IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE DES-VI SECTION
RATIFIED MINUTES OF THE NORMS COMMITTEE-V1 MEETING NO.17/85 DATED 10.01.2019
Please Note
(i) For information of exporters, Norms Committee-V1! handles all cases pertaining to fixation/ratification of norms for Export Products falling under ITC(HS) Chapter 1 to 26 & 94-98. Communications in respect of cases pertaining to NC-VI may be sent to email address: p.sahu@gov.in
(ii) In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the recommendations/ observations/ deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The concerned firm/company may gO through the same and respond accordingly.
(iii) Similarly, a scanned copy of the blank Standard Deficiency Format, which may find a reference in NC decisions, has also been attached in the end. This may also be referred to by the concerned firm/company and may be responded accordingly.
(iv) For information of the exporters, it is informed that wherever DL is issued, the case would be rejected in case the reply of the firm is not received within 90 days from the date of issue of DL.

v) For information of the exporters, it is informed that wherever DL is issued, the case would be rejected in case the reply of the firm is not received within 90 days from the date of issue of DL.

(v) The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspect/wastage norms. While redeeming the applications, RAs should check that the applicant has fulfilled all requirements as prescribed in policy/procedure including those in Policy Circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for issuance of AA and regularization of the case. The Meeting No. 17/85 dated 10.01.2019 of Norms Committee-VI for the year 2018-
19 was held on 10.01.2019 under the Chairmanship of Shri Anil Aggarwal, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the following applications for ratification of norms in respect of advance authorizations under Duty Exemption Scheme (Chapter-4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020. The following members were present in the meeting:-
[SLNo. | Name & Designation Department 2 Shri Shaish Kumar, Technical Expert (Consultant)/Tech1
3 Shri DN. Mathur, Technical Expert (Consultant)/Tech2
4 Shri S.Kipgen, Deputy DGFT
ae Shri PradyumnaSahu, FTDO i DGFTav Lowae
hee amonsemeneae Gr08e
ror ASee0O i of ao a ahs ow 2
OV:oe[SG!] Mea ano yor 1

==> picture [451 x 125] intentionally omitted <==

DGFT

ae Shri PradyumnaSahu, FTDO i DGFTav Lowae
hee amonsemeneae Gr08e
ror ASee0O i of ao a ahs ow 2
OV:oe[SG!] Mea ano yor 1

==> picture [451 x 125] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case|No.:5/31/85-ALC3/2011|Party Name:M&|B|Meet No/Date:17/85-|Status: Deferred|
|ENGINEERING|LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|10.01.2019|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0810107322|Defer|
|:01/85/050/00181/AM12/|:08/24/040/00228/AM12/|03.01.2012|Date:21.02.2019|
|[:][ NC]|[considered]|[the]|[case]|[as]|[per]|[agenda]|[and]|[noted]|[that][ RA]|[Ahmedabad]|[has]|[been]|
|;|[Decision]|
|requested|to|furnish|information|about|the|status|of the|AA|and|if not|ratified,|to|send|a|
|hard|copy of the|application|for examination|and|fixation of norms.|The|reply|of the RA|is|
|awaited,|The Committee|decided|to|send|a reminder|to RA|to|expedite|the|reply.|

----- End of picture text -----

The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 

Case No.:1/1/85-ALC3/2013_ Party Name:ALKALOIDS Meet No/Date:17/85Status: Deferred CORPORATION ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210176467 Defer :01/85/050/00184/AM13/ :02/24/040/00006/AM 13/ 11.04.2012 Date:21.02.2019 : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that RA Kolkata has been 5[Decision] “ requested to furnish information about the status of the AA and if not ratified, to send a hard copy of the application for examination and fixation of norms. The reply of the RA is awaited. The Committee decided to send a reminder to RA to expedite the reply. 


Case No.:4/12/85-ALC3/2013 Party Name:BELOOR BAYIR Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred BIOTECH LTD, ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710097829 Defer :01/85/050/00074/AM 14/ :07/24/040/00163/AM14/ 28.08.2013 Date:2 11.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that RA Bengaluru has been requested to furnish information about the status of the AA and if not ratified, to send a hard copy of the application for examination and fixation of norms. The reply of the RA is awaited. The Committee decided to send a reminder to RA to expedite the reply.

if not ratified, to send a hard copy of the application for examination and fixation of norms. The reply of the RA is awaited. The Committee decided to send a reminder to RA to expedite the reply. 


Case No.:6/20/85-ALC3/2013 Party Name:FERRERO INDIA Meet No/Date:17/85Status: Deferred PVT.LTD, ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110061136 Defer :01/85/050/00125/AM14/ :31/83/040/00150/AM14/ 22.11.2013 Date:21.02.2019 4 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that some other AAs of the firm are under consideration. Hence the Committee decided to add this case with other AAs for taking decision. iy ae } The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 of por <a once 

Case No.:6/24/85-ALC3/2013 |Party Name:THE NATIONAL /Meet No/Date:17/85‘Status: Deferred | INDUSTRIAL ALC3/2018 | CORPORATION LTD 10.01.2019 | | HQ File RLA File ‘Lic. No/Date:0510374926 ‘Defer | :01/85/050/00152/AM14/ :05/24/040/00351/AM14/ 31.12.2013 Date:21.02.2019 | : Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that CLA Delhi has been |requested to furnish information about the status of the AA and if not ratified, to send a. hard copy of the application for examination and fixation of norms. The reply of the CLA. is awaited. The Committee decided to send a reminder to CLA Delhi to expedite the reply.

