DGFT Minutes
In force — no superseding record on file.
RATIFIED Minutes of Mee៝�ng No.10/13 scheduled on 07.08.2012 of Norms Commiោ�ee(NC‐I) (DES.I Sec៝�on) The mee៝�ng No. 10/13 of the Norms Commiោ�ee (NC‐I) for the licensing year 2012‐2013 was held on 07.08.2012 under the Chairmanship of Sh. L.B. Singhal, Addi៝�onal Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applica៝�ons under Duty Exemp៝�on / Remission Schemes (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014 / Handbook of Procedure Volume‐I. The following Members of the Commiោ�ee were present in the mee៝�ng: ‐ Sl.No Name of the representa៝�ves & their Designa៝�on Room No. Telephone No. Depោ�. 1. Sh K.K. Tiwari I.A 476 23063321 Extn. DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, Assោ�. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. Parveen Sharma, Dy.DGFT 306 23061563 Extn. DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. K.C. Raju, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. I ‐The CommiӶee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this mee(ng generated through the online system of NIC. The decisions taken thereon are as under: ‐ 1
Case No.:31/23/80‐ALC2/2009
Party Name:HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD, Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00353/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00651/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710066776 02.09.2009 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that RA, Bangalore informed vide their email dated 20.7.2012 that AA No.0710066676 was issued but not dispatched to firm. RA also informed that AA No.071066808 dated 4.9.2009 was issued to firm from instead. Therefore, the Commiោ�ee decided to close ra៝�fica៝�on of AA No. No.0710066676 and also decided to advise RA to forward copy of applica៝�on in respect of AA No.071066808 immediately for considera៝�on in NC. 2
Case No.:21/39/80‐ALC2/2009
Party Name:VEM TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD., Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00617/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00373/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910040368 18.12.2009 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that this case was earlier referred to PC‐IV Sec៝�on along with reply dated 16.4.2012 received from Dept of Defence Produc៝�on. The Commiោ�ee further noted reply was received from PC‐IV Sec៝�on vide ID Note dated 13.7.2012 and decided to first examine the case on file along with similar other defence related cases pending before NC‐I for ra៝�fica៝�on of norms (about 10 cases). 3
Case No.:32/31/80‐ALC2/2010
Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00510/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00028/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018929 30.08.2010 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that this case was earlier referred to PC‐IV Sec៝�on along with reply dated 16.4.2012 received from Dept of Defence Produc៝�on. The Commiោ�ee further noted that PC‐IV Sec៝�on replied vide
ID Note dated 13.7.2012 and decided to first examine the case on file along with similar other defence related cases pending before NC‐I (about 10 cases). 4
Case No.:2/6/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:THE TATA POWER COMPANY LTD Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00079/AM12/ RLA File :07/21/040/00953/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0710078147 21.03.2011 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DE&IT and decided to send a DO leោ�er reques៝�ng them to expedite their comments. 5
Case No.:29/6/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name: PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00106/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00177/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310634527 06.06.2011 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide email dated 31.7.2012 informed that their technical person is unable and hence they will not aោ�end personal hearing on 7.8.2012. The Commiោ�ee decided to advise the firm to furnish complete details of informa៝�on required by the Technical Authority within 15 days and to aោ�end for personal hearing on 18.9.2012 to explain the details of their case, failing which the Commiោ�ee will be constrained to take a decision to reject their case. 6
Case No.:26/9/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:AKSH TECHNOLOGIES LTD Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00194/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00132/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510296453 13.07.2011 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DE&IT and decided to send a DO leោ�er reques៝�ng them to expedite their comments. 7
