IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr B / NC-I) Advance Authorisation 2013-01-22

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

RATIFIED Minutes of MeeƟng No.22/13 scheduled on 22.01.2013 of Norms CommiƩee(NC‐I) (DES.I SecƟon) The meeƟng No. 22/13 of the Norms CommiƩee (NC‐I) for the licensing year 2012‐2013 was held on 22.01.2013 under the Chairmanship of Sh. L.B. Singhal, AddiƟonal Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applicaƟons under Duty ExempƟon Schemes (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014 / Handbook of Procedure Volume‐I. The following Members of the CommiƩee were present in the meeƟng: Sl.No Name of the representaƟves & their DesignaƟon Room No. Telephone No. DepƩ. 1. Sh K.K. Tiwari I.A 476 23063321 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 428A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, AssƩ. Dir. (Mech) 736A 23063802 Extn.2459 DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. Parveen Sharma, Dy.DGFT 312 23061562 Extn.146 DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. K.C. Raju, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The CommiƩee first considered the minutes of the Norms CommiƩee MeeƟng No.21/13 dated 8.1.2013 for confirmaƟon and confirmed and adopted the same without any change. 1

Case No.:21/39/80‐ALC2/2009

Party Name:VEM TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00617/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00373/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910040368 18.12.2009 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : In this case, firm was invited for personal hearing to explain their case. Shri Sunny Mathew, DGM‐Mfg. Engg‐AS&D appeared before the CommiƩee and explained details of manufacturing process and inputs used in the export product. The CommiƩee requested the firm to make wriƩen reply which the firm has agreed to submit within one week. The CommiƩee also decided to forward copy of firm’s applicaƟon and copy of reply to be received from firm to MSME for examinaƟon and comments. 2

Case No.:32/31/80‐ALC2/2010

Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00510/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00028/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018929 30.08.2010 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm was invited for a personal hearing but the firm did not aƩend the personal hearing. The CommiƩee, therefore, decided to give them a second opportunity of personal hearing to explain their case on 5.3.2013 at 2.30 pm in DGFT, Udyog Bhavan. 3

Case No.:6/21/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00426/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00296/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710083749 04.11.2011 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that DIT has asked the firm to provide certain technical informaƟon required for examinaƟon of the case and firm’s reply is awaited. 4

Case No.:16/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00495/AM12/ RLA File :34/24/040/00186/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3410032547 Defer

/ 14.12.2011 Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to remind them for expediƟng their comments. 5

Case No.:6/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:AUROLAB Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00485/AM12/ RLA File :35/24/040/00029/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3510036982 02.01.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per C&PC leƩer No. 46011/93/2012‐PC‐II dated 22.1.2013 (copy enclosed). RA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 6

Case No.:19/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:CANALAIR AIR SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00498/AM12/ RLA File :32/21/040/00113/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3210052122 11.01.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriƩen comments, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: 1. Net Weight of export product namely, “ 3 Nos. of Fibre Compactor complete with SucƟon fan and 7.5 KW Motor” to be specified as 66.3 MT. 2. Weights of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2,3 & 4 to be specified as 37.5 MT. 55.5 Kgs., 201 Kgs. & 600 Kgs. respecƟvely. 3. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as 1.05 Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 1.01Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 5. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 3 to be allowed as 1.03Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 6. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 4 to be allowed as 1.02Kgs./Kg. content in the export product. 7. QuanƟƟes of import items from Sl. No. 5 to 9 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 7

Case No.:18/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:DELKOR TECHNIK INDIA P.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00497/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00409/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710085428 12.01.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIPP and decided to await comments. 8

Case No.:43/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00522/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00218/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052856 08.02.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee observed that it is a case of deemed exports and decided to check from RA/firm whether it is a case of physical export or deemed export. In case it is a case of deemed export, firm to provide details as to under which paragraph of 8.2 of FTP the supplies are covered. A copy of Project Authority CerƟficate may also be furnished. In case of supply against EPCG licence, the following details may also be provided : i. EPCG licence number and date. ii. CIF value of the licence. iii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iv Custom duty saved amount

iv. Custom duty saved amount. v. Products to be manufactured. vi. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. 9

