IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

RaƟfied Minutes of Meeting No.05/15 scheduled on 27.05.2014 of Norms Committee(NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeƟng No. 05/15 of the Norms CommiƩee (NC‐I) for the licensing year 2014‐2015 was held on 27.05.2014 under the Chairmanship of Dr. L.B. Singhal, AddiƟonal Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applicaƟons under Duty ExempƟon / Remission Schemes (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014 / Handbook of Procedure Volume‐I. The following Members of the CommiƩee were present in the meeƟng except TA, MSME, menƟoned below at Sl. No. 3: ‐ Sl.No. Name of the representaƟves & their DesignaƟon Room No. Telephone No. DepƩ. 1. Sh K.K. Tiwari I.A 476 23063321 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 428A 23063321 Extn.3318 23063166 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. Kanwalinder Singh Sodhi, AssƩ. Dir. (Mech) 736A 23063802 Extn.2459 DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. Priya Ranjan, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. I ‐The CommiƩee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeƟng generated through the online system of NIC. The decisions taken thereon are as under: 1

Case No.:16/6/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:5/80ALC2/2014 27.05.2014 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00081/AM13/ RLA File :31/21/040/00050/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110038576 28.05.2009 Decision : The CommiƩee consider the case and decided to inƟmate firm that Norms CommiƩee can fix the norms only . The CommiƩee further stated that as far as the merger/clubbing of two Advance AuthorisaƟons are concerned, this to be decided by the concerned Regional Authority (RA) only as per applicable policy only. Hence, RA may first take a decision on the request of the firm regarding merger or clubbing of subject Advance AuthorisaƟon and inƟmate Norms CommiƩee accordingly. The CommiƩee also decided to advise the firm to approach concerned RA and close the case on the part of NC‐I. RA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 2

Case No.:1/25/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: RANGSONS ELECTRONICS PVT LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00533/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00250/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0710074552 01.10.2010 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 02.01.2014 sent by DIT directly followed by DGFT reminder dated 28.02.2014, final reminder dated 28.03.2014 and aŌer that decided to await 15 days more to receive reply from the firm. The CommiƩee further noted that DGFT has not received reply of the firm and decided to reject their case with the direcƟon to pay the Custom Duty and applicable interest for regularizaƟon of the license. RA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 3

Case No.:8/14/80ALC2/2011

Party Name: MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00262/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00182/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510300205 24.08.2011 Defer Date:08.07.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply has been forwarded to C&PC and 10th reminder dated 20.5.2014 has been sent to them for expediƟng their comments but the same have not been received Ɵll date and decided to send another reminder to them. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 4

Case No.:23/9/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00203/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00136/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910053032 13.06.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the said case has been forwarded to EPCG division for their inputs and 9th reminder dated 23.5.2014 has been sent to them for expediƟng their inputs but the same have not been received Ɵll date and decided to send another reminder to them. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 5

Case No.:12/15/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: TRANSASIA BIO MEDICALS LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00347/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00235/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310701463 10.07.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the DIT has reminded firm for expediƟng the requisite informaƟon vide their leƩer No. 17(114)/2012‐IPHW dated 16.4.2014 followed by DGFT reminder dated 19.5.2014 and e‐mail message on 26.5.2014. The CommiƩee decided to await firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 6

Case No.:34/24/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: CICB CHEMICON PRIVATE LIMITED, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00514/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00192/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090176 09.08.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 09.09.2013 sent to them again on 08.1.2014 followed by reminder dated 28.3.2014 alongwith copy of deficiency leƩer, further communicaƟon dated 28.3.2014, final reminder dated 20.5.2014 and e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply . Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 7

Case No.:6/7/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00100/AM14/ RLA File :07/21/040/00366/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090351 23.08.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 14.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of DHI. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 8

Case No.:18/15/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00353/AM13/ RLA File :07/21/040/00397/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090531 31.08.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 14.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of 9

Case No.:5/18/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: LUDOWICI MINING PROCESS INDIA PVT LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00373/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00132/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410140287 05.10.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 11.11.2013 sent by C&PC directly followed by DGFT reminder dated 10.02.2014, final reminder dated 28.03.2014 and aŌer that decided to await 15 days more to receive reply from the firm. The CommiƩee further noted that DGFT has not received reply of the firm and decided to reject their case with the direcƟon to pay the Custom Duty and applicable interest for regularizaƟon of the license. RA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 10

Case No.:32/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00117/AM15/ RLA File :07/21/040/00629/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091836 08.11.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of MSME. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 11

Case No.:41/24/80ALC2/2012

Party Name: POLY MEDICURE LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00521/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00356/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510341782 27.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been forwarded to C&PC on 13.2.2013 and 3rd reminder dated 20.5.2014 has been issued to them for expediƟng their comments but the same have not been received. The CommiƩee further decided to send another reminder to C&PC. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 12

Case No.:3/7/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00097/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00544/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910055381 13.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 21.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of 13

Case No.:30/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: SIRIA IMPEX PVT.LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00115/AM15/ RLA File :05/24/040/00446/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510350478 01.04.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/13 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: Advance AuthorizaƟon may be raƟfied on repeat basis as per firm’s Advance AuthorizaƟon No. 0510351414 dated 11.04.2013 raƟfied in Norms CommiƩee MeeƟng No. 16/14 dated 29/10/2013. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 14

Case No.:15/7/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: LURGI INDIA COMPANY PVT.LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00109/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00004/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510352785 30.04.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply is incomplete and decided to grant ‘Personal Hearing’ to the firm on 08.7.2014 by advising them to appear before the CommiƩee alongwith the technical expert who is well conversant with the case and to furnish or submit the following informaƟon during ‘Personal Hearing’ according to DIPP ID Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/14 dated 27.05.2014: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 9 of Standard Deficiency Format. 2. Detailed calculaƟons/basis for the quanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 22 (Molecular Sieve). 3. Details of manufacturing acƟviƟes proposed to be undertaken on import item at Sl. No. 25. Case is deferred to 27.05.2014. 15

