IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE

RATIFIED MINUTES OF THE NORMS COMMITTEE-VI MEETING NO.16/85

Please Note

(1) For information of exporters, Norms Committee-VI handles all cases pertaining to fixation/ratification of norms for Export Products falling under ITC(HS) Chapter 1 to 26 & 94-98. Communications in respect of casespertaining to NC-VI may be sent to email address:
(ii) p.sahu@gov.inIn certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the recommendations/ observations/ deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The concerned firm/company may gO through the same and respond
(iii) accordingly.Similarly, a scanned copy of the blank Standard Deficiency Format, which may find a reference in NC decisions, has also been attached in the end. This may also be referred to by the concerned firm/company and may be responded accordingly.
(iv) For information of the exporters, it is informed that wherever DL is issued, the case would be rejected in case the reply of the firm is not received within 90 days from the date of issue of DL.
(v) The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspect/wastage norms. While redeeming the applications, RAs should check that the applicant has fulfilled all requirements as prescribed in policy/procedure including those in Policy Circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for issuance of AA and regularization of the case.

==> picture [452 x 195] intentionally omitted <==

ng those in Policy Circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for issuance of AA and regularization of the case.

==> picture [452 x 195] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- The Meeting No. 16/85 dated 27.12.2018 of Norms Committee-VI for the year 2018- 19 was held on 03.01.2019 under the Chairmanship of Shri Anil Aggarwal, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the following applications for ratification of norms in respect of advance authorizations under Duty Exemption Scheme (Chapter-4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020. The following members were present in the meeting:- Name & Designation Department Shri Himanshu Rajput, Research Associate, IIFPT ee 2 Shri Shaish Kumar, Technical Expert |DGFT (Consultant)/Tech1 3 Shri D.N. Mathur, Technical Expert |DGFT (Consultant)/Tech2 ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [128 x 16] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- f ooo" Tr0se ee A ie sa bo ----- End of picture text -----

d of picture text -----**

==> picture [128 x 16] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- f ooo" Tr0se ee A ie sa bo ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:8/16/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:MIKI RUBBER Meet No/Date:16/85Approved INDUSTRIES, ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3010102956 | -01/85/050/00162/AM19/ -30/24/040/00012/AM15/ 23.06.2014 | Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA as applied for by the firm, as per written comments of Technical Authority. Export Item Mattress/Pillows made of natural rubber | 3000 Kg latex ImportNaturalItem rubber latex (60% DRC Wet) ig a RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

‘Case No.:7/13/85-ALC3/2015 Party Name:NAVYUG AGRO Meet No/Date:16/85Rejected [INDUSTRIES PRIVATE ALC3/2018 | LIMITED 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:02 10205983 -01/85/050/00103/AM16/ -(2/24/040/00062/AM 16/ 15.07.2015 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and during its deliberations noted that;

7.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:02 10205983 -01/85/050/00103/AM16/ -(2/24/040/00062/AM 16/ 15.07.2015 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and during its deliberations noted that;

i) The aforesaid Advance Authorisation has been issued under Para 4.07 (i) & (ii) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20, on self-declaration basis, which states that “(a) Regional Authority may also issue Advance Authorisation where there is no SION/valid Ad hoc Norms for an export product or where SION / Ad hoc norms have | been notified / published but exporter intends to use additional inputs in the 2 manufacturing process, based on self-declaration by applicant. Wastage so claimed shall be subject to wastage norms as decided by Norms Committee. The applicant shall submit an undertaking to abide by decision of Norms Committee. The provisions in this regard are given in paragraph 4.03 and 4.11 of FTP. | (b) In case of revision / rejection, applicant shall pay duty and interest as notified by DoR within thirty days from the date of hosting of Norms Committee decision on DGFT website.” ii) (a) Advance Authorisation Scheme under Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 also states that a “Minimum value addition required to be achieved under Advance Authorisation is 15%. (b) Export Products where value addition could be less than 15%oP are given in ELE as

5-20 also states that a “Minimum value addition required to be achieved under Advance Authorisation is 15%. (b) Export Products where value addition could be less than 15%oP are given in ELE as

Appendix 4D.” On perusal of Appendix 4D, it is noted that a lower value addition is only prescribed for only 2 items i.e. Copper Anode etc. and certain specified petroleum products. iii) While processing Rice Bran (the duty free raw material imported by the firm from Bangladesh under the Advance Authorisation), the main product which ‘s obtained is the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and as a by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction is generated. Firm in their submissions dated 31.10.2018 has also stated that they have not exported the main product ‘Rice Bran Oi and this has been sold in the domestic market. iv) The firm after processing the duty free input i.e. Rice Bran has exported the by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction to fulfil the export obligation commitment under the Advance Authorisation Scheme. 2.

er processing the duty free input i.e. Rice Bran has exported the by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction to fulfil the export obligation commitment under the Advance Authorisation Scheme. 2. The Committee further noted that: i) In its earlier meetings as detailed in Para 1 above, the Committee has rejected the cases of some other firms with same import/export items, for fixation of Input Output Norms as the technical opinion given to Committee observed that, it is not possible to achieve a 15% Value Addition after rice bran oil extraction from the duty free imported rice bran; il) The firm has stated that there is no restriction or Policy violation for sale of extracted Rice Bran Oil in the domestic market as it fetches a higher price in the Indian market compared to the international market. iii) While obtaining the Advance Authorisation for import of duty free ‘Rice Bran’ the firm was well aware that export of ‘Rice Bran Oil’ is - Prohibited and they will need to adhere to the parameters of the Advance Authorisation Scheme by only exporting the by-product generated i.e. DORB. Further, they also agreed and declared in their application to achieve a minimum 15% value addition from export of DORB. 3 The Committee also noted that vide letter No. 14011/4/2016-ED dated 27.08.2018 MoFPI has recommended import of 1.11 MT of duty free Rice Bran & 2.30 Litres of Hexane for export of 1 MT of Deoiled Rice Bran extraction.

noted that vide letter No. 14011/4/2016-ED dated 27.08.2018 MoFPI has recommended import of 1.11 MT of duty free Rice Bran & 2.30 Litres of Hexane for export of 1 MT of Deoiled Rice Bran extraction. It was noted that the firm, in its submissions, did not give any information to the query raised by the Committee regarding the domestic sale price of the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ which is an important criteria for arriving at the IO norms [for offsetting the saleable wastage or by-product generated during the production process from the duty free entitlements].Rice Bran oil is the best quality vegetable oil with, high vitamin E

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

content and has a considerable high price as compared to other edible oils. | 1) The Committee deliberated the issue again regarding fixation of Input Output Norms based on the revised submissions, the extant FTP/HBP provisions and the advice of the MoFPI and other technical representatives present in the meeting. It was noted that India is one of the largest producer and exporter of tice in the world. Rice, when it is milled, rice bran, a by-product of rice consisting of the outer layer of the kernels is obtained. Rice bran is further processed for its oil and DORB/meal and sufficient domestic availability of

is milled, rice bran, a by-product of rice consisting of the outer layer of the kernels is obtained. Rice bran is further processed for its oil and DORB/meal and sufficient domestic availability of

Rice Bran is there. il) It was also noted that primary purpose of extraction is rice bran oil and Rice bran oil is known for its nutritional superiority and better protection of heart.This oil is also suitable for high temperature cooking. ili) After crude oil has been extracted from rice bran, De-Oiled Rice Bran | (DORB) is obtained. DORB is widely used in the manufacture of Cattle feed, Poultry feed, Fish feed, as fuel for boilers and used for manufacturing sodium silicate, silica gel, insulation bricks, etc. (using fully burnt white ash of husk).

| iv) The Committee also noted that a Standard Input Output Norm (SION) has already been notified under E39 for export of Rice Bran extraction which reads as under:

‘Rice Bran Extraction’ Hexane is allowed : It was observed that SION E39 [notified in 2004] does not allow import of duty free ‘Rice Bran’. Other similar SIONs like E14 [Deoiled Sal seed cake], E37 [Rape Seed extraction], E42 [Soya Extraction] also allow only Hexane as a duty free input/raw material. However, exports continue to happen based on market dynamics. v) The Committee also noted the submissions of the firm that under Para 4.49 (b) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20 any shortfall in Value Addition can be regularized by payment of a fee equivalent to 1% of shortfall in FOB value in Indian Rupee.

the firm that under Para 4.49 (b) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20 any shortfall in Value Addition can be regularized by payment of a fee equivalent to 1% of shortfall in FOB value in Indian Rupee. However a plain reading.of Para 4.49 HBPv1 clearly endicntes! 1 enchant Z ff] i ope ;

that this provision is only applicable in cases of bonafide default and not in situations where Value Addition is achieved by misrepresentation in the initial application or possible overvaluation of exports.

After discussions and based on inputs as indicated above, the Committee came to a conclusion that Minimum Value Addition of 15% or more shown in the Advance Authorisation application is technically not feasible after oil extraction [and its domestic sale] from the duty free imported rice bran. It is assumed that SION E39 and other similar SIONs listed in Para 3 (iv) above also does not allow duty free import of Rice Bran for export of Rice Bran Extraction [and other similar Bran which contains Sal Oil or Rape Seed Oil or Soya Oil] on the premise that the production processes or the technology involved in such oil extraction will not meet the desired minimum value addition criteria as only the by-product or waste generated i.e. the deoiled cake is being exported. Moreover, the firm has enjoyed the benefit of Customs duty exemption on importation of rice bran and sold the ‘rice bran oil’ obtained after extraction in the domestic market.

cake is being exported. Moreover, the firm has enjoyed the benefit of Customs duty exemption on importation of rice bran and sold the ‘rice bran oil’ obtained after extraction in the domestic market. The duty exemption benefit thus gets passed on to ‘rice bran oil’, which has not been exported & leads to undue enrichment of the firm and is not in line with Policy provisions. Committee therefore decided that the Advance Authorisations issued to the firm do not meet the basic parameters of the Scheme as prescribed in Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy and need to be cancelled ab-initio and the firm will regularize all the cases by payment of Customs duty and interest as per guidelines laid down in this regard. 5. Committee also noted that firm has in its later submissions stated that a value addition of 50% has actually been achieved by them by only exporting deoiled rice bran extraction. Concerned RA to examine possible irregularities on export valuation, if any and take suitable action in this regard.

Keeping the above view in facts, the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to the Company to pay applicable duty with interest for regularization of the case.

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

3 Case No.:8/5/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:GRIFFITH bs “Meet No/Date:16/85="

Status: Deferred

ith interest for regularization of the case.

