DGFT Committee Minutes

Norms Committee Minutes of the f(1eeting 0.11/83 dt.16.10.2020 under the Chairmanship of Shri SBS Reddy, Add!. DGFT.

---

The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting:- (i) Shri Nand Lal, Consultant, DPIIT (ii) ShriShaish umar, Technical Expert. (iii) Shri D.N. Mathur, Tec nical Expert. The Committee first considered ~he tnutes of the Nbrms Committee Meeting No.11/83 for confirmation and confirmed the same without!any hange. I I I Note:- I In certai cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/Observations received from the concerned Technical Authority in earlier cases of similar products. A scanned copy of such documents is placed at the end of the Minutes. The scanned copy uploaded is to be accepted. The U. O. No. / a.M. No. ofthe scanned copy is reflected in the Minutes. M/s. Omtech Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai F. No. 01/83/50/600/AM16/DES-IV HLA. No. 03/95/40/253/AM16 Lie. No. 0310797024 dated 02.07.2015 Decision: The Com-m-it-te-econlside~;dthe ~a-se a'sper -;;-g;~d~~~-d n~ted that the firm has filed representation against the decision of the Norms Committee which is beyond 90 days and thus subjected to payment of composition fee of Rs. 5000/-. In this regard, letter dated 30.09.2020 was issued to the firm for fee submisJion. he committee decided to reject the case as the composition fee ~~s_~:~~reC~ivedrrom firm i-~=__:,#

--c-

..-

Case No. M- 560

M/s. Bifumag Industries Pvt.Ltd, Vadodara

·-rstatu~-c~se:---- NC No. 11/20-21 F. No. 01/83/50/458/AM19/DES-IV Reject Date: 16.10.2020 RLA. No. 34~24/40/00047/AM19 Lic. No. 3410044341 dt.19.07.2018

---

--

---

---

---

---

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the firm has filed representation against the decision of the Norms Committee which is beyond 90 days and thus subjected to payment of composition fee of ~s. 5000/-. In this regard, letter dated 30.09.2020 was issued to the firm for fee submission. The committee decided to reject the case as the composition fee was not received from firm.

Case No. M- 559

NC No. 11/20-21 Date: 16.10.2020 Status Case: Reject

• -t--- -~ -- --_.....

---

---

..- --_. ---- - l caseNo. M- 561 r-M/S. Bitum~t~dustris 1;-~t.Ctd,V;dod~ra -------- JStatus Case:

NC No. 11/20-21 F. 0.01/83150/454/AM19/DES-IV Reject Date: 16.10.2020 RLA No. 34/24/40/0048/AM19

---

.l Lie. No. B410r"~42.~!~107,20}8 _ _

I : I Decision:~,tt\h-;:;r ide ;ttd- ca e- ~ - I;;;~ nd noted that the~ir;~h~--filed- representa~ioh a~ainst the deci ion lof fhe ormr, ~Orrnittee ~hi hils beyond 90 day and thus su 'ectbld to payment 9t c9,1npolsdon feelJf Rs·1SOOO/-.In ~his regrrd, letter tJated 3b.09.2020 wfs iss ed to 1e fi~~ for fee SU~lf The commit ee decided 0 rele .t he case Is t e clompbsltlon fee was n trecel d NC No. 11/~0-21 j F. N I' 01/ 3YsO/4S6/4~lQ/ I ES-IV Reject Date: 16.10.202ID RLA 0.3 /24/40/0046{Afrtl ~9 --------~-j~--J++-+--lAA_~IJ~}~±~q~~-=~~9dFr~2 ._~01~-1 -- -t--- L-+

-_ _ Decision: THe O())rmittee co'ttiderF,0 the cale Ia t'ler atend and noted that the firm h. s filed representation ak,inslt the deci~ion f the ~orm.r. [O+rnittee ~hi~h 15 beyond 90 day' and thus sul~jectlJd to payment of c9mposition fee IOfRs. spoo/-. In ~his r~~~~rd,letter ~ated 3b.09.2020 wks issued to ~te fir~ NCNo. 11/f-0-1n F. NOI.01/ 3{SO/4S9/A~1~/~PS-IV Reject Date : 16.1ID.~020 RLA~ . 3 24/40/004161M{l~9 j

