IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr A / NC-II) Advance Authorisation 2021-09-03

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE rDES― II SECT10N〕 MINUTES OF THE NORⅣlS COMInIIITTEE-11 MEETING Noo NC/2/MEET/Ju1/202122/2(Omine cases)DATED 03.09。 2021 Plcttc Notc i.For inliDrmation of cxportcrs,Norlns Committcc‐ H handles all cascs pcrtaining to lxation/ratiflcation of norms for Export Products falling undcr ITC(HS)ChaptCr 72 to 76,781o80& 85. Communications in rcspcct of cascs/pcrtaining to NC‐ II may bc scntto cmall addrcss:nc2- 五. In ccrtain cascs thc dccision Ofthc Norrns Committcc rcfcrs to thc Rccommcndations/Obscrvations/Dcncicncics rcccivcd fronl thc conccrncd ′ I`cchnical Authority. Whcrcvcr applicablc, a scanncd copy of such documcnt has bccn placcd atthc cnd ofthc Minutcs,in running scrial ordcrs.′ 1`hc conccrncd applicant/company may go through thc samc and rcspond accordingly. lii. Thc Norms Committcc has takcn dccislon only with rcspcct to tcchnical aspcct/wastagc norms.Whilc rcdccnling thc applications, RAs should check that thc applicant has full‖ cd aH rcquircmcnts as prcscribcd in policy/proccdurc including thosc in Policy Circulars issucd from timc to timc or any othcr provisions undcr FTP/HBP for EODC. ivo Whcrcvcr thc Committcc has flxcd Norms, thc conccmcd RA mav cnsurc that AA is issucd on thc wastagcs/consumption as ratiflcd by thc Comnlittec or as pcr wぉ tagcs ciaimcd in the application,、vhichcvcr is lcss. Mcclng No.NC/2/MllElソ Juν202122/2(01ninc cascs)of Norms Commltcc‐ H brthc ycar 2021‐22 hcld on 03.09.2021 through Vidco Confcrcncing undcr thc Chairmanship of Shri Akash Taneia,Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to considcr thc fo1lowing applications for ratiflcation of norms in rcspcct ofノ ヽdvancc Authorizations undcr Duty Excmption Schcmc(Chaptcr‐4)of Forcign Tradc Policy 2015‐ 20.Thcお1lowing mcmbcrs 、verc prcsent in thc mccting:‐ Sl.No. Name & Designation Department 1 Shri Shaish Kumar,(TEC‐ 1) Consultant Shri V.C. Agarwal. ('lEC-3) Consultant Shri S.K.Bhatnagar,(SKB) Consultant In attendance Shri Pranav tJpadhyay. Dy. Director DGIr′ I` Pagc I I NC‐2 MEETING No.:NC/2/MIII〕 1`/Juν202122/2(Onlinc cascs)

Minutes of the cases discusscd in the meeting arc as undcr: Case History vidc lcttcr datcd 03 11 2017. follo、vcd datcd 29.03.2018 frorn thc applicant. mc information was sought from the applicant via cmail 25.05.2019 lollowed by reminder on 12.07.2019' The I reply dated 13.11.2019 was referred to Consultant ,C-3) via email dated l4.l I .2019. Thc casc was in M. No.20181 dl.08.01.2020.'l'he Committec noted that the written comments datcd 01.01.2020 of Consultant ('lEC-3) as : l. Nash lndustrics. an DOU, had rcqucstcd lor {jxation b y h a d t h c requested lbr fixation ol scrap/wastage norms for manulacturc and cxport o{'Shcet Mctal Prcsscd Compol made of iron and stccl, coppcr, brass and such other metals/altoys. 'l'he matler was considered in M' No' 0l/81 dated 10.04.2019 and on the advice of Consultant (l'llc-3)' 3. Components are manufactured from iron & stecl, Cu & Al sheets. 4. Wastagcs claimcd is in the range ol' 38o/o to 50Yo f wastage norms lbr cxport product 'sheet mctal pressed ornpnn"ntt lor LJI'}S & other industrial usc'. 2' Applicant has infofmcd th・at thcy ttc mmuねctuHng 100()parts & s & havc submitted some details lor 6 componcnts. which is average of vide range of 'l .5%o to 98.4% 5' As range f wastage is vcry widc and number ol componcnts very targe, it is not possiblc to work out wastagc of every .o.pon.nt. In view of the above, the Committcc decided to call ihc applicant lbr l'}ll' As per NC decision, an cmail dated 25.02.2020 was scnt to the applicant to attend PH on 04.03.2020 ′ 「hc casc 、vas considcrcd in M. No. 22/81 dt. 19.02.2020 as per agcnda and notcd that thc applicant vide emait dated 28.02.2020 has sought anothcr datc lor personal ing on behatf of the applicant. Therefore, thc Committee ided to givc onc morc opportunity to thc applicant personal hearing to cxplain the case belore Norms Committee' buring personal hcaring hctd in Meeting No. 05/81 on 28.07.2020, your rcpresentatives to furnish loltowing inlbrmation: l. To submit details by making subgroup ol' items manul'acturcd in thc limited range of wastages as there is wide variation in the wastage of items manufbcturcd i'e'' 1.5% to 98.40Yu D/l- was sent to thc applicant on 22.09.2020. 'l'hc casc considcred in M No 8/81 datcd 29 09 2020 and dccidcd to ant last opportunity to thc applicant to furnish the requisite nformation. 'l'he applicant's rcply dated 03.11.2020 was sent Consultant ('llrc-3) via cmail on 10. I I .2020. 'l'hc case was in M No l1/81‐ ALC2/2020 datcd 24.11 2020 Hcld on 01.122020)独d dCCidCd to rcmind TIIC-3) for cxpcditing thc comments. Reminder ltant(TItC-3)on l1 01.2021. 'l'he case was last discussed in M. No.0l/81 datcd 21.05'2021 and the Committce noted that Consultant ('l'lrC-3) via cmail 11.02.2021 had requested fbr the hardcopy of the iginal apptication. 'l'hcrcfbre, the Committcc dccidcd to ask e llrm to submit the same. 'fhe applicant's reply was received on 27.07.2021 and the same was forwarded nsultant ('l'lrc-3) on 10.08.202 l. Applicant's Name / AA No. ered the case agenda and via email dated 209.2021 has requested for phYsical file along with hard copy applicant's rePlY the case. mmittce dccidcd send the samc to ltant(TEC… 3) examination of thc 1/80/162/0030 2/AM18/ 1/11/2015:EO IJ:CSEZ/1476/ NASH INDUSTRIES (1)PRIVATE IンIMITED, BENGALUR U Pagel2 NC-2 MEETING No.:NC/2/ヽ41:1〕´ Iソ」u1/202122/2(Olllinc cascs) Meeting Date:0309.2021

'fhe casc was rejccted in M. No. 05/8ldated 18.06.2015 duc to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter datcd I l.l1.2014. Ilowcvcr. thc applicant vidc lettcr dated 12.06.2018 furnished the reply with a rcquest to llx thc ad-hoc norms. 'l'he applicant's reply was forwarded to DI II for examination ol'the on 21.06.2018 fbllowed by rcminder on 12.07.2019 & 11.10.2019. As per NC decision of M. no. 20181 dt. 1.2020, a copy of application was retbrred to DIII on .02.2020. Thc case was considercd in M. No. 23181 dt. .03.2020, the reprcscntativc of DI II informcd that thc case undcr cxamination. l-he Committec considcred the casc as agenda and notcd that I)lll via cmail datcd 16.07.2020 fbr complete sct of application. 'l'hereforc. the ittcc dccidcd to scnd thc complcte sct ol application with thc applicant's rcply datcd 12.06.2018 with all ure to DHI for examination of the case. As of DIII rcccivcd via cmail datcd 29 09.2020, thc was rctrrcd to I)PHT on 30.09.2020 fcDr cxamination& s. The casc was considered in M. No. 8/81 dated .09.2020 and decided to wait for the comments. 'l'hc considcrcd in M.No l1/81‐ AI´ C2/2020 datcd 24 11 Ileld on 01.12.2020) and notcd that thc rcply lurnished by the icant is incomplete. 'l'hcrcfore, thc Committce dccidcd from the applicant to lurnish following information comments givcn by DPIII' vide U. O. No. P 7011/139/2020‐ 1`SヽV datcd 16.10.2020: l. Sl. No. 3, 4, 5, 8 & I I ofthe Standard Deficiency Form fbr cxport item at Sl. No. l. As per NC decision, D/1, was sent to the applicant on I 1.01.2021 followcd by reminders on 06.04.202 l, 05.07.2021 12.07.2021. Flowever, no reply has bccn reccived yct. the agcnda and that thc plicant's rcply wes received despite 'al reminders. mmittee decided to reject the applicant's of flxation norms. Ilc.j ectcd M‐2 1ンIうIGHTON WELSPUN CONTRACT ORSPRIVAT E LIMITED 0310764005 datcd 0101.2014 1/81/050/0006 0//ヽM15/ 3/95/040/0075 2/AM14/ HQ E― offlcc Computer No.: 23969 l'he Commi considered the case the agcnda idcd to remind nsuitant(TEC Defcrrcd M-3 ЛNDAL SAW i′IMITED 0510395407 datcd 24.08.2015 3/AM16/ 7//ヽM16/ ` hc casc、vas ratiflcd in M No. 12/81 datcd 06.09.2016 as pcr I)IPP l」. 0. No. 12/76/2016‐ ′ 「SW/28 datcd 06/09/2016. IIo、vcvcr,the applicant vidc icttcr datcd 1 5.02 2019 rcqucstcd to rc― flx thc ad‐ hoc norms. A copy of rcprcscntation w霞 rctrrcd to Consulant (′ 1`EC‐ 3) on 07.08.2019 for mination. Dcficicncy lcttcr was scnt to thc applicant on .10.2019 as per NC decision of Meeting No. I l/81 dated .2019. Thc applicant's reply dated 14. 11.2019 was rcfcrrcd to Consultant(TEC-3)for cXamination,NC obscrvcd in its M No. 20/81 dt. 08.01.2020 that thc authori,塗 tion is 24.08.2015 and thc party would havc exported thc said items as pcr norms ratificd carlier. 'l'hcrclbrc. thc Committee to seek a rcport lrom RA regarding the thicknesVsurfacc arca of coating w.r.t Adhesivc and Polyethylcne in the export product. An email dated .03.2020 was scnt to ItA. New Delhi. 'l'he casc was in M No. 23/81 dt. 04.03 2020 and decided to remind the RA, New Dclhi, inviting attcntion of Head of RA, for submitting thc rcquisitc infbrmation. As per NC dccision, remindcr was scnt to RA, Ncw Dclhi, on 10.07.2020, 16.07.2020,22.9.2020 & 30.9.2020 lor expediting thc matter. 'l'he casc was considered in M. No. 8/81 datcd 29.09.2020, the Commitlcc considcrcd thc case as pcr agenda and notcd that the report receivcd vide cmail datcd 30.9.2020 from CLA, Ncw Delhi was forwarded to Consultant ('llJC-3) on thc for cxamination. I Iowcvcr, Consultant ('l'llC-3) send physical file to cxamine thc case. 'l'herefore, the mittce dccidcd to send physical file to Consultant ('l'DC- ) for cxamination of thc case. 'l'hc main was rel'crrcd Page 3 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MI:.1:;l-llull202l22l2 (Of1'linc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021 I'hc Committec Yrnsi/lcra.l tho cqce as 01/R

lConsultant (TEC-3) on l9.l1.2020. Thc case was considered in M. No. lllSl-ALC212020 dated 24.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and dccidcd to wait for the comments. Reminder issucd to consultant (1'FlC-3) on 11.01.2021. l'he case was last discussed in M. No.0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and the Committec noted the comments olConsultant ('l'EC- 3) received via cmail dated 11.02.2021 whercin it is stated that in thc repo( of firm, RA, New Delhi had enclosed statement of thc firm on thickness of coating of different layers. 1'he commcnts wcre given on the basis o[details given by the firm in its letter dated 14.1 1.2019 &. the report of study group. However, the details given by the firm to RA, New Delhi did not provide infbrmation separately lor LSAW & seamless pipes. 'l'herefore, the Committee decided to ask from the firm to furnish following inlormation as per advice of Consultant (TEC-3): I . A copy of Shipping Ilill. 2. A copy ofexport ordcr. The applicant's rcply was received on 23.07.2021 and the same was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on 10.08.2021. flowever, no comments have been received yet. M-4 KANADE ANAND UDYOG PVT. Ll`D 0310824397 Datcd ll 10.2018 01/81/050/0054 6/AM19/ 03/94/040/0062 1/AM19/ HQ E― omce Computcr No.: 23970 l'l-he case was rejected in M. No.06/81 dated26.06.2019 due to lnon-submission ol' reply oldeficiency lcttcr darcd 25.03.2019. Ilowever, the applicant vidc lctter dated 12.07.2019 had requestcd lbr ratiflcation of Norms.'l'hc casc was considered in M. No. 17l8l dt.27.ll.20lg, rhe Committec observed thar main file is not availablc. IIencc, it was decidcd to defer thc casc with an advicc to the section to trace out the main file. The case was referred to Consultant GIjC-3) on 06.01.2020. 'l'he case was considered in M. No.20/81 dt.08.01.2020 and decided to wait for comments. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 23181 dt. 04.03.2020 and dccided ro send the applicant's rcply to Consultant (1'llc-3) for examination of the case. Physical Iile along with thc applicant's rcply scnt to Consultant (1'lrc-3) on 25.09.2020 for cxamination of the casc. The casc was considercd in M. No. 8/81 dated 29.09.2020 and dccided to wait lor the comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant ('tEC-3) on I l.l1.2020. The case was considcrcd in M. No. I l/81-ALC212020 dated24.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and Consultant (1'llc-3) via email dated 30.11.2020 informed that thc applicant's rcply has not available to examinc thc casc. 'l.herclbre. the Committee decided to seek lrom thc applicant to I'urnish the following information as per the advice Consultanl ('l'E,C-3): l. Sl. No. 1, 3, 5 and 1l o1' the Standard Deficicncy] Formal. I 2. Material of import item No. 2 & 5. I As per NC dccision, D/1, was sent ro the applicant onl I I .0 1.202 1 followcd by rcminders on 06.04.2021, 0 5.07 .2021 | q 12.07.2021. I lowcver, no reply has been received yet. I 'the Committee considered thc case as per thc agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was not received despitc several reminders. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the applicant's request of fixation of ad-hoc norms. Rejected Page | 4 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MEI:||Jtll202122l2 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

