IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr A / NC-II) Advance Authorisation 2014-11-12

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE (DES-IT SECTION) RATIFIED MINUTES OF THE NORMS COMMITTEE-II MEETING NO.12/81 SCHEDULED ON 12.11.2014.

The Meeting No. 12/81 of Norms Committee-II for the year 2014-15 scheduled to be held on 12.11.2014, was actually held on 27.11.2014 at 03:30 PM under the Chairmanship of Shri Darshan Singh, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the following applications for ratification of norms in respect of advance authorizations under Duty Exemption Scheme (Chapter-4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014. The following members were present in the meeting:-

Department 1 Shri $.K. Jain, D.O. DIPP 2 Shri S.K. Bhatnagar, Deputy I.A. MOS Shri Kanwalinder Singh Sodhi, Assistant Director MSME Shri Haradhan Das, FTDO DGFT

| Case No.:13/16/81‘Party — Meet No/Date:12/81_|Status: | | ALC2/2011 \PVT.LTD.,‘Name:K.S.INSTRUMENTS 12.11.2014|ALC2/2014 PPeferred | HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710079473 \Defer _ 1:01/81/050/00114/AM12/ |:07/24/040/00061/AM12/ (30.05.201 l \Date:30.12.2014 | Decision : NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 21.07.2014 by DIT to the firm. A reminder | | has also sent to the firm on 03.11.2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. i! Hence, NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, |__|In|ThecaseCommitteeit is a Deemeddecidedexport,to checkfirmfromshouldfirmprovidewhetherfollowingit is a caseinformation:-of physical(i)export/EPCG Deemedlicence numberexport.| | and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per _ cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG | licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to po t22014 | (Case No.:11/5/81Party Name: PRECISION ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: 1 | |'ALC2/2012 ||ELECTRONICS LTD. |ALC2/2014(12.11.2014 Deferred |:01/81/050/00078/AM | HQ File 13/ |:05/24/040/00012/AM13/IRLA File (24Lic . No/Date:0504.2012 10323036 D atef e :30.12.2014r | Decision : NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 09.06.2014 by DIT to the firm. A reminder 2 lhas also sent to the firm on 31.10.2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. | ‘Hence, NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, [The Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. | \Inland casedateit (ii)is aCIF Deemedvalue export,of the licencefirm should provide(iii) Whether followingthis licence information:-was issued (i)under EPCGZero licenceduty numberor 3 per licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | jcent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG 30.12.2014. Hae

==> picture [461 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- (Case No.:2/12/81- Party Name:HINDALCO —_|Meet No/Date:12/81- _‘|Status: | ALC2/2014 INDUSTRIES LIMITED ALC2/2014 Deferred | | 12.11.2014 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:02 10176895 |Defer | |:01/81/050/00403/AM15/ :02/24/040/00012/AM13/ 25.04.2012 Date: | | 30.12.2014 | ‘Decision : NC decided to send a letter to [firm] [to][ submit][ the] [following] [information] [as][ per] vrritten| comments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/3 dated 27.11.2014 as under:- ----- End of picture text -----

3 1. Specific Flat Rolled Products (export item) with their respective quantities to be manufactured from Aluminium Coil/sheet (Import item). | 2. Details of manufacturing process with wastage claimed at each stage. ‘The‘export. CommitteeIn case it alsois a decided Deemed toexport, checkfirm fromshould firm whetherprovide followingit is a caseinformation:-of physical (i)export/ EPCG Deemedlicence inumber and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty | lor 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How | |EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands | (teferred to 30.12.2014, | [Case No.:6/16/81Party Name:CROMPTON _ [Meet No/Date:12/81- |Status: | ALC2/2012 GREAVES LIMITED, |ALC2/2014 Deferred 12.1 1.2014 4 [HQ File RLAFile ~—~—|Lic.No/Date:0310709777 |Defer :01/81/050/003 13/AM13/ :03/94/040/00129/AM13/ 20.09.2012 ‘Date: | 30.12.2014 | Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send a| reminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | (Case No.:1/22/81Party Name:BHARAT [Meet No/Date:12/81Status: ALC2/2012 HEAVY ELECTRICALS |ALC2/2014 Deferred | LIMITED }12.11.2014 5 Ho|:01/81/050/00398/AM13/ File RLA_|:11/24/040/00020/AM13/ File “|Lic.No/Date:1110027311[27.11.2012 |Defer'Date:30.12.2014 Decision : NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12.08.2014 to the firm. But, reply of the firm is still awaited. Hence, NC decided to send a reminder to firm to expedite reply. The firm vide it’s reply dated 12.08.14 has confirmed that it is a physical exports project of PPC, Greece. The case | \stands deferred to 30.12.2014. ‘Case No.:7/25/81Party Name:GRAVITA [Meet No/Date:12/81Status: ALC2/2012 INDIA LTD., |ALC2/2014 [Deferred | 12.11.2014 | 6 {HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date: 1310041928 [Defer :01/81/050/00458/AM13/ _ |:13/24/040/00047/AM13/ = |18.01.2013 Date:30.12.2014 Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MOEF. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to MOEF. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

UA%

‘ALC2/2012‘Case No.:23/25/81Party Name:MC COM ‘Meet No/Date: 12/81‘Status: | | INDUSTRIES (INDIA) (ALC2/2014 [Deferred 7 PVT. LTD. ‘12.11.2014 | | | HQ:01/81/050/00474/AM13/ File :03/95/040/00818/AM13/RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 1072168822.01.2013 ‘[ D atef e r:30.12.2014 | Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a | |reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | \Case No.:34/24/81Party Name:PILOT Meet No/Date: 12/81Status: ALC2/2013 INDUSTRIES LTD. AALC2/2014 Deferred 12.11.2014 || 8 IHQ File ‘RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:05 10351299 Defer :01/81/050/00422/AM14/ —:05/24/040/00474/AM13/ 11.04.2013 ‘Date:30.12.2014| _ Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MOEF. Hence NC decided to send a ' reminder to MOEF. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | ‘Case No.:5/5/81‘Party Name:PEARL ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status: | 'ALC2/2013 IINSULATIONS PVT. ‘ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred LIMITED 12.11.2014 | ‘HQ File iRLA File iLic.No/Date:07 10094882 Defer :01/81/050/00107/AM14/_ :07/24/040/00534/AM13/ 17.04.2013 |Date:30.12.2014 9 Decision : NC observed that the application ofthis case was[earlier] sent[to] DIPP.As the case pertains | ‘to DHI, NC decided to send the application to DHI for examination and comments. NC also decided _ to check whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export please | provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) | ‘Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved ‘amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO| _ jagainst the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | _ ‘Case No.:13/5/81-|ALC2/2013 (INDIA)‘Party Name:METLTD, TRADE (ALC2/2014/|Meet No/Date:12/81DeferredStatus: | | )12.11.2014 ‘10 HQ File 'RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:05 10353167 Defer | :01/81/050/00115/AM14/ :05/24/040/00030/AM14/ 03.05.2013 \Date:30.12.2014 ‘Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MOEF. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to MOEF. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | ‘Case No.:14/5/81‘Party Name:JMW INDIA Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | ALC2/2013 (P) LTD. ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred 12.11.2014 11 HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:05 10355876 |Defer | |:01/81/050/00116/AM14/ _|:05/23/040/00062/AM14/ 31.05.2013 |Date:30.12.2014 [Decision : NC decided that CLA Vide Letter No. 05/23/040/62/AM14/ZALC-1 dated 17.04.2014 at SI. No. 1 informed that this AA was issued on repeat basis. However, NC noted that the file no. earmarked for another AA No. 0510347195 dated 22.02.2013. NC, therefore decide to issue a letter | ito CLA seeking clarification on this. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. ‘12. Case No.:37/3/81Party Name:RADIALL Meet No/Date:12/81‘Status: | Soha .* + are +4. ms : . ‘ina Be

| |ALC2/2014 INDIA PRIVATE ALC2/2014 Deferred LIMITED, (12.11.2014 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:07 10095951 Defer :01/81/050/00134/AM15/ _ |:07/24/040/00541/AM13/_ |17.06.2013 paps)? 20’) (Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at DIT. Hence NC decided to send a) | |reminder to DIT. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | \Case No.:2/3/81[Party Name:BELGIUM ‘Meet No/Date: 12/81Status: | |ALC2/2014 ALUMINIUM AND ALC2/2014 \Deferred | PVT.LTD | | GLASS INDUSTRIES (12.11.2014 HQ File IRLA File ‘Lic. No/Date:03 10741017 |Defer | :01/81/050/00099/AM15/_ |:03/94/040/00225/AM14/ |10.07.2013 Date:30.12.2014| Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 24/10/2014 to the firm. A reminder has 3 also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, -~ INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The) case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number| | ‘Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In | and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per’ | |cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG| licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | 30.12.2014. | \Case No.:38/6/81‘Party Name:PREMIER — |Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | ALC2/2014 INDUSTRIAL \ALC2/2014 Deferred | (CORPORATION 12.1 1.2014 | [LIMITED | | HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310741710 (Defer | :01/81/050/00192/AM15/ _ |:03/95/040/00835/AM13/ |16.07.2013 Date:30.12.2014| Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a| | |reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | ‘Case No.:31/15/81Party Name: DIANA Meet No/Date: 12/81Status: | ALC2/2013 METALS ALC2/2014 Deferred | 12.11.2014 | | 15 |HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:04 10148198 |Defer | :01/81/050/00246/AM14/_ |:04/24/040/00076/AM14/ [23.07.2013 Date:30.12.2014 | Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

[Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MOEF. Hence NC decided to send a Hae

, |!

==> picture [486 x 729] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- reminder to MOEF. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | _ iCase No.:29/3/81- ‘Party Name:LEONI ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status: | iALC2/2014 CABLE SOLUTIONS (ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred (INDIA) PVT.LTD. 12.11.2014 | | _ |HQ File RLA File |Lic.No/Date:31 10060000 |Defer :01/81/050/00126/AM15/__|:31/83/040/00080/AM14/ 22.08.2013 \Date:30.12.2014 | Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, 17 INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | ‘Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In | case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number} and date (11) CIF value ofthe licence [(iii)] Whether [this] licence was issued under Zero duty or [3] per icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG, licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | iCase No.:82/15/81- Party Name:POLYCAB (Meet No/Date:12/81- ‘Status: | ‘ALC2/2013 WIRES PVT.LTD. iALC2/2014 Approved | 4 (12.11.2014 | jHQFile IRLA File |Lic.No/Date:03 10746958 | :01/81/050/00297/AM14/ —:03/95/040/00011/AM14/ [26.08.2013 | ‘Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. | No. 12/150/2014-TSW/18 dated 27 /11/2014 as under:- !. Sizes, Quantities and Net weight of cables at export products at SI. No. 1 to 4 may be | specified as per enclosed Annexure. 2. “UOM” of import items at SI. No. | to 3 & 5 to 8 may be corrected as Kgs. | 3. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 i.e. Copper Wire Rod may be allowed as under: | (i) For export products at SI. No. 1(1) to 1(3), 1(7), 1(8), 2(1) to 2(4), 2(8), 2(9), 2(11), 3(2) to ||| (it) 3(5),For export 4(3) toproducts 4(8), 4(10)at SI. & 4(11),No. 1(4) as to1.011(6),Kgs./Kg.1(9), 2(5) contentto 2(7), in the4(1) Export & 4(9) products.as per Engineering | 18 Table. 4. (iii) For export products at SI. No. 1(10), 1(11), 2(10), 3(1) & 4(2 ) as per Engineering Table. 5. | | | 4. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 2 i.e. LDPE Compound( Crosslinkable) may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg content in the Export products at SI. No. 1 to 4 | 5. Quantity of import item at SLNo. 3 i.e. COGEGUM Compound may be allowed as 1.05 | | Kgs./kg content in the Export products at SI. No. 1, 3 & 4. 6. Quantity of import item at SI.No.4 i.e. Glass Mica Tape (Cable grade) may be allowed as 1.02 | Sq.Mtrs./ Sy.mtrs. content in the Export products at Sl. No. 1 & 3. 7. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 5 i.e. PVC Resin may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg content | | in the Export products at SI. No. 2. | 8. contentQuantityinofthe importExportitemproductsat SI.No.at SI.6No.i.e.2.Plasticizer (DOP) may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg | 9. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 7 i.e. Galvanised Steel Wire may be allowed as 1.02 Kgs./kg | content in the Export products at SI. No. 1(9), 1(10), 1€11), 2(10), 2011), 3 & 4. 10. Quantity of import item at SI. No. 8 i.e. HDPE Compound may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg | content in the Export products at SI. No. 1. | | 11. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 9 i.e. Water Swellable Tape may be allowed as 1.01 | 5 —rateetiy aay at ears Pele ----- End of picture text -----

