply. 33
Case No.:6/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00341/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00286/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310703316 27.07.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 31.12.2012 followed by reminder dated 31.1.2013 and decided to send a final reminder reques埀�ng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiĀee shall be constrained to reject their case with direc埀�on to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the licence. 34
Case No.:34/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:CICB CHEMICON PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00514/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00192/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090176 09.08.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm on the following: 1. Details of export Products at Sl. No. 18 with specific items of this export product. 2. Details/Specifica埀�ons of import items at Sl. No. 1, 3, 5, 7, 11 to 13 & 14 to 19. 3. Cons埀�tuents of “Sets” for import items at Sl No. 1, 3, 5, 7 & 14 to 19 4. Details of manufacturing ac埀�vi埀�es on import items at Sl. No. 11 to 13, if any. 35
Case No.:21/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:NASH INDUSTRIES (I) PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00356/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00222/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090408 27.08.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: 1. Export product at Sl. No. 1 to contain “246115.4 Kgs. of HR High Tensile Steel Sheet”. 2. Export product at Sl. No. 2 to contain “129215 Kgs. of HR High Tensile Steel Sheet”. 3. Export product at Sl. No. 3 to contain “251055.4 Kgs. of HR High Tensile Steel Sheet”. 4. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as 657706 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 36
Case No.:19/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:AYAAPPA CNC PVT.LTD, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00354/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00231/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090516 30.08.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per MSME UO note No. 30(238)/11‐ME dated 7.2.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly.
Case No.:18/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19 02 2013 Status: Deferred
37 19.02.2013 HQ File :01/80/050/00353/AM13/ RLA File :07/21/040/00397/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090531 31.08.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has vide leĀer dated 15.2.2013 informed that they will not be making supplies to EPCG licenses. The CommiĀee, however, observed that the case is under examina埀�on of DHI and decided to await comments. 38
Case No.:14/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00349/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00191/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510333407 03.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the firm was advised to produce a cer埀�ficate from the Directorate General of Hydro Carbon in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas sta埀�ng that goods being supplied are required for petroleum gases, in terms of condi埀�on No.41, Sr.No.356 of Custom No埀�fica埀�on No.12 dated 17.3.2012. The CommiĀee noted that firm has replied informing that Cer埀�ficate from the DGG is not required as they are neither a licensee nor sub‐contractor for undertaking the petroleum opera埀�ons under PEL/ML area and are only a manufacturer/supplier of the items in India required by the licensee for their opera埀�onal purposes under Deemed Export Scheme. Condi埀�on No.41 is applicable only when the fully finished products are imported by licensee or their sub‐contractor and not applicable to the import or raw materials and components for the goods manufactured and supplied by the Domes埀�c Supplier, under Deemed Export Scheme, as per DOR No埀�fica埀�on No.2 dated 29.8.2000. The CommiĀee decided to refer this case to Policy Sec埀�on‐VI for examina埀�on and comments. 39
Case No.:4/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00372/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00105/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055624 03.09.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per DIT UO No. W‐27/2/2012 IPEHMD dated 2.1.2013 on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 40
Case No.:42/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MAKSTEEL WIRE HEALDS P. LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00410/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00148/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3410035051 03.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer and decided to remind them for expedi埀�ng their reply. 41
Case No.:17/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GRAZIANO TRASMISSIONI INDIA PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00352/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00210/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510334009 07.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm vide leĀer dated 4.2.2013 has requested for 15 days more 埀�me for furnishing reply to deficiency leĀer. 42
Case No.:9/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00377/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00087/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055736 10.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 31 12 2012 followed by reminder dated
Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 31.12.2012 followed by reminder dated 31.1.2013 and decided to send a final reminder reques埀�ng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiĀee shall be constrained to reject their case with direc埀�on to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the licence. 43
Case No.:35/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:HYDAC (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00403/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00497/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310708767 12.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 26.12.2012 followed by reminder dated 28.1.2013 and decided to send a final reminder reques埀�ng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiĀee shall be constrained to reject their case with direc埀�on to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza埀�on of the licence. 44
Case No.:8/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MASTER HANDLERS PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00376/AM13/ RLA File :31/82/040/00158/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055789 13.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 29.1.2013 and decided to remind the firm for expedi埀�ng their reply. 45
Case No.:36/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:HYDAC (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00404/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00415/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310708922 13.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of firm’s reply dated 20.1.2013 was forwarded to DHI for examina埀�on and comments. 46
Case No.:14/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GRAZIANO TRASMISSIONI INDIA PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00382/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00230/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510335030 18.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm vide leĀer dated 4.2.2013 has requested for 15 days more 埀�me for furnishing reply to deficiency leĀer. 47
Case No.:17/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00385/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00204/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510335146 19.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : : In this case, DIPP has provided their comments vide leĀer dated 19.2.2013. The CommiĀee observed that it is not clear from the firm’s applica埀�on that it is a case of physical export and hence, decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export or deemed exports. If it is a case of Deemed exports, then the goods are supplied under which Para of Chapter 8 of FTP. In case it is a case of supply against Invalida埀�on LeĀer to an EPCG licence, then firm may provide the following details of EPCG licence : i. CIF value of the licence. ii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iii. Custom duty saved amount. iv. Products to be manufactured. l h ld d d h h h l
v. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against their EPCG licence. 48
Case No.:20/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00388/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00228/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510335145 19.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : In this case, DIPP has provided their comments vide leĀer dated 19.2.2013. The CommiĀee observed that it is not clear from the firm’s applica埀�on that it is a case of physical export and hence, decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export or deemed exports. If it is a case of Deemed exports, then the goods are supplied under which Para of Chapter 8 of FTP. In case it is a case of supply against Invalida埀�on LeĀer to an EPCG licence, then firm may provide the following details of EPCG licence : i. CIF value of the licence. ii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iii. Custom duty saved amount. iv. Products to be manufactured. v. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against their EPCG licence. 49
Case No.:21/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00389/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00229/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510335147 19.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : In this case, DIPP has provided their comments vide leĀer dated 19.2.2013. The CommiĀee observed that it is not clear from the firm’s applica埀�on that it is a case of physical export and hence, decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export or deemed exports. If it is a case of Deemed exports, then the goods are supplied under which Para of Chapter 8 of FTP. In case it is a case of supply against Invalida埀�on LeĀer to an EPCG licence, then firm may provide the following details of EPCG licence : i. CIF value of the licence. ii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iii. Custom duty saved amount. iv. Products to be manufactured. v. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against their EPCG licence. 50
Case No.:3/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BRAKES INDIA LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00371/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00127/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410139880 20.09.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per DHI UO No. 3(67)/11‐TSW(B)/11 dated 11.1.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 51
Case No.:11/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:HTD HEAT TRACE(INDIA)PVT LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00379/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00219/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910053887 24.09.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under on repeat basis: 1. Words “1 set comprising of 29 Hea埀�ng modules” to be suffixed with the descrip埀�on of export product. 2. Net Weight of export products to be specified as 31685 Kgs. 3. Quan埀�埀�es of import items from Sl. Nos. 1 to 19 to be allowed on net to net basis as claimed by the firm. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly
52
Case No.:18/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00386/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00243/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510335616 25.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : In this case, DIPP has provided their comments vide leĀer dated 19.2.2013. The CommiĀee observed that it is not clear from the firm’s applica埀�on that it is a case of physical export and hence, decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export or deemed exports. If it is a case of Deemed exports, then the goods are supplied under which Para of Chapter 8 of FTP. In case it is a case of supply against Invalida埀�on LeĀer to an EPCG licence, then firm may provide the following details of EPCG licence : i. CIF value of the licence. ii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iii. Custom duty saved amount. iv. Products to be manufactured. v. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against their EPCG licence. 53
Case No.:34/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00402/AM13/ RLA File :56/24/040/00023/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:5610001111 26.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 30.1.2013 and decided to remind them for expedi埀�ng their reply. 54
Case No.:16/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BORG WARNER EMISSIONS SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00384/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00234/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510336049 28.09.2012 Decision : Based on DHI wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on on repeat basis as per decision in Authoriza埀�on No.510325844 dated 25.5.2012. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 55
Case No.:19/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GRAZIANO TRASMISSIONI INDIA PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00387/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00251/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510336052 28.09.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm vide leĀer dated 4.2.2013 has requested for 15 days more 埀�me for furnishing reply to deficiency leĀer. 56
Case No.:2/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00337/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00234/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510336368 03.10.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per C&PC OM No. 46011/106/2009‐PC‐II dated 2.1.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. C N 3/15/80 ALC2/2012 P N POLY MEDICURE LTD M N /D 24/80 S
57
Case No.:3/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00338/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00237/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510336444 04.10.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per C&PC OM No. 46011/106/2009‐PC‐II dated 2.1.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 58
Case No.:13/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00381/AM13/ RLA File :02/24/040/00107/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0210182828 04.10.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under : 1. Words “namely, GRP Cooling Tower Fan Diameter 336 Inches” to be suffixed with the descrip埀�on of export product. 2. Net weight of export product to be specified as 1979.88 Kgs. 3. Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 1247.32 Kgs., 831.55 Kgs. & 24.94 Kgs. respec埀�vely taking clue from SION C‐1708. 59
Case No.:28/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00396/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00259/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510336414 04.10.2012 Decision : Based on DHI wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: Item 1&2 – 1.02 Kg/Kg content. Item 3 to 7 – To be allowed on Net to Net basis. Item 8 to 10 – Electrode/wire – 1.26 MT and Flux – 1.26 MT. 60
Case No.:5/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LUDOWICI MINING PROCESS INDIA PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00373/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00132/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410140287 05.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that DIT has asked firm vide leĀer No. 46011/04/2013‐PC.II dated 8.2.2013 to provide certain technical informa埀�on required for examina埀�on of the case. 61
Case No.:29/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00397/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00249/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510336580 05.10.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per C&PC OM No. 46011/106/2009‐PC‐II dated 2.1.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly.