M-5 TBEA Enct割 (India)Pr市ate Limited 3410041397 Datcd 23.07.2015 01/81/050/0048 6/AM16/ 34/24/040/0012 3/ノヽM16/ 'l'he casc was rejccted in M. No. 22181 dated 24.01.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 27 .06.2016 followed by reminder dated 2 1.09.201 6. Flowever, the applicant vide mail dated 02.07.2019 has rcquestcd for revision of flxcd Norms. 'Ihe casc was referred to DHI on 26.11.2019. A reminder was also issucd to DI'll on 09.01.2020. 'lhe casc was considered in M. No. 20/81 dt. 08.01.2020 and decidcd to wait for comments. 'fhe case was considered in M. No. 23181 dt. 04.03.2020 and decided to send a complete set of represcntation to DIII as rcquested by thc representative of I)HI. Rcply dated 23.5.2020 was referred to DHI on 27.05.2020 &.22.07.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 5/81 dt. 16.07.2020, the Committce considcred the casc as per agenda and DHI informed that they have rcceivcd only applicant's reply and also nceds the complete sct of application with ANF-4 to examinc thc casc. 'l'hcreforc, the Committee dccidcd to send all the rclevant documents to DIII as per their request. As per NC dccision, the complete application alongwith ANIL4 rcceived lrom the applicant sent to DHI on 28.09.2020 for examination of thc case. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 8/81 daled29.09.2020 and decided to wait for the comments. Reminder was issued to DHI on I l.l 1.2020. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. I 1/81- A1.C212020 dated 24.11.2020 (Hcld on 01.12.2020) and decided to remind DHI lor cxpediting thc comments. 'l-hc completc application atong wilh ANII-4 was send to DHI via email dated 31.12.2020 & 08.02.2021. 'l'hc casc was last discusscd in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21 .05.2021 and the Committce noted that DHI via email dated 19.05.2021 inlormed thal the applicant's rcply was incomplete. 'Ihcrefore, thc Committee decided to ask fiom the lirm to furnish L Itollowing information as pcr commcnts of DHI: I t . Proper calculation of CRGO & Cu lrom the dimensions | & wastage. Calculation of othcr raw matcrial likc oil & press board. Material balancc. Wastage sought in Appendix I lA. 騰 .「晰常冦激」 1:裕1;電∴ぶ鰹I冨∬ . 2 3 4 The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and dccidcd to send a reminder to the applicant lurnishing for thc rcquisite information. I)cfcrrcd Page | 5 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MIIF|'lJull202l22l2 (Ol11inc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

-[he case was inadvertently writtcn ratified in M. No.l2l81 2708.2013 、vhcrcas I)PII.F vidc tJ () No 12/2/2013- rSヽV/40 datcd 14.06.2013 had sought bllo、ving inibrmation mcntioncd in NC M.No 05/81 datcd 06.06.2013 as undcr: l. Voltage rating ol'cables. 2. Detailed calculations for the ircmcnt of each raw material, cxport product wise crted by the Cross-sectional diagram ofthc cablc/Buycrs shcet. 3. Nct weight per KM of each Cable 4. Material balancing viz. nct content of each imported and indige input, export product wisc. per KM o1 cxport product. 5. 'Iotal requirement of cach raw material, cxport product wisc, in a tabular fbrm lJowever, the applicant vide letter .08.2016 had requested lor ratification of Norms. 'l'he case was rclcrred to DPII'I on 25.10.2019 for examination and mments. As per NC decision of Mceting No. 2018 1 dt. 08.01.2020. I)PIIT's dcficicncy letter was sent to the applicant 06.02.2020 Thc casc、vtt considcrcd in M.No.23/81 dt. and decided to rcmind the applicant fbr furnishing hc requisite information. Applicant's reply dt. 19.06.2020 was to I)PI1l on 17.072020. Ihc Comnlittcc dccidcd to forward again the rcply of the applicant to DPII'I lor amination and comments. 'l'hc applicant's rcply reccivcd ti'om the applicant sent again on 28.09.2020 to DPII'I' fbr ination of the case. 'l'he casc was considcred in M. No. l datcd 29.09 2020 and dccidcd to scck again frOm thc icant to furnish following information as per comments ven by DPII'l'vidc LJ. O. No. P-47011/308/201g-'fSW dated .09.2020 as the applicant's reply was dcficient: l. Net weight per KM of each cablc. 2. Matcrial balancing viz. nct content o['cach imported & indigenous inputs. export product wise. pcr KM o export product. As per NC decision, D/l- was sent to the applicant via email 12.11.2020 'l-he case was last considered in M. No. ll/81-Al 24.11.2020 (Ilctd on 01 .12.2020) and decided to remind thc applicant lor furnishing the requisite information. As pcr NC decision, reminders were sent to the applicant on I I .01 .2021 & 08.04.2021 . 'l'he applicant's reply received v il datcd 13 04 2021 'l'he case was last discussed in M. No.0l/81 dated 2l .05.2021 and thc Committee decidcd to forrvard the applicant's reply to DPIIT fbr examination o[-thc casc. As per NC decision, thc same was lorwarded to DPII'f on 12.07.2021. The Committee per agenda and decided to ratify thc ad-hoc norms as per comments of DPI vidc U. 0. No. P 47011/308/2019‐ .08.2021 . (Copy RA conccrned may suitablc ucntial action Approved ヽ4-6 Dclton Cablcs I´td. 0510337606 Dtted 23.10.2012 01/81/050/0042 3/AM13/ 05/23/040/0027 8/AM13/ HQ E‐ offlcc Computcr No: 23946 I,age | 6 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MEl:|l'lJull202122l2 (Oll)inc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

M-7 Lubi Electricals Limitcd, Ahmcdabad ‐Rcfcrrcd by DC,KASEZ 01/81/061/0002 2/AM18/ KASEZ/100% EOU/11/969/00 -01/ KASEZ, vide leuer No. KASET/100%EOU /ll/969/00- 0l/61l6 dated27.09.2017 forwarded a copy olapplication for fixation ol' scrap/wastage norms on regular basis for manufacturc and export of Industrial Valves and Industrial Valve Parts. l'hc DC stated that the wastage norms had been fixed on ad-hoc basis up to 31.03.2003 subject to f-rnal fixation of norms-by-Norms Committee in DGITT. 'l'hc case was considered in M. No. 4 /8 l-Pt.ll dated 03.10.2018 and noted that case was referred to DIPP for commcnts and rcminded on27.09.2019.'Ihc case was considered in M. No. 2018 I dt. 08.01 .2020. the Committee noted that DPII'I' was not reminded for expediting thc commcnts & also the main file was not lraced out by the section. 'fhcrcforc, the Committee decidcd to remind DPII-t and directcd the section to trace out main file immcdiately. The case was considered in M. No. 23181 dt. 04.03.2020. thc Committec noted that DPIII'has not yet been reminded lbr expediting the commcnts & also main file is not yet traced out by the section. 'l'herefbrc, the Committee decided to remind DPII'I & and directcd the section to trace out main file immediately. Since, main file is not traceablc in thc section, completc set of documents have been sought lrom KASIIZ vidc email dated 16.07.2020. l'hc documents rcccivcd from KASEZ was forwarded to DPII'I' vide email dated20.07.2020 lor examination & commcnts. An email was sent on 22.09.2020 to DPIIT for expediting the comments. 'l'he casc was considered in M. No. 8/81 dated 29.09.2020 and decided to scek again from thc applicant to furnish following inlbrmation as pcr comments given by DPIIl' vide U. O. No. P-47011110812020-]'SW dated 10.08.2020 as the applicant's reply was deficient: l. A copy of ad-hoc norms fixed by thc Development Commissioncr. Kandla SIIZ for the items under mnsidcration. 2. Sl. No. 3, 4, 5 & I I of thc Standard Dcliciency Format. As pcr NC decision, D/L wzs sent to the applicant via email on l2.l 1.2020. The case was considered in M. No. I I/81-AI-C212020 dated 24.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and dccided to remind thc applicant for furnishing the rcquisite information. As pcr NC decision, reminders were sent to the applicant on I I .01 .2021& 08.04.2021. Thc case was last discussed in M. No. 01/81 dated 21.05.2021 and the Committec notcd that the applicant did not furnish the reply of DI-.'l'herefore, thc Committec decided to issuc a final reminder to the firm lor furnishing their comments within l5 days' timc. '[hc applicant's reply rcccived vide email dated 19.08.2021 and thc same was lbrwarded to DPII'l' on 23.08.202l.llowevcr, no comments have been received yet. 'Ihe Committee considered the casc as per the agenda and decided to wait fbr comments. Deferred Page I 7 NC-2 MEETING No.r NC/2/Ml:.1:;l'lJull202l22l2 (Ofilinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

M-8 Nco Powcr I]lcctronics 2% ProJccts PVT. LTD. 0310819845 datcd 15032018 01/81/050/0001 2/AM19/ 03/95/040/0106 9//CN41 8 'I'he case was ratified in M. No.l5/81 dated 27.03.2019 as per written comments given by Consultant ('tEC-3). However, the applicant vide letter datcd 0l .04.2019 requested to amend ITC tlS codes in r/o import items No. 3 and 5. F'urther the applicant has also rcquested to amend UOM ol import item No. 5. The Committee considcred thc case in M. No.09/81 datcd 07.08.2019 and notcd that the applicant has not given any reason/justification for such changcs. A D/L was sent to thc applicant vide email dated 02.09.2019 followed by reminder on 07.10.2019. The applicant's reply dt. 09.10.2019 was referred to Consultant (1'EC-3) for examination. I'he case was considered in M. No. 23181 dt.04,03.2020 and dccided to send main llle to Consultant (TI')C-3) as requested in the meeting. Physical lile along with thc representation sent to Consultant ('f'EC-3) on 25.09.2020 lor examination of the case . -fhe case was considered in M. No. 8/81 dated 29.09.2020 and decided to wait for thc commcnts. A reminder was issued to Consultant (l'l1c-3) on 25.11.2020.'fhe case was considered in M. No. I l/81-ALC212020 dated24.ll.2020 ltU.tO on Ol .12.2020) and dccidc to rcmind Consultant (TEC- l3; for expediting the comments. Reminder was issued to lconsultanr (]'EC-3) on ll.0 1.202 l. l'l'h. "u.. was last discusscd in M. No.0l/81 dated 2.05.2021 land Consultant (1'lrc-3) inlbrmed via cmail dated 08.02.2021 Ithat the applicant had requcsted to amend UoM of import item lat Sl. No. 5 from "Number" to "Kg". However, this import litem is a component & was recommended on netto-net basis land its UoM should be in numbers as given in AA. In the Bill lof Entry, quantity of this item is givcn in numbcrs. Therefore, Ithc Committec decidcd to ask from thc applicant to provide Iustification for the same. lAr p"r NC decision, an email was sent to the applicant on Itl.ol .zozl & 10.08.2021. I-Iowever, no reply has been lreceived vet. I I I I Ihc Committee the case as pcr thc agenda and dccidcd to send ^ final reminder to the applicant furnishing rcquisitc information. おr De l'erred M‐ 9 A‐ l Fcncc Products Co. Pvt.Ltd. 0310827173 Datcd 20.022019 01/81/050/0101 7/AM19/ 03/94/040/0100 3/AM19/ HQ E‐ offlcc Computer No.: 23950 'l.hc case was ratified in M. No. 10181-Al.C2l20l9 dated 21.08.2019 on the basis ol inputs givcn by Consultant (TEC- 3). 1'he applicant vide lettcr dated 27.01.2020 stated that thc wastage and quantity of imported material fbr thc product "Relevant Prime Ilot dipped galvanized steel in shects/coils" for all the four export products havc not been given correctly. T'hcrefore. thcy havc requested to re-flx the ad-hoc norms. The casc was last considcred in M. No.23181 dl.04.03.2020 and dccided to re{'er the case to Consultant ('lEC-3) Ibr cxamination & commcnts. Physical filc along with the reprcsentation sent to Consultant ('l'l')C-3) on 25.09.2020 lor examination of thc case. A reminder was issued to consultant (1'EC-3) on l9.l 1.2019. 'fhe case was considered in M. No. lI/81-AI.C212020 dated 24.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and Consultant ('l'liC-3) via cmail datcd 30.11.2020 inlbrmcd that thc applicant in its rcprcsentation datcd 27.01.2020 has not given dctails of amcndment madc in application. 'l'hcreforc, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish thc same. As per NC decision, D/1. was scnt to the applicant on 12.01.2021. l-he applicant's reply datcd 14.01.2021 was scnt to Consultant 'l'he Committee considcrcd thc casc as per the agenda and decided to send a rrminder to the applicant furnishing the requisitc info rmation. for I)cibrrcd Page | 8 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MI:.1:|l'lJull202l22l2 (Offlinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

('fEC-3) on 14.01.2021. The case was last discussed in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant (1'EC-3) inlbrmed via email dated 08.02.2021 that the earlicr thc casc was approved by NC on thc basis of information given in application & inputs in the meeting. 'fhc Norms Committee had accepted wastage proposed by the applicant after recovery. llowevcr, lor rcvicwing the same, firm has not submitted any iustification. 'l'hercfore, thc Committee decided to ask thc firm to submit the justification for enhancing the wastagc within l5 days' time. As per NC decision, an email was sent to the applicant on 13.07.202l.l lowever, no reply has been rece ived yet. M‐ 10 RA」GURU ENTERPRISE S PVT. LIMITED 0310821453 dated 05.06.2018 01/81/050/0032 6/AM19/ 03/95/040/0013 7/AM19/ 'l'he case was approvcd in Mecting No. 7/81 dated 29.11.2018 with l0% wastage.'l'hc norms werc rcvised in M. No.05/81 datcd 12.06.2019 with l2%o wastage after taking l/3rd recovery on the rccommendation of Consultant (1'EC-3) & representative ol DPI I't. The applicant via email dated 11.11.2020 had requested to allow 30% wastagc. 'l-hc rcprcsentation was refbrred to Consultant ('l'llC-3) on 19.11.2020. 'l'hc casc was last considcred in M. No. lllSl-ALC212020 datcd 24.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and dccided to wait lor thc commcnts. Rcminder was issued to Consultant (1'llc-3) on 12.01.2021. 'l'he case was last discussed in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant ('fEC-3) via cmail datcd 08.02.2021 had requested lbr thc hardcopy of thc original application. Thercforc. thc Committce decided to ask fiom thc applicant to submit fo llowing information: l. Flard copy of complete sct of application along with copies of further correspondence, if any. 2. Sheet layout diagram of the matcrial indicating the wastage during blanking for all products, to be exported under AA. As per NC decision, the hard copy of application was sent to Consultant ('t[]C-3) on 10.08.2021 lor cxamination & commcnts. The Committee per agcnda and decided to ask liom the applicant to submit following information, as per the advice of Consultant (Tech 3): L Specitic items of export with quantity in terms of numbers & weight. 2. Sheet layout diagram of the material indicating thc wastage during blanking. I)cibrrcd M‐ H RAJGURU ENTERPRISE S PVT LIMITED 0310813798 datcd 07062017 01/81/050/0087 2/AM19/ 03/95/040/0020 2/AM18/ The case was approvcd in M. No.5/81 dated 12.06.2019, on the recommendation of Consultant (TIIC-3) and rcpresentativc of MSME. 1'he applicant via cmail dated I l.l 1.2020 requcstcd lor Norms to be Ratified from l0%o wastage lo 30%o wastage. 'l'he representation was referred to Consultant (l'EC-3) on 19.11.2020.'fhc case was last considercd in M. No. ll/8 l- A1.C212020 dated 24.11.2020 (Held on 01.12.2020) and decided to wait lor thc commcnts. Reminder was issued to Consultant (IEC-3) on 12.01.2021. 'l'he casc was last disoussed in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant ('l'EC-3) via email dated 08.02.2021 had requested for thc hardcopy of the original application. 'l'herefore, the Committce decided to ask from the applicant to submit following information: l. Hard copy of complcte sct of application along with copics of further correspondcncc, if any. 2. Shcet layout diagram ol the matcrial indicating the wastagc during blanking for atl products, to bc cxportcd under AA. As per NC dccision, thc hard copy ol'application was sent to 'Ihe Committee mnsidered the case as per agenda and dccided to ask from the applicant to submit following information. as per the advice of Consultant (Tech 3): l. Specific items of export with quantity in terms of numbers & weight. 2. Sheet layout diagram of the material indicating thc wastage during btanking. Deferred Page | 9 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MI:.8'l'lJull202122l2 (Oflinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

