IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr B / NC-I) Advance Authorisation 2020-02-18

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

MINUTES OF MEETING NO. 21/80 OF NORMS COMMITTEE- I (DES-I SECTION) DATED 18.02.2020

Meeting No. 21/80 of the Norms Committee (NC-I) for the licensing year 2019-2020 held on 18.02.2020 under the Chairmanship of Sh. R. P. Goyal, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption/Remission Schemes (Chapter-4) of the applicable Foreign Trade Policy and the Handbook of Procedures. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: -

==> picture [458 x 224] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. Name of the representatives & their Designation Department 1. Shri S. K. Jain, D. O. DPIIT 2. Shri B. C. Nayak, DO DHI 3. Shri Sushil Kumar Jangid, Scientist ‘B’ MeitY 4. Shri K.S. Sodhi, Asst. Director MSME 5. Shri Shaish Kumar, (Tech-1) Consultant 6. Shri V.C. Agarwal, (Tech-3) Consultant 7. Shri S. K. Bhatnagar, (SKB) Consultant In Attendance 1. Shri K.V. Tirumala, Deputy DGFT DGFT 2. Shri Pranav Upadhyay, Assistant Director ISS DGFT ----- End of picture text -----

Note:

In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/ Observations/Deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The scanned copies uploaded are to be accepted. The U.O. No./O.M No of the scanned copy is reflected in the minutes.
Wherever the Committee has fixed norms, the RAs should allow inputs as per wastage norms approved or as applied whichever is less.
All applications/representations/reply to the Deficiency letters etc. may be sent to NC-I at e-mail address- nc1.dgft@nic.in. All firms are also requested to mail/send their present valid email addresses so that correspondences can be made through email/ by Post.
Minutes of Meeting 19/20 dated 15.01.2019 were circulated on 10.02.2020 to all the members of the Committee and the comments (if any), there upon received, were incorporated in the Minutes and the said minutes were unanimously approved.

1 | P a g e

MEETING NUMBER: 21/80-ALC2/2019 MEETING DATE: 18.02.2020

==> picture [476 x 286] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: Party Name: SARA SAE Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: 345/15/80-ALC2/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6110001290 Approved :01/80/050/00687/AM19/ :61/24/040/00008/AM16/ 01.06.2015 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of MSME as under: ITCHS ITCHS Export Item Quantity Import Item Recommended Norms Code Code 1 6 Port Bottle 24.000 Relevant 84799090 Manifold Number 0Pipe Seamless As applied inclusive of 2% 73049000 8 Port Bottle 20.000 ASTM-106 wastage on weight basis 84799090 Manifold Number Grade-B OD 102mm Note: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 is 102.524Kgs. 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 is 138.962Kgs. 3. The firm should import relevant items only. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:70/15/80-	Party Name: BHARAT	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	HEAVY ELECTRICALS	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00412/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00095/AM16/	Lic.No/Date:0710108519<br>15.07.2015	Deferred

2 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was again sent to MeitY on 08.01.2020, on their request, for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MeitY for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:363/15/80-	Party Name: PROMAC	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING	ALC2/2019
	INDUSTRIES LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00705/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00184/AM16/	Lic.No/Date:0710108812<br>05.10.2015	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

2 | P a g e

Case No.:364/15/80-	Party Name: PROMAC	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING	ALC2/2019
	INDUSTRIES LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00706/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00185/AM16/	Lic.No/Date:0710108813<br>05.10.2015	Deferred

Case is deferred.

Case No.:12/1/80- Party Name: INTERPUMP Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 HYDRAULICS INDIA PVT. ALC2/2019 LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410162268 Approved :01/80/050/00760/AM19/ :04/24/040/00093/AM17/ 09.09.2016

Case No.:12/1/80-<br>ALC2/2019<br>Party Name: INTERPUMP<br>HYDRAULICS INDIA PVT.<br>LTD.<br>Meet No/Date:21/80-<br>ALC2/2019<br>18.02.2020<br>Status:<br>HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00760/AM19/<br>RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00093/AM17/<br>Lic.No/Date:0410162268<br>09.09.2016<br>Approved	Case No.:12/1/80-<br>ALC2/2019	Case No.:12/1/80-<br>ALC2/2019	Party Name: INTERPUMP<br>HYDRAULICS INDIA PVT.<br>LTD.	Party Name: INTERPUMP<br>HYDRAULICS INDIA PVT.<br>LTD.	Party Name: INTERPUMP<br>HYDRAULICS INDIA PVT.<br>LTD.	Meet No/Date:21/80-<br>ALC2/2019<br>18.02.2020	Status:
	HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00760/AM19/		RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00093/AM17/			Lic.No/Date:0410162268<br>09.09.2016	Approved
5<br> <br> <br> <br>	Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided toratifythe ad-hoc<br>norms onrepeat basisas approved forAA No. 0410160379dated 01.04.2015 in M. No. 19/80 dated<br>20.12.2016 as per written comments ofMSMEas under:<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>Quantity<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms<br>90328100<br>Hydraulic<br>Accessories Base<br>Tube CAM PF-H191<br>1430 L= 1445 C/E=<br>70 (720 Nos) (Each<br>No.65.84 K.G.)<br>Length of each<br>Number is 1445Milli<br>Meter<br>47404.800<br>Kg<br>73041910<br>Seamless steel<br>pipes Raw Tube<br>for base dia 191<br>x1445(720<br>Nos)Each No.99.6<br>K.G Length of<br>Each Number is<br>1450 Milli Meter<br>63618Kgs<br>inclusive of<br>34.20%<br>wastage after<br>affecting 1/3rd<br>recovery<br>90328100<br>Hydraulic<br>Accessories Piston<br>Rod Term PF-H111<br>1430 M100x25<br>L=1425 (504 Nos)<br>(Each No. 30.12<br>K.G.) Length of<br>Each Number is<br>1425Milli Meter<br>15180.480<br>Kg<br>73041910<br>Seamless steel<br>pipes Raw Tube<br>116 x 94 x 1430L)<br>(504 Nos) (Each<br>No.40.96 K.G.)<br>Length of Each<br>Number is 1430<br>Milli Meter<br>18824Kgs<br>inclusive of<br>24% wastage<br>after affecting<br>1/3rdrecovery<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.
	ITCHS<br>Code	Export Item		Quantity	ITCHS<br>Code	Import Item
	90328100	Hydraulic<br>Accessories Base<br>Tube CAM PF-H191<br>1430 L= 1445 C/E=<br>70 (720 Nos) (Each<br>No.65.84 K.G.)<br>Length of each<br>Number is 1445Milli<br>Meter		47404.800<br>Kg	73041910	Seamless steel<br>pipes Raw Tube<br>for base dia 191<br>x1445(720<br>Nos)Each No.99.6<br>K.G Length of<br>Each Number is<br>1450 Milli Meter
	90328100	Hydraulic<br>Accessories Piston<br>Rod Term PF-H111<br>1430 M100x25<br>L=1425 (504 Nos)<br>(Each No. 30.12<br>K.G.) Length of<br>Each Number is<br>1425Milli Meter		15180.480<br>Kg	73041910	Seamless steel<br>pipes Raw Tube<br>116 x 94 x 1430L)<br>(504 Nos) (Each<br>No.40.96 K.G.)<br>Length of Each<br>Number is 1430<br>Milli Meter
	RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0410160379 dated 01.04.2015 in M. No. 19/80 dated 20.12.2016 as per written comments of MSME as under:

3 | P a g e

Case No.:402/15/80-	Party Name: SHIV	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	HYDROMET	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00744/AM19/	RLA File<br>:24/24/040/00034/AM17/	Lic.No/Date:2410042158<br>14.03.2017	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that nobody was appeared for personal hearing on behalf of the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to give one more opportunity to the firm for personal hearing to explain the case before Norms Committee.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:1/11/80-ALC2/2018	Party Name: DIAMOND	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	METAL SCREENS (P) LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00192/AM19/	RLA File<br>:65/24/040/00003/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:6510000003<br>17.05.2017	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 13.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:223/15/80-	Party Name: ZEECO INDIA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PVT.LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00565/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00271/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0310814297<br>28.06.2017	Deferred

8 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Mumbai and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:80/11/80-	Party Name: MACAWBER	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	BEEKAY PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00271/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00230/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0510403845<br>29.08.2017	Deferred

9 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 17.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

4 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:18/19/80-ALC2/2017 Party Name: KINECO KAMAN Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: COMPOSITES - INDIA PVT. ALC2/2019 LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1710006668 Deferred :01/80/050/00299/AM18/ :17/24/040/00050/AM18/ 10.10.2017 10 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DPIIT on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 341] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:36/19/80-ALC2/2017 Party Name: ASHOKA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: MANUFACTURING LTD. ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210207941 Approved :01/80/050/00317/AM18/ :02/24/040/00120/AM18/ 03.11.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of MSME as under: ITCHS Sl. ITCHS Recommended Export Item Quantity Import Item Code No. Code Norms 6A003A- 4588Kgs inclusive Aluminium Munitions Metal 1 76069290 of 56% wastage after 70000.000 Sheet 93069000 Parts (Tail 20% recovery Number Assembly to Drg Aluminium 20698Kgs inclusive 11 No. P7) 2 76042990 Profile (Cross of 176% wastage 6A003A- Shape) after 20% recovery Munitions Metal 93069000 Parts-Components 10000.000 Aluminium 23500Kgs inclusive of S8 Rocket 80 Set 3 76082000 Extruded of 34.2% wastage mm-Bottom Part Seamless Tube after 20% recovery Note: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 is 0.197 Kg out of which weight of Aluminium Sheet is 42 grams and weight of Aluminium Profile is 107 grams. 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 is 4.203Kgs out of which weight of Aluminium Extruded Seamless Tube is 1.75 Kg. 3. The firm should import relevant items only. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:26/20/80-ALC2/2017 Party Name: ICEM Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ENGINEERING COMPANY ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310817800 Deferred :01/80/050/00390/AM18/ :03/94/040/00742/AM18/ 15.12.2017 12 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

5 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/20/80- Party Name: BIRLA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2017 PRECISION ALC2/2019 TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310818218 Deferred :01/80/050/00384/AM18/ :03/94/040/00782/AM18/ 04.01.2018 13 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:23/20/80- Party Name: BIRLA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2017 PRECISION ALC2/2019 TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310818219 Deferred :01/80/050/00387/AM18/ :03/94/040/00784/AM18/ 04.01.2018 14 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/20/80- Party Name: BIRLA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2017 PRECISION ALC2/2019 TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310818275 Deferred :01/80/050/00385/AM18/ :03/94/040/00785/AM18/ 05.01.2018 15 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:22/20/80- Party Name: BIRLA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2017 PRECISION ALC2/2019 TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310818273 Deferred :01/80/050/00386/AM18/ :03/94/040/00783/AM18/ 05.01.2018 16 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

