DGFT Committee Minutes
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE - (DES II SECTION)
MINUTES OF THE NORMS COMMITTEE-II
MEETING No. 13/81-ALC2/2020 DATED 30.12.2020 (Held on 08.01.2021)
Please Note
-
i. For information of exporters, Norms Committee-II handles all cases pertaining to fixation/ratification of norms for Export Products falling under ITC (HS) Chapter 72 to 76, 78 to 80 & 85. Communications in respect of cases/pertaining to NC-II may be sent to email address: nc2.dgft@nic.in
-
ii. In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/ Observations/Deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The concerned applicant/company may go through the same and respond accordingly.
-
iii. Similarly, a scanned copy of the blank Standard Deficiency Format, which may find a reference in NC decisions, has also been attached in the end. This may also be referred to by the concerned applicant/company and may be responded accordingly.
-
iv. The Norms Committee has taken decision only with respect to technical aspect/wastage norms. While redeeming the applications, RAs should check that the applicant has fulfilled all requirements as prescribed in policy/procedure including those in Policy Circulars issued from time to time or any other provisions under FTP/HBP for EODC.
-
v. Wherever the Committee has fixed Norms, the concerned RA may ensure that AA is issued on the wastages/consumption as ratified by the Committee or as per wastages claimed in the application, whichever is less.
-
vi. As per Policy Circular No. 23/2015-20 dated 15.05.2019, exporters may note that, after issue of AA under Para 4.07 of the Hand Book of Procedures, 2015-20 it is the responsibility of the applicants to send hard copy (and soft copy through email) of complete application and other related documents directly to the FTDO of the concerned Norms Committee in the o/o DGFT, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi-110001 for ratification of the norms. In case, the application details are not made available by the exporter to the concerned Norms Committee within two months, the Norms Committee may reject the case due to non-availability of application.
Meeting No. 13/81 of Norms Committee-II for the year 2020-21 (Originally scheduled for 30.12.2020) held on 08.01.2021 under the Chairmanship of Shri R. P. Goyal, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the following applications for ratification of norms in respect of advance authorizations under Duty Exemption Scheme (Chapter-4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20. The following members were present in the meeting:-
| <br>meeting:- | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sl. No. | **Name & Designation ** | Department |
| 1. | Shri S. K. Jain, D. O. | DPIIT |
| 2. | Shri . B. C. Nayak,D. O. | DHI |
| 3. | Shri K. S. Sodhi,AD(ME) | MSME |
| 4. | Shri Sushil Jangid,Scientist ‘B’ | MeitY |
| 5. | Shri Shaish Kumar, (TEC-1) | Consultant |
| 7. | Shri V.C. Agarwal, (TEC-3) | Consultant |
| 8. | Shri S. K. Bhatnagar, (SKB) | Consultant |
| 9. | Dr. Surendar Singh,Dy. Director | EEPC |
| In attendance | ||
| 1. | Shri Shobhit Gupta, Dy. DGFT | DGFT |
-
i. Draft Minutes of Meeting No. 11/81 scheduled for 24.11.2020 and held on 01.12.2020 were circulated among all the members of the Committee on 29.12.2020. On receipt of comments, the minutes were finalized and uploaded on DGFT’s website on 08.01.2020. Therefore, the minutes are unanimously approved.
-
ii. As decided in the last Meeting, the issue of referring cases to the Technical Consultants was discussed in the Meeting. Representative of DHI/DPIIT requested the Committee to forward the cases for the products falling under their administrative domain to them only. The matter was deliberated at length and it was informed that, earlier, before the appointment of Consultants, such cases were referred to the respective administrative ministries only. To cut down the delays in finalization of norms, Consultants were appointed by the DGFT. The Committee was also informed that to speed up the
1 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
disposal in NC-I & NC-II, DGFT has engaged three Consultants, who are retired as Industrial Advisor from DHI; Industrial Adviser from DPIIT and Deputy Industrial Advisor from MoS. In the past, these Consultants used to attend meetings of Norms Committee on behalf of their respective Ministries. Now these Consultants not only eased workload of administrative Ministries but also made valuable contribution in the form of experienced Technical advice. Representative of DHI/DPIIT agreed with the view and informed that these consultants are having vast experience in this field. It was also informed that many a time, Technical Authorities of the Administrative Ministries do not attend the meeting. In fact, the attendance has been lower particularly during COVID although the meetings were held online. Representatives of MoS and DoT are still not attending. The Committee requested the representatives of DHI/DPIIT to regularly participate in the meeting so that they can participate and contribute in the decisions on all the matters including recommendations given by any technical member before ratification. All the members are free to give their inputs if they feel that the recommendations given by a particular technical member needs a change. The Chairman advised the members not to make the issue a turf war as there is no reason to doubt the competency of the members. Main role of the Norms Committee is to make expeditious disposal. In view of above, it was decided that the Committee, in the interest of expeditious disposal of work of norms fixation, may take a decision to whom the cases should be referred. The Chairman advised to bring this to the notice of DG
iii. Representative of DHI also informed that the cases are sent to it in piecemeal manner through emails. He requested to forward the case alongwith complete set of application containing all annexures, queries raised and replies of the applicants every time. In this regard, it was informed that DGFT has launched an online module for management of Norms Committee. In future all the cases would be referred to the concerned Technical Authorities through the module only which would have complete information. The Chairman requested all the Technical Authorities to register themselves in the module.
Minutes of the cases discussed in the meeting are as under:
MEETING NUMBER: 13/81-ALC2/2020 MEETING DATE: 30.12.2020
| Case No.:317/14/81- | Party Name: VOLEX | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | INTERCONNECT (INDIA) | ALC2/2020 | Approved | ||||
| PVT. LTD. | 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0410160894 | |||||
| :01/81/050/01035/AM19/ | :04/24/040/00112/AM16/ | 10.08.2015 |
1
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to fix the norms as per written comments given by MeitY vide U. O. No.: W-21/29/2020-IPHW-MeitY dated 02.12.2020. (Copy enclosed)
RA concerned may take suitable consequential action accordingly.
| Case No.:323/14/81- | Party Name: TRAFOMEC INDIA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | PVT LTD | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710108750 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/01041/AM19/ | :07/24/040/00190/AM16/ | 21.09.2015 | Applicant |
2 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant has not yet furnished requisite information as asked during personal hearing in Meeting No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
The case stands deferred.
2 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:9/14/81-ALC2/2018 | Party Name: JSONS | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOUNDRY PVT LTD | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3110065856 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00727/AM19/ | :31/83/040/00141/AM16/ | 08.01.2016 | Applicant |
3 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (SKB) was sent to the applicant on 21.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:355/14/81- | Party Name: KRISAM | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | AUTOMATION PVT. LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710109343 | Action By: | |||||
| 4 | :01/81/050/01073/AM19/ | :07/24/040/00369/AM16/ | 03.02.2016 | Section | ||||
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer | the case to | |||||||
| MSME for examination & comments as per advice of representative of MeitY. | ||||||||
| The case stands deferred. |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination & comments as per advice of representative of MeitY.
| Case No.:11/14/81- | Party Name: GALLANTT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | METAL LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Withdrawn | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3710002634 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00729/AM19/ | :37/24/040/00009/AM16/ | 04.05.2016 |
5 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant vide email dated 04.01.2021 informed that EODC has been issued for the subject AA and requested to close the matter as no norms are required to be fixed. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case form the agenda.
Case is withdrawn.
| Case No.:12/14/81- | Party Name: GALLANTT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | METAL LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Withdrawn | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3710002636 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00730/AM19/ | :37/24/040/00011/AM16/ | 04.05.2016 |
6 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant vide email dated 04.01.2021 informed that EODC has been issued for the subject AA and requested to close the matter as no norms are required to be fixed. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case form the agenda.
Case is withdrawn.
| Case No.:13/14/81- | Party Name: GALLANTT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | ALC2/2018 | METAL LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Withdrawn | ||||
| 30.12.2020 |
3 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3710002637 :01/81/050/00731/AM19/ :37/24/040/00012/AM16/ 04.05.2016
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant vide email dated 04.01.2021 informed that EODC has been issued for the subject AA and requested to close the matter as no norms are required to be fixed. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case form the agenda.
Case is withdrawn.
| Case No.:14/14/81- | Party Name: GALLANTT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | METAL LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Withdrawn | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3710002638 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00732/AM19/ | :37/24/040/00013/AM16/ | 04.05.2016 |
8 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant vide email dated 04.01.2021 informed that EODC has been issued for the subject AA and requested to close the matter as no norms are required to be fixed. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case form the agenda.
Case is withdrawn.
| Case No.:15/14/81- | Party Name: GALLANTT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | METAL LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Withdrawn | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3710002639 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00733/AM19/ | :37/24/040/00014/AM16/ | 04.05.2016 |
9 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant vide email dated 04.01.2021 informed that EODC has been issued for the subject AA and requested to close the matter as no norms are required to be fixed. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case form the agenda.
Case is withdrawn.
| Case No.:17/14/81- | Party Name: GALLANTT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | METAL LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Withdrawn | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3710002642 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00735/AM19/ | :37/24/040/00008/AM16/ | 23.05.2016 |
10 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant vide email dated 04.01.2021 informed that EODC has been issued for the subject AA and requested to close the matter as no norms are required to be fixed. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case form the agenda.
Case is withdrawn.
| 11 | <br>Case No.:33/14/81-<br>ALC2/2018 | Party Name: DIANA<br>METALS | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00751/AM19/ | RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00136/AM17/ | Lic.No/Date:0410162477<br>08.11.2016 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant |
4 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):
-
Sl. No. 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 11(a) & 15 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
-
To clarify why the export items at Sl. No. 4 to 6 & import items at Sl. No. 2 to 4 are same.
| Case No.:347/14/81- | Party Name: TRAFOMEC | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | INDIA PVT LTD | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710110958 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/01065/AM19/ | :07/24/040/00329/AM17/ | 12.01.2017 | Applicant |
12 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 21.12.2020. However, the applicant via email dated 28.12.2020 has requested 3 weeks more time to furnish the requisite information. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the applicant.
| Case No.:55/14/81- | Party Name: ABB INDIA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710111752 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00773/AM19/ | :07/24/040/00081/AM18/ | 14.06.2017 |
13 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 24.08.2020 followed by reminders on 19.10.2020 & 21.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Bangalore.
| Case No.:67/14/81- | Party Name: KIRAN | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | UDYOG, | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0910065532 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00785/AM19/ | :09/24/040/00320/AM18/ | 05.10.2017 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and Consultant (TEC-1) informed that the applicant’s reply is deficient. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek again from the applicant to 14 furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
-
Manufacturing process in detail indicating wastage claimed for each of input.
-
Details of indigenous input with quantity, if any.
-
Exact chemical name of import item at Sl. No. 2 and 3 with catalogue.
-
Net content of silicone rubber and fiber glass in export.
| 15 | Case No.:183/14/81-<br>ALC2/2018 | Party Name: ABB INDIA<br>LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Status:<br>Rejected |
|---|
5 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| 30.12.2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710112554 | ||
| :01/81/050/00901/AM19/ | :07/24/040/00231/AM18/ | 19.12.2017 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 31.08.2020 followed by reminders on 19.10.2020 & 21.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Bangalore.
| Case No.:73/5/81-ALC2/2018 | Party Name: LM WIND | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWER BLADES [INDIA] | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PVT. LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3410043923 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00281/AM19/ | :34/24/040/00350/AM18/ | 27.02.2018 | TEC-1 |
16 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-1) for examination of the case on 04.11.2020 followed by a reminder on 21.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-1) for expediting the comments.
| Case No.:371/14/81- | Party Name: ADHESIVE | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | SPECIALITIES | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710113008 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/01089/AM19/ | :07/24/040/00351/AM18/ | 22.03.2018 | Applicant |
17 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (TEC-1) was sent to the applicant on 19.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 21.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:103/14/81- | Party Name: LM WIND | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | POWER BLADES INDIA | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| PVT. LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3410044165 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00821/AM19/ | :34/24/040/00065/AM19/ | 23.05.2018 | TEC-1 |
18 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-1) for examination of the case on 03.11.2020 & 04.11.2020 followed by a reminder on 21.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-1) for expediting the comments.
| 19 | <br>Case No.:92/14/81-<br>ALC2/2018 | Party Name: ABB INDIA<br>LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Rejected |
|---|
6 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113375 :01/81/050/00810/AM19/ :07/24/040/00050/AM19/ 01.06.2018
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the applicant on 01.09.2020 followed by reminders on 19.10.2020 & 21.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Bangalore.
| Case No.:108/14/81- | Party Name: LM WIND | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | POWER BLADES INDIA | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| PVT. LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3410044263 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00826/AM19/ | :34/24/040/00075/AM19/ | 19.06.2018 | TEC-1 |
20 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-1) for examination of the case on 03.11.2020 followed by a reminder on 21.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-1) for expediting the comments.
| Case No.:71/8/81-ALC2/2018 | Party Name: LM WIND | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWER BLADES INDIA | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PVT. LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3410044297 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00453/AM19/ | :34/24/040/00117/AM19/ | 02.07.2018 | TEC-1 |
21 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-1) for examination of the case on 03.11.2020 followed by a reminder on 21.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-1) for expediting the comments.
| Case No.:120/14/81- | Party Name: ACCIONA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | WINDPOWER INDIA | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710113621 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00838/AM19/ | :07/24/040/00099/AM19/ | 23.07.2018 | Applicant |
22 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-1) for examination of the case on 17.11.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-1) for expediting the comments.
| 23 | <br>Case No.:128/14/81-<br>ALC2/2018 | Party Name: KIRAN UDYOG | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00846/AM19/ | RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00234/AM19/ | Lic.No/Date:0910066574<br>17.08.2018 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant |
7 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and Consultant (TEC-1) informed that the applicant’s reply is deficient. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek again from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
-
Manufacturing process in detail indicating wastage claimed for each of input.
-
Details of indigenous input with quantity, if any.
-
Exact chemical name of import item at Sl. No. 2 and 3 with catalogue.