Consultant (TEC-3) on 10.08.2021 for examination & comments. ヽ4‐ 12 INJECTOPLA s′rPvT.LTD 0610038682 Datcd 2908.2017 01/81/050/0036 3//ヽレ118/ 06/24/040/0002 0/AM18/ The case was approvcd in M. No. 03181-Al,C2l20l8 dated 14.08.2018 with wastage o1'5% with lhc condition that RA should call for weight of Phenolic Moulding Compound in the export product and take necessary consequential action accordingly. 'fhe case was again considcrcd in M. No.06/81 dated 11.08.2020 held on 25.08.2020 and rcjccted by NC due to non-submission ol' composition fee. Howcvcr. thc applicant vide letter dated 06. I 1.2020 rcquested again lor revicwing ol'ad-hoc norms stating that it is taking AA for manufacturing resultant product "llrush Box Made Out of Phenolic Moulding Compound" under 4.7 HBP and being granted I 1.88 Grams raw material Phenolic Moulding Compound for manufacturing to one piece "Brush Box Made Out of Phcnolic Moulding Compound" on each and every AA. Hence, the applicant requcsted to allow 11.88 Grams per piece. The representation was referred to DPIII' on l8.l1.2020. 'l.he case was considcrcd in M. No. lll8l-LL.C212020 dated 24.11.2020 (tlcld on 01 .12.2020) and dccided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issucd to DPIII' on 12.01.2021. DPIIT via email dt. 05.02.2021 had rcquested that the application may be referred to D/o C&PC. IJence, the case was referred to Consultant (l'EC-l) on 07.04.2021 for cxamination & comments. 'l.he case was considered in M. No.0l/81 dated 21.05.2021, the Committee decided to send a copy of application to Consultant (TEC-l). As pcr NC decision, a copy of application sent to Consultant ('t'IlC-l) on09.07.2021. 'Ihe case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MtiElTJ ull202l22l 1 (Offl ine Cascs) dated I 6.07 .2021 and the Commiltce dccided to ask lrom thc applicant to furnish following information as per comments of Consultant (1'EC-r): l. Drawing of the mould with complete specification of mould (out of which cxport is madc) 2. Past production and consumption data duly ccrtificd. As per NC decision, an email was scnt to the applicant on 19.08.202 I . 'l.he applicant's reply dated 3 I .08.202 I was forwardcd to Consultant (TEC-l) on 01.09.2021 for examination of the case. Ilowever. no comments have been received yet. 'l'he Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to wait for comments. Delerred M‐ 13 TRAFOMEC INDIA MAGNItTICS PRIVATE I´IMITED 0710083779 datcd 08.11.2011 01/81/050/0032 5/AM12/ 07/24/040/0025 8/AM12/ (E-25381) The case was rcjectcd in M. No. 9l8l-N-C212013 dated 16.07.2013 duc to non-submission of rcply to deficiency letter datcd 01.02.2013. The applicant's reply datcd 30.06.2015 along with their earlier reply dated 17.09.2012 wcre forwarded to DIll on 19.02.2016. The casc was considcrcd in offlinc Agenda in M. No. 23181 & 25181 dated 23.02.2016 & 07.03.2017 rcspectively. l-he case was again rejected in M. No.08/81 dated 11.07.2017 due to non-submission of reply to deficiency letter. The applicants vide letter dated 01.05.2019 furnishcd reply and requestcd to ratifo the ad-hoc norms. As per thc decision of M. No. 24l&ldated 18.03.2020. the complete sct of application was forwarded to DHI via cmail dated 06.08.2020. The Committee per thc agenda and decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments. Dcferred Page | 10 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MEl:;1'lJull202l22l2 (Ofiline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

l1'hc casc was considcred in M. No.06/81 dt.25.08.2020 and ldecided to remind I)HI lbr expediting the comments. DHI's lD/L reccived via email on21.09.2020 and sent to thc applicant lon 07. 10.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 09/81 ldated 20.10.2020 (lleld on27.10.2020) and decided to remind Ithe applicant for furnishing the requisite information. The lapplicant's reply vidc letter dt. l0.l 1.2020 was sent to DI{l via lemailon 26.11.2020. ll'h" .u.. was mnsidcrcd in M. No. l2l8 ldated 15.12.2020 lheld on 22.12.2020 and DHI via cmail dated 01.12.2020 linformcd that the appliczurt had not submined point-wisc lreply. 'l'herefore, thc Committee decided to seek again from Ithc applicant to [urnish fbllowing information wise point: I l. Completc spccification with catalogue of each cxport I product with quantity olcxport in number. I z. Sl. No. 2, 4,5 & I I of the Standard Deficiency F'ormat. I 3. Manufacturing process ol' export item giving specilic | *. of each import item. lAs per NC dccision. I)/L was sent to the applicant on 127.01 .2021 . Reply olDt. rcccivcd via cmail dated25.02.2021. l'l'hc case was considcred in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021, Ithe Committec decidcd to forward the applicant's rcply to IDHI for cxamination ol'the casc. lfn" case was last considered in M. No. INC/2/MIiE1T Jull202l22l I (Offl inc Cases) dated I 6.07.2021 land the Committee noted that the reply of deficiency letter ldated 13.04.2017 in respect of subject AA is still pending as linformed by DHI via email dated 21.09.2020. Therefore, the lCommittee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish llollowing inlormation as per comments of DI II: ll. l'o submit infbrmation rclating to calculation ol- corc and I coil dimensions starting from thc cxport product rating in I English. I I lAs per NC decision. an email was sent to the applicant on 123.07.2021.'l'he applicant's reply dated 27.07.2021 was llbrwardcd to DI II on 12.08.2021. Ilowcvcr. no comments lhavc been receivcd yct. M-14 BHARAT IEAVY ELECTRICA IッSI´ IMI′ I`1:D ll10028319 dated 12.01.2018 01/81/050/0009 6/AM19/ 11/24/040/0000 6/AM18/ (E-22943) The case was ratificd in M. No. O5l8l-Al.C2/20 18 dated] I0. 10.2018 as pcr written commcnrs ol DI II vidc U. O. No.l DES-2/BIlEl./G'Ir/2018-'l'W-HIll.'Ihe applicanr vide rheirl email dated 26.11.2018 requested lor rcvision of ratifiedl norms. 'l'he casc was considered in M. No. l2l8 I datedl 18.09.2019, l5181 datcd 30.10.2019 and l8/8t datedl 11.12.2019 and decidcd ro scnd the applicant'sl representation/application to DIII immcdiately. As per thel decision of M. No. 24181dated 18.03.2020, thc complere set ofl application forward to DI II via email dated 07.08.2020. Thcl casc was considered in M. No. 06/81 dt. 25.08.2020 andl decided to remind DIll for expediting the comments. Thel reprcsentation was again lorwarded to DIII on 26.10.2020.1 The case was considered in M. No. 09/81 dated 20.10.20201 (Held on 27.10.2020) and decided ro wait for the comments. Al reminder was issucd to DHI on 25.11.2020. Also, a scan copyl of application was sent to I)HI on 22.12.2020 to cxaminc thcl casc. I The case was considered in M. No. l2l81 dated 15.12.20201 and held on 22.12.2020, thc comments given by DHI videl email datcd 01.12.2020 whcrein it is statcd that the applicantl had requested vide lctter dated 24.11.2018 1o check the iteml Thc Committee mnsidercd the case as per the agenda and decided to wait 1br the comments. I)eferrcd Page I l l NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MEl:|l'lJull202l22l2 (Ol11ine Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

No. 2 ol SION C-158 for typographical error. Furthcr. DHII had requested to send thc file where the SION was fixed tol examine the applicant's request. However, it was noted thatl the SIONs were flxed fbr items since long year back and atl present it is not possible to search out the file of these SIONs. I 'Iherefore, the Committee decided to request Dtll to examinel the matter and lurnished their comments. As per decision, the casc was again referred to I)HI on 27.01 .2021. -- .-" -D---- '--- Thc case was last considercd in M. No.0l/81 dated 21.05.2021, the Committce decided to remind DHI for cxpediting the comments. Ithe case was last considered in M' No. lNclztvuEll J ull202 l22l | (otfl ine cases) dated 16.07 .2021 land the Committee noted the comments of DHI vide email ldatcd 21.06.21 whcrein it is statcd that the issue of the case is lvery critical and not possible to examine the request without lknowing thc basis ol SION and requested to forward the file lwhcre SION was lixed. However, the Committee again noted lat present it is not possible to search out the file of these lslol.ts. Thcreforc, the Committee decided to request lTechnical Representative of DHI to coordinate with lConsultant (TEC-3). to examine the matter afresh and then I provide their comments. I lThe Committee's decision was conveyed to the representative lof DI-ll & Consultant (l'llc-3) vidc cmail dated 19.08.2021. lHowevcr. no comments havc bccn rcceivcd yct' I M‐ 15 NAT10NAL STEEL AND AGRO INDUSTHES LTD 5610004971 Datcd 08082016 01/81/050/0025 1/AM17/ 56/24/040/0002 7/AM17/ Initially, thc casc was rcjected in M. No. 2181-Al.C2l20l7l dated 18.04.2017 due to non-submission of reply to MoSl deficiency letter dated 20.10.2016. 'l'he case was considered inl M. No. 9/81 dated 25.07 .2017 and decided to ratify the norms I for the above AA as per writtcn commcnts of MoS vidc UOI No. 2(10y2016-'l'l) dated 05.07.2017. 'Ihe applicant'sl representation dated 26.11.2018 against above NC decisionl was again considered in M. No. lllSl-ALc2l20l9 datedl 04.09.2019. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 24181 dt.l 18.03.2020 and the Committee noted that the appticant'sl representation was not rcferred to MoS for examination asl dccidcd in M. No.2l181 datcd 22.01 .2020- Scanned copics ofl lcomplete sct o[ applications along with all concerncd/relatedl ldo.urn.ntr (reply to queries raised ctc.) in chronological orderl lhud b".n sought lrom the applicant vide email datedl Ito.os.zozo. The casc was considcred in M. No. 06/81 dt. l lZs.Ot.ZOzO and decidcd to remind the applicant lbr turnishingl Ithc requisitc inlormation. A remindcr was issued to the lapplicant on 08. 10.2020. lhc casc was considcrcd in M. No' lOglSt Aatea 20.10.2020 (lleld on 27.10.2020) and decided to lwait for reply of the applicant. As per NC decision, reminders l*.re rent to the applicant on 26.1 1.2020 & 28.01 .2021. lTh" "u." was considered in M. No. l2lSldated 15.12.2020 ln.tO on 22.12.2020 and dccidcd to givc last opportunity to the lapplicant lor lurnishing the rcquisite information. lThe case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 lrnd the Committee decided to send final reminder to the lapplicant for furnishing the requisite infbrmation. As per NC ldecision, final reminder was scnt to the applicant vide email ldatcd 14.07.2021. Howcvcr, no reply has becn received yet. I 'the Committeel cnnsidered the case asl per the agenda andl noted that thel applicant's reply wasl not received despitel several reminders. Therefore. the Committee decided to reject the applicant's request of revision of ad-hoc norms. Rejcctcd Pagc1 12 NC‐2 MEETING No.:NC/2/MEItl`/Ju1/202122/2(Ominc cascs) Meeting Date:0309.2021 |

M‐ 16 AMC Cookwarc (India)Pvt. 1ンtd● 0710110362 Datcd 02092016 01/81/050/0086 8/AM19/ 07/24/040/0017 6/AM17/ (E-24809) The case was ratified in M. No. 04/81 dated 17.06.2020 as per written comments givcn by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011118912019-'tSW dated 30.06.2020.'l-he applicant via email dated 08.09.2020 rcquested lor re-fixation o1-Norms lbr such items in which the shape of the output product is oval/oblong made out ol'sheet. 'Ihe applicant had provided the dimensions and shape o1 the input and output products. In these cascs the NC had given l07o wastage considering madc out ofcircles. 1'he representation was forwarded to DPIIT vide cmail dated 08.10.2020 for examination of the case. 'Ihe casc was considered in M. No. 09/81 datcd 20.10.2020 (Fleld on 27.10.2020) and DPIIT informed that the case is under examination. 'l'he case was considcrcd in M. No. l2l81 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020, the Committee noted the comments givcn by DPII'l'vide U. O. No.: P-47011118912019- 'l'SW dated 28.10.2020 wherein i1 is mentioned that, due to oversight, norms for certain import items were fixcd as l.l0Kgs/Kg content in the export item which are applicable for manufacture liom Stainless Steel Circle. As in this case, import itcms are Stainless Steel Sheets, wastage would be higher and, thercforc, wastage norms need to be revised. 'l'he applicant had indicated that thc shape of export items in many cases is "Oblong". In view of'above commenls, the Committee decided to seek liom thc applicant to furnish following information as pcr commcnts given by DPII'l-: l. Sheet layout diagram indicating wastage during blanking, export product-wise. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 28.01.2021.'l'he applicant's rcply sent to DPIIl'on 07.04.2021.'lhe case was considcred in M. No. 0l/81 datcd 21.05.2021. the Committee decided to remind DPIII' lor expediting the commcnts. As per NC decision, a rcminder was issued to DPII'Ion 09.07.2021. 'l'he case was last considered in M. No. NC/2iMIltil7Jull202l22l1 (Ol'fline Cascs) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committee dccided to wait for comments. Ilowever, no comments have been receivcd yet. 'the Committee considcred thc case as per the agenda and decided to remind DPIIT fbr expediting the comments. Deferred M‐ 17 AMC Cookwarc (Indial Pvt. Ltd 0710110836 Datcd 23.12.2016 01/81/050/0106 3/AM19/ 07/24/040/0031 3/AM17/ (E-24810) The case was ratified in Meeting No. 4/81-ALC212020 dated 11 .06.2020 as per written comments given by DPll'l'vide U. O. No.: P-47011118912019-TSW dated 30.06.2020.'fhe applicant via email datcd 08.09.2020 rcquested for re-fixation of Norms for only such items in which the shapc of the output product is oval/oblong made out ol shect. 'l.he applicant had providcd the dimensions and shape of the input and output products. In these cascs the NC had givcn l0% wastage considering made out of circles. Thc representation was forwardcd to DPII t vide email dated 08.10.2020 Ibr examination of the case. 'fhe case was last considered in M. No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 (tleld on27.10.2020) and DPIII' informed that the case is under examination. 'Ihe case was considered in M. No. l2l81 datcd 15.122020 held on 22.12.2020, the Committcc noted the comments givcn by DPIIl' vidc U. O. No.: P-470111189/2019-l'SW dated 28.10.2020 wherein it is mentioned that, due to oversight. norms lbr certain import items were fixed as Ll0Kgs/Kg content in the cxport item which are applicable for manufacture from Stainlcss Stcel Circle. As in this case, import items are Stainless Stccl Sheets, wastage would be higher and, thereforc, wastagc norms nced to be rcvised. l'he -l'he Committee considered the casc as per thc agenda and decided to remind DPIIT for expediting thc comments. I)ctrrcd Page I l3 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/Ml:.1:."1'lJull202l22l2 (OlIlinc Cascs) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

