IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

RATIFIED Minutes of Meeting No.22/12 scheduled on 24.01.2012 of Norms Committee(NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 22/12 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20112012 was held on 24.01.2012 under the Chairmanship of Sh. N.P.S. Monga, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh K. K. Tiwari, I.A. 476 23063321 Extn.3322 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. G. Parthasarthi, Dy.DGFT 312 23061563 Extn.301 DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. K.C. Raju, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. I The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC. The decisions taken thereon are as under: 1

Case No.:18/41/80ALC2/2009

Party Name:KEBURGMANN FLEXIBLES INDIA PVT.LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80ALC2/2011 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00639/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00247/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410110339 22.12.2009 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called from C&PC are yet to be received. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind them for expediting their comments. The case may be relisted on 06.03.2012. 2

Case No.:19/18/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00272/AM11/ RLA File :31/24/040/00028/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:3110043412 31.05.2010 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of MCIT received vide their UO No. 17(49)/2010IPHW dated22.12.2011 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: S. No. Import item Description Total Wastage calculated as per details given by the party (on the Net weight) in % Total Import qty. recommended (In M.T.) 1. Lumax Resin GN5006FC KC21Tray Disc 2.34% 120.937 Lumax Resin GN5006FC 0.00%

KC21Main Base 2. Resin ABS AF303G92649 Bezel Assembly 11.96% 29.72 Resin ABS AF303G92649 (Bezel Assembly) 10.91% Resin ABS AF303G92649 (Door) 9.72% 3. Resin ABS AF 303 G8C104 (Bezel Assembly Ivory) 11.96% 14.86 Resin ABS AF 303 G8C104 (Bezel Assembly Ivory) 10.91% Resin ABS AF 303 G8C104 (Door Ivory) 9.72% 4. F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) – (Chassis Outsert) 85.19% 75.667 F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) – (Clamp Assembly) 66.74% F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) – Pulley Gear) 250.0% F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) – Gear Idie) 200.0% F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) (Lever Emergency) 50% F2003 Natural POM (Pulley Motor) 300% F2003 Natural POM (Pulley Motor) 100% F2003 Natural POM (Pulley Motor) 18.31% 5. Master Batch Black MB S315(Chassis Outsert) 84.99% 0.69 6. Master Batch Blue MB

(Pulley Motor) 300% F2003 Natural POM (Pulley Motor) 100% F2003 Natural POM (Pulley Motor) 18.31% 5. Master Batch Black MB S315(Chassis Outsert) 84.99% 0.69 6. Master Batch Blue MB B207(Chassis Outsert) 84.99% 1.104 Master Batch Blue MB B207(Clamp Assembly) 97.89%

( p y) 7. Electrolytic Galvanished Steel Coil Cold Rolled 0.6mmx242mm Steel Coil Cabinet Assembly 13.86% 305.1 8. Electrolytic Galvanished Steel Sheet Cold Rolled 0.5mmx169.5mmx600m Steel Sheet Cabinet Assembly 53.50% 46.05 9. Electrolytic Galvanished 0.5mmx182.8mm Steel Coil(Bottom Assembly) 14.06% 165.225 10. Electrolytic Galvanished Steel Coil Cold Tolled 1.6mmx130mm Steel Coil – (Chassis Outsert) 95.50% 264.51 Electrolytic Galvanished 1.6mmx130mm Steel (Bracket) 0% 11. Electrolytic Galvanised 0.8mmx121mm Steel – (Clamp Assembly) 14.60% 15.026 12. TX 31 natural TX31Guide Feed 20.00% 6.600 13. Acrylic Resin 1H 830Lens Model 30.00% 2.860 14. Resin Lupos GP2100KA01 (Base Up Down) 18.00% 14.750 The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 3

Case No.:15/18/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:INDUS PRO AUTO ENGINEERS PVT.LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00268/AM11/ RLA File :05/23/040/00054/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0510266316 17.06.2010 Decision : The representatives of the firm Shri Rakesh Sharma, Managing Director, appeared before the Committee for personal hearing and explained their case. The Committee deliberated the details of the case. After taking clue from SION H88, the Committee decided to allow import item “Vinyl Sheeting Sierra Black Skin” at 1.05 Sq Yard/Sq Yard content in the export product.

y g q q p p 4

Case No.:45/18/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00298/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00018/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018429 07.07.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the written comments called from Ministry of Defence and case is under examination with Ministry of Defence and the case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 5

Case No.:47/18/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00300/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00017/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018428 07.07.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the written comments called from Ministry of Defence and case is under examination with Ministry of Defence and the case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 6

Case No.:21/18/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00274/AM11/ RLA File :61/24/040/00029/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:6110000472 15.07.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :As per DHI UO note No.3(69)/10TSW(B)/711 dated 28.12.2011, the Committee decided to ask firm to furnish proper justification for the import quantity for item No. 139 to 141 and also give calculation of requirement of each raw material from the dimensions from the firm and to relist the case on 06.03.2012. 7

Case No.:29/22/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00340/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00022/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018565 21.07.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the written comments called from Ministry of Defence and case is under examination with Ministry of Defence and the case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 8

Case No.:30/22/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00341/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00023/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018566 21.07.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that the written comments called from Ministry of Defence and case is under examination with Ministry of

Decision : The Committee noted that the written comments called from Ministry of Defence and case is under examination with Ministry of Defence and the case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 9

Case No.:24/29/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:INVENSYS INDIA PVT., LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00459/AM11/ RLA File :03/94/040/00501/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0310591600 08.09.2010 Decision :The committee noted that a copy of firm’s reply dated 16.12.2011 has been sent to MCIT on 06.01.2012 and the case is under examination. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 10

Case No.:29/29/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICAL LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00464/AM11/ RLA File :11/24/040/00038/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:1110023211 16.09.2010 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of MCIT received vide their UO No. 17(76)/2011IPHW dated09.12.2011 and S.No. Import Item Total Quantity requested for by the party (Km) Total qty recommended for desired length (Km) 1. Optical Fibre 5304.416 5304.416 2. Polyethylene 14490.04 14075.928 a) Import quantity of optical fibre recommended is baased on 5% additional length over the length of the cable. b) Import quantity of Polyethylene material recommended is inclusive of wastage of 2%. 11

Case No.:29/27/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00426/AM11/ RLA File :03/95/040/00354/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0310593772 24.09.2010 Decision :On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: Export Product weight – 73 MT Imports Items 1. Item No. 1 – 34MT – to be allowed with 5% wastage. 2. Item No. 2 – 16.33 MT – with no wastage. 3. Item No. 3 24.23 MT to be allowed with 2% wastage. 4. Item No. 7,8,9 2% of the weight of item No.1 @ 680 Kg. put together. 5. Item No. 5 – As applied fro by the firm.

