DGFT Minutes
In force — no superseding record on file.
MINUTES OF 9th MEETING OF AM-22 OF THE EPCG COMMITTEE HELD UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF SHRI S.B.S. REDDY, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AT 3.00 PM ON 24.11.2021 Ninth meeting for AM-22 of the EPCG Committee was held at 3.00 pm on 24.11.2021 under the chairmanship of Shri S.B.S. Reddy, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade through Video Conferencing mode on Cisco Webex cyber meeting app due to Covid-19 restrictions (Meeting number 2644 672 9278). Following officers attended the meeting:- i. Shri Chandan Kumar, OSD, Department of Revenue ii. Shri Randheep Thakur, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, DGFT iii. Shri Anand Singh Chouhan, Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade, DGFT
- Minutes of the last Meeting were confirmed. Thereafter, the Committee deliberated upon all the cases and following decisions were taken:- Sl.
No. Firm’s Name and file Numbers EPCG Authorization No. Brief history and decision of the Committee 1 Sesha Tools Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
HQRPRCAPPLY00091592AM21 0730011540 dated 13.08.2012 Request for extension of EOP in respect of EPCG Authorization no. 0730011540 dt. 13.08.2012- reg.
After
due
deliberation,
the
Committee
decided
that
to
withdraw the case as the decision
has already been taken in the
meeting held on 13.10.2021.
2
Big Box Containers Pvt. Ltd.,
Ahmedabad
01/36/218/181/AM-21/EPCG
i.
0830009841 dated
06.10.2016
ii.
0830008821 dated
25.07.2017
Request
for
granting
condonation
of
fulfillment
of EO in respect of EPCG
Authorization nos. 0830009841
dt.
81/AM-21/EPCG
i.
0830009841 dated
06.10.2016
ii.
0830008821 dated
25.07.2017
Request
for
granting
condonation
of
fulfillment
of EO in respect of EPCG
Authorization nos. 0830009841
dt.
06.10.2016
and
0830008821 dt. 25.07.2017-
reg.
The firm has stated that there was an unexpected devastating fire in their factory on 28.04.2019 which has resulted in loss of all their inventories, machines, equipment etc. without leaving anything usable. In this regards, they have filed a FIR/Panchnama with local police authorities. They intimated RA, Ahmedabad about the incident with all documentary evidence
and requested for relaxation in fulfillment of EO in the above EPCG Authorizations. In response, RA, Ahmedabad issued D/L directing them to submit export documents such as Shipping Bills, BRC and other relevant documents. The applicant along with his application has submitted copy of Panchnama, news reports and photograph of the fire incident.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to reject the case as there is no merit for consideration of the request on the grounds furnished by the party.
3 Zydus Hospitals and Healthcare Research Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad
01/36/218/196/AM-21/EPCG
i.
0830011045 dated
05.03.2019
ii.
0830011464 dated
05.09.2019
Request
for
waiver
of
maintaining AEO, an extension
in EOP for two years and
fixation of Specific EO to only
two
times
of
duty
saved
amount instead of six times
against EPCG Authorization
nos. 0830011045 dt.
of maintaining AEO, an extension in EOP for two years and fixation of Specific EO to only two times of duty saved amount instead of six times against EPCG Authorization nos. 0830011045 dt. 05.03.2019 and 0830011464 dt. 05.09.2019- reg.
The firm has stated that world is
witnessing
the COVID-19
pandemic. The global markets
are in free fall with supply-chain
disruption
and
manufacturing
falling to the lowest levels in
decades. Exports have fallen
across
almost
all
of
the
commodity & services groups.
The Medical value travel has
been hampered by the sudden
outbreak
of
COVID-19
in
February, 2020. In March, 2020
India witnessed its longest total
lockdown, alike other economics
sectors healthcare too suffered.
The forex revenues of the Zydus
Hospitals fell sharply. Due to
closure of airspace there was no
way for the patients to plan their
travel. Many of these with valid visas and tickets in hand were left stranded. SVPI Airport, Ahmedabad remains closed for direct international flights, which is affecting the travel for those who are willing to seek approval from the embassy and plan their treatment in the city. Only one or two carriers are available with their limited weekly flights which land in Mumbai. Further, transiting through Mumbai still remains a matter of concern for patients and their family with the fear of catching COVID.