ratified, to send a. hard copy of the application for examination and fixation of norms. The reply of the CLA. is awaited. The Committee decided to send a reminder to CLA Delhi to expedite the reply. — The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 | | | Case No.:5/26/85-ALC3/2013 |Party Name:FERRERO INDIA [Meet No/Date:17/85__|Status:Deferred | PVT.LTD, ALC3/2018 | HQ File RLA File 10.01.2019Lic.No/Date:0310769732 |[Defer| :01/85/050/00166/AM14/ :03/94/040/00929/AM14/ 07.02.2014 IDate:21.02.2019 | , Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that some other AAs of the firm are under consideration. The Committee has also decided to get the application details. from RA, Mumbai and if not ratified, the RA may send a copy of the application of the: firm for examination by the Technical Authority. | | _ |The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 | 

| |The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 || Case No.:9/7/85-ALC3/2014 Party Name:PAHAL FOODS Meet No/Date:17/85-_[Status:Deferred _ PVT LTD. ‘ALC3/2018 | ‘10.01.2019 | HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910059870 Defer | :01/85/050/00045/AM15/ :09/24/040/00646/AM14/ '25.04.2014 |Date:21.02.2019 | 7 |Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the AA of the firm has. been forwarded to Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI for examination and comments. The Committee decided to request MoFPI to expedite their comments. |

agenda and noted that the AA of the firm has. been forwarded to Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI for examination and comments. The Committee decided to request MoFPI to expedite their comments. | 


Case No.:1/20/85-ALC3/2014 |Party Name:FEATHERLITE Meet No/Date:17/85|Status: Deferred | OFFICE SYSTEMS PVT. eee 8 | LTD. 10.01.2019 | HQFile = —~—~—*(RLAFile =~ ~—~—~—__{Lic.No/Date:0710104291 [Defer SS :01/85/050/00160/AM15/ ':07/21/040/00046/AM15/ 21.05.2014 ‘Date:21.02.2019 | 8 —————— Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that RA Bengaluru has been requested to furnish information about the status of the AA and if not ratified, to send a. hard copy of the application for examination and fixation of norms. The reply of the RA fs! awaited. The Committee decided to send a reminder to RA to expedite the reply. pP cAYor 0WotAE “lg ROPE GY vo?8° 3 

**==> picture [102 x 31] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
KA ODA ae jo? AA ow<br>CO ee Sa<br>ONG [one]<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>

GY vo?8° 3 

**==> picture [102 x 31] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
KA ODA ae jo? AA ow<br>CO ee Sa<br>ONG [one]<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Case No.:12/17/85Party Name:EASTERN Meet No/Date:17/85Status: Deferred ALC3/2014 CONDIMENTS PRIVATE — ALC3/2018 LIMITED 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1010058862 Defer :01/85/050/00132/AM15/ :10/24/040/00071/AM15/ 31.10.2014 Date:21.02.2019 9 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that RA Cochin has been requested to furnish information about the status of the AA and if not ratified, to send a hard copy of the application for examination and fixation of norms. The reply of the RA is awaited. The Committee decided to send a reminder to RA to expedite the reply. 


**==> picture [450 x 125] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case|No.:34/17/85-|Party Name:NESTLE|INDIA|Meet No/Date:17/85-|Status: Deferred|
|ALC3/2014|LTD|ALC3/2018|
|10.01.2019|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0510392092|Defer|
|:01/85/050/00154/AM15/|:05/24/040/00372/AM15/|20.11.2014|Date:21.02.2019|
|[:NC]|[considered]|[the]|[case]|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|CLA|Delhi|has|been|
|is|[Decision]|
|requested|to|furnish|information|about|the|status|of the AA|and|if not|ratified,|to|send|a|
|hard|copy|of the|application|for examination|and|fixation|of norms.|The|reply of the CLA|
|is|awaited. The Committee|decided to|send|a reminder|to CLA,Delhi|to|expedite|the|reply.|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>



Case No.:21/22/85-ALC3/2014 Party Name:CREATIVE Meet No/Date: 17/85Tansferred GARMENTS PVT. LTD., ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 ~ Lic.No/Date:03 10791381 HQ File RLA File 11 :01/85/050/00181/AM15/ :03/94/040/00713/AM15/ 25.11.2014 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile Group to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather. 

Case No.:10/3/85-ALC3/2015 Party Name:SRS UNISTRAW Meet No/Date:17/85Rejected PRIVATE LIMITED ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10793568 :01/85/050/00024/AM 1 6/ :03/95/040/00878/AM15/ 04.02.2015 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm was granted PH 12 to appear before Committee 13.09.2018, 01.11.2018 13.12.2018 and on 10.01.2019. The Committee noted that the firm has neither appeared for PH nor send any reply for consideration of the Committee. Hence the Committee decided to reject the case with directioncase. to the firm to pay applicable duty along with interest for | regularisationre of the . . . ot¥ oy RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. / oR cero ce c000 | = = Ont we TAS ‘ete? a in SN he 2 e J « Ao)

plicable duty along with interest for | regularisationre of the . . . ot¥ oy RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. / oR cero ce c000 | = = Ont we TAS ‘ete? a in SN he 2 e J « Ao) 

Case No.:10/1/85-ALC3/2015 Party Name:SRS UNISTRAW Meet No/Date:17/85Rejected PRIVATE LIMITED ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10794149 ) :01/85/050/00009/AM 16/ :03/95/040/00996/AM15/ 25.02.2015 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm was granted PH 13 to appear before Committee 13.09.2018, 01.11.2018 13.12.2018 and on 10.01.2019. The Committee noted that the firm has neither appeared for PH nor send any reply for consideration of the Committee. Hence the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to the firm to pay applicable duty along with interest for regularisation of the case. 