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

3 Case No.:8/5/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:GRIFFITH bs “Meet No/Date:16/85="

Status: Deferred

LABORATORIES PVT.LTD, ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710109123 Defer ':01/85/050/00036/AM19/ '-07/24/040/00284/AM16/ 103.12.2015 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NCconsidered the case as per agenda and noted that the reply of the firm has been forwarded to Technical Authority, ie.. MoFPI for examination and comments. The comments is still awaited. The Committee decided to request the TA, i.e., MoFPI, to furnish comments at the earliest. | The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

Case No.:9/5/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:GRIFFITH Meet No/Date:16/85- _ Status:Deferred LABORATORIES PVT.LTD, ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710109124 Defer :0.1/85/050/00037/AM 19/ -07/24/040/00283/AM 16/ 03.12.2015 Date:07.02.2019[:NCconsidered][the][case][as][per][agenda and][noted][that][the][reply][of][ the][firm][has] 4[Decision] been forwarded to Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI for examination and comments. The comments is still awaited. The Committee decided to request the TA, i.e., MoFPI, to furnish comments at the earliest.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

oFPI for examination and comments. The comments is still awaited. The Committee decided to request the TA, i.e., MoFPI, to furnish comments at the earliest.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

‘CaseNo.:41/11/85-<br>ALC3/2018	‘Party Name:BELOOR BAYIR MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>BIOTECHLTD,<br>ALC3/2018<br>27.12.2018	Status:Deferred
HQFile<br>:01/85/050/00109/AM19/<br>Decision:NCconsidered	RLA File<br>~~"<br>ig.No/Date:0710109256 <br>-07/24/040/00344/AM16/<br>12.01.2016<br>thecaseasperagendaandnotedthatthereply	Defer<br>Date:07.02.2019<br>ofthefirmis

5 Decision :NCconsidered the case as per agenda and noted that the reply of the firm is under examination of the Technical Authority, 1.e., Tech.2. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

Case No.:2/6/85-ALC3/2016 Party Name:KAMALA Meet No/Date:16/85Status: Deferred CONSUMER CARE PVT ALC3/2018 LTD 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:0910063332 Defer :(.1/85/050/00029/AM17/ -(09/24/040/00501/AM16/ 29.02.2016 Date:07.02.2019 6 Decision :NCconsidered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI had furnished their comments. However, the Committee decided to seek more information from the firm and as such the firm has been issued DL on 02.01.2019. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm. The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019 hz _gsPvateot

k more information from the firm and as such the firm has been issued DL on 02.01.2019. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm. The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019 hz _gsPvateot

Case No.:32/11/85~~ [Party Name:BELOOR BAYIR (Meet No/Date:16/85_ Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECH LTD, ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710109518 Defer :01/85/050/00100/AM19/ :07/24/040/00407/AM 16/ 15.03.2016 Date:07.02.2019 7 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the reply of the firm is under examination of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

Case No.:17/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:INTERNATIONAL Meet No/Date:16/85Approved FREEZFISH EXPORTS ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date: 1010059433 :01/85/050/00085/AM 19/ :10/24/040/00122/AM16/ 21.03.2016

Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA’ as per comments of the Central Institute of Fisheries Technology vide letter No. 1(7)/FP/Sion/18 date 22.11.2018 allowing the following inputs;

Export Item

Frozen Sardine Whole Round IQF 204300 Kg

==> picture [146 x 25] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ImportBlock FrozenItem Sardine Whole ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [101 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- pe ee ----- End of picture text -----

RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:13/6/85-ALC3/2016 Party Name:NAVYUG AGRO Meet No/Date:16/85Rejected INDUSTRIES PRIVATE ALC3/2018 LIMITED 27.12.2018 ~ Lic.No/Date:02 10206722 HQ File RLA File :01/85/050/00040/AM17/ :02/24/040/00037/AM17/ 31.05.2016

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and during its deliberations noted that;

;

i) The aforesaid Advance Authorisation has been issued under Para 4.07 (i) & (ii) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20, on self-declaration basis, which states that

“(a) Regional Authority may also issue Advance Authorisation where there is no SION/valid Ad hoc Norms for an export product or where SION / Ad hoc norms have been notified / published but exporter inte ds to use additignaliP. EN inputs in the

| manufacturing process, based on self-declaration by applicant. Wastage so claimed shall be subject to wastage norms as decided by Norms Committee. The applicant shall submit an undertaking to abide by decision of Norms Committee. The provisions in this regard are given in paragraph 4.03 and 4.11 of FTP.

ge norms as decided by Norms Committee. The applicant shall submit an undertaking to abide by decision of Norms Committee. The provisions in this regard are given in paragraph 4.03 and 4.11 of FTP.

(b) In case of revision / rejection, applicant shall pay duty and interest as notified by DoR within thirty days from the date of hosting of Norms Committee decision on DGFT website.”

ii) (a) Advance Authorisation Scheme under Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 also states that a “Minimum value addition required to be achieved under Advance Authorisation is 15%. (b) Export Products where value addition could be less than 15% are given in Appendix 4D.” On perusal of Appendix 4D, it is noted that a lower value addition is only prescribed for only 2 items i.e. Copper Anode ete. and certain specified petroleum products.

ili) While processing Rice Bran (the duty free raw material imported by the firm from Bangladesh under the Advance Authorisation), the main product which is obtained is the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and as a by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction is generated. Firm in their submissions dated 31.10.2018 has also stated that they have not exported the main product ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and this has been sold in the domestic market.

DORB] extraction is generated. Firm in their submissions dated 31.10.2018 has also stated that they have not exported the main product ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and this has been sold in the domestic market.

iv) The firm after processing the duty free input ie. Rice Bran has exported the by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction to fulfil the export obligation commitment under the Advance Authorisation Scheme. 2. The Committee further noted that: i) In its earlier meetings as detailed in Para 1 above, the Committee has rejected the cases of some other firms with same import/export items, for fixation of Input Output Norms as the technical opinion given to Committee observed that it is not possible to achieve a 15% Value Addition after rice bran oil extraction from the duty free imported rice bran; ii) The firm has stated that there is no restriction or Policy violation for sale of extracted Rice Bran Oil in the domestic market as it fetches a higher price in the Indian market compared to the international market. iii) | While obtaining the Advance Authorisationff} for eoyee ect cot duty free ‘Rice

in the domestic market as it fetches a higher price in the Indian market compared to the international market. iii) | While obtaining the Advance Authorisationff} for eoyee ect cot duty free ‘Rice

Bran’ the firm was well aware that export of ‘Rice Bran Oil’ is - Prohibited and they will need to adhere to the parameters of the Advance Authorisation Scheme by only exporting the by-product generated i.e. DORB. Further, they also agreed and declared in their application to achieve a minimum 15% value addition from export of DORB. 3. The Committee also noted that vide letter No. 14011/4/2016-ED dated 27.08.2018 MoFPI has recommended import of 1.11 MT of duty free Rice Bran & 2.30 Litres of Hexane for export of 1 MT of Deoiled Rice Bran extraction. It was noted that the firm, in its submissions, did not give any information to the query raised by the Committee regarding the domestic sale price of the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ which is an important criteria for arriving at the IO norms [for offsetting the saleable wastage or by-product generated during the production process from the duty free entitlements].Rice Bran oil is the best quality vegetable oil with high vitamin E content and has a considerable high price as compared to other edible oils. i) The Committee deliberated the issue again regarding fixation of Input Output | Norms based on the revised submissions, the extant FTP/HBP provisions and the advice of the MoFPI and other technical representatives present in the meeting. It was noted that India is one of the largest producer and exporter of rice in the world.

nt FTP/HBP provisions and the advice of the MoFPI and other technical representatives present in the meeting. It was noted that India is one of the largest producer and exporter of rice in the world. Rice, when it is milled, rice bran, a by-product of rice, consisting of the outer layer of the kernels is obtained. Rice bran is further processed for its oil and DORB/meal and sufficient domestic availability of Rice Bran is there. ii) It was also noted that primary purpose of extraction is rice bran oil and Rice bran oil is known for its nutritional superiority and better protection of heart.This oil is also suitable for high temperature cooking. iii) After crude oil has been extracted from rice bran, De-Oiled Rice Bran (DORB) is obtained. DORB is widely used in the manufacture of Cattle feed, Poultry feed, Fish feed, as fuel for boilers and used for manufacturing sodium silicate, silica gel. insulation bricks, etc. (using fully burnt white ash of husk). iv) The Committee also noted that a Standard Input Output Norm (SION) has, already been notified under E39 for export of Rice Bran extraction which reads as under:

E39 For Export of 1 MT of Duty free Import of 5.9 Litres of ‘Rice Bran Extraction’ Hexane is allowed A POO ve ree ane a ae gn ato! ofS COM, 9 Fo DeeSoo ert g Epo

extraction which reads as under:

E39 For Export of 1 MT of Duty free Import of 5.9 Litres of ‘Rice Bran Extraction’ Hexane is allowed A POO ve ree ane a ae gn ato! ofS COM, 9 Fo DeeSoo ert g Epo

It was observed that SION E39 [notified in 2004] does not allow import of duty free ‘Rice Bran’. Other similar SIONs like E14 [Deoiled Sal seed cake], E37 [Rape Seed extraction], E42 [Soya Extraction] also allow only Hexane as a duty free input/raw material. However, exports continue to happen based on market dynamics.

v) The Committee also noted the submissions of the firm that under Para 4.49 (b) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20 any shortfall in Value Addition can be regularized by payment of a fee equivalent to 1% of shortfall in FOB value in Indian Rupee. However a plain reading of Para 4.49 HBPv1 clearly indicates that this provision is only applicable in cases of bonafide default and not in situations where Value Addition is achieved by misrepresentation in the initial application or possible overvaluation of exports. 4. After discussions and based on inputs as indicated above, the Committee came to a conclusion that Minimum Value Addition of 15% or more shown in the Advance Authorisation application is technically not feasible after oil extraction [and its domestic sale] from the duty free imported rice bran.

at Minimum Value Addition of 15% or more shown in the Advance Authorisation application is technically not feasible after oil extraction [and its domestic sale] from the duty free imported rice bran. It is assumed that SION E39_ and other similar SIONs listed in Para 3 (iv) above also does not allow duty free import ofRice Bran for export of Rice Bran Extraction [and other similar Bran which contains Sal Oil or Rape Seed Oil or Soya Oil] on the premise that the production processes or the technology involved in such oil extraction will not meet the desired minimum value addition criteria as only the by-product or waste generated i.e. the deoiled cake is being exported. Moreover, the firm has enjoyed the benefit of Customs duty exemption on importation of rice bran and sold the ‘rice bran oil’ obtained after extraction in the domestic market. The duty exemption benefit thus gets passed on to ‘rice bran oil’, which has not been exported & leads to undue enrichment of the firm and is not in line with Policy provisions. Committee therefore decided that the Advance Authorisations issued to the firm do not meet the basic parameters of the Scheme as prescribed in Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy and need to be cancelled ab-initio and the firm will regularize all the cases by payment of Customs duty and interest as per guidelines laid down in this regard. 7. Committee also noted that firm has in its later submissions stated that a value addition of 50% has actually been a by them by only exporting deoiled rice

eee

bran extraction. Concerned RA to examine possible irregularities on export valuation, if any and take suitable action in this regard.