The Committee deliberated upon the case and decided to defer it for further examination on file.
4 Ashoka Gears, Noida, U.P
01/60/162/297/AM- 21/PRC/EPCG i.
fear of catching COVID.
The Committee deliberated upon the case and decided to defer it for further examination on file.
4 Ashoka Gears, Noida, U.P
01/60/162/297/AM-
21/PRC/EPCG
i.
0530137308 dated
29.10.2004
ii.
0530136893 dated
26.08.2004
iii.
0530136936 dated
08.09.2004
iv.
0530137743 dated
30.12.2004
Request for condonation of not
mentioning
EPCG
License
number
on
shipping
bills
pertaining to Group Company
towards fulfillment of EO in
respect of EPCG Authorization
nos. 0530137308 dt. 29.10.2004,
0530136893 dt. 26.08.2004 and
0530136936
dt.
08.09.2004,
0530137743 dt. 30.12.20004-
reg.
He party has stated that they manufacture against the order obtained from M/s Ashoka Technologies and supply to them being merchant exporter (Group Firm) under Central Excise ARE-1 and Central Excise Invoice. The goods received from them by the Group merchant exporter files shipping bill and necessary endorsement of ARE-1 are made on the shipping bills. They have fulfilled the EO through direct export.
M/s Ashok Gears also submitted
merchant exporter files shipping bill and necessary endorsement of ARE-1 are made on the shipping bills. They have fulfilled the EO through direct export.
M/s Ashok Gears also submitted
the following:
i. Exports were made through Group Company under the Central Excise Rules i.e., ARE-1 and Central Excise Invoice evidencing goods manufactured as described as export product in EPCG License were exported.
ii. Since the exports of same goods were made under Central Excise Rule of Group Company, the condition of Para 5.7.1 of HBP w.e.f. 01.04.2008 shall not be invoked as Group Company is not to be treated as 3rd party.
iii. Besides ARE-1 endorsed on Shipping Bills should be treated as the goods manufactured by them were exported and should not be counted as short fall.
iv. Even if the Group company export en-routed through the Central Excise Rules are treated as 3rd party the omission of EPCG License No. on shipping bills may be condoned as technical fault.
v. Export through Group company is not described as 3rd party in Para 9.28 of FTYP 2004-2009.
the case and decided to reject it as there is no merit for consideration of the request on the grounds furnished by the party.
5 Mew Electrical Limited, Vadodara
01/36/218/254/AM-20/EPCG
i.
3430002748 dated
12.10.2015
ii.
3430002750 dated
12.10.2015
Request
for
Correction
in
Average Export Obligation in
respect of EPCG authorization
No.3430002748
dated
12.10.2015
and
no.
3430002750 Dt.12.10.2015-reg.
3430002750 dated
12.10.2015
Request
for
Correction
in
Average Export Obligation in
respect of EPCG authorization
No.3430002748
dated
12.10.2015
and
no.
3430002750 Dt.12.10.2015-reg.
The firm had submitted the application at RA, Vadodara for correction in the Average EO. A deficiency letter dated 23.10.2019 was issued by RA asking for justification which was furnished. However, they have again received a deficiency letter saying that there is no rationale found to accept the request. The firm is stating that only because all the products were mentioned in the application for issuance that the Average EO taken is so high, otherwise it should have been only related to the export product made on the machine imported.
The firm is stating that it had
imported 'Fine Wire Drawing
Machine'. The for total duty saved
value for both licenses were
Rs.6,46,094.00.
The
product
manufactured by the equipment
would be Copper Wire (HS
Code-74081190/74081990) and
they intended to export the same
under these licenses. However at
the
time
of
making
the
application for issuance, they
had, by mistake, mentioned all
their
products
(including
Copper Rod, Copper Bus Bar,
Tin
Coated
Bus
Bar/Strips,
Enamelled Copper Wire, Paper
Cover Copper Strips/Wire) as
export products and also towards
past exports and consequently the
past average of all export products
was taken as average EO in the
license too. This amounted to
Rs. 72,97,59,216.66 instead of
Rs.
and also towards
past exports and consequently the
past average of all export products
was taken as average EO in the
license too. This amounted to
Rs. 72,97,59,216.66 instead of
Rs. 6,44,76,897.00 relating to
export of Copper Wires alone .