Case No.:14/18/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00368/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00146/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410128602 27.09.2011 Decision : Based on DHI wriោ�en comments vide leោ�er No. 3(55)/2011‐TSW(B)/250 dated 2.7.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: Sl No. Item Total Quan៝�ty to be allowed in MT including (% wastage) 1 CS Plate 331.3(5%) 2 AS Plate 120 (2.4%) 5 CS Tube CS Pipe 899.2(2%) 605.1(2%) 6 AS Tube AS Pipe 774 (2%) 776(1.8%) 7 SS Tube 79.8(2%) 9 Welding wire Welding electrode Cobalt based power 64 4 2
Welding flux 2 Items Nos 3&4 to be deleted and descrip៝�on at Item No.2 to be changed as “Alloy Steel Plates” instead of “Carbon Steel Plates” as requested by applicant vide leោ�er dated 22.6.2012. Sl.No.14:Furnance maintenance pla៹�orm and Sl.No.23:Elevator are not covered under 4.3.1 of FTP, hence to be deleted. Remaining items are to be allowed with accountability clause and nil wastage. Total items‐31. RLA may take necessary ac៝�on accordingly. 8
Case No.:3/18/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00357/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00095/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410129108 11.10.2011 Decision : Based on DHI wriោ�en comments vide leោ�er No. 3(68)/2011‐TSW(B) dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: Sl No. Item Name Total Quan៝�ty to be allowed in MT including (% wastage) 1 CS Plate 1910(5%) 2 AS Plate 564 (1.8%) 3 CS Round 32 (1.8%) 4 AS Round 20 (1.8%) 5 SS Round 5 (1.3%) 6 CS Tube CS Pipe CS Hollows 3676(1.4%) 1627(1.8%) 1547(9.3%) 7 AS Tube AS Pipe AS Blooms 2675(1.5%) 499(1.8%) 1443(20%) as per SION C‐797 8 SS Tube 761(1.4%) 9 Fi៶�ngs 430 Nos 175 MT (Nil) 10 Welding wire/electrode Cobalt based powder Welding Flux 80 2 2 33 AI Sheets 220 MT (Nil) Item No.13,17,24 to be deleted and quan៝�ty of items at S.No.9 and 33 to be increased as requested by firm vide leោ�er dated 9.6.2012. Remaining items are to be allowed with nil wastage and accountability clause. Item No.44,54,57 are spares and to be allowed as per policy. 9
Case No.:9/18/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00363/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00251/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510305773 18.10.2011 Decision : Based on DIPP wriោ�en comments No.107/Sr/DO(NL) dated 18.7.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: Export Item – Interlock System (Rubber to Plas៝�c Bonded Parts) (consis៝�ng of Plas៝�c Part‐Body Lock and Bush). Quan៝�ty : 35,000 Nos. (total weight 796.407 Kgs) Import Item: Sl. No. Item Descrip៝�on
Quan៝�ty to be allowed 1 NBR Black Master Batch (T.C. NBR Mischung) (Elas៝�ca Art Nr. – 023571) 221.55 kg 2 Body Lock (Plas៝�c Part) (T.C. Grundkorper Arre៝�erung) (KKT Art Nr‐70300076) Net + 1% 3 Bush 10:02 (Plas៝�c Part) T.C. Buchse 10:02 natur (KKT Art Nr‐70300075) Net + 1% 10
Case No.:6/21/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00426/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00296/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710083749 04.11.2011 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DE&IT and decided to send a DO leោ�er reques៝�ng them to expedite their comments. 11
Case No.:4/18/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:COMAU INDIA P.LTD, Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00358/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00187/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110051335 08.11.2011 Decision : The firm’s representa៝�ve Shri Amit Kokane, Head‐SCM & Purchasing aោ�ended for personal hearing and explained the details of their case. The Commiោ�ee, therea�er, decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as per General Note 4 for Engineering Product. 12
Case No.:15/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00494/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00346/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084374 02.12.2011 Decision : The Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as per MSME UO Note No. 30(135)/11‐ ME dated 3.7.2012 (copy aោ�ached). 13
Case No.:16/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD., Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00495/AM12/ RLA File :34/24/040/00186/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3410032547 14.12.2011 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of C&PC and decided to send a reminder reques៝�ng them to expedite their comments.
