IN FORCE Norms Committee — Engineering (Gr B / NC-I) Advance Authorisation 2012-06-26

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

RATIFIED Minutes of Mee�ng No.07/13 scheduled on 26.06.2012 of Norms Commi쏃ee(NC‐I) (DES.I Sec�on) The mee�ng No. 07/13 of the Norms Commi쏃ee (NC‐I) for the licensing year 2012‐2013 actually was held on 26.06.2012 under the Chairmanship of Sh. N.P.S. Monga, Addi�onal Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applica�ons under Duty Exemp�on / Remission Schemes (Chapter‐4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2009–2014 / Handbook of Procedure Volume‐I. The following Members of the Commi쏃ee were present in the mee�ng: ‐ Sl. No Name of the representa�ves & their Designa�on Room No. Telephone No. Dep쏃. 1. Sh K.K. Tiwari I.A 476 23063321 Extn. DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. K.K. Funda, Ass쏃. Dir. (Mech) 736A DC(MSME),N.B. 4. Sh. G. Parthasarthi, Dy.DGFT 312 23061563 Extn.301 DGFT, U.B. 5. Sh. K.C. Raju, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. I ‐The Commi쏃ee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this mee�ng generated through the online system of NIC. The decisions taken thereon are as under: ‐ 1

Case No.:31/23/80‐ALC2/2009

Party Name: HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00353/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00651/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710066776 02.09.2009 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that firm’s le쏃er dated 03.02.2012 has been sent to RA, Bangalore on 08.06.2012 and decided to await reply from RA. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 2

Case No.:21/39/80‐ALC2/2009

Party Name:VEM TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00617/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00373/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910040368 18.12.2009 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the PIC agenda along with main file has been sent to PC‐IV sec�on on 18.05.2012 for examina�on and comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 3

Case No.:18/15/80‐ALC2/2010

Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00225/AM11/ RLA File :04/24/040/00061/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0410114584 15.06.2010 Decision : Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note No.3(74)/10‐TSW(B)/202 dated 24.05.2012 and decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. EP : Condenser Tube Cleaning System ‐ 04 Nos, 22.112 MT. 2. Inputs : Sr.No.12 : SS Plate 1.5‐50 mm thick, Quan�ty including (% wastage) MT : 2.76 (5%). 3. Rest of the items are to be allowed on net‐to‐net basis with accountability clause. The RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly.

Case No.:32/31/80‐ALC2/2010

Party Name:SHRI LAKSHMI DEFENCE SOLUTIONS LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00510/AM11/ RLA File :06/24/040/00028/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0610018929 30.08.2010 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the PIC agenda along with main file has been sent to PC‐IV sec�on on 18.05.2012 for examina�on and comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 5

Case No.:28/40/80‐ALC2/2010

Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00878/AM11/ RLA File :05/23/040/00348/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0510285314 08.03.2011 Decision : Based on the Sub‐Commi쏃ee Report, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the subject Authoriza�on as under: Export Product Inputs material Import to be allowed Cement Shoes (i) Seamless Casing Pipe (ii) Components 1. For these products there exist SION C‐1624, 1625 and 1628 and these should also be made applicable to all OD sizes of seamless pipes. 2. Length of relevant seamless pipe to be allowed @1 No of actual length of EP + ½” Extra. In addi�on to above, the OD of relevant seamless pipe to be allowed as actual OD of EP+ ¼” Extra. Float Shoes Cemen�ng Collars ‐Packers ‐Linear Hangers ‐Fluted casing ‐Flow Coupling ‐Anchor Tubing ‐Lock Mandrel ‐Splined Expansion Joint (i) Seamless Casing Pipe (ii) Components Length of relevant seamless pipe to be allowed @1Nos of actual length of EP+ ½” Extra. In addi�on to above, the OD of relevant seamless pipe to be allowed as actual OD of EP+ ¼” Extra. The Components are to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly. 6

Case No.:2/6/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:THE TATA POWER COMPANY LTD Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00079/AM12/ RLA File :07/21/040/00953/AM11/ Lic.No/Date:0710078147 21.03.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the comments called for from DIT are yet to be received and decided to send reminder to expedite their comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:29/6/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred

7 HQ File :01/80/050/00106/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00177/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310634527 06.06.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not clarified the use of solid bar in place of seamless tubes in their reply dated 21.06.2012. Therefore, the Commi쏃ee decided to advise the firm to appear in Personal Hearing on 07.08.2012 to explain the details of the case. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 8

