IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

MINUTES OF MEETING NO. 16/80 OF NORMS COMMITTEE- I (DES-I SECTION) DATED 04.12.2019

Meeting No. 16/20 of the Norms Committee (NC-I) for the licensing year 2019-2020 held on 04.12.2019 under the Chairmanship of Sh. R.P. Goyal, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption/Remission Schemes (Chapter-4) of the applicable Foreign Trade Policy and the Handbook of Procedures. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: -

==> picture [428 x 209] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. Name of the representatives & their Designation Department 1. Shri S. K. Jain, D. O. DPIIT 2. Shri B. C. Nayak, D. O. DHI 3. Shri K.S. Sodhi, Asst. Director MSME 4. Shri Shaish Kumar, (Tech-1) Consultant 5. Shri V.C. Agarwal, (Tech-3) Consultant 6. Shri K.V. Tirumala, Deputy DGFT DGFT 7. Shri Pranav Upadhyay, Assistant Director ISS DGFT ----- End of picture text -----

Note:

In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/ Observations/Deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The scanned copies uploaded are to be accepted. The U.O. No./O.M No of the scanned copy is reflected in the minutes.
Wherever the Committee has fixed norms, the RAs should allow inputs as per wastage norms approved or as applied whichever is less.
All applications/representations/reply to the Deficiency letters etc. may be sent to NC-I at e-mail address- nc1.dgft@nic.in. All firms are also requested to mail/send their present valid email addresses so that correspondences can be made through email/ by Post.
For all the Manual cases, the concerned RA should check the composition fees paid by the firm.
Minutes of Meeting 13/20 dated 23.10.2019 and 14/20 dated 06.11.2019 were circulated on 14.11.2019 and 28.11.2019 respectively, to all the members of the Committee and the comments, there upon received, were incorporated in the Minutes. The said minutes were unanimously approved.

1 | P a g e

MEETING NUMBER: 16/80-ALC2/2019 MEETING DATE: 04.12.2019

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

the Minutes. The said minutes were unanimously approved.

1 | P a g e

MEETING NUMBER: 16/80-ALC2/2019 MEETING DATE: 04.12.2019

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:78/6/83- Party Name: ECOCAT INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC1/2015 PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510394421 Deferred :01/83/050/00408/AM16/ :05/23/040/00078/AM16/ 03.06.2015 1 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the comments for import items at No. Sl. 1 to 4 was given by MSME. The case was referred to DHI on 15.10.2019 for comments on import items at Sl. No. 5 & 6. However, matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer again the case to MSME for comments on rest of the import items. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

ed to refer again the case to MSME for comments on rest of the import items. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/16/80- Party Name: GARDNER Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2015 AEROSPACE PRANITA PVT LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710108718 Rejected :01/80/050/00286/AM16/ :07/24/040/00176/AM16/ 11.09.2015 2 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 15.01.2019 followed by reminders on 18.04.2019 & 21.08.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Bangalore . Case is rejected. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

e Committee decided to reject the case under intimation to RA, Bangalore . Case is rejected. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/15/80- Party Name: AZAD ENGINEERING Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PVT LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File :09/24/040/00679/AM16/ Lic.No/Date:0910063260 Deferred :01/80/050/00347/AM19/ 12.02.2016 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 3 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Hyderabad and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Hyderabad on 29.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again RA, Hyderabad & the firm to submit the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

he firm to submit the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:186/15/80- Party Name: TEMPCO Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT ALC2/2019 PVT LTD 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File :07/24/040/00157/AM17/ Lic.No/Date:0710110332 Deferred :01/80/050/00528/AM19/ 29.08.2016 4 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application was sent to MeitY for examination of the case on 22.08.2019 & 16.09.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again MeitY for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

2 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:404/15/80- Party Name: OSWAL PUMPS Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3310030377 Deferred 5 :01/80/050/00746/AM19/ :33/24/040/00007/AM17/ 03.03.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for examination as per advice of representative of MSME . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

e case to DPIIT for examination as per advice of representative of MSME . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:94/15/80- Party Name: MODEL INFRA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 CORPORATION PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710111766 Deferred :01/80/050/00436/AM19/ :07/24/040/00085/AM18/ 16.06.2017 6 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per advice of MSME : 1. To provide individual import quantity of each size with corresponding step-wise wastage. 2. To provide size & weight of blank with corresponding finished product weight. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:108/15/80-	Party Name: DEE	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	DEVELOPMENT	ALC2/2019
	ENGINEERS LTD.	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00450/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00116/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0510403207<br>22.06.2017	Deferred

7 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 22.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm.

Case is deferred.

I** was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 22.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:405/15/80- Party Name: OSWAL PUMPS Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3310030410 Deferred 8 :01/80/050/00747/AM19/ :33/24/040/00007/AM18/ 01.11.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for examination as per advice of representative of MSME . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

3 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 634] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:261/15/80- Party Name: FUTURE TECH Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710112573 Approved :01/80/050/00603/AM19/ :07/24/040/00258/AM18/ 20.12.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: Export Product: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 may be mentioned as 0.06 Kg. 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 may be mentioned as 0.143 Kg. 3. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 3 may be mentioned as 0.105 Kg. 4. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No.

r unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 may be mentioned as 0.143 Kg. 3. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 3 may be mentioned as 0.105 Kg. 4. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 4 may be mentioned as 0.02 Kg. 5. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 5 may be mentioned as 0.02 Kg. 6. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 6 may be mentioned as 0.144 Kg. 7. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 7 may be mentioned as 0.16 Kg. 8. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 8 may be mentioned as 0.01 Kg. 9. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 9 may be mentioned as 0.125 Kg. 10. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 10 may be mentioned as 1.06 Kg. 11. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 11 may be mentioned as 1.12 Kg. 12. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 12 may be mentioned as 0.16 Kg. 13. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 13 may be mentioned as 0.18 Kg. 14. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 14may be mentioned as 0.18 Kg. 9 15. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 15 may be mentioned as 0.02 Kg. 16. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 16 may be mentioned as 0.144Kg. 17. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 17 may be mentioned as 0.125 Kg. 18. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 18 may be mentioned as 0.183 Kg. 19. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 19 may be mentioned as 0.01 Kg. 20. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 20 may be mentioned as 0.05 Kg. 21. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No.

unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 19 may be mentioned as 0.01 Kg. 20. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 20 may be mentioned as 0.05 Kg. 21. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 21 may be mentioned as 0.911 Kg. 22. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 22 may be mentioned as 0.183 Kg. 23. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 23 may be mentioned as 0.216 Kg. 24. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 24 may be mentioned as 0.603 Kg. 25. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 25 may be mentioned as 0.068 Kg. 26. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 26 may be mentioned as 0.676Kg. 27. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 27 may be mentioned as 0.035 Kg. 28. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 28 may be mentioned as 0.15 Kg. Import Products: 1. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 0.90 Kg. 2. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 4.60 Kg. 3. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 10.00 Kg. 4. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 4 may be allowed as 0.50 Kg. 5. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 4.80Kg. 6. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 78.60 Kg. 7. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 7 may be allowed as 12.60 Kg. 8. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 8 may be allowed as 6.40 Kg. 9. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No.

evant import item at Sl. No. 7 may be allowed as 12.60 Kg. 8. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 8 may be allowed as 6.40 Kg. 9. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 9 may be allowed as applied for. ----- End of picture text -----

4 | P a g e

Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 10 may be allowed as 88.00 Kg. 11. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 11 may be allowed as 96.00 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 12 may be allowed as 19.60 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 13 may be allowed as 52.00 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 14 may be allowed as 3.00 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 15 may be allowed as 10.60 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 16 may be allowed as applied for.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 17 may be allowed as 5.00 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 18 may be allowed as 17.50 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 19 may be allowed as 0.70 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 20 may be allowed as 7.80 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 21 may be allowed as applied for.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 22 may be allowed as 12.00 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 23 may be allowed as 2.10 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 24 may be allowed as 3.80 Kg.

y be allowed as 12.00 Kg.

Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 23 may be allowed as 2.10 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 24 may be allowed as 3.80 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 25 may be allowed as 0.40 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 26 may be allowed as 982.00 Kg.
Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 27 may be allowed as 2.60 Kg. 28. Total quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 28 may be allowed as 48.00 Kg.

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

==> picture [476 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:391/15/80- Party Name: FUTURE Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECH ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 PVT.LTD, 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710112747 Approved :01/80/050/00733/AM19/ :07/24/040/00298/AM18/ 25.01.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: Recommended Sl. ITCHS Sl. ITCHS Export Item Import Item Norms No. Code No.

se as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: Recommended Sl. ITCHS Sl. ITCHS Export Item Import Item Norms No. Code No. Code Aircraft Parts:Base- 10 Relevant "15-5 PH 2945 Kg inclusive 7711151-1 ( Per unit 1 88039000 1 72221919 AMS 5659 1.5"" X of 481% wastage weight is 0.676 Kg) 2.72"" X 7.76"" after 15% recovery Aircraft Parts: Cover Plate-7M3V079-1 Relevant "15-5 PH 77 Kg inclusive of 2 88039000 ( Per unit weight is 2 72221919 AMS 5659 0.75"" X 716% wastage after 0.035 Kg) 1.75"" X 15"" 15% recovery Note: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 is 0.676 Kg. 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 is 0.035 Kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

5 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

Kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

5 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:394/15/80- Party Name: TRIVENI HI- Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECH PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113046 Deferred :01/80/050/00736/AM19/ :07/24/040/00368/AM18/ 04.04.2018 11 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 20.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:121/15/80-	Party Name: ZTT INDIA	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PRIVATE LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00463/AM19/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00009/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0410164238<br>23.04.2018	Deferred

12 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MeitY was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm.

Case is deferred.

as sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:122/15/80-	Party Name: SMC	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PNEUMATICS (INDIA)	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00464/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00047/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510406269<br>27.04.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:29/8/80- Party Name: SAIRA ASIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INTERIORS PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410044210 Approved :01/80/050/00152/AM19/ :34/21/040/00102/AM19/ 07.06.2018 14 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: 1. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2, 11, 12, 21, 22, 31, 32, 41, 42, 51, 52, 61 & 62 may be allowed as 1.05 Meter/Meter of export product . 2. Quantity of import items at Sl. No.

r: 1. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2, 11, 12, 21, 22, 31, 32, 41, 42, 51, 52, 61 & 62 may be allowed as 1.05 Meter/Meter of export product . 2. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 3 to 6, 13 to 17, 23 to 27, 33 to 37, 43 to 47, 53 to 56 & 63 ----- End of picture text -----

6 | P a g e

to 65 may be allowed as per GN-4.

Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 7, 8, 10, 18, 20, 28, 30, 38, 40, 48, 50, 57, 58, 60, 66, 67 to 69 may be allowed on net to net basis .

4. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 9, 19, 29, 39, 49, 59 & 68 may be allowed upto 2% of FoB.