---

'-+ 1--111 ~__+ Aft~.?1443~~-=9~f-_I __ -J-- '- _ __ Decisionlh~ cF ittee consider :~I.the cast as 1ger ag~nd aind noted that ~he firrn ha file to payment 0t cdrpdsitl'on fe9 f Rj' 6000/--. I t is regard, lett r ~ate 30.09.20201 was issued 0 thl~ firm for fe~ slub~ission. The c I mm t lee decided t IJject the caJe as the compo itio fee wa~ not NCNo. 11/tO-Q11 F. No. 01/ 3/50/ 9S/ 19r.~p-IV/ j Reject Date: 16.1CUID20 RLA. o. °i!95/040/6 :OYA~8 J. --------ltt II -J-1 Lic.O~-9-ff-.:!d~ 1~921~? 18 _ _ Decision: -~he &mmlittee con ider· dt the cas as per agenda ard oted that tlhe f'rm representa~i1~ against the deci~i notre Norms Co nli~tee 1hiCr iSI.bey I nd 90 days and t us o paymen1 01 c9rrlPosition feel of R . 5000/-. In t Is regard, le!T"date 30.09.2020Iwas issu irrn for fer S~briSSIOnt The odmrrl ttee decid d to liect thib as '" :~Posltlon fee C No. l1/,O(H F. N0ll 1/8 /SO/3?4/A1 19{9P-IV R ject ate: 16.10. 0201 RLA.110.0 /9S/040/018 / ~18 I

• --i++- - +~~~.~o

~~r§~18 +
_
ecision:
el Corrmlttee
consider
dt the
cas
as pe(
agelnda a~d
n10ted that
t e f rm
epresentat
ol~aJailnst the deci~ion 0 the Norms c~mmlittee whiCJ is beyond 90 days and t us
o payment
0lftc9mpobition
fee bf Ris.~OOO/-.In this rJ~ard, Ilett9r
ated 30.09.2020Iwas
issu
irm for fee S~bri~sibn.
The C mmi tee
decid d to r~I'ect the
lase as the composition
fee
eC!,iyed flOnj.!lrrw-+-
--- tt- --- ----
-.
2
~
-"---""----1-'~"l -
--- -l--t- - ------ -
-- --
~-
-- --
-
Ca e:
-
--
I----
ha
filepi
sub ,ctep
ed
([)thel
w ~ ndt,
-- e---
L-
Ca e:
has filed
sub ecteb
ed If th~
We
no~
---
--

rCa~~ No.M- 566 -
NC No. 11/20-21
Date: 16.10.2020
1
M/s
Shitallndustrie~
Pvt.Ltd., Guja~at
-
-
-
F. No. 01/83/50/567
/AM16/DES-IV
RLA
0.08/24/040/105/AM16
AA No. 0810135687 dt 17.07.2015
. - --- - ._-------
_. -----------_.
Decision:
The Committee
considered the case as per agenda and decided to defer the case. Review
application has been received from the firm and was sent to technical expert (SK) for examination and
providing comments. D/L raised by TE issued on 5.10.2020. Reply has been received by the applicant sent
to TE 12.10.2020. Comment is awaited. The case has been re-listed for 20.11.2020.
---------- --- r~~:-
== --~--
-
-
.: - ~
.-----
-
-- ..--_ --
1
M/s
Unitop Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Mumbai
JStatus Case:
## Case No. M- 567
F. Nol.01/~3/50/560
/AM18/DES-IV
Reject
NCNo. 11/20-21
RLAr'Jo.0, /95/040/871/AM18
_D!_~~-.:~~~~~!-O
__
1 AA N . ~}~Q~}?§}~dt}9:.01.2018
~__+.
+ _.
-
_
Decision:- The Committee
coI sidered
the
case as per agenda and noted
that
the firm
has filed
representation
against the
d~cisior
of the
Norms Committee
which
is beyond
90 days and thus
subjected to payment
of comfosit
on fee of Rs. 5000/-.
In this regard, letter
dated 30.09.2020 was
issued to the firm for fee submissio
. The committee
decided to reject the case as the composition
fee
was not received from firm.
rSt~tu-; Case~
Deferred
,---------
Case
o. M- 568
NC No. 11/20-21
Date: 16.10.2020
-
-
-----------
M/s. Kiri Industries Ahmedabad
Status Case:
HQ
. No. 01/83/050/00508/AM19/DES-IV
lReject
RLA.No. 08/24/040/00190/AM19/
Licence NO.0810143387 dt, 06.09.2018
--. - -
-
- -
1- -
-- - --
-
-- --
-
--
- .-- ----------
---
Decision: The Committee
considered
the
case as per agenda and noted
that
the
firm
has filed
representation
against the decision
of the
orms Committee
which
is beyond
90 days and thus
subjected to payment of composition
fee of Rs. 5000/-.
In this regard, letter
dated 30.09.2020 was
issued to the firm for fee submission. The committee
decided to reject the case as the composition fee
was not received from firm.
~~s~~.~~~~~g_~~-- +-
--
'1 ~6s .K~~~~~~~~~~~~;1~~-~;~~19/ DE~-~~- -- - --- -----l!:~:-~:~-c-as-e-:
---
Date: 16.10.2020
RLA No. 08/24/040/00323/AM19/
_Lice_~
0.0810144_200dt, .9_~.O~~gl~
.___
_
_
Decision: The Committee
co
l
sid red the
case as per agenda and noted
that
the
firm
has filed
representation
against the
decisi n of the
Norms Committee
which
is beyond
90 days and thus
subjected to payment of composiFion fee of Rs. 5000/-.
In this regard, lette
dated 30.09.2020 was
issued to the firm for fee sub
ission. The committee
decided to reject the case as the composition fee
I was no..!.!:.eceivedfrom ~i!1'!2.:--I t-- -- - -
- --.---- ---
1
M/s. Agrisoli~di;p~t~
Ltd"HYde~~b-a-d----------rtatus
Case:
HQ F.No. 01/83/50/01l76/AM19/DES-IV/Pt
Reject
RA F No. 09/24/040/00485/AM19
Lie. NO.0910067109 dt. 24.01.2019
-D;ci~-i~~: Th;-C~m~itte~
~onsidt~d-
t-h~- cas~ as per-agenda --~nd
not~-d-th-atthe
firm has
filed
. ~epres~_~tat~n_~ga~ns~.the
.ecision of the
Norms Committee _w~ich JS _E~yon~_90 days_and~hus_
## Case No. M- 570
NC No. 11/20-21
Date: 16.10.2020
3