Case No.:26/9/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:AKSH TECHNOLOGIES LTD.((A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00194/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00132/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510296453 13.07.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the comments called for from DIT are yet to be received and decided to send reminder to expedite their comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 9

Case No.:14/18/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00368/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00146/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410128602 27.09.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dt.10.05.2012 and subsequent reminder 24.05.2012 calling for certain informa�on and decided to remind the firm to expedite reply. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 10

Case No.:3/18/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00357/AM12/ RLA File :04/24/040/00095/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0410129108 11.10.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dt.10.05.2012 and subsequent reminder 24.05.2012 calling for certain informa�on and decided to await reply from firm. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 11

Case No.:9/18/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00363/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00251/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510305773 18.10.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm’s reply dated 23.03.2012 has been sent to DIPP for examina�on and comments and therefore decided to send reminder to Shri Nand Lal, Sr. DO to expedite comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 12

Case No.:6/21/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:SATTVA ETECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00426/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00296/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710083749 04.11.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012

Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the case is under examina�on with DIT and decided to send reminder to expedite their comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 13

Case No.:4/18/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:COMAU INDIA P.LTD, Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00358/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00187/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110051335 08.11.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not a쏃ended the Personal Hearing. Therefore, the Commi쏃ee decided to give a final opportunity to the firm to appear for PH on 07.08.2012 to explain the details of the case. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 14

Case No.:8/21/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:SARTORIUS STEDIM INDIA PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00428/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00331/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084167 22.11.2011 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Net weights of 1000 Kgs., 1200 Kgs., 1600 Kgs. , 7000 Kgs. & 13000 Kgs. to be specified with the quan��es of export products fro Sl. No 1 to 5 respec�vely. 2. Import items from Sl. Nos. 1 to 15 to be allowed as on net to net basis with accountability clause. 3. Quan��es of import items at Sl. Nos. 16 to 25 to be allowed as 103.7 Kgs., 103.7 Kgs., 17.2 Kgs., 8.8 Kgs., 46.6 Kgs., 29.4 Kgs., 995 Kgs., 1835 Kgs., 424 Kgs.& 356 Kgs. respec�vely inclusive of 5 % wastage. 4. Quan�ty of import item at Sl. No. 26 to be allowed as 256 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage as claimed by the firm. 5. Quan��es of import items at Sl. Nos. 27, 29 & 30 to be allowed as 2520 Kgs., 33.4 Kgs. & 28.1 Kgs. respec�vely inclusive of 5 % wastage. 6. Quan�ty of import item at Sl. No. 28 may be allowed as 63.3 Kgs. inclusive of 2 % wastage. 7. Quan��es of import items from Sl. Nos. 31 to 37 to be allowed as on net to net basis. 8. Import items from Sl. Nos. 38 to 70 to be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. Accordingly, quan��es of import items at Sl. No. 40 & 57 to be allowed as 166 Nos. & 48 Nos. respec�vely. 9. Quan��es of import items from Sl. Nos. 71 to 76 to be allowed as on net to net basis. 10. Import items from Sl. Nos. 77 to 200 to be allowed as on net to net basis with accountability clause. 15

Case No.:15/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:PRANITA ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00494/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00346/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084374 02.12.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm’s reply has been sent to MSME for examina�on and comments and case is under examina�on with MSME. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:16/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Status:

16 Party Name:NETAFIM IRRIGATION INDIA PVT.LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00495/AM12/ RLA File :34/24/040/00186/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3410032547 14.12.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received and therefore decided to send reminder for expedi�ng their comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 17

Case No.:27/45/81‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:KERN‐LIEBERS SPRINGS & STAMPINGS PVT.LTD, Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/81/050/00443/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00367/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710084702 15.12.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 11.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 18

Case No.:31/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:DAYCO VIKAS POWER TRANSMISSION PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00510/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00348/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510311317 15.12.2011 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms on net to net basis with accountability clause. 19

