DGFT Committee Minutes

DIREC'TORATE GENERAL OF F'OREIGN TRADE (DES-II SECTION) MINUTES OF THE NORMS COMMI'ITEE-II MEE'I'lNG No.07/81 (Offline Cases) DATED 16.11.2021 Please Note i. For information of exporters, Norms Committee-ll handles all cases pertaining to fixation/ratification of norms for Export Products falling under ITC (HS) Chapter 72 to 76, 78 to 80 & 85. Communications in respect of cases/perlaining to NC-ll may be sent to email address: nc2.dgft@nic.in ii. In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/ Observations/Deficiencies received fiom the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The concerned applicant/company may go through the same and respond accordingly. iii. The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspecVwastage norms. While redeeming the applications, RAs should check that the applicant has fulfilled all requirements as prescribed in policy/procedure including those in Policy Circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for EODC. iv. Wherever the Committee has fixed Norms, the concerned RA may ensure that AA is issued on the wastages/consumption as ratified by the Committee or as per wastages claimed in the application, whichever is less. Meeting No.07l81 (Offline Cases)of Norms Commiffee-ll for the year 2021-22 held on 16.l1.2021through Video Conferencing under the Chairmanship of Shri Akash Taneja, Additional ftirector General of Foreign Trade to consider the following applications for ratification of norms in respect of Advance Authorizations under Duty Exemption Scheme (Chapter-4) of Forcign Trade Policy 2015-20. 'fhe following members were presenr in the meetrng:- Sl. No. Namc & Dcsignation 1 2 Shri Paramjeet Singh, Additional lndustri Shri Indrajeet Yadav, Dy. Industrial Advi 4. Shri Devcndra Kumar Saini, ADG 5. Shri Shaish Kumar, Consultant ('l'EC-l ) 6 Shri V.C. Agarwal, Consultant (l-EC-3) t_ I In attendt il 2I Shri S. K. Bhatnagar, Consultant (SKB) rnie-- Shri Santosh Kumar Dubey, Dy. DGFT Smt. SmittraVll-u, n-fOO - Minutes of the cases discussed in the meeting are as under: 1l Mlll.ll'lNG NU M IIUR: 07/tl I I)epartment Shri B. C. Nayak, D.O. DI-II DoT DGFT

SI. No. Applicant's Name / AA No. HQ/RA File No. Case ll istory :, CSE7. vide letter dated 03..l prescntation dared 29.03.201 8 fi( quested for fixation of scraP/wi anufacture and exporl of Sl lmponents made of iron and ste ch other metals/alloys. 'l'he matl . No. 0l/81 dated 10.04.2019 t onsultant (TEC-3), some informa e applicant via cmail dated 25. minder on 12.01.2019. I'he i.ll.20l9 was referred to Consult rted 14. I I .2019. 'l'hc case was t )/81 dt. 08.01.2020. 'l'he Comr ritten comments dated 0l .01 .2021 ) as under: 1. Nash lndustries, at rr fixation of wastage norms for retal pressed comPonents for LJI se'.2. Applicant has inforr ranufacturing 1000 Pafts & ( rbmitted some details for 6 comPt re manufactured from iron & ste' y'astages claimed is in the range o verage of vide range of l.5Yo lo /astage is verY wide and numbc rrge, it is not possible to work omponent. In view of the above' 1 r call the applicant for Pll' As Per ated 25.02.2020 was sent to the 'n 04.03.2020. The case was cons It. lg.O2.2O2O as Per agenda and r ,ide email dated 28.02.2020 has s rersonal hearing on behalf of thr he Committee decided to give ol he applicant for Personal hearir lefore Norms Committee. During n Meeting No. 05/8 1 oI 'epresentatives to fumish followin l. 'fo submit details bY maki manufactured in the limitec there is wide variation in manufactured i.e., 1.5% to 9 D/L was sent to the aPPlicant ot was considered in M. No' 8/8 I decided to grant last opportuni furnish the requisite information dated 03.11.2020 was sent to ( email on l0.l I .2020' 'fhe case wi lll8l-ALC212020 dated 24 Ol.l2.2O2O) and decided to remj for expediting the comments. consultant (TEC-3) on I 1.01.202 The case was discussed in 21.05.2021 and the Committee (TEC-3) via email dated I l'02. the hardcopy of the original aP1 Committee decided to ask the fi Ithe applicant's reply was receive Irur. was forwarded to Cr out wastage ol tY:'{lrn. committee considered the tl:-9?Titttt dtt'dlll.ure as per the agenda and noted r NC decision' un t.1u-'lltnut the information fiom the the applicant to attend P-Hl"rlf i.""r', i, ,., to be received. considered in M. No. 22181lfio.u.r. it,. Committee and noted that the aRplicantlO^- la.J to refer the matter to s sought anothcr Oatc rorlnii,f" ;,

• ;^;ination the applicant. f'nerciore.l.ornl"n,, as per advice ;ive one more opportunitV tolf*"'-ii"r, tieC-ll. hearing to exPlain the casel - - 1.2011, followed b fiom the applicant, had astage norms for ' Sheet Mctal Pressed I steel, copper, brass and matter was considercd in and on the advice o brmation was sought 25.05.2019 followed by I'he email reply dated rsultant ('fEC-3) via email ras considercd in M. No. lommittee noted that the 2020 of Consultant ('1'EC- :s, an IIOU, had requested i for export product 'sheet ,r IJPS & other industrial nformed that theY are & componcnts & have omponents. 3. ComPonent steel, Cu & Al sheets. 4. e of 38% to 50oh which is 98.4% 5. As range umbcr ol components very ng personal hearing he Status Dcferred on 28.01.2020, ing information: raking subgroup of items ited range of wastages as the wastage of i 98.40%. on 22.09.2020. The case il dated 29.09.2020 and ity to the applicant on. The applicant's rePlY Consultant (TF.C-3) via was considered in M. No. .1t.2020 (Held nd Consultant (TEC-3 Rcmindcr issued to l. M. No.0l/81 dated noted that Consu 2021 had requested application. Therefore, the : firm to submit the same. ived on 27 .07.202\ and onsultant ('l'llC-3 ) your l'apt ' MEEt:tNc Nun,tnnn: 07/ttl (Offline Cascs) MIitl'l'lNc DA'I'r: l6'l l'2021 302/AM',l8/ I lll12015:E OU:CSEZ/l 4761

applicant vidc letter datedldecided 15.02.2019 requested to re-fix the ad-hoc norms. A copylnorms as per of representation was referred to Consultant ('l-EC-3) onlby Consultant 07.08.2019 for examination. Deficiency letter was sent tolemail dated the applicant on 04. 10.20 l9 as per NC decision oflunder: Meeting No. ll/81 dated 04.09.2019. The applicant'slExport ltems: reply dated l4.l L20 l9 was referred to Consultant ('IEC- 3) for examination. NC observed in its M. No.2018 I dt. case was last discussed in M. No. NC/2/MEEl'lJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) 03.09.2021 and the Committee notcd that Consuhant (TEC-3) via email dated 02.09.2021 had requested physical file along with hard copy applicant's reply o the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination of the case. A letter was issued to the firm to send hard copy of all relevant documents on I 8.10.202 L I lowever, no information has been reccived so [ar. The case was ratified in M. as per DIPP U. O. No. 0610912016. However, the the party would have exported the said items as norms ratified earlier. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek a reporl from RA rcgarding the thickness/surface area of coating w.r.t Adhesive and Polyethylene in export product. An email dated 02.03.2020 was sent RA, New Delhi. The case was considered in M. No. 23181 dt.04.03.2020 and decided to remind the RA, New Delhi, inviting attention of Ilcad of ItA, for submitting the requisite information. As pcr NC decision, remindcr was sent to RA, New Delhi, on 10.01.2020,16.01.2020, 22.9.2020 & 30.9.2020 for expediting the matter. The case was considered in M. No. 8/8 I dated 29.09.2020, the Committee noted that the reporl received vide email dated 30.9.2020 liom CI-A, New Delhi was forwarded nsultant (TEC-3) on the same day for cxamination. However, Consultant (TIIC-3) requcsted to scnd physical file to examinc the case. l'hercfore, thc Committcc to send physical file to Consultant ('l'EC-3) for xamination of the case.'l'he main file was sent Itant ('f EC-3) on 19.1 I .2020.The case nsidered in M. No. lll8l-ALC212020 24.\1.2020 (lJeld on 01.12.2020) and decided to wait the comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant (1'EC-3) on IL01.2021. The case was discussed in M. No. 0l/8 I 2l .05.2021 and the Committee noted the comments o Consultant (TEC-3) rcceived via cmail dated I 1.02.2021 wherein it is stated that in the repoft of firm, RA, New No. l2l81 dated 06.09.2016lThe Committee considered the l2l16120 l6- I SW/28 datedlcase as per the agenda and to revise the ad-hoc comments grven (TEC-3) vide 15.11.2021 as l. The words "Coatin micron(ii) Polyethylene - F-or seamless 1985 micron for area 3030 sq. mtr., 2485 micron for area 1071 l0 sq. mtr., 2985 micron for area 5E706 sq. mtr. and I,SAW pipe 2985 micron for area 39249.566 sq. mtr."may be added in thc description of export item at Sl. No. l. 01.2020 thar the authorization is dated 24.08.2015 and thickness (i)Adhesive- Import ltems:

1. The quantity of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 66. l0 Ml'. 1'he quantity of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 632.30MT. Note: The decision for rest o import items shall remain unchangcd as decided in Mecting No. 12181 dated 06.09.201 6. RA concerned may take suitable consequential action accordingly. Delhi had enclosed statement of the firm on thickness o coating of different layers. 'lhe comments were glven on the basis of details given by the firm in its letter dated l4.ll.2Ol9 & the report of study group. Ilowever, the details given by the firm to RA, New Delhi did not provide information separately for LSAW & seamless pipes. 't'herefore, the Committee decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per advice o Consultant ('l'lrC-3 ): l. A copy of Shipping tlill.
2. A copy ofexpofl order. The applicant's reply was received on23.07.2021 and Approved JINDAL SAW LIMITED 05 I 03 95407 dated 24.08.2015 0r/8r/0s0/00 463tAMt6l 051231040100 201lAMt6l 3ll'rrgc MEFIl'lNG NI.JMBER: 07/81 (Offline Cascs) MElll'lNc DA'IE: 16'll'2021 M-2

0r/8r/050/00 486lAMt6l 34t241040100 t23lAMt6l iame was forwarded to 10.08.2021. Ihe case was last d \lC/2/ML,ll'l'/Jull202l2212 ( )3.09.2021 anddccided to rcm xpediting thc commcnts. Ihe case was rejected in M. lr lue to non-submission of repl )-7.06.2016 followed by rer However, the applicant vide I requested for revision of fix referred to DHI on 26.11.20 issued to DHI on 09.01.2020.' M. No. 20181 dt. 08.01.202C comments. '['he case was cons 04.03.2020 and decided to representation to DFII as requ of DIII. Rcply dated 23.5.201 21 .05 .2020 &. 22.07 .2020. 't-he No. 5/8 |il, 16.01.2020. the case as per agenda and Dtll received only applicant's rt complete set of application w case. 'l'herefore, the Committ relevant documents to I)FII a NC decision, thc complete a; received liom the applicant s for examination of the case. 'l M. No. 8/8 I dated 29.09.2020 comments. Reminder was ll.1l.2020.The case was cor ALC2|2020 dated 24.1 I .2020 decidcd to rcmind DFII for ex1 complete application along wi via email datcd 3 1.12.2020 & The case was discussed in M. 21 .05.2021 and the Committer dated I 9.05.2021 informed tht incomplete. Therefore, the Co from the firm to furnish follov comments of DHI: L Propcr calculation of CR( dimcnsions & wastagc. 2. Calculation ol other raw r board. 3. Material balance. 4. Wastage sought in Appen As per NC decision, D/L w 12.07.2021 . Thc case was NC/2/M 11E'l' I J ull2021 22 12 03.09.2021 and the Commit reminder to the applicant f information. As per NC decir to the applicant on 22.10.20 been received yet. M-3 TBEA Energy (lndia) Private Limited 34)004t391 Dated 23.07.2015 M-4 Lubi Electricals Limited, Ahmedabad

• Referred by DC, KASEZ 0t/8r/061/00 022lAMt8l KASEZ/I OO %EOUltl196 9100-0v KASEZ, vide letter No. KAI 0116116 dated 21.09.2011 application for fixation of regular basis for manufactur Valves and Industrial Valve P wastage norms had been fix 31.03.2003 subject to final fi Consultant (TEC-3) discusscd in M. No. (Offlinc Cases) date d mind Consultant ('l'EC-3) for No.22ltf l dated 24.01.2011 ply of dcficiency letter dated emindcr dated 21.09.2016. : mail dated 02.07.2019 has lxed Norms. The case was

19. A reminder was a )20. The case was considered in 2020 and decided to wait for considered in M. No. 23181 dl. send a complete set o uested by the representati .2020 was refened to DHI on 'l'he casc was considered in M. he Committee considered the Dtll informed that they have ; reply and also needs the n with nNI:-4 to examine the mittee decided to send all the as pcr thcir rcquest. As application alongwithANF-4 sent to DIll on 28.09. 'lhc case was considered in I and decided to wait for the s issued to DHI o considered in M. No. ll/8 l- )20 (Held on 01.12.2020) and pcditing the comments. ith ANIr-4 was send to DHI 08.02.2021. No. 0l/81 dated nittee noted that DHI via email :d that the applicant's reply was e Committee decided to ask ollowing information as per 'CRGO & Cu liom the lc. raw material like oil & press ppendix I lA. forwarded a copy ' scrap/wastage norms on re and export of Industrial Parts. -l'he DC stated that the Committee considered the as per the agenda and ided to final reminder to the Deferred applicant for furnishing the requisite information. as sent to the applicant on last discussed in M. No. (Offlinc Cases) dated ttee was decided to send for furnishing the requtsr sion, a reminder was issued 02 l. However, no reply sp.7.t | 00%F.ou llt 1969 100- The Committee considered the case as decided per to the agenda and ask from the licant to furnish the following information as per xed on ad-hoc basis up omments of DPIIT vide U. O. xation of norms-by-Norms No. P-41011l11l202l -TSW Deferred