Case No.:49/8/80- Party Name: UNI VTL Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRECISION PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6510000016 Approved :01/80/050/00172/AM19/ :65/24/040/00002/AM19/ 12.06.2018

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under:

==> picture [444 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Norms Export Item Import Item Code Code HY 40 Semi-Finished Shroud Billets (16000 Plates (112000 Numbers) ( Per Numbers), 131 94912 Kg inclusive of 84099990 73261990 unit weight = 206 gram) mm diameter x 311% wastage 86.5mm long ----- End of picture text -----

Note: Per unit weight of export item is 206 gram.

ve of 84099990 73261990 unit weight = 206 gram) mm diameter x 311% wastage 86.5mm long ----- End of picture text -----

Note: Per unit weight of export item is 206 gram.

Case No.:134/15/80- Party Name: FUTURE Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECH ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 PVT.LTD, 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113460 Approved :01/80/050/00476/AM19/ :07/24/040/00058/AM19/ 20.06.2018

==> picture [470 x 164] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: 16 ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Norms Export Item Import Item Code Code Aircraft Parts:Hinge- Hardware AL 2024- 917C10012-1 T351 MS20001H12- 616.50 Kg inclusive of 88039000 76161000 7200 72 Aluminum 14% wastage ( Per unit weight = 0.18 Kg) Hinge" Note: Per unit weight of export item is 0.18 Kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under:

7 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

ee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under:

7 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:278/15/80- Party Name: FITCH Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 METALS ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 INDIA PVT. LTD 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310822068 Approved 17 :01/80/050/00620/AM19/ :03/94/040/00262/AM19/ 02.07.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms under GN-4 with accountability clause on the recommendation of representative of DHI . RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:15/8/80- Party Name: SEBROS Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510407110 Approved :01/80/050/00138/AM19/ :05/24/040/00185/AM19/ 06.07.2018

==> picture [470 x 198] intentionally omitted <==

TRIES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510407110 Approved :01/80/050/00138/AM19/ :05/24/040/00185/AM19/ 06.07.2018

==> picture [470 x 198] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: Recommended ITCHS ITCHS 18 Code Export Item Code Import Item Norms Other Parts and accessories of the Relevant Stainless Motor Vehicles of Heading 8701 to Steel Seamless Pipes/ 58930 Kg 8705 of STAINLESS STEEL Tube Grade- AISI inclusive of 41% 87089900 SEAMLESS pipes/tubes, Tube- 73041110 304, OD 77(+/- wastage after Valve Bore, Part # E1140032022A0 0.3mm), ID 69(+/- affecting 20% [Net wt. of Tubes 41815.24 kgs, 0.3mm), Length- 5- recovery @430gm per Pc] 6M Note: The word “Relevant” may be added in the description of import item. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under:

==> picture [476 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

ion:** The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under:

==> picture [476 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SMC Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PNEUMATICS (INDIA) ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510407270 Deferred :01/80/050/00082/AM20/ :05/24/040/00233/AM19/ 23.07.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and Consultant (Tech-3) informed 19 that the firm’s replies dated 02.08.2019 & 13.09.2019 are deficient. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per advice of Consultant (Tech-3): 1. To provide dimensions of components to be manufactured from imported raw material at 48 to 52 in the sketch/drawing. 2. To submit drawing with all dimensions. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

8 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 292] intentionally omitted <==

sketch/drawing. 2. To submit drawing with all dimensions. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

8 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 292] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/10/80-ALC2/2018 Party Name: BHARAT Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: HEAVY ELECTRICALS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410164525 Approved :01/80/050/00190/AM19/ :04/24/040/00061/AM19/ 24.07.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on the recommendation of the representative of DHI as under: 1. Piping system for 2x660 MW Dhaka TPS project, total weight of the export product is 11,708 MT and the same may be incorporated in the license. 20 2. Quantity of import items ( Relevant steel pipes and tubes ) at Sl. No. 1 to 3 may be allowed as 1.02 Kgs/Kg content in the export product taking cue from SION C-1647 . 3. Quantity of import item ( Fittings components ) at Sl. No. 4 may be allowed under GN-4 with accountability clause. 4. Quantity of import item ( Welding consumables ) at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as per SION C- 1647. 5. Quantity of import items ( Components ) at Sl. No. 6 to 9 may be allowed under GN-4 with accountability clause. 6. Import items at Sl. No. 10 to 15 may be deleted as the firm has not given specific use as asked. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

10 to 15 may be deleted as the firm has not given specific use as asked. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 306] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:291/15/80- Party Name: MAINI Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRECISION PRODUCTS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113804 Approved :01/80/050/00633/AM19/ :07/24/040/00140/AM19/ 03.09.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: Export Product: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 may be mentioned as 0.017 Kg. 21 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 may be mentioned as 0.60Kg. 3. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 3 may be mentioned as 0.022 Kg. Import Products: 1. Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 3060 Kg inclusive of 80% wastage after 20% recovery. 2. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed on net to net basis (Weight of each import item is 0.855 Kg). 3. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 4760 Kg inclusive of 116% wastage after 20% recovery. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

9 | P a g e

60 Kg inclusive of 116% wastage after 20% recovery. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

9 | P a g e

Case No.:3/12/80-ALC2/2018	Party Name: BIRLA	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	PRECISION	ALC2/2019
	TECHNOLOGIES LTD.	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00276/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00599/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310824314<br>09.10.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to call the firm for personal hearing to explain the case before Norms Committee as per advice of representative of MSME due to incomplete reply of the party.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:4/12/80-ALC2/2018	Party Name: BIRLA	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	PRECISION	ALC2/2019
	TECHNOLOGIES LTD.	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00277/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00600/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310824317<br>09.10.2018	Deferred

Case is deferred.

cided to call the firm for personal hearing to explain the case before Norms Committee as per advice of representative of MSME due to incomplete reply of the party.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:5/12/80-ALC2/2018	Party Name: BIRLA	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	PRECISION	ALC2/2019
	TECHNOLOGIES LTD.	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00278/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00598/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310824375<br>11.10.2018	Deferred

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/12/80- Party Name: BIRLA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRECISION ALC2/2019 TECHNOLOGIES LTD., 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310824374 Deferred :01/80/050/00285/AM19/ :03/94/040/00597/AM19/ 11.10.2018 25 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to call the firm for personal hearing to explain the case before Norms Committee as per advice of representative of MSME due to incomplete reply of the party. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

10 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

sentative of MSME due to incomplete reply of the party. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

10 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:22/12/80- Party Name: CPS OIL & GAS Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310824383 Deferred :01/80/050/00295/AM19/ :03/94/040/00630/AM19/ 11.10.2018 26 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Mumbai and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Mumbai on 09.05.2019 followed by reminders on 07.06.2019, 24.07.2019 & 05.09.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

ed to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/12/80-ALC2/2018 Party Name: JAICO Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ENTERPRISE LLP ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310824420 Deferred :01/80/050/00274/AM19/ :03/94/040/00612/AM19/ 12.10.2018 27 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Mumbai and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Mumbai on 09.05.2019 followed by reminders on 07.06.2019, 24.07.2019 & 05.09.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:23/12/80-	Party Name: GENERAL	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	INSTRUMENTS	ALC2/2019
	CONSORTIUM SOLE	04.12.2019
	PROP.KULKARNI
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00296/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00640/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310824478<br>16.10.2018	Deferred

UMENTS||ALC2/2019||| |||CONSORTIUM SOLE||04.12.2019||| |||PROP.KULKARNI||||| |HQ File :01/80/050/00296/AM19/||RLA File :03/94/040/00640/AM19/||Lic.No/Date:0310824478 16.10.2018||Deferred|

28 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Mumbai and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Mumbai on 09.05.2019 followed by reminders on 24.07.2019 & 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

11 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 289] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:241/15/80- Party Name: MAINI PRECISION Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRODUCTS LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710114051 Approved :01/80/050/00583/AM19/ :07/24/040/00184/AM19/ 25.10.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: Export Product: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 may be mentioned as 1.755 Kg. 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 may be mentioned as 0.0004 Kg. 29 3. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 3 may be mentioned as 0.009 Kg. 4. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 4 may be mentioned as 0.005 Kg. 5. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No.

r unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 3 may be mentioned as 0.009 Kg. 4. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 4 may be mentioned as 0.005 Kg. 5. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 5 may be mentioned as 0.04 Kg. 6. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 6 may be mentioned as 0.047 Kg. Import Products: 1. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed on net to net basis with per unit weight of import item as 2.735 Kg. 2. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 2, 3 & 4 may be allowed under GN-4. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 1.80 Kgs/Kg content of the export product. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 1.86 Kgs/Kg content of the export product. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/12/80- Party Name: MINDA SILCA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING PVT LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510408370 Deferred :01/80/050/00293/AM19/ :05/24/040/00433/AM19/ 12.11.2018 30 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 22.05.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 25.07.2019 & 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet.

and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 22.05.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 25.07.2019 & 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:267/15/80- Party Name: LARSEN & Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TOUBRO LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310825583 Deferred :01/80/050/00609/AM19/ :03/95/040/00583/AM19/ 11.12.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 31 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Mumbai and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Mumbai on 29.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

12 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

12 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:268/15/80- Party Name: LARSEN & Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TOUBRO LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310825584 Deferred :01/80/050/00610/AM19/ :03/95/040/00579/AM19/ 11.12.2018 32 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 29.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 160] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:269/15/80- Party Name: LARSEN & Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TOUBRO LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310825585 Deferred :01/80/050/00611/AM19/ :03/95/040/00585/AM19/ 11.12.2018 33 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 04.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the firm to furnish the requisite information. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

er, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind the firm to furnish the requisite information. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 159] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:276/15/80- Party Name: BIRLA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 FURUKAWA FIBRE ALC2/2019 OPTICS LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310825749 Deferred :01/80/050/00618/AM19/ :03/94/040/00758/AM19/ 18.12.2018 34 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MeitY was sent to the firm on 27.09.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:14/6/80- Party Name: IND-SPHINX Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PRECISION LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:2210016034 Deferred :01/80/050/00085/AM20/ :22/24/040/00069/AM19/ 18.12.2018 35 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME : 1. To provide detailed size of the export item. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME : 1. To provide detailed size of the export item. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

13 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/14/80- Party Name: ULTRA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERS ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067260 Deferred :01/80/050/00336/AM19/ :31/83/040/00150/AM19/ 19.12.2018 36 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on 24.07.2019 for examination. However, the representative of DHI has informed that the case is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 471] intentionally omitted <==

r>is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 471] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:285/15/80- Party Name: MAINI Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRECISION PRODUCTS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710114362 Approved :01/80/050/00627/AM19/ :07/24/040/00237/AM19/ 02.01.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: Export Product: 1. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 1 may be mentioned as 0.50 Kg. 2. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 2 may be mentioned as 0.56 Kg. 3. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 3 may be mentioned as 1.10 Kg. 4. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 4 may be mentioned as 1.20 Kg. 5. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 5 may be mentioned as 0.449 Kg. 6. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 6 may be mentioned as 0.274 Kg. 7. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 7 may be mentioned as 0.483 Kg. 37 8. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 8 may be mentioned as 0.375 Kg. 9. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 9 may be mentioned as 0.16 Kg. 10. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 10 may be mentioned as 0.218 Kg. Import Products: 1. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No.

item at Sl. No. 9 may be mentioned as 0.16 Kg. 10. Per unit weight of export item at Sl. No. 10 may be mentioned as 0.218 Kg. Import Products: 1. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 218 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 3.36 Kg. 2. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 214 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 3.36 Kg. 3. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 218 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 10.975 Kg. 4. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 4 may be allowed as 218 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 10.87 Kg. 5. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 405 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 3.45 Kg. 6. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 405 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 0.95 Kg. 7. Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 7 may be allowed as 405 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 4.43 Kg. ----- End of picture text -----

14 | P a g e

Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 8 may be allowed as 405 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 1.94 Kg.
Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 9 may be allowed as 450 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 0.61 Kg.
Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 10 may be allowed as 384 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 1.14 Kg.