Case No.:9/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:HTD HEAT TRACE(INDIA)PVT LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00264/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00045/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910052593 11.05.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP leƩer dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: 1. Words “1 set comprising of 24 HeaƟng modules ” to be suffixed with the descripƟon of export product. 2. Net Weight of export products may be specified as 9660Kgs. 3. QuanƟƟes of import items from Sl. Nos. 1 to 20 to be allowed on net to net basis as claimed by the firm. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 10

Case No.:7/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00262/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00337/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410137296 13.06.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per DHI leƩer No. 3(145)2012/TSW(B)/415 dated 19.12.2012 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 11

Case No.:14/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00269/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00087/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510328347 27.06.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: 1. Net Fabricated weight of 364.346MT to be specified with the quanƟty of export product. 2. Word “Relevant” to be prefixed with the descripƟon of import items at Sl. Nos. 1, 6, 7 & 8. 3. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 105 MT inclusive of 4.17 % wastage. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 2 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 41390 Kg inclusive of 53.6 % wastage aŌer taking 20 % recovery. 5. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 3 to be allowed as 2 Nos. (11839 Kgs.) on net to net basis with accountability cause. 6. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 4 to be allowed as 65 Nos. (6959Kgs.)on net to net basis with accountability clause. 7. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 5 to be allowed as 10 Nos. (3000Kgs.) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 8. QuanƟƟes of import items from Sl. No. 6& 7 to be allowed as 6500Kgs. & 25175 Kgs. respecƟvely inclusive of 4.17 % wastage as claimed by the firm. 9. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. No. 8 to be allowed as applied for inclusive of 2 % wastage. 10. QuanƟty of import items at Sl. No. 9& 12 to be allowed as applied for. 11. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 10 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 12. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 11 to be allowed as 2 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 14500 Kg inclusive of 2.1 % wastage. 13 Q Ɵt f i t it t Sl N 13 t b ll d 12 N (500 K ) t t t b i ith

13. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 13 to be allowed as 12 Nos. (500 Kgs.) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 14. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. No., 14, 16 & 17(Welding Consumables) to be allowed as applied for i.e. 2400Kgs., 4500 Kgs.& 60 Kgs. respecƟvely. 15. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. No., 15, 18& 19 (Welding Consumables) to be allowed as 2460Kgs., 3490Kgs. &3404Kgs. respecƟvely. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 12

Case No.:26/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00281/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00212/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310700465 02.07.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: 1. Net Fabricated weights of export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3 to be specified as 155 MT, 38 MT &340 MT respecƟvely. 2. Import items at Sl. No. 1& 2 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained in the export product 3. Import item at Sl. No. 4 shall be of relevant grade and dia. as contained in the export product. 4. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 296000Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 5 %. 5. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 5100Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 3 %. 6. QuanƟty of Test Coupons in import item at Sl. No. 3 to be restricted as 10 Nos.(938Kgs.). 7. Total quanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 3 to be allowed as 192 Nos. (140.21 MT) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 8. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 4 to be allowed as 59978Mtrs. (74 MT) inclusive of a wastage of 2%. 9. Weights of import items at Sl. No. 5, 6, 7 & 9 to be specified as 3 MT, 7.521 MT, 1 MT & 2.2 MT respecƟvely. 10. Import item at Sl. No. 5, 6, 7 & 9 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 11. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 8 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 21000Kgs.inclusive of a wastage of 10 %.. 12. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. Nos. 10, 11& 12 (welding Consumables) to be allowed as 3326Kgs., 5296 Kgs. &5296Kgs. respecƟvely. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly.

Case No.:25/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00280/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00122/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310700668 03.07.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: 1. Net empty weight of export product to be specified as 845 MT. 2. Import items at Sl. No. 1, 2, 3&4 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained in the export product 3. Import item at Sl. No. 7 shall be of relevant grade and dia. as contained in the export product. 4. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 4 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 534000 Kgs., 112000 Kgs. & 33000 Kgs. respecƟvely inclusive of a wastage of 5 %. 5. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 3 to be allowed as 17657Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 3 %. 6. QuanƟty of Test Coupons in import item at Sl. No. 5 to be restricted as 5 Nos.(325 Kgs.).