Committee in DCFT. The case was considered in M. No.ldated 01.10.2021: 2. A copy of ad-hoc norms fixed by the Development Commissioner, Kandla SEZ for the items under consideration. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each exporl product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furn ished. Weight of cach Exporl Product. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenou input in the export produc may be indicated. 7011110812020-TSW dated 10.08.2020 as the weight along with detail icant's reply was deficient: of other imported input 4 /8l-Pt.ll dated 03.10.2018 and noted that case was referred to DIPP for comments and reminded on 27.09.2019. The case was considered in M. No.20181 dt. 08.01.2020, the Committee noted that DPIIT was not reminded for expediting the comments & also thc main file was not traced out by the section. 'l'herefore, the Commiftee decided to remind DPll'l' and directed the section to trace out main file immediately. 'the case was considered in M. No. 23181 dt. 04.03.2020, the Committee noted that DPIIT has not yet been reminded for expediting the comments & also main file is not yet traced out by the section. 'lherefore, the Committce decided to remind DPIIT & and directed the section to trace out main file immediately. Since, main file is not traceable in the section, complete set of documents have been sought fiom KASEZ vide email dated 16.01.2020. The documents received fiom KASEZ was forwarded to DPIIT vide email dated 20.07.2020 for examination & comments. An email was sent on 22.09.2020 to DPI for expediting the comments. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 8/8 I dated 29.09.2020 and decided to seek again from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments givcn by I)Pll'f vidc LJ. O. No. P- A copy of ad-hoc norrns fixed by the Development Commissioner, Kandla SEZ for the items under consideration. 2. Sl. No. 3, 4, 5 & ll of the Standard Deficienc Format. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to thc applicant v email on 12.11.2020. 'l'he casc was considered in M. No. ll/8 l-A1,C212020 dated 24.11.2020 (llcld on 01.12.2020) and decidcd to remind the applicant for Furnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, reminders were sent to the appf icant on I I .01 ,2021& 08.04.2021. The case was discussed in M. No.01/8 I dated 21 .05.2021 and the Committee noted that the applicant did not furnish the reply of DL. Therefore, the Committee decided to issue a final reminder to the firm for furnishing their comments within l5 days' time. 'l'he icant's reply rcccived vide email dated 19.08.2021 the samc was lorwarded to DPII'I' on 23.08.2021 . case was last discussed in M. No. be used in the resultant product and sought to be imporled/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. Starting from the spe cification of the expotl product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, includi the net weight components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage ol manufacturi with 0l/8r/050/00 0t2lAMt9l 031951040101 069/AM l8 No. 3 and 5. Further the applicant has also requested amend LJOM of import item No. 5. 'fhe Commi considered the case in M. No.09/8 I dated 07.08.2019 an noted that the applicant has not given any reason/justification for such changes. A D/L was sent to the applicant vide email dared 02.09.2019 foltowed by reminder on 07. 10.2019. 'l'hc applicant's rcply dt. 09.10.2019 was rcferred to (lonsultant ('l'tiC-3) lor ell1i!?!lq1. 'rhe case ry?s corylqqed in M. No 23181 complete justification and supporlcd NC/2/Mlrlil'lJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) dated by documen evidence/drawings etc. 3.09.2021 and thc Committee decidcd to wait fi mmcnts. casc was ratificd in M. No. l5/8 I dated 21 .03.201 The Committee considered the per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3). as per the agenda and noted Howevcr, the applicant vidc letter datcd 0l .04.20 I that the applicant did not furnish the reply of deficiency letter despite several reminders. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the applicant's request of revision of ad-hoc requestcd to amend I'fC IIS codes in r/o import item norms. Case is rejected. Neo Power Electronics & Projects PVT. LTD. 03 10819845 dated r 5.03 .20 r 8 Rejected sl , I MEEl'lNG NUMBIIR: 07/tll (Offlinc Cases) MI'lE'I'lNG DATE: 16.11.2021 5

at- o+-n-z::ozo -ana a-eciaJl;;;J;"i, nr. t" Consultant (TEC-3) as requested in thc meeting. Physical file along with the representation sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 25.09.2020 for examination of the case. The case was considered in M. No. 8/81 dated 29.09.2020 decided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant (TEC-3) on 25.11.2020. The was considered in M. No. II181-AI C212020 dated 4.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and decide to remind onsultant (TEC-3) for expediting the comments. Reminder was issued to consultant (TEC-3) on tt.0).2021. case was discussed in M. No. 01/8 I d 21.05.2021 and Consultant (-fEC-3) informed via email 08.02.2021 that the applicant had requested to amend UoM of import item at Sl. No. 5 ftom "Number" to "Kg". However, this imporl item is a component & was recommended on net-to-net basis and its UoM should be in numbers as given in AA. ln the Bill Entry, quantity of this itcm is givcn in numbers. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to provide justification for the same. As per NC decision, an email was sent to the applicant on 13.01 .2021 & 10.08.202I . The case was last discussed in M. No. NC/2/MEET lJuU202122l2 (Offline Cases) dated 03.09.2021 and the Committee decided to send a fina rcminder 1o thc applicanl lor I'urnishing the rcquisite information. As pcr NC decision, final reminder was issued to the applicant on 28.10.2021 . Ilowcver, no repl case was ratified in M. No. 10181-ALC2120l9 d 1.08.2019 on the basis of inputs given by Consultant -3). The applicant vide letter dated 27.01.202 that the wastage and quantity of imported materia for the product "Relevant Prime Hot dipped galvanized steel in sheets/coils" for all the four expotl products have not been given correctly.'l'herelore, they have requested to re-fix the ad-hoc norms. The casc was last considered in M. No. 23181 dt.04.03.2020 and decided to refer the case to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination &. comments. Physical file along with the representation sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 25.09.2020 for examination of the case. A reminder was issued to consultant (TEC-3 ) on I 9. I 1 .2019 . The case was considered rn M. No. ll/8 1-ALC212020 dated 24.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and Consultant (l-EC-3) via email dated 30.11.2020 informed that the applicant in its representalion dated 27 .01.2020 has not given details of amendment made in application. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask ffom the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant informed via email dated 18.10.2021 that they had accepted the norms ratified by the Norms Committee in Meeting No. l0/81-ALC212019 dated 21 .08.201 9. I urther, they have requested to close the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda. Withdraw n A-l Fence Products Co. Pvt. Ltd. 0310821 t73 Dated 20.02.2019 applicant to furnish the same. s per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on is withdrawn. applicant's reply dated 14.01 .2021 was senl sultant (TIIC-3) on l4 01.2021. case was discussed in M. No. 0 1/8 1 dated 1.05,2021 and Consultant (TEC-3) informed via email ated 08.02.2021 that the earlier the case was approved by NC on the basis of information given in application & inputs in the meeting. The Noms Committee had wastage proposed by the applicant aft However, for reviewing the same, firm has M-6 0 1/8 1/050/0 1 011lAMtgl 031941040101 003/AM19/ HQ E-office Computer No.: 23950 ,\ {' . } MEETING NUMBER: 07/81 (Offline Cases) MEETING DA'tEr 16.11.2021 been received

ittee for NC on No. ated the The case was approved in Meeting No. 7/8 I 29.1 1.2018 with l07o wastage. The norms were dated revised in M. No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 with l2''/o after taking l/3rd recovery on the recommendation Consultant (TEC-3) & representativc of DPIIT. applicant via email dated 11.11.2020 had requested to allow 30%o wastage. The representation was referred Consultant (TEC-3) on 19.11.2020.The case was last considered in M. No. lllSl-ALC212020 24.11.2020 (Held on 0l .12.2020) and decided to wait the comments. Reminder was issued to Consultant ('l'EC 3) on 12.01.2021. The case was discusscd in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated .02.202 [ had requested for the hardcopy of the original ication. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask fi'om the applicant to submit Following information: l. Hard copy of complete set of application along with copies of furthcr corrcspondcncc, if any. case as per agenda and decided to wait for the reply of the app I icant. Deferred t,, M-8 RAJGURU ENTERPRIS ES PVT. I-IMITED 03t082r453 dated 05.06.2018 RAJGURU EN'f ERPRIS ES PV]" I-IMITEI) 03t0813798 dated 07.06.2011 r /8 r /050/00 326lAM19l 03t9s1040100 t3llAMt9l 0r/8r/0s0/00 872lAMt9l 03t9s1040100 202lAMt8l 2. Sheet layout diagram of the material indicating wastage during blanking for all products, to exported under AA. As per NC decision, the hard copy of application sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 10.08.2021 exam ination & comments. 'I'he case was last discusse d NC/2/MIlETlJull202l22l2 (Offlinc 03.09.202 I and decidcd to ask lrom submit following inlormation, as per Consultant ('I'ech 3): in M. No. Cascs) dated thc applicant to thc advicc Specific items of export with quantity in terms numbers & weight. Sheet layout diagram of the material indicating wastage during blanking. As per NC decision, a I)1. was issued to thc applicant on 10.11.2021 . Howcver, no rcply has bccn reccivcd yet. l .)UZ l . t lowcver, no rcply nas Dccn re cclvco yet. casc was aooroved in M. No. 5/8 I dated 12.06.201' 'the approved in M. No. 5/81 dated 12.06.2019, the , the recommendation of Consultant (TEC-3) and prescntative of MSMB. applicant via email dated I l.\1.2020 requested for Norms to be ratified from l0% wastage to 30%o wastage representation was referred to Consultant ('l'EC-3 as per agenda and decided 19.11.2020. 'fhe case was last considered in M. No. lllSl-ALC212020 datcd 24.11.2020 (Held o to wait for the reply of 1.12.2020) and decided to wait for the comments. p licant. Reminder was issued to Consultant (1'EC-3) on casc was discusscd in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated .02.2021 had requcstcd for thc hardcopy of the original plication. Therefore, thc Committee dccided to ask from the applicant to sulq't f"]Lqry'rgI&.ry!9r, MIrlll'lNc NUMBIiR: 07/ttl (Offline Cases) Mltl'll'lNc DA'[E: 16.11.2021 Deferred

1. IJard copy o1 copies offurl
2. Sheet iayout wastage dur exported und As per NC decit sent to Consu examination &co The case wi NCi2/MEEl'/Jul/ 03.09.202 I and submit followinl Consultant (Tec l. Specific iten numbers & v
3. Sheet layout wastage duri As per NC decisi l0.l 1.2021. How M-9 INJECTOPL AST PVT. LTD. 06 r 0038682 Dated 29.08.2011 t. Drawing of mould (out Past produc ,er NC decis As of complete set of application along with rrther correspondence. if anY. diagram of the material indicating ing blanking for all products, to er AA. ision, the hard copy ultant (TEC-3) on of application was I0.08.2021 for and decided to ask from lowing information, as per t (Tech 3): &comments. was last lJull202l2212 d iscussed (Offline in M. No. Cases) dated the applicant to thc advice o rn terms dated llom the as per items of exporl with & wcight. ut diagram of the material indicating the rring blanking. ision, a DL was issued to the applicant on owever, no reply has been received yet. approved in M. No. 03181-ALC2l20l8 8 with wastage of 5%o with the condition call for wcight of Phenolic Mould hc cxpofl product and takc necessar ction accord ingly. again considered in M. No. d on 25.08.2020 and rejected ion of composition fee. 06/8 r by NC applicant vide letter dated 06.1 1 .2020 in for reviewing of ad-hoc norms stating g AA for manufacturing resultant product Madc Out of Phenolic Moulding Lndcr 4.7 Fllli'] and bcing grantcd I 1.88 aterial Phenolic Moulding Compound for o one piece "Brush Box Made Out o ing Compound" on each and every AA cant requested to allow I 1.88 Grams per ion was referred to DPIIT on l8.l1.2020. considered in M. No. lll8l-ALC212020 2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and decided commcnts. A reminder was issued to DPI DPIII' via email dt. 05.02.2021 had hc application may be referred to the case was referred to Consultant (TEC I lor examination & comments. considered in M. No. 0l/8 1 d Committee decided to scnd a copy to Consultant (TEC- I ). As per NC decision, a pplication sent to Consultant ('fEC-l) on as last considered in M. No. case as per the agenda and noled that Consultant (l'UC-l) informcd that as per the details furnished by the applicant, the export item is made fi'om 4 cavity moulds where sprue & runner weight is around 53 of components weight. item is made out of phenolic moulding compound which is thermosetting resin and it cannot be recycled. IIowever, the Committee noted that DPIIT vide their email dated 05.02.2021 had suggested to refer the case to D/o C&PC. 'lherefore, Committee decided to take opinion from D/o C&PC also before taking a final view. Deferred Jull202l22l1 (Offline Cases) nd the Committee decided to ask furnish following information Consultant (TEC-l): 'the mould with complete specification of which export is made) 'oduction and consumption data duly certified. decision, an email was sent to the applicant on 8l I P( , MFIEI'ING NtJMIIFIR: 07/81 (Offlinc Cascs) MEE'I'lNG DA'l'tl: 16.11.2021

19.08.2021. The applicant's rcply dated 31.08.2021 was forwarded to Consultant ('fEC-l) on 01.09.2021 ination ofthe case. case was last discussed in M. No. NC/2/MEE'IlJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) dated 3 .09.2021 and it was decided to wait for comments The case was rejected in M. No. 9l8l-Al.C2l20l3 dated 16.07.2013 due to non-submission of reply to deficiency lelter dated 0l .02.2013. 'fhe applicant's reply dated 30.06.2015 along with thei earlier reply dated 11.09.2012 were forwarded to DHI on 19.02.2016.'fhe case was considered in offline Agenda in M. No.23l8l & 25l81 dated 23.02.2016 &01.03.2017 respectively. The case was again rejected in M. No. 08/81 dated 11.07.2011 due to non-submission of reply to deficiency letter. The applicants vide letter dated 01.05.2019 furnished reply and requested to ratify the ad-hoc norms. As per the decision of M. No.24l8ldated 18.03.2020, the complete set of application was forwarded to I)lll via email dated 06.08.2020. J'he casc was considered in M. No.06/81 dt. 25.08.2020 and decided to remind DI {l for expediting the comments. DHI's D/L received via email on 21 .09.2020 and sent to the applicant on 07.10.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 (Held on 21.10.2020) and decided to remind the applicant furnishing the requisite information. 'l'he applicant's reply vide letter dt. l0.l1.2020 was sent to DHI via email on 26.t|.2020. 'l'he case was considcred in M. No. I 2/8 I dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and DIll via cmail dated 01.12.2020 informed that the applicant had not submitted point-wise reply. Therefore, the Committee decided again from the applicant to furnish following information wise point: l. Complete specification with catalogue of each export product with quantity of export in number. 2. Sl. No. 2, 4, 5 & ll of the Standard Deficiency Format. 3. Manufacturing process of cxporl item givi specific use of each import item. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant o 21.0.2021. Reply of DL received via email 25.02.2021. The case was considered in M' No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 , the Committee decided to forward applicant's reply to DIII for cxamination of the casc. The casc was considcred in M. No. NC/2/MtjEl'lJull202l22ll (Ol-fline Cascs) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committce noted that the reply o deficiency letter dated 13.04.2017 in respect of subject AA is still pending as informed by DHI via email dated 21 .09.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask fiom the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of DHI: l. To submit information rclating to calculation of core and coil dimensions starting from the export product rating in E,nglish. As per NC decision, an email was sent to the applicant on 23.07.2021. The applicant's reply dated 21 .07 .202t TI{AITOMEC INI)IA MAGNEI-IC S PRIVA'I'E LIMI'II1D 07 10083779 dated 08.1 t.201 I 0r/81/050/00 325tAMt2l 011241040100 258lAMl2l (E-2s3 8 r ) decided to wait for the comments. Deferred MEItl'lNG NUMBFIR: 07/81 (offlinc Cascs) MIiIi'IING DATE: 16.11.2021 NC-2

forwarded to DHI on 12.08.2021. 'fhc casc was last discusscd in M No. NC/2/Ml-'.Bl'lJull202l22l2 (Of1-line Cascs) dated 03.09.2021 and decided to remind DIII lor expediting the comments. As per NC decision, a reminder was sent to DHI on 15.11.2021 . However. no comments have been received yet. M-t I BHARAT HEAVY L]LF]CTRICA LS LIMITED il t0028319 dated 12.0r.20r8 10 | I Mtll.ll'ING Nt.tMBFlR: 07181 (Offline Cases) MIil.t]'ING DA'I'E: 16.11.2021