14
Case No.:27/45/81‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:KERN‐LIEBERS SPRINGS & STAMPINGS PVT.LTD, Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/81/050/00443/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00367/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084702 15.12.2011 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide leោ�er dated 31.7.2012 requested to provide them with copy of deficiency leោ�er dated 11.6.2012 asking for certain informa៝�on. The Commiោ�ee decided to forward copy of this office leោ�er dated 11.6.2012 again to firm and advise them to reply within 15 days failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject their case. 15
Case No.:13/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00492/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00046/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110026418 20.12.2011 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DHI and decided to await comments. 16
Case No.:9/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00488/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00690/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310673188 28.12.2011 Decision : Based on DIPP wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Net empty weights of 115 MT, 7.2 MT, 43 MT, 43 MT & 23.1 MT to be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 3, 4 & 5 respec៝�vely. 2. Import items at Sl. No. 1, 2 & 3 shall be of relevant grade and thickness as contained in the export product 3. Import items at Sl. No. 6 & 8 shall be of relevant grade and dia. as contained in the export product. 4. Quan៝�៝�es of import items at from Sl. No 1, 2 & 3 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 45000 Kgs., 97800 Kgs. & 19000 Kgs. respec៝�vely as 1.05 Kgs./Kg. content in the export products. 5. Quan៝�ty of import item at from Sl. No 4 to be allowed as under on net to net basis Hemispherical Heads 4 Nos. (3268 Kgs.) Test Coupons 8 Nos. (332 Kgs.) 6. Words “Test Coupons” to be deleted from the descrip៝�on of import item at Sl. No. 5. 7. Weights of 33.71 MT, 0.3 MT, 2 MT & 0.46 MT to be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 5, 7, 9 & 10 respec៝�vely. 8. Import items at Sl. No. 5, 7, 9 & 10 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 9. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 6 to be allowed as 27500 Mtrs. (36.95 MT) inclusive of a wastage of 2%.
Sl. No. 5, 7, 9 & 10 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 9. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 6 to be allowed as 27500 Mtrs. (36.95 MT) inclusive of a wastage of 2%. 10. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 8 to be allowed 928 Kgs. inclusive of a wastage of 2%. 11. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 11 to be allowed as applied for. 12. Quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. Nos. 12, 13 & 14 (welding Consumables) to be allowed as 1631 Kgs., 4178 Kgs. & 4178 Kgs. respec៝�vely.
17
Case No.:6/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:AUROLAB Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00485/AM12/ RLA File :35/24/040/00029/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3510036982 02.01.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of C&PC and decided to await comments. 18
Case No.:19/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:CANALAIR AIR SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00498/AM12/ RLA File :32/21/040/00113/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3210052122 11.01.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ask the applicant to furnish following informa៝�on: 1. Details of manufacturing ac៝�vi៝�es/opera៝�ons involved on import items. 2. Informa៝�on in respect of Sl. No.11 of Standard Deficiency Format for import item at Sl. No.1. For net weight of components to be manufactured from this import item, details of components with net weights thereof may be indicated 3. Detailed calcula៝�ons for the quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 supported by the length and number of tubes in the export product namely, Automa៝�c Rotary Filter. 19
Case No.:18/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:DELKOR TECHNIK INDIA P.LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00497/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00409/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710085428 12.01.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide email dated 3.8.2012 informed that they have not received copy of this office earlier deficiency leោ�er and sought 30 days ៝�me for furnishing informa៝�on. The Commiោ�ee, however, observed that the deficiency leោ�er was sent to firm by email and hence their submission cannot be accepted. The Commiោ�ee, however, decided to send the deficiency leោ�er again and grant firm 15 days ៝�me for furnishing informa៝�on failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 20
Case No.:35/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:OM METALS INFRAPROJECTS LTD., Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00514/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00353/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510314332 12.01.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to this office deficiency leោ�er dated 16.7.2012 and decided to remind the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case.
Case No.:2/46/87‐ALC1/2011
Party Name:SIEMENS LTD Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 Status: Approved
21 07.08.2012 HQ File :01/87/050/00365/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00865/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310676945 16.01.2012 Decision : Based on DHI wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: i] Pipes : 1.02 mt/mt content. ii] Components to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 22
Case No.:41/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:ZIEMANN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00520/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00221/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052821 07.02.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to this office deficiency leោ�er dated 10.5.2012 and reminder dated 25.6.2012 and decided to send a final reminder to the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 23
Case No.:43/25/80‐ALC2/2011
Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00522/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00218/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052856 08.02.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : Based on recommenda៝�on of DIPP representa៝�ve present in the mee៝�ng, the Commiោ�ee decided to call for informa៝�on from firm in respect of Sr.No.4,5,11 of Standard Deficiency Format‐Export Product wise. 24
Case No.:8/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SAGE METALS LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00590/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00396/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510317514 13.02.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : : Based on DIPP leោ�er dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ask the applicant to furnish following informa៝�on: 1. Name(s) of Pump Accessories and their respec៝�ve quan៝�៝�es in Nos. also in addi៝�on to their weights. 2. Informa៝�on in respect of Sl. No. 3, 5 & 11 of Standard Deficiency Format, Pump Accessories wise . 3. Names(s) of import item at Sl. No. 5 and their quan៝�៝�es in Nos. also in addi៝�on to their weights. 25
Case No.:1/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00583/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00406/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053404 15.03.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DE&IT issued a deficiency leោ�er to firm and NC issued a reminder to firm on 16.7.2012. Since no reply was received from firm, the Commiោ�ee decided to send a final reminder to the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case.