pp y 6. Rest of the items to be allowed on the net to net basis with accountability clause. 12

Case No.:30/27/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00427/AM11/ RLA File :03/95/040/00360/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0310593860 24.09.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to relist the case on 06.03.2012. 13

Case No.:6/35/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:GATRAY ENVIROTECH SYSTEMS 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00633/AM11/ RLA File :31/24/040/00144/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:3110045144 20.10.2010 Decision : The Committee noted that the written comments called from Ministry of Defence and case is under examination with Ministry of Defence and the case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 14

Case No.:22/35/80ALC2/2010

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00649/AM11/ RLA File :04/24/040/00194/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0410118622 04.11.2010 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as allowed under advance authorization No.0410115603 dt.19.07.2010 15

Case No.:2/32/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00543/AM11/ RLA File :03/95/040/00446/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0310600429 08.11.2010 Decision :On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: Export Product 1. Item No. 1 50 MT 2. Item No. 2 68 MT 3. Item No. 3 75 MT 4. Item No. 4 128 MT Imports

p Item No.1 As applied for with 5% wastage 1. Item No.2 As applied for with 5% wastage 2. Item No.3 As applied for with ‘Nil’ wastage. 3. Item No.4 – To be allowed of 31.74 MT with 2% wastage. 4. Item No.5 – To be allowed of 0.79 MT allowed with ‘Nil’ wastage. 5. Item No.6 – To be allowed of 1 MT allowed with ‘Nil’ wastage. 6. Item No.7 – To be allowed of 0.40 MT allowed with ‘Nil’ wastage. 7. Item No.9 – To be allowed of 1210 Kg. 8. Item No.10 – To be allowed of 3690 Kg. 9. Item No.11 – To be allowed of 3690 Kg. with 2% wastage. 16

Case No.:25/35/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:L&T MHI TURBINE GENERATORS PVT.LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00652/AM11/ RLA File :03/95/040/00545/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0310601333 15.11.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 17

Case No.:53/35/80ALC2/2010

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00680/AM11/ RLA File :61/24/040/00067/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:6110000536 01.12.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 18

Case No.:45/35/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:BOSCH LIMITED, 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00672/AM11/ RLA File :07/24/040/00332/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0710075865 07.12.2010 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Item No. 4 – to be allowed of 10,564 KG with 47% wastage after taking 1/3 recovery. 2. Item Nos. 2,5,7,9 and 11 to be allowed at 2% of FOB value put together. 3. All other items are components and to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.

Case No :36/35/80 ALC2/2010

Part Name:JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT Meet No/Date:22/80 ALC2/2011 Status:

Case No.:36/35/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00663/AM11/ RLA File :05/23/040/00263/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0510279826 20.12.2010 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 27.12.2011. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 20

Case No.:23/36/80ALC2/2010

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: HQ File :01/80/050/00722/AM11/ RLA File :61/24/040/00072/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:6110000544 04.01.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative, the Committee decided to ratify the norms of Advance Authorization No. 6110000544 dated 04.01.2011as per DHI written comments provided vide UO No.3(69)/10TSW(B)/373 dated 12/13.7.2011 in Advance Authorization No.6110000536 dated 1.12.2010. RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 21

Case No.:27/1/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00910/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00051/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610020480 07.01.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the written comments called from Ministry of Defence and case is under examination with Ministry of Defence and the case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 22

Case No.:17/39/80ALC2/2010

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00819/AM11/ RLA File :61/24/040/00074/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:6110000553 25.01.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis of the subject advance authorization No.6110000286 dated 06.02.2009.. 23

Case No.:14/38/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:VASUNDRA MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS PVT.LTD, 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00784/AM11/ RLA File :07/21/040/00786/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0710077109 03.02.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 29.12.201. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06 03 2012

06.03.2012. 24

Case No.:16/38/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00786/AM11/ RLA File :05/23/040/00309/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0510283074 03.02.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed that the products in the Advance Authorization are large and wastage is high and asked for a Team Visit to evaluate on wastage. The Committee, therefore, decided to send a team consisting of representatives of DHI, MSME & DDG and submit a report. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 25

Case No.:23/39/80ALC2/2010

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00825/AM11/ RLA File :61/24/040/00078/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:6110000557 03.02.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis of the subject advance authorization No.6110000286 dated 06.02.2009.. 26

Case No.:43/1/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:SPRAY ENGINEERING DEVICES LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00926/AM11/ RLA File :22/24/040/00090/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:2210010955 04.02.2011 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 27

Case No.:31/38/80ALC2/2010

Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00801/AM11/ RLA File :31/24/040/00239/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:3110046834 09.02.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of MCIT received vide their UO No. 17(99)/2011IPHW dated23.12.2011 and Sl. No. Impot item description Total wastage calculated as per details given by the party (on the Net weight) in % Total Import qty recommended (In M.T.) 1. Lumax Resin GN5006FC 2.34% 145.125

. u a es GN5006 C KC21Tray Disc .3 % 5. 5 Lumax Resin GN5006FC KC21Main Base 0.% 2. Resin ABS AF303G92649Bezel Assembly 11.96% 35.66 Resin ABS AF303G92649Bezel Knob 10.91% Resin ABS AF303G92649 Door 9.72% 3. Resin Gp 2100 kas02 Up Down 18.00% 17.700 4. F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) – Puller Gear 250.00% 6.16 F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) Gear Idle 200.00% 5.940 F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) Geal Loading 100.00% 7.480 F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) Pulley Motor 300.00% 1.760 F2003 Natrual POM (Polyacetal Resin)Clamp Assembly 66.74 8.712 F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) Chassis Outsert 85.19 23.835 F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin)Guide Up Down 18.31% 18.480 F2003 Natural POM (Polyacetal Resin) Lever Emergency 50.00% 3.300 5. Master Batch Black MB S315Guide Feed 10.09 0.264 6. Master Batch Blue MB B207Clam Assy. 97.89 0.414 7 Electrolytic Galvanished 13 86% 244 08

Polyacetal Resin) Lever Emergency 50.00% 3.300 5. Master Batch Black MB S315Guide Feed 10.09 0.264 6. Master Batch Blue MB B207Clam Assy. 97.89 0.414 7 Electrolytic Galvanished 13 86% 244 08

Electrolytic Galvanished 0.6mmx242mm Steel CoilCabinet Assembly 13.86% 244.08 8. Electrolytic Galvanished 0.5mmx169.5mmx600m Steel sheetCabinet Assembly 53.50% 36.840 9. Electrolytic Galvanished 0.5mmx182.8mm Steel Coil – Bottom Assembly 14.06% 132.18 10. Electrolytic Galvanished 1.6mmx130mm Steel Coil – Chassis Outsert Assembly 95.5 264.51 Electrolytic Galvanished 1.6mmx130mm Steel – Bracket Assembly 0 11. Electrolytic Galvanished 0.8mmx121mm Steel Clamp Assembly 14.64% 15.031 12. TX 31 Natural TX31 Guide Feed 20 6.6 13. Acrylic Resin IH 830 – Lens Model 30.00% 2.860 28

Case No.:22/1/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00905/AM11/ RLA File :04/24/040/00244/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0410121548 11.02.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as allowed under advance authorization No.0410121550 dt. 11.02.2011.

