DGFT Minutes

MINUTES OF EPCG COMMITTEE MEETING HELD UNDER CHAIRMANSHIP OF SHRI V.K. GUPTA, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AT 11.00 AM ON 24.08.2011 IN ROOM NO. 11,  UDYOG BHAWAN, NEW DELHI.   S. No.         Name and Designation   (a)              Shri V.K. Gupta, Addl. DGFT & Chairman. (b)              Shri Suresh Kumar, Director, Department of Revenue (c)              Shri Anil Kumar singh, Joint DG, DGFT (d)              Shri K. K. Tiwari, Industrial Adviser, Department of Heavy Industry.  (e)              Dr.  R. A. Lal, Director, O/o Textile Commissioner, Noida. (f)              Shri Ishwar Singh, Deputy DG, DGFT (g)              Shri A. K. Gopal, FTDO (EPCG.I), DGFT (h)              Shri S. K. Swarnkar, FTDO (EPCG.II), DGFT   2.            Minutes of the last Meeting held on 20.07.2011 were confirmed.   3.            The Committee deliberated upon all the cases and took the decisions indicated against each of the case below:   SI. No. Firms Name EPCG Licence No. and Date Request  of  the firm Decision  of  the  EPCG Committee 1. M/s  Abdos Lamitubes  Privates Limited, Guwahati F.No.01/36/218/51/ AM­12/EPCG­I a.   1430000021 dated 28.06.2004 b.   1430000018 dated 28.04.2004 To  treat  the export  of  the product  viz. Laminated  Tubes with  Caps  to Nepal realized in ` similar to physical export  to  SEZ which  are counted  for discharge  of  EO irrespective  of currency  of realization. The  Committee  noted  that the  firm  obtained  the  two Authorizations  for  export  of ‘laminated  tubes  with  caps’ classified  under  Heading 7612  in  Central  Excise

currency  of realization. The  Committee  noted  that the  firm  obtained  the  two Authorizations  for  export  of ‘laminated  tubes  with  caps’ classified  under  Heading 7612  in  Central  Excise Schedule.      As  per  Para 5.7.2  export  proceeds  for fulfilment  of  export obligation  against  EPCG Authorisations  are  required to  be  realised  in  freely convertible  currency  except for  deemed  exports.  The firm  claimed  that  it  was receiving  the  realisation  in free  foreign  exchange  by exporting  multilayer laminated  plastic  tubes  to Nepal  and  completed  EO  of Rs.  1769  lakhs.  The  Central Excise  Authorities  changed the  classification  of  the export  product  under heading 7612 to 3923.  The firm further claimed that due to  change  of  classification, realisation  of  proceeds  was possible  only  in  `  and  the exports of their  product  (to Nepal)  in  free  foreign exchange  came  to  a complete  deadlock.    The

change  of  classification, realisation  of  proceeds  was possible  only  in  `  and  the exports of their  product  (to Nepal)  in  free  foreign exchange  came  to  a complete  deadlock.    The

firm  continued  exports  to Nepal in ` to keep the valued Nepali buyer in their fold.    It  was  decided  to  examine the  issue  on  file  as  per  the provisions  of  subject notification/public  notice, effecting  the  currency  of payment  and  claims  of  the firm  in  this  regard  before approval  of  DGFT  is obtained for relaxation.     2 M/s.  Baramati  Agro Limited, Maharashtra F.No. 1/36/218/36/ AM­12/EPCG­1 a.  3130002719 dated 01.10.2007 b.  3130002727 dated 04.10.2007 c.  3130002728 dated 04.10.2007 (a)        Acceptance of  excise  attested proof  of  exports and  ARE­I  for  EO fulfillment; (b)                Condonation  of procedural lapse of not  mentioning  of EPCG Authorization number  and  date on  shipping  bills of the Third party. The  firm  have  made exports  through  third party  and  all  the shipping Bills show their name  as  supporting manufacturer.  The  firm claims  that corresponding  ARE­I and  excise  attested proof  of  exports showing  Shipping  Bill Numbers  are  also available  with  them.  The  Committee, therefore,  decided  to accept  excise  attested proof  of  exports/  ARE­I and  recommended  to DG  to  condone  the procedural  lapse  of  not mentioning  the  EPCG Authorizations details on shipping  bills  of  the third  party  if  there  is other  corroborative evidence.    The  RA  may dispose  of  the  request of  the  firm