Case No.:4/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: SANATHAN ALLIED INDUSTRIES 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00528/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00038/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910055922 02.05.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DHI U. O. No. 3(24)/14‐TSW(B)12 dated 13.5.2014 (Copy is to be forwarded to RA and firm). 16

Case No.:6/10/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: LICRA GREEN TECHNOLOGIES 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00161/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00019/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710095521 22.05.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 10.02.2014 which actually pertains to DHI (as per the comments of Technical Authority,

pp y p ( p y, MSME)and decided to send the firm’s applicaƟon to DHI for expediƟng their comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 17

Case No.:23/13/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00228/AM14/ RLA File :07/21/040/00068/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710095554 23.05.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 14.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of 18

Case No.:23/10/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: THERMAX LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00178/AM14/ RLA File :31/83/040/00045/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3110058550 30.05.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied deficiency leƩer dated 07.05.2014 and decided to send reminder to the firm for expediƟng their reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 19

Case No.:25/10/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: THERMAX LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00180/AM14/ RLA File :31/83/040/00044/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3110058551 30.05.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied deficiency leƩer dated 07.05.2014 and decided to send reminder to the firm for expediƟng their reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 20

Case No.:2/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00526/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00070/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910056185 30.05.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 07.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of 21

Case No.:3/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00527/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00069/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910056186 30.05.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 07.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of 22

Case No.:27/10/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: SPARKLINE EQUIPMENTS PVT.LTD, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00182/AM14/ RLA File :31/83/040/00040/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3110059032 20.06.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 12.02.2014 followed by reminder dated 31.03.2014 and final reminder dated 19.05.2014. The CommiƩee further noted that the firm has inƟmated that they have furnished their reply vide their e‐mail dated 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for the receipt of their reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 23

Case No.:10/15/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00266/AM14/ RLA File :07/21/040/00090/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710096369 02.07.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 14.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of 24

Case No.:11/15/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00267/AM14/ RLA File :07/21/040/00126/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710096370 02.07.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s reply dated 14.05.2014 has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of 25

Case No.:44/10/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00199/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00113/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510358721 04.07.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that that the firm has been briefly explained about the producƟon of a cerƟficate from a duly authorised officer of the Directorate General of Hydro Carbons in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, to the effect that the said imported goods are required for petroleum operaƟons, is required for raƟficaƟon of subject AA vide leƩer dated 23.5.2014 but the firm has not furnished the same and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 26

Case No.:40/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ZENITH PRECISION PVT LTD ., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00125/AM15/ RLA File :07/24/040/00113/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710097716 23.08.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 23.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 23.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for MSME comments; (ii) to wait for firm’s reply. 27

Case No.:43/5/80ALC2/2014

27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00128/AM15/ RLA File :07/24/040/00156/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710097714 23.08.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 23.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 23.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for MSME comments; 28

Case No.:45/5/80ALC2/2014

27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00130/AM15/ RLA File :07/24/040/00136/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710097715 23.08.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 23.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 23.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for MSME comments; 29

Case No.:9/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Meet No/Date:5/80ALC2/2014 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00094/AM15/ RLA File :07/21/040/00389/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710097934 30.08.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for comments of MSME. 30

Case No.:50/15/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: TERACOM LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00306/AM14/ RLA File :05/24/040/00199/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510364316 03.09.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has been asked to furnish Amendment Sheet issued by the concerned Regional Authority vide leƩer dated 25.4.2014 followed by reminder dated 19.5.2014 and decided to wait for aforesaid document. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 31

Case No.:1/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00001/AM15/ RLA File :09/24/040/00263/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910057521 10.09.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied deficiency leƩer dated 16.05.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply . Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 32

Case No.:9/19/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00381/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00311/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910057710 25.09.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 06.01.2014 sent followed by DGFT reminder dated 10.02.2014, final reminder dated 28.03.2014, e‐mail message on 22.4.2014 and aŌer that decided to await 15 days more to receive reply from the firm. The CommiƩee further noted that DGFT has not received reply of the firm and decided to reject their case with the direcƟon to pay the Custom Duty and applicable interest for regularizaƟon of the license. RA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 33

Case No.:10/19/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: NSK ABC BEARINGS LIMITED, 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00382/AM14/ RLA File :04/24/040/00138/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0410150484 03.10.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/33 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: 1. Words “Cylindrical Roller” may be prefixed with the descripƟon of export product. 2. Net weight of export products may be specified as 17112 Kgs. 3. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed and words “ 61.55 mm x 9.05 mm” may be suffixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No. 1. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 20.688 MT as 1.944 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products aŌer taking 20 % recovery from scrap. 5. Import items at Sl. No. 2 & 3 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause 34

Case No.:11/19/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: NSK ABC BEARINGS LIMITED, 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00383/AM14/ RLA File :04/24/040/00139/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0410150663 07.10.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/34 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: 1. Words “VP34‐4NXRX*U2” may be suffixed with the descripƟon of export product. 2. Net weight of export products may be specified as 49744 Kgs. 3. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed and words “ 64.70 mm x 8.5 mm” may be suffixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No. 1.

Word Relevant may be prefixed and words 64.70 mm x 8.5 mm may be suffixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No. . 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 49.766 MT as 1.663 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products aŌer taking 20 % recovery from scrap. 5. Import items at Sl. No. 2 & 3 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause 35

Case No.:15/19/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00387/AM14/ RLA File :34/24/040/00097/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3410038311 22.10.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 09.12.2013 for examinaƟon/comments followed by reminder dated 20.5.2014 but their comments have not received Ɵll date and decided to remind C&PC for expediƟng their comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 36

Case No.:4/19/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: JBM KANEMITSU PULLEYS PRIVATE LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00376/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00313/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510370156 01.11.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 05.12.2013 for examinaƟon/comments followed by reminder dated 20.5.2014 but their comments have not received Ɵll date and decided to remind DHI for expediƟng their comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 37

Case No.:8/19/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00380/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00310/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510370619 08.11.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that that the firm has been briefly explained about the producƟon of a cerƟficate from a duly authorised officer of the Directorate General of Hydro Carbons in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, to the effect that the said imported goods are required for petroleum operaƟons, is required for raƟficaƟon of subject AA vide leƩer dated 23.5.2014 but the firm has not furnished the same and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 38

