IN FORCE Advance Authorisation

DGFT Minutes

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

RATIFIED Minutes of M.No.32/09 held on 04.11.2008 of Norms Committee (NCI) (DES.I Section) The meeting No.32/09 of the Norms Committee (NCI) for the licensing year 20082009 was held on 04.11.2008 under the Chairmanship of Shri A. Komu, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the applications under Duty Exemption / Remission Schemes (Chapter4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009 / Handbook of Procedure VolumeI. The following Members of the Committee were present in the meeting: Sl.No Name of the representatives & their Designation Room No. Telephone No. Deptt. 1. Sh. Gajraj Singh, Sr. D.O. 23063321 DHI 2.. Sh S.K. Jain, D.O. 429A 23063321 Extn.3318 DIPP 4. Sh. B.D. Ghosh, Jt. I.A. 23063355 M/o Steel, U.B. 5. Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director DC(SSI) 6. Sh. Ramanand Meena, DDG & Convener NCI 485 23061562 Ext.276 DGFT, U.B. 7. Sh. Ramavatar Meena, FTDO 404 23061562 Ext.265 DGFT, U.B. The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting generated through the online system of NIC and some manual cases and the decision taken thereon were as under: 1

Case No.:3/2/85ALC3/2008

Party Name:MAHATI ELECTRICS Meet No/Date:32/80ALC2/2008 04.11.2008 Status:Case deferred HQ File :01/85/050/00003/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00304/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3110032429 23.01.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that DESII Section has wrongly transferred the subject case to NCVI whereas the case pertains to NCI and DESVI Section transferred this case without quoting their NC decision and forwarding the case file. The committee accordingly decided to call for the case file form DESVI and forward the firm’s application to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008 2

Case No.:5/2/85ALC3/2008

Party Name:MAHATI ELECTRICS 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/85/050/00005/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00308/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3110032430 23.01.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that subject case was transferred by DESVI Section without quoting NC decision and forwarding the case file. The committee accordingly decided to call for the case file form DESVI and forward the firm’s application to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 3

Case No.:4/2/85ALC3/2008

Party Name:MAHATI ELECTRICS 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/85/050/00004/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00340/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:3110032470 24 01 2008 Defer Date: 23 12 2008

24.01.2008 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that subject case was transferred by DESVI Section without quoting NC decision and forwarding the case file. The committee accordingly decided to call for the case file form DESVI and forward the firm’s application to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008 4

Case No.:2/2/81ALC2/2008

Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/81/050/00696/AM08/ RLA File :07/24/040/00825/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:0710056335 11.03.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008, 5

Case No.:54/2/81ALC2/2008

Party Name:H P INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/81/050/00748/AM08/ RLA File :24/80/040/00011/AM08/ Lic.No/Date:2410020861 25.03.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 6

Case No.:19/17/84ALC3/2008

Party Name:PAMPAC MACHINES PVT. LTD., 04.11.2008 Status:Case reverted back to RA HQ File :01/84/050/00205/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00158/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310472594 30.05.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received so far. However, according to online data, items of import appear to be covered in GN 4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly decided to revert back the case to concerned Regional Authority without any examination for taking appropriate decision in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. The Regional Authority may take necessary action accordingly. 7

Case No.:3/13/81ALC2/2008

Party Name:MANVI UDYOG 04.11.2008 Status:Case Approved HQ File :01/81/050/00156/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00045/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110034058 17.06.2008 Decision : The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting recommended the case. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization with following modifications: 1. Word “Dia 15 MM” may be prefixed in the description of import item and its quantity may be reduced to 26745 kg. inclusive of 5% wastage.