Case No :30/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BASIC WATER NEEDS Meet No/Date:24/80‐ Status:
62
Case No.:30/18/80 ALC2/2012
Party Name:BASIC WATER NEEDS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80 ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00398/AM13/ RLA File :25/21/040/00067/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:2510003797 05.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm vide email provided reply and decided to forward copy to the technical authority for examina埀�on and comments. 63
Case No.:26/15/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00361/AM13/ RLA File :56/24/040/00025/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:5610001164 08.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm vide email dated 18.2.2013 has sought more 埀�me for submission of informa埀�on. 64
Case No.:6/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:DAEWON INDIA AUTOPARTS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00374/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00142/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410140372 11.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 21.11.2012 followed by reminder dated 31.12.2012 and final reminder dated 29.1.2013 and decided to await 15 days more to receive informa埀�on from firm. 65
Case No.:40/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SHREE CHEM GLOBAL Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00408/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00309/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310712488 11.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of firm’s reply has been forwarded to DIPP for examina埀�on and comments. 66
Case No.:7/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:INDEX AUTO COMPONENTS P LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00375/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00130/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410140496 12.10.2012 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per MSME leĀer No. 30(273)/2011‐ME dated 8.2.2013. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. 67
Case No.:26/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:METSO PAPER INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00394/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00251/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510337125 12.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 68
Case No.:10/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00378/AM13/ RLA File :02/24/040/00115/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0210183238 Defer
16.10.2012 Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 31.1.2013 and decided to remind them for expedi埀�ng their comments. 69
Case No.:23/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00391/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00270/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510337301 16.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the firm was advised to produce a cer埀�ficate from the Directorate General of Hydro Carbon in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas sta埀�ng that goods being supplied are required for petroleum gases, in terms of condi埀�on No.41, Sr.No.356 of Custom No埀�fica埀�on No.12 dated 17.3.2012. The CommiĀee noted that firm has replied informing that Cer埀�ficate from the DGG is not required as they are neither a licensee nor sub‐contractor for undertaking the petroleum opera埀�ons under PEL/ML area and are only a manufacturer/supplier of the items in India required by the licensee for their opera埀�onal purposes under Deemed Export Scheme. Condi埀�on No.41 is applicable only when the fully finished products are imported by licensee or their sub‐contractor and not applicable to the import or raw materials and components for the goods manufactured and supplied by the Domes埀�c Supplier, under Deemed Export Scheme, as per DOR No埀�fica埀�on No.2 dated 29.8.2000. The CommiĀee decided to refer this case to Policy Sec埀�on‐VI for examina埀�on and comments. 70
Case No.:45/24/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00525/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00330/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910054146 18.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 71
Case No.:23/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GANDIKOTA THERMO CONTROLS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00503/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00346/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910054149 19.10.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of MSME and decided to await comments. 72
Case No.:44/24/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00524/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00329/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910054232 01.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 73
Case No.:41/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SUPERMAX PERSONALCARE PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00409/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00576/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714295 05.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : Based on DIPP recommenda埀�on, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm as per Sr.No.3,4,11&11A of Standard Deficiency Format.
Case No.:45/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MAKSTEEL WIRE HEALDS P LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 Status: D f d
74 P. LTD ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00413/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00186/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3410035441 05.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of MSME deficiency leĀer was forwarded to firm for furnishing informa埀�on and reply is awaited. 75
Case No.:49/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GENSER AEROSPACE & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00529/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00316/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091784 06.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer dated 13.2.2013 and decided to await comments. 76
Case No.:44/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00412/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00191/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3410035458 07.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of firm’s applica埀�on has not been received from RA and decided to ask RA to forward 4 sets of firm’s applica埀�on for considera埀�on of this case. 77
Case No.:47/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00415/AM13/ RLA File :56/24/040/00028/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:5610001234 09.11.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under : 1. Quan埀�ty of export products at Sl. 1 to 5 to also be specified as 7,000 Nos., 30,000 Nos., 30,000 Nos., 20,000 Nos. & 14,000 Nos. respec埀�vely in addi埀�on to their weights. 2. Words “of relevant grade & thickness” to be prefixed with the descrip埀�on of import items at Sl. No. 1,2 & 3. 3. Total quan埀�ty of import items at Sl. No 1, 2 & 3 put together to be allowed as 207329 Kgs. as under: (a) For export product at Sl. No.1 as 44149 Kgs. inclusive of 36 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. (b) For export product at Sl. No.2 as 48737 Kgs. inclusive of 35 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. (c) For export product at Sl. No.3 as 17303 Kgs. inclusive of 36 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. (d) For export product at Sl. No.4 as 42526 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. (e) For export product at Sl. No.5 as 54614 Kgs. inclusive of 48.5 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. 78
Case No.:48/18/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BROSE INDIA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00416/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00125/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110056248 12.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer and decided to remind them for expedi埀�ng their comments.