450 numbers** with per unit weight of import item as 0.61 Kg.

Quantity of relevant import item at Sl. No. 10 may be allowed as 384 numbers with per unit weight of import item as 1.14 Kg.

Case No.:7/14/80-ALC2/2018	Party Name: ROTZLER	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	SERVICES PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00323/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00236/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0710114403<br>16.01.2019	Deferred

38 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 18.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of MSME has informed that the case is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:313/15/80-	Party Name: OMEGA	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ICEHILL PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00655/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00627/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510409545<br>31.01.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 160] intentionally omitted <==

e firm on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 160] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:15/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: BHARAT Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: HEAVY ELECTRICALS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1110028485 Deferred :01/80/050/00086/AM20/ :11/24/040/00024/AM19/ 04.02.2019 40 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

15 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 158] intentionally omitted <==

ce, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

15 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 158] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:310/15/80- Party Name: TERUMO Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PENPOL PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:5310019913 Deferred :01/80/050/00652/AM19/ :53/24/040/00013/AM19/ 05.02.2019 41 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-1) was sent to the firm on 21.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: APAR Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: INDUSTRIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310827307 Deferred :01/80/050/00754/AM19/ :03/94/040/00999/AM19/ 26.02.2019 42 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MeitY for examination of the case on 13.06.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 23.08.2019 & 29.11.2019. However, comments have been received yet.

d noted that a copy of application was sent to MeitY for examination of the case on 13.06.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 23.08.2019 & 29.11.2019. However, comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:8/1/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: DAGGER	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	MASTER TOOL	ALC2/2019
	INDUSTRIES LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00756/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/01048/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310827404<br>01.03.2019	Deferred

43 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 22.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.10.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:50/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SAIRA ASIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: INTERIORS PVT LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410044963 Approved 44 :01/80/050/00798/AM19/ :34/24/040/00376/AM19/ 08.03.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: 1. Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4, 11 to 13, 20 to 24, 30 to 34, 40 to 43, 50 to 54 & 60 ----- End of picture text -----

16 | P a g e

to 64 may be allowed under GN-4.

Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 5, 6, 14, 15, 25, 26, 35, 36, 44, 45, 55, 56 & 65 to 66 may be allowed as 1.05 Meter/Meter content in the export product .
Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 7 to 9, 16 to 18, 27, 28, 37, 38, 46 to 48, 57, 58, 67 & 68 may be allowed on net to net basis .
Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed upto 2% of FoB value.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

o 48, 57, 58, 67 & 68 may be allowed on net to net basis .

Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed upto 2% of FoB value.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:44/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: COFLE Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: TAYLOR INDIA CONTROL ALC2/2019 CABLES & SYSTEMS 04.12.2019 PRIVAT HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165321 Deferred :01/80/050/00792/AM19/ :04/24/040/00266/AM19/ 14.03.2019 45 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 17.05.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 22.07.2019 & 05.11.2019. However, the representative of MSME has informed that the case is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

s under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/2/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: AUTO PVT. LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410085 Deferred :01/80/050/00805/AM19/ :05/24/040/00738/AM19/ 28.03.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 46 furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME : 1. Wastage justification and step wise wastage along with process to be provided. 2. Blank size and weight to be provided. 3. Drawing to be provided. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:3/2/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AUTOCOMP	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	CORPORATION PANSE	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00003/AM20/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00298/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:3110067366<br>02.04.2019	Deferred

47 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on 22.07.2019 for examination. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination as no comments are being furnished by DHI.

Case is deferred.

17 | P a g e

was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination as no comments are being furnished by DHI.

Case is deferred.

17 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 127] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/4/80-ALC2/2019 [Party Name: STERLITE POWER ] Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: TRANSMISSION LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828571 Deferred :01/80/050/00016/AM20/ :03/95/040/00051/AM20/ 24.04.2019 48 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MeitY on 31.10.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MeitY for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

herefore, the Committee decided to remind MeitY for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SULZER INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067390 Deferred :01/80/050/00017/AM20/ :31/83/040/00009/AM20/ 24.04.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter 49 seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 22.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.10.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

quisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SULZER INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED. ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067391 Deferred :01/80/050/00018/AM20/ :31/83/040/00010/AM20/ 24.04.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter 50 seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 22.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.10.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

quisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SULZER INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED. ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067392 Deferred :01/80/050/00019/AM20/ :31/83/040/00011/AM20/ 24.04.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter 51 seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 23.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.10.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

18 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

18 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410376 Deferred :01/80/050/00020/AM20/ :05/24/040/00033/AM20/ 25.04.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 52 furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME : 1. Wastage justification and step wise wastage along with process to be provided. 2. Blank size and weight to be provided. 3. Drawing to be provided. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SHIVALIK Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410395 Deferred :01/80/050/00022/AM20/ :05/24/040/00016/AM20/ 26.04.2019 53 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.06.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 22.07.2019 & 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet.

ted that the copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.06.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 22.07.2019 & 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ERBATECH Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: MACHINERY P LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3210078932 Deferred :01/80/050/00024/AM20/ :32/24/040/00004/AM20/ 29.04.2019 54 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Coimbatore and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Coimbatore on 23.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

19 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

19 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: FREEDOM Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: OPTHALMIC PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165526 Deferred :01/80/050/00027/AM20/ :04/24/040/00018/AM20/ 30.04.2019 55 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-1) was sent to the firm on 21.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 159] intentionally omitted <==

uisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 159] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SRI RAM Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: INDUSTRIES ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165532 Deferred :01/80/050/00028/AM20/ :04/24/040/00157/AM19/ 01.05.2019 56 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 145] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:14/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: KINECO Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: KAMAN COMPOSITES - ALC2/2019 INDIA PVT LTD 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828702 Deferred :01/80/050/00029/AM20/ :03/94/040/01131/AM19/ 01.05.2019 57 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MeitY on 03.12.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

9 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:17/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SAIRA ASIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: INTERIORS PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045102 Approved 58 :01/80/050/00032/AM20/ :34/24/040/00035/AM20/ 01.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by MSME as under: 1. Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 1 to 5, 11 to 15, 21 to 24, 31 to 34, 41 to 45 & 51 ----- End of picture text -----

20 | P a g e

to 55 may be allowed under GN-4.

Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 6, 7, 16, 17, 25, 26, 35, 36, 46, 47, 56 & 57 may be allowed as 1.05 Meter/Meter content in the export product .
Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 8, 9, 18, 19, 27 to 29, 37 to 39, 48, 49, 58 & 59 may be allowed on net to net basis .

4. Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 & 60 may be allowed upto 2% of FoB value.

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

et to net basis** .

4. Quantity of relevant import items at Sl. No. 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 & 60 may be allowed upto 2% of FoB value.

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:15/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: CHIRAG Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: UDYOG ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410451 Deferred :01/80/050/00030/AM20/ :05/23/040/00054/AM20/ 02.05.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ask the firm for the following information on the advice of Consultant (Tech-3):

Specific items of export with quantity in number & weight.
Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

59 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

ted. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
Sheet layout diagram of the material indicating the wastage during blanking.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:16/4/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: BLISS ANAND	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00031/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00051/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510410480<br>03.05.2019	Deferred

60 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 03.06.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 22.07.2019 & 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

21 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

21 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/4/80- Party Name: MASU Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 BRAKE PADS PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410488 Deferred :01/80/050/00036/AM20/ :05/24/040/00057/AM20/ 06.05.2019 61 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that firm’s reply was sent to Consultant (Tech 1) on 03.12.2019. However, in the meeting Consultant (Tech 1) informed that the case is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 214] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/4/80- Party Name: MAGNETI Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MARELLI TALBROS ALC2/2019 CHASSIS SYSTEMS 04.12.2019 PRIVATE LI HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410509 Approved :01/80/050/00035/AM20/ :05/24/040/00053/AM20/ 07.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms on the recommendation of representative of DHI as under: 62 ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Norms Export Item Import Item Code Code REAR TOE LINK J9D3-5K896-AA RP14- As per GN-4 with 87088000 [AUTO PARTS] 87088099 X590 SUSPENSION BUSH accoun

r>ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Norms Export Item Import Item Code Code REAR TOE LINK J9D3-5K896-AA RP14- As per GN-4 with 87088000 [AUTO PARTS] 87088099 X590 SUSPENSION BUSH accountability clause RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:19/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410518 Deferred :01/80/050/00034/AM20/ :05/24/040/00762/AM19/ 08.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 63 furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME : 1. Wastage justification and step wise wastage along with process to be provided. 2. Blank size and weight to be provided. 3. Drawing to be provided. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

22 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 305] intentionally omitted <==

ze and weight to be provided. 3. Drawing to be provided. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

22 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 305] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:18/4/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DILIGENT SCM Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: SOLUTIONS PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067492 Deferred :01/80/050/00033/AM20/ :09/24/040/00058/AM20/ 10.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME : 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 64 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4.

