aaa saad Government of India Ministry of Commerce and Industry Department of Commerce
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE
Meeting No - NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 Meeting Date - 15/10/2021
Minutes of the Norms Committee – 3 Meeting No. NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 dated 15.10.2021, was actually held on 21.10.2021 and 29.10.2021 under the Chairmanship of Dr. Amiya Chandra, Addl. DGFT for considering the cases/issues under Duty Exemption Scheme (Chapter-4) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 pertaining to Chemical and Allied products falling under Chapter 29 and 30.
Following members were present in the Meeting:
| Sl.<br>No. |
Name & Designation |
Department |
| 1 |
Shri Shaish Kumar, Technical – 1 |
Consultant |
| 2 |
Shri D.N. Mathur, Technical – 2 |
Consultant |
| In attendance |
|
|
| 1 |
Shri Ajay Kumar, Deputy Director |
DGFT |
- The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspect/ wastage norms. While redeeming the application, RAs should check that the applicant has fulfilled all requirements as prescribed in policy/procedure including those in policy circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for issuance of Advance Authorization and regularization of the case.
The committee went through the minutes of earlier meeting No. NC/3/MEET/Sep/202122/8 dated 24.09.2021 (actually held on 01.10.2021).
MANUAL CASES
| Case No. |
A-01 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Gopinath Chem-Tech Ltd., Ahmedabad |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00674/AM17/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
08/24/040/00215/AM17 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0810138683dated 16.09.2016 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Gopinath Chem-Tech Ltd., Ahmedabad for<br>enhancement in the quantity of import items in respect of adhoc<br>norms fixed against Advance Authorization No. 0810138683 dated<br>16.09.2016 |
| Decision:The Committee considered the request of the firm and in view of the justification given by the firm<br>for low yield of 48.65% in the last stage of reaction, and therefore considering minimum yield of 60% due to<br>oxidation of raw materials and oxidation polymerisation, the Committee decided to revise adhoc norms as under:<br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>S.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>ACRYLIC MPDSA.(4 AMINO 2<br>(CARBOXYETHYL)<br>AMINO<br>BENZENESULFONIC ACID)<br>1 kg<br>1<br>M.P.D.<br>(META<br>PHENYLENE<br>DIAMINE)<br>1.338 kg<br>2<br>SODA ASH<br>2.1 kg<br>3<br>CAUSTIC<br>SODA<br>FLAKES<br>OR<br>CAUSTIC SODA LYE (100% REAL<br>BASIS)<br>3.1 kg<br>4<br>ACRYLIC ACID<br>1.31 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-02 |
A-02 |
A-02 |
A-02 |
|
Meeting No. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00953/AM/15/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
09/24/040/00060/AM15 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0910060145Dated. 19.05.2014 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad for fixation of<br>adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No. 0910060145 dated<br>19.05.2014 |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to ratify adhoc norms under<br>Para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less: <br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>DOLUTEGRAVIR SODIUM<br>1 kg<br>1<br>(R)-3-Aminobutan-1-ol<br>0.395kg<br>2<br>Dimethylformamide Dimethyl acetal or 1, 1-<br>dimethoxy-N,N-dimethylmethanamine<br>2.08 kg<br>3<br>2,4-Difluorobenzylamine<br>0.47 kg<br>4<br>Acetonitrile<br>1.77 kg<br>5<br>Aminoacetaldehyde dimethyl acetal<br>1.67 kg<br>6<br>DimethylOxalate<br>1.677 kg<br>7<br>Methyl-4-methoxy-3-oxobutanoate (or) 4-<br>Methoxyacetoacetate<br>1.245 kg<br>8<br>Potassium carbonate<br>1.60kg<br>9<br>Methylene dichloride<br>3.29kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
DOLUTEGRAVIR SODIUM |
1 kg |
|
1 |
(R)-3-Aminobutan-1-ol |
0.395kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Dimethylformamide Dimethyl acetal or 1, 1-<br>dimethoxy-N,N-dimethylmethanamine |
2.08 kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
2,4-Difluorobenzylamine |
0.47 kg |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Acetonitrile |
1.77 kg |
|
|
|
|
5 |
Aminoacetaldehyde dimethyl acetal |
1.67 kg |
|
|
|
|
6 |
DimethylOxalate |
1.677 kg |
|
|
|
|
7 |
Methyl-4-methoxy-3-oxobutanoate (or) 4-<br>Methoxyacetoacetate |
1.245 kg |
|
|
|
|
8 |
Potassium carbonate |
1.60kg |
|
|
|
|
9 |
Methylene dichloride |
3.29kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction as |
|
|
|
per above decision of NC. |
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-03 |
A-03 |
A-03 |
A-03 |
|
Meeting No. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00997/AM13/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
09/24/040/00354/AM13 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0910054116 dated. 16.10.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad for fixation of<br>adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No. 0910054116 dated<br>16.10.2012 |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to ratify adhoc norms under<br>Para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less: <br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>Methyl-2-[3(S)-[3(2-(7-<br>chloroquinoline-2-yl)<br>ethenyl]<br>phenyl]-3-chloro<br>propyl]<br>benzoate Hydrochloride (MKU)<br>1 kg<br>1<br>Methyl-2-[3 (S)-[3 (2-(7-chloroquinolin-<br>2-yl) ethenyl ]phenyl ]-3-hydroxy propyl<br>]benzoate hydrate(HCP)<br>1.12 kg<br>2<br>THIONYLCHLORIDE<br>0.57 kg<br>3<br>ACETONITRILE<br>0.50kg<br>4<br>METHYLENECHLORIDE<br>4.44 kg<br>5<br>METHANOL<br>2.50kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
Methyl-2-[3(S)-[3(2-(7-<br>chloroquinoline-2-yl)<br>ethenyl]<br>phenyl]-3-chloro<br>propyl]<br>benzoate Hydrochloride (MKU) |
1 kg |
|
1 |
Methyl-2-[3 (S)-[3 (2-(7-chloroquinolin-<br>2-yl) ethenyl ]phenyl ]-3-hydroxy propyl<br>]benzoate hydrate(HCP) |