-
Net content of silicone rubber and fiber glass in export.
| Case No.:297/14/81- | Party Name: BOMAFA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2018 | SPECIAL VALVE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| SOLUTIONS PVT LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0810144141 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/01015/AM19/ | :08/24/040/00258/AM19/ | 20.12.2018 | Applicant |
24 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (TEC-3) was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, the applicant via email dated 29.12.2020 has requested one month more time to furnish the requisite information. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the applicant.
| 25 | Case No.:12/3/81-ALC2/2019 | Party Name: VIKARSH<br>STAMPINGS INDIA PVT.<br>LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00032/AM20/ | RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00007/AM20/ | Lic.No/Date:3110067393<br>24.04.2019 | <br>Action By:<br>Section | |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the<br>for examination & comments as per advice of representative of MeitY.<br>The case stands deferred. | case to DHI |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination & comments as per advice of representative of MeitY.
| Case No.:33/5/81-ALC2/2019 | Party Name: BLUEBIRD | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOLAR PRIVATE LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510410642 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00082/AM20/ | :05/23/040/00078/AM20/ | 21.05.2019 | TEC-3 |
26 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination of the case on 10.09.2020 followed by a reminder on 19.10.2020. However, Consultant (TEC-3) requested to send physical file along with the applicant’s reply. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the same to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination of the case.
| 27 | <br>Case No.:40/5/81-ALC2/2019 | Party Name: SHIVALIK<br>BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQFile | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510410694 | Action By: |
8 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
:01/81/050/00089/AM20/
:05/24/040/00095/AM20/
24.05.2019
TEC-3
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) vide email dated 08.11.2020. However, it was observed that the applicant has filed review in many cases against the lower wastages approved by the NC. Hence, the committee decided to refer the case back to Consultant (TEC-3) with an advice to examine the case to see the actual wastages during manufacturing process and give his recommendations accordingly.
| Case No.:41/5/81-ALC2/2019 | Party Name: SHIVALIK | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510410695 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00090/AM20/ | :05/24/040/00094/AM20/ | 24.05.2019 | TEC-3 |
28 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) vide email dated 08.11.2020. However, it was observed that the applicant has filed review in many cases against the lower wastages approved by the NC. Hence, the committee decided to refer the case back to Consultant (TEC-3) with an advice to examine the case to see the actual wastages during manufacturing process and give his recommendations accordingly.
| Case No.:7/16/81-ALC2/2019 | Party Name: SHIVALIK | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510412272 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00292/AM20/ | :05/24/040/00425/AM20/ | 25.10.2019 | TEC-3 |
29 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted the comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) vide email dated 08.11.2020. However, it was observed that the applicant has filed review in many cases against the lower wastages approved by the NC. Hence, the committee decided to refer the case back to Consultant (TEC-3) with an advice to examine the case to see the actual wastages during manufacturing process and give his recommendations accordingly.
| 30 | Case No.:5/19/81-ALC2/2019 | Party Name: RAJPUTANA<br>INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00344/AM20/ | RLA File<br>:13/24/040/00177/AM20/ | Lic.No/Date:1310049465<br>09.12.2019 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking<br>certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 19.10.2020 followed by<br>reminders on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided<br>to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.<br>The case stands deferred. |
| 31 | <br>Case No.:11/19/81-<br>ALC2/2019 | Party Name: SHERA<br>ENERGY PVT.LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Rejected |
|---|
9 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1310049469 :01/81/050/00350/AM20/ :13/24/040/00184/AM20/ 11.12.2019
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 03.09.2020 followed by reminders on 19.10.2020 & 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Jaipur.
| Case No.:8/22/81-ALC2/2019 | Party Name: H. H. METALS | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510413314 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00398/AM20/ | :05/23/040/00377/AM20/ | 13.01.2020 | Applicant |
32 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (SKB) was sent to the applicant on 20.10.2020 followed by reminders on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:14/22/81- | Party Name: DISHA AUTO | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2019 | COMPONENTS PVT.LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310834191 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00404/AM20/ | :03/94/040/00823/AM20/ | 15.01.2020 | TEC-3 |
33 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 21.12.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-3) for expediting the comments.
| Case No.:17/22/81- | Party Name: K G | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2019 | METALLOYS | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:1310049503 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00407/AM20/ | :13/24/040/00191/AM20/ | 17.01.2020 |
34 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 07.06.2020 followed by reminders on 04.09.2020, 20.10.2020 & 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Jaipur.
| 35 | <br>Case No.:20/22/81-<br>ALC2/2019 | Party Name: USHA<br>INDUSTRIAL<br>CORPORATION. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00410/AM20/ | RLA File<br>:08/24/040/00333/AM20/ | Lic.No/Date:0810147053<br>21.01.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant |
10 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (SKB) was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:1/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: GURUSHREE | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:6310001432 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00459/AM20/ | :63/24/040/00001/AM20/ | 18.02.2020 | Applicant |
36 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (SKB) was sent to the applicant on 20.10.2020 followed by reminders on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:3/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: PARAMJYOTI | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOVERS PVT. LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0610039446 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00461/AM20/ | :06/24/040/00091/AM20/ | 04.03.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to 37 furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
-
Total weight of export product.
-
Net weight of import item at Sl. No. 1 & 2 in export.
-
Details of indigenous input along with their weight.
| Case No.:7/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: KEI | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510413815 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00465/AM20/ | :05/23/040/00460/AM20/ | 06.03.2020 | Applicant |
38 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| 39 | <br>Case No.:5/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: MAK<br>CONTROLS AND<br>SYSTEMS PVT LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00463/AM20/ | RLA File<br>:32/24/040/00136/AM20/ | Lic.No/Date:3210079446<br>06.03.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant |
11 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (TEC-3) was sent to the applicant on 28.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the applicant.
| Case No.:10/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: LOTUS | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVIATION TECHNOLOGY | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510413864 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00468/AM20/ | :05/23/040/00475/AM20/ | 12.03.2020 | MeitY |
40 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MeitY for examination of the case on 28.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 23.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MeitY for expediting the comments.
| Case No.:11/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: PARAM | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310835385 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00469/AM20/ | :03/95/040/01157/AM20/ | 12.03.2020 | Applicant |
41 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:13/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: AUSA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDICAL DEVICES | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710116253 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00471/AM20/ | :07/24/040/00304/AM20/ | 13.03.2020 | Applicant |
42 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (TEC-3) was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| 43 | Case No.:15/1/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: SHIVALIK<br>BIMETAL CONTROLS<br>LTD | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00473/AM20/ | RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00759/AM20/ | Lic.No/Date:0510413875<br>13.03.2020 | ||
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the following ad-hoc<br>norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0510405455 dated 30.01.2018 in M. No. 03/81 dated |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the following ad-hoc norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0510405455 dated 30.01.2018 in M. No. 03/81 dated
12 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
15.05.2019 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as under :
| 15.05.2019 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | 15.05.2019 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | 15.05.2019 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | 15.05.2019 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sl.<br>No. | ITCHS<br>Code | Import Item | Recommended<br>Quantity | |
| 1 | 72269952 | Controlled Expansion Alloys: Cold Rolled Strips of Max.<br>Thickness 2.25 Mm, Minimum Thickness of 1.20 Mm And<br>Upto 80mm Width-He Alloy-Alloy-206 Alloys With 20%<br>Nickel,6% Manganese And Balance Ferrous | 1.03Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product | |
| 2 | 72269952 | Controlled Expansion Alloys: Cold Rolled Strips of Max,<br>Thickness 2.25 Mm, Minimum Thickness of 1.20mm And<br>Upto 80mm Width- He Alloy-Alloy-223 Alloy With 22%<br>Nickel, 3% Chrome&Balance Ferrous | 1.03Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product | |
| 3 | 72269952 | Controllers Expansion Alloys: Cold Rolled Strips of Max.<br>Thickness 2.25 Mm, Minimum Thickness of 1.20 And<br>Upto 80mm Width-Le Alloys-Alloy-36,Alloy With 36%<br>Nickel&Balance Iron | 1.03Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product | |
| 4 | 75061000 | Cold Rolled Strips of Max. Thickness 2.00mm And<br>Minimum Thickness of 1.20mm And Upto 80mm Width-<br>NickelNickel InStrips | 1.03Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| 5 | 74091100 | Cold Rolled Strips of Max. Thickness 2.00 Mm,<br>And Minimum Thickness of 1.20mm And Upto 80mm<br>Width-Copper Copper In Strips, (Minimum Purity 99.90%) | 1.03Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| Note:<br>1. Grade & composition of alloy to match in import & export items.<br>2. Thickness of import items to match thickness of layer of export items<br>RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. |
Note:
1. Grade & composition of alloy to match in import & export items.
2. Thickness of import items to match thickness of layer of export items
| Case No.:18/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: KEI | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510413882 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00476/AM20/ | :05/23/040/00477/AM20/ | 16.03.2020 | Applicant |
44 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 24.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| 45 | Case No.:20/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: SIECHEM<br>TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE<br>LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00478/AM20/ | RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00197/AM20/ | Lic.No/Date:0410166620<br>16.03.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>TEC-3 | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply<br>was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 05.01.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments<br>have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.<br>The case stands deferred. |
13 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:22/1/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: UPR | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENGINEERING PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310835465 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00480/AM20/ | :03/95/040/01185/AM20/ | 17.03.2020 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that as per Policy Circular 46 No. 23/2015-20 dated 15.05.2019 , the applicant was liable to forward the copy of application along with supporting documents to the concerned NC within two months of making the application. However, the same has not been received despite email dated 30.03.2020 followed by reminders on 04.09.2020, 20.10.2020 & 24.12.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Mumbai.
| Case No.:3/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: APAR | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836192 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00528/AM21/ | :03/94/040/00053/AM21/ | 14.05.2020 | TEC-3 |
47 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 21.12.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-3) for expediting the comments.
| Case No.:7/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: C L GUPTA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPORTS LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510414181 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00532/AM21/ | :05/23/040/00016/AM21/ | 15.05.2020 | Applicant |
48 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 20.10.2020 followed by reminders on 24.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:8/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: C L GUPTA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPORTS LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510414182 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00533/AM21/ | :05/23/040/00014/AM21/ | 15.05.2020 | Applicant |
49 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 20.10.2020 followed by reminders on 24.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
14 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| 50 | Case No.:6/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: PARAS<br>LAMINATES PVT LTD | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00531/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00047/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0510414178<br>15.05.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>TEC-1 | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply<br>was sent to Consultant (TEC-1) on 05.01.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments<br>have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.<br>The case stands deferred. |
| Case No.:4/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: R R KABEL | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836210 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00529/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00061/AM21/ | 15.05.2020 | Applicant |
51 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
- Exact chemical name & specification and catalogue of import item No. 3, 4 & 5.
| Case No.:11/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: R R KABEL | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836231 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00536/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00059/AM21/ | 15.05.2020 | Applicant |
52 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 09.11.2020 & 16.11.2020 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2020 informed that the copy of application is incomplete & illegible. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask again from the applicant to furnish a legible & complete set of application for examination of the case.
| Case No.:12/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: R.R.KABEL | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836232 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00537/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00050/AM21/ | 15.05.2020 | Applicant |
53 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
-
Exact name of polymer and catalyst in import item at Sl. No. 3 & 4.
-
Exact function of catalyst in export.
15 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:16/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: MONTEX | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASS FIBRE IND PVT | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836249 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00541/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00083/AM21/ | 18.05.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/304/201954 TSW dated 03.11.2020:
-
Quantity of export item in Square Meter also in addition to its weight.
-
Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 (Aluminium Foil) in Square Meter also in addition to its weight.
-
SL. No. 5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
| Case No.:14/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: VIRGO | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMINATES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510414200 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00539/AM21/ | :05/24/040/00050/AM21/ | 18.05.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and Consultant (TEC-1) informed that 55 the applicant’s reply is deficient. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek again from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
-
Exact name of import items at Sl. No 2 to 4 with catalogue.
-
Sl. No. 2, 4 & 5 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
| Case No.:17/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: DESHMUKH | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD PRIVATE LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836251 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00542/AM21/ | :03/94/040/00073/AM21/ | 19.05.2020 | TEC-3 |
56 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination of the case on 10.09.2020 followed by a reminder on 21.10.2020. However, Consultant (TEC-3) requested physical file to examine the case was. Hence, the Committee directed the section to do the needful.
| 57 | Case No.:18/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: RAJHANS<br>IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00543/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:24/24/040/00010/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:2410043111<br>19.05.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant | |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking<br>certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 29.12.2020. However, no reply<br>has been receivedyet. Hence,the Committee decided to wait for the replyof the applicant. |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 29.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the reply of the applicant.
16 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:21/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: K G | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METALLOYS | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510414203 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00546/AM21/ | :05/23/040/00024/AM21/ | 20.05.2020 | Applicant |
58 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (SKB) was sent to the applicant on 21.10.2020 followed by reminders on 24.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:26/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: C L GUPTA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPORTS LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510414256 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00551/AM21/ | :05/23/040/00032/AM21/ | 27.05.2020 | Applicant |
59 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 21.10.2020 followed by reminders on 24.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:25/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: TRANSCON | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||||
| 30.12.2020 | |||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0910068803 | Action By: | ||||
| :01/81/050/00550/AM21/ | :09/24/040/00111/AM21/ | 27.05.2020 | Section |
- 60
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case has been received in DGFT’s Back Office Portal for examination. Therefore, the Committee directed the Section to forward the case to the concern Technical Authorities for examination & comments.
| 61 | Case No.:30/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: GOLDI SOLAR<br>PRIVATE LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00555/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:52/21/040/00017/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:5210043404<br>28.05.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>TEC-3 | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply<br>was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 04.01.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments<br>have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.<br>The case stands deferred. |
17 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:33/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: LM WIND | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWER BLADES INDIA | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | ||||
| PVT. LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3410046106 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00558/AM21/ | :34/24/040/00048/AM21/ | 29.05.2020 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that as per Policy Circular 62 No. 23/2015-20 dated 15.05.2019 , the applicant was liable to forward the copy of application along with supporting documents to the concerned NC within two months of making the application. However, the same has not been received despite email dated 06.07.2020 followed by reminders on 04.09.2020, 21.10.2020 & 23.12.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Vadodara.
| Case No.:35/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: UPR | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENGINEERING PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836456 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00560/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00117/AM21/ | 01.06.2020 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that as per Policy Circular 63 No. 23/2015-20 dated 15.05.2019 , the applicant was liable to forward the copy of application along with supporting documents to the concerned NC within two months of making the application. However, the same has not been received despite email dated 06.07.2020 followed by reminders on 04.09.2020, 21.10.2020 & 23.12.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Mumbai.
| Case No.:39/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINOMECHANIC | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0410166794 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00564/AM21/ | :04/24/040/00026/AM21/ | 02.06.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
-
Net weight of total export product.
-
Exact description, generic name of import item along with catalogue.
64
-
Revised list of import with quantity indicating generic name along with specific name as indicated in licence.
-
Exact nature of import items namely raw material, components & consumables.
-
Percentage wastage claimed on net content basis for each of raw material and justification for the same.
-
List of consumables along with value.
-
Details of indigenous inputs with their quantity.
-
Percentage of non-volatile matter in various paints, hardner, resin and adhesive.
-
Sl. No. 5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
18 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| 65 | Case No.:44/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: RAYZON<br>GREEN ENERGIES | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00569/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:52/24/040/00011/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:5210043415<br>03.06.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>TEC-3 | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply<br>was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 06.01.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments<br>have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.<br>The case stands deferred. |
| 66 | Case No.:45/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: RAYZON<br>GREEN ENERGIES | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00570/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:52/24/040/00077/AM20/ | Lic.No/Date:5210043417<br>03.06.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>TEC-3 | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the applicant’s reply<br>was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 06.01.2021 for examination of the case. However, no comments<br>have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.<br>The case stands deferred. |
| Case No.:40/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: VON ROLL | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710116545 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00565/AM21/ | :07/24/040/00056/AM21/ | 03.06.2020 | Applicant |
67 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a legible copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent to the applicant on 05.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for a legible copy of application to examine the case.
| 68 | Case No.:47/4/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: ICON<br>POWER SOLUTIONS<br>PRIVATE LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00572/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00041/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0510414336<br>05.06.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant/MeitY | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that MeitY has directly sent a<br>deficiency letter on 11.12.2020 to the applicant. However, no reply/comments have been received yet.<br>Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant/MeitY for furnishing the reply/comments.<br>The case stands deferred. |
| 69 | <br>Case No.:46/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: R R KABEL<br>LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQFile | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836526 | Action By: |
19 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
:01/81/050/00571/AM21/ :03/95/040/00875/AM20/ 05.06.2020
Applicant
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (TEC-3) was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:50/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: NAGREEKA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDCON PRODUCTS (P) | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LTD. | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310836580 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00575/AM21/ | :03/95/040/01148/AM20/ | 08.06.2020 | Applicant |
- 70 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 21.10.2020 followed by reminders on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:49/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: RAJ METAL | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0210209908 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00574/AM21/ | :02/24/040/00018/AM21/ | 08.06.2020 | Applicant |
71 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:52/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: RATNAVEER | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METALS LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3410046133 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00577/AM21/ | :34/24/040/00055/AM21/ | 09.06.2020 | Applicant |
72 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (TEC-3) was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| 73 | <br>Case No.:53/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: R R KABEL<br>LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00578/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00099/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0310836620<br>10.06.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant |
20 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-1):
- Exact name & specification and Catalogue of import item at Sl. No. 2.
| Case No.:54/4/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINOMECHANIC | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0410166814 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00579/AM21/ | :04/24/040/00037/AM21/ | 10.06.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):
74
-
Generic name of import items wherever not given.
-
Specific use of each item of import in export product.
-
Part No. of components wherever not given.
-
To provide clarification for, why 18 import items are shown for export product at Sl. No. 1 and 17 for export product at Sl. No. 2 in application, but in Appendix 4E, 2 items in each export product are shown as indigenous.