==> picture [476 x 145] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:26/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ROTHE ERDE Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067430 Approved :01/80/050/00064/AM20/ :31/83/040/00035/AM20/ 28.05.2019 65 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the ad-hoc norms as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/25/2019-TSW dated 13.11.2019. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 159] intentionally omitted <==

(Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 159] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:28/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SHIRODKAR Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRECI COMP PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067433 Deferred :01/80/050/00066/AM20/ :31/83/040/00028/AM20/ 29.05.2019 66 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

23 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 145] intentionally omitted <==

ce, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

23 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 145] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:29/5/80-ALC2/2019 [Party Name: SHIRODKAR ] Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRECI COMP PVT LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067434 Deferred :01/80/050/00067/AM20/ :31/83/040/00027/AM20/ 29.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter 67 seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 152] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:30/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TIAGO CHEM Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045178 Deferred :01/80/050/00068/AM20/ :34/24/040/00075/AM20/ 30.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 68 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Vadodara and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Vadodara on 26.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far.

the firm & RA, Vadodara and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Vadodara on 26.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:32/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: FUTURE TECH Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710115000 Deferred :01/80/050/00070/AM20/ :07/24/040/00050/AM20/ 31.05.2019 69 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 13.08.2019 followed by reminder on 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

e been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:33/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: GRAND PRIX Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ENGINEERING PVT.LTD. ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410791 Deferred :01/80/050/00071/AM20/ :05/23/040/00096/AM20/ 03.06.2019 70 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 03.07.2019 followed by an I.D. Reminder on 23.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind MSME . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

24 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/6/80- Party Name: SHIVALIK Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 BIMETAL CONTROLS LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410810 Deferred :01/80/050/00072/AM20/ :05/24/040/00129/AM20/ 04.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hardcopy of 71 application as received from RA, New Delhi on 11.06.2019 was incomplete and in this regard, a letter for hardcopy was sent to the firm & RA, New Delhi on 24.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 26.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far.

incomplete and in this regard, a letter for hardcopy was sent to the firm & RA, New Delhi on 24.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 26.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/6/80- Party Name: LAXMI DENTAL Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 EXPORT PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829403 Deferred :01/80/050/00073/AM20/ :03/95/040/00207/AM20/ 04.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 72 furnish following information as per the advice of representative of Consultant (Tech 1): 1. To provide details of exact size and weight of both import and export items. 2. To provide details of percentage wastage claimed, if any, with justification. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:4/6/80-		Party Name: MAGNA		Meet No/Date:16/80-		Status:
ALC2/2019		AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PVT LTD		ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00075/AM20/		RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00049/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:0410165680<br>06.06.2019		Deferred

---|---| |ALC2/2019||AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PVT LTD||ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019||| |HQ File :01/80/050/00075/AM20/||RLA File :04/24/040/00049/AM20/||Lic.No/Date:0410165680 06.06.2019||Deferred|

73 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 30.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/6/80- Party Name: ERBATECH Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MACHINERY PVT LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3210078986 Deferred :01/80/050/00076/AM20/ :32/24/040/00017/AM20/ 06.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter 74 seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 22.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 04.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind again the firm for furnishing the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

25 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 419] intentionally omitted <==

within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

25 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 419] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:8/6/80- Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MOTORS INDIA P LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045192 Approved :01/80/050/00079/AM20/ :34/24/040/00071/AM20/ 06.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on the recommendation of representative of MSME as under : ITCHS Sl. ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code No. Code Norms 1 40169350 Washer Part No. 6290286 As per GN-4 1.05 Kgs/Kg Granulate Hostacom G3 N01 2 39021000 content in the (Polypropylene) Part No. 25038 export product 1.05 Kgs/Kg Granulate Santoprene 201-55 3 39021000 content in the 75 (Polypropylene) Part No. 25019 export product Bearing Support Complete Part No. As per GN 4 39269099 6290378 Synchronous Drain Pump 5 40169390 Rubber Damper Part No. 1320357 As per GN 84137099 DPS25-375 Cam With Shaft Eb25 Part No. As per GN 6 84139190 Part No. 4800334 612000375 Rotor (Magnet) Eb25 Part No. As per GN 7 84139190 6406913 Granulate Latamid 6.6H2G25- 1.05 Kgs/Kg 8 39021000 V0CT1 (Polypropylene) Part No.

84139190 Part No. 4800334 612000375 Rotor (Magnet) Eb25 Part No. As per GN 7 84139190 6406913 Granulate Latamid 6.6H2G25- 1.05 Kgs/Kg 8 39021000 V0CT1 (Polypropylene) Part No. content in the 25029 export product 1.05 Kgs/Kg Enamelled Copper Wire Part No. 9 74081990 content in the 21183 export product 10 39269099 Tab Terminal Part No. 6540117 As per GN-4 RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TEMA INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829486 Deferred :01/80/050/00077/AM20/ :03/95/040/00221/AM20/ 07.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 76 furnish the following information as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011/313/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 : 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of ----- End of picture text -----

26 | P a g e

eight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of ----- End of picture text -----

26 | P a g e

other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.

Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
Particulars of the licenses obtained in the past and ratified by ALC (with or without modification) for the same export product covered under this application, in view of Public Notice No. 48 dated 14.11.2002.
Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 (Forgings) in Nos. in addition to their weights.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 356] intentionally omitted <==

o. 48 dated 14.11.2002.

Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 4 (Forgings) in Nos. in addition to their weights.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 356] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TEMA INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829488 Deferred :01/80/050/00078/AM20/ :03/95/040/00206/AM20/ 07.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011/313/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 : 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported 77 and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 3.

eight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 4. Particulars of the licenses obtained in the past and ratified by ALC (with or without modification) for the same export product covered under this application, in view of Public Notice No. 48 dated 14.11.2002. 5. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 5 (Forgings) in Nos. in addition to their weights. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

27 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 343] intentionally omitted <==

No. 1 to 5 (Forgings) in Nos. in addition to their weights. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

27 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 343] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TEMA INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829553 Deferred :01/80/050/00081/AM20/ :03/95/040/00229/AM20/ 11.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011/313/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 : 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported 78 and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 3.

eight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 4. Particulars of the licenses obtained in the past and ratified by ALC (with or without modification) for the same export product covered under this application, in view of Public Notice No. 48 dated 14.11.2002. 5. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 3 (Forgings) in Nos. in addition to their weights. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

mport items at Sl. No. 1 to 3 (Forgings) in Nos. in addition to their weights. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: AUTO PVT. LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410880 Deferred :01/80/050/00083/AM20/ :05/24/040/00144/AM20/ 11.06.2019 79 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 31.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 05.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VEELINE Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: MEDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210209240 Deferred :01/80/050/00084/AM20/ :02/24/040/00038/AM20/ 11.06.2019 80 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 14.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

28 | P a g e

comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

28 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 345] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:16/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TEMA INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829596 Deferred :01/80/050/00087/AM20/ :03/95/040/00239/AM20/ 12.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011/313/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 : 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported 81 and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 3.

eight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 3. Starting from the specification of export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification & supported by documentary evidence/drawing etc. 4. Particulars of the licenses obtained in the past and ratified by ALC (with or without modification) for the same export product covered under this application, in view of Public Notice No. 48 dated 14.11.2002. 5. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 4 to 8 (Forgings) and 13 in Nos. in addition to their weights. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:17/6/80-ALC2/2019		Party Name: AVLIGHT		Meet No/Date:16/80-		Status:
		AUTOMOTIVES LTD.		ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00088/AM20/		RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00062/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:0510410932<br>14.06.2019		Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 03.12.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

amination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:18/6/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AVLIGHT Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: AUTOMOTIVES LTD. ALC2/2019 * 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410933 Deferred :01/80/050/00089/AM20/ :05/23/040/00063/AM20/ 14.06.2019 83 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 03.12.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

29 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 410] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/6/80- Party Name: ISGEC Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 HITACHI ZOSEN ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510410946 Deferred :01/80/050/00092/AM20/ :05/23/040/00111/AM20/ 14.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish the following information as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P- 47011/313/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 : 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3.

br>47011/313/2019-TSW dated 25.11.2019 : 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of 84 other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 5. Particulars of the licenses obtained in the past and ratified by ALC (with or without modification) for the same export product covered under this application, in view of Public Notice No. 48 dated 14.11.2002. 6. Quantities of import items at Sl. No. 9, 10, 27 & 28 (Forgings) in Nos. in addition to their weights. 7. Detailed calculations for the quantities of welding materials required for overlay (Sl. No. 18 to 21, 23, 24 & 29) supported by overlay areas and thicknesses. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

e quantities of welding materials required for overlay (Sl. No. 18 to 21, 23, 24 & 29) supported by overlay areas and thicknesses. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/8/80- Party Name: MODEL INFRA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 CORPORATION PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710115134 Deferred :01/80/050/00113/AM20/ :07/24/040/00081/AM20/ 05.07.2019 85 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Bangalore and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Bangalore on 23.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

30 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

30 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: KABY Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRECISION MACHINING ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067755 Deferred :01/80/050/00114/AM20/ :09/24/040/00176/AM20/ 05.07.2019 86 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Hyderabad and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Hyderabad on 23.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 152] intentionally omitted <==

ed to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 152] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/8/80-ALC2/2019 [Party Name: MICRON SPECMA ] Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3310030562 Deferred :01/80/050/00119/AM20/ :33/24/040/00015/AM20/ 08.07.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 87 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Panipat and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Panipat on 23.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 59] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ULTRA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ENGINEERS ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067470 Approved :01/80/050/00115/AM20/ :31/83/040/00058/AM20/ 10.07.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

r>ENGINEERS ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067470 Approved :01/80/050/00115/AM20/ :31/83/040/00058/AM20/ 10.07.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

88 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on 18.09.2019 for examination. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination as no comments are being furnished by DHI.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VALEO INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165826 Deferred :01/80/050/00117/AM20/ :04/24/040/00067/AM20/ 12.07.2019 89 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 05.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

31 | P a g e

==> picture [480 x 160] intentionally omitted <==

ittee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

31 | P a g e

==> picture [480 x 160] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DILIGENT Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: SCM SOLUTIONS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067781 Deferred :01/80/050/00118/AM20/ :09/24/040/00199/AM20/ 12.07.2019 90 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 04.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 19.11.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for reply of the firm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:8/8/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AUTO TECH	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
	INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT.	ALC2/2019
	LTD.,	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00120/AM20/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00068/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0410165827<br>15.07.2019	Deferred

91 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on 06.09.2019 for examination. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination as no comments are being furnished by DHI.

