DGFT Committee Minutes

Norms Committee Minutes of the Meeting No 13-/AM 22-23 dated 08.12.2022 under the Chairmanship of Shri Hardeep Singh, Addl. DGFT. JERKOK KKK

The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting:-

(i) Shri A.K. Kanodia, Dy. DG (ii) Shri Shaish Kumar, Technical Expert (iii) Shri D.N. Mathur, Technical Expert (iv) Shri Nand Lal, Technical Expert

The Committee first considered the minutes of the Norms Committee Meeting No. 13/AM 22-23 dated 08.12.2022 for confirmation and confirmed the same without any change.

Note:-

In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations observations received from concerned Technical Authority in earlier cases of similar products. A scanned copy of such documents is placed at the end of the Minutes. The scanned copy uploaded is to be accepted. Scanned copy of the UO No./OM No. is reflected in the Minutes.

Manual Cases

MEETING NUMBER __- NC/4/MEET/NOV/E V2022-23/13-/AM-2 - 2 2- 23 dated 8.12.2022a FF ‘CaseNo.M-401 —'| M/s. Foamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur—_| Status Case: NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00402/AM18 Defered Date Decision:08.12.2022The Committee consideredLic. No. 0510405353the case as datedper agenda 15.01.2018and decided to call|for the firm fora | _Personal Hearing. P.H Letter to be issued. Hence, the committee to defer the case. _ | ‘Case No. M-402 | | M/s. Foamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur . Status Case: | NC No. 13/22-23 | RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00187/AM19 Defered Date: 08.12.2022 _| Lic. No.0510407360 dated 30.07.2018 == dT Decision The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to call for the firm fora Personal Hearing. P.II Letter to be issued. Hence, the committee to defer the case. | CaseNC No.M- 403. | M/s. Foamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur Status Case: | DateNo.: 08.12.202213/22-23 | RLALic. No.F.No. 051040610705/23/040/00008/AM19 dated 12.04.2018 Defered Decision: . | The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to call for the firm fora | Personal Hearing. P.H Letter to be issued. Hence, the committee to defer the case. i | C

“

NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00195/AM19 Defered DateCase No.: 08.12.2022 M- 404 | M/s. FoamtechLic. No. 0510403693Antifire dated Company, Pitampur17.08.2017) - a. | Status Case:= Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to call for the firm for a _Personal Hearing. P.H Letterto be issued. Hence,the committee todeferthe case. NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 05AA/040/36825/AM21 Defered Case No. M- 405 _|aLic. No.Greenlam0511001564 Industries Limited,dated 05.03.2020 New Delhi0 | Status Case: Date :[08.12.2022] Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to defer the case for further[examination.][The][case][has][been][ referred] for technical assessment (NL). NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No03/94/040/00056/AM21 Defered Case No. M- 406 ah Apar Industries Ltd., Vadodara | Status Case: | Date:Decision08.12.2022 | Lic. No.031083176dated 11.05.20200 : The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and decided to call for the catalogue of import item now required with its function and properties in export product D/L has been issued to the firm on 13.12.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Deferthe case, NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 03AA04002331/AM21 Rejeted “CasDat e No.M-407:08.12.2022 | aALic. UPL,MumbaiNo. 0310836176 dated st11.05.2020s—i‘“—s~s~s~™S ec ; Decision: The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and found No Justification for enhancement of Norms ratified earlier as per comparative data from the industry. Therefore, NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 03AA04002331/AM21 Rejected | Date:Case No. 08.12.2022 M- 408 **** | | M/s. UPL,Lic. No. 0311005234 Mumbai dated09.07.2021 Status Case:=a | Decision: The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and found No Justification for enhancement of Norms ratified earlier as per comparative data from the industry. Therefore,the case is rejected. i ah NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 03AA04002331/AM21 Rejected ‘CaseDate No.: 08.12.2022 M- 409 | | M/s. UPL,Lic. No. 0310836039 Mumbai dated 04.03.2020 . | Status Case:. Decision: The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and found No Justification for enhancement of Norms ratified earlier as per comparative data from the industry. | Therefore,the case is rejected. — pede