Since this machine is being used
only
for
the purpose of
making Copper Wire the export
product and average ought to be taken of the past exports of Copper Wire alone.
the case and observed that as per
Para 5.04(b) of the FTP, 2015-
20, Average EO would be the arithmetic mean of export performance in the preceding three licensing years for same and similar products. Therefore, average EO has been fixed correctly by the RA, Vadodara.
The Committee decided to reject the request as there is no merit.
6
Gillette Diversified Operations
Pvt. Ltd., Chennai
01/36/218/187/AM-21/EPCG
0430013601
dated
04.04.2014
Request
for
condonation of procedural
lapse of not mentioning the
name
of
the
supporting manufacturer
in
the shipping bills in respect of
EPCG
Authorization
no.
0430013601 dt. 04.04.2014-reg.
the case and decided to defer it
with the direction to call a report
from RA for verifying factually
correct information.
7
Parbhat Heavy Forge Pvt. Ltd.,
Punjab
HQREPCGPRAPP00138817AM2
2
3030012643
dated
18.06.2014
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block in respect of EPCG
Authorization No. 3030012643
dt.
18.06.2014 under
0%
Concessional duty- reg.
The firm has stated that they have fulfilled only 43.35% EO in the 1st Block within the stipulated time i.e. 4 years. The firm has also stated that they could not fulfill 50% EO in the 1st Block due to some export orders were canceled by the buyers. The firm has informed that they have
ed time i.e. 4 years. The firm has also stated that they could not fulfill 50% EO in the 1st Block due to some export orders were canceled by the buyers. The firm has informed that they have
fulfilled 116% EO during the
2nd Block.
The
firm
has
requested
for
extension
of
1st block with a composition fee
as per Exim Policy
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for relaxation under Para 2.58 of FTP, 2015-20 to allow condonation for approaching the RA for extension in the first block subject to payment of composition fee of 2% on duty saved amount proportionate to unfulfilled portion of EO pertaining to first block and payment Rs.10,000/- .
This has the approval of DG, DGFT.
8 Madhav Govind Foods Products (P) Ltd., Varanasi
HQREPCGPRAPP00128250AM2
2
1530000909
dated
21.11.2012
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block in respect of EPCG
Authorization No. 1530000909
dt.
21.11.2012 under
3%
Concessional duty-reg.
could not fulfill 50%EO in 1st Block within the stipulated time i.e. 6 years due to the global economic recession and economic slowdown. The firm has requested for extension of 1st Block with a composition fee in order to fulfill their EO against the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO
e in order to fulfill their EO against the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO
pertaining to first block and payment Rs.10,000/-.
DGFT.
9 KGY Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as KS Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd.)
HQRPRCAPPLY00131416AM22 5230010730 dated 19.09.2012 Request for extension of EOP for 1 year in respect of EPCG Authorization No. 5230010730 dt. 19.09.2012 - reg.
could not fulfill Block-wise EO
because the unit became NPA &
all their accounts were seized.
Now, they have cleared their
dues to the Banks & are in a
position to export. The firm has
requested for extension of EOP
for 1 year in order to fulfill their
EO against the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided that the applicant may approach RA for extension in EOP in accordance with Notification No. 28 dated 23.09.2021.
10 KGY Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as KS Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd.)
HQRPRCAPPLY00131422AM22
5230012644
dated
24.09.2013
Request for extension of EOP
for 1 year in respect of EPCG
Authorization No. 5230012644
dt. 24.09.2013 - reg.
could not fulfill Block-wise EO
because the unit became NPA &
all their accounts were seized.
Now, they have cleared their
dues Banks & are in a position to
export. The firm has requested
for extension of EOP for 1 year
in order to fulfill their EO against
the above license.
re seized.
Now, they have cleared their
dues Banks & are in a position to
export. The firm has requested
for extension of EOP for 1 year
in order to fulfill their EO against
the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to call for report from RA. Whether first block EO extension has been taken? Whether EO extension
beyond 6 years has been taken?