-
Sl. No. 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
| Case No.:2/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELECTROLEAD PUNE | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3110067796 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00658/AM21/ | :31/83/040/00029/AM21/ | 28.07.2020 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that as per Policy Circular 75 No. 23/2015-20 dated 15.05.2019 , the applicant was liable to forward the copy of application along with supporting documents to the concerned NC within two months of making the application. However, the same has not been received despite email dated 04.09.2020 followed by reminders on 21.10.2020 & 23.12.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Pune.
| Case No.:3/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELECTROLEAD PUNE | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3110067797 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00659/AM21/ | :31/83/040/00028/AM21/ | 28.07.2020 |
76 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that as per Policy Circular No. 23/2015-20 dated 15.05.2019 , the applicant was liable to forward the copy of application along with supporting documents to the concerned NC within two months of making the application. However, the same has not been received despite email dated 04.09.2020 followed by reminders on 21.10.2020 & 23.12.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Pune.
21 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:1/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: KEI | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510414751 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00657/AM21/ | :05/23/040/00088/AM21/ | 28.07.2020 | Applicant |
77 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:4/7/81- | Party Name: AB | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: Approved | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | CASTINGS | ALC2/2020 | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:5010002699 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00660/AM21/ | :50/24/040/00007/AM21/ | 29.07.2020 |
| Case No.:4/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: AB<br>CASTINGS | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status: Approved | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00660/AM21/ | <br>RLA File<br>:50/24/040/00007/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:5010002699<br>29.07.2020 | ||
| 78 | <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as<br>per written comments dated 06.01.2021 given by Consultant (SKB) as under:<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>QuantityITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>73259920<br>High<br>Speed<br>Alloy<br>Steel<br>Castings<br>of<br>Grade (M2)<br>45000<br>Kgs<br>72042900<br>High Speed (M2<br>Grade) Alloy Steel<br>Scrap<br>1.06 Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product<br>Note:<br>1. The description of export item may be amended as “High Speed Alloy Steel Castings of<br>Grade (M2)”.<br>2. The description of import item may be amended as “High Speed (M2 Grade) Alloy Steel<br>Scrap”.<br>RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. |
| 79 | Case No.:13/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: ASEEM<br>TECHNOLOGIES (P) LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00669/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:56/24/040/00013/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:5610005913<br>30.07.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Section | |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to<br>MSME for examination & comments as per advice of the representative of MeitY.<br>The case stands deferred. |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination & comments as per advice of the representative of MeitY.
| 80 | <br>Case No.:7/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: MUNDRA<br>SOLAR PV LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQFile | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0810148262 | Action By: |
22 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
:01/81/050/00663/AM21/ :08/24/040/00119/AM21/ 30.07.2020
TEC-3
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.10.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-3) for expediting the comments.
| Case No.:6/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: VOESTALPINE | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAE VKN INDIA PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510414780 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00662/AM21/ | :05/24/040/00208/AM21/ | 30.07.2020 | Applicant |
- 81 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (SKB) was sent to the applicant on 22.10.2020 followed by reminders on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:8/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINOMECHANIC | ALC2/2020 | Approved | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0410166928 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00664/AM21/ | :04/24/040/00052/AM21/ | 30.07.2020 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2020 as under:
-
The words “ 46.28 Kg/Unit ” may be added in the description of the export items at Sl. No. 1 & 5.
-
The words “ 73.67 Kg/Unit ” may be added in the description of the export items at Sl. No. 2 & 3.
-
The words “ 29.67 Kg/Unit ” may be added in the description of the export items at Sl. No. 4.
-
Quantity of import items may be allowed as per GN-4 .
| Case No.:9/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINOMECHANIC | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0410166929 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00665/AM21/ | :04/24/040/00053/AM21/ | 30.07.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to 83 furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):
-
Generic name of import items wherever not given.
-
Specific use of each item of import in export product.
-
Part No. of components wherever not given.
-
Sl. No. 9 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
-
Copy of Advance Authorization.
23 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:12/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: R T JAIN AND | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMPANY | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310837519 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00668/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00261/AM21/ | 31.07.2020 | Applicant |
84 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (SKB) was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| Case No.:17/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: TOSHIBA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANSMISSION & | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0910069014 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00673/AM21/ | :09/24/040/00233/AM21/ | 03.08.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to 85 furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):
-
Sl. No. 4, 5 & 9 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
-
Justification for use of Al Sheet as conductor in place of rod.
-
Break-up of export product 13 in Al wound & Cu wound transformers & their inputs.
-
Copy of Advance Authorization.
| Case No.:18/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: TOSHIBA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANSMISSION & | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0910069015 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00674/AM21/ | :09/24/040/00232/AM21/ | 03.08.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to 86 furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):
-
Sl. No. 4, 5 & 9 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
-
Use of import items at Sl. No. 4, 5 & 11 in export product.
-
Copy of Advance Authorization.
| 87 | Case No.:15/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: SHIVALIK<br>BIMETAL CONTROLS<br>LTD | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00671/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00215/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0510414832<br>07.08.2020 | ||
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the following ad-hoc<br>norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0510403709 dated 17.08.2017 in M. No. 06/81 dated |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the following ad-hoc norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0510403709 dated 17.08.2017 in M. No. 06/81 dated
24 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
01.11.2018 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as under :
| 01.11.2018 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | 01.11.2018 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | 01.11.2018 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | 01.11.2018 as per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2021 as<br>under**:** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sl.<br>No. | ITCHS<br>Code | Import Item | Recommended<br>Quantity | |
| 1 | 74091100 | Copper strips / Plated Copper Strips , Grade : C10200/ C151<br>Thickness : 0.20mm to 3.00mm Width: upto 200mm | 1.01Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| 2 | 74099000 | Copper Alloy resistance strips/wire, Grade: F-12/ F-10/ F-14<br>/Alloy 38/Alloy 47 or Nickel Chromium Alloy resistance<br>Strips/wire, Grade: NikrothalNLX ITC-75062000) | 1.01Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| 3 | 74091100 | Copper strips / Plated Copper Strips , Grade : C10200/ C151<br>Thickness : 0.20mm to 3.00mm Width: upto 200mm | 1.01Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| 4 | 74099000 | Copper Alloy resistance strips/wire, Grade: F-12/ F-10/F-14/<br>Alloy 38/Alloy 47 or Nickel Chromium Alloy resistance Strips<br>/wire, Grade: NikrothalNLX ITC-75062000) | 1.01Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| 5 | 74091100 | Copper strips / Plated Copper Strips , Grade : C10200/ C151<br>Thickness : 0.20mm to 3.00mm Width: upto 200mm | 1.01Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| 6 | 74099000 | Copper Alloy resistance strips/wire, Grade: F-12/ F-10/F-14/<br>Alloy 38/Alloy 47 or Nickel Chromium Alloy resistance<br>Strips/ wire, Grade: NikrothalNLX ITC-75062000) | 1.01Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>exportproduct | |
| Note: Grade & composition of alloy to match in import & export items.<br>RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. |
Note: Grade & composition of alloy to match in import & export items.
| Case No.:20/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: BHARAT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEAVY ELECTRICALS | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:1110028728 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00676/AM21/ | :11/24/040/00002/AM21/ | 10.08.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3): 88
-
Sl. No. 1 & 15 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
-
Sl. No. 11 & 11(a) of the Standard Deficiency Format for import item at Sl. No. 1 for rotor of motor.
-
Width of import item at Sl. No. 1.
-
Copy of Advance Authorization.
| 89 | Case No.:19/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: DIAMOND<br>ENGINEERING (CHENNAI)<br>PVT LTD | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00675/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00055/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0410166948<br>10.08.2020 | ||
| Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to fix the norms as per<br>written comments given byDPIITvide U. O. No.: P-47011/119/2019-TSW dated 06.01.2021. (copy<br>enclosed) |
25 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:23/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: AMPCO | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METAL INDIA PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Rejected | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3110067815 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00679/AM21/ | :31/83/040/00039/AM21/ | 11.08.2020 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that as per Policy Circular 90 No. 23/2015-20 dated 15.05.2019 , the applicant was liable to forward the copy of application along with supporting documents to the concerned NC within two months of making the application. However, the same has not been received despite email dated 04.09.2020 followed by reminders on 22.10.2020 & 23.12.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Pune.
| Case No.:22/7/81- | Party Name: NAVITAS | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | GREEN SOLUTIONS PVT. | ALC2/2020 | Approved | |||
| LTD. | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:5210043486 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00678/AM21/ | :52/21/040/00063/AM21/ | 11.08.2020 |
| Case No.:22/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Case No.:22/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Case No.:22/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: NAVITAS<br>GREEN SOLUTIONS PVT.<br>LTD. | Party Name: NAVITAS<br>GREEN SOLUTIONS PVT.<br>LTD. | Party Name: NAVITAS<br>GREEN SOLUTIONS PVT.<br>LTD. | Party Name: NAVITAS<br>GREEN SOLUTIONS PVT.<br>LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Approved | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00678/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:52/21/040/00063/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:5210043486<br>11.08.2020 | |||||||
| 91 | <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as<br>per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email dated 27.12.2020 as under:<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export<br>Item<br>Quantity Sl.<br>No.<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Quantity<br>85414012<br>Solar<br>PV<br>Module<br>325 WP<br>1595<br>Number<br>1<br>85414011Poly Solar Cells 5BB<br>157MM x157MM A<br>As per GN-4<br>2<br>70071900<br>Solar Tempered ARC<br>Glass 3.2 mm-1955X985<br>mm(3072 SQM)<br>As per GN-4<br>Note:<br>1. Export item shall contain 72 imported cells per module.<br>2. Imported cells will be same as used in export item.<br>RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. | ||||||||
| <br>ITCHS<br>Code | Export<br>Item | Quantity | Sl.<br>No. | ITCHS<br>Code | Import Item | ||||
| 85414012 | Solar<br>PV<br>Module<br>325 WP | 1595<br>Number | 1 | 85414011 | Poly Solar Cells 5BB<br>157MM x157MM A | ||||
| 2 | 70071900 | Solar Tempered ARC<br>Glass 3.2 mm-1955X985<br>mm(3072 SQM) | |||||||
| Note:<br>1. Export item shall contain 72 imported cells per module.<br>2. Imported cells will be same as used in export item.<br>RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. |
| Case No.:31/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: AUSA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDICAL DEVICES | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| PRIVATE LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710116878 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00687/AM21/ | :07/24/040/00136/AM21/ | 13.08.2020 | Applicant |
92 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):
- Sl. No. 2, 3, 5, 11 & 15 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
26 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:32/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: LASER POWER | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| & INFRA PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0210210037 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00688/AM21/ | :02/24/040/00057/AM21/ | 13.08.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/131/201993 TSW dated 27.11.2020:
-
Detailed calculations for the requirements of each raw material, export product-wise supported by cross sectional diagram of the cable/buyers data sheet.
-
Material balancing viz. net content of each imported and indigenous inputs, export product wise, per KM of export product.
-
Total requirement of each raw material, export product wise, in a tabular form.
| Case No.:35/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: KALPATARU | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWER TRANSMISSION | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LTD. | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0810148343 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00691/AM21/ | :08/24/040/00128/AM21/ | 17.08.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to 94 furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):
-
Sl. No. 5 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format.
-
Galvanizing is shown as process but requirement of Zn is not shown in indigenous inputs. 3. Copy of export order.
| Case No.:36/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: JAIN | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECYCLING PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:3210079645 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00692/AM21/ | :32/24/040/00036/AM21/ | 18.08.2020 | Applicant |
95 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the applicant on 22.10.2020 followed by reminders on 22.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant for furnishing the requisite information.
| 96 | Case No.:37/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: PRIYANKA<br>INDIA PVT.LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00693/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00238/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0510414929<br>18.08.2020 | ||
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms on<br>the basis of study groupreport dated 21.02.2020,as adopted bythe Committee in the MeetingNo. |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms on the basis of study group report dated 21.02.2020, as adopted by the Committee in the Meeting No.
27 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
24/81 dated 18.03.2020, as under:
| ITCHS<br>Code | Export Item | Quantity | ITCHS<br>Code | Import Item | Recommended<br>Quantity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 73239390 | Table, Kitchen & other<br>household articles<br>made From Magnetic<br>Stainless Steel Circle<br>GRADE 430 | 150000<br>Kgs | 72199090 | Magnetic<br>Stainless Steel<br>Circle GRADE<br>430 | 1.10 Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product |
Note:
1. Grade of steel to match in import & export.
2. Thickness of sheet/circle should be between 0.1 mm to 1 mm.
3. Export product should be of circular/oval shape only.
| 97 | Case No.:38/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Case No.:38/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Case No.:38/7/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: SIECHEM<br>TECHNOLOGIES<br>PRIVATE LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00694/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00074/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0410166964<br>18.08.2020 | |||||
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as<br>per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) vide email dated 27.12.2020 as under: | |||||||
| Sl.<br>No. | ITCHS<br>Code | Import Item | Recommended Quantity | ||||
| 1 | 74081190 | 8mm Continuous Cast Copper Rod | 1.01 Kg/Kg content in the export<br>product | ||||
| RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as 97 per written comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) vide email dated 27.12.2020 as under:
| Case No.:39/7/81- | Party Name: POLYCAB | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | INDIA LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Withdrawn | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | |||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310837758 | |||||
| :01/81/050/00695/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00289/AM21/ | 19.08.2020 |
98
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case is already approved in Meeting No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020. Therefore, the committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda.
Case is withdrawn.
| 99 | Case No.:43/7/81-ALC2/2020 | Party Name: MUNDRA<br>SOLAR PV LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00699/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:08/24/040/00139/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0810148374<br>20.08.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant | |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to<br>furnish following information as per comments given by Consultant (TEC-3):<br>1. Calculation of requirement of each input withjustification. |
28 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
- Use of each raw material.
| Case No.:1/10/81- | Party Name: NICO | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | EXTRUSIONS LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310838703 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00781/AM21/ | :03/95/040/01229/AM20/ | 05.10.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of 100 application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 28.10.2020. However, the applicant via email dated 28.10.2020 has informed that they have made some calculation error in the application and hence, applied for amendment with revised figures to RA, Mumbai. Once it is done, they will send the complete set of corrected copy of application to examine the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application.
| Case No.:4/10/81- | Party Name: AXORA | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | RESOURCES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0210210142 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00784/AM21/ | :02/24/040/00089/AM21/ | 06.10.2020 | Applicant |
101 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per comments given by MSME:
- Percentage of lead in export (lead alloy) and import supported by Certificate of Analysis.
| Case No.:2/10/81- | Party Name: HINDALCO | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0210210143 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00782/AM21/ | :02/24/040/00086/AM21/ | 06.10.2020 | Applicant |
102 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 28.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 05.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| 103 | Case No.:3/10/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: PRECISION<br>METALS | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00783/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00411/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0310838730<br>06.10.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant | |
| **Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant<br>to furnish followinginformation asper commentsgiven byConsultant(SKB): |
29 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
-
Why the description of item of export and import is same? What is the difference between the two?
-
Chemical analysis report of imported Alloy Steel Bars.
-
Separate Quantity of each diameter of imported Alloy Steel Bars, which are to be exported after processing.
-
Surface finish of Alloy Steel bars to be imported and exported.
-
Coloured Photographs of Alloy Steel Bars to be imported and exported.
-
Detail Technical note on manufacturing process including the relevant flow sheet.
-
Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of export item to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastage claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification supported by documentary evidence.
| Case No.:5/10/81- | Party Name: TRASCCON | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | INTERCONNECTION | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| SYSTEMS PRIVATE | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| LIMITED | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710117109 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00785/AM21/ | :07/24/040/00180/AM21/ | 07.10.2020 | Applicant |
104 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 28.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 22.12.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the applicant for submitting the complete set of application.
| Case No.:9/10/81- | Party Name: DYNAMIC | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | CABLES PVT. LTD. | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:1310049701 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00789/AM21/ | :13/24/040/00037/AM21/ | 08.10.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011/93/2019-TSW dated 30.12.2020:
105
-
Detailed calculations for the requirements of each raw material, export product-wise supported by cross sectional diagram of the cable/buyers data sheet.