13 7. Total quanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 5 to be allowed as 9 Nos. (42.94 MT) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 8. QuanƟty of Test Coupons in import item at Sl. No. 6 to be restricted as 4 Nos.(260Kgs.). 9. Total quanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 6 to be allowed as 140 Nos. (72.30 MT) on net to net basis with accountability clause. 10. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 7 to be allowed as 1447Mtrs. (9.1 MT) inclusive of a wastage of 2%. 11. Weights of import items at Sl. No. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13&14 to be specified as 23.03 MT, 3 MT, 12 MT, 12MT, 1 MT, 5 MT&5 MT respecƟvely. 12. Import items at Sl. No. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 13. Import items at Sl. No. 12 & 13 to be supplied with the export product. 14. QuanƟƟes of import items at Sl. Nos. 15, 16& 17 (welding Consumables) to be allowed as applied for i.e.5000Kgs., 10000Kgs. &10000Kgs. respecƟvely. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 14

Case No.:15/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00270/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00278/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310701832 13.07.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision :The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 27.11.2012 followed by reminder dated 3.1.2013 and decided to send a final reminder requesƟng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiƩee shall be constrained to reject their case with direcƟon to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regularizaƟon of the licence. 15

Case No.:16/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00271/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00262/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310701811 13.07.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 16

Case No.:4/10/81‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:DEE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/81/050/00199/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00134/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510329855 17.07.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 3.1.2013 and decided to remind them for expediƟng their reply. 17

Case No.:22/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:UNI VTL ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00277/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00272/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310702088 17.07.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 14.1.2013 and decided to remind them for expediƟng their reply.

Case No :2/10/80 ALC2/2012

Party Name:MAXTECH SINTERED Meet No/Date:22/80 Status:

Case No.:2/10/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:MAXTECH SINTERED PRODUCT PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00213/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00079/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055073 23.07.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per MSME UO No. 30(217)2011‐ME dated 3.1.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 19

Case No.:3/10/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00214/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00068/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055074 23.07.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 5.10.2012 followed by reminder dated 27.11.2012 and final reminder dated 3.1.2013 and decided to await 15 days more to receive firm’s reply. 20

Case No.:10/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:AUTO TECH INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00265/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00055/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410138355 24.07.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per MSME UO No. 30(215)2011‐ME dated 21.12.2012 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 21

Case No.:24/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00279/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00149/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510330419 24.07.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to remind them for expediƟng their comments. 22

Case No.:3/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:MULTITEC AIDS PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00258/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00144/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510333002 29.08.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.10.2012 followed by reminder dated 27.11.2012 and final reminder dated 3.1.2013 and decided to await 15 days more to receive firm’s reply. 23

Case No.:5/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00260/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00199/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510333158 30.08.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that DIT has asked the firm to provide certain technical informaƟon required for examinaƟon of the case and firm’s reply is awaited. 24

Case No.:6/13/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ Fil 01/80/050/00261/AM13/ RLA Fil 61/21/040/00002/AM13/ Li N /D 6110000870 D f

HQ File :01/80/050/00261/AM13/ RLA File :61/21/040/00002/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:6110000870 05.09.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that RA was requested for provide copy of firm’s applicaƟon and the same is awaited. 25

Case No.:1/16/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:DIAMOND METAL SCREENS (P) LTD Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00362/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00264/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091357 12.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 26