11 KGY Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as KS Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd.), Surat
HQRPRCAPPLY00131397AM22
5230011063
dated
10.01.2013
Request for extension of EOP
for 1 year in respect of EPCG
Authorization No. 5230011063
dt. 10.01.2013 - reg.
could not fulfill Block-wise EO
because the unit became NPA &
all their accounts were seized.
Now, they have cleared the dues
to the Banks and are in a position
to export. The firm has requested
for extension of EOP for 1 year
in order to fulfill their EO against
the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to call for report from RA. Whether first block EO extension has been taken? Whether EO extension beyond 6 years has been taken?
12 Caddie Hotels Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
HQRPRCAPPLY00129552AM22
0530165223
dated
23.06.2015
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block and EOP in respect
of EPCG Authorization No.
0530165223
dt.
23.06.2015
under 0% Concessional duty-
reg.
could not complete 100% EO within the stipulated time i.e. 6 years due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
pect of EPCG Authorization No. 0530165223 dt. 23.06.2015 under 0% Concessional duty- reg.
could not complete 100% EO within the stipulated time i.e. 6 years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CLA, New Delhi vide D/L dated 09.04.2021 advised the firm to approach EPCG Committee as they have not extended the 1st Block into the 2nd Block. Therefore, the firm has requested for extension of 1st Block and EOP in order to fulfill their EO against the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to
recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO pertaining to first block and payment of Rs. 10,000/-.
DGFT.
13 Mobis India Ltd., Chennai
HQREPCGPRAPP00150030AM2 2 0430018609 dated 11.11.2019 Request for condonation for late submission of Installation certificates against EPCG Authorization No. 0430018609 dt.11.11.2019-reg.
have imported the CG vide Bill
of Entry No. 6014030 dated
10.12.2019 under the EPCG
license
no.
0430018609
dt.11.11.2019 and installed the
same
at
their
factory
on
24.12.2019.
The
firm
has
informed that they have obtained
the installation certificate from
the
Independent
chartered
engineer on 06.03.2020. The firm
has also stated that due to
COVID-19,
they
could
not
submit an installation certificate
which was issued by Chartered
Engineer.
RA, Chennai vide D/L dated 14.06.2021 informed that installation certificate submitted is beyond the time period of 18 months from the date of last import i.e. B.E. dated 10.12.2019.
.
RA, Chennai vide D/L dated
14.06.2021
informed
that
installation certificate submitted
is beyond the time period of 18
months from the date of last
import
i.e.
B.E.
dated
10.12.2019.
RA,
Chennai
advised them to approach the
DGFT (HQ).
the
case
and
decided to
recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow condonation of delay in submission of installation certificate subject to payment of composition fee of Rs. 5000/- and submission of installation certificate. RA to verify that no ECA/DRI/Customs action is pending.
DGFT.
14 NDM Sea Food Processors and Exporter Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata
HQREPCGPRAPP00167161AM2
2
0230014353
dated
23.03.2020
Request for condonation for
late submission of Installation
certificates
against
EPCG
Authorization
No.
0230014353dt.23.03.2020.
As per ANF-2D Form, the firm has stated that the CGs arrived at Kolkata port on 08.10.2020 and 12.11.2020. Since the CGs were to be attached with structural panels; it took some time as laborers were not available for the fixation of parts due to the Covid-19 Scenario. Therefore, they could not submit Installation Certificate within the stipulated time. the case and decided to direct the applicant to first approach RA for condonation of delay in submission of installation certificate.
15 NDM Sea Food Processors and Exporter Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata
HQREPCGPRAPP00167179AM2
2
0230014141dated
30.12.2019
Request for condonation for
late submission of installation
certificates
against
EPCG
Authorization No.
Exporter Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata
HQREPCGPRAPP00167179AM2
2
0230014141dated
30.12.2019
Request for condonation for
late submission of installation
certificates
against
EPCG
Authorization No. 0230014141
dt.30.12.2019-reg.