-
Details of other materials, indigenous or imported, required in the manufacturing of the cables.
-
Net weight per KM of each cable including the weight of indigenous inputs.
-
Material balancing viz. net content of each imported and indigenous inputs per KM of export product.
-
Wastage claimed on each import item, if any.
| 106 | <br>Case No.:8/10/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: HI TECH<br>STAINLESS WORLD | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|
30 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310838793 Action By: :01/81/050/00788/AM21/ :03/94/040/00499/AM21/ 08.10.2020 Applicant
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 28.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 22.12.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the applicant for submitting the complete set of application.
| Case No.:6/10/81- | Party Name: UKB | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | ELECTRONICS PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510415441 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00786/AM21/ | :05/24/040/00337/AM21/ | 08.10.2020 | Applicant |
107 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 29.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 22.12.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the applicant for submitting the complete set of application.
| Case No.:10/10/81- | Party Name: SCHNEIDER | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | ELECTRIC INDIA PVT | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0710117132 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00790/AM21/ | :07/24/040/00196/AM21/ | 14.10.2020 | Applicant |
108 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 29.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 22.12.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the applicant for submitting the complete set of application.
| 109 | Case No.:13/10/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: TOSHIBA<br>TRANSMISSION &<br>DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00793/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00395/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0910069333<br>15.10.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>TEC-3 | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application<br>was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on 05.11.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments<br>have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind Consultant (TEC-3) for<br>examination & comments.<br>The case stands deferred. |
| 110 | Case No.:11/10/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: WAAREE<br>ENERGIES LTD. | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|
31 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:5210043564 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00791/AM21/ | :52/24/040/00055/AM21/ | 15.10.2020 | Applicant |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 29.10.2020 followed by a reminder on 22.12.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the applicant for submitting the complete set of application.
| Case No.:14/10/81- | Party Name: HONYLITE | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | PRIVATE LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Approved | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510415519 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00794/AM21/ | :05/23/040/00234/AM21/ | 16.10.2020 |
111
| 111 | Case No.:14/10/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Case No.:14/10/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: HONYLITE<br>PRIVATE LIMITED | Party Name: HONYLITE<br>PRIVATE LIMITED | Party Name: HONYLITE<br>PRIVATE LIMITED | Party Name: HONYLITE<br>PRIVATE LIMITED | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00794/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00234/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:0510415519<br>16.10.2020 | |||||||
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as<br>per written comments given by MSME via email dated 06.01.2021 as under: | |||||||||
| <br>ITCHS<br>Code | Export Item | Quantity | ITCHS<br>Code | Import Item | Recommended<br>Quantity | ||||
| 73083000 | Stainless Steel<br>Honeycomb<br>Module | 5200<br>Kgs | 73262090 | Honeycomb Core<br>Conforming To<br>304/304L/ Or 316/316L | As per GN-4 | ||||
| Note: The applicant should import relevant items only.<br>RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. |
| Case No.:8/13/81- | Party Name: PRUDENT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | STAINLESS PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:5210043600 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00869/AM21/ | :52/24/040/00068/AM21/ | 17.11.2020 | Applicant |
112 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| 113 | Case No.:6/13/81-<br>ALC2/2020 | Party Name: VIPRA IMPEX | Meet No/Date:13/81-<br>ALC2/2020<br>30.12.2020 | Status:<br>Deferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <br>HQ File<br>:01/81/050/00867/AM21/ | RLA File<br>:52/24/040/00062/AM21/ | Lic.No/Date:5210043602<br>17.11.2020 | <br>Action By:<br>Applicant | |
| <br>**Decision:**The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of<br>application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on<br>04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait<br>for the complete set of application for examination of the case. |
32 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:7/13/81- | Party Name: VIPRA IMPEX | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | ||||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:5210043603 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00868/AM21/ | :52/24/040/00063/AM21/ | 17.11.2020 | Applicant |
114 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| Case No.:5/13/81- | Party Name: KEI | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0510415943 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00866/AM21/ | :05/23/040/00292/AM21/ | 19.11.2020 | Applicant |
115 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| Case No.:9/13/81- | Party Name: PRUDENT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | STAINLESS PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:5210043604 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00870/AM21/ | :52/24/040/00069/AM21/ | 19.11.2020 | Applicant |
116 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| Case No.:1/13/81- | Party Name: HINDALCO | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0210210240 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00862/AM21/ | :02/24/040/00112/AM21/ | 20.11.2020 | Applicant |
117 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
33 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Case No.:3/13/81- | Party Name: DIAMOND | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | ENGINEERING (CHENNAI) | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| PVT LTD | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0410167329 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00864/AM21/ | :04/24/040/00136/AM21/ | 23.11.2020 | Applicant |
118 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| Case No.:4/13/81- | Party Name: JAIN METAL | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | ROLLING MILLS | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| 30.12.2020 | ||||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0410167328 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00865/AM21/ | :04/24/040/00145/AM21/ | 23.11.2020 | Applicant |
119 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| Case No.:10/13/81- | Party Name: ADVENT | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | METAL PROFILE PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Deferred | |||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:5610005995 | Action By: | |||
| :01/81/050/00871/AM21/ | :56/24/040/00036/AM21/ | 25.11.2020 | Applicant |
120 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application has not yet been received from the applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on 04.01.2021. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.
| Case No.:2/13/81- | Party Name: METAL | Meet No/Date:13/81- | Status: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALC2/2020 | CARE ALLOYS PRIVATE | ALC2/2020 | Approved | |||
| LIMITED | 30.12.2020 | |||||
| HQ File | RLA File | Lic.No/Date:0310839723 | ||||
| :01/81/050/00863/AM21/ | :03/95/040/00548/AM21/ | 25.11.2020 |
Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to fix the ad-hoc norms as 12 per written comments dated 06.01.2021 given by Consultant (SKB) and as discussed in the meeting 1 as under:
| <br>as under: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITCHS | Export | Quantity | ITCHS | Import Item | Recommended Quantity |
| Code | Item | Code | |||
| 74031300 | Copper<br>Billets/<br>Ingots | 100000<br>Kgs | 74040012 | Copper Wire Scrap<br>As Per ISRI Code<br>DruidCable | 1.03Kgs/Kg of copper<br>content in the<br>export/importproduct |
34 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Note:
1. The export item should be of minimum 99.00% purity.
2. The import item should contain 40-50% Copper.
35 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Minutes of Offline Cases
| SI.<br>No. | Applicant’s<br>Name / AA<br>No. | HQ/RA File<br>No. | Case History | Decision | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (E-24954)<br>ALSTOM<br>PROJECTS<br>INDIA<br>LIMITED<br>0310683926<br>dated<br>29.02.2012 | 01/81/050/00<br>515/AM12<br>03/94/040/01<br>033/AM12 | The Case was rejected in M. No. 18 dt.<br>04.12.2012 due to non-submission of reply. The<br>applicants vide letter dated 09.02.2016 furnished<br>reply with a requested to fix the ad-hoc norms.<br>The applicant had also furnished reply dated<br>21.02.2019 to DHI of deficiency letter dated<br>23.10.2017 which was forwarded to DHI on<br>31.05.2019. DHI was reminded on 14.08.2019 &<br>03.10.2019 to expedite the comments. As per NC<br>decision of M. No. 13/81 dt. 03.10.2019, a letter<br>was sent to the applicant on 28.10.2019 followed<br>by reminder dated 23.12.2019 requesting to<br>submit the complete set of application. The<br>applicant submitted the copy of application vide<br>email dated 04.06.2020 which was referred to DHI<br>on the same day. As per decision of M. No. 04/81<br>dt. 09.07.2020, D/L was sent to the applicant on<br>27.08.2020. The case was considered in M. No.<br>07/81 dated 08.09.2020. As per NC decision,<br>reminder was sent to the applicant on 22.10.2020.<br>The applicant’s reply was sent to DHI on<br>16.11.2020.<br>The case was last considered in M. No.<br>10/81dated 10.11.2020 and decided to wait for the<br>comments. A reminder was issued to DHI on<br>21.12.2020. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee noted that<br>DHI<br>via<br>email<br>dated<br>29.12.2020 informed that the<br>applicant’s reply is deficient.<br>Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee<br>decided to seek again from<br>the applicant to furnish the<br>following information: | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>Deferred | |
| <br> <br>1. Complete<br>application | |||||
| <br>along with ANF-4A with | |||||
| <br> <br>all relevant enclosures. | |||||
| R1 | |||||
| <br> <br> <br>2. Sl. No. 11 of the SDF. | |||||
| <br> <br>3. The calculation of the | |||||
| <br> <br>requirement<br>of<br>raw | |||||
| <br> <br>material<br>should<br>be | |||||
| <br> <br>supported by dimensional | |||||
| <br> <br>Engineering<br>drawing | |||||
| <br> <br>with relevant dimensions | |||||
| <br>highlighted. | |||||
| <br> <br> | |||||
| (E-24956)<br>BC<br>INSTRUME<br>NTS INDIA<br>PRIVATE<br>LIMITED | KASEZ/100<br>%EOU/II/46/<br>2003-<br>04/Vol.I-941 | The applicant requested for fixation of wastage<br>norms in respect of machined components under<br>100% EOU. The applicant’s representation was<br>referred to DPIIT on 23.05.2018. The complete set<br>of application was again sent to DPIIT on<br>01.11.2019 for examination of the case. The case<br>was last considered in M. No. 19/81 dt.<br>26.12.2019 and decided to seek from the applicant<br>to furnish some information as per advice of<br>representative of DPIIT. As per NC decision, a<br>deficiency letter was sent to the applicant on<br>28.01.2020. However, no reply has been received<br>yet. Information received from the applicant vide<br>email dated 17.06.2020 has been forwarded to<br>DPIIT for comments on 27.06.2020. As per<br>decision of M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020, D/L was<br>sent to the applicant on 01.09.2020. The case was<br>considered in M. No. 07/81 dated 08.09.2020. As<br>per NC decision, reminder was sent to the<br>applicant on 22.10.2020.<br>The case was last considered in M. No.<br>10/81dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and<br>decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the<br>requisite information. The applicant's replydt. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee decided to<br>remind DPIIT for expediting<br>the comments. | <br> <br>Deferred | |
| R2 | |||||
36 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
11.12.2020 was sent to DPIIT on 14.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet.
| 11.12.2020 was sent to DPIIT on 14.12.2020.<br>However, no comments have been received yet. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (E_23203)<br>Vedanta<br>Limited<br>(Formerly<br>M/S. Sterlite<br>Industries<br>(India)<br>Limited<br>3510030450<br>dated<br>03.06.2010 | 01/81/050/00<br>055/AM11/D<br>ES.II<br>35/24/040/00<br>046/AM10/ | The case was rejected in M. No. 26/81-<br>ALC2/2010 dated 28.09.2010 as per written<br>comments<br>of<br>M/o<br>Mines<br>vide<br>OM<br>No.<br>4/(16)/2010-Metal-III/L dated 17.09.2010.<br>The<br>applicant’s<br>representation<br>received<br>on<br>14.02.2019 with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms.<br>The case was decided to examine on file along<br>with written comments of MSME in M. No. 23/81<br>dated 28.01.2014. As per NC decision, an email<br>was again sent to the applicant on 30.01.2020 to<br>attend personal hearing on 19.02.2020. The<br>Committee considered the case in M. No. 22 dated<br>19.2.2020 and heard the applicant’s representative<br>during personal hearing. The Committee directed<br>to the representative to furnish following<br>information as per advice of Consultant (TEC-3):<br>Material Balance sheet.<br>1. Manufacturing processes with stage-wise<br>wastage of all three materials.<br>2. Composition of raw materials.<br>Information received from the applicant vide<br>email<br>dated<br>02.04.2020<br>was<br>referred<br>to<br>Consultant<br>TEC-3<br>on<br>07.04.2020<br>and<br>27.06.2020. As per decision of M. No. 04/81 dt.<br>09.07.2020, the main file was referred to<br>Consultant (TEC-3) on 01.09.2020. The case was<br>considered in M. No. 07dated 08.09.2020 and<br>decided to send hard copy of the applicant’s<br>reply to Consultant (TEC-3).<br>The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81<br>dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and the<br>Committee noted that the hard copy of the<br>applicant’s reply has not yet been sent to<br>Consultant (TEC-3) as decided in the M. No.<br>07/81dated<br>08.09.2020.<br>Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee decided to send the same to<br>Consultant (TEC-3) immediately. The hard copy<br>of applicant's reply dt. 03.07.2020 was sent to<br>Consultant(TEC-3)on 22.12.2020. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee considered<br>the case as per the agenda<br>and<br>Consultant<br>(TEC-3)<br>informed<br>vide<br>comments<br>dated 29.12.2020 that the<br>applicant<br>has<br>given<br>composition<br>of<br>imported<br>material i.e. Cu Concentrate,<br>which contain gold & silver<br>in ppm. Export product is<br>Copper Anode, which again<br>contain gold & silver in ppm.<br>Gold & silver are neither<br>being imported indendently<br>nor being exported, as such,<br>after refining.In view of<br>above wastage of these<br>items<br>cannot<br>be<br>**ascertained.**Earlier also,<br>Department of Mines had<br>rejected<br>the<br>proposal.<br>Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee<br>decided<br>to<br>reject<br>the<br>applicant’s request of fixation<br>of ad-hoc norms.<br>RA concerned may take<br>suitable consequential action<br>accordingly. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>Rejected | |
| R3 | |||||
| (E-23204)<br>CROMPTO<br>N<br>GREAVES<br>LIMITED<br>0310444382<br>dated<br>26.09.2007 | 01/81/050/00<br>624/AM08<br>03/94/040/00<br>634/AM08 | The case was rejected in M. No. 24/81 dated<br>14.09.2010 due to non-submission of reply. The<br>applicant<br>vide<br>letters<br>dated<br>27.12.2016,<br>05.06.2017 and 01.07.2017 had requested to ratify<br>the norms. The representation dated 01.07.2017<br>was forwarded to DHI on 06.07.2017 for<br>examination of the case. In M. No. 04/81-Pt.II<br>dated 03.10.2018, the Committee noted that DHI<br>vide U.O. No. 3/82/2018 dated 13.03.2018 had<br>offered the written comments and recommended<br>the norms on repeat with AA No. 0310343657<br>dated 19.08.2005. The Case was referred to | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee decided to<br>wait<br>for<br>the<br>requisite<br>information. | <br> <br>Deferred | |
| R4 | |||||
37 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Consultant (TEC-3) on 25.09.2019 & 01.11.2019. Consultant (TEC-3) on 04.11.2019 stated that input norms export of refurbished items cannot be worked out as details of parts which need repair/replacement is not known and scrap value of old parts cannot be ascertained. In M. No. 19/81 dt. 26.12.2019, it was decided to call the applicant on personal hearing. As per NC decision, an email was sent to the applicant on 30.01.2020 to attend personal hearing on 19.02.2020. Nobody appeared for PH in M. No. 22/81 dated 19.2.2020. The applicant via email dated 07.07.2020 informed that they will attend PH on 9[th] July 2.30pm. The case was considered in M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020, The Committee heard the representatives of the applicant during personal hearing held through video conferencing. On the advice of Consultant (TEC-3), the Committee directed the representatives to furnish information in tabular form. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 27.08.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated 08.09.2020. As per decision, the applicant’s reply dt. 09.09.2020 was referred to Consultant (TEC-3) on 11.09.2020 & 22.10.2020. The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020, Consultant (TEC-3) informed that the applicant has not provided requisite information against the deficiency letter but has requested to approve the on repeat basis of a case in 2005. The Committee discussed the issue and decided to remind the applicant to furnish the requisite information as sought vide email dated 27.08.2020. As per NC decision, a reminder was sent to the applicant on 29.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. The Case was rejected in M. No.15 dt. 03.11.2015 The Committee decided to Deferred due to non submission of reply of DHI deficiency wait for the comments. letter dated 14.08.2015. The applicant vide letter dated 27.01.2016 had requested the RA, Kolkata (E-23205) for amendment of AA. The copy of licence amendment sheet dated 25.05.2016 along with TEXMACO representation was forwarded to DHI for RAIL & 01/81/050/00 examination. DHI on 04.11.2016 advised to ENGINEERI 125/AM15 consult with DPIIT or ratify under SION C-1647. R5 NG The case was referred to DPIIT on 21.08.2017. LIMITED 02/24/040/00 The Committee in M. No. 4 /81-Pt.II dated 138/AM14 03.10.2018 decided to call the applicant for 0210196856 personal hearing. The PH letter was sent to the dated applicant on 23.09.2019 to appear before NC in 26.11.2013 M. No.13/81 dated 03.10.2019 (actually held on 04.10.2019), as per NC decision, another dated of personal hearing was granted. A letter was sent to the applicant on 31.10.2019 to attend personal hearing on 13.11.2019. In M. No. 16/81 dt.