| |

==> picture [467 x 727] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | | Sq.Mtrs./ Sq.Mtr content in the Export products at SI]. No. 1. | Firm has confirmed that the above AA has been obtained for physical export. ie may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | (Case No.:81/15/81- Party Name:POLYCAB_ —-Meet No/Date:12/81- |Status: | ALC2/2013 'WIRES PVT.LTD. (ALC2/2014 Approved HQFile (12.11.2014 | | | RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10747065 | | :01/81/050/00296/AM 1 4/ :03/95/040/00424/AM 1 4/ 27.08.2013 | | Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. | No. 12/150/2014-TSW/19 dated 27 /11/2014 as under:- 1. Sizes, Quantities and Net weight of cables at export products at SI. No. | to 11 may be specified as per enclosed Annexure. 2. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 i.e. Copper Wire Rod may be allowed as under: (i) For export products at SI. No. 1(1), 1(8), 1(20),2(9), 2(10), 2(12), 2(13),2(15), 2(16), 2(18), | (ii) For2(19), 2(20), 2(21),export products 11¢1),at SI. No.1(2),11(2), 11(3)1(4),1(11),1012), & 11(4) as per1(14), Engineering119) & Table.1(21) as4. applied for i.e. || 12144.24 Kgs/Km, 9497.2 Kgs/Km, 9497.2 Kgs/Km, 12144.24 Kgs/Km, 9497.2 | | (iii) Kgs./Km,For export156.56productsKgs./Kmat SI. No.& 594.9041(3), 1(5),Kgs./Km1(6), 1(7),respectively.1(10), 1(13), 1(15), 1(16), 1(17), 1(18), | | 1(26), 2(1) to 2(6), 2(11), 2(17), 2(22) to 2(26), 3, 4, 9(2), 10 & 11(7) as per Engineering | | Table. 5. (iv) For export products at SI. No. 1(24) ,1( 25), 2(8), 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9(1), as 1.01 Kgs./Kg. | | content in the Export products. | (v) For export products at SI. No. 2(7) & 2(14) as applied for i.e. 7570.2 Kgs/Km & 156.56 | (vi) ForKgs./Kmexport respectively.products at S]. No. 11(5) & 11(6) as applied for i.e. 594.904 Kgs/Km & 7570.2 || Kgs./Km respectively. 3. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 2 i.e. LDPE Compound( Crosslinkable) may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg content in the Export products at SI. No. | to 11 4. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 3 i.e. COGEGUM Compound may be allowed as_ 1.05 | Kgs./kg content in the Export products at SI. No. 1, 5, 7 & 9. | 5. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 4 ie. PVC Resin may be allowed as_ 1.05 Kgs./kg content | in the Export products at SI. No. 2, 3, 4, 6, 8,10 & 11. | 6. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 5 i.e. PVC Plasticizer may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg | content in the Export products at SI. No. 2, 3, 4, 6, 8,10 & 11. Kgs./kg content in the Export products at SI. No. 1,2,4to9 & 11. | 7. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 6 i.e. Galvanised Steel Wire may be allowed as 1.02 | | 8. Quantity of import item at SI. No. 7 ie. Aluminium Ingot may be allowed as 1.01 kgs/kg content in the Export products at S]. No. 3 & 10. | 9. Quantity of import item at SI.No.8 i.e. Glass Mica Tape(Cable grade) may be allowed as | | 1.02 Sq.Mtrs./ Sq.mtrs. content in the Export products at SI. No. 7. | | Firm has confirmed that the above AA has been obtained for physical export. | | RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. i20 |Case No.:52/15/81- Party Name:INDIAN Meet No/Date:12/81- ‘Status: | 6 Hem jolie ly ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [466 x 344] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- |ALC2/2013 \TECHNOMETAL |ALC2/2014 ‘Approved | | iCOMPANY LIMITED 12.11.2014 | |:01/81/050/00267/AM14/HQ File —_:05/23/040/00220/AM14/|RLA File [ 29.08.2013Lic.No/Date:05 10363889 || Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of MOS vide U.O. | | | INo. 2(5)/2013-TW dated 24.09.2014 as under:- | | [Sl.No.] Item of Export Qt [Item oflmport | [Qty] | 1. Ferro 35MT Unroasted molybdenum 40.01 MT Molybdenum(Molybdenum concentrates(MoS2) | 60-70%) Ferro Silicon(Silicon 75- 12,66MT | 85%). | | Aluminium Scrap 4.69MT | RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly, | | | | |Case No.:58/15/81- ‘Party Name:SALZER Meet No/Date:12/81- Status: | | ALC2/2013 |ELECTRONICS LTD ‘ALC2/2014 Deferred | 12.11.2014 21 |HQ File |RLA File 'Lic.No/Date:32 10066905 |Defer :01/81/050/00273/AM14/ _::32/24/040/00007/AM14/ '05.09.2013 Date:30.12.2014 | Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send a ireminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [464 x 384] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- \Case No.:41/15/81- ‘Party Name:SHARDA Meet No/Date:12/81- Status: | (ALC2/2013 MOTOR INDS LTD ALC2/2014 Approved | 12.11.2014 | | HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:0510365038 | | | |:01/81/050/00256/AM 14/ :05/24/040/00197/AM 14/ 09.09.2013 | | _ |Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DHI vide U.O. |No. 3(70)/2013/TSW(B)/2. dated 08.10.2014 as under:- | | [SI Export Product Net Import items Quantity No wt./piece of recommended/piece EP of EP 22 1 Muffler 29385/0155- | 1.90Kg. Non-alloy aluminised | 1.91kg with 26% | 2 3539 steel coil. wastage. AO30MO65 aluminised wastage. | Silencer, Exhaust; 5 46kg. i, Non-alloysteel coil. 410kg0.86kg withwith 30%7% | | ii. Cold rolled | wastage. | | stainless steel | coil | 3 Muffler Exhaust | 2.85 kg. Non-alloy aluminised | 2.44kg with 3.9% 24108/0155-3435-02 steel coil. wastage. 4 Muffler 155-4661 6.90kg Non-alloy aluminised | 5.70kg with 7% | steel coil. _wastage. | 5 Silencer, Exhaust; 6.80kg i. Non-alloy 6kg with 7% AO34F778 aluminised wastage. | 7 ay I i) All bow) rc apeege, ied ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [1 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | | ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [1 x 17] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [2 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | | ----- End of picture text -----

steel coil. Component net to net | ii, Oxidation basis. catalyst | | the above mentioned AA has been obtained above mentioned AA has been obtained mentioned AA has been obtained AA has been obtained has been obtained been obtained obtained | |

Firm vide e-mail dated 18.09.2014 has confirmed that the above mentioned AA has been obtained above mentioned AA has been obtained mentioned AA has been obtained AA has been obtained has been obtained been obtained obtained for physical exports. || RA| may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

(Case No.:2/24/81Party Name:COPRAL ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status: | | ALC2/2013 (CONDUCTORS PVTINSULATED LTD 12.11.|ALC2/ 201 44 Approved | | Ha File [RLA File 'Lic.No/Date:04 10149957 | | | :01/81/050/00390/AM 14/ |:04/24/040/00126/AM14/ (17.09.2013[12/113/2014-TSW/32][dated][ 24][ /09/2014][as][under:-] | bs Decision[No.] : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. | 1. Words ‘containing 25 MT of Copper” may be suffixed with the description of export item. 2. Words “EC Grade” may be suffixed with the description of import item and its quantity may be allowed as applied for i.e. 25 MT on net to net basis as claimed by the firm

Firm vide its E-mail dated 26/11/2014 has informed that the above AA is obtained for physical ‘export. RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | (Case No.:1/15/81Party Name:CROMPTON [Meet No/Date:12/81Status: |ALC2/2013 (GREAVES LIMITED, \ALC2/2014 ‘Rejected | | | 12.11.2014 | HQ File RLA':03/94/040/00985/AM File 13/ Lic,No/Date:0318.09.2013 10750038 | bd ‘Decision:[:01/81/050/00216/AM14/] NC noted that firm has not replied to D/L dated 4/6/2014 reminder dated 12/08/2014 and | final reminder dated 28/10/2014. Since no reply was received form firm despite repeated reminders, | the committee decided to reject the case with direction to firm to pay custom duty & applicable | jinterest for EODC.

Case No.i27/6/81[Party Meet No/Date:12/81_|Status: | | |ALC2/2014 Name: TECHNOMAK ALC2/2014 Deferred | [PROJECT INDIA PVT 12.11.2014 | LTD | | | HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410149963 |Defer[NC][noted][that][Deficiency][letter][was][issued][on][12/08/2014][to][the][firm.][A][reminder][has] ps[‘Decision:] :01/81/050/00181/AM15/__|:04/24/040/00133/AM14/ {18.09.2013 Date:30.12.2014 also sent to the firm on 24/102014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, | INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The eoapinials decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number land date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per[|] \aa 8 ~ fflty .

cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG ‘licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

Case No.:15/24/81Party Name:ASSOCIATED |Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | iALC2/2013 (PIGMENTS LIMITED ALC2/2014 Rejected 12.11.2014 | 1:02/24/040/00088/AM 1 4/ 23.09.2013 L6[:01/81/050/00403/AM14/] HQ File IRLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:021019465 1 | ‘Decision : NC noted that firm has not replied to D/L dated 04/06/2014 reminder dated 12/08/2014 | land final reminder dated 24/10/2014. Since no reply was received form firm despite repeated| jreminders, the committee decided to reject the case with direction to firm to pay custom duty & | peplicable interest for EODC. | _ ALC2/2013|Case No.:24/24/81(INDIA)‘Party Name:METLTD. TRADE ‘Meet\ALC2/2014 No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status:‘Deferred | | (12.11.2014 27 HQ File IRLA File 'Lic.No/Date:0510369439 Defer :01/81/050/00412/AM14/ |:05/24/040/00244/AM14/_ |25,10.2013 Date:30,12.2014 | |Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MOEF. Hence NC decided to send a| ireminder to MOEF. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. Case No.:43/24/81Party Name:MAN iMeet No/Date: 12/81 - Status: | ALC2/2013 INDUSTRIES (INDIA) | |ALC2/2014 Deferred | | | ILTD. 112.11.2014 | | |HQ:01/81/050/0043 File 1/AM14/ |.03/95/040/00597/AMRLA File 14/ 28.10.2013‘Lic.No/Date:03 10755802 Defer[Date:30.12.2014 | Decision: NC noted that the comments of DIPP vide U.O. 12/113/2013-TSW/40 dated 24.09.2014 has been received. 28 ‘Exploration‘Firm vide itsProjectE-mail ofdatedIOCL.13/08/2014Thereforehastheinformedcommitteethat decided(i) supplyto underrequestthistheAAfirmis toto Petroleumprovide a| certificate from DG, Hydrocarbon stating that the item covered under the subject authorisation for ithe IOCL project (ii) It is also decided to forward the copy of Application and reply to EPCG [Division for comments that invalidation letter No.0559002411 dated 14.10.2013 was issued for ‘supply of Steel pipes etc. as per condition sheet whereas the IOCL has obtained EPCG| lauthorisation for export of Petroleum products viz. HDPE, LLDPE, PP, ATF etc. EPCG division | |requested to provide comments. (iii) Further, RA, Mumbai is requested to confirm whether NC can atity this case in view of RA’s Email dated 22.08.2014. NC decided to send a reminder to tirm jand RA to expedite reply. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