Case No.:32/1/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:PSK ENGINEERING PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00915/AM11/ RLA File :07/24/040/00449/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0710077436 18.02.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committed observed that the firm has furnish same reply again and again and decided to inform and ask for pointwise reply to DL dated 4.1.2012 The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 30

Case No.:4/1/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00886/AM11/ RLA File :04/24/040/00298/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0410122003 28.02.2011 Decision : The Committee deliberated the written comments of DHI received vide their UO No 3(40)/10TSW(B)/707 dated 22.12.2011 and Export Total weight of export product for five sets is to be allowed at 1843 MT. The word “Auxiliaries” may be deleted from the description of export product. Import Taking clue from SION C1742, 1. Item No.1 – CS Plate – to be allowed at 94.6 MT with 5% wastage as per SION 2. Item No. 2 – CS Seamless Pipe – The item may be allowed at 467MT with 2% wastage as per SION. 3. Item NO. 3 – AS Seamless Piper – to be allowed at 60.5 MT with 2% wastage as per SION. 4. Item NO. 4 – SS Seamless Pipe – to be allowed at 19 MT with 2% wastage as per SION as applied for. 5. Item No. 5 – Welding material – Allowed as applied for. 6. Item No. 6& 8 – These are components & to be allowed under GN4. 7. Item No.7 – Valves – to be allow as applied for under GN4 with accountability clause. 31

Case No.:30/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:L&T MHI TURBINE GENERATORS PVT.LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00136/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00945/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0310620136 08.03.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that a copy of RA, Mumbai amendment sheet dt.09.11.2011 has been sent to DHI on 27.12.2011 and the case is under their examination and case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 32

Case No.:12/1/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00894/AM11/ RLA File :05/24/040/00419/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0510286112 15.03.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of DHI informed the Committee that the export product with part numbers are not recognizable from the documents

ec s o : e ep ese tat ve o o ed t e Co ttee t at t e e po t p oduct w t pa t u be s a e ot ecog ab e o t e docu e ts mentioned by the firm. The Committee decided to advice the firm to appear in Personal Hearing alongwith their documents as well as a sample of the export product and Scrap Blank strip to present their case in person along with technical expert and full facts of the case. The case may be re listed on 06.03.2012. 33

Case No.:32/7/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00138/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00009/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110024726 11.05.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 34

Case No.:15/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00121/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00046/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410124251 20.05.2011 Decision : The Committee noted that a copy of firm’s reply dt.24.01.2012 received on 31.01.2012 forward to DHI for examination and comments. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 35

Case No.:16/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00122/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00045/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410124249 20.05.2011 Decision : The Committee noted that a copy of firm’s reply dt.24.01.2012 received on 31.01.2012 forward to DHI for examination and comments. 36

Case No.:36/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00051/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410124216 20.05.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 27.12.2011. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 37

Case No.:2/10/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:INVENSYS INDIA PVT., LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00197/AM12/ RLA File :03/94/040/00034/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310633321 27.05.2011 Decision :The Committee noted that a copy of firm’s reply dt.29.11.2011 has been sent to MCIT on 27.12.2011 and the case under their examination. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Case No.:3/10/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:INVENSYS INDIA PVT., LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00198/AM12/ RLA File :03/94/040/00035/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310633340 27.05.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that a copy of firm’s reply dt.29.11.2011 has been sent to MCIT on 27.12.2011 and the case under their examination. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 39

Case No.:35/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:L&T MHI TURBINE GENERATORS PVT.LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00141/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00125/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310633816 31.05.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 40

Case No.:1/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00107/AM12/ RLA File :09/24/040/00119/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0910046990 03.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that a copy of firm’s reply dt.19.01.2012 received on 30.01.2012 forward to DHI for examination and comments. 41

Case No.:2/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:DENSO HARYANA PVT. LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00108/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00066/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510292671 06.06.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Item No. 1 to 6 – Components – to be allowed on net to net basis. 2. Item No. 7 – to be allowed of 1.05 kg/kg content of the export product. 3. Item No. 8 As applied for. 42

Case No.:11/7/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00117/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00065/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410124734 08.06.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as

allowed udner advance authorization No.0410124435 dt. 27.05.2011. 43

Case No.:12/7/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00118/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00067/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410124735 08.06.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis of the subject advance authorization No.0410080519 dt.18.04.2006 44

Case No.:14/10/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00209/AM12/ RLA File :61/24/040/00012/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:6110000627 08.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : As per DHI UO note No.3(69)/10TSW(B)/711 dated 28.12.2011, the Committee decided to asked to furnish proper justification for the import quantity for item No. 139 to 141 and also give calculation of requirement of each raw material from the dimensions from the firm and to relist the case on 06.03.2012 45

Case No.:13/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:L&T MHI TURBINE GENERATORS PVT.LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00119/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00126/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310635194 09.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to relist the case on 6.3.2012. 46

Case No.:18/7/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00124/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00317/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0410124882 13.06.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DHI received vide their UO No 3(40)/10TSW(B)/706 dated 22.12.2011 and Export : The total weight of export product for three sets is 3108 MT & the same may be incorporated in the licence. The word “Auxiliaries” may be deleted from the description of export. Import : The equivalent Standard Input Output Norms is C1742

1. Item No 1 – CS Plate – to be allowed at 72 MT with 5 % wastage as per SION. 2. Item No. 2 – CS Seamless Pipe – to be allowed at 147.5 MT with 2% wastage as per SION. 3. Item No. 3 – AS Seamless Pipe – to be allowed at 20.7 MT with 2% wastage as per SION. 4. Item No. 4 – SS Seamless Pipe – to be allowed at 14.7 MT with 2% wastage as per SION. 5. Item No. 5 – Welding material – Allowed as applied for. 6. Item No. 6 – This is a component & may be allowed under GN4. 47