s;;-bjectJpavment
LO"lPOsit
0 f~h
I~-Sp90('n
(hi - rfgard~ lette;-;Jated 3ilM:20
0 ;;;as~
Case No.'11nH -I t
Mis
ropJs
IndiaN L dl Hy~abld t --
Itatus C
e:
NCNo. 111
20
r21
I
HQ fl.
o.
1(83/S0/0r~/1~~9/DES-J~1
1
Jeject
Date : 16.1O.202~
R.AFI o. P /94/d40/0Pi6/frr119
-----l.J+---+Tt-t-
I_LIc.JIJ_,03 .9i~~~2r54dt- ~r.'O~+~Ql-8_
_
_
Decision:
T1e Fommittee
COfide
ed the
ca~e a
1Per ag ndj,nd
loted
that
the
fIrm has filed!
representa
ior
1~1inst the
de isio
of the
N~r
s ddmmittee
wrich
is beyond
~O days and thu~
subjected
~olpa~ment
of comb
siti n fee of R , 500~f-'
In fhiS regard,
letter
date~
30.109,202
waJ
issued to t~eUirm lorllee subml!sion
The commit ee [.
to fct
t e case as th~ CTositiO
leJ
__". 16~~jj~I~_
•. ~. F~ ~ti3;~~~~frt~11-
_-+-
__
_
Decision:
-~e Cllmmittee
c01 ider d thel cas~ fS pe
age da a1d
n
I ted
that
t e fir
has
led
~epresentatif~1 againsl the
dedi ion Of the
Noon],
~nnmittke 'I"hlch i
beyond 90 days and
us
jSUed
to ti
m
for Ife submiJ,ion
rhe commi'tt rrded
10 r jelt th
case as the com OSiti] lee
-- ---------J-ll-1Jt -J -H~~-N~if-2~~_q~Z4~~t-~1il~~t20117_1-_1_- -_1-1- _
Decision:
The Committee
consi1erea
the
case e~ PEr agenda
n1 not1ed that
th
firnp has filed
rJpresentatidn
ag,ll1st
the
deci~lon
I f the
I Nor I s Cp
mitte~
"'1hiSh is beyond
90 days and t~us
sJbjected
to paymrnt
of compoSition fee 01 Rs. 5~0o/-.lln
this r'galrd, letter dated BO.0~.2020
1 as
is)ued to the firr for f~e submisji
".
he commit e I d.
ided to rej~cJ the base as the 10mISition
e
~~C~Vfrr~~~b
~i tt-~H-=- =Stat ~~se.
N I No. 11/20 21 I
HQ F.No 011
3/S010067}4M10YDES-IVI
App10ved
~
te :1~0ll+- _d; F~~3:tf~~;:~t~fdl~
I~__
,_
~ ~
Sas under:-
~:~u;I:;Jt
+
-100
:*,rlF9rJr-d-,~:i
1
800:oDi(g
I
I
I
Kg
Dry BaSIS~iVql§
- - - ,----,--