The firm has mentioned that the CG was imported from Germany and arrived in India on
15.01.2020. After obtaining clearance from port authorities, the same was received by the Unit by February 2020. After the CG was received the same were to be installed by the German team but they could not arrive the country was in severe lockdown during that period. Therefore, they could not submit Installation Certificate within the stipulated
the case and decided to direct the applicant to first approach RA for condonation of delay in submission of installation certificate.
16 Varun Hospitality Private Limited, Vijaywada, (A.P.)
HQRPRCAPPLY00178461AM22 2630000964 dated 15.06.2011 Request for extension of EOP for 2 years against EPCG Authorization No. 2630000964 dt. 15.06.2011 under 3% Concessional duty - reg.
As per ANF-2D, the firm has
stated that they obtained the said
Authorization
for
importing
capital goods for the construction
of their 5 Star Hotel Project at
Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh.
They are facing huge loss due to
the
Covid-19
pandemic
and
restriction,
as
there
is
a
reluctance to travel by both
national
and
international
tourists/business travelers. Hotels
were shut down for a significant
period and there was no revenue.
nd restriction, as there is a reluctance to travel by both national and international tourists/business travelers. Hotels were shut down for a significant period and there was no revenue. The firm has also stated that they could not fulfill100% EO within the extended time period i.e.10 years (8 years+ 2 years) due to COVID-19. Therefore, the firm has requested for extension of EOP for 2 years in order to fulfill the EO.
After due deliberation, the
Committee decided that the applicant may approach RA for extension in EOP in accordance with Public Notice 67 dated 31.3.2020 and Notification No. 28 dated 23.09.2021.
17 NDM Sea Food Processors and Exporter Private Limited, Kolkata
HQREPCGPRAPP00167166AM2 2 0230014315 dated 11.03.2020 Request for condonation for late submission of installation certificates against EPCG Authorization No. 0230014315 dt.11.03.2020.
The firm has stated that the CGs arrived from Vietnam on 06.05.2020 and 25.02.021. They submitted 2 nexus certificates. Due to lockdown, complete parts of the CGs could not be received. Therefore, they could not submit the Installation certificate within the stipulated time.
the case and decided to direct the
applicant
to first
approach
RA for condonation of
delay
in submission
of
installation
certificate in terms of Para 5.04
of HBP.
18 Ghodawat Consumer Pvt. Ltd.,
Kolhapur
HQREPCGPRAPP00147680AM2
2
3130009850dated
03.02.2017
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block in respect of EPCG
Authorization No. 3130009850
dt.
18 Ghodawat Consumer Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur
HQREPCGPRAPP00147680AM2
2
3130009850dated
03.02.2017
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block in respect of EPCG
Authorization No. 3130009850
dt.
03.02.2017 under
0%
Concessional duty- reg.
could not fulfill 50% EO in the
1st Block due to Covid-19 and
strict lockdown within the State.
The firm has further stated that
they are negotiating new export
orders. The firm has further
stated that they could not apply
for an extension of 1st Block
within the stipulated time period
i.e. 90 days due to COVID-19.
The firm has requested for
extension of the 1st Block in
order to fulfill EO.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO pertaining to first block.
DGFT.
19 Anshika Fasteners Pvt. Ltd. , Nagpur
HQRPRCAPPLY00087202AM21
5030000112
dated
09.06.2011
Request for extension of EOP
in
respect
of
EPCG
Authorization No. 5030000112
dt.09.06.2011 - reg.
have tried to secure overseas
orders but faced stiff competition
from neighboring countries like
China,
Taiwan,
and
Korea.
Finally, they were able to get
orders from Dubai, UAE and
they
continued
to
export
and were able to complete EO to
the tune of 43%. The firm has
further informed that the prices
for
raw
material
are
comparatively very high for
“Fasteners Industrial Segment”
hence they could not compete
with other overseas competitors.
Bangladesh,
Sri
Lanka,
etc.
that the prices
for
raw
material
are
comparatively very high for
“Fasteners Industrial Segment”
hence they could not compete
with other overseas competitors.
Bangladesh,
Sri
Lanka,
etc.
