IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr B / NC-I) Advance Authorisation 2019-09-25

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

MINUTES OF MEETING NO. 11/80 OF NORMS COMMITTEE- I (DES-I SECTION) DATED 25.09.2019

Meeting No. 11/20 of the Norms Committee (NC-I) for the licensing year 2019-2020 held on 25.09.2019 under the Chairmanship of Sh. R.P. Goyal, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption/Remission Schemes (Chapter-4) of the applicable Foreign Trade Policy and the Handbook of Procedures. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: -

==> picture [428 x 183] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. No. Name of the representatives & their Designation Department 1. Shri S. K. Jain, D. O. DPIIT 2. Shri B. C. Nayak, D. O. DHI 3. Shri K.S. Sodhi, Asst. Director MSME 4. Shri Shaish Kumar, (Tech-1) Consultant 5. Shri V.C. Agarwal, (Tech-3) Consultant 6. Shri K.V. Tirumala, Deputy DGFT DGFT ----- End of picture text -----

Note:

In certain cases the decision of the Norms Committee refers to the Recommendations/ Observations/Deficiencies received from the concerned Technical Authority. Wherever applicable, a scanned copy of such document has been placed at the end of the Minutes, in running serial orders. The scanned copies uploaded are to be accepted. The U.O. No./O.M No of the scanned copy is reflected in the minutes.
Wherever the Committee has fixed norms, the RAs should allow inputs as per wastage norms approved or as applied whichever is less.
All applications/representations/reply to the Deficiency letters etc. may be sent to NC-I at e-mail address- nc1.dgft@nic.in. All firms are also requested to mail/send their present valid email addresses so that correspondences can be made through email/ by Post.
Minutes of Meeting 09/20 dated 14.08.2019 and 09/20 Part 2 (Manual) dated 28.08.2019 were circulated on 05.09.2019 and 11.09.2019, to all the members of the Committee and the comments, there upon received, were incorporated in the Minutes. Hence, the said minutes were unanimously approved and therefore uploaded on dgft.gov.in.

1 | P a g e

MEETING NUMBER: 11/80-ALC2/2019 MEETING DATE : 25.09.2019

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: Party Name: WONJIN Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: 8/9/80-ALC2/2019 AUTOPARTS INDIA PVT ALC2/2019 LTD. 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410144145 Deferred :01/80/050/00133/AM20/ :04/24/040/00271/AM13/ 13.03.2013 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME:

Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished.

Weight of each Export Product.
Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.
Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 306] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:345/15/80- Party Name: SARA SAE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6110001290 Deferred :01/80/050/00687/AM19/ :61/24/040/00008/AM16/ 01.06.2015 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 2 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

2 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 131] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:70/15/80- Party Name: BHARAT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 HEAVY ELECTRICALS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710108519 Deferred 3 :01/80/050/00412/AM19/ :07/24/040/00095/AM16/ 15.07.2015 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MeitY for examination as per the advice of representative of DHI . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:356/15/80-	Party Name: TERUMO	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PENPOL LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00698/AM19/	RLA File<br>:53/24/040/00006/AM16/	Lic.No/Date:5310018513<br>04.08.2015	Withdrawn

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that RA, Trivendrum has updated the spreadsheet showing that the above AA has been issued on repeat basis. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda under intimation to RA, Trivendrum.

Case is withdrawn.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:363/15/80- Party Name: PROMAC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 INDUSTRIES LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710108812 Deferred :01/80/050/00705/AM19/ :07/24/040/00184/AM16/ 05.10.2015 5 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 05.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of DHI informed in meeting that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:364/15/80-	Party Name: PROMAC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING	ALC2/2019
	INDUSTRIES LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00706/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00185/AM16/	Lic.No/Date:0710108813<br>05.10.2015	Deferred

6 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 06.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of DHI informed in meeting that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

3 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710109710 Deferred :01/80/050/00353/AM19/ :07/24/040/00004/AM17/ 26.04.2016 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm vide letter 7 dated 12.08.2019 requested to approve this AA on repeat basis. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee noted that, as the AA was applied under No-norms category of 4.07 of HBP , prior to fixation of ad-hoc norm. Therefore the same cannot be considered on repeat basis. Hence, the Committee decided to refer the case to MSME for examination & comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:19/15/80-	Party Name: AYYAPPA CNC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00361/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00045/AM17/	Lic.No/Date:0710109807<br>12.05.2016	Deferred

8 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 11.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:24/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710109871 Deferred :01/80/050/00366/AM19/ :07/24/040/00038/AM17/ 26.05.2016 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 9 furnish following information as per advice of representative of MSME as under: 1. To provide clarification for, why in the received calculation per unit export weight is given as 96 Kg while total components weight is mentioned as 465 Kg. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:207/15/80- Party Name: SULZER Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PUMPS INDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310806671 Withdrawn :01/80/050/00549/AM19/ :03/95/040/00353/AM17/ 27.07.2016 10 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that RA, Mumbai informed vide letter dated 30.07.2019 that the above AA has been issued on Net to Net basis under GN-4 . Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda under intimation to RA, Mumbai . Case is withdrawn. ----- End of picture text -----

4 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: INTERPUMP Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: HYDRAULICS INDIA PVT. ALC2/2019 LTD. 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410162268 Deferred :01/80/050/00760/AM19/ :04/24/040/00093/AM17/ 09.09.2016 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 11 furnish following information as per advice of representative of MSME as under: 1. To provide clarification for, why in the attached flow chart with application it is stated per unit export weight as 65.84 Kg & 30.12 Kg while in flow chart per unit weight is mentioned as 73.37 Kg & 31.02 Kg. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 306] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:386/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710110861 Deferred :01/80/050/00728/AM19/ :07/24/040/00292/AM17/ 28.12.2016 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 12 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

5 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 382] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:26/23/80- Party Name: MITA INDIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2016 PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510401181 Approved :01/80/050/00529/AM17/ :05/24/040/00489/AM17/ 06.01.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments of MSME as under: Sl. ITCHS Recommended Norms Import Item No. Code SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 1 73049000 FINISHED (38mm x 4mm) 38mm x 4mm the export product SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 2 73049000 FINISHED (38mm x 5mm) 38mm x 5mm the export product 13 SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 3 73049000 FINISHED (42.5mm x 5mm) 42.5mm x 5mm the export product SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 4 73049000 FINISHED (44mm x 5mm) 44mm x 5mm the export product SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 5 73049000 FINISHED (44.5mm x 6.75mm) 44.5mm x 6.75mm the export product SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 6 73049000 FINISHED (48.3mm x 5mm) 48.3mm x 5mm the export product SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 7 73049000 FINISHED (50mm x 6mm) 50mm x 6mm the export product SEAMLESS NON ALLOY STEEL TUBES HOT 1.03 Kgs/Kg content in 8 73049000 FINISHED (54mm x 8mm) 54mm x 8mm the export product Note: Tube weight (in kg.) in per unit weight of each component should be as per Column X of annexure. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 219] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:159/15/80- Party Name: EMPIRE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDUSTRIES ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410042896 Approved :01/80/050/00501/AM19/ :34/24/040/00304/AM17/ 31.01.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 3410042546 dated 21.09.2016 in M. No. 16/80 dated 14.11.2017 14 as per written comments of MSME as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms 1.01 Kgs/Kg MAGNESIUM MAGNESIUM INGOTS 81042010 81041100 content in the TURNING PURITY 99.90% export product RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

6 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 213] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:160/15/80- Party Name: EMPIRE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDUSTRIES ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410042895 Approved :01/80/050/00502/AM19/ :34/24/040/00305/AM17/ 31.01.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments of MSME as under: 15 ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms MAGNESIUM Relevant MAGNESIUM 1.01 Kgs/Kg content 81042010 81041100 TURNING INGOTS PURITY 99.90 % in the export product Note: The word “Relevant” may be added in the description of import item. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:402/15/80-	Party Name: SHIV	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	HYDROMET	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00744/AM19/	RLA File<br>:24/24/040/00034/AM17/	Lic.No/Date:2410042158<br>14.03.2017	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to call the firm for personal hearing to explain the case in the forthcoming NC meeting as per advice of Consultant (Tech-1).

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/3/80-ALC2/2017 Party Name: MINDA SILCA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510402001 Deferred :01/80/050/00011/AM18/ :05/24/040/00634/AM17/ 20.03.2017 17 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 13.06.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 08.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

7 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:398/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710111555 Deferred :01/80/050/00740/AM19/ :07/24/040/00395/AM17/ 08.05.2017 18 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:91/15/80-	Party Name: AYYAPPA CNC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00433/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00043/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0710111569<br>09.05.2017	Deferred

19 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 11.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/19/80- Party Name: VEM Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2017 TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910065039 Deferred :01/80/050/00292/AM18/ :09/24/040/00054/AM18/ 15.05.2017 20 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 15.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/8/80-ALC2/2017 Party Name: THE INDURE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510402573 Deferred :01/80/050/00148/AM18/ :05/24/040/00005/AM18/ 16.05.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 21 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide details of import item at Sl. No. 5. 2. To provide calculations supported by drawing. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

8 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/11/80- Party Name: DIAMOND Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 METAL SCREENS (P) LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6510000003 Deferred :01/80/050/00192/AM19/ :65/24/040/00003/AM18/ 17.05.2017 22 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per advice of representative of MSME as under: 1. To provide license amendment sheet. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:132/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710111628 Deferred :01/80/050/00474/AM19/ :07/24/040/00034/AM18/ 19.05.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and a copy of application was sent to 23 MSME on 10.07.2019 for examination of the case. It was also noted that the firm vide letter dated 05.08.2019 requested to approve this AA on repeat basis. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee noted that, as the AA was applied under No-norms category of 4.07 of HBP , prior to fixation of ad-hoc norm. Therefore the same cannot be considered on repeat basis. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:400/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710111634 Deferred :01/80/050/00742/AM19/ :07/24/040/00394/AM17/ 22.05.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and a copy of application was sent to 24 MSME on 10.07.2019 for examination of the case. It was also noted that the firm vide letter dated 05.08.2019 requested to approve this AA on repeat basis. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee noted that, as the AA was applied under No-norms category of 4.07 of HBP , prior to fixation of ad-hoc norm. Therefore the same cannot be considered on repeat basis. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

9 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 393] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/9/80- Party Name: S AND P Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2017 ENTERPRISES ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410163247 Approved :01/80/050/00188/AM18/ :04/24/040/00058/AM18/ 20.06.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments of MSME as under: Export Products: 1. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 1 should be 15.2 gram. 2. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 2 should be 23.7 gram. 3. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 3 should be 32.8 gram. 4. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 4 should be 18.90 gram. 5. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 5 should be 29.60 gram. 6. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 6 should be 20.00 gram. 25 7. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 7 should be 28.00 gram. 8. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 8 should be 32.00 gram. 9. Per unit weight of export product at Sl. No. 9 should be 97.00 gram. Import Product: 1. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed 112 numbers. 2. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed 207 numbers. 3. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed 18 numbers. 4. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 4 may be allowed 112 numbers. 5. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed 38 numbers. 6. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed 18 numbers. 7. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 7 may be allowed 39 numbers. 8. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 8 may be allowed 28 numbers. 9. Quantity of import item at Sl. No. 9 may be allowed 372 numbers. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:80/11/80-	Party Name: MACAWBER	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	BEEKAY PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00271/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00230/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0510403845<br>29.08.2017	Deferred

26 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 11.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