comments.Reminder
Consultant (TEC-3) & I However, no comments M-r2 AMC Cookware (lndia) Pvt. t-rd. 01 t0t t0362 Dated 02.09.20t6 0r/81/050/00 86S/AM r 9/ 071241040100 t76lAMt7l (E-2480e) The case was ratified in as per written comments P-4701rl l 89/2019-TSW via email dated 08.09.2( Norms for such items in product is oval/oblong n had provided the dimens output products. ln thest wastage considering mad The representation was dated 08.10.2020 for exr was considered in M. Nc on 27.10.2020) and DP under examination.'fhe 12181 dated 15.12.202 Commiftee noted the cor O. No.: P-410llll89l wherein it is mentioned t certain imporl items were the export itcm which fi'om Stainless Steel Circ are Stainless Stecl Sheets therefore, wastage norr applicant had indicatcd t many cases is "Oblong". Committee decided to se following information as l. Sheet layout diag blanking, export pr As per NC decision, D/ 28.01.2021.'fhe applici 01 .04.2021. The case wi dated 21.05.2021, the r DPII'l' for expediting thc a reminder was issued to 'fhe casc was N C/2/M EtiT I J ul 1202 I 22 I 16.07.2021 and the Cr comments. 'l'he case was last NC/2/M EEl' I J ull202 l22t 03.09.2021 and decided commcnts. A remindcr DPllT. llowever, no com M- l3 AMC Cookware (lndia) Pvt. Ltd. 07r0110836 Dated 23.12.2016 0 r /8 r /0s0/0 r 063lAM19l 071241040100 313/AMt7l (E-248 r 0) 'l'he casc was ratificd in dated 17.06.2020 as pr DPII f vide U. O. No.: 30.06.2020. The applicz requested lor re-fi xation which the shape of the made out of shect. Tt dimensions and shape o ln these cases the I considering made out of forwarded to DPIIT vi' examination oI thc case. M. No. 09/81 dated 20.1( was issued on 25.10.2021 DHI for expediting the comments. ; have been received yet. M. No. 04/81 dated 17.06.202 given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: dated 30.06.2020. The applicant 2020 requested for re-fixation o in which the shape of the output made out of sheet. The applicant rsions and shape of the input and these cases the NC had given I made out of circles. tbrwarded to DPIIl' vide email examination of the case. The No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 ( PIIT informed that the case i case was considered in M. No. 20 held on 22.12.2020, comments given by DPIIT vide U. 89/2019-TSW dated 28.10. that, due to oversight, norms were fixed as l.l0Kgs/Kg content in are applicable for manufactu le. As in this case, import item heets, wastage would bc higher and, norms nccd to be revised. l'hc tcd that thc shape of cxport items in ng". In view of above comments, the to seek from the applicant to furnish In as per comments given by DPII'f : rgram indicating wastagc dur product-wisc. D/L was sent to the applicant on pplicant's rcply sent to DPII'f o was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I Committce decided to remind rc comments. As per NC decision, DPlll' on 09.07 .2021 . considered in M. No. /1 (Offline Cases) dated ommittee decided to wait considered in M. No. 2 (Offline Cases) dat to rcmind l)I']ll'l' cxpcditing was issued on 26.10.2021 t comments have been received yet. Mccting No. 4/81-ALC2 per writtcn comments given b P -47 0 I I I t89 120 I 9-1'SW icant via cmail dated 08.09.2020 rn olNorms for only such items in he output product is oval/oblong The applicant had provided the of the input and output products. NC had given l0% wastage of circles. 'lhe representation was Committee considered as per the agenda and ecided to wait for ments. The Committce considered case as per the agenda decided to wait for comments. the and the ide email dated 08.10.2020 'l'hc case was last considcred in 0.2020 (lleld on 27.10.2020) and Deferred Deferred MFltll'lNG NUMBFIR: 07/tll (Offline Cascs) MUI'11'lNG DA1'Fl: 16.11.2021

DPIIT informed that the case is under examination. case was considcrcd in M. No. l2l8l dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020. the Committee noted the comments given by DPII'| vide [J. O. No.: P- 410llll89l20l9-TSW dated 28.10.2020 wherein it is mentioned that, due to ovcrsight, norms for certain imporl ilems were fixed as l.l0Kgs/Kg content in the expotl item which are applicable for manufacture liom Stainless Steel Circlc. As in this case, imporl items are Stainless Steel Sheets, wastage would be higher and, therefore, wastage norms need to be revised. applicant had indicated that the shape of export items in many cases is "Oblong". ln view of above comments, t Committee decided to scck fi'om the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by DPIIl': I . Sheet layout diagram indicating wastage durin b lanking, exporl producl-wise. As per NC decision, D/1. was scnt to the applicant o 28.01.2021. Applicant's Reply sent to DPII'| 1.04.2021 . l-he case was considered in M. No.0l/8 I ted 21.05.2021 , the Committee decided to remin DI'}ll'l' for expediting the commcnts. As per NC decision, areminderwas issuedto DPIIT on09.07.2021 . The case was considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlJull202l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.01 .2021 and the Committec decided to wait for comments. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. NC/2/MEIIT lJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) dated 03.09.2021 and decided to remind DPII'l' expediting for comments. A reminder was issued on 26.1 0.202 I to DPIIT. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2iMEET lJull202122l2 (Offline Cases) dated 03.09.2021 and dccided 1o remind DPll'l' expediting for commcnts. A rcmindcr was issued on 26.10.2021 lo DPll'f . However, no comments havc bcen received yet. case was ratified in Meeting No. 4/81-ALC212020 d 17.06.2020 as per written comments given DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-41011118912019-TSW dated .06.2020. The applicant via email dated 08.09.2020 uested for re-fixation of Norms for only such in which shape of the output product is oval/oblong made out sheet. The applicant had provided the dimensions and ofthc input and output products. ln these cases the had given l0%o wastage considering made out o es. rcpresentation was forwarded to DPIIT vide email 08.10.2020 lor examination of the case. The case as last considered in M. No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 Held on 27.10.2020) and DPIIT informed that the case is under examination. 'fhe case was considered in M. No. )2181 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020, the mmittce noted thc commenls givcn by I)I'>lll. vidc U. No.: P-47011118912019-TSW dated 28.10.2 erein it is mentioned that, due to oversight, norms rlain import items were fixed as l.l0Kgs/Kg content in export item which are applicable for manufactu from Stainless Steel Circle. As in this case, import item Stainless Steel Sheets, wastage would be higher and therefore, wastage norms need to be revised. icant had indicated that the shape of export items in NC Deferred M-t4 AMC Cookware (lndia) Pvt. Lrd. 07 101 | \264 Dated 09 .03 .20 t7 0 l/8 r/050/0 r 01slAMl9l 71241040100 3 83/AM l7l (E-248 r r ) ecided to wait for the MtlEl'lNC NtIMBEII: 07/81 (Offlinc Cascs) Mtll.ll'lNC I)A'I'U: 16.11.2021 -t

M-15 AMC Cookware (lndia) Pvt. Ltd. 07 t0l I 1502 Dated 28.04.2011 01/81/050/00 766lAMtgl 011241040100 0 r6ln M r8/ (E-24812) many cases is "Oblong". In view of above comments, Committee decided to seek fi'om the applicant to furni following information as per comments given by DPlll-: l. Sheet layout diagram indicating wastage during blanking, export product-wrsc. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 28.01.2021. Applicant's Reply sent to DPIIT on 01 .04.2021 . The case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 21.05.2021, the Committee decided to remind DPIIT for expediting thc comments. As per NC decision, a reminder was issued to DPI IT on 09 .01 .2021 . The case was considered in M. No. NC/2/MEE'f lJull202l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committee decided to wait comments. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) dated 3.09.2021 and decided to remind DPIIT expediting for comments. A reminder was issued on 26.10.2021 to DPIIT. Howevcr, no comments have been received yet. case was ratified in Meeting No. 4/81-ALC212020 ated 11 .06.2020 as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-4l0llll89l20l9-TSW dated 30.06.2020. The applicant via email dated 08.09.2020 requested for re-fixation of norms for only such items in which the shape of the output product is oval/obl made ou1 of sheet. 'l'he applicant had provided the imensions and shape of the input and output products. ln these cases the NC has given l0% wastage considering made out of circles. 'l'he representation was forwarded to DPII'f vide email dated 08.10.2020 for examination of the case. 'l'he was considered in M. No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 ( on 21.10.2020) and DPll'l informed that the case is under examination. case was last considered in M. No. l2l8 1 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020. thc Committee noted the omments given by DPIIl' vide LJ. O. No.: P- 70111189/2019-'ISW dated 28.10.2020 wherein it is ioned that, duc to ovcrsight, norms for ccrtain import itcms were fixed as l.l0Kgs/Kg content in thc itcm which are applicable lor manufacture from ecided to wait for the Deferred Stainlcss Steel Circle. As in this case, impon itcms are Stainlcss Stcel Sheets, waslage would be higher and, therefore, wastage norms need to be revised. mments. applicant had indicated that the shape of export items i many cases is "Oblong". In view of above comments, Committce decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by DPII'l': l. Sheet layout diagram indicating wastage during blanking, export product-wisc. As per NC decision, D/1, was sent to the applicant on 28.01.2021. Applicant's Reply sent to DPIIT on 01 .04,2021. The casc was considered in M. No' 0l/8 I ated 2l .05.2021 , the Committec decided to remind DPlll' for expediting the comments. As per NC decision, reminder was issued to DPIIT on 09.01 .2021 . I'he casc was considered in M. No. dated NC/2/MllETlJull202l22ll (Offline Cascs) 16.07.2021 and thc Committee decided to cornments. -f he case was last considcred tn No M 13 ll'lgc . MUI.I,TtNG NUMBIiR: 07/tll (offlinc Cases) MEEl'lNG DA'I'Fl: 16.11.2021

NC/2/MEETlJuV202122l2 (Offline 03.09.2021 and decided to remind DP comments. A reminder was issued , DPIIT. I-lowever, no comments havc bc M-16 DISHA AUTO COMPONEN TS PVT.LTD. 031082t769 Dated 19.06.20 r 8 0t/8r/050/00 245lAMt9l 031941040100 228lAMt9l l'he case was ratified in Meeting No. dated 0 L05.20 I 9 as per written cor DPIIT vide their F. No.: P-47011i94, 16.04.2019. The applicant vide letter requested for revision of ratified norm allow import quantitics in Unit of Mear and (ii) to allow rcjcction/wastagc materials or 9.89% on finished rcpresentation was relerrcd to DPII'l'on The case was considered in M. No. l2lt 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and dec the comments. The case was considered in M. I 21 .05.2021 and the Committee noted DPIIl- vide U. O. No. P-410111941 05.01 .2021. Fufther, the case was meeting and the Committee obscrvec cases had been referred to Consuh examination. Therefore, the Committe the case to Consultanl (1'EC-3 ) for comments. As per NC dccision, the ca Consultant (TEC-3) on 10.08.2021 for comments. l'he case was last considered NC/2/MEET lJul1202l2212 (Offline 03.09.2021 and noted that Consultant ( dated 03.09.202 I had rcqucstcd for p with comments of DPII'| to examir physical file was sent to Consult 15.09.2021. However, no comments hr M-t7 DISHA AUTO COMPONEN TS PVT.LTD. t0829026 dated .05.201 9 03 14 0 I /8 r /05 0/00 064lAM20l 031941040100 096lAM20l J'he case was ratified in Meeting No. dated 27.05.2020 as per written cor MSMU. 'I'he applicant via cmail date requested for personal hearing and norms allotled to it.-l'he representatio MSME on02.12.2020. The case was considered in M. No. l2ll 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and dec thc comments. Reminder was issued to 29.01.2021. The case was considered in M. I 2l .05.2021 and the Committec noted MSME received via email dated23.04. case was discussed in the meeting ar observed that the similar cases had Consultant ('l't'.C-3) for cxaminatior Committee decided to refer the case to 3) for examination & comments. As pe case was referred to Consultant (l'EC- for reexamination& comments. The case was last considcred NC/2/MEETllull202l2212 (Offline 03.09.2021 and noted that Consultant ( dated 03.09.2021 had requested for p with comments of DPIIT to cxamine thr Cases) dated llT expediting for I on 26.10.2021 bcen received yet. 1 No. 2/8-ALC212019 l comments given by lll94l20l9-f SW dated etter dated 22.02.2020 norms as under:- (i) to Measurement as Meter ;tagc ol 9oh on raw Lished product. l-he I'l' on 02.12.2020. ,. l2l8ldated d decided to wait for No. 0l/81 dated the comments '2019-TSW dated discussed in the rved that the simi rsultant (-lEC-3) rittee decided to re for examination & case was referred to br re-examination & d in M. No. : Cases) dated (1.t'lC-3) via email physical file along ine the case. l'he Itant (TEC-3) on have been received ttro. 3/{t 1-/.L.C212020 commcnts given by ated 25.1I .2020 had rd correction in the n was referred 2lSldated lecided to wait for to MSMB on No. 0l/81 dated the comments 4.2021 . Furlher, the and the Committce d been referred to I as per the agenda and ded to wait for the 'lhe Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the physical file of the case is not traceable in the section. l'herefore, the Committee decided to send the same to Deferred Deferred ination. J'herefore, the asc to Consultant (TEC- As per NC decision, the ( l'EC-i) on 10.08.2021 Consultant (TEC-3) examination & comments No. dated email alon the case. dinM. Cases) (TEC-3) via physical file MEEI'ING NIJMBFIR: 07/ttl (Offlinc Cascs) Mlltl'I'lNG DA'l'li: 16.11.2021 I

M-t8 DIACH CHEMICAL S& PIGMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED 02t0208269 dated r 3.03.20 I 8 0 I /8 I /05 0/00 108/AM l9l 021241040t00 t92lAMl8t I ne case was reJec 30.01 .2019 due to letter. 'Ihe appl furnished a reply norms. The repre 02.12.2020. The case was 15.12.2020 held o the comments. DP that the case ma
forwarded to MSIv The case was c 21.05.2021 and tl email dated 20.05. of Analysis subm lead in import is 9r the exporl quantity ask ffom the a information as per l. 'l'o provide ar imported an percentage o As per NC decisi< applicant on 14.07 The case was NCl2lMEETlJull2t 03.09.2021 and r applicant for furnis M- l9 DIACH CHEMICAL S& PIGMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED 0210201910 dated 10. I 1.2017 I he case was reJec 30.01.2019 due to letter. I'he applic 17.08.2020 l'urnish ad-hoc norms. 'l'he on 02.12.2020 & 3 ]'he case was c 15.12.2020 held or the comments. A 02.02.2021. l.'ur1he 20.05.2021for exar The case was c( 21.05.2021 and th email dated 20.05.1 of Analysis submit lead in import is 97 expon quantity. Th( from the applicant t per comments of M L To provide av imporled and percentage of ir As per NC decisior rpplicant on 14.01.1 I-he case was \Cl2lMDE';-llull20 )3.09.2021 and dt rpplicant for fumisl M-20 LM WINI) POWER BI,ADES 0r/81/050/00 439lAMt9t he case was ral I .05.2019 as pcr u l'EC-l).'fhe app rejected in M. No. ll ue to non-submission applicant via ema reply and requested representation was r vas considered in eld on 22.12.2020 ar s. DPIIT via email da : may be refer to N MSME on 01.04.202 ,as considered in I ,nd the Committee n \0.05.2021 informed submitted by the apl t is 96.43o/o which wc antity. Therefore, the he applicanl to lu s per comments of Ml average lead and provide rof impoft. :ision, a deficiency lctter .01.2021. was last considered t1120212212 (Offline d decidcd to scnd a rr rnishing the requisite infor :jected in M. No. I l/81-A : to non-submission of rep plicant via email datcd nished a reply and requesl 'l'he representation was re k 31.t2.2020. s considered in M. I d on 22.12.2020 and deci A remindcr was issuec rther, the case was referre examination & comments. i considered in M. No I the Committee noted tl 05.2021 informed that, as :mitted by the applicant, ;9loh which works out to Therefore, the Committee mt to furnish the following f MSME as under: I average lead percentage tnd provide the overall of import. ision, a deficiency lcttcr r 01.202t. /as last considered 1120212212 (Offline ( I decided to send a re; nishing the requisite inforr ratificd in Meeting Nr cr written comments giver applicant via email dat, pe the r. l l/81 -ALC2l20l 8 dater ion of reply of deficienc' rmail dated 13.08.2021 ted to ratify the ad-ho, rs referred to DPIIT ot in M. No. l2l8ldater ) and decided to wait fo I dated 05.01.2021 inforn r MSME. 'Ihe case wa ,.021 . r M. No.0l/81 dater e noted that MSME vir ed that, as per Certificatr applicant, the percent o works out to be less that the Committee decided tr lurnish the lollowint 'MSMII as under: )erccntage of each batcl he overall average lea( rcy lctter was sent to tht sidered in M. No )ffline Cases) datec cnd a rcminder to th< risite information. The Committee considered tht case as per the agenda and tht applicant's reply has been sen to MSME on 16.11.2021 for examination of the case. Hence the Committee decided to wai for the comments. Deferred llSl-ALC2l20l8 datec of reply of deficiency datcd 13.08.2020 & requesled to ratify the was referrcd to DPII'l n M. No. I 2/8 I dated and decided to wait for as issued to DPIIT on as referred to MSME on )mments. M. No.0l/81 dated : noted that MSME via rd that, as per Certificate rpplicant, the percent of 'ks out to be less than the lommittee decided to ask following information as it'. ercentage of each batch : overall average lead lcttcr was sent the iidered in M. No ffline Cases) dated :nd a reminder to the site information. Deferred ing No. 2/81 dater s given by Consultan ril dated 19.11.2021 case as per the agenda. Consultant ('lEC- l) informed Approved Ml.llll'lNG NUMBER: 07181 (Offline Cascs) MEI.ITING DA'IFI: l[.tt.202t

