DGFT Minutes

1

Norms Committee Minutes of the Mecting No 08-/AM 22-23 dated 02.09.2022 (held on 06.09.2022) under the Chairmanship of Shri Hardeep Singh, Addl. DGFT. ORK

The following Members of the Committee were present in the meceting:-

(i) Shri Shaish Kumar, Technical Expert (ii) Shri D.N. Mathur, Technical Expert (iii) Shri Nand Lai, Technical Expert

23 The Committee first considered the minutes of the Norms Committec Meeting No. 08-/AM 22dated 02.09.2022 (held on 06.09.2022) for confirmation and confirmed the same without any change.

Note:-

In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations observations received from concerned Technical Authority in carlicr cases of similar products. A scanned copy of such documents is placed at the end of the Minutes. The scanned copy uploaded is to be accepted. Scanned copy of the UO No./OM No. is reflected in the Minutes.

Manual Cases

a : _ NC/4/MEET/August/ 2022-23/ 08-/AM 22-23 dated 02.09.2022 MEETING NUMBER * (held on 06.09.2022) | Case No. M- 255 | M/s. Pooja Fragrance, Bangalore | Status Case: | NC No, 08/22-23 | HQ V.No, 01/83/50/800/ AM21 Defered | Date : | RLAF.No. 07/24/040/00308/AM20 | Lic. No. 0710116350 dated 20.04.2020 _ ; Decision: The Committce considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | defer the case for further examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | Case No. M- 256 M/s. Shree Rishabhdev Marble & Minerals Pvt I.td., | Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 Rajasthan | Defered Date | HQ E.No. | LOP No. 12-79/2018-100 KOU/6951 dated 02.07.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | defer the case for further examination. ‘The case has been referred for technical assessment (IDNM). | Case No. M- 257 M/s. Savitri Sugandalaya, Karnataka Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 HQ F.No. 01/83/50/604/ AM19 Defered | Date RLA F.No, 07/24/040/00190/AM20 | Lic. No.0710115903 dated 23.12.2019 | | | Decision: ‘The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | defer the case for further examination. ‘he case has been referred for technical assessment (JNM). | ‘ysa

2

tee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | defer the case for further examination. ‘he case has been referred for technical assessment (JNM). | ‘ysa

2

Case No. M- 258 M/s. Savitri Sugandalaya, Karnataka Status Case: | NCDate No, 08/22-23 RLAHQ }.No.F.No, 07/24/040/00143/AM2101/83/50/01068/ AM21 Defered | Decision: Lic. No. 0710116994 dated 11.09.2020 | defer The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | the case for further examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | | Case No. M- 259 M/s. Sri Vijayalakshmi Aarbathi Status Case: | NCDate No. 08/22-23 RLAHQ F.No.F.No. 07/24/040/00148/AM2101/83/50/01068/ AM21 Defered | |[Decision:][ The][ Committee][ considered] Lic. No. 0710117099[ the][ case][ as][ per] dated[ agenda] 06.10.2020[in][ presence][ of][ technical][experts][ and][ decided][to] defer the case for further examination. ‘The case has been referred for technical asscssment (I)NM), | Case No. M- 260 M/s. Sri Vijayalakshmi Aarbathi Status Case: NC No. 08/22-23 HQ }'.No. 01/83/50/01068/ AM21 Defered Date RLA F.No. 07/24/040/00225/AM20 Decision: Lic. No. 0710115962 dated 31.12.2019 defer The Committce considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | the case for further cxamination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | Case No. M- 261 | M/s. Sri Vijayalakshmi Aarbathi Status Case: NC No. 08/22-23 | RLA E.No. 07/24/040/00260/AM20 Defered | Date | Lic. No.

The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | Case No. M- 261 | M/s. Sri Vijayalakshmi Aarbathi Status Case: NC No. 08/22-23 | RLA E.No. 07/24/040/00260/AM20 Defered | Date | Lic. No. 0710116111 dated 11.02.2020 | Decision: The Committee considered the Case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to defer the case for further examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM).

