DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.18/10 held on 04.08.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 18/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 held on 04.08.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 475 23062635 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. B.D. Ghosh. Jt. IA 399 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 4. Sh. A.K. Mishra, AIA M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 6. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:15/8/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ARJUN TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LTD, Meet No/Date:18/80ALC2/2009 04.08.2009 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00296/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00410/AM07/ Lic.No/Date:0410087487 09.02.2007 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 2
Case No.:56/6/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:DOSHION LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00246/AM09/ RLA File :08/24/040/00232/AM07/ Lic.No/Date:0810063592 13.03.2007 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision :The representative of DIPP present in the meeting informed the committee that as per firm’s letter dated 16.02.2009, total net export weight is 11342 Kgs. and total gross export weight is 13673 Kgs. Firm has further stated that all import items have been imported on net to net basis without any wastage. However, weight of import items at S.No.9 (Stainless Steel Pipes / Tubes) and at S.No.14 (UPVC Pipe) is 1400 MT and 360 MT respectively. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm under intimation to RA and to relist the case on 29.09.2009: 1. Clarify as to how no wastage has been claimed on the import items when the weight of only two import items at Sl. Nos. 9 & 14 is 1760 MT. 2. Give details of export products at S.Nos. 3, 4 & 5 and 3. Submit information in respect of S.No. 4, 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format, export productwise.
Case No.:1/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04 08 2009
3 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00301/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00223/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0410091098 18.09.2007 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 4
Case No.:47/28/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:GEECY ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED., 04.08.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00447/AM08/ RLA File :03/94/040/00617/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310443471 18.09.2007 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net empty weight of 32 MT may be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 may be allowed as 20 Nos. (5579 Kgs.) on net to net basis. 3. Description of import item at S.No. 2 may be modified as “SS Tubes / Pipes 19.05 MM OD x 2.11 MM thk. x 6100 MM long”. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No. 2 may be allowed as 14396 mtrs. (12956 Kgs.) on net to net basis. 5. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. Note: The import of components shall be permitted on nettonet basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilized in the manufacture of the resultant product. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 5
Case No.:28/30/81ALC2/2007
Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/81/050/00362/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00559/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510210503 15.10.2007 Defer date: 18.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they have finalized their comments and will be communicated to DGFT shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for a short period and to relist the case on 18.08.2009. 6
Case No.:3/51/83ALC1/2007
Party Name:SCHENCK PROCESS INDIA LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/83/050/02037/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00623/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510212444 23.11.2007 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009.
Case No.:63/12/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS 04 08 2009
7 LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00429/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00353/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910032441 20.12.2007 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 8
Case No.:3/2/85ALC3/2008
Party Name:MAHATI ELECTRICS 04.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/85/050/00003/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00304/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3110032429 23.01.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the ratification could not be made on time as the case was attached electronically in different NC due to wrong ITC (HS) code mentioned by the firm. The applicant has also claimed 10% wastage in their application therefore their reply that the authorization was issued on nettonet basis is not acceptable. RA also has not informed that authorization is issued under GN4 for the engineering products. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish specific reply to the queries raised in this office letter and subsequent reminder in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 9
Case No.:5/2/85ALC3/2008
Party Name:MAHATI ELECTRICS 04.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/85/050/00005/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00308/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3110032430 23.01.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the ratification could not be made on time as the case was attached electronically in different NC due to wrong ITC (HS) code mentioned by the firm. The applicant has also claimed 10% wastage in their application therefore their reply that the authorization was issued on nettonet basis is not acceptable. RA also has not informed that authorization is issued under GN4 for the engineering products. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish specific reply to the queries raised in this office letter and subsequent reminder in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 10
Case No.:4/2/85ALC3/2008
Party Name:MAHATI ELECTRICS 04.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/85/050/00004/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00340/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3110032470 24.01.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the ratification could not be made on time as the case was attached electronically in different NC due to wrong ITC (HS) code mentioned by the firm. The applicant has also claimed 10% wastage in their application therefore their reply that the authorization was issued on nettonet basis is not acceptable. RA also has not informed that authorization is issued under GN4 for the engineering products. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish specific reply to the queries raised in this office letter and subsequent reminder in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
11
Case No.:101/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:NICOMET INDUSTRIES LTD. 04.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00977/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/01062/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310459253 25.01.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 12
Case No.:87/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CHANDAN STEEL LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00756/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01305/AM07/ Lic.No/Date:0310462020 21.02.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the M/o Steel informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. Since, the case is quite old, the Committee urged the representative of MOS to give comments immediately. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 13
Case No.:42/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00918/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00940/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510217768 12.03.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s reply. The Committee therefore handedover the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 14
Case No.:119/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00995/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00941/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510217932 14.03.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The committee noted that further DL already issued to the firm based on the DC(MSME) comments dt. 23/07/09 and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 15
Case No.:1/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:NEPTUNE INDUSTRIES LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01554/AM09/ RLA File :08/24/040/00263/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0810070858 24.03.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their case will be rejected and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009.