+plicant had indicated that the shape of export items in many lases is "Oblong". ln view of above commcnts, the Committee lecided to seek f'rom thc applicant to fumish following information as per comments given by DI'll'l': L Sheet layout diagram indicating wastage during blanking, export product-wise. As per NC decision, D/L was scnt to the applicant on 28.01 .2021. Applicrurt's Reply sent to DPIIT on 07-04.2021. 'I'he case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05-2021, the Committee decidcd to remind DPII'| for expediting the comments. As per NC decision, a reminder was issued to DPII'I' on 09.0'7.2021. l'he case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEE'I7J u112021221 1 (Offl ine Cases) dated I 6.07 .2021 and the Committcc decidcd to wait for comments' However, no comments havc been reccived yet' M‐ 18 AMC Cookwarc (Indi→PVt・ Ltd. 0710111264 Dtted 09.03.2017 01/81/050/0107 5/AM19/ 07/24/040/0038 3/AM17/ (E‐24811) I'he case was ratified in Meeting No. 4/81-ALC212020 darcdl 17.06.2020 as pcr written comments given by DPIIT vide U.l O. No.: l'-47011118912019-1'SW dated 30.06.2020.'l-hel applicant via email dated 08.09.2020 requested for re-fixationl of Norms for only such in which the shape of the outputl product is oval/oblong made out of shect.-lhe applicant hadl provided the dimcnsions and shapc of the input and outputl products. In thcse cases the NC had given l0% wastagel considering madc out of circles. I 'I'hc rcpresentation was lorwardcd to DPIIl'vide email datedl 08.10.2020 for examination ol the case. 'l.he case was lastl considered in M. No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 (Held onl 27.10.2020) and DPII1 informed that the case is underl examination. The case was considered in M. No. l2l81 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020, the Committee noted the commcnts given by DPIII'vidc LJ. O. No.: P-47011118912019- TSW dated 28.10.2020 whcrein it is mentioned that, due to oversight, norms lbr ccrtain import items wcre fixed as l.l0Kgs/Kg content in the export item which are applicable for manufacture from Stainless Stecl Circle. As in this casc, import items are Stainlcss Stcel Sheets, wastage would be higher and, therefore, wastage norms necd to be revised. The appticant had indicated that the shape of export items in many cases is "Oblong''. In view of above comments, thc Committee dccided to seek fi'om the applicant to fumish following information as per comments givcn by DPIIl': t. Sheet layoul diagram indicating wastage during blanking, expoft product-wise. As per NC decision, D/1, was scnt to the applicanl on lZS.Ot.ZOZ|. Applicent's Reply sent to DPII'I on 07.04.2021. lTh" "^. was considered in M. No. 01/81 dated 21.05.2021, Ithc Committee decided to remind DPII'I- fbr expediting the lcomments. As per NC decision, a reminder was issued to loRItr on 09.07.202t. Ithe case was last considered in M. No. lNclznraeei'l Jdl202l22ll (offlinc Cases) dated 16.07.2021 land thc Committee decided to wait for comments. However, Ino commcnts havc becn rcceivcd yct. l'hc Committee mnsidered the case as per the agenda and decided to remind DPIIT for expediting the comments. Deferrcd N24-19 AMC Cookware (lndia) Pvt. Ltd. 01/81/050/0076 6/AM19/ 07/24/040/0001 6/AM18/ -[hc case was ratificd in Meeting No. 4/81-ALC212020 dated 17.06.2020 as per written commcnts given by DPII'I. vide U. o. No.: P-47011118912019-TSW dated 30.06.2020. The applicant via email dated 08.09.2020 requested for rc-fixation of norms for only such items in which the shape of the output Thc Committee mnsidered the case as per the agenda and decided to remind DPIIT for expediting I)cfcrrcd page I l4 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MEL'|'lJull202122/2 (OlIlinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

0710111502 Datcd 2804.2017 (E-24812) product is oval/oblong made out of shect. 1'hc applicant had provided thc dimcnsions and shape of the input and output products. In these cases the NC has given l0% wastage considering made out of circles. The representation was forwarded to DPII'I' vide email dated 08.10.2020 for cxamination ol the casc. 'l'he case was considcred in M. No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 (lleld on 27.10.2020) and DPII'I inlbrmcd that the casc is under cxamination. l'he case was last considered in M. No. l2l8l dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020. the Committee notcd thc comments given by DPII'l'vide U. O. No.: P-47011118912019- l'SW dated 28.10.2020 wherein it is mentioned that. due to oversight, norms for certain import items were fixcd as l.lOKgs/Kg contcnt in the export itcm which arc applicablc lbr manul'acturc liom Stainless Stcel Circle. As in this casc. import items are Stainlcss Steel Shects, wastage would bc highcr and, thcrelbre, wastage norms necd to bc revised. The applicant had indicatcd that thc shape of export itcms in many cases is "Oblong". In view ol abovc comments, the Committec decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by DPII'l': l. Sheet layout diagram indicating wastage during blanking, export product-wise. As pcr NC decision, D/L was scnt to the applicant on 28.01.2021. Applicant's Rcply scnt to DPII'I' on 07.M.2021. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 datcd 21.05.202 l. thc Committee dccided to remind Dl'}ll'l' lbr expcditing thc comments. As pcr NC dccision, a rcminder was issucd to DPIII'on 09.07.2021. 'lhe casc was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEE'|/J ul/2021221 1 (Offl inc Cases) dated I 6.07 .2021 and the Committce decided to wait for comments. Ilowever, no comments have bcen rcceived yet. the comments. M-20 DISHA AUTO COMPONEN TS PVT.LTD. 0310821769 Datcd 19.06.2018 01/81/050/0024 5/AM19/ 03/94/040/0022 8/AM19/ 'fhe case was ratified in Meeting No. 2/81-ALC212019 dated 01.05.2019 as per written comments given by DPII'I'vide their F. No.: P-4701119412019-TSW dated 16.04.2019. 'l'he applicant vide letter dated22.02.2020 requested for revision of ratified norms as under:- (i) to allow import quantities in lJnit ol Measurement as Meter and (ii) to allow rcjection/wastage of 9%o on raw matcrials or 9.89oh on finishcd product. 'l'he representation was referred to DPIIT on02.12.2020. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. l2l81 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and decided to wait for the comments. The casc was last considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and thc Committec notcd the comments of DPIII' vide U. O. No. P-470111941201g-l'SW datcd 05.01.2021. Further, the casc was discussed in thc meeting and the Committce observcd that thc similar cascs had been rcfcrrcd to Consultant ('l'llc-3) for examination. 'l'hcrelbre, the Committce decided to refer the case to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination & commcnts. As per NC decision, the case was referred to Consultant (1'EC-3) on 10.08.202 I for reexamination & commcnts. Thc Committee considered the casc as per thc agenda and noted that Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 03.09.2021 has requested lbr physical file along with comments of DPII'| to cxamine the case. Deferred M-21 DISHA AUTO COMPONEN TS PVTI´TD 0310829026 01/81/050/0006 4//ヽM20/ 03/94/040/0009 6/AM20/ 'l'he case was rati{ied in Mceting No. 3/81-ALC212020 datcd 27.05.2020 as pcr written comments givcn by MSMI.I. The applicant via email datcd 25.1 1.2020 had requcsted lbr personal hearing and corrcction in the norms allotted to it. The representation was rcfcrred to MSMtj on02.12.2020. I'hc Committce :onsidcrcd the case as oer the agcnda and :roted that Consultant (TEC-3) I)cferred Page I l5 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MtE'l'lJull202l22l2 (Oflinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

datcd 14.05.2019 th" "ut" was considcrcd in M. No. l2lSldatcd 15.12'2020 held on 22.12.2020 and decided to wait lbr the comments' Reminder was issucd to MSME on29.01.2021. 'l'he case was last considercd in M. No.0l/81 dated 2l .O5.2OZl and the Committee noted the comments of MSME received via email datcd 23.04.2021. F-urther, the case was discussed in the mceting and the Committce observcd that the similar cascs had been referred to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination. l'herefore, the Committce dccidcd to rcfer the case to Consultant (1'liC-3) for cxamination & comments' As per NC decision. thc case was rcferred to Consultant (lllc-3) lon 10.08.2021 for rccxamination & comments. via email datcd 03.09.2021 has requested for physical file along with comments of MSME to examine the case. M-22 | DIACH CHEMICAIンS &PIGMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED 0210208269 datcd 13.03.2018 | 01/81/050/0010 8/AM19/ 02/24/040/0019 1 2/AM18/ a deficiency lctter was sent to the . Llowever, no reply has been received Th. ."* ^ rejected in M. No. lllSl-Al'C212018 datedl 30.01.2019 due to non-submission of reply of dcficiencyl letter. -l'he applicant via email datcd 13.08.2020 furnished al reply and requested to ratify the ad-hoc norms' Thel representation was referred to DPIII'on02.12.2020. I 'fhe case was considered in M. No. l2l8ldated 15'12'20201 held on 22.12.2020 and decided to wait for the comments'I DPII'l'via email dated 05.01.202 I inform that the case may bel refcr to MSME. 'l-he case was lbrwarded to MSME onl o7 .04.2021. I 'fhe case was last considercd in M. No.0l/81 datcdl 21.05.2021 and the Committee noted that MSMIT via cmaill dated 20.05.2021 inlormed that. aii per Ccrtificate of Analysisl Lsubmitted by thc applicant. the pcrccnt ol lead in impon isl 196.43o/o which works out to be lcss than the export quantity. l h'h"r"for", the Committcc decided to ask lrom thc applicant tol llurnish the lollowing inlbrmation as per comments olMSMEl las undcr: I I I ,. ,o rlrovide average lcad perccntagc ol' cach batch I ipntt.d and provide the overall average lcad I p.t..ntage ol import. The Committee per the agenda and decided to send a reminder to the applicant lor furnishing the requ i site info rm ation. Deferred M‐ 23 DIACH CHEMICALS &PIGMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED 0210207970 datcd 1011.2017 01/81/050/0004 0/AM19/ 02/24/040/0012 2/ノヽM18/ Dcfcrrcd Pagc I 16 NC-2 MEETING No.:NC/2/MI〕 I〕1/Ju1/202122/2(0111inc Cascs) Meeting Date:03.092021

A s 靱 」 of import. per NC dccision, a deficiency letter was sent to the icant on 14.0'7.2021. However, no reply has bcen received M-24 Ravin Cablcs Limitcd 0310828162 datcd 04.04.2019 01/81/050/0000 9/AM20/ 03/95/040/0131 3/AM19/ 'l'he case was ratified in Mecting No. 20181-ALC2l20l9 dated 08.01.2020 as per written commcnts dated 08.01.2020 given by Consultant ('lEC-3). 'l'he applicant vide lettcr dated 06.02.2020 rcqucstcd 1<> amend import item namc Iiom "Copper Wire Rod" to "l Core x 300 sq. rnrn coppcr conductor" tbr both export product. '[hc rcprcsentation was rcfcrrcd to Consultant ('l'EC-3) on 02.t2.2020. 'l'he casc was considcred in M. No. l2l8ldatcd 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and dccided to wait for thc comments. A reminder was issucd to Consultant (1'EC-3) on02.02.2021 . l'he case wru last considcred in M. No.0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant ('l'EC-3) infbrmcd via email dated 20.05.2021 that the applicant had rcqucstcd to amend import ilem at Sl. No. I as "l Corex 300 sq. mm Cu conductor". Import item at Sl. No. I was recommcnded as "Cu wire rod" as the samc was given as net content in export product. Hence, the applicant should explain the discrepancy in import item & net content shown in export product. 'l-hereflore, the Committee decided to ask from thc applicant to providc the clarification for thc same. As per NC dccision, an cmail was sent to the applicant on 14.07.2021. 1'he applicant's rcply datcd 10.08.2021 was forwardcd to Consultant (1'EC-3) on I 1.08.2021. The Committee per the agenda and Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 03.09.2021 informed that thc applicant vide reply dated 21.07.2021 did not furnish the specific rcply against the deficiency lettcr issued to them. Ilence, no change can be made in the rccommcndation. l'hereforc. the Committee decided to reject the applicant's request and maintained status quo. Rcjectcd M‐25 LM WIND POWER BLADES (INDIA)PVT. LTD 0710108496 datcd 10.07.2015 01/81/050/0043 9//ヽM19/ 07/24/040/0007 9/AM16/ 'l-he case was ratillcd in Mceting No. 2/81 dated 01.05.2019 as per written comments givcn by Consultanl ('l'llC-l). Thc applicant via email dated I 9. I 1.2020 requcsted to removc the sentencc "not lcss than" and allow flexibility of +/- 3 %.'Ihe represcntation was relbrred to Consultant (lEC-1) on 02.12.2020 for examination of the case. 'l'he case was considcred in M. No. l2l81 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant to Ii:rnish following inlbrmation as pcr comments given by Consultant ('tllC-l): l. Copy of shipping bills indicating wcight ol- entirc export. As per NC decision, D/L was scnt to thc applicant on 02.02.2021. 1'he applicant's rcply was scnt to Consultant (IEC-I) on07.04.2021. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021, the Committec dccidcd to send physical file of the case to Consultant (TIIC-I). 'fhc physical filc ol the case is not traceable in thc section. 'l'hercforc, a soft copy ol application was scnt to Consultant (]'EC- I ) to examine thc casc. 'l'he case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MDE'|/Jull202122ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and Consultant (l'lrc-l) informcd that soft copy oldrawing is not clear and legible. 'lherefore, thc Committec decided to ask from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments of Consultant ('l'EC-l): l. 'to givc clear copy of drawing whcrein a tolerance of

  • I - 3%o allowed in weight. As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 19.08.2021. However, no commcnts have been l'he Committce per the agenda and decided to send e rrminder to the applicant for furnishing the rcquisite inlbrmation. Def'errcd Page I l7 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MEE''lJull202l22l2 (OII)ine Cascs) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

received yet. M-26 I′M WIND POWER I〕l′ADES INDIA PRIVATE I´IMITED 0710106866 datcd 20102014 01/81/050/0047 3/AM15/ 07/24/040/0025 0/AM15/ The case was ratified in Meeting No. 02181 dated 01.05.20191 as per writtcn comments given by Consultant (TEC-I). Thel appticant via email dated 19.11.2020 requested to remove thel sentence "not lcss than" and allow flexibility of +/- 3 %' 'l'he representation was referred to Consultant (l'EC-l) on 02.12.2020 lbr cxamination of thc casc. The case was considcrcd in M. No. l2l81 dated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and dccided to seek from thc applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant ('l'EC-l):