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. 

**==> picture [451 x 126] intentionally omitted <==**

the firm to pay applicable duty along with interest for regularisation of the case. 

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. 

**==> picture [451 x 126] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No.:7/3/85-ALC3/2015|Party Name:ARJUNA|Meet No/Date:17/85-|Approved|
|NATURAL|EXTRACTS|ALC3/2018|
|LIMITED|10.01.2019|
|HQ File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date: 1010059048|
|:01/85/050/00021/AM16/|:10/24/040/00126/AM15/|04.03.2015|
|14|Decision|:|NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|vide|Policy|Circular|
|No.05/2009-14|dated|14.08.2013,|RA|can|take|action|on|the|basis|of Sample|Analysis|
|Report (SAR)|furnished|by the|Spice|Board.|The|Committee|therefore,|decided|to|request|
|RA, Kochi to take appropriate|action|in accordance with above mentioned|Policy|Circular.|

----- End of picture text -----

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

==> picture [451 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

with above mentioned|Policy|Circular.|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. 

**==> picture [451 x 153] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No.:6/4/85-ALC3/2015|Party Name:SRS UNISTRAW|Meet No/Date:17/85-|Rejected|
|PRIVATE|LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|10.01.2019|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:03 10794569|
|:01/85/050/00036/AM|16/|:03/95/040/01021/AM15/|13.03.2015|
|Decision|: NC|considered|the|case|as|per agenda|and|noted|that the|firm was|granted PH|
|15|to|appear|before|Committee|13.09.2018,|01.11.2018|13.12.2018|and|on|10.01.2019.|The|
|Committee|noted|that|the|firm|has|neither|appeared|for|PH|nor|send|any|reply|for|
|consideration|of|the|Committee.|Hence|the|Committee|decided|to|reject|the|case|with|
|direction|to|the|firm|to|pay|applicable|duty|along|with|interest|for|regularisation|of|the|
|case.|

----- End of picture text -----

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

==> picture [131 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- p AaADA SatXeKn‘oesoepe 0kooAGa oa orSeeNeer ah eal ye ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:7/1/85-ALC3/2015 Party Name:BELOOR BAYIR Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred BIOTECH LTD, ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710107884 Defer :01/85/050/00006/AM16/ :07/24/040/00453/AM15/ 19.03.2015 Date:21.02.2019

LOOR BAYIR Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred BIOTECH LTD, ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710107884 Defer :01/85/050/00006/AM16/ :07/24/040/00453/AM15/ 19.03.2015 Date:21.02.2019

16 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has been issued DL vide email dated 09.01.2019. The Committee decided to send a reminder to the firm to expedite the reply.

Case No.:4/6/85-ALC3/2015	PartyName:SRSUNISTRAW<br>PRIVATE LIMITED	MeetNo/Date:17/85-<br>ALC3/2018	Rejected
		10.01.2019
HQ File<br>:01/85/050/00073/AM16/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/01103/AM15/	Lic.No/Date:0310796027<br>19.05.2015

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm was granted PH 17 to appear before Committee 13.09.2018, 01.11.2018 13.12.2018 and on 10.01.2019. The Committee noted that the firm has neither appeared for PH nor send any reply for consideration of the Committee. Hence the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to the firm to pay applicable duty along with interest for regularisation of the case.

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:34/14/85Party Name:PARAYIL FOOD Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 PRODUCTS PVT.LTD., ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date: 1010059475. Defer :01/85/050/00153/AM19/ :10/24/040/00012/AM17/ 11.05.2016 Date:21.02.2019[:][NC][considered][the][case] as per agenda and noted that the application of the -[Decision] firm has been forwarded to Technical Authorities, i-e., MoFPI and CIFT for examination and comments. The comments from the TAs are awaited. The Committee decided to send reminder to TAs to expedite their comments.

==> picture [361 x 111] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 m . oA woke 40S, ke KMagegh? oP?EON Keearfo” Ae GOCE Co adSOS Sovoe A oe0 ee sees ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:24/14/85Party Name:CRI LIMITED Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210207064 Defer :01/85/050/00143/AM19/ :02/24/040/00092/AM17/ 04.10.2016 Date:21.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following information from the firm as per the comments of the Technical Authority, i-e., Tech.1;

i) Dia of Brass wire, il) Exact shape & drawing of export item, ili) Sample of export product, iv) Justification for 54% wastage in ultrasonic cleaning

he Technical Authority, i-e., Tech.1;

i) Dia of Brass wire, il) Exact shape & drawing of export item, ili) Sample of export product, iv) Justification for 54% wastage in ultrasonic cleaning

Case No.:3/14/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:SWANI SPICE Meet No/Date:17/85Approved MILLS PVT. LTD. ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10811833 :01/85/050/00122/AM19/ :03/95/040/00972/AM17/ 15.03.2017

Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA on the basis of the recommendation of the Technical Authority of MoFPI/Technical Consultants allowing the following inputs;

ad Export Item Coriander powder made of coriander seeds 490.200 MT of same variety, grade and origin as imported.