A

Date:Decision:NCCase No.No.08.12.2022 13/22-23 M- 410 |+ AANo.031082593 R.A.F.No.M/s.Apar 03/94/040/00353/AM19 Industriesdated 25.07.2018 Ltd,Mumbai = ~~~—~—__|| StatusCase:| Approved The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to taking cue from SION A-3383ExportraI t ifyem the norms|as_under:-Quantity '| Importitem= | Quantity_ Transformer Oil-IS 335 1 Kg TOBS/Base Oil 1.003 Kg (Viscosity 30+/-3 CST at See es eee | | RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 ofHBP as per above decision of __ |.Norms Committee. NCCase No. M- 411 M/s. Apar Industries Ltd., Mumbai | Status Case: Date:No. 08.1 13/2 2 -23.2022 _|| RaAANo.031082593 03/94/040/00353/AM19 | Approved Decision: dated 25.07.2018 eee The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to taking cue from SION A-3383 ratify the norms as under:Se pila fe Export Item | Quantity | Importitem =| Quantity Transformer Oil-IS 335 1 Kg TOBS /Base Oil 1.003 Kg (Viscosity 30+/-3 CST at RA concernedeemay take necessary eee)action under Para 4.7Sennof HBP as per above decisionofMinor eee Norms Committee. ee

DateDecision:NCCaseNo.M-412 No.: 13/22-2308.12.2022 —«||| R.A.F.No.AAM/s. No.0310827420AparIndustriesLtd,Mumbai 03/94/040/01046/AM19dated 01.03.2019 ~—~—~—~|| | ApprovedStatusCase: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to taking cue from SION Export Item | Quantity | Importitem | Quantity Transformer Oil-IS 335 1 Kg TOBS /Base Oil 1.003 Kg (Viscosity 30+/-3 CST at | 40°C) RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per aboveadecision of bd[Committee.] |[Norms] CaseNo.M-413.NC No. 13/22-23 —*«| M/s.GangaRasayanieR.A.F.No. 03/94/040/00078/21Pvt Ltd, Kolkata ~—~—| | RejectedStatus Case: Date: 08.12.2022 __| AANo.0310836252 dated 19.05.2020 0 | The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and decided to request of the firm may be rejected . Since the description isalready mentioned in the minutes alongwith technical Charterstics

==> picture [41 x 59] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> yy)<br>a<br>ty<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

)

NC No. 13/22-23 R.A.F.No. 03/94/040/00075/21 Date ae ae - The Committee: 08.12.2022considered—_ |AANo.0310836001the case as per Agendadated and26.04.2020decided to00)request of the firm may be rejected. Since the description is already mentioned in the minutes alongwith technical Charterstics Case No. M- 415 M/s. Ferolite Jointing Limited, Ghazibad | Status Case: ~ NCDate No.: 08.12. 022 13/22- 2 3 | RLALic. No F . No.0510412036 05/23/040/00258/AM20 dated 07.10.2019 | Defered Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to defer the case forfurther examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (NL). NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00258/AM20 Defered CD a st e No.: 08.12.2022 M- 416 | M/s.Lic. No. Fruzyme3211000790 Biotechdated India Private15.04.2021 Limited | Status Case: Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and the request of the firm is not clear. The firm isadvisedto clarify alongwith documentary evidence. Hence, the committee to defer the case. | NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00290/AM18 Defered CD a st e No.: 08.12.2022 M- 417 | M/s.Lic. No. Foamtech0510404467 Antifiredated Company,01.11.2017 Pitampur Status Case: Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to call for the firm for a Personal Hearing. P.H Letter to be issued. Hence, the committee to defer the case. Case No. M- 418 M/s. Foamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur Status Case: NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00/AM18 Defered Date :08.12.2022 Ee No. 0510401083 dated 04.01.2017 | a | Decision : The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to call for the firm for a _ Personal Hearing. P.H Letter to be issued. Hence, the committee to deferthe case. ‘CaseNo.M-419 ——*| M/s. Vidhi Speciality Food Ingredient Limited = —| Status Case: NC No. 13/22-23 HQ F.No. 01/83/50/753/ AM19 Rejected Date : 08.12.2022 RLA F.No. 03/95/040/00881/AM91 Decision:sa esThe CommitteeLic.consideredNo. 0310825270the casedatedas 28.11.2018per Agenda _and Noted that the firmte didEe not appear for the Personal Hearing dated 08.12.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Reject the SOee oe ; ‘CaseNo.M-420 _| M/s. Vidhi[Speciality] Food Ingredient Limited Status Case: NC No. 13/22-23 HQ F.No. 01/83/50/604/ AM19 Rejected Date : 08.12.2022 RLA F.No. 03/95/040/0475/AM19 aDecision: The CommitteeLic.consideredNo. 0310823156the casedatedas per20.08.2018Agenda and Notedeethat the firm did: not wa

\

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and Noted that the firm did not appear for the Personal Hearing dated 08.12.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Reject the 0.i ee NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 03/95/040/0624/AM19 Rejected Case No. M- 421 ats Vidhi Speciality Food Ingredient Limited _ tone Decision: The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and Noted that the firm did not appear for the Personal Hearing dated 08.12.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Reject the case. ee CaseNo.M-422. |WMs.LeethalndustriesLtd,Cochin = == | Status Case: NC No. 13/22-23 Subject : Fixation of SION for Paper Cups for EOU Defered Date : 08.12.2022__ gee te a ee aif Decision: The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and decided to call for the

information of deficiencies:

1. Specification/Dimension of export items and GSM and sign of import item indicating whether import is in roll form or cut to sign.