6 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 243] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:126/15/80- Party Name: SHAKTI Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PUMPS (INDIA) LTD. ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:5610005299 Deferred :01/80/050/00468/AM19/ :56/24/040/00036/AM18/ 08.01.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011/328/2018-TSW dated 30.12.2019: 17 1. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. Weight of “Nut” and weight of Stainless Steel Strip in the Stainless Steel Clamping Strip (Export item). 2. Sheet layout diagram of the material indicating the wastage during blanking. 3. Quantity of export items in Nos. also in addition to its weight. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:8/17/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SHAKTI PUMPS Meet No/Date:21/80-ALC2/2019 Status: (INDIA) LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:5610005319 Approved :01/80/050/00240/AM20/ :56/24/040/00038/AM18/ 15.01.2018 ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:8/17/80-ALC2/2019Party Name: SHAKTI PUMPS<br>(INDIA)LTD.<br>Meet No/Date:21/80-ALC2/2019<br>18.02.2020<br>Status:<br>HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00240/AM20/<br>RLA File<br>:56/24/040/00038/AM18/<br>Lic.No/Date:5610005319<br>15.01.2018<br>Approved	Case No.:8/17/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: SHAKTI PUMPS<br>(INDIA)LTD.	Meet No/Date:21/80-ALC2/2019<br>18.02.2020	Status:
	HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00240/AM20/	RLA File<br>:56/24/040/00038/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:5610005319<br>15.01.2018	Approved
18	Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on<br>repeat basis as approved for AA No. 5610005059 dated 11.01.2017 as per written comments of DPIIT<br>vide U. O. No.: P-47011/328/2018-TSW dated 30.12.2019 as under:<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>Quantity<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended Norms<br>84139120<br>S.S. NRV<br>(10000 Nos.)<br>46375.000<br>Kg<br>72193490<br>Relevant grade<br>and thickness<br>Stainless Steel<br>Sheet / Strips<br>/Coil AISI 304 /<br>304L / DDQ /<br>P304N / 316<br>95744 Kgs as 1.24 Kgs/Kg<br>content in the export item at<br>Sl. No. 1 & 2.192 Kgs/Kg<br>content in the export items<br>at Sl. No. 2 after taking 1/3rd<br>recovery from the scrap<br>84139120<br>S.S. Suction<br>Case (7000<br>Nos.)<br>17445.400<br>Kg<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 5610005059 dated 11.01.2017 as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/328/2018-TSW dated 30.12.2019 as under:

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ZTT INDIA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410163956 Deferred :01/80/050/00768/AM19/ :04/24/040/00212/AM18/ 07.02.2018 19 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY has sought following information from the firm vide letter dated 16.12.2019 followed by a reminder letter dated 04.02.2020: 1. Details of export product i.e. drawing, calculation etc. ----- End of picture text -----

7 | P a g e

Quantity of net import material required for manufacturing one unit of export product.
Wastage claimed in manufacturing process.
Justification of wastage.

However, no information has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the reply/comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:393/15/80-	Party Name: SARTORIUS	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	STEDIM INDIA PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00735/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00348/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0710113010<br>23.03.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 29.01.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:10/1/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: MAGNA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	AUTOMOTIVE INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00758/AM19/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00001/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0410164172<br>06.04.2018	Deferred

21 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME :

Manufacturing flow chart with wastage justification.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:6/8/80-ALC2/2018	Party Name: L & T-MHPS	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	TURBINE GENERATORS	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00129/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/01112/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0310820724<br>27.04.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI on 14.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

8 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:397/15/80- Party Name: PROMAC Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 INDUSTRIES LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113276 Deferred :01/80/050/00739/AM19/ :07/24/040/00357/AM18/ 14.05.2018 23 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:166/15/80-	Party Name: BHARAT	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	HEAVY ELECTRICALS	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00508/AM19/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00171/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0910066472<br>18.07.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI on 18.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:76/11/80- Party Name: HIMACHAL Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 FUTURISTIC ALC2/2019 COMMUNICATIONS LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510407445 Deferred :01/80/050/00267/AM19/ :05/23/040/00215/AM19/ 06.08.2018 25 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MeitY for examination of the case on 15.07.2019 followed by an ID reminder on 14.11.2019 and also that MeitY informed vide their email dated 15.01.2020 that the case is under process. However, in the meeting also representative of MeitY informed that the case is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:19/11/80-	Party Name: ICEM	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING COMPANY	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00210/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00306/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310822939<br>09.08.2018	Deferred

26 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 13.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

9 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:179/15/80- Party Name: PROMAC Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 INDUSTRIES LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113710 Deferred 27 :01/80/050/00521/AM19/ :07/24/040/00102/AM19/ 13.08.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:34/1/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: KINECO	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	KAMAN COMPOSITES -	ALC2/2019
	INDIA PVT. LTD.	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00782/AM19/	RLA File<br>:17/24/040/00017/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:1710006716<br>20.08.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply has been forwarded to DPIIT on 18.02.2020 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:23/11/80-	Party Name: JAYESH	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	METALS AND FERRO	ALC2/2019
	ALLOYS LLP	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00214/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00488/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310823416<br>29.08.2018	Deferred

29 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted the written recommendation of the representative of MSME, stating that the size of import & export items is overlapping and hence the License should be cancelled. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the firm for personal hearing, in its upcoming Norms Committee meeting.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:28/11/80- Party Name: L & T-MHPS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310823400 Deferred :01/80/050/00219/AM19/ :03/95/040/00466/AM19/ 29.08.2018 30 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that second deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 13.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

10 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: L & T-MHPS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310823645 Deferred :01/80/050/00757/AM19/ :03/95/040/00469/AM19/ 07.09.2018 31 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 13.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:201/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113852 Deferred :01/80/050/00543/AM19/ :07/24/040/00155/AM19/ 17.09.2018 ----- End of picture text -----

32 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 18.11.2019 followed by a reminder on 07.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:57/11/80-	Party Name: GL&V INDIA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PRIVATE LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00248/AM19/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00096/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:3110067179<br>26.09.2018	Deferred

33 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and the representative of MSME informed that the firm’s reply is incomplete and advised to call the firm for personal hearing. Therefore, the Committee decided to call the firm for personal hearing to explain the case before Norms Committee in the forthcoming NC meeting.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:82/11/80- Party Name: ANSTECH Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410044543 Deferred :01/80/050/00273/AM19/ :34/24/040/00218/AM19/ 04.10.2018 34 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Vadodara and the firm on 08.07.2019 followed by reminders on 25.09.2019, 18.10.2019, 08.01.2020 & 03.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

11 | P a g e

Case No.:247/15/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00589/AM19/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00324/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0910066802<br>02.11.2018	Deferred

35 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:249/15/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00591/AM19/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00329/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0910066804<br>02.11.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 318] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/12/80- Party Name: MINDA SILCA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510408370 Approved :01/80/050/00293/AM19/ :05/24/040/00433/AM19/ 12.11.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of MSME as under: Export items: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 is 8.40 Gram. 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 is 8.05 Gram . 37 3. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 3 is 9.10 Gram . 4. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 4 is 9.50 Gram . 5. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 5 is 9.60 Gram . 6. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 6 is 9.43 Gram . 7. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 7 is 8.88 Gram (14.28 Gram with plastic head) . 8. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 8 is 12.72 Gram (15.50 Gram with plastic head) . 9. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 9 is 6.96 Gram (10.96 Gram with plastic head) . 10. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 10 is 6.95 Gram (10.95 Gram with plastic head) . 11. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 11 is 10.62 Gram (16.40 Gram with plastic head) . 12. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 12 is 6.34 Gram (10.34 Gram with plastic head) . 13. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 13 is 7.42 Gram (12.00 Gram with plastic head) . 14. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 14 is 4.38 Gram (10.50 Gram with plastic head) . 15. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 15 is 6.99 Gram (12.90 Gram with plastic head) . ----- End of picture text -----

12 | P a g e

Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 16 is 5.00 Gram (7.10 Gram with plastic head) .
Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 17 is 7.22 Gram (14.20 Gram with plastic head) . 18. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 18 is 6.20 Gram (11.20 Gram with plastic head) . 19. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 19 is 8.83 Gram (10.50 Gram with plastic head) . 20. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 20 is 11.64Gram (14.00 Gram with plastic head) .

Import item:

Quantity of relevant import item may be allowed as 125795Kgs inclusive of 65% wastage after 1/3[rd] recovery.

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:253/15/80- Party Name: BHARAT Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 HEAVY ELECTRICALS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066870 Deferred :01/80/050/00595/AM19/ :09/24/040/00340/AM19/ 16.11.2018 38 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply (hardcopy) was sent to DHI on 13.01.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:259/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710114156 Deferred :01/80/050/00601/AM19/ :07/24/040/00182/AM19/ 22.11.2018 39 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 18.11.2019 followed by a reminder on 07.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:17/1/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: MUDHRA FINE	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	BLANC PRIVATE LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00765/AM19/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00207/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0410164995<br>17.12.2018	Deferred

40 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 18.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 07.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

13 | P a g e

Case No.:274/15/80-	Party Name: STERLITE	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	TECHNOLOGIES LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00616/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00812/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310825720<br>18.12.2018	Deferred

41 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY sought again certain information from the firm vide letter dated 05.12.2019 followed by a reminder letter dated 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the reply/comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 217] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:279/15/80- Party Name: SUPER CIRCLE Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 AUTO LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510409020 Approved :01/80/050/00621/AM19/ :05/24/040/00506/AM19/ 20.12.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of Consultant (Tech-1) as under: 42 1. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 5 & 7 to 12 may be allowed as 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the export product. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as applied for and value restricted up to 1% FoB. 3. As regards to item no. 13, the Committee decided to delete this item as the description of this item is very vague. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:293/15/80-	Party Name: STERLITE	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	POWER TRANSMISSION	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00635/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00869/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310826313<br>10.01.2019	Deferred

43 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY sought again certain information from the firm vide letter dated 05.12.2019 followed by a reminder letter dated 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the reply/comments.

Case is deferred.

14 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 283] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/1/80- Party Name: MUDHRA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 FINE BLANC PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LTD 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165082 Approved :01/80/050/00769/AM19/ :04/24/040/00222/AM19/ 11.01.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of MSME as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Quantity Import Item Code Code Norms 44 ITLA BONAITI S.R.L. 18262 Kgs SUB ASSY Material Description: inclusive of Sector And 42900.000 42CRMOSE116 116.5*6 115% wastage 87089900 Norton 72269230 Number Coil Specification: after taking DIA.30.15 EN10132-3 Material Grade 1/3 [rd] recovery RH :42CRMO4 from scrap Note: 1. Net weight of finished product is 0.198 Kg. 2. The firm should import relevant items only. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:298/15/80- Party Name: ULTRA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERS ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067288 Deferred 45 :01/80/050/00640/AM19/ :31/83/040/00164/AM19/ 16.01.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:23/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: PARKER Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: HANNIFIN INDIA PVT. ALC2/2019 LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165142 Deferred :01/80/050/00771/AM19/ :04/24/040/00223/AM19/ 28.01.2019 46 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply has been sent to MSME on 15.01.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been revived yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

15 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 295] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:25/1/80- Party Name: MUDHRA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 FINE BLANC PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LTD 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165210 Approved :01/80/050/00773/AM19/ :04/24/040/00241/AM19/ 13.02.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of MSME as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Quantity Import Item Code Code Norms 47 ERNESTO CAM-0000- MALVESTITI SPA 1277- PART NO: SECTOR LH 190000.000 FIF384002XS01N 87089900 CAM-0000- 87089900 Net to net basis Number SECTOR LH 1332- ANDPARTNO: SECTOR FIF384002XD01N RH SECTOR RH Note: 1. The firm should import relevant items only. 2. Per unit weight of Export Product should be 0.165 kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 283] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:26/1/80- Party Name: MUDHRA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 FINE BLANC PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LTD 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165228 Approved :01/80/050/00774/AM19/ :04/24/040/00242/AM19/ 19.02.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of MSME as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Quantity Import Item Code Code Norms 48 ITLA BONAITI S.R.L. 14638 Kgs SUB ASSY Material Description: inclusive of Sector And 34386.000 42CRMO4SE116 116.5X6 115% wastage 87089900 Norton 72269230 Number Coil Specification: after taking DIA.30.15 EN10132-3 Material 1/3 [rd] recovery RH Grade: 42CRMO4 from scrap Note: 1. Net weight of finished product is 0.198 Kg. 2. The firm should import relevant items only. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

16 | P a g e

Case No.:42/1/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: LARSEN &	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	TOUBRO LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00790/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/01295/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310827622<br>12.03.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) vide email dated 14.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-3) asked for physical copy of application/file. Therefore, the Committee decided to send physical copy of application to Consultant (Tech-3).