38 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
13.11.2019, the Committee heard the applicant’s representative during personal hearing and noted that authorisation was amended after its issuance. However, the representatives could not explain the present details of export and import items. Therefore, the Committee directed to the representative to submit some information. As per NC decision, D/L was issued to the applicant on 12.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 27.01.2020. Information received from the applicant vide email dated 03.04.2020 has been referred to DPIIT on 01.06.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 and decided to remind DPIIT to expedite the comments. Reminder issued to DPIIT on 26.08.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated 08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant to furnish the following information as per comments of DPIIT vide U. No. No. P-47011/116/2020-TSW dated 07.09.2020: 1. Copy of AA along with all the amendment sheets.
-
Final list of import & export items after incorporating all amendments.
-
Information at Sl. No. 3, 4, 5 & 11 of Deficiency Format, export product-wise.
The applicant's reply dt. 14.09.2020 was sent to DPIIT on 28.10.2020. The main file of the case was also sent to DPIIT on 11.11.2020. The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decided to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued to DPIIT on 22.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet.
This case was rejected in M. No. 12/81 dated The Committee decided to Deferred 13.02.2019 due to non-submission of reply to remind the applicant for deficiency letter dated 04.10.2018 raised by MoS. furnishing the requisite The applicant vide letter dated 14.05.2019 information. enclosed a copy of their earlier reply dated 17.07.2018 stating that they had already replied on NATIONAL 17.07.2018 and requested to ratify the norms. As STEEL AND per decision of M. No. 13/81dated 04.10.2019, the AGRO 01/81/050/00 case was referred to Consultant (TEC-3) on INDUSTRIE 146/AM19/ 01.11.2019 as comments from MoS were not R6 S LIMITED coming. In M. No. 16/81 dt. 13.11.2019, the 56/24/040/00 Committee noted the comments furnished by MoS 5610005277 031/AM18/ vide U.O. No. 2(17)/2019-TD dated 08.11.2019 as dated well as comments of Consultant (TEC-3) and 18.12.2017 decided to seek from the applicant the following information: (i) Stage wise wastage of import item No. 1. (ii) Justification for import item 6 i.e. GP sheet for packing when one of the export product is also GP sheet. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 12.12.2019. The case was considered in M. No. 19/81 dt. 26.12.2019 and
39 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
decided to ask from MoS and the party to clarify both the points. A reminder was also sent to the applicant on 27.01.2020. As per NC decision taken in Meeting No. 22 dated 19.2.2020, reminder was sent to the applicant on 01.04.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 & 07/81dated 08.09.2020 and decided to grant last opportunity to the applicant to furnish the requisite information. As per NC decision, final D/L reminder was sent to applicant on 26.08.2020. The applicant's reply dt. 19.09.2020 was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) & MoS on 13.10.2020 & 05.11.2020. The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and Consultant (TEC-3) informed that the applicant’s reply dated 19.09.2020 is deficient. Therefore, the Committee decided to seek again from the applicant to furnish the following information: 1. To provide Stage-wise wastages supported with calculations like width of imported coil, trimming details at each stage etc. 2. Regarding import item at Sl. No. 2, to provide justification why GP sheet is necessary for packing. As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 22.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. The case was ratified in M. No. 13/81 dated The Committee considered Approved 19.09.2017 as per DIPP comments vide U. O. the case as per the agenda No.12/68/2017-TSW/45 dated 19.09.2017. The and noted the comments applicant vide letter dated 25.01.2018 had given by DPIIT vide U. O. requested for revision of ratified norms. As per No.: P-47011/80/2019-TSW NC decision, a letter was again sent to the dated 09.11.2020 wherein it applicant to attend PH on 26.12.2019. The is stated that earlier different Committee heard the applicant’s representative norms were recommended as during personal hearing in M. No. 19/81 dt. the applicant had not (E-23371) 26.12.2019 and decided to refer the case to submitted any documentary SHIVALIK DPIIT for further examination. As per NC evidence regarding the sale BIMETAL 01/81/050/00 decision, the case was referred to DPIIT on price of the scrap generated CONTROLS 397/AM17/ 31.01.2020. The case was considered in M. No. during the manufacturing R7 LTD. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 and the Committee noted process. Now, the applicant 05/24/040/00 the written comments of DPIIT given vide U.O. has submitted the 0510399656 287/AM17/ No. P-470111/80/2019-TSW dated 26.5.2020. representation against taking dated The Committee also noted the applicant had higher recovery from 08.09.2016 applied two import items whereas DPIIT had mixed/contaminated scrap allowed import item No. 1 only. No comment supported by documentary was given in r/o import item No. 2. Hence, the evidence i.e. invoice for sale Committee decided to refer back the matter of scarp and therefore, norms again to DPIIT for re-examination. The have been recommended for Committee also noted that the applicant has revision after taking actual demanded significantly higher wastage than that recovery from scrap. recommended by DPIIT. Hence, it was also Since, Consultant (TEC-3) decided to ask the applicant to justify wastages has also agreed upon the as demanded. As per NC decision, D/L was sent wastage recommended by
40 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
to applicant on 27.08.2020. The applicant’s reply DPIIT. Therefore, the email dated 04.09.2020 was forwarded to DPIIT Committee decided to revise on 04.09.2020 for examination of the case. The the ad-hoc norms as per case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated comments given by DPIIT 08.09.2020, and decided to remind DPIIT for vide U. O. No.: P- expediting the comments. Reminder issued to 47011/80/2019-TSW dated DPIIT on 22.10.2020 & 05.11.2020. The case 09.11.2020. (Copy enclosed) was last considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020, the Committee RA concerned may take noted the comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. suitable consequential action No.: P-47011/80/2019-TSW dated 09.11.2020. accordingly. The Committee observed that similar cases of the same applicant have also been referred to Consultant (TEC-3). Hence, the Committee decided to take a view in the matter on receipt of comments from Consultant (TEC-3). The representation & comments copy was referred to Consultant (TEC-3) on 28.12.2020. The case was ratified in M. No. 3/81-ALC2/2018 The Committee considered Approved dated 14.08.2018 on repeat basis as approved for the case as per the agenda AA No. 0510402399 dated 01.05.2017 ratified in and noted the comments M. No.11/81/ALC2/2017 dated 22.08.2017. The given by DPIIT vide U. O. applicant’s representation received on 22.11.2018 No.: P-47011/80/2019-TSW with a request for revision of ratified norms. As dated 09.11.2020 wherein it per NC decision of M. No. 15/81 dt. 30.10.2019, a is stated that earlier different letter was sent to the applicant to attend PH on norms were recommended as 13.11.2019. The Committee again called the the applicant had not applicant for personal hearing as nobody was submitted any documentary appeared for personal hearing in M. No. 16/81 dt. evidence regarding the sale 13.11.2019. As per NC decision, an email was price of the scrap generated sent to the applicant to attend PH on 26.12.2019. during the manufacturing The Committee heard the applicant’s process. Now, the applicant representative during personal hearing in M. No. has submitted the (E-24958) 19/81 dt. 26.12.2019 and decided to refer the case representation against taking Shivalik 01/81/050/00 to DPIIT for further examination. As per NC higher recovery from Bimetal 197/AM17/ decision, the case was referred to DPIIT on mixed/contaminated scrap R8 Controls Ltd. 12.02.2020. The case was considered in M. No. supported by documentary 05/24/040/00 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 and noted the written evidence i.e. invoice for sale 0510398533 045/AM17/ comments of DPIIT given vide U.O. No. P- of scarp and therefore, norms dated 470111/80/2019-TSW dated 26.5.2020. The have been recommended for 17.05.2016 Committee also noted the applicant had applied revision after taking actual two import items whereas DPIIT had allowed recovery from scrap. import item No. 1 only. No comment was given Since, Consultant (TEC-3) in r/o import item No. 2. Hence, the Committee has also agreed upon the decided to refer back the matter again to DPIIT for wastage recommended by re-examination. The Committee also noted that the DPIIT. Therefore, the applicant had demanded significantly higher Committee decided to revise wastage than that recommended by DPIIT. the ad-hoc norms as per Hence, it was also decided to ask the applicant to comments given by DPIIT justify wastages as demanded. As per NC vide U. O. No.: P- decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on 47011/80/2019-TSW dated 27.08.2020. The applicant’s reply email dated 09.11.2020. (Copy enclosed) 04.09.2020 was forwarded to DPIIT on 04.09.2020 for examination of the case. The case RA concerned may take was considered in M. No. 07/81dated 08.09.2020 suitable consequential action
41 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| and decided to remind DPIIT for expediting the<br>comments. Reminder issued to DPIIT on | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>accordingly. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.10.2020. The case was last considered in M. | |||||
| No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020,<br>the Committee noted the comments given by<br>DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/80/2019-TSW<br>dated 09.11.2020. The Committee observed that<br>similar cases of the same applicant have also been<br>referred to Consultant (TEC-3). Hence, the<br>Committee decided to take a view in the matter on<br>receipt of comments from Consultant (TEC-3).<br>The representation & comments copy was referred<br>to Consultant(TEC-3)on 28.12.2020. | |||||
| (E-23465)<br>SHIVALIK<br>BIMETAL<br>CONTROLS<br>LTD.<br>0510405797<br>dated<br>07.03.2018 | <br>01/81/050/00<br>174/AM19/<br>05/24/040/00<br>606/AM18/ | The case was ratified in M. No. 3/81-<br>ALC2/2018 dated 14.08.2018. The applicant<br>vide letter dated 18.06.2019 had stated that the<br>norms was ratified as per SION C-397 but the<br>export item is different. They had, therefore,<br>requested to review the decision and requested<br>for personal hearing. As per NC decision of M.<br>No. 15/81 dt. 30.10.2019, an email dated<br>31.10.2019 sent to the applicant to attend PH on<br>13.11.2019. In M. No. 16/81 dt. 13.11.2019, the<br>Committee noted that nobody was appeared for<br>personal hearing on behalf of the applicant and<br>the Committee granted another date for personal<br>hearing. As per NC decision, a letter was sent to<br>the applicant to attend PH on 26.12.2019. The<br>Committee heard the applicant’s representative<br>during personal hearing in M. No. 19/81 dt.<br>26.12.2019 and decided to refer the case to<br>Consultant (TEC-3) for further examination. As<br>per decision, the case was referred to Consultant<br>(TEC-3) on 31.01.2020. As per NC decision<br>taken in Meeting No. 22 dated 19.2.2020, D/L<br>was sent on 01.04.2020. Applicant’s reply dt.<br>01.06.2020 was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on<br>01.06.2020. The case was considered in M. No.<br>04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 and decided to seek from<br>the applicant the following information: 1.<br>Justification for wastage of 31.30% on input for<br>slitting supported by evidence.<br>2. Price of disposal of scrap in last 3 years with<br>supporting document<br>3. Document for CIF price of inputs.<br>As per NC decision, D/L was sent to applicant on | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee considered<br>the case as per the agenda<br>and<br>Consultant<br>(TEC-3)<br>informed vide email dated<br>07.01.2021 that earlier norms<br>were ratified by NC as per<br>SION<br>C397<br>with<br>10%<br>wastage. Now, the applicant<br>has<br>requested<br>for<br>enhancement of wastage and<br>claimed 50% wastage due to<br>use of wider coil of 74mm<br>for final product size of<br>50.80mm<br>for<br>which<br>no<br>technical<br>justification<br>has<br>been given. Also, considering<br>the processes involved in<br>manufacture<br>of<br>export<br>product<br>an<br>increase<br>in<br>wastage already allowed is<br>not<br>justified.<br>Since,<br>the<br>applicant vide letter dated<br>26.12.2020 did not give any<br>additional<br>technical<br>information. Therefore, the<br>Committee decided toreject<br>the applicant’s request for<br>revision of ad-hoc norms as<br>per<br>comments<br>given<br>by<br>Consultant (TEC-3).<br>RA concerned may take<br>suitable consequential action<br>accordingly. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>Rejected | |
| R9 | |||||
| 27.08.2020. The applicant’s reply email dated | |||||
| 11.09.2020 was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) | |||||
| on 11.09.2020 for examination of the case. The | |||||
| case was considered in M. No. 07/81dated | |||||
| 08.09.2020 and decided to wait for the comments. | |||||
| Reminder issued to Consultant (TEC-3) on | |||||
| 22.10.2020. The case was last considered in M. | |||||
| No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 | |||||
| and Consultant(TEC-3)informed vide email |
42 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| dated 16.11.2020 that earlier norms were ratified<br>by NC as per SION C397 with 10% wastage. | dated 16.11.2020 that earlier norms were ratified<br>by NC as per SION C397 with 10% wastage. | dated 16.11.2020 that earlier norms were ratified<br>by NC as per SION C397 with 10% wastage. | <br> | <br> | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Now, the a<br>of wastage<br>74mm for<br> | pplicant has requested for enha<br>10% to 50% due to use of wide<br>final product size of 50.80<br>e is no technical justification h<br>r discussion, the Committee de<br>he applicant to furnish justifica | ncement<br>r coil of<br>mm for<br> | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | |||||||
| which ther<br>given. Afte<br>ask from t | as been<br>cided to<br>tion for | |||||||||
| <br>using wider coil of 74mm for final product size of<br>50.80mm.<br>As per NC decision, D/L was sent to the<br>applicant on 23.12.2020. The applicant's reply<br>dt. 26.12.2020 was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) | <br> | |||||||||
| via email on 28.12.2020. | ||||||||||
| JINDAL<br>SAW<br>LIMITED<br>0510410575<br>dated<br>14.05.2019 | The case was ratified in M. No. 14/81 dated<br> | <br> <br>The Committee decided to<br> <br> | Deferred | |||||||
| IND<br>SAW | 16.10.2019<br>21.08.2019<br>applicant<br>rtd f | as per written comments<br>given by Consultant (TEC-<br>vide letter dated 10.10.20<br>r riin f rtifid nrm | dated<br>3). The<br>19 had<br>he case<br>3)<br>on<br>M. No. | <br> <br> <br> <br>wait for the comm | ents. | |||||
| equese<br>was<br>refe<br>03.12.2019 | o evso o ae os.<br>rred<br>to<br>Consultant<br>(TEC-<br>. The case was considered in | <br> <br> | ||||||||
| AL<br> | 01/81/050/00 | 19/81 dt. 26.12.2019 and decided to wait for<br>comments. Reminder sent to Consultant (TEC-3)<br>vide email dated 14.04.2020 for expediting the<br>comments. The case was considered in M. No.<br>04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 and decided to seek from the<br>applicant to furnish following information as per<br> | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | |||||||
| 068/AM20/ | advice of Consultant (TEC-3): To provide detailed<br>calculations of stage-wise percentage wastage<br>lid i th ltt ith ti dt | <br> <br> | ||||||||
| R10 | ||||||||||
| 041<br>date<br>.05.2 | 0575<br>d<br>019 | 05/23/040/00<br>065/AM20/ | came n<br>As per NC<br>on 26.08.2 | e eer w supporng oc<br>decision, D/L was sent to the a<br>020. The case was considered in | umens.<br>pplicant | <br> <br> <br> | ||||
| <br>M. No. | ||||||||||
| 07/81dated | 08.09.2020 and decided to rem | ind the<br>rmation.<br>t to the | ||||||||
| applicant f<br>As per N | or furnishing the requisite info<br>C decision, reminder was sen | <br> | ||||||||
| applicant on 22.10.2020. The case was last | <br> <br> <br> <br> | |||||||||
| considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held | ||||||||||
| on 17.11.2020 and decided to remind the applicant<br>for furnishing the requisite information.<br>As per NC decision, reminder was sent to the<br>alicant on 23122020 The alicant's rel dt | ||||||||||
| pp ... pp py .<br>07.01.2021 was sent to Consultant (TEC-3) on<br>07.01.2021. However, no comments have been | <br> <br> | |||||||||
| <br>receivedye | <br>t. | |||||||||
| KO<br>P<br>061<br>22 | TSONS<br>. LTD<br>0038228<br>dated<br>.09.2015 | The case | was ratified in M. No. 20/8 | 1 dated | <br> <br>The Committee<br>the case as per | considered<br>agenda and<br> | Rejected | |||
| 12.01.2016 | as per written comments of D | HI vide | ||||||||
| NS<br>D | 01/81/050/00<br> | U.<br>O.<br>N | o.<br>3(214)/2015/TSW(B)/398 | <br>dated | <br> <br> <br>noted that no rep<br>received from th<br> | ly has been<br>e applicant<br> | ||||
| 18.12.2015 | . The applicant vide letter | dated | ||||||||
| R11 | 326/AM16/<br>06/24/040/00<br>024/AM16/ | 27.11.2019 had requested for revision of ratified | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>despite<br>many<br>reminders.<br>Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee<br>decided<br>to<br>reject<br>the<br>applicant’s<br>request<br>of<br>revision of ad-hoc norms. | |||||||
| norms. As per the decision of M. No. 19/81 dt. | ||||||||||
| 26.12.2019, the case was referred to DHI on | ||||||||||
| 13.02.2020. In M. No. 22/81 dt. 19.02.2020, the | ||||||||||
| Committee decided to wait for comments. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 04/81 dt.<br>09.07.2020 and directed the section to forward |
43 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
complete application with ANF4A to DHI for examination and comments. Scanned copies of complete set of applications along with all concerned/ related documents (reply to queries raised etc.) in chronological order was sought from the applicant vide email dated 27.08.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 07/81dated 08.09.2020 and decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, reminder was sent to the applicant on 22.10.2020. The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, a reminder was sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. However, no reply has been received yet.
