DGFT Minutes
In force — no superseding record on file.
RATIFIED Minutes of MeeƟng No.16/13 scheduled on 30.10.2012 of Norms CommiƩee(NC‐I) (DES.I SecƟon) The meeƟng No. 16/13 of the Norms CommiƩee (NC‐I) for the licensing year 2012‐2013 was held on 30.10.2012 under the Chairmanship of Sh. L.B. Singhal, AddiƟonal Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applicaƟons under Duty ExempƟon / Remission Schemes (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014 / Handbook of Procedure Volume‐I. The following Members of the CommiƩee were present in the meeƟng: ‐ Sl.No Name of the representaƟves & their DesignaƟon Room No. Telephone No. DepƩ. 1. Sh K.K. Tiwari I.A 476 23063321 Extn. DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, AssƩ. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. Parveen Sharma, Dy. DGFT 306 23061563 Extn. DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. K.C. Raju, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. I ‐The Commi៝�ee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this mee៝�ng generated through the online system of NIC. The decisions taken thereon are as under: ‐ 1
Case No.:21/39/80‐ALC2/2009
Party Name:VEM TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00617/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00373/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910040368 18.12.2009 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that a reference was made to SCOMET SecƟon of DGFT seeking some informaƟon regarding condiƟon of export product against subject authorizaƟon and decided to await comments. 2
Case No.:32/31/80‐ALC2/2010
Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00510/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00028/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018929 30.08.2010 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : : The CommiƩee noted that a reference was made to SCOMET SecƟon of DGFT seeking some informaƟon regarding condiƟon of export product against subject authorizaƟon and decided to await comments. 3
Case No.:29/6/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00106/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00177/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310634527 06.06.2011 Decision : The applicaƟon of the firm was considered in the meeƟng. The CommiƩee observed that the norms for their product are already fixed permi迀�ng import of Seamless Steel Tubes. However, firm wanted to import Solid Bars. The firm has explained the reason for import of Solid Bars that the product which they are exporƟng is of very high thickness of 80‐90 mm and this kind of products cannot be made from Seamless Steel Tubes. Hence, they have to import Solid Bars. Based on DHI wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on repeat basis as per decision in AuthorizaƟon No.310622006 as requested by applicant vide their leƩer dated 26.9.2012. The wall thickness 65.91 mm and alloy composiƟon‐15‐15 HS Stainless, to be included in the EP.
The CommiƩee also directed the firm that in respect of any export done under Duty ExempƟon Scheme from 18.9.2012 onwards, in the product export details, the specificaƟons viz thickness, grade of Steel etc. must specifically be indicated in the Shipping Bills. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 4
Case No.:26/9/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:AKSH TECHNOLOGIES LTD.((A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00194/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00132/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510296453 13.07.2011 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIT and decided to await comments. 5
Case No.:6/21/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00426/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00296/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710083749 04.11.2011 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIT and decided to await comments. 6
Case No.:16/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00495/AM12/ RLA File :34/24/040/00186/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3410032547 14.12.2011 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. 7
Case No.:27/45/81‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:KERN‐LIEBERS SPRINGS & STAMPINGS PVT.LTD, Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/81/050/00443/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00367/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084702 15.12.2011 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per wriƩen comments of MSME received vide UO note No. 30(168)/11‐ME dated 8.10.2012 (copy to be forwarded to RLA). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 8
Case No.:6/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:AUROLAB Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00485/AM12/ RLA File :35/24/040/00029/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3510036982 02.01.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. 9
Case No.:19/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:CANALAIR AIR SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00498/AM12/ RLA File :32/21/040/00113/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3210052122 11.01.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012
Decision : The representaƟve of DIPP informed that firm has not replied properly to deficiency leƩer and hence, firm to be asked to provide informaƟon as per deficiency leƩer sent to them. 10
Case No.:18/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:DELKOR TECHNIK INDIA P.LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00497/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00409/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710085428 12.01.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 9.10.2012 and decided to remind them for expediƟng their reply. 11
Case No.:35/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:OM METALS INFRAPROJECTS LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00514/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00353/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510314332 12.01.2012 Decision : Based on DHI wriƩen comments received vide UO No. 3(74)/12‐TSW(B)/325 dated 18.9.2012, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: Export Item Qty Comments Hydro mechanical Equipment, Spillway radial gate 1 Set Qty to be amended to 1 set consisƟng of 4 numbers of weight 621.36 MT Import Item Qty Comments HR SS Plates 32.58 MT Thickness of plates is 20 mm to be incorporated in the licence. 12
Case No.:43/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00522/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00218/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052856 08.02.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer and reminder dated 5.10.2012 and decided to send a final reminder requesƟng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiƩee shall be constrained to reject their case with direcƟon to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regularizaƟon of the licence. 13
Case No.:1/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00583/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00406/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053404 15.03.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee considered the wriƩen comments of DEIT received vide UO No.17(48)/2012‐IPHW dated 26.09.2012 and decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly.