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 407] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:49/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DIAMOND Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: METAL SCREENS (P) LTD ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6510000026 Approved :01/80/050/00797/AM19/ :65/24/040/00007/AM19/ 14.03.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of MSME as under: Export Items: 1. Export item at Sl. No. 1 consists of SS perforated sheets with the following bifurcation: i. 2150Kgs having 4.76mm hole diameter, 6.35mm pitch, open area 51%. ii. 1475Kgs having 4.76mm hole diameter, 7.94mm pitch, open area 33%. iii. 1850Kgs having 6.35mm hole diameter, 7.94mm pitch, open area 58%. iv. 1980Kgs having 6.35mm hole diameter, 9.53mm pitch, open area 40%. v. 1145Kgs having 12.70mm hole diameter, 17.96mm pitch, open area 48%. 50 2. Export item at Sl. No. 2 consists of SS perforated sheets with the following bifurcation: i. 2687.50Kgs having 4.76mm hole diameter, 6.35mm pitch, open area 51%. ii. 2625Kgs having 4.76mm hole diameter, 7.94mm pitch, open area 33%. iii. 3500Kgs having 6.35mm hole diameter, 7.94mm pitch, open area 58%. iv. 3500Kgs having 6.35mm hole diameter, 9.53mm pitch, open area 40%. v. 1750Kgs having 12.70mm hole diameter, 17.46mm pitch, open area 48%. vi. 1750Kgs having 3.18mm hole diameter, 4.76mm pitch, open area 40%. Import item: 1. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 13863Kgs inclusive of 61.20% wastage after 1/3 [rd] recovery. 2. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 15557Kgs inclusive of 33.20% wastage after 1/3 [rd] recovery. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

17 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:46/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ISGEC TITAN Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: METAL FABRICATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510409960 Deferred :01/80/050/00794/AM19/ :05/23/040/00557/AM19/ 15.03.2019 51 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 14.01.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind DPIIT for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:18/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: MAINI Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: PRECISION PRODUCTS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710114732 Deferred :01/80/050/00056/AM20/ :07/24/040/00306/AM19/ 29.03.2019 52 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 14.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:5/2/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: VIPRA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	CLOSURES PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00005/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/01384/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310828134<br>03.04.2019	Deferred

53 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 07.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:14/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: UNI VTL Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: PRECISION PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6510000027 Deferred :01/80/050/00052/AM20/ :65/24/040/00006/AM19/ 05.04.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

54 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) on 13.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech3) asked for physical copy of application/file. Therefore, the Committee decided to send physical copy of application to Consultant (Tech-3).

Case is deferred.

18 | P a g e

Case No.:3/3/80-ALC2/2019		Party Name: MUDHRA FINE		Meet No/Date:21/80-		Status:
		BLANC PRIVATE LTD		ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00009/AM20/		RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00294/AM19/		Lic.No/Date:0410165451<br>11.04.2019		Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI for examination of the case on 12.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 12.02.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:4/3/80-ALC2/2019		Party Name: VEELINE MEDIA		Meet No/Date:21/80-		Status:
		LIMITED		ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00010/AM20/		RLA File<br>:02/24/040/00003/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:0210209114<br>16.04.2019		Deferred

56 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 07.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 164] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SMC Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: CORPORATION (INDIA) ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410292 Deferred :01/80/050/00011/AM20/ :05/24/040/00020/AM20/ 18.04.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and the firm’s representatives explained the 57 case before Norms Committee. The Committee directed to the representatives to furnish following information: 1. Sample of import items (Blanks) & export items (Finished items) along with their corresponding weight. 2. Copy of invoice indicating CIF value. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:8/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: L & T-MHPS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828481 Deferred :01/80/050/00014/AM20/ :03/95/040/01354/AM19/ 23.04.2019 58 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 06.08.2019. The firm vide letter dated 14.09.2019 informed that the Project Engineering & Detail Design is in progress and is expected to be complete by January 2020 and sought more time to respond. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

19 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: RAYCHEM Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: RPG PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828517 Approved :01/80/050/00015/AM20/ :03/95/040/01371/AM19/ 23.04.2019 59 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/324/2018-TSW dated 21.01.2020. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:8/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: GODREJ & Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828981 Approved :01/80/050/00046/AM20/ :03/94/040/00093/AM20/ 13.05.2019 60 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/23/2019-TSW dated 28.01.2020. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:5/5/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00043/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00061/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067528<br>15.05.2019	Deferred

61 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067529 Deferred :01/80/050/00044/AM20/ :09/24/040/00059/AM20/ 15.05.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

62 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

20 | P a g e

Case No.:7/5/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00045/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00060/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067530<br>15.05.2019	Deferred

63 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 344] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: PAHARPUR Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: COOLING TOWERS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210209171 Deferred :01/80/050/00039/AM20/ :02/24/040/00012/AM20/ 16.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. No.: P-47011/323/2018- TSW dated 24.01.2020: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension for export item at Sl. No. 1 , Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 . 64 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for export item at Sl. No. 1 , for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export item at Sl. No. 1 , basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 5. Difference in the export item at Sl. No. 2 and import item at Sl. No. 8 with details of manufacturing activities involved on import item, if any. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: HEURTEY Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: PETROCHEM INDIA ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045150 Deferred :01/80/050/00051/AM20/ :34/24/040/00059/AM20/ 17.05.2019 65 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI on 14.01.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

21 | P a g e

Case No.:12/5/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: DILIGENT SCM	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	SOLUTIONS PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00050/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00078/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067545<br>20.05.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 14.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: CERATIZIT Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: INDIA ROUND TOOL ALC2/2019 SOLUTIONS P. LTD. 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710114952 Deferred :01/80/050/00059/AM20/ :07/24/040/00017/AM20/ 24.05.2019 67 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Bangalore and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Bangalore on 15.07.2019 followed by reminders on 18.10.2019 & 14.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 205] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: CROWN Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: CLOSURES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829905 Deferred :01/80/050/00098/AM20/ :03/94/040/00246/AM20/ 25.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of Consultant (Tech-1): 68 1. Complete set of application with information as per 4E with all technical details, manufacturing process & wastage at each stage of manufacturing. 2. Exact specification of import item at Sl. No. 2 to 5. 3. Percentage of non-volatile matter in import item No. 2 to 5. 4. Net content of each import item in export & wastage claimed. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

22 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: OSWAL PUMPS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3310030557 Deferred :01/80/050/00099/AM20/ :33/24/040/00012/AM20/ 25.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. No.: P-47011/16/2020- TSWdated 04.02.2020: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 69 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:3/7/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: OAM SAAI	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	INTERNATIONAL INC.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00100/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00181/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510411061<br>26.06.2019	Deferred

70 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 07.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:4/7/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00101/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00138/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067697<br>26.06.2019	Deferred

71 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 10.12.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the firm to furnish the requisite information within 15 days.

Case is deferred.

23 | P a g e

Case No.:5/7/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00102/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00142/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067698<br>26.06.2019	Deferred

72 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:6/7/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00103/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00140/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067699<br>26.06.2019	Deferred

73 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067700 Deferred :01/80/050/00104/AM20/ :09/24/040/00139/AM20/ 26.06.2019 74 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:8/7/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00105/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00137/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067701<br>26.06.2019	Deferred

75 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

24 | P a g e

Case No.:9/7/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00106/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00141/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067702<br>26.06.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 16.10.2019 followed by reminders on 10.12.2019 & 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: P. M. ELECTRO Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067458 Deferred :01/80/050/00107/AM20/ :31/83/040/00048/AM20/ 28.06.2019 77 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Pune and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Pune on 08.08.2019 followed by reminders on 11.11.2019, 08.01.2020 & 03.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 243] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: POLYCAB Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: INDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830021 Deferred :01/80/050/00108/AM20/ :03/95/040/00295/AM20/ 01.07.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY has sought following information from the firm vide letter dated 16.12.2019 followed by a reminder letter dated 04.02.2020: 78 1. Details of export product i.e. drawing, drawing, calculations etc. 2. Quantity of net import items required to manufacture one unit of export product. 3. Wastage claimed in the manufacturing process. 4. Justification of wastage. However, no information has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the reply/comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

25 | P a g e

Case No.:12/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AUTOCOMP Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: CORPORATION PANSE ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067460 Deferred :01/80/050/00109/AM20/ :31/83/040/00050/AM20/ 01.07.2019

79 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI for examination of the case on 22.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 14.01.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again DHI for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.: Party Name: BANGALORE Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: 13/7/80-ALC2/2019 BIOTECH LABS PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710115122 Deferred :01/80/050/00110/AM20/ :07/24/040/00082/AM20/ 03.07.2019

80 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 12.07.2019 followed by reminder on 17.09.2019 & 13.02.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:15/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DOOWON Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: CLIMATE CONTROL ALC2/2019 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6610000035 Deferred :01/80/050/00112/AM20/ :66/24/040/00003/AM20/ 03.07.2019 81 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Vijayawada and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Vijayawada on 18.10.2019 followed by reminders on 08.01.2020 & 03.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:43/11/80-	Party Name: ERBATECH	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	MACHINERY PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00169/AM20/	RLA File<br>:32/21/040/00061/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3210079031<br>19.07.2019	Deferred

82 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 13.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 12.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

26 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 248] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/9/80- Party Name: TOLIA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 INDUSTRIES ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830453 Approved :01/80/050/00126/AM20/ :03/95/040/00218/AM20/ 22.07.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments of MSME as under: Recommended 83 ITCHS ITCHS Export Item Quantity Import Item Norms Code Code 97654 Kg AISI S2 Grade inclusive of AISI S2 Grade Alloy 85888.000 84829130 72281090 Alloy Steel Wire / 13.7% wastage Steel Rollers Kg Wire Rods after 20% recovery Note: The firm should import relevant item only. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DYNA FORCE Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: HYDRAULICS PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067484 Deferred :01/80/050/00128/AM20/ :31/83/040/00067/AM20/ 25.07.2019 84 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Pune and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Pune on 18.10.2019 followed by reminders on 08.01.2020 & 03.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: RATNAMANI Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: METALS AND TUBES LTD ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0810145826 Deferred :01/80/050/00129/AM20/ :08/24/040/00135/AM20/ 25.07.2019 85 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 20.11.2019 followed by a reminder on 07.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the firm to furnish the requisite information within 15 days. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

27 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ROTHE ERDE Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067486 Approved :01/80/050/00130/AM20/ :31/83/040/00066/AM20/ 26.07.2019 86 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/25/2019-TSW dated 17.02.2020. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:42/11/80- Party Name: PREMIER Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 INDUSTRIAL ALC2/2019 CORPORATION LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830608 Deferred :01/80/050/00168/AM20/ :03/95/040/00377/AM20/ 26.07.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

87 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application was forwarded to Consultant (Tech 1) on 10.02.2020. However, Consultant (Tech 1) informed that import/export item doesn’t belong to them. Hence the committee decided to forward the firm’s representation to Consultant (SK Bhatnagar).