Case No.:5/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 Status: Deferred
79 CO. LTD., ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00485/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00605/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310715374 21.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that earlier copy of applica埀�on was forwarded to DHI. The CommiĀee observed that this case pertains to DIPP and accordingly decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DIPP for examina埀�on and comments. 80
Case No.:7/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00487/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00650/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310715387 21.11.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under : 1. Net empty weight of 63934 Kgs. to be specified with the quan埀�ty of export product. 2. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as 216 Kgs. (108 Nos.) on net to net basis. 3. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 36 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item to be allowed as applied for i.e. 639 Kgs inclusive of 3 % wastage. 4. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 3 to be allowed as 3 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 4553 Kgs inclusive of 3 % wastage as claimed by the firm. 5. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 4 to be allowed as 56 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item to be allowed as applied for i.e. 58 Kgs. inclusive of 4 % wastage. 6. Word “Relevant” to be prefixed with the descrip埀�ons of import items at Sl. No. 5 & 6. 7. Quan埀�ty of import items at Sl. No. 5 to be allowed as 25510 Kgs . inclusive of 19.8 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. 8. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 6 to be allowed as 36662 Kgs. ( 39749 Mtrs.) inclusive of 2 % wastage. 9. Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. Nos. 7, 8 & 9 ( Welding Consumables) to be allowed as 319 Kgs. each. 81
Case No.:30/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:METAL CLOSURES PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00510/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00340/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092080 22.11.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per SION at Sl. No. C‐773 for Engineering products. 82
Case No.:32/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00512/AM13/ RLA File :07/21/040/00638/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092053 22.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that a deficiency leĀer was sent to firm and their reply is awaited. 83
Case No.:43/24/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00523/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00369/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910054372 23.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013
84
Case No.:17/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PUTZMEISTER CONCRETE MACHINES PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00497/AM13/ RLA File :17/24/040/00046/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:1710005142 30.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that earlier copy of applica埀�on was forwarded to DIPP. The CommiĀee observed that this case pertains to DHI and accordingly decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DHI for examina埀�on and comments. 85
Case No.:21/24/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00501/AM13/ RLA File :61/24/040/00040/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:6110000900 30.11.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 86
Case No.:47/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:WELD FUSE PVT. LTD . Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00527/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00410/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910054423 03.12.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: 1 Net weight of export product at Sl. No. 1 to be specified as “17736 Kgs. containing 8526 Kgs. of Galvanised wire, 2921 Kgs. of PVC items & 5970 Kgs. of MS/Galvanized Flats/Angles”. 2. Word ‘Relevant” to be prefixed with the descrip埀�ons of import items at Sl. No. 1 & 3 and their quan埀�埀�es to be allowed as applied for i.e. 8610.84 Kgs. & 6030 Kgs. respec埀�vely inclusive of 1 % wastage. 3. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 2950.68 Kgs. inclusive of 1 % wastage. 87
Case No.:27/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00507/AM13/ RLA File :53/24/040/00013/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:5310015894 05.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 88
Case No.:10/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00490/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00738/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716497 06.12.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under on repeat basis: 1. Net empty weight of 3110 Kgs. to be specified with the quan埀�ty of export product at Sl. No. 1. 2. Net empty weights of 37420 Kgs. to be specified with the quan埀�埀�es of each export product at Sl. No. 2, 5 & 8. 3. Net empty weights of 26480 Kgs. to be specified with the quan埀�埀�es of each export product at Sl. No. 3, 6 & 9. 4. Net empty weights of 1492 Kgs. to be specified with the quan埀�埀�es of each export product at Sl. No. 4, 7
&10. 5. Word Relevant” to be prefixed with the descrip埀�on of import item at Sl. No. 1 and its quan埀�ty to be allowed as 31236 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. 6. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 (Welding Electrodes) to be allowed as applied for i.e. 20 Kgs. 89
Case No.:12/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00492/AM13/ RLA File :06/24/040/00032/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0610029845 06.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 90
Case No.:29/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:AYAAPPA CNC PVT.LTD, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00509/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00364/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092340 06.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of MSME and decided to await comments. 91
Case No.:37/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:KSS ABHISHEK SAFETY SYSTEMS PVT. LTD, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00517/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00351/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510340262 06.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision :The CommiĀee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leĀer and decided to await reply. 92
Case No.:2/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00482/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00657/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716655 07.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: 1. Net empty weight of export product to be specified as 163 MT. 2. Import item at Sl. No. 1 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained in the export product 3. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No.1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 112000 Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 5 %. 4. Weights of import items at Sl. No. 2, 3, 4 & 5 to be specified as 5.4 MT, 44 MT, 4.933 MT & 2 MT respec埀�vely. 5. Import items at Sl. No. 2, 3, 4 & 5 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 6. Quan埀�ty of import items at Sl. No. 6, 7 & 8 (welding Electrodes) to be allowed as 744 Kgs. , 1990 Kgs. & 1990 Kgs. respec埀�vely. 93
Case No.:8/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00488/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00735/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716642 07.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm as per Sr No 4 5 11&13 of
Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm as per Sr.No.4,5,11&13 of Standard Deficiency Format. 94
Case No.:9/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00489/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00606/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716636 07.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm as per Sr.No.3,4,5,11&11A of Standard Deficiency Format. 95
Case No.:16/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TEXMACO RAIL & ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00496/AM13/ RLA File :02/24/040/00133/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0210184235 07.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DHI, the CommiĀee decided to ask firm to provide details of inputs per unit of EP and marked on drawings. 96