1.12 kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
THIONYLCHLORIDE |
0.57 kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ACETONITRILE |
0.50kg |
|
|
|
|
4 |
METHYLENECHLORIDE |
4.44 kg |
|
|
|
|
5 |
METHANOL |
2.50kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction as |
|
|
|
per above decision of NC. |
|
| Case No. |
A-04 |
| Meeting No. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00044/AM12/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
09/24/040/00422/AM11 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0910045287 dated. 28.01.2011 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad for fixation of<br>adhoc norms fixed against Advance Authorization No. 0910045287<br>dated. 28.01.2011 |
| **Decision:**Deferred for comments of TE. |
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-05 |
A-05 |
A-05 |
A-05 |
|
Meeting No. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00104/AM16/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
09/24/040/00662/AM15 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0910061843dated31.03.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad for fixation of<br>adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No. 0910061843 dated<br>31.03.2015 |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to ratify adhoc norms under<br>Para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less: <br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>N-(4-fluorobenzyl) 5-hydroxy-<br>1-methyl-2-(2-{[(5-methyl-1<br>3<br>4-oxadiazol-2-yl)<br>carbonyl]<br>amino} propan-2-yl)-6-oxo-1 6-<br>dihydro<br>pyrimidine-4-<br>carboxamide<br>(or)<br>N-(4-<br>fluorobenzyl)-5-hydroxy-1-<br>methyl-2-(1-methyl-1-{{(5-<br>methyl-1<br>3<br>4-oxadiazol-2-<br>yl)carbonyl}amino}ethyl)-6-<br>oxo-1<br>6-dihydropyrimidine-4<br>carboxamide (RALTEGRAVIR<br>STAGE - VIII)<br>1 kg<br>1<br>Hydroxyl amine .HCl<br>1.810kg<br>2<br>Dimethyl acetylene dicarboxylate(DMADC)<br>2.619kg<br>3<br>N-Methylpyrrolidone(NMPO)<br>4.189kg<br>4<br>Dimethyl formamide<br>0.006kg<br>5<br>Acetonitrile<br>3.85kg<br>6<br>Methylene Dichloride<br>12.67 kg<br>7<br>Methanol<br>22.36kg<br>8<br>o-Xylene<br>4.75kg<br>9<br>Acetic Acid<br>3.017 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
N-(4-fluorobenzyl) 5-hydroxy-<br>1-methyl-2-(2-{[(5-methyl-1<br>3<br>4-oxadiazol-2-yl)<br>carbonyl]<br>amino} propan-2-yl)-6-oxo-1 6-<br>dihydro<br>pyrimidine-4-<br>carboxamide<br>(or)<br>N-(4-<br>fluorobenzyl)-5-hydroxy-1-<br>methyl-2-(1-methyl-1-{{(5-<br>methyl-1<br>3<br>4-oxadiazol-2-<br>yl)carbonyl}amino}ethyl)-6-<br>oxo-1<br>6-dihydropyrimidine-4<br>carboxamide (RALTEGRAVIR<br>STAGE - VIII) |
1 kg |
|
1 |
Hydroxyl amine .HCl |
1.810kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Dimethyl acetylene dicarboxylate(DMADC) |
2.619kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
N-Methylpyrrolidone(NMPO) |
4.189kg |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Dimethyl formamide |
0.006kg |
|
|
|
|
5 |
Acetonitrile |
3.85kg |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Methylene Dichloride |
12.67 kg |
|
|
|
|
7 |
Methanol |
22.36kg |
|
|
|
|
8 |
o-Xylene |
4.75kg |
|
|
|
|
9 |
Acetic Acid |
3.017 kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction as |
|
|
|
per above decision of NC. |
|
| Case No. |
A-06 |
| Meeting No. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00847/AM/13/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
09/24/040/288/AM13 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0910053905dated 26.09.2012 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad for fixation of<br>adhoc norms fixed against Advance Authorization No. 0910053905<br>dated 26.09.2012 |
| Decision:The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to call for following<br>information from the firm:<br>(i)<br>Molecular weight of all input and output items.<br>(ii)<br>Percentage yield on molar basis for all the steps. |
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-07 |
A-07 |
A-07 |
A-07 |
|
Meeting No. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00528/AM/16/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
09/24/040/00396/AM15 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0910061183 dated 05.11.2014 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad for fixation of<br>adhoc norms fixed against Advance Authorization No. 0910061183<br>dated 05.11.2014 |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of<br>Para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given below or as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
ELETRIPTAN HYDROBROMIDE<br>ALPHA FORM |
1 kg |
|
1 |
D-Proline |
3.61 kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
5-Bromo indole |
4.42 kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Dimethyl formamide |
0.10kg |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Vitride(70% Solution in Toluene) |
8.80kg |
|
|
|
|
5 |
Tetrahydrofuran |
9.44 kg |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Triethyl amine |
1.78kg |
|
|
|
|
7 |
Methane sulfonic acid |
0.98kg |
|
|
|
|
8 |
Potassium carbonate |
1.29kg |
|
|
|
|
9 |
Hydrobromic acid |
1.07 kg |
|
|
|
|
10 |
Acetonitrile |
9.23kg |
|
|
|
|
11 |
Hexanes |
4.67 kg |
|
|
|
|
12 |
Toluene |
37.20kg |
|
|
|
|
13 |
Dichloromethane |
19.14 kg |
|
|
|
|
14 |
Methanol |
21.24 kg |
|
|
|
|
15 |
Acetone |
3.85kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction a |
|
|
sper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-08 |
A-08 |
A-08 |
A-08 |
|
Meeting No. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00092/AM/15/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