Case No.:73/12/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:JKM DAE RIM AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED., 04.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00439/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00535/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0710056578
16 25.03.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 17
Case No.:129/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:AVLIGHT AUTOMOTIVES LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00652/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00991/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510219004 04.04.2008 Decision : The representative of the DC(MSME) discussed the case with Chairman NCI on 03.08.2009 as he would not be able to attend the NC meeting due some unavoidable work and suggested that the imported item can be allowed as per 1.05 kg./kg. basis. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per DC(MSME) recommendation as under: 1. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 1.05kg./kg. content in the export product. 2. Net weight of export items at Sl.No. 1,2 & 3 may be specified as 485.76 kg., 485.76 kg. & 200 kg. respectively. 18
Case No.:131/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:AVLIGHT AUTOMOTIVES LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00654/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00993/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510219001 04.04.2008 Decision : The representative of the DC(MSME) discussed the case with Chairman NCI on 03.08.2009 as he would not be able to attend the NC meeting due some unavoidable work and suggested that the imported item can be allowed as per 1.05 kg./kg. basis. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per DC(MSME) recommendation as under: 1. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 1.05kg./kg. content in the export product. 2. Net weight of export items at Sl.No. 1,2 & 3 may be specified as 3238.35 kg., 3238.35 kg. & 1333.37 kg. respectively. 19
Case No.:25/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TEXMACO LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00901/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00337/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0210111218 09.04.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance
Case No.:28/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TIL LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00904/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00014/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210111784 Defer date:
20 HQ File :01/80/050/00904/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00014/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210111784 25.04.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply and case was under study with DIPP. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 21
Case No.:8/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KENNAMETAL INDIA LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01561/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00797/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0710057214 30.04.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has sought time for submission of required information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 22
Case No.:18/8/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ERBATECH MACHINERY P LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00299/AM09/ RLA File :32/24/040/00006/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210037776 06.05.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 23
Case No.:96/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00972/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00030/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410021368 09.05.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The committee noted that DL already issued to the firm based on the DHI comments dt. 07.07.2009 and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 24
Case No.:98/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00974/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00252/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3410021362 09.05.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that the complete papers of the case are not readily available with him. The Committee therefore handedover the case file to the technical authority for detailed examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009.
Case No.:56/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PSL LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00932/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00178/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310472141 27.05.2008
25 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. The description of export product may be modified as under: “ Carbon Steel Submerged Arc Welded Pipes with Corrosion & Concrete Coating, size OD: 356.6 mm , CTE Thickness 6 mm, CWC Thickness 30 mm 17812.2 Mtrs. CWC Thickness 60 mm 20 239.8 Mtrs CWC Thickness 85 mm 34660.2 Mtrs Quantities of import items may be allowed as under: a) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 1 viz. Synthetic primer be allowed as 7598 Litres. b) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 2 viz. CTE may be allowed as 632 MT c) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 3 viz. Inner Wrap may be allowed as 152921 Sq. Mtrs. d) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 4 viz. Outer Wrap may be allowed as 76461 Sq. Mtrs.. e) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 5 viz. Welded Wiremesh may be allowed as 154374 Sq. Mtrs. f) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 6 viz. Steel Grit may be allowed as applied for i.e. 8 MT.. g) Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 7 viz. Cement may be allowed as 3764 MT 26
Case No.:52/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00928/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00150/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310472298 28.05.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(116)/09TSW(B)/281 dated 29.06.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of DHI letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. 27
Case No.:104/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00980/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00189/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310472348 29.05.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 28
Case No.:47/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GUMMI METALL TECHNIK (INDIA)PVT.LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00923/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00092/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710057665 02.06.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The
29
Case No.:63/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:EVERGREEN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00939/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00171/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310473669 09.06.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply and case was under study with DIPP. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 30
Case No.:28/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:HORIZON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00551/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00217/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510222895 26.06.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 31
Case No.:41/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:L D FABRICATORS PVT.LTD, 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00564/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00128/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710058224 30.06.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 32
Case No.:47/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:AQUASUB ENGINEERING 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00570/AM09/ RLA File :32/24/040/00014/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210038146 01.07.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to direct the firm to furnish the following information complete in all respects otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009.: 1. Quantity of each export product as given in Annexure I of firm’s letter dated 22.4.2009 in nos. 33
Case No.:48/16/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00571/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00127/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910034488 01.07.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that the complete papers of the case are not readily available with him. The Committee therefore handedover the case file to the technical authority for detailed examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009.
34
Case No.:32/18/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TRANSLLOY INDIA PVT. LTD., 04.08.2009 Status:Case transferred HQ File :01/80/050/00701/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00293/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310478002 09.07.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the firm has furnished incomplete reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. Chemical composition of export product indicating the content of each import item therein has not been shown in the firm’s reply. The Committee however decided to transfer the case to DESII Section as desired by them as the export product falls under the jurisdiction of NCII. 35
Case No.:8/18/84ALC3/2008
Party Name:RADIANT INDUSTRIES (PP. VIJAY V. JADHAV) 04.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/84/050/00229/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00108/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110034521 23.07.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 36
Case No.:66/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:WEATHERFORD DRILLING & PRODUCTION SERVICES(I)P.LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00942/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00090/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022116 21.08.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply and case was under study with DHI. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 37
Case No.:73/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CICB CHEMICON PRIVATE LIMITED, 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00949/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00237/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710059270 21.08.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from SCOMET Division (Export Policy) regarding requirement of export authorization in case of deemed export are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 38
Case No.:75/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00951/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00468/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310483368 22.08.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance
39
Case No.:85/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CRISTOPIA ENERGY SYSTEMS(I) PVT.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00961/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00026/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110018228 25.08.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 40
Case No.:86/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:RATNESH METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00962/AM09/ RLA File :08/24/040/00113/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0810074246 26.08.2008 Decision : The M/o Steel furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.2(13)/2006TW Vol. IV dated 30.06.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of MOS letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. 41
Case No.:115/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:JHAGADIA COPPER LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00991/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00105/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022188 28.08.2008 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 309(284)/2008ME dated 04.08.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of DC(MSME) letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. 42
Case No.:95/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00971/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00337/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510226413 28.08.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply and case was under study with DHI. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 43
Case No.:129/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:JAYDEEP INDUSTRIES 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01005/AM09/ RLA File :52/24/040/00014/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:5210024198 29.08.2008 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U O No 30(11)2008ME dated 02 07 2009 The Committee after
43 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.30(11)2008 ME dated 02.07.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of DC(MSME) letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. 44
Case No.:131/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01007/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00496/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310484775 01.09.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 45
Case No.:133/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MIVEN MAYFRAN CONVEYORS PVT. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01009/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00256/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710059499 01.09.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 46
Case No.:24/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:SURAJ INDUSTRIES 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01577/AM09/ RLA File :30/24/040/00005/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3010057794 02.09.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 47
Case No.:4/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TEKSONS LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01557/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/01217/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310488911 03.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 48
Case No.:1/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:WEATHERFORD DRILLING & PRODUCTION SERVICES(I)P.LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01181/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00134/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022519 14.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The
49
Case No.:11/32/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01191/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00280/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035658 16.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 50
Case No.:8/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GUMMI METALL TECHNIK (INDIA)PVT.LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01188/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00395/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060465 16.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 51
Case No.:9/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:G.B. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01189/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00172/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099219 16.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply and case was under study with DHI. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 52
Case No.:18/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01198/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00698/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310491045 20.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply and case was under study with DIPP. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 53
Case No.:21/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01201/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00190/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035836 20.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their
Case No.:41/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED 04.08.2009
54 0 .08. 009 HQ File :01/80/050/01221/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00655/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310491632 23.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s reply. The Committee therefore handedover the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 55
Case No.:44/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01224/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00339/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229888 23.10.2008 Defer date: 18.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they have finalized their comments and will be communicated to DGFT shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for a short period and to relist the case on 18.08.2009. 56
Case No.:45/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED, 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01225/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00170/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099440 23.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s reply. The Committee therefore handedover the firm’s reply to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 57
Case No.:46/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:SUR HENNIG PVT. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01226/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00420/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060659 23.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 58
Case No.:60/32/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KAMAL RUBPLAST INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01240/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00477/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510230022 27.10.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from Shri S.K. Sharma, DD(Chem), DC(MSME) are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue a D.O. reminder from DDG to expedite their comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 59
Case No.:6/38/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01505/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00324/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036139 01.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The
60
Case No.:14/39/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01567/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00183/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410100820 15.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 61
Case No.:15/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01568/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00586/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510232526 15.12.2008 Defer date: 18.08.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they have finalized their comments and will be communicated to DGFT shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration for a short period and to relist the case on 18.08.2009. 62
Case No.:20/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:WEATHERFORD DRILLING & PRODUCTION SERVICES(I)P.LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01573/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00169/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022901 15.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that they received the firm’s reply and case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 63
Case No.:21/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01574/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00230/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036420 15.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 29.09.2009: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 2. Use of each export product. 3. Use of each import item. 4. Bellows appear both in export item and import item. It is shown as spares in list of imports. The firm may give clarification. 5. Manufacturing activity involved in each item of import. 6. Gross weight and net weight of each item of import.
Case No.:18/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01622/AM09/ RLA File :53/24/040/00008/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:5310007118 16 12 2008
64 16.12.2008 Decision : The C&PC furnished written comments in this case vide their letter No.46011/21/2009PC.II dated 12.5.09. The Committee deliberated upon the comments of C&PC and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Quantity of import item No.1 may be allowed with 5% wastage. 2. Quantity of import item Nos.2 & 4 may be allowed on nettonet basis. 3. Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per written comments of C&PC referred to above (copy enclosed). 65
Case No.:27/39/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01580/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00351/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910036322 16.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 66
Case No.:37/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01590/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00612/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510232794 17.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply wherein they informed that their product is covered under SION C837. The committee observed that the export product is not covered under SION C837 as stated by the firm. However, the Committee handedover the firm’s reply to the DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 67
Case No.:50/39/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:NICOMET INDUSTRIES LTD. 04.08.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/01603/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00793/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310498704 18.12.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 68
Case No.:1/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01605/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00511/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710061857 22.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 69
Case No.:6/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01610/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00251/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110036564 22.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009
69 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 70
Case No.:8/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:VA TECH ESCHER WYSS FLOVELPVT. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01612/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00631/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233247 23.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 71
Case No.:10/40/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01614/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00565/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510233251 23.12.2008 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 72
Case No.:1/35/85ALC3/2008
Party Name:GESTEK ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/85/050/00243/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00650/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510234536 15.01.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The committee noted that the DL issued to the exporter was received undelivered . The committee accordingly decided to forward it to RA to serve the DL to firm after verifying the existence of firm, if necessary. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 73
Case No.:19/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00136/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00951/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310502952 19.01.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of items at S.Nos. 3, 11 & 11(a) of Standard Deficiency Format. 2. Quantity of export product in numbers. 3. Thickness of import item. 74
Case No.:3/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01764/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00706/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510235844 05 02 2009 Defer date: 29 09 2009
05.02.2009 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm has furnished their reply to DGFT as well as DC(MSME). The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 75
Case No.:4/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01765/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00707/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510235848 05.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the committee that the firm has been called for personal hearing in their other similar cases on 18.08.2009. The committee therefore advised the representative of DHI to decide this case also based on the discussion to be held during PH. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 76
Case No.:7/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PYRO ELECTRIC INSTRUMENTS GOA PVT.LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01768/AM09/ RLA File :17/24/040/00101/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1710002402 05.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Weight of component viz. Drilled Bar Stock made out of Incoloy 800H Rod i.e. import item at S.No.2. 77
Case No.:10/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KINETIC ENGINEERING LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01771/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00304/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110037278 06.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 78
Case No.:11/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:RANGSONS ELECTRONICS PVT LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01772/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00553/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710062859 06.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from DIT are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 79
Case No.:12/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01773/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00953/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310506016 06.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The
80
Case No.:29/48/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01790/AM09/ RLA File :61/24/040/00069/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:6110000286 06.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm with copy to RA for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 81
Case No.:6/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:TIMKEN INDIA LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01767/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00259/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210122985 06.02.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting informed the committee that he recommended the case based on the reply of the firm wherein they also desired to amend the quantity. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to forward a copy of firm’s reply to RA for their information and ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Quantities and net export weights of different types of bearing races in the export products may be specified as under: Export Product description Quantity in Numbers Net Export Weight Double Extended Cone 42000 Series 1766 Nos. 2455 Kgs. Naked Cone NP63399480252 13498 Nos. 69380 Kgs. Total: 15264 Nos. 71835 Kgs. 2. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as 128991 Kgs. inclusive of 97.6% wastage after 20% recovery. 82
Case No.:5/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:RANGSONS ELECTRONICS PVT LTD 04.08.2009 Status:Case close HQ File :01/80/050/01766/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00559/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710062891 09.02.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information.
83
Case No.:15/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ABB LIMITED 04.08.2009 Status:Case close HQ File :01/80/050/01776/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00610/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710062941 10.02.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that RA neither reported the status of the case nor forwarded the four sets of application in response to this office letter and subsequent reminder. Since, the subject authorization is quite old; the Committee presumed that ratification of norms of the subject authorization is not required to RA so that the case may be closed on the part of NC. The Regional Authority may take note of the NC decision for information. 84
Case No.:17/48/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01778/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00073/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110019583 10.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 85
Case No.:18/48/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01779/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00076/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110019584 10.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 86
Case No.:22/48/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01783/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00401/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037049 12.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 87
Case No.:23/48/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01784/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00408/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037050 12.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The
Case No.:24/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT.
88 LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01785/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00936/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310506902 12.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 89
Case No.:26/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ZINSER TEXTILE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01787/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00876/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310507257 16.02.2009 Decision : The Textile Commissioner recommended the case as per GN4 for Engineering products vide their letter No.9(144)/2009/TXM/Q/03 dated 03/06/2009 wherein they have also advised to consult DHI as Textile Machinery fall under their purview. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of TC’s letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. 90
Case No.:28/48/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ICEM ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED, 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01789/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01013/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310507440 16.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information despite reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to issue final reminder to the firm to furnish the required information by 22.09.2009 otherwise their 91
Case No.:13/37/85ALC3/2008
Party Name:DRIPLEX WATER ENGINEERING LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/85/050/00266/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00670/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510236625 17.02.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Words “containing 51800 ltrs. Ion Exchange Resins” may be suffixed with the description of export product. 2. Quantities of import items from S.Nos. 1 to 5 may be allowed as applied for on net to net basis with accountability clause.
Case No.:33/48/80ALC2/2008
PLTD 04 08 2009
92 P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01794/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00419/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037105 17.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Specific items of export with quantity in number and weight. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No.3,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 3. Break up of tube sheet and flanges in number and weight separately. 93
Case No.:34/48/80ALC2/2008
P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01795/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00418/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037106 17.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 94
Case No.:35/48/80ALC2/2008
P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01796/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00414/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037107 17.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Specification of export product. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 95
Case No.:36/48/80ALC2/2008
P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01797/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00420/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910037108 17.02.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. 96
Case No.:3/3/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ROSE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00003/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00937/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310514295 02.04.2009 Defer date: 18.08.2009 Decision : The DC(MSME) furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.30(17)2009ME dated 15.07.2009. Since the representative of DC(MSME) was not present in the meeting , Committee decided to defer the consideration only for a short period so as to deliberate the case in the presence of DC(MSME) representative. The case may be relisted on 18.08.2009.
Case No :3/2/85ALC2/2009
Party Name:SAI KALA POWER PVT LTD Meet No/Date:18/80ALC2/2009 Status:Case deferred
97
Case No.:3/2/85 ALC2/2009
Party Name:SAI KALA POWER PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:18/80 ALC2/2009 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/85/050/00003/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00656/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710064045 06.04.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The committee noted that case was attached in NCVI as the firm has mentioned wrong ITC (HS) code for the export product. The Committee also noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward 4 set of application and ask the firm to give correct ITC(HS) code. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 98
Case No.:5/3/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VIDYUT METALLICS PVT. LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00005/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/01039/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310514778 06.04.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 99
Case No.:8/3/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:PRABHA EXPORTS(P) LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00008/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00855/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310515268 13.04.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 2. Use of each export product. 3. Use of each import item in the manufacture of export product. 4. Placement of items of import. 100
Case No.:6/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:RAJ ENGINEERING CO 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00123/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00015/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310517595 28.04.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 101
Case No.:18/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00135/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00037/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310518054 01.05.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision :The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance
102
Case No.:5/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ROSE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00122/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00086/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310519689 13.05.2009 Defer date: 18.08.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that DC(MSME) has already submitted written comments in a similar case of the firm. However, that case was deferred by the Committee for consideration in NC meeting to be held on 18.08.2009. The Committee decided that this case will also be decided based on the other case in the next meeting to be held on 18.08.2009. 103
Case No.:8/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TERUMO PENPOL LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00125/AM10/ RLA File :53/24/040/00001/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:5310008351 20.05.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance 104
Case No.:2/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00119/AM10/ RLA File :03/94/040/00150/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310521734 28.05.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Information in respect of items at S.Nos. 3, 11 & 11(a) of Standard Deficiency Format. 2. Quantity of export product in numbers. 3. Thickness of import item. 105
Case No.:3/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00120/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00007/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000313 29.05.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The committee noted that DL already issued to the firm based on the DHI comments dt. 24.07.2009 and firm’s reply is still awaited. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009.