e  of  not mentioning  the  EPCG Authorizations details on shipping  bills  of  the third  party  if  there  is other  corroborative evidence.    The  RA  may dispose  of  the  request of  the  firm  after verification  of  the aforesaid  documents  as per Policy Circular No. 7 dated  11.07.2002.  DG has  approved  the recommendation  of the Committee. 3 M/s  Fuso  Glass  India Pvt. Limited, Chennai F.No. 18/47/08/EPCG­I (a) 430007074 dated 23.01.2009, 430007830 dated 11.11.2009, 430008421 dated 05.04.2010, 430009025 dated 29.09.2010, (a)          Request  for inclusion  of  Eight EPCG  licenses  in the decision of the EPCG  Committee Meeting  held  on 04.05.2011 and  (b)     Condonation of procedural lapse a.            The Committee, in  its  meeting  held  on 04.05.2011,  had allowed  the  firm’s request  for  acceptance of  ARE­I  and  Bill  of Exports  for  supplies made  to  SEZ  Unit  for fulfilment of EO against

430009026 dated 29.09.2010, 430009033 dated 01.10.2010, 430009529 dated  11.02.2011 and 430009530 dated 11.02.2011.   (b) No. 0430006389 dated 18.07.2008.   for  endorsing    of wrong  EPCG Authorization  No. on  the  B/E    and ARE  for  supplies SEZ  Units  shown towards  fulfillment of  EO  against  Authorization No.0430006389 dated 18.07.2008. (c)          Request  for waiver  of  Annual Average  in  EPCG licenses  issued  to us.  –  Rejected  in last  meeting  held on 20.07.2011. 13  (1+12)  EPCG Authorizations  wherein EPCG  licence  number and  date  were  not mentioned  on documents  of  exports. The  Committee, therefore,  decided  to

in last  meeting  held on 20.07.2011. 13  (1+12)  EPCG Authorizations  wherein EPCG  licence  number and  date  were  not mentioned  on documents  of  exports. The  Committee, therefore,  decided  to recommend  to  DG  to extend  the  similar facility  in  respect  of  8 other  licences  issued  to the  firm  subject  to verification  of details/corroborative documents  by  the Regional  Authority.  DG has  approved  the recommendation  of the EPCG Committee. b.                        The  Bill  of exports  shown  towards discharge  of  export obligation against EPCG Authorization No.0430006389  dated 18.07.2008  issued  to the  firm  have  been endorsed  with  two other  EPCG Authorization  Numbers. The firm have furnished an  affidavit/undertaking for  the  condonation  of the  procedural  lapse  of not  mentioning  EPCG Authorization  No.  on the B/E and ARE­I.  The Committee  decided  to recommend  to  DG  to  condone the procedural lapse  of  endorsing  wrong  EPCG Authorization  Nos.  on the  B/E  and  ARE­I  for supplies  to  SEZ  Units shown  towards fulfilment of EO against  the  subject Authorization  (No.0430006389  dated 18.07.2008)  subject  to submission  of documents as per Policy Circular  No.  7  dated 11.07.2002.    DG  has approved  the recommendation  of the EPCG Committee.

thorization  (No.0430006389  dated 18.07.2008)  subject  to submission  of documents as per Policy Circular  No.  7  dated 11.07.2002.    DG  has approved  the recommendation  of the EPCG Committee.

c.  The  Committee decided  to  maintain  its earlier  decision  in respect  of  the  firm’s request  for  waiver  of annual average. 4 M/s  Grand  Hotel (Bombay)    Private Limited, Mumbai F.No. 01/36/218/229/ AM­11/EPCG­I 03300100379 dated 23.06.2000         Waiver  of regularisation  as Tourist  Vehcle  for Redemption of EPCG Licence  No. 03300100379  dated 23.06.2000  issued to  M/s  Grand  Hotel (Bombay)  Private Limited, Mumbai. The  Committee  in  its last  meeting  held  on 20.07.2011  deferred the  request  of  the  firm for  want  of  detailed justification  which  was not  given.    Therefore, the  Committee  rejected the  request  for  want  of appropriate justification. 5 M/s Honda Siel Power Products  Ltd.,  New Delhi F.No. 01/36/218/61/ AM­12/EPCG­I 0530130928 dated 08.05.2000 Acceptance  of  CE Certificate  in  lieu  of Installation Certificate  by  Central Excise Authority. The  case  was  earlier considered  on 20.07.2011.  Shri P. K. Jain,  Sr.  Executive appeared  before  the Committee  and  made submissions  that  Export Obligation  had  already been  completed  by March,  2007  and installation certificate by Chartered  Engineer  was submitted  to  CLA,  New Delhi  way  back  in 2001.  CLA, Delhi raised objections  for acceptance  of  CE Certificate  only  in August,  2010  while examining  the  proposal of  the  firm  for  issuance of  EODC.  The  firm,

