DGFT Committee Minutes
RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.31/10 held on 03.11.2009 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No. 31/10 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20092010 was held on 03.11.2009 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh B. C. Nayak. D.O. 475 23062635 DHI, U.B. 2. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP, U.B. 3. Sh. B.D. Ghosh. Jt. IA 399 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 4. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Dir. 736A DC(MSME), N.B. 5. Sh. A.K. Mishra, AIA M/o Steel, U.B. 6. Sh. Krishan Kumar, DDG & Convener NCI 302 23061562 Ext.380 DGFT, U.B. 7. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1
Case No.:28/48/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:GKB RX LENS PVT LTD Meet No/Date:31/80ALC2/2009 03.11.2009 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/80/050/00674/AM08/ RLA File :02/24/040/00304/AM07/ Lic.No/Date:0210097869 07.02.2007 Defer Date: 24.11.2009 Decision : The Committee observed that no reply of the firm had been received by this office in response to this office letter calling for certain information. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind the firm for expediting the said information otherwise their case will be rejected without any further chance and no further representation will be entertained. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 2
Case No.:56/6/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:DOSHION LTD. 03.11.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00246/AM09/ RLA File :08/24/040/00232/AM07/ Lic.No/Date:0810063592 13.03.2007 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No.:109/48/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:TUFF ENGINEERING PVT.LTD. Status:Case rejected
3 y 03.11.2009 j HQ File :01/80/050/00755/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00147/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510204041 24.05.2007 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm has neither furnished the complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information nor appeared before the Committee for personal hearing in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 4
Case No.:16/32/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:NATIONAL STEEL AND AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD., Meet No/Date:31/80ALC2/2009 03.11.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/00532/AM08/ RLA File :11/24/040/00041/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:1110016239 22.10.2007 Decision : The MOS furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 21(11)/2008TW dated 14.10.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization in accordance with their written comments as under: Export Item: Item Thickness (mm) Quantity (MT) Cold Rolled Galvanised Colour Coated Non Alloy Sheets/Hoops /Strips/ Wide Coils having zinc coating of 180 gms per sq. metre and paint coating of 40 Sq. meter per litre primer (primer thickness 8 micron), 25 sq.metre per litre back coat (back coat thickness 12 micron) 20 sq.metre per litre top coat (top coat thickness 20 micron). a) 0.25 mm to 0.29 b) 0.30 mm to 0.34 c) 0.35 mm to 0.39 d) 0.40 mm to 0.44 e) 0.45 mm to 0.49 f) 0.50 mm to 0.54 Total a) 1710 b) 332 c) 273 d) 1349 c) 1996 d) 65 5725 MT Import Item: Sl. No. Item Quantity 1. cold Rolled Galvanized Non Alloy Steel Strips/Wide Coils 5680.17 MT 2. Steel Strappings 11.450 MT 6. VCI Rusto Paper 28625 Sq. meter 7. Guard Film 73.325 MT 8. Primer (Volume Solid 34+2%; Dry density 1.06 + 0.02) 151.8 Litre 9. Top Coat (Volume Solid 43+2%; Dry density 1.18 + 0.02) 90303.2 Litre 10. Back Coat (Volume Solid 32+2%; Dry density 1.09 + 0.02) 72284.9 Litre For arriving at the requirements of consumables at Sl.Nos 2 & 3 clue has been taken from SION C469 and for Sl.No.4 from Engg. Table1. Mean thickness of export item has been considered for calculating the requirement of Cold Rolled Galvanized Steel and Paints. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly
The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 5
Case No.:22/32/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00538/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00570/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211053 24.10.2007 Defer Date: 10.11.2009 Decision : The representative of MOS present in the meeting informed the Committee that their comments are under finalization. The Committee accordingly, decided to defer the case for a short period and to relist it on 10.11.2009. 6
Case No.:23/32/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00539/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00571/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211055 24.10.2007 Defer Date: 10.11.2009 Decision : The representative of MOS present in the meeting informed the Committee that their comments are under finalization. The Committee accordingly, decided to defer the case for a short period and to relist it on 10.11.2009. 7
Case No.:24/32/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00540/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00572/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510211058 24.10.2007 Defer Date: 10.11.2009 Decision : The representative of MOS present in the meeting informed the Committee that their comments are under finalization. The Committee accordingly, decided to defer the case for a short period and to relist it on 10.11.2009. 8