Initially, the case was rejected in M. No. 21/81 The Committee decided to Deferred dated 31.12.2013 as per written comments of DHI wait for the comments. vide U. O. No. 3(41)/2012/TSW(B)/294 dated 06.12.2013. The case was again considered in M. No. 11/81 dated 22.08.2017 and rejected due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 13.04.2017 raised by DHI. Now, the applicant vide letter dated 01.05.2019 had furnished reply & requested for ratification of ad-hoc norms. The representation was referred to DHI via email dated 24.12.2019. The case was last considered in M. No. 19/81 dt. 26.12.2019 and the Committee decided to defer the case with an advice to the section to trace out the main file as main file was (E-23508) not available. Main file is traced out and referred to DHI on 12.02.2020. In M. No. 22/81 dt. TRAFOMEC 19.02.2020, the Committee decided to wait for 01/81/050/00 INDIA comments. The case was considered in M. No. 270/AM13/ R12 MAGNETIC 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020, On the request of DHI, the S PVT. LTD. Committee directed the section to forward 07/24/040/00 complete set of application with ANF4A to DHI 216/AM13/ 0710090674 for examination and comments. Scanned copies of dated complete set of applications along with all 11.09.2012 concerned/related documents (reply to queries raised etc.) in chronological order was sought from the applicant vide email dated 07.10.2020. The case was considered in M. No. 07/81dated 08.09.2020 and decided to remind the applicant for furnishing the requisite information. As per NC decision, reminder was sent to applicant on 05.11.2020. The applicant via email dated 05.11.2020 requested for 2 days to reply. The applicant’s reply vide letter dated 10.11.2020 was received. The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020, the Committee noted that the applicant has not given point wise reply to the deficiencies raised. Hence, the Committee decided to ask the applicant to
44 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| furnish the same. As per decision, the complete set | furnish the same. As per decision, the complete set | furnish the same. As per decision, the complete set | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| of applicat<br>on 04.01.2<br>receivedye | ion with ANF4A was referred<br>021. However, no comments ha<br>t. | to DHI<br>ve been | <br> | |||||||
| (E-23960)<br>JINDAL<br>SAW<br>LIMITED<br>0510409209<br>dated<br>07.01.2019 | The case<br>18.09.2019<br>16092019 | was ratified in M. No. 12/8<br>as per written comments<br>ien b Consultant (TEC- | 1 dated<br>dated<br>) The | <br> <br> <br>The Committee<br>the case as per<br>and comments of | considered<br>the agenda<br>Consultant<br> | Deferred | ||||
| .. gv y .<br>applicant vide letter dated 03.01.2020 stated that<br>NC allowed the quantity of imported item No. 1<br>and 2 with 10% wastage instead of 20% wastage<br>as per SION C797. Therefore, they requested to<br>allow 20% wastage in respect of import item at Sl.<br>Nos. 1 & 2. The applicant’s representation was | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>(TEC-3) vide email dated<br>07.01.2021. The Committee<br>noted that the party was<br>allowed wastages earlier on<br>the basis of proper study.<br>Therefore, there should be | |||||||||
| forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on 22.01.2020<br> | <br> <br>proper justification as to why<br> | |||||||||
| -239<br>IND<br>SAW<br>MIT<br>040<br>date<br>.01.2 | 60)<br>AL<br> <br>ED | 01/81/050/00<br>948/AM19/ | for examin<br>19.02.2020<br>comments.<br>04/81 dt 0 | ation of the case. In M. No. 2<br>, the Committee decided to<br>The case was considered in<br>9072020 nd diid t nd | 2/81 dt.<br>wait for<br>M. No.<br>hil | <br> <br> <br> <br>the norms are be<br>Hence,<br>the<br>decided to refer<br>bk t Cnlt | ng revised.<br>Committee<br>the matter<br>nt (TEC3) | |||
| R13 | ||||||||||
| <br>9209 | 05/23/040/00<br> | .<br>file to Con<br>case. As p | .. a ece o se<br>sultant (TEC-3) for examinatio<br>er decision, the main file was | ysca<br>n of the<br>sent to | <br> <br> <br>ac o osu<br>for reexamination. | -<br> | ||||
| d<br>019 | 440/AM19/ | <br>Consultant (TEC-3) on 01.09.2020. The case was<br>considered in M. No. 07/81 dated 08.09.2020 and<br>decided to seek from the applicant the following<br>information on the advice of Consultant (TEC-3):<br>Detailed calculation of stage-wise wastages. As<br>per NC decision, D/L was sent to the applicant on<br> | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | |||||||
| 22.10.2020. The case was last considered in M. | <br> | |||||||||
| N 10/81dd 10112020 hld 17112020 | ||||||||||
| o. | ate .. e on . | . | <br> <br> | |||||||
| and decide<br>the requisit<br>The applic | d to remind the applicant for fu<br>e information.<br>ant's reply dt. 03.12.2020 was | rnishing<br>sent to | ||||||||
| <br>Consultant | <br> (TEC-3)on 04.12.2020. | |||||||||
| JINDAL<br>SAW<br>LIMITED<br>0510409268<br>dated<br>09.01.2019 | The case w | as ratified in M. No. 12/81-AL | C2/2019 | <br>The Committee | considered<br> | Approved | ||||
| dated 18.09.2019 as per written comments dated<br>16.09.2019 given by Consultant (TEC-3). The<br>applicant vide letter dated 06.01.2020 requested<br>for revision of ratified norms and stated that the<br>quantity of imported item No.1 Epoxy Powder has<br>allowed 236.219 MT instead of claimed after<br> | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>the case as per the agenda<br>and<br>Consultant<br>(TEC-3)<br>informed<br>vide<br>comments<br>dated 29.12.20202 that the<br>applicant vide representation<br>dated<br>06.01.2020<br>has<br> <br> <br> <br> | |||||||||
| 01/81/050/00<br>955/AM19/ | enhancement 306.219 MT while import item<br>No.8, Primer SK345 has fully disallowed by the<br>Norms Committee. The applicant’s representation<br>was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on | <br> <br> <br> <br>requested<br>for<br>review<br>of<br>norms for import items at SL.<br>No. 7 & 8. Import item at SL.<br>No 7 was allowed as alied | ||||||||
| R14 | <br>0409268<br>dated<br>.01.2019 | <br>9268<br>d | <br>05/23/040/00<br>454/AM19/ | <br>31.01.2020<br>was consid<br>the<br>Com | <br>for examination of the case. T<br>ered in M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.0<br>mittee<br>noted<br>that<br>the<br>app | <br>he case<br>7.2020,<br>licant’s | <br> <br> <br> <br>.<br>as<br>it<br>was<br>b<br>entitlement<br>as<br>group report. Imp | pp,<br>elow<br>the<br>per<br>study<br>ort item at | ||
| 019 | representati<br>Consultant<br> | on has not yet been forwa<br>(TEC-3) with main file as de<br> | rded to<br>cided in<br> | <br> <br> <br>SL. No. 8 was d<br>was not part of<br> | eleted as it<br>export. The<br> | |||||
| Meeting No. 22/81 dated19.2.2020. Therefore, the<br>Committee directed the section to send the<br>representation with main file immediately. As per<br>decision, the main file was sent to Consultant<br>(TEC-3) on 01.09.2020. The case was considered | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>applicant has also informed<br>that<br>they<br>had<br>taken<br>amendment<br>in<br>AA<br>for<br>enhancing quantity of import<br>item at SL. No.7. They have<br>also given use of import item<br>at SL. No. 8 in manufacture | |||||||||
| in M. No. 07/81 dated 08.09.2020 decided to<br>remind Consultant(TEC-3)for expeditingthe |
45 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant | comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant | comments. A reminder was issued to Consultant | <br>of<br>export<br>product.<br>After | <br>of<br>export<br>product.<br>After | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (TEC-3) o | n 22.10.2020. The case w | as last | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>discussion, the<br>decided the follow<br>**1. **No change in<br>No. 7 as the | Committee<br>ing: | ||||||
| considered | in M. No. 10/81dated 10.11.20 | 20 held | ||||||||
| on 17.11. | 2020 and decided to remin<br>(TEC-3) for expediting the co<br>r was issued to Consultant (TE<br>. | d again<br> | ||||||||
| Consultant<br>A reminde<br>23.12.2020 | mments.<br>C-3) on | import item<br>party was | ||||||||
| <br>given quantity as applied<br>for. Now it has revised<br>the requirement in view<br>of technical Committee’s<br>report rather than on the<br>basis<br>of<br>its<br>actual<br> | ||||||||||
| requirement. | ||||||||||
| 2. Quantity of i<br>at Sl. No.<br>allowedas a | mport item<br>8 may be<br>ppliedfor | |||||||||
| <br>i.e. CIF valu<br>upto 1.2% of | <br>e restricted<br>FoB value. | |||||||||
| Note:<br>(i) The decision for rest of<br>the import items as decided<br>in<br>Meeting<br>No.<br>12/81-<br>ALC2/2019<br> | ||||||||||
| <br>dated<br>18092019<br>shall<br>remain | ||||||||||
| ..<br> <br>unchanged.<br>(ii) It was decide<br>the RA not to | <br> <br>d to advise<br>change the | |||||||||
| quantities<br>in<br>where the norm<br> | the<br>cases<br>s are being<br> | |||||||||
| fixed or have been fixed by<br>NC.<br>RA concerned may take<br>suitable consequential action<br>accordingly. | ||||||||||
| R15 | <br>Paloma<br>Turning<br>Company<br>Private<br>Limited,<br>Bangalore, A<br>100% EOU | Paloma Turnin Coman Private Limited | <br>The Committee considered<br> | Rejected | ||||||
| 01/81/171/00 | g py ,<br>Bangalore, a 100% EOU, vide letter dated<br>02.08.2016 stated that they are manufacturer and<br>100%<br>exporters<br>of<br>customized<br>machined<br>components<br>made<br>out<br>of<br>bar<br>stocks/Cut | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>the case as per the agenda<br>and<br>noted<br>the<br>written<br>comments given by MSME<br>vide email dated 06.01.2021.<br> | ||||||||
| aloma<br>urning<br>ompany<br>Private<br>imited,<br>galore, A<br>0% EOU | a<br>ng<br>any<br> | 022/AM20/D<br>ES2/<br> | <br>blanks/For<br>CAM oper<br>customer s<br> | <br>gings, Tubes of various metals<br>ated automatics, CNC Machine<br>pecification and drawings. The<br> | made on<br>s as per<br>finished<br>his raw<br>ed since<br>f | <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee n<br>applicant is a 1<br> | oted that the<br>00% EOU.<br> | |||
| te<br>ed,<br>A | <br>CSEZ<br>Bangalore<br>FN1/19/20 | export pro<br>material th<br>h | duct is manufactured out of t<br>e remnant is the scrap generat<br>il hii f l | <br> <br> <br>As per extent pro<br>application for<br>SION<br>hld<br> | cedure, the<br>fixation of<br> <br>b | |||||
| <br>.o.<br>06-<br>EOU:CSEZ | te process nvoves macnng o metas out o<br>bar stocks/Cut blanks/Forgings, Tubes. Therefore,<br>the applicant had requested to fix the SION for<br>scrap<br>generated.<br>O/o<br>MSME<br>Development<br>Institute, Bangalore vide letter dated 02.05.2011<br>had enclosed a copy of the percentage of scrap<br>generated from Aluminium,Steel,Stainless Steel | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>sou<br>ave<br>een<br>routed<br>through<br>concerned<br>Development Commissioner<br>of SEZ with relevant input-<br>output data. However, the<br>same has not been received<br>yet. Hence,the Committee |
R15
46 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
works out from 16 to 80% as Annexure ‘A’. The decided to reject the case. Committee also decided to ask CSEZ to submit complete set of documents in the present case. Email to CSEZ sent on 27.08.2020 followed by reminder on 01.09.2020. Reminders were also sent to the applicant to furnish application through CSEZ vide 27.08.2020 followed by reminders on 01.09.2020, 22.10.2020, 23.12.2020. The applicant's reply dt. 23.12.2020 was sent to MSME on 24.12.2020. The Committee considered Deferred the case as per the agenda The case was withdrawn in M. No. 44/81and noted the written ALC2/2009 dated 02.02.2010 on the ground that comments given by MSME the case was rejected in M. No. 38/81 dated vide email dated 07.01.2021. 22.12.2009 (actually held on 29.12.2009) due to non submission of reply of the deficiency letter The Committee noted the raised by DIPP. The applicant vide letter dated case was rejected in M. No. 11.11.2019 furnished reply with a request to fix 38/81 dated 22.12.2009 the ad-hoc norms and also asked for personal (actually held on 29.12.2009) hearing. The applicant’s representation was due to non submission of forwarded to DPIIT on 31.01.2020. In M. No. PRANITA reply of the deficiency letter 22/81 dt. 19.02.2020, the Committee decided to ENGINEERI raised by DIPP. wait for comments. Comments of DPIIT D/L NG Subsequently, the case was 01/81/050/00 received vide email dated 23.04.2020. DPIIT D/L SOLUTION placed in M. No. 44/81026/AM10/ was sent to the applicant on 07.07.2020. The case R16 S PRIVATE ALC2/2009 dated 02.02.2010 was considered in M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 LIMITED and withdrawn. The 07/24/040/00 and decided to wait for reply of the applicant. A applicant has applied for 039/AM10/ reminder was sent to the applicant on 27.08.2020. 0710064492 review after a lapse of The case was considered in M. No. 07/81dated dated approx. 10 years. It is not 08.09.2020 and decided to remind again the 04.05.2009 known whether the case has applicant for furnishing the requisite information. been considered by the NC in As per NC decision, reminder was sent to the any meeting during this applicant on 22.10.2020. The applicant’s reply period. Hence, the received via email dated 17.11.2020 has been Committee decided to seek a forwarded to DPIIT on 17.11.2020. The case was report from concerned RA last considered in M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 about present status of norms held on 17.11.2020 and decided to wait for the fixation including any comments. Reminder issued to DPIIT on pending ECA action. 23.12.2020. The case was referred to MSME on 06.01.2021 on the advised of DPIIT. Office of DC, VSEZ, Visakhapatnam vide letter The Committee considered Approved dated 14.01.2020 had referred a copy of the case as per the agenda application dated 02.05.2017 of Synergies and decided to fix the ad-hoc Castings Limited stating that the unit is a 100% norms as per written EOU manufacturer and exporter of Aluminium comments given by MSME (E-23515) VSEZ File Alloy Wheels and requested for fixation of vide email dated 07.01.2021. R17 Synergies No. 8/EOUwastage norms. The representation was forwarded (Copy enclosed) Castings 326/VSEZ/2 to DPIIT on 31.01.2020. In M. No. 22/81 dt. Limited 020/312 19.02.2020, the Committee decided to wait for comments. DPIIT informed via email dated 03.06.2020 that the matter may be consulted with MSME. The case was considered in M. No. 04/81 dt. 09.07.2020 and decided to refer the case to