Case No. M- 262 M/s. Nitta Gelatin India Limited, Cochin Status Case: NC No. 08/22-23 HQ ¥.No.01/83/050/00458/AM20 Defered Date RLA F.No. 10/24/040/00066/AM20 The Lic. No. 1010060321 dated 06.11.2019 case Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to defer the for further examination, The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM).

Case No. M- 263 M/s. Nitta Gelatin India Limited, Cochin | Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 HQ F.No.01/83/050/00458/AM20 Defered | TheDate Lic.RLA F.No.No. 10 1 10003400/24/040/01566/AM20dated 20.05.2021 | | cas¢ Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to defer the | for further examination. ‘The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | Case No. M- 264 M/s. Eswari Global Metal Industries Private Status Case: | | NC No. 08/22-23 | Limited, Karnataka | Defered Date | HQ E.No.JIQRNORMAPPLY 00116706 /AM22 | ‘Las

3

.

sment (DNM). | Case No. M- 264 M/s. Eswari Global Metal Industries Private Status Case: | | NC No. 08/22-23 | Limited, Karnataka | Defered Date | HQ E.No.JIQRNORMAPPLY 00116706 /AM22 | ‘Las

3

.

| RLALic. E.No.No. 0710116110 07/24/040/00265/AM20 dated 11.02.2020 | || Decision :The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and decided to call for the information of deficiencies: 1; COA report of both import and export items from the foreign supplier/puyer. 2. Reason for giving different HS code for Export and import items when both are lead. | 3. Complete calculation for requirement of raw material/s giving Chemical reaction with | |[D/L][ has] molecular[ been][ issued] weight[ to][ the] and[ firm] yield for[ on][ 08.09.2022.] the manufacture[ Hence,] of[ the] export[ Committee] item.[ decided][ to][ Defer][ the][ case.] || | Case No. M- 265 M/s. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals Ltd., Status Case: | | NC No. 08/22-23 Limited, Karnataka Approved | Lic. No3410044059 dated 18.04.2018 | = ; Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat | | Date RLA F.No. 34/24/040/00016/AM19 | | basis as under:.

c. No3410044059 dated 18.04.2018 | = ; Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat | | Date RLA F.No. 34/24/040/00016/AM19 | | basis as under:. | Export Item _ | Quantity Importitem | Quantity | | R410A(Refrigerant Blend | Purity) OR | Refrigerant Gas 1.0 MT Chloroform (minimum 99% 1.37 MT | | | R410A(Filled in Cyl of251bs/1 | | | | 1.3 kgs Gas capacity made out | | | | of CRCA S/Sheel (Blend of R- | | | | | 32-50%, R-125 -50%) | | | | Methanol Nil | Fluorspar (Acid Grade) 1.02 MT | | Difluoromethanc (HFC-32) (R0.50 MT 32) - | | | Anhydrous Hydro Flurie Acid Nil | | Relevant Packing Material (i.e. Allowed as per | | GasEmpty Capacity Cylinder)(251bs/11.3 made out of CRCA kgs GeneralPacking Policy material forof | | || | | s/Sheet of thick up to 4mm) H.B. Procedure Vol. II | | | RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm || | Case No. M- 266 M/s. Atlantic Care Chemical, Kerala | Status Case: | NCDate No. 08/22-23 || RLALic. F.No.No. 1010056981 10/24/040/00080/AM14dated18.02.2014 | Defered || |[for][ further][ examination.][ ‘Ihe][ case has][ been][ referred][for][ technical][ assessment][ (DNM).] |[defer] Decision:[ the][ case] The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | Case No. M- 267 M/s. Atlantic Care Chemical, Kerala Status Case | | NC No. 08/22-23 RLA E.No. 10/24/040/00045/19 Defered | | Date | Lic. No. 1010058769 dated 03.09.2014 a

4

perts and decided to | Case No. M- 267 M/s. Atlantic Care Chemical, Kerala Status Case | | NC No. 08/22-23 RLA E.No. 10/24/040/00045/19 Defered | | Date | Lic. No. 1010058769 dated 03.09.2014 a