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510411435 Deferred :01/80/050/00137/AM20/ :05/24/040/00251/AM20/ 02.08.2019 88 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 14.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:41/11/80- Party Name: PHOENIX Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 FOILS PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830770 Deferred :01/80/050/00167/AM20/ :03/95/040/00459/AM20/ 02.08.2019 89 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

28 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 127] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SSP PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510411438 Deferred :01/80/050/00138/AM20/ :05/24/040/00259/AM20/ 05.08.2019 90 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DPIIT on 10.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:45/11/80- Party Name: L&T- MHPS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2004 TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310831568 Deferred :01/80/050/00171/AM20/ :03/95/040/00574/AM20/ 16.09.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 91 furnish following information as per the advice of representative of DHI : 1. Export weight of each turbine blade. 2. Calculation of requirement of raw material supported by Dimensional Engineering Drawing justifying the wastage in the manufacturing process. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:46/11/80-	Party Name: L&T-MHPS	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2004	BOILERS PVT LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00172/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00588/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0310831569<br>16.09.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 19.12.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/13/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: RONCH Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: POLYMERS PVT LTD ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310832012 Deferred :01/80/050/00186/AM20/ :03/95/040/00654/AM20/ 04.10.2019 93 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Mumbai and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Mumbai on 17.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

29 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/13/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: FERRUM Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: EXTREME ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510412040 Deferred :01/80/050/00187/AM20/ :05/23/040/00265/AM20/ 07.10.2019 94 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, New Delhi and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, New Delhi on 17.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:3/13/80-ALC2/2019		Party Name: AVLIGHT		Meet No/Date:21/80-		Status:
		AUTOMOTIVES PVT. LTD.		ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00188/AM20/		RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00266/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:0510412058<br>09.10.2019		Deferred

95 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 21.01.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/13/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: L&T- MHPS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310832116 Deferred :01/80/050/00189/AM20/ :03/95/040/00681/AM20/ 10.10.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 96 furnish following information as per the advice of representative of DHI : 1. Export weight of each turbine blade. 2. Calculation of requirement of raw material supported by Dimensional Engineering Drawing justifying the wastage in the manufacturing process. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/13/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: L&T- MHPS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310832159 Deferred 97 :01/80/050/00190/AM20/ :03/95/040/00655/AM20/ 11.10.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

30 | P a g e

Case No.:6/13/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: GODREJ &	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00191/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00505/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0310832178<br>11.10.2019	Deferred

98 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to Consultant (SKB) for examination as per advice of the representative of DPIIT . However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to call the firm for personal hearing to explain the case along with all the relevant Technical Drawing in the forthcoming NC meeting.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:7/13/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: ISGEC	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:*
	HITACHI ZOSEN LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00192/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00269/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510412096<br>11.10.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, New Delhi and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, New Delhi on 17.12.2019 and again on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait the hardcopy.

Case is deferred.

100

Case No.:8/13/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00193/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00347/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068080<br>14.10.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Hyderabad and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Hyderabad on 17.12.2019 and again on 13.02.2020 & 17.02.2020. However, no information has been received so far. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait the hardcopy. Case is deferred.

Case No.:9/13/80-	Party Name: GENESIS	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	PACKAGING PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00194/AM20/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00152/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0710115559<br>14.10.2019	Deferred

101 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 01.11.2019 followed by a reminder on 12.02.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

31 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/13/80- Party Name: GOLD MOHUR Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PROFILES LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510412119 Deferred 102 :01/80/050/00195/AM20/ :05/23/040/00279/AM20/ 15.10.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-1) was sent to the firm on 11.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/13/80- Party Name: GLOVIS INDIA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 (P) LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410166162 Deferred :01/80/050/00196/AM20/ :04/24/040/00111/AM20/ 15.10.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

103 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 14.11.2019 followed by an ID reminder on 07.01.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 269] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/15/80- Party Name: SHAKTI Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PUMPS INDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:5610005713 Approved :01/80/050/00209/AM20/ :56/24/040/00019/AM20/ 31.10.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/328/2018-TSW dated 28.01.2020 as under: 1. Import item at Sl. No. 1 to 3 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained/utilized in the 104 export items. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 8093.19Kgs as 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the export items at Sl. No. 1 to 3. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 1214.33Kgs as 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the export items at Sl. No. 4 & 5. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 245625Kgs as per SION C-1519. 5. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 4 to 6 may be allowed as 2400 Nos., 2400 Nos. and 4800 Nos. respectively on net to net basis with accountability clause. 6. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 7 may be allowed as 10060 Meters on net to net basis as claimed by the firm. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

32 | P a g e

Case No.:2/15/80-	Party Name: ULTRA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERS	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00210/AM20/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00099/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3110067586<br>05.11.2019	Deferred

105 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 15.01.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind RA, Pune & the firm for submitting the complete set of application.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:1/17/80-	Party Name: VICTORA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	AUTO PVT. LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00233/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00513/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510412724<br>29.11.2019	Deferred

106 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 15.01.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind RA, New Delhi & the firm for submitting the complete set of application.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/17/80- Party Name: SULZER Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PUMPS INDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310833126 Deferred :01/80/050/00234/AM20/ :03/95/040/00827/AM20/ 02.12.2019 107 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 15.01.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind RA, Mumbai & the firm for submitting the complete set of application. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:3/17/80-	Party Name: SULZER	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	PUMPS INDIA LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00235/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00828/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0310833143<br>02.12.2019	Deferred

108 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 15.01.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind RA, Mumbai & the firm for submitting the complete set of application.

Case is deferred.

33 | P a g e

Case No.:4/17/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00236/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00438/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068243<br>02.12.2019	Deferred

109 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 10.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 17.02.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:5/17/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00237/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00439/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068244<br>02.12.2019	Deferred

110 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 03.02.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:6/17/80-	Party Name: TRILLIUM	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	FLOW TECHNOLOGIES	ALC2/2019
	INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00238/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00852/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0310833148<br>02.12.2019	Withdrawn

111 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm vide email dated 17.02.2020 informed that they have applied the AA under “ Net to net ” basis as per general conditions of Chapter 4 of FTP 2015-20. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda under intimation to RA, Mumbai.

Case is withdrawn.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/17/80- Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MOTORS INDIA P LTD ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045677 Deferred :01/80/050/00241/AM20/ :34/24/040/00270/AM20/ 03.12.2019 112 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 15.01.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind RA, Vadodara & the firm for submitting the complete set of application. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

34 | P a g e

Case No.:10/17/80-	Party Name: HANNING	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	MOTORS INDIA P LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00242/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00271/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045679<br>03.12.2019	Deferred

113 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 15.01.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind RA, Vadodara & the firm for submitting the complete set of application.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:11/17/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00243/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00437/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068247<br>04.12.2019	Deferred

114 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 03.02.2020. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

115

Case No.:12/17/80-	Party Name: DOOWON	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	CLIMATE CONTROL	ALC2/2019
	INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00244/AM20/	RLA File<br>:26/24/040/00012/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:2610012887<br>04.12.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 29.01.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/17/80- Party Name: KABY Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PRECISION MACHINING ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910068268 Deferred 116 :01/80/050/00245/AM20/ :09/24/040/00447/AM20/ 06.12.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for examination & comments as per advice of the representative of DHI . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

35 | P a g e

Case No.:1/21/80-	Party Name: BAUMER	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	TECHNOLOGIES INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00266/AM20/	RLA File<br>:52/24/040/00051/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:5210043275<br>23.12.2019	Deferred

117 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to Consultant (Tech-3) vide email dated 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, Consultant (Tech-3) asked for physical copy of application/file. Therefore, the Committee decided to send physical copy of application to Consultant (Tech-3).

Case is deferred.

Case No.:2/21/80-	Party Name: DILIGENT	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	SCM SOLUTIONS PR	ALC2/2019
	IVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00267/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00474/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068302<br>24.12.2019	Deferred

118 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 14.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/21/80- Party Name: DIGI DRIVES Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510413072 Deferred :01/80/050/00268/AM20/ :05/23/040/00375/AM20/ 24.12.2019 119 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:4/21/80-	Party Name: CRYOGAS	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	EQUIPMENT PVT LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00269/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00287/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045738<br>24.12.2019	Deferred

120 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

36 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/21/80- Party Name: SHAKTI Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PUMPS INDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:5610005767 Approved 121 :01/80/050/00270/AM20/ :56/24/040/00026/AM20/ 24.12.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/314/2018-TSW dated 13.02.2020. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

122

Case No.:6/21/80-	Party Name: SHAKTI	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	PUMPS INDIA LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00271/AM20/	RLA File<br>:56/24/040/00027/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:5610005768<br>24.12.2019	Approved

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/314/2018-TSW dated 13.02.2020. (Copy enclosed)

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Case No.:7/21/80-	Party Name: DAMPER	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	TECHNOLOGY INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PVT. LTD.	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00272/AM20/	RLA File<br>:32/24/040/00099/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3210079311<br>27.12.2019	Deferred

123 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Coimbatore & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/21/80- Party Name: BONATRANS Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310833747 Deferred :01/80/050/00274/AM20/ :03/94/040/00785/AM20/ 27.12.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

124 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

37 | P a g e

Case No.:8/21/80-	Party Name: TEGA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	INDUSTRIES LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00273/AM20/	RLA File<br>:02/24/040/00148/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0210209647<br>30.12.2019	Deferred

125 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Kolkata & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

126

Case No.:10/21/80-	Party Name: BANGALORE	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	BIOTECH LABS PVT LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00275/AM20/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00223/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0710115950<br>30.12.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 17.02.2020 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:11/21/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00276/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00489/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068312<br>31.12.2019	Deferred

127 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 03.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:12/21/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00277/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00490/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068313<br>31.12.2019	Deferred

128 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 03.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

38 | P a g e

Case No.:13/21/80-	Party Name: AUTOCOMP	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	CORPORATION PANSE	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00278/AM20/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00128/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3110067645<br>31.12.2019	Deferred

129 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:14/21/80-	Party Name: ISGEC HEAVY	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00279/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00381/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510413163<br>01.01.2020	Deferred

130 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:15/21/80- Party Name: SOGEFI Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 ENGINE SYSTEMS INDIA ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710115971 Deferred :01/80/050/00280/AM20/ :07/24/040/00097/AM20/ 02.01.2020 131 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Bangalore & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

132

Case No.:16/21/80-	Party Name: MICRON	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00281/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00590/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510413177<br>02.01.2020	Deferred

Case is deferred.

39 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:17/21/80- Party Name: ISGEC HEAVY Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 ENGINEERING LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510413181 Deferred :01/80/050/00282/AM20/ :05/23/040/00378/AM20/ 02.01.2020 133 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm and in this regard an email has been sent on 13.02.2020. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/21/80- Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910068392 Deferred :01/80/050/00295/AM20/ :09/24/040/00522/AM20/ 21.01.2020 ----- End of picture text -----

134 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:2/21/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00296/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00523/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068393<br>21.01.2020	Deferred

135 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:3/21/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00297/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00524/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068394<br>21.01.2020	Deferred

136 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

40 | P a g e

Case No.:4/21/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00298/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00528/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068395<br>21.01.2020	Deferred

137 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:5/21/80-	Party Name: MAHINDRA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	DEFENCE SYSTEMS LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00299/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00602/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510413404<br>21.01.2020	Deferred

138 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, New Delhi and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

139

Case No.:6/21/80-	Party Name: MICRON	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00300/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00675/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510413411<br>21.01.2020	Deferred

Case is deferred.