26
Case No.:2/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00584/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00385/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053407 15.03.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DE&IT issued a deficiency leោ�er to firm and NC issued a reminder to firm on 16.7.2012. Since no reply was received from firm, the Commiោ�ee decided to send a final reminder to the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 27
Case No.:3/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00585/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/01039/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310686540 15.03.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide email dated 31.7.2012 informed that their technical person is unable and hence they will not aោ�end personal hearing on 7.8.2012. The Commiោ�ee decided to advise the firm to furnish complete details of informa៝�on required by the Technical Authority within 15 days and to aោ�end for personal hearing on 18.9.2012 to explain the details of their case, failing which the Commiោ�ee will be constrained to take a decision to reject their case. 28
Case No.:4/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00586/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00395/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053419 19.03.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DE&IT issued a deficiency leោ�er to firm and NC issued a reminder to firm on 16.7.2012. Since no reply was received from firm, the Commiោ�ee decided to send a final reminder to the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 29
Case No.:5/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00587/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00393/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053435 20.03.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DE&IT issued a deficiency leោ�er to firm and NC issued a reminder to firm on 16.7.2012. Since no reply was received from firm, the Commiោ�ee decided to send a final reminder to the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 30
Case No.:6/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00588/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00410/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053447 21.03.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DE&IT issued a deficiency leោ�er to firm and NC issued a reminder to firm on 16.7.2012. Since no reply was received from firm, the Commiោ�ee decided to send a final reminder to the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case.
31
Case No.:10/1/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00592/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00401/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053492 26.03.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that DE&IT issued a deficiency leោ�er to firm and NC issued a reminder to firm on 16.7.2012. Since no reply was received from firm, the Commiោ�ee decided to send a final reminder to the firm for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 32
Case No.:6/4/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:FENIX PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00059/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00012/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110053907 24.04.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to this office deficiency leោ�er dated 17.7.2012 and decided to remind them for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 33
Case No.:8/4/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:UNI VTL ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00061/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00053/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310692316 26.04.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not replied to this office deficiency leោ�er dated 17.7.2012 and decided to remind them for expedi៝�ng their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee shall be constrained to take a decision to reject the case. 34
Case No.:1/10/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:BOSCH LIMITED, Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00212/AM13/ RLA File :07/24/040/00459/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710088081 08.05.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that copy of firm’s applica៝�on has not been received from RA and decided to request RA to forward 4 sets of firm’s applica៝�on for considera៝�on. 35
Case No.:1/7/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:TRANS ENGINEERS INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00049/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110054678 14.06.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP representa៝�ve present in the mee៝�ng, the Commiោ�ee decided to call for informa៝�on from as per Sr.No. 3,4,5&11 of Standard Deficiency Format‐Export Product wise.