Governments had levied heavy
import duty for their export
products. Therefore, they could
not export in these countries. The
firm has also stated that their
firm
has
undergone
huge
financial losses in the year 2016-
17 and 2017-18. Due to financial
crisis spread across the whole
country including the Economy
of India and present COVID-19
circumstances. They are not in a
position to afford any payment of “Customs Duty along with applicable interest on the Duty Saved Value in proportion to the un-fulfilled SEO due to the huge financial losses.
The Committee noted that the matter was examined by EPCG Committee in its meeting held on 14.02.2020. The decision of the Committee as under: “The Committee noted that the party has completed only 43.53% of EO in the stipulated EOP of 6 years and extended period of EOP for two years. The party seeks further two years extension for fulfillment of remaining EO. The Committee deliberated upon the case and decided to reject the request for EOP extension being devoid of merit.” Now, the party is seeking a Personal hearing to explain their case. the case and decided to defer the case as party sought PH in this matter. 20 Sheela Agro Pvt.
nsion being devoid of merit.” Now, the party is seeking a Personal hearing to explain their case. the case and decided to defer the case as party sought PH in this matter. 20 Sheela Agro Pvt. Ltd., Katni, Madhya Pradesh
HQRPRCAPPLY00152537AM22
1130001505
dated
08.05.2009
Request for extension of EOP
for two years in respect of
EPCG
Authorization
No.
1130001505
dt.
08.05.2009 under
03%
Concessional duty-reg.
have supplied finished products to many exporters from time to time since the importation of CG but could not endorse EPCG No. and their company names as “Supporting Manufacturer” on Exporter Shipping Bill. Due to procedural lapse, they could not claim export benefits. They have
supplied export products to Ultimate Exporter who has not endorsed the firm’s EPCG Authorization on the Shipping Bills and they have not ensured for the same out of sheer ignorance. Therefore, they could not fulfill 100% EO within the extended time period.
The Committee observed that the EO period of the EPCG authorization under the 3% Duty saved Scheme has expired on 07.05.2017. The party has not submitted any application for extension in EO after expiry of EOP. There is no provision under the FTP to grant EOP for a period of two years from the date of approval.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to reject the case as there is no merit.
ere is no provision under the FTP to grant EOP for a period of two years from the date of approval.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to reject the case as there is no merit.
21 Meghmani LLP, Ahmedabad
HQRPRCAPPLY00089869AM21
0830011875
dated
09.04.2020
Request for condonation for
submission
of
Installation
certificates
against
EPCG
Authorization No. 0830011875
Dated. 09.04.2020-reg.
The firm has stated that during the lockdown their shipment was cleared under EPCG. They tried for amendment of BoE on payment of duty but due to COVID -19 situation the Customs officials did not allow any kind of amendments and hence they had to clear the shipment under EPCG License.
The firm has further stated that they have already made the payment of Duty of Rs. 1757580.82 along with the applicable interest of Rs. 110511.00 vide CHALLAN No.
11/09/2020.The firm has informed that since they were sure that they would not be able to maintain AEO, therefore, they installed the machinery in their sister company’s SEZ plant. Since, the CG was not installed in the plant of M/s Meghmani pigment’s plant. Therefore, they are not able to submit the Installation Certificate against the said authorization. the case and decided to defer the case and call a report from RA for details regarding any show cause by Customs or DGFT for machinery imported before or after payment of duty.
22 A.L.
ion. the case and decided to defer the case and call a report from RA for details regarding any show cause by Customs or DGFT for machinery imported before or after payment of duty.
22 A.L. Paper House, Jaipur
HQREPCGPRAPP00147466AM2
2
1330002182
dated
29.06.2009
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block in respect of EPCG
Authorization No. 1330002182
dt. 29.06.2009 - reg.
As per the ANF-2D form, the
firm has stated that they could
not fulfill 50% EO in the
1st Block within the stipulated
time i.e. 6 years due to uncertain
business events. The firm has
further informed that they have
fulfilled
100%
EO
in
the
2nd Block.
The
firm
has
requested
for
extension
of
1st block to fulfill the EO in the
above EPCG Authorization.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO pertaining to first block and
payment of Rs.10,000/-.
DGFT.
23 Caddie Hotels Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
HQRPRCAPPLY00116904AM22
0530165052
dated
01.06.2015
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block and EOP in respect
of EPCG Authorization No.