(rNDlA) PVT. LTD 0710108496 dated 10.07.2015 LM WIND POWER BLADES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 0710106866 dated 20.10.201,4 11241040100 ,-"rt.d to-r"ro* ifr.-r.r,t.*. "not less thanl;andfthut ut p.t the details furnished allow flexibility of +l- 3 o/o. The representation waslby the applicant, they have referred to Consultant (TEC-l ) on 02.12.2020 forlexported 3 Rotor Blades' 019lAMt6l 413lAMl5l 011241040100 2s0lAMl5l

1. To give clear tolerance of 'l /- As per NC decision, a copy of drawing wherein 3% allowed in wcight. L Net weight of exPort t Blade) should 6468.56+l-3% instead of "net weight less than 6468'56Kg blade". ination of the case. llnitially, they have not given the case was considered in M. No. \2181 datedlweight of export item and NC \5.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and decided to seek fromlhad put weight condition as not the applicant to furnish following information us pe'lless ll"i ul:l15tl?.1id,t: ;;ilJ;iltr.,uyt".rrttant(1'E-c-t): .l'lt.t. blades are,rolylino:t]: I Co'py of shipping biils indicating weight of]nut"t having. . length of 40 entire export. lmeters and width of 3'23 me:-er: As per NC decislon, D/L was sent to the applicant onland also these ur. hul1,.ti 02.ti2.2021. The applicant's reply was sent to Consultantland . may have vanatron TEC-I) on 01 .04.2021. lweiSht' l.he case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I datedlNow, the applicant have 2l 05.2O2l , the Committee decided to send physical filelrequested for +l- 3oh variation.,in of the case to Consultant (TEC-l). -Ihe physiial file of']above weight.condition' ln, the the case is not traceable in the scction. l-herefore, a softlcopy of drawings submined by copy of application was sent to Consultant (l.EC-l) tolthe applicant. +/- 3%o variation is examine the case. lindicated "lq .u1t9... weight case was considered in M. No.lindicated in shipping bill is at NC/2/MEET lJull2O2l22ll (Offline Cases) datedlwithin this range' 16.01.2021 and Consultant (TEC-l) informed that soft as per the comments y of drawing is not clear and legible Therefore, the minee decided ro ask fiom the applicant to furnishlof Consultant ,(TEC-l), th: following information u, p., comments of ConsultantlCommrttee -d'.e;l9:l ^::.^i::'d weight condition as under: K deficiency lettcr was sent licant on 19.08.2021. case was last considered in M ' NC/2/MEET lJull202122l2 (Offline Cases) 03.09.2021 and decided to send a reminder 5.10.202 I for examination of the case' applicant for furnishing the requisite information' The applicant's reply was sent to Consultant ('lEC-l) Note: 'l'he decision for rest import items shall rematn unchanged as decided in Meeting No. 02/81 dated 01.05.2019. RA concerned maY take suitable consequential actton weight. to the No. dated to the not per E".ll.r, th. t"t. ^ uppr-ou.a * ft'fti'g No f VSf lff,rt C"n'-tn ^tatl:'ll: ated 03.11.2015 as per writren comments of C&PC videlcase ?t ,.t.rn. agenda and ). M. No. 460tll2ll/2005-PC.ll dated 24'08'20t5' lC'onsultant ,(TE:.',] :lllT:1 The norms were again revised in Mceting No. 0218 llthat as per the details furnished dated0l.05.20l9 as per written comments given bylby the. applicant'. 'hty-,lll: wuw L 'wJ tLv \ ' "- r-' lexoorted 3 Rotor Blades' nsultant (TEC-I). L j . ,, ., r-^-.^ -^+ ^i.,^- +ha The applicant via email dated 19.11 2020 reques1:g,.tolrni1i1'l'':n:J have not given the remove the sentence ,.not less than,' and allow flexibilitylweight of expotl tt:T 19 )^9 of +/ 3 yo.Therepresentation was referrcd to Consultantlhad put.weight condition as not /Tt-r\ t\ ^- n. r.l 1^rn f^, owqminqrion nf fhe case- llatt than 8638'94Kg/Blade' (TEC-l) on02.12.2020 for examination of the case' .l[.tt ]l"i doi6'v4N's/DrauE' The case was considered in M' No' l2l8l datedlThese b.lades are ':1''"':",'j ll 15.12.2L2|held on 22.12.2020 and decided ro seek fromlnature having length of 47'50 the applicant to furnish following information as Perlmeter: i'9":'^dtl^"I"'i I""- ;. "'U;; i'irirrrit oills indicating weight of entireland may have variation in t,- Approvcd export. "-'D"-' As per NC decision, D/L was -sent to the aPPlicant. "llI:::-.^,tT- -l'1")^t:::,^,,::l: il dr:;d;; il;;it;#,' ..prv "'-r.ni,o'con'ultantirequested fot +/- 3%o variation in (rEC-r) on 07.04.202r. ,labove :',19n:,:::1T.i"l;J,tll a"#"""r-ffiio* M. No. 0l/81 datedlcopy of drawings submitted b Mt][].I'ING NtJMI}F]R: 07/tt1 (offline Cases) MEE,I.ING DA.I'E: 16,11,2021

1.05.2021, the Committee decided to send physical file the applicant, +l- 3Yo variation is the case to Consultant (TEC-l). T'he physical file indicated and also weight case is not traceable in the section. Therefore, a soft indicated in shipping bill is a within this range. opy of application was sent to Consultant (TEC-l) to mine the casc. case was last considered in M. No. EETlJull202122l1 (Offline Cases) dated 16.01.2021 and Consultant (TEC-l) informed that soft copy of drawing is not clear and legible. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask fi'om the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of Consultant (rEC-l): l. To give clear copy of drawing wherein tolerance of +l- 3o/o allowed in weight. As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was sent to applicant on 19.08.2021 . 'he case was last considercd in M. Note: 'I'he decision for rest NC/2/MEETlJull20212212 (Offline Cases) import items shall remain unchanged as decided in Meeting No. 02181 dated 3 .09.2021 and decided to scnd a reminder to applicant for furnishing the rcquisite information. applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-l) on I .05.201 9. 25.10.2021 for examination of the casc. RA concerned may take suitab sequential ingly. case was rejected in M. No. 9l8l-Al,C2l20l6 dated 6.07.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency lefter as raised by DeitY. Since, no reply was received liom the company despitc remindcr, the committee decided to reject the case. 'l'he applicant vide lettcr dated 29.01.2020 furnished a reply and requested to ratify the ad-hoc norms. 'l.he representation was referred to Consultant (TEC-l) on 02.12.2020 for examination of the case. The case was considered in M. No. 12181 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and decided to seek fi'om the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC- l): I . Copy of complete sct of application. 2. Quantity and commercial value of waste generated. 3. Production/ consumption data for the licensing period duly certified by central excise. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 02.02.2021. A reminder was sent to thc applicant on 08.04.202 l. 'Ihe applicant's rcply was sent to Consultant (l'IrC-l ) on I 8.05.202 l. No. dated Therefore, as per the comments of Consultant (TEC- | ), the Committee decided to amend the weight condition as under: l. Net weight of export (Per B lade) shou ld be 8638.94+l-3Y" Kgs instead of "net weight not less than 8638.94Kg per blade". decided to send final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. ]'he case was conside red in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant ('fEC-l) informed via emai dated 20.05.2021 that the applicant did not submit prope reply of deficiency letter. l-hereforc, the Commi decided to again ask thc firm to submit thc sai information within l5 days. As per NC decision, a email was sent to the applicant on 14.01 .2021 l-he casc was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) 03.09.2021 and decided to send a reminder to applicant for furnishing thc rcquisite information. As NC dccision, a reminder was issued to the applicant o 25.10.2021. Howcver, no has been rcceived as yet. M-22 l.axmi E lectron ics Moulds& Precision Engg P. Ltd. 07r0r06r87 dated 25.01.2014 0l/81/050/00 455lAMt6l 07t21040100 359/AM 15/ Deferred 17!t'lgc ' :l ' MFlli'l'lN(l NUMBER: 07/81 (Offline Cases) MtII,ITING DATE: 16.11.2021 I

case was consid;red in Offline Agenda in M. No. 32l8ldated 25.10.2011 and decided to reject the of applicant to allow imporl of Alloy Steel Coil as the above license is issued under SION and inputs are also allowed as per SION. 'l'he applicant vide letter dated 03.05.2012 had requested the PRC for realization o icy to accommodate use of utilization of Alloy Steel in Coil in place of Plate.'l'he case was considered in PRC in Meeting No. 14/8 I dated 17.07 .2072 and decided reject the request to allow input which is not pafi SION. The PRC vide lctter dated 01'06.2019 advrsed the applicant to approach the concerned NC for a decision in the matter. Now, the applicant vide letter dated 11.07.2019 had encloscd copies of communications and other supporting documcnts and requested to ratify t s. The case was considered in M. No. l8/8 I d I l.l2.2Ol9 and the applicant's representative didn' explain the technical details before Norms Committee during personal hearing. On the request of the representative, the Committee decided to granl one more opportunity of pcrsonal hearing to the applicant in the forthcoming NC meeting. PII letter sent on \0.0.2020 uesting to appear for PII on22.01.2020. The case was nsidered in M. No. 2ll8 I dated 22.01.2020 and mittee directed to the representative to furnish following information as per advice of Consu (SKB): l. Exact details of export items 2. Use of exact raw materials. 3. To provide explanation for why value addition is low. 4. Type of grade of material used. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on to Consultant 5.03.2020. 'l'he applicant's reply was sent SKB) via email on 16.03.2020. case was considered in M. No 06/8 I dt.25'08' the Committe c noted the written comments d 17.3.2020 given by Consultant (SKB). After deliberating the matter, the Committee decided to seek from the licant an statement for impofi item 'Plate/Coil' in the following format: Ilill of entry No. and datc Bxact tion l'lxact thickncss Quantity. As per NC ecision, D/I, was issued to the applicant on23.l.202 followed by a reminder on 07.12.2020. case was considered in M. No. l2l8 ld 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020, the applicant via email dated 07. 12.2020 had requested for extension of time till 30'h December 2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the applicant. As per NC decision, a reminder was sent to the applicant 02.02.2021 . The applicant's reply was sent sultant (SKB) on 01.04.2021. The case sidered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and that Consultant (SKB) informed in meeting that the case was under examination. A reminder was issued to Consultant (SKB) on 09.07 .2021. case was considered in M. No. NC/2/MEET lJull202122l1 (Offline Cases) dated 16.01.2021 and Consultant (SKB)vide email dated 13.07.2021 informed that as per the applicant leffer No. PVDGFT/NMPl2O20 dated 03.02.2021, they had informed to DGFT that they had imported 20686 Kgs Hot Rolled Stainless steel plates of I Omm of grade 3 l6l, [)cfc r rcd ecided to send final remi to the applicant for fumishi the requisite information. 01181162100 580/AMl1/ 341241040100 r33/AM06/ HQ E-office Computer No.: 23376 TUBE PRODUCTS INCORPOR ATE 3410014376 dated 19.09.2005 M-23 18 lt']ag.' '",, ;. ,,, r MEEl'lNG NUMIIEII:07/81 (OfflineCascs) MltEl'lNG DA'I'E: 16'll'2021

M-24 38911.844 Kgs Stainless Steel Coils of 3.3mm ickness of grade 3 l7L. 'l'herefore, the Committee ecided to ask from the applicant to furnish the followi information as per comments of Consultant (SKB): l. To clarify whether the applicant used the aforesaid imported grade and thickness plates (l0mm) & coils (i.3mm) in the exporl itcms or not. 'lo submit a detailed sheet indicating export product description, quantity, invoice No. & Date, Unit Weight, Total Weight, Shipping Bill & Date, import item as per license, description of imported item, thickness and other relevant information which can justify that the imported items had been actually used in the exported products. As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 19.08.202 l. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEET lJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) dated 03.09.2021 and decided to send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, a reminder was issued to the applicant on 25,10.2021. However, no reply has been received as yet. The case was ratified in Mceling No. l3l81-Al.C2l20l9 dated 03.10.20 l9 on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2011 in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 dated 12.6.201 9 allowing quantity of each import item @ 1.015 Kg/Kg content in the export product with the condition that thickness and grade of import and export items to match. The applicant via email dated 10.09.2020 request for review of norms for Percentage of Scrap for Import product on Export items from 1.015%lo 3 Yo and change of Measurement. 'l'he representation was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for examination the case. The case was considered in M. No. l2l8 I dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKB) informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requested wastage as 570 for processing of imported ilicon electrical steel of cold rolled full hard (unannealed) wide coil against expotl of flat rolled ucts ol silicon electrical steel other than grain iented. Ministry of Steel since beginning in various AA recommended wastagc @ 3% for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Orientcd Illcctrical Stccl. I'h mmittee observed that wastage @3Yo was allowed by Committee for AA No. 3410043635 dated l4.l1.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 as per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-TD dated 10.04.2018. 'lhe Committee considered the decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per comments glven by M/o Steel vide email dated 29.09.2021as under; l. The quantity of import items may be allowed with 37o wastage on net weight ofexport product. Notc: 'l'he thickness and gradc f import and export items match. RA concerned may take suitab ial action N( sequent to this, wastages for many AAs were cord ingly. ved @3o/o on the written comments of MoS However, on the oral advicc of reprcscntative of MoS, the Committee approved the wastages @ 15% in Meeting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2017. Hence, the Committee llowed same wastages in all subsequent cases. Itant (SKB) vide lettcr dated 15.12.2020 had ined to allow wastages @3"h in vicw of the operat like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & :ooling etc. rcquircd to proccss for manufacturing Cold CHINA S'TEI]I- PORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE LIMI'TED 3410044554 Dated 05.r0.2018 0r/81/050/00 882lAMt9l 34t24t040100 112lAMt9l Approved MI.lEl'lN(l NI.JMBFIR: 07/81 (Offline Cases) MI'lUI'lNG DA'I'tl: 16.ll-2021

nof f.a Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. The matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in the matter. As per decision, the case was referred to MoS o 3.02.2021. The case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I d 2l .05.2021 and noted that the representative of MoS informed in meeting that the case was under examination. A rcminder was sent to MoS on .01 .2021 . MoS requested for a copy of application to ine the case and the same was sent on 13.01 .2021 . -he case was considered in M. No NC/2/MEET lJull202l22l1 (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 andthe Committee decided to wait for the in M. No. Cases) dated for expcditi l'hc casc was ratificd in Mceting No lTl8l-Al'C2l2Ol dated 27 .l I .2019 on repeat basis as approved for AA No' 3410043636 dated 14.11.2011 in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 dated 12.6.201 9 allowing quantity of each imporl item @ 1.015 Kg/Kg content in the exporl product with the ition that thickness and gradc of import and expotl items to match. I'hc applicant via crnail dated 10.09.2020 request fi review of norms for Percentagc ol Scrap for lmpo product on Export items from lr}l5% lo 3 oh- The representation was referred to Consultant (SKts) on 08.12.2020 for examination of the case. The case was considered in M. No. l2l8 ldatcd]'I'he Committee considered the 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKB)lcase informed vide letter dated 15.12.2O2O that the applicantldeci to revise the ad-hoc comments. The case was last considered NC/2/MEETlJul1202l2212 (Offline 03.09.2021 and decided to remind MoS thc comments. had requested wastage as 5o% for processing of imported silicon electrical steel of cold rolled full hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon electrical stecl other than grain ted. Ministry of Steel since beginning in variousll. AA recommended wastage @ 3% for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. The Committee observed that wastage @3oh was allowed by the Committee for AA No. 341004363 5 dated 14.11.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 aslNote: The thickness and grade and export items to per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-l'l) dated 10.04.2018.1of import to this, wastages for many AAs werelmatch. @3o/o on the writtcn comments of MoS. llowever, on the oral advice of representative of MoS, the Committee approved the wastages @ 1.5% in Meeting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2017. Hence, the Committee allowed same wastages in all subsequent cases. Consultant (SKB) vide letter dated 15.12.2020 had opined to allow wastages @3o/o in view of the operations like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. RA concerned may take suitable sequential action accordingly. The matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in the matter. As per decision, the case was referred to MoS o 3.02.2021 . l'he case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 d 0r/81/050/00 t02lAM20l 341241040100 074lAM20l norms as per comments glven by M/o Steel vide email dated 29.09.2021 as under: The quantity of imPort 37o wastage on net weight of export product. Approved CHINA STEEL CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 341004sr91 Dated 04.06.2019 M-25 MEE'I'ING NLJMIIUR: 07/tll (Offline cases) MEtll'lNG DA'l'li: 16.11.2021