09/24/040/00451/AM13 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0910058792 dated31.12.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad for fixation<br>of adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No. 0910058792<br>dated 31.12.2013 |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to ratify adhoc norms under<br>Para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less: <br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>LUMEFANTRINE<br>1 kg<br>1<br>2,7-DICHLORO-9H- FLUORINE<br>0.760kg<br>2<br>METHYLENE DICHLORIDE<br>1.380kg<br>3<br>METHANOL<br>2.19kg<br>4<br>ISO PROPYL ALCOHOL<br>0.555kg<br>5<br>SODIUM BORO HYDRIDE<br>0.060kg<br>6<br>DI-BUTYLAMINE<br>0.500kg<br>7<br>DIMETHYL FORMAMIDE<br>0.555kg<br>8<br>P-CHLOROBENZALDEHYDE<br>0.3476kg<br>9<br>N-HEPTANE<br>0.757 kg<br>10<br>ACTIVATED CARBON(CECA ENO PC)<br>0.011 kg<br>11<br>HEXANE<br>0.832 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
LUMEFANTRINE |
1 kg |
|
1 |
2,7-DICHLORO-9H- FLUORINE |
0.760kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
METHYLENE DICHLORIDE |
1.380kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
METHANOL |
2.19kg |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ISO PROPYL ALCOHOL |
0.555kg |
|
|
|
|
5 |
SODIUM BORO HYDRIDE |
0.060kg |
|
|
|
|
6 |
DI-BUTYLAMINE |
0.500kg |
|
|
|
|
7 |
DIMETHYL FORMAMIDE |
0.555kg |
|
|
|
|
8 |
P-CHLOROBENZALDEHYDE |
0.3476kg |
|
|
|
|
9 |
N-HEPTANE |
0.757 kg |
|
|
|
|
10 |
ACTIVATED CARBON(CECA ENO PC) |
0.011 kg |
|
|
|
|
11 |
HEXANE |
0.832 kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction as |
|
|
|
per above decision of NC. |
|
| Case No. |
Case No. |
|
A-09 |
|
|
| Meeting No. |
|
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
| Date |
|
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
| Firm’sName |
|
|
M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad |
|
|
| HQ F. No. |
|
|
01/82/050/00043/AM/12/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
|
01/82/050/01506/AM/15/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
|
01/82/050/01056/AM/15/DES-III |
|
|
| RLA F. No. |
|
|
09/24/040/00452/AM11 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/24/040/00085/AM13 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/24/040/00240/AM15 |
|
|
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
|
0910045290 dated 28.01.2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
0910052887 dated 05.06.2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
0910060930dated 10.09.2014 |
|
|
| Subject |
|
|
Request of M/s Mylan Laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad (formerly |
|
|
|
|
|
known as M/s Matrix Laboratories Ltd.) for fixation of adhoc |
|
|
|
|
|
norms against Advance Authorization Nos. 0910045290 dated |
|
|
|
|
|
28.01.2011, 0910052887 dated 05.06.2012 and 0910060930 dated |
|
|
|
|
|
10.09.2014 |
|
|
| **Decision:**The Committee considered |
|
|
the request of the firm and it was decided to ratify adhoc norms under |
|
|
| Para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
<br>Sl.<br>Import items |
Qty. |
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
ZOFENOPRIL CALCIUM |
1 kg |
1<br>Trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline |
1.02 kg |
|
|
|
|
2<br>Benzyl chloroformate |
1.76kg |
|
|
|
|
3<br>Dichloromethane |
2.75kg |
|
|
|
|
4<br>Triethyl amine |
1.75kg |
|
|
|
|
5<br>Methanol |
2.50kg |
|
|
|
|
6<br>S-(-)-3-benzoylthio-2-methylpropionic acid |
1.05kg |
|
|
|
|
7<br>Dimethyl Formamide |
0.11 kg |
|
| RA concerned maytake further necessary |
|
|
action asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-10 |
A-10 |
A-10 |
A-10 |
|
MeetingNo. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
M/s India Glycols Ltd, New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
HQ F. No. |
|
01/82/050/01039/AM17/DES-III<br>01/82/050/00038/AM18/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
05/23/040/00412/AM17<br>05/23/040/00556/AM17 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0510400608 dated 06.12.2016<br>0510401982 dated 17.03.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s India Glycols Ltd, New Delhi for enhancement in<br>the quantity of import item No. 2 – Silver Catalyst in respect of<br>adhoc norms fixed against Advance Authorization Nos. 0510400608<br>dated 06.12.2016 and 0510401982 dated 17.03.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Decision:The Committee considered the request of the firm and taking cue from earlier decision for same<br>export product in Meeting No.2/AM21 dated 24.07.2020against advance authorization No.0510405825 dt.<br>09.03.2018, it was decided to revise adhoc norms as under:<br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG)<br>1 kg<br>1<br>Denatured Ethyl Alcohol<br>1.123 kg<br>2<br>Silver Catalyst<br>(Activity 17% to 18%)<br>0.000284 kg<br>3<br>AluminaCatalyst<br>0.000362 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) |
1 kg |
|
1 |
Denatured Ethyl Alcohol |
1.123 kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Silver Catalyst<br>(Activity 17% to 18%) |
0.000284 kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
AluminaCatalyst |
0.000362 kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case No. |
A-11 |
|
MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
Date |
15/10/2021 |
|
Firm’sName |
M/s S M Herbals Pvt Ltd, CLA, New Delhi |
|
HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00842/AM14/DES-III |
|
RLA F. No. |
05/24/040/00239/AM14 |
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0510367886dated08.10.2013 |
|
Subject |
Request of M/s S M Herbals Pvt. Ltd., CLA, New Delhi for review of<br>norms in respect of adhoc norms fixed against Advance<br>Authorization No. 0510367886 dated 08.10.2013 |
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of firm and after deliberation,it was decided to grant<br>Personal Hearingto firm to explain their case. |
|
| Case No. |
A-12 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s S M Herbals Pvt Ltd, CLA, New Delhi |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00608/AM13/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
05/24/040/00147/AM13 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0510330512 dated 25.07.2012 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s S M Herbals Pvt. Ltd., CLA, New Delhi for review of |
|
norms in respect of adhoc norms fixed against Advance |
|