Case No.:2/16/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:SUPERMAX PERSONALCARE PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00363/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00441/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310712865 16.10.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under as per firm’s Advance AuthorizaƟon No.0310671588 dated 19.12.2011 raƟfied in NC meeƟng dated 06.03.2012 aŌer taking clue from SION C‐873: a) Net weight of export product to be specified as 164860 Kgs. b) Word “Relevant” to be prefixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No. 1 and its quanƟty to be allowed as 11024 Kgs. inclusive of 75 % wastage. c) QuanƟƟes of import items at S.Nos. 2, 3, 7 & 8 to be allowed as 136290 Kgs, 6050 Kgs, 3080Kgs& 28160 Kgs respecƟvely inclusive of 10 % wastage. d) QuanƟƟes of import items at S.Nos. 4 & 5 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 455 Kgs each. inclusive of 30 % wastage. e) QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 6 to be allowed as 78 Kgs. inclusive of 30 % wastage. f) QuanƟƟes of import items at S.No. 9, 10, 11 & 12 put together to be allowed within 1% of fob value of exports. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 27

Case No.:9/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:COOLDECK AQUA SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00456/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00527/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310712895 16.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. 28

Case No.:22/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00469/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00287/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091411 16.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency and decided to remind them. 29

Case No.:8/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00455/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00575/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310713034 17.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013

Case No.:4/16/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:WELD FUSE PVT. LTD . Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00365/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00334/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910054144 18.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that copy of applicaƟon has not been received in NC and decided to request RA/firm to provide 4 sets of applicaƟon for consideraƟon of the case in NC. 31

Case No.:6/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00453/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00582/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310713179 18.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 32

Case No.:17/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00464/AM13/ RLA File :07/21/040/00507/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091489 22.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to forward copy of applicaƟon to DHI/MSME for examinaƟon and comments. 33

Case No.:24/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00471/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00300/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091567 25.10.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIT and decided to await comments. 34

Case No.:30/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:DAYCO VIKAS ENGINE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00477/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00284/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510337678 26.10.2012 Decision : On the recommendaƟon of DHI, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 35

Case No.:25/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PLANSEE INDIA HIGH PERFORMANCE MATERIALS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00472/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00277/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091620 29.10.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP leƩer dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: Taking clue from SION C‐1316, quanƟƟes of import items at Sl. No. 1 & 2 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 265Kgs. and 17.5Kgs. respecƟvely. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. C N 7/22/80 ALC2/2012 P t N GEA ECOFLEX INDIA M t N /D t 22/80 St t

Case No.:7/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00454/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00610/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714432 06.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 37

Case No.:1/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:G & T OIL STATES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00448/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00625/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714469 07.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm vide their leƩer dated 10.1.2013 informed that they are approaching RA, Mumbai for ge軀�ng certain amendments in the subject authorizaƟon and requested to defer the case Ɵll the authorizaƟon is amended by RA, Mumbai. 38

Case No.:2/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:G & T OIL STATES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00449/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00626/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714471 07.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 The CommiƩee noted that firm vide their leƩer dated 10.1.2013 informed that they are approaching RA, Mumbai for ge軀�ng certain amendments in the subject authorizaƟon and requested to defer the case Ɵll the authorizaƟon is amended by RA, Mumbai. 39

Case No.:10/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:ALSTOM INDIA LIMITED, Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00457/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00684/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714594 07.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that copy of applicaƟon has not been received and decided to request RA/firm to forward copy of applicaƟon for consideraƟon of the case. The CommiƩee also decided to seek informaƟon with regard to specific name, weight of EP, use of input No.4, weight balance etc. 40

Case No.:32/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00479/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00192/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3410035465 07.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to remind them for expediƟng their comments. 41

Case No.:4/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00451/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00529/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714659 08.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 42

Case No.:5/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred

42 HQ File :01/80/050/00452/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00586/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714769 09.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 43

Case No.:3/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:INGERSOLL‐RAND (INDIA) LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00450/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00661/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310714998 16.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 44

Case No.:11/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00458/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00327/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510339184 20.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : On the recommendaƟon of DIPP, the CommiƩee decided to seek informaƟon from firm on the following: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 3, 4, 5&11 of Standard Deficiency Format‐export product wise. 2. QuanƟty of import item at Sl. No. 1, 2&3 in meters also in addiƟon to their weights. 3. QuanƟƟes of import items from Sl. Nos. 4 to 8 in Nos. also in addiƟon to their weights. 45