Case No.:34/45/81‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/81/050/00450/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00042/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110026417 20.12.2011 Decision : Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note No.3(57)2012‐TSW(B)/225 dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Export Product: 2 x 14 MW Hydro Turbine, MIV & Governor (total weight 103.7 MT) Generator (total weight 327.9 MT) for Nyaborongo HEP, Rwanda 2. Inputs Sl No. Item Total quan�ty MT including (% wastage) 1 CS Plates (63 – 110 mm Thick) 44.5 (30%) 6 CRNGO (1mm thk) 106 (10%) 7 Half hard copper strip 5.8 (0.5%) 8‐10 Insulators As applied 11 Paint 0.15

3. Item Nos. 12 to 15 – To be allowed with accountability clause. 4. Item nos. 2 to 5 ‐ To be allowed with accountability clause with ‘nil’ wastage. 20

Case No.:13/25/80‐ALC2/2011 Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY

ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00492/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00046/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110026418 20.12.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The representa�ve of the DHI informed the Commi쏃ee that the case is under examina�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012. 21

Case No.:14/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00493/AM12/ RLA File :11/24/040/00037/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:1110026416 20.12.2011 Decision : Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note No.3(28)/2012‐TSW(B)/244 dated 22.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Export Product: Total weight 241.84 MT to be incorporated. 2. Inputs: Sl No. of AA Item Name Quani쏃y in including (% wastage) 1 CS Plates (90‐160mm) 125MT (27%) 2 Ferroform tube of relevant dia 41 kg (2%) 22

Case No.:26/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:GLOBE HI‐FABS Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00505/AM12/ RLA File :05/23/040/00358/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510311818 20.12.2011 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DC(MSME) received vide their UO Note No.30(133)2011‐ME dated 12.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms on Net‐to‐Net basis without any wastage and with accountability clause.

Case No.:40/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:VITROMED HEALTHCARE Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved

23 HQ File :01/80/050/00519/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00287/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510311874 20.12.2011 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of C&PC received vide their OM No.46011/15/2012‐PC‐II dated 22.05.2012, the commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ Item to be Exported Quan�ty Measured Volume Fluid Administra�on Set (Bure쏃e Set) 1 nos Raw‐material recommended for import Quan�ty 1. PP Granules 1.05 kg/kg content in export product 2. PVC Compound 1.05 kg/kg content in export product 3. ABS Resin/ Granules 1.05 kg/kg content in export product 4. Relevant C‐Clamp Net+/‐2% wastage 5. Relevant Shut Off Valve/ Floater Net+/‐2% wastage 6. Relevant Latex Bulb Net+/‐2% wastage 7. Relevant Air Vent Spike cover Net+/‐2% wastage 8. Relevant Paper Filter Net+/‐2% wastage 9. Relevant Needles Net+/‐2% wastage 10.Relevant Y‐Site Net+/‐2% wastage 11. For 1 kg. components / parts made of PVC Compound (i) PVC Resin (ii) Di‐Octyl Phthalate / Hexamoll Dinch (iii) Dioctyl Adipate (DOA) (iv) Calcium Zinc Stabilizer (v) Calcium Stearate 0.704 kg 0.330 kg 0.0165 kg 0.0110 kg 0.0055 kg 12. Medical Kra �߀Papre As per Packing Policy 13. Polyester Polylaminte Film As per Packing Policy 24

Case No.:9/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00488/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00690/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310673188 28.12.2011 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 25.5.2012. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:10/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:GENSER AEROSPACE & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00489/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00393/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710085074 29.12.2011 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DC(MSME) received vide their UO Note No.30(148) 2011‐ME dated 26.03.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐

25 Name of the item Quan�ty Weight of the raw material 200 gms Weight of export product 60 gms Wastage 140 gms Percentage wastage 240 % Wastage a߀�er 20% recovery 192% Qty of export product in Nos. Weight of the imported inputs 4510 Nos. 790.15 kg apx. The quan�ty of imported raw material to be allowed is 790 kg. 26

Case No.:8/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00487/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00749/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310673619 30.12.2011 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note No.3(61)/2011/TSW(B)/224 dated 07.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Export Product : Waste heat Boiler, Reac�on Furnace, Steam Drum, TGT Line 4 sets each. (Total 2726 MT) 2. Inputs: Item No. AA Item Total quan�ty including wastage 1 CS Plate (upto 190mm thick) 1952.88 (3%) 2 Steel Tubes SA 179 604 (2%) 5 Steel Pipe SA 106 43.5 (2%) 6 Round bar SA 479 2.458 (2%) 8 Produc�on Test coupons 1.50 (20 Nos) 9/10 Welding wire / Electrode 72 11 Flux 72 3. Item No. 13 – (Tools) – To be allowed with accountability clause. 4. Rest of the items are allowed with accountability clause with ‘nil’ wastage. 27