Case No.:2/17/81ALC2/2008

Party Name:CIM TOOLS PVT.LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/81/050/00249/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00160/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710058366 08.07.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 9

Case No.:5/17/81ALC2/2008

Party Name:VISIOCORP MOTHERSON LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/81/050/00252/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00238/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510223636 09.07.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. However, it was also noticed that how the case was listed before NC –I when the file was opened under the head of 81 which pertains to NCII. The Committee, therefore, decided to seek this clarification form NIC and remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 10

Case No.:8/18/84ALC3/2008

Party Name:RADIANT INDUSTRIES (PP. VIJAY V. JADHAV) 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/84/050/00229/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00108/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110034521 23.07.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 11

Case No.:2/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01182/AM09/ RLA File :61/24/040/00040/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:6110000225 07.10.2008 Defer Date: 23.12.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 12

Case No.:1/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:WEATHERFORD DRILLING & PRODUCTION SERVICES(I)P.LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01181/AM09/ RLA File :34/24/040/00134/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3410022519 14.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission

of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 13

Case No.:6/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01186/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00541/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310490271 14.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 14

Case No.:3/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ANAND EXPORTS 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01183/AM09/ RLA File :06/24/040/00037/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0610014410 15.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DC(SSI) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 15

Case No.:4/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01184/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00319/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060422 15.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 16

Case No.:5/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01185/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00321/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060423 15.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 17

Case No.:7/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01187/AM09/ RLA File :61/24/040/00041/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:6110000226 15.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission

Case No.:12/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:OHSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMTIED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01192/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00182/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035794 15.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 19

Case No.:8/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GUMMI METALL TECHNIK (INDIA)PVT.LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01188/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00395/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060465 16.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 20

Case No.:9/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:G.B. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01189/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00172/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099219 16.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 21

Case No.:10/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:TCF NADI INDUSTRIAL FANS PRIVATE LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01190/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00168/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099220 16.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to RA to take appropriate decision at their own level in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007. 22

Case No.:11/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01191/AM09/ RLA File :09/24/040/00280/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0910035658 16.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission

Case No.:13/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01193/AM09/ RLA File :61/24/040/00043/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:6110000229 17.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 24

Case No.:14/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:SAFEX FIRE SERVICES LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01194/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00573/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310490865 17.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP & DC(SSI) for examination and 25

Case No.:15/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01195/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00555/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310490893 17.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 26

Case No.:16/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01196/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00556/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310490899 17.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 27

Case No.:17/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GEA ECOFLEX INDIA PVT.LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01197/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00618/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310490931 17.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission

Case No.:18/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01198/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00698/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310491045 20.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 29

Case No.:20/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT. LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01200/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00454/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229541 20.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DC(SSI) for examination and 30

Case No.:21/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:STARION INDIA P.LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01201/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00190/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035836 20.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 31

Case No.:22/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01202/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00461/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229572 20.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e C&PC & (DC(SSI) for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008. 32

Case No.:23/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:POLY MEDICURE LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01203/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00462/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229573 20.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e C&PC & DC(SSI) for examination and

Case No.:19/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:TIMKEN INDIA LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01199/AM09/ RLA File :02/24/040/00177/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0210118695 21.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 34

Case No.:24/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:HONEYWELL TURBO (INDIA) PVT.LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01204/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00249/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035849 21.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to RA to take appropriate decision at their own level in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007 with the advice that value addition may be examined after taking into account all inputs including the other imported inputs. 35

Case No.:25/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:HONEYWELL TURBO (INDIA) PVT.LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01205/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00247/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035850 21.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to RA to take appropriate decision at their own level in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007 with the advice that value addition may be examined after taking into account all inputs including the other imported inputs. 36

Case No.:26/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:HONEYWELL TURBO (INDIA) PVT.LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01206/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00251/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035851 21.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to RA to take appropriate decision at their own level in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007 with the advice that value addition may be examined after taking into account all inputs including the other imported inputs.