10 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:188/15/80- Party Name: AYYAPPA CNC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710112073 Deferred :01/80/050/00530/AM19/ :07/24/040/00156/AM18/ 31.08.2017 27 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 11.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:18/19/80-	Party Name: KINECO	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2017	KAMAN COMPOSITES -	ALC2/2019
	INDIA PVT LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00299/AM18/	RLA File<br>:17/24/040/00050/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:1710006668<br>10.10.2017	Deferred

28 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case has been referred to MSME on 14.08.2018 for examination & comments, as MeitY vide F. No.: 17(3)/2018IPHW dated 31.07.2019 informed that the case does not pertain to it. Therefore, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:30/11/80-	Party Name: AKSHAR	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PRECISION TUBES PVT.	ALC2/2019
	LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00221/AM19/	RLA File<br>:34/24/040/00179/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:3410043530<br>10.10.2017	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 16.07.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:36/19/80- Party Name: ASHOKA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2017 MANUFACTURING LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210207941 Deferred :01/80/050/00317/AM18/ :02/24/040/00120/AM18/ 03.11.2017 30 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. ----- End of picture text -----

11 | P a g e

Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated.
Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:237/15/80-	Party Name: AYYAPPA CNC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PVT LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00579/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00223/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0710112397<br>10.11.2017	Deferred

31 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 11.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 295] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:26/20/80- Party Name: ICEM Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2017 ENGINEERING COMPANY ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310817800 Deferred :01/80/050/00390/AM18/ :03/94/040/00742/AM18/ 15.12.2017 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and Consultant (Tech-3) informed that the firm’s reply dated 10.07.2019 is deficient due to following reasons: 1. To provide clarification for export product at Sl. No. 1:- i.) Why number of dished ends is given as 4 at one place & 5 in another. 32 ii.) Why number of petals is given as 5 in one place & 6 in another. iii.) Why weight of import & export are different from as given in AA. 2. There are also similar deficiencies in other export products, clarify. 3. To provide process of manufacture & use of export product at Sl. No. 5. 4. To provide details of indigenous inputs like welding consumables. 5. To provide details of cladding. The Committee decided to ask from the firm to provide clarification on the above mentioned deficiencies. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

12 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/20/80- Party Name: BIRLA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2017 PRECISION ALC2/2019 TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310818218 Deferred :01/80/050/00384/AM18/ :03/94/040/00782/AM18/ 04.01.2018 33 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 02.01.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 02.05.2019 & 09.07.2019 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:23/20/80-	Party Name: BIRLA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2017	PRECISION	ALC2/2019
	TECHNOLOGIES LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00387/AM18/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00784/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0310818219<br>04.01.2018	Deferred

34 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 02.01.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 02.05.2019 & 09.07.2019 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:21/20/80-	Party Name: BIRLA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2017	PRECISION	ALC2/2019
	TECHNOLOGIES LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00385/AM18/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00785/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0310818275<br>05.01.2018	Deferred

35 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 02.01.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 02.05.2019 & 15.07.2019 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:22/20/80- Party Name: BIRLA PRECISION Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2017 TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310818273 Deferred :01/80/050/00386/AM18/ :03/94/040/00783/AM18/ 05.01.2018 36 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 02.01.2019 followed by I.D. reminders on 02.05.2019 & 15.07.2019 for expediting the comments. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

13 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 302] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:32/11/80- Party Name: AQUASUB Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3210078358 Approved :01/80/050/00223/AM19/ :32/24/040/00040/AM18/ 05.01.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 3210077566 dated 17.06.2015 in Meeting No. 06/80 dated 03.07.2019 as per written comments of DPIIT vide U. O. No.: P-47011/22/2019-TSW dated 14.08.2019 as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item 37 Code Code Norms Parts of Centrifugal Pump (Side 1.29 Kgs/Kg Channel Pump)(The Net content content in the of 106192 Kgs. Of Relevant Relevant Cold Rolled export product 84139120 Cold Rolled Stainless Steel 72209900 Stainless Steel Sheets / Coils after taking 1/3 [rd] Sheets / Coils should account in AISI 304 Grade recovery from the end product duly reflected in scrap S/Bs certified by customs) Note: Description, Part No., Quantity (in Nos.) and Net empty weight (in Kgs.) of the export item may be specified in the AA as per list attached. (Copy enclosed) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: ZTT INDIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410163956 Deferred :01/80/050/00768/AM19/ :04/24/040/00212/AM18/ 07.02.2018 38 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MeitY on 04.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, MeitY vide email dated 24.09.2019 informed that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:392/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710112968 Deferred :01/80/050/00734/AM19/ :07/24/040/00336/AM18/ 13.03.2018 39 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

14 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:393/15/80- Party Name: SARTORIUS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 STEDIM INDIA PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113010 Deferred :01/80/050/00735/AM19/ :07/24/040/00348/AM18/ 23.03.2018 40 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 06.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 223] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:118/15/80- Party Name: LMT TOOLS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067025 Deferred :01/80/050/00460/AM19/ :31/83/040/00001/AM19/ 06.04.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and Consultant (Tech-3) informed that the firm’s reply dated 25.07.2019 is deficient due to following reasons: 41 1. Calculations with supporting drawings for 4-5 sizes of export product, where wastage is high or quantity is high. 2. To provide document of disposal of scrap in last 3 years having value in it. The Committee decided to ask from the firm to provide clarification on the above mentioned deficiencies. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: MAGNA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: AUTOMOTIVE INDIA ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410164172 Deferred :01/80/050/00758/AM19/ :04/24/040/00001/AM19/ 06.04.2018 42 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 06.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

15 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:40/8/80-ALC2/2018 Party Name: SARA SAE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6110001499 Deferred :01/80/050/00163/AM19/ :61/24/040/00001/AM19/ 16.04.2018 43 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 06.05.2019 followed by a reminder on 05.07.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send again a reminder to the firm to furnish the requisite information. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 445] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/8/80-ALC2/2018 Party Name: L & T-MHPS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310820724 Deferred :01/80/050/00129/AM19/ :03/95/040/01112/AM18/ 27.04.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 44 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 5. Cross Sectional Diagram of export product with calculation of raw material requirement and the weight of the Cable in Kg. per Km. Copy of relevant National/International Standard/buyer’s data sheet may also be furnished. 6. To provide details of number of consumable items like paints, thinner & primers etc. with their total value. 7. To provide details of raw material weight & finished weight of casting & forging proposed for import. 8. To provide details of breakup of all import items in sets to numbers. 9. To provide details of accessories proposed for import. 10. To provide detailed list of spares if any. 11. AA number of the similar export product & copy of NC decision. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

16 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:46/5/80-ALC2/2018 Party Name: S AND P Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENTERPRISES ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410164303 Deferred :01/80/050/00095/AM19/ :04/24/040/00027/AM19/ 07.05.2018 45 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 03.06.2019 followed by a reminder on 08.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:127/15/80-	Party Name: AYYAPPA CNC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00469/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00020/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0710113266<br>10.05.2018	Deferred

46 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 11.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:397/15/80-	Party Name: PROMAC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING	ALC2/2019
	INDUSTRIES LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00739/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00357/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0710113276<br>14.05.2018	Deferred

47 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 05.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of DHI informed in meeting that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:45/11/80- Party Name: JAMES Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ROBINSON LABS PVT LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066251 Deferred :01/80/050/00236/AM19/ :09/24/040/00035/AM19/ 21.05.2018 48 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-1) was sent to the firm on 06.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

17 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:128/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113340 Deferred :01/80/050/00470/AM19/ :07/24/040/00034/AM19/ 28.05.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and a copy of application was sent to 49 MSME on 10.07.2019 for examination of the case. It was also noted that the firm vide letter dated 05.08.2019 requested to approve this AA on repeat basis. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee noted that, as the AA was applied under No-norms category of 4.07 of HBP , prior to fixation of ad-hoc norm. Therefore the same cannot be considered on repeat basis. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:129/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113346 Deferred :01/80/050/00471/AM19/ :07/24/040/00033/AM19/ 28.05.2018 50 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:130/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113344 Deferred :01/80/050/00472/AM19/ :07/24/040/00040/AM19/ 28.05.2018 51 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:131/15/80-	Party Name: DYNAMATIC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00473/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00032/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0710113347<br>28.05.2018	Deferred

52 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

18 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 159] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:166/15/80- Party Name: BHARAT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 HEAVY ELECTRICALS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066472 Deferred :01/80/050/00508/AM19/ :09/24/040/00171/AM19/ 18.07.2018 53 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 06.08.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the firm to furnish the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:9/11/80-ALC2/2018	Party Name: LEIXIR	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
	RESOURCES PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00200/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00218/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510407454<br>06.08.2018	Approved

54 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and the firm’s representative explained the case before the Norms Committee during personal hearing. The Committee decided to ratify the norms as applied for on one time basis (with no repeat allowed on this) on the recommendation of technical members present.

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Case No.:76/11/80-	Party Name: HIMACHAL	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	FUTURISTIC	ALC2/2019
	COMMUNICATIONS LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00267/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00215/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510407445<br>06.08.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY vide email dated 24.09.2019 informed that the firm’s reply against deficiency letter received on 15.07.2019 & the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:19/11/80-	Party Name: ICEM	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING COMPANY	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00210/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00306/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310822939<br>09.08.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and Consultant (Tech-3) informed that the firm’s reply dated 28.07.2019 is deficient due to following reasons:

Weight of import & export are different than in AA.
To provide details of indigenous inputs like welding consumables.

19 | P a g e

To provide details of cladding.

The Committee decided to ask from the firm to provide clarification on the above mentioned deficiencies.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:179/15/80-	Party Name: PROMAC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING	ALC2/2019
	INDUSTRIES LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00521/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00102/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0710113710<br>13.08.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 06.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of DHI informed in meeting that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:182/15/80-	Party Name: INJECTOPLAST	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00524/AM19/	RLA File<br>:06/24/040/00023/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0610038953<br>20.08.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-1) was sent to the firm on 17.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: Party Name: KINECO Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: 34/1/80-ALC2/2019 KAMAN COMPOSITES - ALC2/2019 INDIA PVT. LTD. 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:1710006716 Deferred 59 :01/80/050/00782/AM19/ :17/24/040/00017/AM19/ 20.08.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination as per the advice of representative of DPIIT . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

20 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:25/11/80- Party Name: LARSEN & Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TOUBRO LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310823360 Deferred :01/80/050/00216/AM19/ :03/95/040/00056/AM19/ 28.08.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter 60 seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 06.05.2019 and final reminder on 08.07.2019. The firm vide letter dated 13.07.2019 requested for extension of time i.e. 90 days to furnish the requisite information. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:23/11/80- Party Name: JAYESH METALS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 AND FERRO ALLOYS LLP ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310823416 Deferred :01/80/050/00214/AM19/ :03/94/040/00488/AM19/ 29.08.2018 61 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 23.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:28/11/80- Party Name: L & T-MHPS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 PRIVATE LIMITED HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310823400 Deferred :01/80/050/00219/AM19/ :03/95/040/00466/AM19/ 29.08.2018 62 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 29.03.2019 and final reminder on 27.05.2019. The firm vide letter dated 13.07.2019 requested for extension of time i.e. 90 days to furnish the requisite information. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 150] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: Party Name: PLANSEE INDIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: 65/11/80-ALC2/2018 HIGH PERFORMANCE ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 MATERIALS PVT. LTD. HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113822 Deferred :01/80/050/00256/AM19/ :07/24/040/00094/AM19/ 06.09.2018 63 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 08.07.2019 followed by final reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