4

| defer the case for further examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 31/83/040/00051/AM16 Approved Date Lic. No. 3110065556 dated 23.07.2015 | | Case No. M- 268 M/s. Porocell India Limited, | Status Case: | Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms as applicd | for wastage is 0.008% as _under:a AluminaExport[Item] | Quantity _ Import Item ; Quantity | (Without Ball Durocel 242 | 62105.300 Kg | Alumina Powder AP22 | 62105 Kg | RA any filler) | | Committec.concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of I[BP as per above decision of Norm | || NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 10/24/040/00023/15 Defered | | Case No. M- 269 | M/s. Atlantic Care Chemical, Kerala | Status Case: |[‘The][ Committee][considered][the][ case][as][per][ agenda][in][ presence][ of][ technical][experts][and][decided][to] | |[Decision:] Date | Lic. No. 1010058474 dated 17.06.2014 | | defer the case for further examination, he case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | | Case No. M- 270 | M/s. Insecticides India Ltd., Maharashtra Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 | RLAK.No. 10/24/040/00023/15 Approved | Dated: 06.09.2022 | Lic. No.

ed for technical assessment (DNM). | | Case No. M- 270 | M/s. Insecticides India Ltd., Maharashtra Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 | RLAK.No. 10/24/040/00023/15 Approved | Dated: 06.09.2022 | Lic. No. 0310836054 dated 01.05.2020 | Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms as under:Export Item Quantity Import Item Quantity | | Ammonium Salt of | 1.0 Kg Glyphosate 95% TC | 0.731 Kg | | Glyphosate 75.7% WG | ail | RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm |Committee. | | | Case No. M- 271 M/s. ¥oamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur Status Case: | | NCDecision[Dated:] No. 08/22-23[06.09.2022] :The Committee| RLALic.considered F.No.No. 0510407360 05/23/040/00187/AM19the casedatedas30.07.2018per Agenda and decided | Deferedto call for7 the || information of deficiencies: 1. Manufacturing process of export item, giving stage wise wastage of raw materials both imported and indigenous. 2. COA report/composition of Export item, indicating weight in Kg terms.. | | 43 . C hemicalomplete namecalculation of DX 5011for theFoamrequirementStabilizer. of inputs (both imported and indigenous) giving | net import content and wastage separately for the manufacture of export item, along with Appendix | 4 E of the application giving quantity of indigenous items. | | D/L has been issued to the firm on 08.09.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Defer the case. | | |

==> picture [502 x 682] intentionally omitted <==

giving quantity of indigenous items. | | D/L has been issued to the firm on 08.09.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Defer the case. | | |

==> picture [502 x 682] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br>

|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|5|
|Case|No.|M-|272|M/s.|Foamtech|Antifire|Company,|Pitampur.|||Status|Case:|||
|Dated:|06.09.2022|Lic.|No.|0510403692|dated|17.08.2017|
|NC No. 08/22-23|RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00194/AM18|||Defered|
|Decision|:The|Committee|considered|the|case|as|per|Agenda|and|decided|to|call|for|the|||
|information|of deficiencies:|||
|1,|Manufacturing|process|of|export|item,|giving|stage|wise|wastage|of|raw|materials|both|imported|||
|and|indigenous.|
|2.|COA|report/composition|of|Export|item,|indicating|weight|in|Kg|terms..|||
|43|.|C|hemicalompletenamecalculation of DX 5011for theFoamrequirementStabilizer.|of|inputs|(both|imported|and|indigenous)|giving|||
|net|import content|and wastage|separately|for the|manufacture|of export|item,|along|with|Appendix|||
|4|E|of the|application|giving|quantity|of|indigenous|items.|
|D/L has been|issued|to the firm on|08.09.2022.|Hence, the Committee|decided to Defer the case.|||
|||Case No. M- 273|||M/s. Foamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur|Status Case:|||
|||NC No. 08/22-23|||RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00008/AM19|Defered|
|Dated:|06.09.2022|||Lic.|No.