-----r--------------------
---f, -r~--r
I
I
i
~se~
M~S
RU
I ami;J~,Jja~t~~-----.--
s~ s Case
~~~!~O~G:b~~~~ia~l1:'1~
__-' J::ved__
AMMONIUM
D, MOIHBDATE
6~ 000
f'l0'YbdenUr
CIa
I pound 01
506280
Kg
I
Kg
Dry B:asis aVi~g
.
I
I
I
Molybden
T oonent
of
-- ---------- .-jl--'H--'-J
1-- -·1---·--1~6~t~OE~.-g~-d·d~,D[:-1---
--~i59S0Kg------~-------
r_-
11'1
T
I
~tYI~
--
~--
f-
I
I
I
rn~e_4L}- __ -+-----_~ _
--
--------~-
-t -+- ----
---j
P~~a L~~J.m.?:!~'Y~3}- ---+-.E2:~~-----r----
r_-----
co~tent
of
7L5f
1nd
bre~overy
pf f o.und
90%
pn
~I olybdenum
I con lent
basis
i.e.
.111
K
MdIYbdenum/[~
of 'Moly
denum
content
'Inthe Mol1YOden in corppound.
Noe-2.
In case
of tariation
of
I Iybc efum
conterlt
ir
the
Moly
I dJnum
compound,
the
pro-rat
the Molybden
m bo~pound
as per
erti icate 01analylis rrA)
frr
f~rJign s!upplier.
RA foncerned.
rpay ta~. neJssary
~jtion under ~ara 4.7 of ~IBP as per abLe
c ecision of
Norms Comm'tte~
I
--
,NCNo. 11/20-21
HQ FINo. 0' /83(59/S0S/AM
1/0Es-rv/ pt
.Deferrdd
]
r
ate
16.10.2020
I RAFl'Jo. 36P4/~4P/023/A~
14
I
•
--------¥-i -"17°~0}~i'~(970~3
+-T-- ---;----
__
~
1-1
I
I
5
..•.,t-.
I
~,
I'
I
I
I
I
I
r-t----+- ---- ---------~-1T--11t--1-
t-----
---+ -1----1----
- -~_
I
--

I ---
I
I
I
I
I
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
;
I
I:
I
-------- -It--iii--l--i-----
---; -i--~----4-+--+-44-
1---
-1-
-IT--
---
f- -
__
-------4---'

j-- ---
1,
:
~1------'1----------
--1--------------~-- ---- -------
------
,
Ii
I ~
I
-- j-1j--tJi--i--ft-----
I
I
I
I
I
W
I
I
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I--ltT-----~+,------------1---- ------ -- -
----.---.-~-

N-METHYL PYRROLIDINE
1.241 Kg
r------------------------+~~~~~--------------~
1,2A TRIAZOLE
0.400 Kg
----
----
--------
--.-----"'------------------4
ETHY.':,S=YCLO
~X!\_~
_-__
0~._1_..:3~5_K_~gc_
_"_
_
I 1
~'~~~f;~L~6~~~~~~iQ~
------~:6~~{:--
--------------
1--
.__
--
--
l£oR~ATE
--
---
-------------------1
RA concerned
may
take
necessary
action
under
## Para 4.7 of
HBP as per
above
decision
of
orr
I Committee.
NC No. 11/20-21
HQ F. 0.01/83/50/604/AM16/DES-IV/pt
Date: 16.10.2020
RA F No. 03/95/40/00217/AM-16
________
__
~i~N_o·Q~~.9+?~71.~~_Q~:...
09·9!~201_5
.
L.
---j
Decision:The
committee
consider
d thj
case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms as under:-
_~xport Ite~ __=_---- _tlm~~rti~~ =__
City
DIFLUFENICAN TECHNICAL
1 Kg
2-CHLORO
ICOTINIC ACID
0.476 Kg
98% MIN.
1-------------- ---- -- -
2,4-DIFLUORO ANILINE
0.370 Kg
---. --- ------
-
--- --- -- ------ -----------------
3-HYDROXY
0.500 Kg
BE ZOTRIFL ORIDE
1-----------------+4----
--+'---- -------.------.- - ----- ---------------
0.889 Kg
PAHA CHLORO BENZYL
CHLORIDE
I
~.-------------------~-+----------------~
SODIUM HYDRIDE (60%)
0.246 Kg
Status Case:
Approved
RA concerned
may
take
necessary
bction
under
## Para 4.7
of
HBP as per
above
decision
of
Nor
Committee.
~ ---- - --
--
\
NC No. 11/20-21
HQ F.No. 0l/83/50/67/AM19/DES-IV/
Reject
Date:
16.10.2020
RA F No. 03/95/40/01060/AM-18
_ __
Li~:..~~.031Q819598
DT~0?~23.20~____
_
_
Decision:
The Committee
consi
ered
the
case as per agenda
and
noted
that
the firm
has filed
representation
against
the
decision
0
the
Norms
Committee
which
is beyond
90 days and thus
subjected
to payment
of composi lion fee of Rs. 5000/-.
In this regard,
letter
dated
30.09.2020
was
issued to the firm for fee submission.
T e committee
decided to reject the case as the composition
fee
was not received from firm.
Mj~Re;Tone
I~dustrie~ LimitedM~m-bai-
--
[tatU~-------l
HQ
.No.Ol/83/50/164/AM18/DES-IV/
Reject
RA F No. 03/95/40/00001/AM-18
Lic. NO.0310813079
DT. 05.07.2017
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
__
--0
considered
tbe
case as per agenda
and
n~te.9_ t~~t !h~irm
~~~ed.
I
## Case No. M- 583
NC No. 11/20-21
Date: 16.10.2020
Decision
: The Committee
8
-------------------------
---- -------
---