==> picture [475 x 137] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- \Case No.:61/24/81- Party Name:POLYCAB — Meet No/Date:12/81- _'Status: | iALC2/2013 |WIRES PVT.LTD. ALC2/2014 iApproved | | 12.11.2014 | | 79 HQ File RLA File ‘Lic. No/Date:0310757014 | | ':01/81/050/00449/AM14/__':03/95/040/00582/AM14/ [06.11.2013 | | | Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. | arm , 6 Pe QR ce ----- End of picture text -----

| No. 12/150/2014-TSW/29 dated 27.11.2014 as under:| | | 1. Sizes, Quantities and Net weight of cables at export products at SI. No. 1 to6 may be | specified as per enclosed Annexure.
(i) For export products at SI. No. 1 , 2, 4, 5 & 6, as 1.01 Kgs/Kg. content in the Export
| 2. Quantity of import item at S.No.1 i.e. Copper Wire Rod may be allowed as under: (ii) products.For export products at SI. No. 3, as per Engineering Table. 5. |
|3. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 2 i.e. LDPE Compound( Crosslinkable) may be allowed as | 1.05 Kgs./kg content in the Export products at SI. No. 1 to 5 4. Quantity of import item at SINo. 3 ie. COGEGUM Compound may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg content in the Export products at SI. No. 1 & 4. |
1. Quantity of import item at SI.No. 4 i.e. PVC Resin may be allowed as_ 1.05 Kgs./kg content | in the Export products at SI. No. 2, 3, 5 & 6. |
1. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 5 i.e. PVC Plasticizer may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg | content in the Export products at SI. No. 2, 3, 5 & 6.
| 7. Quantity of import item at SI.No.6 i.e. Glass Mica Tape(Cable grade) may be allowed as | | 8. Quantity1.02 Kg./ Kg.of imporcon t eni t emin theat Sl. ExportNo. 7 productsi.e. HDPEat SI.Compound No. 1 & 4.may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./kg |
| content in the Export product at S]. No. 1& 2. | 9. QuantitySq.Mtrs./ ofSq.Mtr importcontentitem atin SI.No.the Export8 i.e.productsWater atSwellableSI. No. 1 Tape& 2.. may be allowed as 1.01 | | 10. Quantity of import item at Sl.No. 9 i.e. Galvanised Steel Wire may be allowed as 1.02 | | Kgs./kg1(26), 2(1), content2(7),in2(10),the Export3,4 & products6. at SI. No. 1(1), 1(3), 1(10),1(11), 1(12), 1€15), 1(16), | 11. Quantity of import item at SI. No. 10 i.e. Aluminium Ingot may be allowed as 1.01 kgs/kg
|| Fim| hascontent confirmedin the Export that theproduct above AAat SI. hasNo. been5. obtained for physical export. | | NA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | ‘Case No.:17/3/81Party Name:KALYANI est No/Date: 12/81 - Status: | ‘cca TECHNOFORGE LTD. /ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred
30 | 12.11.2014 | | | |HQ File RLA File 'Lic.No/Date:3110061030 |Defer | :01/81/050/00114/AM15/_ |:31/83/040/00148/AM14/_ |07.11.2013 Date:30.12.2014 |
| ‘Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send a. | jreminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | ‘\Case No.:45/24/81Party Name:BARTEC Meet No/Date:12/81_|Status: | |a|ALC2/2013 INDIA (P) LTD. \ALC2/2014(12.11.2014 Deferred HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:05 10370995 [Defer | |:01/81/050/00433/AM14/ _ |:05/23/040/00309/AM14/__|13.11.2013 Date:30.12.2014 | Ae tol (244

Decision: Firm has informed that the above AA is obtained for deemed export, supply of goods to lOCL petroleum operations. Therefore, in order to avail of central excise exemption vide SI. No. 336 of the Notification No. 12/2012-CE, dated 17.03.2012, the domestic supplier shall be required ‘to fulfil condition No. 41 General of Hydro Carbons in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, to the effect that the said supplies are required for petroleum operations”. (Under Para 8.3 of FTP, TED exemption is one of the deemed export benefits for these supplies. | [Second benefit is Advance Authorisation. Accordingly The Committee decide to send the above jexplanation to the firm and ask the firm to furnish the aforesaid certificate from, the Directorate | |General of Hydro Carbons in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. (The: case stands stands deferred to 30.12.2014. 30.12.2014.

==> picture [467 x 592] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- (The: case stands stands deferred to 30.12.2014. 30.12.2014. || | ICase No.:69/24/81- Party Name: VOESTALPINE (Meet No/Date:12/81- \Status: ALC2/2013 IVAE VKN INDIA P. ALC2/2014 Approved ‘LTD.(FORMERLY 12.11.2014 HQ File IRLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:05 10371075 | :01/81/050/00457/AM14/ —_}:05/24/040/00291/AM14/ 14.11.2013 = Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DHI vide U.O. | No. 3(44)/2014-TSW(B) dated 17.10.2014 as under:- | || || SI. Export Product Net Import Items Quantity No. wt./set recommended/set of EP of EP } 1. Rail Turnout “STD 54EI- | 8489kg. | 1-2 Flat bottom rail S4EI | 4139 kg. with 5% 140-1:7 R/L (CB) ; R260 of relevant length. wastage. || || 1435:1:20 3.of relevantGuard raillength.33CI R260 220kg. with 1% 4-5. Switch blade blank wastage. (32 | RH/LH. im 6-25. Component 1470kg. with 1% wastage. Net to net basis as | | per GN-4. | 2 Rail Turnout “STD 54EI- | 8422kg. | 26-27.Flat bottom rail 4136 kg. with 5% 140-1:6 R/L (CB) ; 54EI R260 of relevant wastage. | | 1435:1:20 length. 28. Guard rail 33CI R260 | 218kg. with nil | | of relevant length. wastage. | 29-30. Switch blade blank | | RH/LH. 1454kg. with nil | | | | 31-48. Component Netwastage.to net basis as | per GN-4, | | ‘RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | [Case No.:70/24/81- ‘Party iMeet No/Date: 12/81- \Status: ALC2/2013 Name: VOESTALPINE IALC2/2014 Deferred 33 iVAE VKN INDIA P. 12.11.2014 ILTD.(FORMERLY | HQ File IRLA File Lie.No/Date:05 10371077 Defer | roo ----- End of picture text -----

':01/81/050/00458/AM14/_ |:05/24/040/00296/AM14/ [14.11.2013 |Date:30.12.2014 Decision : NC decided to senda letter to firm to submit the following information as per written comments of DHI vide U.O. No. 3(44)/2014/TSW(B) dated 23/05/2014 as under:“It is observed that firm has claimed 20% wastage on Imported raw material without giving any \justification/ calculation. The firm may, therefore, be requested to justify the requirement and furnish information as per SI. No. 2, 3&11 of SDL.” Replystands ofdeferred the firmto whether30.12.2014.it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export is also awaited. The case | |Case No.:73/24/81Party ‘Meet No/Date:12/81__|Status: | ALC2/2013 (Name: MOTHERSON ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | SSUMI SYSTEMS LTD., {12.11.2014 | HQ File RLA File |Lic, No/Date:05 10371064 eker | :01/81/050/00461/AM14/ _|:05/24/040/00295/AM14/ 14.11.2013 ‘Date:30.12.2014| Desiskon: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 24/102014 to the firm. But, reply of the! 34 firm is still awaited. Hence, NC decided to send a reminder to firm to expedite reply. However, The[|] Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In| case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number| and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per| icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG, licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to '30.12.2014. | | \Case'ALC2/2013 No.:60/24/81PartyENGI N ame:MILEENEERS MeetALC2/2014 No/Date: 12/81‘Status:(Deferred | 12.11.2014 | 35 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10758104 |Defer :01/81/050/00448/AM14/ |:03/95/040/00656/AM14/ |18.11.2013 Date:30.12.2014| [Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send , || |reminder|stands deferredto DHI. to 30.12.2014,NC decided to send a reminder to firm and RA to expedite comments. The case|| ‘Case No.:9/24/81Party Name:VINDHYA — Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | \ALC2/2013 TELELINKS LTD., \ALC2/2014 Deferred | | | 12.11.2014 | | | |HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date: 1110027781 |Defer | |:01/81/050/00397/AM14/__|:11/24/040/00001/AM14/ |21.11.2013 Date:30.12.2014| Decision : NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 19.5.2014 by DOT to the firm. A 36 |reminderreminder. has also sent to the firm on 09.09.2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite| Hence, NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However,Deemed export.The CommitteeIn case it decidedis a Deemedto checkexport,fromfirmfirmshouldwhetherprovideit is followinga case of physicalinformation:-export/(i) | EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued| under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be | |manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG | {Lr Fold 4 12 bail: mT oo

| llicence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | | Case No.:32/24/81Party Name:WILLIAMS Meet No/Date:12/81_|Status: | | |ALC2/2013 (CONTROLS INDIA ALC2/2014 Deferred | PRIVATE LIMITED 12.11.2014 | | 37 |HQ File IRLA File \Lic.No/Date:3 110061138 |Defer | ' |:01/81/050/00420/AM14/ :31/82/040/00186/AM14/ 22.11.2013 Date:30.12.2014 | | Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DIT. Hence NC decided to send a| | reminder to DIT. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. Case No.:26/3/81‘Party Name:A-I| FENCE Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | /ALC2/2014 PRODUCTS ‘ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | | (CO.PVT.LTD. 12.11.2014 'HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10759039 Defer | | ::01/81/050/00123/AM15/ ':03/94/040/00737/AM14/ 25.11.2013 |Date:30.12.2014 (Decision : NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has | ‘also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, 38[INC][decided][to][send][a][final][reminder][to][firm][to][furnish][reply][within][15][days][time.] . However, The| ‘Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number | ‘and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per| cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | | (30.12.2014. | ** Case No.:16/24/81-ALC2/2013 ‘COMPOSITEiParty Name:AEP R ONIVATE ALC2/2014Meet No/Date:12/81- ‘ Status:Deferred | ‘LIMITED 12.11.2014 | ‘HQ File 'RLA File Lic.No/Date:0810126642 Defer 39 :01/81/050/00404/AM14/_ |:08/24/040/00364/AM14/ 26.11.2013 \Date:30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that the comments of DIPP vide U.O. 7/323/2013-TSW/174 dated 19/08/2014 have been received. However, reply of the firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed | | export Is also awaited. NC decided to send a reminder to furnish reply on physical export/ Deemed iexport. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | ‘Case No.:28/3/81iParty Name:TEXMACO Meet No/Date:12/81‘Status: ‘ALC2/2014 (RAILLIMITED & ENGINEERING (|ALC2/201412.11.2014 (Deferred | | HQ File ‘RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:02 10196856 Defer | | :01/81/050/00125/AM15/_|:02/24/040/00138/AM14/ 26.11.2013 \Date:30.12.2014 40 f Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has | also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence,| | ‘Committe|NC decid e d todecided send ato finalcheckreminderfrom firm to firmwhether to furnish replyit is a case of withinphysical15 daysexpor t /ime.Deemed. However,export. TeIn | case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number | Wa 13 Mam{o (in \4