Case No.:6/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:AUROLAB Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00485/AM12/ RLA File :35/24/040/00029/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3510036982 02.01.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the comments called for from C&PC are yet to be received and therefore decided to send a reminder to expedite their comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:19/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:CANALAIR AIR SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00498/AM12/ RLA File :32/21/040/00113/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3210052122 11.01.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has sought �me vide their e‐mail dated 21.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 29

Case No.:18/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:DELKOR TECHNIK INDIA P.LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00497/AM12/ RLA File :07/24/040/00409/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0710085428 12.01.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 10.05.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 30

Case No.:35/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:OM METALS INFRAPROJECTS LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00514/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00353/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510314332 12.01.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm’s reply dated 20.05.2012 has been sent to DHI on 30.05.2012 for examina�on and comments and case is under examina�on with DHI. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 31

Case No.:3/51/81‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:AUTO COMP INDIA PVT. LTD Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/81/050/00490/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00206/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052368 13.01.2012 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note No.3(60)/12‐TSW(B)/208 dated 28.05.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms on repeat basis as per AA No.3110043464 dated 02.06.2010 and allow import with 42% wastage. 32

Case No.:2/46/87‐ALC1/2011

Party Name:SIEMENS LTD Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/87/050/00365/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00865/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310676945 16.01.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee decided to send a copy of firm’s applica�on to DHI for examina�on and comments, the case pertains to DHI. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:1/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved

33 HQ File :01/80/050/00480/AM12/ RLA File :03/94/040/00914/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310679315 31.01.2012 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Net empty export weight of 16.265 MT to be specified with the quan�ty of export product. 2. Words” Gr. TP304L, Size 19.05 mm OD x 2.11 mm Thk.” To be suffixed with the descrip�on of import item. 3. Quan�ty of import item to be allowed as 10160 Kgs. (11308 mtr.) inclusive of 4 % wastage. 34

Case No.:41/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:ZIEMANN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00520/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00221/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052821 07.02.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that a copy of DIPP D/L dated 10.05.2012 has been sent to the firm on 25.06.2012 and await the firm’s reply. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 35

Case No.:42/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00521/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00930/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310680916 08.02.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office le쏃er dt.09.05.2012 and subsequent reminder 25.05.2012 calling for certain informa�on, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. 36

Case No.:43/25/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:SGL CARBON INDIA PVT.LTD Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00522/AM12/ RLA File :31/83/040/00218/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110052856 08.02.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee decided to forward the firm’s applica�on to DIPP for examina�on and comments. the case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 37

Case No.:8/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:SAGE METALS LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00590/AM12/ RLA File :05/24/040/00396/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0510317514 13.02.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee decided to forward the firm’s applica�on to DIPP for examina�on and comments. the case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:1/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00583/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00406/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053404 15.03.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 04.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 39

Case No.:2/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00584/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00385/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053407 15.03.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 04.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 40

Case No.:3/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00585/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/01039/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310686540 15.03.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not clarified the use of solid bar in place of plates in their reply dated 21.06.2012. However, the Commi쏃ee decided to advise the firm to appear in Personal Hearing on 07.08.2012 to explain the details of the case. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 41

Case No.:4/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00586/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00395/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053419 19.03.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 04.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 42

Case No.:5/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00587/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00393/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053435 20.03.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 04.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:6/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Status:

43 Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00588/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00410/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053447 21.03.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 04.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 44

Case No.:9/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PERMANENT MAGNETS LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00591/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/01065/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310687321 21.03.2012 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ Word “relevant” to be prefixed with the descrip�on of import item and its quan�ty to be allowed as applied for i.e. 3079.875 Kgs. inclusive of 7.5% wastage a߀�er 1/3rd recovery. 45

Case No.:10/1/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PRECISION AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS INDIA LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00592/AM12/ RLA File :31/82/040/00401/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:3110053492 26.03.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :The Commi쏃ee noted that the comments called for from DIT are yet to be received and therefore decided to send reminder to them to expedite their comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 46

Case No.:1/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:NEON INNOVATIVE PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00054/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00049/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310691652 23.04.2012 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Quan�ty of import item to be allowed as 260 Nos. on net to net basis.