14
Case No.:2/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00584/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00385/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053407 15.03.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee considered the wriƩen comments of DEIT received vide UO No.17(51)/2012‐IPHW dated 26.09.2012 and decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 15
Case No.:3/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00585/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/01039/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310686540 15.03.2012 Decision : The applicaƟon of the firm was considered in the meeƟng. The CommiƩee observed that the norms for their product are already fixed permi迀�ng import of Seamless Steel Tubes. However, firm wanted to import Solid Bars. The firm has explained the reason for import of Solid Bars that the product which they are exporƟng is of very high thickness of 80‐90 mm and this kind of products cannot be made from Seamless Steel Tubes. Hence, they have to import Solid Bars. Based on DHI wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on repeat basis as per decision in AuthorizaƟon No.310600433 as requested by applicant vide their leƩer dated 26.9.2012. The wall thickness 70 mm and alloy composiƟon‐15‐15 HS Stainless, to be included in the EP. The CommiƩee also directed the firm that in respect of any export done under Duty ExempƟon Scheme from 18.9.2012 onwards, in the product export details, the specificaƟons viz thickness, grade of Steel etc. must specifically be indicated in the Shipping Bills. 16
Case No.:4/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00586/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00395/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053419 19.03.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee considered the wriƩen comments of DEIT received vide UO No.17(49)/2012‐IPHW dated 26.09.2012 and decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 17
Case No.:5/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00587/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00393/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053435 20.03.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee considered the wriƩen comments of DEIT received vide UO No.17(50)/2012‐IPHW dated 26.09.2012 and decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly.
Case No.:6/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved
18 HQ File :01/80/050/00588/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00410/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053447 21.03.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee considered the wriƩen comments of DEIT received vide UO No.17(52)/2012‐IPHW dated 26.09.2012 and decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 19
Case No.:10/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00592/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00401/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053492 26.03.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee considered the wriƩen comments of DEIT received vide UO No.17(70)/2012‐IPHW dated 03.10.2012 and decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on Net to Net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 20
Case No.:6/4/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:FENIX PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00059/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00012/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110053907 24.04.2012 Decision : The firm vide its leƩer dated 31.10.2012 informed that they have surrendered the subject licence to RA for cancellaƟon and enclosed a copy of surrender leƩer No. 31/83/165/000197/AM13 dated 24.4.2012 issued by RA. Hence, the CommiƩee decided to close the case and advise RA accordingly for necessary acƟon. 21
Case No.:8/4/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:UNI VTL ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00061/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00053/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310692316 26.04.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that copy of firm’s reply has been forwarded to MSME for examinaƟon and decided to await MSME comments. 22
Case No.:1/10/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BOSCH LIMITED, Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00212/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00459/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710088081 08.05.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. 23
Case No.:9/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:HTD HEAT TRACE(INDIA)PVT LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00264/AM13/ RLA File :09/24/040/00045/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0910052593 11.05.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee observed that this is a case of Deemed Exports and supply is against an EPCG licence. The CommiƩee, therefore, decided to call for copy of Project Authority CerƟficate as well as the following details : i. EPCG licence number and date.