Case is deferred.

owever, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination as no comments are being furnished by DHI.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ANSTECH Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045281 Deferred :01/80/050/00121/AM20/ :34/24/040/00127/AM20/ 15.07.2019 92 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Vadodara and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Vadodara on 23.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 104] intentionally omitted <==

ed to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 104] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ULTRA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ENGINEERS ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 93 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067477 Deferred :01/80/050/00122/AM20/ :31/83/040/00056/AM20/ 17.07.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was referred to DHI on 17.09.2019 for examination. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the ----- End of picture text -----

32 | P a g e

Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination as no comments are being furnished by DHI.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: APAR Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: INDUSTRIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830379 Deferred :01/80/050/00123/AM20/ :03/94/040/00303/AM20/ 17.07.2019 94 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MeitY on 26.11.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

9 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ZOBELE INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830415 Deferred :01/80/050/00124/AM20/ :03/95/040/00352/AM20/ 18.07.2019 95 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Mumbai and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Mumbai on 23.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

d to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/8/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: HORIZON Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: CHUTES PVT LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067480 Deferred :01/80/050/00125/AM20/ :31/83/040/00064/AM20/ 18.07.2019 96 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Pune and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Pune on 23.08.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

33 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

33 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DYNA FORCE Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: HYDRAULICS PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067484 Deferred :01/80/050/00128/AM20/ :31/83/040/00067/AM20/ 25.07.2019 97 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Pune and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Pune on 14.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/10/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: MOTORS INDIA P LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045343 Deferred 98 :01/80/050/00139/AM20/ :34/24/040/00138/AM20/ 06.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination & comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination & comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/10/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DOOWON Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS ALC2/2019 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165942 Deferred :01/80/050/00140/AM20/ :04/24/040/00079/AM20/ 07.08.2019 99 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Chennai and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Chennai on 14.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

ed to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/10/80- Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MOTORS INDIA P LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045361 Deferred 100 :01/80/050/00142/AM20/ :34/24/040/00145/AM20/ 08.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination & comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

34 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/10/80- Party Name: JKS Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File : Lic.No/Date:3210079060 Deferred :01/80/050/00143/AM20/ 32/24/040/00033/AM20/ 08.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 101 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Coimbatore and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Coimbatore on 16.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

on has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/10/80- Party Name: LM WIND POWER Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 BLADES INDIA PVT. LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045365 Deferred :01/80/050/00144/AM20/ :34/24/040/00152/AM20/ 09.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 102 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Vadodara and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Vadodara on 11.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

ed to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/10/80- Party Name: MAINI PRECISION Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PRODUCTS LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710115278 Deferred :01/80/050/00145/AM20/ :07/24/040/00106/AM20/ 13.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per written comments of Consultant (Tech-3): 103 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. To provide clarification for, how the diameter of import item at Sl. No. 3 is 28mm while diameter of export item is shown as 12.80mm. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

104

	Case No.:8/10/80-		Party Name: SHAKTI PUMPS		Meet No/Date:16/80-		Status:
	ALC2/2019		INDIA LIMITED		ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019
	HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00146/AM20/		RLA File<br>:56/24/040/00012/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:5610005668<br>13.08.2019		Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for the examination as per advice of representative of MSME.

Case is deferred.

35 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for the examination as per advice of representative of MSME.

Case is deferred.

35 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/10/80- Party Name: SHAKTI Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PUMPS INDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:5610005671 Deferred 105 :01/80/050/00148/AM20/ :56/24/040/00013/AM20/ 19.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for the examination as per advice of representative of MSME. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/10/80- Party Name: AVLIGHT Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 AUTOMOTIVES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510411553 Deferred :01/80/050/00149/AM20/ :05/23/040/00164/AM20/ 20.08.2019 106 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, New Delhi and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, New Delhi on 11.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

on has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/10/80- Party Name: KINECO Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 KAMAN COMPOSITES - ALC2/2019 INDIA PVT LTD 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310831081 Deferred 107 :01/80/050/00150/AM20/ :03/94/040/00329/AM20/ 20.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for examination & comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

108

Case No.:13/10/80-	Party Name: CAPCO	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	WATER SOLUTIONS	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00151/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00273/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0310831168<br>22.08.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 11.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

36 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 150] intentionally omitted <==

ave been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

36 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 150] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:14/10/80- Party Name: PENGUIN Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PETROLEUM SERVICES ALC2/2019 PVT.LTD, 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310831190 Withdrawn :01/80/050/00152/AM20/ :03/95/040/00505/AM20/ 23.08.2019 109 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was already withdrawn in Meeting No. 14/80 dated 06.11.2019 as RA, Mumbai had informed vide email dated 14.10.2019 that the above AA was issued on repeat basis . Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda. Case is withdrawn. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:15/10/80- Party Name: LM WIND POWER Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 BLADES INDIA PVT. LTD ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045391 Deferred :01/80/050/00153/AM20/ :34/24/040/00164/AM20/ 23.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 110 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Vadodara and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Vadodara on 11.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019.

br>110 application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Vadodara and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Vadodara on 11.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:16/10/80- Party Name: LARSEN & Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 TOUBRO LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310831221 Deferred :01/80/050/00154/AM20/ :03/95/040/00393/AM20/ 26.08.2019 111 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case has been referred to DHI on 27.11.2019 for examination. However, the representative of DHI informed that export items does not pertain to them. Hence, the Committee decided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination & comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

ided to refer the case to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination & comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:17/10/80- Party Name: MAGNETI Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MARELLI TALBROS ALC2/2019 CHASSIS SYSTEMS 04.12.2019 PRIVATE LI HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510411630 Deferred 112 :01/80/050/00155/AM20/ :05/24/040/00304/AM20/ 26.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 30.10.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

37 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:18/10/80- Party Name: DECON INDIA Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PLASTICS PVT LTD ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067515 Deferred :01/80/050/00156/AM20/ :31/83/040/00079/AM20/ 26.08.2019 113 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Pune and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Pune on 11.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far.

ed from the firm & RA, Pune and in this regard a letter was sent to the firm & RA, Pune on 11.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.11.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:19/10/80-	Party Name: DILIGENT	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	SCM SOLUTIONS	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00157/AM20/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00272/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0910067939<br>27.08.2019	Deferred

114 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 18.09.2019 followed by a reminder on 22.11.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/10/80- Party Name: OSWAL Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PUMPS LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3310030578 Deferred 115 :01/80/050/00158/AM20/ :33/24/040/00017/AM20/ 27.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for the examination as per advice of representative of MSME. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

ed the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for the examination as per advice of representative of MSME. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/10/80- Party Name: AUTO TECH Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. ALC2/2019 LTD., 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410166015 Deferred :01/80/050/00159/AM20/ :04/24/040/00091/AM20/ 28.08.2019 116 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 16.10.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

38 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

mittee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

38 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:22/10/80- Party Name: ISGEC HEAVY Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 ENGINEERING LIMITED ALC2/2019 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510411660 Deferred :01/80/050/00160/AM20/ :05/23/040/00208/AM20/ 28.08.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI: 1. Weight of each Export Product. 2. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported 117 and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 3. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 4.

be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 4. Pipes proposed for import may be given in length. 5. Components like item No. 16 to 28 may be given in number in addition to weight with specific use in the export product. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:1/12/80-		Party Name: AYYAPPA		Meet No/Date:16/80-		Status:
ALC2/2019		CNC PVT LTD		ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00173/AM20/		RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00135/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:0710115448<br>18.09.2019		Deferred

118 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 26.11.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:2/12/80-	Party Name: HEURTEY	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	PETROCHEM INDIA	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00174/AM20/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00185/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3410045459<br>19.09.2019	Deferred

ALC2/2019**||PETROCHEM INDIA||ALC2/2019||| |||PRIVATE LIMITED||04.12.2019||| |HQ File :01/80/050/00174/AM20/||RLA File :34/24/040/00185/AM20/||Lic.No/Date:3410045459 19.09.2019||Deferred|

119 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm and in this regard an email was sent on 29.11.2019. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

39 | P a g e

120

Case No.:3/12/80-	Party Name: FINE PAC	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	STRUCTURES PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00175/AM20/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00088/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3110067537<br>20.09.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 21.10.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

wever, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind DHI for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/12/80- Party Name: FREUDENBERG Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 FILTRATION TECHNOLOGIES ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 INDIA PVT. LTD. HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067543 Deferred :01/80/050/00176/AM20/ :31/83/040/00008/AM20/ 24.09.2019 121 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm and in this regard an email was sent on 29.11.2019. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

ed to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/12/80- Party Name: GODREJ & Meet No/Date:16/80- Status: ALC2/2019 BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., ALC2/2019 & 04.12.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310831805 Deferred :01/80/050/00177/AM20/ :03/94/040/00480/AM20/ 25.09.2019 122 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm and in this regard an email was sent on 29.11.2019. However, no information has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:6/12/80-	Party Name: VICTORA	Meet No/Date:16/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	AUTO PVT. LTD	ALC2/2019
		04.12.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00178/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00338/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510411950<br>25.09.2019	Deferred

port Item** Recommended Norms 84139190 Parts Of Oil Field Equipment *PWR END CASE Q10 MACHD V3 (K.G 36575) Part No- 102183717 72085190 Plates Of Various Sizes A. PLATE 100 X 2000 X 8000 MM (K.G 113040) (Nos 9) B.PLATE 100 X 2000 X 3800 MM (K.G 5966) (Nos 1)S690QL Total K.G= 119006 225% wastage after 20% recovery RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.||||| ||ITCHS Code|Export Item|ITCHS Code|Import Item|Recommended Norms| ||84139190|Parts Of Oil Field Equipment *PWR END CASE Q10 MACHD V3 (K.G 36575) Part No- 102183717|72085190|Plates Of Various Sizes A. PLATE 100 X 2000 X 8000 MM (K.G 113040) (Nos 9) B.PLATE 100 X 2000 X 3800 MM (K.G 5966) (Nos 1)S690QL Total K.G= 119006|225% wastage after 20% recovery| ||RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.|||||

53 | P a g e

Sl. No. 403

Case No. :8/9/80-ALC2/2017<br>Status:
M/s. AUTOCOMP CORPORATION<br>PANSE<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic. No.: 3110066789 dt. 21.06.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/50/186/AM18/DES-I<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 31/83/040/00044/AM18
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
18/80dated 02.01.2018 due to non submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 07.09.2017 followed by final
reminder dated 15.12.2017.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the case was referred toDHIon 07.10.2019 for examination.
However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind DHIfor expediting
the comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 404

	Case No. :66/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Status:	Case No. :66/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Status:	Case No. :66/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Status:	Case No. :66/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Status:	Case No. :66/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Status:
	M/s. ULTRA ENGINEERS<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic. No.: 3110067063 dt. 29.05.2018

	HQ. No.: 01/80/50/115/AM19/DES-I<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>Approved
	norms<br>RLA No.: 31/83/040/00028/AM19
	Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.<br>08/80 dated 14.09.2018 as per written comments ofDHIvide U. O. No.: TSW(B)/4U/3/6956/2018 dated<br>27.07.2018. However, the firm vide letter dated 17.06.2019 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.<br>The Committee reconsidered the case and decided tore-fixthe ad-hoc norms on repeat basis ofAA No.<br>3110066956 dated 05.01.2018on the recommendation of the representative ofDHIas under:<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms<br>84139190<br>Parts Of Oil Field<br>Equipment *PWR END<br>CASE Q10 MACHD V3<br>(K.G 30800) Part No-<br>102183717<br>72085190<br>PLATE 110 X 2500 X 12000 MM<br>(K.G 103620) (Nos 4 ) Total K.G=<br>103620 S690QL<br>225% wastage<br>after 20%<br>recovery<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

LATE 110 X 2500 X 12000 MM (K.G 103620) (Nos 4 ) Total K.G= 103620 S690QL 225% wastage after 20% recovery RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.||||| ||ITCHS Code|Export Item|ITCHS Code|Import Item|Recommended Norms| ||84139190|Parts Of Oil Field Equipment *PWR END CASE Q10 MACHD V3 (K.G 30800) Part No- 102183717|72085190|PLATE 110 X 2500 X 12000 MM (K.G 103620) (Nos 4 ) Total K.G= 103620 S690QL|225% wastage after 20% recovery| ||RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.|||||