21 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 151] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/1/80-ALC2/2019 [Party Name: L & T-MHPS ] Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 PRIVATE LIMITED HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310823645 Deferred :01/80/050/00757/AM19/ :03/95/040/00469/AM19/ 07.09.2018 64 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 06.05.2019 and final reminder on 05.07.2019. The firm vide letter dated 13.07.2019 requested for extension of time i.e. 90 days to furnish the requisite information. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:200/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710113846 Deferred :01/80/050/00542/AM19/ :07/24/040/00137/AM19/ 14.09.2018 65 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:201/15/80-	Party Name: DYNAMATIC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00543/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00155/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0710113852<br>17.09.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 10.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:49/11/80- Party Name: LEIXIR RESOURCES Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510407822 Approved :01/80/050/00240/AM19/ :05/23/040/00264/AM19/ 18.09.2018 67 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and the firm’s representative explained the case before the Norms Committee during personal hearing. The Committee decided to ratify the norms as applied for on one time basis (with no repeat allowed on this) on the recommendation of technical members present. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

22 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:22/11/80- Party Name: CROWN Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 CLOSURES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310823992 Deferred :01/80/050/00213/AM19/ :03/94/040/00561/AM19/ 26.09.2018 68 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 06.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:57/11/80-	Party Name: GL&V INDIA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	PRIVATE LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00248/AM19/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00096/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:3110067179<br>26.09.2018	Deferred

69 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 20.06.2019 followed by reminder on 06.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:82/11/80- Party Name: ANSTECH Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410044543 Deferred :01/80/050/00273/AM19/ :34/24/040/00218/AM19/ 04.10.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of 70 application has not yet been received from RA, Vadodara & the firm and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Vadodara and the firm on 08.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 25.09.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to remind RA, Vadodara and the firm in this regard. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:243/15/80- Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING PVT LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066798 Deferred :01/80/050/00585/AM19/ :09/24/040/00328/AM19/ 02.11.2018 71 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

23 | P a g e

Case No.:244/15/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00586/AM19/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00327/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0910066799<br>02.11.2018	Deferred

72 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:245/15/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00587/AM19/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00325/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0910066800<br>02.11.2018	Deferred

73 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:246/15/80- Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING PVT LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066801 Deferred :01/80/050/00588/AM19/ :09/24/040/00314/AM19/ 02.11.2018 74 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:247/15/80- Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING PVT LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066802 Deferred :01/80/050/00589/AM19/ :09/24/040/00324/AM19/ 02.11.2018 75 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 08.07.2019 followed by reminder on 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

24 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:248/15/80- Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066803 Deferred :01/80/050/00590/AM19/ :09/24/040/00326/AM19/ 02.11.2018 76 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:249/15/80- Party Name: AZAD ENGINEERING Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066804 Deferred :01/80/050/00591/AM19/ :09/24/040/00329/AM19/ 02.11.2018 77 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 08.07.2019 followed by reminder on 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:250/15/80- Party Name: AZAD ENGINEERING Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066805 Deferred :01/80/050/00592/AM19/ :09/24/040/00312/AM19/ 02.11.2018 78 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:251/15/80-	Party Name: AZAD	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00593/AM19/	RLA File<br>:09/24/040/00307/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0910066806<br>02.11.2018	Deferred

79 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

25 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 431] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:253/15/80- Party Name: BHARAT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 HEAVY ELECTRICALS ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910066870 Deferred :01/80/050/00595/AM19/ :09/24/040/00340/AM19/ 16.11.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. Specification/rating of all export items. 2. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 3. Weight of each Export Product. 4. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from 80 sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 5. Bifurcated quantities of components to be accounted for in the resultant product and the requirement of components as spares. Raw Material / Consumables. 6. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. 7. Details of spares & accessories in the export product & list of items required to manufacture the same. 8. List of insulating material & their value. 9. Breakup of all items with quantity in set to numbers. 10. List of all casting & forging with their raw weight & finished weight. 11. Details of mandatory spares & accessories its quantity (export). Please clarify the items which are imported, indigenously procured & which are manufactured out of imported raw material. 12. Details of import item at Sl. No. 37 & its specific use. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/13/80-ALC2/2018 Party Name: SULZER INDIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067242 Deferred :01/80/050/00314/AM19/ :31/83/040/00124/AM19/ 22.11.2018 81 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

26 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/13/80-ALC2/2018 Party Name: SULZER INDIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067241 Deferred :01/80/050/00315/AM19/ :31/83/040/00123/AM19/ 22.11.2018 82 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:259/15/80- Party Name: DYNAMATIC Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710114156 Deferred :01/80/050/00601/AM19/ :07/24/040/00182/AM19/ 22.11.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and a copy of application was sent to 83 MSME on 11.07.2019 for examination of the case. It was also noted that the firm vide letter dated 12.08.2019 requested to approve this AA on repeat basis. However, the matter was discussed in the meeting and the Committee noted that, as the AA was applied under No-norms category of 4.07 of HBP , prior to fixation of ad-hoc norm. Therefore the same cannot be considered on repeat basis. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:265/15/80-	Party Name: DEE	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	DEVELOPMENT	ALC2/2019
	ENGINEERS LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00607/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00361/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510408837<br>10.12.2018	Deferred

84 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

27 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 410] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:266/15/80- Party Name: Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 VALVEWORKS INDIA ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067250 Approved :01/80/050/00608/AM19/ :31/83/040/00137/AM19/ 11.12.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments of Consultant (Tech-3) as under: Sl. ITCHS Recommended Norms Import Item No. Code Rough Forging 290-8210-P3FO Body 2 1/16 As applied less 20% recovery on 1 73261990 INCH 15M PSL3 (145 Kg Per No Total 50 weight basis i.e. duty exemption Nos.) Alloy Steel - Grade- 4130 would be allowed on 6720.8 kg Rough Forging 290-8310-P3FO Body 3 1/16 As applied less 20% recovery on 2 73261990 INCH 15M PSL 3 (400 Kg Per No Total 70 weight basis i.e. duty exemption 85 Nos) Alloy Steel - Grade- 4130 would be allowed on 25860.94 kg Rough Forging 290-CIWFC-7410-P3FO As applied less 20% recovery on 3 73261990 Body 4 1/16 INCH 10M PSL 3 (437Kg Per weight basis i.e. duty exemption No Total 100 Nos) Alloy Steel - Grade- 4130 would be allowed on 40339.6 kg Rough Forging 265-5210HE Body 2 1/16 As applied less 20% recovery on 4 73261990 INCH 5M, FE/RTJ R-24, PSL3 (85Kg Per No weight basis i.e. duty exemption Total 300 Nos) Alloy Steel - Grade- 4130 would be allowed on 23838 kg Rough Forging 290-7210-P3HE Body 2 1/16 As applied less 20% recovery on INCH 10M HEAT TREATMENT, PSL3 5 73261990 weight basis i.e. duty exemption (117.90 Kg Per No Total 50 Nos) Alloy Steel would be allowed on 5555.1 kg - Grade- 4130 Rough Forging 290-CIWFC-8910-P3HE As applied less 20% recovery on BODY GV CIWFC 2 9/16 INCH 15M FE 75- 6 73261990 weight basis i.e. duty exemption K PSL-3 HEAT TRETMENT (238Kg Per No would be allowed on 11021.4 kg Total 50 Nos) Alloy Steel - Grade- 4130 Note: The words “Rough Forging” may be added in the description of import items. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:31/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SULZER INDIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067252 Deferred :01/80/050/00779/AM19/ :31/83/040/00139/AM19/ 12.12.2018 86 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

28 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:32/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: SULZER INDIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067253 Deferred :01/80/050/00780/AM19/ :31/83/040/00140/AM19/ 12.12.2018 87 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:272/15/80-	Party Name: ICEM	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERING COMPANY	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00614/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00785/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310825670<br>14.12.2018	Deferred

88 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 28.05.2019 followed by reminders on 05.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 223] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:273/15/80- Party Name: LMT TOOLS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067254 Deferred :01/80/050/00615/AM19/ :31/83/040/00144/AM19/ 17.12.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and Consultant (Tech-3) informed that the firm’s reply dated 25.07.2019 is deficient due to following reasons: 89 1. Calculations with supporting drawings for 4-5 sizes of export product, where wastage is high or quantity is high. 2. To provide document of disposal of scarp in last 3 years having value in it. The Committee decided to ask from the firm to provide clarification on the above mentioned deficiencies. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

29 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: Party Name: MUDHRA FINE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: 17/1/80-ALC2/2019 BLANC PRIVATE LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410164995 Deferred 90 :01/80/050/00765/AM19/ :04/24/040/00207/AM19/ 17.12.2018 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination as per the advice of representative of DHI . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:274/15/80-	Party Name: STERLITE	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	TECHNOLOGIES LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00616/AM19/	RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00812/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0310825720<br>18.12.2018	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY vide email dated 24.09.2019 informed that the firm’s reply against deficiency letter received on 18.06.2019 & the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:275/15/80- Party Name: STERLITE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310825721 Deferred :01/80/050/00617/AM19/ :03/95/040/00815/AM19/ 18.12.2018 92 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY vide email dated 24.09.2019 informed that the firm’s reply against deficiency letter received on 29.05.2019 & the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:277/15/80- Party Name: MAFLOW Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067256 Approved :01/80/050/00619/AM19/ :31/83/040/00143/AM19/ 19.12.2018 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as 93 per written comments of Consultant (Tech-3) as under:

Quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1, 8, 10, 14, 25, 31, 32, 34, 46, 49, 50 & 52 may be allowed with net plus 1% wastage .
Quantity of rest of the import items may be allowed as per GN-4 .

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

30 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:279/15/80- Party Name: SUPER CIRCLE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 AUTO LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510409020 Deferred :01/80/050/00621/AM19/ :05/24/040/00506/AM19/ 20.12.2018 94 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-1) was sent to the firm on 30.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:280/15/80-	Party Name: VICTORA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	AUTO PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00622/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00529/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510409056<br>26.12.2018	Deferred

95 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 29.05.2019 followed by reminder on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:281/15/80-	Party Name: VICTORA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	AUTO PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00623/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00530/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510409057<br>26.12.2018	Deferred

96 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by MSME was sent to the firm on 29.05.2019 followed by reminder on 08.07.2019 & 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

31 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 297] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:283/15/80- Party Name: CHEMICO Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 SYNTHETICS LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510409145 Approved :01/80/050/00625/AM19/ :05/23/040/00428/AM19/ 01.01.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments of Consultant (Tech-1) as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms ANTIMONY 97 ANTIMONY METAL CONCENTRATE ( Antimony Total weight of (Sb 99.65% Min.) Content 55.04% ) with 10.98% 81101000 26171000 import allowed (Weight of Antimony = H2O ( Water ) Content is 3,40,000 Kg 1,55,690 Kg) (Weight of Antimony content = 1,66,588KG) Note: 1. The norms recommended as per the Certificate of Analysis submitted by the firm vide email dated 24.09.2019. 2. Weight of Antimony in the export product should be 1,55,690 Kg. 3. Weight of Antimony content in the import product should be 1,66,588 Kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Note: Erroneously generated case at Sl. No. 98 in the Agenda is deleted and rest cases have been renumbered.