ii. CIF value of the licence. iii. Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iv. Custom duty saved amount. v. Products to be manufactured. vi. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. 24
Case No.:7/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00262/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00337/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410137296 13.06.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision :The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. 25
Case No.:1/7/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TRANS ENGINEERS INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Closed HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00049/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110054678 14.06.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm vide their leƩer dated 5.10.2012 informed they have surrendered the subject authorizaƟon to RA, Pune. The CommiƩee, therefore, felt that there is no acƟon pending on its part and decided to close the case and also to inform RA. 26
Case No.:14/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00269/AM13/ RLA File :05/23/040/00087/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510328347 27.06.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP recommendaƟon, the CommiƩee decided to seek informaƟon from firm as per Sr.No. 3,4,5,11 & 13 of Standard Deficiency Format. 27
Case No.:26/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00281/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00212/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310700465 02.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 9.10.2012 and decided to 28
Case No.:25/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00280/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00122/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310700668 03.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 9.10.2012 and decided to
29
Case No.:15/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00270/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00278/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310701832 13.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP recommendaƟon, the CommiƩee decided to seek informaƟon from firm as per Sr.No. 4,5,11 & 11A of Standard Deficiency Format. 30
Case No.:16/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00271/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00262/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310701811 13.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 9.10.2012 and decided to 31
Case No.:28/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:AUTO TECH INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00283/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00325/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410138056 13.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.10.2012 and decided to 32
Case No.:29/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:AUTO TECH INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00284/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00324/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410138057 13.07.2012 Decision : Based on MSME wriƩen comments received vide UO note No.30(220)/2011‐ME dated 1.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on repeat basis as per decision in authorizaƟon No.0410129764 dated 28.10.2011. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 33
Case No.:22/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:UNI VTL ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00277/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00272/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310702088 17.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.10.2012 and decided to 34
Case No.:2/10/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MAXTECH SINTERED PRODUCT PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00213/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00079/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055073 23.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012
Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.10.2012 and decided to 35
Case No.:3/10/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00214/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00068/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055074 23.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer and reminder dated 5.10.2012 and decided to send a final reminder requesƟng them to expedite their reply within 15 days, failing which the CommiƩee shall be constrained to reject their case with direcƟon to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regularizaƟon of the licence. 36
Case No.:10/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:AUTO TECH INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00265/AM13/ RLA File :04/24/040/00055/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0410138355 24.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.10.2012 and decided to 37
Case No.:24/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00279/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00149/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510330419 24.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of C&PC and decided to await comments. 38
Case No.:18/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00273/AM13/ RLA File :11/24/040/00017/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:1110027197 25.07.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. 39