Case No.:2/33/81ALC2/2007
Party Name:ROCHEM SEPARATION SYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 03.11.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/81/050/00399/AM08/ RLA File :03/95/040/00714/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310447861 25.10.2007 Decision : The Committee noted that the firm has neither furnished the complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information nor appeared before the Committee for personal hearing to explain their case. The Committee accordingly decided to ratify the norms of the subject authorization based on the available information as under: 1. Import item no. 13 being raw material may be deleted as it can’t be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering products. 2. Rest of the import items being component may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering products. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No.:3/51/83ALC1/2007
Party Name:SCHENCK PROCESS INDIA LTD. 03.11.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/83/050/02037/AM08/ RLA File :05/24/040/00623/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510212444 23.11.2007
9 Decision : The firm has informed that the norms for the similar authorization has already been ratified by the NC vide file no. 01/81/162/285/AM08/ DESII in its meeting No.19/08 held on 07.08.2007. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis in accordance with NC decision dt. 07.08.2007 in authorization No 0510202306 dt. 10.04.2007. 10
Case No.:21/52/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:GEA BGR ENERGY SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01098/AM08/ RLA File :04/24/040/00324/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0410092979 02.01.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply by 09.11.2009. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 11
Case No.:8/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00308/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00471/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910032693 22.01.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri P. Satyanarayana, Executive Director, alongwith two executives appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply by 09.11.2009. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 12
Case No.:9/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00309/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00399/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910032691 22.01.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri P. Satyanarayana, Executive Director, alongwith two executives appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply by 09.11.2009. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 13
Case No.:24/52/80ALC2/2007
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01101/AM08/ RLA File :04/24/040/00349/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0410093469 25.01.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR ) d b f th C itt f l h i Th l i d th t th C itt Th C itt th d ti f th
(BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply by 09.11.2009. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 14
Case No.:55/52/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:REINHARDT ROTOMACHINES 03.11.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/01132/AM08/ RLA File :34/24/040/00215/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3410020774 07.02.2008 Decision : The DHI furnished written comments in this case vide their U.O. No. 3(31)/08TSW(B) dated 14.10.2009 recommending the norms based on the available information as the firm has furnished incomplete information inspite of detailed discussion during the personal hearing in NC meeting held on 21.07.2009. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization based on available information in accordance with DHI comments as under: 1. Quantity of import Item no 1 may be reduced to 2 as the export item is also 2. 2. Quantity of import Item no 6 may be reduced to 2 with description “FX3U128 MR/ESA” 3. Item no 18 and 19 may be deleted as these items are not there in the application. 4. All other items in the revised list may be allowed as applied for as per GN4. 15
Case No.:18/52/80ALC2/2007
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01095/AM08/ RLA File :04/24/040/00364/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0410093855 13.02.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply by 09.11.2009. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 16
Case No.:66/52/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:PRECIHOLE MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD., 03.11.2009 Status:Case approved HQ File :01/80/050/01143/AM08/ RLA File :03/95/040/01129/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310461634 19.02.2008 Decision : The firm vide their letter dated 28th Jyly, 2009 informed that the norms for the similar authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007 has already been ratified by the NC in its meeting No.5/09 held on 29.04.2008. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis in accordance with NC decision in authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007.