Case No.:2/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:PERMANENT MAGNETS LIMITED Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00055/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00018/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310691668 23.04.2012

47 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Quan�ty of import item at Sl.No.1 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 9450 Kgs. inclusive of 5% wastage. 2. Quan��es of import items at Sl.No.2 & 3 to be allowed as applied for i.e. 9360 Kgs & 7722 Kgs respec�vely inclusive of 95% wastage a߀�er 1/3rd recovery. 48

Case No.:3/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00056/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00019/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310691949 24.04.2012 Decision : On the recommenda�on of DHI representa�ve present in the mee�ng, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy norms of subject authoriza�on under GN4 with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly. 49

Case No.:4/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00057/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00015/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310691954 24.04.2012 Decision : On the recommenda�on of DHI representa�ve present in the mee�ng, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy norms of subject authoriza�on under GN4 with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly. 50

Case No.:5/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00058/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00017/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310691960 24.04.2012 Decision : On the recommenda�on of DHI representa�ve present in the mee�ng, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy norms of subject authoriza�on under GN4 with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly. 51

Case No.:6/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:FENIX PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00059/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00012/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110053907 24.04.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision :As per DC(MSME) UO note No.30(172) 2011‐ME dated 11.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to call for the following informa�on/clarifica�on from the firm and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012: ‐ 1. Use size specifica�on and technical drawing and weight of each export product.

2. Process of manufacturing to be carried out on imported input. 3. Weight of each raw material, content of imported input there in and material Balancing. 4. Process of mfg the export product. 52

Case No.:7/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00060/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/01151/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310692031 25.04.2012 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Net empty export weights of 98060 Kg. to be specified with the quan��es of each export product at Sl. No. 1 to 4. 2. Words “ Ellip�cal Head/Hemispherical Heads/Ellipsoidal” to be deleted from the descrip�on of import item at Sl. No. 1. 3. Quan�ty of import item at Sl. No. 1 to be allowed as 8 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 26712 Kg inclusive of 5 % wastage. 4. Quan�ty of import item at Sl. No. 2 to be allowed as 36 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 1828 Kg inclusive of 5 % wastage. 5. Quan�ty of import item at Sl. No. 3 to be allowed as 164 Nos. on net to net basis. However, duty free weight of this item to be allowed as 49050 Kg inclusive of 5 % wastage. 6. Word “Relevant” to be prefixed with the descrip�ons of import items at Sl. No. 4 & 5. 7. Quan�ty of import item at Sl. No. 4 to be allowed as 6484 Kgs. ( 172.2 Mtrs.) inclusive of 2 % wastage. 8. Quan�ty of import item at Sl. No. 5 to be allowed as 311644 Kgs. inclusive of 12.5 % wastage a߀�er 1/3rd recovery. 9. Quan��es of import items at Sl. Nos. 6, 7 & 8 (Welding Consumables) to be allowed as 5688 Kgs. each. 53

Case No.:8/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:UNI VTL ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00061/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00053/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310692316 26.04.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : As per DC(MSME) UO note No.30(177) 2011‐ME dated 21.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to call for the following informa�on/clarifica�on from the firm and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012: ‐ 1. Size specifica�on and drawing of each export product. 2. Weight of each blank/forging with its size and dimensional drawing. 3. Process of mfg on the imported inputs and stage wise wastage involved. 4. Wastage Jus�fica�on and wastage calcula�ons on export weight. 5. Weight of each finished export product.

Case No.:9/4/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:GRIND MASTER MACHINES PVT.LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00062/AM13/ RLA File :03/94/040/00067/AM13/

54 Lic.No/Date:0310692741 30.04.2012 Decision :Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note No.3(77)/2012/TSW(B)/246 dated 22.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms under GN‐4 with accountability clause. 55

Case No.:3/7/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00144/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00068/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310698322 12.06.2012 Decision : On the recommenda�on of DHI representa�ve present in the mee�ng, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy norms of subject authoriza�on under GN4 with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly. 56

Case No.:4/7/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00145/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00159/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310698286 12.06.2012 Decision : On the recommenda�on of DHI representa�ve present in the mee�ng, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy norms of subject authoriza�on under GN4 with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly. 57

Case No.:5/7/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00146/AM13/ RLA File :03/95/040/00082/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:0310698260 12.06.2012 Decision : On the recommenda�on of DHI representa�ve present in the mee�ng, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy norms of subject authoriza�on under GN4 with accountability clause. RLA may take necessary ac�on accordingly. 58

Case No.:1/7/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:TRANS ENGINEERS INDIA PVT.LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 26.06.2012 Status: Deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00142/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00049/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110054678 14.06.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee decided to remind the RA (with a copy to the firm) to forward the firm’s applica�on at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority for examina�on and submission of comments. The case may be re‐listed on 07.08.2012.