  1. Copy of shipping bills indicating weight of entirc export. As per NC decision, D/1, was scnt to the applicant on 02.02.2021. 'l'he applicant's reply was sent to Consultant (l'EC-l ) on 07.04.2021. 'l'he case was considcrcd in M. No. 01/81 dated 21.05.2021, the Committee decided to scnd physical file of the case to Consultant (TIjC-l). 'l'he physical file of the case is not traceable in thc section. 'l'herefore, a soft copy of application was sent to Consultant (TEC- I ) to examine the case. 'l'he case was last considered in M. No. NC/2MEE?Jull2o2122l I (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and Consultant (l'EC-l ) informcd that soft copy of drawing is not clear and legible. l-herefore, the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish lollowing information as per l*rnr"nt. of Consultant (1'EC-l): I IIt. 'l'o give clear copy of drawing whcrcin a tolerance of l+l- 3% allowed in weight. I lnr p., NC decision. a deficiency letter was sent to the lapplicant on 19.08.2021. Howevcr, no comments havc bcen lrcccived yet. The Committee per thc agcnda and dccided to send ^ reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. I)cfcrrcd M‐ 27 Laxmi EIcctronics Moulds& Prccislon Engg P Ltd 0710106187 datcd 25.072014 01/81/050/0045 5/AM16/ 07/21/040/0035 9/AM15/ The case was rejected in M. No. 9181-AL'C2l20l 6 datedl 26.07.2016 due to non-submission ol'reply ol'dcficiency letterl as raised by DeitY. Sincc, no reply was received lrom thel company despite reminder, the committee decided to reject thcl casc. I 1-he applicant vidc letter dated 29.01.2020 furnished a replyl and requested to ratiry the ad-hoc norms' 'l'he reprcsentationl was referred to Consultant (l'EC-l) on 02.12.2020 forl examination of thc casc. I 'l-he case was considered in M. No. 12181 dated 15.12.20201 held on 22.12.2020 and decided to seek fiom the applicant to Iurnish following information as per commcnts given by Consultant (TI:C- I ): I l. Copy olcompletc sct of application. I Z. Quantity and commercial value of waste generated. | :. Production/ consumption data for the licensing period I duly certified by central cxcise. Ilns pcr NC decision, I)/[, was sent to thc applicant on IOZ.OZ.ZOZ|. A reminder was sent to the applicant on IOS.O+.ZOZt. 'l'hc applicant's reply was sent to Consultant lfl'DC-t I on 18.05.2021. I l'rn".r." was last considered in M. No.0l/81 dated lZt.OS.ZOZI and Consultant (TIIC-l) informed via cmail dated IZO.OS.ZOZ| that the applicant did not submit proper replY of 'l'he Committee considcred the case as per the agenda and decided to send final reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requi site i nformation. Delerred page I l8 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/\4EE'l'ltull202l22l2 (Olfline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

deficiency lctter. 'l'herefore, thc Committee decided to again ask the firm to submit thc said information within l5 days. As per NC decision, an cmail was scnt to the applicant on 14.07 .202l.l lowcver, no reply has been received yet. M-28 TUBE PRODUCTS INCORPORA TE 3410014376 datcd 19092005 1/81/162/0058 0/AMl1/ 34/24/040/0013 3/AM06/ HQ E‐ olncc Computcr No: 23376 'l'he case was considered in Offline Agenda in M. No. 32/81datcd 25.10 201l and dccidcd to rqicct thC rcqucst appticant to allow import of Atloy Steel Coit as the above licensc is issued under SION and inputs arc also allowcd pcr S10N ´ 「hc applicant vidc lcttcr datcd 03 05 2012 had requcsted thc PRC for rcalization ol policy to use of utilization of Alloy Steel in Coit in place of Platc' T case was considcred in PRC in Meeting No. l4l81 17.07.2012 and dccided to rcjcct thc requcst to allow i which is not part of SION. 'Ihe PRC vide letter 07.06.2019 adviscd thc applicart to approach thc conccrned NC for a decision in the matter. Now, the applicant vide letter dated I1.07.2019 had encloscd copies of communications and other supporting documcnts and requcsted to ratifo the norms. '[he case was considercd in M. No. 18/81 dated I1.12.2019 and the applioant's reprcsentative didn't explain the technical details belore Norms Committce during pcrsonal hearing. On the rcquest of the representative, the Committee decided to grant one morc opportunity of personal hearing to the applicant in the lbrthcoming NC mccting. PH letter sent on 10.0.2020 rcquesting to appcar lbr I'}tI on 22.01 .2020. 降 i驚:即雖h越∬′議∬ 1囀 ls of export items. 2. Usc of exact raw materials. 3. 1'o ide cxptanation for why valuc addition is low. 4. 'l'ype は解 肌∬ら総摺制plitttヽL轟竃棚離雛] CおCヽVaS COnsidCrcd in M No.06/81 dt.25082020,thc ittcc noted the written comments dated 17.3.2020 given Consultant (SKB). After deliberating the matter, the mittee decided to seek from the appticant an statement for import item 'Plate/Coil' in the following format: Bill of entry No. and datc Exact description Exact thickness Quantity. As per NC dccision, D/I. was issucd to the applicant on 23.1 l .2O2O fol lowed by a rem inder on 07 . | 2.2020. requcsted fbr cxtcnsion ol'timc till 30'h Dcccmber 2020' :cfore. the Committce dccided to wait lbr rcply of thc As per NC decision, a reminder was sent to the applicant on 02.02.2021. The applicant's reply was scnt to Consultant (SKB)on 07.04.2021.Thc casc was considcrcd in M.No. 01/81 datcd 21 05 2021 and notcd tha Consultant(SKB) nformed in mccting that thc case was undcr examination' A was issucd to Consultant (SKB) on 09.07.2021 'he case was last considered in M. No' NC/2/MElう・ I`/」u1/202122/1(01llinc Cascs)datcd 16.07.2021 Consultant(SKB)vidC Cmail datcd 13.07.2021 inliDmcd as pcr thc applica■ lcttcr N9 Tり4RGF′ I`/NvP/2929 03102.2021,licy had inbrmcd to DGFT t,… Defcrred Page I 19 NC-2 ルIEETING No.:NC/2/MEET/」u1/202122/2(Ominc cascs) ⅣIeeting Date:03.09.2021

importcd 20686 Kes IIot Rolled Stainless steel plates of lOmm of grade 3161, and 38977.844 Kgs Stainless Steel Coils of 3.3mm thickncss ol'grade 317L.'l'hcrcfore, the Committee decided to ask lrom the applicant to lurnish the following information as per comments ol'Consultant (SKI)):

  1. To clarifi whether the applicant used the aloresaid imported grade and thickness plates (l0mm) & coils (3.3mm) in the export items or not.
  2. To submit a detailed sheet indicating export product description, quantity, invoice No. & Date, Unit Weight, 1'otal Wcight, Shipping Ilill & Date, import item as per liccnse, description of imported item, thickness and other relcvant inlbrmation which can justif, that the imported items had becn actually used in thc cxported products. As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on 19.08.2021. However, no comments have been receivcd yet. M-29 CHINA STEElン CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE I´IMITED 3410044554 Dated 05.10.2018 01/81/050/0088 2/AM19/ 34/24/040/0017 2/AM19/ 'l'he case was ratified in Meeting No. l3l81-Al,C2l2019 dated 03.10.2019 on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2017 in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 datcd 12.6.2019 allowing quantity ol each import item (a) 1.015 Kg/Kg content in the cxport product rvith thc condition that thickncss and grade ol'import and export items to match. The applicant via cmail dated 10.09.2020 rcquest for rcview of norms for Percentage of Scrap for Import product on lixpo( items from 1.015% to 3 o/o and change of Mcasurement. The rcpresentation was re ferred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for examination of the case. 'l'he casc was considcrcd in M. No. l2l8ldated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKI]) infbrmed vidc letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requcsted wastage as 5o/o for processing of imported silicon electrical steel of cold rolted full hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon elcctrical steel other than grain orientcd. Ministry of Steel sincc bcginning in various AA recommended wastage @) 3% lor manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. 'f he Committee observed that wastage @3o/o was allowed by the Committee for AA No. 3410043635 datcd 14.11.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 daled 15.5.2018 as per MoS tJO No.2(8)/2017-'l'D dated 10.04.2018. Subscqucnt to this, wastagcs lor many AAs werc approved @)oh on thc written commcnts of MoS. Ilowever, on the oral advice of representative of MoS, the Committee approved the wastages @ 1.5% in Meeting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14. I L2017. Hence. the Committee allowed same wastagcs in alI subsequent cases. Consultant (SKI)) vidc letter dated 15.12.2020 had opined to allow wastagcs (1)3% in view o[the opcrations like clcaning, welding, anncaling. coating, baking & cooling etc. required to process fbr manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented I'llectrical Steel. 'l'he matter was delibcrated in the mecting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in thc matter. As per decision. the case was rclerred to MoS on 03.02.2021 ] 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.20211 and noted that the reprcsentative of MoS informed in meetingl that the case was under cxamination. A remindcr was sent tol The Committee per the agenda and decided to remind MoS for expediting the comments. Deferred Page 20 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MIIF|!'I.ltll202l22l2 (Offlinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

MoS on 09.07.2021. MoS requestcd for a copy ol- application lo examine the case and thc same was sent on 13.07 .2021 . Ihe case was last considercd in M. No. NC/2/MEE't/Jul/2021221 | (Offl ine Cases) dated I 6.07 .2021 and thc Committee decided to wait lbr the comments. llowever, no comments have been rcceived yet. M‐ 30 CHINA STEEIン CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITItD 3410045191 1)atcd 04.06.2019 01/81/050/0010 2/AM20/ 34/24/040/0007 4/AM20/ 'l'he case was ratified in Meeting No. l7l81-AI-C212019 daled 27.11.2019 on repcat basis as approved for AA No. 3410043636 datcd 14.11.2017 in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 datcd 12.6.2019 allowing quantity of each import itcm @ 1.015 Kg/Kg content in the export product with the condition that thickncss and grade of import and export items to match. The applicant via email dated 10.09.2020 request for review of norms lor Percentage of Scrap for Import product on Export itcms lrom l.0l5o/o lo 3 o/o. 'l'he representation was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for examination of the case. l'he case was oonsidcred in M. No. l2l8ldated 15.12.2020 hcld on 22.12.2020 and Consultanl (SKI]) informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requested wastage as 5%o for processing of imported silicon clcctrical steel of cold rolled futl hard (unannealcd) wide coil against export of flat rollcd products of silicon elcctrical steel othcr than grain orientcd. Ministry of Steel since beginning in various AA recommended wastage (4 3% for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented Illectrical Stecl. The Committee observed that wastage @3%o was allowed by the Committec for AA No. 3410043635 datcd 14.Il,2017 in its Mecting No. I/8I datcd 15.5.2018 as pcr MoS LJO No.2(8)/2017-'l'D dated 10.04.2018. Subscqucnt to this, wastages for many AAs were approved ())o/o on thc written comments of MoS. Ilowever, on the oral advice ol represcntativc ol'MoS, the Committee approved the wastages @ l.5o/o in Meeting No. 05/81 datcd 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 datcd 14. I I .2017. Ilence, the Committee allowcd same wastages in all subsequent cascs. Consultant (SKI)) vidc lctter dated 15.12.2020 had opined to allow wastages @3% in view of the opcrations like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Orientcd I'llcctrical Stcel. 'l'he matter was delibcratcd in the meeting and the Committce decidcd to seek second opinion o1'MoS in the matter. As pcr decision, the case was referred to MoS on 03.02.2021. l'hc case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and notcd that the representative ol'MoS inlbrmed in mceting that thc case was under cxamination. A rcminder was sent to MoS on 09.07.2021. MoS requcsted for a copy of application 1o examine the case and thc samc was sent on 13.07 .2021 . ]'he casc was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEE'|/J ull202 l22l I (Offl inc Cascs) dated 16.07 .2021 and the Committec decided to wait for thc comments. I lowevcr, no commcnts have bcen rcceivcd yct. Thc Committee per the agenda and decided to remind MoS for expediting the comments. I)cferrcd M‐31 CHINA STEEIン CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE IJMI′ I`1:D 01/81/050/0066 7/AM19/ 34/24/040/0037 6/AM18/ The case was ratified in M. No. 5181-Al.C2l20l9 dated 12.06.2019 on the recommendation of the representative of MoS. 'the applicant via cmail dated 10.09.2020 requested for rcview of norms for Pcrcentage of Scrap lbr Import producl on IJxport items from 1.015% lo 3 Yo. T'he represcntation was relbrred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for cxamination olthe case. l'he Committce rcnsidcred the case as rcr thc agenda and lccidcd to remind MoS lor cxpcditing lhc commcnts. I)efcrred Page | 21 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MI-l:|l'lJull202l22l2 (Ofline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

3410043988 Datcd 22032018 'l'he case was considered in M. No. l2l8ldated 15.12.2020 hcld on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKI]) informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that thc applicant had requested wastagc as 5Yo for processing ol'imported silicon clcctrical steel of cold rolled full hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon electrical steel other than grain oriented. Ministry of Steel since beginning in various AA rccommended wastage @ 3% for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oricnted Electrical Stecl. 'l'he Committee observed that wastagc (@3%, was allowcd by the Committce for AA No. 3410043635 datcd l4.l 1.2017 in its Meeting No. 1/81 dated 15.5.2018 as pcr MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-'l'D dated 10.04.2018. Subsequcnt to this, wastages for many AAs were approved @)o/o on the written comments of MoS. IIowever, on the oral advice of rcpresentative ol MoS, the Committee approved the wastages @ 1.5% in Meeting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14. I1.2017. Hence, thc Committee allowed same wastages in all subsequent cases. Consultant (SKI)) vidc lctter dated 15.12.2020 had opined to allow wastages (43% in view of the operations like cleaning, wclding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. required to proccss for manufacturing Cold Rollcd Non-Grain Oriented Iilectrical Steel. 'l'he matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion ol'MoS in the matter. As pcr decision, the case was relbrred to MoS on03.02.2021. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 0l/8 I dated 21.05.2021 and noted that the rcprescntative olMoS inlormed in mecting that the casc was under examination. A reminder was sent to MoS on 09.07.2021. MoS requestcd lbr a copy ol'application to examine the case and the same was scnt on 13.07.2021. 'l'he case was last considercd in M. No. NC/2/MI1Ii't/Jull202122l 1 (Offl ine Cases) dated 16.07 .2021 and the Committec decidcd to wait for the commcnts. I Iowever, no comments have been received yet. M-32 CIIINA STEEL CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 3410045223 1)atcd 21062019 01/81/050/0013 9/AM20/ 34/24/040/0007 3/AM20/ 'fhe case was ratified in M. No. l7l8l-ALC2/20 19 dated 27.11.2019 on repeat basis as approvcd for AA No. 3410043636 datcd l4.l1.2017 in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 dated 12.6.2019 allowing quantity of cach import item @ 1.015 Kg/Kg content in the export product with the condition that thickness and grade of import and export itcms to match. '[he applicant via email dated 10.09.2020 request tbr rcview of norms for Percentage of Scrap for Import product on Export items from 1.015% to 3 %o. 1'he rcprescntation was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 fbr examination of the case. The case was considcred in M. No. l2l8ldated 15.12.2020 hcld on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKB) informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requestcd wastage as 5oZ for processing of imported silicon clectrical steel of cold rotled full hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon electrical steel other than grain orientcd. Ministry of Steel since beginning in various AA rccommended wastage @ 3Yo for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. The Committee obscrved that wastage @3o/o was allowed by the Committce for AA No. 3410043635 dated l4.lL2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 as per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-'l'D dated 10.04.2018. Subsequent to this, wastages lilr many AAs werc approvcd (40% on the written commcnts of MoS. Ilowever, on the oral advice of rcprescntative ol MoS, the Committee Thc Committee per the agenda and decided to remind MoS for expediting the comments. De{'errcd Page 22 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MI'll:;f lJull2o2l22l2 (O1iline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

approved the wastages @ 1.5% in Mceting No. 05/81 datcd 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 datcd 14. Il 2017. llence, the Committee allowed same wastages in all subsequent cases. Consultant (SKB) vide letter dated 15.12.2020 had opined to allow wastages (@3% in view of the opcrations like cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. required to process for manufacturing Cold Rollcd Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. 'l'hc matter was deliberatcd in the meeting and thc Committee decided to seck second opinion of MoS in the matter. As per decision, the oase was referred to MoS on03.02.2021. 'Ihe case was considercd in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and noted that the represcntative of MoS informed in meeting that the case was under examination. A reminder was sent to MoS on 09.07.2021 . MoS requestcd for a copy of application to examine thc casc and the same was scnt on 13.07.2021. 'l'he case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEIIT/JuU202l22l I (Offlinc Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committcc dccidcd to wait for thc comments. Howevcr, no comments have been received yet. M‐ 33 CHINA STEEl′ CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATI] LIMITED 3410045548 1)atcd 18.10.2019 01/81/050/0028 8/AM20/ 34/24/040/0020 6/AM20/ The case was ratified in M. No. 16181-ALC212019 dated I 3. I I .20 I 9 on repcat basis as approved for AA No. 3410043636 dated 14.11.2017 in NC-2 M. No. 05/81 dated 12.6.2019 on the rccommendation of rcprescntative of MoS. 'l'he applicant via cmail dated 10.09.2020 requcst lbr review of norms for Perccntagc ol'Scrap lbr Import product on Iixport items from I .01 5% to 3 oh. 'l'he represcntation was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for examination of the case. The case was considered in M. No. l2l8ldated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKI]) informed vide letter dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requcsted wastage as 5Yo lor processing ol imported silicon clectrical steel of cold rollcd lull hard (unanncaled) wide coil against export of flat rolled products ol' silicon clectrical steel other than grain oriented. Ministry of Steel sincc beginning in various AA recommended wastagc (a) 3o/o for manufbcturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Oricntcd Electrical Stecl. ]'he Committee observed that wastage (a)3Yo was allowed by the Committee lor AA No. 3410043635 dated 14.l1.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 as per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-'l'D datcd 10.04.2018. Subsequent to this, wastagcs lor many AAs wcre approved @)%o on thc writtcn commcnts ol'MoS. Howevcr, on thc oral advicc of reprcscntativc ol' MoS, thc Committee approved the wastages (u) 1.5o/o in Mceting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 datcd 14.l1.2017. Hencc' the Committec allowcd samc wastages in all subsequent cascs. Consultant (SKB) vide lcttcr dated 15.12.2020 has opined to allow wastagcs @3% in view of thc opcrations likc cleaning, welding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. required to process lbr manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-Grain Orientcd Electrical Steel. 'l'he matter was dcliberatcd in the meeting and thc Committce decided to seek second opinion o[ MoS in thc matter. As per decision, the case was relerred to MoS on03.02.2021. 'fhe case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and noted that thc representative ol'MoS infbrmcd in meeting that the case was under cxamination. A reminder was sent to MoS on 09.07.2021. MoS requestcd for a copy ol' application to examine thc case and the same was scnt on 13.07.2021. 'Ihe casc was last considered in M. No. ]'he Committee considcred the case as pcr thc agcnda and decided to remind MoS lbr cxpediting the comments. Dcfbrred pagel23 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MIil:|I'lJull202l22l2 (Ofline Cases) Meeting Date: 03-09.2021