Case No.:12/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:METSO PAPER INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00459/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00309/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510339397 23.11.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : On the recommendaƟon of DHI, the CommiƩee decided to ask the firm to furnish name, descripƟon of inputs and quanƟty in numbers. 46

Case No.:14/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:DAYCO VIKAS POWER TRANSMISSION PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00461/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00334/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510339380 23.11.2012 Decision : On the recommendaƟon of DHI, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per GN4 for Engineering product and on Net to Net basis with accountability clause for Sr.No.33 & 47. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 47

Case No.:21/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:SONA STAMPINGS LTD./SONA KOYO STEERING SYSTEMS Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00468/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00320/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510339521 26.11.2012 Decision : On the recommendaƟon of DHI, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per GN4 for Engineering product. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly.

Case No.:16/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:MVS ENGINEERING LTD Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00463/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00314/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510339718 Defer

48 29.11.2012 Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee considered the case and observed that firm in their applicaƟon has menƟoned at Sr.No.19 that it is a Deemed Export supply to Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project whereas in their covering leƩer dated 16.11.2012 addressed to CLA, they have menƟoned that it is a physical export supply to Saudi Arabia. The CommiƩee decided to seek a clarificaƟon from firm in this regard. In case it is a Deemed Export supply, please clarify under which paragraph of 8.2 of FTP it is covered and a copy of PAC may also be provided. In case of supply against EPCG licence, the following details may also be provided : i. EPCG licence number and date. ii. CIF value of the licence. iii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iv. Custom duty saved amount. v. Products to be manufactured. vi. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. The CommiƩee also decided to check from RA(CLA) whether they have issued this AuthorizaƟon for Physical Export or Deemed Export. 49

Case No.:18/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:ROBONIK ( INDIA ) PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00465/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00371/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716199 03.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that C&PC has returned this applicaƟon as it does not pertain to them. The CommiƩee decided to forward copy of firm’s applicaƟon to DIPP / MSME for examinaƟon and comments. 50

Case No.:20/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:SUNDRAM FASTENERS LTD., Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00467/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00191/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410141439 03.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 51

Case No.:31/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00478/AM13/ RLA File :34/24/040/00208/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3410035594 03.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. 52

Case No.:13/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:LLOYD ELECTRIC & ENGG. LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00460/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00348/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510340058 04.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 53

Case No.:15/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00462/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00349/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510340048 04.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to advise firm to produce a cerƟficate from the Directorate General of Hydro Carbon in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas staƟng that goods being supplied are required for petroleum gases, in terms of condiƟon No.41, Sr.No.356 of Custom NoƟficaƟon No.12 dated 17.3.2012.

g , , 54

Case No.:19/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PHOENIX FOILS PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00466/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00342/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310716381 05.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 55

Case No.:27/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00474/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00111/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410141542 05.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. 56

Case No.:28/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00475/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00086/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410141537 05.12.2012 Decision : On the recommendaƟon of DHI, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 57

Case No.:29/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00476/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00158/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410141543 05.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. 58

Case No.:26/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00473/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00093/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410141641 07.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. 59

Case No.:23/22/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:SHAILESH FORGING WORKS Meet No/Date:22/80‐ ALC2/2012 22.01.2013 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00470/AM13/ RLA File :24/24/040/00016/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:2410037772 12.12.2012 Defer Date:05.03.2013 S.No.37

Case No. A ‐ 16

M/s. VA Tech Escher Wyss Flovel Ltd., d b d HQ F.No.01/80/050/00925/AM12/DES.I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00940/AM07 0510199700 dt 20 02 2007

Faridabad dt.20.02.2007 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of norms The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per DHI leƩer No. 3(93)/2012‐TSW(B) dated 21.1.2013 (copy enclosed). The wastage norms are for regularizaƟon purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiƩed. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.38