Sl. No. 405

Sl. No. 405
Case No. : 18/8/80-ALC2/2018	Status:
M/s. ULTRA ENGINEERS<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
Lic. No.: 3110067111 dt. 12.07.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/50/141/AM19/DES-I<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Approved
norms<br>RLA No.: 31/83/040/00053/AM19
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
14/80 dated 20.02.2019 on the recommendation of representative ofDHI. However, the firm vide letter dated
17.06.2019 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and decided tore-fixthe ad-hoc norms on repeat basis	ofAA No.
3110066956 dated 05.01.2018on the recommendation of the representative ofDHIas under:

54 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms ----- End of picture text -----

[476 x 26] intentionally omitted <==**

----- Start of picture text ----- ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms ----- End of picture text -----

ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms	ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms	ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms	ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms	ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms	ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms
	84139190	Parts Of Oil Field<br>Equipment *PWR END<br>CASE Q10 MACHD V3<br>Part No-102183717 (K.G<br>77000)	72085190	PLATE 100 X 2000 X 10000 MM<br>S690QL (15 NOS )	225% wastage<br>after 20%<br>recovery
	RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 406

==> picture [476 x 487] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. : 12/8/80-ALC2/2018 Status: M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019 M/s. ULTRA ENGINEERS Lic. No.: 3110067088 dated 25.06.2018 HQ. No.: 01/80/50/135/AM19/DES-I Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc Approved RLA No.: 31/83/040/00043/AM19 norms Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 14/80 dated 20.02.2019 on the recommendation of representative of DHI . However, the firm vide letter dated 17.06.2019 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to re-fix the ad-hoc norms on repeat basis of AA No. 3110066956 dated 05.01.2018 on the recommendation of the representative of DHI as under: Sl. ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item No. Import Item Code Code Norms PLATE 100 x 2000 x 8000 225% wastage after 1 72085190 MM ( 1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery PLATE 100 x 2500 x 8000 225% wastage after 2 72085190 MM (1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery PLATE 100 x 2500 x 10000 225% wastage after 3 72085190 MM (1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery PLATE 100 x 2500 x 12000 225% wastage after 4 72085190 MM ( 1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery Parts Of Oil Field PLATE 100 x 2500 x 3000 225% wastage after 5 72085190 Equipment *PWR MM ( 1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery END CASE Q10 PLATE 100 x 2000 x 6000 225% wastage after 6 72085190 84139190 MACHD V3 (K.G MM

3000 225% wastage after 5 72085190 Equipment *PWR MM ( 1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery END CASE Q10 PLATE 100 x 2000 x 6000 225% wastage after 6 72085190 84139190 MACHD V3 (K.G MM (1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery 51975) Part No- PLATE 100 x 2500 x 6000 225% wastage after 7 72085190 102183717 MM ( 2 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery PLATE 100 x 2000 x 5700 225% wastage after 8 72085190 MM (2 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery (Equivalent Euro 26265.56) PLATE 100 x 2000 x 6300 225% wastage after 9 72085190 MM ( 2 NO) S690QL 20% recovery (Equivalent Euro 29030.40) PLATE 100 x 2000 x 10500 225% wastage after 10 72085190 MM (1 NOS) S690QL 20% recovery (Equivalent Euro 24192) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

55 | P a g e

Sl. No. 407

Sl. No. 407
Case No. :9/15/80-ALC2/2017	Status:
GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
Lic. No.: 0310815049 Dated 07.08.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00263/AM18<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 03/94/040/00379/AM18
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
03/80 dated 09.05.2018 on the recommendation ofDPIIT. However, the firm vide letter dated 05.10.2018
requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by
DPIITwas sent to the firm on 07.10.2019 followed by a reminder on 02.12.2019. However, no reply has been
received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 408

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. : 66/3/80-ALC2/2015 Status: M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019 PYRO ELECTRIC INSTRUMENTS Lic. No.: 1710006020 Dated 08.01.2015 GOA PVT. LTD. HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00066/AM16 Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc Approved RLA No.: 17/24/040/00178/AM15 norms Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 12/80 dated 15.09.2015 as per comments given by DIPP I. D. Note No.: 12/103/2015-TSW/58 dated 15.09.2015. However, the firm vide letter dated 08.05.2018 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.

12/80 dated 15.09.2015 as per comments given by DIPP I. D. Note No.: 12/103/2015-TSW/58 dated 15.09.2015. However, the firm vide letter dated 08.05.2018 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to omit the condition “to suffix the length of export items at Sl. No. 1 to 8” as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: 7/84/2019-TS dated 13.11.2019 with the following conditions: 1. The length of items exported at Sl. No. 1 to 5 was 372.50 mm, to be verified by RA. 2. The length of items exported at Sl. No. 6 & 7 was 472.50 mm, to be verified by RA. 3. The length of item exported at Sl. No. 8 was 422.50 mm, to be verified by RA.

372.50 mm, to be verified by RA. 2. The length of items exported at Sl. No. 6 & 7 was 472.50 mm, to be verified by RA. 3. The length of item exported at Sl. No. 8 was 422.50 mm, to be verified by RA. Note: Rest of the decisions will remain unchanged as approved in Meeting No. 12/80 dated 15.09.2015. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 409

Case No. :35/20/80-ALC2/2017<br>Status:
TINITA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic. No.: 0310818442 Dated 11.01.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00399/AM18<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred
RLA No.: 03/95/040/00851/AM18
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
05/80 dated 06.06.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 15.01.2019 followed by final
reminder 02.05.2019. However, the firm furnished the reply vide email dated 25.07.2019 with a request to fix the
ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toDPIITfor
examination of the case as per advice of representative of MSME.
Case is deferred.

56 | P a g e

Sl. No. 410

CaseNo. : 21/20/80-ALC2/2015<br>Status:
M/s SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic.No.: 5610004687Date:18.09.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00398/AM16<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-<br>Deferred
hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 56/24/040/00027/AM16
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in M.
No.9/80-ALC2/2016 dated02.08.2016 as per the written comments of DIPP vide ID
No.12/64/2016/TSW/38 dated 02.08.2016. However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc
norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDPIIT
on 07.10.2019 for examination of the case. The representative ofDPIITagain requested for the
complete set of firm’s representation. Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the complete set of
firm’s representation toDPIIT.
Caseis deferred.

Sl. No. 411

Sl. No. 411
Case No. :6/13/80-ALC2/2017		M/s BOMBARDIER	Status:
M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019		TRANSPORTATION INDIA
Lic.No.: 3410042477Date: 30.08.2016		PRIVATE LTD.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00242/AM18		Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-	Deferred
RLA No.: 34/21/040/00306/AM17		hoc norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case as		per the agenda noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No.16/80-ALC2/2017 dated 14.11.2017as per written comments of DHI I.D No. TSWB
3/80/2017 dated 29.11.2017. However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted	that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as
raised byDHIwas sent to the firm on 02.11.2019.		However, no reply has been received yet. Therefore,
the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 412

Sl. No. 412
CaseNo. : 64/11/80-ALC2/2018	Status:
M/s IND-SPHINX PRECISION LTD<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic.No.:2210015975Date:13.09.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00255/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.:22/24/040/00048/AM19
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No.13/80-ALC2/2018 dated 22.01.2019on repeat basis as approved for AA No.	2210015101
dated 10.10.2014 on the recommendation of the representative of DHI. However, the firm has requested
for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toMSME
for examination of the case as per advice of representative of DHI.
Caseis deferred.

57 | P a g e

Sl. No. 413

CaseNo. : 52/25/80-ALC2/2016<br>Status:
M/s EXCELLENT HI-CARE<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
PRIVATE LIMITED<br>Lic.No.: 0410162359Date: 07.10.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00621/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 04/24/040/00105/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No.14/80-ALC2/2017 dated 10.10.2017 due to non submission of reply ofdeficiency letter
as raised by DEIT vide letter No. 17 (20)/2017-IPHW dated 15.05.2017, 04.07.2017. However, the firm
has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred to
MeitYfor examination of the case on 09.10.2019 followed by an ID reminder on 02.12.2019. However,
no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 414

Sl. No. 414
CaseNo. : 16/16/80-ALC2/2016	Status:
M/s VEE KAY VIKRAM & CO LLP<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic.No.: 0810136711 Date:11.12.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00391/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 08/24/040/00308/AM16
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No.17/80-ALC2/2017dated 19.12.2017 on the ground that the unit of measurement of
export & import items are different i.e. export items are in number and import items are in Kg. However,
the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation to
Consultant (Tech-1)for examination of the case as per advice of representative of MSME.
Caseis deferred.

Sl. No. 415

CaseNo. : 30/3/80-ALC2/2014<br>Status:
M/s VIJAY TANKS & VESSELS<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
LIMITED<br>Lic.No.: 3410039435Date: 06.03.2014
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00041/AM15<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 34/24/040/00286/AM14
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No.21/80-ALC2/2014 dated 06.01.2015as per written comments of DIPP vide Note No.
12/1/2015-TSW/22 dated 06.01.2015. However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred to
DPIITon 09.10.2019 for examination of the case. The representative ofDPIITagain requested for the
complete set of firm’s representation. Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the complete set of
firm’s representation toDPIIT.
Case is deferred.

58 | P a g e

Sl. No. 416

Case No. :17/19/80-ALC2/2014<br>Status:
M/s IND-SPHINX PRECISION LTD.<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic. No.: 2210015101 Date: 10.10.2014
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00451/AM15<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 22/24/040/00056/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
22/80-ALC2/2015 dated 02.02.2016as per written comments ofMSMEvide ID Note No. 30 (199)/15-ME dated
30.12.2015.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case
and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toMSMEon 18.10.2019 for examination of the case.
However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind MSMEfor
expediting the comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 417

Sl. No. 417
Case No. :8/5/80-ALC2/2017		Status:
M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic. No.: 0510402055 Date: 24.03.2017	M/s OAM SAAI INTERNATIONAL INC.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00069/AM18	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00649/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
17/80-ALC2/2017 dated 19.12.2017on the ground that the export and import item are same.
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case and
noted that the firm’s representation was referred toMSMEon 09.10.2019 for examination of the case. However,
no comments have been received yet. Therefore,	the Committee decided toremind MSMEfor	expediting the
comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 418

	Case No. :25/33/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:	Case No. :25/33/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:	Case No. :25/33/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:	Case No. :25/33/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:	Case No. :25/33/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:	Case No. :25/33/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:
	M/s R. D. ENGINEERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic. No.: 0310596998 Date: 14.10.2010

	HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00581/AM11<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms<br>Approved<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00557/AM11

	Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the norms were ratified the norms by<br>NC in its2/80-ALC2/2011 dated19.04.2011as per written comments of DIPP received vide their U.O. Note No.<br>dated 19.04.2011.<br>However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case<br>and decide to ratify the norms on the advice of representative ofMSME:<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms<br>84198910<br>COLUMNS (TAG NO. 040-C-<br>001 and 042-C-001) MADE<br>OUT OF STEEL PLATE -SA-<br>516-Gr.70.(196.564 MT.)<br>1<br>72259900<br>RelevantSTEEL<br>PLATES.