Case No.:19/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:PRANAV VIKAS (INDIA) LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00125/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00090/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510293230 13.06.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis as per Advance Authorization No. 0510288376 dated 20.04.2011 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting dated 10.01.2012. Details are as under: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 7200 Nos. on net to net basis with accountability clause. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 42 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 3 & 4 to be allowed as 1218 Kgs. & 194.6 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 3 % wastage. 4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5, 6 & 7 to be allowed as 182.8 Kgs., 504 Kgs. & 127.4 Kgs respectively inclusive of 2 % wastage. 5. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 8 to be allowed as 2400 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item may be allowed as 184 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 6. Total quantities of import items from Sl. No. 9 to 11 put together to be allowed within 2 % of FOB value of exports. 48

Case No.:1/10/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:INVENSYS INDIA PVT., LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00196/AM12/ RLA File :03/94/040/00231/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310635806 13.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that a copy of firm’s reply dt.15.11.2011 has been sent to MCIT on 27.12.2011 and the case under their examination. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 49

Case No.:20/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00126/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00102/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510293271 14.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed that the products in the Advance Authorization are large and wastage is high and asked for a Team Visit to evaluate on wastage. The Committee, therefore, decided to send a team consisting of representatives of DHI, MSME & DDG and submit a report. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Case No.:15/10/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:LALITHA & COMPANY PAPER PRODUCTS PVT LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00210/AM12/ RLA File :09/24/040/00067/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0910047134 15.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 27.12.2011. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requsite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 51

Case No.:41/7/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00147/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00111/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510293870 20.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed that the products in the Advance Authorization are large and wastage is high and asked for a Team Visit to evaluate on wastage. The Committee, therefore, decided to send a team consisting of representatives of DHI, MSME & DDG and submit a report. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 52

Case No.:2/13/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:RAJ ENGINEERING CO 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00247/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00153/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310639510 30.06.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee decided to forward a copy of firm’s reply dt.17.01.2012 to DIPP for their examination and comments. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 53

Case No.:7/10/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:PRANAV VIKAS (INDIA) LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00202/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00138/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510297044 20.07.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis as per Advance Authorization No. 0510288376 dated 20.04.2011 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting dated 10.01.2012. The details are as unde: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 7200 Nos. on net to net basis with accountability clause. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 42 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 3 & 4 to be allowed as 1218 Kgs. & 194.6 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 3 % wastage. 4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5, 6 & 7 to be allowed as 182.8 Kgs., 504 Kgs. & 127.4 Kgs respectively inclusive of 2 % wastage. 5. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 8 to be allowed as 2400 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 184 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 6. Total quantities of import items from Sl. No. 9 to 11 put together to be allowed within 2 % of FOB value of exports. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly

Case No.:8/10/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:NEUMAN & ESSER ENGINEERING (INDIA) PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00203/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00099/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110049329 20.07.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s did not attend the Personal Hearing on 24.01.2012. The Committee again decided to advise the firm to appear before the NC to explain their case in person regarding manufacturing activities involved in the project. The case may be relisted on 06.03.2012. 55

Case No.:3/13/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:J PAN TUBULAR COMPONENTS PVT.LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00248/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00167/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510298976 08.08.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 27.12.2011. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 56

Case No.:4/13/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00249/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00169/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510299731 17.08.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 57

Case No.:5/13/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00250/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00170/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510299733 17.08.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 58

Case No.:4/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:TITANIUM TANTALUM PRODUCTS LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00372/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00129/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410127409 25.08.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 28.12.2011. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Case No.:5/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:TITANIUM TANTALUM PRODUCTS LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00373/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00132/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410127411 25.08.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 28.12.2011 for furnishing the information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 60

Case No.:1/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:SOLOGUARD MEDICAL DEVICES PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00369/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00161/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410127648 30.08.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of C&PC received vide their OM No.46011/107/2011PCII dated 10.01.2012 and Item to be Exported Quantity Single Use 2ml / 5ml Syringes with needle 1 No. Rawmaterial recommended for Import Quantity / kg 1. HDPE Granules 2. Polypropylene Granules 3. Bulk needles 4. Printed Ink Black Gravure 5. Paper 60 Gsm Bleached 6. Paper 180 gsm Unbleached 7. LDPE Plastic Film Natural 8. Coated White Board 1.01 kg./kg content in the export product 1.01 kg./kg content in the export product Net to net 0.00007 gram As per packing policy As per packing policy As per packing policy As per packing policy 61

Case No.:16/24/85ALC3/2011

Party Name:VELANKANI INFRASTRUCTURE & PROJECTS PVT LTD, 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/85/050/00138/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00209/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710082007 05.09.2011 Defer Date: 06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been returned by DHI. The Committee decided to advise the firm to appear in Personal Hearing before the NC to explain their case in person alongwith name of the equipment and No manufacturing activities. The case may be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Case No.:2/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:SREE ATREYA ENTERPRISES 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00370/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00170/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410128603 27.09.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 06.03.2012: 1. The firm to submit in respect of Sl.No.11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 63

Case No.:9/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:MICRO TECH.CNC PRIVATE LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00377/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00237/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710082914 29.09.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committed noted that RA, Bangalore amendment sheet No. 1 dated 02.01.2012 forward to DHI for examination and comments. 64

Case No.:4/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:DIAMOND METAL SCREENS (P) LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00436/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00251/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710082954 30.09.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as 61227 Kgs. inclusive of 10 % wastage after 1/3rd recovery of scrap. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 19058 Kgs. inclusive of 10 % wastage after 1/3rd recovery of scrap. 65

Case No.:15/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00383/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00234/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510304857 10.10.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of C&PC received vide their OM No 46011/52/2009PCII dated 11.01.2012 and Item to be Exported Quantity Single Blood Bag Size 350 ml(NOA No. RITES/MSM/NACP/05/2010/406 dated 14.06.2011 for supply to National Aids Control Project) 1 No.