Case No. A ‐ 21

M/s. Philips Electronics India Ltd., Kolkata HQF.No.01/81/050/00268/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00092/AM07 0210091324 dt.12.07.2006 Date: 22.01.2013 RaƟficaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that firm has informed vide email that they have already paid the Customs Duty and applicable interest in this case and requested for closure of their case. The CommiƩee also noted that a copy of this email has already been forwarded to RA, KolkaƩa. Since the firm has already paid the Custom duty and applicable interest in this case, the CommiƩee observed that there is no acƟon required from the NC and decided to inform RA to take necessary acƟon for closure/EOD. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.488

Case No. A/R‐98

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00573/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00223/AM11 0910043468 dt.09.09.2010 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that this case been referred to EPCG Division for clarificaƟon and decided to defer the case. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.489

Case No. A/R‐88

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/01436/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00556/AM07 0910030003 dt.16.04.2007 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.490

Case No. A/R‐107

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Chennai HQF.No.01/80/050/00078/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.04/24/042/00102/AM05 0410069858 dt.25.04.2005 Date: 22.01.2013 Amendment of Norms S.No.491

Case No. A/R‐118

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00495/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00169/AM11 0910043002 dt.06.08.2010 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that this case been referred to EPCG Division for clarificaƟon and decided to defer the case. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.492

Case No. A/R‐126

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Chennai HQF.No.01/80/050/00077/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00101/AM05 0410069856 dt.25.04.2005 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of Norms S.No.493

Case No. A/R‐128

M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00180/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00004/AM10 0910037842 dt.06.05.2009 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of Norms S.No.494

Case No.A/R‐153

M/s. Thermax Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/162/00480/AM07/ DES‐I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA F.No.31/24/040/00186/AM07 3110026329 dt.04.09.2006 Date: 22.01.2013 RaƟficaƟon of Norms S.No.495

Case No. A/R‐79

M/s. Patel Airtemp (India) Ltd., Ahmedabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00125/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.08/24/040/00186/AM08 0810068645 dt.26.11.2007 Date: 22.01.2013 RaƟficaƟon of Norms Based on DIPP leƩer dated 21 1 2013 the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under:

Based on DIPP leƩer dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: a) Net weight of export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3 to be specified as 331.5 MT, 3 MT & 4 MT respecƟvely b) Word “Relevant” to be prefixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No. 1 and its quanƟty to be 1.05 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products. c) Weight of import items at Sl. No. 2 to be specified as 42.95 MT. d) QuanƟty of import item at Sl.No. 2 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. The wastage norms are for regularizaƟon purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiƩed. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.496

Case No. A/R‐92

M/s. Cethar Limited, Tiruchirapalli HQF.No.01/80/050/00579/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00282/AM12 0410133046 dt.23.01.2012 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that firm was invited for personal hearing on 22.1.2013 to explain their case. However, firm vide their email informed that their technical person is unavailable and requested for postponement of personal hearing. The CommiƩee decided to given the firm a second opportunity of personal hearing on 5.3.2013 at 2.30 p.m. to explain their case. S.No.497

Case No. A/R‐95

M/s. LLOYD Electric & Engineering Ltd., New Delhi HQF.No.01/80/050/00101/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.05/23/040/00076/AM12 0510292264 dt.31.05.2011 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.498

Case No. A/R‐97

M/s. Sage Metals Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00855/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00371/AM11 0510284565 dt.28.02.2011 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP leƩer dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to revise norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: 1. Word” relevant” to be prefixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No.1 and its quanƟty to be allowed as 44460Kgs. inclusive of 10 % wastage (as per Sub‐CommiƩee report). The wastage norms are for regularizaƟon purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiƩed. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.499

Case No. A/R‐98

M/s. Sage Metals Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00696/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00316/AM11 0510280781 dt.30.12.2010 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms Based on DIPP leƩer dated 21.1.2013, the CommiƩee decided to revise norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: 1. Word” relevant” to be prefixed with the descripƟon of import item at Sl. No.1 and its quanƟty to be allowed as 110000 Kgs. inclusive of 10 % wastage (as per Sub‐CommiƩee report). The wastage norms are for regularizaƟon purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiƩed. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.500