Import Item

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:2/14/85~—_—~Party Name:REYNOLDS Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 PENS INDIA P LTD ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410164055 Defer :01/85/050/00121/AM19/ :04/24/040/00240/AM 18/ 08.03.2018 Date:21.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following 51 information from the firm as per the comments of the Technical Authority, i-e., Tech.1; i) Net content of each import item in each export product separately il) Weight of each export product separately \ rs iii) Calculation sheet to arrive at the quantity of item asked for. en yrs lereice The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 bora¥ Sos baatas64 .0

KO 30

BM e0e ot aie? of?

==> picture [437 x 708] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/14/85- Party Name:APEEJAY TEA Meet No/Date:17/85- [Status:Deferred | ALC3/2018 LIMITED \ALC3/2018 | | 10.01.2019 | | |HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210208546 [Defer | :01/85/050/00123/AM19/ —:02/24/040/00052/AM19/ 06.07.2018 Date:21.02.2019 | 22 |Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that RA Kolkata was. requested to send Hard Copy of the application of the firm which is still awaited. The The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 | | Committee decided to send a reminder to the RA to send H.C. at the earliest. E | Case No.:30/14/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:SsHOCKLEY __ [MeetNo/Date:17/85-.

case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 | | Committee decided to send a reminder to the RA to send H.C. at the earliest. E | Case No.:30/14/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:SsHOCKLEY __ [MeetNo/Date:17/85-. [Approved | | HALL ELECTRONICS (P) _|ALC3/2018 | | HQ File LTD.RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:021020863210.01.2019 || | | |:01/85/050/00149/AM19/ :02/24/040/00055/AM19/ (09.08.2018 | | Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the. following inputs; | AA on the basis of the recommendation of the Technical Authority Tech.1, allowing the. Export Item | | | | Soft stuffed toys containing 15851.000 Number 1. Circular knitted Fabrics-6640 | Sq.Mt. | 2. Nylex-3040 Sq.Mt. | 3. Poly fibre- 1970 Kg. | 4. Plastic eyes-16000 Nos. 5. Ribbon- 3000 Mttrs. | 23 6. Velcro- 1965 yds. | 7. Electronic sound module for toys- | 15851 Nos. 8. Battery- 63404 Nos. 9. Packing- 15851 Nos. Import Item 1. | Circular knitted pile fabric made of 6972 Sq. Mt. synthetic yarn. 2._Nylex Brushed Tricot eee 3. Polyester staple fibre 1989.7 Kg 4. Plastic Eyes made of ABS Plastic 16000 Numbers | 6.5. Ribbon of relevant width aea Velcro of relevant width 1984.65 Yds. | 7. Electronic Sound Module for Toys 15851 Numbers 8. AA Alkaline batte 63404 Numbers Item9._Packing materials | [_Asperpackaging] policy No | to 9 are with accountability in export | | RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

AA Alkaline batte 63404 Numbers Item9._Packing materials | [_Asperpackaging] policy No | to 9 are with accountability in export | | RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. \ ofRe | pS gSeEe<a BEKO, BS 3 eo? cA SEE EOS Ss - $Congb << PGX\O%. a. KooCSOsOE i ia ORD SO ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [442 x 693] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- [{Meet][ No/Date:17/85.][ ‘Approved] e No.:26/14/85-ALC3/2018 |Party [Name:SHOCKLEY] HALL ELECTRONICS (P) ‘ALC3/2018 | fae File ‘{RLAFileLTD. ~ |Lic.No/Date:0210208642'10.01.2019 | 4 :01/85/050/00145/AM19/ |:02/24/040/00056/AM19/ 13.08.2018 | | Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the | AAfollowing on the basis of the recommendation of the Technical Authority Tech.1, allowing the| Export Item | | inputs; Soft stuffed toys containing 120000 Number 1. Circular knitted Pile Fabrics- | 2. 40300Sq.Mt. 3. Nylex-5182Sq.Mt. | 4. Poly fibre- 1471 Kg. | Plastic Parts-120000 Nos. 24 5. Ribbon- 73350Mtrs. 6. Velcro- 10892 yds. 7. [PomPom-] [81000] [Nos.] | 8 Packing- 2380 Nos. | Import Item | 1. ofCircular syntheticknittedyarn. pile fabric made | | }—4. Plastic Parts for Toys [120000 Numbers] | -8 Packing materials | As per packaging polly | S| R A mayAsa take subsequentgens consequential See action accordingly.ne < Se | & Case No.:6/14/85-ALC3/2018 |Party Name:GODREJ& ‘Meet No/Date:17/85- [Approved BOYCE MFG.

ackaging polly | S| R A mayAsa take subsequentgens consequential See action accordingly.ne <_ Se | & Case No.:6/14/85-ALC3/2018 |Party Name:GODREJ& ‘Meet No/Date:17/85- [Approved BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., |ALC3/2018 HQ (10.01.2019 :01/85/050/00125/AM19/File IRLAFile {Lic No/Date:0310823277 |Be ckoe Decision Los/S440/00447/AN 19/ (24.08.2018 | 25 : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the, |AA on the basis of the recommendation of the Technical Authority Tech.1, allowing the. following inputs; | Export Item Made ofHR sheet) t :eeSs 9 A &E oS oa AAs? ----- End of picture text -----

(Made of HR sheet) [SeSes ae Import Item Hot rolled steel coils of thickness less than | 1.02 MT/MT of export 3 mm IS 2062: 2006,E350 (FE490)IS5986:2002, FE 510/DIN17100 ST52/JISG3101 SS490/EN10025S355 Hot rolled steel coils of thickness less than | 1.02 MT/MT of export 3 mm IS 2062: 2006,E250 (FE410)IS5986:2002, FE 410/DIN17100 ST42/JISG3101 SS400/EN10025S255

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:13/14/85Party Name:SAMI SPICES Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 AND HERBS PVT. LTD. ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10823256 Defer —:01/85/050/00132/AM19/ :03/95/040/00452/AM 19/ 24.08.2018 Date:21.02.2019 56 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has been issued DL vide email dated 9.1.2019 for which the reply is awaited. The Committee decided to remind the firm to expedite the reply.