Control Project) Rawmaterial recommended for Import Quantity 1. PVC Sheet 1.25 kg/kg of PV C Sheet contained in the export product 2. Poly Carbonate resins/granules 1.05 kg./kg content in the export product 3. P.P. Granules 1.05 kg./kg content in the export product 4. Adenine Net+/5% wastage 5. Blood Bag Labels Net+/5% wastage 6. Relevant NeedleStainless Steel Net+/5% wastage 7. For 1 kg components/parts made of PVC compound (i) PVC Resin (ii) DiOctyl Phthalate (DOP)/Hexamoll Dinch (i) Epoxidised Soylabean Oil (ii) Calcium Zinc Stablizer (iii) Calcium Stearate 0.692 kg 0.324 kg 0.032 kg 0.010 kg 0.005 kg 8. Polyester Polylaminate Film As per packing Policy 9. Alumnium Pouch As per packing Policy 66

Case No.:21/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00453/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00236/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510304983 11.10.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated and decided to ratify the norm for the subject advance authorization No. 0510304983 dated 11.10.2011 under GN4 with accountability clause. 67

Case No.:1/16/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00318/AM12/ RLA File :03/94/040/00499/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310659138 12.10.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Net empty export weight of 23.12 MT to be specified with the quantity of export product. 2 W d “R l t” t b fi d ith th d i ti f i t it t Sl N 1 d tit f thi it b ll d li d f i

2. Word “Relevant” to be prefixed with the description of import item at Sl. No. 1 and quantity of this item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 26035 Kgs. inclusive of 16 % wastage after 1/3rd recovery. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl. Nos. 2, 3 & 4 ( Welding Consumables) to be allowed as 225 Kgs. each. 68

Case No.:6/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00374/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00265/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510305825 18.10.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm did not reply to this office letter dated 27.12.2011 for furnishing the information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 69

Case No.:5/22/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00437/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00034/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110026003 24.10.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 70

Case No.:7/22/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00439/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00036/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110026004 24.10.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 71

Case No.:27/22/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00459/AM12/ RLA File :61/24/040/00045/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:6110000698 24.10.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case may be considered under repeat basis as per Advance Authorization No.6110000313.

Case No.:10/19/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00378/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00252/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710083574 27.10.2011

72 Decision : The Committee deliberated the written comments of MCIT received vide their UO No 17(100) 2011IPHW dated 20.12.2011 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on NettoNet basis with accountability clause. 73

Case No.:3/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:NICOMET INDUSTRIES LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00435/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00616/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310662448 31.10.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DC(MSME) received vide their UO Note No30(112)/2011ME dated 16.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: “The import of Cobalt Concentrate is allowed as 1.0963 Kg/kg content in cobalt concentrate (On cobalt concentrate basis) for export of 1 kg of cobalt metal.” 74

Case No.:16/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00384/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00252/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510307049 02.11.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of C&PC received vide their OM No 46011/106/2009PCII dated 10.01.2012 and Item to be Exported Quantity Close Wound Suction Unit (Polyvac Set) 1 No. Rawmaterial recommended for import Quantity 1. LDPE Granules 2. PP Granules 3. Relevant CClamp 4. Relevant Trocar 5. For 1 kg Components/Parts made of PVC Compound (i) PVC Resin (ii) Dioctyl Phthalate(DIO) (iii) Dioctyl Adipate (DOA) (i ) E idi d S b Oil 1.05 kg/kg content in the export product 1.05 kg/kg content in the export product Net+/2% wastage Net+/2% wastage 0.704 kg 0.330 kg 0.0165 kg 0 033 k

(iv) Epoxidised Soyabean Oil (v) Calcium Zinc Stabilizer (vi) Calcium Stearate 6. Medical Kraft Paper 7. Polyester Polylaminate Film 0.033 kg 0.0110 kg 0.0055 kg As per packing Policy As per packing Policy 75

Case No.:6/22/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00438/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00033/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110026067 03.11.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 76

Case No.:41/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:JAYANITA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00473/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00287/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510307107 03.11.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3 to be allowed as applied for on net to net basis with accountability clause. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 4 (Glue) to be allowed as applied for i.e. 5 Kgs.. 77

Case No.:11/19/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00379/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00222/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410130298 15.11.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 78

Case No.:11/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00443/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00282/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510308174 16.11.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed that the products in the Advance Authorization are large and wastage is high and asked for a Team Visit to evaluate on wastage. The Committee, therefore, decided to send a team consisting of representatives of DHI, MSME & DDG and

submit a report. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 79

Case No.:13/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:METSO PAPER INDIA PVT.LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00381/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00279/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510308223 17.11.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, and committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per GN4 for Engineering Products. 80

Case No.:14/19/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:METSO PAPER INDIA PVT.LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00382/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00280/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510308225 17.11.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, and committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per GN4 for Engineering Products. 81

Case No.:17/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:PRANAV VIKAS (INDIA) LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00449/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00278/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510308694 21.11.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis as per Advance Authorization No.0510288376 dated 20.04.2011 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting dated 10.01.2012. The details are as under: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 14400 Nos. on net to net basis with accountability clause. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 84 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. 3. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 3 & 4 to be allowed as 2436 Kgs. & 389.2 Kgs. respectively inclusive of 3 % wastage. 4. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 5, 6 & 7 to be allowed as 365.6 Kgs., 1008 Kgs. & 254.8 Kgs respectively inclusive of 2 % wastage. 5. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 8 to be allowed as 4800 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 368 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 6. Total quantities of import items from Sl. No. 9 to 11 put together to be allowed within 2 % of FOB value of exports.

Case No.:18/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:NEUMAN & ESSER ENGINEERING (INDIA) PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred

82 ( N ) V .0 . 0 e e ed HQ File :01/80/050/00450/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00246/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110051581 22.11.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to DIPP on 28.11.2011. The Committee decided to advise the firm to again appear before the NC to explain their case in person regarding manufacturing activities involved in the project. The case may be relisted on 06.03.2012. 83

Case No.:13/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:DRIPLEX WATER ENGINEERING LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00445/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00318/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510309896 30.11.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, and committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Item No. 1 to 7, 10 and 11 allowed under GN4 for engineering product. 2. Item 8 & 9 allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 84

Case No.:31/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00463/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00656/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310668209 30.11.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: 1. Net export weight of 300 MT to be specified with the quantity of export product. 2. Import items at Sl. Nos. 1, 2 & 3 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained in the export product 3. Quantities of import items at from Sl. No 1 & 3 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 205682 Kgs. & 22063 Kgs. respectively inclusive of a wastage of 3 %. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl. No 2 to be allowed as 54788 Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 15 % after 1/3rd recovery. 5. Weight of 30.3 MT to be specified with the quantity of import item at Sl. Nos. 4 and this item to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 6. Quantities of import items from Sl. Nos. 5 to 10 (welding Consumables) to be allowed as applied for i.e. 2000 Kgs., 1600 Kgs., 1050 Kgs., 6883 Kgs. , 1144 Kgs. & 4744 Kgs. respectively.