==> picture [438 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 5. Keeping the above view in facts, the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to the Company to pay applicable duty with interest for regularization of the case. ----- End of picture text -----

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:10/5/85Party Name:SYNTHITE Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 INDUSTRIES LIMITED ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File -'RLA File Lic.No/Date:1010059603 Defer :01/85/050/00038/AM19/ :10/24/040/00057/AM17/ 07.09.2016 ‘Date:07.02.2019 10 Decision :NCconsidered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under examination of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

==> picture [453 x 112] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:18/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:INDO GERMAN Meet No/Date:16/85- Approved ALKALOIDS ALC3/2018 | (27.12.2018 aie RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10809109 HQ File | !1 Decision:01/85/050/00086/AM19/:NC considered the:03/94/040/00729/AM17/ case as per agenda and decided10.11.2016to ratify the norms of the AA on Repeat Basis as stated by RA, Mumbai vide letter No. 03/94/40/729/AM17 dated 10.11.2016. ----- End of picture text -----

enda and decided10.11.2016to ratify the norms of the AA on Repeat Basis as stated by RA, Mumbai vide letter No. 03/94/40/729/AM17 dated 10.11.2016. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:4/2/85-ALC3/2017 Party Name:KAMALA Meet No/Date:16/85_ Status:Deferred CONSUMER CARE PVT ALC3/2018 LTD 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:09 10064530 Defer :01/85/050/00014/AM18/ ':09/24/040/00439/AM17/ 26.12.2016 Date:07.02.2019[:NCconsidered][the][case][as][per][agenda][and][noted][that][the][Technical][Authority,] -[Decision] i.e., MoFPlIhad furnished their comments. However, the Committee decided to seek more information from the firm and as such the firm has been issued DL on 02.01.2019. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

13 Case No.:9/2/85-ALC3/2017 _— Party Name:APEEJAY TEA

Meet No/Dater16/85Approved

==> picture [134 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- YFat othe 00ateorel not een Otero! ee ‘ot COCR wei ----- End of picture text -----

‘LIMITED, ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210207459 —:01/85/050/0001 9/AM18/ :02/24/040/00237/AM17/ 10.03.2017 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA allowing the following inputs;

Export Item Packaged Tea containing 55 kgs(net) | 17655 Numbers blended tea in each packet (60% imported tea blended with 40% local/Indian tea)

Import Item Tea: Green/Black tea

582615 Kg

The exporter should account for net quantity of green tea and black tea in export product. The grade, quality& origin of imported tea should match with the tea exported. Other regulations of FTP / HBP 2015-20 like Value Addition and Pre-import condition should also be complied with.

Case No.:7/11/85-ALC3/2018	PartyName:PREMIER<br>GLOBALCORPORATE<br>SOLUTIONS PRIVATE	MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>ALC3/2018<br>27.12.2018	Rejected	Rejected
	LIMITED
HQ File<br>~_RLA File<br>:01/85/050/00075/AM19/<br>:07/24/040/00080/AM18/<br>Decision:NCconsideredthecaseasperagenda		Lic.No/Date:0710111709<br>05.06.2017<br>andnotedthattheimport	item	i.e.,

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the import item i.e., 14 Ascorbic Acid is a vitamin, has been used for export of Dietary food supplement. Under Para 4.11(a)(ix) of FTP, 2015-20 Vitamins except for use in Pharmaceutical Industry are ineligible for import on Self Declaration basis. As such, the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to company to pay applicable duty with interest for regularisation of the case.

re ineligible for import on Self Declaration basis. As such, the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to company to pay applicable duty with interest for regularisation of the case.

Case No.:33/11/85Party Name:BELOOR BAYIR Meet No/Date:16/85__Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECH LTD ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:0710111717 Defer :01/85/050/00101/AM19/ :07/24/040/00074/AM 18/ 07.06.2017 Date:07.02.2019 15 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the reply of the firm is under examination of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2.

==> picture [455 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | or The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019 b. V4 oe: oyu ee, a jPR eas me ome? aX TOS HEF orelST oto? 12: FOS Saw, Mooneeiu. of ae wl ----- End of picture text -----

| or The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019 b. V4 oe: oyu ee, a jPR eas me ome? aX TOS HEF orelST oto? 12: FOS Saw, Mooneeiu. of ae wl ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:36/11/85Party Name:BELOOR BAYIR Meet No/Date:16/85Rejected ALC3/2018 BIOTECH LTD ALC3/2018 | 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:07 10111716 | :01/85/050/00104/AM19/ :07/24/040/00075/AM18/ 07.06.2017 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the import item i.¢., 16 Ascorbic Acid Powder which is vitamin C. has been used for export of vitamins as food supplements. Under Para 4.11(a)(ix) of FTP, 2015-20 Vitamins except for use in Pharmaceutical Industry are ineligible for import on Self Declaration basis. As such, the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to company to pay applicable duty with interest for regularisation of the case.

CaseNo.:3/4/85-ALC3/2017	PartyName:APEEJAYTEA<br>LIMITED,	‘MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>ALC3/2018<br>27.12.2018	Approved
HQFile<br>:01/85/050/00046/AM18/<br>Decision:NCconsidered	RLA File<br>:02/24/040/00048/AM18/<br>thecaseasperagendaand	Lic.No/Date:0210207679<br>13.06.2017<br>decidedtoratifythe	normsofthe

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA allowing the following inputs;

17 1. Import item at S.No.1 is allowed at Net to Net basis. 2. Import items at S.No. 2-7 are allowed as per Packaging Policy. 3. Import item at S.No. 8 is not allowed as flavouring item.

nputs;

17 1. Import item at S.No.1 is allowed at Net to Net basis. 2. Import items at S.No. 2-7 are allowed as per Packaging Policy. 3. Import item at S.No. 8 is not allowed as flavouring item.

The grade, quality& origin of imported tea should match with the tea exported. Other regulations of FTP /HBP 2015-20 like Value Addition and Pre-import condition should also be complied with.

Case No.:2/1/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:DUKES Meet No/Date:16/85Approved (CONSUMER CARE LIMITED ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:09 10065259 :01/85/050/00002/AM19/ -09/24/040/00119/AM18/ 07.07.2017 | Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms for the above advance authorization as per recommendation of Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI 1g vide O.M. No. 4/19/2013-DGFT dated 23.10.2018 allowing the inputs as under :

==> picture [432 x 113] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Export Item Quantity Import Item The ingredient wise (gm) usage quantity (gm) Maida Wheat Products ee ) [eee| ae /) _ _hFedElavours Ethyl Vanillin [Od ; MEI? oat BEC en as oC) <$eSaeeS Sate@eh ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [456 x 152] intentionally omitted <==

) [eee| ae /) _ _hFedElavours Ethyl Vanillin [Od ; MEI? oat BEC en as oC) <$eSaeeS Sate@eh ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [456 x 152] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Skimmed Milk Powder (aes Whey Powder Milk Protein 7) eee | Cocoa Mass (Cocoa Liquor) 2s eae Cocoa Butter i rae eae. Biobake (Enzyme) Food | Chocolate 100 Ingredients | | 1 Coated Waker Hazel Nut Paste Cf [ees] — Hyfoama (Milk Protein) i: [ae] | 4 containing Paper & Paper Board Packing | As per packaging Wafers Material polic ----- End of picture text -----

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:3/1/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:DUKES ~~ |Meet No/Date:16/85Approved CONSUMER CARE LIMITED ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 ets ~ IRLA File Lie. No/Date:09 10065258 af HQ File :01/85/050/00003/AM19/ :09/24/040/00118/AM18/ (07.07.2017 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms for the above advance authorization as per recommendation of Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI vide O.M. No. 4/19/2013-DGFT dated 23.10.2018 allowing the inputs as under :

==> picture [460 x 193] intentionally omitted <==

as per recommendation of Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI vide O.M. No. 4/19/2013-DGFT dated 23.10.2018 allowing the inputs as under :

==> picture [460 x 193] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | Export Item Quantity Import Item The ingredient wise BB (gm) usage quantity (gm) Maida Wheat Products =e 19 Food Flavours Ethyl Vanillin 1 =e Waters & er ee | Wafer Rolls ig | (Fruit Flavour) Pectin Vegetable thickner } eae CarrageenanFoodIngredient |O0_| Biobake (Enzyme) Food | Ingredients Paper & Paper Board As per packaging | -olicy 100 ----- End of picture text -----

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

==> picture [456 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- (Case No.:4/1/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:KAMALA : "Meet No/Date: 16/85- ; ‘Status:Deferred (CONSUMER CARE PVT ALC3/2018 20 LTD 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910065336 Defer = : 23aa :01/85/050/00004/AM19/ oe 08.08.2017 a Date:07.02.2019 /B VeROTSN 4 SlePain roleattoReratignnen* Wane ----- End of picture text -----

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI had furnished their comments. However, the Committee decided to seek more information from the firm and as such the firm has been issued DL on 02.01.2019. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

cided to seek more information from the firm and as such the firm has been issued DL on 02.01.2019. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

Case No.:5/1/85-ALC3/2018 |Party Name:‘KAMALA Meet No/Date:16/85—_ Status:Deferred ‘CONSUMER CARE PVT ALC3/2018 LTD 27.12.2018 HQ File ~RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910065337 Defer :01/85/050/00005/AM19/ :09/24/040/00126/AM18/ 08.08.2017 Date:07.02.2019[:][ NC][considered][the][case][as][per][ agenda][and][noted][that][the][Technical][Authority,] x1[Decision] ie., MoFPI had furnished their comments. However, the Committee decided to seek more information from the firm and as such the firm has been issued DL on 02.01.2019. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019

==> picture [454 x 111] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No.:5/11/85-|Party|Name:SHREE MALANI||Meet No/Date:16/85-|Status: Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|FOAMS PRIVATE LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|27.12.2018|
|HQ File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0910065610|Defer|||
|:01/85/050/00073/AM|19/|:09/24/040/00344/AM18/|27.10.2017|Date:07.02.2019|
|22|‘Decision|: NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|reply|of the|firm|is|
|under|examination|of|the|Technical|Authority,|i.e.,|Tech.1.|The|Committee|decided|to|
|wait|for the comments|of the|Technical|Authority,|i.e.,|Tech.1.|

----- End of picture text -----


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 

Case No.:3/9/85-ALC3/2017 Party Name:AVATAAR HOME Meet No/Date:16/85Approved FASHION PRIVATE ALC3/2018 LIMITED 27.12.2018 | Lic.No/Date:32 10078308 HQ File RLA File :01/85/050/00121/AM18/ :32/24/040/00032/AM18/ 21.11.2017 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms for the above advance authorization as per recommendation of Technical Authority, i.e., Textile Commissioner vide Letter No. 47(100)/RMG-2017/NC/Avatar dated 14.12.2018 ie allowing the inputs as under : 

Export Item Articles of Bedding and Cushions cover of 244730.500 Sq. Mtrs. various size No. Of pcs 176400 (containing 244730.50 Sq.Mtrs. of 100% | Pigment Printing Spun Polyester, Woven Fabric-200 GSM duly reflected in S/Bs certified by Customs - 

- poe 4 EFT AMMAT 0d° 

| 

Import Item 100 PCT Pigment Printing Spun Polyester 259414.30 Sq. Mtrs. Woven Fabric Width 50 to 52 inch 300 DTY 10S/I GSM 200 

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

T 0d° 

| 

Import Item 100 PCT Pigment Printing Spun Polyester 259414.30 Sq. Mtrs. Woven Fabric Width 50 to 52 inch 300 DTY 10S/I GSM 200 

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly. 

Case No.:37/11/85Party Name:BELOOR BAYIR Meet No/Date:16/85‘Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECH LTD, ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:07 10112473 Defer ~ 24 |:01/85/050/00105/AM19/Decision : NC considered:07/24/040/00234/AMthe case as per agenda18/ and30.11.2017noted that the replyDate:07.02.2019of the firm is under examination of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2. 


Case No.:13/10/85-ALC3/2017 Party Name:MANGLAM ARTS Meet No/Date:16/85Transferred ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 ~ “Lic.No/Date:13 10048805 HQ File |RLA File :01/85/050/00134/AM 18/ ':13/24/040/00042/AM18/ 11.12.2017 95 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5. which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather.

t, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5. which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather. 