Delhi  way  back  in 2001.  CLA, Delhi raised objections  for acceptance  of  CE Certificate  only  in August,  2010  while examining  the  proposal of  the  firm  for  issuance of  EODC.  The  firm, approached  Custom authorities  to  issue Installation  Certificate.  The  Customs  have, however,declined  for the  same  on  the grounds that the licence has already expired.    The  Committee  decided to recommend to DG for acceptance  of Installation  Certificate by  an  Independent Chartered  Engineer  in lieu  of  Jurisdictional Central  Excise  Authority as an exception and not to  be  quoted  as precedence.    DG  has approved  the

recommendation  of the Committee.   6 M/s  Indian Immunologicals Limited, Hyderabad F.No. 01/36/218/83/ AM­12/EPCG­I 0930005355 dated 04.12.2009 Waiver  of condonation  for   maintenance  of Annual  Average Export Obligation. Mr.  Nelson,  Manager and Mr. P. Aditya Kiran, Executive    appeared before  the  Committee.   Vaccines  being exported  by  them  were banned  in  the  Middle East  wherein  these products  were registered.    The  case was  deferred  with  the direction  to  submit detailed justification.  7   M/s  Garden  Silk  Mills Ltd., Mumbai F.No. 01/36/218/22/ AM­12/EPCG­I   N. A. (a)      Allow Zero Duty  Benefit  for import  of  Capital Goods for Rs. 325 Crore  in  their  PFY Unit  by  relaxing the  Policy  with the  plea  that  the large  corporate have  multi product manufacturing  in separate  units under  difference ITCHS  Code  and Excise  Units  and the  NON  TUFS units manufacturing altogether different  products

hat  the large  corporate have  multi product manufacturing  in separate  units under  difference ITCHS  Code  and Excise  Units  and the  NON  TUFS units manufacturing altogether different  products under  separate excise registrations should be allowed Zero  Duty Scheme. (b)            To  allow Zero  Duty  Benefit for  import  of Capital  Goods  at their Vareli Unit. The  Committee  noted that  the  firm  have  3 units (under single IEC) and  out  of  these  they have  not  availed  TUFS benefit  in  one  of  the units  viz.  Vareli  Unit. The  Committee  perused the  provisions  of  Para 5.1A  of  HBP  according to  which  “Zero  duty scheme shall also not be available  for  units  who are  currently  availing any  benefits  under Technology Upgradation  Fund Scheme  (TUFS) administered by Ministry of  Textiles,  Government of  India.    Since  the Vareli  unit  has  not availed benefit of TUFS, it  is  entitled  to  Zero Duty  Scheme  under

Para 5.1 of FTP.

    8 M/s    Jewel  Consumer Care  Private  Limited, Baroda F.No. 01/36/218/91/ AM­12/EPCG­I 3430000059 dated 27.06.2002 (a)     To accept the export  of “Toothbrush”  for completing  EO against  the  licence (i.e.  inclusion  of alternate  product towards fulfilment of EO). (b)     To adjust the exports  done  during the  block  years 2008­09  and  2009­ The  Committee  decided to  defer  the  case  and call the representative of the  firm  with  detailed justifications  in  support of  their  requests  how the  CG  for  manufacture of Hangers can be used for  manufacture  of Tooth Brush etc.

10  towards fulfilment  of  exports done  during preceding  block years  i.e.  during 2003­04  to  2007­ 2008. 9 M/s  SAS  Hotels  and Enterprises  Limited, M/s  APA  Hotels Private  Limited, Chennai F.No.18/126/ AM­11/EPCG­II a.  0430002512 dated  30.03.2005 (SAS  Hotels  & Enterprises Ltd.)   b.  0430003252 dated  19.12.2005 (SAS  Hotels  & Enterprises Ltd.)   c.  0430003245 dated  15.12.2005 (APA  Hotels  Pvt. Ltd.) Waiver  of  condition of  registration  of vehicle  as  Tourist Vehicle  for  issuance of EODC. The  Committee  in  its last  meeting  held  on 20.07.2011  deferred the  request  of  the  firm for  want  of  detailed justification  which  was not  given.    Therefore, the  Committee  rejected the  request  for  want  of appropriate justification. 10 Jt. DGFT, Bangalore F.No.18/59/ AM­12/EPCG­II N. A. Grant  of  EPCG authorization  for import  of  LCD/TV Sets for Hospital. It  was  decided  to  defer the  case  for  further