r>Recommended Norms 84198910 COLUMNS (TAG NO. 040-C- 001 and 042-C-001) MADE OUT OF STEEL PLATE -SA- 516-Gr.70.(196.564 MT.) 1 72259900 RelevantSTEEL PLATES. (SA 516-Gr- 70) (ASSORTED SIZE)34 NOS. 193706 Kg inclusive of 3% wastage after 1/3rd recovery RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.|||||| ||ITCHS Code|Export Item|Sl. No.|ITCHS Code|Import Item|Recommended Norms| ||84198910|COLUMNS (TAG NO. 040-C- 001 and 042-C-001) MADE OUT OF STEEL PLATE -SA- 516-Gr.70.(196.564 MT.)|1|72259900|RelevantSTEEL PLATES. (SA 516-Gr- 70) (ASSORTED SIZE)34 NOS.|193706 Kg inclusive of 3% wastage after 1/3rd recovery| ||RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.||||||

59 | P a g e

Sl. No. 419

CaseNo. : 7/2/80-ALC2/2014<br>Status:
M/s TRANSASIA BIO MEDICALS<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
LTD.<br>Lic.No.: 0310771504 Date:24.02.2014
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00007/AM15<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-<br>Deferred
hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00849/AM14
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No. 20/80-ALC2/2015dated05.01.2016 as per the written comments of DEIT vide U. O. No.:
W-27/17/2014-IPHW dated 08.12.2015.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered
the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toMeitYon 09.10.2019 for examination of
the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind
MeitYfor expediting the comments.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 420

Sl. No. 420
Case No. :19/23/80-ALC2/2015	Status:
M/s STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES<br>M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
LTD.<br>Lic.No.: 0310799243Date: 06.10.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00432/AM16<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00427/AM16
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 15/80-ALC2/2016dated 25.10.2016due to non submission reply of deficiency letter dated
21.06.2016 (raised by DEIT).
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered
the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toMeitYon 07.10.2019 for examination of
the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind
MeitYfor expediting the comments.
Case is deferred.

60 | P a g e

Sl. No. 421

Sl. No. 421	Sl. No. 421
Case No. 56/19/80-ALC2/2017<br>Case No. 18/3/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No. 50/11/80-ALC2/2018<br>
M/s AUTO COMP INDIA PVT. LTD.<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Lic. No. /date: 3110066941 dated 20.12.2017<br>Lic. No. /date: 3110067004 dated 15.03.2018<br>Lic. No. /date: 3110067175 dated 12.09.2018
HQ. No. 01/80/050/00337/AM18<br>HQ. No. 01/80/050/00018/AM19<br>HQ. No .01/80/050/00241/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms in<br>respect of 3 AA issued toM/s AUTO COMP<br>Deferred
INDIA PVT. LTD.,under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol.-<br>I) – reg.<br>RLA No. 31/83/040/00109/AM18<br>RLA No. 31/83/040/00166/AM18<br>RLA No.31/83/040/00090/AM19
Decision:<br>i.)	In respect of Lic. No. /date: 3110066941 Date: 20.12.2017 Rejected<br>The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the norms were rejected the norms by<br>NC in its4/80-ALC2/2018 dated 23.05.2018, 3/80-ALC2/2018 dated 09.05.2018 andas import<br>item description is not clear Advance authorizations allowed onlyfor specific import item.
ii.)	In respect of Lic. No. /date: 3110067004 dated 15.03.2018Approved<br>Committee considered the case as per agenda in its meeting No.3/80-ALC2/2018 dated 09.05.2018<br>and deliberated on the matter in the presence of technical representatives of DHI, DIPP and MSME. It<br>is decided to ratifythe norms
iii.)<br>**In respect of Lic. No.

18 dated 09.05.2018** and deliberated on the matter in the presence of technical representatives of DHI, DIPP and MSME. It is decided to ratifythe norms| |iii.) In respect of Lic. No. /date: 3110067175 dated 12.09.2018 Approved Committee considered the case as per agenda in its meeting No.3/80-ALC2/2018 dated 09.05.2018 and ratified the norms as per the written comments of DHI vide their U. No. No. DES-I/AIPL/HIC-1- 2018-HEI dated 20.12.2018 However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms in respect of above mentioned 3 advance authorizations. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that firm’s representation was forwarded toDHIon 09.10.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind DHIfor expediting the comments. Case is deferred.||

Sl. No. 422

CaseNo. : 13/16/80-ALC2/2017<br>Status:
M/s LARSEN & TOUBRO<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
LIMITED.<br>Lic.No.: 0310815484 Date: 01.09.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00276/AM18/<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-<br>Deferred
hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00052/AM18
Decision:The committee considered the case as per agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No.6/80-ALC2/2018 dated11.07.2018 as the parts of the import items given (unit of
measurement) in sets and each set consist of how many numbers and their composition is not known.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered
the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIon 07.10.2019 for examination of
the case. However, the representative of DHI informed that the firm has not provided the reply of
deficiencies raised by them. Therefore, the Committee decided to ask the firm to furnish the reply of
deficiencies point-wise.
Case is deferred.

61 | P a g e

Sl. No. 423

Sl. No. 423
Case No.13/5/80-ALC2/2017<br>Case No.29/19/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No.8/14/80-ALC2/2018
M/s SENIOR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019<br>Adv. Lic. No. 0510402202 dated 12.04.2017<br>Adv. Lic. No. 0510399661 dated 08.09.2016<br>Adv. Lic. No. 0510409022 dated 20.12.2018	Status:
HQ. No. 01/80/050/00074/AM18<br>HQ. No. 01/80/050/00424/AM17<br>HQ. No. 01/80/050/00324/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms in respect of 3 AA issued toM/s<br>SENIOR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,	Deferred
under Para 4.7 of HBP (Vol.-I) – reg.<br>RLA No. 05/24/040/00012/AM18<br>RLA No. 05/24/040/00288/AM17<br>RLA No. 05/24/040/00435/AM19
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the above three cases were approved by
NC<br>in<br>Meeting<br>No.<br>8/80<br>dated<br>18.07.2017,<br>Meeting<br>No.	22/80<br>dated
31.01.2017 and Meeting No. 06/80 dated 03.07.2019 as per the written comments of DIPP letter	no. 12/54/2017-
TSW/105 dated 18.7.2017, written comments of DIPP vide UO No. 12/6/2017-TSW/56 dated	31.01.2017 and
written comments of DPIIT vide U.O. No.: P-47011/416/2018-TSW dated 03.07.2019 respectively.
However, the firm has requested for re-viewing of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case
and the firm’s representative explained the case before Norms Committee during personal hearing.

However, the firm has requested for re-viewing of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case|| |and the firm’s representative explained the case before Norms Committee during personal hearing. The Committee|| |directed the firm’s representative to furnish the following information certified by CA/CE, as per advice of|| |representative ofDPIIT:|| |1. Net weight of Child parts.|| |2. Net weight of complete assembly.|| |Case is deferred.||

Sl. No. 424

Sl. No. 424
Case No. :24/17/80-ALC2/2014	Status:
M/s GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM<br>M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
INDIA LIMITED.<br>Lic. No.: 0410159425 Date: 16.09.2014
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00396/AM15<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 04/24/040/00154/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No.5/80-ALC2/2016 dated 08.06.2015due to non submission reply of deficiency letter dated
14.11.2014 (raised by DHI).
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered	the case and
noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIfor examination of the case on 21.08.2019
followed by an ID reminder on 18.10.2019. The representative ofDHIagain requested for	the complete
set of firm’s representation. Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the complete	set of firm’s
representation toDHI.
Case is deferred.

62 | P a g e

Sl. No. 425

Sl. No. 425
CaseNo. : 12/7/80-ALC2/2016		Status:
M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019	M/s HONDA TRADING
Lic.No.: 0510398531 Date:17.05.2016	CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00233/AM17	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/23/040/00053/AM17	norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was		rejected in
Meeting No. 11/80 dated 19.08.2017 due to non submission reply of deficiency letter dated		26.04.2017
(raised byDHI).
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered
the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toConsultant (Tech-3)for examination of the
case as per advice of representative of DHI.
Caseis deferred.

Sl. No. 426

Sl. No. 426
CaseNo. : 37/19/80 ALC2/2017		Status:
M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019	M/s GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO.
Lic.No.: 0310815644dated 08.09.2017	LTD.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00318/AM18	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
RLA No.:03/94/040/00432/AM18	norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case	as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No.4/80-ALC2/2018 dated 23.05.2018on the recommendation of technical representatives of
DHI, DIPP and MSME.
However, the firm has requested for	re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee	reconsidered
the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toDPIITfor examination of the case as per
advice of representative ofDHI.
Caseis deferred.

Sl. No. 427

Case No. :17/31/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:
M/s BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS<br>M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
LIMITED<br>Lic.No.: 0910043002 Date: 06.08.2010
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00495/AM11<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 09/24/040/00169/AM11
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 40/80 dated 22.03.2011 due to non submission reply of deficiency letter as raised by DHI.
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms.The Committee considered the case and
noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIon 18.10.2019 for examination of the case.
However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind DHIfor
expediting the comments.
Caseis deferred.

63 | P a g e

Sl. No. 428

CaseNo. : 17/33/80-ALC2/2010<br>Status:
M/s BHARAT HEAVY<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
ELECTRICALS LIMITED<br>Lic.No.: 0910043468 dated 09.09.2010
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00573/AM11<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 09/24/040/00223/AM11
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 2/80 dated 19.04.2011 due to non submission reply of deficiency letter as raised by DHI.
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered
the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIon 18.10.2019 for examination of
the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind
DHIfor expediting the comments.
Caseis deferred.

Sl. No. 429

Sl. No. 429
Case No. :23/9/80ALC2/2012		Status:
M/s BHARAT HEAVY<br>M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
ELECTRICALS LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0910053032 dated 13.06.2012
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00203/AM13<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc		Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 09/24/040/00136/AM13
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was withdrawn
from the meeting owing to non receipt of comments from EPCG Division in Meeting No.		23/80 dated
16.02.2016.
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee		reconsidered
the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIon 18.10.2019 for examination of
the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind
DHIfor expediting the comments.
Caseis deferred.

Sl. No. 430

Case No. :30/33/80-ALC2/2009<br>Status:
M/s BHARAT HEAVY<br>M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
ELECTRICALS LIMITED<br>Lic.No.: 0910039076 dated27.08.2009
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00496/AM10<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.:09/24/040/00184/AM10
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 48/80 dated 02.03.2010 due to non submission reply of the deficiency later as raised by
DHI.
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the
case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIon 07.10.2019 for examination of the
case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided toremind DHI
for expediting the comments.
Caseis deferred.