47 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| MSME for examination and comments as<br>recommended by DPIIT. As per decision, the<br>case was referred to MSME on 01.09.2020. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated<br>08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant | MSME for examination and comments as<br>recommended by DPIIT. As per decision, the<br>case was referred to MSME on 01.09.2020. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated<br>08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant | MSME for examination and comments as<br>recommended by DPIIT. As per decision, the<br>case was referred to MSME on 01.09.2020. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated<br>08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant | MSME for examination and comments as<br>recommended by DPIIT. As per decision, the<br>case was referred to MSME on 01.09.2020. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated<br>08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant | MSME for examination and comments as<br>recommended by DPIIT. As per decision, the<br>case was referred to MSME on 01.09.2020. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated<br>08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant | MSME for examination and comments as<br>recommended by DPIIT. As per decision, the<br>case was referred to MSME on 01.09.2020. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated<br>08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant | MSME for examination and comments as<br>recommended by DPIIT. As per decision, the<br>case was referred to MSME on 01.09.2020. The<br>case was considered in M. No. 07/81 dated<br>08.09.2020 and decided to seek from the applicant | <br> <br> <br> <br> | <br> <br> <br> <br> | <br> <br> <br> <br> | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| to furnish<br>of MSME:<br>1. Sl. N<br> | following information as per c<br> <br>o. 3, 4, 5 & 11 of the<br>ency Format.<br>decision, D/L was sent to the<br>2020. The applicant via em | omments<br>Standard | <br> | |||||||||||||
| Defici<br>As per NC<br>on 22.10. | applicant | <br> | ||||||||||||||
| <br>ail dated | ||||||||||||||||
| <br>09.11.2020 requested 15 days' time to reply. The | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | |||||||||||||||
| case was last considered in M. No. 10/81dated | ||||||||||||||||
| 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decided to<br>wait for reply of the applicant. A Reminder was<br>sent to the applicant on 23.12.2020. The<br>applicant's reply dt. 05.01.2021 was sent to<br> | ||||||||||||||||
| MSME on 05.01.2021. | ||||||||||||||||
| The case was approved in M. No. 3/81- | <br>The Committee considered<br>the case as per agenda and<br> | Deferred | ||||||||||||||
| ALC2/2020 dated 27.05.2020 as per written | ||||||||||||||||
| comments | given by Consultant (TEC- | 1). The | <br>decided to see | k from the<br>sh following<br>er comments<br>nt (TEC-1): | ||||||||||||
| applicant | vide letter dated 09.07.2020 r | equested | <br>applicant to furni | |||||||||||||
| for ratifica | tion of ad-hoc norms and stated | that the | <br>information as p | |||||||||||||
| (E | -249 | 61) | imort e | ight of chemicals under Sr. No. | 3 and 4 | <br>ien b Conslt | ||||||||||
| p w | <br>gv y u | <br>king of raw | ||||||||||||||
| is not as | per 5% wastages, which sh | ould be | ||||||||||||||
| 01/81/050/00 | ||||||||||||||||
| Olect | ra | 3038.740 | and 663.004 Kgs instead of 12 | 16.5 and | <br>1. Detailed wor | |||||||||||
| R18 | Gr | eent | ech | 080/AM20/ | <br>303.63 Kgs. The case was referred to consultant | <br> <br> <br>material on | ||||||||||
| L | imit | ed | (TEC-1) for examination & comments vide email | <br>Silicon rubbe | ||||||||||||
| <br>09/24/040/00 | ||||||||||||||||
| 091 | 006 | 7556 | dated 05.11.2020. The case was last considered in | |||||||||||||
| <br>056/AM20/ | ||||||||||||||||
| Date | d | M. No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on | ||||||||||||||
| 22 | .05.2 | 019 | 17.11.2020, Consultant (TEC-1) asked to send | |||||||||||||
| physical file of the case to examine the case. | <br> <br> <br> <br>comparison<br>to<br>earlier<br>letter dated 02.03.2020. | |||||||||||||||
| Therefore, the Committee decided to send the | ||||||||||||||||
| same to Consultant (TEC-1) for examination of | ||||||||||||||||
| th Th i fil d t Cltt | ||||||||||||||||
| e case. | e man e was sen o | onsuan | ||||||||||||||
| (TEC-1)o | n 31.12.2020. | |||||||||||||||
| (E<br>Ze<br>P<br>031<br> <br>13 | 249 | The case<br>30.01.201<br>Consultant<br>27.11.201 | was rejected in M. No. 1<br>due to non-submission | 1/81 dated<br>f reply of | <br> <br>The Committee<br>the case as per | considered<br>the agenda<br> | Deferred | |||||||||
| 65 | ,<br> <br>(TEC-3)<br>deficiency<br>le<br>8 followed by final re | <br>tter<br>dated<br>minder on | <br> <br> <br> <br>and noted that<br>the case is no | <br>main file of<br>t available. | ||||||||||||
| -<br>eco I<br>vt. L<br>081<br>Date<br>.02.2 | )<br>ndia<br>td.<br>9114<br>d<br>018 | 01/81/050/00<br>360/AM19/ | 24.01.2019. The applicant via email dated<br>06.08.2020 furnished reply and requested to ratify<br>the ad-hoc norms. The case was referred to<br> | <br> <br> <br> <br>Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee<br>decided to defer the case with<br>an advice to the section to<br> <br> <br> | ||||||||||||
| R19 | ||||||||||||||||
| 03/95/0<br> | 40/00<br> | co<br>vid | nsultant (TE<br>e email dat | C-3) for exa<br>ed 29.10.20 | mination & comments<br>20. The case was last | <br> <br> <br>forward<br>Consult<br> | <br>physical<br>file<br>to<br>ant<br>(TEC-3)<br>for<br> | |||||||||
| 891/A | M18/ | co | sidered in | . No. 10/8 | dated 10.11.2020 held | <br> <br> <br> <br>examina | tion. | |||||||||
| on | 17.11.2020, | Consultant<br>of the case<br>Ci | (TEC-3) asked to send<br>to examine the case.<br>didd d h | |||||||||||||
| ph<br>Th | ysical file<br>f h | |||||||||||||||
| ereore, te ommttee ece to sen te<br>same to Consultant (TEC-3) for examination of<br>the case. | <br> | |||||||||||||||
48 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| (E-24984)<br>Leitwind<br>Shriram<br>Manufacturin<br>g Private<br>Limited<br>0410164757<br>dated<br>05.10.2018 | 01/81/050/00<br>472/AM19/<br>04/24/040/00<br>148/AM19/ | The case was rejected in M. No. 02/81dated<br>01.05.2019, due to non-submission of reply of<br>deficiency letter raised by Consultant (TEC-1).<br>The applicant via email dated 04.09.2020<br>furnished reply and requested to ratify the ad-hoc<br>norms. The copy of representation has been<br>forwarded to Consultant (TEC-1) on 17.11.2020.<br>The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81<br>dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decided<br>to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued<br>to Consultant (TEC-1) on 23.12.2020. However,<br>no comments have been receivedyet. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee decided to<br>remind<br>again<br>Consultant<br>(TEC-1) for expediting the<br>comments. | <br> <br> <br>Deferred | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R20 | |||||
| (E-24986)<br>Leitwind<br>Shriram<br>Manufacturin<br>g Private<br>Limited<br>0410164534<br>dated<br>27.07.2018 | 01/81/050/00<br>363/AM19/<br>04/24/040/00<br>042/AM19/ | The case was rejected in M. No. 3/81dated<br>15.05.2019, due to non-submission of reply of<br>deficiency letter raised by Consultant (TEC-1).<br>The applicant via email dated 18.08.2020<br>furnished a reply and requested to ratify the ad-<br>hoc norms. The copy of representation has been<br>forwarded to Consultant (TEC-1) on 17.11.2020.<br>The case was last considered in M. No. 10/81<br>dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020 and decided<br>to wait for the comments. A reminder was issued<br>to Consultant (TEC-1) on 23.12.2020. However,<br>no comments have been receivedyet. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee decided to<br>remind<br>again<br>Consultant<br>(TEC-1) for expediting the<br>comments. | <br> <br> <br>Deferred | |
| R21 | |||||
| (E-24987)<br>Leitwind<br>Shriram<br>Manufacturin<br>g Private<br>Limited<br>0410165252<br>dated<br>26.02.2019 | 01/81/050/01<br>107/AM19/<br>04/24/040/00<br>253/AM19/ | The case was rejected in M. No. 01/81 dated<br>01.04.2020, due to non-submission of reply of<br>DHI deficiency letters. The applicant via email<br>dated 04.09.2020 furnished a reply and requested<br>to ratify the ad-hoc norms. The copy of<br>representation has been forwarded to DHI on<br>17.11.2020. The case was last considered in M.<br>No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020<br>and decided to wait for the comments. A reminder<br>was issued to DHI on 23.12.2020. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee considered<br>the case as per the agenda<br>and the representative of DHI<br>informed that the applicant’s<br>reply dated 11.09.2020 is<br>deficient.<br>Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee decided to seek<br>from the applicant to furnish<br>the following information:<br>1. Rating of the export<br>product.<br>2. Calculation<br>supported<br>by<br>dimensional<br>engineering<br>drawing<br>with<br>relevant<br>dimensions highlighted.<br>3. Information<br>as<br>per<br>Appendix 4G.<br>The cases stands deferred. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>Deferred | |
| R22 | |||||
| (E-24988)<br>Leitwind<br>Shriram<br>Manufacturin<br>g Private<br>Limited<br>0410165668<br>dated<br>31.05.2019 | 01/81/050/00<br>095/AM20/<br>04/24/040/00<br>023/AM20/ | The case was rejected in M. No. 23/81 dated<br>04.03.2020, due to non-submission of reply of<br>DHI deficiency letters. The applicant via email<br>dated 11.09.2020 furnished a reply and requested<br>to ratify the ad-hoc norms. The copy of<br>representation has been forwarded to DHI on<br>17.11.2020. The case was last considered in M.<br>No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020<br>and decided to wait for the comments. A reminder<br>was issued to DHI on 23.12.2020. However, no<br>comments have been receivedyet. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee considered<br>the case as per the agenda<br>and decided to fix the ad-hoc<br>norms<br>as<br>per<br>written<br>comments given by DHI as<br>under:<br>1. Quantity<br>of<br>import<br>items at Sl. No. 1 to 35<br>may be allowed as per<br>GN-4<br>with<br>accountability<br>clause | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>Approved | |
| R23 | |||||
49 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| with no wastage on<br>weight<br>&<br>number<br>terms.<br>Note:<br>1. The total weight of<br>export item at SL. No. 1<br>is 274.20MT each and<br>may be added in the<br>description<br>of<br>the<br>export item.<br>2. The weight of export<br>item at SL. No. 2 is<br>114.00MT and may be<br>added in the description<br>of the export item.<br>3. The words “Braking<br>System”<br>may<br>be<br>suffixed<br>with<br>the<br>description<br>of<br>the<br>import item at SL. No.<br>1.<br>4. The word “Machined”<br>may be suffixed with<br>the description of the<br>import item at SL. No.<br>15.<br>RA concerned may take<br>suitable consequential action<br>accordingly. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (E-24989)<br>Leitwind<br>Shriram<br>Manufacturin<br>g Private<br>Limited<br>0410165234<br>dated<br>20.02.2019 | 01/81/050/01<br>133/AM19/<br>04/24/040/00<br>254/AM19/ | The case was rejected in M. No. 01/81 dated<br>01.04.2020, due to non-submission of reply of<br>DHI deficiency letters. The applicant via email<br>dated 04.09.2020 furnished a reply and requested<br>to ratify the ad-hoc norms. The copy of<br>representation has been forwarded to DHI on<br>17.11.2020. The case was last considered in M.<br>No. 10/81 dated 10.11.2020 held on 17.11.2020<br>and decided to wait for the comments. A reminder<br>was issued to DHI on 23.12.2020. However, no<br>comments have been received yet. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>The Committee considered<br>the case as per the agenda<br>and the representative of DHI<br>informed that the applicant’s<br>reply dated 11.09.2020 is<br>deficient.<br>Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee decided to seek<br>from the applicant to furnish<br>the following information:<br>1. Rating of the export<br>product.<br>2. Calculation supported by<br>dimensional engineering<br>drawing with relevant<br>dimensions highlighted.<br>3. Information<br>as<br>per<br>Appendix 4G.<br>The cases stands deferred. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>Deferred | |
| R24 | |||||
| CHHAPERI | 01/81/050/00 | The case was approved in M. No. 17/81- | The Committee decided to | <br>Deferred | |
| A | 137/AM20/ | ALC2/2019 dated 27.11.2019 as per written | <br>wait for the comments. | ||
| R25 | |||||
| INTERNATI | comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- | <br> | |||
| ONAL | 07/24/040/00 | 47011/303/2019-TSW dated 13.11.2019. The | |||
| COMPANY | 066/AM20/ | applicant via email dated 02.12.2020 has |
50 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| requested for ratification of ad-hoc norms and | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0710115072 | inform that the export item width has been | ||||
| Dated | restricted to 300 mm but it depends on client order | ||||
| 19.06.2019 | and machine capacity, at the current capacity and | ||||
| order situation kindly allow width of export item | |||||
| upto 360 mm and thickness of export item to be | |||||
| same or less than the import item thickness. The | |||||
| representation<br>was<br>referred<br>to<br>DPIIT<br>on | |||||
| 29.12.2020. However, no comments have been | |||||
| receivedyet. | |||||
| Dynamic<br>Flow<br>Products Pvt.<br>Ltd.<br>0310830300<br>Dated<br>15.07.2019 | <br>01/81/050/00<br>172/AM20/<br>03/94/040/00<br>248/AM20/<br>(E-23927) | The case was approved in Meeting No. 09/81<br>dated 20.10.2020 held on 27.10.2020 as per<br>comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email<br>dated 26.10.2020. The applicant via email dated<br>02.12.2020 requested for correction in exports<br>item description of norms. The representation was<br>referred to Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. | <br>The Committee considered | <br>Approved | |
| <br>the case as per agenda. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||
| <br>Consultant (TEC-3) informed | |||||
| <br>via email dated 07.01.2021 | |||||
| <br>that while bifurcating export | |||||
| <br>product some part of its | |||||
| description was missing and | |||||
| hence, description of export | |||||
| product may be amended as | |||||
| per the applicant’s request. | |||||
| Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee | |||||
| decided<br>to<br>amend<br>the | |||||
| description of export product | |||||
| as per comments given by | |||||
| Consultant (TEC-3) as under: | |||||
| Export item: | |||||
| R26 | |||||
| 1. “Pup Joint and C & C | |||||
| **Hose”**is 331142 Kgs | |||||
| containing 260506 Kgs | |||||
| seamless pipes. | |||||
| 2. “**NPST Pup joint”**is | |||||
| 8766Kgs<br>containing | |||||
| 6513Kgs seamless pipes. | |||||
| Note: The decision for rest | |||||
| of the import items as | |||||
| decided in Meeting No. | |||||
| 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 shall | |||||
| remain unchanged. | |||||
| RA concerned may take | |||||
| suitable consequential action | |||||
| accordingly. | |||||