Case No.:21/12/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:QUADRANT EPP SURLON INDIA LTD. 03.11.2009
17 HQ File :01/80/050/00387/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00886/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510216788 21.02.2008 Decision : The Committee observed that the comments called for from Chemical Division of DC(MSME) are still awaited inspite of D.O. reminder. The Committee, therefore, asked the Member Secretary to request to the concerned technical authorities over phone to expedite their comments. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 18
Case No.:19/12/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THE INDURE PVT. LTD 03.11.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00385/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00822/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510217071 27.02.2008 Decision :The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm did not furnish any reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information, in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. 19
Case No.:42/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:BOTIL OIL TOOLS INDIA PVT LTD(FORMERLY BAKER OIL 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00918/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00940/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510217768 12.03.2008 Defer Date: 22.12.2009 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 22.12.2009. 20
Case No.:69/52/80ALC2/2007
Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01146/AM08/ RLA File :03/95/040/01133/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310464682 12.03.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration and to relist the case on 22.12.2009. 21
Case No.:119/24/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 03.11.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00995/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00941/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0510217932 14.03.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm has neither furnished the complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information nor appeared before the Committee for personal hearing in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
Case No.:41/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:KILBURN ENGINEERING LIMITED 03 11 2009
22 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00341/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01309/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310465801 19.03.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee requested DHI to furnish their comments by 17.11.2009. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 23
Case No.:50/10/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:ALSTOM PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED, 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00350/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/01318/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0310465996 25.03.2008 Decision : The representative of the DHI informed the Committee that the case was under their study. The Committee requested DHI to furnish their comments by 17.11.2009. The case may be relisted on 24.11.2009. 24
Case No.:29/14/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00505/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00077/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410096594 18.06.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 25
Case No.:43/16/80ALC2/2008
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00566/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00085/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410096891 01.07.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 26
Case No.:63/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:LUBI SUBMERSIBLES LTD 03.11.2009 Status:Case rejected HQ File :01/80/050/00874/AM09/ RLA File :08/24/040/00079/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0810074011 18.08.2008 Decision : The Committee decided to reject the case on the ground that the firm has neither furnished the complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information nor appeared before the Committee for personal hearing in the absence of which, it was not possible to decide the requirement of inputs. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.
27
Case No.:65/22/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00876/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00192/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035094 19.08.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri P. Satyanarayana, Executive Director, alongwith two executives appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 28
Case No.:31/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01161/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00467/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910035538 07.10.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri P. Satyanarayana, Executive Director, alongwith two executives appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 29
Case No.:32/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01162/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00468/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0910035539 07.10.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri P. Satyanarayana, Executive Director, alongwith two executives appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 30
Case No.:39/30/80ALC2/2008
Party Name:MULTITEX FILTRATION ENGINEERS LTD 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/01169/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00442/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229059 08.10.2008 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri S.K. Raj, Manager – Matl. alongwith two executives appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 31
Case No.:1/17/80ALC2/2009
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00224/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00079/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410106106 14.07.2009 Decision : The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the d i h b li d
same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 32
Case No.:1/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00449/AM10/ RLA File :61/24/040/00036/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:6110000362 13.10.2009 Decision : On the recommendation of the representative of DHI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and to relist the case on 22.12.2009: 1. Specific quantity of each export product and their weight separately with details of Auxiliaries. 2. Input weight of each casting / forging and corresponding finished weight. 3. Use of each component proposed for import in the manufacture of export product. 4. Total value of insulating material proposed for import. 5. Length and weight of different types of pipes / tubes proposed for import separately. 6. Information in respect of Sl.No.5,9 & 11 of the Standard Deficiency Format export product wise. 7. Length and weight of low fin pipes proposed for import (Item No. 79). 8. Input weight and finished weight of titanium Claded plates with thickness of cladding (Item No. 81). 33
Case No.:7/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:S.P.M.GRAPHICS PRIVATE LIMITED, 03.11.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00455/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00234/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067517 13.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 34
Case No.:5/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00453/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00269/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039591 14.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority (DHI) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 35
Case No.:6/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:THERMAL SYSTEMS (HYDERABAD) P.LTD., 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00454/AM10/ RLA File :09/24/040/00270/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0910039592 14 10 2009
35 14.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority (DHI) for 36
Case No.:11/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:MINDA SILCA ENGINEERING LTD. 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00459/AM10/ RLA File :05/24/040/00341/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510251004 15.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DHI and DC(MSME) informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s application. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s application to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 37
Case No.:2/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ITT CORPORATION INDIA PVT LTD 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00450/AM10/ RLA File :34/24/040/00112/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3410025399 15.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority (DIPP) for 38
Case No.:3/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00451/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00161/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108588 15.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority (DHI) for 39
Case No.:10/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ACE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS LTD., 03.11.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00458/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00240/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067615 16.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007.
Case No.:4/31/80ALC2/2009
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00452/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00168/AM10/ Lic No/Date:0410108614 Defer Date: 22 12 2009
40 HQ File :01/80/050/00452/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00168/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108614 16.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority (DHI) for 41
Case No.:8/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KAMAL RUBPLAST INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00456/AM10/ RLA File :05/23/040/00063/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0510251132 20.10.2009 Decision : The representative of DIPP ( Sh. Shaish Kumar, Industrial Advisor, Chemical Division) and DC(MSME) informed the Committee that they have not received the firm’s application. The Committee therefore handed over the firm’s application to the technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 42
Case No.:14/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00462/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00194/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067704 21.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for 43
Case No.:15/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00463/AM10/ RLA File :31/24/040/00129/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040354 22.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for 44
Case No.:12/31/80ALC2/2009
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00460/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00170/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108785 23.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for
Case No.:13/31/80ALC2/2009
LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00461/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00169/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108791
45 Q 23.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for 46
Case No.:9/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:ZINSER TEXTILE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 03.11.2009 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/80/050/00457/AM10/ RLA File :03/95/040/00454/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0310541679 23.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 47
Case No.:17/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:KIRLOSKAR CHILLERS PRIVATE LIMITED Meet No/Date:31/80ALC2/2009 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00465/AM10/ RLA File :31/21/040/00193/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:3110040394 27.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DIPP for 48
Case No.:16/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:SUTURES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00464/AM10/ RLA File :07/24/040/00263/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0710067849 28.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DC(MSME) & C&PC for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. 49
Case No.:18/31/80ALC2/2009
Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 03.11.2009 HQ File :01/80/050/00466/AM10/ RLA File :04/24/040/00156/AM10/ Lic.No/Date:0410108868 28.10.2009 Decision : The Committee noted that the Regional Authority neither forwarded the hardcopy of firm’s application nor reported the status of the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA with a copy to firm to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e. DHI for
Case No. A/R93
M/s. GKB RX Lens Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata HQ F.No.01/80/50/01264/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00193/AM09 0210119385 dt.06.11.2008 Date: 03.11.2009 Ratification of norms The Committee decided to refer the representation of the firm to DC(MSME) alongwith C&PC comments (O.M. No. 46011/42/2007PC.II dt. 23.03.2009) for review of the case. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009.
Case No. A/R94
M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01096/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00322/Am08 0410092978 dt.02.01.2008 Date: 03.11.2009 The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009.
Case No. A/R95
M/s. GKB RX Lens Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata HQ F.No.01/80/50/01816/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.02/24/040/00280/AM09 0210123668 dt.25.02.2009 Date: 03.11.2009 The Committee decided to refer the representation of the firm to DC(MSME) alongwith C&PC comments (O.M. No. 46011/42/2007PC.II dt. 23.03.2009) for review of the case. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009.
Case No. A/R96
M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01097/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00325/AM08 0410092981 dt.02.01.2008 Date: 03.11.2009 The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009.
Case No. A/R97
Reference from Jt.DGFT, of M/s. IDMC LTd., Vithal HQ F.No.01/80/50/00357/AM07/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.34/24/040/00761/Am07 3410016398 dt.04.07.2006 Date: 03.11.2009 The representative of DHI, present in the meeting, informed the Committee that they have not received the copy of RA letter received through fax. The Committee decided to refer the copy of RA’s representation to DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009.
Case No. A/R98
M/s. Indiana Conveyors Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00183/AM00/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.03/24/00042/00009/AM00 03030323 dt.17.06.1999 Date: 03.11.2009 The representative of DHI, present in the meeting, informed the Committee that they have not received the copy of firm’s application. The Committee, accordingly, decided to forward the case file to them for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009.