Authorization No. 0510330512 dated 25.07.2012 |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the request of firm and after deliberation,it was decided to grant |
|
| Personal Hearingto firm to explain their case. |
|
| Case No. |
A-13 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| RLA’sName |
M/s SM Herbals Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/01111/AM20/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
05/24/040/00321/AM14 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0510347573dated 27.12.2013 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s SM Herbals Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi for ratification |
|
of norms under Para 4.7.6 of HBP Vol. I (2009-2014) against |
|
Advance Authorization No. 0510347573 dated 27.12.2013 |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the request of firm and after deliberation,it was decided to grant |
|
| Personal Hearingto firm to explain their case. |
|
| Case No. |
Case No. |
A-14 |
|
|
|
|
| MeetingNo. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
| Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
| Firm’sName |
|
M/s Tina Organics Pvt. Ltd., CLA, New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
| HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00654/AM18/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
| RLA F. No. |
|
05/24/040/00256/AM18 |
|
|
|
|
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0510403979dated 11.09.2017 |
|
|
|
|
| Subject |
|
Request of M/s Tina Organics Pvt. Ltd., CLA, |
New Delhi for fixation |
|
|
|
|
|
of adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No. |
|
|
0510403979 |
|
|
|
dated 11.09.2017 |
|
|
|
|
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and taking cue from SION |
|
|
|
|
A-1145 and |
|
| manufacturing process furnished by the firm, it was decided to ratify norms under para 4.07 of HBP |
|
|
|
|
Vol. I as per |
|
| details below or as applied by firm whichever is less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty.<br>Sl.<br>Import items |
|
|
Qty. |
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
|
|
TRI<br>XYLENYL<br>PHOSPHATE |
1 kg<br>1<br>MIXED XYLENOL LIQUID |
|
|
0.939kg |
|
|
ADDITIVE FOR LUBRICATING |
2<br>PHOSPHOROUS<br>YELLOW |
SOLID |
|
0.0878 kg |
|
|
OIL |
(P4) |
|
|
|
|
| RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Case No. |
|
A-15 |
| MeetingNo. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
|
M/s Yasho Industries Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai |
| HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00897/AM18/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
|
03/95/040/00664/AM18 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0310817118dated 16.11.2017 |
| Subject |
|
Request of M/s Yasho Industries Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai for |
|
|
enhancement in the quantity of Import Item No. 2 in respect of |
|
|
adhoc norms fixed by NC-3 against Advance Authorization No. |
|
|
0310817118 dated 16.11.2017 |
| Decision: |
The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to call for following |
|
| information from the firm: |
|
|
|
(i)<br>Stoichiometric balance of chemical reaction with number of moles used to arrive at |
|
|
the quantity of raw material asked for. |
|
| Case No. |
Case No. |
A-16 |
|
|
|
| MeetingNo. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
| Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
| Firm’sName |
|
M/s Shiva Pharmachem Limited, Vadodara |
|
|
|
| HQ F. No. |
|
01/82/050/00926/AM15/ /DES-III |
|
|
|
|
|
01/82/050/00529/AM16/ /DES-III |
|
|
|
|
|
01/82/050/01116/AM15/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
|
01/82/050/00105/AM16/DES-III |
|
|
|
| RLA F. No. |
|
34/24/040/00100/AM15 |
|
|
|
|
|
34/24/040/00131/AM15 |
|
|
|
|
|
34/24/040/00200/AM15 |
|
|
|
|
|
34/24/040/00010/AM16 |
|
|
|
| Advance Authorization No. and Date<br>3410040395 dated 23.07.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3410040489 dated 27.08.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
3410040669 dated 07.11.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
3410041157 dated 22.04.2015 |
|
|
|
| Subject |
|
Request of M/s Shiva Pharmachem Limited, Vadodara for |
|
|
|
|
|
enhancement in the quantity of import item in respect of adhoc |
|
|
|
|
|
norms fixed by NC -3 against Advance Authorization Nos. |
|
|
|
|
|
3410040395 dated 23.07.2014, 3410040489 dated |
|
27.08.2014, |
|
|
|
3410040669 dated 07.11.2014 and 3410041157 dated 22.04.2015 |
|
|
|
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and on the basis of justification |
|
|
given the firm, |
|
|
| technical details justified by Chemical Engineer. Norms of 1.868 kg / kg seems to be justified, however in the |
|
|
|
|
|
| first two cases norms cannot be exceeded from 1.262 kg / kg as the firm had applied for 1.262 kg in those |
|
|
|
|
|
| Advance Authorizations and also the firm had not enhanced the quantity in its Advance Authorization. For other |
|
|
|
|
|
| two advance authorizations, norms of 1.868 kg / kg may be allowed. Accordingly, it was decided |
|
|
to revise adhoc |
|
|
| norms as under: |
|
|
|
|
|
| For Advance Authorization No.3410040395 dated 23.07.2014 and 3410040489 dated 27.08.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty.<br>Sl.<br>Import items |
|
Qty. |
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
|
3,5-Dimethylbenzoyl Chloride |
1 kg<br>1<br>Mesitylene / 1,3,5-Trimethyl Benzene |
|
1.262 kg |
|
|
(DMBC)Assay: Min 99%) |
Assay: Min 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Advance Authorization No. 3410040669 dated 07.11.2014 and 3410041157 dated 22.04.2015
| Export product |
Qty. |
Sl. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
|
No. |
|
|
| 3,5-Dimethylbenzoyl Chloride |
1 kg |
1 |
Mesitylene / 1,3,5-Trimethyl Benzene |
1.868 kg |
| (DMBC)Assay: Min 99%) |
|
|
Assay: Min 99% |
|
Note: The above norms are only for closure purpose of subject Advance Authorization. Hence, no repeat norms will be allowed on the basis of the above decision.