I
I
I
I
I
I
~'t--rrf-~
--- -----j-- --\---- ----------- --------
_______
--.-i-----

-=JH~tJ-jifl~B~ttNG-
~o~
- -
Rt concerne~ [a~
take
necess
ac Ion under Para •.~ of HBPa
per above decision of Nor s
---- ----------
--- -- --- --~------
---
-----
Cafe No. M- 5~91
MI Vs MOLtex
lass Fi re IrdUS Iriels
Stat~scase:
N~No.1l/20-n
!
Private td.,
ufnbai
I
Appnoved
~02~
lNOO
~OB 9455cedJij.
6.1201~-+___
_
__
1-----
~:~/;E,e co",-rmi~Of5irJ~;~ f'~r; ~
d!9 e .IE.!tify~r"'~t~
."!'E!r
-frEr.JMESH1at- -1-1-~t-t-r---~ASUil\ntN-- ~
o:s5 Kg
LASSFI8RE
I
------
I~
t- - --l
I j-ov~- i=_-=-==
04~2~g
-.-+-+---1
'
-------t4
I _
_ _
_
+_~
"f'
f'~E~ASS",
'S~T'NG
-
~
51<JL
;:~~~:;e~
t ke ecessrye =:
an: ~f_H
p as :er.:~o~eci~ia ':::0 5
-s:~:U-
M/~~
alii co~
~ In IuSf~es-G~
: =-==
5t9tusCa,+:~---+-h
~C No. 11/29-2
11
R~ F ~m. 08 24/04P/00 103/+f?O
I
Approved
~101~
_
lIc NoloBj 145Ta
e'jr
2
:
9
_ _
--
-----I-+-~
~~~:t~]195
'DY~ -LACK-l~
- - 'f~!~r!~lMINf:~iEN
L---
~rg
.:te:t!t
-
-~
= j _~
$= P~ml=
-_ -= --== $_-6_
K
-"l-+----l-l1
1 rms
I
SlatusC
NC No. l1/~ol21t
F. Nqj 01/ 3/050Y005([)9/1~
I
Deferred
Date : 16.1p.~020
RLA N0. 0 /94/040/0~140:1,A,18
-4~
+
AA N! .03 0815652 d tb~
.09.2017 t
-O;ci,;;;;;; Tt.co
m m iiie;;:on~de
/ihe tcase .r.- P~1agenra-a nd de~ilded-todef~r th -caSe. F ~i'1'1'
applicati01
h~s ~efn Ireceived f
10m
he firm an
as s rt to ~ech ic I ex ert (DNM) 'lor e aminatilci n anp
J"o~n~fi -9 E~rai~
I
~ fssr- n ~O
29~~ePlt
hilSb~ed.iJ
the apw[;cat
I
--------
~_f__t"-'---l-~ _f--j---
I
I

I
Ti--T -----ihth-L- -t+---
1---- -11-- JI-+- 1JJ--'-
t is :t
--t
-
--
-------+--f_
Nf No. 11/20t2~
I
j
.N . 01/83/50
1 l{A 120/9ES-'
Cas :
Date:
16.10.2020
I
LA
o. 08h4/0n
/00057/
Arvr20
1
Defi rred
:h---- -l-. -t- +----
-~-~JO~~~}44
'j~? d~t~d }_O~Q~9~__
_
A~vanceAut orizatl
issuedforFPI
r 15 item.
ette I! beissuej
_
N I No. 11/20-
1
21
. No. OJ/83/50/F.67
AIA[I20/DES-IV
Cas :
D~OI02~
'-+-l hAN~~~f%
V ld$
ol~
--r
Def rree
D.ciSion'Th~comm¥leeconside1d *e case asVr !~nda and d~ided 10 defer '~e case. Re'liew
adplication
has Ibe~n received
frorr
th
firm Jnd %1 se
~ to techn = expbrt
(SK) for examfnation
sind
PlrbVidingco~ments. DIt raIsedb~jTEi sued0n 5.1p.~ofte p'~ha beenrkceivedbyI Ie apblica nIl. nt
IOIE~10fb
~le]sttr!T-:Cdll'~11120~
-=~
C se
o. M- 5~4
) l'}'1/s D ~ Finh-emicals
~-La
Jratories
(R) L d.,
]~S
N~ No. 11/20-21
I
F. No. 0~/83/
50/00699118
j
casTi
D1te: 16.10.2b2?
LANoj b3/9
/040/0052EI:AM19
Defnred
4is~,Je1t~T~~o~~P~d
de~dtodefert~e~
se. Rel~i-;;
aplplication
has beenl refeived
frdr
th
firm land
el~t
91technlical
expert
I(DNM) for examination
Ind
providingco"]menlf.D/L rbisedJr TE ssued on 2 .09.~~O.Replyhas be~nreceivedby Ih, appli
nt
tT~35r5~trt~r1
t[;~il:rae~Je~
edf~r~lL:]:,-
NClNo. 1J/20-12t
I
~Q F.No 01{PVsO/~30/trJ,i19/fIES-IV}1
pt
Rejebt
D te:
16.10.2020
I
HA F Nol. 09/~;/040A003~51A~