Case No.:2/7/80‐ALC2/2012

Party Name:FLASH POINT EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD. Meet No/Date:7/80‐ ALC2/2012 Status: Deferred

59 26.06.2012 HQ File :01/80/050/00143/AM13/ RLA File :31/83/040/00054/AM13/ Lic.No/Date:3110054686 14.06.2012 Defer Date:07.08.2012 Decision : The Commi쏃ee decided to remind the RA (with a copy to the firm) to forward the firm’s applica�on at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority for examina�on and submission of comments. The case may be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. 60

Case No.:3/9/80‐ALC2/2011

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED Meet No/Date:5/80‐ ALC2/2012 29.05.2012 Status: Approved HQ File :01/80/050/00170/AM12/ RLA File :03/95/040/00166/AM12/ Lic.No/Date:0310640468 05.07.2011 Decision : Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note No.3(34)/2010/TSW(B)/247 dated 25.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Export Product: 3x660 MW Boiler piping spools Total weight 2620.76 MT for Korali TPS. 2. Inputs : S.No. Item Total quan�ty (MT) including wastage (%) 3 AS pipes 2357.65 (2%) 4 to 15 Welding electrode / wire 41.57 16 to 18 Welding Flux 19.80 19 AS Plate 10 (5%) 3. Rest of the two items are allowed with accountability and nil wastage. 4. Quan�ty of inputs at 1 to 3 has been increased as per applicant’s le쏃er dt.24.05.2012. S.No.12

Case No. A ‐ 09

M/s. Jhagadia Copper Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/00542/AM10/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA.F.No.34/24/039/00001/AM10 3410024795 dt.29.07.2009 Date: 26.06.2012 Ra�fica�on of norms The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm vide their le쏃er dated 18.06.2012 has requested for postponement of P.H. to 07.08.2012 instead of 26.06.2012. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to give the firm a final opportunity for PH on 07.08.2012. and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012. S.No.13

Case No. A ‐ 16

M/s. VA Tech Escher Wyss Flovel Ltd., Faridabad HQ F.No.01/80/050/00925/AM12/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00940/Am07 0510100700 dt.20.02.2007 Date: 26.06.2012 Fixa�on of norms

The representa�ve of the DHI informed the Commi쏃ee that the case is under examina�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012. S.No.14

Case No. A ‐ 17

M/s. VA Tech Escher Wyss Flovel Ltd., Faridabad HQ F.No.01/80/050/00927/AM12/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00 /Am07 0510199824 dt.21.02.2007 Date: 26.06.2012 Fixa�on of norms The representa�ve of the DHI informed the Commi쏃ee that the case is under examina�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012. S.No.66

Case No.A/R‐153

M/s. Thermax Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/162/00480/AM07/ DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.31/24/040/00186/AM07 3110026329 dt.04.09.2006 Date: 26.06.2012 Ra�fica�on of Norms The Commi쏃ee noted that the DHI D/L dated 14.06.2012 has been sent to firm on 25.06.2012 and await firm’s reply. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. S.No.67

Case No. A/R‐ 168 M/s.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai F.No. 01/80/50/ 01741/AM09/DES.ILic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.03/94/040/00798/AM09 0310497146 dt.10.12.2008 Date: 26.06.2012 Ra�fica�on of norms The representa�ve of the DIPP informed the Commi쏃ee that the case is under examina�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012. S.No.68