	CaseNo.:28/14/85-<br>PartyName:GEOFRESH<br>ALC3/2018<br>NUTRACEUTICALS	MeetNo/Date:17/85-<br>ALC3/2018<br>10.01.2019	Status:Deferred
	HQ File<br>RLA File<br>ae<br>:01/85/050/00147/AM19/<br>:08/24/040/00181/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0810143347 <br>28.08.2018	Defer<br>Date:21.02.2019
57	Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda <br>DL vide email dated 9.1.2019 for which the reply	and noted that the firm hasbeen issued<br> is awaited. The Committee decided to
	remindthefirmtoexpeditethereply.

==> picture [378 x 93] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 ye / ie es Lo EOS a, ) “sO ASO RS ocd Me EES.o KESEL<o YYPr0 On ~. “A ne o ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [451 x 105] intentionally omitted <==

9 ye / ie es Lo EOS a, ) “sO ASO RS ocd Me EES.o KESEL<o YYPr0 On ~. “A ne o ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [451 x 105] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case|No.:9/14/85-|Party Name:INDO GERMAN|Meet No/Date:17/85-|Status:|Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|ALKALOIDS|ALC3/2018|
|10.01.2019|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:03|10823446|Defer|
|:01/85/050/00128/AM19/|:03/94/040/00493/AM19/|30.08.2018|Date:21.02.2019|
|Decision|:|NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|decided|to|seek|the|following|
|[from][ the]|[firm]|[as][ per][ comments][ of][ the]|[Technical]|[Authority,]|[ie,][ Tech2);]|
|=|[information]|

----- End of picture text -----

i) COA of imported roots from Foreign Supplier showing % of Active Content. ii) COA of Export item showing % of Active Content iii) | Wastage claimed during various steps of Extraction process

==> picture [452 x 111] intentionally omitted <==

ing % of Active Content. ii) COA of Export item showing % of Active Content iii) | Wastage claimed during various steps of Extraction process

==> picture [452 x 111] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case|No.:29/14/85-|Party Name:KOMATHA|Meet No/Date:17/85-|Status:Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|IMPEX PRIVATE|LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|10.01.2019|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0410164634|Defer|
|:01/85/050/00148/AM19/|:04/24/040/00120/AM19/|03.09.2018|Date:21.02.2019|
|59|Decision|:|NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|application|of|the|
|firm|has|been|forwarded|to|Technical|Authority,|i.c.,|MoFPI|for|comments,|which|is|
|awaited.|The|Committee|decided|to|remind MoFPI|to|expedite|the comments.|

----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:27/14/85Party Name:REYNOLDS Meet No/Date:17/85‘Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 PENS INDIA P LTD ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410164640 Defer :01/85/050/00146/AM19/ :04/24/040/00117/AM19/ 04.09.2018 Date:21.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following[from][the][firm][as][ per][ the][ comments][of][ the][ Technical][Authority,][i.e.,][Tech.1;] -3[information] i) Net content of each import item in each export product separately ii) Weight of each export product separately iii) Calculation sheet to arrive at the quantity of item asked for. The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 = ry* SgS 9 SE s oe SS FoPEE ke EEE Cees

tely ii) Weight of each export product separately iii) Calculation sheet to arrive at the quantity of item asked for. The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 = ry* SgS 9 SE s oe SS FoPEE ke EEE Cees

==> picture [1 x 18] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:10/14/85Party Name:CHIRAL Meet No/Date:17/85‘Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 ORGANICS (P) LTD. ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10823892 Defer :01/85/050/00129/AM19/ :03/94/040/00529/AM19/ 19.09.2018 Date:21.02.2019

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following information from the firm as per the comments of the Technical Authority, ie., Tech.2;

31 Both import and export items refer to the same product with the same ITC-HS code. The firm may be advised to furnish the following details i) Difference between import and export items may be elaborated in terms of Technical Specifications supported by documentary evidence. il) COA of import items from Foreign Supplier. iii) | COA of Export item from Customs Accredited Laboratory.

Case No.:25/14/85Party Name:PUSILIN Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECHNOLOGY ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0610038988 Defer :01/85/050/00144/AM19/ :06/24/040/00033/AM19/ 26.09.2018 Date:21.02.2019

85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECHNOLOGY ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0610038988 Defer :01/85/050/00144/AM19/ :06/24/040/00033/AM19/ 26.09.2018 Date:21.02.2019

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Team of[Directorate][had][proposed][to][visit][the][manufacturing][unit][ of][ the][firm][near][ Gurugram][on] ae[this] 18.01.2019 to assess the quantum of enzymes used in the manufacturing process. The firm | vide email dated 08.01.2019 informed that their Technical persons who are of Chinese origin are on leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during the 1‘' week of March, 2019.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.