iate justification. 10 Jt. DGFT, Bangalore F.No.18/59/ AM­12/EPCG­II N. A. Grant  of  EPCG authorization  for import  of  LCD/TV Sets for Hospital. It  was  decided  to  defer the  case  for  further discussions  in  the  next meeting. 11 M/s  Tex  India Enterprises  (P)  Ltd., Faridabad F.No.18/01/ AM­12/EPCG­II 0530149208  dated 19.06.2009 Clarification  whether average  EO  is  to  be maintained  in proportion  to  the number  of  spilled over  days  or  for  the entire financial year. The firm was required to fulfil  the  export obligation  up  to 18.06.2017.    However, the  firm  fulfilled  Export Obligation  on 23.04.2010,  that  is, within  one  year.  However,  the  period  of one  year  spilled  over  in two  financial  years.  Therefore,  CLA,  New Delhi  insisted  for maintenance  of  Annual Average  for  two  years, that  is,  2009­2010  and 2010­11.    The  firm claimed  that  in  lieu  of 23  days  in  2010­11, insistence  for maintenance of Average EO for the entire period is not justified.    It  was  noted  that  the licence  was  issued  in June, 2009 and the firm maintained  AEP  from April,  2009  till  March, 2010.    Since,  the exporter  has  fulfilled AEP  for  2009­10,  AEP for  2010­11  is, therefore,  not  to  be insisted upon.

une, 2009 and the firm maintained  AEP  from April,  2009  till  March, 2010.    Since,  the exporter  has  fulfilled AEP  for  2009­10,  AEP for  2010­11  is, therefore,  not  to  be insisted upon.

12 M/s  Nutech  Print Services, New Delhi F.No.01/36/218/239/ AM­11/EPCG­I/II a.  05300151660 dated 29.03.2010 b.  0530152415 dated  11.06.2010 c.  0530151714 dated 31.03.2010 d.  0530152680 dated 06.07.2010 and e.  0530153525 dated 27.09.2010 Prior  Permission  for transfer  of  capital goods  from  Okhla, New  Delhi  Unit  to Faridabad Unit. The  address  and  details of  both  the  units  are mentioned  in  IEM  & IEC.    The  Committee, therefore,  decided  to grant the permission for shifting  of  Capital Goods  from  their  Okhla Unit  to  Faridabad  Unit subject to submission of fresh  installation certificate  from  the Jurisdictional  Central Excise  Authority  within a  period  of  six  months from  the  date  of  the decision.  They  should also  submit  initial installation certificate to RA. 13 M/s  NTL  Electronics India Ltd., Noida F.No.18/94/ AM­12/EPCG­II 0530151531 dated 15.03.2010 Prior  permission  for transfer  of  capital goods  from  Roorkee Unit  to  Dehradun Unit. The  address  and  details of  both  the  units  are mentioned  in  IEM  and in  RCMC.  The Committee,  therefore, decided  to  grant  the permission  for  shifting of  Capital  Goods  from their  Roorkee  Unit  to Dehradun  Unit  subject to  submission  of installation  certificate from  Jurisdictional Central  Excise  Authority within  a  period  of  six months from the date of

from their  Roorkee  Unit  to Dehradun  Unit  subject to  submission  of installation  certificate from  Jurisdictional Central  Excise  Authority within  a  period  of  six months from the date of decision.  They  should also  submit  initial installation certificate to RA. 14 M/s Heaven Diamonds Private  Limited, Mumbai F.No. 01/36/218/230/ AM­11/EPCG­1 01500362 dated 11.04.1996   (RE­2004) In  due  to  reasons beyond its centrol. To  accept  the exports  made  upto 31.03.2006  (after the  validity  of  the original  EOP) towards  the fulfilment  of  Export Obligation. The firm was eligible for extension  in  time  for  2 years as per the relevant Policy  Provisions  at  the time of issue of licence. However,  it  could  not obtain  the  same.    The Committee  decided  to accept the exports made upto  31.03.2006 without  any composition  fee  for regularisation  of  the authorization as per GRC decision  dated 25.08.2006  that “Accordingly,  the Committee  having regard  to  the  facts  and circumstances  of  the

t  any composition  fee  for regularisation  of  the authorization as per GRC decision  dated 25.08.2006  that “Accordingly,  the Committee  having regard  to  the  facts  and circumstances  of  the