8
_---0IJ1l1 ~::!w~rfaler
__t'·o.'~Ol1J- __ 1__ ~_
-
- __
D cision
: THe fcof[nilteel
consldiered
Ithe case
a
I er
age~da
ana
no ed
that
thl
fir
has
lied
relPresentatiol~
agatst
t~e decisio~
of tt~NO+S
cp+mittee
which i b1eyontd 90 days a~d thus sUbje10ted
to]payment
0 cpmp?sition
fee of [15.50
0/-. In thisl rE?gar ,Iletter
da ed!30.09.2020
was issue~ to the ~irm
fo I fee submi
sion. The committe
de ided to reject
t e case as t e €Om.dosition
f.ee.Jvas.t'
rece iLed
fromf!cmi
- Inj--- ---+ ---
-J- ~
NO No. 11/20-p-i
~Q F.No. 01/
3(50/1364
"f.111/jES-IV}pt
Rejebt
Dal e : 16.10.20l
0
I I
RA F No 09/2
/040/003
5{9 I
b
-----.-~
Llf'" 4¥re
6,'
-~
~
-
~
~
I
1
I
I
--:--------
---
:
I
i

l!
I.
=- ---±U± ------tt---=--+~==------
--~I-
__t---~-
Defision
: ThF
Comrittel
consi
ered
the
case
a~
e1 agenta
and
no ed
that
thl
firr
h
representation
,gainst
the
drcisiorl
of 1i1e Norms
C01m
ttee
whibh
i~ bhon~
90 days antJ thus
su
to
ayment=P~Sitilmfee of R .50'
0/-. Inthisr g"dll'etterld'ted fO-O~-2020 wasilsue~tDt
for fee sUbmi1sion.
r~e co I mittee
deb ded
to reject
the case a
thb
aompbsition
fee ~as
Tt
r
!.:~~--t-
t+ - - r+-- --- -t -'-~---~
I
I
I
Da e : 16.10.2
129
RA F No.
I
_ ~_______:P~ ~ L~'EN~:9 10~ 6f-~.§l--+!36±~1~_lM__
~_~
_
Decision: The comlli
tee
conside
d t
e case
as p~rlage1aa
and
decidFd
t
call for furt
er i
l for
## Case No. M- S~F (b)
MIs
Bha
irad
a Chemicallnduft
es Ltd.
NcINO. 11/20-F
HQ F.NO
r
ol/k
AISO/V40/
Millr~DES-IVV pt
Daie:
16.10.2020
I
RA F No.
I
I
~-t-~---~J ~4J- _~ic._N~WO~
7060 d!}6
0 ~?~~9-----1-
~
--+_
~ h~eg~lL
JS b~ele~~rli
!d
'~l'1~2t
I~Is~s relistedfor ~1~
CageND.M- 517t
"1/s Bhair.J a chericall duttfl"sLtd.
.rtat}ca
NcINo.11/2o-pl
I
HQ F.NOI 01/8
SO/242/AM20
(JIES-IV/lpt
efe~red
Dake : 16.10.2020
RA F No.
I
I
1
- -IJt1l-I~:r~I~LO~~I__- -- ----~-
De· ision : Th~CO
mitte
conside~
d th
case 1as p rag
10a and derided
t
call for furt
er imform
~l'~iS~]
~e
~ a~
,~e cdl =r~
~~s
re-li~edfDtl~
CaeND.M- 5'Fkin-
M sBhagcad aChemieallndutt\i,es
Lt
rtatu Ca
NC No. 11/20-11
HQ F.No.
1/8
/'SO/0IBS/Af20lDIES-'V/
pt
Defe1red
Da e : 16.10.2020
I
RA F No.
11 I
I
___
~ J~-+ fc- ~~:
1~0 7~~
jdtl~'~l~!t!_~
~_~_~~_ -1--- _~_
De lision : Th~CO
ml1te
conside,~d
th
case as PTrl~gI~da
an
decided
t
call for furt
er imform
In t
is regard,
ID/LhaJ
een raised tJ the fir1m dated
15. 0jh020.
Th
I case is re-listed
for
20.1
.20
~s;NO~(d~
=J~IJ~~dUS
~~~-=-5=sca
r
NC o. 11/20-41
I
I
HQ F.N0
1
1 P1/~~/SO/0229/fr2?/
IES-IVYpt
I ith~raw
Da e : 16.10.2~20
RA F No. (i)8/21/?40/0013'
/A~16
I
__~~~---M
.Lie ND.Ol0135M,-ed
2b.c ~.01~
. -
-
-
I
I
l'
I
~
I
I
I
rr+r ---------~r 11~--tL~--
-TlT--~+--
--
-- ~-
as
i ed
bje
ed
he r rm
ece
ed
-- ~-
se:
-~
---
ma ion.
20
se:
--
mati on.
20
---
~-
---
-
se:
--- --
at , n.
20
~- --
-- -
se:
-- ~-
at , n.
20
~-
=-1
--
se:
n
~
---
---