Case No.:7/21/80-	Party Name: LM WIND	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	POWER BLADES INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PVT. LTD	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00301/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00329/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045799<br>21.01.2020	Deferred

140 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Vadodara and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

41 | P a g e

Case No.:8/21/80-	Party Name: LM WIND	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	POWER BLADES INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PVT. LTD	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00302/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00330/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045800<br>21.01.2020	Deferred

141 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Vadodara and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

142

Case No.:9/21/80-	Party Name: MICRON	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00303/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00398/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510413428<br>23.01.2020	Deferred

Case is deferred.

Case No.:10/21/80-	Party Name: THERMAL	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD)	ALC2/2019
	P. LTD.	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00304/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00506/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068410<br>24.01.2020	Deferred

143 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:11/21/80-	Party Name: CHEMICO	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	SYNTHETICS LTD.	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00305/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00408/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510413441<br>24.01.2020	Deferred

144 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, New Delhi and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

42 | P a g e

Case No.:12/21/80-	Party Name: KAY BOUVET	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00306/AM20/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00139/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3110067666<br>27.01.2020	Deferred

145 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Pune and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:13/21/80-	Party Name: HANNING	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	MOTORS INDIA P LTD	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00307/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00336/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045818<br>28.01.2020	Deferred

146 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Vadodara and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:14/21/80- Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MOTORS INDIA P LTD ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045819 Deferred :01/80/050/00308/AM20/ :34/24/040/00337/AM20/ 28.01.2020 147 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Vadodara and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:15/21/80- Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MOTORS INDIA P LTD ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045820 Deferred :01/80/050/00309/AM20/ :34/24/040/00338/AM20/ 28.01.2020 148 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Vadodara and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

43 | P a g e

Case No.:16/21/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00310/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00525/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068424<br>29.01.2020	Deferred

149 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:17/21/80- Party Name: AVLIGHT Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 AUTOMOTIVES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510413478 Deferred :01/80/050/00311/AM20/ :05/23/040/00359/AM20/ 29.01.2020 150 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, New Delhi and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:18/21/80-	Party Name: LM WIND	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	POWER BLADES INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PVT. LTD	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00312/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00341/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045830<br>30.01.2020	Deferred

151 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Vadodara and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:19/21/80- Party Name: BENGAL Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510413481 Deferred :01/80/050/00313/AM20/ :05/23/040/00415/AM20/ 30.01.2020 152 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, New Delhi and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

44 | P a g e

Case No.:20/21/80-	Party Name: LM WIND	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	POWER BLADES INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PVT. LTD	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00314/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00344/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045838<br>30.01.2020	Deferred

153 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Vadodara and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:21/21/80-	Party Name: BHARAT	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	HEAVY ELECTRICALS	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00315/AM20/	RLA File<br>:11/24/040/00011/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:1110028681<br>31.01.2020	Deferred

154 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Bhopal & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Bhopal and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:22/21/80- Party Name: JAIN Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LTD. ALC2/2019 & 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310834593 Deferred :01/80/050/00316/AM20/ :03/94/040/00435/AM20/ 03.02.2020 155 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Mumbai and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

156

Case No.:23/21/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00317/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00557/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068441<br>03.02.2020	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

45 | P a g e

157

Case No.:24/21/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00318/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00559/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068442<br>03.02.2020	Deferred

Case is deferred.

158

Case No.:25/21/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00319/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00552/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068443<br>03.02.2020	Deferred

Case is deferred.

159

Case No.:26/21/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00320/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00554/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068444<br>03.02.2020	Deferred

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:27/21/80- Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910068445 Deferred :01/80/050/00321/AM20/ :09/24/040/00553/AM20/ 03.02.2020 160 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

46 | P a g e

Case No.:28/21/80-	Party Name: FRIZAIR	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	PRIVATE LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00322/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00556/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910068449<br>04.02.2020	Deferred

161 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Hyderabad & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Hyderabad and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:29/21/80-	Party Name: COFLE TAYLOR	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:*
ALC2/2019	INDIA CONTROL CABLES &	ALC2/2019
	SYSTEMS PRIVAT	18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00323/AM20/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00167/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0410166495<br>05.02.2020	Deferred

162 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Chennai & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Chennai and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:30/21/80- Party Name: AYYAPPA Meet No/Date:21/80- Status: ALC2/2019 CNC PVT LTD ALC2/2019 18.02.2020 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710116097 Deferred :01/80/050/00324/AM20/ :07/24/040/00262/AM20/ 05.02.2020 163 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Bangalore & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Bangalore and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:31/21/80-	Party Name: TEMA INDIA	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00325/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/01062/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0310834668<br>06.02.2020	Deferred

164 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Mumbai and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

47 | P a g e

Case No.:32/21/80-	Party Name: IND-SPHINX	Meet No/Date:21/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	PRECISION LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		18.02.2020
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00326/AM20/	RLA File<br>:30/24/040/00122/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3010105038<br>07.02.2020	Deferred

165 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Ludhiana & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Ludhiana and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

48 | P a g e

Manual Cases

Sl. No. 658

Manual Cases<br>Sl. No. 658
Case No.36/21/80-ALC2/2016	Status:
NAVKAR FITTINGS &<br>FORGINGS PVT. LTD.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No.: 0310808954 Date: 03.11.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00496/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 03/95/040/00606/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
04/80-ALC2/2017dated 23.05.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter raised by DIPP vide UO
No.12/13/2017-TSW/81 dated 02/03/2017.
However, the firm had furnished the reply with a request to re-open the case and fix the ad-hoc norms.
The Committee noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toMSMEon 28.11.2018 followed by ID
reminders on 17.09.2019 & 10.01.2020 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received
yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind again MSMEfor expediting the comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 659

Sl. No. 659	Sl. No. 659	Sl. No. 659	Sl. No. 659	Sl. No. 659	Sl. No. 659
Case No.14/15/80-ALC2/2013<br>Automat Irrigation Pvt. Ltd.<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No.: 0510362949 dated 20.08.2013
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00270/AM14<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>Approved
norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00199/AM14
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.<br>22/80 dated 02.02.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 30.07.2014 as raised by C & PC.<br>However, the firm had furnished the reply with a request to re-open the case and fix the ad-hoc norms.<br>The Committee decided toratifythe ad-hoc norms as per written comments ofConsultant (Tech-1)as under:<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>Quantity<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms<br>84248100<br>Rigid Poly Vinyl<br>Chloride (PVC) Articles<br>(consisting of PVC Resin<br>33000 kg.)<br>34642.00<br>Kg<br>39042110<br>Poly Vinyl Chloride<br>(PVC) Resin<br>(Suspension Grade)<br>As applied<br>(Wastage<br>allowed is Nil)<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.
	Export Item	Quantity	ITCHS<br>Code	Import Item	Recommended<br>Norms
	Rigid Poly Vinyl<br>Chloride (PVC) Articles<br>(consisting of PVC Resin<br>33000 kg.)	34642.00<br>Kg	39042110	Poly Vinyl Chloride<br>(PVC) Resin<br>(Suspension Grade)	As applied<br>(Wastage<br>allowed is Nil)
				NC.

Sl. No. 660

Case No.50/2/80-ALC2/2016<br>Status:
S AND W JEWELLERY PRIVATE<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0710108479 dated 08.07.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00053/AM17<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>Rejected
norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00125/AM16
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
05/80 dated 07.06.2016 as per written comments of MSME vide U. O. No.: TSW B 3/26/20TL-13024/82/2016-
MMM & A-DCMSME dated 20.05.2016.
However, the firm vide letter dated 26.04.2017 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The
Committee noted that a deficiency letter seeking information as raised byMSME,i.e.“The complete statement of
exports along with copies of shipping bills”, was sent to the firm on 30.11.2018 followed by reminders on
18.09.2019 & 10.01.2020. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toreject
the firm’s request under intimation toRA, New Delhi.
Case is rejected.

49 | P a g e

Sl. No. 661

==> picture [476 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 2/4/80-ALC2/2015 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 Terumo Penpol Ltd. Lic. No.: 5310008377 dated 28.05.2009 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00073/AM16 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc Deferred RLA No.: 53/21/040/00002/AM10 norms Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted its decision of Meeting 11/19 date ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted its decision of Meeting 11/19 date 30.11.2018 in which representative of MSME stated that the norms may be fixed on the basis of DIPP recommendation vide No. 07/9/20l6-TSW dt. 08.12.2017 for License No. 5310019514 dt. 05.10.2017 as ratified in Meeting No. 16/80 dated 14.11.2017. However, the Committee observed that the description of export item in the subject application does not exactly match with that appearing in the recommendation of DIPP and due to this it was requested to MSME to provide comments.

30.11.2018 in which representative of MSME stated that the norms may be fixed on the basis of DIPP recommendation vide No. 07/9/20l6-TSW dt. 08.12.2017 for License No. 5310019514 dt. 05.10.2017 as ratified in Meeting No. 16/80 dated 14.11.2017. However, the Committee observed that the description of export item in the subject application does not exactly match with that appearing in the recommendation of DIPP and due to this it was requested to MSME to provide comments. Based on the deliberations & as per advice of MSME, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech - 1) to look into the issue. Hence, the case was referred to Consultant (Tech -1) on 16.10.2019 for examination & comments . Consultant (Tech-1) informed that a similar case of the firm has already been referred to PLEXCOUNCIL and Department of C & PC. PLEXCOUNCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days time to reply the query and no information has been received from Deptt. of C & PC. The Committee noted that Deptt. of C & PC and PLEXCOUNCIL were reminded on 12.02.2020 for the expediting the matter. However, no information has been received yet from any of the department. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the information. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 662

	Sl. No. 662
	Case No.26/11/80-ALC2/2016<br>Status:
	Dee Development Engineers Ltd.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No.: 0510398701 dated 01.06.2017

	HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00299/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
	norms in respect of AA issued to M/s. Dee<br>Development Engineers Ltd., under Para 4.7<br>of HBP(Vol.-I)– reg.<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00101/AM17
	Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting<br>No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 19.04.2017.<br>The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that firm’s reply against the DHI’s deficiency letter was<br>sent to DHI on 21.01.2020. However, the representative of DHI informed that firm has not replied to the following<br>queries:<br>1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed<br>for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these<br>imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and<br>supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.<br>2. Utilization of Import item no. 11 in export item.<br>Therefore, the Committee decided toremind again the firmto furnish the requisite information within 15 days.<br>Case is deferred.

50 | P a g e

Sl. No. 663

Sl. No. 663
Case No.5/14/80-ALC2/2016	Status:
Injectoplast Pvt. Ltd.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic. No.: 0610038435 dated 09.08.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00355/AM17<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Approved
norms<br>RLA No.: 06/24/040/0015/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting
No. 17/80 dated 19.12.2017 as per comments of MSME with import item at Sl. No. 7 deleted.
However, the firm requested along with justification, for allowing the import of item at Sl. No. 7. The
Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to allowimport item No. 7 with 2% wastage, as it is
used along with import item at Sl. No. 4, as per written comments ofConsultant (Tech-1).
Note: The decision for rest of the import items will remain unchanged as decided in M. No.	17/80 dated
19.12.2017.
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 664

Sl. No. 664
Case No.21/6/80-ALC2/2016	Status:
Dee Development Engineers Ltd.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic. No.: 0510398216 dated 13.04.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00180/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00015/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 19.04.2017.
However, the firm had furnished the reply with a request to re-open case and fix the ad-hoc norms. The
Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised byDPIIT
was sent to the firm on 16.12.2019 followed by a reminder on 12.02.2020. However, no reply has	been received
yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 665

Sl. No. 665
Case No.15/2/80-ALC2/2016	Status:
Deepeeka Exports Pvt. Ltd.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic. No.: 0510396524 dated 04.12.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00018/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00371/AM16	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No. 14/80 dated 11.10.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 04.08.2016.
The Committee noted that the firm’s reply against deficiency letter dated 15.01.2019 was sent toMSME
for examination of the case on 21.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 12.02.2020. However, no comments have
been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided towaitfor the comments.
Case is deferred.