Case No.:3/8/85-ALC3/2017 Party Name: MADHU Meet No/Date:16/85__ Status:Deferred JAYANTI INTERNATIONAL ALC3/2018 LTD., 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3210078336 Defer | :01/85/050/00101/AM18/ :32/24/040/00037/AM 18/ 12.12.2017 Date:07.02.2019 26 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm has been forwarded to Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI on 27.12.2018 for examination and comments. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of the Technical Authority. 


Case No.:28/10/85Party Name:PUSILIN Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2017 BIOTECHNOLOGY ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 27.12.2018 27 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0610038762 Defer :01/85/050/00149/AM18/ :06/24/040/00043/AM18/ 20.12.2017 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that_thesTechnical Team of 

B71 hgreget Ont. 

this Directorate had proposed to visit the manufacturing unit of the firm near Gurugram on 18.01.2019 to assess the quantum of enzymes used in the manufacturing process. The firm vide email dated 08.01.2019 informed that their Technical persons who are of Chinese origin are on leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during[|] the 1°' week of March, 2019.

n leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during[|] the 1°' week of March, 2019. 


Case No.:14/10/85-ALC3/2017 Party Name:AVATAAR HOME Meet No/Date:16/85Transferred FASHION PRIVATE ALC3/2018 LIMITED (27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3210078350 28 :01/85/050/00135/AM18/ :32/24/040/00038/AM18/ 26.12.2017 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather. 

```text
||CaseNo.:2/10/85-ALC3/2017||PartyName:ORIENTCRAFT<br>LIMITED|MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>ALC3/2018|‘Transferred||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||||27.12.2018|||
|29|HQ File<br>;<br>:01/85/050/00123/AM18/<br>Decision:NCconsidered|RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00508/AM18/<br>thecaseasperagendaand|Lic.No/Date:0510405286<br>10.01.2018<br>notedthattheexport/import|export/importitems|||

at, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather.

~~		CaseNo.:1/11/85-ALC3/2017	PartyName:FABRO<br>LEATHER INDUSTRIES LLP	MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>_—*Transferred<br>ALC3/2018
				'27.12.2018
	30	HQFile<br>:01/85/050/00151/AM18/<br>Decision:NCconsidered	RLA File<br>:13/24/040/00052/AM18/<br>thecaseasperagendaand	Lic.No/Date:1310048835<br>12.01.2018<br>notedthattheexport/importitems

Case No.:16/10/85Party Meet No/Date:16/85- __ Status:Deferred ALC3/2017 Name:LEELADISTILLERIES ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 27.12.2018 _ ~~ |Lie.No/Date:2510004912 Defer HQ File. 'RLA File 31 :01/85/050/00137/AM18/ :25/24/040/00009/AM18/ 23.01.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under examination of Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI and comments is awaited. The Committee decided to request the Technical Authority to expedite their comments. , sat th

= xe * OOM ear, 00°

==> picture [209 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

PI and comments is awaited. The Committee decided to request the Technical Authority to expedite their comments. , sat th

= xe * OOM ear, 00°

==> picture [209 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Fao" ae? xh ofar yn ML Or eE.g GOK) pe? at On oe ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:13/2/85Party Name:BAWA Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 FISHMEAL & OIL CO ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710112805 Defer :01/85/050/00022/AM19/ :07/24/040/00260/AM 18/ 09.02.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following information from the firm as proposed by the Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI vide OM 32 No. E-14011/15/2018-ED, dated 15.11.2018

| -® Process flow chart il) Detailed compositionof the imported and exported item clearly stating the difference between the export & import item iii) Requisite steps of processing along with technical justification of wastage at each processing step.

Case No.:2/11/85-ALC3/2017 Party Name:FASHION Meet No/Date: 16/85transferred ACCESSORIES ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:05 10405648 33 :01/85/050/00152/AM18/ :05/23/040/00427/AM 18/ 15.02.2018

at, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather.

‘Case No.:9/2/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:DRY TECH Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred PROCESSES (I)PVT.LTD; — ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 . .———s=—«ss«C<“‘«‘C HOFie A Phe ~~ \Lic.No/Date:0310819527 Defer :01/85/050/00018/AM19/ ':03/94/040/00922/AM18/ 05.03.2018 Date:07.02.2019 |

34 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm was issued DL on 10.10.2018 followed by reminders on 14.11.2018 and 26.12.2018. The reply of[the][firm] is still awaited. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm till next meeting.

Case No.:10/2/85Party Name:DRYTECH Meet No/Date: 16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 PROCESSES (1)PVT.LTD; ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310819595 Defer 35 :01/85/050/00019/AM19/ :03/94/040/00950/AM18/ 07.03.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under examination of Technical Authority, ie., MoFPI and comments is awaited. The Committee decided to request the Technical Authority to expeditea) their comments. mae is are! BG p ee ead? $i, Fih0OF AGore cok” =

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.

Case No.:1/7/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:AMOL Meet No/Date:16/85Approved PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. ALC3/2018 LTD. 27.12.2018 'HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:13 10048890 | 101/85/050/00044/AM19/ :13/24/040/00065/AM18/ 09.03.2018 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms for the above advance authorization as per recommendation of Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.2, i allowing the inputs as under :

Export Item L-Arginine Granular Blend N-Cap 1Kg | (Containing 96% L-Arginine) Import Item L-Arginine HCL 99% Crystalline Pwder 0.9696 Kg

RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:8/1/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:ESSEM Meet No/Date:16/85—_Status:Deferred TECNOPINZ PVT. LTD ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File “RLA File Lic.No/Date:3 110067002 Defer :01/85/050/00008/AM 19/ :31/83/040/00163/AM18/ 15.03.2018 Date:07.02.2019 |

37 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the reply of the firm is under examination of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.1. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.1.

agenda and noted that the reply of the firm is under examination of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.1. The Committee decided to wait for the comments of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.1.

Case No.:6/2/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:OHSUNG Meet No/Date:16/85Status: Deferred ELECTRONICS INDIA ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMTIED 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067013 Defer :01/85/050/00015/AM19/ :31/83/040/00175/AM18/ 23.03.2018 Date:07.02.2019 38 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm was issued DL 0n 07.08.2018 followed by reminders on 14.11 2018 and 27.12.2018. The reply of the firm is still awaited. The Committee decided to wait for the reply of the firm till next meeting.

‘Case No.:14/2/85-_ Party Name:PUSILIN Meet No/Date:16/85_ Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECHNOLOGY ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 27.12.2018 39 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0610038854 Defer :01/85/050/00023/AM19/ :06/24/040/00001/AM19/ (05.04.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Team of this Directorate had proposed to visit the manufacturing unig,of the firm near Gurugram on

18.01.2019 to assess the quantum of enzymes used in the manufacturing process. The firm vide email dated 08.01.2019 informed that their Technical persons who are of Chinese origin are on leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during the 1 week of March, 2019.

==> picture [454 x 157] intentionally omitted <==

ted this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during the 1 week of March, 2019.

==> picture [454 x 157] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|The|case|stands|deferred|to|07.02.2019.|
|~|(Case No.:4/2/85-ALC3/2018|Party Name:ORIENT CRAFT|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Transferred|
|LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|27.12.2018|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:05 10406059|
|40|:01/85/050/00013/AM19/|:05/24/040/00002/AM19/|06.04.2018|
|Decision|:|NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|export/import|items|
|are|textile|items.|The|Committee|noted|that,|it|has|been|decided|with|the|approval|of DG|
|in|the|F.No.|01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI|to|transfer|the|cases|relating|to|Textile|to NC-5|
|which|is primarily|a Norms Committee|for Textile and|Leather.|

----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [452 x 128] intentionally omitted <==


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


**==> picture [452 x 128] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No.:3/2/85-ALC3/2018|Party Name:ORIENT CRAFT|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Transferred|
|(LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|27.12.2018|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|~||Lic.No/Date:05 10406083|)|
|Al|:01/85/050/00012/AM19/|:05/24/040/00009/AM19/|10.04.2018|
|Decision|:|NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|export/import|items|
|are|textile|items.|The|Committee|noted|that,|it|has|been|decided|with|the|approval|of DG|
|in|the|F.No.|01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI|to|transfer|the|cases|relating|to|Textile|to NC-5|
|which|is primarily|a Norms Committee|for Textile and|Leather.|

----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [433 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case|No.:15/2/85-|Party Name:PUSILIN|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Status:Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|BIOTECHNOLOGY|ALC3/2018|
|PRIVATE|LIMITED|27.12.2018|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0610038858|Defer|
|:01/85/050/00024/AM|19/|:06/24/040/00002/AM19/|10.04.2018|Date:07.02.2019|

----- End of picture text -----

|PRIVATE|LIMITED|27.12.2018| |HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0610038858|Defer| |:01/85/050/00024/AM|19/|:06/24/040/00002/AM19/|10.04.2018|Date:07.02.2019|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Team of[Directorate][had][ proposed][to][visit][the][ manufacturing][ unit][ of][ the][ firm][ near][ Gurugram][on] ‘é[this] 18.01.2019 to assess the quantum of enzymes used in the manufacturing process. The firm vide email dated 08.01.2019 informed that their Technical persons who are of Chinese origin are on leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during the 1°' week of March, 2019. 


Case No.:8/11/85Party Name:TASTE L FINE Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 FOOD PRIVATE LIMITED ALC3/2018 43 27122018 HQ File RLA File ~ 'Lic.No/Daté03 |0820474 Defer :01/85/050/00076/AMi = 19/ aah :03/95/040/00040/AM19/: > — 16.04:205855<°Se ok etixe Aese2 oo Date:07.02.2019— : EEEOS A at” 20

LC3/2018 43 27122018 HQ File RLA File ~ 'Lic.No/Daté03 |0820474 Defer :01/85/050/00076/AMi = 19/ aah :03/95/040/00040/AM19/: > — 16.04:205855<°Se ok etixe Aese2 oo Date:07.02.2019— : EEEOS A at” 20 