| Dynamic<br>Flow<br>Products Pvt.<br>Ltd.<br>0310827574<br>dated<br>08.03.2019 | <br>01/81/050/01<br>1 45/AM19/<br>03/94/040/01<br>0 61/AM19/<br>(E-24814) | <br>The case was approved in Meeting No. 09/81<br>dated 20.10.2020 held on 27.10.2020 as per<br>comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email<br>dated 26.10.2020. The applicant via email dated<br>02.12.2020 requested for correction in exports<br>item description of norms and wrong gross qty of<br>exports item. The representation was referred to<br>Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. | <br>The Committee considered | <br>Approved | |
| <br>the case as per agenda. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||
| <br>Consultant (TEC-3) informed | |||||
| <br>via email dated 07.01.2021 | |||||
| R27 | <br>that while bifurcating export | ||||
| <br>product some part of its | |||||
| <br>description was missing and | |||||
| hence, description of export | |||||
| product may be amended as | |||||
| per the applicant’s request. |
51 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| Therefore,<br>the<br>Committee | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| decided<br>to<br>amend<br>the | |||||
| description of export product | |||||
| as per comments given by | |||||
| Consultant (TEC-3) as under: | |||||
| Export item: | |||||
| 1. “Pup Joint and C & C | |||||
| Hose” is347251.90 Kgs | |||||
| containing 266468 Kgs | |||||
| seamless pipes. | |||||
| 2. “**NPST Pup Joint”**is | |||||
| 34766.20Kgscontaining | |||||
| 26379Kgs<br>seamless | |||||
| pipes. | |||||
| Note: The decision for rest | |||||
| of the import items as | |||||
| decided in Meeting No. | |||||
| 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 shall | |||||
| remain unchanged. | |||||
| RA concerned may take | |||||
| suitable consequential action | |||||
| accordingly. | |||||
| Dynamic<br>Flow<br>Products Pvt.<br>Ltd.<br>0310819096<br>Dated<br>12.02.2018 | <br>01/81/050/00<br>106/AM19/<br>03/94/040/00<br>873/AM18/<br>(E-24815) | The case was approved in Meeting No. 09/81<br>dated 20.10.2020 held on 27.10.2020 as per<br>comments given by Consultant (TEC-3) via email<br>dated 26.10.2020. The applicant via email dated<br>02.12.2020 stated that typing mistake made by NC<br>in "Point No. 2 of notes" of norms (i.e. old<br>Meeting No. 23/81 dated 04.03.2020 and case No.<br>R-56) instead of wrong meeting No. 05/81 dated<br>16.07.2020) requested for correction in Point No.<br>2. The representation was referred to Consultant<br>(TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. | <br>The Committee considered | <br>Approved | |
| <br>the case as per agenda and | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||
| <br>noted that earlier the case | |||||
| <br>was approved in Meeting No. | |||||
| <br>23/81 dated 04.03.2020 as | |||||
| <br>per comments of Consultant | |||||
| <br>(TEC-3) and it was wrongly | |||||
| <br>mentioned in note of NC | |||||
| <br>decision in Meeting No. | |||||
| <br>09/81 dated 20.10.2020 held | |||||
| on 27.10.2020 wherein norms | |||||
| were<br>revised<br>as<br>per | |||||
| comments<br>of<br>Consultant | |||||
| (TEC-3).<br>Therefore,<br>the | |||||
| R28 | Committee decided to amend | ||||
| the**“Point No. 2 of the** | |||||
| Note” of the decision of NC | |||||
| of Meeting No. 09/81 dated | |||||
| 20.10.2020<br>held<br>on | |||||
| 27.10.2020 and may be read | |||||
| as under: | |||||
| 1. The decision for rest of | |||||
| the import items as | |||||
| decided in Meeting No. | |||||
| 23/81 dated 04.03.2020 | |||||
| shall<br>remain | |||||
| unchanged. | |||||
52 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
Note: Rest of the decision as decided in Meeting No. 09/81 dated 20.10.2020 held on 27.10.2020 shall remain unchanged. RA concerned may take suitable consequential action accordingly. Tubacex 01/81/050/00 The case was approved in Meeting No. 23/81The Committee decided to Deferred Prakash India 053/AM20/ ALC2/2019 dated 04.03.2020 on the wait for the comments. Private 03/95/040/00 recommendation of Consultant (TEC-3). The Limited 101/AM20/ applicant vide letter dated 18.06.2020 requested 0310828823 for re-fixation of norms and stated that the 10% dated wastage allowed instead of 35% for sr. no. 1 of 07.05.2019 import item, hence the applicant had applied the application exactly as per SION Norms Sr. no. C- R29 831 for import of Sr. No. 1. In which the export & import item description are exactly same as the applied for norms fixation & wastage is given for import item sr. no. 1 is 1.35MT for 1MT of export item. Therefore, the applicant has requested to enhance the wastage of import item sr. no. 1 from 10% to 35%. The representation was referred to Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. BERGEN 01/81/050/00 The case was rejected in M. No. 9/81-ALC2/2016 The Committee decided to Deferred PIPE 448/AM18/ dated 20.10.2020 and held on 27.10.2020, the wait for the comments. SUPPORTS 04/24/040/00 applicant was asked several times to furnish INDIA 153/AM18/ certain information as raised in meeting No. 08/81 PRIVATE HQ E-office dated 19.12.2018, 03/81 dated 15.05.2019, 09/81 LIMITED Computer dated 07.08.2019 & 06/81 dated 11.08.2020. The 0410163738 No.:24464 representatives of the applicant during personal dated hearing held through video conferencing in 28.11.2017 Meeting No. 06/81 (Originally scheduled for 11.08.2020) held on 25.08.2020 was also directed R30 to furnish the requisite information. However, Consultant (TEC-3) informed that the applicant has not yet been furnished any specific reply against issued deficiency letters despite many reminders. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Chennai. The applicant via email dated 08.12.2020 furnished a reply and requested to ratify the adhoc norms. The representation was referred to Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet.
53 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
| R. K. STEEL | R. K. STEEL | <br>01/81/050/00 | The case was rejected in M. No. 7/81 dated | The case was rejected in M. No. 7/81 dated | The case was rejected in M. No. 7/81 dated | The case was rejected in M. No. 7/81 dated | <br>The Committee considered | <br>The Committee considered | <br> <br>Approved | <br> <br>Approved | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANUFAC | 781/AM19/ | 08.09.2020 held on 15.09.2020 due to non | <br>the case as per agenda and | ||||||||
| TURING | submission of the copy of application from the | <br>decided to fix the ad-hoc | <br> <br> <br> | ||||||||
| COMPANY | 04/24/040/00 | applicant and in this regard, an email was sent on | <br>norms<br>as<br>per<br>written | ||||||||
| PRIVATE | 101/AM18/ | 23.12.2019 followed by reminders on 30.03.2020, | <br>comments dated 06.01.2021 | ||||||||
| LIMITED | 07.06.2020 & 24.08.2020. | given by Consultant (SKB) | |||||||||
| HQ E-office | The applicant via email dated 14.12.2020 | <br>as under: | |||||||||
| 0410163442 | Computer | furnished a reply and requested to ratify the ad- | |||||||||
| R31 | dated | No.: 24076 | hoc norms. The representation was referred to | ||||||||
| 18.08.2017 | Consultant(SKB)on 29.12.2020. | ||||||||||
| ITCHS<br>Code | Export Item | Quantity | ITCHS<br>Code | Import Item | Recommended<br>Quantity | ||||||
| 73066100 | <br> | Galvanized steel square<br>/rectangular Tubes | 952.38<br>MT | 72104900 | Prime<br>Non<br>Alloy<br>GalvanizedSteelCoils | 2.5% wastage on net<br>content of export | |||||
| Note: The applicant should import items of relevant grade and | thickness. | ||||||||||
| RA concerned maytake suitable consequential action accordingly. | |||||||||||
| ECIE | 01/81/050/00 | The case was rejected in M. no. | 4/81 dated | <br>The Committee decided to | <br>Deferred | ||||||
| IMPACT | 029/AM13/ | 17.06.2020 and held on 09.07.2020, based on the | <br>wait for the comments. | ||||||||
| PVT. LTD. | 07/24/040/00 | written comments given by DPIIT vide U.O. No. | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||||||
| 0710086493 | 446/AM12/ | P-47011/87/2020 TSW dated 30.6.2020. The | |||||||||
| dated | applicant via email dated 11.09.2020 stated that | ||||||||||
| R32 | 22.02.2012 | the product is customizable (different lengths and | |||||||||
| width) wastage is very less and there is only the | |||||||||||
| side cutting loss. Hence wastage is negligible / nil | |||||||||||
| and requested to fix the norms on net to net basis. | |||||||||||
| The representation was referred to DPIIT on | |||||||||||
| 29.12.2020. However, no comments have been | |||||||||||
| receivedyet. | |||||||||||
| CG Power | 01/81/050/00 | The case was ratified in Meeting No. 20/81 dated | <br>The Committee decided to | <br>Deferred | |||||||
| and Industrial | <br>505/AM15/ | 19.12.2017 as per comments of DHI vide UO No. | <br>wait for the comments. | ||||||||
| Solution | 03/94/040/00 | TSWB-3/181/2014<br>dated<br>12.01.2018.<br>The | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||||||||
| Limited | 268/AM15/ | applicant vide letter dated 27.11.2020 stated that | |||||||||
| (Formerly | in the DHI comments, the Norms were ratified for | ||||||||||
| Crompton | all items from Sr. no. 1 to 29 and items no. 30 to | ||||||||||
| Greaves | 39 were deleted. No reason was assigned in the | ||||||||||
| Limited) | DHI letter dated 12.01.2018 to delete the items | ||||||||||
| mentioned at 30 to 39. The party has already | |||||||||||
| R33 | |||||||||||
| 0310789692 | imported the inputs specified under sr. no. 30 to | ||||||||||
| dated | 39, used in the manufacture of the export products | ||||||||||
| 26.09.2014 | i.e. Transformers and the same have already been | ||||||||||
| exported, hence the party has requested for review | |||||||||||
| the application and allow the inputs as per Item | |||||||||||
| No. 30 to 39 on net to net basis as the goods are | |||||||||||
| engineering goods which are permitted in the | |||||||||||
| policy on Net to Net basis. The representation was | |||||||||||
| referred to Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. | |||||||||||
| However,no comments have been receivedyet. | |||||||||||
| TUBEX | 01/81/050/00 | The case was rejected in M. no. 11/81 dated | <br>The Committee decided to | <br>Deferred | |||||||
| INDIA | 028/AM18/ | 22.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of | <br>wait for the comments. | ||||||||
| R34 | |||||||||||
| 0510401449 | 05/24/040/00 | DIPP deficiency letter sent to firm on 27.06.2017 | <br> | ||||||||
| dated | 537/AM17/ | followed with reminder dated 14.08.2017. | |||||||||
| 31.01.2017 | The applicant vide letter dated 25.12.2020 |
54 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
furnished a reply and requested to ratify the adhoc norms. The hard copy of representation was forwarded to Consultant (TEC-3) on 29.12.2020. However, no comments have been received yet.
The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair.
Shobhit Gupta Dy. Director General of Foreign Trade E-mail: nc2.dgft@nic.in shobhit.gupta@gov.in
55 | Page 55 Minutes of NC-II Meeting No. 13/81 scheduled for 30.12.2020 and held on 08.01.2021
SDF
| Export Items: | Export Items: | Export Items: |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Model number, technical specification and specific quantity-both in terms of number (if<br>any)and/or weight,of each exportproduct(Appendix-33 of current HBP refers). | |
| 2 | Detail technical note on manufacturing process includingthe relevant flowsheet. | |
| 3 | Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may<br>also be furnished. | |
| 4 | Weight of each Export Product. | |
| 5 | Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the<br>purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each<br>imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along<br>with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be<br>imported/procured from sources other than the license,if any,mayalso be indicated. | |
| Import Items: | ||
| 6 | Information about the inputs required per unit of the resultant product as per Sl. No. 1 of<br>Appendix-11A appearingin current HBP(Vol.I)separatelyfor eachproduct. | |
| Components: | ||
| 7 | Technical characteristics /part numbers,if any. | |
| 8 | Assembly drawings/diagrams of the resultant product showing placement and exact use<br>of components in the exportproduct(s). | |
| 9 | Bifurcated quantities of components to be accounted for in the resultant product and the<br>requirement of components as spares. Raw Material / Consumables. | |
| 10 | Size and specification including grade, composition, range, thickness etc. of the items<br>proposed for import. | |
| 11 | Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw<br>material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components<br>to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of<br>manufacturing<br>with<br>complete<br>justification<br>and<br>supported<br>by<br>documentary<br>evidence/drawings etc. | |
| 11(a) | Sheet layout diagram of the material indicatingthewastage duringblanking. | |
| 12 | Cross Sectional Diagram of export product with calculation of raw material requirement<br>and the weight of the Cable in Kg. per Km. Copy of relevant National/International<br>Standard/buyer’s data sheet mayalso be furnished. | |
| 13 | Weight of Steel, which requires imported welding material, giving break-up of:<br>i)<br>Steel Plates/Sheets upto 30mm thickness<br>ii)<br>Steel Plates/Sheets more than 30 mm thickness and upto 70 mm thickness<br>iii) Steel Plates/Sheets more than 70 mm thickness.<br>iv) Others e.g.Flanges,Pipes,Tubes,Bars/Rods, Castings/Forgings etc. | |
| 14 | Particulars of the licenses obtained in the past and ratified by ALC (with or without<br>modification) for the same export product covered under this application, in view of<br>PublicNoticeNo.48dated 14.11.2002. | |
| 15 | Use of exportproduct. | |
| 16 | You are advised to applyfor SION. | |
| 17 | Please use expanded/full name of endproduct.Do not use the abbreviations/short form. | |
| 18 | -- | |
| 19 | Any other information: | |
| 20 | The information called for must be submittedin duplicate within 15 daysfrom the date<br>of issue of this letter. The information may be directly sent to Chairman, NC-II, O/o<br>DGFT,UdyogBhawan,New Delhi-110011,Office Telephone No.: 23061562,Extn.267. |
==> picture [666 x 1042] intentionally omitted <==
| Description | Wastage<br>% for<br>aluminium<br>alloy | Wastage<br>paint | % for | Wastage<br>Nickel | Wastage<br>Nickel | % | for | Wastage<br>Copper | Wastage<br>Copper | % | for | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Painted | 1.08 kg/kg<br>net | |||||||||||
| aluminium<br>alloy wheels<br>12" to 16" | content<br>of<br>aluminium<br>alloy<br>in export | Upto 2% <br>FoB value | of | |||||||||
| product | ||||||||||||
| 1.12 kg/kg<br>net | ||||||||||||
| Painted<br>aluminium<br>alloy wheels | content<br>of<br>aluminium<br>alloy<br>in export | Upto 2% <br>FoB value | of | |||||||||
| 17" to 22" | product | |||||||||||
| Chrome<br>Plated<br>Aluminium<br>alloy wheels<br>12" to 22" | 1.12 kg/kg<br>net<br>content<br>of<br>aluminium<br>alloy<br>in export<br>producl | 1.01 kg/kg<br>net<br>content<br>of<br>Nickel in<br>export<br>product | 1.01 kg/kg<br>net<br>content<br>of<br>Copper<br>in<br>export<br>product | |||||||||
| --.__.------_ | ..- -----<br>.. .--.---------- -----------_. | .__ | J |
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.