RA concerned may take further necessary action as per above decision of NC.
| Case No. |
Case No. |
A-17 |
|
|
|
| MeetingNo. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
| Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
| Firm’sName |
|
M/s Techno Drugs & Intermediates (P) Ltd., Mumbai |
|
|
|
| HQF. No. |
|
01/83/050/00503/AM17/DES-III |
|
|
|
| RLA F. No. |
|
03/95/040/00486/AM17 |
|
|
|
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0310392619dated02.08.2006 |
|
|
|
| Subject |
|
Request of M/s Techno Drugs & Intermediates, Mumbai for fixation |
|
|
|
|
|
of adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No. 0310392619 |
|
|
|
|
|
dated 02.08.2006 |
|
|
|
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and on the basis of information provided by the |
|
|
|
|
|
| firm, like Patent Copy for percentage yield obtained and also Batch BMR of the Plant, it was noted that there are |
|
|
|
|
|
| 25 operations involved also Export Product name as given by the firm, it was decided to ratify adhoc norms under |
|
|
|
|
|
| Para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details |
|
given below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less: |
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty.<br>Sl. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
|
4,4 dihydroxy-diphenyl)-pyridyl-2-methane<br>1000 kg<br>1 |
|
Pyridine-2-Aldehyde |
770.00 kg |
|
|
Note: The above norms are only for closure purpose of subject Advance Authorization. |
|
|
Hence, no |
|
|
repeat norms will be allowed on the |
basis of the above decision. |
|
|
|
| RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case No. |
|
A-18 |
A-18 |
A-18 |
A-18 |
|
MeetingNo. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
STERILE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, CLA, New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/00638/AM14/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
05/24/040/00203/AM14 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0510364653dated05.09.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Sterile India Private Limited, CLA, New Delhi for<br>fixation of adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No.<br>0510364653 dated 05.09.2013 |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered<br>4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given |
the request of the firm and it was decided to ratify adhoc norm<br>below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less: |
|
|
|
s under Para<br>Qty.<br>1.10 kg |
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
AMOXYCILLINE STERILE BP<br>(Amoxicillin Sodium Sterile BP) |
1 kg |
|
1 |
AMOXYCILLINE TRIHYDRATE BP |
1.10 kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction |
|
|
asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
| Case No. |
A-19 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Cipla Ltd., Mumbai |
| HQ F. No. |
F. No. 01/82/050/00972/AM17/DES-III<br>F. No. 01/82/050/00285/AM18/DES-III<br>F. No. 01/82/050/00610/AM18/DES-III<br>F. No.01/82/050/00127/AM19/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
03/94/040/00617/AM17<br>03/94/040/01181/AM17<br>03/94/040/00295/AM18<br>03/94/040/00822/AM18 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0310808312 dated 06.10.2016<br>0310812323 dated 03.04.2017<br>0310814908 dated 31.07.2017<br>0310818765dated30.01.2018 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Cipla Ltd, Mumbai for fixation of adhoc norms<br>against Advance Authorization Nos. 0310808312 dated<br>06.10.2016, 0310812323 dated 03.04.2017, 0310814908 dated<br>31.07.2017 and 0310818765 dated 30.01.2018 |
| **Decision:**Deferred for comments of TE. |
|
| Case No. |
A-20 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Cipla Ltd., Mumbai |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00779/AM19/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
03/94/040/00038/AM19 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0310820626dated 25.04.2018 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Cipla Ltd., Mumbai for fixation of adhoc norms<br>against Advance Authorization No. 0310820626 dated 25.04.2018 |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to ratify adhoc norms under Para<br>4.07 of HBP Vol. I as per details given below or as applied by the firm, whichever is less:<br> <br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Export Product<br>Qty.<br>1<br>Amoxicillin and Clavulanate Potassium for Oral Suspension USP 250mg /<br>62.5mg (Pack Size 75ml) Each 5ml contains: Amoxycillin Trihydrate USP<br>equivalent to Amoxicillin 250mg, Clavulanate Potassium USP equivalent to<br>Clavulanic Acid62.50mg<br>69214.000<br>Number<br>2<br>Amoxicillin and Clavulanate Potassium for Oral Suspension USP 250mg /<br>62.5mg (Pack Size 100ml) Each 5ml contains: Amoxycillin Trihydrate USP<br>equivalent to Amoxicillin 250mg, Clavulanate Potassium USP equivalent to<br>Clavulanic Acid62.50mg<br>118012.000<br>Number<br>3<br>Amoxicillin and Clavulanate Potassium for Oral Suspension USP 250mg /<br>62.5mg (Pack Size 150ml) Each 5ml contains: Amoxycillin Trihydrate USP<br>equivalent to Amoxicillin 250mg, Clavulanate Potassium USP equivalent to<br>Clavulanic Acid62.50mg<br>78380.000<br>Number<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>1<br>Amoxycillin Trihydrate<br>1683.05kg<br>2<br>CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM WITHSILICON DIOXIDE 1:1<br>898.660kg<br>3<br>SILICONE DIOXIDE(SYLOID 244FP)<br>Not matching with Master<br>Batch Formula<br>4<br>115CC HDPE BOTTLES 75 ML (250/62.5)<br>Relevant as per packing<br>policy<br>5<br>185 CC HDPE BOTTLES 100 ML (250/62.5)<br>Relevant as per packing<br>policy<br>6<br>225 CC HDPE BOTTLES 150 ML (250/62.5)<br>Relevant as per packing<br>policy<br>7<br>28-400 WHITE CLIC LOC CAP WITH PRINTED FSM-1<br>Relevant as per packing<br>policy<br>8<br>Cap 28/400 WHT CRC W/FS M-I WITH INDUCTION SEALING<br>Relevant as per packing<br>policy<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
| Case No. |
A-21 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Arch Protection Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/01448/AM21/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
03/94/040/00195/AM21 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0310837011 dated02.07.2020 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Arch Protection Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai for<br>enhancement in the quantity of import item in respect of adhoc<br>norms fixed against Advance Authorization No. 0310837011 dated<br>02.07.2020 |
| Decision:The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was the firm has not furnished any technical<br>justification in support of its request for enhancement in norms. Hence, it was decided torejectthe case<br>maintaining the status quo.<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
| Case No. |
A-22 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Balaji Amines Limited, Pune |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/02238/AM19/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
31/83/040/00149/AM19 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
3110067274 dated31.12.2018 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Balaji Amines Limited, Pune for enhancement in the<br>quantity of import item in respect of adhoc norms fixed against<br>Advance Authorization No. 3110067274 dated 31.12.2018 |
| Decision:The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was the firm has not furnished any technical<br>justification in support of its request for enhancement in norms. Hence, it was decided torejectthe case<br>maintaining the status quo.<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
| Case No. |
A-23 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Balaji Amines Limited, Pune |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/02499/AM19/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
31/83/040/00184/AM19 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
3110067338dated 28.02.2019 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Balaji Amines Limited, Pune for enhancement in the<br>quantity of import item in respect of adhoc norms fixed against<br>Advance Authorization No. 3110067338 dated 28.02.2019 |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was observed that the norms for the first<br>import item – 1,4 Butanediol were fixed at 1.06 kg due to some typing error. Hence, the Committee decided to<br>revise adhoc norms as under:<br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl. No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE<br>1 kg<br>1<br>1,4 BUTANEDIOL<br>1.16 kg<br>2<br>GBL CATAYLYST<br>0.001 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-24 |
A-24 |
A-24 |
A-24 |
|
MeetingNo. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
|
M/s Shirdi Chemicals Pvt Ltd, Mumbai |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/050/01009/AM20/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
|
03/95/040/01005/AM20 |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
0310834190dated 15.01.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Shirdi Chemicals Pvt Ltd., Mumbai for enhancement<br>in the quantity of import item in respect of adhoc norms fixed against<br>Advance Authorization No. 0310834190 dated 15.01.2020 |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was observed that Import Item No. 1 – Ortho<br>Cresol is used as a reactant and also solvent, taking into 65% recovery, it was decided to revise adhoc norms as<br>under:<br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>DMBPC<br>OR<br>4,4-<br>Cyclohexylidene<br>bis<br>2-<br>methylphenol<br>OR<br>Dimethylbisphenolcyclohexane<br>DMBPC<br>1 kg<br>1<br>Ortho Cresol Cas No. 95-48-7<br>1.05 kg<br>2<br>3-Mercaptopropionic Acid Minimum 99%<br>0.025 kg<br>3<br>Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid Minimum 94% 0.065 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
Qty. |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
DMBPC<br>OR<br>4,4-<br>Cyclohexylidene<br>bis<br>2-<br>methylphenol<br>OR<br>Dimethylbisphenolcyclohexane<br>DMBPC |
1 kg |
|
1 |
Ortho Cresol Cas No. 95-48-7 |
1.05 kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
3-Mercaptopropionic Acid Minimum 99% |
0.025 kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid Minimum 94% |
0.065 kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction as |
|
|
|
per above decision of NC. |
|
|
Case No. |
A-25 |
A-25 |
A-25 |
A-25 |
A-25 |
|
MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Firm’sName |
M/s Cropnosys (india) Private Limited, Mumbai |
|
|
|
|
|
HQ F. No. |
01/82/050/00647/AM19/DES-III<br>01/82/050/00087/AM18/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
|
RLA F. No. |
03/94/040/00527/AM19<br>03/94/040/00466/AM16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0310823957 dated 24.09.2018<br>0310811611 dated03.03.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject |
Request of M/s Cropnosys (india) Private Limited, Mumbai for<br>enhancement in the quantity of import item in respect of adhoc norms<br>fixed against Advance Authorization No. 0310823957 dated 24.09.2018<br>and 0310811611 dated 03.03.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and taking cue from earlier decision for same<br>export product / import item in Meeting No.10/AM19 dated 13.11.2018against advance authorization No.<br>0310676633 dt. 24.01.2014, it was decided to revise adhoc norms as under:<br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>2-Amino-3-Chloro-5-Trifluoromethyl<br>Pyridine Minimum98% [F1]<br>1 kg<br>1<br>2,3-Dichloro-5-trifluoromethyl<br>Pyridine<br>[DCTF]<br>1.20 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export product |
|
Qty. |
Sl.<br>No. |
Import items |
Qty. |
|
2-Amino-3-Chloro-5-Trifluoromethyl<br>Pyridine Minimum98% [F1] |
|
1 kg |
1 |
2,3-Dichloro-5-trifluoromethyl<br>Pyridine<br>[DCTF] |
1.20 kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction as |
|
|
per above decision of NC. |
|
|
| Case No. |
A-26 |
| Meeting No. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Jindal Drugs Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00053/AM19/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
03/94/040/00727/AM18 |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0310817723dated 12.12.2017 |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Jindal Drugs Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai for fixation of<br>adhoc norms against Advance Authorization No. 0310817723 dated<br>12.12.2017 |
| Decision:The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to call for following information<br>from the firm:<br>(i)<br>As per manufacturing process details, Eucalyptol Oil is crude, as such COA of import<br>item from foreign supplier indicating % composition & % purity, impurity profile.<br>(ii)<br>Complete technical specification of export item indicating purity profile.<br>(iii)<br>Justification for 5% wastage indicating wastage at each step.<br>(iv)<br>Production /Consumption data for last two years duly certified by GST. |