Case No.:13/19/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: STERICAT GUTSTRINGS PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00385/AM14/ RLA File :05/24/040/00249/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510370609 08.11.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.03.2014 sent by C&PC directly followed by DGFT reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 39

Case No.:10/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00010/AM15/ RLA File :07/24/040/00292/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710100276 06.12.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that DEIT has given deficiency leƩer No. 27/19/2014‐IPHW dated 08.5.2014 to the firm directly and decided to remind firm to furnish the informaƟon according to the aforesaid DIT leƩer (Copy of DEIT’s leƩer No. 27/19/2014‐IPHW dated 08.5.2014 to be forwarded to the firm). Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 40

Case No.:33/25/80ALC2/2013

27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00557/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00291/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710100457 11.12.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has neither replied the DES‐I leƩer dated 28.02.2014 issued to them for clarifying type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) followed by reminder dated 28.3.2014 nor forwarded the requisite informaƟon sought vide deficiency leƩer dated 03.04.2014. The CommiƩee further noted that the firm has requested for the grant of 15 days Ɵme vide their leƩer dated 21.04.2014 which is already over and decided to give reminder to the firm for furnishing their reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 41

Case No.:15/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: DIABU DIAMOND TOOLS (INDIA) PVT LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00539/AM14/ RLA File :07/21/040/00739/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710100662 18.12.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DC(MSME) U.O. Note No. 30(42)/2014‐ME dated 26.05.2014 (Copy to be forwarded to RA and firm). 42

Case No.:25/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: GANDIKOTA THERMO CONTROLS PVT LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00549/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00472/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910058650 19.12.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 03.04.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 43

Case No.:1/22/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: SCREENOTEX (INDIA) PVT.LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00426/AM14/ RLA File :08/24/040/00436/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0810127774 07.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DC(MSME) U.O. Note No. 30(34)/14‐ME dated 12.05.2014 (Copy to be forwarded to RA and firm). 44

Case No.:34/25/80ALC2/2013

27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00558/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00322/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710101167 07.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has neither replied the DES‐I leƩer dated 28.02.2014 issued to them for clarifying type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) followed by reminder dated 28.3.2014 nor forwarded the requisite informaƟon sought vide deficiency leƩer dated 03.04.2014. The CommiƩee further noted that the firm has requested for the grant of 15 days Ɵme vide their leƩer dated 21.04.2014 which is already over and decided to give reminder to the firm for furnishing their reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 45

Case No.:11/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT INDIA LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00535/AM14/ RLA File :07/21/040/00854/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710101246 10.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 20.05.2014 followed by an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 46

Case No.:35/25/80ALC2/2013

27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00559/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00325/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710101261 13.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has neither replied the DES‐I leƩer dated 28.02.2014 issued to them for clarifying type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) followed by reminder dated 28.3.2014 nor forwarded the requisite informaƟon sought vide deficiency leƩer dated 03.04.2014. The CommiƩee further noted that the firm has requested for the grant of 15 days Ɵme vide their leƩer dated 21.04.2014 which is already over and decided to give reminder to the firm for furnishing their reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 47

Case No.:36/25/80ALC2/2013

27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00560/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00339/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710101249 13.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has neither replied the DES‐I leƩer dated 28.02.2014 issued to them for clarifying type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) followed by reminder dated 28.3.2014 nor forwarded the requisite informaƟon sought vide deficiency leƩer dated 03.04.2014. The CommiƩee further noted that the firm has requested for the grant of 15 days Ɵme vide their leƩer dated 21.04.2014 which is already over and decided to give reminder to the firm for furnishing their reply. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 48

Case No.:31/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00555/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00511/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910058926 15.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DHI U.O. Note No. 3(17)/2014TSW(B) dated 28.03.2014 (Copy to be forwarded to RA and firm). 49

Case No.:37/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: UNITED MANUFACTURING CO. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00561/AM14/ RLA File :05/24/040/00379/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510376277 16.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 03.04.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014 and decided to send final reminder to the firm for expediƟng their reply failing which the CommiƩee would be constrained to reject their case with direcƟon to pay the Custom Duty and applicable interest for regularizaƟon of the license. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 50

Case No.:24/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00548/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00417/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510376515 20.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 28.02.2014 for examinaƟon and comments and on the basis of recommendaƟon of Technical Authority, DHI present in the meeƟng, the CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to submit the revised descripƟon of the export product which should exclude the items in import list and specific raƟngs and use of export product. The CommiƩee also noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 28.02.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.5.2014, e‐mail dated 21.05.2014 which has not been received Ɵll date and also decided to ask the firm to furnish the aforesaid revised descripƟon and clarificaƟon on the type of export. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 51

Case No.:23/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00547/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00416/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510376999 24.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 28.02.2014 for examinaƟon and a reminder dated 20.5.2014 has been given to them for expediƟng their comments. The CommiƩee decided to wait for DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 52

Case No.:17/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00541/AM14/ RLA File :05/24/040/00407/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510377258 27.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 28.02.2014 for examinaƟon/comments followed by reminder dated 20.5.2014 but their comments have not received Ɵll date and decided to remind C&PC for expediƟng their comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 53

Case No.:26/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: AIRPACK COMPRESSOR TEKNOLOGIES PVT LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00550/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00427/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510377245 27 01 2014

27.01.2014 Decision : : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 28.03.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 54

Case No.:32/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00556/AM14/ RLA File :09/24/040/00326/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0910059091 28.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 28.02.2014 for examinaƟon/comments followed by reminder dated 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 55

Case No.:38/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ESSAR PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00562/AM14/ RLA File :52/24/040/00044/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:5210040638 28.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 28.03.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 56

Case No.:1/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ALSTOM INDIA LIMITED, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00525/AM14/ RLA File :32/21/040/00177/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3210072580 30.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 04.04.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 57

Case No.:12/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BLISS ANAND PVT.LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00536/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00425/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510377954 31.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 28.03.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 58