NC/2/MEEl・/」u1/202122/1(Offlinc Cascs)datcd 16.072021 and thc Committcc dccidcd to wait for thc commcnts Ho、vcvcr,no commcnts havc bccn rcccivcd yct. M‐ 34 CIIINA STI〕EL CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE IッIMITED 3410044194 Datcd 3105.2018 01/81/050/0082 3/AM19/ 34/24/040/0005 9/AM19/ l'he case was ratified in Meeting No. l3l81-Al.C2l20l9 datedl 03.10.2019 on repeat basis as approved for AA No.l 3410043636 dated 14.11.2017 in NC-2 M. No. 5/81 datedl 12.6.2019 allowing quantity of each import item @ l.0l5l Kg/Kg content in the cxport product with the condition thatl thickness and gradc of import and export items to match. Thel applicant via email dated 10.09.2020 rcquest for review ofl norms for Percentage of Scrap lor Import product on Exportl items from 1.015% to 3 oh and Change of tJnit ofl measurement. 'Ihc reprcsentation was rcferrcd to Consultantl (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for cxamination of the casc. I The case was considered in M. No. l2l8ldated l5'12.20201 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKII) informed vide letterl dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had requested wastage asl 5Vo for processing of imported silicon electrical stecl of coldl rollcd fult hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flatl rolled products of silicon electrical steel other than grainl oriented. Ministry of Steel since bcginning in various AA] recommended wastage (@ 3% lor manufacturing Cold Rollcd Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel. 'l'he Committce observed that wastage @3oh was allowed by the Committee for AA No. 3410043615 dlted I4.11.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 as per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-TD dated LtO.O+.ZOlt. Subsequent to this, wastages for many AAs were lapprored @lYo on the written comments of MoS. I-lowever, lon the oral advicc of representative of MoS, the Committee lapproved the wastages Qt) 1.5% in Mecting No' 05/81 dated It z.oe .zot g lor AA No. 3410043636 dated 14. I 1.2017. Hence, Ithe Committee allowed same wastages in all subsequent cases' lConsultant (SKB) vide letter dated 15J22020 had opined to lallow wastages @3oh in view olthe opcrations like cleaning, lwelding. annealing. coating, baking & cooling etc. required to lpro"".. lor manulacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented lElectrical Steel. lThe matter was deliberated in the meeting and the Committee ldecided to seek second opinion of MoS in the matter. As per ldecision, the case was referred to MoS on03.02.2021. lTh" ... was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 land noted that the rcpresentative of MoS informed in meeting Ithat the case was undcr cxamination. A reminder was sent to lMoS on 09.07.2021. MoS requested for a copy of application Ito cxaminc the casc and the same was scnt on 13.07.2021. l't'n" casc was last considered in M. No. I INC/2/MEIi'U J ull202l22l I (Of'fl ine Cases) dated I 6.07.2021 land the Committcc dccided to wait for the comments. lHo.r.r. no commcnts have becn received yet. 'the Committee per the agenda and decided to remind MoS for expediting the comments. Dclcrred M‐ 35 CHINA S´ I`1〕EL CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATIt LIヽ41TED 3410044193 Datcd 31052018 01/81/050/0066 8/AM19/ 34/24/040/0005 8/AM19/ The case was ratified in M. No. 5l8l-Al,C2l20l9 dated 12.06.2019 on the recommendation of the rcpresentative of MoS. The applicant via email dated 10.09.2020 requcsted for rcview of norms lbr Perccntage ol Scrap lor import product on export itcms fiom 1.015% to 3 Yo. 'l'he representation was referred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.122020 lbr examination ofthe case. The case was considercd in M. No. l2l8ldated 15.12.2020 held on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKB) informed vidc letter dated 15.12.2020 that thc applicant had requested wastage as Thc Committee per the agenda and decided to remind MoS for expediting the comments. Dcrcrrcd Pagel24 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MIlE1'lJull202l22l2 (Ofline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

5oh for processing of imported silicon electrical stcel of cold rolled full hard (unanneated) wide coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon electrical steel other than grain oriented. Ministry of Steel since beginning in various AA recommended wastage @ 3o/o for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented Illectrical Steel. 'Ihe Committee observed that wastage @3o/o was allowed by the Committee for AA No. 3410043635 dated 14.11.2017 in its Mecting No. l/81 dated 15.5.2018 as per MoS UO No.2(8)/2017-'l'D dated 10.04.2018. Subsequent to this, wastages lor many AAs werc approved @lYo on the written comments of MoS. Howcver, on the oral advice ol representativc o1'MoS, the Committee approved thc wastagcs Qt) 1.5% in Mceting No. 05/81 dated 12.06.2019 for AA No. 3410043636 datcd 14. I L2017. Hence, the Committee allowcd samc wastages in all subscquent cases. Consultant (SKB) vidc letter datcd 15.12.2020 had opined to allow wastages @3% in view of the operations likc cleaning, wclding, annealing, coating, baking & cooling etc. rcquired to process lor manufacturing Cold Rolled Non-(irain Oricnted Electrical Steel. The matter was dclibcrated in thc mceting and the Committcc dccided to seek sccond opinion of MoS in thc matter. As pcr decision, thc case was referred to MoS on03.02.2021. 'Ihe casc was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and noted that the representativc of MoS informcd in meeting that the case was under examination. A reminder was sent to MoS on 09.07.2021. MoS rcquested lor a copy of application to examine the casc and the same was sent on 13.07.2021. 'Ihe casc was last considcred in M. No. NC/2/MIIE'|iJ ull202l22l 1 (Offl ine Cases) datcd I 6.07 .2021 and the Committcc dccided to wait lbr the comments. However, no commcnts havc becn rcceived yet. M-36 CHINA STEEL CORPORATI ON INDIA PRIVATE I´IMITED 3410043636 Datcd 14.112017 01/81/050/0066 6/AM19/ 34/24/040/0017 0/AM18/ The case was ratitied in M. No. 5l8l-Al.C2l20l9 datcdl 12.06.2019 on thc rccommendation of the represcntative ofl MoS. 'l'he applicant via email dated 10.09.2020 requested fbrl review of norms for Percentage of Scrap for Import product on I Export items lrom 1.015% lo 3 %o. 'l.hc representation was] referred to Consultant (SKB) on 08.12.2020 for examination ol'thc casc. Thc casc was considercd in M. No. l2l8ldatcd 15.12.2020 hcld on 22.12.2020 and Consultant (SKI]) informcd vide lcttcr dated 15.12.2020 that the applicant had rcqucstcd wastage as 5%o lor processing of imported silicon electrical stcel of cold rolled full hard (unannealed) wide coil against export of flat rolled products of silicon electrical steel other than grain oriented. Ministry of Steel since beginning in various AA recommcnded wastage (t, 3o/, for manufacturing Cold Rolled Non Grain Oriented Fllcctrical Stcel. 'l'he Committcc observcd that wastage (a)3Vo was allowcd by the Committce lbr AA No. 3410043635 dated 14.11.2017 in its Meeting No. l/81 dated 15.5.201 8 as per MoS LJO No.2(8)/2017-1'D dated 10.04.2018. Subsequent to this, wastages for many AAs were lapproved @o/. on the written comments of MoS. However, lon the oral advice of rcprescntativc of MoS, the Committee lapproved the wastagcs @ 1.5% in Mceting No. 05/81 dated I 12.06.2019 for AA No. 341 0043636 dated 14. I I .201 7. Hencc, Ithc Committee allowcd same wastages in all subsequent cascs. lConsultant (SKB) vide lettcr dated 15.12.2020 had opined to lallow wastagcs (a)3o/o in vicw olthc operations likc cleaning, lwelding, anncaling. coating, baking & cooling etc. required to ′ 1`hc Committee considcred the casc as per thc agenda and decided to remind MoS lor cxpediting thc commcnts. I)efcrrcd Page | 25 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/Mlrl:;l'lJull202l22l2 (Offline Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

process for manufacturing Cotd Rolted Non-Grain Oricnted Lllectrical Steel. '[he matter was deliberatcd in the meeting and the Committee decided to seek second opinion of MoS in the matter. As per decision, the case was refcrred to MoS on03.02.2021. The case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 2'1.05.2021 and noted that thc representativc of MoS informed in meeting that the case was under examination. A rcminder was sent to MoS on 09.07.2021. MoS requested lor a copy of application to examine the case and the same was sent on 13.07 .2021. The case was last considered in M. No' NC/2/MEET/Jull202122ll (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committee decidcd to wait for the comments. However. no comments have been received yet. M‐37 (E‐ 24954) Al´STOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED 0310683926 datcd 29.022012 01/81/050/0051 5/AM12 03/94/040/0103 3/AM12 I'he casc was rejected in M. No. 18 dated 04.12.2012 due tol non-submission of reply. The applicants vide lettcr datedl Og.02.2016 furnished rcply with a requested to fix the ad-hocl norms. The applicant had also fumished reply datedl 2l.O2.2Olg to DIll of deficiency letter dated 23.10.2017 whichl was fbrwarded to Dlll on 31.05.2019. DIII was reminded onl 14.08.2019 & 03.10.2019 to expedite the commcnts' As perl NC decision of M. No. l3l81 dt. 03.10.2019, a letter was sentl to the applicant on 28.10.2019 followed by reminder datedJ 23.12.2019 requesting to submit the complete set ol application. 'l'he applicant submitted the copy of application vide email dated 04.06.2020 which was ref'erred to DHI on the same day. As pcr decision of M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020, D/L was sent to thc applicant on 27.08.2020. The casc was considered in M. No. 07181 dated 08.09.2020. As per NC dccision, a reminder was scnt to the applicant on 22.10.2020. 'l'he applicant's reply was sent to DI II on l 6.l 1.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 10/8ldated 10.11.2020 and decided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to DHI on 21.12.2020;lhe case was considered in M. No. l3l81 dated 30.12.2020 held on 08.01.202 l. the Committee noted that DHI via email dated 29.12.2020 informed that the applicant's reply is deficient. l'herefore, the Committee decided to seek again from the applicant to fumish the fol low ing information: l. Complete application along with ANF-4A with alt relevant enclosures. 2. Sl. No. I I olthc SDF'. 3. 'fhe calculation of the requirement of raw material should be supported by dimensional Engineering drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted. As per NC decision, l)/1, was sent to the applicant on r 0.03.202 I . The case was last considered in M. No.0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and the Committee decidcd to send a reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As pcr NC decision, a reminder was issued to the applicant on 14.07.2021. Ilowever, no reply hu. bg!! .g!9,r99 :g _ The Committee mnsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was not received despite reminder dated 14.07 .2021. 'l'hercfore, the Committee decided to reject the applicant's request of fixation of ad-hoc norms. Rejected M‐ 38 (E‐ 23204) CROMPTON GREAVES LIMITED 0310444382 datcd 2609.2007 01/81/050/0062 4/AV108 03/94/040/0063 4/AM08 I'he Committee :onsidered the case as per the agenda and noted that the npplicant's reply was not received despite rcveral reminders. Iherefore, the Rejected Pagel26 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MIll:|f lJull202l22l2 (OfIlinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

lrepeat with AA No. 03 10343657 dated 19.08.2005. Thc Case lwas referred to Consultant (l'EC-3) on 25.09.2019 & l0 I . I I .201 9. Consultant (l'FlC-3) on 04. I I .2019 stated that linput norms export of relurbished items cannot bc worked out las details of parts which necd repair/replacement is not known land scrap value of old parts cannot be ascertained. In M. No. ltlltt Ot. 26.12.2019, it was decided to call the applicant on lpcrsonal hearing. As per NC decision, an email was sent to the lapplicant on 30.01.2020 to attcnd pcrsonal hearing on 119.02.2020. Nobody appeared for PH in M. No. 22181 dated ll}.Z.ZOZO. 'l'he applicant via email dated 07.07.2020 informed Ithat they would attend PII on 9'h July 2.30pm. 'l'he case was lconsidered in M. No.04/81 dt. 09.07.2020, l'he Committee heard the rcpresentatives of the applicant during pcrsonal hearing held through vidco conl'crcncing. On the advice of Consultant ('l'EC-3). the Committcc directed the representatives to furnish infbrmation in tabular form. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on27.08.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 07181 dated 08.09.2020. As per decision, thc applicant's rcply dt. 09.09.2020 was referred to Consultant (TIIC-3) on I1.09.2020 & 22.10.2020. 'lhe case was considered in M. No. 10/81 datcd l0.l1.2020 held on 17.11.2020, Consultant ('l'lrc-3) informed that the applicant had not providcd requisite information against the deficiency lctter but had rcquestcd to approvc the on repeat basis ol a case in 2005. 'l'hc Committcc discusscd the issue and dccidcd to remind the applicant to lurnish thc rcquisite information as sought vide email dated 27.08.2020. As per NC decision, a rcmindcr was sent to thc applicant on29.12.2020. 'l'he casc was considered in M. No. 13/8 I dated 30.12.2020 held on 08.01.202 I and dccided to wait fbr the requisire information. As per NC dccision. a reminder was sent to the applicant on 10.03.2021 ] The case was last considcred in M. No. 0l/8 I datedi 21.05.2021 and the Committee decided to send final reminderl to the applicant for fumishing thc rcquisitc information. ns perl NC dccision, final rcminder was issued to the applicant onl 14.07 .2021. However, no reply has been received yet. I Committcc decided to reject the applicanl's request of fixation of ad-hoc norms. M‐ 39 NAT10NAL STEEL AND AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED 5610005277 datcd 18.12.2017 01/81/050/0014 6/AM19/ 56/24/040/0003 1/AM18/ l'l'his case was rejccted in M. No. l2l81 dated 13.02.2019 duc l,o non-submission of rcply to deficicncy letter dated 104. 10.2018 raised by MoS. 'l'hc applicant vidc letter daled 114.05.2019 cncloscd a copy ol'their carlier reply dated I I 7.07.20 I 8 stating that they had alrcady replied on I 7.07.20 I 8 lzrrd requested to ratily thc norms. As pcr dccision of M. No. ll3/8ldated 04.10.2019. thc case was refcrred to Consultant ('IEC-3) on 01.11.20 19 as commcnts from MoS were not coming. In M. No. l6181 dr. l3.l1.2019, the Comminee noted the commcnts furnishcd by MoS vide U.O. No. 2(17)/2019- 'l'D dated 08.11.2019 as wcll as commcnts ol Consultant (1'EC-3) and decidcd to seck lrom the applicant thc following information: (i) Stagc wise wastagc of import item No. l. (ii) Justification for import item 6 i.e. GP shcet for packing when onc ol the cxport product is also GP sheet. As per NC decision, D/1. was scnt to thc applicant on 12.12.2019.'l'he case was considered in M. No. l9l81 dt. 26.12.2019 and decidcd to ask liom MoS and thc party to clarify both the points. A reminder was also sent to the applicant on 27.01 .2020. As per NC dccision taken in Mceting No. 22 dated 19.2.2020, a reminder was sent to the applicant on 01.04.2020.'l'he casc was considcred in M. No. 04/8 I dt. 'l'he Committee considercd the case as pcr thc agenda and noted that the applicant's reply was not rcceived dcspite several reminders. 'Iherefore, the Committee decided to reject thc applicant's request of fixation of ad-hoc norms. Rejected Pagel2T NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MIrE'l-lJull202l22l2 (OfIIine Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