Case No.:35/14/85Party Name:UNITED FOODS Meet No/Date:17/85Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:53 10019860 Defer :01/85/050/00154/AM19/ :53/24/040/00005/AM19/ 01.10.2018 Date:21.02.2019 33 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm has been forwarded to Technical Authority, i.e., Coffee Board for comments, which is awaited. The Committee decided to remind Coffee Board to expedite the comments.

==> picture [356 x 106] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 reat. oorofKeKA : pi SOs.ae ooEGET Per heLEKI a obigy FQ wi: LOSE s@ AO oRNoAe <? Boh Ca e osehoe ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:31/14/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:AMOL Meet No/Date:17/85Approved PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. ALC3/2018 LTD. 10.01.2019 HQ File ~RLA File Lic.No/Date:1310049113 :01/85/050/00150/AM19/ :13/24/040/00108/AM19/ 25.10.2018

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms for the above advance authorization as per recommendation of Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2, = allowing the inputs as under :

Export Item

L-Arginine Granular Blend N-Cap 1 Kg/Kg (Containing 96% L-Arginine) Import Item L-Arginine HCL 99% Crystalline Powder _| 0.9696 Kg

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Item

L-Arginine Granular Blend N-Cap 1 Kg/Kg (Containing 96% L-Arginine) Import Item L-Arginine HCL 99% Crystalline Powder _| 0.9696 Kg

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:20/14/85Party Name: HAMILTON Meet No/Date:17/85- _ Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 HOUSEWARES PVT.LTD, (ALC3/2018 10.01.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10823252 Defer :01/85/050/00139/AM19/ :03/94/040/00468/AM 19/ 24.08.2018 Date:21.02.2019

[:NC][considered][the][case] as per agenda and noted that the online data of the "[Decision] applications was not available. Hence, the Committee decided to circulate copy of the application manually among the Technical Authorities for examination in the next meeting.

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- } ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [130 x 105] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- » Vp & Vhegieot 3Od lteaSicetree” MSof &GLB asCoGKae [Aes] oet ao"ss % 4 Ce Ga iO” Ox oe ve0? ----- End of picture text -----

Manual Agenda

Case No. M-157 Name of the firm: M/s Meet No/Date:17/85Status:Deferred FERRERO INDIA PV ated LTD. hee HQ File : Defer 01/85/050/125/AM14/DES.VI Date:21.02.2019 (Vol.IV) Subject:Modification of already fixed ad-hoc input output norms in respect of 22 Advance Authorizations obtained by M/s Ferrero India Pvt. Ltd. (List of 22 AAs are given below) rSNo.[Hg.F.No.—~—~—~—~—~—|Advance Authorisation Nos. anddate__ | 4. |01/85/050/00134/AM16/| [5 _|01/85/050/0003 1 079863632/AM16/|Dated:03.09.2015 F 6. |01/85/050/00 0310 79961080102280/AM Dated: 2115 .1 0.20152.20156/|| 8. 01/85/050/00003108 0 33738/AM17/|Dated:16.03.2016 F9._|01/85/050/00009/AM17/__|0310803375 Dated:16.03.2016

Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Authority of MoFPI has informed that their Technical Team is examining the cases of the firm. The Committee also observed that the firm has some more AAs pending for fixation of norms. The Committee therefore, decided to send all the remaining 30 AAs of the firm to MoFPI to examine and furnish comments so that the Committee can take decision in all the AAs. The case stands deferred to 21.02.2019 oe. oth aea yyeeKS oea

==> picture [82 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- CNET ATO ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [413 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

[82 x 12] intentionally omitted <==**

----- Start of picture text ----- CNET ATO ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [413 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. M-158 Name of the firm: | Meet No/Date:17/85- Status: M/sKashmir Walnuts ALC3/210.01.2 01 98 Approved ----- End of picture text -----

HQ File :F.No. 01/85/17 1/00040/AM19/DES. VI

;

Subject: Fixation of adhoc norms for export of Walnut Kernels (Chandler Variety) against import of Walnuts in Shell (Chandler Variety) under Para 4.06 of FTP, 2015-20 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments of Ministry of Food Processing Industries furnished vide OM No.E-14/10/2015-EDdated 01.01.2019 . The Committee further noted that on the basis of internet source (www.chandlerwalnuts.cum) norms for export of chandler walnut kernels against import of chandler walnuts of some other firm has been fixed in the Meeting No.2/19 dated 23.05.2018. Hence the Committee decided not to allow wastage on moisture loss and transportation loss and approved the norms allowing the following inputs Export Item Walnut Kernels (Chandler Variety) 49.00 Kg

Import Items Walnuts in Shell (Chandler Variety) 100.00 Kg

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No. M-159 Name of the firm: Meet No/Date:17/85Status: ALC3/2018 Approved M/sSetia Overseas _'!0.01.2019

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

t consequential action accordingly.