Case No.A/R‐01

M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited, Kanchipuram HQ F.No.01/80/162/01163/AM09/ DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.04/21/040/00103/AM12 0410124806 dt.10.06.2011 Date: 26.06.2012 Request for amendment in descrip�on of import item in advance authoriza�on. The representa�ve of the firm a쏃ended the PH and explained the details of the case. A߀�er discussion, the Commi쏃ee decided to modify norms of subject authoriza�on as under: 1. Descrip�on of import item No.56 to be modified as Non Alloy HR Plates and Coils, 16 mm thick to 165 mm thick. 2. Quan�ty of import item No.56 to be allowed 1168185 kgs. 3. Import items No. 57 to 66, 121 to 127, 182 to 188 to be deleted. 4. There shall be no change in CIF value of Advance Authoriza�on. S.No.69

Case No.A/R‐04

M/s. Netafim Irriga�on India Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/050/00162/AM11/ DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.34/24/040/00217/AM09 3410026833 dt.16.04.2010 Date: 26.06.2012 Ra�fica�on of norms

Based on the wri쏃en comments of C&PC received vide their OM No.46011/55/2010‐PC‐II dated 18.05.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ Item to be Exported Quan�ty Raw‐material sought to be Imported Quan�ty 1. HDPE Granules 8.1615 gm 2. Master Batch (Plasblack) 1.8376 gm 3. LLDPE Granules 22.6507 gm 4. LDPE Granules 8.1615 gm 5. Emiters (Drippers) 1.9908 No.(0.487 gm) S.No.70 Case No.A/R‐ 09 M/s.Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Trichi HQF.No.01/80/050/00327/AM12/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.04/24/040/00116/AM12 0410128795 dt.30.09.2011 Date: 26.06.2012 Revision of norms Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as per SION C‐1742 under GN4 basis except for following:‐ 1. Item No.2 – To be allowed at 1.05 kg/kg content. 2. Item Nos. 6 to 17 – To be allowed on Net to Net with accountability clause. 3. Item No.3 and 4 – 1.02 kg/kg content. S.No.71

Case No.A/R‐10

M/s.Strip‐N‐ Metal Equipment HQF.No.01/81/050/00789/A07/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.05/24/040/00836/AM07 0510197641 dt.10.01.2007 Date: 26.06.2012 Ra�fica�on of norms The Commi쏃ee noted that the request of the firm to be send to DC(MSME) for examina�on and comments. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. S.No.72

Case No.A/R‐

11 M/s.Shree Gayatri Healds Manufacturing Co. HQF.No.01/80/050/00476/A11/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.52/80/040/00018/AM11 5210032162 dt.08.10.2010 Date: 26.06.2012 Ra�fica�on of norms On the recommenda�on of DIPP representa�ve present in the mee�ng, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms under GN‐4 for the Engineering Product.

Sl.No.73

Case No. C‐ 18

M/s. Pipavav Shipyards Ltd., Amreli F.No.01/81/80/162/00612/AM11/DES.I Mee�ng No.07/13 Fixa�on of input output norms in respect of 100% EOU for the export product “ Ship, Cargo Ships, Barges & Vessels for Transport, Factory Ship, Life Boats, Hulls and Vessels falls under Chapter 89 of ITC(HS) – reg. Date: 26.06.2012 The Commi쏃ee noted that the comments from Ministry of Shipping are not received even a߀�er several reminders. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to address a D.O. le쏃er to Ministry of Shipping from Chairman, NC‐I. The case is to be re‐ listed on 07.08.2012. Sl.No.74

Case No. C – 18

M/s. Bhukanvala Diamond Systems Pvt. Ltd., Navsari HQ F.No.01/80/162/00056/AM12/DES‐I Mee�ng No.07/13 Request for fixa�on of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) for the export product “Die Sets and PVC Blister Moulds” in respect of 100% EOU Date: 26.06.2012 The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not replied to this office le쏃er dated 04.06.2012 for furnishing the informa�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expedi�ng the said informa�on failing which their case will be rejected without any further no�ce. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. Sl.No.75

Case No. C – 33

M/s. M+Acer Automo�ve Systems Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore HQ F.No.01/80/162/00914/AM12/DES‐I Mee�ng No.07/13 Fixa�on of Scrap/Wastage norms for the export product “Level Indicator Assembly” in respect of 100% EOU. Date: 26.06.2012 The representa�ve of the DHI informed the Commi쏃ee that the case is under examina�on. The Commi쏃ee, therefore, decided to defer the case and to re‐list the case on 07.08.2012. Sl.No.76