Case No.:17/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00272/AM13/ RLA File :11/24/040/00013/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:1110027205 31.07.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per DHI wriƩen comments received vide leƩer No. 3(124)/2012 TSW(B)/328 dated 20.9.2012 (copy to be forwarded to RA). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly.
Case No.:1/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TERACOM LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred
40 HQ File :01/80/050/00256/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00196/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510332771 28.08.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIT and decided to await comments. 41
Case No.:2/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:ANGIPLAST PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00257/AM13/ RLA File :08/24/040/00182/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0810114631 29.08.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that reply received from firm and decided to forward same to MSME for examinaƟon and comments. 42
Case No.:3/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name: MULTITEC AIDS PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00258/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00144/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510333002 29.08.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer dated 10.10.2012 and decided to 43
Case No.:4/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name: MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00259/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00206/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510333156 30.08.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon on repeat basis as per Advance AuthorizaƟon No.0510299295dated 11.08.2011 raƟfied in Norms CommiƩee MeeƟng No. 02/ dated 17/04/2012: 1. Net weight of export product may be specified as 356.4 Kgs. 2. QuanƟty of import item may be allowed as 2840.5 Kgs. inclusive of 697% wastage aŌer taking 6% recovery from scrap. 44
Case No.:5/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name: ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00260/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00199/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510333158 30.08.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DIT and decided to await comments. 45
Case No.:6/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00261/AM13/ RLA File :61/21/040/00002/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:6110000870 05.09.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012
Decision : The CommiƩee noted that copy of applicaƟon has not been received from RA and decided to request RA to forward 4 sets of applicaƟon immediately for consideraƟon in NC. 46
Case No.:30/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00285/AM13/ RLA File :05/24/040/00215/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0510334026 07.09.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject on repeat basis as per Advance AuthorizaƟon No.0510295994 dated 07.07.2011 raƟfied in Norms CommiƩee MeeƟng No. 09/12 dated 26/07/2011: 1. Net weight of export product may be specified as 682.2Kgs. 2. QuanƟty of import item may be allowed as 2865.2 Kgs. inclusive of 320% wastage aŌer taking 6% recovery from scrap 47
Case No.:3/16/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00364/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00295/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310708067 07.09.2012 Decision : Based on DHI wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon under GN‐4 for Engineering Products. Item 29 & 30 – deleted. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. 48
Case No.:31/13/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00286/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00266/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310708237 10.09.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP leƩer dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to seek following informaƟon from the firm: 1. Net weight of indigenous items in the export product. 2. For net weight of components to be manufactured from import item at Sl. No. 1 & 2, details of components with net weights thereof may be indicated. 3. QuanƟty of “Test coupons” at import item at Sl. No. 3 & 4 in Nos. and weight and jusƟficaƟon/basis for the quanƟty of “Test coupons”. 4. Detailed calculaƟons for the quanƟty of import item at Sl.No. 5 supported by length and number of Pipes/tubes in the export product 5. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 13 of Standard Deficiency Format. 49
Case No.:1/16/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:DIAMOND METAL SCREENS (P) LTD Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00362/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00264/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0710091357 12.10.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012
Decision : The CommiƩee noted that copy of applicaƟon has not been received from RA and decided to request RA to forward 4 sets of applicaƟon immediately for consideraƟon in NC. 50
Case No.:2/16/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SUPERMAX PERSONALCARE PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:16/80‐ ALC2/2012 30.10.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00363/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00441/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310712865 16.10.2012 Defer Date:11.12.2012 Decision : The CommiƩee noted that copy of applicaƟon has not been received from RA and decided to request RA to forward 4 sets of applicaƟon immediately for consideraƟon in NC. S.No.26
Case No. A ‐ 09