Case No. M-159 Name of the firm: Meet No/Date:17/85Status: ALC3/2018 Approved M/sSetia Overseas _'!0.01.2019

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

HQ File :F.No. 01/85/171/00045/AM19/DES. VI

==> picture [446 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

Items Walnuts in Shell (Chandler Variety) 100.00 Kg \ RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. | fostye AEROOra ~— hee OES ach

==> picture [446 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No. M-160|Name|of the firm:|Meet|Status:|
|M/s Hemraj|No/Date:17/85-|Rejected|
|:|ALC3/2018|
|Industries|Pvt.|Ltd.|10.01.2019|
|HQ|File No.|RLA File No.|AA No.|
|01/85/05/00069/|AM16/DES.VI|02/24/040/00017/|AM16|0210205810|dated 19.05.2015|

----- End of picture text -----

Subject: Fixation of adhoc norms for above mentioned Advance Authorisationsfor export of “Deoiled Rice Bran Extraction” against Import of “Rice Bran” obtained by M/s Hemraj Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm vide letter No. Nil, dated 28.11.2018 has stated that they have submitted the cancellation application against the above mentioned AA in the O/o Joint Director General of Foreign Trade (JDGFT), Kolkata vide letter dated 11.06.2015. However, copy of the same has not been provided. The Committee therefore, decided to reject the case with direction to RA, Kolkata to take consequential action accordingly.

==> picture [417 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No. M-161, 162 & 163|Name|of the firm:|Meet|Status:|
|M/s Hemraj|No/Date:17/85-|Rejected|
|:|ALC3/2018|
|Industries|Pvt.|Ltd.|10.01.2019|
|‘HQ File No.|RLA File No.|AA No.|

--|---|---|---| |Case No. M-161, 162 & 163|Name|of the firm:|Meet|Status:| |M/s Hemraj|No/Date:17/85-|Rejected| |:|ALC3/2018| |Industries|Pvt.|Ltd.|10.01.2019| |‘HQ File No.|RLA File No.|AA No.|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


01/85/05/00165/ AM16/DES.VI 92/24/040/00167/ AM16 0210206342 dated 14.12.2015 01/85/05/00058/ AM16/DES.VI 02/24/040/ 00041 / AM16 0210205882 dated 12.06.2015 01/85/05/00039/ AM17/DES.VI 0210206758 dated 15.06.2016 a he cera eee 02/24/040/00047/ AM17 . 

Subject: Fixation of adhoc norms for above mentioned Advance Authorisationsfor export of “Deoiled Rice Bran Extraction” against Import of “Rice Bran” obtained by M/s Hemraj Industries Pvt. Ltd. 

Decision :Committee noted that the firm M/s Hemraj Industries Pvt. Ltd. aggrieved by the earlier decision on fixation of Input Output norms in respect of above mentioned AAs, have represented for a review against the earlier decisions of the Norms Committee in the above mentioned cases: 

2 Committee during its deliberations noted that: 

The aforesaid Advance Authorisations have been issued under Para 4.07 (i) & (ii) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20, on self-declaration basis, which states that “(a) Regional Authority may also issue Advance Authorisation where there is no SION/valid Ad hoc Norms for an export product or where,SION / Ad hoc norms have —_

eclaration basis, which states that “(a) Regional Authority may also issue Advance Authorisation where there is no SION/valid Ad hoc Norms for an export product or where,SION / Ad hoc norms have —_ 

been notified / published but exporter intends to use additional inputs in the manufacturing process, based on self-declaration by applicant. Wastage so claimed shall be subject to wastage norms as decided by Norms Committee. The applicant shall submit an undertaking to abide by decision of Norms Committee. The provisions in this regard are given in paragraph 4.03 and 4.11 of FTP. (b) In case of revision / rejection, applicant shall pay duty and interest as notified by DoR within thirty days from the date of hosting of Norms Committee decision on DGFT website.” 

ii. 

(a) Advance Authorisation Scheme under Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 also states that a “Minimum value addition required to be achieved under Advance Authorisation is 15%. (b) Export Products where value addition could be less than 15% are given in Appendix 4D.” On perusal of Appendix 4D, it is noted that a lower value addition is only prescribed for only 2 items i.e. Copper Anode etc. and certain specified petroleum products.

5% are given in Appendix 4D.” On perusal of Appendix 4D, it is noted that a lower value addition is only prescribed for only 2 items i.e. Copper Anode etc. and certain specified petroleum products. 

iii. While processing Rice Bran (the duty free raw material imported by the firm from Bangladesh under the Advance Authorisation), the main product which is obtained is the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and as a by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction is generated. Firm in their submissions dated 31.10.2018 has also stated that they have not exported the main product ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and this has been sold in the domestic market. 

iv. The firm after processing the duty free input i.e. Rice Bran has exported the by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extractionto fulfil the export obligation commitment under the Advance Authorisation Scheme.

## 3. The Committee further noted that: 

i) In its earlier meetings as detailed in Para 1 above, the Committee has rejected the cases for fixation of Input Output Norms as the technical opinion given to Committee observed that it is not possible to achieve a 15% Value Addition after rice bran oil extraction from the duty free imported rice bran; 

- ii) The firm has requested for a review of the earlier decision and has stated in their submissions that there is no restriction or Policy violation for sale of extracted Rice Bran Oil in the domestic market as it fetches a higher price in the Indian market compared to the international market. 

iii) While obtaining the Advance Authorisation for import of duty free ‘Rice Bran’ the firm was well aware that export of ‘Rice Bran Oil/is eS ainsi Na will need to 

adhere to the parameters of the Advance Authorisation Scheme by only exporting the by-product generated i.e. DORB. Further, they also agreed and declared in their application to achieve a minimum 15% value addition from export of DORB. iv) The investigations of DRI are pending against the subject Advance Authorisations and also observed that the matter is subjudice in Hon’ble High Court at Kolkata;

e addition from export of DORB. iv) The investigations of DRI are pending against the subject Advance Authorisations and also observed that the matter is subjudice in Hon’ble High Court at Kolkata; 