==> picture [465 x 693] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||and date (ii) CIF value of|the|licence|(iii) Whether this|licence was issued under Zero duty or 3|per ||
|||cent|Scheme|(iv)|Custom|duty|saved|amount|(v)|Products|to|be|manufactured|(vi)|How me|
|||_|licence|holder|intends|to|discharge|the|EO|against|the|EPCG|licence.|The|case|stands|deferred|to|
|30.12.2014.|||
|||
|||\Case No.:35/3/81-|Party Name: TANISHKA||Meet No/Date:12/81-|\Status:|||
|ALC2/2014|INTERNATIONAL,|\ALC2/2014|Deferred|
|||||112.11.2014|||
|Al|IHQ File|RLA File|\Lic.|No/Date:03 10759186|(Defer|
|:01/81/050/00132/AM15/||:03/95/040/00548/AM14/||26.11.2013|'Date:30.12.2014|
|Pesan: NC noted that the comments of|MSME vide U.O. 30(91)/14-ME dated 04/08/2014 have||
||||awaited.been received.The|case However,stands|deferredreply of theto|30.12.2014. firm whether|it|is|a case of physical|export/ Deemed|export )|
||||Case No.:6/24/81-|Party Name:SIECHEM|Meet No/Date: 12/8 |-|Status:|||
||ALC2/2013|[TECHNOLOGIES|ALC2/2014|‘Deferred|||
|||PRIVATE LIMITED|| 12.11.2014|||
||42 |HQ:01/81/050/00394/AM14/_ File|RLA|:04/24/040/00192/AM14/ File|=|\Lic.No/Date:04[27.11.2013|10152322 Defer|Date:30.12.2014|||
||||Decision:|NC|observed|that|case|is|under|examination|at|DOT.|Hence|NC|decided|to|send|a!|
|||jreminder to DOT. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.|||
||||Case No.:7/24/81-|Party Name:SIECHEM|—__|Meet|No/Date:12/81-|_|Status:|
|||ALC2/2013|TECHNOLOGIES|\ALC2/2014|Deferred|||
|PRIVATE|LIMITED|(12.11.2014|||
|43||HQ File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:04 10152323||Defer|||
|:01/81/050/00395/AM14/_||:04/24/040/00193/AM14/|{27.11.2013|Date:30.12.2014|||
|(Decision:|NC|observed|that|case|is|under|examination|at|DOT.|Hence|NC|decided|to|send|a||
|reminder to DOT. The case stands deferred|to 30.12.2014.|||
||||Case No.:54/24/81-|Party Name:GRAVITA|{Meet No/Date:12/81-|_|Status:|||
||ALC2/2013|INDIA LTD.,|ALC2/201412.11.2014|Deferred|||
|44||HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date: 1310045247||Defer|
|||:01/81/050/00442/AM14/__||:13/24/040/00037/AM14/||03.12.2013|Date:30.12.2014|
||||Decision:|NC|observed|that|case|is|under|examination|at|MOEF.|Hence|NC|decided|to|send|a|
||||reminder to MOEF. The case|stands|deferred to 30.12.2014.|||
|||jesse No.:21/24/81-|Party Name:DELPHI|—_ [Meet No/Date:12/81-|_|Status:|||
||ALC2/2013|(CONNECTION||ALC2/2014|Deferred|||
|iSYSTEMS|INDIA|(12.11.2014|||
|45|||LIMITED,|||||
|THO File|RLA File|[Lic.|No/Date: 1010055822|[Defer|||
|:01/81/050/00409/AM14/_||:10/24/040/00043/AM14/||04.12.2013|Date:30.12.2014|||
|Decision:|NC|observed|that|case|is|under|examination|at|C|&|PC.|Hence NC|decided|to|send|al|
||||reminder to|C & PC. The case|stands|deferred|to 30.12.2014.|||

----- End of picture text -----

=V0Lee Wo!4eg

, |

| (Case No.:79/24/81Party Name:APAR Meet No/Date: 12/81 - Status: | | (12.11.2014 | | iALC2/2013 INDUSTRIES LIMITED ‘ALC2/2014 Approved | HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:34 10038659 | |[:][ NC][decided][to][ratify][the][norms][of][ above][ AA][as][per][written][comments][of][ DIPP][vide][U.O.] »[‘Decision] :01/81/050/00467/AM 1 4/ ':34/24/040/00220/AM 14/ (09.12.2013 No. 12/150/2014-TSW/46 dated 27/11/2014 as under:| Quantity of import item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 16.435 MT as 1.01 Kgs./Kg. content in ‘the export product. | | |RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | | \Case No.:28/6/81‘Party Name: ADVANCE Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | |ALC2/2014 CABLE ALC2/2014 Deferred | | ‘TECHNOLOGIES 12.11.2014 | | |PVT.LTD, | (47 HQ[:01/81/050/00182/AM] File[15/] ':07/24/040/00283/AM14/IRLA File Lic.No/Date:071010048912.12.2013 Deter|Date:30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that the comments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/89/2014-TSW/87 dated 09.07.2014. Firm vide its E-mail dated 25/09/2014 has confirmed that the above AA is obtained for deemed export. Supplies are to mega power project. However, one place (Annexure-I) in the _ 'PAC, it is mentioned as Advance Cables Limited and in another place it is mentioned as Advance (Cables Technologies Pvt. Limited. NC decided to ask the firm to clarify. The case stands deferred ito 30.12.2014.

| (Case No.:27/3/81‘Party Name: FRICTION Meet No/Date:12/81[Status: =| | |ALC2/2014 IMETAL FIBRES (INDIA) ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred || |HQ File IRLAiP.LTDFile 12.11.2014Lic.No/Date:05 10373564 |Defer | |:01/81/050/00124/AM15/_ |:05/23/040/00369/AM14/ 16.12.2013 |Date:30.12.2014 | | Decision : NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has 48 lalso sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence,| NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | (Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In _ case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number| jand date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG | licence30.12.2014.holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | |Case No.:3/12/81‘Party Name:ABB LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/81‘Status: | ALC2/2014 ALC2/2014 Deferred | 12.11.2014 iad HQ File RLA File iLic.No/Date:07 10100658 Defer :01/81/050/00404/AM15/ |:07/21/040/00342/AM 14/ 18.12.2013 Date: | 30.12.2014| | Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 26/11/2014 to the firm. But, reply of the| 15 oes \y

==> picture [113 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- oes \y ) ----- End of picture text -----

Committeefirm is still awaited.decided Hence,to check NCfrom decidedfirm whetherto send ait reminderis a case toof firm physical to expediteexport/reply.Deemed However,export. TheIn icase it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number land date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | 30.12.2014. | (Case No.:19/24/81Party Name:THERMAL — Meet No/Date:12/81‘Status: |ALC2/2013 I ENGINEERISYSTEMS A N GD ALC2/12.11. 201 44 Deferred HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410153488 Defer :01/81/050/00407/AM 14/ ':04/24/040/00203/AM14/ 23.12.2013 |Date:30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has 50 |also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In | case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence os and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iit) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG Teen holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | Case No.:18/24/81‘Party Name:SHALIMAR iMeet No/Date: 12/8 1- \Status: | | (ALC2/2013 WIRES INDUSTRIES ALC2/2014 \Deferred | LTD., 12.11.2014 51 Re|:01/81/050/00406/AM14/File RLA:02/24/040/00125/AM14/ File 26.12.2013|Lic.No/Date:02 10198164 |\ D eferate:30.12.2014 Decision : NC noted that a letter was sent to RA, Kolkata to clarify that the item of export and import item in respect of above the AA is not matching with the application of the firm. RA, therefore again requested to send correct application to this Directorate. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

ICase No.:66/24/81‘Party Name:KOTSONS ~— ‘Meet No/Date:12/81‘| Status: | ALC2/2013 PVT.LTD. \ALC2/2014 Deferred | | 12.11.2014 HQ':01/81/050/00454/AM14/_ File pA|:06/24/040/00032/AM14/ File 'Lic.No/Date:0626.12.2013 10035619 poteDate:30.12.2014 | |Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has 52 lalso sent to the firm on 26/11/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, | | INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number| and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG| licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | 30.12.2014. am - —Feltaft

==> picture [464 x 215] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:30/24/81- Party Name:PILOT ‘Meet No/Date:12/81- —|Status: | | |ALC2/2013 INDUSTRIES LTD, ‘ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | (12.11.2014 53 HQ File RLA File iLic.No/Date:05 10375028 Defer :01/81/050/00418/AM14/ |:05/24/040/00327/AM14/ 31.12.2013 'Date:30.12.2014 r | Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MOEF. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to MOEF. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | Case No.:83/24/81- [Party Name: WAGO |Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status: | |ALC2/2013 iLIMITED ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred 12.11.2014 54 |HQ File IRLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:05 10375074 |Defer | :01/81/050/00471/AM14/ _ :05/24/040/00360/AM14/ ‘01.01.2014 ‘Date:30.12.2014 | Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [465 x 119] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ‘Case No.:38/3/81- Party Name:EXCEL Meet No/Date:12/81- |Status: | | |ALC2/2014| |POWER SWITCHGEAR |ALC2/201412.11.2014 |(Deferred | ' :01/81/050/00135/AM15/HQ File ':04/24/040/00216/AM14/IRLA File Lic.No/Date:041015379201.01.2014 [D(Dat e :30.12.2014fer ‘Decision: Firm vide e-mail dated 21/11/2014 has confirmed that the above AA has been obtained| 55 [for physical export. Accordingly, NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as prewritten ‘comments of DHI vide U.O. 3(1 16)/Excl/curk./2014/TSW (B)/ dated 20.08.2014 as under:- ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [467 x 334] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- “The application of the firm has been examined and it is observed that the firm has proposed to jimport vacuum circuit breaker as component on net to net basis. O/o DGFT may, therefore, | pons the proposal as per condition of GN-4 for engineering products.” | RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | _ |Case No.:22/24/81- iParty Name: ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: | | |iALC2/2013 .&IRATNAMANITUBES LIMITED METALS =ALC2/201412.11.2014 Deferred | 56 | :01/81/050/00410/AM ~ HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:08 10127694 'Defer | Decision: NC noted that14/the:08/24/040/00425/AM14/comments of DIPP vide U.O. |03.01.201412/89/2014/TSW/101 dated‘Date:3009 . 12.201407.2014 lhas | been received. However, reply of the firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export is awaited. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | ‘Case No.:87/24/81- Party Name: DELPHI (Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: a (ALC2/2013 [AUTOMOTIVE ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred ISYSTEMS PVT.LTD. 12.11.2014 \57 HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:0510375673 Defer ):01/81/050/00475/AM14/ :05/23/040/00393/AM14/ .08.01.2014 ‘Date:30.12.2014 | ‘Decision: NC noted that the comments of DHI vide U.O. 3(33)/2014/TSW (BY) dated 18.07.2014 ‘has been received. NC also decided to ask firm to send reply on Physical exports/ deemed export ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [202 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 17 - AmaFolly ----- End of picture text -----

| | immediately. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. Case No.:11/3/81‘Party Name:CROMPTON Meet No/Date: 12/81Status: | ALC2/2014 GREAVES LIMITED, ‘ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred 12.11.2014 | | HQ File ‘RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10766733 |Defer | :0.1/81/050/00108/AM15/|:03/94/040/00526/AM14/ 17.01.2014 ‘Date:30.12.2014 | 5g[also] Decision:[sent] NC[to][the] noted[firm][on] that[24/10/2014.] Deficiency[But] letter[reply] was[of] issued[ the][firm] on[is] 12/08/2014[still][awaited] to the[despite] firm.[reminder.] A reminder[Hence,] has NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In| | |case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number | | jand date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | |cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG, ‘licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | Case No.:74/24/81Party Name:TTP Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status: | ALC2/2013 ‘TECIPRIVATE INOLOGIES LIMITED '(ALC2/201412.11.2014 ‘Deferred| |:01/81/050/00462/AMHQ File 14/ RLA::07/24/040/00380/AM14/ File |03.02.2014Lic.No/Date:0710101868 [DeferDate:30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has '59 [also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The| Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In) case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. Case No.:84/24/81‘Party Name: TATA BP ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- \Status: | ALC2/2013 SOLAR INDIA LTD. ‘ALC2/2014 Deferred | 12.11.2014 | 60 HO':01/81/050/00472/AM14/ File IRLA;:07/24/040/00395/AM14/File ‘Lic.No/Date:0710101901(04.02.2014 'DeferDate:30.12.2014 || |Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. \Case No.:85/24/81iParty Name: TATA ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- \Status: ALC2/2013 POWER SOLAR '(ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | SYSTEMS LTD. 12.11.2014 | | 61 |HQ File RLA File 'Lic. No/Date:0710102050 Defer | |:01/81/050/00473/AM14/ _:07/24/040/00413/AM14/ '07.02.2014 |Date:30.12.2014 | Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a! ireminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. Hae _ a yehietty 18 sienaeS ' ao bs haber Mans ; "