\
, Decision 'The committe.r;~nside;:Lhe
ca~-';--;-;;;;';~ge~~: and it ';;as noted tha~m
has withdrawn
the case as the case was earlier approve
in NC Meeting
NO.07/83 dated 13/11/2019.
Status:
C No. 11/20-21
~Q F.~o.
Defer
Date:
16.10.2020
RA F
o.
f-------
__
L·c.:.~.:2Q2-_009_2_6~§.9~1_2.03.2013
_
Decision: The Committee
considered
the case as per agenda and decided to defer the case. D/L raised by
TE issued on 10.09.2020.RePJy..fr~r:!1 :~~fr.~~~
aw~~e<!:...Th~caseJ2.asbeen re-listed for 20.11.2020
--~---------- -
~
## Case No. M- 600
NC No. 11/20-21
Date:
16.10.2020
-
---
-
[~/s-
ode~~-I~~s~cticide;Li;'it~~d -CCdhi~a -----ISt~t-~;~-------
HP. F. \0.
Defer
RA F No.
_ _ _
~N'?j:
~0~01.9363_~~~6..:2-0.3..Q~5
_
Decision: The Committee
considered
the oase as per agenda and decided to defer the case. D/L raised by
TE issued on 10.09.2020. ~eply from
Ihe fi ~.~_a~aite~.
I~e_case has bee~ re-listed for 20.11.202._0
_
r
----
~---.!---.----- - -------- -
-.
-----
-..---------=t:-- -
--
## Case No. M- 601
MyS Di ine Stone Enterprises,
Status:
NC No. 11/20-21
J HCD. F.N . 01/83/162/351/AM13/DES-IV
Approved
Date:
16.10.2020
.----.--1
-----
._-------
--
-- - - -----
-.........----- - ---------
Decision:The
matter
was placed out
of agenda where
the representation
received
from
M/s
Divin
Stone Enterprise
requested
clarification
on Wastage
Norms
Fixation
was discussed. The request
wa
brought
to the committee.
The committee
examined
the request
and it was found
that
the minute
recorded
in meeting
of
NC
o. 2/14
held
on 10.4.2013
and meeting
of NC-IV No. 28/13
eld 0
10.10.2012 had a typographic error.
he Ird
"Wastage" was erroneously added in the 6" column
I
both cases, so it was decided to remo r th
same. The rectified
decision is mentioned
below -
Meeting
reference
- NC NO. 2/14 held on 1, .4.2013
S. No
Stone Item
Wastage
Wastage percentage
Total wastage
Output
Percentage
on
recommended
in
percentage
on
input
basis
dressing of blocks and
input basis
carving of shaped pieces
1.
Dome
42.80
8.4
51.20
48.80
2.
Mandovar
43.35
8.4
51.95
48.05
3.
Kaksasan
58.70 \
I
8.4
67.1
32.90
\
Meeting
reference
- NC-IV
o. 28/13
held on 10.10.2012
Wastage
Wastage
percentage
Total wastage
Output j
Percentage a
recommended
in dressing
percentage
on
input
basis
of blocks and carving of
input
basis
shaped pieces
~~~~
S. No
Stone Item
13
e
s
s
n
n

·1
!
I'
I
I-~
,
..
:
I
I