Case No.:13/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00537/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00432/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510377960 31.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 03.04.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 59

Case No.:14/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00538/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00435/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510377931 31.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 28.02.2014 for examinaƟon/comments and aŌer that Amendment Sheet has been sent to C&PC on 13.3.2014 . The CommiƩee further noted that a reminder dated 20.5.2014 has also been sent to C&PC for expediƟng their comments and decided to wait for C&PC comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 60

Case No.:28/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00552/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00434/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510377945 31.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 28.02.2014 for examinaƟon/comments followed by reminder dated 20.5.2014 but their comments have not received Ɵll date and decided to remind C&PC for expediƟng their comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 61

Case No.:30/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:5/80ALC2/2014 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00554/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00447/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510377899 31.01.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 20.05.2014 followed by an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 62

Case No.:7/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ICEM ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00092/AM15/ RLA File :03/94/040/00983/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310769175 04.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following informaƟon according to DIPP ID Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/62 dated 27.05.2014: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4, 5, 11 &14 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 2. QuanƟƟes of export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 4 in Nos. also in addiƟon to their weights. 3. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. No. 1, 3, 4 & 5 in Nos. also in addiƟon to their weights. 63

Case No.:19/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: DICKINSON FOWLER PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00543/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00396/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710101974 05.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DIPP and DHI both on 28.2.2014 and DHI comments vide their U.O. No. 3(20)/14 dated 21.3.2014 has been received. On the basis of DHI comments a deficiency leƩer dated 31.3.2014 has been issued and firm’s reply dated 03.5.2014 has been forwarded to DHI on 15.5.2014 for their examinaƟon and comments. AŌer that DIPP has also sent their comments vide their I.D. note No. 12/52/2014‐TSW/69 dated 22.4.2014 which has been forwarded to the firm on 23.5.2014. The CommiƩee further noted that subject maƩer pertains to DIPP (as per DHI Comments) and firm has not replied to the deficiency leƩer dated 23.5.2014 based on the comments of DIPP. The CommiƩee decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 64

Case No.:29/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00553/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00464/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510378593 07.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 28.03.2014 followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 65

Case No.:46/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO. LTD, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00131/AM15/ RLA File :02/24/040/00187/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0210199768 07.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon/comments and decided to wait for DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 66

Case No.:47/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name:TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO. LTD, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00132/AM15/ RLA File :02/24/040/00195/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0210199868 10.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon/comments and decided to wait for DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 67

Case No.:18/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00542/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00451/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510378995 11.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that that the firm has been briefly explained about the producƟon of a cerƟficate from a duly authorised officer of the Directorate General of Hydro Carbons in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, to the effect that the said imported goods are required for petroleum operaƟons, is required for raƟficaƟon of subject AA vide leƩer dated 23.5.2014 followed by an e‐mail message dated 27.5.2014 but the firm has not furnished the same and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 68

Case No.:27/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00551/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00455/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510378994 11.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that that the firm has been briefly explained about the producƟon of a cerƟficate from a duly authorised officer of the Directorate General of Hydro Carbons in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, to the effect that the said imported goods are required for petroleum operaƟons, is required for raƟficaƟon of subject AA vide leƩer dated 23.5.2014 followed by an e‐mail message dated 27.5.2014 but the firm has not furnished the same and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 69

Case No.:7/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: SCREENOTEX (INDIA) PVT.LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00531/AM14/ RLA File :08/24/040/00508/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0810128956 18.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DC(MSME) U.O. Note No. 30(37)/14‐ME dated 19.05.2014 (Copy to be forwarded to RA and firm). 70

Case No.:4/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00004/AM15/ RLA File :03/95/040/00907/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310770845 18.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 16.05.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 71

Case No.:48/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: PUTZMEISTER CONCRETE MACHINES PRIVATE LIMITED, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00133/AM15/ RLA File :17/24/040/00117/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:1710005701 18.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon/comments and decided to wait for DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 72

Case No.:5/25/80ALC2/2013

Party Name: SOGEFI MNR FILTRATION INDIA PVT LTD, 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00529/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00376/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710102212 19.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DIPP on 05.05.2014 for examinaƟon/comments and decided to wait for DIPP comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014.

Case No :6/2/80 ALC2/2014

Party Name: TECHNOWEB TEXTILE ENGINEERING Meet No/Date:5/80 ALC2/2014 Status:

Case No.:6/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: TECHNOWEB TEXTILE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00006/AM15/ RLA File :03/95/040/00936/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310771124 20.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 09.04.2014 for examinaƟon & comments which is followed by a reminder dated 20.5.2014 to them for expediƟng their comments and decided to wait for C&PC comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 74

Case No.:8/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00008/AM15/ RLA File :04/24/040/00223/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0410155406 20.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 16.05.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 75

Case No.:7/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: TRANSASIA BIO MEDICALS LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00007/AM15/ RLA File :03/95/040/00849/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310771504 24.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 08.04.2014 given by DIT directly followed by reminder dated 20.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 76

Case No.:11/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: NIKHTISH ENTERPRISES 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00011/AM15/ RLA File :31/83/040/00208/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3110062747 24.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME and DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon/comments which actually pertains to MSME and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 77

Case No.:4/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00089/AM15/ RLA File :03/94/040/01044/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310771884 25.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/77 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: 1. Net Empty weight of 8350 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟƟes of each export product at Sl. No. 1 & 2. 2. Net Empty weight of 49978 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟty of each export product at Sl. No. 3 to 6. 3. Net Empty weight of 44120 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟty of each export product at Sl. No. 7 & 8. 4. Net Empty weight of 17870 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟty of each export product at Sl. No. 9 & 10. 5. Net Empty weight of 52270 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟty of each export product at Sl. No. 11 & 12. 6. Net Empty weight of 17215 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟty of each export product at Sl. No. 13 & 14. 7. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descripƟon of import items at Sl. No. 1 & 4 to 8. 8. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 67438Kgs. as 1.05 Kgs./kg. content in the export products. 9. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 22 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as 46522 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage.

the export products. 9. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 22 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as 46522 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 10. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 128 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 17546 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage. 11. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 4 may be allowed as 81114 Kgs. (88162 Meters) inclusive of 3 % wastage. 12. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 48044 Kgs. (20729 Meters) inclusive of 3 % wastage. 13. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 12047 Kgs. (313.8 Meters) inclusive of 3 % wastage. 14. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 7 may be allowed as 32095Kgs. as 1.05 Kgs./kg. content in the export products. 15. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 8 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 13570 Kgs. as 1.03 Kgs./kg. content in the export products. 16. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 9 may be allowed as 48 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as 139931 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 17. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 10 may be allowed as 84 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 4154 Kgs. inclusive of 2.75 % wastage. 18. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 11 may be allowed as 20 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 4064 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage.

stage. 18. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 11 may be allowed as 20 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as applied for i.e. 4064 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage. 19. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. Nos. 12, 13 &14 may be allowed as 2746 Kgs. each. 78

Case No.:9/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: DECON INDIA PLASTICS PVT. LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00009/AM15/ RLA File :31/83/040/00231/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3110062832 26.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 16.04.2014 for examinaƟon/comments and decided to send reminder to C&PC comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 79

Case No.:3/2/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: L&TMHI BOILERS PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00003/AM15/ RLA File :03/95/040/00888/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310772317 27.02.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 16.05.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 80

Case No.:8/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: GODREJ& BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00093/AM15/ RLA File :03/94/040/01046/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310773144 05.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/80 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: 1. Net Empty weight of 17000 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟty of export product. 2. Words “19 mm OD x 0.9 mm Thk” may be suffixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No. 1. 3. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descripƟon of import items at Sl. No. 2, 3, 4 & 6. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 5100 Kgs. (18165 Meters) inclusive of 2 % wastage. 5. QuanƟty of import items at Sl. No. 2, 3 & 4 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 1635 Kgs., 928 Kgs. & 6962 Kgs. respecƟvely as 1.03 Kgs./kg. content in the export product. 6. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 2 Nos. on net to net basis. Duty free weight of this item may be allowed as 1504 Kgs. inclusive of 88 % wastage aŌer taking 20 % recovery from scrap. 7. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 30.6Kgs. as 1.02 Kgs./kg. content in the export product. 8. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. Nos. 7, 8 &9 may be allowed as 96 Kgs. each. 81

Case No.:12/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BANGALORE BIOTECH LABS PVT LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00097/AM15/ RLA File :07/21/040/01088/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710102669 06.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for MSME comments; 82

Case No.:34/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00119/AM15/ RLA File :03/95/040/00894/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310773184 06.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DIT on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon/comments and decided to wait for DIT comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. 83

Case No.:42/5/80ALC2/2014

27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00127/AM15/ RLA File :07/24/040/00443/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710102670 06.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 23.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 23.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for MSME comments; 84

Case No.:5/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BLUE STAR LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00090/AM15/ RLA File :03/94/040/00639/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310773653 10.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following informaƟon according to DIPP ID Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/84 dated 27.05.2014: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 2. Details of import item at Sl. No. 9 and its specific use in the export products. 85

Case No.:6/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BLUE STAR LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00091/AM15/ RLA File :03/94/040/00640/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310773656 10.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following informaƟon according to DIPP ID Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/85 dated 27.05.2014: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4, 5, 6 &11 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 2. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 4 has been indicated as 8208.5 Nos. and its correct quanƟty may be indicated. 86

Case No.:35/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: OIL STATES INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT.LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00120/AM15/ RLA File :03/95/040/00974/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310774051 11.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following informaƟon based on the comments of Technical Authority given in the meeƟng : InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4, 5, 6 &11 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 87

Case No.:33/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: PHOENIX FOILS PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00118/AM15/ RLA File :03/95/040/00941/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310773858 11.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following informaƟon based on the comments of representaƟve of DIPP, present in the meeƟng : InformaƟon in respect of S. No. 3,4,5 &11 of Standard Deficiency Format – Export Productwise. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014.

Case No.:13/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: MAKSTEEL WIRE HEALDS P. LTD 27 05 2014 Status: Deferred

88 27.05.2014 Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00098/AM15/ RLA File :34/24/040/00307/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3410039543 12.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DIPP on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which actually pertains to MSME. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to forward the firm’s applicaƟon to MSME for examinaƟon and comments; 89

Case No.:14/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: MAKSTEEL WIRE HEALDS P. LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00099/AM15/ RLA File :34/24/040/00306/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3410039544 12.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DIPP on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which actually pertains to MSME. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to forward the firm’s applicaƟon to MSME for examinaƟon and comments; 90

Case No.:11/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ANALYSER INSTRUMENT CO.PVT.LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00096/AM15/ RLA File :13/24/040/00056/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:1310046344 13.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following informaƟon according to DIPP ID Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/90 dated 27.05.2014: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 3, 6, 8 & 9 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 2. Manufacturing operaƟons on import items 3. Details of other inputs, imported or indigenous, used in the export products. 91

Case No.:3/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: GODREJ& BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00088/AM15/ RLA File :03/94/040/01080/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310774819 18.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/91 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: 1. Net Empty weight of 19400 Kgs. may be specified with the quanƟty of each export product at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3. 2. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 3 Nos. (965.4 Kgs.) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 3. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 3 Nos. (518.4 Kgs.) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 3 Nos. (3003 Kgs.) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 92

Case No.:24/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00109/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00496/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382119 19.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which actually pertains to DIPP and decided to forward the firm’s applicaƟon to DIPP for examinaƟon and comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 93

Case No.:25/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00110/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00505/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382120 19.03.2014 Defer Date:08.07.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which actually pertains to DIPP. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to forward the firm’s applicaƟon to DIPP for examinaƟon and comments; 94

Case No.:37/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00122/AM15/ RLA File :56/24/040/00051/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:5610003907 20.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/94 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: 1. Net weights of 52 MT, 88.5 MT & 102 MT may be specified with the quanƟƟes of export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3 respecƟvely. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descripƟons of import items at Sl. No. 1 to 5. 3. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 11743 Kgs. inclusive of 5 % wastage. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 944 Kgs. inclusive of 18 % wastage aŌer 1/3rd recovery from scrap. 5. QuanƟƟes of import item at Sl. No. 3 &4 may be allowed as 163750 Kgs. & 29688 Kgs. respecƟvely as per SION C‐1519. 6. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 29918 Kgs. inclusive of 20 % wastage aŌer 20 % recovery from scrap. 7. DescripƟon of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be corrected as “Rubber Cable 4Cx2.5 Sq.mm” and its quanƟty may be allowed as16400 Meters on net to net basis. 8. Import items at Sl. Nos. 7 to 12, 14 & 15 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 4500 Nos. each on net to net basis with accountability clause. 9. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 13 may be allowed on net to net basis as claimed by the firm. 95

Case No.:44/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: YTEC INDIA PVT. LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00129/AM15/ RLA File :05/24/040/00481/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382360 21.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which actually pertains to MSME. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 23.05.2014 followed by e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and the same has not been received and decided the following: (i) to forward the firm’s applicaƟon to MSME for examinaƟon and comments; 96

Case No.:28/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00113/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00533/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382687 25.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments and on the basis of recommendaƟon of Technical Authority, the CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to submit the revised descripƟon of the export product which should exclude the items in import list and specific raƟngs and use of export product. The CommiƩee also noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received Ɵll date also decided to ask the firm to furnish the aforesaid revised descripƟon and clarificaƟon on the type of export. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 97

Case No.:29/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00114/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00534/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382690 25.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments and on the basis of recommendaƟon of Technical Authority, the CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to submit the revised descripƟon of the export product which should exclude the items in import list and specific raƟngs and use of export product. The CommiƩee also noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received Ɵll date also decided to ask the firm to furnish the aforesaid revised descripƟon and clarificaƟon on the type of export. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 98

Case No.:36/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00121/AM15/ RLA File :56/24/040/00054/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:5610003945 26.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish the following informaƟon according to DIPP ID Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/98 dated 27.05.2014: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4 & 5 of Standard Deficiency Format, export product wise. 2. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 11 of Standard Deficiency Format for import items at Sl. No.1, 2 & 5, export product wise. 3. Size/Specs. of import item at Sl. No. 6 and jusƟficaƟon/basis for quanƟty of this item. Net length of rubber cable in each export product may also be indicated. 99

Case No.:41/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ULTRA ENGINEERS 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00126/AM15/ RLA File :31/83/040/00239/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3110063265 26.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 26.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for DHI comments. 100

Case No.:15/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00100/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00551/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382898 27.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 101

Case No.:16/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00101/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00548/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382895 27.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 102

Case No.:17/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00102/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00549/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382896 27.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 103

Case No.:18/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00103/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00552/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382899 27.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20 05 2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and

Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 104

Case No.:19/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00104/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00550/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382897 27.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 105

Case No.:20/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00105/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00547/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382894 27.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 106

Case No.:21/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00106/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00546/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510382893 27.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for MSME comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 107

Case No.:26/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BORG WARNER EMISSIONS SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00111/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00541/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510383080 28.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for DHI comments; 108

Case No.:10/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BANCO PRODUCTS (INDIA) LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00095/AM15/ RLA File :34/24/040/00261/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3410039675 31.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DIPP on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which actually pertains to DHI. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to send the firm’s applicaƟon to DHI for examinaƟon and comments; 109

Case No.:23/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ADORE MEDI PRIVATE LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00108/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00517/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510383193 31.03.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to MSME on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for MSME comments; 110

Case No.:22/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: DRIPLEX WATER ENGINEERING LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00107/AM15/ RLA File :05/23/040/00463/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510383361 01.04.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for DHI comments; 111

Case No.:1/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: HITACHI HOME AND LIFE SOLUTIONS (INDIA) LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00086/AM15/ RLA File :08/24/040/00001/AM15/ Lic.No/Date:0810130301 02.04.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/111 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: 1. Import items at Sl. Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 6 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 1000 Nos. each on net to net basis with accountability clause. 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the descripƟons of import items at Sl. No. 4 & 5. 3. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 4 may be allowed as 1.02 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 1.01 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products. 112

Case No.:27/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD., 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00112/AM15/ RLA File :05/24/040/00003/AM15/ Lic.No/Date:0510383513 03.04.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 20.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 20.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to wait for C&PC comments; Case is deferred to 08.07.2014 113

Case No.:39/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00124/AM15/ RLA File :04/24/040/00278/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0410156867 04.04.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 23.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 114

Case No.:31/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: NEUMAN& ESSER ENGINEERING (INDIA) PVT LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00116/AM15/ RLA File :31/82/040/00301/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:3110063440 09.04.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 20.05.2014 which actually pertains to DIPP and decided to send the firm’s applicaƟon to DIPP for examinaƟon and comments. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. 115

Case No.:38/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: VEELINE MEDIA LTD. 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00123/AM15/ RLA File :02/24/040/00229/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0210202416 11.04.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s applicaƟon has been sent to DHI on 26.05.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which actually pertains to DIPP. The CommiƩee further noted that firm’s clarificaƟon on type of export (whether physical export or deemed export against invalidaƟon leƩer to EPCG license) has been sought vide DES‐I leƩer dated 26.05.2014 which has not been received and decided the following: (i) to send the firm’s applicaƟon to DIPP for examinaƟon and comments; 116

Case No.:2/5/80ALC2/2014

Party Name: ENERTECH ENGINEERING PVT LTD 27.05.2014 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00087/AM15/ RLA File :09/24/040/00003/AM15/ Lic.No/Date:0910060055 12.05.2014 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that hard copy of firm’s applicaƟon has not been received from RA, Hyderabad. The CommiƩee decided to ask RA, Hyderabad for forwarding the same and sending the copy of communicaƟon which would be made to RA in this regard to firm also for their informaƟon. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.118

Case No. A – 03

M/s. L & T‐MHI Boilers Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/162/00348/AM14/DES‐I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.03/95/039/00004/AM11 0310760909 dt.06.12.2013 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for fixaƟon of norms for Annual requirement under para 4.24(v) Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply received on 26.5.2014 has been sent to DHI on 27.5.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for DHI comments . Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.119

Case No. A ‐ 01

M/s. Analyser Instruments Co. Pvt. Ltd., Kota (Rajasthan) HQF.No.01/80/162/00032/AM15/DES‐I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.13/24/040/00281/AM14 1310044806 dt.17.10.2013 Date: 27.05.2014 RaƟficaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply has been received which to be forwarded to DIPP for examinaƟon and comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.120

Case No. A/R‐

138 M/s. DynamaƟc Technologies Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00460/AM11/DES‐I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00189/AM11 0710074081 dt.06.09.2010 Date: 27.05.2014 FixaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply has been sent to MSME on 10.2.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is followed by a reminder dated 16.5.2014 for expediƟng their comments and decided to wait for MSME comments . Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.121

Case No. A/R‐42

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00773/AM11/DES‐I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00380/AM11 0910044575 dt.06.12.2010 Date: 27.05.2014 RaƟficaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply has been sent to DHI on 23.5.2014 for examinaƟon and comments. The CommiƩee also noted that inputs of EPCG Division has been sought in this case and ninth reminder dated 23.5.2014 has been given to them for expediƟng their comments. The CommiƩee decided to wait for EPCG inputs and DHI

been sought in this case and ninth reminder dated 23.5.2014 has been given to them for expediƟng their comments. The CommiƩee decided to wait for EPCG inputs and DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.122

Case No. A/R‐74

M/s. DynamaƟc Technologies Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00464/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RLA, No.07/21/040/00507/AM13 0710091489 dt.22.10.2012 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for fixaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee decided to fix adhoc norms on the basis of DC(MSME) U.O. Note No. 30(291)/2011‐ME dated 21.02.2014 (Copy to be forwarded to RA and firm). S.No.123

Case No. A/R‐

123 M/s. Modine Thermal Systems Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram(TN) HQF.No.01/80/050/00043/AM14/DES‐I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00261/AM14 0410143937 dt.06.03.2013 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for revision of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply has been sent to DIPP on 16.5.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for DIPP comments . Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.124

Case No. A/R‐

124 M/s. Modine Thermal Systems Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram(TN) HQF.No.01/80/050/00042/AM14/DES‐I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00260/AM14 0410143936 dt.06.03.2013 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for revision of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s reply has been sent to DIPP on 16.5.2014 for examinaƟon and comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for DIPP comments . Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.125

Case No. A/R‐125

M/s. Tema India Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00185/AM14/DES‐I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00187/AM14 0310737757 dt.14.06.2013 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for revision of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 31.03.2014 followed by reminder dated 19.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.126

Case No. A/R‐98

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00573/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00223/AM11 0910043468 dt.09.09.2010 Date: 27.05.2014 FixaƟon of Norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that inputs of EPCG Division has been sought in this case and ninth reminder dated 23.5.2014 has been given to them for expediƟng their comments. The CommiƩee decided to wait for EPCG inputs. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. No.127

Case No. A/R‐

118 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00495/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00169/AM11 0910043002 dt.06.08.2010 Date: 27.05.2014 FixaƟon of Norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that inputs of EPCG Division has been sought in this case and ninth reminder dated 23.5.2014 has been given to them for expediƟng their comments. The CommiƩee decided to wait for EPCG inputs. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.128

Case No. A/R‐140

M/s. Alstom Projects India Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/01450/AM04/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.03/24/042/00205/AM04 0310247081 dt.12.01.2004 Date: 27.05.2014 FixaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that inputs of EPCG Division has been sought in this case and seventh reminder dated 19.5.2014 has been given to them for expediƟng their comments. The CommiƩee decided to wait for EPCG inputs. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.129

Case No. A/R‐11

M/s. TRF Ltd., Kolkata HQF.No.01/80/050/00053/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00223/AM11 0210156321 dt.18.03.2011 Date: 27.05.2014 RaƟficaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 04.04.2014 followed by reminder dated 19.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.130

Case No. A/R‐12

M/s. TRF Ltd., Kolkata HQF.No.01/80/050/00052/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00224/AM11 0210156322 dt.18.03.2011 Date: 27.05.2014 RaƟficaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 04.04.2014 followed by reminder dated 19.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.131

Case No. A/R‐13

M/s. TRF Ltd., Kolkata HQF.No.01/80/050/00639/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00122/AM11 0210150220 dt.04.11.2010 Date: 27.05.2014 RaƟficaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 04.04.2014 followed by reminder dated 19.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.132

Case No. A/R‐14

M/s. Netaffim Irrigaiton India Pvt. Ltd., Vadodara HQF.No.01/80/050/00305/AM14/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.34/24/040/00102/AM14 3410037946 dt.16.09.2013 Date: 27.05.2014 Revision / amendment of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s representaƟon has been sent to C&PC on 26.03.2014 for examinaƟon & comments which is followed by a reminder dated 19.5.2014 to them for expediƟng their comments and decided to wait for C&PC comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.133

Case No. A/R‐15

M/s. Pranita Engineering SoluƟons Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/81/050/00026/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00039/AM10 0710064492 dt.04.05.2009 Date: 27.05.2014 RaƟficaƟon of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 31.03.2014 followed by reminder dated 19.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.134

Case No. A/R‐26

M/s. Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd., Noida HQF.No.01/80/050/00563/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00291/AM11 0510277676 dt.23.11.2010 Date: 27.05.2014 Revision of norms Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the firm’s request has been sent to DHI on 15.05.2014 for examinaƟon & comments which is under their examinaƟon and decided to wait for DHI comments. Case is deferred to 08.7.2014. S.No.135