0530165052
dt.
01.06.2015
under 0% Concessional duty-
reg.
could not complete 100% EO within the stipulated time i.e. 6 years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CLA, New Delhi vide D/L dated 09.04.2021 advised the firm to approach EPCG Committee as they have not extended the 1st Block into the 2nd Block.
ime i.e. 6 years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CLA, New Delhi vide D/L dated 09.04.2021 advised the firm to approach EPCG Committee as they have not extended the 1st Block into the 2nd Block. Therefore, the firm has requested for extension of 1st Block and EOP in order to fulfill their EO against the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO pertaining to first block and payment of Rs.10,000/-
DGFT.
24 Caddie Hotels Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
HQRPRCAPPLY00129520AM22
0530165176
dated
17.06.2015
Request
for
extension
of
1st Block and EOP in respect
of EPCG Authorization No.
0530165176
dt.
17.06.2015
under 0% Concessional duty -
reg.
could not complete 100% EO within the stipulated time i.e. 6 years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CLA, New Delhi vide D/L dated 09.04.2021 advised the firm to approach EPCG Committee as they have not extended the 1st Block into the 2nd Block. Therefore, the firm has requested for extension of 1st Block and EOP in order to fulfill their EO against the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO pertaining to first block and payment of Rs. 10,000/-.
DGFT.
25 Sehgal Knitters, Amritsar
HQRPRCAPPLY00109459AM22 1230001341dated 26.05.2015 Request for extension of EOP for two years in respect of EPCG Authorization No. 1230001341dt.
DGFT.
25 Sehgal Knitters, Amritsar
HQRPRCAPPLY00109459AM22 1230001341dated 26.05.2015 Request for extension of EOP for two years in respect of EPCG Authorization No. 1230001341dt. 26.05.2015 under 0% Concessional duty - reg.
could not export last year due to Covid-19. Now, they have exports order in hand. Therefore, they need an extension of EOP. RA, Ludhiana issued D/L dated 02.06.2021 as under: “You have not applied block condonation as well as EOP within time as the 1st block
has already expired on 26.05.2019; You are advised to get your case to regularize.” After due deliberation, the Committee decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 to allow unfulfilled portion of EO pertaining to first block and payment Rs. 10,000/-.
DGFT.
26 Bharti Hygiene Care Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur
HQRPRCAPPLY00150318AM22 5030000595 dated 02.07.2015 Request for extension of EOP for two years in respect of EPCG Authorization No. 5030000595 dt. 02.07.2015 - reg.
could not complete 100% EO within the stipulated time i.e. 6 years due to slow down in the international market & some financial problems. The firm has requested for extension of EOP for two years in order to fulfill their EO against the above license.
After due deliberation, the Committee decided that the applicant may approach RA for extension in EOP for 2 years taking into consideration date of application for EO extension as 29.7.2021.
r due deliberation, the Committee decided that the applicant may approach RA for extension in EOP for 2 years taking into consideration date of application for EO extension as 29.7.2021.
27 Damodar Industries Ltd., Mumbai
HQREPCGPRAPP00110611AM2
2
0330032217
dated
.26.03.2012
Request for regularization of
excess
duty
credit
utilized
within 10% on EPCG License
No. 0330032217 dt.26.03.2012 –
reg.
The applicant has requested to allow regularization of late payment of additional fee to cover excess imports.
The Committee noted that Para 5.16 (a) of HBP 2015-20, as amended, provides that if authorization issued has been utilized for import of goods in excess of duty saved amount indicated on the authorization by not more than 10%, the RA may accept additional fee to cover excess imports effected, in terms of duty saved amount, even beyond one month but within two years of the excess import taking place, subject to payment of composition fee of Rs. 5000/- per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for FTP, 2015-20 for condonation of procedural lapse of delay of more than a month in payment of fee for excess duty saved amount as envisaged in the Para 5.16(a) of HBP 2015-20, subject to payment of composition fee of Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess utilization is not more than 10% of duty saved mentioned in the subject EPCG authorizations. The party is also required to pay an additional composition fee of Rs.
ondition that the excess utilization is not more than 10% of duty saved mentioned in the subject EPCG authorizations. The party is also required to pay an additional composition fee of Rs. 5,000/- for each year of delay beyond the expiry of the period of two years of the excess import taking place.