OS.O72Ul & 07/8ldated 08.09.2020 and decidcd to grant lastl opportunity to the applicant to furnish the requisitel information. As per NC dccision, final D/1, reminder was sentl to the applicant on 26.08.2020. The applicant's reply dt'l 19.Og.2O2O was sent to Consultant (l'EC-3) &MoS onl 13.10.2020 & 05.11.2020' 'l'he case was considcred in M' No'l 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 hcld on 17.11.2020 and Consultantl (TEC-3) informed that thc applicant's reply dated 19.09.20201 is deficient. Thgrefore, thc Committee decided to seek againl from the applicant to furnish the following information: I l. l'o provide Stage-wise wastages supported . with calculations like width of imported coil. trimming details at each stage etc. lZ. Regarding import item at Sl. No. 2, to provide I iustification why GP sheet is necessary for packing. lnr p.r NC decision, D/l- was sent to the applicant on lzz.tz.zozo. l'l'h" "ur. was considered in M. No. l3l8ldated 30.12.2020 lh.ld on 08.01.2021 and decided to remind the applicant for lfurnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, a lreminder was sent to the applicant on 10.03.2021' lTh".ase was last considered in M. No.0l/81 dated lzl os.zozl and the Committee decided to send final reminder Ito thc applicant for lumishing the requisite information. As per INC decision. final rcminder was issued to the applicant on lZO.Ol .ZOZI. Howevcr, no rcply has been received yet. I M‐40 (E-23508) TRAFOMEC INDIA MAG■lETICS PVT.LTD. 0710090674 datcd ll.09.2012 01/81/050/0027 レ昴れ 1 niiiutty, the case was rejected in M. No.21181 dated '1 .122013 as per written comments of DHI vide U' O' No' i(4 I y20 I 2/TSW (8U294 dated 06. I 2.20 I 3. l'he case was again considered in M. No. 1l/81 dated 12.08.2017 and rcjectcd due to non-submission of reply ol leficiency letter dated 13.04.2017 raised by DHI. Now, the rpplicant vide lettcr dated 01.05.2019 had furnished reply & iquested for ratification of ad-hoc norms. 'l'he representation vas referred to DHI via cmail dated 24.12.2019. The casc was ast considercd in M. No. l9l81 dt. 26.12.2019 and the lommittec decided to dcfer the case with an advice to thc ;eclion to trace out the main file as main file was no1 rvailable. Main fite is traced out and referred to DHI on 12.02.2020. In M. No.22181 dt. 19.02.2020, the Committee Jecided to wait for commcnts' 'fhe case was considcred in M' No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020, On the rcquest of DFII. tht Committec dirccted the section to forward complete set o: application with ANIT4A to DI II for examination anr comments. Scanned copies ol completc set of applicationr along with all conccrned/relatcd documents (reply to queriel raised etc.) in chronological order was sought from tht applicant vidc email dated 07.10.2020.'l'he casc wa mnsidered in M. No. 07/Sldated 08.09.2020 and decided tt remind the applicant for fumishing the requisite information As per NC decision, a reminder was sent to applicant ol 05.1 1.2020. 'Ihe applicant via emaiI dated 05' l 1 '2021 requested for 2 days to rcply. 'l'he applicant's reply vidc lette dated 10. I I .2020 was rcccived. Thc case was considered in M' No' 10/81 dated l0'11'2021 held on 17.11.2020, the Committee noted that the applicar has not given point wise repty to the deficiencies raisec Hence, the Committee decided to ask the applicant to furnisl thc samc. As per dccision, the complete set of application wit lANfaa was refcrred to DIll on 04.01.20?1. Additionz 撫 C輔 | DHI for cxpcditing the commcnts. Deferred Page | 28 NC‐2 PIEETING No.:NC/2/MI:ET/Juν202122/2(Ominc cascs) Pleeting Date:0309.2021

intbrmation rcccivcd from the applicant was also sent to DIII. The applicant's reply was sent to DIII on 19.05.2021. The case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and the Committce decided wait lbr DIII's comments. 'l'he case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEET/Jull202l22l1 (Offlinc Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committce noted that the reply of deficiency lctter dated 13.04.2017 in respect of subiect AA is stitl pending. 'lherefore, the Committee decided to ask fiom the applicant to furnish following inlbrmation as pcr commcnts of DIll: l. l'o submit information relating to calculation of core and coil dimensions starting from the export product rating in English. As per NC decision. a deficicncy lettcr was issued to thc applicant on 23.07 .2021. -thc applicant's rcply datcd 27 .07.2021 was lorwarded to DI II I 1.08.2021 for examination & comments. I lowcver, no commcnts have been reccivcd yct. M-41 PRANITA ENGINEERIN G S01ッUT10NS PRIVAl`E LIMITED 0710064492 datcd 04.05.2009 01/81/050/0002 6/AM10/ 07/24/040/0003 9/AM10/ 'Ihe case was withdrawn in M. No. 44/81-ALC212009 dated) 02.02.2010 on the ground that the case was rejected in M. No. 38/81 dated 22.12.2009 (actually hcld on 29.12.2009) duc to non-submission of reply of the deficicncy letter raised by DIPP. The applicant vide lefler datcd I l.l1.2019 furnishcd rcply with a rcqucst to fix the ad-hoc norms and also asked lor personal hearing. 'l'he appticant's rcpresentation was forwarded to Dl)ll'l' on 31.01.2020. In M. No. 22181 dt. 19.02.2020, the Committec decided to wait lor comments. Comments of DPII'I' D/L received vide email dated 23.04.2020. DPIIT's D/L was sent to the applicant on 07.07.2020. 'l'hc casc was considercd in M. No. 04/81 dl.09.07.2020 and decided to wait for reply of the applicant. A rcminder was sent to the applicant on 27.08.2020.'l'hc case was considered in M. No. 07/8ldated 08.09.2020 and decided to remind again the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, a reminder was scnt to the applicant on 22.10.2020. 'l'he applicant's reply received via email dated 17.11.2020 was forwarded to DPll'l' on l7.l1.2020.'['hc case was considered in M. No. 10/81 datcd 10.11.2020 hcld on 17.11.2020 utd dccided to wait for thc comments. A reminder was issucd to DPIIT on 23.12.2020.'l'he case was referred to MSMII on 06.01.2021 on thc advised of DPIIl'. 'Ihe written comments was received by MSME via e mail datcd 07.01.2021. 'l'he Committee noted the case was rejected in M. No.38/81 dated 22.12.2009 (actually held on 29.12.2009) duc to non- submission of rcply of the deficiency lctter raised by DIPP. Subsequently. the case was placcd in M. No. 44181- ALC212009 datcd 02.02.2010 and withdrawn. 'l'hc applicant had applied for rcview after a lapsc olapprox. l0 years. lt is not known whethcr thc casc was considcrcd by the NC in any meeting during this period. Ilence, thc Committee decided to seck a report lrom concerned RA about present status of norms fixation including any pending ECA action. A letter was sent to RA, Bangalore on 08.04.2021 in this regard. I'fh" "^t" was last considered in M. No.0l/81 dated lzl .os.zOzt antl the Committee decided to remind RA, lBangalore lor lurnishing the rcquisitc information. As per NC ldecision, an cmail was sent to RA, Ilangalore on 20.07.2021. lHowevcr. no inlbrmation has bcen rcccivcd yet. 'l'he Committee pcr the agcnda and dccidcd to remind again RA, Bangalore tbr expcditing thc comments. Deferred Page | 29 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MItF;l'lJull202122l2 (Ofilinc Cascs) Meeting Date:03.09.2021

M‐42 (E‐ 24961) Olcctra Grccntcch Limhcd 0910067556 Datcd 22.05.2019 | 01/81/050/0008 0/AM20/ 09/24/040/0005 6/AM20/ The case was approved in M. No. O3l8l-N-C212020 datedl 27.05.2020 as per written comments given by Consultantl (TEC-l). The applicant vide letter dated 09.07'2020 requestedl for ratification of ad-hoc norms and stated that the importl weight of chcmicals under Sr. No. 3 and 4 is not as per 5%l *u.Lg"r, which shoutd bc 3038.740 and 663.004 Kgs insteadl o11216.5 and 303.63 Kgs. I Thc case was referred to consultant (l'EC-l) for examinationl & comments vide email dated 05.11.2020. The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81 dated I 0. 1 1 .2020 held on ItZ.t t.ZOzo. Consultant (]'EC-l) asked to send physical file of Ithe casc to examine the casc. 'l'herefore, the Committee ldecided to send the same to Consultant ('l'EC-l) for lexamination of the case. 'l'he main file was send to Consultant It'fpC-f l on 31.12.2020. The case was considered in M. No' Itl/gtdated 30.12.2020 held on 08.01.2021, and decided to lseek lrom the applicant to lurnish rcquisite inlormation as pcr lcomments given hy Consultant (l'UC-l). As per NC decision, lD/L *ur sent to the applicant on 07.04.2021 . ll'h".u." was last considercd in M. No.0l/81 dated lzt.Os.ZOZt and the Committee decidcd to send a reminder to Ithc applicant lor furnishing the rcquisite information. As per INC decision, a remindcr wa^s issued to the applicant on 120.01.2021. I I -he Committeel nnsidered the case asl rer agenda and notedl hat the applicant'sl ,ia email datedl t.l .07.2021 informedl hat they ut.l vithdrawing their equest letter dated )9.07.2020. -l'he rpplicant also nformed that theY 'rave accepted the luantities fixed bY the Jon'ble Norms lommittee and "equested to close the License as per the already C o m m i t w i t h d r 輸     ¨ 0           ・ lt t   S C         W t h c m t h c c a m   c a s c i s ryproved. Therefore Committee withdraw from the Withdrawn M-43 | (E‐ 24965) Zccco lndia Pvt.Ltd. 0310819114 Datcd 13.02.2018 01/81/050/0036 0/AM19/ 03/95/040/0089 1/AM18/ | The case was rejectcd in M. No. 1 I /81 dated 3 0.01 .20 I 9, due to non-submission of reply deficiency letter raised by Consultant ('lUC-3). The applicant via email dated 06.08.2020 furnished reply and requested to ratifu the ad-hoc norms. The case was referred to consultant GEC-3) for examination & comments vide email dated 29.10'2020. ]'he case was considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10. I I .2020 held on l7 .11.2020. Consultant (TEC-3) asked to send physical file of the case to examine the case. 'l'herefore, the Committee ldecidcd to send the same to Consultant (TEC-3) tor lexamination olthc case. Accordingly, file was sent to lConsultant ('lEC-3). ll'h" .ur. was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 land the Committee decided to remind Consultant (1'EC-3). As lper NC dccision. the reminder was issued to Consultant (1'EC- l3) on 09.07.2021. Consultant (]'EC-3) via cmail dated llZ.Ol .ZOZI requested for physical file of the case and thc same lhas heen sent to examine the casc. l'l-h. .u.. was last considered in M. No. lNClZlrranurl hll202l22ll (offlinc cases) dated 16.07 .2021 land the Committce decided to wait for the comments. wastage detait of both impot items separately. Starting from thr specification o the expor product, basi calculation as tr how ol ra
material proposed fo import has bee arrived ?I including the n< weight c components to b ― ― l b に 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Committee considercd the ca-se as per the agenda and Consuitant(TEC… 3) infbrmed that applicant's reptl dated 06.08.2020 it incomplete. Therefore, tht Committee decided tc ask from the applican to furnish thr following informatior as per comments o Consultant (TEC-3) Ll. To provide ne I weight d Deferred Pagc1 30 NC‐ 2 MEETlNG No.:NC/2/MEE′ I`/Juν202122/2(OIninc cascs) Meeting Date:03092021

manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed aI each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawing s etc. ('l'he information should be in order) The casc stands deferred. M-44 (E‐ 24984) Lcitwind Shriram Manufacturing Privatc Limhcd 0410164757 datcd 05.102018 01/81/050/0047 2/AM19/ 04/24/040/0014 8/AM19/ The case was rcjectcd in M. No. 02l8ldated 01.05.2019, due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by Consultant (TflC-l). 'l'hc applicant via cmail dated 04.09.2020 furnished reply and requestcd to ratily the ad-hoc norms. l'he copy of representation was lorwardcd to Consultant (1'EC-l) on l7 .r1.2020. 'l'he case was considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10. I1.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decidcd to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant (l'EC-l) on23.12.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and the Committee decided to rcmind again Consultant ('l'EC- l). As per NC decision, the reminder was issued to Consultant (l'tic- I ) on 09.07.2021. The case was last considered in M. No. NC/2/MEIi17J u112021221 I (Ofllinc Cases) dated 1 6.07 .2021 and the Committee dccidcd to ask I'rom thc applicant to furnish the Ibllowing information as pcr comments of Consultant (TEC-1): l. 'l'o provide justification of high wastage upto 47.6%o in glass fabric with the help of tay out sheet. 2. Commcrcial value of wastage gcneratcd. As pcr NC dccision, a deficicncy lctter was sent to thc applicant on23.08.2021. Howevcr, no rcply has been received vet. The Committee considcred the casc as per the agenda and decided to send a reminder to the applicant lbr furnishing the requisite inlbrmation. I)cfcrrcd M‐45 (E‐24986) Lcitwind Shrlram ヽ4anufacturing Privatc Limitcd 0410164534 datcd 27.07.2018 01/81/050/0036 3/AM19/ 04/24/040/0004 2/ノヽM19/ The case was rcjected in M. No. 3/8 I dated I 5.05.2019, due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by Consultant (TFIC-l). The applicant via email dated 18.08.2020 furnished a rcply and requested to rati$ the ad-hoc norms. 'l'he copy of represcntation was forwarded to Consultant (TIiC-l) on l7 .11.2020. The case was considercd in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant ('l'EC-l) on23.12.2020. The case was considercd in M. No. 0l/81 datcd 21.05.2021 and thc Committee decided to remind again Consultant (I'EC- l). As per NC decision, the rcmindcr was issued to Consultant (l'EC- I ) on 09.0'1.2021. The case was last considered in M. No. The Committee per the agenda and decidcd to send ^ reminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite in lormation. I)cibrrcd Page | 31 NC-2 MEETING No.: NC/2/MIIF.TlJull202l22l2 (Oflinc Cases) Meeting Date: 03.09.2021