case,  which  were beyond  the  control  of the  firm,  decided  to refer  the  matter  to  the PRC  (EPCG  Committee in  this  case)  for extension  of  EOP  upto 31.03.2006 without any fee  or  penalty  and thereafter,  redemption of EPCG licence”.   15 M/s  Hyundai Motor  India  Ltd., Chennai F.No. 01/36/218/104/ AM­12/EPCG­I EPCG  Authorizations issued  during  AM  – 2004 to AM – 2012. Recognition  of  211 Vendors  and  sub­ vendors  as supporting manufacturers  for regularization of the licences. EPCG Committee  has  been allowing  endorsement  of vendors  as  and  when approached.      The Committee  last  allowed endorsement of vendors in its  meeting  held  on 13.08.2010.    The Committee  further  noted that  these  vendors  are  for manufacturing  of  specific components  of  the Hyundai  Motors  only.  M/s Hyundai Motors could have got  endorsement  of  as many  vendors  as  they wanted in their licences  as supporting  manufacturers at  the  time  of  obtaining EPCG authorizations..   The  Committee,  therefore, allowed  endorsement  of vendors  as  supporting manufacturers  for regularization  of  the licences. 16 M/s  Celebi Ground  Handling Delhi  Pvt.  Ltd., New Delhi F.No. 01/36/218/138/ AM­10/EPCG­1 Applied  for  by  the firm. Import of Container Pallet  Loader Commander, Baggage  Cart, Towbar  Head  and Patterned  Wheel (Spares) for Airport Services.

New Delhi F.No. 01/36/218/138/ AM­10/EPCG­1 Applied  for  by  the firm. Import of Container Pallet  Loader Commander, Baggage  Cart, Towbar  Head  and Patterned  Wheel (Spares) for Airport Services. The  Committee  noted  that EPCG  Authorization  for import  of  Container  Pallet Loader  Commander, Baggage  Cart,  Towbar Head and Patterned Wheel (Spares)  etc.  has  already been  issued  to  the  same firm  by  the  CLA,  New Delhi.    The  representative of  DHI  confirmed  that these items/Loaders cannot be  used  for  any  other purpose  or  at  any  place other  than  the  enclosed premises  of  the  Airport. The  Committee,  therefore, decided to allow import of these items to the firm M/s

/ Celebi  Ground  Handling Delhi  Pvt.  Ltd.,  New  Delhi subject to other terms and conditions of the scheme. 17 M/s  Shasun Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Chennai F.No.18/33/ AM­12/EPCG­II 0430001385 dated 20.11.2003. Request  for condonation  of block­wise  export obligation. The  Committee  noted  that as  per  Para  5.8.2  of  HBP Vol.  I,  the  exports obligation  of  a  particular block  of  year  may  be  set off  by  the  excess  exports made  in  the  preceding block  year  and  decided  to allow  counting  of  exports made in first block towards fulfillment  of  shortfall  in EO for the second block. 18 M/s  Oxford Processors  (P) Ltd., Kolkata F.No.18/121/ AM­11/EPCG­II 0230000021 dated 23.03.2000 Request  for condonation  of block­wise  export obligation for 3rd & 4th blocks. The  request  for condonation  of  block­wise export  obligation  was acceded  to,  in  the  last

021 dated 23.03.2000 Request  for condonation  of block­wise  export obligation for 3rd & 4th blocks. The  request  for condonation  of  block­wise export  obligation  was acceded  to,  in  the  last meeting of the Committee, without  imposing composition  fee  on  the grounds  that  the  firm  was a  BIFR  unit.    However,  to ascertain  that  the rehabilitation  package  has been  approved  by  BIFR,  a condition  was  imposed that  in  case  there  is  no rehabilitation  package  of the  BIFR,  custom  duty  of 50%  for  extension  of  EO period  and  2% composition  fee  for condonation of each block period  will  need  to  be paid.   The firm  could  not  submit the rehabilitation package.  Therefore,  the  Committee reviewed  its  decision  and allowed  condonation  of block­wise  EO  subject  to payment  of  2%  of composition  fee  in proportion  to  the  shortfall at the end of each  block.    19 M/s  Shirpur  Gold Refinery  Ltd., Dhule F.No.18/49/ AM­12/EPCG­II a.    0330000677 dated 06.11.2000 b.    0330001131 dated 01.06.2001 c.    0330002501 dated 05.09.2002 The  firm  has requested  for  (i) extension  in  export obligation  period (ii)  condonation  of block­wise  EO;  & (iii)  re­fixation  of EO  from  CIF  to duty  saved  amount basis  in  respect  of The  Committee  noted  that Para  6.11  of HBP(RE:2000,  2001  & 2002)  provided  for extension  of  block­wise export  obligation  and therefore,  the  Committee agreed to  allow  the  block­ wise  condonation  as  per the said Para.