Case No.:2/7/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:FLASH POINT EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00143/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00054/AM13/
36 Lic.No/Date:3110054686 14.06.2012 Decision : Based on DIPP wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as per General Note‐4 for Engineering products. 37
Case No.:2/10/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:MAXTECH SINTERED PRODUCT PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00213/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00079/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055073 23.07.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that copy of firm’s applica៝�on has not been received from RA and decided to request RA to forward 4 sets of firm’s applica៝�on for considera៝�on. 38
Case No.:3/10/80‐ALC2/2012
Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:10/80‐ ALC2/2012 07.08.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00214/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00068/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110055074 23.07.2012 Defer Date:18.09.2012 Decision : The Commiោ�ee noted that copy of firm’s applica៝�on has not been received from RA and decided to request RA to forward 4 sets of firm’s applica៝�on for considera៝�on. S.No.16
Case No. A ‐ 09
M/s. Jhagadia Copper Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00542/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA.F.No.34/24/039/00001/AM10 3410024795 dt.29.07.2009 Date: 07.08.2012 Ra៝�fica៝�on of norms The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not availed the last opportunity for personal hearing granted to them for explaining their case. The Commiោ�ee, therefore, decided to ask RA to immediately provide details such as background of the firm in the last five years, value of subject Advance Authoriza៝�on, the authority with whose approval this Authoriza៝�on have been issued, details of import items along with quan៝�ty and value, details of items which are already exported along with quan៝�ty and value, etc. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. S.No.17
Case No. A ‐ 16
M/s. VA Tech Escher Wyss Flovel Ltd., Faridabad HQ F.No.01/80/050/00925/AM12/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00940/Am07 0510100700 dt.20.02.2007 Date: 07.08.2012 Fixa៝�on of norms Based on DHI leោ�er dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to seek informa៝�on from firm on following: i] To regroup inputs export product wise ii] Calcula៝�on for item No.1 wastage. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. S.No.18
Case No. A ‐ 17
M/s. VA Tech Escher Wyss HQ F.No.01/80/050/00927/AM12/DES.I Lic.No. & Date
Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Flovel Ltd., Faridabad RA.F.No.05/24/040/00 /Am07 0510199824 dt.21.02.2007 Date: 07.08.2012 Fixa៝�on of norms Based on DHI leោ�er dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to seek informa៝�on from firm on following: i] To regroup inputs export product wise ii] Calcula៝�on for item No.27‐45 and 68 to 74 and quan៝�ty in numbers in place of lots. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. S.No.129
Case No.A/R‐153
M/s. Thermax Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/162/00480/AM07/ DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.31/24/040/00186/AM07 3110026329 dt.04.09.2006 Date: 07.08.2012 Ra៝�fica៝�on of Norms The Commiោ�ee noted that firm has not furnished reply to this office deficiency leោ�er dated 25.6.2012 and decided to remind them to expedite their reply failing which the Commiោ�ee would be constrained to reject the case, with direc៝�on to firm to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza៝�on of the licence. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. S.No.130
Case No. A/R‐ 168
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai F.No. 01/80/50/ 01741/AM09/DES.ILic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.03/94/040/00798/AM09 0310497146 dt.10.12.2008 Date: 07.08.2012 Ra៝�fica៝�on of norms Based on DIPP wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Net weights of 1336.5 Kgs., 998.2 Kgs., 125 Kgs. & 140 Kgs. to be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of export products at Sl. No. 1, 2 3 & 4 respec៝�vely. 2. Word “Relevant” to be prefixed with the descrip៝�ons of import items at Sl. No.1 & 11 to 14. 3. Word “bar” to be suffixed with the descrip៝�on of import item at Sl. No.1. 4. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as 1279 Kgs. inclusive of 814 % wastage a�er 15 % recovery. 5. Quan៝�៝�es of import items from Sl.No.2 to 10 to be allowed as 200 Nos., 173 Nos., 594 Nos., 2376 Nos., 3287 Nos., 1188 Nos., 7941 Nos., 57931 Nos.& 1188 Nos. respec៝�vely on net to net basis with accountability clause. 6. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No.11 to be allowed as 226 Kgs. inclusive of 69 % wastage a�er 5 % recovery. 7. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 12 may be allowed as 2832 Kgs. inclusive of 133 % wastage a�er 5 % recovery. 8. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 13 to be allowed as 340 Kgs. inclusive of 7 % wastage. 9. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 14 to be allowed as 852 Kgs. inclusive of 581 % wastage a�er 5 % recovery.