Case No.:14/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:ANAND EXPORTS 24 01 2012 Status: Approved

85 24.01.2012 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00446/AM12/ RLA File :06/24/040/00041/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0610024849 01.12.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per GN4 for Engineering Products. 86

Case No.:24/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:UNITED ENGINEERING (EASTERN)CORPN., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00456/AM12/ RLA File :02/24/040/00151/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0210170116 01.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to DHI on 12.01.2012. However, the committee decided to forward a copy of firm’s application to DC(MSME) for examination and comments, as the case pertains to them. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 87

Case No.:8/22/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00440/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00217/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410131227 02.12.2011 Decision : On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as per advance authorization No.0410118621 dt.04.11.2010. 88

Case No.:28/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:ENGINEERS TRIO 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00460/AM12/ RLA File :30/24/040/00045/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3010081270 02.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to DHI on 11.01.2012. However, the committee decided to forward a copy of firm’s application to DC(MSME) for examination and comments, as the case pertains to them. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 89

Case No.:42/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00474/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00343/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084372 02.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the application received from the firm is incomplete. The Committee decided to inform the RA/firm about it and request for complete information. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Case No.:12/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED 24 01 2012 Status: Deferred

90 LIMITED 24.01.2012 Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00444/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00334/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510310395 07.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : On the recommendation of DIPP representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 06.03.2012: 1. Firm to submit information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 and 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 91

Case No.:16/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:GAS TECH PROCESS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00448/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00329/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510310399 07.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The Committee noted that the firm did not replied to this office letter dated 11.01.2012 for furnishing the information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 92

Case No.:20/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:PERSANG ALLOY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00452/AM12/ RLA File :34/24/040/00185/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3410032430 07.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : As per DC(MSME) UO note No.30(113) 2011ME dated 16.01.2012 and the committee decided to ask the following information from the firm: 1. Process flow chart indicating process of manufacturing, stage wise wastage for export product. 2. Reason to importing primary product at Sl. No.1 and 4 in shape of bar. 3. Size, Specification and composition of export product. 93

Case No.:32/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:H.L.EQUIPMENTS 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00464/AM12/ RLA File :52/24/040/00040/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:5210037266 07.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : On the recommendation of DIPP representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 06.03.2012: 1. Firm to submit information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 and 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format Export product wise. 94

Case No.:10/22/80ALC2/2011

LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00442/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00231/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410131397 09.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination The Committee therefore decided to defer

Decision :The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer 95

Case No.:15/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:LIFELONGINDIA LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00447/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00327/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510310610 09.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to DIPP on 05.01.2012. However, the committee decided to forward a copy of firm’s application to C&PC for examination and comments, as the case pertains to them. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 96

Case No.:9/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:MOTHERSON TECHNO TOOLS LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80ALC2/2011 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00441/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00315/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510311119 13.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to DHI on 05.01.2012 for examination and comments. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 97

Case No.:25/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:ALLMINERAL ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00457/AM12/ RLA File :02/24/040/00150/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0210171021 16.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm did not reply vide this office letter dated 16.01.2012. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting requisite information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 102

Case No.:26/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:H.L.EQUIPMENTS 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00458/AM12/ RLA File :52/24/040/00042/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:5210037449 16.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : On the recommendation of DIPP representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 06.03.2012: 1. Firm to submit information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 and 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format Export product wise. 103

Case No.:34/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:MAHINDRA NAVISTAR ENGINES PVT. LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00466/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00731/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310671168 16.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to DHI on 16.01.2012 for examination and comments. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Case No.:30/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:SUPERMAX PERSONALCARE Status:

104 PRIVATE LIMITED 24.01.2012 Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00462/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00732/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310671588 19.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to MSME on 17.01.2012. However, the committee decided to forward a copy of firm’s application to DIPP for examination and comments, as the case pertains to them. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. 105

Case No.:40/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:AUTO TECH INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00472/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00246/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410131869 20.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision :The representative of the DC(MSME) informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to relist the case on 06.03.2012. 106

Case No.:35/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:ZENITH PRECISION PVT LTD ., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00467/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00371/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084884 21.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DC(MSME) informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to relist the case on 06.03.2012. 107

Case No.:33/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:NICOMET INDUSTRIES LTD. 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00465/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00758/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310672301 22.12.2011 Decision : The Committee deliberated the written comments of DC(MSME) received vide their UO Note No30(112)/2011ME dated 16.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: “The import of Cobalt Concentrate is allowed as 1.0963 Kg/kg content in cobalt concentrate (On cobalt concentrate basis) for export of 1 kg of cobalt metal.” 108

Case No.:36/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:ZENITH PRECISION PVT LTD ., 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00468/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00370/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084928 22.12.2011 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The representative of the DC(MSME) informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to relist the case on 06.03.2012.

109

Case No.:37/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00469/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00328/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510312194 23.12.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: Advance Authorization to be ratified as under on repeat basis as per Advance Authorization No. 0510295994 dated 07.07.2011 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting No. 09/12 dated 26/07/2011: 1. Net weight of export product to be specified as 345.6 Kgs. 2. Quantity of import item to be allowed as 1451.5 Kgs. inclusive of 320% wastage after taking 6% recovery from scrap 110

Case No.:38/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00470/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00327/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510312193 23.12.2011 Decision :The Committee deliberated the written comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 24.01.2012 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as under: Advance Authorization to be ratified as under on repeat basis as per Advance Authorization No. 0510265105 dated 01.06.2010 ratified in Norms Committee Meeting No. 37/11 dated 08.02.2011. 1. Net weight of export product to be specified as 383.8 Kgs. 2. Quantity of import item to be allowed as 1681 Kgs. inclusive of 338% wastage after taking 6% recovery from scrap. 111

Case No.:1/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:GUDEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00433/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00285/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052171 30.12.2011 Decision :On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the committee decided to ratify the norm on Net to Net basis with accountability clause.