Case No.:31/3/81Party Meet No/Date: 12/81 - Status: | (ALC2/2014 Name:DEUTSCHLAND \ALC2/2014 Deferred ‘TRANSFORMERS PVT. /12.11.2014 | | |LTD 162 JHQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:0410155409 |Defer :01/81/050/00128/AM15/ _ |:04/24/040/00249/AM14/ |20.02.2014 Date:30.12.2014 | |Decision: NC noted that the comments of DHI vide U.O. 30(68)/2012-ME dated 20.06.2014 has _ |been received.NC also decided to send a letter through e-mail to furnish information on Physical | |Export/Deemed Export. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

_ |Case No.:29/6/81‘Party Name:ADVANCE Meet No/Date:12/81\Status: | ALC2/2014 (CABLE ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | ‘TECHNOLOGIESPVT.LTD, 12.11.2014 |63'|:01/81/050/00183/AM15/_ |HQ File RLA|:07/24/040/00358/AM14/ File {20.02.2014Lic.No/Date:0710102261 |\Date:30.12.2014|Defer ‘Decision: NC noted that the comments of DIPP vide U.O. 12/89/2014-TSW/111 dated 09.07.2014 | exporthas beenis awaited.received.TheHowevcas e r,standsreplydeferredof the tofirm30.12.2014.whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed

==> picture [461 x 436] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | |Case No.:6/3/81-ALC2/2014 Party Name:SUZLON (Meet No/Date:12/81- ‘Status: | ENERGY LIMITED ALC2/2014 ‘Approved j12.11.2014 | | [HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3 110062872 | :01/81/050/00103/AM15/ :3:1/83/040/00227/AM 14/ 03.03.2014 | ‘Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DHI vide U.O. | |No. 3(113)suz./Wind/2014-TSW(B) dated 17.10.2014 as under:- | Export Product Net Import Items Quantity wt./set of recommended/set of | | EP 7 EP | | Tubular tower consisting of | 191984 Prime coated HR four sections/ set-parts kg. Non alloy = Steel | | of wing operated electricity Plate |64| Senerator Model-S95, 2.1 MW- Z | STV-9090 Mhub heightight. 6. . 20mm thicki 01454. kg. 10% | | | 7-9 12mm thick | | |“488° 10-11. 13mm thick | | | 08!21ke. % | | wastage | | 12-13. 14mm thick | | | 96247ke- *% wastage | | 14-16. 15mm thick 07059ke, 5% | 17-19. 16mm thick ||| W@S™8° | | 7 20-21. 17mm thick | | | 11976ks. i wastage 19 gon F Aetial Leese ----- End of picture text -----

Cie

==> picture [450 x 711] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | 22-23. 18mm thick | |] 13545kg. 5% | | | || 24-25. 19mm thick wastage | | 10046kg. 5%| | | | 26. 20mm thick wastage | 27. 21mm thick 11132kg. 3% |}. wastage 28, 22mm thick 11972kg. 2% 29-30. 23mm thick wastage | 31-32. 24mm thick | | | 06301kg. 2% wastage 33, 25mm thick 06616kg. 2% wastage | 34. 26mm thick 06932kg. 2% wastage 35. 33mm thick 14494kg. 2% 36 39mm thick wastage | | 15124kg. 2% | | | 37. 60mm thick wastage 07878kg. 2% wastage | | 08192kg. 2% | wastage 10398kg. 2% wastage 11973kg. 2% | | wastage | 01129kg. 10% | | | wastage | Import otem from SI. No. 130 to 150 are consumables and their combined CIF value may be) restricted within 2% of FOB value of export. | Tel |4 ----- End of picture text -----

Import item from SI. No. 151 to 176 are packing materials and they may be allowed as per policy | for packing material. _ ‘Rest of the items are components and they may be allowed on net to net basis as per condition of GN-4 for engineering products. Fim vide its E-mail dated 13/08/2014 has confirmed that the above AA is obtained for physical[|] lexport. RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | Case No.:7/3/81‘Party Name: Meet No/Date: 12/81Status: | | |ALC2/2014 PIGMENTSASSOCIATEDLIMITED 12.11.ALC2/ 20 1414 ‘Deferred HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:02 10200692 ‘Defer :01/81/050/00104/AM15/_ ':02/24/040/00207/AM14/ 03.03.2014 iDate:30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has ‘65 |also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | |Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number land date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG | 30.12.2014. |

| Case No.:8/3/81Party Name:NEOSTAR — Mcet No/Date:12/81‘Status: ALC2/2014 STEEL TUBES ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred PVT.LTD., 12.11.2014 | HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410155954 Defer | , :01/81/050/00105/AM15/ |:04/24/040/00270/AM14/ 06.03.2014 iDate:30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has 66 also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, ‘NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | [Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In icase it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number | jand date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per'| | icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG _ ‘licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | |Case No.:15/3/81‘Party Name: UM CABLES — Mcet No/Date:12/81Status: || |ALC2/2014 iLTD., ALC2/201412.11.2014 |Approved | |HQ File ‘RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310773 187 | | 67 :01/81/050/00112/AM15/ ':03/95/040/00972/AM 1 4/ 06.03.2014 | iDecision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIT vide U.O. No. 17(2)/2014-IPHW dated 7.10.2014 as under:| | The items proposed for import are essential to assembic the export product. This department recommends ratification of norms of advance authorization as follows based on ‘NIL’ iwastage for all other import items.

{aay et Ci yr. Ohge ey Loyro Lae Mew

==> picture [446 x 105] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | [S.No Import item i Import Quantity Import Quantity | Applied for by the Party in |Recommended in Kg. Copper in form of C.C Roads _| 203763.350 202388.4 Hoo Kg. (2. | HDPE Compound 47390.100 47390.1 35 Aluminium Foil Coated with Co | 28790.910 28790.91 Polymers 4, LLDPE Compound 62375.070 62374.98 ----- End of picture text -----

| RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | (Case No.:22/6/81Party Name: VEER-O‘Meet No/Date: 12/81Status: | ALC2/2014 METALS PVT .LTD ALC2/2014 ‘Approved | 12.11.2014 |
HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:0710102673 | :01/81/050/00176/AM15/ ':07/24/040/00438/AM14/ (06.03.2014 Decision: Firm has confirmed that the above AA has been obtained for deemed export and supply
| is to 100% EOU. Accordingly, NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written icomments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/113/2014-TSW/90 = dated 24/09/2014 as _under:-
1. |, Specific list of export items (Sheet metal Components) may be specified as per enclosed | Annexure. 2. Words “of relevant thickness” may be suffixed with the description of import item at SI. No. 1 | and its quantity may be allowed as 226.304 MT as 1.28 Kg./Kg. content in the export products after taking 1/3" recovery from scrap.
|3. Net weight of import item at S!. No. 2 may be specified as 12820 Kgs. | 4, Quantity of import item at S!. No. 2 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.

==> picture [464 x 338] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | Lt = ‘|Case No.:16/3/81- Party Name:BEKAERT _ |Meet No/Date:12/81- Status: ALC2/2014 INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. |ALC2/2014 Deferred (12.11.2014 HQ File IRLA File \Lic.No/Date:3 110063001 |Defer | :01/81/050/001 13/AM15/ |:3 1/83/040/00167/AM14/ |07,03.2014 Date:30.12.2014 | 69 Decision:also sent NCto thenotedfirm onthat24/10/2014. Deficiency Bule t terreply wasofissued the firm on is12/08/2014still awaitedto thedespitefirm.reminder. A reminderHence,has. | |NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The caseCommitteeit is a decidedDeemed toexport, check fromfirm shouldfirm whetherprovide followingit is a caseinformation:-of physical export/(i) EPCG Deemedlicenceexport.numberIn | and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | | jlicencecent Scheme holder(iv) intendsCustom to dischargeduty savedthe EOamount against the(v) Products EPCGtolicence.be manufactured The case stands(vi) HowdeferredEPCG to 30.12.2014. | 79 [Case No.:14/3/81- Party Name: TEMPEL [Meet No/Date:12/81- Status: | ALC2/2014 [PRECISION METAL ALC2/2014 |Deferred {4% 22 FoTe] ' Pinmbeee, Bae Cees ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [461 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- PRODUCTS INDIA PV. 12.11.2014 || iLTD., HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410156295 |Defer :01/81/050/00111/AM15/_ |:04/24/040/00272/AM14/ 17.03.2014 'Date:30.12.2014 ‘Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DIII. Hence NC decided to send a| reminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [463 x 117] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | | ALC2/2014Case No.:9/3/81- iLTDParty Name: SIEMENS ALC2/2014Mcet No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status:Deferred | 12.11.2014 7 HQ File IRLA File ‘Lic.No/[ate:03 10774805 |Defer 1:01/81/050/00106/AM15/_ |:03/95/040/01013/AM14/ 18.03.2014 ‘Date:30.12.2014 \Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DIII. Hence NC decided to send a jreminder to DHI, Firm vide letter dated 21.10.2014 informed that the above AA has been obtained | for Physical Exports. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | ----- End of picture text -----

| Case No.:20/3/81Party Name: GUJARAT | Mcet No/Date:12/81_[Status: | ALC2/2014 CORRER ALLOYS LTD, jALC2/2014 Deferred | | 12.11.2014 | |HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:03 10775177 |Defer ':01/81/050/00117/AM15/ :03/94/040/01116/AM14/ 20.03.2014 Date:30.12.2014 | |Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issucd on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has '72_ ialsoNC decidedsent to theto sendfirm aonfinal24/10/2014.reminderButto firmreplytooffurnishthe firmreplyis stillwithinawaited15 daysdespitetime. reminder.. However,Hence,The (Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In icase it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number land date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per} | icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG ‘licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the :PCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