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm was issued DL on 14.11.2018 and reply is awaited. The Committee decided to issue reminder to the firm to expedite their reply within 15 days from the date of issue of the reminder failing which the Committee will take decision Suo-Motu. The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. Case No.:14/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:VARAHAMURTI Meet No/Date:16/85Transferred FLEXIRUB INDUSTRIES —_ ALC3/2018 | PVT. LTD. 27.12.2018 HQ File ~'RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510406238 44 :01/85/050/00082/AM 19/ :05/24/040/00050/AM19/ 26.04.2018 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather. Case No.:11/5/85Party Name:PUSILIN Meet No/Date:16/85Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECHNOLOGY ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:06 10038868 Defer :01/85/050/00039/AM19/ :06/24/040/00007/AM19/ 07.05.2018 Date:07.02.2019

Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECHNOLOGY ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:06 10038868 Defer :01/85/050/00039/AM19/ :06/24/040/00007/AM19/ 07.05.2018 Date:07.02.2019 

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Team of[Directorate][had][proposed][to][visit][the][manufacturing][unit][of][ the][firm][near][Gurugram][on] re[this] 18.01.2019 to assess the quantum of enzymes used in the manufacturing process. The firm vide email dated 08.01.2019 informed that their Technical persons who are of Chinese. origin are on leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during the 1°' week of March, 2019.

## The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 

Case No.:11/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:GRAINSPAN Meet No/Date: 16/85Approved NUTRIENTS PVT. LTD. ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:08 10142720 :01/85/050/00079/AM 19/ :08/24/040/00065/AM19/ 01.06.2018 

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA on the basis of the comments of Technical Authority, MoFPI, vide email dated ‘és 27.12.2018 allowing the following inputs; 

**==> picture [437 x 136] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
Export Item<br>Various Types of Papad 113400 Kg<br>Import Item<br>Potato Starch 109544 Kg<br>With 92% content of export product as starch. ssa<br>GEKORE ODS GO 21<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>



Case No.:15/11/85Party Name:ZF LIFECARE Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 INDUSTRIES PRIVATE ALC3/2018 LIMITED 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1010059966 Defer ) :01/85/050/00083/AM19/ :10/24/040/00011/AM19/ 06.06.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following information from the firm as recommended by the Technical Authority, i.e., DIPP vide letter No. 7/275/2018-TSW dated 15.10.2018. ee i) Manufacturing process indicating stage-wise wastage of each raw material for the manufacturing of sanitary Napkin, indicating weight of export product in Kg term. ii) Complete calculation for requirement of raw materials indicating net import iii) content in the export product duly certified by Chartered Engineer.

ndicating weight of export product in Kg term. ii) Complete calculation for requirement of raw materials indicating net import iii) content in the export product duly certified by Chartered Engineer. Production of export product vis-a-vis consumption of raw materials (both imported & indigenous) for the last three years duly certified by Chartered Accountant.

## The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 

‘Case No.:6/11/85-ALC3/2018 |Party Name:AL KABEER Meet No/Date:16/85Approved EXPORTS PVT. LTD ALC3/2018 HQ 27.12.2018 File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310821549 | :01/85/050/00074/AM19/ :03/94/040/002 12/AM19/ 08.06.2018 

Status:NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA on the basis of the comments of Technical Authority, MoFPI, vide OM No F- 14011/24/2018-ED dated 19.11.2018 allowing the following inputs; 

4g Export Item Ready to cook frozen cheese samosa with | 91 .673MT net content of 51.428 MT of white feta cheese. 

**==> picture [284 x 39] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
_ Import Item<br>_ [White feta cheese pee<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>



**==> picture [449 x 97] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
Case No.:12/11/85- Party Name:OMSONS ~ Meet No/Date:16/85- Status:Deferred<br>49 ALC3/2018 MARKETING PVT.LTD. ALC3/2018<br>27.12.2018<br>HQ File bees | ee Lie.No/Date:0510406791 Defer<br>Bere ten eae :<br>me :01/85/050/00080/AM19/ :05/24/040/00118/AM19//) 08.06.2018. BL O% ye Date:07.02.2019<br>eat Aad rRONG cot?<br>gs Geo5ScEOF EY rH COC oh Seineoat<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the Technical Authority, ie., MoFPI and their comments are awaited. The Committee decided to request MoFPI to expedite their comments.

## The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 

**==> picture [451 x 111] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No.:44/11/85-|Party Name:SHREE MALANI|Meet No/Date:16/85-|_|Status:Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|FOAMS PRIVATE|LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|||27.12.2018|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0910066299|[Defer|
|—|:01/85/050/00112/AM19/|:09/24/040/00033/AM19/|08.06.2018|Date:07.02.2019|
|Decision|:|NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|application|of the|
|firm|is under consideration|of the|Technical|Authority,|i.e.,|Tech.1|and|the comments|are|
|awaited.|The Committee decided|to request|Tech.1|to expedite|their comments.|

----- End of picture text -----

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.

==> picture [451 x 136] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No.:10/11/85-|Party|Name:INDIA|FOOD|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Status: Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|EXPORTS|ALC3/2018|
|27.12.2018|
|HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:5310019757|(Defer|
|I|:01/85/050/00078/AM19/|:53/24/040/00001/AM19/|18.06.2018|Date:07.02.2019|
|Decision|:|NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|application|of the|
|firm|is|under|consideration|of the|Technical|Authority,|ie,|MoFPI|and|their|comments|
|are|awaited.|The Committee|decided to request MoFPI|to expedite|their comments.|
|‘The|case|stands|deferred|to|07.02.2019.|

----- End of picture text -----

‘Case No.:30/11/85Party Name:PARAYIL Meet No/Date:16/85- _ Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 EXPORTS ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1010059976 (Defer a :01/85/050/00098/AM19/ :10/24/040/00015/AM19/ 25.06.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the MoFPI and their comments are awaited. The Committee decided to request MoFPI to expedite their comments, The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.

application of the firm is under consideration of the MoFPI and their comments are awaited. The Committee decided to request MoFPI to expedite their comments, The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. Case No.:16/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:AGRI-PURE Meet No/Date:16/85Rejected NATURAL FOODS PRIVATE ALC3/2018 LIMITED 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3 110067100 53 :01/85/050/00084/AM 19/ :31/83/040/00046/AM 19/ 30.06.2018 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the basic Customs duty on the import item is more than 30% and hence the import item falls under ineligible category as per Para 4.11(a)(iii) of FTP, 2015-20. The Committee therefore, decided to = z - A SRO 9 - Pe EN ag ae reject the case with direction to the ‘basineH ev? eld" ero? duty with interest for

regularisation of the case.

(RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

Case No.:1/11/85Party Name:PUSILIN Meet No/Date:16/85Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 BIOTECHNOLOGY ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0610038915 Defer :01/85/050/00069/AM 19/ :06/24/040/00016/AM19/ 04.07.2018 Date:07.02.2019

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Team of rr[this][Directorate][had][proposed][to][visit][the][manufacturing][unit][of][ the][firm][near][ Gurugram][on] 18.01.2019 to assess the quantum of enzymes used in the manufacturing process. The firm vide email dated 08.01.2019 informed that their Technical persons who are of Chinese origin are on leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during the 1“' week of March, 2019.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.

	Case No.:45/11/85-<br>PartyName:TTK<br>Meet No/Date:16/85-<br>Status: Deferred
	ALC3/2018<br>HEALTHCARE LIMITED<br>ALC3/2018
	27.12.2018
	HQ File<br>RLA File<br>Lic.No/Date:0710113533 Defer
	:01/85/050/00113/AM19/<br>:07/24/040/00085/AM19/<br>04.07.2018<br>‘Date:07.02.2019
	°°Decision<br>:NC considered the case as peragenda and observed thathard copy ofthe firm
	has been received from RA, Jaipur. The Committee decided to forward the application of
_	thefirmtotheTechnicalAuthority,i.e.,MoFPIforexaminationandcomments.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.

Case No.:24/11/85Party Name: VENKATESH Meet No/Date: 16/85Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 FOOD INDUSTRIES ALC3/2018 27.12.2018
HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510407111 Defer :01/85/050/00092/AM19/ :05/24/040/00206/AM 19/ 06.07.2018 Date:07.02.2019

°® Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the MoFPI and their comments are awaited. The Committee decided to request MoFPI to expedite their comments.

Case No.:1/9/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:ORIENT CRAFT Meet No/Date:16/85Status: Deferred LIMITED ALC3/2018 27.12.2018
57 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510407155 Defer :01/85/050/00046/AM 19/ :05/24/040/0021 1/AM19/ 11.07.2018 Date:07.02.2019

==> picture [437 x 63] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG Po Sec? A Le Pano"axl ge $M so= OFvol a e ,oreaSenoLi 2 ----- End of picture text -----

in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather.

||Case No.:19/11/85-|PartyName:SARITA|MeetNo/Date:16/85-||Transferred|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||ALC3/2018|HANDA EXPORTS PVT|—ALC3/2018|||
|||LTD|27.12.2018||||
||HQ File|RLA File|Lic.No/Date:05 10407186|||
|58|:01/85/050/00087/AM19/|—_:05/24/040/00214/AM19/|13.07.2018|||

Case No.:27/11/85-	PartyName:PUSILIN	Meet No/Date:16/85-	Status: Deferred
ALC3/2018	BIOTECHNOLOGY	ALC3/2018
	PRIVATE LIMITED	27.12.2018
HQ File	RLA File	Lic.No/Date:0610038922	Defer
:01/85/050/00095/AM19/	:06/24/040/00017/AM19/	16.07.2018	Date:07.02.2019

|---| |ALC3/2018|BIOTECHNOLOGY|ALC3/2018|| ||PRIVATE LIMITED|27.12.2018|| |HQ File|RLA File|Lic.No/Date:0610038922|Defer| |:01/85/050/00095/AM19/|:06/24/040/00017/AM19/|16.07.2018|Date:07.02.2019|

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the Technical Team of[Directorate][had][proposed][to][visit][the][manufacturing][unit][of][ the][firm][near][Gurugram][on] a[this] 18.01.2019 to assess the quantum of enzymes used in the manufacturing process. The firm vide email dated 08.01.2019 informed that their Technical persons who are of Chinese origin are on leave till end of the February, 2019 and requested this Directorate to send the | Technical Team thereafter. The Committee decided to send the Technical Team during the 1“' week of March, 2019.

	Case No.:28/11/85-ALC3/2018	PartyName:MAXICAN	Meet No/Date:16/85-
		EXPORT	ALC3/2018
			27.12.2018
	HQ File	RLAFile	Lic.No/Date:3210078572
60	:01/85/050/00096/AM19/	:32/24/040/00022/AM19/	18.07.2018

at, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather.

Case No.:38/11/85-	PartyName:M& B	MeetNo/Date:16/85-	Status:Deferred
ALC3/2018	ENGINEERING LIMITED	ALC3/2018
		27.12.2018
HQ File	RLA File	Lic.No/Date:0810143055	Defer
:01/85/050/00106/AM19/	:08/24/040/00101/AM19/	19.07.2018	Date:07.02.2019

°! Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the Technical Authority, i.e., DIPP and their comments are awaited. The Committee decided to request DIPP to expedite their comments. { pv _ \ JZ porn. The case stands deferred case stands deferred stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 07.02.2019. VYao ACIS .

{ _ The case stands deferred case stands deferred stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 07.02.2019.

Case No.:39/11/85Party Name:AGASTYA Meet No/Date:16/85Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 NUTRIFOOD INDUSTRIES ALC3/2018 LLP 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0810143066 Defer | .:01/85/050/00107/AM19/ :08/24/040/00120/AM19/ 20.07.2018 Date:07.02.2019 © Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has been issued DL on 27.2.2018 and reply is awaited. The Committee decided to send reminder to the firm to expedite the reply.