112

Case No.:2/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00434/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00814/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310673988 02.01.2012 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : On the recommendation of DIPP representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 06.03.2012: 1. Firm to submit information in respect of Sl.No.4,5 and 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format. 113

Case No.:29/22/80ALC2/2011

Party Name:BROSE INDIA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS PVT LTD 24.01.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00461/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00196/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052234 04.01.2012 Defer Date:06.03.2012 Decision : The Committee decided to remind the RA (with a copy to the firm) to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.520

Case No. A/R

136 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Haridwar HQ F.No.01/80/50/00319/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.61/24/040/00020/AM10 6110000343 dt.19.08.2009 Date: 24.01.2012 Ratification of norms The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re list the case on 06.03.2012. S.No.521

Case No. A/R

18 M/s. Theyssenkrup Industries India Pvt. LTd., Pune HQF.No.01/80/050/00022/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00198/AM10 3110041936 dt.15.02.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted that the firm did not furnish the replied vide this office letter dated 09.01.2012 for furnishing the information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information failing which their case will be rejected without any further notice. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012 S.No.522

Case No. A/R

20 M/s. Marks Pryor Marketing Technology Pvt. LTd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00827/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00213/AM10 3110042306 dt.10.03.2010 Date: 24 01 2012 Ratification of norms

Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re S.No.523

Case No. A/R

23 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Haridwar HQF.No.01/80/050/00232/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.61/24/040/00024/AM11 6110000457 dt.17.06.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as per advance authorization No.6110000286 dt. 06.02.2009. S.No.524

Case No. A/R

58 M/s. Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd., Gujarat HQF.No.01/80/162/0000518/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.34/82/042/00007/AM04 3410008330 dt.29.08.2003 Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re S.No.525

Case No. A/R

63 M/s. The Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., New Delhi HQF.No.01/81/050/00052/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.05/24/040/01081/AM07 0510202875 dt.24.04.2007 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re S.No.526

Case No. A/R

139 M/s. Cartoon Sanitation Pvt. Ltd., Mathura(UP) HQF.No.01/80/050/00824/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.06/24/040/00056/AM11 0610020559 dt.12.01.2011 Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted that the firm’s reply dated09 12 2011 has been sent to DIPP on 27 12 2011 and case is under examination with DIPP The case is to

The Committee noted that the firm s reply dated09.12.2011 has been sent to DIPP on 27.12.2011 and case is under examination with DIPP. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.527

Case No. A/R

140 M/s. G.B. Engineering Pvt. LTd., Tiruchirapalli HQF.No.01/80/050/00682/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00196/AM11 0410119183 dt.25.11.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted that the firm’s reply dated 20.12.2011 has been sent to DHI on 28.12.2011 and case is under examination with DHI. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.528

Case No. A/R

141 M/s. Atherm Thermal Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00882/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00463/AM11 0710077971 dt.10.03.2011 Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee deliberated the written comments of DC(MSME) received vide their UO Note No.30(84) 2011ME dated 19.12.2011 and decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on NettoNet basis with accountability clause. S.No.529

Case No. A/R

153 M/s. Maini Precision Products Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00147/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00091/AM06 0710037715 dt.09.05.2005 Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted that the firm’s reply dated 13.01.2012 has been sent to DIPP on 16.01.2012 and case is under examination with DIPP. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.530 CaseNo.A/R156 M/s. Lloyd Electric & Engineering Ltd., New Delhi HQF.No.01/80/050/00101/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00076/AM12 0510292264 dt.31.05.2011 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms The Committed noted that the firm’s representation has been sent to DIPP for examination and comments and case is under examination with DIPP. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

S.No.531 CaseNo.A/R157 M/s. Boysen India Limited, Noida HQF.No.01/80/050/00782/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00316/AM11 0510282994 dt.03.02.2011 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms Based on the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. S.No.532 CaseNo.A/R158 M/s. Boysen India Limited, Noida HQF.No.01/80/050/00035/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00037/AM12 0510288928 dt.17.04.2011 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms Based on the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. S.No.533 CaseNo.A/R159 M/s. The Saraswati Industrial

norms Based on the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. S.No.533 CaseNo.A/R159 M/s. The Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00082/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00020/AM12 0510272363 dt.08.09.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms On the recommendation of DIPP representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to correct export weight as 750.29 MT. S.No.534 CaseNo.A/R160 M/s. Shakti Pumps India P. Ltd., Indore HQF.No.01/80/050/00150/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.11/24/040/00031/AM11 1110024619 dt.27.04.2011 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to relist the case on 06.03.2012. S.No.535 CaseNo.A/R161 M/s. The Indure P. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00089/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00020/AM11 0510264158 dt.12.05.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re

.05.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re

S.No.536 CaseNo.A/R162 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals LTd., Haridwar HQF.No.01/80/050/00529/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.61/24/040/00030/AM11 6110000473 dt.15.07.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as per advance authorization No.6110000286 dt. 06.02.2009. S.No.537 CaseNo.A/R163 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals LTd., Haridwar HQF.No.01/80/050/00870/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.61/21/040/00002/AM11 6110000573 dt.01.03.2011 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms On the recommendation of DHI representative present in the meeting, the Committee decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as per advance authorization No.6110000286 dt. 06.02.2009. S.No.538 CaseNo.A/R164 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals LTd., Bhopal HQF.No.01/80/050/00226/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 22/12 RA.F.No.11/24/040/00011/AM11 1110022638 dt.18.06.2010 Date: 24.01.2012 Revision of norms The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re Sl.No.177

Case No. C 17

M/s. Lucas TVS Ltd., Chennai received through DC(MEPZSEZ), Chennai F.No. 01/81/80/162/00379/AM10/DES.I Meeting No.22/12 Fixation of regular wastage norms for manufacturing of different types of “Starter, Alterator, Wiper Motor and Compressor”. Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the firm Shri S. Emperumanar, Officer (Finance) attended the Personal Hearing and explained the details of the case. The Committee noted that the firm’s representative had shown product samples to DHI representative in the meeting and firm had to incorporate certain amendments in their calculations and submit to DHI. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.178

Case No. C01

M/s. BOSCH Limited, Bangalore F.No.01/80/162/1193/AM09/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of SION for the export product “Common Rail

Injector Parts” Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted that firm reply dated 10.12.2011 has been sent to DHI on 27.12.2011 and reply dt.10.01.2012 also forward to DHI and case is under examination. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.179

Case No. C 04

M/s. International Tubular Services (India) Pvt. Ltd., Taloja F.No.01/80/162/00007/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for the export product “4 ¾ Energie Jar (Parts of Oil Field Equipment / Drilling Machinery) and components in respect of 100% EOU Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the DHI informed in the meeting informed that the case will be examined after the proposed visit to M/s. Botil Oil Tools India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi as is a similar case. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.180

Case No. C 07

M/s. BOSCH Limited, Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/162/00683/AM10/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Request for fixation of SION for the export product “Viz. Common Rail Pump” Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re S.No.181

Case No. C 08

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00262/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against deemed export” Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.182

Case No. C 09

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00263/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against deemed export” Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.183

Case No. C 10

M/s. Ultra Engineers Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00249/AM12/DES.I Meeting No 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for special Brand Rate