Case No.:27/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:HONEYWELL TURBO (INDIA) PVT.LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01207/AM09/ RLA File :31/21/040/00250/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035852 21.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to RA to take appropriate decision at their own level in terms of Policy Circular No. 20 dt. 05.12.2007 with the advice that value addition may be examined after taking into account all inputs including the other imported inputs. 28

Case No.:29/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:NOV SARA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01209/AM09/ RLA File :61/24/040/00042/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:6110000232 21.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 39

Case No.:28/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:WESTFALIA SEPARATOR (INDIA) PVT.LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01208/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00389/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060561 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 40

Case No.:30/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01210/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00379/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060602 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 41

Case No.:31/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01211/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00378/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060603 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore,

decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 42

Case No.:32/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:WESTFALIA SEPARATOR (INDIA) PVT.LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01212/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00384/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060605 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 43

Case No.:33/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:WESTFALIA SEPARATOR (INDIA) PVT.LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01213/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00393/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060606 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 44

Case No.:34/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:SUR HENNIG PVT. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01214/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00410/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060607 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 45

Case No.:35/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ACE DESIGNERS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01215/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00366/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060609 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to 46

Case No.:36/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ACE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01216/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00405/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060610 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda,

items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to 47

Case No.:37/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ACE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01217/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00403/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060611 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to 48

Case No.:38/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:ACE DESIGNERS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01218/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00370/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060614 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to 49

Case No.:39/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:KOHLI AUTOMOBILES PVT.LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01219/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00455/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229799 22.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to 50

Case No.:40/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:TECHNOVA IMAGING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01220/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00579/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310491629 23.10.2008

50 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 51

Case No.:41/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:TEMA INDIA LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01221/AM09/ RLA File :03/95/040/00655/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310491632 23.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 52

Case No.:42/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01222/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00474/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229880 23.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 53

Case No.:43/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:MICRON INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01223/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00475/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229883 23.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 54

Case No.:44/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:THE SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01224/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00339/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510229888 23.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 55

Case No.:45/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED, 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01225/AM09/ RLA File :04/24/040/00170/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0410099440 23.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission

Case No.:46/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:SUR HENNIG PVT. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01226/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00420/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060659 23.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission 57

Case No.:47/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:SANDVIK ASIA LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01227/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00196/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035889 23.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP/DC(SSI) for examination and 58

Case No.:48/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01228/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00675/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310491696 24.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 59

Case No.:49/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01229/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00676/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310491730 24.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 60

Case No.:53/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:FLOWSERVE INDIA CONTROLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:32/80ALC2/2008 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01233/AM09/ RLA File :32/24/040/00036/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210038997 24.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to

Case No.:54/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:FLOWSERVE INDIA CONTROLS PVT. LTD., Meet No/Date:32/80ALC2/2008 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01234/AM09/ RLA File :32/24/040/00037/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3210038999 24.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that firm’s application has not been received from RA so far. However, according to the information available in online agenda, items of import appear to be covered in GN4 for the Engineering Products. The Committee accordingly, without any examination, decided to revert back the case to 62

Case No.:50/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01230/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00717/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310492142 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 63

Case No.:51/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01231/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00714/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310492145 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 64

Case No.:52/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:VIRGO ENGINEERS LIMITED 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01232/AM09/ RLA File :31/24/040/00202/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:3110035913 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission

Case No.:55/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICAL LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01235/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00029/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110018797 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIT/DOT for examination and 66

Case No.:56/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICAL LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01236/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00046/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110018798 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIT/DOT for examination and 67

Case No.:57/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01237/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00035/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110018800 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP/DOT for examination and 68

Case No.:58/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01238/AM09/ RLA File :11/24/040/00047/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:1110018802 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DOT for examination and submission 69

Case No.:59/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:CONTROL & SWITCHGEAR CO LTD. 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01239/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00463/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510230010 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission

Case No.:60/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:KAMAL RUBPLAST INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. 04 11 2008

70 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01240/AM09/ RLA File :05/24/040/00477/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0510230022 27.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DC(SSI) for examination and 71