2l .05.2021 and noted that the representative of MoS informed in meeting that the case was unde examination. A reminder was sent to MoS on 09.01 .2021. MoS requested for a copy of application examine the case and the same was sent on 13.07 .2021 . case was considered in M. No NC/2/MEETlJull202l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.01 .2021 and the Committee decided to wait for the ments. The case was last N C/2/M EE'f I I ull 202 t 22 I 2 03.09.2021 and decided to the comments. considered in M. No. (Offline Cases) dated remind MoS for cxpediting M-26 The case was ratified in M. No. 5181-ALC212019 d 12.06.2019 on the recommendation of the representat of MoS. The applicant via email dated 10.09.202 requested for review of norms for Percentage of S for Import product on lixport items from l.0l5yo to 3 %o. The representation was refered to Consultant (SKB) on .12.2020 for examination of thc casc. case was considered in M. No. I 2/8 I dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consulrant (SKB) informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 rhat the applicant requested wastage as 570 for processing of imported silicon electrical steel of cold rolled full hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon elcctrical steel other than grain oriented. Ministry of Stecl since beginning in various AA recommended wastagc @ 3% for manufacturing Ilolled Non Grain Oricnted Illectrical Steel. 'l'he Committee observed that wastage @3oh was allowed by the Committee for AA No. 3410043635 dated 14.11.2017 in its Meeting No. l/gl dated t5.5.20tg per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-TD dated t0.04.2018 Subsequent to this, wastages for many AAs approvcd @3Yo on thc written comments of MoS. l{owever, on the oral advice of representative of MoS, Committee approved the wastages @ 1.5% in Meeting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2017. Hence, the Committee allowed same wastagcs in all subscquent cases. Consultant (SKB) vide lefrer dated 15 12.2020 had opined to allow wastages @3% in view of the operations like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & ing etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Elcctrical Steel. The matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in matter. As per decision, the case was referred to MoS 03.02.2021. case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 1.05.2021 and noted that the representative of MoS informed in meeting that the case was u ination. A reminder was scnt to MoS on 09.07.2021 . MoS requcsted for a copy of application examinc the case and the same was scnt on 13.07.2021 he case was considered in M. No. NC/2/M IlEl'lJull202l22l I (Offl ine Cases) dated 16.01.2021 and the Comminec decided to wait for the comments. The case was last considercd in M. No. NC/2/MEETllull202122l2 (9ff1ine Cases) dated CHINA STEEI, ITPORA'I'I ON INDIA PRIVA-fE LIMITT]D 34 r 0043988 Dated 22.03.2018 0 r /8 I /0s 0/00 667lAMt9t 34124t040t00 376/AMt8t 29.09.2021 as under: l. I'he quantity of imporl 37o wastage on net weight ofexport product. Note: The thickness and grade import and export items to match. RA concerned may take suitable consequential accordingly. Approved i. ;. ,: MEETIN(] NUMBIiR: O7l8I (OffliNC CASCS) MT]E'I'ING DA'I'E,: 16.II.2O2I

03.09.2021 and decided to remind MoS for the comments. case was ratified in M. No 11181-ALC212019 date 21 .ll.2}lg on repeat basis as approved for AA No' 3410043636 dated l4.ll.2Ol1 in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 dated 12.6.2019 atlowing quantity of each import item @ 1.015 Kg/Kg content in the exporl product with the ition that thickness and grade of import and export items to match. The applicant via email dated l0'09' request for review of norms for Percentage of Scrap for Imporl product on Export items from 1.015% to 3 %' The representation was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for examination of the casc. -l'hc case was considered in M. No. l2l8 ldated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKB informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant AA recommended wastage @ 3oh for m Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrica Committee observed that wastage @3Y" wa the Committee for AA No. 341004 l4.ll.2ol1 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-T'D dated Subsequent to this, wastagcs for many products of silicon electrical steel other than grainl friented. Ministry of Steel since beginning in varioutlrh" c..,--ittee considered the approved @,3Yo on the writtcn comments or^ :":r: I Ho*.r.r, on the oral advice of representative of i\4oS,l tr, wastage on net weight the Committee approved the wastages @ 1.5%-,inl ;i;;;;iproduct. Mceting No. 05/81 dated 1206.2019 for AA .No l 3410043636 datcd 14.ll.2Ol1. Hencc, thc CommittttlNot., I'he thickness and grade allowed same wastages in all subsequent cases. , lor import and export items to ,nsultant (SKB) vide lener dated 15. 12.2020 had . l;"i;t ined to allow wastages @3V" in view of the operations l-- li-ke cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold had requested wastage as 5%o for processing of imported silicon electrical steel of cold rolled full hard unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolled Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel' matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in the matter. As per decision, the case was referred to MoS on 03.02.2021. The case was considered in M' No 0 l/8 I dated 21 .05.2021 and noted that the represcntative of M informed in meeting that the case was under mination. n reminder was sent to MoS on .01 .2021 . MoS requested lor a copy of application to ine the case and the same was sent on l3'07'202 l' case was considered in M' No' NC/2/MEET lJull202122l1 (Offline Cases) dated 16.01.2021 and the Committec decided to wait for the ments. A pprovcd RA concerned consequential cord ingly may take suitab actlon The case was last N C/2/M E ET I J ul 1202 \ 22 I 2 3.09.2021 and decided to considered in M' No. (Offline Cases) dated remind MoS for exPediting CHINA STEEL CORPORATI ON INDIA 0l/81/050/00 288lAM20l 341241040100 ( the comments. m" .^. was ratified in M. No. 1618l-ALC2|20l9 dated The Committee considered the ided to revise the ad-hoc ared 12.6.2019 on the recommendation of representatt norms as Per comments glven l3.l1.2019 on repeat basis as approved for AA No' 3410043636 datcd 14.11.2017 in NC-2 M' No' 05/81 01/8 r /050/00 t39lAM20l 341241040100 ol3lA|/lzol CHINA STEEL ON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 34t0045223 Dated 21.06.2019 M-21 :: MEEI'ING NUMBER: 07/81 (offline C'ases) MEEl'lNG DA'[E: 16'll'2021 Approvcd

206lAM20t MoS. The applicant via email dated 10.09.2020 request for review of norms for Percentage of Scrap Import product on Exporl items from 1.015% to 3 %. The representation was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 8.12.2020 for examination of the case. case was considered in M. No. 12l8 I dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKB) informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requested wastage as 5o/o for processing of imported silicon electrical steel of cold rolled full hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rol products of silicon electrical steel other than grai oriented. Ministry ol Steel since beginning in vari AA recommended wastage @ 3% for manufacturi Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. Committee observed that wastagc @3o/o was allowcd b thc Committec for AA No. 3410043635 dated 14.11.2017 in its Mceting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-TD dated 10.04.2018. bsequent to this, wastages for many AAs were @3o/, on the written comments of MoS. However, on the oral advice of representative of MoS, Committee approved the wastagcs @ 1.5%o in Meeting No. 05i81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2017. [{ence, the Commiuee allowed same wastages in all subsequent cases. Consultant (SKB) vide letter dated 15.12.2020 ined to allow wastages @3%o in view of the operations like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & ing etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. 'lhe matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee decidcd to seek sccond opinion of MoS in the matler As pcr dccision, thc case was rcfcrrcd to MoS 03.02.2021. The case was considered in M. No. 0l /8 I 21 .05.2021 and noted that the reprcsentative of MoS informed in meeting that the case was ination. A reminder was sent to MoS on .01 .2021 . MoS requested for a copy of application to ine the case and the same was sent on 13.01 .2021. case was considered in M. No. NC/2/MEET lJull202l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.01.2021 and the Committee decided to wait for comments. The case was last NC/2/M EE'f I t ul I 202 I 22 12 3.09.2021 and decided to considered in M. No. (Offline Cases) dated remind MoS for expediting the comments. The case was ratified in Meeting No. l3l81-ALC2IZO19 dated 03.10.2019 on rcpeat basis as approved for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.ll.20ll in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 dated l2.6.2019 allowing quantity of each imporl item 1.015 Kg/Kg content in the cxport product with 0rl81/050/00 823lAMt9t 341241040t00 059/AM r9l condition that thickness and grade of import and items to match. 1'he applicant via email datcd 10.09 request for rcview of norms for Pcrcentage of Scrap Imporl product on lrxporl itcms from 1.015% to 3 %o and of Unit of measurement. l'he representation was ferred to Consultant (SKB) on 08,12.2020 for examination of the case. The case was considered in M. No. M-29 PRIVATE LIMITED 34 I 0045548 Dated I 8. t 0.2019 by M/o Steel vide email dated 29.09.2021 as under: l. The quantity o[ impofl 37o wastage on net weight ofexport product. Note: The thickness and grade of import and export items to match. RA concemed may take suitable cordingly. 'l'he Committee considered the decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per comments given by M/o Steel vide email dated 29.09.2021 as under: l. 'l-he quantity of imporl 37o wastage on net weig of export product. Note: The thickness and srade Approved CIIINA s't'Etit. PORA'II ON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 34t0044t94 Dated 3 L05.201 8 23 l l'rr ''

• ' MItlt'tlNG NUMBI,IR:07/ttl (OfflineCases) MItETING DA'I'E: 16.11.2021

15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKB import and export items to may take suitable actlon informed vide lctter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requested wastage as 5%o for processing of imported ilicon electrical steel of cold rolled full hardlRA concerned (unannealed) wide coil against expofl of flat rolledlconsequential products of silicon electricaI steel other than grainlaccordingly' oriented. Ministry of Steel since beginning in various AA recommended wastage @ 3% for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. The Committee observed that wastage @3oh was allowed by the Committee for AA No. 3410043635 14.11.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15 5.2018 per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-1'D dated 10.04.2018. Subsequent to this, wastages for many AAs were approved @3oh on the written comments of MoS. However, on the oral advice of representative of MoS, the Committee approved the wastages @ l'5% in Meeting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2011. Hence, the Committee llowed same wastages in all subsequent cases Itant (SKB) vide letter dated 15.12.2020 ined to allow wastages @3o/" in view of the operations like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. required to proccss for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented Electrical Steel' The matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in the matter. As per decision, the case was referred to MoS 3.02.2021. The case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated and noted that the representative of MoS informed in meeting that the case was mination. A reminder was sent to MoS on .07.2021 . MoS requested for a copy of application to ine the case and the same was sent on 13.01 .2021- case was considered in M' No. NC/2/MEET lJull2O2l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.01.2021 and the Committee decided to wait for the comments. match. 2t.05.2021 The case was last N C/2/M EE'f I J ull 202 t 22 I 2 considcred (Offline remind MoS in M. No. Cases) dated 3.09.2021 and decided to for expeditin the comments. 08.12.2020 for examination of the case. ]'he case was considered in M. No. I218 ldated L The quantitY of imPort 37o wastage on net weight of export Product. 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultanl (SKB informcd vide letter datcd I 5.12.2020 that the applicant had requested wastage as 5oh for processing of i iilicon electrical steel of cold rolled full hardl unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolledlNote: The thickness a1d Srade products of silicon electrical steel other than grainlof import and exporl items t oriented. Ministry of Steel since beginning in variouslmatch' AA recommended wastage @ 3% for manufacturingl Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented E,lectrical Steel. ThelRA concerned maytake suitable mmittee observed that wastage @3oh was allowed bylconsequential action the Committee for AA No. 3410043635 d accordi r h " . ^. " ---* r. .uti l* d i., rnl- N o. --s I s r .A L C-Z z O r S d ut.alffi th. 12.06.2019 on the recommendation of the representativelcase as per the agenda and for import product on export items from l.Ol5% to i %.lby M/o Steel vide email dated 'l'he representation was referred to Consultant (SKB) onlZe.OS.ZOZI as under: Approvcd 0l/8r/050/00 668/AM l9l 341241040100 058/AM l9l CFIINA STEEL PORA'I'I ON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 3410044],93 Dated 31.05.2018 M-30 MoS. The applicant via email dated 10.01 uested for review of norms for Percentage of to revise the as per comments