4. The Committee also noted that vide OM No.14011 /14/2016-ID dated 28.08.2018, MoFPI has recommended import of 1.11 MT “Rice Bran” & 2.30 Ltr. “Hexane” for export of 1 MT of Deoiled Rice Bran extraction. It was noted that the firm, in its revised submissions, did not give any information to the query raised by the Committee regarding the domestic sale price of the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ which is an important criteria for arriving at the IO norms [for offsetting the saleable wastage or by-product generated during the production process from the duty free entitlements].Rice Bran oil is the best quality vegetable oil with high vitamin E content and has a considerable high price as compared to other edible oils, 

i) The Committee deliberated the issue again regarding fixation of Input Output Norms based on the revised submissions, the extant FTP/HBP provisions and the advice of the MoFPI and other technical representatives present in the meeting. It was noted that India is one of the largest producer and exporter of rice in the world. Rice, when it is milled, rice bran, a by-product of rice consisting of the outer layer of the kernels is obtained. Rice bran is further processed for its oil and DORB/ meal and sufficient domestic availability of Rice Bran is there.

n, a by-product of rice consisting of the outer layer of the kernels is obtained. Rice bran is further processed for its oil and DORB/ meal and sufficient domestic availability of Rice Bran is there. It was also noted that primary purpose of extraction is rice bran oil and Rice bran oil is known for its nutritional superiority and better protection of heart.This oil is also suitable for high temperature cooking. 

After crude oil has been extracted from rice bran, De-Oiled Rice Bran (DORB) is obtained. DORB is widely used in the manufacture ofCattle feed,Poultry feed,Fish feed, as fuel for boilers and used for manufacturing sodium silicate, silica gel, insulation bricks, etc. (using fully burnt white ash of husk). 

ii) The Committee also noted that a Standard Input Output Norm (SION) has already been notified under E39 for export of Rice Bran extraction which reads as under: 

**==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
|<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


iii) E39 iv) For Export of 1 MT ofjiv) Duty free Import of 5.9 Litres ‘Rice Bran Extraction’ of Hexane is allowed 

It was observed that SION E39 [notified in 2004}/\does aiiSporeeseimport of duty free CEB eatpov aman TOT 12

1 MT ofjiv) Duty free Import of 5.9 Litres ‘Rice Bran Extraction’ of Hexane is allowed 

It was observed that SION E39 [notified in 2004}/\does aiiSporeeseimport of duty free CEB eatpov aman TOT 12 

| ‘Rice Bran’. Other similar SIONs like E14[Deviled Sal seed cake], E37 [Rape Seed extraction], E42 [Soya Extraction] also allow only Hexane as a duty free input/raw material. | However, exports continue to happen based on market dynamics. | iii) The Committee also noted the submissions of the firm that under Para 4.49 (b) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20 any shortfall in Value Addition can be regularized by | | Payment of a fee equivalent to 1% of shortfall in FOB value in Indian Rupee. However a | plain reading of Para 4.49 HBPv1 clearly indicates that this Provision is only applicable in cases of bonafide default and not in situations where Value Addition is achieved by 4 misrepresentation in the initial application or possible overvaluation of exports. | After discussions and based on inputs as indicated above, the Committee came to a | conclusion that Minimum Value Addition of 15% or more shown in the Advance | sale] from the duty free imported rice bran.

discussions and based on inputs as indicated above, the Committee came to a | conclusion that Minimum Value Addition of 15% or more shown in the Advance | sale] from the duty free imported rice bran. It is assumed that SION E39 and other, | Authorisation application is technically not feasible after oil extraction [and its domestic, | similar SIONs listed in Para 4 (ii) above also does not allow duty free import of Rice| | Bran for export of Rice Bran Extraction [and other similar Bran which contains Sal Oil or | Rape Seed Oil or Soya Oil] on the premise that the production processes or the technology involved in such oil extraction will not meet the desired minimum value addition criteria as only the by-product or waste generated i.e. the deoiled cake is being. || exported. Moreover, the firm has enjoyed the benefit of Customs duty exemption on | | importation of rice bran and sold the rice bran oil, obtained after extraction in the domestic market. The duty exemption benefit thus gets passed on to ‘rice bran oil’ | which has not been exported and leads to undue enrichment of the firm and is not in. | line with Policy Provisions. Committee therefore decided that the Advance | Authorisation issued to the firm do not meet the basic parameters of the Scheme as | prescribed in Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy and need to be cancelled ab-initio and | guidelines laid down in this regard. | the firm will regularize the cases by payment of Customs duty and interest as per | 

19

4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy and need to be cancelled ab-initio and | guidelines laid down in this regard. | the firm will regularize the cases by payment of Customs duty and interest as per | 

19 

6. Committee also noted that firm has in its later submissions stated that a value addition | of 50% has actually been achieved by them by only exporting deoiled rice bran. 

| andextraction. take suitable action Concerned RA in this to examine regard. possible irregularities on €xport valuation, if any | may take subsequent consequential action accordingly, | 

Date:21.01.2019 Place:New (Pradyumna Sahu) Delhi Foreign Trade Development Officer Wagfreer san/PRADYUMNA rears often§ HUey orelgn Trade Development Officer Directorio Canara VERT afer PTT Deptt. of Commerce Udyog Bhawan tees, 

20

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 9619 --apply.