64 | P a g e

Sl. No. 431

CaseNo. : 23/17/80-ALC2/2014<br>Status:
M/s GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM<br>M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
INDIA LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0410159424 dated 16.09.2014
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00395/AM15<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>Deferred
norms<br>RLA No.: 04/24/040/00155/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 05/80 dated 08.06.2015due to non submission reply of deficiency letter dated 14.11.2014
(raised by DHI).
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered
the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIon 18.10.2019 for examination of
the case. The representative ofDHIagain requested for the complete set of firm’s representation.
Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the complete set of firm’s representation toDHI.
Caseis deferred.

Sl. No. 432

==> picture [476 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. : 1/33/85-ALC3/2008 Status: M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019 M/s BOVING FOURESS LIMITED Lic. No.: 0710061697 dated 15.12.2008 HQ. No.: 01/85/050/00218/AM09 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc Deferred RLA No.: 07/24/040/00524/AM09 norms ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 2/80 dated 13.04.2010 due to non submission reply of deficiency letter as raised by DHI.

However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred to DHI on 02.11.2019 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI again requested for the complete set of firm’s representation. Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the complete set of firm’s representation to DHI .

Sl. No. 433

Case No.2/17/80-ALC2/2017		Status:
M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019	M/s VEM TECHNOLOGIES PVT.
Lic. No.: 0910065045 Date: 15.05.2017	LTD.
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00281/AM18	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc	Deferred
RLA No.: 09/24/040/00055/AM18	norms
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 05/80 dated 06.06.2019 due to non	submission reply of deficiency letter dated 14.01.2019as
raised by DPIIT.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered
the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toConsultant (Tech-3)for examination of the
case as per advice of representative ofDPIIT.
Caseis deferred.

65 | P a g e

Sl. No. 434

==> picture [476 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 47/14/80-ALC2/2014 Status: M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019 M/s ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA Lic. No. /date: 0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 LIMITED HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00368/AM15 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc Deferred RLA No.: 07/24/040/00092/AM15 norms. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: In continuation to Meeting No. 12/80 dated 09.10.2019, the Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 11/80 dated 01.09.2015 due to nonsubmission reply of deficiency letter as raised by DHI. Thereafter, the firm represented against the rejection and requested for a review. The case was again considered and deferred in Meeting no. 11/19 dated 06.12.2018 with following decision: “The Committee noted that a personal hearing was already given to the firm on 06.12.2018. In the personal hearing the firm informed the committee that it has taken various AA’s for supply of 33 rail/tramway coaches. Further, firm stated that it _has taken an additional license for supplementary material required for these very 33 rail/tramway coaches. However, it has an additional export obligation of another 33 rail/tramway coaches in this license. The Committee observed that the given submission is not tenable.

hese very 33 rail/tramway coaches. However, it has an additional export obligation of another 33 rail/tramway coaches in this license. The Committee observed that the given submission is not tenable. The committee decided to seek a detailed report from the concerned RA regarding of all such licenses issued to the firm, admissibility and current status.”_ In response to Norm Committee’s e-mail dated 23.04.2019, Addl. DGFT Bangalore informed that firm has obtained several license, which are pending for the wants of norms and also informed about a letter from ECA-II, DGFT, New Delhi seeking information regarding alleged corrupt practices followed by M/s Alstom Transport India. In this matter, the committee noted that the firm had approach the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) and the matter was taken up vide Meeting No. 17/AM20 held on 27.08.2019. The PRC noted the submissions by the firm as under: _“They have stated that initially, 7 Advance Authorizations were applied for duty free import of inputs required for the manufacture and supply of 33 Metro Train sets to Chennai Metro Rail Limited being a deemed export project. ATIL sought amendment in all 7 Advance Authorizations to include residual items that were required to manufacture the 33 Train sets but the request was rejected citing technical reasons by RA. Thereupon, ATIL was compelled to apply for additional Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 for importing residual inputs that were missed out and not covered under earlier 7 Advance Authorizations.

L was compelled to apply for additional Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 for importing residual inputs that were missed out and not covered under earlier 7 Advance Authorizations. Acquisition of Alstom India limited who was the manufacturer of key sub-assemblies also lead to inclusion of components required for manufacture of sub-assemblies in the captioned Advance Authorization. However, while applying for the said Advance Authorization (8[th] AA), export obligation of 33 Metro Train sets was declared inadvertently, as the system did not allow the applicant to apply for a new license unless the export obligation was declared. In fact, there is no separate EO under the Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 as all imported inputs were used for manufacture of 33 train sets declared under previous 7 Advance licenses. The Advance Authorization No.0710105249 dated 20.06.2014 under which parts required for manufacture of 33 Metro Trains have been imported has been issued after 22 months from the date of earliest Advance Authorization in the clubbing set. Hence, request is to treat the supplies of 33 Train sets to the Metro Project supplied against Advance Authorizations as one and to discharge the EO. “_ The policy relaxation committee vide PRC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 27.08.2019 gave the following decision in the matter:

66 | P a g e

nce Authorizations as one and to discharge the EO. “_ The policy relaxation committee vide PRC Meeting No. 17/AM20 dated 27.08.2019 gave the following decision in the matter:

66 | P a g e

“Decision: The Committee heard the submission made by the firm and discussed the matter at length and decided to relax the conditions as laid down in Para 4.38 (vi), (vii) and (xii) of HBP 2015-20 as amended vide Public Notice No.70/2015-20 dated 30.01.2019 for clubbing of eight Advance Authorizations No.(i)0710090351 dated 21.08.2012, (ii)0710090531 dated 31.08.2012, (iii)0710095554 dated 23.05.2013, (iv)0710096369 dated 02.07.2013, (v)0710096370 dated 02.07.2013, (vi)0710099232 dated 28.10.2013 and (vii)0710101246 dated 10.01.2014 and (viii) 0710105249 dated 20.06.2014. It is subject to verification that amendments request of the firm made in the AAs was rejected by the RA, as claimed by the firm and all inputs imported in the 8 AAs are fully accounted for in the supplies. The other terms and conditions for clubbing shall remain same as per policy/HBP provisions. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting.”

This Committee observed that the PRC has clubbed all the eight authorizations for imports and export purposes. Export obligation of AA No. 0710105249 dt. 20.06.2014 would remain as it is even after clubbing. Hence, the Committee in its Meeting No. 10/80 dated 11.09.2019, asked the firm to furnish following information:

ation of AA No. 0710105249 dt. 20.06.2014 would remain as it is even after clubbing. Hence, the Committee in its Meeting No. 10/80 dated 11.09.2019, asked the firm to furnish following information:

To provide detailed statement to account for the inputs in the export products against this license.
Relevant technical drawings and wastage details may be provided in relevant formats for examination by the technical authorities for the purpose of fixation of norms.

And also sought clarification from the PRC cell on 05.11.2019 regarding the export obligation of the eighth authorization if it would run concurrently with the export obligation of the first seven authorizations.

The Committee noted that the firm’s reply dated 06.11.2019 forwarded to DHI on 02.12.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of DHI asked for details of other cases of the firm which were earlier ratified by NC. Therefore, the Committee decided to send the relevant details of other cases to DHI for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 435

CaseNo. 57/17/80-ALC2/2015
M/s BIRLA FURUKAWA FIBRE<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
OPTICS PRIVATE LIMITED<br>Lic.No.:1710006165Date:27.08.2015
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00361/AM16<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc
norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.:17/24/040/00043/AM16
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 23/80 dated 16.02.2016 due to non submission reply of deficiency letter dated 02.02.2015
as raised by DEIT.
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the
case and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toMeitYfor examination of the case on
09.10.2019 followed by an ID reminder on 02.12.2019. However, no comments have received yet.
Hence, the Committee decided wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

67 | P a g e

Sl. No. 436

Sl. No. 436
CaseNo. 9/27/80-ALC2/2014
M/s KINECO KAMAN<br>M.No.:16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019	Status:
COMPOSITES - INDIA PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 1710006043 Date: 30.01.2015
HQ.No.: 01/80/050/00634/AM15/<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms<br>RLA No.: 17/24/040/00180/AM15/	Approved
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No. 4/80-ALC2/2015 dated23.05.2017 as per the written comments of DIPP vide U. O. No.12
(39)/2017-TSW/4 dated 23.05.2017.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered
the case and decided tore-fixthe ad-hoc norms as per comments of DPIIT vide	U. O. No. P-
47011/193/2019-TSW dated 15.11.2019. (Copy enclosed)
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

Sl. No. 437

CaseNo. 2/23/80-ALC2/2015
M/s KINECO KAMAN<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
COMPOSITES - INDIA PVT. LTD.<br>Lic.No.:1710006173Date: 08.09.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00415/AM16/<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms<br>Approved<br>RLA No.:17/24/040/00044/AM16/
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in
Meeting No. 7/80-ALC2/2015dated04.07.2017 as per the written comments of DIPP vide U.O. No.
7/52/2017-TSW/13 dated 04.7.2017.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered
the case and The Committee considered the case and decided tore-fixthe ad-hoc norms as per
comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No. P-47011/193/2019-TSW dated 15.11.2019. (Copy enclosed)
RAconcernedmaytakefurther necessaryaction as per the decisionof NC.

Sl. No. 438

Sl. No. 438
CaseNo. 1/25/80-ALC2/2015
M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019	M/s UNITED DRILLING TOOLS LTD	Status:
Lic.No.: 0510397442 Date:29.01.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00441/AM16/<br>RLA No.: 05/24/040/00493/AM16/	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc<br>norms	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 05/80 dated 07.06.2016 due to non submission reply of deficiency letter dated		29.03.2016
as raised by DHI.
However, the firm has requested for	fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered
the case and decided to forward the firm’s representation toConsultant (Tech-3)for examination of the
case as per advice of representative of DHI.
Caseis deferred.

68 | P a g e

Sl. No. 439

Case No.19/23/80-ALC2/2016
M/s AZAD ENGINEERING PRIVATE<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0910064137 Date: 14.09.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00522/AM17/<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 09/24/040/00295/AM17/
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting
No. 02/80-ALC2/2017 dated 25.04.2017 on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0910064137 dated 14.09.2016 on
the recommendation of the representative of DHI.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case
and noted that the firm’s representation was referred toDHIon 09.10.2019 for examination of the case. However,
the representative of DHIasked for the annexureof the firm’s reply dated 03.11.2017. Therefore, the Committee
decided to send the annexure to DHI for examination of the case.
Case is deferred.

Sl. No. 440

Case No.1/19/80-ALC2/2017
M/s DAGGER MASTER TOOL<br>Status:<br>M. No.: 16/80-ALC2/2019 dated 04.12.2019
INDUSTRIES LIMITED<br>Lic No.: 0310817719 Date: 12.12.2017
HQ File No.: 01/80/050/00282/AM18/<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA File No.: 03/94/040/00728/AM18
Decision:The Committee conside

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6847 --apply.