Case No.:61/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:FRONTLINE PRECISIONS PVT LTD 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01241/AM09/ RLA File :07/24/040/00398/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0710060773 29.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DIPP for examination and submission 72

Case No.:62/32/80ALC2/2008

Party Name:FLAT PRODUCTS EQUIPMENTS (I) LTD., 04.11.2008 HQ File :01/80/050/01242/AM09/ RLA File :03/94/040/00700/AM09/ Lic.No/Date:0310492220 29.10.2008 Decision : The Committee noted that hardcopy of firm’s application has not been received so far from concerned Regional Authority. The Committee, therefore, decided to remind RA to forward the firm’s application at the earliest and on receipt forward the same to technical authority i.e DHI for examination and submission

Case No. A/R38

M/s. Doshion Ltd., Ahmadabad HQ F.No.01/80/162/1412/AM07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.32/09 RA F.No.08/24/40/264/AM07 0810063495 dt.09.03.2007 Date: 04.11.2008 Ratification of norms The case regarding revision of norms for the aforesaid authorization which were already ratified by the NC in its meeting No. 11/09 held on 10.06.2008 has been considered by the Committee based on a representation of the firm and the information available on file. The representative of DIPP present in the meeting informed the background of the case. The Committee noted that the firm was earlier called for PH in the NC meeting held on 22/1/2008 to seek the details of export products and the basis of working out the requirement of import items which were not clear. After discussions with firm’s representative, descriptions of export products at Sl. Nos 1,2, 4 & 7 were modified. The Committee also took note of the facts reported by the firm that they had completed 100 % export obligation before communication of NC decision and, export documents can not be changed at this stage and accordingly they have requested for the followings: 1. To delete the words “ Capacity 130 cubic meters” with the description of export product at Sl.No 3. 2. To delete the words “ Dosing Tank” with the description of export product at Sl.No 7. Keeping in view that the firm had completed exports before communication of NC decision to them for modification in the descriptions of export products, Norms

cription of export product at Sl.No 7. Keeping in view that the firm had completed exports before communication of NC decision to them for modification in the descriptions of export products, Norms committee may delete the words “Capacity 130 cubic meters” with the description of export product at Sl.No 3. However, firms request for deletion of words “Dosing Tank” with the description of export product at Sl.No 7 may not be accepted as the original description of this export product namely, “Poly Electrolyte” does not constitute an equipment/machinery

equipment/machinery. Regarding granting of wastages on import items at Sl.Nos 5,6 & 7, as firm had calmed a wastage of 2 % as also indicated in their letter dated 10th December, 2007 and as normally it is not possible to have Nil wastage on these inputs, a wastage of 2 % was granted to them as per the standard practice. However, if the firm is not interested in any wastage on import items at Sl.Nos 5,6 & 7, the same may be allowed as 1.0 Mtr/Mtr content in the export products

Case No. A/R39

M/s. Manatec Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Pondicherry HQ F.No.01/80/50/994/AM.07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.32/09 RA F.No.25/24/40/3/AM08 2510001789 dt.30.11.2006 Date: 04.11.2008 Ratification of norms The case regarding ratification of norms for the aforesaid authorization has been considered by the Committee based on a representation of the firm and information available on file. The Committee noted that the NC has rejected this case earlier due to non submission of information on time. However, on perusal of the clarification of the firm it emerged that the subject authorization may be covered under GN4 for the engineering products. Accordingly, Committee decided to ratify the norms in respect of the subject advance authorization as per General Note No.4 for Engineering Product.

Case No. A/R40

M/s. Auto Comp India P. Ltd., Nasik HQ F.No.01/80/50/343/AM.08/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.32/09 RA F.No.31/24/40/00195/AM08 3110030840 dt.20.09.2007 Date: 04.11.2008 Ratification of norms The case regarding ratification of norms for the aforesaid authorization has been considered by the Committee based on a representation of the firm and information available on file. The Committee noted that the NC has rejected this case earlier due to non submission of information on time. However, on perusal of the clarification of the firm it emerged that similar authorization of the same firm were ratified by the NC during recent past. The Committee accordingly decided to examine the case on file and ratify the norms of the subject advance authorization also based on the earlier NC decisions with the approval of Chairman NCI.