Case No.:293/15/80-		Party Name: STERLITE POWER		Meet No/Date:11/80-		Status:
ALC2/2018		TRANSMISSION LIMITED		ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00635/AM19/		RLA File<br>:03/95/040/00869/AM19/		Lic.No/Date:0310826313<br>10.01.2019		Deferred

98 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that MeitY vide email dated 24.09.2019 informed that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/1/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: MUDHRA FINE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: BLANC PRIVATE LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165082 Deferred :01/80/050/00769/AM19/ :04/24/040/00222/AM19/ 11.01.2019 99 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 29.05.2019 followed by a 08.07.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind again MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

32 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 289] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:296/15/80- Party Name: BONATRANS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310826356 Approved :01/80/050/00638/AM19/ :03/94/040/00879/AM19/ 14.01.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0310824925 dated 06.11.2018 in Meeting No. 10/80 dated 11.09.2019 on the recommendation of representative of DHI as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended 100 Code Export Item Code Import Item Norms 67.1008/58 Rolled Machined Axle for Wheel set Acc. Bar for BTG Net to Net with to Dwg. D11-3-02846 (Net wt. of Transfer Order D11- 20% recoverable 86071910 86071910 each Machined Axle is 405.000 3-03029 (Net wastage on KGS/PCS) Weight 660 Kgs/ weight basis PCS) Note: Import item is allowed on Net to Net with 20% recoverable wastage on weight basis i.e. duty exemption on import item allowed on 121800 Kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:298/15/80-	Party Name: ULTRA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	ENGINEERS	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00640/AM19/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00164/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:3110067288<br>16.01.2019	Deferred

101 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DHI on 16.07.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of DHI informed in meeting that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

102

Case No.:406/15/80-	Party Name: ALLROUND	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2018	(INDIA) VEGETABLE	ALC2/2019
	PROCESSING MACHINES PRI	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00748/AM19/	RLA File<br>:33/24/040/00016/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:3310030504<br>18.01.2019	Withdrawn

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that RA, Panipat has updated the spreadsheet showing that the above AA has been issued on Net to Net basis. Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda under intimation to RA, Panipat.

Case is withdrawn.

33 | P a g e

103

Case No.:23/1/80-	Party Name: PARKER	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	HANNIFIN INDIA PVT.	ALC2/2019
	LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00771/AM19/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00223/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0410165142<br>28.01.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 30.07.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 265] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:311/15/80- Party Name: BONATRANS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDIA PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310826867 Approved :01/80/050/00653/AM19/ :03/94/040/00949/AM19/ 06.02.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0310824925 dated 06.11.2018 in Meeting No. 10/80 dated 11.09.2019 on the recommendation of representative of DHI as under: 104 ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms 1008/58 Rolled Bar Machined Axle for Wheel set Acc. Net to Net with for BTG Transfer to Dwg. D11-3-02846 (Net wt. of 20% recoverable 86071910 86071910 Order D11-3-03029 each Machined Axle is 405.000 wastage on (Net Weight 660 KGS/PCS) weight basis Kgs/PCS) Note: Import item is allowed on Net to Net with 20% recoverable wastage on weight basis i.e. duty exemption on import item allowed on 182700 Kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:25/1/80- Party Name: MUDHRA FINE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 BLANC PRIVATE LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165210 Deferred :01/80/050/00773/AM19/ :04/24/040/00241/AM19/ 13.02.2019 105 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 11.07.2019 followed by an I.D. reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

34 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 265] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:317/15/80- Party Name: BONATRANS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDIA PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310827036 Approved :01/80/050/00659/AM19/ :03/94/040/00986/AM19/ 14.02.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No. 0310824925 dated 06.11.2018 in Meeting No. 10/80 dated 11.09.2019 on the recommendation of representative of DHI as under: 106 ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms Machined Axle for Wheel set 67.1008/58 Rolled Bar Net to Net with Acc. to Dwg. D11-3-02846 (Net for BTG Transfer Order 20% recoverable 86071910 86071910 wt. of each Machined Axle is D11-3-03029 (Net wastage on 405.000 KGS/PCS) Weight 660 Kgs/PCS) weight basis Note: Import item is allowed on Net to Net with 20% recoverable wastage on weight basis i.e. duty exemption on import item allowed on 730800 Kg. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:330/15/80- Party Name: AUTO COMP Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 INDIA PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067323 Deferred 107 :01/80/050/00672/AM19/ :31/83/040/00173/AM19/ 19.02.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to MSME for examination as per the advice of representative of DHI. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:26/1/80-	Party Name: MUDHRA FINE	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	BLANC PRIVATE LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00774/AM19/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00242/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0410165228<br>19.02.2019	Deferred

108

Case is deferred.

35 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 314] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:333/15/80- Party Name: SREE RAM Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2018 TUBEWELL ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3210078867 Approved :01/80/050/00675/AM19/ :32/24/040/00057/AM19/ 21.02.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on the basis of inputs given by Technical Authorities as under: ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms SINOTRUK 371 MOUNTED NEW SINOTRUCK 6 X 4 WITH DTH CUM ROTARY 109 TRUCK CHASSIS (LHD) DRILLING RIG , LEFT HAND DRIVE HYDRAULIC ,TRANSFER MODEL GEAR BOX ATTACHED NO.ZZ1257S4641W WITH A MUD PUMPS - L - As applied with CHASSIS NO. 84304110 250-H - 1 SET & SINOTRUK 87059000 conditions of LZZ5BLSF2JN441068, 371 MOUNTED WITH ELGI GN-4. ENGINE NO: COMPRESSOR 1200 CFM - 181007025537 & CHASSIS 330 PSI, HYDRAULIC, NO. LZZ5BLSF4JN441069 TRANSFER GEAR BOX ENGINE WITH WELDING NO:181007025677 GENERATOR 1 SET RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

110

Case No.:29/1/80-	Party Name: AUTO TECH	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT	ALC2/2019
	LTD.	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00777/AM19/	RLA File<br>:04/24/040/00257/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0410165239<br>21.02.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 11.07.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:38/1/80- Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510409856 Deferred :01/80/050/00786/AM19/ :05/24/040/00681/AM19/ 06.03.2019 111 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 08.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to remind MSME for expediting the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

36 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:41/1/80- Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510409909 Deferred :01/80/050/00789/AM19/ :05/24/040/00705/AM19/ 12.03.2019 112 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 02.07.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 147] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:42/1/80- Party Name: LARSEN & Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 TOUBRO LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310827622 Deferred :01/80/050/00790/AM19/ :03/95/040/01295/AM19/ 12.03.2019 113 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by Consultant (Tech-3) was sent to the firm on 06.08.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the firm to furnish the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 59] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:49/1/80- Party Name: DIAMOND Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 METAL SCREENS (P) LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6510000026 Deferred :01/80/050/00797/AM19/ :65/24/040/00007/AM19/ 14.03.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

114 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 16.05.2019 followed by reminders on 08.07.2019 & 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:46/1/80-	Party Name: ISGEC TITAN	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	METAL FABRICATORS	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00794/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00557/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510409960<br>15.03.2019	Deferred

115 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 29.05.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

37 | P a g e

116

Case No.:47/1/80-	Party Name: VICTORA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	AUTO PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00795/AM19/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00712/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0510409964<br>18.03.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to MSME on 06.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

Case No.:7/2/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: AYYAPPA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
	CNC PVT. LTD.	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00800/AM19/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00299/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0710114686<br>20.03.2019	Deferred

117 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 04.06.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

118

Case No.:18/5/80-	Party Name: MAINI	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	PRECISION PRODUCTS	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00056/AM20/	RLA File<br>:07/24/040/00306/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:0710114732<br>29.03.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI on 16.09.2019 for examination of the case. The representative of DHI informed that the case is under examination. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/2/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VIPRA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: CLOSURES PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828134 Deferred :01/80/050/00005/AM20/ :03/95/040/01384/AM19/ 03.04.2019 119 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 04.06.2019 followed by a reminder on 06.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

38 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:14/5/80- Party Name: UNI VTL Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PRECISION PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6510000027 Deferred :01/80/050/00052/AM20/ :65/24/040/00006/AM19/ 05.04.2019 120 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to request RA, Bangalore & the firm for submitting the complete set of application. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:1/3/80-ALC2/2019		Party Name: ISGEC		Meet No/Date:11/80-		Status:
		HITACHI ZOSEN LIMITED		ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00007/AM20/		RLA File<br>:05/23/040/00578/AM19/		Lic.No/Date:0510410182<br>09.04.2019		Approved

121

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U.O. No.: P-47011/98/2019-TSW dated 29.08.2019. (Copy enclosed)

RA concerned may take suitable consequential action accordingly.

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: MOTORS INDIA P LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045037 Approved :01/80/050/00008/AM20/ :34/24/040/00405/AM19/ 10.04.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as 122 per written comments of MSME as under: 1. Relevant quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 10 may be allowed as per GN-4 . 2. Relevant quantity of import item at Sl. No. 11 to 16 may be allowed on net to net basis with nil wastage . RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.: Party Name: MUDHRA FINE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: 3/3/80-ALC2/2019 BLANC PRIVATE LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0410165451 Deferred :01/80/050/00009/AM20/ :04/24/040/00294/AM19/ 11.04.2019 123 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 05.07.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the firm to furnish the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

39 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: HANNING Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: MOTORS INDIA P. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045047 Approved :01/80/050/00013/AM20/ :34/24/040/00015/AM20/ 15.04.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as 124 per written comments of MSME as under: 1. Relevant quantity of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 15 may be allowed as per GN-4 . 2. Relevant quantity of import item at Sl. No. 16 to 18 may be allowed on net to net basis with nil wastage . RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: VEELINE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: MEDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210209114 Deferred :01/80/050/00010/AM20/ :02/24/040/00003/AM20/ 16.04.2019 125 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 06.06.2019 followed by a reminder on 08.08.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

126

Case No.:5/3/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: SMC	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
	CORPORATION (INDIA)	ALC2/2019
	PRIVATE LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00011/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00020/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510410292<br>18.04.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that reply of deficiency letter was received on 20.09.2019. Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the reply to Consultant (Tech-3) for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TINITA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828410 Deferred :01/80/050/00012/AM20/ :03/95/040/00030/AM20/ 18.04.2019 127 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 08.07.2019 followed by final reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

40 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 160] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:8/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: L & T-MHPS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: TURBINE GENERATORS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828481 Deferred :01/80/050/00014/AM20/ :03/95/040/01354/AM19/ 23.04.2019 128 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DHI was sent to the firm on 06.08.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to send final reminder to the firm to furnish the requisite information within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/3/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: RAYCHEM Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: RPG PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828517 Deferred :01/80/050/00015/AM20/ :03/95/040/01371/AM19/ 23.04.2019 129 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 08.07.2019 followed by final reminder on 17.09.2019. However, it was also noted that the firm vide email dated 17.09.2019, 19.09.2019 & 24.09.2019 informed that they did not receive any deficiency letter yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to send again a deficiency letter to the firm as raised by DPIIT . Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 268] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:8/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: GODREJ & Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310828981 Deferred :01/80/050/00046/AM20/ :03/94/040/00093/AM20/ 13.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per written comments given by DPIIT vide U. O. No.: 47011/268/2018-TSW dated 09.09.2019 as under: 130 1. Model number, technical specification and specific quantity-both in terms of number (if any) and/or weight, of each export product (Appendix-33 of current HBP refers). 2. Detail technical note on manufacturing process including the relevant flow sheet. 3. Weight of each Export Product. 4. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 5. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to ----- End of picture text -----

41 | P a g e

be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.

Case is deferred.

131

Case No.:10/5/80-	Party Name: I-TECH PLAST	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019	INDIA PVT. LTD.(EOU)	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00048/AM20/	RLA File<br>:03/94/040/00088/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0310828994<br>14.05.2019	Deferred

Case is deferred.

132

Case No.:2/5/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: TATA	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
	HITACHI CONSTRUCTION	ALC2/2019
	MACHINERY COMPANY	25.09.2019
	PRIVAT
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00040/AM20/	RLA File<br>:02/24/040/00194/AM18/	Lic.No/Date:0210209166<br>15.05.2019	Withdrawn

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm informed vide letter (Received on 14.08.2019) that the above AA has been issued on Net to Net basis . Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda under intimation to RA, Calcutta .