==> picture [464 x 112] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ‘Case No.:13/3/81- IParty Name:METALOID Meet No/Date:12/81- \Status: i ‘ALC2/2014 ARCHITECTU RAL ALC2/2014 Deferred | PRIVATE LIMITED 12.11.2014 3 HQ File RLA File l.ic.No/Date:04 10156493 Defer :01/81/050/00110/AMI5/ _|:04/24/040/00295/AM14/ 24.03.2014 ‘Date:30.12.2014| | |Decision: NC noted that the firm vide its e-mail dated 12/11/2014 has informed that they have isurrendered the above AA. NC decided to ask RA, Chennai to confirm. The case stands deferred to (30.12.2014. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:34/3/81‘Party Name: MAK Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | ees ISYSTEMSICONTROLSPVT ANDLTD. “ALC2/2014[2.11.2014 ‘Deferred ln ‘HQ File. RLA File | ic. No/iate:32 10074543 |Defer ':01/81/050/00131/AM15/_ |:32/21/040/00217/AM14/ 27.03.2014 |Date:30.12.2014| (Decision: NC noted that the firm has informed that they have surrendered the AA and RA, foesalso decided hasto askedask the the firmfirm to furnishsubmit nonnon- u tilizationtilizationcertificatecertificate.fromThe Chennaicase standsAir Customs.deferred NCto fae 33 5 To Aly Hs tht she

| 30.12.2014. | Case No.:4/3/81Party Name:SUZLON Meet No/Date:12/81(Status: | \ALC2/2014 ENERGY LIMITED 'ALC2/2014 Approved | 12.11.2014 | HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3 110063310 :01/81/050/00101/AM15/ :31/83/040/00240/AM14/ 28.03.2014 Decision:No. 3(93)/Gen./Suz. NC decidedEng./2014-TSW(B)/5_ to ratify the norms ofdatedabove17.10.2014 AA as peras writtenunder:-comments of DHI vide U.O. 75 nebeen applicationexamined andand subit i s equentobservedreplythat submittedexport productby the firmand videimport theiritemslettercovered dated 19.09.2014in the subject has lauthorization are same as in AA No. 3110062872 dated 03.03.2014 issued to the same firm. Subject authorization may, therefore, be ratified on repeat basis. Firm vide its E-mail dated 13/08/2014 has confirmed that the above AA is obtained for ae export. RA may take suitable consequential RA may take suitable consequential may take suitable consequential take suitable consequential suitable consequential consequential action accordingly. accordingly. |

export. RA may take suitable consequential RA may take suitable consequential may take suitable consequential take suitable consequential suitable consequential consequential action accordingly. accordingly. | |Case No.:12/3/81Party Name:BEKAERT Meet No/Date:12/81[Status ALC2/2014 INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. |ALC2/2014 Deferred | | (12.11.2014 | | |:01/81/050/00109/AM15/HQ File ‘RLA::31/83/040/00241/AM14/File 'Lic.No/Date:3{28.03.2014 | 10063315 aeDate:30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that Deficiency Ictter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has| 76 |also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of[the][firm][is][still][awaited][despite][reminder.][Hence,] INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per |cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG || |licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | |30.12.2014, ‘Case No.:9/6/81Party Name:SHERA Meet No/Date:12/81‘Status: | |ALC2/2014 IENERGY PVT.LTD. ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | | 12.11.2014 | | HQ File IRLA File ‘Lic.No/Date: 13 10046636 Defer | :01/81/050/00163/AM15/ |:13/24/040/00060/AM14/ 03.04.2014 Date:30.12.2014| 77 Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 24/10/2014 to the firm. But, reply of the \Fiem is still awaited. Hence, NC decided to send a reminder to firm to expedite reply. However, The| ‘Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per} cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

78 \Case No.:10/6/81-

Party Name:DYNAMIC _ /Meet No/Date:12/81‘Status: |

joespagdl, Fig:

| ALC2/2014 CABLES PVT.LTD. —- |ALC2/2014 Deferred | | HQ File RLA| File ‘Lic.No/Date:12.11.2014 1310046635 |Defer | | :01/81/050/00164/AM15/__}:13/24/040/00059/AM14/ 103.04.2014 \Date:30.12.2014 ‘Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has| | lalso sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, | INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | \Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In | case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number | jand date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | | icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | 30.12.2014. iCase No.:20/6/81Party |Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- (Status: ALC2/2014 [Name: ASSOCIATED \ALC2/2014 Deferred | 4 PIGMENTS LIMITED (12.11.2014 | ps| HQ|:01/81/050/00174/AM15/ File IRLA}:02/24/040/00011/AM15/ File |23.04.2014Lic.No/Date:02 10202660 Pelee|Date:30.12.2014

‘Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MOEF. Hence NC decided to send a | reminder to MOEF. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

‘Case No.:1/6/81Party Name:JINDAL [Meet No/Date: | 2/81‘Status: | | ALC2/2014 (INDIA) LIMITED ‘ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | | )12.11.2014 | AQ File IRLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:02 10202770 |Defer | ':01/81/050/00155/AM15/__ |:02/24/040/00206/AM1 4/ 25.04.2014 Date:30.12.2014 has been received. The firm has informed vide their E-mail dated 17.07.2014 that the above AA is | Decision:obtained for NCdeemed noted thatexport, the commentssupply of goods of DIPPto ONGC vide U.O.petroleum 12/89/2014-TSW/139operations. Therefore,dated 09.07.2014in order to 80 avail of central excise exemption vide SI. No. 336 of the notification No. 12/2012-CE, dated (17.03.2012, the domestic supplier shall be required to fulfil condition No. 41 which include | iproduction of a certificate from a duly authorised officer of the Directorate General of Hydro | ‘Carbons in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, to the effect that the| | isaid supplies are required for petroleum operations”. Under Para 8.3 of FTP, TED exemption is one ‘Accordinglyjof the deemed export benefits for these supplies. Second benefit is Advance Authorisation.| | furnish the aforTh e said Committeecertificate decidedfrom, atodulysendauthorized the above officerexplanationof thetoDirectorate the firm andGeneral ask theof firm Hydro to}| || deferred|Carbons toin 30.12.2014.the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. The case stands| | [Case No.:32/6/81‘Party Name:REGEN ‘Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | | |ALC2/2014 POWERTECH PRIVATE |ALC2/2014 Deferred | LIMITED (12.11.2014 |:j 8|HQ File RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:0410157506 Defer (:01/81/050/00186/AM 15/ |:04/24/040/00010/AM15/ 30.04.2014 |Date:30.12.2014 ‘Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 24/10/2014 to the firm. But, reply of the firm is still awaited. Hence, NC decided to send a reminder to firm to expedite reply. However, The | Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In| coe f 25 rolratly l \ avign, tew

;

| case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number| ‘and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | 30.12.2014.icent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG 'Case No.:5/6/81'Party Name:ALSTONE Meet No/Date:12/81Fea ‘ALC2/2014 INTERNATIONAL jALC2/2014 Deferred ! 12.11.2014 | | | |HO File IRLA File Pere ate SaaS [Defer | '01/81/050/00159/AM15/_':05/23/040/00021/AM15/ 02.05.2014 (Date:30.12.2014 | (Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 21/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has 82 lalso sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The ‘Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In |case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number | land date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per lheence holdercent Scheme (iv)intendsCustomto dischargeduty savedthe EOamountagainst(v) theProducts EPCGtolicence.be manufacturedThe case stands(vi) HowdeferredEPCG to 30.12.2014. | |\Case No.:14/6/81Party Name:ELKAY ‘Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: | | ‘ALC2/2014 TELELINKS LTD. ALC2/2014 Deferred | 12.11.2014 | | | |:01/81/050/00168/AM15/|:05/23/040/003HQ File IRLA File 1 1/AM12/ ‘Lic(05 . 05.2014No/Date:05 10385709 peDa te :30.12.2014r Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has 83 ljalso sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, | INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The| |Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In| case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (1) EPCG licence number and date (ji) CIF value of the licence (iif) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | centlicenceSchemeholder(iv)intendsCustomto dischargeduty savedthe amountEO against(v) Productsthe EPCGtolicence.be manufacturedThe case stands(vi) HowdeferredEPCGto | 30.12.2014. | | iCase No.:15/6/81iParty Name:ELKAY (Meet No/Date: 12/8 |- Status: ALC2/2014 'TELELINKS LTD. ‘ALC2/2014 ‘Deferred | | (12.11.2014 | HQ File IRLA File 'Lic.No/Date:05 10385708 Pete | :01/81/050/00169/AM15/ |:05/23/040/00445/AM13/ |05.05.2014 pate 204) | |Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has | 84 |also sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence, INC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The| Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In| case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number| and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per| | |cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG | 30.12.2014.\licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred a

26 | hinynn itt eight, WSs aihi

| [Case No.:2/6/81Party Name:C & S Meet No/Date:12/81__|Status: | | ALC2/2014 ELECTRIC LIMITED fat12.11.2014oot 14 |(Deferred |85 HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:05 10385804 ‘Defer | :01/81/050/00156/AM15/ |:05/23/040/00038/AM15/ |06.05.2014 |Date:30.12.2014 | ‘Decision: NC noted that the comments of DHI vide U.O. 3(67)/2013/TSW(B) dated 14072014 | has been received. NC also decided to ask firm to furnish information on Physical Export/Deemed |Export immediately. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014, | | \Case No.:3/6/81aces Name:LS CABLE [Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | } ALC2/2014 INDIA PRIVATE \ALC2/2014 Deferred | |HQ File — |LIMITED,RLA File — .12.11.2014Lic.No/Date:05 10386027— ,——Defer — —|| | [:01/81/050/00157/AM15/ |:05/23/040/00005/AM15/ 08.05.2014 Date:30.12.2014 86 ‘Decision:also sent toNCthenotedfirm onthat24/10/2014. Deficiency letterBut replywasofissued the firmon is12/08/2014still awaitedto thedespitefirm.reminder.A reminderHence, has| | CommitteINC decideddecidedto send toa final check reminder from firm to whether firm to furnishit is a casereply of within physical15 daysexport/time. Deemed. However, export.The In | case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number land date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | licencejeent Schemeholder(iv)intendsCustomto dischargeduty savedthe amountEO against(v) Productsthe EPCGtolicence.be manufacturedThe case stands(vi) HowdeferredEPCGto 30.12.2014, | |Case No.:4/6/81‘Party Name:AVON 1 Meet No/Date: 12/81\Status: | | ALC2/2014 TUBETECH PVT.LTD. |ALC2/2014 Deferred | '12.11.2014 | HQ:01/81/050/00158/AM15/_ File RLA|:05/23/040/00051/AMI15/ File |08.05,.2014Lic.No/Date:0510386029 Date:30.12.2014[Defer[But][ reply][ of][ the][ firm][is][still][awaited][ despite][ reminder.][ Hence,] 87[also] Decision:[ sent][ to] NC[ the] noted[ firm][ on] that[ 24/10/2014.] Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has ICanihities decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In | NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | icaseland dateit is (ii)a Deemed CIF value export, of the firm licence should(iii) provide following Whether this licence information:- was issued(i)under EPCG Zerolicence duty or number 3 per | llicencecent Schemeholder(iv)intendsCustomto dischargeduty savedthe EOamountagainst(v) theProducts EPCGtolicence.be manufacturedThe case stands(vi) Howdeferred EPCG|to | (30.12.2014, [ ‘Case No.:16/6/81‘Party Name:LS CABLE Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- ‘Status: | |ALC2/2014 ert PRIVATE |ALC2/2014 Deferred sg HQ File LIMITED,RLA File 12.11.2014ILic. No/Date:05 10386026 [Defer | |:01/81/050/00170/AM15/ :05/23/040/00004/AM15/ 08.05.2014 Date:30.12.2014 ‘Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 12/08/2014 to the firm. A reminder has | | lalso sent to the firm on 24/10/2014. But reply of the firm is still awaited despite reminder. Hence,} NC decided to send a final reminder to firm to furnish reply within 15 days time. . However, The | 27 Sarr4 Furinn