NC/2A4EET/Ju1120212211 (Offline Cases) dated 16.07.2021 and the Committee decided to ask from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of Consultant (TEC-l): l. 'fo provide justification ol high wastage upto 47.60/o in glass fabric with the help of lay out sheet. 2. Commercial valuc of wastage generatcd. As per NC decision, a deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on23.08.2021. Flowever, no reply has been received yet. M‐46 (E‐ 24987) Lcitwind Shriram Manufacturing Privatc Limitcd 0410165252 datcd 26.022019 01/81/050/0110 7/AM19/ 04/24/040/0025 3/AM19/ | 'Ihc case was rejected in M. No.01/81 dated 01.04.2020. duel to non-submission ol'reply of DI ll deficiency letters. Thel appticant via cmail dated 04.09.2020 furnished a reply andl requested to ratify the ad-hoc norms. The copy ofl representation was forwarded to DHI on 17.11.2020. The casel was considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on] l7.ll.2O2O and decided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to DHI on 23.12.2020. 'l'he representativc of DIII informed that the applicant's reply ldatcd ll.O9.2O2O is deficient. l'herclore, thc Committee ldecided to seek lrom the applicant to furnish the fbllowing linformation: I t. Rating of thc exporl product. I Z. Calculation supported by dimensional engincering I drawine with relevant dimensions highlighted. I l. lnlormation as pcr Appendix 4G. lAt p.r NC decision. D/1, was sent to the applicant on lor o+.zozo. l'l'h" "^." was last considered in M. No.0l/81 dated lZt.OS.ZOZI and thc Committce decidcd to send a reminder to Ithe applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As per INC decision, a reminder was issued to the applicant on lOS.Ol .ZOZ\ . I lowever. no reply has been received yet. l. The Committee per the agenda and decided to send final rtminder to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. Deferred M-47 0410165234 datcd 2002.2019 Э1/81/050/0113 3/AM19/ 04/24/040/0025 4/AM19/ 'ih..^. was rejected in M. No.0l/81 dated 01.04.2020' duel to non-submission of rcply of DIll deficiency letters. 1'hel applicant via email datcd 04.09.2020 furnished a reply andl requested to rati! the ad-hoc norms. I The copy of representation was forwarded to DHI onl l':..11.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 10/81 datedl 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decided to wait for thel comments. A reminder was issued to DHI on 23.12.2020. I The representative of DIII informcd that thc applicant's replyl datcd I 1.09.2020 is deficient. 'fherefore, the Committeel ldccided to scck lrom the applicant to lurnish the lbllowingl linformation: I I f. Rating otthe expon product I lz. Calculation supported by dimensional engineeringl I drawing with relevant dimcnsions highlighted. I l:. Information as per Appendix 4G. lar p.t NC decision, D/I. was sent to the applicant on loa.o+.zozo. lTh".r." was last considercd in M. No.0l/81 dated lz:.os.ZOZt and the Committee dccidcd to send a reminder to Ithe applicant for furnishing thc requisite information. As per INC dccision, a rcminder was issued to the applicant on lOS.Ol .ZOZI . I lowever, no rcply has been received yet' I T'he Committee mnsidered the case as per the agenda and decided to send final rrminder to the applicant for furnishing thc requisite information. Deferred Pagc1 32 NC‐2 MEETING No.:NC/2/MEEl`/Juν202122/2(Ollline cases)Meeting Date:03.09.2021

ヽ 4‐48 CHHAPERIA INTERNAT10 NAlン COMPANY 0710115072 datcd 19062019 01/81/050/0013 7/AM20/ 07/24/040/0006 6/AM20/ The case was approved in M. No. l7l8l-Alc2l20l9 dated 27.11.2019 as per written comments givcn by DPIIT vide LJ. O. No.: P-4701113031201g-'l'SW dated l3.l 1.2019. 'l'hc applicant via cmail datcd 02.12.2020 had requcsted for ratification of ad-hoc norms and inlbrm that the export item width had been reslricted to 300 mm but it depends on client ordcr and machine capacity, at the current capacity and order situation kindty altow width ol'cxport item upto 360 mm and thickness of cxport item to bc samc or lcss than thc import item thickncss. 'fhe representation was referred to DPII'I' on 29.12.2020. DPII'I"s DL received via email dated 14.01.2021 and issued to thc applicant on 05.03.2021.'l'hc applicant's rcply was sent to DPII'l'on 07.06.2021 fbltowcd by a rcminder on20.07.2021. 'l'he Committcc considcrcd the case as pcr agcnda and decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per comments of DPIIT vidc U. O. No. P- 47011t303D019- ]'SW dated 26.07.2021. (Copy cnclosed) RA takc conccrned may consequcntial accordingly. suitable action Approved M‐49 rubaccx I)rakash lndia Privttc Limitcd 0310828823 datcd 07052019 01/81/050/0005 3/AM20/ 03/95/040/0010 1/ハヽ420/ 'l'hc case was approved in Mccting No. 23/81-ALC212019 dated 04.03.2020 on thc recommendation of Consultant (TEC- 3). 1'he applicant vide letter dated 18.06.2020 requested for re- fixation of norms and stated that thc l07o wastage allorved instcad of 35% for sr. no. I of import itcm, hencc thc applicant had applicd the application cxactly as pcr SION Norms Sr. no. C-83 I for import of Sr. No. l.ln which thc cxport & import item description arc exactly same as the applied for norms fixation & wastage is given for import item Sr. No. I is 1.35M1' for lMTof export item. 'l'hcrefore, thc applicrurt had requcsted to cnhancc thc wastage of import item Sr. No. I from l0% to 35Yo. Thc representation was referred to Consultant (1'EC-3) on 29.12.2020. 'l'he case was last considered in M. No.0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and the Committee dccided to ask from the applicant to t-urnish lbllowing information as pcr commcnts of Consultant ('l'liC-3) : l. 'l'o provide detailed calculations of wastagc incurred at cach stage with supporting documents. As per NC decision. a deliciency lctter was sent to the appticant on20.07.2021. Ilowcver, no reply has been rcceived 'l'he Committee considercd the casc as pcr thc agenda and decided to send a reminder to the applicant for firrnishing thc rcquisitc information. Dcfcrred M‐ 50 CG Powcrand industrial Solution Limitcd (「OrmCrly Crompton Grcavcs Limitcd) 0310789692 datcd 26.092014 01/81/050/0050 5//tヽ415/ 03/94/040/0026 8/AM15/ 'l'hc case was ratified in M. No.20181 dated l9'12.2017 as per comments ol DIll vide LiO No. 'I'SWB-3 ll8ll2014 dated I 2.01 .20 I 8. The applicant vide lettcr datcd 27.11.2020 stated that in the DI ll commcnts, the Norms wcre ratificd for all items liom Sr. no. I to 29 and items no. 30 to 39 wcrc deleted. No rcason was assigned in the DHI lctter datcd 12.01.2018 to delete the items mentioned at 30 to 39. 'l'he party has already imported the inputs specified undcr sr. no. 30 to 39, used in the manufacture of the export products i.e. 'l'ransformers and thc samc have alrcady bcen exportcd, henoc the party has requcstcd for revicw the application and allow the inputs as pcr Item No. 30 to 39 on nct to net basis as the goods are engineering goods which are permitted in the policy on Net to Net basis' The rcprcsentation wa.s ret'crred to Consultanl ('tFlC-3) on 29.t2.2020. 'l'hc casc was last considcred in M. No.0l/81 dated 21.05.2021 and Consultant ('l'EC-3) inlbrmed via email dated 20.05.2021 thal thc applicant had represented against deletion of import itcms at Sl. No. 30 to 39by DIll. 'l'hcsc items are not intcgral part of cxport items i.e. 'l'ransformer and therefore, 'l'he Committee considercd the case as per the agenda and decided to remind DHI for expediting the commcnts. Dcf'erred Pagc 33 NC-2 MEETING No.:NC/2/MI〕 I'1/」uν202122/2(Ominc cascs)Mee“ ng Date:03.09.2021

cannot be considered. As thc carlicr comments were given by DHI, therefore, the Committee decided to forward the representation to DHI as per advice of Consultant (TEC-3)' As per NC decision, the case was referred to DHI on 20.07.2021 Ibr examination & commcnts. Horvever. no comments have becn receivcd Yct. M‐ 51 TATA POWER SOLAR SYS′ I`EMS IンTD 0710115133 1)atcd 05.072019 D1/81/050/0015 8/AM20 RIンA Filc No: 07/24/040/0006 5/AM20/ th. "ut" was approved in M. No' lllSl-A1,C212020 datedl 24.11.2020 (l{cld on 01.12.2020) as pcr written commentsl given by Consultant (1'EC-3). I Tne appticant letter dated 01.04.2021 had requested forl rcinstate Solar Cell/PV Cell (HS Code:85414011) in placc ofl deletedrawmaterialsitemNo. 1to ll inM.No. 1l/81 datedl 24.11.2020 (lJeld on 01.12.2020). The reprcscntation was sentl to Consultant ('l'EC-3) on06.04.2021 | 'l'hc case was considered in M. No.0l/81 dated 2l'05.20211 and Consultanl (1'f'lc-3) inlbrmed via cmail dated 20.05.202 I that the applicant had reprcscnted the proposal lor approval of norms on repcat basis of AA issued in 2014' However, the applicant's requcst of older AA rctbrence did not have same import & export items. 'l'hcrefore, the Committee decided to lask the applicant to submit their justification again within l5 ldays' time. 'l'hc applicant vide email dated 2l-06.2021 has lsubmitted some documcnts and also submitted some l.uppl.r"nt*y inlormation to Consultant ('tEC -3) with lcarbon copy to DGFT via cmail dated 22.06.2021 . Il't'he case was last considered in M. No. lNclzlvut''l'l Jull202 l22l | (of'fl ine Cases) dated 16.07 .2021 land Consultant (l't-.C-3) informed via cmail dated 12.07.2021 Ithat the applicant, via cmail dated 18.06.21 and subsequent lemails, has given details of imported items in AA 0710102050 ldated 07.02.2014. olwhich repcat has bccn sought. and import litems in AA under considcration. While AA dated 07.02.2014 InaA l9 import items including PV cells, AA under lconsideration has 28 import items excluding PV cells. The lapplicant has also submittcd a copy oIlcttcr dated 13.01.2019 lwritten by thcm to RA, Bangalore tbr amcndment ol AA. I'l'herefore, as per advice of Consultant (1'UC-3). the lCommittee decided to get a reporl from RA, Bangalore on lamendment oIAA as requcsted by the applicant. I lAs per NC dccision, an email was sent to the RA, Bangalore lon 19.08.2021. Ilowever. no information has bcen received 1r.,. I 'l'he Committee mnsidercd the case as per the agenda and decided to remind RA, Bangalore lor exocditine the mmmcnts. Dcrcrrcd


NC-2 Page | 34 MEETING No.:NC/2/MI〕IET/Juν 202122/2(011linc cascs)

F:le No.P‐ 47011′ 308′2019‐ TSW srfi-frgTfiT aTFrtrq3{t{5qdl-rrETrtr{r vf&li g-d*d ilt{ 3Tiafrr.?dfqr friHIfi Governntent of lndia Ministry of Commerce & lndustry Department for Promotron of lndustry & lnternal Trade (Technicai SuPPort SecIon) Subject. - Mls Delton Cables Ltd ( A.A. No.0510337606 dated 23 .10-2414. Reference. - D.G.F.T. F. No. 01i81/050/423lAM-1&'DES-2 DGFT(DES-2) nray kindly referto their e-mail daled 12th July 2021 fonrarding firms reply for fixation of norms in respect of the above-mentioned A.A. ln this connection, the undersigned is directed to say that the Instant A.A. rnay b€ ratified as under.

  1. l,.i*t weight ,'Kl'i ot er.port items at Sl.No. l to 29 under the Advance Authoneation may :re snecifiecl as iinder - Quantity of import 1 Copper allowed as 1 01 K9s/Kg cOntentin the exportlle!ns at Sl.No.lt0 29 2 Quatttty ofimpOFtitelll at Si No 2(PVC COnlpound)may be a1lowed as l、 05 KgゴKg contentin the exportitems at SI_No.1 lo 22 &26 to 29 3、Quanttty ofimport iem at S:No_3(PolySter Tape)may be allowed as 1 02 Kgs/Kg contentin the expo「titems at SI No 14.21t023.25 8 27to 29 4 0uanuty Ofimportitem at Si No 4(Aluminiun MylarTape)may be a1loNved as 1 02Kgs/ K9oontentin the exportitems at Sl.No 21,22、 24 and 271o 29. 5 0uanuty OfinlpOrtitenn at SI No 5(LSZH)may be allowed as 1 05Kgs/Kg contentin the export items at Sl"No.24 to 26.
  2. Quantity of import ltern at Sl.Fio.6 (Copper Tapeimay be allowed as content in the export items at Sl. No.4 to 13 & 24 lo 26. Norms Cornnrittee may take a vlelv. 1.01K9s/K9 イざ属瀞・ , :Lrl, Developinent C)fflcer Tel.23063166 E―nlatil susnik lam@nにln DCF■ y=馴 reC10r DES‐ 11, DP‖TUO.NO P‐ 470117308/2019‐ TSW dated 03 08 2021 S i N 。 ヽetヽⅣe19ht lKgs/Knl) L   O ヽ う ヽ ヽet Weight iKgs/Km) ― 一 〇 ヽet lAFeight KgslKm) 1 一 〇 NetヽVeight KgsFKm) 1 〕9270 389487 17 21543 15 31290 9 一 ‡1635 10 ,26565 18 241 50 26 103215 う 0 36360 う59747 19 ,720 〕930 4 M080 O ι 「88603 20 8974 :8 21840 5 27785 3 〕93038 )825 :9 〕9250 6 79655 4 5330 22 21420 7 210780 15 21000 23 4280 ≧87280 213 15 24 26040 Of at Sl.No.1 t Copper Wire EC Graoe) ;may be

F:le No.P-47011′ 303′ 2019‐TSW 群R富劇く中|く 締 回 表 勲 輛 動 ― 油 赫 cq:Ч :く師 Government ofindia Ministry of cOmnlerce&lndustry Departmentfor Promotlo0 0flndustry&lnternal Trade (丁echnicat support seclon) Sublecti_いν1/s Chhaperia!nternational Company‐ A.A、No 0710115072 dated 19.06_2019 Reference:_DGF^T FNo.01/81/50ノ137/AM-20/DES-2 DGFT(DES‐ 2)may kindly refer to their e―ma‖ dated 201h July,2021 forwarding ttrnl s reply in connection、ヘノith their representation for re― fixation of norms in respect of the above― ■lenuOned A A. In this connection,the undersigned is directed to say that based on the information received from ti、e ftrm、 norms may be alη ended as under― 1.Descrlplon of export itenl may be amended as `cOpper Tape cut to sレe having thickness‐ 0.o45mm(45 Microns)and Width-25mm,30mm.50mm and 360mm■ 2.Desc面ptlon ofimpOrtitem inay be amended as'tcOpper Tape in」unlbo Ro‖ havlng thickness‐ 041■lm(410 Mlcrons)and width-360mm" 3. Quantity ofimportilem may be a‖ owed as 99505 Kgs inclusive oF O.5%,wastage Norms Committee may take a view. ― ″
´ 百K嘆爾獅ひし | Development Oflcer Te1 23063166 E‐ ma‖ i sushlk,aln@nic in OCFT(Shl_Pranev υpaolyay__Dy.o,recto「,p[s‐ lil DP‖TUONO P-47011/303/2019-TSVヾ dated 26 07 2021

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied