DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of Mee៝�ng No.12/14 held on 03.09.2013 of Norms Commiោ�ee(NC‐I) (DES.I Sec៝�on) The mee៝�ng No. 12/14 of the Norms Commiោ�ee (NC‐I) for the licensing year 2012‐2013 was held on 03.09.2013 under the Chairmanship of Dr. L.B. Singhal, Addi៝�onal Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applica៝�ons under Duty Exemp៝�on Schemes (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014 / Handbook of Procedure Volume‐I. The following Members of the Commiោ�ee were present in the mee៝�ng: ‐ Sl.No Name of the representa៝�ves & their Designa៝�on Room No. Telephone No. Depោ�. 1. Sh K.K. Tiwari I.A 476 23063321 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 428A 23063166 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, Assោ�. Dir. (Mech) 736A 23063802 Extn.2459 DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. Parveen Sharma, Dy.DGFT 312 23061562 Extn.146 DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. K.C. Raju, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. 1
Case No.:14/38/80‐ALC2/2010
Party Name:VASUNDRA MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS PVT.LTD, Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00784/AM11/ RLA File :07/21/040/00786/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0710077109 03.02.2011 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DIT vide leោ�er No.17(115)/2012‐IPHW dated 13.8.2013 has provided comments. The Commiោ�ee, however, decided to ask the firm to give a complete list of items which are intended to be imported under this authoriza៝�on as well as list of items which are intended to be procured from the domes៝�c market along with their value. This was required as in the applica៝�on the firm have simply indicated “as per bill of material”. The list of items which are permiោ�ed to be imported under this authoriza៝�on has to be specifically men៝�oned in the authoriza៝�on. The Commiោ�ee also decided to check up from RA as to whether advance authoriza៝�on has been issued with any specific list of items or with a general descrip៝�on “as per bill of material”. 2
Case No.:36/7/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00051/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410124216 20.05.2011 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : On the recommenda៝�on of DHI representa៝�ve present in the mee៝�ng, the Commiោ�ee decided to defer the case.
Case No.:29/2/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:OMEGA ICEHILL PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00618/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00384/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510316908 08.02.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under:
3 1. Net weights of 7233 Kgs., 8887 Kg., 2524 Kgs. & 1548 Kgs may be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 ,3 & 4 respec៝�vely. 2. Import items at Sl. No. 1 & 2 shall be of relevant grade as contained in the export products. 3. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 6.996 MT as 1.05 Kgs./Kg. in the export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3. 4. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 14.206 MT as 1.05 Kgs./Kg. in the export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3. 5. Import items at Sl. No. 3 to 6 may be deleted as use of these items not shown in the export items. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 4
Case No.:26/14/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00312/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00043/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710088185 14.05.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 12.4.2013 followed by reminder dated 30.5.2013 and final reminder dated 9.7.2013 and decided to send an email reminder for expedi៝�ng their reply. 5
Case No.:15/11/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:YOKOGAWA INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00229/AM13/ RLA File :07/21/040/00120/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710088440 24.05.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the maោ�er is under examina៝�on of PC‐VI Sec៝�on and decided to await comments. 6
Case No.:44/14/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00330/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00149/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710089403 02.07.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 7.2.2013 issued by DIT followed by reminder dated 24.7.2013 and final reminder dated 8.8.2013 and decided to send an email for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the case will be rejected. 7
Case No.:17/11/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00231/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00129/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510329275 10.07.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 8
Case No.:19/11/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:HARI MACHINES LTD Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Withdrawn HQ File :01/80/050/00233/AM13/ RLA File :23/24/040/00001/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:2310003202 10.07.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013
Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that this case was already decided in mee៝�ng dated 23.7.2013 and accordingly withdrawn the case. 9
Case No.:9/11/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BENGAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00223/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00131/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510329934 17.07.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that an email was sent to firm for informa៝�on and reply is awaited. 10
Case No.:27/14/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00313/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00180/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090071 03.08.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 12.4.2013 followed by reminder dated 30.5.2013 and final reminder dated 9.7.2013 and decided to send an email reminder for expedi៝�ng their reply. 11
Case No.:8/14/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BOYSEN INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00294/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00149/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510331556 08.08.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as per MSME UO note No. 30(09)/13‐ME dated 1.8.2013 (copy to be forwarded to firm and RA). RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 12
Case No.:1/17/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00366/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00333/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310704473 08.08.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to seek informa៝�on from firm on the following: 1. Informa៝�on in respect of Sl. No. 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format. 2. For net weight of components to be manufactured from import items at Sl. No.1 & 2, details of components with net weights thereof may be indicated 3. Detailed calcula៝�ons for the quan៝�ty of Carbon Steel Tubes & pipes (import items at Sl. No. 3 & 4 ) supported by length and number of tubes/pipes in the export product. 13
Case No.:19/14/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00305/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00166/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510331795 09.08.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 24.5.2013 followed by reminder dated 29.8.2013 and decided to send a final email reminder reques៝�ng them for expedi៝�ng their reply.
14
Case No.:21/14/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00307/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00188/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710090187 10.08.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as per DIT UO No. 17/93/2012‐IPHW dated 31.7.2013 (copy to be forwarded to firm and RA). RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 15
Case No.:5/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00260/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00199/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510333158 30.08.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DIT has issued a deficiency leោ�er on 23.7.2013 seeking certain informa៝�on from firm for examina៝�on of the case. The Commiោ�ee decided to remind the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply. 16
Case No.:2/17/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PLAST TECH ENGINEERING Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00367/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00136/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410140373 11.10.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that C&PC has issued a deficiency leោ�er on 18.4.2013 seeking certain informa៝�on from firm for examina៝�on of the case. The Commiោ�ee decided to remind the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply. 17
Case No.:21/20/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GEI INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS LTD., Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00437/AM13/ RLA File :11/24/040/00024/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110027289 19.10.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that reply submiោ�ed by the firm is not complete/proper and hence decided to seek informa៝�on from firm on the following: 1. Informa៝�on in respect of Sl. No. 4, 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format.‐export product wise. 18
Case No.:13/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD, Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00574/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00366/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092780 31.12.2012 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. 19
Case No.:23/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PSK ENGINEERING PVT LTD Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00584/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00420/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710092968 08.01.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013
Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 29.8.2013 and decided to remind them for expedi៝�ng their reply. 20
Case No.:8/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:JINDAL RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00569/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00400/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510342981 10.01.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 12.4.2013 followed by reminder dated 29.5.2013 and final reminder dated 9.7.2013 and decided to send an email to firm reques៝�ng them to submit their reply immediately failing which the case will be rejected. 21
Case No.:27/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00588/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00164/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110056801 11.01.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 9.4.2013 followed by reminder dated 30.5.2013 and final reminder dated 9.7.2013 and decided to send an email to firm reques៝�ng them to submit their reply immediately failing which the case will be rejected. 22
Case No.:17/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BLUE STAR LTD. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00578/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00825/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310720787 15.01.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 9.7.2013 followed by reminder dated 29.8.2013 and decided to send a final reminder reques៝�ng them for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the case will be rejected. 23
Case No.:15/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00576/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00791/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310722249 29.01.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er sent to them vide DHI UO No. 3(57)/11‐TSW(B)/174 dated 1.8.2013. The Commiោ�ee also noted that firm is making supply to oil explora៝�on project of ONGC and the subject maោ�er was referred to PC‐IV Division for clarifica៝�on. However, the Commiោ�ee decided to request the firm to aោ�end for personal hearing to explain the details of supply on 15.10.2013 at 2.30 p.m. before the Norms Commiោ�ee in DGFT, Udyog Bhawan. 24
Case No.:5/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00566/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00453/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510345480 11.02.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 24.5.2013 followed by reminder dated 29.8.2013 and decided to send a final reminder to firm reques៝�ng them to expedite their reply failing which
the case will be rejected. 25
Case No.:21/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TEXMACO UGL RAIL PRIVATE LIMITED. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00582/AM13/ RLA File :02/24/040/00174/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0210186293 11.02.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DHI and decided to await comments. 26
Case No.:1/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00562/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00249/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3410036266 26.02.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 27
Case No.:3/26/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:M M AQUA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00564/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00290/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510347794 28.02.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as per C&PC OM No. 46011/253/2004‐ PC‐II dated 12.8.2013 (copy to be forwarded to firm and RA). RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 28
Case No.:34/8/80‐ALC2/2013
Party Name:NEO WHEELS LTD (FRMLY KNOWN AS VERSATILE H.C.& ENG Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00144/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/00036/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310732167 22.04.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of MSME and decided to await comments. 29
Case No.:33/8/80‐ALC2/2013
Party Name:THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00143/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/00063/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310733011 01.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm is making supply to Invalida៝�on Leោ�er of EPCG and the maោ�er was referred to EPCG Division for clarifica៝�on. 30
Case No.:41/8/80‐ALC2/2013
LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00151/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/01030/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310733370 06.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er sent to them vide DHI UO No. 3(57)/11‐TSW(B)/175 dated 1.8.2013. The Commiោ�ee also noted that firm is making supply to oil explora៝�on project of ONGC and the subject maោ�er was referred to PC‐VI Division for clarifica៝�on. However, the Commiោ�ee
decided to request the firm to aោ�end for personal hearing on 15.10.2013 at 2.30 p.m. to explain the details of supply before the Norms Commiោ�ee in DGFT, Udyog Bhawan. 31
Case No.:35/8/80‐ALC2/2013
LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00145/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/00813/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310733531 07.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 29.8.2013 and decided to remind them for expedi៝�ng their reply. 32
Case No.:36/8/80‐ALC2/2013
LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00146/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/01006/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310733535 07.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 29.8.2013 and decided to remind them for expedi៝�ng their reply. 33
Case No.:43/8/80‐ALC2/2013
Party Name:UNI VTL PRECISION PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00153/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/00095/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310733552 07.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of MSME and decided to await comments. 34
Case No.:42/8/80‐ALC2/2013
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00152/AM14/ RLA File :11/24/040/00014/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:1110027462 09.05.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as per DHI UO No. 3(51)/13‐TSW(B)/172 dated 1.8.2013 (copy to be forwarded to firm and RA). RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 35
Case No.:32/8/80‐ALC2/2013
LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/00089/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310733939 10.05.2013 Decision : Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Net weight of 56 MT may be specified with the quan៝�ty of export product. 2. Import item at Sl. 1 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained in the export product. 3. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 5000 Kgs. as 1.05 Kgs./Kg. in the export product. 4. Weights of import items at Sl. No. 2 & 4 may be specified as 10900 Kgs. & 142 Kgs. respec៝�vely.
5. Quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 2 & 4 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 6. Import item at Sl. No. 3 shall be of relevant grade and dia. as contained in the export product. 7. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 43660 Meters (41 MT ) inclusive of a wastage of 2 %. 8. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 5 (welding Consumables) may be allowed as 619 Kgs. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 36
Case No.:3/6/80‐ALC2/2013
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00094/AM14/ RLA File :05/23/040/00016/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0510353884 13.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case was referred to PC‐VI Division for clarifica៝�on and reply is awaited. 37
Case No.:39/8/80‐ALC2/2013
LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00149/AM14/ RLA File :03/95/040/00055/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0310734097 13.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 1. Decision : Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to seek informa៝�on on following from firm: Net weight of indigenous items in the export product. 2. Informa៝�on in respect of Sl. No. 5, 11 & 13 of Standard Deficiency Format. 3. Informa៝�on in respect of Sl. No. 11A of Standard Deficiency Format for import item at Sl. No. 1 4. For net weight of components to be manufactured from import items at Sl. No.1, 2, 10 & 11, details of components with net weights thereof may be indicated. 5. No. of Produc៝�on Test Coupons and weight thereof at import item at Sl. No. 3 and jus៝�fica៝�on/basis for the quan៝�៝�es of “Produc៝�on Test coupons” . 38
Case No.:37/8/80‐ALC2/2013
LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00147/AM14/ RLA File :52/24/040/00051/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:5210039749 16.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that copy of applica៝�on has been forwarded to DIPP for examina៝�on and comments. The Commiោ�ee also noted that firm has not provided reply to deficiency leោ�er and decided to remind them for expedi៝�ng their reply. 39
Case No.:38/8/80‐ALC2/2013
LIMITED Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00148/AM14/ RLA File :52/24/040/00045/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:5210039748 16.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that copy of applica៝�on has been forwarded to DIPP for examina៝�on and comments.
Case No.:1/6/80‐ALC2/2013
Approved
40 Party Name:DIAMOND METAL SCREENS (P) LTD Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 HQ File :01/80/050/00092/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00045/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710095552 23.05.2013 Decision : Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Word “relevant” may be prefixed with the descrip៝�on of import items from Sl. No. 1 to 6. 2. Quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 1 & 5 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 14060.8 Kgs. & 5865 Kgs. respec៝�vely as 1.04 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products at Sl. No. 1 & 5 respec៝�vely. 3. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 1392.6 Kgs. as 1.03 Kgs./Kg. content in the export product at Sl. No. 2 in line with wastages on similar export products at. No. 4 & 6. 4. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 10296 Kgs. as 1.04 Kgs./Kg. content in the export product at Sl. No. 2 in line with wastages on similar export products at. No. 1 & 5. 5. Quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 4 & 6 may be allowed as applied for i.e. 1050.6 Kgs. & 464.53 Kgs. respec៝�vely as 1.03 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products at Sl. No. 4 & 6 respec៝�vely. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 41
Case No.:2/6/80‐ALC2/2013
Party Name:SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA) LTD., Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00093/AM14/ RLA File :56/24/040/00006/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:5610002221 30.05.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that copy of applica៝�on has not been received and an email was sent to RA for applica៝�on. 42
Case No.:1/12/80‐ALC2/2013
Party Name:PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:12/80‐ ALC2/2013 03.09.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00205/AM14/ RLA File :07/24/040/00144/AM14/ Lic.No/Date:0710097670 22.08.2013 Defer Date:15.10.2013 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that copy of applica៝�on has not been received in NC and decided to request RA/firm to immediately forward copy of applica៝�on for considera៝�on of the case. S.No.285
Case No. A/R‐70
M/s. Zenith Precision Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00375/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00207/AM11 (i) 0710073874 dt.27.08.2010 (ii ) 0710072313 dt.07.06.2010 (iii ) 0710070294 dt.17.03.2010 (iv ) 0710075610 dt.24.11.2010 Date: 03.09.2013 Ra៝�fica៝�on of norms The Commiោ�ee noted that firm was reminded by email to submit their reply. The Commiោ�ee decided to send a final email reminder reques៝�ng the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the case will be rejected. Case deferred to 15.10.2013. Sl.No.286
Case No. A/R‐80
M/s. Boysen India Limited Noida HQF.No.01/80/050/00533/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00204/AM12 0510275831 dt.27.10.2010
Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leោ�er dated 17.5.2013 followed by reminder dated 9.7.2013 and final reminder dated 29.8.2013 and decided to send an email to firm for expedi៝�ng their reply. Case deferred to 15.10.2013. S.No.287
Case No. A/R‐17
M/s. IDMC Limited, Udyog Nagar HQF.No.01/80/050/00723/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.34/24/040/00124/AM06 3410014306 dt.07.09.2005 Date: 03.09.2013 Request for amendment / revision of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to modify norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Net empty weights of 5444 Kgs., 2946 Kgs., 4458 Kgs., 21617 Kgs., 23611 Kgs., 23448 Kgs., 12238 Kgs., 12758 Kgs. & 8917 Kgs. may be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of export products from Sl. Nos. 1 to 9 respec៝�vely.. 2. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 1965 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage as applied for by the firm. 3. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 may be allowed as 19210 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage as applied for by the firm. 4. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 3 may be allowed as 20486 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage as applied for by the firm. 5. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 4 may be allowed as 4314 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage as applied for by the firm. 6. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 5 may be allowed as 5498 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage as applied for by the firm. 7. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be allowed as 10644 Kgs. inclusive of 3 % wastage as applied for by the firm. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. S.No.288
Case No. A/R‐21
M/s. Atlas Copco (India) Ltd., Pune HQF.No.01/80/050/00690/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.03/94/040/01231/AM06 0310375369 dt.10.04.2006 Date: 03.09.2013 Fixa៝�on of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to modify norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: “For the purpose of regulariza៝�on, Advance Authoriza៝�on may be ra៝�fied as per General Note ‐4 of Engineering products”. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. S.No.289
Case No. A/R‐61
M/s. United Drilling Tools Ltd., Delhi HQF.No.01/80/050/00397/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00318/AM10 0510249707 dt.22.09.2009 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms The Commiោ�ee noted that the subject maោ�er was referred to PC‐VI Division for clarifica៝�on and reply is awaited. Case deferred to 15.10.2013. Sl.No.290
Case No. A/R‐35
M/s. Kern‐Liebers Springs & Stampings Pvt. Ltd., Tumkur HQ F.No.01/81/50/00443/AM12/DES‐I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00367/AM12 0710084702 dt.15.12.2011 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of Norms The Commiោ�ee considered the representa៝�on submiោ�ed by the firm for revision of norms and a�er detailed delibera៝�on of the case, the Commiោ�ee decided to reaffirm the earlier decision of NC and closed the case on the part of Norms Commiោ�ee. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. Sl.No.291
Case No. A/R‐37
M/s. Lifelong India Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00482/AM09/DES‐I Lic. No. & date
Gurgaon Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00099/AM09 0510222158 dt.13.06.2008 Date: 03.09.2013 Part No. as per Norms Commiោ�ee decision not men៝�oned on shipping Bills The Commiោ�ee considered reply submiោ�ed by DHI vide UO No.3(87)/08‐TSW(B)/129 dated 21.6.2013. The Commiោ�ee examined the case. Since export has already done, the Commiោ�ee agreed with the request of the firm to delete the part numbers from the export products. However, RA has to ascertain the net content of the imported items is indicated in the Export Product and based on the net content 5% wastage is to be allowed as per the norms approved earlier. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. Sl.No.292
Case No. A/R –41
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ranipet HQ F.No.01/80/50/00572/AM12/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA F.No.61/24/040/00055/AM12 6110000728 dt.27.12.2011 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms The Commiោ�ee noted that as per decision of the Norms Commiោ�ee‐I at Sr.No.165 in its mee៝�ng dated 11.6.2013, Shri S.C. Miោ�al, Execu៝�ve Director (Finance‐RM), and Shri D.K. Pandey, General Manager, Engg & Commercial Coordina៝�on, BHEL aោ�ended before the Commiោ�ee and explained that they are impor៝�ng Turbine and Generator under this authoriza៝�on and supplying to project authority. The Commiោ�ee informed the firm that if goods are imported and supplied as it is, then facility of Advance Authoriza៝�on will not be allowed as per Policy Circular No. 50 dated 28.12.2011. However, the Chairman, NC‐I has drawn the aោ�en៝�on of the firm to Custom No៝�fica៝�on No.12/2012 dated 17.3.2012 wherein it is permiោ�ed to import goods for Mega Power Projects without payment of custom duty and suggested the firm to explore the possibility of clearing the goods under zero custom duty under this custom no៝�fica៝�on subject to compliance of condi៝�ons as given in this no៝�fica៝�on. The Commiោ�ee decided to defer the case to 15.10.2013. S.No.293
Case No. A/R‐49
M/s. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00245/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00712/AM10 0310557677 dt.29.01.2010 Date: 03.09.2013 Amendment in quan៝�៝�es / addi៝�on of addi៝�onal import items The Commiោ�ee noted that in this case firm is supplying to oil explora៝�on project of ONGC and firm was asked to provide a cer៝�ficate from Directorate of Hydrocarbon. The firm has not provided any reply in this regard but has requested for personal hearing vide their leោ�er dated 19.7.2013. The Commiោ�ee, however, observed that the maោ�er regarding eligibility for facility of advance authoriza៝�on when supply is to petroleum explora៝�on fields is under examina៝�on of PC‐ VI Division and decided to await comments from PC‐VI Sec៝�on. Case deferred to 15.10.2013. S.No.294
Case No. A/R‐142
M/s. Tema India Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00583/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00543/AM11 0310594253 dt.28.09.2010 Date: 03.09.2013 Ra៝�fica៝�on of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to seek informa៝�on from firm on the following: 1. Informa៝�on in respect of Sl. No. 11 & 11A of Standard Deficiency Format for CS Plates & SS Plates –export product wise. Case deferred to 15.10.2013. S.No.295
Case No. A/R‐48
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00546/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00802/AM13 0310719442 dt.04.01.2013 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to maintain Status quo and firm’s representa៝�on was rejected as weight of import item at Sl. No. 1 has been reduced a�er taking 20 % recovery from scrap and quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 8 has been reduced a�er taking 1/3rd recovery from the scrap generated during the manufacturing opera៝�ons.���
Accordingly, the Commiោ�ee decided to close the case on the part of Norms Commiោ�ee. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. S.No.296
Case No. A/R‐49
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00271/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00262/AM13 0310701811 dt.13.07.2012 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to maintain Status quo and firm’s representa៝�on was rejected as quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 4 & 10 has been reduced a�er taking 1/3rd recovery from the scrap generated during the manufacturing opera៝�ons. Accordingly, the Commiោ�ee decided to close the case on the part of Norms Commiោ�ee. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. S.No.297
Case No. A/R‐50
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00442/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00442/AM13 0310712579 dt.12.10.2012 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to maintain Status quo and firm’s representa៝�on was rejected as quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 has been reduced a�er taking 1/3rd recovery from the scrap generated during the manufacturing opera៝�ons. Accordingly, the Commiោ�ee decided to close the case on the part of Norms Commiោ�ee. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. S.No.298
Case No. A/R‐58
M/s. ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd., Noida HQF.No.01/80/050/00458/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00327/AM13 0510339184 dt.20.11.2012 Date: 03.09.2013 Modifica៝�on of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to modify norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Word “with accessories and parts” may be suffixed with the descrip៝�on of export items at Sl. No. 1 to 8. 2. UOM of export products at Sl. No. 1 to 8 may be amended from “Number’ to “Set” RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. S.No.299
Case No. A/R‐59
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00438/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00465/AM13 0310712410 dt.11.10.2012 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to maintain Status quo and firm’s representa៝�on was rejected as quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 has been reduced a�er taking 1/3rd recovery from the scrap generated during the manufacturing opera៝�ons. Accordingly, the Commiោ�ee decided to close the case on the part of Norms Commiោ�ee. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. S.No.300
Case No. A/R‐60
M/s. ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd., Noida HQF.No.01/80/050/00544/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00407/AM13 0510315464 dt.24.01.2012 Date: 03.09.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 3.9.2013, the Commiោ�ee decided to modify norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: Keeping in view that import was undertaken before ra៝�fica៝�on of norms, norms may be modified as under, for the purpose of regulariza៝�on: 1. Words “size 19.05 MM OD” may be prefixed with the descrip៝�on of import item at Sl. No. 1. 2. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 may be allowed as 58166 Kgs on net to net basis.�
RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. Sl.No.301
Case No. C –07
M/s. Alpha Technologies Pvt. Ltd.., Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00016/AM13/DES‐I Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 Fixa៝�on of input output norms for the export product “Row & Heat Exchanger and Des Kit, Pre‐processor PCB Assembly, Main Processor PCB Assembly, Power supply Unit PCB Assembly etc” in respect of 100% EOU ‐ reg Date: 03.09.2013 The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DIT and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 15.10.2013. S.No.302
Case No. C‐04
Reference received from Addl. DGFT, Kolkata of M/s. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Kolkata HQF.No.01/80/162/00061/AM14/DES.I Mee៝�ng No. 12/14 Clarifica៝�on against SION at Sl. No. C‐1647 Engineering Product – reg. Date: 03.09.2013 The representa៝�ve of M/s. L&T Construc៝�on Shri Aravind Srinivasan, Senior Design Engineer, Instrumenta៝�on aោ�ended personal hearing before the Commiោ�ee. He explained that they have obtained more than one Advance Authoriza៝�ons for supply of Coal Handling Plants. The inputs include components of mechanical, electrical, electronics and instrumenta៝�on for supply of the export products. He explained that the components are essen៝�al items and without them the Coal Handling Plants cannot be complete. The Commiោ�ee advised them to make a detailed submission giving all inputs and components required for the manufacturing of the Coal Handling Plants and its manufacturing processes. The Commiោ�ee explained to them that if they obtain more than one authoriza៝�on for supply to Mega Power Plants, they may maintain a list of such authoriza៝�ons and also place a copy of PAC in each files. The firm agreed to submit their detailed reply within a week’s ៝�me to the Norms Commiោ�ee. Case deferred to 15.10.2013.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.