14.l1.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 as per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-TD dated 10.04.2018. Subsequent to this, wastages for many AAs were @3oh on the written comments of MoS. However, on the oral advice of representative of MoS, the Committee approved the wastages @ 1.5% in Meeting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2011. Hence, the Committee llowed same wastages in all subsequent cases. Itant (SKB) vide letter dated 15.12.2020 had ined to allow wastages @3Yo in vicw of thc operations like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & ing etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. matter was deliberated in the meeting and ittee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in matter. As per decision, the case was referred to MoS on 03.02.2021 . 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 2l ,05.2021 and noted that the representative of MoS informed in meeting that the casc was under examination. A reminder was sent to MoS on 09.07.2021 . MoS requested for a copy of application to examine the case and the same was sent on 13.01 .2021 . 'the case was considercd in M. No. NC/2/MEII'flJull202l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committee decided to wait for the comments. The case was last considered NC/2/MEE'1-lJul1202l2212 (Offline 03.09.2021 and decided to remind MoS the comments. in M. Cases) No for expeditin I /8 I /050/00 666lAMt9l 341241040100 r70lAM r8/ ( 'lhe case was ratified in M. No. 5l8l-ALC2l20l9 d 12.06.2019 on the recommendation of the represen of MoS. The applicant via email dated 10.09.202 requested for review of norms for Percentage of Scra for Import product on Exporl items fiom 1.015% to 3 Vo. represcntation was rcferrcd to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for examination of the casc case was considered in M. No. 12181 15.12.2020 held on 22.122020 and Consultant (SKB informcd vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requested wastagc as 5%o for processing of im silicon electrical stccl of cold rolled full unannealed) widc coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon clectrical steel othcr than grain d. Ministry of Steel sincc bcginning in vari AA recommended wastage @ 3% for manufacturi old Rolled Non Grain Oriented l:]lectrical Steel. 'l mittee observed that wastage @3o/o was allowed b the Committee for AA No. 3410043635 dated 14.11.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-'ID dated 10.04.2018. Subsequent to this, wastages for many AAs were proved @3Yo on the written comments of MoS However, on the oral advice of representative of M the Committee approved the wastages @ 1.5% in Meeting No. 05i81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2011. flence, the Committee llowed same wastages in all subsequent cases Itant (SKB) vide letter dated 15.12.2020 had to allow wastages @3%)" view of the opJraltel CHINA STEEL CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVA'f E I-IMITED 34 l 004363 6 Dated 14.11.20t7 ided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per comments grven by M/o Steel vide email dated 29.09.2021 as under: l. l'he quantity of import 3%o wastage on net weight ofexport product. Note: 'l'he thickness and import and export items t match. RA concerned may take suitab sequential Approved MllFll'lN(; NUMBER: 07/81 (Offline Cases) MEE'IING DA'I-E: 16-11.2021

like cl coolinl Rolled The n Comm matter. 03.02." The c 21.05." inform 09.07. examr The NC/2/ 16.01 comm The 3.09 M-32 (E-23s08) TRAFOMEC INDIA MAGNETIC S PV'I" LTD. 0t t009061 4 dated I I .09.2012 0 r/8 r /0s0/00 270lAM13l 01t241040100 2t6lAM13l Initiall 3t.12." No. 3(, The cz 22.08.: ol def Now, furnish norms. dated i l9l8r the car main l traced 22181 comm( 09.07." directe applici comm( applicr (reply sought The ( 08.09.: furnisl a rem applici to rel 10.1 1. l'he < I 05 cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & ing etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold ed Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. matter was deliberated in the meeting and the rmittee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in the er. As per decision, the case was referred to MoS on 2.2021. case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 5.2021 and noted that the representative of MoS brmed in meeting that the case was ination. A reminder was sent to MoS .202 1. MoS requested for a copy of application mrne the case and the same was sent on 13.07 .2021 - ) case was considered in M. No. l2lMEE'l'lJtll202122ll (Offline Cases) dated 01 .2021 and the Committec decided to wait for the comments. The case was last NC/2/M EE l' I )ull202 12212 considcrcd in M. No. (Offline Cascs) dated remind MoS for expediting )9.2021 and decided to comments ly, the case was rejected in M. No. 2ll8 I dated 2013 as per written comments of DHI vide U. O. '.4 t)120121T SW (B)1294 dated 06. 1 2.20 I 3. case was again considered in M. No. ll/8 I d 2011 and rejected due to non-submission of repl leficiency lctter dated 13.04.2017 raised by Dl ll. i, the applicant vide lettcr dated 0l .05.2019 had ished reply & requested for ratification of ad-hoc ns. 'l-he representation was referred to DHI via email d 24.12.2019. The case was last considered in M. No. dL.26.12.2019 and the Committee decided to the case with an advice to the section to trace out the main file as main file was not available. Main file is traced out and relerrcd to DFll on 12.02.2020. ln M. No. 22181 dt. 19.02.2020. the Committee decided to wait for comments. 'I'he case was considered in M. No. 04i8 I dt. 2020, On the request of DHl, the Committee rected the section to forward complete set o ication with ANF4A to DHI for examination and ments. Scanncd copies of complete set o icalions along with all concemcd/rclated document idcd 10 rcmind DII I fi Deferrcd Committee considered as per the agenda the and to qucrics raiscd ctc.) in chronological order w expediting the comments liom the applicant vide email dated 01.\0.2020. case was considered in M. No. 07/8 ld 2020 and decided to remind the applicant fi ishing the requisite information. As per NC decision reminder was sent to applicant on 05.11.2020. Tl pplicant via emaiI dated 05 . I 1 .2020 requested for 2 da reply. The applicant's reply vide letter dated .2020 was received. case was considered in M. No. l0/8 I dated 2020 held on l7.l 1.2020, the Committee noted that lplicant has not given point wise reply to the :ncies raised. Hence, the Committee decided to ask plicant to furnish the same. As per decision, the ete set of application with ANF4A was referred on 04.0f .2021 . Addirional information received he applicant was also sent to DHI. 'fhe applicant's ,vas scnt to DI ll on I 9.05.202 I . case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 2021 and the Committec dccided wait for DHI's MI.llll'lNG NUMlllllt: 07/tll (Ofllinc Cascs) Mlll'll'lNG DA'l'Fl: 16.11.2021

M-33 PRANITA ENGINEERI NG SOLTJ'f IONS PRIVATE LIMITED 0t t0064492 dated 04.05.2009 0r/81/050/00 026lAMt0t 07/241040100 039lAMt0t 27 | , : :. "r ,. MEE'l'lNG NUMtlllR:07/81 (OfflincCases) MllEl'lNG DA'Ill: 16.11.2021

r /8 r /0s0/00 360lAMrgl 031951040100 891/AMl8/ (E-24e6s) Zeeco India Pvt. Ltd. 03108191 l4 Dated I 3.02.2018 (E-24984) LeitwindShrir am Manufacturin g Private Limited 04t0164751 M-34 0r/81/0s0/00 4l2lAM19l t241040100 t48/AMr9/ Bangalore for furnishing the requisite information. As was sent to RA, Bangalore on NC decision, an email 07.202t. case was last considered in M. No. Cases) dated NC/2/MEEl'lJull202l22l2 (Offline 03.09.2021 and decided 1o remind again RA, tlanga for expediting the comments. Rcminder was issued to RA, Bangalore on 09.11.2021.However, no information has been received yet. case was re.iected in M. No. I l/81 dated 30'01.2019 ue to non-submission of reply deficiency letter raised Consultant (TEC-3). 1'he applicant via email dated 06.08.2020 furnished reply and requcsted to ratify the ad- hoc norms. The case was referred to consultant (TEC-3) for ination & comments vide email dated 29.10.2020' case was considered in M' No' l0/8 I dated l0.l1.2020 held on 11.11.2020, Consultant (TEC-3 asked to send physical file of the case to examine the case. l'herefore, the Committee decided to send the same to Consultant ('fUC-3) for examination of the case' Accordingly, file was senl to Consultant ('f liC-3)' The case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 1 1.05.202 I and the Committee decided to remind Itant (TEC-3). As per NC decision, the reminde was issued to Consultant ('IEC-3) on 09 07 .2021 ' Consultant (1'EC-3) via email dated \2.07.2021 uested for physical file of the case and thc same has scnt to examine the case. case was considered NC/2/MEEl'lJull202l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.01 .2021 and the Committee decided to wait for the comments. The case was last considered in M' No' NC/2/MEET lJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) dated 3.0g.2021 and Consultant (1'EC-3) informed that the icant's reply dated 06.08.2020 is incomplete' efore. the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments ofConsultant ('l'EC-3 ): l. To provide net weight & wastage details of both in M. No. Deferred ion ofthe export Product, of raw material ProPosed by Consultant (TEC-1). The applicant via email dated 04.09.2020 furnished reply for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out o these impofted materials, wastages claimed at eac stage of manufacturing with complete justificatio and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. (The information should bc in order) deficiency letter was issued to the applicant on lO.l1.2O2l .However, no reply has been received yet' case was reiected in M. No.02lSldated 01.05'2019, due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised Committee considered requested to ratify the ad-hoc norms. -fhe copy o to send final remi to the applicant for furnishi the requisite information. representation was forwarded to Consultant ('lEC-l) t] | 2020 The case was considered in M. No' l0/8 I dated decided to wait for rePlY of the applicant. case stands defened.

• MEE'l'lN(l NL.lMBtlR: 07/ttl (offlinc cases) M[rlll'lNc DA'I'E: l6.ll'2021

dated 05.10.2018 10.11.2020 held on 11.11.2020 at the comments. A reminder was (TEC-l) on23.12.2020. The case was considered in l 21.05.2021 and the Committee de Consultant (TEC-l). As per NC was issued to Consu ltant (TEC- I ) The case was considere NC/2/MEETlJull202t22lt (Off 16.01 .2021 andthe Committee de applicant to furnish the followir comments of Consultant (TEC- l): l. To provide justification of hi5 in glass fabric with the help ol 2. Commercial value of wastage As per NC decision, a deficiency applicant on 23.08.202 I . I'he casc was last consic NC/2/MEEl'lJull202t2212 (Off 03.09.2021 and decided to sen applicant for furnishing the requis NC decision, a reminder was issu 27.10.2021 . However, no reply hat M-i6 (E-24e86) LeitwindShrir am Manufacturin g Private Limited 0410164534 dated 27.01.2018 0l/8r/050/00 363lAMtgl 041241040100 042lAMt9l The case was rejected in M. No. . due to non-submission of reply of by Consultant (TEC- l). 'Ihe applicant via email dated I reply and requested to ratify the ar of representation was forwarded on 17.11.2020. The case was considered in 10. I I .2020 held on 11 .l | .2020 a the commcnts. A remindcr was ('l EC- I ) on 23. 12.2020. 'lhe case was considered in 21.05.2021 and the Committee dr Consultant ('lEC-l). As per NC was issued to Consultant (TEC-l ) The case was considere NC/2/MEE'flJull202122l1 (Off 16.01 .2021 and the Committec dr applicant 1o furnish the followir comments of Consultant ('l.EC-l): l. -fo provide justification of hi1 in glass fabric with the help o1 2. Commercial value of wastage As per NC decision, a deficiency applicant on 23.08.202 I . The case was last consir NC/2/MEE'flJull202l2212 (Of{ 03.09.2021 and decided to sen applicant for furnishing the requis NC decision, a reminder was isst 21 .10.2021 . Ilowevcr, no reply har 'fhc case was rejccted in M. No. 0 M-37 (E-24e81) LeitwindShrir am Manufacturin g Private Limited 0 r /8 I /050/0 I t07lAM19l 04t241040100 2s3lAM19l 20 and decided to ' was issued to Co in M. No. 0l/8l ee decided to remin NC decision, the rr 3- I ) on 09.07 .2021 . idered in M. (Offline Cases) :e decided to ask fi lowing information )-t): lf high wastage uptt :lp of lay out sheet. itage generated. iency letter was serl onsidered in M (Offline Cases) send a rcmindcr lquisite information ; issued to the appl as been received yet. . 3/81 dated 15.05.2( rf deficiency letter ra 18.08.2020 furnishe ad-hoc norms. The c I to Consultant (TE( M. No. 10/81 d and decided to wait rs issued to Consul :red in M. No. rmittee dccidcd to r per NC decision, (TEC-l ) on 09.07.) considered in 'l (Offline Ca rmittec decided to : following inform high wastage r : of lay out she rge generated. ncy letter was nsidered in Offline Case send a reminr luisite informat issued to the a has been rcceit r.0l/81 dated ( DHI deficie t4.09.2020 1 d-hoc normt to DHI on M. No. ll ided to wait for I to Consultant o.0l/81 dated to remind again ln, the reminder )7 .202t. n M. No. Cases) dated to ask llom the rrmation as per tage upto 47.6% rt sheet. was sent to in M. No. Cases) dated cmindcr to the :rmation. As per the applicant on received yet. ted 15.05.2019, rcy letter raised 020 furnishcd a rorms. The copy rsultant (TEC- I ) ). 10/81 dated ided to wait for I to Consultant ). 0l/81 dated to remind again rn, the reminder )7.2021. n M. No. Cases) dated to ask from the )rmatlon as per tage upto 4l .6Yo rt sheet. was sent to in M. No Cases) datec 'eminder to tht crmation. As per the applicant or rcceived yet. decided to send final reminder to the applicant lor furnishing the requisite information. Deferred lated 01.04.2020, leficiency letters. :020 furnishcd a norms. The copy I on l7.l 1.2020. Io. l0/81 dated decided to wait for reply of the applicant. Deferred 29 lt'.rge' "'' I MEE'tlNG NUMBER: 07/tll (Offlinc Cases) MtlL'l'lNG DA]'li: 16.11.2021 I

t4t016s252 dated 26.02.2019 2',. T r€ C ).11.2020 held on li Le comments. A re 3.r2.2020. he representative of :ply dated I 1.09.20 ommittee decided to re following informat L Rating of the ex1 2. Calculation suPl drawing with rel 3. Information as P rs per NC decision, 8.04.2020. 'he case was cons | .05.2021 and the eminder to the aPPl nformation. As Per N o the applicant on 09. .he case was I ,)cl2lMEETlJdl202l t3.09.2021 and deci rpplicant for furnishir llC decision, a remin L0.l 1.2021. However, M-38 (E-2498e) LeitwindShrir am Manufacturin g Private Limited 0410165234 dated 20.02.2019 ) I /8 r /050/0 I t33lAMt9l )41241040100 2s4lAMt9l lhe case was rejected lue to non-submissior fhe applicant via en -eply and requested to fhe copy of rePreset 11 .l1.2020. The case lared l0.l I .2020 helc lor thc comments. A 23.12.2020. I'he representative of reply dated 11.09.2 Committee decided tt the following informa l. Rating of the exP 2. Calculation suPP drawing with rek 3. Information as Pt As per NC decision, 08.04.2020. -l'he case was con 21 .05.2021 and the reminder to the aP; information. As per ) M-39 Tubacex Prakash India Private Limited 03 r 0828823 dated 0 1 /8 1 /05 0/00 0s3/AM20/ 0319s1040100 101/AM20/ I he case was a Al,C2l20l9 dated 0 Consultant (TEC-3 18.06.2020 requeste that the 10o% wastag of imporl item, ht application exactlY I l7.l I .2020 and reminder was rf DHI 2020 to seek ratlon: decided to wait fi issued to DHI on informed that the aPPlicant's is deficient. Therefore, the ftom the applicant to furnish informed that the aPPlicant' is deficient. l'herefore, the fiom the applicant to furnish supported by dimensional engineering h relevant dimensions highlighted. as per Appendix 4G. on. D/L was sent to the aPPlicant on dered in M. No. 0l/81 dated Committee decided to send clicanl for furnishing the requisite NC decision, a reminder was issued ) 01 .2021. last considered in M. No' 2212 (Offline Cases) dated ide d to send a reminder to the ng the requisite information. As dcr was issued to the aPPlicant on no reply has been received Yet. rd in M. No. 01/81 dated 0l .04.2020, on of reply of DHI deficiency letters. enrail dated 04.09.2020 furnished to ratify the ad-hoc norms. resentation was forwarded to DHI on casc was considered in M. No. l0/8 I held on 11.11.2020 and decided to wait s. A reminder was issued to DHI on : of Dlll )9.2020 :d to seek rmatlon: r export product. suppofled by dimensional engineerin r relevant dimensions highlighted. per Appendix 4G. n. D/L was sent to the aPPlicant on decided to wait for rePlY of the applicant. considered in M. No.0l/81 dated the Committee decided to send plicant for furnishing the requisite NC decision, a reminder was issued t.01 .2021 Iast considered in M. No. 12212 (Offline Cases) dated :ided to send a reminder to ng the requisite information. As pe :minder was issued to the aPPlicant )ver, no reply has been received yct. approved in Meeting No.2318l' 04.03.2020 on the recommendation o case as Per the agenda and Consultant (TEC-3) vide email dated 15.1 1 .202 1 informed that applicant have not given ustifi cation for enhancement as per SIoN Norylt !9.9:!lLfo. wastage. -l'herefore, the TEC-3). 1'he applicant vide letter dated :quested for re-fixation of norms and stated wastage allowed instead of 35%o for sr. no. I em, hence the applicant had applied the Deferred 30 I MItEI'ING NUMBI,R: 07/81 (Offline Cases) MEEl'lNG DA'I'E: l6.tl'2021 Rejected