|
|
Case No. |
Case No. |
A-27 |
A-27 |
A-27 |
A-27 |
|
Meeting No. |
|
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
15/10/2021 |
|
|
|
|
Firm’s Name |
|
M/s Clean Science and Technology Limited, Pune<br>(Earstwhile known as M/s Clean Science and Technology Private<br>Limited, Pune) |
|
|
|
|
HQF. No. |
|
01/82/MISC/Para 4.06/3/AM22/DES-III |
|
|
|
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
|
Not issuedyet |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
Request of M/s Clean Science and Technology Limited, Pune<br>(Earstwhile known as M/s Clean Science and Technology Private<br>Limited, Pune) for fixation of norms of the export product Ascorbyl<br>Palmitate with one of the inputs Ascorbic Acid under Para 4.06 of<br>HBP Vol. I (2015-20) |
|
|
|
|
**Decision:**The Committee considered the request of the firm and taking cue from earlier decision for same<br>export product in Meeting No.7/AM21 dated 24.12.2020 (Case No. A-63), it was decided to ratify the norms<br>under para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I as per details below:<br>Export Product<br>Qty<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import item<br>Qty<br>ASCORBYL PALMITATE<br>1 kg<br>1<br>PALMITIC ACID<br>1.10 kg<br>2<br>THIONYL CHLORIDE<br>0.50 kg<br>3<br>ASCORBIC ACID<br>0.729 kg<br>4<br>N,N DIMETHYL ACETAMIDE<br>0.67 kg<br>5<br>METHYLENE DICHOLORIDE<br>0.78 kg<br>6<br>N-BUTYL ACETATE<br>0.67 kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export Product |
Qty |
|
Sl.<br>No. |
Import item |
Qty |
|
ASCORBYL PALMITATE |
1 kg |
|
1 |
PALMITIC ACID |
1.10 kg |
|
|
|
|
2 |
THIONYL CHLORIDE |
0.50 kg |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ASCORBIC ACID |
0.729 kg |
|
|
|
|
4 |
N,N DIMETHYL ACETAMIDE |
0.67 kg |
|
|
|
|
5 |
METHYLENE DICHOLORIDE |
0.78 kg |
|
|
|
|
6 |
N-BUTYL ACETATE |
0.67 kg |
|
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction |
|
|
|
asper above decision of NC. |
|
| Case No. |
A-28 |
| MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
| Date |
15/10/2021 |
| Firm’sName |
M/s Hubergroup India Private Limited, Mumbai |
| HQF. No. |
01/82/MISC/Para 4.06/1/AM21/DES-III |
| RLA F. No. |
--- |
| Advance Authorization No. and Date |
Not issuedyet |
| Subject |
Request of M/s Hubergroup India Private Limited, Mumbai for<br>fixation of norms for the export product - Vegetable Oil based Fatty<br>Butyl Ester (having 83% Lauric Acid and 22% Normal Butanol<br>(ITC HS Code– 29159099) under Para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I (2015-20) |
| Decision:The Committee considered the request of the firm and it was decided to call for following information<br>from the firm:<br>(i)<br>As per the process given, mixture alongwith Normal Butanol is heated upto 1200 C,<br>which is not possible, since N Butanol B.P. is below 1200 C. Please explain.<br>(ii)<br>Function of PTSA & TPP in the process of manufacturing.<br>(iii)<br>Justification for 7.4% wastage in simple mixing process. |
|
|
Case No. |
A-29 |
|
MeetingNo. |
NC/3/MEET/Oct/202122/9 |
|
Date |
15/10/2021 |
|
Firm’s Name |
M/s Solvey Specialities India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai<br>(Formerly known as M/s Rhodia Specialty Chemicals India) |
|
HQF. No. |
01/82/050/00069/AM19/DES-III |
|
RLA F. No. |
03/95/040/00976/AM18 |
|
Advance Authorization No. and Date |
0310819042 dated08.02.2018 |
|
Subject |
Request of M/s Solvey Specialities India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai (Formerly<br>known as M/s Rhodia Specialty Chemicals India) to consider its<br>request under Para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I and to allow import item No. 2<br>– Ascorbic Acid |
|
Decision:The Committee received the following request from firm and RLA, Numbai to ratify norms under<br>Para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I considered following points:<br>(i) The firm vide e-mail dated 15.02.2021 had informed that they had submitted their application under<br>para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I, however, RLA, Mumbai inadvertently issued subject Advance Authorization<br>under para 4.07 of HBP Vol. I. Accordingly, the firm had requested to allow import item No. 2 –<br>Ascorbic Acid as they had submitted their application under para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I.<br>(ii)<br>RLA, Mumbai vide letter dated 22.04.2021 has stated that they had issued Advance Authorization No.<br>0310819042 dated 08.02.2018 to M/s Solvay Specialities India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as<br>M/s Rhodia Speciality Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd.) instead of Para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I. Now, RLA,<br>Mumbai has requested to review the application under para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I and on the receipt of<br>revised norms, the redemption will be considered further.<br>The Committee considered the above requests and it was decided to allow import of Ascorbic Acid under Para 4.06<br>of HBP Vol.I. Accordingly, it was decided to ratify the norms under para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I as per details<br>below: <br>Export product<br>Qty.<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>Import items<br>Qty.<br>Bricorr<br>Flow<br>(Tetrakis<br>(Hydroxymethyl)<br>Phosphonium<br>Sulphate (2 : 1)(containing min.<br>71.5%<br>Bricorr<br>70a<br>and<br>1%<br>Ascorbic Acid)<br>1000.000 MT<br>1.<br>Bricorr 70a / Tolcide PS 70a<br>715.00 MT<br>2.<br>Ascorbic acid<br>10.00 MT<br>Note: The above norms should be treated for Para 4.06 application only.<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper above decision of NC. |
|
- (ii) RLA, Mumbai vide letter dated 22.04.2021 has stated that they had issued Advance Authorization No. 0310819042 dated 08.02.2018 to M/s Solvay Specialities India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as M/s Rhodia Speciality Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd.) instead of Para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I. Now, RLA, Mumbai has requested to review the application under para 4.06 of HBP Vol. I and on the receipt of revised norms, the redemption will be considered further.