51 | P a g e

Sl. No. 666

==> picture [476 x 79] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 45/24/80-ALC2/2013 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 Kelvion India Pvt. Ltd. Lic. No.: 0310766285 dated 15.01.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00522/AM14 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc Deferred RLA No.: 03/94/040/00880/AM14 norms Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 22/80 dated 20.01.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 30.07.2014.

Meeting No. 22/80 dated 20.01.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 30.07.2014. The firm furnished the reply vide letter dated 20.11.2017 with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/271/2018-TSW dated 23.12.2019: 1. Weight of each export product. 2. Detailed calculation as to how the quantity of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported matrials, wastage claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 3. Sheet layout diagram of the material indicating the wastage during blanking. 4. The gross weight of the blanks do not match with the size of blanks as indicated in the drawings e.g. as per drawing the gross weight for blank for import item at Sl. No. 1 comes out to be 1.618 Kg as against 3.08 Kgs, indicated in the drawing. The basis for the gross weights of blanks may be furnished supported by blank size and size of export item. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 667

Sl. No. 667
CaseNo. 52/15/80-ALC2/2013	Status:
Sharma Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic.No. : 3410037864dated11.09.2013
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00308/AM14<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Rejected
norms<br>RLA No.: 34/24/040/00131/AM14
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in M.
No. 04/80 dated 13.05.2014 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 17.12.2013.
The Committee noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised byDPIIT
was sent to the firm on 16.07.2019 & subsequent reminders on 19.11.2019, 13.01.2020 & 12.02.2020.
However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided torejectthe firm’s request
under intimation toRA, Vadodara.
Case is rejected.

52 | P a g e

Sl. No. 668

Sl. No. 668
Case No. A/R 16/19	Status:
TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd.<br>M. No.: 21/80-<br>ALC2/2019 dated<br>18.02.2020
HQ. No.:<br>01/80/162/301/AM18/<br>DES-18<br>Subject:EOU- M/s. TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd., LOP No. PER:<br>076/EOU/VSEZ/HYD/2011 dated 25.07.2011 for fixation of wastage<br>norms for export product “Helicopter cabin kits & parts and accessories<br>for Aircraft” against import items 1. Stainless Steel bars/rods 2. Stainless<br>Steel Tube/Pipes 3. Stainless Steel round bars	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the application of the firm was sent
to DIPP on 10.07.2018 and also to DHI on 03.08.2018 for their examinations/comments. Since, they had stated that
the export product is not under the purview of DIPP/DHl, so it was forwarded toMSMEon 18.03.2019 followed
by reminders on 24.09.2019, 10.01.2020 & 12.02.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the
Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 669

Case No.67/2/80-ALC2/2016	Status:
ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic. No.: 0510397548 dated 09.02.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00070/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00472/AM16
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
15/80 dated 06.03.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 11.10.2018.
However, the firm had requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee noted that the firm’s
representation was forwarded toMSMEon 11.07.2019 followed by reminders on 24.09.2019 & 10.01.2020, for
examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to
remind again MSMEfor expediting the comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 670

==> picture [476 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 27/9/80-ALC2/2017 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 TERUMO PENPOL PRIVATE LIMITED Lic. No.: 5310019417 dated 15.06.2017 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00205/AM18 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms Deferred RLA No.: 53/24/040/00003/AM18 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 03/80 dated 09.05.2018 as per written comments of DIPP (TSW section) vide letter No.: 07/9/2016-TSW dated 08.12.2017. However the firm requested to re-fix the norms and also allow them for Personal Hearing . In continuation to Meeting 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee noted that the firm appeared for PH in its Meeting 09/80 dated 14.09.2019 and explained the reason for higher wastage claimed. Based on the deliberations, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech 1) to look into the issue. Consultant (Tech-1) pointed out that firm is requesting to increase the wastage norms for PVC compound from 10% to 16% on the basis of Deptt. of C&PC suggestion vide letter dated 10.09.2012 for amending the SION H-67 and AA of the firm has been ratified on the basis of SION H-67 which allows for only 10%. Consultant (Tech 1) suggested that PLEXCOUNCIL may be requested to provide Production/Consumption data of other manufacturers. The Committee noted that the case was referred to PLEXCOUNCIL & Deptt. Of C & PC on 18.10.2019 & 05.11.2019 respectively. However, PLEXCOUNCIL vide email dated 17.12.2019 had requested for 15 days time to reply the query and no information has been received from Deptt. Of C&PC. The Committee noted that Deptt. of

53 | P a g e

C&PC and PLEXCOUNCIL were reminded on 12.02.2020 for the expediting the matter. However, no information has been received yet from any of the department. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the information.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 671

Sl. No. 671
Case No. : 61/25/80-ALC2/2016	Status:
M/s. BARODA EQUIPMENT AND<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
VESSELS PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No. /date: 3410042545 dated 21.09.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/50/621/AM17/DES-I<br>Subject:Request for reviewing of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 34/24/040/00182/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in	M. No. 14/80-
ALC2/2017dated 10.10.2017due to non submission of reply of deficiency raised by DPIIT.
However, the firm furnished the reply vide letter dated 31.07.2019 with a request to fix the ad-hoc
norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised
byDPIITwas sent to the firm on 19.11.2019 and 13.01.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore,
the Committee decided toremind again the firmto furnish the requisite information within 15 days.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 672

==> picture [476 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. : 24/17/80-ALC2/2014 Status: M/s GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 INDIA LIMITED Lic. No. /date: 0410159425 dated 16.09.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00396/AM15 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc Approved RLA No.: 04/24/040/00154/AM15 norms ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 05/80-ALC2/2016 dated 08.06.2015 due to non submission of reply to the deficiency (raised by DHI). However, the firm vide their letter dated 07.05.2019 had submitted their reply and requested to reopen the case for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee observed, as per DHI’s remark, that the application was incomplete and after receiving the complete representation with reply against the deficiency letter, the same was forwarded to DHI on 21.01.2020. Now the Committee decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms on the recommendation of the representative of DHI as under: Export items: Description & quantity both weight & number submitted by the firm at Annexure 1 may be incorporated in the AA. Import items: 1. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 may be allowed under GN-4 . 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 5 is with nil wastage both in weight & length term. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 673

==> picture [476 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. : 24/19/80-ALC2/2014 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 M/s SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD. Lic. No. /date: 5610004450 Date: 21.10.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00458/AM15 Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc Deferred RLA No.: 56/24/040/00042/AM15 norms ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 5/80-ALC2/2016dated 07.06.2016as per recommendation of DIPP vide ID Note No. 12/46/2016-TSW/11 dated 03.06.2016. However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case as

54 | P a g e

per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/328/2018-TSW dated 30.12.2019:

Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing, for each of the export item.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 674

Case No. :No.:9/12/80-ALC2/2017<br>SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) PRIVATE<br>LIMITED<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No. /date: 0510403402 dated 14.07.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00223/AM18<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 05/24/040/00172/AM18
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in M. No. 3/80-
ALC2/2016 dated 09.05.2018as per recommendation of DHI, DIPP and MSME present in the meeting.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee in continuation to
Meeting 19/80 dated 15.01.2020 noted that firm has been called for personal hearing. On hearing the firm,
Consultant (Tech 3) asked the firm to submit samples of all kinds of import and export items, as Wastage varies
from item to item. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the samples from the firm.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 675

Case No. :16/8/80-ALC2/2018<br>M/s.SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA)<br>PRIVATE LIMITED<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No.: 0510407130 Date: 09.07.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/139/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 05/24/040/00207/AM19
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
4/80-ALC2/2019 dated 22.05.2018as per written comments ofDPIITvide U. O. No.: P-47011/289/2018-TSW
dated 25.04.2019.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee in continuation to Meeting 19/80
dated 15.01.2020 noted that firm has been called for personal hearing. On hearing the firm, Consultant (Tech 3)
asked the firm to submit samples of all kinds of import and export items, as Wastage varies from item to item.
Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the samples from the firm.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 676

Sl. No. 676
Case No.41/3/80-ALC2/2015			Status:
M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020	Y-TEC INDIA PVT. LTD.
Lic. No.: 0510393093 dated 05.02.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00041/AM16	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms		Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00523/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in		Meeting No.
18/80 dated 08.12.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 22.06.2015.
However, the firm vide letter dated 20.12.2018 submitted the representation with a request		to fix the ad-
hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as
raised byConsultant (Tech-1)was sent to the firm on 22.11.2019 and a reminder on 13.01.2020.		However, no
reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind again the firmfor furnishing the
requisite information within 15 days.
Case is deferred.

55 | P a g e

Sl. No. 677

Sl. No. 677
CaseNo. 14/3/80-ALC2/2017	Status:
BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic. No. /date: 0410162877 dated 09.03.2017
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00014/AM18<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Approved
norms<br>RLA No.: 04/24/040/00215/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No.12/80-ALC2/2017dated 12.09.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency raised
by DIPP vide U. O. No.:12/36/2017-TSW/160 dated 16/05/2017.
However, the firm furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee
considered the case as per the agenda and decided toratifythe ad-hoc norms as per written	comments of
DPIITvide U. O. No.: P-47011/100/2019-TSW dated 15.01.2020. (Copy enclosed)
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 678

Sl. No. 678
CaseNo. : 25/21/80-ALC2/2016<br>M/s L & T-MHPS TURBINE		Status:
GENERATORS PRIVATE<br>M.No.:21/80-ALC2/2019 dated18.02.2020
LIMITED<br>Lic. No. /date: 0310808650 Date: 21.10.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00485/AM17<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-<br>hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00528/AM17		Approved
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was		approved in
Meeting No. 11/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.12.2018 as per DHI written recommendation		vide F. No.
3/12/2017/TSW(B) dated 18.05.2018 with several items deleted.
The firm has requested for fixing the norms for Import items at Sl. No. 49 to 51 which were deleted by
DHI in Meeting 11/80 dated 06.12.2018. The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to allow
import items at Sl. No. 49 to 51 on repeat basisas approved forAA No. 0310803636dated 30.03.2016
on the recommendation of the representative ofDHIas under:
1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 49 may be allowed as 247 kgs.
2. Total Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 50 and 51 may be allowed as 916 kgs.
RAconcernedmaytakefurther necessaryaction as per the decisionof NC.

Sl. No. 679

Case No.:39/5/80-ALC2/2017<br>L & T-MHPS TURBINE<br>Status:
GENERATORS PRIVATE<br>M.No.:21/80-ALC2/2019 dated18.02.2020
LIMITED<br>Lic. No. /date: 0310813078 Date: 05.05.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00100/AM18<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-<br>hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/01041/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No.15/80-ALC2/2018dated 06.03.2019 as per the written comments of DHI vide their U.O.
No. DES-I/L&T/Tu-1-2018-HEI dated 24.12.2018.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case as
per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per advice of
representative of DHI:

56 | P a g e

To submit calculation correlating the same with dimensional engineering drawing with relevant dimensions highlighted.
Write-up/catalogue of items which are proposed to be imported as components. The specific use of items should be given.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 680

CaseNo.: 7/11/80-ALC2/2015<br>L & T-MHPS TURBINE	Status:
GENERATORS PRIVATE<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
LIMITED<br>Lic.No. /date: 0310796416Date: 04.06.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00214/AM16/<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-<br>hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00086/AM16	Withdrawn
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No.9/80-ALC2/2016dated 02.08.2016 as per the written comments of DHI vide U. O. No.: 3
(174)/15-TSW (B) dated 19.07.2016.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case
as per agenda and noted that the firm vide email dated 29.01.2020 requested to withdraw the case.
Therefore, the Committee decided towithdrawthe case from the agenda under intimation toRA,
Mumbai.
Case is withdrawn.