01 .05.2019 CG Power and Industrial Solution Limited (Formerly Crompton Greaves Limited) 0310189692 dated 26.09.2014 0 1/8 r /05 505/AM t5l 031941040t00 268lAMt5t import of Sr. No. L In which the exporl & import Committee decided to reject the iption are exactly same as the applied for norms applicant's request of revision fixation & wastage is given for import item Sr. No. I is ad-hoc norms as per the advice of Consultant (TEC-3). l.35MT for IMT of export item. Therefore, the appli requested to enhance the wastage of impoft item Sr No. I fiom l0%oto 35oh.The representation was re to Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. Case is rejected. The case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I 21.05.2021 and the Committee decided to ask fi'om applicant to furnish following information as per comments of Consultant ('tEC-3): L 't'o provide detailed calculations of wastage incurred at each stage with supporting documents. As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was sent applicant on 20.01.2021. The case was last considcred in M. NC/2/MEEl'lJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) 03.09.2021 and decided to send a reminder applicant for furnishing the requisite information. The applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) l0.l l'2021 for exam ination of the case. The case was ratified in M. No. 2018 I dated 19.12.201 as per comments of DFII vide UO No. TSWB- 3l l81 12014 dated I 2.01.201 8. The applicant vide letter dated 27.11.2020 stated that in the DIII comments, the Norms werc ratified for all item fiom Sr. no. 1 to 29 and items no.30 to 39 were deleted. No reason was assigned in the DHI letter dated 12.01 .2018 to delete the items mentioned at 30 ro 39. The as per advice of Consultant ('IEC-3). As per NC decision, the case was referred to DHI 20.01 .2021 for examination & comments. case was last conside red in M. No. Cases) dalcd rcmindcr to the information.Also, to the applicant t6.t L2021. NC/2/MEETlJull202l22l2 (Offline 3.09.2021 and dccided to scnd a party has already imported the l'ransform samc have already been exported, hence t requested for review the application and allo as per Item No. 30 to 39 on net to net basis are engineering goods which are permitted i nn Net in Nef hacic 'l'hp rphraaahfali^h r,o on Net to Net basis. 'l'he representation war ,, Consultant (TEC-3) on29.12.2020. urwrruu tul rsonal The case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I datedl r case 21.05.2021 and Consultant (1'EC-3) informo.l .i^ .;"il After dated 20.05.2021 thar the applicant had against deletion of imporl items at Sl. No. DHL 'Ihese items are not integral parl of i.e. Transformer and therefore, cannot be co the earlier comments were givcn by DHI, t Committee decided to forward the represent to the No. dated to the M-40 plicant for furnishing the requisite email was sent on 12.l I .2021 uesting to attend personal hearing on Deferred 31 lllnr:e r' i' " ;r MEE'I'ING NUMBER: 07/81 (offline Cases) MEETING DA'IE: 16.11.2021

decided to wait for the requisi information. TATA POWER SOLAR SYSTEMS LTD 07101 15133 Dated 05.07.201 9 0l/8r/050/00 l5SiAM20 Rl-A File No: 011241040100 065lAM20l HQ File :0 l/8 l/050 /00598/A M2l RLA File :561241040 /00008/A M21l I M/s HEALTHIC o QT.JALITY PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED Lic.No/Date: 56 l 0005893 19.06.2020 'lhe case was approved in M' No. I l/81'Al-C212020 dated 24.11.2020 (Held on 01.122020) as per written given by Consultant (TIrC-3) 'lhe applicant letter dated 0l 04.2021 had requested for reinstate Solar Cell/PV Cell (HS Code:85414011) in place of deleted raw materials item No. I to ll in M' No' j tlsl dated 24.11.2020 (Held on 0l'12.2020). T'he representation was sent to Consultant ('tEC-3) on 06.04.2021. The case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 1.05.2021 and Consultant (TEC-3) informed via email dared 20.05.2021 that the applicant had represented proposal for approval of norms on repeat basis of AA issued in 2014. However, the applicant's request of older A reference did not have same imporl & export items' , the Committee decided to ask the applicant submit their justification again within l5 days' time' The applicant vide email dated 21.06.2021 has submitted M-41 some documents and also submitted some supplementary information to Consultant (TEC -3) with carbon copy to DGFT via email dated 22-06 2021' ]'he case was considered in M' No' NC/2iMljE'l'lJull2O2l22ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 andConsultant ('IEC-3) informed via email 12.07.2021 that the applicant, via email dated 18.06.2 I and subsequent emails, has given details o imported items in AA 0710102050 dated 01 '02'2014, of which repeat has been sought, and import items in AA Deferred Deferred under consideration. While AA dated 07 '02'2014 had l9 imporl items including PV cells, AA under consideration trai ZS import items excluding PV cells. The applicant has also submitted a copy of letter dated l3'01 201 written by them to RA, Bangalore for amendment of AA. Therefore, as per advice of Consultant (TEC-3), the mmittce decided to get a report from RA, Bangalo amendment of AA as requested by the applicant' As per NC decision, an email was sent to the RA, Bangalore on 19.08.2021 . The case was last considered in M NC/2/MEET lJul120212212 (Offline Cases) 03.Og.2O2l and decided to remind again ItA, Bangalore for expediting thc comments Remindcr was issued to ILA, llangalore on 09.ll.2021.Howevcr, no information No been receivcd Yet. Th. t"* *^ rejected in Meeting No' I I /8 l- The Committee considered the case as Per the agenda and Consultant (TEC-3) informed via email dated 15.11.2021 that as Per the information submitted bY the applicant vide representation dated 23.09.2021, it is very difficult to distinguish between imPort & exPort item. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the aPPlicant the detailed list of imPort & !Igo(!t9m! ALC2|2O2O dated 24.11.2020 on the ground that there is no change in m and IT'CIIS Code of impofi , it is difficult to distinguish 6 itcm,the case was rejected on the advice of Consultant (TEC-3)' exporting in consumer packing (size). Hence, first they import in Uutt< and then cut it into consumer size like 20 gm, 49 gm, 35 gm & 50 gm and pgg!-!tgtgfn MI'E'I'ING NUMBF]R: 07/ttl (offlinc cases) MFIEI'lNG DA'I.E',: l6'll'2021

M- 43 HQ File :0 l/8 l/050 100524tA Ml8 RLA File :041241040 /00190/A M l8/ HQ F. No. 0r8r05000 527 A Mtll RLA F. No. 051231040t 0045 l/ AM12 018105000 219A. Mt2l 0512310401 00nl AM12 consumer pack with good value addition. The firm's representation was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on23.09.2021 for examination & comments. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlSep1202l2213 (Offline Cases) dated 29.09.2021 and the Committee decided to wait for thc comments. 'l'he case was rcjeclcd in Mccting No. 12181- duc to non-submission ALC2l20l8 dated 13.02.2019 reply of deficiency letter. Now, the firm vide cmail dated 25.03.2021 & 21.04.2021 has furnished reply of deficiency letter with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. It is further mentioned by the firm that the Lead content in the imporl item "Re-melted lcad ingot" is 96.5yo. The firm's representation was forwarded to DPlll' on 23.09.2021 for examination & comments. 'fhe case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlSepl202l22l3 (Offline Cases) dated 29.09.2021 and thc Committee decided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to DPII'l' on 2l .10.2021 for expcditing the comments. Ilowever, no comments have bcen received ye1. The case was rejected in Meeting No. 0218 I dated 18.04.2011 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter.'l'he case was forwarded to NC-2 by PRC. Now, the firm vide letter dated 07.07.2021has requested to fix the ad-hoc norms. The firm's reprcsentation was forwarded to DPIIT on 23.09.2021 for examination & comments. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlSepl202l22l3 (Offline Cases) dated 29,09.2021 and the Committee decided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to DPIIT on 2.10.2021 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received yet. The case was rejected in Meeting No.: 2418 I dated 13.02.2014 due to non-submission reply of deficiency letter. Now, the firm vide letlcr datcd 01 .01 .2021 has requested to fix the ad-hoc norms and letler dated 07.09.2021 has furnished reply of deficiency letter. lt is further noted that the casc is forwarded to NC-2 by PRC. The firm's representation was forwarded to DPIIT on 23.09.2021 for examination & comments. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlSep1202l22l3 (Offline Cases) dated 29.09.2021 and the Committee decided to wait for the comments. A rcminder was issued to DPIIT on 21.10.2021 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received yet. M. 44 M- 45 M/s POCL ENTERPRI SES LTD. Lic.No/Date: 0410163810 20.12.2011 M/s Delton Cables Limited. Lic. No/Date: 0510328127 dated 03.07 .2012 the case as per the agenda and decided to wait for the comments. Deferred and decided to wait for the comments. Deferred M/s Delton Cables Limited Lic. No/Date: 05t0305311 dated 14.10.201 I and decided to wait for the comments. Deferred ", , ' MItl.l'l'lN(i NLlMItIiR: 07/ttI (Offlinc Cascs) MEl.ll'lNG DA'I'E: 16.11.2021 t I

M- 46 M/s PILOT INDTJSTRIE S I-TD Lic.No/ Date: 0510408140 Dated t 8.10.2018 HQ File : HQRNOR MREV rw00l36l 2IAM 22 Ap lhe casc was rejected in Meeting No.: 06/8 ldated )-6.06.2019 due to non-submission reply of deliciency etter raised by MSME. Now, the firm vide e-mail dated 02.03-2021 has [urnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. fhe firm's representation was forwarded to MSME on 23.09.2021 for examination & comments. The case was last considered in M' No' NC/2/MEET lSep120212213 (Offline Cases) dated 29.0g.2021 and the Committee decided to wait for the comments. lmport ltem and decided to fix the ad- hoc norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 05 I 0400699 dated 09.12.2016 as Per comments given bY MSME vide email dated 0l .10.2021 as under: Recommended QuantitY rle consequential action accordingly RA concerned may take suita M- 47 M/s CONSOLID ATED COIN COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Lic. No.: 0s I 04058 l0 dated 07.03.2018 HQ File: HQRNOR MREV tw001465 49AM22l 0512310401 004s7 I AMI S The case was ratified in Meettng No. Uj/U t dateo 14.08.2018 on repeat as approved for AA No' 05 I 0399348 dated 03.08.201 6. 'l'he norms were again revised in Meeting No' 05/81 dated 16.07.2020 held on 28.01.2020 on the basis of study group repo( dated 21.02.2020 as adoptcd by the Committee in the Meeting No. 24181 dated l8'3'2020' The Norms were recommended with l17o wastage for Copper Scrap, 8% wastage for Nickel Full Plates & 8% wastage for SHG Zinc Ingots' Now, the firm has again requested to review the ad-hoc norms. -lhe firm's representation was forwarded to DPII'I on 23.09.2021 for examination & comments. l'he case was last considcred in M ' No' NC/2/MEE'l-lSep1202l22l3 (Offline Cases) dated 29.0g.2021 and the Committee noted that the firm had requested for revision of earlie representatives of the firm al hearing and exPlained their Committee. Thereaftcr, the amongst the technical members in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer back the matter to DPIIT & Consultant (TEC-3) for their opinion on the subject matter. As per NC decision, the case was referred to DPIIT & Consultant (TEC-3) on I l.l 1.2021 for examination & comments. However, no comments have been received as Yet. ITCHS Code Export Item Quantity I'I'CIIS Codc 780 I I 000 Pure Lead (ee.e1%) 2000.000M]' 8548 I 020 Lead Scrap Drained Batteries "Rains", Rains As Per ISRI As applied for inclusive of 0.60"/, wastage and decided to wait for the comments. Deferrcd

M/s SHIVALIK BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD Lic. No.: 05104t3875 dated t3.03.2020 M/s SHIVALIK BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD Lic. No.: 0s104t4611 dated 22.01.2020 M/s SHIVAt,IK BIMETAL CON'f ROLS I,TD Lic. No.: 0510401345 dated 27.01.20t8 M- 49 HQ File : HQRNOR MREVIW 0l/8r/050/ 00473/AM 20 HQ File : HQRNOR MREV tw0 t/8 r /0 50/006 4TAM2l 0512410401 00 I 85/ AM-I9 HQ File : HQRNOR MREV rw0 l/81/0 50/004 51lAM2t 0s124t040t 002421 AM-I9 The case was approved in Meeting No.l3lt 30.12.2020 on repeat basis with 3%o wasti approved for AA No.0510405455 dated 30.01.2 per written comments given by Consultant (TEC Now, the firm has rcquested for revision of norms. The firm's representation was forwarded to Cor (1'EC-3) on 23.09.2021 for examination & comn The case was last considered in M NC/2/MEETlJull202t2212 (Offline Cases) 03.09.2021 and decided to wait for the con Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 08.10.2021 that the case may be referred to DPIII- for exam & comments. The case was referred to Dt,l I 8. I 0.202 I for comments. 'l'he comments received from DPIIT on 03. I I .202 l.Also, an em sent on 12.11.2021 to the applicant requesting to personal hearing on 16.I 1.2021 . 'l'he case was approved in Meeting No, 20.10.2020 held on 21 .10.2020 on repeat I wastage as approved for AA No. 05 10, 30.04.20 l9 as per written comment Consultant ('lEC-3) vide email dated l8.l Now, the firm has requested for revisi, norms. The firm's representation was forwarded to C ('fEC-3) on 23.09.2021 for examination & cr 'Ihe case was last considered in NC/2/MEI1TlJul120212212 (Offline Cases 03.09.2021 and decided to wait for the cr Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 08.10.20 that the case may be referred to DPIIT for exa & comments. The case was referred to DPIIT on l0.ll. comments. The commcnts were received fro on 18.11.202LAlso, an email was scnt on 12 to the applicant requesting to attend persona on 16. I I .2021 . 'l'he case was approved in Mceting No. 17, 21 .11.2019 with 3%o wastage as per writlen c dated 2l .l I .20.l9 given by Consultant (TBC-3 Now, the firm has rcquested for revision r norms. The firm's representation was forwarded to C (1'EC-3) on 23.09.2021 for examination & cr The case was last considered in NC/2/MEE'flJull202l2212 (Offline Cases 03.09.2021 and decided to wait for the cr Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 08.10.20 that the case may be referred to DPIIT for ext & comments. The case was referred to I 18.10.202 I for comments. The commer received from DPIIT on 03.11.202 l.Also, an e sent on 12.11.2021 to the applicant requesting personal hearing on 16. I 1.2021. M- 50 No.l3181dated %o wastage as d 30.01 .2018 as ant (TEC-3). ision of ad-hoc :d to Consultant r & comments. in M. No. Cases) dated the comments. 3.10.2021 stated for examination I to DITPIT on omments were ;o, an email was .resting to attend and noted that the comments of DPIIT given vide U.O. No. P- 4101 I 180120 I 9-TSW dated 03.t 1.2021 . Ihe firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. After due discussion, the Committee directed the firm's representatives to submit detailed represcntation with justification of the revision of the ratified norms. Deferred ,lo. 09/8 I dated at basis with 3%o 10410424 dated )nts given by t. r 0.2020. ision of ad-hoc rd to Consultant n & comments. in M. No. Cases) dated the comments. 1.10.2021 stated for examination l0.l 1.2021 for 'ed from DPlll- : on l2.l1.2021 ersonal hearing No.l7l81 dated 'it1en comments IIrC-3). sion of ad-hoc d to Consultant n & comments. in M. No. Cases) dated the comments. .10.2021 stated lor examination I to DPIIT on )mments were o, an email was resting to attend The Commitlee considered and noted that the comments of DPII'l' given vide U.O. No. P- 41 0 I | 180120 l9-TSW dated 18.11.2021. The firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. After due discussion, the Committee directed the firm's representatives to submit detailed representation with .iustification of the revision of the ratified norms. Deferred and noted that the comments of DPIIT given vide U.O. No. P- 47 0 | | l80l20l 9-'lSW dated 03.t.2021. The firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. After due discussion, the Committee directed the firm's representatives to submit detailed representation with justification of the revision of the ratified norms. Deferred ': i ' MllE'fIN(l NtJMBlllt: 07/tll (Offlinc Cascs) MI.lEl'lNG |)A'I'U: 16.11.2021 M. 48 I