M/s. Jhagadia Copper Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00542/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.34/24/039/00001/AM10 3410024795 dt.29.07.2009 Date: 30.10.2012 RaƟficaƟon of norms The CommiƩee noted the following: (i) The CommiƩee has asked RA to get details from firm viz. total import made against the authorizaƟon, uƟlized to manufacture of export product, balance unuƟlized etc. (ii) RA vide its leƩer dated 28.8.2012 informed that it was not known the actual details of import item and export, since firm has not submiƩed required documents. However, RA has issued Demand NoƟce to firm. (iii) RA vide its leƩer dated 20.09.2012 informed that informaƟon sought by the Norms CommiƩee cannot be gathered from the firm as the Demand NoƟce issued to the firm was returned undelivered from the Postal authoriƟes with the remark “Company Closed”. The CommiƩee considered the case and noted that the requisite informaƟon was not forthcoming from the firm and decided to reject the case and advise RA. RLA to take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.27
Case No. A ‐ 16
M/s. VA Tech Escher Wyss Flovel Ltd., Faridabad HQ F.No.01/80/050/00925/AM12/DES.I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00940/Am07 0510100700 dt.20.02.2007 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of norms The CommiƩee noted that firm has requested for three weeks Ɵme for furnishing certain informaƟon sought by NC in regard to raƟficaƟon of subject authorizaƟon. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.28
Case No. A ‐ 17
M/s. VA Tech Escher Wyss Flovel Ltd., Faridabad HQ F.No.01/80/050/00927/AM12/DES.I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00 /Am07 0510199824 dt.21.02.2007 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of norms The CommiƩee noted that reply received from firm and decided to forward a copy to DHI for examinaƟon and comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.29
Case No. A ‐19
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals HQF.No.01/80/162/00456/AM13/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00405/AM12 0910050156 dt.12.11.2011
Date: 30.10.2012 Ltd., Tiruchirapalli FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.329
Case No. A/R‐98
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00573/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00223/AM11 0910043468 dt.09.09.2010 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee observed that this is a case of Deemed Exports and supply is against an EPCG licence. The CommiƩee, therefore, decided to call for copy of Project Authority CerƟficate as well as the following details : i.EPCG licence number and date. ii.CIF value of the licence. iii.Whether this licence was issued under Zero duty or 3 per cent Scheme. iv.Custom duty saved amount. v.Products to be manufactured. vi. How EPCG licence holder intends to discharge the EO against the EPCG licence. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.330
Case No. A/R‐88
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/01436/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00556/AM07 0910030003 dt.16.04.2007 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.331
Case No. A/R‐
100 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00052/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00423/AM10 0910040811 dt.03.02.2010 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per DHI wriƩen comments received vide leƩer No. 3(42)/2010‐TSW(B)/339 dated 28.9.2012 (copy to be forwarded to RA). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.332
Case No. A/R‐
107 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Chennai HQF.No.01/80/050/00078/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.04/24/042/00102/AM05 0410069858 dt.25.04.2005 Date: 30.10.2012 Amendment of Norms The CommiƩee noted that firm’s request is for reducing export product weight from 2928 MT to 1643 MT. The firm has also submiƩed that they have received payment cerƟficate for 1440 MT. The CommiƩee decided to seek following clarificaƟon from the firm:
(i) whether they are going to get payment only for 1440 MT of it is going to get payment for 1643 MT. In case the payment is being received for 1440 MT then import quanƟty would also be allowed corresponding to 1440 MT only. (ii) In the beginning when the AA has been confirmed and the import quanƟty has been allowed corresponding to Export Weight of 2928 MT. In case Export Product quanƟty got reduced to 1643 MT or 1440 MT then the quanƟty of import also to be correspondingly reduced. Hence the applicant to give a statement showing as to how much quanƟty as applied, how much quanƟty permiƩed by the NC, how much quanƟty they have actually effected by the import and as per the norms approved, how much is the quanƟty required corresponding to 1643 MT or 1440 MT as the case may be. Since the licence is dated 25.4.2005 and licence is already expired, in case BHEL has already done import corresponding to EP weight of 2928 MT then BHEL will have to pay Customs Duty and interest for the excess import. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.333
Case No. A/R‐
114 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00387/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/99455/AM09 0910037412 dt.17.03.2009 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per DHI wriƩen comments received vide leƩer No. 3(42)/2010‐TSW(B) vol22/340 dated 28.9.2012 (copy to be forwarded to RA). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. S.No.334
Case No. A/R‐
115 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/01580/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00351/AM09 0910036322 dt.16.12.2008 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.335
Case No. A/R‐