Case No.:4/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:HYDAC (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00484/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00765/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716799 10.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DHI, the CommiĀee decided to ask firm to provide details viz proper name, func埀�ons of input at Sr.No. 1,31,36,55,71,78. 97
Case No.:1/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00481/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00614/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716939 11.12.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: 1. Net Fabricated weight of export product to be specified as 213.5 MT. 2. Import items at Sl. No. 1& 2 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained in the export product 3. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No.1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 2072 Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 3 %. 4. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No.2 to be allowed as 18987 Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 5 %. 5. Weights of import items at Sl. No. 3, 4 & 5 to be specified as 7.164 MT, 179 MT& 0.509 MT respec埀�vely. 6. Import items at Sl. No. 3, 4 & 5 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 7. Quan埀�ty of import items from Sl. No. 6 to 11 (welding Electrodes) to be allowed as applied for i.e. 1000 Kgs., 4676 Kg., 3450 Kgs., 50 Kgs., 7867 Kgs. & 12543 Kgs. respec埀�vely. 98
Case No.:36/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GLOBE HI‐FABS Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00516/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00366/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510340575 11.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of MSME and decided to await comments.
99
Case No.:33/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00513/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00355/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510340616 12.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm on the following: 1. Informa埀�on in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4, 5, 11 & 13 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 2. Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. No. 5, 6, 18,19, 27 & 28 in Nos. also in addi埀�on to their weights. 3. Quan埀�ty of import items at Sl. No. 7 to 9, 20 to 22 & 29 to 31 in meters also in addi埀�on to their weights. 100
Case No.:3/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:KILBURN ENGINEERING LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00483/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00770/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310717144 13.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP, the CommiĀee decided to ask firm to provide informa埀�on as per Sr.No.3,4,5&11 of Standard Deficiency Format. 101
Case No.:6/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00486/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00623/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310717132 13.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DHI for examina埀�on and comments. 102
Case No.:13/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:INJECTOPLAST PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00493/AM13/ RLA File :06/24/040/00034/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0610029941 13.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 103
Case No.:24/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:CLYDE BERGEMANN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00504/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00372/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510340930 17.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that copy of applica埀�on was forwarded to DHI but the case pertains to DIPP. The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DIPP accordingly for examina埀�on and comments. 104
Case No.:11/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00491/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00710/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310717487 18.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : Based on DHI recommenda埀�on, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on as per Sr.No. 4,5,11 of Standard Deficiency Format.
105
Case No.:26/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BRAKES INDIA LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00506/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00181/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410141867 18.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 106
Case No.:35/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GRAZIANO TRASMISSIONI INDIA PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00515/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00363/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510341157 18.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of MSME and decided to await comments. 107
Case No.:38/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:NASH INDUSTRIES (I) PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00518/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00370/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092536 18.12.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under on repeat basis: 1. Export product to contain “404542 Kgs. of HR High Tensile Steel Sheet” 2. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as 424769 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 108
Case No.:39/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00519/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00381/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092540 18.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIT and decided to await comments. 109
Case No.:50/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:G S RADIATORS LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00530/AM13/ RLA File :30/24/040/00049/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3010090521 18.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DHI/MSME for examina埀�on and comments. 110
Case No.:46/24/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00526/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00188/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410141886 19.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013
Case No.:1/21/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LLOYD ELECTRIC & ENGG. LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred
111 HQ File :01/80/050/00447/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00346/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510341301 20.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that RA/firm has not forwarded copy of applica埀�on. The CommiĀee decided to ask RA/firm to immediately provide copy of applica埀�on for considera埀�on of the case. 112
Case No.:42/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00522/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00357/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510341408 20.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 113
Case No.:40/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00520/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00395/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092636 21.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIT and decided to await comments. 114
Case No.:25/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ACCU‐FIX PRECISION TOOLS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00505/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00220/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3410035737 26.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision :The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. 115
Case No.:15/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00495/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00751/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310718335 27.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm on the following: 1. Basis for the quan埀�埀�es of import items with quan埀�埀�es of import items in each export item supported by documentary evidence. 2. Informa埀�on in respect of Sl. No. 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format, export product wise. 116
Case No.:28/24/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00508/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00204/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410142075 27.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 117
Case No.:41/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00521/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00356/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510341782 27.12.2012 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of C&PC and decided to await comments.