import item at Sl. No. 13 to be allowed as 340 Kgs. inclusive of 7 % wastage. 9. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No. 14 to be allowed as 852 Kgs. inclusive of 581 % wastage a�er 5 % recovery. 10. Quan៝�ty of import item at Sl. No.15 to be allowed as 1038 Nos. on net to net basis. with accountability clause. S.No.131
Case No.A/R‐10
M/s. Strip‐N‐ Metal Equipment HQF.No.01/81/050/00789/A07/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.05/24/040/00836/AM07 0510197641 dt.10.01.2007 Date: 07.08.2012 Ra៝�fica៝�on of norms
The Commiោ�ee noted that MSME has vide UO Note No. 30(194)2011‐ME dated 2.8.2012 sought certain informa៝�on and decided to seek the same from the firm. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. S.No.132
Case No.A/R‐31
M/s. Maini Precision Products Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQF.No.01/80/050/00147/AM06/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.07/24/040/00091/AM06 0710037715 dt.09.05.2005 Date: 07.08.2012 Revision of norms The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DIPP and decided to await comments. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. S.No.133
Case No.A/R‐32
M/s. SPIG Cooling Towers India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00534/AM11/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.03/95/040/00604/AM11 0310599828 dt.02.11.2010 Date: 07.08.2012 Fixa៝�on of norms Based on DIPP wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Net weight of 792.97 MT to be specified with the quan៝�ty of export product. 2. Weights of 4460 Kgs., 8230 Kgs., 22 Kgs., 215 Kgs. & 8230 Kgs. to be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 respec៝�vely. 3. Weights of 224.4 MT, 112.228 MT, 4.347 MT & 2.172 MT to be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 6, 7, 8 & 9 respec៝�vely. 4. Quan៝�៝�es of all the import items from Sl. No.1 to 9 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. S.No.134
Case No.A/R‐33
M/s. SPIG Cooling Towers India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQF.No.01/80/050/00658/AM11/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.03/95/040/00760/AM11 0310606521 dt.15.12.2010 Date: 07.08.2012 Fixa៝�on of norms Based on DIPP wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: 1. Net weight of 499.35 MT may be specified with the quan៝�ty of export product. 2. Weights of 2370 Kgs., 120 Kgs., 60 Kgs., 2370 Kgs., 81 Kgs., 1212 Kgs. & 10640 Kgs. to be specified with the quan៝�៝�es of import items at Sl. No. 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5, 6 & 7 respec៝�vely. 3. Quan៝�ty of impoprt item at Sl. No. 12 to be modified as 23753 Nos. (164820 Kgs.) 4. Quan៝�៝�es of all the import items from Sl. No.1 to 12 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. S.No.135
Case No.A/R‐34
M/s. Precision Automa៝�on and Robo៝�cs India Ltd., HQF.No.01/80/050/00781/AM11/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.31/21/040/00326/AM11 3110046719 dt.01.02.2011 Date: 07.08.2012 Fixa៝�on of norms The Commiោ�ee noted that the case s under examina៝�on of DE&IT and decided to await comments. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. S.No.136
Case No.A/R‐35
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ranipur HQF.No.01/80/050/00209/AM12/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.61/24/040/00012/AM12 6110000627 dt.08.06.2011 Date: 07.08.2012 Revision of norms Based on DHI wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on on repeat basis as per decision in Advance Authoriza៝�on No.6110000472. S.No.137
Case No.A/R‐36
M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Chennai HQF.No.01/85/050/00057/AM12/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.04/24/040/00296/AM11 0410121516 dt.10.02.2011 Date: 07.08.2012 Amendment of norms Based on DHI wriោ�en comments dated 7.8.2012, the Commiោ�ee decided to ra៝�fy norms of subject authoriza៝�on as under: i] Item 1 – to be allowed at 1.05kg/kg content. ii] Item 2,3,4 to be allowed at 1.02 kg/kg content. iii] Item 6 to be allowed as applied for by firm. iv] Remaining items are to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. S.No.138
Case No.A/R‐37
M/s. Kineco Pvt. Ltd., Goa HQF.No.01/80/050/00440/AM12/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee៝�ng No.10/13 RA F.No.17/24/040/00028/AM10 1710002815 dt.08.10.2009 Date: 07.08.2012 Fixa៝�on of norms On the recommenda៝�on of DHI representa៝�ve present in the mee៝�ng, the Commiោ�ee decided to seek informa៝�on from firm in respect of Sr.No.11 of Standard Deficiency Format. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.138
Case No. C‐ 18
M/s. Pipavav Shipyards Ltd., Amreli F.No.01/81/80/162/00612/AM11/DES.I Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Fixa៝�on of input output norms in respect of 100% EOU for the export product “ Ship, Cargo Ships, Barges & Vessels for Transport, Factory Ship, Life Boats, Hulls and Vessels falls under Chapter 89 of ITC(HS) – reg. Date: 07.08.2012