Case No.C‐07

M/s. Tara Aerospace Systems Ltd., Hyderabad HQ F.No.01/80/162/00249/AM14/DES‐I MeeƟng No.05/15 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for fixaƟon of input output wastage norms for the export product “Helicopter Cabin Kits, Design, Development and Manufacturing of Parts and Accessories for Civilian AircraŌ” in respect of 100% EOU – reg. Decision : The CommiƩee decided to fix the norms on the basis of DIPP I.D. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/C‐07 dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: Keeping in view the nature of export products, manufacturing operaƟons and wastages involved at different stages of manufacture as also explained by firm’s representaƟves during the presentaƟon before the Norms CommiƩee on 21st January, 2014 , it is recommended that Scrap wastage norms for various components/parts of “Helicopter Cabin Kit” may be fixed for the EOU in terms of para 6.8(e) of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009‐14, as per the producƟon, consumpƟon and wastage data verified and cerƟfied by the Central Excise Department (Copy enclosed) S.No.136

Case No.C‐08

M/s. MSS India Pvt. Ltd., Nasik HQ F.No.01/80/162/00320/AM14/DES‐I MeeƟng No.05/15 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for fixaƟon of input output norms for the export product “Small fabricated items, Fabricated bus bars, Press work items, Braided connectors, Laminated connectors, Cast connector, Switch fuse unit HSN, Bolted/ Moulded Connector, Moulded Components, DC Bus bars, Machined & Forged Components, BaƩery Charger/Transformer, Electrical Parts Make of Ferrous & Non Ferrous Material (Viz. Copper, Brass, Aluminium, Steel, Monel, Inconel and Lead etc.), Cast Pillars, Electrical & Auto Assemblies, Plate contacts” in respect of 100% EOU – reg. Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 28.03.2014 followed by reminder dated 16.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 21.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.137

Case No.C‐10

M/s. Pesco Beam Environmental SoluƟons Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram HQ F.No.01/80/162/00311/AM14/DES‐I MeeƟng No.05/15 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for fixaƟon of input output norms in respect of manufacture and export of Used Oil Refinery Machinery System – reg. Decision : The CommiƩee considered the DIPP observaƟon /comments made vide their ID Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/C‐10 dated 27.05.2014 which is under : 1. Firm has stated that the MSME Development InsƟtute had submiƩed their report for fixaƟon of wastage norms directly to Development Commissioner, MSEZ and a copy of report was not given to them. 2. In view of above, in the first instance, DC, MSEZ may be requested to forward a copy or report of MSME Development InsƟtute for fixaƟon of wastage norms for all the items in this case Keeping in view on the above comments, the CommiƩee decided to request DC, MSEZ to forward a copy or report of MSME Development InsƟtute for fixaƟon of wastage norms for all the items in this case. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.138

Case No.C‐11

M/s.TayotaKirloskar Auto Parts Ltd., Karnataka HQ F.No.01/80/171/00441/AM14/DES‐I MeeƟng No.05/15 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for fixaƟon of wastage norms in respect of 100% EOU – reg. Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.02.2014 followed by reminder dated 19.05.2014, an e‐mail message on 27.5.2014 and decided to wait for firm’s reply. Case is deferred to 08.07.2014. S.No.139

Case No. A/R‐27

M/s. Geecy Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00117/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.05/15 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00132/AM08 0310430069 dt.21.05.2007 Date: 27.05.2014 Request for amendment in import item No. 1 of norms. Decision : The CommiƩee decided to modify norms on the basis of DIPP U.O. Note No. 12/74/2014‐TSW/27‐A/R dated 27.05.2014 which are as under: Taking in view this Advance AuthorizaƟon was raƟfied in NC meeƟng No. 38/10 dated 22.12.2009 based on available informaƟon and that firm has now clarified that the earlier informaƟon was submiƩed by them based on preliminary engineering and during detailed engineering, the actual thickness of import item at Sl. No. 1 (Boiler Quality Plates(Carbon Steel Plates) used in the export product was from 10 mm to 52 mm thick,for the purpose of redempƟon, norms may be modified as under: Words “ 20 mm to 52 mm thk” given in the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be amended as “ 10 mm to 52 mm thk”

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6713 --apply.

DGFT Minutes

Case No.:16/6/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:1/25/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:8/14/80­ALC2/2011

Case No.:23/9/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:12/15/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:34/24/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:6/7/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:18/15/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:5/18/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:32/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:41/24/80­ALC2/2012

Case No.:3/7/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:30/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:15/7/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:4/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:6/10/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:23/13/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:23/10/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:25/10/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:2/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:3/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:27/10/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:10/15/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:11/15/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:44/10/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:40/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:43/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:45/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:9/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:50/15/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:1/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:9/19/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:10/19/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:11/19/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:15/19/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:4/19/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:8/19/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:13/19/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:10/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:33/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:15/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:25/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:1/22/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:34/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:11/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:35/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:36/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:31/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:37/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:24/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:23/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:17/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:26/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:32/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:38/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:1/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:12/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:13/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:14/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:28/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:30/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:7/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:19/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:29/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:46/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:47/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:18/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:27/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:7/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No.:4/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:48/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:5/25/80­ALC2/2013

Case No :6/2/80 ALC2/2014

Case No.:6/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:8/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:7/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:11/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:4/5/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:9/2/80­ALC2/2014

Case No.:16/6/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:1/25/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:8/14/80ALC2/2011

Case No.:23/9/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:12/15/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:34/24/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:6/7/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:18/15/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:5/18/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:32/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:41/24/80ALC2/2012

Case No.:3/7/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:30/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:15/7/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:4/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:6/10/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:23/13/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:23/10/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:25/10/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:2/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:3/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:27/10/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:10/15/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:11/15/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:44/10/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:40/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:43/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:45/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:9/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:50/15/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:1/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:9/19/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:10/19/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:11/19/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:15/19/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:4/19/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:8/19/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:13/19/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:10/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:33/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:15/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:25/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:1/22/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:34/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:11/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:35/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:36/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:31/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:37/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:24/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:23/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:17/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:26/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:32/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:38/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:1/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:12/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:13/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:14/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:28/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:30/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:7/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:19/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:29/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:46/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:47/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:18/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:27/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:7/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:4/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:48/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:5/25/80ALC2/2013

Case No.:6/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:8/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:7/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:11/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:4/5/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:9/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:3/2/80ALC2/2014

Case No.:8/5/80ALC2/2014