M- 5l M/s SHIVALIK BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD Lic. No.: 05 I 0408423 dated r5.l1.2019 HQ File : HQRNOR MREV IW0l/81/0 s0/005 24lAM21 05t2410401 004491 AM-I9 The case was approved in Meeting 29.05.2019 as per written comments vide U.O. No. P-4701 ll80l20 15.05.2019. Now, the firm has requested for re norms. The firm's representation was forwat 23.09.202l for examination & comme 'l'he case was last considered NC/2/MEET lJull202l2212 (Offline 03.09.2021 and decided to wait for the The case was referred to DPlll' ot comments. The comments were rece on 03. I I .202 I .Also, an email was se to the applicant requesting to attend on l6.l 1 .2021. M- 52 M/s SHIVALIK BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD Lic. No.: 0510408424 Dated l5.r 1.2018 HQ File :0I /81/050 t00s22lA Ml9/ RLA File :051241040 1004441A Mt9/ The case was approved in Meeting 29.05.2019 as per written comments vide U.O. No.: P-4101118012( 15.05.2019. Now, thc firm has requested for re norms. l'he firm's representation was forwa 23.09.2021 for examination & commt The case was lasl considerer NC/2/MEET I Jdl202l22l2 (Offl ine 03.09.2021 and decided to wait for th The case was referred to DPII'I' o comments. The comments were rec( on 03.11.202 l.Also. an email was sr to the applicant requesting to attend on l6.l 1 202],. M- 53 M/s SHIVALIK BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD Lic. No.: 05 r 0405455 dated 30.01 .2018 HQ File :01/81/050 /0033 r /A M19 RLA File :051241040 l00s21lA M18/ The case was approved in NC 0i/8 I dated I 5.05 .20 I 9 as per v given by Consultant (l'trc-3) Now, the firm has requested for r norms. l'he firm's representation was forwa (TEC-3) on 23.09.2021 for examina ]'he case was last considere NC/2/MEET lJul120212212 (Offlinr 03.09.2021 and decided to wait f Consultant (1'EC-3) via email dated that the case may be referred to DPI & comments. The case was refet 18.10.202 I for comments. The received from DPIIT on 03.11.2021. sent on 12.11.2021 to the applicant r personal hearing on t6.11.2021 . No. 04/81 dated given by DPIIT 19-1'SW dated for revision of ad-hoc forwarded to DPll'f on :omments. iidered in M. No. )ffline Cases) dated for the comments. 'll'I' on I 8.10.2021 for 'e received from DPIIT was sent on 12.11.2021 attend personal hearing No.: 04/81 s given by 0 t 9-TSW dated DPII'I dated ;ted for revision of ad-hoc was forwardcd to DPIIT on r & comments. considered in M. No. (Offline Cases) dated wait for the comments. DPII'l' on I 8.10.2021 for were received from DPII'f rail was sent on 12.11.2021 1 to aflend personal hearing I Meet written No/Date: comments for revision of ad-hoc orwarded to Consultant mination & comments. idered in M. No. ffline Cases) dated ait for the comments. lated 08.10.2021 stated DPIIT for examination referred 1o DPIIT on The comments were 102 l.Also, an email was :ant requesting to attend Deferred Deferred Defcrred and noted that the comments of DPIIT given vide U.O. No. P- 47 0 I 1 180120 l9-TS W dated 03 .11 .2021 . The firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. After due discussion, the Committee directed the firm's representatives to submit detailed representation with justification of the revision of the ratified norms. and noted that the comments of DPIIT given vide U.O. No. P- 4701 | 18012019-TSW dated 03.11.2021. The firm's representatives also attended Personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. After due discussion, the Committee directed the firm's representatives to submit detailed rePresentation with -iustification of the revision of the ratified norms. and noted that the comments of DPIIT given vide U.O. No. P- 47 0 I 1 180 120 \9-TSW dated 03.11.2021. I'he firm's representatives also attended Personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. After due discussion, the Committee d irected the firm's representatives to submit detailed representatlon with justification of the revision of the ratified norms. I MEE'l'lNG NUMBER: 07/81 (offline Cases) MI.lEl'lNc DA'l'E: 16.11,2021

M- 54 The case was initially referred to DIPP and NC-2 vide their meeting 23181 dated 06.03.2018 received DIPP's comments vide O.M. No. 11351120]r8-TSW dated 12.03.2018. However, NC requested DIPP to re- examine the matter. DIPP raised deficiency letter to the firm, but the case got rejected vide NC-2 Meeting No. 05/8 I dated 10.10.2018 due to non-submission of reply. In this matter, a Special Norms Committee dated 12.12.2017 comprising members of DPIII- and MSME was also convened. The applicant vide letter dated 20. 10.2018 requested to allow wastage on repeat basis as given to it in other cases in Special Norms Committee Meeting dated 12.12.2011 . Thereafter, the case was referred to Consultant (TEC-3) who directed the firm to submit ceftain information during personal hearing dated 26.06.2019. 'I'he applicant's reply was forwarded to Consultant (l'EC-3) on 06.08.2019 along with reminder on 11.10.2019. ln compliance of M. No. l4l8 I dated 16.10.2019 decision, a letter was sent to the applicant via email dated 05.11.2019 to seek liom the applicant to furnish exact details ofsizes on advice of Consultant (1'EC-3 ). The case was considered in M. No. 20l8 I dated 08.01.2020 and Consultant (TEC-3) informed that the applicant's reply dated 18.12.20ll9 is very vague. Therefore, the Committee decided to give last opportunity to the applicant to submit the exact details of sizes of the export product vis-a-vis import along with quantity. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to thc applicant on 06.02.2020. However, the applicant vide email dated 08.02.2020 informed that exact import/ export quantity is not needed for fixation of norms. The case was last considered in M. No. 23l8ldated 04.03.2020 and decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. Reply received fiom the applicant vide email dated 15122.4.2020 was referred to Consultant ('l'l'.C-3) for examination and comments. However, the Committee noted that the applicant has only provided the sizes of import product but not provided thc exact details of sizes of the expor.t product vis-2r-vis import along with quantity despite several reminders. Hence, the Committee decided to reject the request of the applicant to review the case. Now the firm requested for revicw the case. Now, the applicant vide thcir lctter dated 23.08.2021 again requested to allow wastage on repeat basis as given to it in other cases in Special Norms Committee Meeting dated I 1.12.2017. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEETlJull202122l2 (Offline Cases) dated 03.09.2021 and noted that a copy of representation was sent ro DPIIl" MSME and Consultant (1'lrC-3) on 23129.09.2021 . Comments have been rcceived from MSMF. & DPIII- via email daLed 29.09.2021, & 06.10.2021 respectively. The firm was also allowed to attend personal hearing on 16. I 1.2021 as requested. M/s KIRTANLA L STEEL PRIVA'IE LIMITEI) Lic. No.: 03r08r6055 dated 29.09.2017 HQ File : HQRNOR MREV rw0r/8 r/0 s0l0t I AMI8 0319410401 00s29t AM/I8 and noted that the firm had requested for revision of earlier ratified norms. The firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. 'I'he Committee noted the comments given by MSME, DPIIT & Consultant ('l-EC-3) via email dated 29.09.2021, 06.10.202t & 24.1 t.2021 respectively. The Committee also noted that no conclusive comments have been received from the concerned Technical Authorities in the instant case. 'Iherefore, the Committee de cided that the case may be considered by a Special Committee to be constituted for examining the request for revlew. Deferred 37 I l'l 3. i. i, :' .: MEIII'INC NUMITER: 07/til (Offlinc Cascs) MEll'I'lNG DA'I'F],: 16.11.2021

frc-.^.-ut upproa in ft4. No. 14.08.2018 allowing the wastage of 03/81 dated 23%. The KIRTANLA L STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED 03r0815s26 dated 05.09.2011 KIRTANLA L STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED 03r0815527 dated 05.09.2017 F.No. 0r/8r/050/ 00443/AM l8/ 03t9410401 00 r05/AM r8/ applicant vide lettcr dated l8'8.2018 requested to allow wastage on repeat basis as given to it in other cases in Special Norms Committee Meeting dated 12.12.2011. Ho*.r.., the applicant was directed to submit certain information as per advice of Consultant (TEC-3 ) during personal hearing dated 26.06-2019 ' The applicant's reply was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on 06.08.2019 along with reminder on 11.10.2019. ln compliance of M. No. l4l81 dated 16.10.2019 decision, a letter was sent to the applicant via email dated 05.1 1.2019 to seek ffom the applicant to furnish exact details of sizes on advice of Consultant (TEC-3). The case was considered in M. No. 20181 dt' 0S.01.2020 and Consultant ('IEC-3) informed that the applicant's reply dated 18.12.2019 is very vague' Therefore, the Committee decided to give last opportunity to the applicant to submit the exact details of sizes of the export product vis-a-vis import along with quantity. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 06.02.2020. However, the applicant vide email dated 8.2.2020 informed that exact import / export quantity is not needed for fixation of norms. The case was considered in M. No. 23181 dl.04.03.2020 and decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, a reminder was sent to applicant on 10.7.2020. Thc case was last considered in M. No. 05/81 dt. 16.01 .2020 held on 2l .Og.2O2O.l'he Committee noted that the applicant is not providing the exact details of sizes of the export product vis-a-vis import along with quantity despite several reminders. Ilence, the Committee decided to reject the request of the applicant to review the case. However, the applicant vide letter dated 12.10.2021 has requested to review the case to enhance the wastage allowed. ltre case was approved in M. No.03/8 I dated 14.08.2018 allowing the wastage of 23%o. The applicant vide letter dated I 8.8.20 I 8 requested to allow wastage on repeat basis as given to it in other cases in Special Norms Committee Meeting dated 12.122011 . However, it was also noted that the applicant was dircctcd to submit ccrtain information as per advice of Consultant (1'EC-l) during personal hearing dated 26.06.201 9. fhe applicant's reply was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on 06.08.20.l9 along with reminder on 11.10.2019. In compliance of M. No.l4l81 dated 16.10.2019 decision, a letter was sent to the applicant via email dated 05.11.2019 to seek fi'om the applicant to furnish exact details of sizes on advice of Consultant ('lEC-3). l'he case was considered in M. No. 20181 dt. 08.01.2020 and Consultant (1'tic-3) informed that the applicant's reply dated 18.12.2019 is very vague. Therefore, the Committee decided to give last opportunity to the applicant to submit the exact details of sizes of the cxport product vis-a-vis import along with quantity. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 06.02.2020. However, the applicant vide email dated 8.2.2020 informed that exact import / export quantity is not nceded for fixation of norms. The The Committee re- considered the case as Per the agenda and noted that the firm had requested for revision of earlier ratified norms. The firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. Thereafter, the case was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided that the case may be considered by a SPecial Committee to be constituted lor examining the request for review. The Committee re- considered the case as Per the agenda and noted that the firm had requested for revision of earlier ratified norms. The firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. Thereafter, the case was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided that the case may be considered by a SPecial Committee to be constituted for examining the request for review. Deferred Deferred case was considered in M. No' 23181 il. 04.03.2020 F. No. :01/81/050 t004421A M18/ 0319410401 00102/AM r8/ M6ETtNG NLjMIIER: 07/tll (offline cases) MIitil'lNG DA'I'E: l6.l l'2021 I

and decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. Reply received from the applicant vide email dated 15122.4.2020 has been referred to Consultant (l'EC-3) for examination and comments. The case was last considered in M. No. 05/8 I dr. 16.01 .2020 held on 2t.09.2020. 't'he Committee noted that the applicant is not providing the exact details of sizes of the export product vis-a-vis import along with quantity despite several reminders. Hence, the Committee decided reject the request of the applicant to review the case. Ilowever, the applicant vide letter dated 12.10.2021 has requested to reconsider A9!'-!t!9 !9I- .tq!,e t!9le!Egq4ll9y9q-_ The case was approved in M. No. 2418 I dated 18.03.2020 with wastage of 43oh as per comments of Consultant (TEC-3). The applicant vide letrer dated 12.10.2021 has requested to review the ratified ad-hoc norms. Th. "^. *^ ratin"a in Vf . No. 3/8l.ALC2DOl8 dat.d 14.08.201 8. l-he applicant vide lcrter dated I 8.06.2019 had stated that the norms was ratified as per SION C- 397 but the export item is different. 'fhey had, therefore, requested to review the decision and requested for personal hearing. The Committee heard the applicant's representative during personal hearing in M. No. l9l81 dt. 26.12.2019 and decided ro refer the case to Consultant (TEC-3) for furlher examination. A D/L was senr on 01.04.2020. Applicant,s reply dt. 0l .06.2020 was sent to Consultant (-lEC-3) on 01.06.2020. The case was considered in M. No.04/gI dt. 09.07.2020 and decided to seek certain information from the applicant. The applicant's reply email dated 11.09.2020 was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on 11.09.2020 for examination of the case.'l'he case was considered in M. No. l0/gl dared 10.11.2020 held on 17 .l I .2020and decided to scek ccftain information from the applicant. 'l'hc applicant's reply dt.26.12.2020 was sent to Consultant (l'EC-j) via email on 28.12.2020. The case was considcred in M. No. l3lgI dated 30.12.2020 held on 08.01.2021 and consultanr (TEC-3) informed vide email dated 07.01.2021 that earlier norms were ratified by NC as per SION C397 with l0% wastage. Now, the applicant has requested for enhancement of wastage and claimed 50% wastage due to use of wider coil of 74mm for final product size of 50.80mm for which no rechnical justification has been given. Also, considering the processes involved in The Committee re- considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm had requested for revision of earlier ratified norms. The firm's representatives also attended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. '[hereafter, the case was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided that the case may be considered by a Special Committee to be constituted for examining the request for review. The Committee re- considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm had requested for revision of earlier ratified norms. The firm's representatives also atlended personal hearing and explained their case before Norms Committee. After due discussion, the Committee directed the firm's representatives to submit representatton detailed with justifi cation of the revision of the ratified norms. manufacture of ex roduct an increase in w KIRTANLA L STEEL PRIVA'fE LIMITED 03 I 0820384 dated r r .04.201 8 (E-2346s) SHIVALIK BIMETAL CONTROLS I-TD. 0510405191 dated 07.03.20 I 8 F.No. 0t/81/050/ 00002/AM l9 031941040t 00878/AM l8/ 0t t81t0s0t 00t74tAM t9t 05/24t0401 00606/n M t8l Deferred Deferred ', i ,:, MEtl'rlNG NUMBER: 07181 (offline Cascs) MEETTNC DATE: t6.lt.z0z1 M5 7

already allowed is not justified. Since, the applicant vide letter dated26.12.2020 did not give any additional technical information. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the applicant's request for revision of ad-hoc norms as per comments given by Consultant (rEC-3). The applicant vide letter dated 12.10.2021 has requested to review the case and enhance the wastage allowed. The firm's representation was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on 12.11.2021 for examination of the case' 40 | : , , 'i,, ' MtlFl'1lNG NUMIIIiR: 07/81 (Offline cases) MIilll'lNG DATE: 16'll'2021