ision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has been issued DL on 27.2.2018 and reply is awaited. The Committee decided to send reminder to the firm to expedite the reply.

Case No.:43/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:HART FOODS, Meet No/Date:16/85Rejected ALC3/2018 | (27.12.2018 HQ File ~ RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10822501 :01/85/050/00111/AM19/ :03/94/040/00354/AM19/ 23.07.2018 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that both import & export 63 items are same, i.e., Monosodium Glutamate and Export item itself is 100% Monosodium Glutamate. From the export/import items the Committee observed that there is no manufacturing activity involved in the process. Hence the Committee decided to reject the case with direction to company to pay applicable duty with interest for regularisation of the case.

	Case No.:2/11/85-ALC3/2018	PartyName:ORIENTCRAFT	MeetNo/Date:16/85-
		LIMITED	ALC3/2018
			27.12.2018
	OMG<br>oS.	RLA File	Lic.No/Date:0510407269
64	:01/85/050/00070/AM19/	:05/24/040/00235/AM19/	23.07.2018

Date:16/85-|Transferred| |---|---|---|---|---| |||LIMITED|ALC3/2018|| ||||27.12.2018|| ||OMG oS.|RLA File|Lic.No/Date:0510407269|| |64|:01/85/050/00070/AM19/|:05/24/040/00235/AM19/|23.07.2018||

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG in the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 which is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather. ‘(Case No.:42/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:SUNIL Meet No/Date:16/85Approved HEALTHCARE LIMITED ALC3/2018 (27.12.2018 ) HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:05 10407273 :01/85/050/00110/AM19/ :05/24/040/00232/AM19/ 23.07.2018

Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA 65 on the basis of the comments of Technical Authority, Tech.2, allowing the following

inputs;

==> picture [371 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Export Item Empty Hard Gelatin Capsules( White 65.46 MT Cor coloured containing minimum 9.5% S OS Titanium Dioxide) \ P EEE GS : A= XKCMP Be LO tol ro, OX, \Pa. eh ----- End of picture text -----

Import Item Pharmaceutical Gelatin (Capsule Grade) 72.00 MT Titanium Dioxide 6.22 MT

==> picture [428 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

\Pa. eh ----- End of picture text -----

Import Item Pharmaceutical Gelatin (Capsule Grade) 72.00 MT Titanium Dioxide 6.22 MT

==> picture [428 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No.:48/11/85-ALC3/2018|Party Name:GELTEC|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Approved|
|PRIVATE|LIMITED|ALC3/2018|
|27.12.2018|
|HQ:01/85/050/00116/AM19/File|~|':03/94/040/00299/AMRLA|File|19/|26.07.2018Lic.No/Date:03 10822637|

----- End of picture text -----

Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA on the basis of the comments of Technical Authority, Tech.2, allowing the following inputs;

66 Export Item

Sun Vert (Gelatin coated Tablet) ( Each _ | tablet containing 60 mg Graminex G60 _ | and 3 mg Graminex GFX)

1 No.

==> picture [272 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----


Import	Item
Graminex G60	61.20 Mg
Graminex GFX	3.06 Mg

----- End of picture text -----

— Case No.:35/11/85Party Name:NATURAL Meet No/Date:16/85__'Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 HERBS & FORMULATIONS ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Peet Lic.No/Date:6110001529 Defer | ®” :01/85/050/00103/AM19/ :61/24/040/00005/AM19/ (27.07.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has been issued DL on 14.11.2018 and reply is awaited. The Committee decided to send reminder to the firm to expedite the reply.

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.

Case No.:3/11/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:ORIENT CRAFT Meet No/Date:16/85Transferred LIMITED ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File ‘RLA File Lic.No/Date:05 10407371 68 :01/85/050/0007 1/AM19/ :05/24/040/00270/AM19/ 31.07.2018

Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG whichin the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather. an ae ortarene

|CaseNo.:29/11/85-<br>ALC3/2018|||Party<br>MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>Name:GRAINSPANNUTRIENTS |ALC3/2018|Party<br>MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>Name:GRAINSPANNUTRIENTS |ALC3/2018||Approved||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||||PVT. LTD.|27.12.2018||||
|HQ File<br>:01/85/050/00097/AM|19/||RLA File<br>:08/24/040/00156/AM19/|~ |Lie.No/Date:0810143148<br>01.08.2018|||||
|Decision :NC considered|||the case as peragenda and decided to ratify the norms oftheAA|||||
|on the basis of|the comments of<br>Technical|||Authority, MoFPI, vide||email dated||
|27.12.2018 allowing||the|following inputs;|||||
|6 Export Item||||||||
|Various TypesofPapad|Papad||31500Kg|||||
|Import Item||||||||
|Bohai iar|aS||aa|||||
|||||||\||
|With92% content|ofexport product as starch.|||||||
|RAmaytake suitable||consequential action accordingly.||||||
|CaseNo.:26/11/85-||:|PartyName:OHSUNG|MeetNo/Date:16/85-|Status: Deferred|||
|ALC3/2018|||ELECTRONICS INDIA|ALC3/2018||||
||||PRIVATE LIMTIED|27.12.2018||||

||consequential action accordingly.||||||
|CaseNo.:26/11/85-||:|PartyName:OHSUNG|MeetNo/Date:16/85-|Status: Deferred|||
|ALC3/2018|||ELECTRONICS INDIA|ALC3/2018||||
||||PRIVATE LIMTIED|27.12.2018||||
|HQ File|||RLA File|Lic.No/Date:3110067132|[Defer|||
|:01/85/050/00094/AM19/|||:31/83/040/00072/AM19/|02.08.2018|Date:07.02.2019|||

Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following information from the firm as per the comments of Technical Authority, i.e., DIPP vide. letter No. 7/270/2018-TSW dated 12.10.2018:
70 i) To indicate the weight of plastic part made up of Resin granules, and giving also specific/generic name of Resin granules;
ii) Import content of item 10 to 16 and 21 to 22 of the application in the export iii) product indicating wastage claimed in manufacturing the export product. Complete calculation for requirement of raw material/input for manufacturing
iv) export product duly certified by Chartered Engineer. Justifying the requirement of Printing ink (S.No. 17, 18, 19) and thinner in the export product (20)

‘Case No.:40/11/85Party Name:NATURAL Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 HERBS & FORMULATIONS |ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6110001533 Defer ”' :01/85/050/00108/AM19/ :61/24/040/00007/AM19/ 06.08.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has been issued DL on 14.11.2018 and reply is awaited. The Committee decided to send reminder to the firm to expedite the reply.

==> picture [206 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

that the firm has been issued DL on 14.11.2018 and reply is awaited. The Committee decided to send reminder to the firm to expedite the reply.

==> picture [206 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- __ The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [86 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- yA unt ene" ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [133 x 20] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 6aKeSALERsot ----- End of picture text -----

‘Case No.:31/11/85Party Name:MAXICAN ‘Meet No/Date: 16/85Transferred | ALC3/2018 EXPORT, ‘ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3210078601 2 :01/85/050/00099/AM 19/ :32/24/040/00027/AM 19/ 09.08.2018 Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG whichin the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather.

||CaseNo.:4/11/85-<br>ALC3/2018||PartyName:SARITAHANDA <br>EXPORTS PVT LTD|MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>ALC3/2018|Transferred|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||||||27.12.2018||
|73|HQFile<br> :01/85/050/00072/AM19/||RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00294/AM19/|Lic.No/Date:0510407561<br>20.08.2018||

e:16/85- ALC3/2018|Transferred| |---|---|---|---|---|---| ||||||27.12.2018|| |73|HQFile :01/85/050/00072/AM19/||RLA File :05/24/040/00294/AM19/|Lic.No/Date:0510407561 20.08.2018||




_ Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the export/import items are textile items. The Committee noted that, it has been decided with the approval of DG whichin the F.No. 01/85/171/53/AM19/DES.VI to transfer the cases relating to Textile to NC-5 is primarily a Norms Committee for Textile and Leather. 

Case No.:6/16/85Party Name:ITALIAN Meet No/Date:16/85Status: Deferred ALC3/2018 EDIBLES PRIVATE ALC3/2018 aa HQ:01/85/050/00160/AM19/File ~ 'RLALIMITEDFile a (27.12.2018Lic.No/Date:5610005483 Defer ™ :56/24/040/00023/AM19/ 26.09.2018 ‘Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the Technical Authority, i.e., MoFPI and their comments are awaited. The Committee decided to request MoFPI to expedite their comments.

## The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 

Case No.:5/16/85Party Name:BELCHEM INDS. Meet No/Date:16/85_|Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 INDIA PVT. LTD. ALC3/2018 27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310824476 Defer be :01/85/050/00159/AM 19/ :03/94/040/00543/AM19/ 16.10.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the Technical Authority, i.e. DIPP and their comments are awaited. The Committee decided to request DIPP to expedite their comments.

## The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019. 

Case No.:7/16/85-ALC3/2018 Party Name:JEWEL Meet No/Date: 16/85Approved CONSUMER CARE PVT LTD ALC3/2018 16 27.12.2018 | HQFile -RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410044616 | | :01/85/050/00161/AM19/ :34/24/040/00241/AM19/ 22,10:2048-0: Ke Ge EAs 

Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms of the AA on the basis of the comments of Technical Authority, Tech.1, allowing the following inputs;

## Export Item 

Toothrushes (Handle made out ofbamboo)|1No. SSCid 

**==> picture [364 x 57] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
Import Item<br>Articles of wood-bamboo toothbrush 2% Wastage<br>handle<br>Nylon 612 Monofilament 1.05 Kg/Kg content in export<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>



|CaseNo.:4/16/85-ALC3/2018|‘PartyName:KERRY<br>INGREDIENTS INDIA|MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>ALC3/2018|Approved|
|---|---|---|---|
||PRIVATE LIMITED|27.12.2018||
|HQ File.|RLA File|~ Lic.No/Date:0310824614||
|:01/85/050/00158/AM19/|:03/94/040/00637/AM19/|23.10.2018||
|™Decision :NC considered thecaseasperagendaanddecided to ratifythenormsoftheAA<br>on Repeat<br>basisas informed by RA, Mumbai vide their letter No.03/94/40/637/AM19||||
|dated23.10.2018.||||

## RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. 

- Case No.:3/16/85Party Name:OHSUNG Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred ALC3/2018 ELECTRONICS INDIA ALC3/2018 PRIVATE LIMTIED 27.12.2018 

- HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3 110067221 ‘Defer 

- ':01/85/050/00157/AM19/ :31/83/040/00118/AM19/ 31.10.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following information from the firm as per the comments of Technical Authority, i.e., DIPP vide letter No. 7/270/2018-TSW dated 12.10.2018: 

- 78 i) To indicate the weight of plastic part made up of Resin granules, and giving also specific/generic name of Resin granules; 

- | li) Import content of item 10 to 16 and 21 to 22 of the application in the export ili) product indicating wastage claimed in manufacturing the export product. Complete calculation for requirement of raw material/input for manufacturing 

- iv) export product duly certified by Chartered Engineer. Justifying the requirement of Printing ink (S.No. 17, 18, 19) and thinner in the export product (20) 


79 Case No.:1/16/85Party Name:MARINE Meet No/Date:16/85__Status:Deferred | ALC3/2018 HYDROCOLLOIDS ALC3/2018 |Z 27.12.2018 was Saree faa nent officer faa! Frade Dev OR[aan] 30 

‘HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1010060059 Defer :01/85/050/00155/AM19/ :10/24/040/00062/AM19/ 14.11.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.1 . The Committee decided to request him to expedite comments.