Case No. A/R99
M/s. The Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/01253/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00402/AM09 0510230292 dt.04.11.2008 Date: 03.11.2009 Revision of norms The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to revise the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Weight of import item at Sl. No. 6 may be modified as 9690 Kgs inclusive of 3 % wastage. 2. Weight of import item at Sl. No. 7 may be modified as 3545 Kgs inclusive of 3 % wastage. 3. Quantity of import item at S.No.12 i.e SAW Flux may be modified as 1500 Kgs. Case No. A/R100 M/s. The Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00986/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00588/AM08 0510211186 dt.26.10.2007 Date: 03.11.2009 The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Net empty weights of 22 MT, 39 MT & 33 MT may be specified with the quantities of export products at S.Nos. 1, 2 & 3 respectively (cumulative net empty weight 94 MT). 2. Word “Relevant” may be prefixed with the description of import item at S.Nos. 1 & 2. 3. Quantity of import item from S.No. 1 may be allowed as 13951 mtrs(13495 Kgs.) inclusive of 2 % wastage. 4. Quantity of import item at S.No. 2 may be allowed as 34 Nos. on net to net basis. Total weight of this item may be allowed as 15714 Kgs Kgs. inclusive of 2% wastage. Case No. A/R101 M/s. Precihole Machine Tools Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/50/00638/AM09/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/00062/AM09 0310469321 Date: 03.11.2009
dt.24.04.2008 The firm vide their letter dated 17th August, 2009 informed that the norms for the similar authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007 has already been ratified by the NC in its meeting No.5/09 held on 29.04.2008. The Committee, accordingly, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization on repeat basis in accordance with NC decision in authorization No 0310445426 dt. 08.10.2007. Case No. A/R102 M/s. Maxop Engineering Co. Pvt. LTd., HQ F.No.01/80/162/407/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.05/24/040/00029/AM08 0510204052 dt.24.05.2007 Date: 03.11.2009 The Committee noted that RA vide their letter dt. 20.07.2009 informed that the subject authorization was issued on repeat basis as per para 4.7.1 of Handbook of Procedures Vol.I and the firm’s application was inadvertently forwarded to NC for ratification of norms. Keeping in view the RA’s comments, Committee decided to withdraw the NC decision taken in NC Meeting No. 33/08 dt. 13.11.2007 vide case No. A118. DEFERRED CASE S.No.149
Case No. A/R5
M/s. Rochem Separation Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd., HQ F.No.01/81/50/00956/AM07/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.03/95/040/01491/AM07 0310421472 dt.28.02.2007 Date: 03.11.2009 The Committee noted that the firm has neither furnished the complete reply with reference to this office letter and subsequent reminder calling for certain information nor appeared before the Committee for personal hearing to explain their case. The Committee accordingly decided to ratify the norms of the subject authorization based on the available information as under: 1. Import item no. 14 being raw material may be deleted as it can’t be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering products. 2. Rest of the import items being component may be allowed as per GN4 for the engineering products. The RLA may take necessary action accordingly. S.No.150
Case No. A/R78
M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai HQ F.No.01/80/50/01099/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.04/24/040/00323/Am08 0410092975 dt.02.01.2008 Date: 03.11.2009 The representative of the firm Shri K.S. Madhusudhan, General Manager – Projects alongwith Shri Ramesh Sampath, Sr. DGM of their group company (BGR energy) appeared before the Committee for personal hearing. They explained the case to the Committee. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, advised them to furnish some specific information which is not available in their reply. They promised to furnish the same as per advice. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009.
SUPPLEMANTARY AGENDA CASE
Case No. A 4
M/s. Geecy Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Mubmai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00117/AM08/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00132/AM08 0310430069 dt.21.05.2007 Date: 03.11.2009 The Committee noted that this case was earlier listed in the online agenda for the NC meeting No. 26/08 held on 25.09.2007 wherein a large number of cases i.e. 1632 cases were automatically got attached through the online system. During that meeting NC decided to forward the index of the meeting to RA with the request to forward the status of these cases with 4 set of firm’s application wherein norms are yet to be ratified. No comments of RA have been received so far. However, the firm has forwarded their application with the request to expedite the norms. The Committee, accordingly, reopened the case and requested the representative of DIPP for early submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 22.12.2009. SUPPLEMANTARY AGENDA CASE
Case No. A 5
M/s. CPS Color India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/50/00827/AM06/DES.I Lic. No. & date Meeting No. 31/10 RA.F.No.03/94/040/00649/AM06 0310347808 dt.19.09.2005 Date: 03.11.2009 The Committee noted that this case was earlier listed in the online agenda for the NC meeting No. 26/08 held on 25.09.2007 wherein a large number of cases i.e. 1632 cases were automatically got attached through the online system. During that meeting NC decided to forward the index of the meeting to RA with the request to forward the status of these cases with 4 set of firm’s application wherein norms are yet to be ratified. The RA has now requested to expedite the norms. The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly ratified the norms of the subject authorization as per GN4 for the Engineering Products. (B. C. Nayak D.O., DHI) Member (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (B. D. Ghosh, Jt. IA, MOS) Member (K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director) Member (A.K. Mishra, AIA, MOS) Member (Krishan Kumar, Dy. DGFT) Convener
(A. Komu) Chairman
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.