|decided to Defer the case.|||
|||Case No. M- 273|||M/s. Foamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur|Status Case:|||
|||NC No. 08/22-23|||RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00008/AM19|Defered|
|Dated:|06.09.2022|||Lic.|No. 0510406107|dated|12.04.2018|||oS|||
||Decision|:The|Committee|considered|the|case|as|per|Agenda|and|decided|to|call|for|the|||
|information|of|deficiencies:|
|1.|Manufacturing|process|of|export|item,|giving|stage|wise|wastage|of|raw|materials|both|imported|
|||and|indigenous.|
|||2.|COA report/composition|of Export item, indicating weight|in Kg terms..|||
|||4.3.|CompleteChemical namecalculation of DX 5011for theFoamrequirement Stabilizer.|of|inputs|(both|imported|and|indigenous)|giving||||
|||net|import|content|and|wastage|separately|for the|manufacture|of export|item,|along|with|Appendix|||
|||D/L|has4 Ebeen of theissued applicato|t|ionhe|givingfirm|on quantity of08.09.2022. indigenousHence,|theitems.Committee|decided|to|Defer|the|case.||||
|NC|No.|08/22-23|RLA|F.No.|05/23/040/00195/AM19|Defered|
|CaseDated: No.06.09.2022 M- 274|Lic.M/s.No.

firm|on quantity of08.09.2022. indigenousHence,|theitems.Committee|decided|to|Defer|the|case.||||
|NC|No.|08/22-23|RLA|F.No.|05/23/040/00195/AM19|Defered|
|CaseDated: No.06.09.2022 M- 274|Lic.M/s.No. Foamtech0510403693 Antifiredated Company,17.08.2017 Pitampur__|||Status Case:||||
|Decision|:The|Committee|considered|the|case|as|per|Agenda|and|decided|to|call|for|the||||
|information|of|deficiencies:|
|1.|Manufacturing|process|of|export|item,|giving|stage|wise|wastage|of|raw|materials|both|imported|||
|and|indigenous.|||
|2.|COA|report/composition|of|Export|item,|indicating|weight|in|Kg|terms..|||
|3.|Chemical|name|of DX|5011|Foam|Stabilizer.|||
|4.|Complete|calculation|for|the|requirement|of|inputs|(both|imported|and|indigenous)|giving|_||
|le|net|import|content|and|wastage|separately|for the|manufacture|of export item, along|with|Appendix|||

----- End of picture text -----<br>

6

| 4 E of the application giving quantity of indigenous items. | | D/L has been issued to the firm on 08.09.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Defer the case. | | Case No. M- 275 M/s. Foamtech Antifire Company, Pitampur Status Case: |[06.09.2022] Lic. No. 0510405353 dated 15.01.2018 |[Dated:] NC No, 08/22-23 | RLA F.No. 05/23/040/00402/AM18 | Defered | | Decision :The Committee considered the case as per Agenda and decided to call for the | information of deficiencies: | 1, Manufacturing process of export item, giving stage wise wastage of raw materials both imported | and indigenous. | | 32 **.

per Agenda and decided to call for the | information of deficiencies: | 1, Manufacturing process of export item, giving stage wise wastage of raw materials both imported | and indigenous. | | 32 . C hemicalOA report/compositionname of DX 5011of ExportFoam item,Stabilizer.indicating weight in Kg terms.. | | 4. Complete calculation for the requirement of inputs (both imported and indigenous) giving | net import content and wastage separately for the manufacture of export item, along with Appendix 4 E of the application giving quantity of indigenous items. D/L has been issucd to the firm on 08.09.2022. Hence, the Committee decided to Defer the case. | | Case No.[06.09.2022] M- 276 Lic.M/s.No. Roha0310822113 Dye Chem Privatedated 04.07.2018 Limited | Status Case: | |[Dated:] NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 03/95/040/00279/AM19 Approved. Decision: | | | | ‘Tartrazineiixport ItemThe(C.1.No.19140) committee considered| Quantity1.0 Kg the case|| asDimethylImportper agenda andItem Acetyl Succinate decided: to ratify|| 0.426Quantity the norms Kg/Kg as under:| || _| (Dye content87% 98% | | | , Sulphanilic Acid 98% Min | 0.800 Kg/Kg _ | | Sodium Nitrite 98% Min | 0.315 Kg/Kg 1 | | |[Soda] Caustic[ Ash] Soda[99%] 99%[Min] Min || 0.170 Ke/Kg | | RA 0.570 Kg/kg | 71 | concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm Fa | Committee. ig NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 07ax04000201/am23 Approved | | CD a ts e d: No.06.09.2022 M- 277 | Lic.M/s.No.

ecessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm Fa | Committee. ig NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 07ax04000201/am23 Approved | | CD a ts e d: No.06.09.2022 M- 277 | Lic.M/s.No. Brilliant0711004025 Printers PivateDATED Limited19.05.2022 Status Case: Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and the request of the firm for amendment in Description import item, which was ratified in the mecting no. 06/NC/4/MEET/JUN/202223 dated 19.05.2022. The Committee decided to taking cue from SION A 1569, the following norms may be recommended. _ Decision: The committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms as under:| | Export Item | Quantity Import Item | Quantity | | | Printed Books= Qty | 15714.0 Kg Printing Thin paper - 17600 Kg || | 17000 Nos.(Contents of | uncoated 39 gsm, 91 CM (for Y Printing Thin Paper 17000 copies = | | ly

7

| Uncoated, 39 gsm 91 cm | | =15714 Kgs | | Printed Books= Qty 8000 | 11242.0 Kg Printing Thin paper - 12591.0 Kg | | | Nos.(Contents of uncoated 30 gsm, 70 CM (for x | | (Printing Thin Paper 8000 copies) a All=11242Uncoated,Kgs 30 gsm 70 cm | | || RAother conditions of norms ratified carlicr will remain unchanged. concerned may take necessaty action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm | | Committee. | | | NCCaseNo, No.08/22-23 M- 278 M/s.RLA ShalimarF-.No. 07/24/040/00272/AM20Incense Private Limited, Karnataka StatusDefered Case: | Dated: 06.09.2022 Lic. No.

above decision of Norm | | Committee. | | | NCCaseNo, No.08/22-23 M- 278 M/s.RLA ShalimarF-.No. 07/24/040/00272/AM20Incense Private Limited, Karnataka StatusDefered Case: | Dated: 06.09.2022 Lic. No. 0710116150 dated 20.02.2020 | Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to defer the case for further examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | Case No. M- 279 M/s. Shalimar Incense Private Limited, Karnataka Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 07/24/040/00718/AM19 Defered Dated: 06.09.2022 | Lic. No.0710113504 dated 28.06.2018 _ Decision: a | defer The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | the case for further examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM). | Case No. M- 280 M/s. Shalimar Incense Private Limited, Karnataka Status Case: | | NC No. 08/22-23 RLA V.No. 07/24/040/00718/AM19 Defered Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda in presence of technical experts and decided to | Dated: 06.09.2022 Lic. No, 0710113391 dated 05.06.2018 | | defer the case for further examination. The case has been referred for technical assessment (DNM), Case No, M- 281 M/s. Sumitomo Chemical India Ltd., Mumbai Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 03/94/040/00684/Am19 Approved Decision:Dated: 06.09.2022The Committee consideredLic.

sessment (DNM), Case No, M- 281 M/s. Sumitomo Chemical India Ltd., Mumbai Status Case: | NC No. 08/22-23 RLA F.No. 03/94/040/00684/Am19 Approved Decision:Dated: 06.09.2022The Committee consideredLic. No, 0310824976the case asdatedper agenda12.11.2018and as© per the discussion; heldain the Norms Committee, It has been decided to amend the export Qty unit of measurement as only Under for ratification purpose. | || Export item | measurement) measurement) ; | Existing Norms (Unit | Revised Norms (Unit | | Chloropyriphos 48% KC | Kg Litres | | RA concerned may take necessary action under Para 4.7 of HBP as per above decision of Norm e | All other conditions of norms ratified earlier will remain unchanged. A Committee. hs Date:9.09.2022 Chetan Parkash Jaggarwal