dered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm is under consideration of the Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.1 . The Committee decided to request him to expedite comments. 


ALC3/2018Case No.:2/16/85. Party Name:SHOCKLEY Meet No/Date:16/85Status:Deferred HALL ELECTRONICS (P) —_ALC3/2018 LTD. (27.12.2018 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210208800 Defer :01/85/050/00156/AM19/ :02/24/040/00122/AM19/ 16.11.2018 Date:07.02.2019 Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek following information from the firm as per the comments of Technical Authority, i.e., Tech.1; 

sa 

i) Detailed manufacturing process indicating wastage of each raw material at different stages. ii) GSMofimport item 1 & 2 iii) Width of Ribbon & Velcro iv) Material of Ribbon | v) Exact description of import item at S.No.7

## MANUAL CASES 

**==> picture [438 x 94] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
Case No. M-147 Name of the firm: Meet No/Date:16/85- Status:Deferred<br>ALC3/2018<br>| M/s Shivaji Cane 27.12.2018<br>Processors Ltd<br>HQFile:F.No. RAF. No. (Defer<br>01/85/17 1/00004/AM18 31/83/040/00018/AM18 Date:07.02.2019<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Subject: Fixation of norms under para 4.06 of HBP for export of “Kahndsari Sugar and Jaggery Powder” against import of Raw Sugar” by M/s Shivaji Cane Processors Ltd before issue of Advance Authorisation by RA, Pune. Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm was issued DL on 26.12.2018 to furnish a copy of the ANF 4(B) of the application which is still awaited from the firm. The Committee also noted that the application of the firm is under examination of Directorate of Sugar and comments are still awaited. The Committee therefore, decided to send a reminder to the firm to send a copy of the ANF(4B) inunediately and request Directorate of Sugar to expedite their comments. 2.0% Sa sae 

**==> picture [120 x 38] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
ig 0“ ore ne<br>ForgasSa Oechow<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


31 

**==> picture [455 x 690] intentionally omitted <==**

nally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
ig 0“ ore ne<br>ForgasSa Oechow<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


31 

**==> picture [455 x 690] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|The|case|stands|deferred|to|07.02.2019.|
|Case|No.|M-148|Name|of|the|firm:|Meet|No/Date:16/85-|‘Status:Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|
|M/s|Jabs|International|27.12.2018|
|Pvt.|Ltd.,|Navi|Mumbai|
|HQ|File|:F.No.|RA|F.|No.|Ecom|Ref.|No.|Defer|Date:|
|01/85/171/171/AM17/DE|03/94/040/00830/AM1|03/94/072/05700/0488/08|97.02.2019|
|S-VI|7|58|
|Subject:|Fixation|of|norms|under|para|4.06|of|HBP|for|export|of|
|“processed/assorted/sterilised|spices|namely|CARDAMOM|ETO|Treated|against|import|of|
|unprocessed/unassorted/unsterlised/spices|namely|cardamom|by|M/s|Jabs|International|
|Pvt.|Ltd.|
|Decision|:NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|application|of the|firm|
|was|forwarded|to|Technical|Authority,|ie.|MoFPI|and|Spice|Board|for|comments.|The|
|MoFPI|had|furnished|the|comments|while|the|comments|from|Spice|Board|is|still|awaited.|
|The|Committee|also|noted|that|the|Spice|Board|had|sought|some|more|information|from|the|
|firm which|has|already|been|furnished|to|the|Spice|Board.|The Committee|decided|to|request|
|the|Spice|Board|to|expedite|the|comments.|
|The|case|stands|deferred|to|07.02.2019.|
|Case|No.|M-149|Name|of the|firm:|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Status: Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|
|M/s|Frigorifico|Allana|27.12.2018|
|Private|Limited,|

ite|the|comments.|
|The|case|stands|deferred|to|07.02.2019.|
|Case|No.|M-149|Name|of the|firm:|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Status: Deferred|
|ALC3/2018|
|M/s|Frigorifico|Allana|27.12.2018|
|Private|Limited,|
|‘HQ|File|:F.No.|RA|F.|No.|Ecom|Ref.|No.|Defer|Date:|
|01/85/171/00025/AM18/D|03/94/040/00934/AM1|03/88/146/47800/0539/55|07.02.2019|
|ES.VI|8/|50|
|Subject:|Fixation|of ad-hoc ad-hoc|input|output|norms|under|par 4.06 4.06|of HBP, HBP,|2015-20|for|export|of|
|“Pro|PSCO|32/Edible|vegetable|FAT/Hydrogenated|Vegetable|Oil/Hydrogenated|Vegetable|
|Oil|Alfa|Pro|PSCO|32/Hydrogenated.|Oil/ICMP|40/ICMP|40|Vanaspati/Hydrogenated|
|Vegetable|Oil|Alfa|Pro-ICMP/Hydrogenated|Vegetable|Oil|Alfa|Pro-Sco38”|against|import|of|
|“Crude|Palm|Kernal|Oil.|
|Decision|:NC|considered|the|case|as|per|agenda|and|noted|that|the|application|of the|firm|
|was|forwarded|to|Technical|Authority,|i.e.|MoFPI.|The|MoFPI|had|furnished|the|comments.|
|Since|the|import|item|is|an|oil|products,|the|Committee|decided|to|seek|comments|from|the|
|Directorate|of Sugar|and|Vegetable|Oils.|As|such|the|application|of the|firm|has|been|sent|to|
|them|for|comments|which|is|awaited.|The|Committee|decided|to|request|the|Directorate|of|
|Sugar and Vegetable|Oils|to expedite|the comments.|paw|
|The|\|oreetie"pod.|
|case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.|Wd|deereesscs|

----- End of picture text -----

st|the|Directorate|of| |Sugar and Vegetable|Oils|to expedite|the comments.|paw| |The||oreetie"pod.| |case stands deferred to 07.02.2019.|Wd|deereesscs|


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


_ Subject: Fixation of ad-hoc ad-hoc input output norms under par 4.06 4.06 of HBP, HBP, 2015-20 for export of “Pro PSCO 32/Edible vegetable FAT/Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil/Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Alfa Pro PSCO 32/Hydrogenated. Oil/ICMP 40/ICMP 40 Vanaspati/Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Alfa Pro-ICMP/Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Alfa Pro-Sco38” against import of “Crude Palm Kernal Oil. 

|CaseNo.M-150|Name ofthe firm:<br>M/s Frigorifico Allana|MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>ALC3/2018<br>27.12.2018|Status:Deferred|
|---|---|---|---|
||Private Limited,|||
|HQ File:F.No.<br>01/85/171/00018/AM18/D <br>ES.VI|RA F. No.<br> 05/23/040/00325/AM1 <br>8/|Ecom Ref. No.<br> 03/88/146/47800/0528/72 <br>93|DeferDate:<br> 07.02.2019|



Subject: Fixation of ad-hoc input output norms under par 4.06 of HBP, 2015-20 for export of “Refined Corn Oil packed in 3 Ltr Jars” against import of “Refined Corn Oil’. Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm was forwarded to Technical Authority, i.e. MoFPI. The MoFPI had furnished the comments. Since the import item is an oil products, the Committee decided to seek comments from the Directorate of Sugar and Vegetable Oils. As such the application of the firm has been sent to them for comments which is awaited. The Committee decided to request the Directorate of Sugar and Vegetable Oils to expedite the comments.

Oils. As such the application of the firm has been sent to them for comments which is awaited. The Committee decided to request the Directorate of Sugar and Vegetable Oils to expedite the comments. 

The case stands deferred to 07.02.2019, 

|Case No.M-151|Name ofthe firm:|MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>ALC3/2018|Status:Deferred|
|---|---|---|---|
||M/s Frigorifico Allana|27.12.2018||
||Private Limited,|||
|HQ File :F.No.<br>01/85/171/00024/AM18/<br>DES.VI|RA F. No.<br>03/94/040/00921/AM1 <br>8/|Ecom Ref. No.<br> 03/88/146/47800/0538/9<br>281|Defer Date:<br>07.02.2019|



Subject: Fixation of ad-hoc input output norms under par 4.06 of HBP, 2015-20 for export of “Refined Corn Oil packed in 3 Ltr Jars” against import of “Refined Corn Oil’. Decision :NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that the application of the firm was forwarded to Technical Authority, i.e. MoFPI. The MoFPI had furnished the comments. Since the import item is an oil products, the Committee decided to seek comments from the Directorate of Sugar and Vegetable Oils. As such the application of the firm has been sent to them for comments which is awaited. The Committee decided to request the Directorate of Sugar and Vegetable Oils to expedite the comments. 


**==> picture [76 x 20] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
Case No. M-152<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Name of the firm: Meet No/Date:16/85-. pa Approved \ |ALC3/2018 _ yw exatcer 

**==> picture [365 x 65] intentionally omitted <==**

**<br>
Case No. M-152<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Name of the firm: Meet No/Date:16/85-. pa Approved \ |ALC3/2018 _ yw exatcer 

**==> picture [365 x 65] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|M/s.|Sami|Labs|Limited|27.12.2018|
|HQ File :F.No.|RA|F.|No.|AA No. 0710030082|
|01/85/050/00094/AMO05/|07/24/040/00141/AMO|dated10.06.2004|
|DES.VI|5|

----- End of picture text -----

Subject: Fixation of ad-hoc input output norms under par 4.06 of HBP, 2015-20 for export of “Refined Corn Oil packed in 3 Ltr Jars” against import of “Refined Corn Oil’. Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that vide Policy Circular No.05/2009-14 dated 14.08.2013, RA can take action on the basis of Sample Analysis Report (SAR) furnished by the Spice Board. The Committee therefore, decided to request RA, Cochi to take appropriate action in accordance to above mentioned Policy Circular. RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly,

==> picture [457 x 194] intentionally omitted <==

A, Cochi to take appropriate action in accordance to above mentioned Policy Circular. RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly,

==> picture [457 x 194] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Case No. M-153, 154 &|Name|of the|firm:|Meet No/Date:16/85-|Rejected|
|155|M/s.|P.K.|Agri|Link|Pvi|ALC3/2018|
|Ltd.|27.12.2018|
|HQ|File|:F.No.|RA|F.|No.|AA|No.|
|01/85/05/00124/ AM16/|02/24/040/00101/A|0210206072 dated|
|DES.VI|M16|14.08.2015|
|01/85/05/00005/ AM17/|02/24/040/00198/A|0210206516|dated|
|DES.VI|M16|02.03.2016|
|01/85/05/00037/|AM17/|02/24/040/00007/A|9210206631|dated|
|DES.VI|M17Pog|dee|/|22.04.2016|
|Subject:|Fixation|of|adhoc|norms|for|Advance|Authorisation|No.|0210206072|dated|
|14.08.2015|for|export|of|“Deoiled|Rice|Bran|Extraction”|against|Import|of|“Rice|Bran and|
|Hexane”|obtained by M/s|P.K. Agri|Link Pvt.|Ltd.|

----- End of picture text -----


**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Decision :Committee noted that the firm M/s P.K. Agri Link Pvt. Ltd, aggrieved by the earlier decision on fixation of Input Output norms has represented for a review against the earlier decisions of the Norms Committee in the above mentioned cases. 2 Committee during its deliberations noted that: i. The aforesaid three (3) Advance Authorisations have been issued under Para 4.07 (i) & (ii) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20, on self-declaration basis, which states that “(a) Regional Authority may also issue Advance Authorisation where there is no SION/valid Ad hoc Norms for an export product or where SION / Ad hoc norms have been notified / published but exporter intends to use additional inputs in the manufacturing process, based on self-declaration by applicant. Wastage so claimed shall be subject to wastage norms as decided by Norms Committee. The applicant shall submit an undertaking to abide by decision of Norms Committee. The provisions in this regard are given in paragraph 4.03 and 4.11 of FTP. (b) In case of revision / rejection, applicant yo sor OM SS ate IPO este Ent ile 

   - shall pay duty and interest as notified by DoR within thirty days from the date of hosting of Norms Committee decision on DGFT website.”

ejection, applicant yo sor OM SS ate IPO este Ent ile 

   - shall pay duty and interest as notified by DoR within thirty days from the date of hosting of Norms Committee decision on DGFT website.” 

- ii. Advance Authorisation Scheme under Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 also states that a “Minimum value addition required to be achieved under Advance Authorisation is 15%, (ii) Export Products where value addition could be less than 15% are given in Appendix 4D.” On perusal of Appendix 4D it is noted that a lower value addition is only prescribed for only 2 items i.e. Copper Anode etc. and certain specified petroleum products. 