| \Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In| | asi it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number! and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per | cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred toy | |30.12.2014. | | \Case No.:33/6/81Party Name:REGEN Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | LIMITED (12.11.2014 | | - | ALC2/2014 POWERTECH PRIVATE |ALC2/2014 Deferred HQ File RLA File \Lic.No/Date:0410157763 iia | -01/81/050/00187/AM15/ :04/24/040/00020/AM15/ (08.05.2014 'Date:30.12.2014 | | |Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 24/10/2014 to the firm. But, reply of the | i Committeefirm is still awaited.decided Hence,to check NC from decidedfirm whether to send ait reminderis a case toof firm physical to expediteexport/ reply. Deemed However,export. TheIn|| case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to | (30.12.2014. | | |Case No.:12/6/81[Party Name:KUMAR |Meet No/Date:12/81|Status: | | ALC2/2014 akSTRIES ALC2/2014 Deere | bo |[HQ][ File] RLA File ‘Lic.No/Date:0512.11.2014 10386576 |Defer || | :01/81/050/00166/AM15/ :05/23/040/00061/AM15/ \15.05.2014 Date:30.1220)) Decision: NC noted that the comments of DIPP vide U.O. 12/89/2014-TSW /154 dated 09.07.2014 nas been received. NC also decided to ask firm to furnish information on Physical Export/Deemed |Export immediately. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | ee No.:34/6/81Party Name: VIKARSH “(Meet No/Date:12/81|Status: | | |ALC2/2014 PVT.STAMPINGS LTD. INDIA 12.11.2014ALC2/2014 \Deferred| | pt HQ-01/81/050/00188/AMI15/|:31/82/040/00262/AM14/ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:316.05.2014 110063984 [‘ at :30.12.2014 D ef e r | | ‘Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send a| _ |reminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. ' |Case No.:35/6/81‘Party Name: VIKARSH et No/Date:12/81Status: | ALC2/2014 STAMPINGS INDIA ALC2/2014 Deferred | PVT. LTD. 12.11.2014 | ~ [Lic.No/Date:3 110063985 [Defer | 92 {HQ-01/81/050/00189/AM15/|:31/82/040/00015/AM15/File RLA File 16.05.2014 Date:30.12.2014 | |Decision: NC observed that case is under ‘examination at DHI. Hence NC ‘decided to send a| ‘reminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. ey:'AL.C2/2014 No.:6/6/81-: Party(LIMITEDName:SURAJ —_—‘|Meet|ALC2/2014 No/Date: 12/81farsi‘Deferred | tae e n Cl (calid - Hien Vit emeeigde, Way

| | | [12.11.2014 | feo File RLA File |Lic.No/Date:0810131446 Pefer | Decision:01/81/050/00160/AM15/: NC decided to sendLogeptanaovo008a letter to firm 7/AM3/to submit|19.05.2014the following informationDate:30.12.2014as per written | pommens of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/93dated 27/11/2014 as under:| || || 1. mayFor bethesamesize andrangesmay ofbe exportclarified..and import items, OD & WT of import item and export item | | 2. Manufacturing process with reduction in diameter and wall thickness at each stage of | | pilgering/drawing and wastage claimed at each stage with complete justification. | |The Committee also decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed | lexport. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence | number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty| | lor 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How| 'EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands | |deferred to 30.12.2014. | |Case No.:18/6/81Party Name: HAVELLS i No/Date:12/81—|Status: | | | 12.11.2014 | | ALC2/2014 INDIA LTD. |ALC2/2014 Approved | ':01/81/050/00172/AM15/ —|:05/23/040/00070/AMI15/ 21.05.2014 | |HQ File RLA File — 10386989 | | |Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. | No: 12/150/2014-TSW/94 dated 27 /11/2014 as under:| 1. Net weight of export products may be specified as under: No. | Weight No. | Weight No, | Weight No. | Weight | (Kgs./Kim) (Kgs./Km) (Kgs./Km) (Kgs./Km) 194|| pl4 [4945[843 9 3566.4 1719 426.8 25 | 718.7 | | 5__| 1012.4 13 2370.1 ||6 || 7 15 | (8 [1943.9 [16 [1009.2 [24 [547 || || 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 viz. Copper Rod/copper Wire Rod (EC Grade) may| | be allowed as applied for i.e. 26672.05 Kgs. for export products at SI. No. 17 to 31, taking | 3. clueQuantity from Engineering Tablesof import item at Sl. 4No.2 & 5. viz. XLPE Insulation Compound may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products at SI. No. 1 to 21. | 4. Description of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be corrected as “Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC)| | at SI. No. 1 to 31. | | Resin” and its quantity may be allowed as_ 1.05 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products | | 5. Quantity of import item No.4 viz. Plasticizer (DOP) may be allowed as as 1.05 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products at SI. No. 1 to 31. | 6. Kgs./Kg.Quantity ofcontent importin itemthe No.5export productsviz. Antimonyat SI. No. Trioxide1 to 31. may be allowed. as 1.05 29 el) ly

yang aT ,

ma may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | |Case No.:36/6/81Party Name: VIKARSH Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: | |ALC2/2014 STAMPINGS INDIA PVT. |ALC2/2014 Approved | LTD. 12.11.2014 | 95 [HQ:01/81/050/00190/AM15/ File _|:31/83/040/00031/AM15/IRLA File Lic.No/Date:322.05.2014 110064045 | Decision: NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per recommendation of DHI on 09/07/2014 under SION C-323 in NC meeting on 9.7.2014. The firm has confirmed that the above| AA is obtained for Physical Export. RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | | [Case No.:37/6/81|Party Name: VIKARSH Meet No/Date:12/81|Status: | ALC2/2014 STAMPINGS INDIA PVT. |ALC2/2014 Approved LTD. 12.11.2014 96 HQ|:01/81/050/00191/AM15/ File RLA:31/83/040/00026/AM15/ File Lic.No/Date:322.05.2014 110064046 | | Decision: NC noted that DHI has recommendedforratification of the above AA on 09/07/2014 a | NCexportmeetingand SupplyunderisSIONagainstC-323.invalidationFirm hasletter.confirmed that the above AA is obtained for deemed| | |RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | ‘|Case No.:1/9/81‘Party Name:METAL Meet No/Date: 12/81‘Status: | 'ALC2/2014 (CLOSURES PRIVATE ALC2/2014 \Approved | | LIMITED, 12.11.2014 | [HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710104372 | | 97 |Decision::01/81/050/00255/AM15/Firm has confirmed:07/24/040/00060/AM15/that the above AA has been obtained22.05.2014for deemed export and supply|| is to 100% EOU. Accordingly, NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/89/2014-TSW/154 dated 09/07/2014 as under:Advance Authorization may be ratified as per SION at SI. No. C-773 for Engineering products.

RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

|Case No.:2/9/81Party Name: MAHENDRA Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- \Status: \ALC2/2014 INDUSTRIES ALC2/2014 |\Closed | | 12.1 1.2014 | 198| |HQ|:01/81/050/00256/AM15/ File RLA:07/24/040/00151/AMI5/ File [22.07.2014po No/Detei7 1010332 | ‘Decision: NC noted that RA, Bangalore vide letter No.07/24/40/151/AM15 dated 31.10.2014 has_| aes that Advance Authorization has been issued on repeat basis as per norms fixed by ALC | IRAvide meeting No.8/81may take suitable consequentialdated 02.07.2013.actionIt wasaccordingly. accordingly decided to close the case. |

==> picture [464 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | oe No.:3/9/81- |Party Name:APAR [Meet No/Date: 12/81- Status: ALC2/2014 [INDUSTRIES LIMITED |ALC2/2014 Deferred | | | 12.11.2014 | 30 {her ——qoli24 14 ----- End of picture text -----

| JHQFile = IRLA File |Lic.No/Date:3410040390 [Defer :01/81/050/00257/AM15/ 34/24/040/00095/AM15/ '23.07.2014 |Date:30.12.2014 |Decision: NC observed that hard copy of application has not received from RA. Hence NC | |decided to send E-mail to RA/firm to pyforwardpphard copy of the application. RA may also confirm idetails whether the AA was issued on repeat basis. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | Case No.:4/12/81‘Party Name:JINDAL \Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: 12.11.2014 | ALC2/2014 (INDIA) LIMITED jALC2/20 14 Deferred HQ File RLA File ILic.No/Date:0210204629 [Defer | | |:01/81/050/00405/AM15/ — |:02/24/040/00036/AM15/ — [25.07.2014 Date: ) | 30.12.2014 | ‘Decision : NC decided to senda letter to firm to submit the following information as per written | — of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/100 dated 27 /11/2014 as under:| | 1. Thickness of 3LPE coating. , 00 | 23 . DetailedInformationcalculationsin respect offor Sl.the No.quantities 5 of Standard Deficiency Format.of import items at SI. No. 2 to 4, | wastages claimed. | | supported by coating thicknesses and coating areas in the export product and | 4. Justification for the requirement of 4.75 mm to 10 mm thick Non Alloy Steel | Coil (Import item No. 1) for the manufacture of export item. | Theexport. CommitteeIn case alsoit is decideda Deemed to checkexport, fromfirm firmshould whetherprovideit is afollowing case of physicalinformation:- export/(i) DeemedEPCG | {licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured| (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case | stand deferred to 30.12.2014. | |Case No.:7/12/81Party Name:RAMESH [Meet No/Date:12/81—|Status: | | ALC2/2014 WIRE MESH INDUSTRIES |ALC2/2014 Approved } | 12.11.2014 | [HQ File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:0910060851 | :01/81/050/00408/AM 15/ :09/24/040/00199/AM15/ 13.08.2014 ‘Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide | 0 U0. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/101 dated 27 /11/2014 as under:Kgs. of Galvanised wire of 1.6. mm dia) ”. | | 1 Net weight of export product at SI]. No. 1 may be specified as “7722 Kgs. containing 7722 | 2 Net weight of export product at SI. No. 2 may be specified as “9653.5 Kgs. containing 9653.5 Kgs. of Galvanised wire of 1.6. mm dia)”. & 9750 Kgs. respectively as 1.01 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products at SI. No. 1 & 2 | 3 respectively.Quantities of import items at SI. No. | & 2 may be allowed as applied fori.e. 7800 Kgs. | RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

==> picture [78 x 42] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- {fae —Folrat!4 r : ----- End of picture text -----

' vata, Bares

==> picture [461 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | |Case No.:11/12/81- ‘Party Name: MAN ‘Meet No/Date:12/81- Status: | ALC2/2014 INDUSTRIES (INDIA) rear Deferred | HQ LTD. 12.11.2014 | File RLA File [Lic.No/Date:03 10788157 te :01/81/050/00412/AM15/ :03/95/040/00233/AM15/ — 20.08.2014 Date: | [30.12.2014| ‘Decision : NC decided to senda letter to firm to submit the following information as per written. comments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/102 dated 27 /11/2014 as under:- 1. Breakup of 300 Meters of Casing Pipe at SI. No. | of list of Export items in terms of | 102 Outer Diameter (OD) & Wall Thickness (WT) . 2. Breakup of 1800 Meters of Casing Pipe at SI. No. 2 of list of Export items in terms of Outer Diameter (OD) & Wall Thickness (WT) . 3. Details of import item at Sl. No. 7 (Multistart Connectors) with its specific use in the export items and basis for its quantity. ----- End of picture text -----

The Committee also decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | Case No.:13/12/81[Party Name: H. K. IMPEX [Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: ALC2/2014 PVT. LTD. |ALC2/2014 Approved )12.11,.2014 Ho:01/81/050/00414/AM15/ File ~— —_:03/94/04.0/00354/AM15/IRLA File Lic.No/Date:0301.09.2014 10788542 Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide | U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/103 dated 27/11/2014 as under:-

Words “containing 127273 Kgs. of Cold Rolled Stainless Steel Circles Grade 201” may be}

103 suffixed with the description of export product at Sl. No. 1. | 2. Words “containing 67273 Kgs. of Cold Rolled Stainless Steel Circles Grade 410” may bel suffixed with the description of export product at SI. No. 2.

Word “Width” given in the description of import items at SI. No. 1 & 2 may be amended to “Diameter”.
1. Words “of relevant thickness” may be suffixed with the descriptions of import items at SI. No. 1 & 2 and their quantities may be allowed as applied for i.e. 140000 Kgs. & 74000 Kgs. respectively as 1.10 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products at Sl. No. 1 & 2 respectively.
2. Import items at Sl. No. No. 3, 4 & & 5 may be allowed within 2 % of FOB may be allowed within 2 % of FOB be allowed within 2 % of FOB allowed within 2 % of FOB within 2 % of FOB 2 % of FOB % of FOB of FOB FOB value of exports. of exports. exports.