118 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00495/AM11/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00169/AM11 0910043002 dt.06.08.2010 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that in this case supply is against EPCG licence and eligibility is being examined in EPCG SecƟon. The CommiƩee decided to await EPCG comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.336
Case No. A/R‐
126 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Chennai HQF.No.01/80/050/00077/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00101/AM05 0410069856 dt.25.04.2005 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that firm’s request is for reducing export product weight from 2800 MT to 1829 MT. The firm has also submiƩed that they have received payment cerƟficate for 1648 MT. The CommiƩee decided to seek following clarificaƟon from the firm: (i) whether they are going to get payment only for 1648 MT of it is going to get payment for 1648MT. In case the payment is being received for 1648 MT then import quanƟty would also be allowed corresponding to 1648 MT only. (ii) In the beginning when the AA has been confirmed and the import quanƟty has been allowed corresponding to Export Weight of 2800 MT. In case Export Product quanƟty got reduced to 1829MT or 1648 MT then the quanƟty of import also to be correspondingly reduced. Hence the applicant to give a statement showing as to how much quanƟty as applied, how much quanƟty permiƩed by the NC, how much quanƟty they have actually effected by the import and as per the
norms approved, how much is the quanƟty required corresponding to 1829 MT or 1648 MT as the case may be. Since the licence is dated 25.4.2005 and licence is already expired, in case BHEL has already done import corresponding to EP weight of 2928 MT then BHEL will have to pay Customs Duty and interest for the excess import. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.337
Case No. A/R‐
128 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Hyderabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00180/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.09/24/040/00004/AM10 0910037842 dt.06.05.2009 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.338
Case No.A/R‐153
M/s. Thermax Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/162/00480/AM07/ DES‐I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA F.No.31/24/040/00186/AM07 3110026329 dt.04.09.2006 Date: 30.10.2012 RaƟficaƟon of Norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.339
Case No.A/R‐10
M/s. Strip‐N‐ Metal Equipment HQF.No.01/81/050/00789/A07/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA F.No.05/24/040/00836/AM07 0510197641 dt.10.01.2007 Date: 30.10.2012 RaƟficaƟon of norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of MSME and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.340
Case No.A/R‐31
M/s. Maini Precision Products Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00147/AM06/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA F.No.07/24/040/00091/AM06 0710037715 dt.09.05.2005 Date: 30.10.2012 ModificaƟon of norms Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to modify norms of subject authorizaƟon as under: Import Item No. QuanƟty* (In Kgs) Wastage ( %) 1 7592 368 % aŌer 15 % recovery 2 7484 270% aŌer 5 % recovery 3 14956 211 % aŌer 5 % recovery 4 12960 323 % aŌer 15 % recovery 5 14959 325 % aŌer 15 % recovery 6 3202 189 % aŌer 5 % recovery 7 8125 276 % aŌer 5 % recovery 8 5720 186 % aŌer 5 % recovery
*A recovery of 5 % has been taken on Carbon steel scrap and 15 % on Alloy steel scarp as per the sub‐ commiƩee report. Further, rejecƟon wastage of 15 % has not been allowed. S.No.341
Case No.A/R‐34
M/s. Precision AutomaƟon and RoboƟcs India Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00781/AM11/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA F.No.31/21/040/00326/AM11 3110046719 dt.01.02.2011 Date: 30.10.2012 FixaƟon of norms The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.342
Case No. A/R‐79
M/s. Patel Airtemp (India) Ltd., Ahmedabad HQF.No.01/80/050/00125/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.08/24/040/00186/AM08 0810068645 dt.26.11.2007 Date: 30.10.2012 RaƟficaƟon of Norms Based on DIPP recommendaƟon, the CommiƩee decided to seek informaƟon as per Sr.No.4,5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Formant‐Export Product wise. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. Sl.No.343
Case No. C‐ 18
M/s. Pipavav Shipyards Ltd., Amreli F.No.01/81/80/162/00612/AM11/DES.I MeeƟng No.16/13 FixaƟon of input output norms in respect of 100% EOU for the export product “ Ship, Cargo Ships, Barges & Vessels for Transport, Factory Ship, Life Boats, Hulls and Vessels falls under Chapter 89 of ITC(HS) – reg. Date: 30.10.2012 Based on DHI wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to fix norms of subject case as per SION C‐ 1647. RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly. Sl.No.344
Case No. C – 18
M/s. Bhukanvala Diamond Systems Pvt. Ltd., Navsari HQ F.No.01/80/162/00056/AM12/DES‐I MeeƟng No.16/13 Request for fixaƟon of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) for the export product “Die Sets and PVC Blister Moulds” in respect of 100% EOU Date: 30.10.2012 The CommiƩee noted that firm has not replied to deficiency leƩer and decided to remind them for expediƟng their reply. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. Sl.No.345
Case No. C – 33
M/s. M+Acer AutomoƟve Systems Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00914/AM12/DES‐I MeeƟng No.16/13 FixaƟon of Scrap/Wastage norms for the export product “Level Indicator Assembly” in respect of 100% EOU. Date: 30.10.2012 Based on DIPP wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to seek Following informaƟon from firm: 1. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 4, 5 &11 of Standard Deficiency Format. 2. InformaƟon in respect of Sl. No. 11(a) of Standard Deficiency Format for import item “Brass Strip”.