2. Complete calculation for the requirement of raw materials both imported and indigenous of indicating net import c content and wastage separately. 3. Drawing and Design of cup and CAD of export items (Separately for outer wall and bottom part) giving efficiency. 4. Photograph of paper cup showing both outer wall and bottom part. D/L has beenissued to the firm on 15.12.2022. Hence, the Committeedecided to Defer the case. ‘Case No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 03/95/040/00079/AM06 Approved DateNC :No.08.12.2022 M-423 [Lic. N agaro.0310328733 Haveli Perfumes & Aromatics, Mumbai ——_| Status Case: dated 05.05.2005 a Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided for similar export item Norms have been approved in case No. 23 in Meeting No. 01/83 dated 05.04.2006, taking in to consideration these norms, and norms applied which ever is less, license is ratified as applied under:for as Export Itemvimeesgaa| Quantity Kg eee|[aaImportItem Vinyl Ether || eeQuantity3-20 KQ RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 03/95/040/00784/AM06 Approved ‘CaseDate No. M-: 08.12.2022 424 — | M/s.Lic. NagarNo. 0310350044 Haveli Perfumesdated & Aromatics,03.10.2005|Mumbaieeefor || “Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided for similar export item Norms have been approved in case No. 23 in Meeting No. 01/83 dated 05.04.2006, taking in to consideration | these norms, and norms applied which ever is less, license is ratified as applied for as under: yy by

)

;

==> picture [478 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Export Item | Quanti Import Item ch Quanti<br>Trans 2-Heptenal «(| 1.0Kg<br>——_—*| Ethyl Vinyl Ether| 3.20 Kg aa<br>oo | WNValeraldehyde A B8OKG<br>RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm<br>Committee<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

CaseNo.M-425 ~| M/s. Nagar Haveli Perfumes & Aromatics, Mumbai —s—S—s| SttatusCase: NC No. 13/22-23 RLA F.No. 03/95/040/00784/AM06 Approved Date : 08.12.2022 Lic. No. 0310401925 dated 29.09.2006 Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided for similar export item Norms have been approved in case No. 19 in Meeting No. 01/83 dated 05.04.2006, taking in to consideration these norms, and norms applied which ever is less, license is ratified as applied for as under :- Export Item —O( |Quantity,=—s | ImportIltem —— ——s—Ss<i‘| Quantity ‘Trans 2-Heptenal (| 1.0Kg =| Ethyl Vinyl Ether (| 3.375Kg | WN Valeraldehyde A B0KG RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm Committee CaseNo.M-426| M/s. Nagar Haveli Perfumes & Aromatics,Mumbai Status Case. DateNC No.: 08.12.2022 13/22-23 ikLic. F.No.No. 0310401924 03/95/040/00784/AM06dated 29.09.2006 Approved Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided for similar export item Norms have been approved in case No. 19 in Meeting No. 01/83 dated 05.04.2006, taking in to consideration theseExport norms,Item and norms —S—s|appliedQuantitywhich ever==—is| ImportIltemless, license is ————Ss—SsS|ratified as applied forQuantity as under:___ Trans -4-Decen-1-AL___|1.0Kg | Morillol(1-Octen 3-01) (|2.75Kg | NButyl Vinyl Ether [5.40 Kg RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm Committee CaseNo.M-427..~—| Ws. Nagar Haveli Perfumes & Aromatics, Mumbai —sS——SC=s|— Status Case: NCDate No.: 08.12.2022 13/22-23 | RLALic. F.No.No. 0310413403 03/95/040/01119/AM07dated 22.12.2006 foro Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided for similar export item Norms have been approved in case No. 02 in Meeting No. 01/83 dated 05.04.2006, taking in to consideration these norms, and norms applied which everis less, licenseis ratified as applied foras[under:-] Export Item | Quantity| ImportItem | Quantity — Trans -2-Dodecen-1-AL_ |1.0Kg | AldehydeC-10 (| 3.0Kg womens, | Ehtyl Vinyl Ether | 2.015 Kg -- RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm Committee C ss Date: 16.12.2022 Chetan Parkash Jaggarwal Foreign Trade Development Officer