Sl. No. 681

==> picture [472 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated Astha Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Status: 18.02.2020 HQ File No: Subject: Request for 100% EOU for fixation of Norms for Deferred 01/80/162/003/AM20/DES1 Precision Metal Machined Parts Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the representation received from O/o Development Commissioner Vishakhapatnam Special Economic Zone, Hyderabad has forwarded the application of M/s Astha corporation Pvt. Ltd., for 100% EOU for fixation of Norms for Precision Metal Machined Parts. The firm had requested for fixation of norms. The Committee noted that the case was referred to MSME for examination on 27.08.2019 followed by reminders on 08.11.2019 & 06.01.2020. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the representation received from O/o Development Commissioner Vishakhapatnam Special Economic Zone, Hyderabad has forwarded the application of M/s Astha corporation Pvt. Ltd., for 100% EOU for fixation of Norms for Precision Metal Machined Parts.

Sl. No. 682

Case No.: 21/5/80-ALC2/2018 M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Status: Licence No.: 0510406253 dated 27.04.2018 HQ File No: 01/80/050/00070/AM19/ Subject: Request for revision of ad-hoc norms Approved RLA File No: 05/24/040/00040/AM19/

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No. 01/80 dated 03.04.2019 on the recommendation of DPIIT vide their U. No. P -47011/381/2018-TSW dated 18.02.2019.

The firm vide letter dated 12.07.2019 has requested to revise the ratified norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted the comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 12.02.2020 wherein it was stated that earlier the norms were recommended for the above AA as the firm had not submitted any documentary evidence regarding the sale price of the scrap generated during the manufacturing

57 | P a g e

process. Now, the firm has submitted the representation against taking higher recovery from the scrap supported by documentary evidence i.e. invoice for sale of scrap and, therefore, norms have been revised. In view of above comments, the Committee decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 . (Copy enclosed)

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 683

==> picture [472 x 229] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. : 16/12/80-ALC2/2018 MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT. LTD. Status : M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 Licence No.: 0510408225 Date: 25.10.2018 HQ File No: 01/80/050/00289/AM19/ Subject: Request for revision of ad-hoc norms Approved RLA File No: 05/24/040/00398/AM19/ Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in meeting No. 14/80 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DPIIT vide their F. No.: P-47011/17/2019/TSW dated 08.02.2019. The firm vide their letter dated 12.07.2019 has requested to revise the ratified norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted the comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 12.02.2020 wherein it was stated that earlier the norms were recommended for the above AA as the firm had not submitted any documentary evidence regarding the sale price of the scrap generated during the manufacturing process. Now, the firm has submitted the representation against taking higher recovery from the scrap supported by documentary evidence i.e. invoice for sale of scrap and, therefore, norms have been revised. In view of above comments, the Committee decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 . (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Sl. No. 684

==> picture [472 x 217] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case Number : 20/5/80-ALC2/2018 MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 Licence No.: 0510406252 Date: 27.04.2018 HQ File No: 01/80/050/00069/AM19/ Subject: Request for revision of ad-hoc norms Approved RLA File No: 05/24/040/00042/AM19/ Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No. 1/80 dated 03.04.2019 on the recommendation of DPIIT vide their U.O. No. P -47011/379/2018-TSW dated 20.02.2019. The firm vide their letter dated 15.07.2019 has requested to revise the ratified norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted the comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 12.02.2020 wherein it was stated that earlier the norms were recommended for the above AA as the firm had not submitted any documentary evidence regarding the sale price of the scrap generated during the manufacturing process. Now, the firm has submitted the representation against taking higher recovery from the scrap supported by documentary evidence i.e. invoice for sale of scrap and, therefore, norms have been revised. In view of above comments, the Committee decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 . (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

58 | P a g e

Sl. No. 685

==> picture [484 x 277] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case Number : 46/24/80-ALC2/2012 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Status : M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 Licence No.: 0410141886 Date: 19.12.2012 Subject: Request for revision of ad-hoc norms Approved HQ File No: 01/80/050/00526/AM13/ RLA File No: 04/24/040/00188/AM13/ Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.07/80 dated 25.06.2013 as per comments of DHI UO No. 3(23)/13-TSW(B)/89 dated 6.5.2013. However, the firm vide letter dated 17.10.2019 requested for revision of ad-hoc norms. The firm stated that they have not requested DGFT to amend the UoM as “Number” for the items which have UoM as “Set”. Based on their requirement, they have only provided the break up details. The firm has further stated that the quantity of material they have imported in terms of “Number” is same as that they have declared to DGFT earlier. Now, they have requested to revise the Unit of Measurement (UoM). The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that representative of DHI has informed the following: “The applicant has requested to allow import in sets instead of numbers. The firm has only given the break up. DGFT to check if import is prior to ratification and allow import under GN-4 with no wastage in weight and number terms.” Hence the Committee, on the basis of DHI’s recommendation, decided to allow import under GN-4 with no wastage in weight and number terms and also to direct RA, Chennai, to check if import is prior to ratification before allowing discharge of EO. RA Chennai to take necessary action. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.07/80 dated 25.06.2013 as per comments of DHI UO No. 3(23)/13-TSW(B)/89 dated 6.5.2013.

However, the firm vide letter dated 17.10.2019 requested for revision of ad-hoc norms. The firm stated that they have not requested DGFT to amend the UoM as “Number” for the items which have UoM as “Set”. Based on their requirement, they have only provided the break up details. The firm has further stated that the quantity of material they have imported in terms of “Number” is same as that they have declared to DGFT earlier. Now, they have requested to revise the Unit of Measurement (UoM).

“The applicant has requested to allow import in sets instead of numbers. The firm has only given the break up. DGFT to check if import is prior to ratification and allow import under GN-4 with no wastage in weight and number terms.”

Hence the Committee, on the basis of DHI’s recommendation, decided to allow import under GN-4 with no wastage in weight and number terms and also to direct RA, Chennai, to check if import is prior to ratification before allowing discharge of EO.

Sl. No. 686

==> picture [484 x 230] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case Number : 46/24/80-ALC2/2012 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Status : M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 Lic. No.: 0410112044 dated.02.03.2011 HQ File No: 01/80/050/00819/AM10/ Subject: Request for revision of ad-hoc norms Deferred RA.F.No.04/24/040/00290/AM10 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.07/80 dated 25.06.2013 as per written of DHI UO No. 3(23)/13-TSW(B)/89 dated 6.5.2013. The firm vide letter dated 17.10.2019 requested for revision of ad-hoc norms. The firm stated that they have not requested DGFT to amend the UOM as “Number” for the items which have UOM as “SET”. Based on their requirement, they have only provided the break up details. The firm has further stated that the quantity of material they have imported in terms of “Number” is same as that they have declared to DGFT earlier. Now, they have requested to revise Unit of Measurement (UoM). The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 14.01.2020. However, firm vide their e-mail dated 13.02.2020 informed that D/L e-mail has not been received by them. Therefore, the Committee decided to again send the said Deficiency Letter to the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

The firm vide letter dated 17.10.2019 requested for revision of ad-hoc norms. The firm stated that they have not requested DGFT to amend the UOM as “Number” for the items which have UOM as “SET”. Based on their requirement, they have only provided the break up details. The firm has further stated that the quantity of material they have imported in terms of “Number” is same as that they have declared to DGFT earlier. Now, they have requested to revise Unit of Measurement (UoM).

The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 14.01.2020. However, firm vide their e-mail dated 13.02.2020 informed that D/L e-mail has not been received by them. Therefore, the Committee decided to again send the said Deficiency Letter to the firm.

Sl. No. 687

Case No.:43/23/80-ALC2/2016<br>MINCO TECH (INDIA) PRIVATE<br>LIMITED<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No. /date: 0210207219 Date: 21.12.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00546/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Approved
RLA No.: 02/24/040/00187/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in M. No.
9/80-ALC2/2017dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of replyof deficiencyletter dated 22.03.2017 raised by

59 | P a g e

DIPP.

The firm vide letter dated 30.09.2019 has furnished the reply of deficiency letter and requested for fixation of adhoc norms. The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/13/2020-TSW dated 12.02.2020. (Copy enclosed)

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 688

==> picture [476 x 83] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 53/2/80-ALC2/2016 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 ALSTOM INDIA LIMITED Lic. No. /date: 0310795652 Date: 30.04.2015 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00056/AM17/ Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms Deferred RLA No.: 03/94/040/00060/AM16/ Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in M. No. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in M. No. 20/80-ALC2/2016 dated 03.01.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 24.10.2016 raised by DHI.

20/80-ALC2/2016 dated 03.01.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 24.10.2016 raised by DHI. The firm vide letter dated 28.09.2019 had requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per advice of representative of DHI: 1. Copy of complete set of application. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 689

==> picture [476 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 58/12/80-ALC2/2014 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. Lic. No. /date: 3110064489 Date: 27.06.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00307/AM15/ Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms Deferred RLA No.: 31/83/040/00082/AM15 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in M. No. 3/80-ALC2/2015 dated 12.05.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 07.10.2014. The firm vide letter dated 02.11.2019 has furnished the reply and requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/15/2020-TSW dated 12.02.2020: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export item, Catalogue, if any, may be furnished. 2. Assembly drawings/diagrams of the resultant product showing placement and exact use of components in the export product (s). 3. Bifurcated quantities of components to be accounted for in the resultant product and the requirement of components as spares. Raw Material / Consumables. 4. For import items at Sl. No. 11 & 12, export product wise: Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred.

60 | P a g e

Sl. No. 690

==> picture [476 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 10/8/80-ALC2/2015 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT. LTD. Lic. No. /date: 0310795103 Date: 06.04.2015 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00116/AM16 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms Deferred RLA No.: 03/94/040/01169/AM15 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 20/80-ALC2/2015 dated 05.01.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 22.09.2015 raised by DIPP.

No. 20/80-ALC2/2015 dated 05.01.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 22.09.2015 raised by DIPP. The firm vide letter dated 02.11.2019 has furnished the reply and requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/15/2020-TSW dated 12.02.2020: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Bifurcated quantities of components to be accounted for in the resultant product and the requirement of components as spares. Raw Material / Consumables. 5. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 6. Cross Sectional Diagram of export product with calculation of raw material requirement and the weight of the Cable in Kg. per Km. Copy of relevant National/International Standard/buyer’s data sheet may also be furnished. 7. Basis for the gross weight of 7.337Kgs for blank sheet supported by blank size of the plate (Component). Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 691

Sl. No. 691
Case No.:39/22/80-ALC2/2014		Status:
GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic. No. /date: 0310789333 Date: 17.09.2014
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00520/AM15/<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms		Deferred
RLA No.: 03/94/040/00580/AM15/
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in M. No.
10/80-ALC2/2015dated 17.08.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 20.03.2015 raised by
DIPP.
The firm vide letter dated 02.11.2019 has furnished the reply and requested for fixation of		ad-hoc norms.
The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish		the following
information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/15/2020-TSW dated 12.02.2020:
1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also		be furnished.
2. Weight of each Export Product.
3. Startingfrom the specification of the exportproduct,basic calculation as to how of raw materialproposed

61 | P a g e

for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

Cross Sectional Diagram of export product with calculation of raw material requirement and the weight of the Cable in Kg. per Km. Copy of relevant National/International Standard/buyer’s data sheet may also be furnished.
Blank size supported by size of component separately for each component.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 692

==> picture [476 x 83] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 20/19/80-ALC2/2014 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. Lic. No. /date: 0310788788 Date: 05.09.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00454/AM15 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms Deferred RLA No.: 03/94/040/00415/AM15 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 4/80-ALC2/2015 dated 26.05.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 09.02.2015 raised by DIPP.