==> picture [462 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 5. Import items at Sl. No. No. 3, 4 & & 5 may be allowed within 2 % of FOB may be allowed within 2 % of FOB be allowed within 2 % of FOB allowed within 2 % of FOB within 2 % of FOB 2 % of FOB % of FOB of FOB FOB value of exports. of exports. exports. | | RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | | | [Case No.:9/12/81- Party Name: TRAFIGURA [Meet No/Date: 12/81- Status: | |‘ALC2/2014 INDIA PVT. LTD ALC2/201412.11.2014 |Deferred || 104 |HQ:01/81/050/00410/AM15/ File RLA__|:03/95/040/00456/AM15/ File — Cou(02.09.2014 DeferDate: sono (Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a 32 lan rig teensipnentatines ----- End of picture text -----

i I

||reminder toMSME. Thecasestands|stands deferredto30.12.2014.|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||CaseNo.:6/12/81-<br>ALC2/2014|PartyName:RADIANT<br>/WIRING SYSTEMS PVT|[MeetNo/Date:12/81-<br>|ALC2/2014|—[Status:<br>Deferred|_||
||<br>(HQFile<br>:01/81/050/00407/AM15/<br>|||‘LTD<br>IRLAFile<br>—_|:09/24/040/00281/AM15/ —|12.11.2014<br>LLic.No/Date:0910060913 <br> |04.09.2014||Defer<br>Date:<br>30.12.2014||

| |Decision : NC decided to send a letter to firm to submit the following information as per written| | |comments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/105 dated 27 /11/2014 as under:-

1105 | 1. Size of core (Wire) at SI. No. 1 to 4 of the list of import items and material thereof. | | 2. Basis/detailed calculations for the quantities of import items. | Justification for the wastages claimed on import items supported by the manufacturing process with wastage at each stage of manufacture. | The Committee also decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG export.licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under| | Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured ___|(vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case | ~~ |stands deferred to 30.12.2014. Case No.:10/12/81Party Name: PRESTRESS _|Meet No/Date:12/81Status: | |ALC2/2014 WIRE INDUSTRIES ALC2/2014 Approved 12.11.2014 | HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:03 10789102 | | :01/81/050/0041 1/AM15/ :03/95/040/00488/AM15/ 12.09.2014 Decision : NC decided to ratify the norms of—above AA as=per written comments= of DIPP vide.| 106 pe No. 12/150/2014-TSW/106 dated 27 11/2014 as under:| | 1. Quantityproduct takingof importclue itemfrom atSIONSI]. No.C-1626.1 may be allowed as 1.02 Kgs./Kg. content in the export | 2. Quantity of import item at SI. No. 2 may be allowed upto 4 % of the net weight of steel wire | | rods taking clue from SION C-1626. | | |RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly. | | Case No.:14/12/81Party Name:AVDHOOT {Meet No/Date:12/81|Status: _| | |ALC2/2014 ENGINEERS (PROP. |ALC2/2014 (Deferred | |\VASUDEO D. 12.11.2014 107 |IHQ File 'YERAVDEKAR)IRLA File |Lic.No/Date:3 110064889 | [Defer | :01/81/050/00415/AM15/ :31/83/040/00143/AM15/ 17.09.2014 Date: 30.12.2014 [Decision : NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a | reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | [108 |Case No.:12/12/81Party Name: RAJGURU [Meet No/Date:12/81‘Status: | 33 . sSeral (Y : ‘ wprape, Many

==> picture [461 x 101] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||(ALC2/2014|ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.|i|LC2/2014|‘Deferred|||
|||HQ|File|RLA|File|Lic.No/Date:0312.11.2014|10789472||Defer|||
|:01/81/050/00413/AM15/|:03/95/040/00437/AM15/|19.09.2014|Date:|
|30.12.2014|
|‘Decision|:|NC|decided|to|send a|letter|to|firm|to|submit|the|following|information|as|per|
|recommendation|of DIPP|vide|representative|in|the|meeting|dated|27/11/2014|as|under:-|

----- End of picture text -----

SI.No.3, 4,5,11 &11A (Export Product Wise) of SDL.

The Committee also decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed licencepiper numberIn case andit isdatea Deemed(ii) CIF export,value offirm the shouldlicence provide(iii) Whetherfollowingthis licenceinformation:-was issued(i) EPCGunder Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | Case No.:5/12/81Party Name: DIAMOND [Meet No/Date:12/81(Status: ALC2/2014 ENGINEERING ALC2/2014 Deferred | (CHENNAD PVT LTD 12.11.2014 [HQ File RLA File |Lic.No/Date:0410159486|Defer :01/81/050/00406/AM15/ :04/24/040/00153/AMI15/_ —- [25.09.2014 Date: | 130.12.2014| ‘Decision : NC decided to send a letter to firm to submit the following information as per| 109 iiieaiiediig of DIPP representative in the meeting dated 27/1 1/2014 as under:SI. No. 1,3,4,5 & 11 (Export Product Wise) of SDL

The Committee also decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured costands Howdeferred EPCGto licence30.12.2014. holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case 'Case No.:8/12/81Party Name:GURU Meet No/Date: 12/8 1- Status: |ALC2/2014 INDIARAJENDRA METALLOYS PVT. LTD., (12.11.2014|ALC2/2014 Deferred F 10 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:08 10133450 |Defer :01/81/050/00409/AM I 5/ :08/24/040/00234/AMI5/ —- {25.09.2014 Date: 30.12.2014 Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence NC decided to send a| reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | \Case No.:1/12/81Party Name:OIL COUNTRY (Meet No/Date:12/81[Status: | ALC2/2014 TUBULAR LIMITED |ALC2/2014 Deferred | rh: 12.11.2014 | HO File IRLA File Lic.No/Date:09 10061 126 [Defer :01/81/050/00402/AM15/ :09/24/040/00383/AM15/ —- 22.10.2014 Date: | 30.12.2014| ae —jo (241

*. Sthieeu 2

==> picture [463 x 161] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | (Decision: NC noted that hard copy of the application of the firm has not been received. NC| decided to send letter to RA. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | | |Case No.:15/12/81- Party Name: RAYCHEM Meet No/Date:12/81- __|Status: | |ALC2/2014 RPG PVT LTD. (12.11.2014AALC2/2014 Deferred | 1D HQ:01/81/050/00416/AM15/ File IRLA:34/24/040/00191/AM15/ File Lic.No/Date:3407.11.2014 10040663 D ate:efer | 30.12.2014 Decision: NC noted that hard copy of the application of the firm has not been received. NC | |decided to send letter to RA. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014. | ----- End of picture text -----

Offline Agenda M. No. 12/81 dated 12.11.2014

SI. No. 115 Case No. ARM/s. Lloyd Insulations (India) Limited Meeting No. 12/81 F. No. 01/81/50/36/AM-10/DES-II Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for fixation of Norms in respect of Advance License No. 0510241176 dated 12.05.2009.

Decision: NC decided to call the representative for PH before the Chairman to resolve the issue. However, reply of the firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export is awaited. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

SI. No. 116

==> picture [453 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. AR- 15 M/s. Kalyani Technoforge Limited Meeting No. 12/81 F. No. 01/81/50/399/AM 13/DES-II Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for fixation of Norms in respect of Advance License No. 3110056380 dated 05.12.2012. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

SI. No. 117 Case No. AR- 16 M/s. Theeta Electronics Private Limited Meeting No. 12/81 F. No. 01/81/50/1015/AM07/DES-II Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for fixation of Norms in respect of Advance License No. 0510200804 dated 12.03.2007. Decision: NC noted that Deficiency letter was issued on 24.09.2014 to the firm. But, reply of the firm is still awaited. Hence, NC decided to send a reminder to firm to expedite reply. However, The Committee decided to check from firm whether it is a case of physical export/ Deemed export. In case it is a Deemed export, firm should provide following information:- (i) EPCG licence number and date (ii) CIF value of the licence (iii) Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme (iv) Custom duty saved amount (v) Products to be manufactured (vi) How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

tam eel"[4] ty Mga ¢

==> picture [451 x 61] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- SI. No. 118 Case No. AR- M/s. Kalyani Technoforge Limited Meeting No. 12/81 F, No. 01/81/50/344/AM14/DES-IH Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for fixation of Norms in respect of Advance License No. 3110060740 dated 18.10.2013. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

SI. No. 119

Case No. AR- 19 M/s. Modine Thermal Systems Private Limited Meeting No. 12/81 F. No. 01/81/50/317/AM14/DES-II Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for amendment in adhoc Norms in respect of Advance License No. 0410150483 dated 03.10.2013.

Decision: NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/19-A/R dated 27 /11/2014 as under:1. Typographical error may be corrected and word “Alloy” may be deleted from the description of export item instead of import item as mentioned earlier.
1. Typographical error may be corrected and Words “WT: 0.4 mm” may be suffixed with the description of export item instead of import item as mentioned earlier.
RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

SI. No. 120

==> picture [453 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. AR- 22 M/s. Vautid-Shah Hardface Pvt. Ltd. Meeting No. 12/81 F. No. 01/81/50/122/AM14/DES-II Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for amendment in adhoc Norms in respect of Advance License No. 0310732920 dated 30.04.2013. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DIPP. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to DIPP. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

Sl. No. 121

Case No. AR- 23 M/s. Angelique International Limited Meeting No. 12/81 F. No. 01/81/50/271/AM13/DES-II Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for amendment in adhoc Norms in respect of Advance License No. 0510334458 dated 12.09.2012.

Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DIPP. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to DIPP. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

Sl. No. 122

Case No. AR- 24 M/s. Oil Country Tubular Limited Meeting No. 12/81 F. No. 01/81/50/306/AM11/DES-I Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for amendment in adhoc Norms in respect of Advance License No. 0910043872 dated 11.10.2010.

Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at DHI. Hence NC decided to send a reminder to DHI. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

==> picture [130 x 58] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ro rolOe pe tP e y rh ‘ hig’) UF poe ORE Bene 5 rapa, dw oi ----- End of picture text -----

|SI. No. 123||||
|---|---|---|---|
|CaseNo. AR- 25|M/s. Wieland Metals India Private Limited|||
|Meeting No. 12/81|F.No. 01/81/50/365/AM13/DES-II_ 01/81/50/426/AM 13/DES-II|||
||01/81/50/462/AM13/DES-II_ 01/81/50/082/AM14/DES-II|||
||01/81/50/165/AM14/DES-II_ 01/81/50/263/AM14/DES-II|||
||01/81/50/248/AM14/DES-II_ 01/81/50/243/AM14/DES-II|||
||01/81/50/130/AM15/DES-II|||
|Dated:- 12.11.2014 | Request of M/s. Wieland Metals India Private Limited for ratification of||||
||Norms<br>in respect of Advance Authorization Nos.<br>(i)|0710090999|dated|
||27.09.2012<br>(ii)<br>0710091865<br>dated<br>08.11.2012<br>(iii)|0710093248|dated|
||22.01.2013<br>(iv) 0710094520<br>dated 27.03.2013<br>(v)|0710095033|dated|
||26.04.2013<br>(vi) 0710096503<br>dated<br>08.07.2013<br>(vii)|0710097183|dated|
||30.07.2013<br>(viii) 0710098134 dated 06.09.2013<br>(ix)|0710098755|dated|
||03.10.2013|||

Decision: NC observed that case is under examination at MSME. Hence, NC decided to send a reminder to MSME. The case stands deferred to 30.12.2014.

SI. No. 124 F, No. 01/81/50/00001/AM14/DES-II Dated:- 12.11.2014 Request for amendment in adhoc Norms in respect of Advance License No. 0510350242 dated 25.03.2013.

Decision: NC decided to ratify the norms of above AA as per written comments of DIPP vide U.O. No. 12/150/2014-TSW/26-A/R dated 27 /11/2014 as under:-

Quantity of import item at S.No. 1 may be allowed as 29143 Meters as 1.02 Mtrs./Mtr. content in the export product.

RA may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

th Date:27.11.2014 HaradhanTolleDas Place: New Delhi Foreign Trade Development Officer

' bi neeeigte, Bleyi i

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.