Case No.:4/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00121/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00910/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310521948 29.05.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting informed the committee that norms of the similar authorization bearing No. No.0310490271 dated 14.10.2008 has been ratified by the NC in its Meeting held on 14.04.2009 and he has recommended the norms of this case based on the aforesaid NC decision. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis as per Advance Authorization No.0310490271 dated 14.10.2008 ratified in NC Meeting held on 14.04.2009 with following modifications: 1. Net empty export weights of 796.1 MT & 272.9 MT may be specified with the quantities of export products at S.Nos. 1 & 2 respectively (total net
106 empty export weight 1069 MT). 2. Weights of 742817 Kgs. and 108146 Kgs. may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.No. 1 & 3 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 3. Weight of 5035 Kgs & 3252 Kgs. may be specified with the quantities of import items at S.No. 2 & 4 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 4. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descriptions of import items at S.Nos. 5, 6 & 7. 5. Quantities of import items at Sl.No.5 & 6 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 22129 Kgs. & 62915 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 3 % wastage. 6. Quantity of import item at S.No.7 may be allowed as 1040 mtrs. (7222 Kgs.) inclusive of 2% wastage. 7. Weights of 75.738 MT, 2.2 MT, 1.5 MT, 2 MT, 2.6 MT, 6 MT & 1.5 MT may be added with the quantities of import items at S.Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 & 20 respectively and their quantities may be allowed on net to net basis. 8. Quantities of import items from S.Nos.13 to 17 may be allowed as applied for. 9. Import item at S.No.19 may be allowed as per Packing Policy. 10. Import item at S.No.20 to be supplied alongwith export product. 11. Import of components may be allowed with accountability clause. Note: The import of components shall be permitted on nettonet basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilized in the manufacture of the resultant product. 107
Case No.:11/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00128/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00121/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522066 01.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5,11 & 13 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 108
Case No.:12/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED 04.08.2009 Status:Case closed HQ File :01/80/050/00129/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00090/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522086 01.06.2009 Decision : The committee noted that the subject case was already decided by the NC in its meeting No. 11/10 held on 16.06.2009. The case was listed due to technical error. The committee accordingly decided to withdraw the case from the agenda. 109
Case No.:14/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00131/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00051/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310522281 02.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The
110
Case No.:9/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THE INDURE PVT. LTD 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00126/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00113/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510242827 02.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The DHI has desired some information vide their U.O. No. 3(50)/08TSW(B) dt. 04.08.2009. The Committee has decided to ask the firm to furnish the required information/clarification desired by the technical authority otherwise their case would be rejected. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 111
Case No.:15/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD. 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00132/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00117/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510242888 03.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 112
Case No.:16/11/80ALC2/2009
P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00133/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00062/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038103 03.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Specific items of export with quantity in number and weight. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No.4, 5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 3. Use of ceramic Ferrules and justification of quantity of import (item No. 11). 4. Break up of different types of valves into hand and electric operated (item no. 6). 113
Case No.:17/11/80ALC2/2009
P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00134/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00064/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038105 03.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Specific items of export with quantity in number and weight. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No.5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 3. Use of ceramic Ferrules and justification of quantity of import (item No. 20). 4. Break up of different types of valves into hand and electric operated (item no. 17). 5. Break up of raw material / components proposed for import for each export product. 6. Item no. 10 and 11 may be given in numbers. 7. Tube sheet at item no. 13 and 14 may be given both in weight and number.