11  of HBP(RE:2000,  2001  & 2002)  provided  for extension  of  block­wise export  obligation  and therefore,  the  Committee agreed to  allow  the  block­ wise  condonation  as  per the said Para.

p EPCG  licence  No. 0330000677  dated 06.11.2000;  0330001131  dated 01.06.2001  and 03300025001 dated 05.09.2002.   The  Committee  also  noted that  the  firm  is  under Securitisation  and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act).  However, the  current  FTP/HBP  does not  provide  dispensation of  composition  fee  for extension  in  export obligation  period  as provided  in  the  case  of units  under  BIFR. Therefore,  the  Committee allowed  extension  in export  obligation  period subject  to  payment  of composition  fee  or enhancement of EO, as per choice of exporter in terms of  Para  5.11  of  current HBP.   Refixation  of  export obligation  on  duty  saved amount  is  allowed  as  per provisions for Para 5.19 of HBP  and  the  request therefore  was  acceded  to under the said Para. 20 Clarification sought by JDGFT, Ludhiana Clarification sought by JDGFT, Chandigarh F.No. 01/36/218/97/ AM­12/EPCG­1 F.No. 01/36/218/75/ AM­12/EPCG­1 N. A. 1.Clarification  on EPCG Authorisation  for import  of Furniture  by Educational Institutes. 2.Clarification  on EPCG Authorisation  for import  of Bathroom fittings,  Exercise Machine, Furniture  Items, Modular  Kitchen etc Service  providers  for educational  services  have requested  for  import  of   Furniture,  Bathroom fittings,  Exercise  Machine,

fittings,  Exercise Machine, Furniture  Items, Modular  Kitchen etc Service  providers  for educational  services  have requested  for  import  of   Furniture,  Bathroom fittings,  Exercise  Machine, Modular  Kitchen  etc.  The Committee  decided  to defer the case for having a detailed  discussion  in  the next meeting. 21 M/s  Gupta  Swabs Limited., Chennai F.No. 01/36/218/64/ AM­12/EPCG­I 0430000477  dated 10.12.2001 Fulfilment of Export Obligation  against EPCG  Licence  No. 0430000477  dated 10.12.2011  by undertaking  job work  from  SEZ unit. The  Committee  observed that  a  clarification  that “only the value addition of job  work  should  be counted  for  export obligation  as  the  material is  being  supplied  for jobbing”  has  already  been issued  to  CLA,  New  Delhi.     The  Committee  decided to allow the same in the

to a o t e sa e t e instant case.   22 M/s  Mafatlal Denim  Ltd., Mumbai F.No. 01/36/218/183/ AM­11/EPCG­I 8 Licences Waiver  of  Annual Average  Export Obligation The  Committee  asked  the representative  of  the  firm  to submit  detailed  technical inputs  and  justifications  in technical  matter  to  Dr.  R.  A. Lal,  Director,  O/o  Textile Commissioner  for  his comments. 23 M/s  Jindal Stainless Steelway, Gurgaon, Haryana F.No. 01/36/218/98/ AM­12/EPCG­1 0530151199 dated 09.02.2010 To allow shifting of Capital  Goods installed at premises of  Supporting Manufacturer  to their own Plant. The  Committee  decided  to allow  shifting  of  Capital Goods  installed  in  the premises  of  Supporting Manufacturer  to  its  own Plant.

mises of  Supporting Manufacturer  to their own Plant. The  Committee  decided  to allow  shifting  of  Capital Goods  installed  in  the premises  of  Supporting Manufacturer  to  its  own Plant.    Fresh  installation certificate  is  required  to  be furnished  within  6  months.     However,  the  certificate  of Jurisdictional  Central  Excise Authority  for  initial installation  may  also  be submitted to RA.   24 Discussion  on Maintenance  of Annual  Average Export Obligation Discussion could  not  be  held on  24.08.2011  due  to paucity  of  time.    However,  a discussion  with  the representative  of  DHI  and DIPP  was  held  on 25.08.2011.    It  was  also decided  to  discuss  this  issue in the next meeting.               The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair.  

---