No. 4/80-ALC2/2015 dated 26.05.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 09.02.2015 raised by DIPP. The firm vide letter dated 02.11.2019 has furnished the reply and requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/15/2020-TSW dated 12.02.2020: 6. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 7. Weight of each Export Product. 8. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 9. Cross Sectional Diagram of export product with calculation of raw material requirement and the weight of the Cable in Kg. per Km. Copy of relevant National/International Standard/buyer’s data sheet may also be furnished. 10. Blank size supported by size of component separately for each component. Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 693

Sl. No. 693
Case No.:4/8/80-ALC2/2018		Status:
M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020	CHIRAG UDYOG
Lic. No. /date: 0510406909 Date: 19.06.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00127/AM19<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00141/AM19/	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in M. No.
10/80-ALC2/2019dated 11.09.2019 on the basis	of inputs given by the Technical Authorities present in the
meeting.
The firm vide letter dated 21.10.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered
the case and decided to refer the case toConsultant (Tech-3)for the examination & comments as per advice of
representative ofMSME.
Case is deferred.

62 | P a g e

Sl. No. 694

Case No.:11/11/80-ALC2/2018<br> 35/1/80-ALC2/2019<br>Status:
ISGEC HITACHI ZOSEN LIMITED<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020
Lic. No. /date: 0510407480 Date: 08.08.2018<br>0510409835 Date: 05.03.2019
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00202/AM19/<br>01/80/050/00783/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms<br>Approved
RLA No.: 05/23/040/00216/AM19/<br>05/23/040/00526/AM19
Decision (AA 0510407480):The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was<br>approved in Meeting No.3/80-ALC2/2019dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-<br>47011/84/2019-TSW dated 24.04.2019.<br>The firm vide letter dated 14.08.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the<br>case as per the agenda and decided torevisethe ad-hoc norms for both the AA as per written comments ofDPIIT<br>vide U. O. No.: P-47011/98/2019-TSW dated 12.02.2020. (Copy enclosed)<br>Note:<br>1. For AA No. 0510407480 dated 08.08.2018:The decision for rest of the import items will remain<br>unchanged as decided in Meeting No.3/80-ALC2/2019dated 08.05.2019.<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.
Decision (AA 0510409835):The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was
approved in Meeting No.7/80-ALC2/2019dated 17.07.2019 as per written comments of DPIIT vide U.O. No.: P-
47011/98/2019-TSW dated 27.06.2019.
The firm vide letter dated 20.09.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the
case as per the agenda and decided torevisethe ad-hoc norms for both the AA as per written comments ofDPIIT
vide U. O. No.: P-47011/98/2019-TSW dated 12.02.2020. (Copy enclosed)
Note:
1. For AA No. 0510409835 dated 05.03.2019:The decision for rest of the import items will remain
unchanged as decided in Meeting No.7/80-ALC2/2019dated 17.07.2019
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 695

==> picture [476 x 106] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 13/11/80-ALC2/2018 Status: 9/3/80-ALC2/2018 M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Lic. No. /date: 0510407381 Date: 31.07.2018 0510405742 Date: 28.02.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00204/AM19 Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc Deferred 01/80/050/00009/AM19 norms RLA No.: 05/24/040/00265/AM19 05/24/040/00599/AM18 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 3/80-ALC2/2019 dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DPIIT vide F. No.: P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 18.04.2019.

The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 3/80ALC2/2019 dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DPIIT vide F. No.: P-47011/85/2019-TSW dated 16.04.2019.

The firm vide letters dated 15.07.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred to DPIIT on 06.01.2020. However, the

63 | P a g e

representative of DPIIT informed in meeting that the case is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 696

==> picture [476 x 74] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 331/15/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Lic. No. /date: 0510409696 Date: 20.02.2019 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00673/AM19 Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc Approved RLA No.: 05/24/040/00668/AM19 norms Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting ----- End of picture text -----

No. 3/80-ALC2/2019 dated 08.05.2019 as per written comments of DPIIT vide their F. No.: P-47011/17/2019TSW dated 16.04.2019. The firm vide letter dated 06.06.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that DPIIT stated that earlier the norms were recommended for the above AA as the firm had not submitted any documentary evidence regarding the sale price of the scrap generated during the manufacturing process. Now, the firm has submitted the representation against taking higher recovery from the scrap supported by documentary evidence i.e. invoice for sale of scrap and, therefore, norms have been revised. In view of above comments, the Committee decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/17/2019-TSW dated 11.02.2020 as under: 1. Net weight of export product may be specified as 931 Kgs. 2. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 3994Kgs as 4.29 Kgs/Kg content in the export product after taking 6% recovery from the scrap. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 697

==> picture [476 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 25/8/80-ALC2/2017 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Lic. No. /date: 0510402472 Date: 05.05.2017 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00169/AM18 Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc Rejected RLA No.: 05/24/040/00056/AM18 norms ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 14/80-ALC2/2017 dated 10.10.2017 on the recommendation of DIPP letter no. 12/71/2017-TSW/81 dated10.10.2017.

The firm vide letter dated 24.06.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted the comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.:P-47011/14/2020 dated 17.02.2020 wherein DPIIT stated that earlier the norms were recommended after taking 50% recovery from the scrap and no modification is needed. Therefore, the Committee decided not to revise the ratified ad-hoc norms and rejected the firm’s request .

Case is rejected.

64 | P a g e

Sl. No. 698

==> picture [476 x 78] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: 14/11/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020 MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Lic. No. /date: 0510407383 Date: 31.07.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00205/AM19 Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc Approved RLA No.: 05/24/040/00263/AM19 norms Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 1/80-ALC2/2019 dated 03.04.2019 on the recommendation of DPIIT vide their letter No. P-47011/17/2019TSW dated 20.02.2019.

No. 1/80-ALC2/2019 dated 03.04.2019 on the recommendation of DPIIT vide their letter No. P-47011/17/2019TSW dated 20.02.2019. The firm vide letter dated 15.07.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that DPIIT stated that earlier the norms were recommended for the above AA as the firm had not submitted any documentary evidence regarding the sale price of the scrap generated during the manufacturing process. Now, the firm has submitted the representation against taking higher recovery from the scrap supported by documentary evidence i.e. invoice for sale of scrap and, therefore, norms have been revised. In view of above comments, the Committee decided to revise the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/17/2019-TSW dated 11.02.2020 as under: 1. Net weight of export product may be specified as 501.75 Kgs. 2. Quantity of import item may be allowed as 3998.95Kgs as 4.29 Kgs/Kg inclusive as 7.97 Kgs/Kg content in the export product after taking 6% recovery from the scrap. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 699

Case No.:20/9/80-ALC2/2017<br>CORNING TECHNOLOGIES INDIA<br>PVT. LTD.<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No. /date: 0510403029 Date: 05.06.2017		Status:
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00198/AM18/<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc		Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00081/AM18/
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting
No.11/80-ALC2/2018dated 06.12.2018 as per the written comments of MeitY vide U. O. No.	17/ (18)/2017-
IPHW dated 13.11.2018.
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and
decided to forward the firm’s representation toMeitYfor examination & comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 700

Case No.:25/14/80-ALC2/2018<br>M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020<br>Lic. No. /date: 0510386129 Date: 09.05.2014		SPIROTECH HEAT EXCHANGERS<br>PVT. LTD.		Status:
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00341/AM19		Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc		Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00051/AM15/		norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting
No.14/80-ALC2/2018dated 20.02.2019 as per	written comments of DPIIT vide F. No.: P-47011/24/2019-TSW
dated 20.02.2019.
The firm vide letter dated 22.04.2019 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.			The Committee
reconsidered the case and decided to forward the	firm’s representation toDPIITfor examination &		comments.
Case is deferred.

65 | P a g e

Sl. No. 701

Sl. No. 701
Case No.:53/3/80-ALC2/2017		Status:
M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020	GL&V INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Lic. No. /date: 3110066640 Date: 29.03.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00053/AM18/	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 31/83/040/00185/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No.7/80-ALC2/2019dated 17.07.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 07.03.2019 raised
by Consultant (Tech-3).
The firm vide letter dated 30.12.2019 has	furnished the reply and requested for fixation of	ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toConsultant (Tech-3)for
examination & comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 702

Sl. No. 702
Case No.: 11/14/80-ALC2/2018		Status:
M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020	TIL LIMITED
Lic. No. /date: 0210208838 Dated:07.12.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00327/AM19/	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
RLA No.: 02/24/040/00107/AM19	norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting
No. 14/80-ALC2/2018 dated 20.02.2019 as per written comments of DHI vide U.O. No.: DES-1/TILL/OTRS-1-
2019-HEI dated 19.02.2019.
The firm vide letter dated 13.08.2019 & 22.01.2020 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The
Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toDHIfor examination &
comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 703

Sl. No. 703
Case No.:40/8/80-ALC2/2018		Status:
M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020	SARA SAE PRIVATE LIMITED
Lic. No. /date: 6110001499 Date: 16.04.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00163/AM19	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 61/24/040/00001/AM19
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No.15/80-ALC2/2019dated 15.11.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 06.05.2019
raised by MSME.
The firm vide letter dated 01.02.2020 has	furnished the reply and requested for fixation of	ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toMSMEfor examination
& comments.
Case is deferred.

66 | P a g e

Sl. No. 704

Sl. No. 704
Case No.:23/8/80-ALC2/2018		Status:
M. No.: 21/80-ALC2/2019 dated 18.02.2020	GE POWER INDIA LIMITED
Lic. No. /date: 0310821275 Date: 28.05.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00146/AM19	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
RLA No.: 03/94/040/00164/AM19	norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No.4/80-ALC2/2019dated 22.05.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 28.12.2018 raised
by DHI.
The firm vide letter dated 27.09.2019 has	furnished the reply and requested for fixation of	ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and decided	to forward the firm’s representation toDHIfor examination &
comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 705

Sl. No. 705
Case No.:4/10/80-ALC2/2018<br>M.No.:21/80-ALC2/2019 dated18.02.2020<br>Lic.No. /date: 0410164525Date:24.07.2018	BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS<br>LIMITED	Status:
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00190/AM19	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
RLA No.: 04/24/040/00061/AM19	norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was		approved in
Meeting No. 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019 on the recommendation of the representative ofDHI.
The firm vide letter dated 02.01.2020 has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The
Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation		toDHIfor
examination & comments.
Case is deferred.

67 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 656] intentionally omitted <==

68 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 676] intentionally omitted <==

69 | P a g e

70 | P a g e

71 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 681] intentionally omitted <==

72 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 668] intentionally omitted <==

73 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 676] intentionally omitted <==

74 | P a g e

75 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 671] intentionally omitted <==

76 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 683] intentionally omitted <==

77 | P a g e

78 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 637] intentionally omitted <==

79 | P a g e

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.