114
Case No.:20/11/80ALC2/2009
P.LTD., 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00137/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00063/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910038107 03.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following 1. Specific items of export with quantity in number and weight. 2. Information in respect of Sl.No.3, 5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 3. Use of ceramic Ferrules and justification of quantity of import (item No. 12). 4. Break up of different types of valves into hand and electric operated (item no. 5). 5. Break up of raw material / components proposed for import for each export product. 6. Items covered under export item “components of boiler” may be specified. 115
Case No.:23/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00140/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00008/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000314 03.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 116
Case No.:24/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00141/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00009/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000315 03.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 117
Case No.:25/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:IDMC LIMITED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00032/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410024359 03.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The 118
Case No.:26/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SPX INDIA PVT.LTD, 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00143/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00094/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510242998 04.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 D i i Th C itt t d th t h d f fi ’ li ti h t b i d f f d R i l A th it i it f i d
Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DC(MSME) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 119
Case No.:22/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00139/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00077/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710065272 05.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority in spite of reminder. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward 4 set of application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. 120
Case No.:27/11/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 04.08.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00144/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00038/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038751 09.06.2009 Defer date: 29.09.2009 Decision : The DC(MSME) has desired some information vide their U.O. No. 30(31)2008ME dt. 30.07.2009. The Committee has decided to ask the firm to furnish the required information/clarification desired by the technical authority otherwise their case would be rejected. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. S.No. 11
Case No. A09
M/s. Trumac Engg. Co. P. Ltd; Ahmedaad HQ F.No.01/80/162/880/AM.09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.18/10 RA F.No.03/95/40/39/2/AM09 0310488667 dt.01.10.2008 Date: 04.08.2009 Ratification of norms The Textile Commissioner recommended the case as per GN4 for Engineering products vide their letter No.9(68)/2009/TXM/6 dated 04/06/2009 wherein they have also advised to consult DHI as Textile Machinery fall under their purview. The DHI representative and other members after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of TC’s letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. S.No 75
Case No. A/R60
M/s. Alstom Projects India Ltd;, Vadodara HQ F.No.01/80/50/1180/AM07/DES.I HQ F.No.01/80/50/00844/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 18/10 RA F.No.03/94/40/01100/AM07 RA F.No.03/94/40/00850/AM07 0310414907 dt. 08.01.2007 0310406397 dt. 02.11.2206 Date: 04.08.2009 Revision of norms The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. S No 76
S.No.76
Case No. A/R68
M/s. MPP Technologies P. Ltd; Banglore HQ F.No.01/80/162/921/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 18/10 RA F.No.34/21/40/915/AM07 0710048373 dt.13.11.2006 Date: 04.08.2009 Revision of norms The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. S.No.77
Case No. A/R73
M/s.Magppie International Ltd; New Delhi HQ F.No.01/80/50/695/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No. 18/10 RA F.No.05/24/40/538/AM07 0510191655 dt.25.09.2006 Date: 04.08.2009 Revision of norms The committee noted that firm has furnished the reply in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The committee decided to examine the reply of the firm on file and place the case before NC in its meeting to be held on 29.09.2009. S.No.78
Case No. A/R21
M/s. Patels Airtemp (India) Ltd. F.No. 01/80/50/125/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.18/10 R.A. F.No.08/24/40/186/AM08 0810068645 dt. 26.11.07 Date: 04.08.2009 The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 29.09.2009. S.No.79
Case No. A/R
M/s. Yashika Boats. F.No. 01/85/162/184/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.18/10 R.A. F.No.01/81/40/0002/AM07 1010023407 Dt. 25.04.2006 Date: 04.08.2009 The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No.3(119)/09TSW(B)/288 dated 09/07/2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments. Copy of DHI letter referred to above may be forwarded to RA. S.No.23
Case No. C04
M/s.Bhukhanwala Diomond Systems Ltd. F.No. 01/80/162/11/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.18/10 Fixation of Norms Date: 04.08.2009 On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 29.09.2009: Copy of KSEZ letter No. KASEZ/100%/EOUII/169/199293/VOLIV/ 10569 dt. 27.12.2007 recommending adhoc norms for the product. S.No.24 C C 0 / h kh l 01/80/162/12/A 10/ S i &
Case No. C05
M/s.Bhukhanwala Diomond Systems Ltd. F.No. 01/80/162/12/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.18/10 Fixation of Norms Date: 04.08.2009 On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 29.09.2009: 1. Information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 2. Unit of each export product. 3. Specific quantity of import and use of each import item in the manufacture of export product. 4. Placement of items of import. S.No.25
Case No. C06
M/s. Powermaster Engineers Pvt. Ltd. F.No. 01/80/162/237/AM10/DES.I Meeting No.18/10 Clarification about DEPB Entry Date: 04.08.2009 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study and they will finalize their comments shortly. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 29.09.2009. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (B. D. Ghosh, Jt. IA, MOS) Member (K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director) Member (A.K. Mishra, AIA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A. Komu) Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.