The Commiោ�ee noted that a D.O. leោ�er has been issued from Chairman, NC‐I to JS(Ports), Ministry of Shipping and decided to await reply. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.139
Case No. C – 18
M/s. Bhukanvala Diamond Systems Pvt. Ltd., Navsari HQ F.No.01/80/162/00056/AM12/DES‐I Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Request for fixa៝�on of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) for the export product “Die Sets and PVC Blister Moulds” in respect of 100% EOU Date: 07.08.2012 The Commiោ�ee noted that DHI vide UO No. 1A(1)/09‐TSW(B)/270 dated 2.8.2012 informed that firm’s reply of dated 16.6.2012 has been examined and firm has not replied to points 2,3&4 raised by DHI vide their leោ�er dated 30.5.2012. The Commiោ�ee, therefore, decided to ask the firm to provide complete details within 2 weeks ៝�me, failing which the Commiោ�ee would be constrained to reject the case, with direc៝�on to firm to pay the Customs duty and applicable interest for regulariza៝�on of the licence. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.140
Case No. C – 33
M/s. M+Acer Automo៝�ve Systems Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00914/AM12/DES‐I Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Fixa៝�on of Scrap/Wastage norms for the export product “Level Indicator Assembly” in respect of 100% EOU. Date: 07.08.2012 The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of DHI and decided to await comments. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.141
Case No. C – 01
M/s. Terumo Penpol Ltd., Trivandrum HQ F.No.01/80/050/00258/AM12/DES‐I RA’s F. No.53/24/040/00011/AM12 Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Modifica៝�on of SION as per Para 4.9 of HBP (Vol.‐I) Date: 07.08.2012 The Commiោ�ee noted that the case is under examina៝�on of C&PC and decided to remind them to expedite their comments. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.142
Case No. C – 03
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00090/AM13/DES‐I Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Fixa៝�on of SION for the export product “Collar 4 – ¾ Inches EWR CTN” –reg. Date: 07.08.2012 The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide email dated 31.7.2012 informed that their technical person is unable and hence they will not aោ�end personal hearing on 7.8.2012. The Commiោ�ee decided to advise the firm to furnish complete details of informa៝�on required by the Technical Authority within 15 days and to aោ�end for personal hearing on 18.9.2012 to explain the details of their case, failing which the Commiោ�ee will be constrained to take a decision to reject their case. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.143
Case No. C – 04
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00083/AM13/DES‐I Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Fixa៝�on of SION for the export product “Collar 6 ¾ Inches Collar EWR Phase‐4” –reg. Date: 07.08.2012
The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide email dated 31.7.2012 informed that their technical person is unable and hence they will not aោ�end personal hearing on 7.8.2012. The Commiោ�ee decided to advise the firm to furnish complete details of informa៝�on required by the Technical Authority within 15 days and to aោ�end for personal hearing on 18.9.2012 to explain the details of their case, failing which the Commiោ�ee will be constrained to take a decision to reject their case. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.144
Case No. C – 05
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00145/AM13/DES‐I Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Fixa៝�on of SION for the export product “Collar Collar 9 ½ Inches EWR Phase 4” –reg. Date: 07.08.2012 The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide email dated 31.7.2012 informed that their technical person is unable and hence they will not aោ�end personal hearing on 7.8.2012. The Commiោ�ee decided to advise the firm to furnish complete details of informa៝�on required by the Technical Authority within 15 days and to aោ�end for personal hearing on 18.9.2012 to explain the details of their case, failing which the Commiោ�ee will be constrained to take a decision to reject their case. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012. Sl.No.145
Case No. C – 06
M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00082/AM13/DES‐I Mee៝�ng No.10/13 Fixa៝�on of SION for the export product “Collar High Flow 8 Inch EWR Phase 4” – reg. Date: 07.08.2012 The Commiោ�ee noted that firm vide email dated 31.7.2012 informed that their technical person is unable and hence they will not aោ�end personal hearing on 7.8.2012. The Commiោ�ee decided to advise the firm to furnish complete details of informa៝�on required by the Technical Authority within 15 days and to aោ�end for personal hearing on 18.9.2012 to explain the details of their case, failing which the Commiោ�ee will be constrained to take a decision to reject their case. The case is to be relisted on 18.9.2012.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6665 --apply.