Case No. A/R‐106

M/s. Komet Precision Tools Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00825/AM07/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.07/24/040/00487/AM07 0710048122 dt.27.10.2006 Date: 22.01.2013 FixaƟon of norms The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on repeat basis as per decision in respect of Advance AuthorizaƟon No.710048122 as requested by applicant vide their leƩer dated 07.01.2013. The wastage norms are for regularizaƟon purpose only. In case of expired licence, no fresh import to be permiƩed. RA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.501

Case No. A/R‐107

M/s. L&T‐MHI Turbine Generators Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00141/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00125/AM12 0310633816 dt.31.05.2011 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms The CommiƩee decided to revise norms of subject authorizaƟon as per DHI leƩer No. 3(104)/2011/TSWB/226 dated 11.6.2012 (copy enclosed). RA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.502

Case No. A/R‐108

M/s. Brakes India Limited, Chennai HQF.No.01/80/050/01124/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00263/AM08 0410093871

imited, Chennai MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00263/AM08 0410093871 dt.15.02.2008 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms S.No.503

Case No. A/R‐109

M/s. Poly Medicure Ltd., New Delhi HQF.No.01/80/050/00391/AM2/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00241/AM12 0510305885 dt.19.10.2011 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.504

Case No. A/R‐110

M/s. Poly Medicure Ltd., New Delhi HQF.No.01/80/050/00427/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00281/AM12 0510309080 dt.19.10.2011 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.505

Case No. A/R‐111

M/s. Poly Medicure Ltd., New Delhi HQF.No.01/80/050/00390/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00238/AM12 0510304858 dt.10.10.2011 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. S.No.506

Case No. A/R‐112

M/s. Thermax Limited, Pune HQF.No.01/80/050/00310/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00017/AM06 3110021206 dt.14.07.2005 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms S.No.507

Case No. A/R‐113

M/s. Thermax Limited, Pune HQF.No.01/80/050/00885/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.31/24/040/00227/AM08 3110031126 dt.15.10.2007 Date: 22.01.2013 Revision of norms Sl.No.508

Case No. C – 18

M/s. Bhukanvala Diamond Systems Pvt. Ltd., Navsari HQ F.No.01/80/162/00056/AM12/DES‐I MeeƟng No.22/13 Request for fixaƟon of Adhoc Norms for the export product “Die Sets and PVC Blister Moulds” in respect of 100% EOU Date: 22.01.2013 The CommiƩee decided to fix Adhoc norms in this case as per DHI UO No. 1A(1)/09‐TSW(B)/10 dated 11.1.2013 (copy enclosed). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. Sl.No.509

Case No. C – 33

M/s. M+Acer AutomoƟve Systems Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00914/AM12/DES‐I MeeƟng No.22/13 FixaƟon of Scrap/Wastage norms for the export product “Level Indicator Assembly” in respect of 100% EOU. Date: 22.01.2013 The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. Sl.No.510

Case No. C – 06

M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00082/AM13/DES‐I MeeƟng No.22/13 FixaƟon of Adhoc Norms for the export product “Collar High Flow 8 Inch EWR Phase 4” – reg. Date: 22.01.2013 The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer and decided to remind them for expediƟng their reply. Case deferred to 5.3.2012. Sl.No.511

Case No. C – 09

M/s. MTAR Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad HQ F.No.01/80/162/00462/AM13/DES‐I MeeƟng No.22/13 FixaƟon of input output wastage Ad‐hoc Norms for the export product “Oil & Gas ExploraƟon components, Catalina Hot Box & Aero Space Parts” in respect of 100% EOU –reg Date: 22 01 2013

respect of 100% EOU reg. Date: 22.01.2013 S.No.512

Case No. A/R‐114

M/s. Godrej & Boyce Co. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/01085/AM12/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.22/13 RA.F.No.03/94/040/01092/AM08 0310460269 dt.06.02.2008 Date: 22.01.2013 Amendment of norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIPP and decided to await comments. Case deferred to 5.3.2012.

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.