Case is withdrawn.

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TATA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: HITACHI CONSTRUCTION ALC2/2019 MACHINERY COMPANY 25.09.2019 PRIVAT HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0210209167 Withdrawn :01/80/050/00041/AM20/ :02/24/040/00036/AM19/ 15.05.2019 133 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm informed vide letter (Received on 14.08.2019) that the above AA has been issued on Net to Net basis . Therefore, the Committee decided to withdraw the case from the agenda under intimation to RA, Calcutta . Case is withdrawn. ----- End of picture text -----

42 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 191] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067528 Deferred :01/80/050/00043/AM20/ :09/24/040/00061/AM20/ 15.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 134 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015- 20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067529 Deferred :01/80/050/00044/AM20/ :09/24/040/00059/AM20/ 15.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 135 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015-20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/5/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067530 Deferred :01/80/050/00045/AM20/ :09/24/040/00060/AM20/ 15.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 136 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015-20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

43 | P a g e

137

	Case No.:1/5/80-ALC2/2019		Party Name: PAHARPUR		Meet No/Date:11/80-		Status:
			COOLING TOWERS LIMITED		ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019
	HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00039/AM20/		RLA File<br>:02/24/040/00012/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:0210209171<br>16.05.2019		Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DPIIT for examination as per the advice of representative of DHI .

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 236] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/5/80- Party Name: PERMANENT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 MAGNETS LIMITED ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829082 Approved :01/80/050/00047/AM20/ :03/95/040/00131/AM20/ 16.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 30.05.2019. However, no comments are being furnished by MSME . The case was discussed in the meeting and the Committee decided to ratify the norms on the basis of inputs given by the Technical Authorities present in the meeting as under: 138 ITCHS ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code Code Norms B72M Manganese Alloys B72M Grindings (Waste Ingots (Mangenese and As applied & Scrap of Manganese 81110010 Manganese Base Alloys 81110020 (Taking cue from base Alloys) (Manganese Unwrought) (Manganese SION C-1627) 70% +/- 5%) 70% +/- 5%) RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 252] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:17/5/80- Party Name: PERFECT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 TOOLS & FORGINGS ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:5610005613 Approved :01/80/050/00055/AM20/ :56/24/040/00004/AM20/ 16.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms on repeat basis as approved for AA No.: 1110028342 dated 12.06.2018 in M. No. 4/20 dated 22.05.2019 per written comments of Consultant (Tech-3) as under: 139 Sl. ITCHS Recommended Norms Import Item No. Code Galvanised Plain Coils Prime Grade : DX51D and 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the 1 72104900 Thickness : 0.18 mm to 0.60 mm export product Galvanised Plain Coils Prime Grade : DX51D and 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the 2 72104900 Thickness : 0.18 mm to 0.30 mm export product 1.05 Kgs/Kg content in the 3 39042290 PVC Compound export product Note: Technical specification & thickness to match in the export & import items. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC. ----- End of picture text -----

44 | P a g e

140

Case No.:	Party Name: BAPL	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
7/9/80-ALC2/2019	ROTOTECH PRIVATE	ALC2/2019
	LIMITED	25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00132/AM20/	RLA File<br>:56/24/040/00039/AM19/	Lic.No/Date:5610005614<br>16.05.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 08.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/5/80- Party Name: HEURTEY Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PETROCHEM INDIA ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3410045150 Deferred 141 :01/80/050/00051/AM20/ :34/24/040/00059/AM20/ 17.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case to DHI for examination as per the advice of representative of DPIIT. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 306] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/5/80- Party Name: DILIGENT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 SCM SOLUTIONS ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067545 Deferred :01/80/050/00050/AM20/ :09/24/040/00078/AM20/ 20.05.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 142 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

45 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:20/5/80- Party Name: ULTRA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 ENGINEERS ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067427 Deferred :01/80/050/00058/AM20/ :31/83/040/00026/AM20/ 22.05.2019 143 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the firm’s reply was sent to DHI on 17.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, the representative of DHI informed in meeting that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:21/5/80- Party Name: CERATIZIT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 INDIA ROUND TOOL ALC2/2019 SOLUTIONS P. LTD. 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710114952 Deferred :01/80/050/00059/AM20/ :07/24/040/00017/AM20/ 24.05.2019 144 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Bangalore & the firm and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Bangalore and the firm on 15.07.2019. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to remind RA, Bangalore & the firm for submitting the complete set of application. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: CROWN Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: CLOSURES PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310829905 Deferred :01/80/050/00098/AM20/ :03/94/040/00246/AM20/ 25.06.2019 ----- End of picture text -----

145 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Mumbai and the firm on 08.08.2019 & 13.08.2019 respectively. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for complete set of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

146

	Case No.:2/7/80-ALC2/2019		Party Name: OSWAL		Meet No/Date:11/80-		Status:
			PUMPS LIMITED		ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019
	HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00099/AM20/		RLA File<br>:33/24/040/00012/AM20/		Lic.No/Date:3310030557<br>25.06.2019		Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to refer the case (along with the amendment request in export items of the firm) to DPIIT for examination & comments.

Case is deferred.

46 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: OAM SAAI Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: INTERNATIONAL INC. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510411061 Deferred :01/80/050/00100/AM20/ :05/24/040/00181/AM20/ 26.06.2019 147 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME on 04.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 180] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067697 Deferred :01/80/050/00101/AM20/ :09/24/040/00138/AM20/ 26.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 148 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015-20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 193] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:5/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067698 Deferred :01/80/050/00102/AM20/ :09/24/040/00142/AM20/ 26.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 149 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015-20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

47 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 178] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067699 Deferred :01/80/050/00103/AM20/ :09/24/040/00140/AM20/ 26.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 150 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015-20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 193] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:7/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067700 Deferred :01/80/050/00104/AM20/ :09/24/040/00139/AM20/ 26.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 151 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015-20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:8/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067701 Deferred :01/80/050/00105/AM20/ :09/24/040/00137/AM20/ 26.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 152 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015-20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

48 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 191] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:9/7/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: AZAD Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ENGINEERING PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0910067702 Deferred :01/80/050/00106/AM20/ :09/24/040/00141/AM20/ 26.06.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to 153 furnish following information as per advice of representative of DHI as under: 1. To provide the calculations of the claimed wastage linked with drawing of the export product. 2. To provide information as per Appendix 4H & 4K of DGFT’s Public Notice No. 68/2015- 20 dated 22/03/2018. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:10/7/80- Party Name: P. M. ELECTRO Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067458 Deferred :01/80/050/00107/AM20/ :31/83/040/00048/AM20/ 28.06.2019 154 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Pune and the firm on 08.08.2019 & 13.08.2019 respectively. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:11/7/80- Party Name: POLYCAB Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 INDIA LIMITED ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830021 Deferred :01/80/050/00108/AM20/ :03/95/040/00295/AM20/ 01.07.2019 155 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MeitY on 04.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, MeitY vide email dated 24.09.2019 informed that the case is under examination. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

49 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/7/80- Party Name: AUTOCOMP Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 CORPORATION PANSE ALC2/2019 PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067460 Deferred :01/80/050/00109/AM20/ :31/83/040/00050/AM20/ 01.07.2019 156 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Pune and the firm on 08.08.2019 & 13.08.2019 respectively. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:13/7/80- Party Name: BANGALORE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 BIOTECH LABS PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710115122 Deferred :01/80/050/00110/AM20/ :07/24/040/00082/AM20/ 03.07.2019 157 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to MSME for examination of the case on 12.07.2019 followed by reminder on 17.09.2019. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 294] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:14/7/80- Party Name: GENESIS Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 PACKAGING PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0710115123 Deferred :01/80/050/00111/AM20/ :07/24/040/00075/AM20/ 03.07.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per agenda and decided to ask from the firm to furnish following information as per the advice of representative of MSME: 1. Detail technical drawings with dimension of each export product, Catalogue, if any, may also be furnished. 2. Weight of each Export Product. 158 3. Weight of each of the imported and indigenous input, separately for each product, for the purpose of material balancing. Net weight (Gross weight minus wastage) for each imported and indigenous input in the export product may be indicated. Net weight along with details of other imported input to be used in the resultant product and sought to be imported/procured from sources other than the license, if any, may also be indicated. 4. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete justification and supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

50 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:15/7/80- Party Name: DOOWON Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 CLIMATE CONTROL ALC2/2019 INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:6610000035 Deferred :01/80/050/00112/AM20/ :66/24/040/00003/AM20/ 03.07.2019 159 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from the firm & RA, Vijayawada and in this regard a letter was sent to RA, Vijayawada and the firm on 08.08.2019 & 13.08.2019 respectively. However, no information has been received so far. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for complete set of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:1/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: TOLIA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: INDUSTRIES ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830453 Deferred :01/80/050/00126/AM20/ :03/95/040/00218/AM20/ 22.07.2019 160 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Mumbai and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:2/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: RONCH Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: POLYMERS PVT LTD. ALC2/2019 & 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830576 Deferred :01/80/050/00127/AM20/ :03/95/040/00379/AM20/ 25.07.2019 161 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Mumbai & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Mumbai and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:3/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: DYNA FORCE Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: HYDRAULICS PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:3110067484 Deferred :01/80/050/00128/AM20/ :31/83/040/00067/AM20/ 25.07.2019 162 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Pune and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

51 | P a g e

==> picture [476 x 142] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:4/9/80-ALC2/2019 Party Name: RATNAMANI Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: METALS AND TUBES LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0810145826 Deferred :01/80/050/00129/AM20/ :08/24/040/00135/AM20/ 25.07.2019 163 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to Consultant (Tech-1) on 13.08.2019 for examination of the case. However, on the advice of Consultant (Tech -1), the Committee decided to forward the case to Consultant (Tech-3) Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

Case No.:5/9/80-ALC2/2019	Party Name: ROTHE ERDE	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
	INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED	ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00130/AM20/	RLA File<br>:31/83/040/00066/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:3110067486<br>26.07.2019	Deferred

164 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, Pune & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, Pune and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case.

Case is deferred.

==> picture [476 x 303] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:6/9/80- Party Name: SCHOTT Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 KAISHA PRIVATE ALC2/2019 LIMITED 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0310830694 Approved :01/80/050/00131/AM20/ :03/95/040/00444/AM20/ 30.07.2019 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and decided to ratify the norms as per written comments of Consultant (Tech-1) as under: ITCHS Sl. ITCHS Recommended Export Item Import Item Code No. Code Norms GLASS BARRELS *RELEVANT GLASS 1.10 Kgs/Kg 165 (SYRINGES) IN VARIOUS 1 70023200 TUBING content in the CAPACITIES WITH OR 70023200 export product WITHOUT PLUNGER TIP / PLUNGER TIP / RUBBER STOPPER / Net to Net with RUBBER STOPPER / PLUNGER STOPPER, WITH 2 40169990 PLUNGER STOPPER accountability OR clause 40169990 90183100 WITHOUT TIP CAP / OVS TIP CAP / Net to Net with (ORIGINAL VETTOR OVS(ORIGINAL accountability SYSTEM) / SRC (SCHOTT VETTOR SYSTEM) / clause RIGID CAP) / RIGID SRC(SCHOTT RIGID NEEDLE SHIELD / 3 40021990 CAP) / RIGID NEEDLE FLEXIBLE NEEDLE SHIELD / FLEXIBLE SHIELD, WITH OR NEEDLE SHIELD WITHOUT NEEDLE 40021990 ----- End of picture text -----

52 | P a g e

(CANNULA) STERILE OR Net to Net with NON STERILE. [NET accountability WEIGHT OF GLASS NEEDLE (CANNULA) clause 4 90183290 TUBING-1650 KGS., 90183290 BALANCE THREE ITEMS ON NET TO NET

*Note: Diameter of Tube imported and that used in the resultant product to conform.