Engineers, Pune Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against deemed export” Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.184

Case No. C 20

M/s. ITS India Pvt. Ltd., Taloja (Mahrashtra) HQF.No.01/80/162/00287/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of input output norms for the export product “6 ½ Energie Jar (Parts of Oil Field Equipment/ Drilling Machinery) and components thereof”. Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the DHI informed in the meeting informed that the case will be examined after the proposed visit to M/s. Botil Oil Tools India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi as is a similar case. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.185

Case No. C 21

M/s. ITS India Pvt. Ltd., Taloja (Mahrashtra) HQF.No.01/80/162/00234/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of adhoc norms under para 6.8(e) of FTP 200914 for the export product “ 8” Energie Energizaer (Parts of Oil field Equipment / Drilling Machinery) and components thereof”. Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the DHI informed in the meeting informed that the case will be examined after the proposed visit to M/s. Botil Oil Tools India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi as is a similar case. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012. S.No.186

Case No. C 23

Reference received from PCVI of M/s. Getrag HiTech Gears Pvt. TLd., Bhiwani(Rajasthan) HQF.No.01/80/92/180/NORMS/AM12/PCVI/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of input output wastage norms for eh export product “Timing Gears” in respect of LOP NO.03 129/99100%EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case is under examination. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re S.No.187

Case No. C 24

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00635/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against Export Supplies to 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm.

S.No.188

Case No. C 25

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00637/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against Export Supplies to 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.189

Case No. C 26

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00638/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against Export Supplies to 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.190

Case No. C 27

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00639/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against Export Supplies to 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.191

Case No. C 28

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00640/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against Export Supplies to 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.192

Case No. C 29

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00636/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against Export Supplies to 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012

The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. S.No.193

Case No. C 30

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQF.No.01/80/162/00634/AM12/DES.I Meeting No. 22/12 Fixation of wastage norms for Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back against Export Supplies to 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. Sl.No.194

Case No.C12

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQ F.No.01/80/162/00247/AM12/DES.I Meeting No.20/12 Date: 27.12.2011 Fixation of wastage norms for “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back” against deemed export . The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. Sl.No.195

Case No.C13

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQ F.No.01/80/162/00246/AM12/DES.I Meeting No.20/12 Date: 27.12.2011 Fixation of wastage norms for “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back” against deemed export . The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. Sl.No.196

Case No.C14

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQ F.No.01/80/162/00245/AM12/DES.I Meeting No.20/12 Date: 27.12.2011 Fixation of wastage norms for “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back” against deemed export . The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the cases when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm.

q p y g y Sl.No.197

Case No.C15

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQ F.No.01/80/162/00248/AM12/DES.I Meeting No.20/12 Date: 27.12.2011 Fixation of wastage norms for “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back” against deemed export . The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the case when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. Sl.No.198

Case No.C16

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQ F.No.01/80/162/00243/AM12/DES.I Meeting No.20/12 Date: 27.12.2011 Fixation of wastage norms for “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back” against deemed export . The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the case when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. Sl.No.199

Case No.C17

M/s. Ultra Engineers, Pune HQ F.No.01/80/162/00244/AM12/DES.I Meeting No.20/12 Date: 27.12.2011 Fixation of wastage norms for “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back” against deemed export . The Committee noted the written comments of DIPP dated 24.01.2012 and decided to seek comments from RA, Pune as to why ratification of NC is required in the case when the “Special Brand Rate Duty Draw Back to 100% EOU” is fixed on the basis of actual wastage details furnished by the firm. Sl.No.200

Case No. C – 34

M/s. LEO Primecomp Pvt. Ltd., Puducherry HQ F.No.01/80/162/00914/AM12/DESI Meeting No.22/12 Fixation of input output norms for the export product “Machined, Assembled and Plastic Components meant for Banking Sector” in respect of 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to DIPP on 06.01.2012 for examination and comments and case under examination with DIPP. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Sl.No.201

Case No. C – 35

M/s. Poly Medicure Ltd., Haryana HQ F.No.01/80/162/00947/AM12/DESI Meeting No.22/12 Fixation of wastage norms in respect of 100% EOU. Date: 24.01.2012 The Committee noted that the firm’s application has been sent to C&PC on 16.01.2012 for examination and comments and case under examination with C&PC. The case is to be relisted on 06.03.2012.

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 7184 --apply.

DGFT Minutes

Case No.:18/41/80­ALC2/2009

Case No.:19/18/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:15/18/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:45/18/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:47/18/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:21/18/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:29/22/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:30/22/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:24/29/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:29/29/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:29/27/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:30/27/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:6/35/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:22/35/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:2/32/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:25/35/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:53/35/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:45/35/80­ALC2/2010

Case No :36/35/80 ALC2/2010

Case No.:36/35/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:23/36/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:27/1/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:17/39/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:14/38/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:16/38/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:23/39/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:43/1/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:31/38/80­ALC2/2010

Case No.:22/1/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:32/1/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/1/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:30/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:12/1/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:32/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:15/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:16/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:36/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:2/10/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:3/10/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:35/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:2/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:11/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:12/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:14/10/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:13/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:18/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:19/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/10/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:20/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:15/10/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:41/7/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:2/13/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:7/10/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:8/10/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:3/13/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/13/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:5/13/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:5/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:16/24/85­ALC3/2011

Case No.:2/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:9/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:15/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:21/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/16/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:6/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:5/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:7/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:27/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:10/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:3/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:16/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:6/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:41/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:11/19/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:11/22/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:18/41/80ALC2/2009

Case No.:19/18/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:15/18/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:45/18/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:47/18/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:21/18/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:29/22/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:30/22/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:24/29/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:29/29/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:29/27/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:30/27/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:6/35/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:22/35/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:2/32/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:25/35/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:53/35/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:45/35/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:36/35/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:23/36/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:27/1/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:17/39/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:14/38/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:16/38/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:23/39/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:43/1/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:31/38/80ALC2/2010

Case No.:22/1/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:32/1/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/1/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:30/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:12/1/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:32/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:15/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:16/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:36/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:2/10/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:3/10/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:35/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:2/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:11/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:12/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:14/10/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:13/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:18/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:19/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/10/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:20/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:15/10/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:41/7/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:2/13/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:7/10/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:8/10/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:3/13/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/13/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:5/13/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:5/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:16/24/85ALC3/2011

Case No.:2/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:9/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:4/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:15/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:21/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:1/16/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:6/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:5/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:7/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:27/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:10/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:3/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:16/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:6/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:41/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:11/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:11/22/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:13/19/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:14/19/80ALC2/2011