--c-- ------Jr-{t - r-t------~J__ 1------ - ~--1----1-- ------~---+__.___4__---- --
1,
Column /3ase
. 1,5t
n
~.f+0
1
39.90
60.10
2.1
Colurnh
?9.5C
~·rO
1
37.90
62.1
I
3.1
Column The~i
h.5C
~·flO
29.90
70.1
4.
Column 'l~at~a5ara
~7,0('
~·rO
I
1
55.40
44.60
II
5,
Column
Capltal
~9,6(
~.rO
48.00
52,00
6.
Ceilings ,L~y~r-l
I
47,0(
I
1&·140
I
55.40
44,60
I
7,
Ceilings Lay~r-2
~7.0(
I
~'140
55.40
144,60
I
8.
Ceilings Lay~t-3
~7.qq
&.140
55.40
144,60
9.1
Kangr~
~3.d(
~·140
I
51.40
48.60
lQ.
Chhaj~
1
p4.011
~j40
I
72.40
127.60
II
Beams
I
5.0
I
~j40
I
23.40
76.60
14.
Toran I
1 I
I )3.0~
I
~j40
I
61.40
38.60
1~.
Jali
I
I
I 9.d~
8140
I
27.40
72.60
~~
"l~===[li=~=*I~_+t_6~4===6==
## Case No. M-602
MIs Nitta Gelat ne 11d~ Ltd+
Statu"
D cision:The r~que9t was receiV~d fr( 1M/s Nit ta GJlaflne regan, in
its pending claims f(j)rDEPB
license in the P94. ~)C4~as referr
d th
matter to NC
I
IVtb seek op nibn on the claims mad,
by the
fi m that the SiaN has a typogra
hical error, The matt
IkNasdiscussJd
in the NC meeting
/20-21
itr'
the unit hals been mentione,
as 'I' gl' in SIGNArr
.
Adcordinglv,
(he
re~uest
Was al 0 ref9rred
to
{APEfll
lor
Jeek n~ inputs
lrom
the
corcerned
cdmpanies
a~dl~royiae
their opinion Jf the SIO 'i~ela~e
noJ
i
reaei\.lledrJply from CAPEXI stating
that the SIGNInee1i coreetion
as
equested Jy th T .
tne eXiStingr- fjryin SIGN J1827 is amer"Jdedl
rea
as (l)nlder- I
[
A1ilJ-if
Aidhtem
J-Qt~.---f- -
~+p~-rtie';f---
-
-TQty----l
I
'-0 se~h---
--
--lMrr-- - - #U~h~1B;r
es --- -]4.0 MT -J
It is menti~"'t.'
LZe1m~al s"'eto
b~ a;;-~ ~PilOlii,henC:Z
Publ ;:Nabee
is
,-~E~!e9_!~_~~I?-pbIiSf-~
-1..---_.---f--f---- t---
--f--
---
--------'---
----1-+--'
## Case No. M- 603
M/
I hdia Gela in1e& [hemic
Is
Status:
L
~
I
I
I
Ir
I
_~~~l~~{~I~io
II
I
~ _:r~01~3/ISOYl6S~A:-:~_
:Ie~e~ __
oI;cision:TheleJ;\;;~
tee ednsidel~d
th Aase t,nd
e]ndtoted
Ph~sical heari 'g lor more F'arillCation.
he
c bmmittee d cide~ to c~11for additionl, Idocurentf
ant
i~ this rega~d D/L has been iSSUEd to the firn
On 02'11'20l9...01je'caseli~e':-~bd
for 20,111.2020,[
j
---------r I I~--t
I
--
I ---: -t-----~- '-'---I '------,-.
--1----.
I
I
I
I
I
1~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----1 ---t ---t ---~----
.- - -- - ----J-~-------~--------
I
I
I
l.;~ "
i
-
•.•.•..- •....j
L- __
~
'---

I
I
I
I
I,
Cf
I
.,. 7
Sheta)arkash
Jjggarlwal
Fore! n Trade De e1lo
lent Office
I
'
D te:06.11.2020
PI ce:New Delhi
---1-- -r--t---