Case deferred for 11.12.2012. Sl.No.346
Case No. C – 01
M/s. Terumo Penpol Ltd., Trivandrum HQ F.No.01/80/050/00258/AM12/DES‐I RA’s F. No.53/24/040/00011/AM12 MeeƟng No.16/13 ModificaƟon of SION as per Para 4.9 of HBP (Vol.‐I) Date: 30.10.2012 The CommiƩee decided to examine the case on file. Sl.No.347
Case No. C – 03
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00090/AM13/DES‐I MeeƟng No.16/13 FixaƟon of Adhoc Norms the export product “Collar 4 – ¾ Inches EWR CTN” –reg. Date: 30.10.2012 The applicaƟon of the firm was considered in the meeƟng. The CommiƩee observed that the norms for their product are already fixed permi迀�ng import of Seamless Steel Tubes. However, firm wanted to import Solid Bars. The firm has explained the reason for import of Solid Bars that the product which they are exporƟng is of very high thickness of 80‐90 mm and this kind of products cannot be made from Seamless Steel Tubes. Hence, they have to import Solid Bars. Based on DHI wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to fix adhoc norms of subject case on repeat basis as per decision in AuthorizaƟon No.310600433. Wall thickness of 70 mm and 15‐15 HS Stainless Steel to be included in the EP. The CommiƩee also directed the firm that in respect of any export done under Duty ExempƟon Scheme from 18.9.2012 onwards, in the product export details, the specificaƟons viz thickness, grade of Steel etc. must specifically be indicated in the Shipping Bills. Sl.No.348
Case No. C – 04
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00083/AM13/DES‐I MeeƟng No.16/13 FixaƟon of Adhoc Norms for the export product “Collar 6 ¾ Inches Collar EWR Phase‐4” –reg. Date: 30.10.2012 The applicaƟon of the firm was considered in the meeƟng. The CommiƩee observed that the norms for their product are already fixed permi迀�ng import of Seamless Steel Tubes. However, firm wanted to import Solid Bars. The firm has explained the reason for import of Solid Bars that the product which they are exporƟng is of very high thickness of 80‐90 mm and this kind of products cannot be made from Seamless Steel Tubes. Hence, they have to import Solid Bars. Based on DHI wriƩen comments dated 30.10.2012, the CommiƩee decided to fix adhoc norms of subject case on repeat basis as per decision in AuthorizaƟon No.310622006. Wall thickness of 70 mm and 15‐15 HS Stainless Steel to be included in the EP. The CommiƩee also directed the firm that in respect of any export done under Duty ExempƟon Scheme from 18.9.2012 onwards, in the product exported, specificaƟons, thickness and grade of Steel must specifically be indicated in the Shipping Bills. Sl.No.349
Case No. C – 05
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00145/AM13/DES‐I MeeƟng No.16/13 FixaƟon of Adhoc Norms for the export product “Collar Collar 9 ½ Inches EWR Phase 4” –reg. Date: 30.10.2012 The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. Sl.No.350
Case No. C – 06
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00082/AM13/DES‐I MeeƟng No.16/13 FixaƟon of Adhoc Norms for the export product “Collar High Flow 8 Inch EWR Phase 4” – reg. Date: 30.10.2012 The CommiƩee noted that the case is under examinaƟon of DHI and decided to await comments. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. Sl.No.351
Case No. C – 09
M/s. MTAR Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad HQ F.No.01/80/162/00462/AM13/DES‐I MeeƟng No.16/13 FixaƟon of input output wastage Ad‐hoc Norms for the export product “Oil & Gas ExploraƟon components, Catalina Hot Box & Aero Space Parts” in respect of 100% EOU –reg. Date: 30.10.2012 The CommiƩee noted that firm has sought more Ɵme for providing certain informaƟon sought by the CommiƩee. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.352
Case No. A ‐ 21
M/s. Philips Electronics India Ltd., Kolkata HQF.No.01/81/050/00268/AM10/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No.16/13 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00092/AM07 0210091324 dt.12.07.2006 Date: 30.10.2012 RaƟficaƟon of Norms Based on DIPP recommendaƟon, the CommiƩee decided to seek informaƟon from firm as per Sr.No. 4,5, & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format. Case deferred for 11.12.2012. S.No.353
Case No. A/R‐
67 M/s. Solo Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/01194/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date MeeƟng No. 14/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00734/AM08 0510213888 dt.20.07.2007 Date: 03.10.2012 RaƟficaƟon of norms The CommiƩee decided to raƟfy norms of subject authorizaƟon as per DHI wriƩen comments received vide UO No.3(30)/2008/TSW(B)/68 dated 06.02.2009 (copy to be forwarded to RA). RLA may take necessary acƟon accordingly.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6672 --apply.