ecision : The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 118
Case No.:14/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00494/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00758/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310718890 01.01.2013 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : Based on recommenda埀�on of DHI, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on as per Sr.No. 4,5,11 of Standard Deficiency Format. 119
Case No.:18/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00498/AM13/ RLA File :02/24/040/00142/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0210184912 01.01.2013 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DIPP for examina埀�on and comments. 120
Case No.:19/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00499/AM13/ RLA File :02/24/040/00160/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0210184913 01.01.2013 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DIPP for examina埀�on and comments. 121
Case No.:31/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00511/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00377/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510342330 03.01.2013 Decision : Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject on repeat basis as per firm’s Advance Authoriza埀�on No. 0510312193 dated 23.12.2011 ra埀�fied in Norms CommiĀee Mee埀�ng No. 22/12 dated 24/01/2012: 1. Net weight of export product to be specified as 501.6 Kgs. 2. Quan埀�ty of import item to be allowed as 2197 Kgs. inclusive of 338% wastage a韆�er taking 6% recovery from scrap. 122
Case No.:48/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00528/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00403/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510342730 08.01.2013 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : On the recommenda埀�on of DIPP, the CommiĀee decided to seek informa埀�on from firm on the following: 1. Informa埀�on in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4, 5, 11 & 13 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 2. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 in Nos. also in addi埀�on to its weight. 123
Case No.:20/24/80‐ALC2/2012
ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00500/AM13/ RLA File :61/24/040/00050/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:6110000908 09.01.2013 Defer Date:02.04.2013
Decision :The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DHI and decided to await comments. 124
Case No.:22/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SANDVIK ASIA PVT. LIMITED Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00502/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00165/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110056767 09.01.2013 Decision : Based on DHI wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: Item 1 – As applied. Item 5 – To be allowed on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. Item 2 & 3 – Consumables within 1% of FOB value. Item 4 – To be allowed as per packing policy. 125
Case No.:51/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00531/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00382/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710093573 07.02.2013 Defer Date:02.04.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee decided to ask RA/firm to provide copy of applica埀�on for considera埀�on of the case. 126
Case No.:52/24/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD Meet No/Date:24/80‐ ALC2/2012 19.02.2013 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00532/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00411/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510345202 07.02.2013 Decision : The CommiĀee noted that CLA vide leĀer No. 05/24/40/00411/AM13/ZALC/CLA/961137 dated 11.2.2013 informed that this authoriza埀�on was issued under Para 4.7.1 of HBP Vol.I on repeat basis and hence they have not forwarded copies of applica埀�on to NC. The CommiĀee observed that there is no ac埀�on required on the part of NC and decided to close the case. S.No.557
Case No. A/R‐ 173
M/s. Thermax Ltd., F.No. 01/80/50/01550/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA F.No.31/24/040/00296/AM09 3110036393 dt.09.09.2008 Date: 19.02.2013 Ra埀�fica埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.558
Case No. A/R‐26
M/s. Bharat Heavy ELectricals Ltd., Bhopal HQF.No.01/80/050/00139/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.11/24/040/00004/AM12 1110024727 dt.11.05.2011 Date: 19.02.2013 Request for revision /amendment of norms. The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.559
Case No. A/R‐29
M/s. SMC Pneuma埀�cs (India) Pvt. Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00036/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00035/AM12 0510289309 dt.02.05.2011 Date: 19.02.2013 Ra埀�fica埀�on of norms. Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as per GN‐4 for Engineering products. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. S.No.560
Case No. A/R‐74
M/s. MVS Engineering HQF.No.01/80/050/00905/AM07/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00678/AM07 0510194349
Ltd., New Delhi Mee埀�ng No. 4/ 3 RA.F.No.05/ 4/040/00678/AM07 05 0 94349 dt.14.11.2006 Date: 19.02.2013 Request for amendment in norms This issue was considered and it is seen that item No.3 was applied as Äir Blower” as 2 Nos. This 2 Nos had ‘1 No’ as a component and ‘1 No’ as spare. The spare is to be allowed as per Spare Policy applicable to this authoriza埀�on. Hence, the spare has to be given at Sr.No.6,7 and including at Sr.No.3, totaling to be allowed within that limit of Spare Policy. This was also indicated in the minutes of Mee埀�ng No.44 dated 6.2.2007 where against Item No. 6 & 7, it was stated that quan埀�ty of import items will be allowed as per Spare Policy and for Item No.3, it was clearly indicated that Item No.3 is allowed as 1 No. on Net to Net basis and addi埀�onal item under Sr.No.3 is to be allowed as per Spare Policy applicable to import of spares. Hence, no change is allowed now. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. S.No.561