Following export product / import items were identified for fixation of new SIONs and were placed before Norms Committee for taking a view on it:
| SL.<br>NO. |
NAME OF THE<br>EXPORT PRODUCT |
QTY. |
IMPORT ITEMS |
QTY. |
NAME OF THE<br>FIRMS WHO ARE<br>MANUFACTURING<br>THE EXPORT<br>PRODUCT |
| 1. |
CAMPHOR USP |
1 kg |
ALPHA PINENE |
1.146 kg |
CAMPHOR &<br>ALLIED PRODUCTS<br>LIMITED |
| 2. |
CALCIUM LACTATE<br>GLUCONATE |
1 kg |
CALCIUM GLUCONATE -<br>ORALGRADE |
0.686 kg |
GLOBAL CALCIUM<br>PRIVATE LIMITED, |
|
|
|
CALCIUM CARBONATE |
0.310 kg |
|
|
|
|
LACTIC ACID - ANY GRADE |
0.560 kg |
|
| 3. |
FERROUS LACTATE |
1 kg |
LACTIC ACID - ANY GRADE |
1.028 kg |
GLOBAL CALCIUM<br>PRIVATE LIMITED, |
| 4. |
MAGNESIUM LACTATE |
1 kg |
LACTIC ACID - ANY GRADE |
1.19 kg |
GLOBAL CALCIUM<br>PRIVATE LIMITED, |
| 5. |
ZINC LACTATE |
1 kg |
LACTIC ACID - ANY GRADE |
0.990 kg |
GLOBAL CALCIUM<br>PRIVATE LIMITED, |
| 6. |
PYRIDINE 98% MIN |
1 kg |
ALUMINO<br>SILICATE<br>CATALYST |
0.019 kg |
JUBILANT LIFE<br>SCIENCES LIMITED |
|
|
|
ETHYL<br>ALCOHOL<br>(DENATURED) |
2.194 kg |
|
|
|
|
PROPIONALDEHYDE |
0.073kg |
|
|
|
|
METHANOL |
1.41 kg |
|
| 7. |
BETA PICOLINE |
1 kg |
DENATURED<br>ETHYL<br>ALCOHOL |
1.121 kg |
JUBILANT LIFE<br>SCIENCES LIMITED |
|
|
|
PROPIONALDEHYDE |
0.057 kg |
|
|
|
|
METHANOL |
0.76kg |
|
|
|
|
AMMONIA |
0.82 kg |
|
|
|
|
ALUMINO<br>SILICATE<br>CATALYST |
0.007 kg |
|
| 8. |
METHYL COBALAMIN<br>JP (MECOBALAMIN) |
1 kg |
VITAMIN B12<br>(CYANOCOBALAMIN) |
0.95 kg |
SUPRIYA<br>LIFESCIENCE LTD.<br>MAHIMA LIFE<br>SCIENCES PVT.LTD.<br>MICRO ORGO-<br>CHEM |
| 9. |
DISODIUM MAGNESIUM<br>EDTA |
1 kg |
ETHYLENE<br>DIAMINE<br>TETRA ACETICACID |
0.690 kg |
AVA CHEMICALS<br>PVT.LTD. |
| 10. |
COPPER EDTA |
1 kg |
ETHYLENE<br>DIAMINE<br>TETRA ACETICACID |
0.710 kg |
AVA CHEMICALS<br>PVT.LTD. |
| 11. |
RECTOPAMINE HCL |
1 kg |
AMINO<br>ACETONITRILE<br>HCL |
1.00 kg |
INCHEM<br>LABORATORIES<br>PRIVATE LIMITED |
|
|
|
PHENOL |
1.21 kg |
|
|
|
|
ALUMINIUMCHLORIDE |
1.717 kg |
|
|
|
|
4-( 4 - HYDROXY PHENYL )<br>- 2 - BUTANONE |
0.70 kg |
|
The Committee after deliberations has decided to fix a new Standard Input Output Norms (SION) for following export product / import item:
| Export Product |
Qty. |
Import Item |
Qty. |
| METHYL COBALAMIN JP<br>(MECOBALAMIN) |
1 kg |
VITAMIN B12<br>(CYANOCOBALAMIN) |
0.95 kg |
Meeting ended with thanks to Chair and participants
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.