Case No. B7

M/s. Larsen & Toubro, td., Mumbai HQ F.No.01/80/162/772/AM09/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.32/09 RA F.No.03/95/40/526/AM09 NIL Date: 04.11.2008 Ratification of norms The case regarding to ratification of norms with reference to an application filled by the applicant firm for issuance of adv. Authorization for a CIF value of more than 100 crore in terms of para 4.8 of Handbook of Procedures Vol.I was considered by the Committee. The Committee decided to refer the copy of firm’s application to DIPP for examination and submission of comments. The case may be relisted on 23.12.2008.

Case No. C82

M/s. International Tractors Ltd; Hoshiarpur (PB) HQ F.No.01/80/162/244/AM.07/DES.I Lic.No. & Date Meeting No.32/09 F.No.Adv.101/AM05/LIC/LDH 3010038882 Dt.1.12.2004 & 3010044631 dt.10.11.2005 Date: 04.11.2008 Clubbing of advance Licences. The case regarding clubbing of two advance authorizations obtained for single export obligation was considered by the Norms Committee based on the representations of the firm and reports submitted by the RA. The Committee noted that two Advance Authorizations were issued in this case against export of 75 tractors. Two advance th i ti bt i d b th t f i t f t t t t b i i t t tit f 75 t t I t d f l i f d t i

authorizations were obtained by the exporter for import of components on nettonet basis against same export quantity of 75 tractors. Instead of applying for amendment in firms licence for inclusion of additional components, the exporter applied for a second licence, which was granted. The RA had no knowledge that the second licence was obtained against the E.O. imposed against the earlier licence. Keeping in view of the facts that the firm has applied for the balance quantity of imported components in the second authorization to fulfill the EO for the original 75 tractors, which can be permitted as per GN4 for the engineering products with accountability clause, the Committee decided to refer the case to PRC for clubbing of two licences with waiver of EO for the second license. (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (Gajraj Singh, Sr. D.O., DHI) Member

efer the case to PRC for clubbing of two licences with waiver of EO for the second license. (S.K. Jain, D.O., DIPP) Member (Gajraj Singh, Sr. D.O., DHI) Member ( B.D. Ghosh, Jt. IA, M/o Steel) Member (K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director) Member (R.N. Meena, Dy. DGFT) Convener (A.Komu) Chairman

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6522 --apply.

DGFT Minutes

Case No.:3/2/85­ALC3/2008

Case No.:5/2/85­ALC3/2008

Case No.:4/2/85­ALC3/2008

Case No.:2/2/81­ALC2/2008

Case No.:54/2/81­ALC2/2008

Case No.:19/17/84­ALC3/2008

Case No.:3/13/81­ALC2/2008

Case No.:2/17/81­ALC2/2008

Case No.:5/17/81­ALC2/2008

Case No.:8/18/84­ALC3/2008

Case No.:2/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:1/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:6/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:3/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:4/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:5/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:7/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:12/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:8/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:9/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:10/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:11/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:13/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:14/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:15/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:16/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:17/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:18/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:20/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:21/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:22/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:23/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:19/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:24/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:25/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:26/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:27/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:29/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:28/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:30/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:31/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:32/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:33/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:34/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:35/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:36/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:37/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:38/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:39/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:40/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:41/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:42/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:43/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:44/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:45/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:46/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:47/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:48/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:49/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:53/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:54/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:50/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:51/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:52/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:55/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:56/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:57/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:58/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:59/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:60/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:61/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No.:62/32/80­ALC2/2008

Case No. A/R­38

Case No. A/R­39

Case No. A/R­40

Case No. B­7

Case No. C­82