DGFT.
28 Sant Rubbers Ltd, Jalandhar
HQRPRCAPPLY00093257AM21 3030017135 dated 27.06.2018 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 3030017135 dt. 27.06.2018 –reg.
allow regularization of late
5.16 (a) of HBP, 2015-20, as amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
29 Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd, Surat
HQRPRCAPPLY00166714AM22 5230010037 dated 13.02.2012 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 5230010037 dt. 13.02.2012 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess
at if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess
subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
30 R.V. Overseas, Amritsar
HQREPCGPRAPP00131602AM2 2 1230001108 dated 21.03.2014 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 1230001108 dt.21.03.2014 – reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to
Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
31 H.B. Fuller India Adhesives Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
HQREPCGPRAPP00139738AM2 2
i. 0330030526 dated 09.09.2011 ii. 0330030529 dated 09.09.2011 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized Nos. 0330030526 dt. 09.09.2011 and 0330030529 dt. 09.09.2011 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for
t. 09.09.2011 and 0330030529 dt. 09.09.2011 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for
HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
32 Canbara Industries Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
HQRPRCAPPLY00117156AM21 0330039799 dated 19.09.2014 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 0330039799 dt. 19.09.2014 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to
recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
33 Canbara Industries Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
HQRPRCAPPLY00117155AM21 0330039798 dated 19.09.2014 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 0330039798 dt. 19.09.2014 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if
0330039798 dated 19.09.2014 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 0330039798 dt. 19.09.2014 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if
per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
34 Maruti Fashion, Surat
HQRPRCAPPLY00166080AM22 5230016489 dated 21.04.2015 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 5230016489 dt. 21.04.2015 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if
per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
35 Mahavir Textiles, Mumbai
HQREPCGPRAPP00123673AM2
2
i.
0330033625 dated
07.09.2012
ii.
0330044440 dated
30.05.2016
Request for regularization of
excess
duty
credit
utilized
Nos. 0330033625 dt. 07.09.2012
and 0330044440 dt. 30.05.2016
–reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if
uest for regularization of excess duty credit utilized Nos. 0330033625 dt. 07.09.2012 and 0330044440 dt. 30.05.2016 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if
per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
36 J. Korin Spinning Pvt. Ltd., Surat
HQREPCGPRAPP00156752AM2 2 5230004321 dated 17.10.2008 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 5230004321 dated 17.10.2008–reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
37 Omkar Creation, Surat
HQRPRCAPPLY00166065AM22
5230026419
dated
06.09.2018
Request for regularization of
excess
duty
credit
utilized
No. 5230026419 dt. 06.09.2018
–reg.
allow regularization of late
HQRPRCAPPLY00166065AM22
5230026419
dated
06.09.2018
Request for regularization of
excess
duty
credit
utilized
No. 5230026419 dt. 06.09.2018
–reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
38 Mukand Ltd., Mumbai
HQREPCGPRAPP00144170AM2 2 0330030084 dated 21.07.2011
Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 0330030084 dt. 21.07.2011 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
39 Mukand Ltd., Mumbai
HQREPCGPRAPP00144178AM2
2
0330029911
dated
04.07.2011
Request for regularization of
excess
duty
credit
utilized
No.
0330029911
dt. 04.07.2011 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
he case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
40 J. Korin Spinning Pvt. Ltd., Surat
HQREPCGPRAPP00156755AM2
2
5230015505
dated
14.11.2014
Request for regularization of
excess
duty
credit
utilized
No. 5230015505 dt. 14.11.2014
–reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
41 Reliance Industries Ltd., Mumbai
HQRPRCAPPLY00113020AM21 0330035069 dated 13.02.2013 Request for regularization of excess duty credit utilized No. 0330035069 dt. 13.02.2013 –reg.
allow regularization of late
amended, provides that if per authorization.
the case and decided to recommend to DG for HBP 2015-20, subject to Rs. 5000/- per year per authorization and to the condition that the excess
subject EPCG authorizations.
DGFT.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 6439 --apply.