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

==> picture [476 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No.:12/9/80- Party Name: VICTORA Meet No/Date:11/80- Status: ALC2/2019 AUTO PVT. LTD. ALC2/2019 25.09.2019 HQ File RLA File Lic.No/Date:0510411435 Deferred :01/80/050/00137/AM20/ :05/24/040/00251/AM20/ 02.08.2019 166 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the hard copy of application has not yet been received from RA, New Delhi & the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to request from RA, New Delhi and the firm to furnish the hard copy of application for examination of the case. Case is deferred. ----- End of picture text -----

167

Case No.:13/9/80-	Party Name: SSP PVT. LTD.	Meet No/Date:11/80-	Status:
ALC2/2019		ALC2/2019
		25.09.2019
HQ File<br>:01/80/050/00138/AM20/	RLA File<br>:05/24/040/00259/AM20/	Lic.No/Date:0510411438<br>05.08.2019	Deferred

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that a copy of application was sent to DPIIT on 24.09.2019 for examination of the case. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.

Case is deferred.

53 | P a g e

Manual Cases

Case No. 8/16/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No. 139<br> Status:
M. No.: 11/80- dt. 25.09.2019<br>M/s. AKSHAR PRECISION TUBES
PVT.LTD<br>Lic. No. /date: 3410042233<br>Dated:01.06.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/50/383/AM17/DES-I<br>Subject: Request for reviewing of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred
RLA No.: 34/24/040/00027/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No. 22/80-ALC2/2016 dated 31.01.2017 due to non submission of reply against the deficiency
raised by DPIIT.
However, the Party furnished the reply vide their latter dated 14.03.2019 with a request to
reopen their case and fix the ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case and noted that firm’s
representation has been forwarded toDPIIT for their commentson 21.08.2019 and 23.09.2019.
Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case Number : 61/25/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No. 140	Status:
M. No.: 11/80- dt. 25.09.2019<br>M/s. BARODA EQUIPMENT AND
VESSELS PVT LTD<br>Lic. No. /date: 3410042545<br>Date:21.09.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/50/621/AM17/DES-I<br>Subject:Request for reviewing of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 34/24/040/00182/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No.14/80-ALC2/2017dated 10.10.2017 due to non submission of reply of deficiency raised by
DPIIT.
However, the Party furnished the reply vide their letter dated 31.07.2019 with a request to fix
the ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case and noted that firm’s representation has been
forwarded toDPIIT for their commentson 24.09.2019.Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for
the comments.
Case is deferred.

54 | P a g e

Case No. :24/17/80-ALC2/2014<br>Case No. 141	Status:
M. No.: 1/80-ALC2/2019 dated<br>25.09.2019<br>M/s GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA
LIMITED.<br>Lic. No. /date: 0410159425<br>Date: 16.09.2014
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00396/AM15<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 04/24/040/00154/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the norms were rejected by NC in its
Meeting 05/80-ALC2/2016 dated 08.06.2015due to non submission of reply to the deficiency (raised by DHI).
However, the firm has requested for fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and
noted that firm’s representation has been sent to DHI on 21.08.2019 for their comments. Therefore the Committee
decided toremind DHIto furnish their comment.
Case is deferred.

Case No. :25/21/80-ALC2/2016		Case No. 142	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated<br>25.09.2019		M/s L & T-MHPS TURBINE GENERATORS
Lic. No. /date: 0310808650<br>Date: 21.10.2016		PRIVATE LIMITED.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00485/AM17		Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 03/95/040/00528/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the norms were approved by NC in its
11/80-ALC2/2018 dated 06.12.2018as	per	DHI written recommendation vide F. No. 3/12/2017/TSW(B) dated
18.05.2018.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case
and noted that firm’s representation has been sent to DHI on 24.09.2019 for their comments. Therefore, the
Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No. :24/19/80-ALC2/2014	Case No. 143	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated<br>25.09.2019<br>Lic. No. /date: 5610004450<br>Date: 21.10.2014	M/s SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00458/AM15	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 56/24/040/00042/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the norms were approved by NC in its
5/80-ALC2/2016 dated 07.06.2016as per recommendation of DIPP vide ID Note No. 12/46/2016-TSW/11 dated
03.06.2016.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case
and noted that firm’s representation has	been sent to DPIIT on 24.09.2019 for their comments.	Therefore, the
Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

55 | P a g e

Case No. :No.:9/12/80-ALC2/2017	Case No. 144	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019	M/s.SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) PRIVATE
Lic. No. /date: 0510403402/14.07.2017	LIMITED
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/223 /AM18	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00172/AM18
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the norms were approved by NC in its
3/80-ALC2/2016 dated 09.05.2018as per recommendation of DHI, DIPP and MSME present in the meeting.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee considered the case
and noted that firm’s representation has been sent to Tech-3 on 24.09.2019 for their comments.		Therefore, the
Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No. :16/8/80-ALC2/2018	Case No. 145	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Lic. No.: 0510407130 Date: 09.07.2018	M/s.SMC PNEUMATICS (INDIA) PRIVATE<br>LIMITED
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/139/AM19	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00207/AM19
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the norms were approved by NC in its
4/80-ALC2/2019 dated 22.05.2018as per written comments of DPIIT vide their U. O. No.: P-47011/289/2018-
TSW dated 25.04.2019.
However, the firm has requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted
that firm’s representation has been sent to Tech-3 on 24.09.2019 for their comments. Therefore, the Committee
decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.28/19/80-ALC2/2014<br>Case No. 146	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>VOITH HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0510391512 dated 09.10.2014
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00462/AM15<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00277/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
12/80 dated 12.09.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 04.05.2017. However, the firm
vide letter dated 30.05.2019 furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that firm’s reply was referred to DHI vide email dated 23.08.2019
for examination of the case. However, the comments have not been received yet. The Committee decided to
remind DHIfor the comments.
Case is deferred.

56 | P a g e

Case No.72/27/80-ALC2/2014<br>Case No. 147<br> Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>VOITH HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0510393194 Date: 13.02.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00697/AM15<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00547/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
12/80 dated 12.09.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency raised by DHI vide UO No.3 (85)/15-TSW
(B) dated 06.11.2015. However, the firm vide letter dated 30.05.2019 furnished the reply with a request to fix the
ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that firm’s reply was referred to DHI vide email dated 23.08.2019
for examination of the case. However, the comments have not been received yet. The Committee decided to
remind DHIfor the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.41/3/80-ALC2/2015<br>Case No. 148	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Y-TEC INDIA PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 0510393093 dated 05.02.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00041/AM16<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/24/040/00523/AM15
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
18/80 dated 08.12.2015 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 22.06.2015. However, the firm
vide letter dated 20.12.2018 submitted the representation with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation dated 20.12.2018 has	been sent to
Consultant (Tech-3) on 23.09.2019. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the technical comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.36/21/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No. 149	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>NAVKAR FITTINGS & FORGINGS
PVT LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 0310808954 Date: 03.11.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00496/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 03/95/040/00606/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
4/80-ALC2/2017dated 23.05.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency raised by DIPP vide UO
No.12/13/2017-TSW/81 dated 02/03/2017.
However, the Party had furnished the reply with a request to re-open their case and fix the ad-hoc norms.
The Committee noted that firm’s representation has been sent toMSMEon 28.11.2018 along with an	ID reminder
on 17.09.2019 for their comments.Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

57 | P a g e

Case No.14/15/80-ALC2/2013	Case No. 150	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Lic. No.: 0510362949 dated 20.08.2013	Automat Irrigation Pvt. Ltd.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00270/AM14	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/23/040/00199/AM14
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No.	09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee noted that the firm’s
representation was forwarded toMSMEon 28.11.2018 along with the ID reminder on 24.09.2019 for examination
of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Therefore the Committee decided to wait for the
comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No. 50/2/80-ALC2/2016 Case No 151 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 S AND W JEWELLERY PRIVATE LIMITED Lic. No.: 0710108479 dated 08.07.2015 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00053/AM17 Subject: Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms Deferred RLA No.: 05/23/040/00125/AM16

Decision: In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee noted that a deficiency letter seeking information as raised by MSME, i.e. “ The complete statement of exports along with copies of shipping bills” , was sent to the firm on 30.11.2018 along with the reminder on 18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

Case No.262/15/80-ALC2/2018	Case No 152	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Lic. No.: 0710110857 Date: 28.12.2016	MAINI PRECISION PRODUCTS LIMITED
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00604/AM19<br>RLA No.: 07/24/040/00284/AM17	Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms	Approved

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda. The party appeared for Personal Hearing. After hearing the party, the committee decided to approve the case as per the recommendation of the technical members present and taking into the consideration the firm’s AA 0710108649 ratified in Meeting 10/80 dated 11.09.2019 , as under:

==> picture [455 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Sl. Recommended ITCHS Sl. ITCHS No Export Item Import Item Norms Code No. Code PUMP BODY COMPLETE - SS440B Round bar 1.70Kgs/Kg content ASSEMBLY TO P/N 1 87089900 1 72222019 DIA 16 in the export TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF SS440B DIA 16 mm product. SLEEVE AF.0100517 /C-1 PUMP BODY COMPLETE - SS415M Round bar 1.70Kgs/Kg content ASSEMBLY TO P/N 2 87089900 2 72222019 DIA 43 in the export TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF SS415M DIA 43 mm product. BODY PUMP FH.0100048.F ----- End of picture text -----

Note: Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 1 is 18 gram. Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 2 is 23 gram.

RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

58 | P a g e

Case No.260/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Manual Case No 153		Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>MAINI PRECISION PRODUCTS LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0710112552 Date: 15.12.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00602/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 07/24/040/00248/AM18		Approved
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda. The Party appeared for Personal Hearing. After
hearing the party, the committee decided to approve the case as per the recommendation of the technical members
present in the meeting and taking into the consideration thefirm’s AA 0710108649 ratified in Meeting 10/80
dated 11.09.2019, as under :
Sl.<br>No.<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item	Recommended<br>Norms
1<br>87089900<br>PUMP BODY COMPLETE -<br>ASSEMBLY TO P/N<br>TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF<br>SLEEVE AF.0100517 /C-1<br>1<br>72223019<br>SS440B Round bar<br>DIA 16<br>SS440B DIA 16 mm	1.70Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product.
2<br>87089900<br>PUMP BODY COMPLETE -<br>ASSEMBLY TO P/N<br>TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF<br>BODY PUMP FH.0100048.F<br>2<br>72223019<br>SS415M Round bar<br>DIA 43<br>SS415M DIA 43 mm	1.70Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product.
SS440B Round bar	1.70Kgs/Kg
3<br>87089900<br>SLEEVE TO P/N 28514680A<br>3<br>72223019<br>Dia16	content in the
SS440B Dia 16 mm	exportproduct.
Note: Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 1 is 18 gram.
Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 2 is 23 gram.
<br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

	Case No.174/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No 154<br>Status:	Case No.174/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No 154<br>Status:	Case No.174/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No 154<br>Status:	Case No.174/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No 154<br>Status:	Case No.174/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No 154<br>Status:	Case No.174/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No 154<br>Status:	Case No.174/15/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No 154<br>Status:
	M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>MAINI PRECISION PRODUCTS LIMITED<br>Lic. No: 0710113655 Date: 27.07.2018

	HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00516/AM19<br>SbR f fii f dh<br>Approved
	uject:equest or re-xaton o a-oc norms<br>RLA No.: 07/24/040/00106/AM19
<br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>	Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda. The Party appeared for Personal Hearing. After<br>hearing the party, the committee decided to approve the case as per the recommendation of all the technical<br>members present in the meeting and taking into the consideration thefirm’s AA 0710108649 ratified in Meeting<br>10/80 dated 11.09.2019, as under :<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Export Item<br>Sl.<br>No.<br>ITCHS<br>Code<br>Import Item<br>Recommended<br>Norms<br>1<br>87089900<br>PUMP BODY COMPLETE -<br>ASSEMBLY TO P/N<br>TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF<br>SLEEVE AF.0100517 /C-1<br>1<br>72223019<br>SS440B Round bar<br>DIA 16<br>SS440B DIA 16 mm<br>1.70Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product.<br>2<br>87089900<br>PUMP BODY COMPLETE -<br>ASSEMBLY TO P/N<br>TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF<br>BODY PUMP FH.0100048.F<br>2<br>72223019<br>SS415M Round bar<br>DIA 43<br>SS415M DIA 43 mm<br>1.70Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product.<br>Note: Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 1 is 18 gram.<br>Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 2 is 23 gram.<br> <br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.
	Sl.<br>No.	ITCHS<br>Code	Export Item	Sl.<br>No.	ITCHS<br>Code	Import Item	Recommended<br>Norms
	1	87089900	PUMP BODY COMPLETE -<br>ASSEMBLY TO P/N<br>TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF<br>SLEEVE AF.0100517 /C-1	1	72223019	SS440B Round bar<br>DIA 16<br>SS440B DIA 16 mm
	2	87089900	PUMP BODY COMPLETE -<br>ASSEMBLY TO P/N<br>TM.0114659.B CONSISTS OF<br>BODY PUMP FH.0100048.F	2	72223019	SS415M Round bar<br>DIA 43<br>SS415M DIA 43 mm	1.70Kgs/Kg<br>content in the<br>export product.
	Note: Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 1 is 18 gram.<br>Per piece weight of export at Sl. No. 2 is 23 gram.<br> <br>RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction asper the decision of NC.

59 | P a g e

Case No.39/8/80-ALC2/2015<br>Case No 155<br>Status:
M. No.: 9/80-ALC2/2019 dated 14.08.2019<br>Donaldson India Filter Systems Pvt. Ltd.<br>Lic No. 0510394576 dated 16.06.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00145/AM16<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00074/AM16
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee noted that a deficiency letter
seeking information as raised byDPIIT,was sent to the firm on 28.11.2018 along with the reminder on
18.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.
Case is deferred.

Case No.2/4/80-ALC2/2015<br>Case No 156	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Terumo Penpol Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 5310008377 dated 28.05.2009
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00073/AM16<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 53/21/040/00002/AM10	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted its decision of Meeting 11/19 date
30.11.2018 in which representative of MSME stated that the norms may be fixed on the basis of DIPP
recommendation vide No. 7/9/20l6-TSW dt. 08.12.2017 for License No. 5310019514 dt. 05.10.2017 as ratified in
meeting no. 16/80 dated 14.11.2017. However the Committee observed that the description of export item in the
subject application does not exactly match with that appearing in the recommendation of DIPP and due to this it
requested MSME to provide input/output norms.
The Committee noted that in this regard a reminder was sent to MSME on 17.09.2019. However, on the advice of
representative of MSME, the Committee decided to forward the firm’s request toConsultant (Tech -1).
Case is deferred.

==> picture [477 x 75] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 27/9/80-ALC2/2017 Case No 157 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 TERUMO PENPOL PRIVATE Lic. No.: 5310019417 dated 15.06.2017 LIMITED HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00205/AM18 Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms Deferred RLA No.: 53/24/040/00003/AM18 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 03/80 dated 09.05.2018 as per written comments of DIPP (TSW section) vide letter No.: 07/9/2016-TSW dated 08.12.2017. However the firm requested to re-fix the norms and also allow them for Personal Hearing .

03/80 dated 09.05.2018 as per written comments of DIPP (TSW section) vide letter No.: 07/9/2016-TSW dated 08.12.2017. However the firm requested to re-fix the norms and also allow them for Personal Hearing . In continuation to Meeting 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee noted that the firm appeared for PH in its Meeting 09/80 dated 14.09.2019 and explained the reason for higher wastage claimed. Based on the deliberations, the Committee decided that Consultant (Tech 1) to look into the issue. Consultant (Tech-1) pointed out that firm is requesting to increase the wastage norms for PVC compound from 10% to 16% on the basis of Deptt. of C&PC suggestion vide letter dated 10.09.2012 for amending the SION H-67 and AA of the firm has been ratified on the basis of SION H-67 which allows for only 10%. Consultant (Tech 1) suggested that PLEXCOUNCIL may be requested to provide Production/Consumption data of other manufacturers. Considering all the facts, the Committee decided that Deptt. of C&PC may again be consulted in the matter keeping in the mind the innovation in technology and to also request PLEXCONCIL to provide Production/Consumption data of other manufacturers. Case is deferred.

60 | P a g e

Case No.2/10/80-ALC2/2014	Case No 158	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Lic. No.: 0310781699 dated 15.05.2014	Larsen & Toubro Ltd.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00198/AM15<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00038/AM15	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee decided to sendfinal reminder
to the firm to furnish the requisite information	within 15 days failing which the case will be rejected.
Case is deferred.

==> picture [477 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 45/24/80-ALC2/2013 Case No 159 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 Kelvion India Pvt. Ltd. Lic. No.: 0310766285 dated 15.01.2014 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00522/AM14 Deferred Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms RLA No.: 03/94/040/00880/AM14 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised by DPIIT was sent to the firm on 27.11.2018, with subsequent reminder on 18.09.2019. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.

Case is deferred.

Case No.26/11/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No 160	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Dee Development Engineers Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 0510398701 dated 01.06.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00299/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 05/23/040/00101/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 19.04.2017.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDHIon
03.12.2018 & reminder on 17.09.2019, for examination of the case. However, no comments have	been received
yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.21/6/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No 161	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Dee Development Engineers Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 0510398216 dated 13.04.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00180/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00015/AM17	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No. 09/80 dated 01.08.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 19.04.2017.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDPIIT
on 15.01.2019 & reminder on 17.09.2019, for examination of the case. However, no comments have	been received
yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

61 | P a g e

Case No.5/14/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No 162	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Injectoplast Pvt. Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 0610038435 dated 09.08.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00355/AM17<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 06/24/040/0015/AM17	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting
No. 17/80 dated 19.12.2017 as per comments of MSME.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toMSME
on 15.01.2019 & reminder on 17.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received
yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.15/2/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No 163	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Deepeeka Exports Pvt. Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 0510396524 dated 04.12.2015
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00018/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00371/AM16	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No. 14/80 dated 11.10.2016 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 04.08.2016.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as
raised byMSMEwas sent to the firm on 15.01.2019 and subsequent reminder on 18.09.2019. However, no reply
has been received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply.
Case is deferred.

Case No.55/3/80-ALC2/2015	Case No 164	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Lic. No.: 1710006064 dated 11.03.2015	Goa Thermostatic Instruments Pvt. Ltd.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00055/AM16<br>RLA No.: 17/24/040/00204/AM15	Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80	dated 14.09.2019, The Committee noted that firm’s reply dated
23.09.2019 has been sent to MSME on 24.09.2019. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the		comments.
Case is deferred.

62 | P a g e

==> picture [477 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 11/17/80-ALC2/2015 Case No 165 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 Glovis India Pvt. Ltd. Lic. No.: 0410161029 dated 21.09.2015 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00315/AM16 Approved Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms RLA No.: 04/24/040/00124/AM16 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 3/80-ALC2/2016 dated 10.05.2016.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 3/80-ALC2/2016 dated 10.05.2016. However, the Party furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The case was discussed in the meeting and on the recommendation of Consultant (Tech-1), the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under: 1. Import item at serial No. 5, 6, 11, 24, 25, 32 are Polyamide Resin and may be allowed as 1.02 kg/kg content in export product. 2. Import item at serial No. 16 is reinforcing agent for Polypropylene and may be allowed as 1.005 kg/kg content. 3. Import item at serial No. 19 is Polypropylene which may be allowed as 1.02 kg/kg content in export product. 4. Rest of the item may be deleted as they are components. RA concerned may take further necessary action

Case No.16/15/80-ALC2/2013<br>Case No 166<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Indus Pro Auto Engineers Pvt. Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 0510363605 dated 26.08.2013
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00272/AM14<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/0221/AM14
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee considered the case as per
agenda and decided to ask the firm to furnish following information as per the advice ofrepresentative of MSME:
1. As per firm’s reply 1.88 sq. mtr. is to be used in each export product which translates into 3196 sq.mtr.
Why there is anomaly?
Case is deferred.

Case No.54/2/80-ALC2/2012<br>Case No 167	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Driplex Water Engineering P. Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 0510317886 dated 15.02.2012
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00018/AM13<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00450/AM12	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was approved in Meeting
No. 09/80 dated 24.07.2012 as per written comments of DHI.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDHIon
29.07.2019 & reminder on 17.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet.
Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

63 | P a g e

Case No.52/15/80-ALC2/2013<br>Case No168<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Sharma Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.<br>Lic. No. : 3410037864 dated 11.09.2013
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00308/AM14<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 34/24/040/00131/AM14
Decision:In continuation to Meeting 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee considered the case as per the agenda
and noted that a deficiency letter seeking certain information as raised byDPIITwas sent to the firm on
16.07.2019 & subsequent reminder on 24.09.2019. However, no reply has been received yet. Hence, the Committee
decided to wait for the firm’s reply.
Case is deferred.

==> picture [477 x 75] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 39/31/80-ALC2/2010 Case No 169 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 R.D Engineers India P. Ltd. Lic. No.: 0310592767 dated 16.09.2010 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00517/AM11 Approved Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms RLA No.: 03/95/040/00480/AM11 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. 12/80 dated 06.09.2011 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 15.07.2011. However, the Party furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The case was discussed in the meeting and on the recommendation of technical representative of MSME , the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under:

Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting	Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No. 12/80 dated 06.09.2011 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 15.07.2011. However, the
Party furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The case was discussed in the meeting and on the
recommendation oftechnical representative of MSME, the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under:
For	Exports:
1.	Net weight of Tag No 89-C-001 may be amended as 72.038 MT (Import item weight = 63.797 MT + Indigenous =
	8.241 MT)
2.	Net weight of Tag No. 09-C-002 may be amended as 68.478 MT (Import item weight = 58.374 MT + Indigenous =
	10.104 MT)
3.	Net weight of Tag No. 89-C-003 may be amended as 95.474 MT (Import item wait = 74.455 MT + Indigenous =
	21.023 MT )
For	Imports:
1.	Relevant items of import may be allowed as applied, with NIL wastage as requested by firm.
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction.

Case No.4/27/80-ALC2/2010<br>Case No170<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>R.D Engineers India P. Ltd.<br>Lic. No.: 0310584240 dated 20.07.2010
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00401/AM11<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Approved<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00297/AM11
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
12/80 dated 06.09.2011 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 01.07.2011. However, the Party
furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The case was discussed in the meeting and on the
recommendation oftechnical representative of MSME, the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under:
For Exports:
1.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. 13-V-11 = 75.433 MT (Import item weight = 66.105 MT + indigenous = 9.32 MT)
2.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. 13-V-18 = 8.188 MT (Import item weight = 4.895 MT + indigenous = 3.29 MT)
For Imports:
1.<br>Relevant item of import may be allowed as approved, with nil wastage as requested by firm.
Case is deferred.