Case No. A/R‐103
M/s. Minda Silca Engineering Ltd., Noida HQF.No.01/80/050/00348/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00181/AM11 (1) 05102702714 dt. 17.08.2010; (2) 0510273715 dt. 27.09.2010; (3) 0510251004 dt. 15.10.2009 (4) 0510247528 dt. 11.08.2009 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�ons as under: (i) AA No. 05102702714 dated 17.8.2010 – As per MSME UO No.30(277)/11‐ME dated 9.1.2013 (copy enclosed). (ii) AA No.0510273715 dated 27.9.2010 – As per MSME UO No.30(277)/11‐ME dated 12.2.2013 (copy enclosed). (iii) AA No. 0510251004 dated 15.10.2009 – As per MSME UO No.30(277)/11‐ME dated 11.1.2013 (copy enclosed). (iv) AA No.0510247528 dated 10.8.2009 – As per MSME UO No. 30(277)/11‐ME dated 14.2.2013 (copy enclosed). The wastage norms are for regulariza埀�on purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiĀed. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. S.No.562
Case No. A/R‐104
M/s. Maha埀� Electrics, Pune HQF.No.01/85/050/00004/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00340/AM08 3110032470 dt.24.01.2008 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms Based on DHI wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on on repeat basis as per decision in Advance Authoriza埀�on No.3110032429 dated 23.01.2008 as requested by applicant vide leĀer dated 02.01.2013. The wastage norms are for regulariza埀�on purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiĀed. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. S.No.563
Case No. A/R‐106
M/s. Tranter India Private Ltd., Pune HQF.No.01/80/050/00169/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.31/83/040/00063/AM12 3110049045 dt.05.07.2011 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.564
Case No. A/R‐107
M/s. Shree Electricals Ltd., Pune HQF.No.01/80/050/00975/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00204/AM08 3110031243 dt.22.10.2007 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.565
Case No. A/R‐128
M/s. IDMC Limited, Udyog Nagar (Gujarat) HQF.No.01/80/050/00999/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No. 34/24/040/00168/AM08 RA.F.No. 34/24/040/00162/AM08 (i) 3410020002 dt.05.11.2007 (ii) 3410019958 dt.02.11.2007 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.566
Case No. A/R‐129
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd HQF.No.01/80/050/00651/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No. 04/24/040/00205/AM11 0410118773 d
Electricals Ltd., Trichy dt.10.11.2010 Date: 19.02.2013 Revision of norms Based on DHI wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to revise norms of subject authoriza埀�on as follows: Shells – to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. Item No.38 – Numbers can also be men埀�oned along with weight – Net to Net basis with accountability clause. S.No.567
Case No. A/R‐130
reference received from Addl.DGFT, Mumbai of M/s. Adler Mediequip Pvt. LTd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00403/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00698/AM12 0310663899 dt.08.11.2011 Date: 19.02.2013 Amendment of import items No.4 as per amendment sheet No.1 Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: 1. Descrip埀�on of import item at Sl. No.4 to be amended as per Amendment Sheet No. 1 dated 23/10/2012 aĀached with the Advance Authoriza埀�on. S.No.568
Case No. A/R‐131
M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited, Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/01106/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.03/95/040/01070/AM08 0310461144 dt.14.02.2008 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.569
Case No. A/R‐132
M/s. Gastek Engineering (P) Ltd., New Delhi HQF.No.01/80/050/00509/AM07/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00346/AM07 0510188500 dt.08.08.2006 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that this case was considered in NC Mee埀�ng No.36 dated 12.12.2006 and advised the firm for change in the import and export items and quan埀�ty thereof and also for conver埀�ng the license from Deemed Export to Physical Export. The CommiĀee observed that it has not received any further communica埀�on has been received from firm or RA in this regard. Shri Sanjay Jaisingh of the firm aĀended before the CommiĀee and explained that they have got the necessary amendment from CLA as per NC decision dated 12.12.2006. He has further explained that this authoriza埀�on was obtained for import of 2714 kg of Carbon Molecular Sieves for export of 1 No Nitrogen Plant. But they have exported 2 Nos Nitrogen Plants against this authoriza埀�on. The CommiĀee advised the firm to make a wriĀen submission giving complete details of import and export made under the subject authoriza埀�on for considera埀�on of their case further. Case deferred to 5.3.2013. S.No.570
Case No. A/R‐133
M/s. Bharat Heavy Plate & Vessels Ltd., Viskhapatnam HQF.No.01/80/050/00073/AM03/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.26/80/042/00042/AM02 2610001898 dt.28.03.2002 Date: 19.02.2013 Revision of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.571
Case No. A/R‐134
M/s. Prijai Heat Exchangers Pvt. Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00657/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00558/AM11 0310603942 dt.01.12.2010 Date: 19.02.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on as under: 1. Descrip埀�on & quan埀�埀�es of export items to be modified as under: Sl. No. Descrip埀�on Quan埀�ty 1 1.5 TR ODU for Split AC (containing 860 Kgs. of Copper Tube) 304 Nos. 2(a) 2 TR ODU for Split AC (containing 3840 Kgs. of Copper Tube) 1000 Nos. 2(b) 2 TR ODU for Split AC (without System tubing) (containing 5788 Kgs. of Copper Tube) 1649 Nos. Total 2953 Nos. 2. Quan埀�ty of export items to be allowed as under: (i) Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. No. 1 & 10 put together to be allowed as 10593 Kgs. inclusive of 1 % wastage.