iii. While processing Rice Bran (the duty free raw material imported by the firm from Bangladesh under the three Advance Authorisations), the main product which is obtained is the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and as a by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction is generated. Firm in their submissions dated 31.10.2018 has also stated that they have not exported the main product ‘Rice Bran Oil’ and this has been sold in the domestic market. iv. The firm after processing the duty free input i.e. Rice Bran has exported the by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction to fulfil the export obligation commitment under the Advance Authorisation Scheme.

ter processing the duty free input i.e. Rice Bran has exported the by-product De-Oiled Rice Bran [DORB] extraction to fulfil the export obligation commitment under the Advance Authorisation Scheme. 

3. The Committee further noted that: i) In its earlier meetings as detailed in Para 1 above, the Committee has rejected the 3 cases for fixation of Input Output Norms as the technical Opinion given to Committee observed that it is not possible to achieve a 15% Value Addition after rice bran oil extraction from the duty free imported rice bran; 

ii) The firm has requested for a review of the earlier decision and has stated in their submissions that there is no restriction or Policy violation for sale of extracted Rice Bran Oil in the domestic market as it fetches a higher price in the Indian market compared to the international market. iii) While obtaining the 3 Advance Authorisations [issued between August 2015 to April 2016] for import of duty free ‘Rice Bran’ the firm was well aware that export of “Rice Bran Oil’ is - Prohibited and they will need to adhere to the parameters of the Advance Authorisation Scheme by only exporting the by-product generated i.e. DORB. Further, they also agreed and declared in their application to achieve a minimum 15% value addition from export of DORB. 

iv) The investigations of DRI are pending against the subject Advance Authorisations and also observed that the matter is subjudice in Hon’ble High Court at Kolkata; . ¥) . The Committee also noted it vide OM teat614011 /24/2016-ED dated

g against the subject Advance Authorisations and also observed that the matter is subjudice in Hon’ble High Court at Kolkata; . ¥) . The Committee also noted it vide OM teat614011 /24/2016-ED dated 

27.08.2018 MoFPI has recommended export of 1.00 MT of “Deoiled ricebran extraction” against import of 1.11 MT “Rice Bran” &2.30Ltr.”Hexane”. It was noted that the firm, in its revised submissions, did not give any information to the query raised by the Committee regarding the domestic sale price of the ‘Rice Bran Oil’ which is an important criteria for arriving at the IO norms [for offsetting the saleable wastage or by-product generated during the production process from the duty free entitlements].Rice Bran oil is the best quality vegetable oil with high vitamin E content and has a considerable high price as compared to other edible oils. 

4. i) The Committee deliberated the issue again regarding fixation of Input Output Norms based on the revised submissions, the extant FTP/HBP provisions and the advice of the MoFPI and other technical representatives present in the meeting. ii) It was noted that India is one of the largest producer and exporter of rice in the world. Rice, when it is milled, rice bran, a by-product of rice consisting of the outer layer of the kernels is obtained. Rice bran is further processed for its oil and DORB/ meal and sufficient domestic availability of Rice Bran is there.

a by-product of rice consisting of the outer layer of the kernels is obtained. Rice bran is further processed for its oil and DORB/ meal and sufficient domestic availability of Rice Bran is there. 

iii) It was also noted that primary purpose of extraction is rice bran oil and Rice bran oil is known for its nutritional superiority and better protection of heart. This oil is also suitable for high temperature cooking. 

iv) After crude oil has been extracted from rice bran, De-Oiled Rice Bran (DORB) is obtained. DORB is widely used in the manufacture of Cattlefeed,Poultryfeed,Fish feed, as fuel for boilers and used for manufacturing sodium silicate, silica gel, insulation bricks etc (using fully burnt white ash of husk). 

5. The Committee also noted that a Standard Input Output Norm (SION) has already been notified under E39 for export of Rice Bran extraction which reads as under: E39 For Export of 1 MT of ‘Rice Duty free Import of 5.9 Litres of Bran Extraction’ Hexane is allowed 

It was observed that SION E39 [notified in 2004] does not allow import of duty free ‘Rice Bran’. Other similar SIONs like E14 [Deoiled Sal seed cake], E37 [Rape Seed extraction], E42 [Soya Extraction] also allow only Hexane as a duty free input/raw material. However, exports continue to happen based on market dynamics. 

sane , ae xs Toment ‘46°

E37 [Rape Seed extraction], E42 [Soya Extraction] also allow only Hexane as a duty free input/raw material. However, exports continue to happen based on market dynamics. 

sane , ae xs Toment ‘46° 

6. The Committee also noted the submissions of the firm that under Para 4.49 (b) of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20 any shortfall in Value Addition can be regularized by payment of a fee equivalent to 1% of shortfall in FOB value in Indian Rupee. However a plain reading of Para 4.49 HBPv1 clearly indicates that this provision is only applicable in cases of bonafide default and not in situations where Value Addition is achieved by misrepresentation in the initial application or possible overvaluation of exports. 7 After discussions and based on inputs as indicated above, the Committee came to a conclusion that Minimum Value Addition of 15% or more shown in the Advance Authorisation application is technically not feasible after oil extraction [and its domestic sale] from the duty free imported rice bran. It is assumed that SION E39 and other similar SIONs listed in Para 5 above also does not allow duty free import of Rice Bran for export of Rice Bran Extraction [and other similar Bran which contains Sal Oil or Rape Seed Oil or Soya Oil] on the premise that the production processes or the technology involved in such oil extraction will not meet the desired minimum value addition criteria as only the by-product or waste generated i.e. the deoiled cake is being exported.

rocesses or the technology involved in such oil extraction will not meet the desired minimum value addition criteria as only the by-product or waste generated i.e. the deoiled cake is being exported. Moreover, the firm has enjoyed the benefit of Customs duty exemption on importation of rice bran and sold the ‘rice bran oil’ obtained after extraction in the domestic market. The duty exemption benefit thus gets passed on to ‘rice bran oil’, which has not been exported & leads to undue enrichment of the firm and is not in line with Policy provisions. Committee therefore decided that the Advance Authorisations issued to the firm do not meet the basic parameters of the Scheme as prescribed in Para 4.09 of Foreign Trade Policy and need to be cancelled abinitio and the firm will regularize all the cases by payment of Customs duty and interest as per guidelines laid down in this regard. 8. Committee also noted that firm has in its later submissions stated that a value addition of 50% has actually been achieved by them by only exporting deoiled rice bran extraction. Concerned RA to examine possible irregularities on export valuation, if any and take suitable action in this regard. 

**==> picture [427 x 126] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
RA may take subsequent consequential action accordingly.<br>OP Garigne”<br>yor? 27<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


|‘CaseNo.M-156|IndianOilseedsand<br>ProduceExport<br>Promotion Council|MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>“ascae|Approved|
|---|---|---|---|
||(IOPEPC)|||

r>yor? 27<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


|‘CaseNo.M-156|IndianOilseedsand<br>ProduceExport<br>Promotion Council|MeetNo/Date:16/85-<br>“ascae|Approved|
|---|---|---|---|
||(IOPEPC)|||



HQ File :F.No. 01/85/171/90/ AM16/D ES.VI 

Subject: Modification of SION at SI. No. E-92 for Ground Nut Kernels. Decision : NC considered the case as per agenda and noted that; 

- i) Three firms namely M/s Khedut Feeds & Foods Pvt. Ltd., M/s Tanna Agro Impex Pvt. Ltd. and M/s S.M. International had requested for modification of SION at SI. No. E-92 for Ground Nut Kernels. 

- li) Indian Oilseeds and Produce Export Promotion Council vide their letter dated 02.02.2017 on their recommendation have also requested this Directorate for 

- iii) Modification of SION existing at Sl. No. E-92 for Ground Nut Kernels. The Committee noted thatat present SION E-92 speaks only import of 1.05 kg/kg content in the export product packing (i) Raw Jute and (ii) Relevant 

- iv) LDPE/HDPE/PP Granules are allowed against export of 1 Kg Ground Nut Kernels. The Committee noted that Comments were sought from Ministry of Food Processing Industries and Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh. And Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh intimated that they are not dealing

Comments were sought from Ministry of Food Processing Industries and Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh. And Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh intimated that they are not dealing 

- v) with the trade related aspects and suggested to get comments from APEDA. Vi) Accordingly, Comments from APEDA was sought. Comments received from from APEDA vide letter No. PFD-2017-18-000013 dated /02408 in 19.09.2017 and from MoFPI vide OM No.4(17)/2017-DGFT dated 22.03.2018 which MoFPI recommended for 20% wastage on export in the case shelling 

- outturn ratio, i.e, production of Sound Mature Kernels(SKM) from whole Ground Nut or Ground Nut in shell and 5% wastage on export in the case of production of 

- vil) Sound Mature Kernels (SKM) from the unprocessed lot of Ground Nut Kernels. | NC called the representatives of Indian Oilseeds and Produce Export Promotion Council and the Personal Hearing was held on 3r4 January, 2019 in which the following officers had appeared before the Committee and presented their case for modification of SION E-92 for Ground Nut Kernels. a) Shri Anand P. Seth, Adviser, Indian Oilseeds and Produce Export Promotion Council 

- b) Shri SanjivSawla, Former Chairman, Indian Oilseeds and Produce Export Promotion Council 

- viii) c) Shri Kishore Tanna, Director, Groundnut Panel Convener. The Committee heard the representatives of Indian Oilseeds and Produce Export Promotion Council in the meeting and after due deliberation decided to recommend modification on the SION E-92 for Ground Nut Kernels as under;

representatives of Indian Oilseeds and Produce Export Promotion Council in the meeting and after due deliberation decided to recommend modification on the SION E-92 for Ground Nut Kernels as under; 

S.No. | Process Actual process | Process Process communicated | recommende approved by i losses as | losses Losses as VA cro blk LOPEPC dby MoFPI | the Norms eRADYO wfencer 

**==> picture [397 x 325] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
ee1 ee |Committee-<br>Groundnut in shell | 50% (2:1 ratio) | 20% 20%<br>(120241) to<br>exportable HPS<br>groundnut kernels<br>(120242)<br>ai Groundnut in shell 60%(2.5:1 ratio) 25%<br>(120241) to<br>exportable HPS<br>roasted and blanched<br>groundnut kernels<br>(2081100)<br>3. Upgraded Kernels | 10% (1.11:1 | 5% 5%<br>(120242) to | ratio)<br>exportable HPS<br>groundnut kernels<br>4. Upgraded Kernels | 20% eu Sa | 10%<br>(120242) to | ratio)<br>exportable HPS<br>roasted and blanched<br>kernels (20081100)<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


ix) Any modification in SION E-92 will be done through a Public Notice after obtaining approval of the Competent Authority. 

Date:16.01.2019 Place:New Delhi 

WZ ie (PradyumnaSahu) Foreign Trade Development Officer 

TE /PRADYUMNASAHU undoneT brecciaseptt.Fieof Commercetows

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 9618 --apply.