64 | P a g e

Case No.5/8/80-ALC2/2011		Case No 171<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Lic. No: 0310634076 dated 01.06.2011		R.D Engineers India P. Ltd.
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00153/AM12<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00168/AM12		Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Approved
Decision:The Committee considered the case as		per the agenda and noted that the case was rejected in Meeting
No. 14/80 dated 04.10.2011 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 15.07.2011. However, the
Party furnished the reply with a request to fix	the	ad-hoc norms. The case was discussed in the meeting and on the
recommendation oftechnical representative of MSME, the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under:
For Exports:
1.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. 9-V-907 =		137.897 MT (Import weight =135 MT + Indigenous = 2.897 MT)
2.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. XX-V-XXX = 137.897 MT (Import weight = 135 MT + Indigenous = 2.897 MT)
For Imports:
1.<br>Relevant item of import may be allowed as applied, with NIL wastage as requested by firm.
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction.

==> picture [477 x 74] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 21/5/80-ALC2/2011 Case No 172 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 R.D Engineers India P. Ltd Lic. No.: 0310625116 dated 05.04.2011 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00057/AM12 Approved Subject: Request for fixation and of ad-hoc norms RLA No.: 03/95/040/00004/AM12 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. ----- End of picture text -----

14/80 dated 04.10.2011 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 15.07.2011. However, the Party
furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The case was discussed in the meeting and on the
recommendation oftechnical representative of MSME, the Committee decided to ratify the norms as under:
For Exports
1.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. 30-C-007 = 28.895 MT (Import item weight = 27 MT+Indigenous = 1.985MT)
2.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. 30-V-27 = 35.138 MT (Import item weight = 33.153 MT+Indigenous = 1.985MT )
3.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. 30-V-008 = 12.7 MT (import item weight = 10.864 MT +Indigenous = 1.843MT)
4.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No 30-V-14 = 23.147 MT (import item weight = 18.33 MT +Indigenous = 4.817MT)
5.<br>Net weight of export item Tag No. 30-V-17 = 25.965 MT (import item weight =22.12 MT +Indigenous = 3.845MT)
6.<br>Net weight of export item Tag no. 30-V-37 = 5.53 MT (import item weight = 5.53 MT +Indigenous = 2.341MT)
For Imports
1.<br>Relevant import of S.No.1 may be allowed as applied, as NIL wastage as requested by firm.
2.<br>Relevant import of S.No.2 may be allowed as per GN-4.
RA concerned maytake further necessaryaction

Case No.11/24/80-ALC2/2013<br>Case No173<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>Himenviro Environmental P. Ltd<br>Lic. No.: 0510374103 dated 19.12.2013
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00488/AM14<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00367/AM14
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
01/80 dated 01.04.2014 as per written comments of DIPP U.O. No.: 12/78/2014-TSW/93 dated 01.04.2014.
The firm vide letter dated 08.10.2017 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee
reconsidered the case and noted that the firm was called for personal hearing on 17.10.2018 and 25.09.2019 to
explain the case before Norms Committee as per advice of DPIIT. However, nobody appeared for personal hearing
on behalf of the firm. Hence, the Committee decided to give last opportunity to the firm forpersonal hearingto
explain the case before Norms Committee.
Case is deferred.

65 | P a g e

==> picture [477 x 74] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 17/21/80-ALC2/2016 Case No 174 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 TRF LIMITED Lic. No.: 0210206731 dated 03.06.2016 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00477/AM17 Deferred Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms RLA No.: 02/24/040/00041/AM17 Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No. ----- End of picture text -----

16/80 dated 14.11.2017 on the ground that there is no manufacturing activity involved. The firm represented against the Committee decision vide their letter dated 24.07.2018. Firm’s representation was sent to DHI for comments/examination. DHI vide their e-mail stated that “DHI has no fresh comments to offer and Norms Committee may take a view as per the policy”. The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm was called for personal hearing on 25.09.2019 to explain the case before Norms Committee as per advice of DPIIT. However, nobody appeared for personal hearing on behalf of the firm. Hence, the Committee decided to give last opportunity to the firm for personal hearing to explain the case before Norms Committee. Case is deferred.

Case No. A/R 16/19<br>Case No 175	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated<br>25.09.2019<br>TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd.
HQ. No.:<br>01/80/162/301/AM18/DES-18<br>Subject:EOU- M/s. TATA Sikorsky Aerospace Ltd., LOP<br>No. PER: 076/EOU/VSEZ/HYD/2011 dated 25.07.2011 for<br>fixation of wastage norms for export product “Helicopter<br>cabin kits & parts and accessories for Aircraft” against<br>import items 1. Stainless Steel bars/rods 2. Stainless Steel<br>Tube/Pipes 3. Stainless Steel round bars	Deferred
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee considered the case as per the
agenda and noted that the application of the firm was sent to DIPP on 10.07.2018 and also to DHI	on 03.08.2018
for their examinations/comments. Since they had stated that the export product is not under the purview of
DIPP/DHl, so it was forwarded to MSME on 18.03.2019 and 24.09.2019. However, no comments have been
received yet. Hence, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.36/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No176<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>CHASYS AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS
PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 3110067031 dated 17.04.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00085/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 31/83/040/00002/AM19
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
10/80 dated 16.11.2018 as per written comments of DHI vide U.O. NO. TSWB /3/60/2017 dated 24.11.2017.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDHI
on 17.07.2019 and 25.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence,
the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

66 | P a g e

Case No.34/19/80-ALC2/2017<br>Case No177<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>CHASYS AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS
PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 3110066895 dated 31.10.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00315/AM18<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 31/83/040/00101/AM18
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
09/80 dated 17.10.2018 as per written comments of DHI vide U.O. NO. TSWB FN: 3 (35)/2017 dated 27.3.2017.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDHI
on 17.07.2019 and 25.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence,
the Committee decided to wait for the comments..
Case is deferred.

Case No.26/7/80-ALC2/2017<br>Case No178	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>CHASYS AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS
PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 3110066727 dated 09.05.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00136/AM18<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 31/83/040/00181/AM17	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
17/80 dated 19.12.2017 on the recommendation of DHI.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDHI
on 17.07.2019 and 25.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence,
the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.14/8/80-ALC2/2017<br>Case No179<br>Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>CHASYS AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS
PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 3110066778 dated 09.06.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00158/AM18<br>Subject:Request for re- fixation of ad-hoc norms.<br>Deferred<br>RLA No.: 31/83/040/00033/AM18
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
17/80 dated 19.12.2017 as per written comments of DHI vide letter No.: TSWB/3/60/2017 dated 24.11.2017.
The Committee reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDHI
on 17.07.2019 and 25.09.2019 for examination of the case. However, no comments have been received yet. Hence,
the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Case is deferred.

67 | P a g e

Case No.59/6/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No180		Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019
L&T-MHPS BOILERS PVT. LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 0310804134 dated 25.04.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00219/AM17<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms.<br>RLA No.: 03/95/040/00792/AM16		Deferred
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee considered	the case as per
agenda and decided to ask the firm to furnish following information as per the advice ofrepresentative of DHI:
1. Starting from the specification of the export product, basic calculation as to how of raw material proposed
for import has been arrived at, including the net weight of components to be manufactured out of these
imported materials, wastages claimed at each stage of manufacturing with complete	justification and
supported by documentary evidence/drawings etc.
2.<br>Relevant drawings.
Case is deferred.

Case No.67/2/80-ALC2/2016<br>Case No181	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>ECOCAT INDIA PVT.LTD<br>Lic. No.: 0510397548 dated 09.02.2016
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00070/AM17<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 05/23/040/00472/AM16	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in Meeting No.
15/80 dated 06.03.2019 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency letter dated 11.10.2018.
In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee noted that firm’s	representation
has been sent to MSME on 11.07.2019 and reminder on 24.09.2019. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for
the comments.
Case is deferred.

Case No.23/5/80-ALC2/2018<br>Case No182	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>RITES LTD.<br>Lic. No.: 0510406273 dated 27.04.2018
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00072/AM19<br>Subject:Request for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 05/24/040/00045/AM19	Deferred
Decision:In continuation to Meeting No. 09/80 dated 14.09.2019, the Committee considered the case as per the
agenda and noted that firm was called for certain information. However, the information has not been received yet.
Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the firm’s reply
Case is deferred.

68 | P a g e

Case No.2/19/80-ALC2/2017<br>Case No183	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019<br>TIL LIMITED<br>Lic. No.: 0210207957 dated 09.11.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00283/AM18<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms<br>RLA No.: 02/24/040/00121/AM18	Deferred
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No.
04/80 dated 23.05.2018 on the recommendation of DHI.
The firm vide letter dated 26.06.2019 requested for re-fixation of ad-hoc norms. The Committee
reconsidered the case and noted that the firm’s representation was forwarded toDHIon 26.07.2019 and reminder
sent on 24.09.2019 for examination of the case. However,representative of DHIagain requested for the full
representation of the firm. Therefore, the Committee decided to forward the complete information to DHI again.
Case is deferred.

==> picture [477 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Case No. 28/8/80-ALC2/2017 Case No 184 Status: M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated 25.09.2019 NIPHA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED Lic. No.: 0210207598 Date: 15.05.2017 HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00172/AM18 Approved Subject: Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms RLA No.: 02/24/040/00026/AM18 ----- End of picture text -----

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 04/80 dated 23.05.2018.

Decision: The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was approved in Meeting No. 04/80 dated 23.05.2018. However, the Party furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The case was discussed in the meeting and on the recommendation of technical representative of MSME , the Committee decided to ratify the norms as per earlier decision taken by NC in its meeting No. 9/80 dated 17.10.2018 against advance authorization No. 0210208194 dated 06.02.2018 under: i. Import of pipes is allowed at 1.21 kg/kg in export product with usual TC/thickness conformity clause. The party will account for the material imported in the export product. RA concerned may take further necessary action as per the decision of NC.

Case No.14/3/80-ALC2/2017<br>Case No185	Status:
M. No.: 11/80-ALC2/2019 dated<br>25.09.2019<br>BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED<br>Lic. No. /date: 0410162877<br>Date: 09.03.2017
HQ. No.: 01/80/050/00014/AM18<br>Subject:Request for fixation of ad-hoc norms	Deferred
RLA No.: 04/24/040/00215/AM17
Decision:The Committee considered the case as per the agenda noted that the case was rejected in
Meeting No.12/80-ALC2/2017dated 12.09.2017 due to non-submission of reply of deficiency raised
by DIPP vide UO No.12/36/2017-TSW/160 dated 16/05/2017.
However, the Party furnished the reply with a request to fix the ad-hoc norms. The representation
of the firm was sent to DPIIT on 29.07.2019 & reminder on 23.09.2019 for their comments. However,
the comments have been received yet. Therefore, the Committee decided to wait for the comments.
Caseis deferred.

69 | P a g e

==> picture [502 x 623] intentionally omitted <==

70 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 531] intentionally omitted <==

71 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 597] intentionally omitted <==

72 | P a g e

==> picture [480 x 589] intentionally omitted <==

73 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 648] intentionally omitted <==

74 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 578] intentionally omitted <==

75 | P a g e

==> picture [558 x 404] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [558 x 202] intentionally omitted <==

76 | P a g e

==> picture [496 x 614] intentionally omitted <==

77 | P a g e

==> picture [469 x 627] intentionally omitted <==

78 | P a g e

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.