(ii) Import items at Sl. No. 2, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16, 17 & 18 to be deleted. (iii) Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. No. 3 & 12 put together to be allowed as 2953 Nos. on net to net basis with accountability clause. (iv) Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. No. 4 & 13 put together to be allowed as 2953 Nos. on net to net basis with accountability clause. (v) Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. No. 5 & 14 put together to be allowed as 2953 Nos. on net to net basis with accountability clause. (vi) Quan埀�埀�es of import items at Sl. No. 6 & 15 put together to be allowed as 2953 Nos. on net to net basis with accountability clause. 3. Revised FOB value of exports and CIF value of import items to be incorporated by RA. The wastage norms are for regulariza埀�on purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiĀed. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. S.No.572
Case No. A/R‐135
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ranipet HQF.No.01/80/050/00237/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00045/AM13 0410137727 dt.29.06.2012 Date: 19.02.2013 Revision of norms Based on DHI wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to revise norms of subject authoriza埀�on as follows: Item 5 – to be allowed on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. S.No.573
Case No. A/R‐136
M/s. SMC Pneuma埀�c (India) Pvt. Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00453/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00236/AM12 0510304983 dt.11.10.2011 Date: 19.02.2013 Ra埀�fica埀�on of norms The CommiĀee decided to forward copy of applica埀�on to DIPP for examina埀�on and comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.574
Case No. A/R‐137
M/s. Flovel Energy Pvt. Limited, Faridabad HQF.No.01/81/050/00396/AM11/DES‐ II/DES‐I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00135/AM11 0510271787 dt.31.08.2010 Date: 19.02.2013 Ra埀�fica埀�on of norms The CommiĀee decided to seek complete details of manufacturing ac埀�vi埀�es being carried out on inputs for manufacture of export products along with flow chart and relevant drawings. Further, it may also be informed whether it is a case of Deemed exports or physical exports. In case of Deemed Export, indicate the relevant Para of Chapter 8 of FTP and a copy of the Project Authority Cer埀�ficate is to be furnished. In case of supply against EPCG licence, the following details may also be provided : i. EPCG licence number and date. ii. CIF value of the licence. iii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iv. Custom duty saved amount. v. Products to be manufactured. vi. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.575
Case No. A/R‐138
M/s. Dynama埀�c Technologies Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00460/AM11/DES‐I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00189/AM11 0710074081 dt.06.09.2010 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.576
Case No.C‐39
Reference received from PC‐4(B) of M/s. Mul埀�‐Serve Rolls Limited, Kolkata HQ F.No.01/94/180/00422/AM12/PC‐4(B)/DES.I Mee埀�ng No.24/13 Date: 19.02.2013 Clarifica埀�on as whether the export product “Adamite Quality Roll” is covered under DEPB Sl. No. 571 of product Group “Engineering” (Product Code : 61) – reg. The CommiĀee deliberated the case and observed that the chemical composi埀�on of the export product Ädamite Quality Roll” exported by the firm does not match with the chemical composi埀�on of “Rolls” covered at SION C‐1332 which is the enabling SION for DEPB at Sl.No.571 of product Group “Engineering‐61”. In view of this, export of Ädamite Quality Roll” is not eligible for DEPB. The CommiĀee decided to forward this informa埀�on to PC4(B) Sec埀�on.
S.No.577
Case No.C‐08
M/s. M+Acer Automo埀�ve Systems Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00269/AM13/DES‐I Mee埀�ng No.24/13 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of input output norms for the export product “Solenoid” in respect of 100% EOU – reg. The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013. S.No.578
Case No. A/R‐139
M/s. Ohsung Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00709/AM10/DES‐I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00220/AM10 3110041743 dt.29.01.2010 Date: 19.02.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP wriĀen comments dated 19.2.2013, the CommiĀee decided to ra埀�fy norms of subject authoriza埀�on on repeat basis as per firm’s Advance Authoriza埀�on No. 3110049734 dated 11.08.2011 ra埀�fied in Norms CommiĀee Mee埀�ng No. 14/80 dated 04/10/2011: 1. Net weights of 99.5 MT, 5.48 MT and 30.208 MT may be specified with quan埀�埀�es of export products at Sl. No 1, 2 & 3 respec埀�vely. 2. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl.No. 1 to be allowed as 99708 Kgs. inclusive of 11.4 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. 3. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl.No. 2 to be allowed as 13867 Kgs. inclusive of 38.7 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. 4. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl. No. 3 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 5480 Kgs. on net to net basis. 6. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl.No. 4 to be allowed as 53561 Kgs. inclusive of 103.5 % wastage a韆�er 1/3rd recovery. 7. Quan埀�ty of import item at Sl.No. 6 to be allowed as 7776 Kgs. inclusive of 100 % wastage. The wastage norms are for regulariza埀�on purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiĀed. RLA may take necessary ac埀�on accordingly. S.No.579
Case No. A/R‐140
M/s. Tema India Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00042/AM12/DES‐I Lic. No. & date Mee埀�ng No.24/13 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00950/AM11 (i) 0310603295 dt.26.11.2010 (ii) 0310617937 dt.25.02.2011 Date: 19.02.2013 Fixa埀�on of norms The CommiĀee noted that the case is under examina埀�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 2.4.2013.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.