Case No. C – 01

M/s. Terumo Penpol Ltd., Trivandrum HQ F.No.01/80/050/00258/AM12/DES‐I RA’s F. No.53/24/040/00011/AM12 Mee�ng No.07/13 Modifica�on of SION as per Para 4.9 of HBP (Vol.‐I) Date: 26.06.2012 The Commi쏃ee noted that firm’s reply dated 9.7.2012 was received and decided to forward copy to C&PC for examina�on. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. Sl.No.77

Case No. C – 02

M/s. LEO Primecomp Pvt. Ltd., Puducherry HQ F.No.01/80/162/01253/AM12/DES‐I Mee�ng No.07/13 Request of input output norms for the export product “Automated Teller Machined” in respect of 100% EOU – reg. Date: 26.06.2012 Based on the wri쏃en comments of DIPP received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to fix the ad‐hoc norms as under:‐

“Keeping in view the finished shape of components/parts and various machining opera�ons including turning, grinding, drilling, etc. involved in the manufacturing of components/parts , it is recommended that Scrap wastage norms for various Engineering machined components/parts (123 Nos.) of “Automa�c Teller Machines” etc. may be fixed for the EOU in terms of para 6.8(e) of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009‐14, as per the Inspec�on report of MSME‐Development Ins�tute, Chennai submi쏃ed by them to Development Commissioner, Madras Special Economic Zone vide their le쏃er dated 22.09.2011. Sl.No.78

Case No. C – 03

M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00090/AM13/DES‐I Mee�ng No.07/13 Fixa�on of SION for the export product “Collar 4 – ¾ Inches EWR CTN” –reg. Date: 26.06.2012 The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not clarified the use of solid bar in place of seamless tubes reply dated 21.06.2012. However, the Commi쏃ee decided to advise the firm to appear in Personal Hearing on 07.08.2012 to explain the details of the case. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. Sl.No.79

Case No. C – 04

M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00083/AM13/DES‐I Mee�ng No.07/13 Fixa�on of SION for the export product “Collar 6 ¾ Inches Collar EWR Phase‐4” –reg. Date: 26.06.2012 The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not clarified the use of solid bar in place of seamless tubes in their reply dated 21.06.2012. However, the Commi쏃ee decided to advise the firm to appear in Personal Hearing on 07.08.2012 to explain the details of the case. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. Sl.No.80

Case No. C – 05

M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00145/AM13/DES‐I Mee�ng No.07/13 Fixa�on of SION for the export product “Collar Collar 9 ½ Inches EWR Phase 4” –reg. Date: 26.06.2012 The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not clarified the use of solid bar in place of seamless tubes reply dated 21.06.2012. However, the Commi쏃ee decided to advise the firm to appear in Personal Hearing on 07.08.2012 to explain the details of the case. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. Sl.No.81

Case No. C – 06

M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/00082/AM13/DES‐I Mee�ng No.07/13 Fixa�on of SION for the export product “Collar Collar High Flow 8 Inch EWR Phase 4” –reg. Date: 26.06.2012 The Commi쏃ee noted that the firm has not clarified the use of solid bar in place of seamless tubes reply dated 21.06.2012. However, the Commi쏃ee decided to advise the firm to appear in Personal Hearing on 07.08.2012 to explain the details of the case. The case is to be re‐listed on 07.08.2012. S.No.82 Case No.A/R‐ 12 M/s.L&T MHI Tutbine HQF.No.01/80/050/00881/AM11/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date

Generators Pvt. Ltd., Mubmai Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.03/95/040/00926/AM11 0310620641 dt.10.03.2011 Date: 26.06.2012 Amendment / inclusion of addi�onal items. Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Item No. 22 to 26 – To be deleted as requested due to indigenous development. 2. Item No. 88 to 146 ‐ To be added on Net to net with accountability. S.No.83 Case No.A/R‐ 13 M/s.L&T MHI Tutbine Generators Pvt. Ltd., Mubmai HQF.No.01/80/050/00136/AM11/DES‐I Lic.No. & Date Mee�ng No.07/13 RA F.No.03/95/040/00945/AM11 0310620136 dt.08.03.2011 Date: 26.06.2012 Amendment in list of gods & CIF Value Based on the wri쏃en comments of DHI received vide their UO Note dated 26.06.2012, the Commi쏃ee decided to ra�fy the norms in respect of the subject advance authoriza�on as under:‐ 1. Item No. 88 to 134 – To be allowed on Net to net with accountability.

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.